EP0251295A2 - High nickel chromium alloy - Google Patents

High nickel chromium alloy Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0251295A2
EP0251295A2 EP87109408A EP87109408A EP0251295A2 EP 0251295 A2 EP0251295 A2 EP 0251295A2 EP 87109408 A EP87109408 A EP 87109408A EP 87109408 A EP87109408 A EP 87109408A EP 0251295 A2 EP0251295 A2 EP 0251295A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
alloy
nitrogen
chromium
nickel
titanium
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP87109408A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0251295B1 (en
EP0251295A3 (en
Inventor
Pasupathy Ganesan
Gaylord Smith
Curtis Steven Tassen
Jack Milton Wheeler
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Huntington Alloys Corp
Original Assignee
Inco Alloys International Inc
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Inco Alloys International Inc filed Critical Inco Alloys International Inc
Publication of EP0251295A2 publication Critical patent/EP0251295A2/en
Publication of EP0251295A3 publication Critical patent/EP0251295A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0251295B1 publication Critical patent/EP0251295B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C19/00Alloys based on nickel or cobalt
    • C22C19/03Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel
    • C22C19/05Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C22METALLURGY; FERROUS OR NON-FERROUS ALLOYS; TREATMENT OF ALLOYS OR NON-FERROUS METALS
    • C22CALLOYS
    • C22C19/00Alloys based on nickel or cobalt
    • C22C19/03Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel
    • C22C19/05Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium
    • C22C19/058Alloys based on nickel or cobalt based on nickel with chromium without Mo and W

