EP0248533A2 - Method, apparatus and system for recognising broadcast segments - Google Patents

Method, apparatus and system for recognising broadcast segments Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0248533A2
EP0248533A2 EP87303968A EP87303968A EP0248533A2 EP 0248533 A2 EP0248533 A2 EP 0248533A2 EP 87303968 A EP87303968 A EP 87303968A EP 87303968 A EP87303968 A EP 87303968A EP 0248533 A2 EP0248533 A2 EP 0248533A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
signature
segment
frame
parametized
segments
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP87303968A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0248533B1 (en
EP0248533A3 (en
Inventor
William L. Thomas
Steven J. Sletten
John W. Mathews Jr.
Jeffrey C. Swinehart
Michael W. Fellinger
John E. Hershey
George P. Hyatt
Robert F. Kubichek
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Comdata Inc
Original Assignee
SCANAMERICA LP
Scanamerica L P
Ceridian Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by SCANAMERICA LP, Scanamerica L P, Ceridian Corp filed Critical SCANAMERICA LP
Publication of EP0248533A2 publication Critical patent/EP0248533A2/en
Publication of EP0248533A3 publication Critical patent/EP0248533A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0248533B1 publication Critical patent/EP0248533B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G11INFORMATION STORAGE
    • G11BINFORMATION STORAGE BASED ON RELATIVE MOVEMENT BETWEEN RECORD CARRIER AND TRANSDUCER
    • G11B27/00Editing; Indexing; Addressing; Timing or synchronising; Monitoring; Measuring tape travel
    • G11B27/10Indexing; Addressing; Timing or synchronising; Measuring tape travel
    • G11B27/19Indexing; Addressing; Timing or synchronising; Measuring tape travel by using information detectable on the record carrier
    • G11B27/28Indexing; Addressing; Timing or synchronising; Measuring tape travel by using information detectable on the record carrier by using information signals recorded by the same method as the main recording
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V20/00Scenes; Scene-specific elements
    • G06V20/40Scenes; Scene-specific elements in video content
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04HBROADCAST COMMUNICATION
    • H04H60/00Arrangements for broadcast applications with a direct linking to broadcast information or broadcast space-time; Broadcast-related systems
    • H04H60/35Arrangements for identifying or recognising characteristics with a direct linkage to broadcast information or to broadcast space-time, e.g. for identifying broadcast stations or for identifying users
    • H04H60/37Arrangements for identifying or recognising characteristics with a direct linkage to broadcast information or to broadcast space-time, e.g. for identifying broadcast stations or for identifying users for identifying segments of broadcast information, e.g. scenes or extracting programme ID
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04HBROADCAST COMMUNICATION
    • H04H60/00Arrangements for broadcast applications with a direct linking to broadcast information or broadcast space-time; Broadcast-related systems
    • H04H60/56Arrangements characterised by components specially adapted for monitoring, identification or recognition covered by groups H04H60/29-H04H60/54
    • H04H60/58Arrangements characterised by components specially adapted for monitoring, identification or recognition covered by groups H04H60/29-H04H60/54 of audio
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04HBROADCAST COMMUNICATION
    • H04H60/00Arrangements for broadcast applications with a direct linking to broadcast information or broadcast space-time; Broadcast-related systems
    • H04H60/56Arrangements characterised by components specially adapted for monitoring, identification or recognition covered by groups H04H60/29-H04H60/54
    • H04H60/59Arrangements characterised by components specially adapted for monitoring, identification or recognition covered by groups H04H60/29-H04H60/54 of video

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the automatic recognition of broadcast segments, particularly commercial advertisements broadcast by television stations.
  • real-time continuous pattern recognition of broadcast segments is accomplished by constructing a digital signature from a known specimen of a segment which is to be recognized.
  • the signature is constructed by digitally parametizing the segment, selecting portions from among random frame locations throughout the segment in accordance with a set of predefined rules (i.e. different frames are selected for each segment, but the selection is always based on the same criteria) to form the signature, and associating with the signature the frame locations of the portions.
  • the signature and associated frame locations are stored in a library of signatures. Each signature in the library is identified with a particular segment to be recognized.
  • a broadcast signal is monitored and digitally parametized.
  • the library For each frame of the parametized monitored signal, the library is searched for any signature that may be associated with that frame. Using the frame information stored with the signature, each of the potentially associated stored signatures is compared to the appropriate frames of the parametized signal. If a stored signature compares with the monitored data, a match is declared and the broadcast segment is identified using identification data associated with the signature.
  • a digital keyword derived from a designated frame in the parametized segment is identified as associated with the segment signature, but the association of that keyword with a particular segment signature is nonexclusive -- i.e., the same keyword can be associated with more than one signature.
  • a plurality of additional frames is selected from among random frame locations throughout the segment in accordance with a set of predefined rules and, in a library of signatures, the keyword representing the designated frame and the words representing the additional frames are stored together with the offsets of the additional frames relative to the designated frame.
  • a broadcast signal is monitored and digitally parametized.
  • the library For each monitored digital word of the parametized monitored signal, the library is searched for any signature associated with a keyword corresponding to that monitored word, and the additional words of any such signature are compared with those words of the parametized monitored signal which are separated from the monitored word by the stored offset amounts. If the stored signature compares with the monitored data, a match is declared and the broadcast segment is identified using identification data associated with the signature data.
  • a system additionally has means for detecting the occurrence of artifacts within the monitored signal characteristic of potential unknown broadcast segments to be recognized, and means for classifying and identifying such potential unknown segments.
  • One embodiment of such a system includes a plurality of local sites in different geographic regions for monitoring broadcasts in those regions, and a central site linked to the local sites by a communications network.
  • Each local site maintains a library of segment signatures applicable to its geographic region, and each has at least means for performing the storing, monitoring, searching, comparing and detecting tasks described above.
  • the central site maintains a global library containing all of the information in all of the local libraries.
  • Classification and identification of potential unknown segments involves the generation at the local site of compressed audio and video information, a temporary digital signature, and parametized monitored signal information for a potential unknown segment not found in the library of the local site. At least the parametized monitored signal information and the temporary signature are transmitted to the central site over the communications network. At the central site, the temporary signatures, which are stored in a special portion of the global library, are searched, and the signatures stored in the main portion of the global library are also searched, and are compared with the transmitted parametized monitored signal information to determine if the potential unknown segment was previously received by another local site and is therefore already known to the system. If so, and if a global signature has already been generated, the temporary signature at the originating local site is replaced with the previously generated global signature.
  • the present invention can identify a segment of a broadcast signal by pure continuous pattern recognition on a real-time basis. No codes need be inserted into the broadcast signal prior to transmission and no "cues" or “signalling events” (e.g., fades-to-black or scene changes) that occur in the broadcast need be used in the recognition process.
  • the broadcast signal can be either a radio broadcast, for which audio information is obviously used for the recognition process, or a television broadcast, for which audio information, video information, or both, can be used, and can be an over-the-air signal, a cable television signal, or a videotape signal.
  • the broadcast signal is parametized to yield a digital data stream composed, preferably, of one 16-bit digital word for every 1/30 of a second of signal.
  • the audio data is synchronized with the video frame rate to form an "audio frame*.)
  • the information is then processed in the same way whether it originated as audio or video.
  • a digital signature is constructed for each segment to be recognized.
  • the construction of the signature is discussed in more detail below. However, it preferably comprises 128 bits representing eight 16-bit words corresponding to eight frames of signal information selected from among random frame locations throughout the segment in accordance with a set of predefined rules.
  • the incoming audio or video signal is digitized and parametized to yield, preferably, a 16-bit digital word for each frame of data. This also is discussed in more detail below.
  • the incoming signal is received, it is read into a buffer which holds, e.g., two minutes of signal data. Each word of this data is assumed to be the first word of an eight-word signature.
  • offset information indicating the spacing (i.e., the number of frames) between each such word and the first signature word.
  • the library of signatures of known segments to be recognized is searched for signatures beginning with that word. Using the offset information stored with the signatures, subsequent received words, already in the buffer, are compared to the remaining signature words to determine whether or not they match those remaining words of the signature.
  • the system of the invention be capable of comparing, in real time, incoming frame signature data to many tens of thousands of segment signatures representative of as many different commercials.
  • the number of signatures that can be stored and searched within the real-time limitation of 1/30 second and, hence, the number of broadcast segmemts which can be monitored can be increased to several hundred thousand using a designated frame keyword lookup data reduction method.
  • a signature is constructed for a known segment, one frame from the segment is chosen, using criteria to be discussed below, as the key frame, its digital perametized equivalent becoming the keyword.
  • the signature is still, preferably, eight 16-bit words, but the stored offset information now represents spacing from the keyword rather than from the first signature word.
  • the keyword can be one of the signature data words, in which case the offset for that word is zero, or it can be a ninth word.
  • the keyword also need not temporally precede all of the other signature words and often will not.
  • the present invention need not rely during the recognition process on any cues, signalling events or pre-established codes in the broadcast signal. It simply monitors the incoming signal and performs continuous pattern recognition.
  • Video information is parametized and digitized as described below. Although, in the description which follows, parametization is based upon signal luminance, it is to be understood that other or additional attributes of a video signal could be used for this purpose.
  • a number of areas, preferably 16 (although more or fewer areas may be used), of the video field or frame are selected.
  • the size of each area is preferably eight-by-two pixels, although areas of other sizes could be used.
  • the luminance of each area is averaged to produce an absolute gray scale value from, e.g., 0-255. This value is normalized to a bit value of 0 or 1 by comparing the value to one of the following:
  • the goal in selecting which comparison to make is to maximize entropy -- i.e., to minimize correlation between the areas.
  • Correlation refers to the degree to which the luminance value of one area is related to or follows that of another area.
  • the fourth comparison is preferred, with the previous frame being one to four frames behind the current frame.
  • the distribution of the sixteen areas in the field or frame, as well as the aixteen areas in the previous field or frame is preferably asymmetrical about the center of the field or frame, because it has been empirically determined that video frames are composed in such a way that there is too much correlation between symmetrically located areas.
  • FIG. 1 A sample partial distribution of areas within a frame is shown in FIG. 1.
  • Frame 10 is actually a video field of sampled pixels.
  • frame will be used to mean either field or frame.
  • a bit value of 1 is returned if the luminance of the area in question exceeds the luminance of the comparison area. If the luminance of the area in question is less than or equal to the luminance of the comparison area, a bit value of 0 is returned.
  • a 16-bit mask word is created along with each 16-bit frame signature.
  • the mask word represents the reliability of the frame signature. For each bit in the frame signature, if the absolute value of the luminance difference used to calculate that bit value is less than a threshold or "guard band" value, the luminance value is assumed to have been susceptible to error (because of noise in transmission), and so the mask bit for that bit is set to 0, indicating suspect data. If the absolute value of the luminance difference is greater than or equal to the guard band value, the luminance value is assumed to be much greater than the noise level and the corresponding mask bit is set to 1, indicating reliable data. As discussed below, the number of ones or zeroes in the mask word is used in generating segment signatures and setting comparison thresholds.
  • An audio '' 'frame' signature if such a signature is used, can be constructed in the same foraat as a video frame signature so that it can be processed in the same way.
  • Such an audio signature may be used to recognize broadcast radio segments, or may be used to confirm the identification of a video segment the data for which includes a high percentage of suspect data.
  • the use of audio signatures is not necessary to the invention.
  • the parametized "frame signature" informa - tion is stored in a circular buffer large enough to hold, preferably, approximately twice as much signal information as the longest broadcast segment to be identified.
  • a segment signature is being compared to the frame signature data, for each frame that passes the observation point eight comparisons between the segment signature data and the frame signature data are made, one word at a time, using the offset data stored with the segment signature to choose the frame signatures for comparison.
  • the frame signature and segment signature words are compared using a bit-by-bit exclusive-NOR operation, which returns a 1 when both bits are the same and a O when they are different. The number of ones resulting from the exculsive-NOR operation is accumulated over all eight word comparisons.
  • Stable data means the word selected must have some minimum duration in the broadcast segment -- i.e., it is derived from a portion of the segment for which there are at least a minimum number of (e.g., 20 or more) frames of the same or similar data).
  • Noise-free data are data having an associated mask word with a maximum number of unmasked bits. (Maximization of duration or stability, and minimization of masked bits or noise, can be two competing criteria.)
  • Hamming distance refers to the dissimilarity of the digital data. It is desirable for more positive and reliable identification of broadcast segments that a signature for one broadcast segment differ from that for another broadcast segment by at least a minimum number of bits, known as the Hamming distance. In generating the second or any subsequent signature in the database, Hamming distance from existing signatures must be considered.