Definitions

  • the subject invention is directed to a high nickel-chromium-iron alloy, and more particularly to a Ni-Cr-Fe alloy of special chemistry and micro-structure such that it is capable of affording a desired combination of properties at elevated temperature upwards of 2000°F (1143°C) under oxidizing condition.
  • rollers have been produced from electric-arc furnace melted, argon-oxygen decarburized (AOD) refined ingots.
  • AOD argon-oxygen decarburized
  • the composition used differed somewhat from the above, a typical composition being approximately 0.03%C, 0.3% Si, 0.3% Mn, 22.5% Cr, 0.4% Ti, 0.02% Nb, 1.27% Al, 60.8% Ni, 0.08% Co, 0.29% Mo. 0.015% N, less than 0.001% O2,and balance essentially iron.
  • At 2050°F (1121°C) rollers lasted some 12 months and at times longer. However, at 2130°F (1165°C) such rollers manifested failure in 2 months or less.
  • the alloy contemplated herein contains about 19 to 28% chromium, about 55 to 65% nickel, about 0.75 to 2% aluminum, about 0.2 to 1% titanium, up to about 1% each of silicon, molybdenum, manganese, and niobium, up to 0.1% carbon, from about 0.035% or 0.04% to 0.08% or 0.1% nitrogen, up to 0.01% boron and the balance essentially iron.
  • a preferred alloy contains 21 to 25% Cr, 58 to 63% Ni, 1 to 2% Al, 0.3 to 0.7% Ti, 0.1 to 0.6% Si, 0.1 to 0.8% Mo, up to 0.6% Mn, up to 0.4% Nb, 0.02 to 0.1%C, 0.04 to 0.08% N, with iron being the balance.
  • Nickel contributes to workability and fabricability as well as imparting strength and other benefits.
  • Aluminum and chromium confer oxidation resistance but if present to the excess lend to undesirable microstructural phases such as sigma. Little is gained with chromium levels much above 28% or aluminum levels exceeding 2%.
  • a level of about 0.1 to 0.5% Cr23C6 aids strength to about 2057°F (1125°C). This is particularly true if one or both of silicon and molybdenum are present to stabilize the carbide phase. In this regard the presence of 0.1 to 0.6% silicon and/or 0.1 to 0.8% molybdenum is advantageous.
  • Titanium acts as a malleabilizer as well as serving to form the grain boundary pinning phase, TiN.
  • Niobium will further stabilize the nitride phase and from 0.05 to 0.4% is beneficial.
  • Manganese is preferably held to low levels, preferably not about 0.6%, since higher percentages detract from oxidation resistance. Up to 0.006% boron may be present to aid malleability. Calcium and/or magnesium in amounts, say up to 0.05 or 0.1%, are useful for deoxidation and malleabilization.
  • Iron comprises essentially the balance of the alloy composition. This allows for the use of standard ferroalloys in melting thus reducing cost. As to other constituents, sulfur and phosphorus should be maintained at low levels, e.g., up to 0.015% sulphur and up to 0.02 or 0.03 phosphorus . Copper can be present.
  • the alloy is electric-arc furnace melted, AOD refined and electroslag remelted (ESR) for (a) uniform distribution of the nitrides (b) better nitrogen content control, and (c) to maximize yield.
  • ESR electroslag remelted
  • the nitrogen can be added to the AOD refined melt by means of a nitrogen blow just prior to pouring the ingot to be ESR melted.
  • the alloy is, as a practical matter, non age-hardenable or substantially non age-­hardenable, and is comprised essentially of a stable austenitic matrix virtually free of detrimental quantities of subversive phases. For example, upon heating for prolonged periods, say 300 hours, at tem­peratures circa 1100°F (593°C) to 1400°F(700°C) metallographic analysis did not reveal the presence of the sigma phase.
  • Alloys A through C are low nitrogen compositions with varying carbon content. Although increasing carbon content progressively inhibited grain growth, it was ineffective in controlling gain size for long periods of time above about 1100°C (2010°F).
  • the increasing nitrogen levels of Alloys 1 and 2 resulted in several beneficial attributes in alloys of the invention.
  • the uniform dispersion of nitride resulted in stabilization of the grain size and longer stress rupture lives at elevated temperature.
  • the oxidation resistance of alloys within the invention was also improved (surprisingly) as measured by the reduction of the denuded zone beneath the surface scale.
  • the nitrogen level of Alloy D was also beneficial in comparison with A, B and C but it is deemed that Alloy D would not perform as well as Alloys 1 and 2 over prolonged periods as is indicated by the data in Table II.
  • Alloys A and B were fabricated into 26.9 mm diameter (1.06 in) x 2438.4mm (96 in.) rollers using 2.0 mm (0.08 in.) gauge sheets and then field tested in an actual furnace operating at 1165°C (2130°F). Both alloys failed by stress rupture in a short time. Alloy C was hot worked into a solid bar 26.9 mm (1.06 in.) diameter and placed in field operation for 6 days. The average grain size was 12 mils. after exposure with grains as large as 60 mils. The stress rupture life of an alloy similar to alloy A at 1177°C (2150°F) and 6.89 MPa (1 Ksi) was 308 hours.
  • Alloys 1 and 2 were fabricated similarly and exposed to the same thermal conditions as alloys A through C. (Alloys D, 1 and 2 are intermediate carbon content compositions with increasing nitrogen levels). The beneficial effect of increasing nitrogen content on grain size stability is demonstrated by the data in Table II. Rollers were fabricated from Alloy 2 (and also D) as described for Alloys A and B and are currently in field service without incident. Alloy 1 was fabricated into a solid roller as described for Alloy C. This alloy (1) was tested in field service at 1165°C (2130°F) for 8 days and then metallographically evaluated for grain size. The grain size was 12 mils after exposure and 2 mils prior to exposure.
  • electric-arc furnace melting, AOD refining with a nitrogen blow, followed by ESR remelting of the alloy is the preferred manufacture route over air induction furnace melting of the ingots because of improved yield to final product and because of the better dispersion of the nitrides.
  • An additional and unexpected benefit of the nitrogen additions is a marked reduction of the depth of the denuded zone (depletion of chromium and aluminum contents) as the nitrogen content is increased.
  • Table III shows the depth of the denuded zone for alloys C, D and 2. This dramatic increase in resistance to alloy depletion in the base alloy is attributed to the effect of nitrogen on grain size retention and concomitantly on oxide scale density and tenacity.
  • the subject invention provide nickel chromium alloys which afford a combination of desirable metallurgical properties including (1) good oxidation resistance at elevated temperatures (2) high stress-rupture lives at such temperatures, and (3) a relatively stable microstructure.
  • the alloys are characterized by (4) a substantially uniform distribution of titanium nitrides (TiN) throughout the grains and grain boundaries.
  • TiN titanium nitrides
  • the nitrides are stable in the microstructure up to near the melting point provided at least 0.04% nitrogen is present. A nitrogen level down to 0.035% might be satisfactory in certain instances.
  • the grain size not exceed about 15 mils, preferably being not more than 12 mils, the size of the grains being uniform outwardly to the alloy surface.
  • the alloy of the present invention has been described in connection with the behavior of rollers in furnaces for frit production, the alloy is also deemed useful for heating elements, ignition tubes, radiant tubes, combustor components, burners, heat exchangers, furnace fixtures, mufflers, belts, etc.
  • the metal and ceramic process industries, chemical manufactures and the petroleum and petrochemical processing industries are illustrative of industries in which the alloy of the invention is deemed particularly useful.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Materials Engineering (AREA)
  • Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
  • Metallurgy (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Heat Treatment Of Articles (AREA)
  • Manufacture And Refinement Of Metals (AREA)
  • Heat Treatments In General, Especially Conveying And Cooling (AREA)
  • Powder Metallurgy (AREA)