  • Kntropy refers to the desirability, discussed above, of having the minimum possible correlation between different portions of the data. for this reason, given the preferred signature data length (8 words, 16 bits per word), preferably no two signature words should be taken from points closer together in the segment than one second. This sets a lower limit on the length of broadcast segments which can be be reliably recognized. If, e.g., eight words make up a signature, and they must be at least one second apart, the shortest segment that can be reliably recognized is a segment of approximately ten seconds in length.
  • the duration criterion and mask words are also stored with the segment signature for use in the recognition process.
  • the duration parameter signifies that, because the frame data are stable for some time period, a certain number of successive matches on that data should be obtained during the recognition process. If significantly more or fewer matches are obtained, the matches are discarded as statistical anomalies.
  • the mask data define a threshold parameter which is used during the recognition process to adjust the default number of matching bits required before a signature is considered to have matched the broadcast data. For example, a default threshold could be set for the system which, during an attempt to match a particular segment signature, is lowered by one-half the number of masked bits associated with that signature.
  • a keyword is chosen from within the segment. Having a buffer at least twice as long as the longest segment to be identified assures that sufficient broadcast signal history to make a recognition remains in the buffer at the time the keyword reaches the observation point.
  • the criteria used for choosing the keyword are similar to those for choosing the signature words ⁇ it should be of stable duration and relatively noise free, augmented by the need for a "level list" -- i.e., there should be no more than about four signatures having the same keyword so that the necessary computations can be made within the the 1/30 second real-time limit.
  • a signature Before a signature can be constructed for a segment for addition to the segment signature data base, it must be determined that a broadcast segment it being received.
  • new segments may be played into the system manually -- e.g., where an advertiser or advertising agency supplies a video tape of a new commercial or commercials.
  • the operator and the system know that this is a new segment, the signature for which is not yet stored in the segment signature library.
  • Bowever it can happen that a new commercial is broadcast by a local broadcast station for which no videotape was earlier supplied and which, therefore, is not yet known to the system. Therefore, the present invention also can detect the presence in the incoming signal of potential segments to be recognized that are new and presently unknown.
  • the present invention relies on the presence in the broadcast signal of signal artifacts characteristic of such potential unknown segments.
  • artifacts can include fades-to-black, audio power changes including silence ("audio fade-to-black”), and the presence (but not the content) of pre-encoded identification data appearing, e.g., in the vertical intervals of video signals.
  • These artifacts are not assumed to indicate the presence of a new, unknown segment to be recognized per se. Rather, they are used as part of a decision-making process.
  • the parametized information derived from the unknown segment is saved along with audio and video information corresponding to the unknown segment.
  • the signal artifacts that marked the unknown segment are not retained, nor is any record kept of what they were.
  • the saved audio and video information is ultimately presented, in compressed form (as discussed below), to an operator for use in identifying the new and unknown segment and recording the identification in the segment signature library.
  • the operator also records any special requirements needed to prepare a signature for the segment.
  • some national commercials include two portions: a portion which is always the same irrespective of in which part of the country the commercial is to be broadcast (the "constant” portion), and a portion which differs depending on where the commercial is to be broadcast (the "variable” or "tag” portion). It is important to accurately identify different versions of such national commercials. If a comer- cial for a national product has a tag that is specific to one region, the commercial is considered different from the same commercial tagged for a different region. Therefore, the operator would note that the signature must include data from the tag portion of the segment, and that additional data must be taken from the tag. A signature is then generated automatically as described above.
  • tags are used, depending on the type of tag associated with the commercial.
  • One type of tag is known as a "live tag”, which is a live-action audio/video portion of at least five seconds duration.
  • Another type of tag is known as a "still tag” which is a still picture -- e.g., of text -- which has insufficient video content for generating a unique signature.
  • Either type of tag can occur anywhere in the commercial.
  • a separate signature is generated for the tag.
  • the system logs both the commercial occurrences and the tag occurrences, and then merges that data with the help of pointers in the signature database.
  • a flag or pointer associated with the commercial signature triggers a brute force video comparison of a frame of the tag with a frame of the reference tag or tags. This comparison is not necessarily done in real time.
  • a system constructed in accordance with the present invention is preferably composed of one or more local sites and one central site. Utilizing the recognition methods described above, a local site scans one or more broadcast video and audio television signals looking for known broadcast segments. If a known segment is detected, the local site records time and date information, the channel being monitored, the identification of the segment, and other information in its database. Relying on signal artifacts, the local site also notes and records signals that it senses are likely to be new segments of interest which are not yet known to the system.
  • the central site communicates, e.g., via telephone lines, with the local sites to determine what known broadcast segments have been detected and what potential but unknown segments have been seen and saved, and to disseminate to appropriate local sites segment signature and detection information corresponding to new broadcast segments not yet known to those local sites. It is anticipated that the ultimate identification of a new and unknown segment will require visual or aural interpretation by a human operator at the central site.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of the system including a central site 22 and a plurality of linked local sites 21.
  • Each local site 21 monitors broadcasting in its geographic region.
  • the local sites 21 are located at cable television head end stations to assure a clear input signal.
  • the local site 21 is capable of recognizing and identifying known broadcast segments and logging occurrences of such segments by date, time, duration, channel, identification, and other desirable information.
  • the local site is also capable of recognizing the occurrence of potentially and new unknown segments, and of generating temporary key signatures for such unknown segments so that it can maintain a log of all occurrences of each such segment pending the identification of the segment by the central site 22.
  • Local site 21 sends to central site 22 via communications channels 23a, b all log information for recognized known segments, plus information relating to all potential new and unknown segments, and receives in return software updates, signature library updates, and requests for additional information. If a new signature transmitted to and received by one local site 21 originated as an unknown segment originally transmitted to the central site by that local site 21, the local site 21 merges the temporary log into other data awaiting transmission to central site 22, and then purges the temporary signature from its database.
  • This ''central-local site is identical to the other local sites 21 and serves the same function as the other local sites 21 for the broadcast market in which it and central site 22 are located.
  • central-local site 21a is connected to central site 22 by direct high-speed data link 24, new segments monitored by central-local site 21a are quickly available to central site 22 for identification.
  • the signatures for those new segments that are of national scope can then be quickly disseminated to the remote local sites 21 to minimize the number of times a local site 21 will classify a received segment as an unknown, and thereby to prevent communications channels 23a, b from being burdened unnecessarily with the transmission of signature and other data (compressed audio and video) corresponding to locally unknown national segments.
  • the audio and video information corresponding to new and unknown segments must be transmitted to the central site 22 via communications channels 23a, b to be reviewed by an operator during the identification process, the data is gathered by local site 21 in a compressed format to reduce communications overhead and expense.
  • Compression of the video data preferably is accomplished as follows. First, not every frame is captured. Preferably, only one frame every four seconds is captured to create a "slide show" effect, with an option at the request of an operator at central site 22 to capture frames more frequently. Second, as is well known, a television video frame consists of two interlaced fields occurring 1/60 second apart. In the "slide show", small motion; between the fields causes a noticeable flicker. Therefore, only one field is captured, which still provides a recognizable image. Third, not all pixels are necessary for a sufficiently recognizable image. It has been found that 160 x 120 pixels is sufficient, with an option at the request of an operator at central site 22 to capture 320 x 240 pixels per field. fourth, it is not necessary to capture color information.
  • Audio compression is more difficult to accomplish. Considerable information can be removed from video data while still maintaining a recognizable image. However, only a smaller amount of information can be removed from audio data without the remaining audio becoming difficult or impossible to understand, or unacceptably fatiguing for human operators.
  • ADPCM Adaptive Differential Pulse Code Modulation
  • ADPCK techniques and circuitry are well known.
  • the frame signature data and the temporary segment or key signature generated for that unknown segment, and the compressed audio and video information for that segment are stored.
  • the local site 21 is polled periodically by central site 22 and at those times the stored frame signature data and the temporary signatures are transmitted to central site 22 for identification via communications channels 23a, b.
  • the audio and video information are transmitted optionally, but these data are always stored by local site 21 until the identification and signature of the segment are returned by the central site 22.
  • signature compressor 25 associated with central site 22 first checks the frame signature data against the global signature database, which contains all signatures from all local databases for all broadcast segments known to the system, to determine whether or not the "unknown" segment in fact previously had been identified and is already known to the system (perhaps because a different local site saw the broadcast segment before), but the signature for which had not yet been sent to all locai sites 21 or had been identified as being of limited geographic scope and so sent to only some of local sites 21.
  • the global signature for that segment (which may differ somewhat from the temporary signature) is transmitted back to the originating local site, and the originating local site 21 is instructed to replace the temporary key signature generated locally with the global key signature. If the frame signature data are not matched to a signature in the global database, the corresponding temporary key signature is added to a separate portion of the global database used to store temporary signatures.
  • This "temporary global database” allows coprocessor 25 to carry out the grouping of like unknowns, previously discussed, because if the same unknown comes in from another local site 21 it should be matched by the temporary signature stored in the global database, thereby indicating to coprocessor 25 that it is probably the same segment which has already been sent by another local site 21.
  • coprocessor 25 causes host computer 27 to request the compressed audio and/or video data from local site 21 if those data have not already been transmitted.
  • audio and video data preferably are not initially transmitted from local sites 21 on the theory that the frame signature data may be identified as a known segment upon comparison to the global database.
  • the audio and/or video data may also have already been sent for another segment in the group. Further, audio and video need not both necessarily be transmitted.
  • the operator will request one set of data. In this case, unknown segment data are stored until the missing audio or video data arrive, and then queued to an operator workstation 26. If the operator determines that the audio (if only video was sent) or video (if only audio was sent) data are also•needed, the unknown data are again stored until the missing information arrives, when the data are requeued. Similarly, the operator may determine that higher resolution video (320 x 240 pixels or more frames per second) is needed and the unknown data again are stored.
  • local site 21 In a case where high resolution video is requested, if local site 21 always captures the high resolution video and simply does not transmit it for purposes of economy, it can be transmitted quickly on request. However, the system may be implemented in such a way that local site 21 does not routinely capture the high resolution video, in which case it is necessary to wait until the segment is broadcast again in that locality.
  • the operator may also determine that the information captured as a result of the signal artifacts is actually two segments (e.g., in a 30-second interval, two 15-second commercials occurred), or that two consecutive intervals were each half of a single segment (e.g., two 30-second segments represent one 60-second commercial). In such a case, the operator instructs the system to break up or concatenate the segments, recreate the frame signature and segment signature data, and restart the identification process for the resulting segment or segments.
  • the frame signature data for each segment in the group must be aligned with the frame signature data for each other segment in the group before a global key signature can be constructed. Alignment is necessary because different segments in the group may have been captured by local sites 21 by the detection of different artifacts. Thus, the segments may not all have been captured identically -- i.e., between the same points. For example, a set of segment data in a group for a broadcast segment nominally 60 seconds in length may in fact, as captured, be only 55 seconds in length because the segment was broadcast incompletely. Or, a member segment of the group may be too long or too short because it was captured as a consequence of the detection of a fade-to-black artifact or of an audio power change artifact.
  • Alignment is carried out by coprocessor 25.
  • the frame signature data for the first segment in the group are placed in a buffer.
  • data for a second segment are clocked word-by-word into another buffer and an exclusive-NOR between all bits of the two segments is continually performed as the second segment is clocked in.
  • an exclusive-NOR between all bits of the two segments is continually performed as the second segment is clocked in.
  • the aligned data then are used as a baseline to align the remaining segments in the group.
  • the alignment process is time-consuming. Bowever, it is not necessary that alignment be done on a real-time basis. Preferably, alignment is performed at night, or at some other time when system activity is at a low point.
  • a best fit of both the frame signature data and the mask data is calculated by assigning to each bit position the value of that bit position in the majority of segments.
  • the signature coprocessor 25 then generates a new global signature for the segment using the best fit parametized data.
  • the new global signature After the new global signature has been generated, it is compared to the frame signature data for all of the unknown segments in the group to which it applies to make certain that the data for each segment matches the signature. If the new global signature does not match each set of frame signature data, this signifies either that an error was made in selecting the keyword or another of the data words, or that one or more sets of data in the group are really not representative of the same segment. In such a case, an operator may have to view additional segments in the group.
  • the signature is transmitted back to each local site 21 or to an appropriate subset of local sites if the newly identified segment is not of national scope.
  • the respective local sites 21 then merge the data they had been keeping based on the temporary signatures and send it to central site 22, replace the temporary signatures they had been retaining with the new global signature in their local databases, and purge the audio, video, and frame signature data for that segment.