Abstract

An oxidation resistant nickel-chromium based alloy possessing good stress rupture characteristics at elevated temperature and consisting essentially of;
55 to 65% nickel
19 to 28% chromium
0,75 to 2% aluminium
0,2 to 1% titanium
0,035 to 0,1% nitrogen
up to about 0,1% carbon
up to 1% each of silicon, molybdenum, manganese and niobium
up to 0,1% boron
the balance essentially iron.

Description

  • The subject invention is directed to a high nickel-chromium-iron alloy, and more particularly to a Ni-Cr-Fe alloy of special chemistry and micro-structure such that it is capable of affording a desired combination of properties at elevated temperature upwards of 2000°F (1143°C) under oxidizing condition.
  • Since at least the early 50's the demand has been incessant for economical materials capable of performing satisfactorily under increas­ingly severe operating conditions, notably temperature. For example, and by way of illustration, in the ceramic tile industry frit-firing temperatures have been on the increase in an effort to accomodate new frits and higher furnace loads, this to remain competitive in the market-place. Initially, various manufacturers of furnace rollers for this application used an alloy containing roughly 0.04% C, 0.25% Si, 0.25% Mn, 22.75% Cr, 0.4% Ti, 0.01% Nb, 1.35% Al, 59.5% Ni, 0.35% Co, 0.03% N, 0.001% O₂, balance iron, the alloy being produced from ingots melted in an air induction furnace. The rollers lasted up to roughly 18 months at 2060°F (1127°C), ultimately failing from oxidation-enhanced stress-rupture failure with fracture being intergrannular.
  • More recently, the rollers have been produced from electric-arc furnace melted, argon-oxygen decarburized (AOD) refined ingots. The composition used differed somewhat from the above, a typical composition being approximately 0.03%C, 0.3% Si, 0.3% Mn, 22.5% Cr, 0.4% Ti, 0.02% Nb, 1.27% Al, 60.8% Ni, 0.08% Co, 0.29% Mo. 0.015% N, less than 0.001% O₂,and balance essentially iron. At 2050°F (1121°C) rollers lasted some 12 months and at times longer. However, at 2130°F (1165°C) such rollers manifested failure in 2 months or less.
  • From our investigation of the problem it would appear that failure is caused by a rather dramatic change in microstructure as temperature is increased. This was not initially or readily apparent since our first approach was to increase the levels of aluminum and chromium to enhance oxidation behavior. But this was not a panacea. In any case, extensive experimentation reflects that circa 2150°F (1177°C), and above there is a lack of microstructural control of grain size. It would appear that the M₂₃C₆ carbide, stabilized by silicon and molybdenum, but consisting mainly of chromium, begins to redissolve into the matrix. This frees the grain boundaries to migrate under applied stress and results in coarse or massive grains, e.g., one to three grains across the wall thickness, 0.080 in. (2.0mm), of the rollers. This can be viewed, at least in part, as failure induced by the alternating tensile and compressive stresses set up in the rollers as a consequence of temperature and time. Actually many grain boundaries appear to be perpendicular to the roller surface and serve as sites for preferential grain boundary oxidation attack which, in turn, leads to premature grain boundary rupture.
  • It has now been found that the oxidation resistance of alloys of the type above-discussed can be improved by a controlled addition and retention of nitrogen as discussed infra. Put another way, it has been discovered that the microstructure of the alloys of the type under con­sideration, notably grain size, can be controlled or rendered relatively structurally stable over extended periods at elevated temperature through a microalloying addition of nitrogen.
  • Generally speaking and in accordance with the present invention, the alloy contemplated herein contains about 19 to 28% chromium, about 55 to 65% nickel, about 0.75 to 2% aluminum, about 0.2 to 1% titanium, up to about 1% each of silicon, molybdenum, manganese, and niobium, up to 0.1% carbon, from about 0.035% or 0.04% to 0.08% or 0.1% nitrogen, up to 0.01% boron and the balance essentially iron.
  • A preferred alloy contains 21 to 25% Cr, 58 to 63% Ni, 1 to 2% Al, 0.3 to 0.7% Ti, 0.1 to 0.6% Si, 0.1 to 0.8% Mo, up to 0.6% Mn, up to 0.4% Nb, 0.02 to 0.1%C, 0.04 to 0.08% N, with iron being the balance.
  • Nitrogen plays a major role in effectively enhancing oxidation resistance. It forms a nitride with titanium, approximately 0.15 to 0.8% TiN depending upon the stoichiometry of the nitride. This level of TiN pins the grain size at temperatures as high as 2192°F (1200°C), and stabilizes grain size, which, in turn, causes a marked increase in operating life, circa as long as 12 months or longer, at the much higher temperature of 2192°F (1200°C). Put another way the presence of nitrogen/nitride increases the temperature capability over convention­ally used materials by some 135°F (75°C) or more. Below about 0.04% nitrogen (0.17% stoichiometric) there would appear to be insufficient precipitate to pin the grain boundaries. Above about 0.08% (non-­stoichiometric TiN) the alloy tends to become gassy, difficult to manu­facture and difficult to weld. Apart from the foregoing advantage of this microalloy addition, stress-rupture life is increased, thus, permitting furnace operators to increase load bearing capacity at temperature without a detrimental sacrifice in roller life.
  • In carrying the invention in practice, care should be exercized in achieving proper composition control. Nickel contributes to workability and fabricability as well as imparting strength and other benefits. Aluminum and chromium confer oxidation resistance but if present to the excess lend to undesirable microstructural phases such as sigma. Little is gained with chromium levels much above 28% or aluminum levels exceeding 2%.
  • Carbon need not exceed 0.1% to minimize the formation of excess carbides. A level of about 0.1 to 0.5% Cr₂₃C₆ aids strength to about 2057°F (1125°C). This is particularly true if one or both of silicon and molybdenum are present to stabilize the carbide phase. In this regard the presence of 0.1 to 0.6% silicon and/or 0.1 to 0.8% molybdenum is advantageous.
  • Titanium acts as a malleabilizer as well as serving to form the grain boundary pinning phase, TiN. Niobium will further stabilize the nitride phase and from 0.05 to 0.4% is beneficial.
  • Manganese is preferably held to low levels, preferably not about 0.6%, since higher percentages detract from oxidation resistance. Up to 0.006% boron may be present to aid malleability. Calcium and/or magnesium in amounts, say up to 0.05 or 0.1%, are useful for deoxidation and malleabilization.
  • Iron comprises essentially the balance of the alloy composition. This allows for the use of standard ferroalloys in melting thus reducing cost. As to other constituents, sulfur and phosphorus should be maintained at low levels, e.g., up to 0.015% sulphur and up to 0.02 or 0.03 phosphorus . Copper can be present.
  • In terms of processing, conventional air melting procedures may be used, including the employment of induction furnaces. However, vacuum melting and refining can be employed where desired. Preferably the alloy is electric-arc furnace melted, AOD refined and electroslag remelted (ESR) for (a) uniform distribution of the nitrides (b) better nitrogen content control, and (c) to maximize yield. In this connection, the nitrogen can be added to the AOD refined melt by means of a nitrogen blow just prior to pouring the ingot to be ESR melted. The alloy is, as a practical matter, non age-hardenable or substantially non age-­hardenable, and is comprised essentially of a stable austenitic matrix virtually free of detrimental quantities of subversive phases. For example, upon heating for prolonged periods, say 300 hours, at tem­peratures circa 1100°F (593°C) to 1400°F(700°C) metallographic analysis did not reveal the presence of the sigma phase.
  • The following information and data are given to afford those skilled in the art a better perspective as to the nature of the alloy herein abovedescribed:
  • A series of alloys (Table I) were melted in an air induction furnace (Alloys C, 1 and 2) or in an electric-arc furnace (Alloys A, B and D), then AOD refined and ESR remelted. Ingots were broken down to approximately 0.280 inch hot bands which were then cold rolled in coils to approximately 0.080in. thickness with two intermediate anneals at 2050°F (1121°C). Sheet specimens were annealed at about 2150°F (1177°C) prior to test. A metallographic examination was then conducted upon exposing each alloy for either 16 hour increments at 2012°F (1100°C) and 2192°F (1200°C) or 100 hour increments at 2130°F (1165°C) to measure grain growth versus time at various temperatures. The data are reported in Table II.
    Figure imgb0001
    Figure imgb0002
  • Alloys A through C are low nitrogen compositions with varying carbon content. Although increasing carbon content progressively inhibited grain growth, it was ineffective in controlling gain size for long periods of time above about 1100°C (2010°F). The increasing nitrogen levels of Alloys 1 and 2 resulted in several beneficial attributes in alloys of the invention. The uniform dispersion of nitride resulted in stabilization of the grain size and longer stress rupture lives at elevated temperature. The oxidation resistance of alloys within the invention was also improved (surprisingly) as measured by the reduction of the denuded zone beneath the surface scale. The nitrogen level of Alloy D was also beneficial in comparison with A, B and C but it is deemed that Alloy D would not perform as well as Alloys 1 and 2 over prolonged periods as is indicated by the data in Table II.