  • a first preferred embodiment of a local site 30 is shown diagrammatically in FIG. 3, and includes an IBM PC personal computer 31 and two Intel 310 computers 32, 33, interconnected by conventional RS-232C serial links 34, 35.
  • Personal computer 31 uses a circuit card 36 and a software program to extract video parameter data from inconing video signals.
  • Computer 32 creates signatures for new and unknown segments and matches existing signatures maintained in a signature library against incoming frame signature data.
  • Computer 33 logs the Whits" or matches made by personal computer 32.
  • a frame grabber card 36 such as the PC Vision Frame Grabber by Imaging Technologies, in personal computer 31 generates 512 x 256 pixels for each frame of incoming video information. However, frame grabber 36 is utilized so that only one field per frame is sampled. Frame grabber 36 also provides a video field clock that is used by computer 31. Computer 31 processes the frame grabber output to produce a four-bit word representing each frame.
  • a Microsoft MACRO Assembler listing of the program used in personal computer 31 is attached hereto as Appendix A and a flowchart, the blocks thereof keyed to the lines of the program listing, is shown in FIG. 4. The flowchart and program listing will be readily understood by those of ordinary skill in the art.
  • the parametized data from personal computer 31 are transmitted over serial link 34 to computer 32 where they are clocked into a section of R A M partitioned, using pointers, as a modulo-2048 circular buffer.
  • the buffer holds 34 seconds of data.
  • frame grabber 36 and personal computer 31 are too slow to grab all of the frame data in real time (although in the second preferred embodiment, described below, this function is performed by hardware which does operate in real time). Resultantly, some data are lost.
  • the data that are provided over serial link 34 are inserted into the buffer in their current real-time positions.
  • Computer 32 "backfills" the buffer by filling in the empty positions with the next succeeding real time data.
  • Computer 32 creates signatures and matches incoming frame signature data to a signature database as described above, without using the designated frame keyword lookup technique.
  • a PL/M listing of the signature generation program is attached hereto as Appendix B and a flowchart, the blocks of which are keyed to the lines of the program listing, is shown in FIG. 5.
  • a PL/M listing of the signature detection program is attached hereto as Appendix C and a flowchart, the blocks of which are keyed to the lines of the program listing, is shown in FIG. 6.
  • the flowcharts and program listings will be readily understood by those of ordinary skill in the art.
  • each segment is divided into nine sections -- a half-section at the beginning, followed by eight full sections, and a half-section at the end.
  • the two half-sections are discarded to account for possible truncation of the beginning or end of the segment when it is broadcast.
  • a word is then selected, using the previously described criteria of stable data, noise-free data, Hamming distance, and entropy, from each of the eight sections.
  • the signatures created are stored in the memory of computer 32 while the match data are transmitted over serial link 35 to computer 33 which keeps track of the matches.
  • FIG. 7 A listing of a PL/M program used in computer 33 is attached hereto as Appendix D and a flowchart, the blocks of which are keyed to the lines of the program listing, is shown in FIG. 7.
  • the flowchart and program listing will be readily understood by those of ordinary skill in the art.
  • Signatures are generated in the system of FIG. 3 by the computer 32. However, the generation of signatures is not initiated as earlier described and as implemented in the second preferred embodiment (described below). Rather, in the system of FIG. 3, an operator must "prime” the system by specifying the segment length, playing a tape into the system and manually starting the buffer filling process. Computer 32 then builds a signature automatically. However, there is no threshold or guard-band computed here as was earlier described, and as implemented in the second preferred embodiment (described below). In the second preferred embodiment, a threshold associated with the signature is modified by subtracting from the default threshold one-half the number of masked bits in the signature, while in the system of FIG. 3 the default threshold is augmented at the time of comparison by one-half the number of masked bits in the data being compared.
  • FIGS. 8-12 A second preferred embodiment of the system of the invention is shown in FIGS. 8-12.
  • FIGS. 8-11B show the details of local sites 21.
  • FIG. 8 is a block diagram of a local site 21.
  • the local site 21 is comprised of two major subsystems: the signal processing subsystem 80 and the control computer 81.
  • the signal processing subsystem 80 receives incoming RF broadcast signals and performs three distinct tasks:
  • the hardware of signal processing subsystem 80 includes matching matching module 82, compression module 83, and one or more tuners 84 (there is one tuner for each broadcast station to be monitored).
  • Tuner 84 may be any conventional RF tuner; and in the preferred embodiment is Zenith model ST-3100.
  • Matching module 82 and compression module 83 are built around the well-known Intel Corporation Multibuse II Bus Structure. Multibus® II is described in the Multibus® II Bus Architecture Databook (Intel Order No. 230893) and the Multibus® II Bus Architecture Specification Handbook (Intel Order No. 146077C), both of which are incorporated herein by reference. The first two tasks discussed above are performed in matching module 8 2 . The third task is performed in compression module 83.
  • Each of the two modules 82, 83 includes a Central Services Module (CSM) 90 which is a standard off-the-shelf item (such as Intel Order No. SBC-CSM-001) required in all Hultibus® II systems.
  • CSM Central Services Module
  • Each module also has an executive microcomputer board 91a, 91b which controls communications between the respective module and control computer 81. All components on each module are interconnected on public bus 92, while those components which require large amounts of high-speed data transfer between them are additionally interconnected by private bus 93.
  • Matching module 82 further includes one channel card 94 for each channel to be monitored -- e.g., one for each commercial station in the local market.
  • Channel cards 94 generate the 16 bits per frame of parametized signal data and the corresponding 16-bit mask for both audio and video in accordance with the methods earlier described.
  • Channel cards 94 also signal the occurrence of signal artifacts which indicate, and are used to delineate and capture, potential unknown segments.
  • Also contained within matching module 82 are two circular buffer memories 95.
  • One buffer 95 is for audio and the other is for video. These buffers store on a temporary basis the incoming parametized frame signature data, as earlier described. In this preferred embodiment, the maximum length of broadcast segments to be recognized is assumed to be one minute.
  • each buffer can hold 4,096 frames, which is 136.5 seconds, of video at a frame rate of thirty frames per second, or just over two minutes. 4,096 is 2 12 , so the offset data associated with each signature (as earlier described) is 12 bits long. Parametized signal information is moved from channel cards 94 to the circular buffers 95 when requested by executive microcomputer 91a.
  • Matching module 82 also includes correlation card 96, shown in more detail in FIG. 10.
  • Correlation card 96 performs the task of recognizing incoming broadcast segments . Correlation card 96 accomplishes this by comparing incoming video and audio frame signature data with the locally stored database of key signatures to find matches.
  • the local signature database is stored in memory 97 (up to 1 3 megabytes of conventional random access memory). Since correlation card 96 in the preferred embodiment may operate on both audio and video data (although, e.g., only video can be used), correlation card 96 must have sufficient capacity to process an amount of data equivalent to twice the number of channels to be monitored.
  • Correlation card 96 performs all functions required to generate the raw data for the final correlation, or determination of a segment match.
  • Executive microcomputer 91a accumulates the matches resulting from key signature comparisons done by correlation card 96, and then transmits the accumulated matches to control computer 81.
  • correlation card 96 contains signature comparison processor (SCP) 101 and two independent interfaces 102, 103 to the Multibus® II public and private buses.
  • SCP 101 is a programmable element which operates under command of executive microcomputer 91a. SCP 101 is responsible for the following primary functions:
  • Control unit 104 of SCP 101 directs the operation of SCP 101.
  • Control unit 104 includes memory which contains all microprogram instructions defining SCP operation. It also contains sufficient functionality to allow for the efficient sequencing of the required microinstructions. Control unit operation is directed, at an upper level, by instructions generated by executive microcomputer 91a.
  • Logic unit 105 performs all address and data manipulations required to load both incoming and previously defined reference signatures into onboard buffers for comparison. Signature data is resident in external, offboard memory accessible by the private bus; logic unit 105 and control unit 104 together execute all private bus interface functions.
  • Logic unit 105 also generates messages to and interprets messages from executive microcomputer 91a.
  • An example of a message interpreted by logic unit 105 is a request to compare selected key signatures in the key signature database to the current, incoming segment signature.
  • An example of a message generated by logic unit 105 is that which is generated at the end of a comparison which defines how well the incoming signature matches the reference (how many total correct or incorrect bits after comparison).
  • the logic unit peripheral hardware nodule 106 is responsible for assisting logic unit 105 in performing signature comparisons. Specifically, the module contains logic which is intended to increase the processing capability of SCP 101. The features of module 106 are:
  • Executive microcomputer 91a is a standard commercial microcomputer card (e.g., Intel Order No. SBC-286-100) based on an 80286 microprocessor. The function of this card is to:
  • Compression module 83 includes (in addition to central services module 90 and executive microcomputer 91b) audio capture card 98a, video capture card 98b, and associated circular buffer memories 99a, 99b.
  • the audio and video capture cards are shown in more detail in FIGS. 11A and 11B, respectively.
  • Audio and video capture cards 98a, 98b each can monitor up to eight broadcast channels (monitoring more channels requires multiple cards).
  • Video card 98b captures incoming video frames at a slide-show rate of one frame per second and digitizes and compresses the video data, while audio card 98a digitizes and captures audio continually, for each of the eight.channels.
  • the audio and video from up to eight channels are brought to. these cards (as vell as to the channel cards) from channel tuners 8 4 by coaxial cables.
  • a conventional 1-of-8 multiplexer 110 (implemented in this embodiment as a T-switch circuit design using CMOS 4066 integrated circuits), selects one of the eight channels for capture.
  • the audio from each channel is fed to one of up to eight combination filter/coder/decoder circuits 111, such as a National Semiconductor 3054 integrated circuit.
  • combination circuit 111 the audio signal is passed through a low-pass filter and then through a coder/decoder which performs a logarithmic analog-to-digital conversion resulting in a digital signal with a compressed amplitude (the audio signal is expanded again prior to being audited by an operator at central site 22).
  • the compressed digital signal is then passed through an adaptive differential pulse code modulator (ADPCM) 112 similar to that used by the telephone industry -- e.g., a NEC 7730 integrated circuit -- for further compression.
  • ADPCM adaptive differential pulse code modulator
  • An Intel .80188 microprocessor 113 controls the movement of the compressed audio data from ADPCM 112 through bus interface 114 to private bus 93 of compression module 83, and thence to circular buffer memory 99a.
  • a JEDEC-standard RAM/EPROM 113a contains programs and memory workspace used by microprocessor 113.
  • common video circuit 115 uses the sync information contained in the received analog video signal to generate clock pulses and addresses for analog-to-digital conversion of the video signal.
  • Circuit 115 outputs both address signals and digitized data signals representing the video at the rate of one field per second at 116 and 117, respectively.
  • the data pass to arithmetic logic unit (ALU) 118 which further compresses the video data by reducing each video field or frame to 160 (horizontal) by 120 (vertical) pixels, each pixel averaging four-by-two pixel areas in size, using gray scale pixel averaging.
  • ALU arithmetic logic unit
  • the address data pass from common video circuit 115 to dither prom 119 which contains a table of pseudorandom numbers -- one for each video address output by circuit 115.
  • dither prom 119 contains a table of pseudorandom numbers -- one for each video address output by circuit 115.
  • ALU 118 contains a table of pseudorandom numbers -- one for each video address output by circuit 115.
  • This dithering technique by which a low-information-content video signal can be visually improved, allows the video frame to be compressed to as few as 9600 bytes.
  • the dithered compressed video data are then passed to one of two line buffers 1101a, b (one buffer is filled while the other is being read and emptied), from which they are passed under the control of direct memory access controller 1102 to private bus 93 of compression module 83, and thence to circular buffer memory 99b.
  • the audio and video data are placed in circular buffers 99a and 99b holding the most recent two minutes of data for that channel under the direction of control computer 81 and executive microcomputer 91b.
  • Executive microcomputer 91b preferably is a standard commercial microcomputer card (e.g., Intel Order No. SBC-286-100) based on an 80286 microprocessor. This card provides an interface path to the control computer 81. All data to be transferred to the central site is requested by control computer 81.
  • the signal processing subsystem 80 can be referred to as the "front end" of local site 21.
  • Control computer 81 can be referred to as the "back end”.
  • Control computer 81 (FIG. 8) is preferably a commercially available MicroVAX 11 minicomputer manufactured by Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC), running the DEC VMS virtual memory operating system. Between one and nine megabytes of RAM memory are provided along with one DEC RA81 Winchester disk drive (with controller) having a capacity of 456 megabytes.
  • a DPV11 synchronous interface connects the control computer 81 to communications channels 23a, b via a modem.
  • a DRV11 direct memory access controller connects control computer 81 to signal processing subsystem 80.
  • control computer 81 A function of control computer 81 is to determine, using detected signal artifacts, when new and as yet unknown broadcast segments may have been received. Control computer 81 also keeps track of the temporary log for such segments until the segments have been identified by central site 22. Another function of control computer 81 is to determine, based on duration and other criteria, such as time of day, whether or not matches accumulated by executive microcomputer 91a actually indicate that a segment has been recognized. (For example, during "prime time" no commercials are normally broadcast at, e.g., 7 minutes after the hour.) In performing these functions, control computer 81 exercises its ability to control all segment processing subsystem 80 functions via executive microcomputers 91a, 91b.
  • Control computer 81 can instruct modules 82 and 83 to tune to a particular channel to capture audio/video data, to compare a pair of frame and key signatures, or to generate a local signature. These instructions can originate in control computer 81 itself or ultimately at central site 22. For example, in identifying a new segment, an operator may Deed higher resolution video information. In such a case, control computer 81 would act on instructions from central site 22 by requesting module 83 to capture the required data when the desired segment is next received. Control computer 81 also stores on disk a backup copy of the signature database stored in RAM memory 97.
  • central system 22 includes central-local site 21a, coprocessor 25, mainframe "host” computer and memory 27 with associated mass storage device 28, communications processor 29 and workstations 26.
  • Coprocessor 25 is used to assist with certain computationally intensive functions related to the signature processing requirements of the central site 22.
  • the "front end * of coprocessor 25 is identical to matching module 82 of local site 21, earlier described, except for the omission from coprocessor 25 of channel cards 94. It is preferred, however, that the memory for the signature database within coprocessor 25 be expanded over that of the local site to ensure that all key signatures used at all local sites can be resident in coprocessor 25.
  • the "back end" of coprocessor 25 preferably uses the same MicroVAX computer used by local sites 21 (FIG. 8), although a different type of computer could be used. Another alternative is that the coprocessor front end may be attached to communications processor 29 at the central site. It is also preferred that the coprocessor hardware be duplicated at central site 22 so that a backup system is available in case of a failure of the primary coprocessor.
  • the coprocessor's signature generating and comparing functions are performed in the front end, while its checking and grouping functions are controlled by its back and utilizing the comparison capabilities of the front end as described above.
  • Workstation 26 is the vehicle by which new and unknown segments are presented to, and classified by, human operators.
  • a secondary function of workstation 26 is to act as a terminal in the maintenance of host resident databases.
  • Workstation 26 is made up of the following:
  • workstation 26 The heart of workstation 26 is the IBM 3270 AT computer.
  • the 3270 AT is a blend of an IBM 3270 terminal and an IBM AT personal computer. By combining the power of these components, a very effective mainframe workstation is created.
  • Workstation 26 allows easy communication with host 27 and has its own processing capability. Up to four sessions with host 27 can be started as well as a local process all viewed in separate windows on the console screen. A combination of host and local processes are used by the operator.
  • the video card contained in the 3270 AT can display two different segments.
  • Each video card consists of a pair of "ping-pong" (A/B RAM) memories for holding compressed gray scale video data.
  • the ping-pong memories can be used in one of two ways. First a segment can be pre-loaded into RAM A while RAM B is being displayed. Second, the ping-pong memories can be used to load the next frame of a segment while the other is being displayed. Gray scale data is returned to video format and smoothed before being passed through the video digital-to- analog converter.
  • An audio control card is also provided in the 3270 AT.
  • ADPCM circuits e.g., NEC 7730
  • Workstation 26 supports the identification process of new commercial segments and contains self-test routines to check the status of the machine and components. It is possible for workstation 26 to operate in a somewhat stand-alone mode requesting needed information from host 27 and passing results back. Alternatively, host 27 could control the application and send audio/video requests to workstation 26. The operator at workstation 26 controls the audio and video cards to cause the audio and/or video portions of selected segments to be displayed or output.
  • Host computer 27 is preferably an IBM mainframe of the 308X series, such as an IBM 3083.
  • Host computer 27 maintains a copy of the global signature database and an archive of all parametized and compressed audio/video data from which the signature database was generated.
  • the archive allows recreation of the signature database in the event, e.g., of an accidental catastrophic loss of data.
  • Host computer 27 uses the following commercially available software packages:
  • Host 27 also commands the workstation 26, coprocessor 25 and, ultimately, local site 21. For example, it may be determined that additional information is needed from a particular local site 21. Host 27 acts on that determination by instructing the appropriate local site control computer 81 to request that its signal processing subsystem 80 capture additional data, or upload some data previously captured, for example.
  • Host 27 also uses information transmitted by the various local sites 21 as to the occurrences of segments to compile a log of occurrences and one or more reports requested by the system users.
  • Communications channels 23a, b and communications processor 29 are shown diagrammatically in more detail in FIG. 12.
  • coprocessor 25 has a separate control computer 121, although, as stated above, the functions of that computer could be handled by communications processor 29.
  • All communications within central site 22 and local sites 21 are coordinated by Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) equipment. Therefore, communications throughout the system are based on DEC's DECNet protocol.
  • DECNet protocol is run on a local area network 120.
  • An SNA gateway 122 manufactured by DEC is connected to local area network 120 to translate between DECNet and IBM's Systems Network Architecture to allow communications between host 27 and the rest of the system.
  • An IBM 3725 communications control device 123 interfaces between SNA gateway 122 and host 27.
  • An I BM 3724 cluster controller 124 interfaces between device 123 and workstations 26, allowing workstations 26 to communicate with host 27.
  • Central-local site 2 1 a is connected to local area network 120 by high-speed link 24 as earlier discussed.
  • Communications control computer 29 is preferably a Digital Equipment Corporation VAX 8200.
  • Coprocessor control computer 121 is the identical computer and in fact, as discussed above, its function can be performed by communications control computer 29 if desired.
  • Communications control computer 29 interfaces between local area network 120 and local sites 21.
  • local sites 21 with which high-speed or high-volume communications is necessary or desired can be by high-speed leased line 23b.
  • a lower speed packet switching data network 23a running the well-known X.25 protocol is used.
  • the X.25 protocol is transparent to DECNet and is available on such commercial data communications networks as Telenet or Tymnet.
  • Communications lines 125 between individual local sites 21 and network 23a can be provided either by leased line or over the telephone dial-up network.

Abstract

A method, apparatus and system are provided for recognizing broadcast segments, such as commercials, in real time by continuous pattern recognition without resorting to cues or codes in the broadcast signal. Each broadcast frame is parametized to yield a digital word and a signature is constructed for segments to be recognized by selecting, in accordance with a set of predefined rules, a number of words from among random locations throughout the segment and storing them along with offset information indicating their relative locations. As a broadcast signal is monitored, it is parametized in the same way and the library of signatures is compared against each digital word and words offset therefrom by the stored offset amounts. A data reduction technique minimizes the number of comparisons required while still maintaining a large database.

Description

    Background of the Invention
  • This invention relates to the automatic recognition of broadcast segments, particularly commercial advertisements broadcast by television stations.
  • Commercial advertisers are interested in log data shoving when various commercials are broadcast on radio or television. This interest stems both from a desire to confirm that broadcast time paid for was actually provided and from an interest in monitoring competitors' advertising strategies.
  • It would be advantageous to be able to provide an automated method and system for logging commercial broadcast data which does not rely for recognition on the insertion of special codes in the broadcast signal or on cues occurring in the signal.
  • It is also desirable to provide such a method and system which can identify large numbers of commercials in an economic and efficient manner in real time, without resorting to expensive parallel processing or to the most powerful computers.
  • Summary of the Invention
  • It is an object of this invention to provide an automated method, apparatus and system for logging commercial broadcast data which does not rely for recognition on the insertion of special codes or on cues occurring in the signal.
  • It is another object of this invention to provide such a method, apparatus and system which can identify large numbers of commercials in an efficient and economic manner in real time, without resorting to expensive parallel processing or to the most powerful computers.
  • In accordance with the method and apparatus of this invention, real-time continuous pattern recognition of broadcast segments is accomplished by constructing a digital signature from a known specimen of a segment which is to be recognized. The signature is constructed by digitally parametizing the segment, selecting portions from among random frame locations throughout the segment in accordance with a set of predefined rules (i.e. different frames are selected for each segment, but the selection is always based on the same criteria) to form the signature, and associating with the signature the frame locations of the portions. The signature and associated frame locations are stored in a library of signatures. Each signature in the library is identified with a particular segment to be recognized. A broadcast signal is monitored and digitally parametized. For each frame of the parametized monitored signal, the library is searched for any signature that may be associated with that frame. Using the frame information stored with the signature, each of the potentially associated stored signatures is compared to the appropriate frames of the parametized signal. If a stored signature compares with the monitored data, a match is declared and the broadcast segment is identified using identification data associated with the signature.
  • In another embodiment of a method and apparatus according to the invention, a digital keyword derived from a designated frame in the parametized segment is identified as associated with the segment signature, but the association of that keyword with a particular segment signature is nonexclusive -- i.e., the same keyword can be associated with more than one signature. A plurality of additional frames is selected from among random frame locations throughout the segment in accordance with a set of predefined rules and, in a library of signatures, the keyword representing the designated frame and the words representing the additional frames are stored together with the offsets of the additional frames relative to the designated frame. A broadcast signal is monitored and digitally parametized. For each monitored digital word of the parametized monitored signal, the library is searched for any signature associated with a keyword corresponding to that monitored word, and the additional words of any such signature are compared with those words of the parametized monitored signal which are separated from the monitored word by the stored offset amounts. If the stored signature compares with the monitored data, a match is declared and the broadcast segment is identified using identification data associated with the signature data.
  • A system according to the invention additionally has means for detecting the occurrence of artifacts within the monitored signal characteristic of potential unknown broadcast segments to be recognized, and means for classifying and identifying such potential unknown segments. One embodiment of such a system includes a plurality of local sites in different geographic regions for monitoring broadcasts in those regions, and a central site linked to the local sites by a communications network. Each local site maintains a library of segment signatures applicable to its geographic region, and each has at least means for performing the storing, monitoring, searching, comparing and detecting tasks described above. The central site maintains a global library containing all of the information in all of the local libraries. Classification and identification of potential unknown segments involves the generation at the local site of compressed audio and video information, a temporary digital signature, and parametized monitored signal information for a potential unknown segment not found in the library of the local site. At least the parametized monitored signal information and the temporary signature are transmitted to the central site over the communications network. At the central site, the temporary signatures, which are stored in a special portion of the global library, are searched, and the signatures stored in the main portion of the global library are also searched, and are compared with the transmitted parametized monitored signal information to determine if the potential unknown segment was previously received by another local site and is therefore already known to the system. If so, and if a global signature has already been generated, the temporary signature at the originating local site is replaced with the previously generated global signature. Like potential unknown segments not found in the main portion of the global library are grouped together. Compressed audio and video for at least one of the segments in the group is requested from the local site and an operator at the central site plays it back to classify and identify it. After the operator has identified the segment, the system automatically constructs a signature which is added to the global library and to the appropriate local libraries.
  • Brief Description of the Drawings
  • The above and other objects and advantages of the invention will be apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference characters refer to like parts throughout, and in which:
    • FIG. 1 is a diagrammatic representation of the areas of a video frame sampled to derive parametized signal data;
    • FIG. 2 is a block diagram of a system according to the invention;
    • FIG. 3 is a block diagram of an experimental local site according to the invention;
    • FIG. 4 is a flowchart of a software program used in the system of FIG. 3;
    • FIG. 5 is a flowchart of a second software program used in the system of FIG. 3;
    • FIG. 6 is a flowchart of a third software program used in the system of FIG. 3;
    • FIG. 7 is a flowchart of a fourth software program used in the system of FIG. 3;
    • FIG. 8 is a block diagram of a local site according to the invention;
    • FIG. 9 is a block diagram of the signal processing subsystem of FIG. 8;
    • FIG. 10 is a block diagram of the correlator card of FIG. 9;
    • FIG. 11A is a block diagram of the audio capture card of FIG. 9;
    • FIG. 11B is a block diagram of the video capture card of FIG. 9; and
    • FIG. 12 is a block diagram of the central site and system communications of the invention.