  • Alloys A and B were fabricated into 26.9 mm diameter (1.06 in) x 2438.4mm (96 in.) rollers using 2.0 mm (0.08 in.) gauge sheets and then field tested in an actual furnace operating at 1165°C (2130°F). Both alloys failed by stress rupture in a short time. Alloy C was hot worked into a solid bar 26.9 mm (1.06 in.) diameter and placed in field operation for 6 days. The average grain size was 12 mils. after exposure with grains as large as 60 mils. The stress rupture life of an alloy similar to alloy A at 1177°C (2150°F) and 6.89 MPa (1 Ksi) was 308 hours.
  • Alloys 1 and 2 (and also Alloy D) were fabricated similarly and exposed to the same thermal conditions as alloys A through C. (Alloys D, 1 and 2 are intermediate carbon content compositions with increasing nitrogen levels). The beneficial effect of increasing nitrogen content on grain size stability is demonstrated by the data in Table II. Rollers were fabricated from Alloy 2 (and also D) as described for Alloys A and B and are currently in field service without incident. Alloy 1 was fabricated into a solid roller as described for Alloy C. This alloy (1) was tested in field service at 1165°C (2130°F) for 8 days and then metallographically evaluated for grain size. The grain size was 12 mils after exposure and 2 mils prior to exposure. The stress rupture life of an alloy composition similar to Alloy 1 at 1177°C (2150°F) and 6.89 MPa (1Ksi) was 507 hours. This increase in stress rupture life over, for example, alloy A demonstrates a contribution to strength by the nitrogen addition. Likewise alloy D was stress rupture tested at 1090°C (2000°F) and 13.78 MPa (2Ksi) along with an alloy similar to Alloy C. The times to failure were a maximum of 224 and 157 hours, respectively. Again, the contribution to strength by the nitrogen addition was noted.
  • In manufacturing the furnace rollers, all the above alloys were autogeneous welded using tungsten-arc argon-shielded welding procedures. No difficulties in welding were encountered. However, at higher than 0.08% nitrogen welding problems might ensue.
  • As indicated herein, electric-arc furnace melting, AOD refining with a nitrogen blow, followed by ESR remelting of the alloy is the preferred manufacture route over air induction furnace melting of the ingots because of improved yield to final product and because of the better dispersion of the nitrides. An additional and unexpected benefit of the nitrogen additions is a marked reduction of the depth of the denuded zone (depletion of chromium and aluminum contents) as the nitrogen content is increased. Table III shows the depth of the denuded zone for alloys C, D and 2. This dramatic increase in resistance to alloy depletion in the base alloy is attributed to the effect of nitrogen on grain size retention and concomitantly on oxide scale density and tenacity.
    Figure imgb0003
  • Given the foregoing, including the data in Tables I, II and III it will be noted that the subject invention provide nickel chromium alloys which afford a combination of desirable metallurgical properties including (1) good oxidation resistance at elevated temperatures (2) high stress-rupture lives at such temperatures, and (3) a relatively stable microstructure. The alloys are characterized by (4) a substantially uniform distribution of titanium nitrides (TiN) throughout the grains and grain boundaries. The nitrides are stable in the microstructure up to near the melting point provided at least 0.04% nitrogen is present. A nitrogen level down to 0.035% might be satisfactory in certain instances. This is in marked contrast to the M₂₃C₆ type of carbide which tends to go back into solution at around 2125-2150°F (1163-1177°C) whereupon nothing remains to control grain size. It is to advantage that (5) the grain size not exceed about 15 mils, preferably being not more than 12 mils, the size of the grains being uniform outwardly to the alloy surface.
  • While the alloy of the present invention has been described in connection with the behavior of rollers in furnaces for frit production, the alloy is also deemed useful for heating elements, ignition tubes, radiant tubes, combustor components, burners, heat exchangers, furnace fixtures, mufflers, belts, etc. The metal and ceramic process industries, chemical manufactures and the petroleum and petrochemical processing industries are illustrative of industries in which the alloy of the invention is deemed particularly useful.
  • Although the present invention has been described in conjunction with preferred embodiments, it is to be understood that modifications and variations within the scope of the appended claims may be resorted to without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, as those skilled in the art will readily understand.