    Detailed Description of the Invention 1. Theory of Preferred operation
  • The present invention can identify a segment of a broadcast signal by pure continuous pattern recognition on a real-time basis. No codes need be inserted into the broadcast signal prior to transmission and no "cues" or "signalling events" (e.g., fades-to-black or scene changes) that occur in the broadcast need be used in the recognition process. The broadcast signal can be either a radio broadcast, for which audio information is obviously used for the recognition process, or a television broadcast, for which audio information, video information, or both, can be used, and can be an over-the-air signal, a cable television signal, or a videotape signal.
  • Whether audio or video information is used, the broadcast signal is parametized to yield a digital data stream composed, preferably, of one 16-bit digital word for every 1/30 of a second of signal. (In the case of audio information associated with video information, the audio data is synchronized with the video frame rate to form an "audio frame*.) The information is then processed in the same way whether it originated as audio or video.
  • A digital signature is constructed for each segment to be recognized. The construction of the signature is discussed in more detail below. However, it preferably comprises 128 bits representing eight 16-bit words corresponding to eight frames of signal information selected from among random frame locations throughout the segment in accordance with a set of predefined rules.
  • The incoming audio or video signal is digitized and parametized to yield, preferably, a 16-bit digital word for each frame of data. This also is discussed in more detail below. As the incoming signal is received, it is read into a buffer which holds, e.g., two minutes of signal data. Each word of this data is assumed to be the first word of an eight-word signature. Associated with each word of the signature is offset information indicating the spacing (i.e., the number of frames) between each such word and the first signature word. As each received word reaches a predetermined observation point in the buffer, the library of signatures of known segments to be recognized is searched for signatures beginning with that word. Using the offset information stored with the signatures, subsequent received words, already in the buffer, are compared to the remaining signature words to determine whether or not they match those remaining words of the signature.
  • In order for the method to operate in real time, all library comparisons must be made in the time that a received word remains at the observation point. Because a television frame lasts 1/30 second, all comparisons for a given received word must take place within 1/30 second. If every segment signature in the library must be compared to the incoming frame signature data every 1/30 second, current computer speeds would allow comparison to only a few thousand library signatures. This would place an upper limit on the number of segments whose signatures can be stored in the library and the number of broadcast segments (e.g., commercials) which could be monitored without using expensive parallel processors or very powerful computers.
  • In the United States, however, as many as 500 different commercials may be playing within a market region at any given time. Assuming a market having 6 stations to be monitored, in the aggregate there may be as many as 4,000 or more occurrences of these commercials each day. Moreover, as many as 40,000 different commercials may be airing nationwide at any given time, and as many as 90,000 or more new commercials may be introduced nationwide each year. Accordingly, it is desirable that the system of the invention be capable of comparing, in real time, incoming frame signature data to many tens of thousands of segment signatures representative of as many different commercials.
  • The number of signatures that can be stored and searched within the real-time limitation of 1/30 second and, hence, the number of broadcast segmemts which can be monitored can be increased to several hundred thousand using a designated frame keyword lookup data reduction method. Using such a method, when a signature is constructed for a known segment, one frame from the segment is chosen, using criteria to be discussed below, as the key frame, its digital perametized equivalent becoming the keyword. The signature is still, preferably, eight 16-bit words, but the stored offset information now represents spacing from the keyword rather than from the first signature word. The keyword can be one of the signature data words, in which case the offset for that word is zero, or it can be a ninth word. The keyword also need not temporally precede all of the other signature words and often will not. If 16-bit words are used, there can be 216, or 65,536, possible keywords. Signatures are thus stored in a lookup table with 65,536 keys. Each received word that reaches the observation point in the buffer is assumed to be a keyword. Using the lookup table, a small number of possible signatures associated with that keyword are identified. As discussed below, one of the selection criteria for keywords is that on average four signatures have the same keyword. Typically, then, four signature comparisons would be the maximum that would have to be made within the 1/30 second time limit, assuming no data errors in the received signal. Four signatures multiplied by 65,536 keys yields 262,144 possible signatures for the system, meaning that the system has the capability of identifying in real time any of that number of broadcast segments.
  • Whether or not the designated frame keyword lookup technique is used, the present invention need not rely during the recognition process on any cues, signalling events or pre-established codes in the broadcast signal. It simply monitors the incoming signal and performs continuous pattern recognition.
  • Video information is parametized and digitized as described below. Although, in the description which follows, parametization is based upon signal luminance, it is to be understood that other or additional attributes of a video signal could be used for this purpose.
  • A number of areas, preferably 16 (although more or fewer areas may be used), of the video field or frame are selected. The size of each area is preferably eight-by-two pixels, although areas of other sizes could be used. The luminance of each area is averaged to produce an absolute gray scale value from, e.g., 0-255. This value is normalized to a bit value of 0 or 1 by comparing the value to one of the following:
    • 1. The average luminance of the entire field or frame;
    • 2. The average luminance of some other area of the field or frame;
    • 3. The average luminance of the same area in some previous field or frame; or
    • 4. The average luminance of some other area of some previous field or frame.
  • The goal in selecting which comparison to make is to maximize entropy -- i.e., to minimize correlation between the areas. (Correlation refers to the degree to which the luminance value of one area is related to or follows that of another area.) For this reason, the fourth comparison, above, is preferred, with the previous frame being one to four frames behind the current frame. For the same reason, the distribution of the sixteen areas in the field or frame, as well as the aixteen areas in the previous field or frame, is preferably asymmetrical about the center of the field or frame, because it has been empirically determined that video frames are composed in such a way that there is too much correlation between symmetrically located areas.
  • A sample partial distribution of areas within a frame is shown in FIG. 1. Frame 10 is actually a video field of sampled pixels. (Hereinafter, "frame" will be used to mean either field or frame.) The luminance areas 2n (n = 1-16) (not all sixteen shown) are the areas used for determining the parametized digital word for the current frame. The luminance areas 2n' (n = 1-16) (not all sixteen shown) are areas whose values are held for use as the "previous frame" data for a later frame.
  • Whatever comparison is used, a bit value of 1 is returned if the luminance of the area in question exceeds the luminance of the comparison area. If the luminance of the area in question is less than or equal to the luminance of the comparison area, a bit value of 0 is returned. (It is to be understood that here, and in the discussion that follows, the assignments of ones and zeroes for data and mask values can be reversed.) By normalizing the data in this way, offset and gain differences between signals transmitted by different stations or at different times (caused, e.g., by different transmitter control settings), are minimized. The sixteen values thus derived create a parametized "frame signature".
  • A 16-bit mask word is created along with each 16-bit frame signature. The mask word represents the reliability of the frame signature. For each bit in the frame signature, if the absolute value of the luminance difference used to calculate that bit value is less than a threshold or "guard band" value, the luminance value is assumed to have been susceptible to error (because of noise in transmission), and so the mask bit for that bit is set to 0, indicating suspect data. If the absolute value of the luminance difference is greater than or equal to the guard band value, the luminance value is assumed to be much greater than the noise level and the corresponding mask bit is set to 1, indicating reliable data. As discussed below, the number of ones or zeroes in the mask word is used in generating segment signatures and setting comparison thresholds.
  • An audio '' 'frame' signature," if such a signature is used, can be constructed in the same foraat as a video frame signature so that it can be processed in the same way. Such an audio signature may be used to recognize broadcast radio segments, or may be used to confirm the identification of a video segment the data for which includes a high percentage of suspect data. However, the use of audio signatures is not necessary to the invention.
  • The parametized "frame signature" informa- tion is stored in a circular buffer large enough to hold, preferably, approximately twice as much signal information as the longest broadcast segment to be identified. When a segment signature is being compared to the frame signature data, for each frame that passes the observation point eight comparisons between the segment signature data and the frame signature data are made, one word at a time, using the offset data stored with the segment signature to choose the frame signatures for comparison. The frame signature and segment signature words are compared using a bit-by-bit exclusive-NOR operation, which returns a 1 when both bits are the same and a O when they are different. The number of ones resulting from the exculsive-NOR operation is accumulated over all eight word comparisons. It is not necessary actually to construct a ''parameter signature", by in fact concatenating the offset parametized frame signature words, in order to make the comparison. If the number of ones accumulated by the exclusive-NOR operation exceeds a predetermined default threshold, modified as discussed below, a match is considered to have occurred for the frame at the observation point.
  • Signatures are assigned to segments as follows:
    • A plurality, preferably eight, words are selected from the parametized segment meeting the following criteria: stable data, noise-free data, Hamming distance, and entropy.
  • Stable data means the word selected must have some minimum duration in the broadcast segment -- i.e., it is derived from a portion of the segment for which there are at least a minimum number of (e.g., 20 or more) frames of the same or similar data).
  • Noise-free data are data having an associated mask word with a maximum number of unmasked bits. (Maximization of duration or stability, and minimization of masked bits or noise, can be two competing criteria.)
  • Hamming distance refers to the dissimilarity of the digital data. It is desirable for more positive and reliable identification of broadcast segments that a signature for one broadcast segment differ from that for another broadcast segment by at least a minimum number of bits, known as the Hamming distance. In generating the second or any subsequent signature in the database, Hamming distance from existing signatures must be considered.
  • Kntropy refers to the desirability, discussed above, of having the minimum possible correlation between different portions of the data. for this reason, given the preferred signature data length (8 words, 16 bits per word), preferably no two signature words should be taken from points closer together in the segment than one second. This sets a lower limit on the length of broadcast segments which can be be reliably recognized. If, e.g., eight words make up a signature, and they must be at least one second apart, the shortest segment that can be reliably recognized is a segment of approximately ten seconds in length.
  • Using these criteria, eight frame signatures are selected from the parametized segment and an eight-word segment signature made up of those eight frame signatures is generated and stored. The duration criterion and mask words are also stored with the segment signature for use in the recognition process. The duration parameter signifies that, because the frame data are stable for some time period, a certain number of successive matches on that data should be obtained during the recognition process. If significantly more or fewer matches are obtained, the matches are discarded as statistical anomalies. The mask data define a threshold parameter which is used during the recognition process to adjust the default number of matching bits required before a signature is considered to have matched the broadcast data. For example, a default threshold could be set for the system which, during an attempt to match a particular segment signature, is lowered by one-half the number of masked bits associated with that signature.
  • If the designated frame keyword lookup technique is to be used, a keyword is chosen from within the segment. Having a buffer at least twice as long as the longest segment to be identified assures that sufficient broadcast signal history to make a recognition remains in the buffer at the time the keyword reaches the observation point. The criteria used for choosing the keyword are similar to those for choosing the signature words ― it should be of stable duration and relatively noise free, augmented by the need for a "level list" -- i.e., there should be no more than about four signatures having the same keyword so that the necessary computations can be made within the the 1/30 second real-time limit.
  • Although using the keyword technique requires that in general only four comparisons need be made (because there are up to four signatures assigned to each keyword), additional comparisons are made to allow for the possibility of error in the parametization of the broadcast signal (occurring, e.g., because of noise in the transmission of the signal). Such additional comparisons lessen the probability of inaccurately recognizing a broadcast segment. If an error rate of one bit per frame signature is assumed, then in addition to the nominal keyword, sixteen additional keywords (obtained by successively complementing each different bit of the nominal keyword) are also checked. If each of the seventeen keywords checked has four signatures associated with it, then sixty-eight comparisons must be made within each 1/30 second interval. If an error rate of two bits per frame signature is assumed, then the number of keywords increases 2 16 to Σ ( ) = 137, requiring 548 comparisons. Given the i=o i current state of computer technology, this is still possible within the 1/30 second interval.
  • Before a signature can be constructed for a segment for addition to the segment signature data base, it must be determined that a broadcast segment it being received. In some cases, new segments may be played into the system manually -- e.g., where an advertiser or advertising agency supplies a video tape of a new commercial or commercials. In such a case, the operator and the system know that this is a new segment, the signature for which is not yet stored in the segment signature library. Bowever, it can happen that a new commercial is broadcast by a local broadcast station for which no videotape was earlier supplied and which, therefore, is not yet known to the system. Therefore, the present invention also can detect the presence in the incoming signal of potential segments to be recognized that are new and presently unknown. For this purpose only (i.e., to detect but not to recognize), the present invention relies on the presence in the broadcast signal of signal artifacts characteristic of such potential unknown segments. These artifacts can include fades-to-black, audio power changes including silence ("audio fade-to-black"), and the presence (but not the content) of pre-encoded identification data appearing, e.g., in the vertical intervals of video signals. These artifacts are not assumed to indicate the presence of a new, unknown segment to be recognized per se. Rather, they are used as part of a decision-making process. For example, if two artifacts occur 30, 60 or 120 seconds apart near the hour or the half-hour, and no known segment was identified during the time between their occurrence, there is a high probability that a new and unknown segment of interest was present. On the other hand, if the interval between signal artifacts is accounted for by identified segments, the artifacts are not used or otherwise relied upon by the system and the fact that the artifacts occurred is deleted from memory. Other possible indications of the presence of new and unknown segments of interest are the occurrence or two known segments separated by 30, 60 or 120 seconds, or some other interval during which no known segments were identified, or the occurrence of one signal artifact separated in time from a known segment by such an interval. Once it is determined that a new and unknown segment of interest may be present, the parametized information derived from the unknown segment is saved along with audio and video information corresponding to the unknown segment. The signal artifacts that marked the unknown segment are not retained, nor is any record kept of what they were.
  • The saved audio and video information is ultimately presented, in compressed form (as discussed below), to an operator for use in identifying the new and unknown segment and recording the identification in the segment signature library. The operator also records any special requirements needed to prepare a signature for the segment. For instance, some national commercials include two portions: a portion which is always the same irrespective of in which part of the country the commercial is to be broadcast (the "constant" portion), and a portion which differs depending on where the commercial is to be broadcast (the "variable" or "tag" portion). It is important to accurately identify different versions of such national commercials. If a comer- cial for a national product has a tag that is specific to one region, the commercial is considered different from the same commercial tagged for a different region. Therefore, the operator would note that the signature must include data from the tag portion of the segment, and that additional data must be taken from the tag. A signature is then generated automatically as described above.
  • The ability to differentiate between otherwise identical commercials having differing tags is one important feature of this invention. Two different approaches are used, depending on the type of tag associated with the commercial. One type of tag is known as a "live tag", which is a live-action audio/video portion of at least five seconds duration. Another type of tag is known as a "still tag" which is a still picture -- e.g., of text -- which has insufficient video content for generating a unique signature. Either type of tag can occur anywhere in the commercial.
  • When a live tag is involved, a separate signature is generated for the tag. The system logs both the commercial occurrences and the tag occurrences, and then merges that data with the help of pointers in the signature database. For a still tag, a flag or pointer associated with the commercial signature triggers a brute force video comparison of a frame of the tag with a frame of the reference tag or tags. This comparison is not necessarily done in real time.
  • A system constructed in accordance with the present invention is preferably composed of one or more local sites and one central site. Utilizing the recognition methods described above, a local site scans one or more broadcast video and audio television signals looking for known broadcast segments. If a known segment is detected, the local site records time and date information, the channel being monitored, the identification of the segment, and other information in its database. Relying on signal artifacts, the local site also notes and records signals that it senses are likely to be new segments of interest which are not yet known to the system.
  • On a periodic basis, the central site communicates, e.g., via telephone lines, with the local sites to determine what known broadcast segments have been detected and what potential but unknown segments have been seen and saved, and to disseminate to appropriate local sites segment signature and detection information corresponding to new broadcast segments not yet known to those local sites. It is anticipated that the ultimate identification of a new and unknown segment will require visual or aural interpretation by a human operator at the central site.
  • FIG. 2 illustrates a block diagram of the system including a central site 22 and a plurality of linked local sites 21. Each local site 21 monitors broadcasting in its geographic region. Preferably, the local sites 21 are located at cable television head end stations to assure a clear input signal. The local site 21 is capable of recognizing and identifying known broadcast segments and logging occurrences of such segments by date, time, duration, channel, identification, and other desirable information. The local site is also capable of recognizing the occurrence of potentially and new unknown segments, and of generating temporary key signatures for such unknown segments so that it can maintain a log of all occurrences of each such segment pending the identification of the segment by the central site 22. Local site 21 sends to central site 22 via communications channels 23a, b all log information for recognized known segments, plus information relating to all potential new and unknown segments, and receives in return software updates, signature library updates, and requests for additional information. If a new signature transmitted to and received by one local site 21 originated as an unknown segment originally transmitted to the central site by that local site 21, the local site 21 merges the temporary log into other data awaiting transmission to central site 22, and then purges the temporary signature from its database.
  • One local site 21a ia located at or near the central site 22 and is connected to the remainder of central site 22 by a high-speed direct data line 24. This ''central-local" site is identical to the other local sites 21 and serves the same function as the other local sites 21 for the broadcast market in which it and central site 22 are located. However, because central-local site 21a is connected to central site 22 by direct high-speed data link 24, new segments monitored by central-local site 21a are quickly available to central site 22 for identification. The signatures for those new segments that are of national scope can then be quickly disseminated to the remote local sites 21 to minimize the number of times a local site 21 will classify a received segment as an unknown, and thereby to prevent communications channels 23a, b from being burdened unnecessarily with the transmission of signature and other data (compressed audio and video) corresponding to locally unknown national segments.
  • Because the audio and video information corresponding to new and unknown segments must be transmitted to the central site 22 via communications channels 23a, b to be reviewed by an operator during the identification process, the data is gathered by local site 21 in a compressed format to reduce communications overhead and expense.
  • Compression of the video data preferably is accomplished as follows. First, not every frame is captured. Preferably, only one frame every four seconds is captured to create a "slide show" effect, with an option at the request of an operator at central site 22 to capture frames more frequently. Second, as is well known, a television video frame consists of two interlaced fields occurring 1/60 second apart. In the "slide show", small motion; between the fields causes a noticeable flicker. Therefore, only one field is captured, which still provides a recognizable image. Third, not all pixels are necessary for a sufficiently recognizable image. It has been found that 160 x 120 pixels is sufficient, with an option at the request of an operator at central site 22 to capture 320 x 240 pixels per field. fourth, it is not necessary to capture color information.
  • Audio compression is more difficult to accomplish. Considerable information can be removed from video data while still maintaining a recognizable image. However, only a smaller amount of information can be removed from audio data without the remaining audio becoming difficult or impossible to understand, or unacceptably fatiguing for human operators. In view of this, the preferred method of audio compression is Adaptive Differential Pulse Code Modulation (ADPCM), which is used by the telephone industry and thus produces "telephone quality" audio. ADPCK techniques and circuitry are well known.
  • When local site 21 detects a potentially new and unknown broadcast segment, the frame signature data and the temporary segment or key signature generated for that unknown segment, and the compressed audio and video information for that segment, are stored. The local site 21 is polled periodically by central site 22 and at those times the stored frame signature data and the temporary signatures are transmitted to central site 22 for identification via communications channels 23a, b. As discussed below, the audio and video information are transmitted optionally, but these data are always stored by local site 21 until the identification and signature of the segment are returned by the central site 22.
  • When central site 22 receives the frame signature data and temporary key signature correSponding to an unknown segment from the local site 21, signature compressor 25 associated with central site 22 first checks the frame signature data against the global signature database, which contains all signatures from all local databases for all broadcast segments known to the system, to determine whether or not the "unknown" segment in fact previously had been identified and is already known to the system (perhaps because a different local site saw the broadcast segment before), but the signature for which had not yet been sent to all locai sites 21 or had been identified as being of limited geographic scope and so sent to only some of local sites 21. If the unknown frame signature data match a signature in the global database, the global signature for that segment (which may differ somewhat from the temporary signature) is transmitted back to the originating local site, and the originating local site 21 is instructed to replace the temporary key signature generated locally with the global key signature. If the frame signature data are not matched to a signature in the global database, the corresponding temporary key signature is added to a separate portion of the global database used to store temporary signatures. This "temporary global database" allows coprocessor 25 to carry out the grouping of like unknowns, previously discussed, because if the same unknown comes in from another local site 21 it should be matched by the temporary signature stored in the global database, thereby indicating to coprocessor 25 that it is probably the same segment which has already been sent by another local site 21.
  • At the same time that the temporary signature for a new segment is stored by coprocessor 25 in the global database, coprocessor 25 causes host computer 27 to request the compressed audio and/or video data from local site 21 if those data have not already been transmitted. For economy in comuni- cations, audio and video data preferably are not initially transmitted from local sites 21 on the theory that the frame signature data may be identified as a known segment upon comparison to the global database. However, for some "hot" markets where new segments frequently originate (e.g., Chicago, Los Angeles and New York), the audio and/or video data may also have already been sent for another segment in the group. Further, audio and video need not both necessarily be transmitted. For some new and unknown segments, perhaps only the audio, or only the video, can enable the identification, while for other new and unknown segments both will be necessary. If no data for the audio or video had been sent, the operator will request one set of data. In this case, unknown segment data are stored until the missing audio or video data arrive, and then queued to an operator workstation 26. If the operator determines that the audio (if only video was sent) or video (if only audio was sent) data are also•needed, the unknown data are again stored until the missing information arrives, when the data are requeued. Similarly, the operator may determine that higher resolution video (320 x 240 pixels or more frames per second) is needed and the unknown data again are stored. In a case where high resolution video is requested, if local site 21 always captures the high resolution video and simply does not transmit it for purposes of economy, it can be transmitted quickly on request. However, the system may be implemented in such a way that local site 21 does not routinely capture the high resolution video, in which case it is necessary to wait until the segment is broadcast again in that locality.
  • Once the operator has all of the necessary information, he or she then plays back the audio and/or video information to identify the unknown segment, specifying any special requirements for signature generation as discussed above. The operator may also determine that the information captured as a result of the signal artifacts is actually two segments (e.g., in a 30-second interval, two 15-second commercials occurred), or that two consecutive intervals were each half of a single segment (e.g., two 30-second segments represent one 60-second commercial). In such a case, the operator instructs the system to break up or concatenate the segments, recreate the frame signature and segment signature data, and restart the identification process for the resulting segment or segments.
  • After an operator has identified the segment, the frame signature data for each segment in the group must be aligned with the frame signature data for each other segment in the group before a global key signature can be constructed. Alignment is necessary because different segments in the group may have been captured by local sites 21 by the detection of different artifacts. Thus, the segments may not all have been captured identically -- i.e., between the same points. For example, a set of segment data in a group for a broadcast segment nominally 60 seconds in length may in fact, as captured, be only 55 seconds in length because the segment was broadcast incompletely. Or, a member segment of the group may be too long or too short because it was captured as a consequence of the detection of a fade-to-black artifact or of an audio power change artifact.
  • Alignment is carried out by coprocessor 25. First, the frame signature data for the first segment in the group are placed in a buffer. Next, data for a second segment are clocked word-by-word into another buffer and an exclusive-NOR between all bits of the two segments is continually performed as the second segment is clocked in. When the aggregate number of ones returned by the exclusive-NOR is at a maximum (meaning that the compared bits are the same -- either zeroes or ones), alignment has been achieved. The aligned data then are used as a baseline to align the remaining segments in the group. The alignment process is time-consuming. Bowever, it is not necessary that alignment be done on a real-time basis. Preferably, alignment is performed at night, or at some other time when system activity is at a low point.
  • Once the parametized data for all segments within a group have been aligned, a best fit of both the frame signature data and the mask data is calculated by assigning to each bit position the value of that bit position in the majority of segments. The signature coprocessor 25 then generates a new global signature for the segment using the best fit parametized data.
  • After the new global signature has been generated, it is compared to the frame signature data for all of the unknown segments in the group to which it applies to make certain that the data for each segment matches the signature. If the new global signature does not match each set of frame signature data, this signifies either that an error was made in selecting the keyword or another of the data words, or that one or more sets of data in the group are really not representative of the same segment. In such a case, an operator may have to view additional segments in the group.
  • If the new global signature matches each grouped segment, the signature is transmitted back to each local site 21 or to an appropriate subset of local sites if the newly identified segment is not of national scope. The respective local sites 21 then merge the data they had been keeping based on the temporary signatures and send it to central site 22, replace the temporary signatures they had been retaining with the new global signature in their local databases, and purge the audio, video, and frame signature data for that segment.
  • II. Preferred Embodiments
  • A first preferred embodiment of a local site 30 is shown diagrammatically in FIG. 3, and includes an IBM PC personal computer 31 and two Intel 310 computers 32, 33, interconnected by conventional RS-232C serial links 34, 35. Personal computer 31 uses a circuit card 36 and a software program to extract video parameter data from inconing video signals. Computer 32 creates signatures for new and unknown segments and matches existing signatures maintained in a signature library against incoming frame signature data. Computer 33 logs the Whits" or matches made by personal computer 32.
  • A frame grabber card 36, such as the PC Vision Frame Grabber by Imaging Technologies, in personal computer 31 generates 512 x 256 pixels for each frame of incoming video information. However, frame grabber 36 is utilized so that only one field per frame is sampled. Frame grabber 36 also provides a video field clock that is used by computer 31. Computer 31 processes the frame grabber output to produce a four-bit word representing each frame. A Microsoft MACRO Assembler listing of the program used in personal computer 31 is attached hereto as Appendix A and a flowchart, the blocks thereof keyed to the lines of the program listing, is shown in FIG. 4. The flowchart and program listing will be readily understood by those of ordinary skill in the art.