Claims (6)

1. A high nickel-chromium alloy characterized by (a) enhanced resistance to oxidation at elevated temperature, (b) good stress rupture life at such temperatures, and (c) a controlled grain size, said alloy consisting essentially of about 55 to 65% nickel, about 19 to 28% chromium, about 0.75 to 2% aluminum, about 0.2 to 1% titanium, about 0.035% to 0.1% nitrogen, up to about 0.1% carbon, up to 1% each of silicon, molybdenum, manganese and niobium, up to 0.1% boron, and the balance essentially iron.
2. The alloy set forth in claim 1 containing about 58 to 63% nickel, 21 to 25% chromium, 1 to 2% aluminum, 0.3 to 0.7% titanium, at least one of 0.1 to 0.6% silicon and 0.1 to 0.8% molybdenum, up to 0.6% manganese, up to 0.4% niobium, 0.02 to 0.1% carbon and 0.04 to 0.08% nitrogen.
3. The alloy set forth in claim 2 containing both silicon and molybdenum.
4. As a new article of manufacture, a furnace roller formed from the alloy set forth in claims 1, 2 or 3.
5. The alloy set forth in claims 1, 2 or 3 and containing at least one of up to 0.1% of calcium and up to 0.1% magnesium.
6. A high nickel-chromium alloy characterized by (a) enhanced resistance to oxidation at elevated temperature, (b) good stress rupture life at such temperatures, and (c) a controlled grain size, said alloy consisting essentially of about 55 to 65% nickel, about 19 to 28% chromium, about 0.75% to 2% aluminum, about 0.2 to 1% titanium, about 0.035 to 0.1% nitrogen, up to about 0.1% carbon, and the balance essentially iron, said alloy being further characterized by a relatively stable microstructure having titanium nitrides substantially uniformly distributed throughout the grains and grain boundaries and with the average grain size not exceeding about 15 mils.
EP87109408A 1986-07-03 1987-06-30 High nickel chromium alloy Expired - Lifetime EP0251295B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US88162386A 1986-07-03 1986-07-03
US881623 1986-07-03

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0251295A2 true EP0251295A2 (en) 1988-01-07
EP0251295A3 EP0251295A3 (en) 1989-03-01
EP0251295B1 EP0251295B1 (en) 1992-01-22

Family

ID=25378853

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP87109408A Expired - Lifetime EP0251295B1 (en) 1986-07-03 1987-06-30 High nickel chromium alloy

Country Status (6)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0251295B1 (en)
JP (1) JPS6326321A (en)
KR (1) KR880001836A (en)
AU (1) AU7505687A (en)
BR (1) BR8703367A (en)
CA (1) CA1304608C (en)

Cited By (7)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0508058A1 (en) * 1991-04-11 1992-10-14 Krupp VDM GmbH Austenitic alloy nickel-chromium-iron
EP0549286A1 (en) * 1991-12-20 1993-06-30 Inco Alloys Limited High temperature resistant Ni-Cr alloy
EP1188845A1 (en) * 2000-09-14 2002-03-20 BÖHLER Edelstahl GmbH Nickel based alloy for high temperature technology
WO2003046241A1 (en) * 2001-11-30 2003-06-05 Tors Ferromagnetic alloy for induction heated cooking
US6808570B2 (en) * 2002-03-08 2004-10-26 Mitsubishi Materials Corporation Fin and tube for high-temperature heat exchanger
EP1899489A1 (en) * 2005-07-01 2008-03-19 Sandvik Intellectual Property AB Ni-cr-fe alloy for high-temperature use.
US8597438B2 (en) 2007-10-05 2013-12-03 Sandvik Intellectual Property Ab Use and method of producing a dispersion strengthened steel as material in a roller for a roller hearth furnace

Families Citing this family (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4787945A (en) * 1987-12-21 1988-11-29 Inco Alloys International, Inc. High nickel chromium alloy
JP2904066B2 (en) * 1995-08-31 1999-06-14 松下電器産業株式会社 Temperature sensor and method of manufacturing the same
DE102012013437B3 (en) * 2011-02-23 2014-07-24 VDM Metals GmbH Use of a nickel-chromium-iron-aluminum alloy with good processability
DE102012015828B4 (en) * 2012-08-10 2014-09-18 VDM Metals GmbH Use of a nickel-chromium-iron-aluminum alloy with good processability

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3146136A (en) * 1961-01-24 1964-08-25 Rolls Royce Method of heat treating nickel base alloys
US3607243A (en) * 1970-01-26 1971-09-21 Int Nickel Co Corrosion resistant nickel-chromium-iron alloy
SU464648A1 (en) * 1973-10-02 1975-03-25