  • The parametized data from personal computer 31 are transmitted over serial link 34 to computer 32 where they are clocked into a section of RAM partitioned, using pointers, as a modulo-2048 circular buffer. The buffer holds 34 seconds of data. frame grabber 36 and personal computer 31 are too slow to grab all of the frame data in real time (although in the second preferred embodiment, described below, this function is performed by hardware which does operate in real time). Resultantly, some data are lost. However, the data that are provided over serial link 34 are inserted into the buffer in their current real-time positions. Computer 32 "backfills" the buffer by filling in the empty positions with the next succeeding real time data. Computer 32 creates signatures and matches incoming frame signature data to a signature database as described above, without using the designated frame keyword lookup technique. A PL/M listing of the signature generation program is attached hereto as Appendix B and a flowchart, the blocks of which are keyed to the lines of the program listing, is shown in FIG. 5. A PL/M listing of the signature detection program is attached hereto as Appendix C and a flowchart, the blocks of which are keyed to the lines of the program listing, is shown in FIG. 6. The flowcharts and program listings will be readily understood by those of ordinary skill in the art.
  • For the purposes of creating signatures in this embodiment, each segment is divided into nine sections -- a half-section at the beginning, followed by eight full sections, and a half-section at the end. The two half-sections are discarded to account for possible truncation of the beginning or end of the segment when it is broadcast. A word is then selected, using the previously described criteria of stable data, noise-free data, Hamming distance, and entropy, from each of the eight sections. The signatures created are stored in the memory of computer 32 while the match data are transmitted over serial link 35 to computer 33 which keeps track of the matches. A listing of a PL/M program used in computer 33 is attached hereto as Appendix D and a flowchart, the blocks of which are keyed to the lines of the program listing, is shown in FIG. 7. The flowchart and program listing will be readily understood by those of ordinary skill in the art.
  • Signatures are generated in the system of FIG. 3 by the computer 32. However, the generation of signatures is not initiated as earlier described and as implemented in the second preferred embodiment (described below). Rather, in the system of FIG. 3, an operator must "prime" the system by specifying the segment length, playing a tape into the system and manually starting the buffer filling process. Computer 32 then builds a signature automatically. However, there is no threshold or guard-band computed here as was earlier described, and as implemented in the second preferred embodiment (described below). In the second preferred embodiment, a threshold associated with the signature is modified by subtracting from the default threshold one-half the number of masked bits in the signature, while in the system of FIG. 3 the default threshold is augmented at the time of comparison by one-half the number of masked bits in the data being compared.
  • A second preferred embodiment of the system of the invention is shown in FIGS. 8-12.
  • FIGS. 8-11B show the details of local sites 21. FIG. 8 is a block diagram of a local site 21. The local site 21 is comprised of two major subsystems: the signal processing subsystem 80 and the control computer 81.
  • The signal processing subsystem 80, shown in more detail in FIG. 9, receives incoming RF broadcast signals and performs three distinct tasks:
    • 1. It recognizes "known" broadcast segments by comparing received frame signature data to a local library of segment signatures;
    • 2. It detects artifacts in the received broadcast signal for the purpose of delineating and capturing potential "unknown" broadcast segments whose frame signature data do not match any locally stored segment signature; and
    • 3. It collects data (e.g., compressed video and audio, time of day, and so forth), to allow subsequent identification of "unknown" segments by an operator at the central site. Hardware performs much of these tasks to provide maximum speed of operation. In addition, software-driven microprocessors cooperate with the hardware to assist with the lower speed portions of these tasks and to allow progran- mability and flexibility.
  • The hardware of signal processing subsystem 80 includes matching matching module 82, compression module 83, and one or more tuners 84 (there is one tuner for each broadcast station to be monitored). Tuner 84 may be any conventional RF tuner; and in the preferred embodiment is Zenith model ST-3100. Matching module 82 and compression module 83 are built around the well-known Intel Corporation Multibuse II Bus Structure. Multibus® II is described in the Multibus® II Bus Architecture Databook (Intel Order No. 230893) and the Multibus® II Bus Architecture Specification Handbook (Intel Order No. 146077C), both of which are incorporated herein by reference. The first two tasks discussed above are performed in matching module 82. The third task is performed in compression module 83.
  • Each of the two modules 82, 83 includes a Central Services Module (CSM) 90 which is a standard off-the-shelf item (such as Intel Order No. SBC-CSM-001) required in all Hultibus® II systems. Each module also has an executive microcomputer board 91a, 91b which controls communications between the respective module and control computer 81. All components on each module are interconnected on public bus 92, while those components which require large amounts of high-speed data transfer between them are additionally interconnected by private bus 93.
  • Matching module 82 further includes one channel card 94 for each channel to be monitored -- e.g., one for each commercial station in the local market. Channel cards 94 generate the 16 bits per frame of parametized signal data and the corresponding 16-bit mask for both audio and video in accordance with the methods earlier described. Channel cards 94 also signal the occurrence of signal artifacts which indicate, and are used to delineate and capture, potential unknown segments. Also contained within matching module 82 are two circular buffer memories 95. One buffer 95 is for audio and the other is for video. These buffers store on a temporary basis the incoming parametized frame signature data, as earlier described. In this preferred embodiment, the maximum length of broadcast segments to be recognized is assumed to be one minute. For longer segments, only a one-minute portion is used for recognition purposes. Accordingly, each buffer can hold 4,096 frames, which is 136.5 seconds, of video at a frame rate of thirty frames per second, or just over two minutes. 4,096 is 212, so the offset data associated with each signature (as earlier described) is 12 bits long. Parametized signal information is moved from channel cards 94 to the circular buffers 95 when requested by executive microcomputer 91a.
  • Matching module 82 also includes correlation card 96, shown in more detail in FIG. 10. Correlation card 96 performs the task of recognizing incoming broadcast segments . Correlation card 96 accomplishes this by comparing incoming video and audio frame signature data with the locally stored database of key signatures to find matches. The local signature database is stored in memory 97 (up to 13 megabytes of conventional random access memory). Since correlation card 96 in the preferred embodiment may operate on both audio and video data (although, e.g., only video can be used), correlation card 96 must have sufficient capacity to process an amount of data equivalent to twice the number of channels to be monitored.
  • Correlation card 96 performs all functions required to generate the raw data for the final correlation, or determination of a segment match. Executive microcomputer 91a accumulates the matches resulting from key signature comparisons done by correlation card 96, and then transmits the accumulated matches to control computer 81.
  • As shown in FIG. 10, correlation card 96 contains signature comparison processor (SCP) 101 and two independent interfaces 102, 103 to the Multibus® II public and private buses. SCP 101 is a programmable element which operates under command of executive microcomputer 91a. SCP 101 is responsible for the following primary functions:
    • 1. Generation of all addresses to database memory 97 for the purpose of accessing key signatures, current circular buffer data, and segment signatures (the latter when this card is used in the coprocessor as described below);
    • 2. Performing the actual bit-by-bit comparison of frame signature data and stored segment signatures;
    • 3. Execution of self-test diagnostic functions as requested by executive microcomputer 91a; and
    • 4. Relaying results of each key signature comparison to the executive microcomputer 91a for final segment correlation.
  • Control unit 104 of SCP 101 directs the operation of SCP 101. Control unit 104 includes memory which contains all microprogram instructions defining SCP operation. It also contains sufficient functionality to allow for the efficient sequencing of the required microinstructions. Control unit operation is directed, at an upper level, by instructions generated by executive microcomputer 91a.
  • Logic unit 105 performs all address and data manipulations required to load both incoming and previously defined reference signatures into onboard buffers for comparison. Signature data is resident in external, offboard memory accessible by the private bus; logic unit 105 and control unit 104 together execute all private bus interface functions.
  • Logic unit 105 also generates messages to and interprets messages from executive microcomputer 91a. An example of a message interpreted by logic unit 105 is a request to compare selected key signatures in the key signature database to the current, incoming segment signature. An example of a message generated by logic unit 105 is that which is generated at the end of a comparison which defines how well the incoming signature matches the reference (how many total correct or incorrect bits after comparison).
  • The logic unit peripheral hardware nodule 106 is responsible for assisting logic unit 105 in performing signature comparisons. Specifically, the module contains logic which is intended to increase the processing capability of SCP 101. The features of module 106 are:
    • 1. Programmable memories which contain constant data;
    • 2. Word swap hardware which allows information in internal logic unit registers to be positionally exchanged at high speed; and
    • 3. Hardware which counts the number of active bits in a preliminary signature comparison result, in preparation for testing against a predetermined threshold.
  • Executive microcomputer 91a is a standard commercial microcomputer card (e.g., Intel Order No. SBC-286-100) based on an 80286 microprocessor. The function of this card is to:
    • 1. Maintain the signature data base;
    • 2. Transfer data from the channel cards to the circular buffers;
    • 3. Maintain the keyword pointers;
    • 4. Accumulate the correlation results (for use in applying the duration criterion);
    • 5. Capture data for segment identification; and
    • 6. Provide an interface path to the control computer 81. (All data to be transferred to central site 22 is requested by control computer 81. The key signature database is downloaded from control computer 81.)
  • Compression module 83 includes (in addition to central services module 90 and executive microcomputer 91b) audio capture card 98a, video capture card 98b, and associated circular buffer memories 99a, 99b. The audio and video capture cards are shown in more detail in FIGS. 11A and 11B, respectively.
  • Audio and video capture cards 98a, 98b each can monitor up to eight broadcast channels (monitoring more channels requires multiple cards). Video card 98b captures incoming video frames at a slide-show rate of one frame per second and digitizes and compresses the video data, while audio card 98a digitizes and captures audio continually, for each of the eight.channels.
  • The audio and video from up to eight channels are brought to. these cards (as vell as to the channel cards) from channel tuners 84 by coaxial cables. On video capture card 98b, a conventional 1-of-8 multiplexer 110 (implemented in this embodiment as a T-switch circuit design using CMOS 4066 integrated circuits), selects one of the eight channels for capture.
  • As shown in FIG. 11A, on audio card 98a, the audio from each channel is fed to one of up to eight combination filter/coder/decoder circuits 111, such as a National Semiconductor 3054 integrated circuit. In combination circuit 111, the audio signal is passed through a low-pass filter and then through a coder/decoder which performs a logarithmic analog-to-digital conversion resulting in a digital signal with a compressed amplitude (the audio signal is expanded again prior to being audited by an operator at central site 22). The compressed digital signal is then passed through an adaptive differential pulse code modulator (ADPCM) 112 similar to that used by the telephone industry -- e.g., a NEC 7730 integrated circuit -- for further compression. An Intel .80188 microprocessor 113 controls the movement of the compressed audio data from ADPCM 112 through bus interface 114 to private bus 93 of compression module 83, and thence to circular buffer memory 99a. A JEDEC-standard RAM/EPROM 113a contains programs and memory workspace used by microprocessor 113.
  • As shown in FIG. 11B, on video card 98b, common video circuit 115 uses the sync information contained in the received analog video signal to generate clock pulses and addresses for analog-to-digital conversion of the video signal. Circuit 115 outputs both address signals and digitized data signals representing the video at the rate of one field per second at 116 and 117, respectively. The data pass to arithmetic logic unit (ALU) 118 which further compresses the video data by reducing each video field or frame to 160 (horizontal) by 120 (vertical) pixels, each pixel averaging four-by-two pixel areas in size, using gray scale pixel averaging. The address data pass from common video circuit 115 to dither prom 119 which contains a table of pseudorandom numbers -- one for each video address output by circuit 115. When an address is received by dither prom 119, the pseudorandom number associated with that address is passed to ALU 118 to be added to the compressed video data. This dithering technique, by which a low-information-content video signal can be visually improved, allows the video frame to be compressed to as few as 9600 bytes. The dithered compressed video data are then passed to one of two line buffers 1101a, b (one buffer is filled while the other is being read and emptied), from which they are passed under the control of direct memory access controller 1102 to private bus 93 of compression module 83, and thence to circular buffer memory 99b.
  • The audio and video data are placed in circular buffers 99a and 99b holding the most recent two minutes of data for that channel under the direction of control computer 81 and executive microcomputer 91b. Executive microcomputer 91b preferably is a standard commercial microcomputer card (e.g., Intel Order No. SBC-286-100) based on an 80286 microprocessor. This card provides an interface path to the control computer 81. All data to be transferred to the central site is requested by control computer 81.