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3146136A (en) * 1961-01-24 1964-08-25 Rolls Royce Method of heat treating nickel base alloys
US3607243A (en) * 1970-01-26 1971-09-21 Int Nickel Co Corrosion resistant nickel-chromium-iron alloy
SU464648A1 (en) * 1973-10-02 1975-03-25

Cited By (11)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP0508058A1 (en) * 1991-04-11 1992-10-14 Krupp VDM GmbH Austenitic alloy nickel-chromium-iron
EP0549286A1 (en) * 1991-12-20 1993-06-30 Inco Alloys Limited High temperature resistant Ni-Cr alloy
EP1188845A1 (en) * 2000-09-14 2002-03-20 BÖHLER Edelstahl GmbH Nickel based alloy for high temperature technology
US6797232B2 (en) 2000-09-14 2004-09-28 Bohler Edelstahl Gmbh Nickel-based alloy for high-temperature technology
WO2003046241A1 (en) * 2001-11-30 2003-06-05 Tors Ferromagnetic alloy for induction heated cooking
FR2833019A1 (en) * 2001-11-30 2003-06-06 Imphy Ugine Precision FERROMAGNETIC ALLOY FOR INDUCTION COOKING
US6808570B2 (en) * 2002-03-08 2004-10-26 Mitsubishi Materials Corporation Fin and tube for high-temperature heat exchanger
EP1899489A1 (en) * 2005-07-01 2008-03-19 Sandvik Intellectual Property AB Ni-cr-fe alloy for high-temperature use.
EP1899489A4 (en) * 2005-07-01 2010-08-18 Sandvik Intellectual Property Ni-cr-fe alloy for high-temperature use.
US8926769B2 (en) 2005-07-01 2015-01-06 Sandvik Intellectual Property Ab Ni—Cr—Fe alloy for high-temperature use
US8597438B2 (en) 2007-10-05 2013-12-03 Sandvik Intellectual Property Ab Use and method of producing a dispersion strengthened steel as material in a roller for a roller hearth furnace

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
KR880001836A (en) 1988-04-27
EP0251295B1 (en) 1992-01-22
BR8703367A (en) 1988-03-15
AU7505687A (en) 1988-01-07
CA1304608C (en) 1992-07-07
JPS6326321A (en) 1988-02-03
EP0251295A3 (en) 1989-03-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4671931A (en) Nickel-chromium-iron-aluminum alloy
CA1066922A (en) Heat-resistant allow for welded structures
JP2818195B2 (en) Nickel-based chromium alloy, resistant to sulfuric acid and oxidation
US4784830A (en) High nickel chromium alloy
EP0251295B1 (en) High nickel chromium alloy
US4487743A (en) Controlled expansion alloy
US4460542A (en) Iron-bearing nickel-chromium-aluminum-yttrium alloy
JPS6344814B2 (en)
EP0075416B1 (en) Heat treatment of controlled expansion alloys
US4006011A (en) Controlled expansion alloy
JPH02267240A (en) Heat-resistant alloy
EP0628088B2 (en) Nickel-molybdenum alloys
EP0322156B1 (en) High nickel chromium alloy
JPH0776721A (en) Heat treatment of heat resisting cast alloy
EP0076574B1 (en) Heat treatment of controlled expansion alloys
JPH07252608A (en) Ferritic stainless steel alloy amenable to hot working
JPH0472039A (en) High purity heat resistant steel
JPH0835043A (en) Hot-workable ferritic stainless steel alloy
JPS6293353A (en) Austenitic heat resisting alloy
JPS61217555A (en) Heat resistant austenitic steel
JPS6138256B2 (en)
JPS596910B2 (en) heat resistant cast steel
JPH08291355A (en) Chromium-base heat resistant alloy
JPS6376851A (en) Heat resistant fe base alloy for heat treating pot
JPS61159556A (en) Heat resistant cast alloy

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT CH DE ES FR GB IT LI NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19890706

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19901227

RBV Designated contracting states (corrected)

Designated state(s): GB

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: DE

Ref legal event code: 8566

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): GB

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19960521

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19970630

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19970630