  • The signal processing subsystem 80 can be referred to as the "front end" of local site 21. Control computer 81 can be referred to as the "back end".
  • Control computer 81 (FIG. 8) is preferably a commercially available MicroVAX 11 minicomputer manufactured by Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC), running the DEC VMS virtual memory operating system. Between one and nine megabytes of RAM memory are provided along with one DEC RA81 Winchester disk drive (with controller) having a capacity of 456 megabytes. A DPV11 synchronous interface connects the control computer 81 to communications channels 23a, b via a modem. A DRV11 direct memory access controller connects control computer 81 to signal processing subsystem 80.
  • A function of control computer 81 is to determine, using detected signal artifacts, when new and as yet unknown broadcast segments may have been received. Control computer 81 also keeps track of the temporary log for such segments until the segments have been identified by central site 22. Another function of control computer 81 is to determine, based on duration and other criteria, such as time of day, whether or not matches accumulated by executive microcomputer 91a actually indicate that a segment has been recognized. (For example, during "prime time" no commercials are normally broadcast at, e.g., 7 minutes after the hour.) In performing these functions, control computer 81 exercises its ability to control all segment processing subsystem 80 functions via executive microcomputers 91a, 91b.
  • Control computer 81 can instruct modules 82 and 83 to tune to a particular channel to capture audio/video data, to compare a pair of frame and key signatures, or to generate a local signature. These instructions can originate in control computer 81 itself or ultimately at central site 22. For example, in identifying a new segment, an operator may Deed higher resolution video information. In such a case, control computer 81 would act on instructions from central site 22 by requesting module 83 to capture the required data when the desired segment is next received. Control computer 81 also stores on disk a backup copy of the signature database stored in RAM memory 97.
  • Referring again to FIG. 2, central system 22 includes central-local site 21a, coprocessor 25, mainframe "host" computer and memory 27 with associated mass storage device 28, communications processor 29 and workstations 26.
  • Coprocessor 25 is used to assist with certain computationally intensive functions related to the signature processing requirements of the central site 22. The "front end* of coprocessor 25 is identical to matching module 82 of local site 21, earlier described, except for the omission from coprocessor 25 of channel cards 94. It is preferred, however, that the memory for the signature database within coprocessor 25 be expanded over that of the local site to ensure that all key signatures used at all local sites can be resident in coprocessor 25.
  • The "back end" of coprocessor 25 preferably uses the same MicroVAX computer used by local sites 21 (FIG. 8), although a different type of computer could be used. Another alternative is that the coprocessor front end may be attached to communications processor 29 at the central site. It is also preferred that the coprocessor hardware be duplicated at central site 22 so that a backup system is available in case of a failure of the primary coprocessor. The coprocessor's signature generating and comparing functions are performed in the front end, while its checking and grouping functions are controlled by its back and utilizing the comparison capabilites of the front end as described above.
  • Workstation 26 is the vehicle by which new and unknown segments are presented to, and classified by, human operators. A secondary function of workstation 26 is to act as a terminal in the maintenance of host resident databases. Workstation 26 is made up of the following:
    • 1. A standard IBM 3270 AT computer capable of local processing and communicating with host computer 27;
    • 2. A 30 MB hard disk drive, 1.2 MB floppy drive, color console monitor and keyboard all attached to the 3270 AT;
    • 3. Two video monitors for viewing two segments simultaneously;
    • 4. One audio output device (e.g., headphones) for listening to the audio portion of a segment;
    • 5. A video card installed in the 3270 AT for controlling the video portions of segments; and
    • 6. An audio card installed in the 3270 AT for controlling the audio portion of segments.
  • The heart of workstation 26 is the IBM 3270 AT computer. The 3270 AT is a blend of an IBM 3270 terminal and an IBM AT personal computer. By combining the power of these components, a very effective mainframe workstation is created. Workstation 26 allows easy communication with host 27 and has its own processing capability. Up to four sessions with host 27 can be started as well as a local process all viewed in separate windows on the console screen. A combination of host and local processes are used by the operator.
  • The video card contained in the 3270 AT can display two different segments. Each video card consists of a pair of "ping-pong" (A/B RAM) memories for holding compressed gray scale video data. The ping-pong memories can be used in one of two ways. First a segment can be pre-loaded into RAM A while RAM B is being displayed. Second, the ping-pong memories can be used to load the next frame of a segment while the other is being displayed. Gray scale data is returned to video format and smoothed before being passed through the video digital-to- analog converter.
  • An audio control card is also provided in the 3270 AT. ADPCM circuits (e.g., NEC 7730) on the audio control card expand the data and output a serial bit stream for conversion to analog information to be played on the opetator's headphones.
  • Workstation 26 supports the identification process of new commercial segments and contains self-test routines to check the status of the machine and components. It is possible for workstation 26 to operate in a somewhat stand-alone mode requesting needed information from host 27 and passing results back. Alternatively, host 27 could control the application and send audio/video requests to workstation 26. The operator at workstation 26 controls the audio and video cards to cause the audio and/or video portions of selected segments to be displayed or output.
  • Host computer 27 is preferably an IBM mainframe of the 308X series, such as an IBM 3083. Host computer 27 maintains a copy of the global signature database and an archive of all parametized and compressed audio/video data from which the signature database was generated. The archive allows recreation of the signature database in the event, e.g., of an accidental catastrophic loss of data.
  • Host computer 27 uses the following commercially available software packages:
    • 1. Operating system -- IBM MVS/XA;
    • 2. Communications software -- IBM ACF/VTAM, MCP, MPAA;
    • 3. Telecommunications monitor -- IBM CICS; and
    • 4. Database management system -- Cullinet IDMS.
  • Host 27 also commands the workstation 26, coprocessor 25 and, ultimately, local site 21. For example, it may be determined that additional information is needed from a particular local site 21. Host 27 acts on that determination by instructing the appropriate local site control computer 81 to request that its signal processing subsystem 80 capture additional data, or upload some data previously captured, for example.
  • Host 27 also uses information transmitted by the various local sites 21 as to the occurrences of segments to compile a log of occurrences and one or more reports requested by the system users.
  • Communications channels 23a, b and communications processor 29 are shown diagrammatically in more detail in FIG. 12. In the embodiment shown, coprocessor 25 has a separate control computer 121, although, as stated above, the functions of that computer could be handled by communications processor 29.
  • All communications within central site 22 and local sites 21 are coordinated by Digital Equipment Corporation (DEC) equipment. Therefore, communications throughout the system are based on DEC's DECNet protocol. Within central site 22, the DECNet protocol is run on a local area network 120. An SNA gateway 122 manufactured by DEC is connected to local area network 120 to translate between DECNet and IBM's Systems Network Architecture to allow communications between host 27 and the rest of the system. An IBM 3725 communications control device 123 interfaces between SNA gateway 122 and host 27. An I BM 3724 cluster controller 124 interfaces between device 123 and workstations 26, allowing workstations 26 to communicate with host 27. Central-local site 21a is connected to local area network 120 by high-speed link 24 as earlier discussed.
  • Communications control computer 29 is preferably a Digital Equipment Corporation VAX 8200. Coprocessor control computer 121 is the identical computer and in fact, as discussed above, its function can be performed by communications control computer 29 if desired.
  • Communications control computer 29 interfaces between local area network 120 and local sites 21. For local sites 21 with which high-speed or high-volume communications is necessary or desired -- e.g., major "hot" markets such as New York, Chicago or Los Angeles -- communication can be by high-speed leased line 23b. However, for most local mites 21, a lower speed packet switching data network 23a running the well-known X.25 protocol is used. The X.25 protocol is transparent to DECNet and is available on such commercial data communications networks as Telenet or Tymnet. Communications lines 125 between individual local sites 21 and network 23a can be provided either by leased line or over the telephone dial-up network.
  • Thus it is seen that a method, apparatus and system has been provided for accurately (with a less than 1% error rate), rapidly and reliably logging the occurrences of large numbers of broadcast segments without relying on cues or codes in the signal, and for identifying new segments with a minimum of human involvement.
  • Persons skilled in the art will appreciate that the present invention can be practiced by other than the embodiments described herein, which are presented for the purpose of illustration and not of limitation, and the present invention is limited only by the claims that follow.
    Figure imgb0001
    Figure imgb0002
    Figure imgb0003
    Figure imgb0004
    Figure imgb0005
    Figure imgb0006
    Figure imgb0007
    Figure imgb0008
    Figure imgb0009
    Figure imgb0010
    Figure imgb0011
    Figure imgb0012
    Figure imgb0013
    Figure imgb0014
    Figure imgb0015
    Figure imgb0016
    Figure imgb0017
    Figure imgb0018
    Figure imgb0019
    Figure imgb0020
    Figure imgb0021
    Figure imgb0023
    Figure imgb0024
    Figure imgb0025
    Figure imgb0026
    Figure imgb0027
    Figure imgb0028
    Figure imgb0029
    Figure imgb0030
    Figure imgb0031
    Figure imgb0032
    Figure imgb0033
    Figure imgb0034
    Figure imgb0035
    Figure imgb0036
    Figure imgb0037
    Figure imgb0038
    Figure imgb0039
    Figure imgb0040
    Figure imgb0041
    Figure imgb0042
    Figure imgb0043
    Figure imgb0044
    Figure imgb0045
    Figure imgb0046
    Figure imgb0047
    Figure imgb0048
    Figure imgb0049
    Figure imgb0050
    Figure imgb0051
    Figure imgb0052
    Figure imgb0053
    Figure imgb0054
    Figure imgb0055
    Figure imgb0056
    Figure imgb0057
    Figure imgb0058
    Figure imgb0059
    Figure imgb0060
    Figure imgb0061
    Figure imgb0062
    Figure imgb0063
    Figure imgb0064
    Figure imgb0065
    Figure imgb0066
    Figure imgb0067
    Figure imgb0068
    Figure imgb0069
    Figure imgb0070
    Figure imgb0071
    Figure imgb0072
    Figure imgb0073
    Figure imgb0074
    Figure imgb0075
    Figure imgb0076
    Figure imgb0077
    Figure imgb0078
    Figure imgb0079
    Figure imgb0080
    Figure imgb0081
    Figure imgb0082
    Figure imgb0083
    Figure imgb0084
    Figure imgb0085
    Figure imgb0086
    Figure imgb0087
    Figure imgb0088
    Figure imgb0089
    Figure imgb0090
    Figure imgb0091
    Figure imgb0092
    Figure imgb0093
    Figure imgb0094
    Figure imgb0095
    Figure imgb0096
    Figure imgb0097
    Figure imgb0098
    Figure imgb0099
    Figure imgb0100
    Figure imgb0101
    Figure imgb0102
    Figure imgb0103
    Figure imgb0104
    Figure imgb0105
    Figure imgb0106
    Figure imgb0107
    Figure imgb0108
    Figure imgb0109
    Figure imgb0110
    Figure imgb0111
    Figure imgb0112
    Figure imgb0113

Claims (47)

  1. A method for continuous pattern recognition of broadcast segments, said method comprising:
    constructing a digital signature from a known sample of a segment to be recognized by digitally parametizing said segment, selecting portions from among random frame locations throughout said parametized segment in accordance with a set of predefined rules to form said signature, and associating with said signature the frame locations of said portions;
    storing said signature and said associated frame locations in a library of signatures, each signature in said library being identified with a particular segment to be recognized;
    monitoring a broadcast signal;
    digitally parametizing said monitored signal;
    of said parametized monitored signal, searching said library for any signature potentially associated therewith and, usigne the frame location information associated with said signature, comparing each of said potentially associated stored signatures to the appropriate frames of said parametized monitored signal.
  2. 2. The method of claim 1 wherein said signatures and parametized signals are derived from the video portion of said segments and said monitored signal.
  3. 3. The method of claim 1 wherein said signatures and parametized signals are derived from both the audio and video portions of said segments and said monitored signals.
  4. 4. The method of claim 2 wherein said signatures and said parametized signals are derived from the luminance of said video portion.
  5. 5. The method of claim 4 wherein each digital word of said signature and said parametized signals is derived by comparing the average luminances of selected areas of a frame of said segment to the average luminance of at least one reference area, each of said selected areas providing a bit of said digital word.
  6. 6. The method of claim 5 wherein said selected areas are asymmetrically spaced about the center of said frame.
  7. 7. The method of claim 5 wherein said at least one reference area is said entire frame.
  8. 8. The method of claim 5 wherein said at least one reference area is, for each of said selected areas, a different preselected area of said frame.
  9. 9. The method of claim 5 wherein said at least one reference area is, for each of said selected areas, the corresponding area of a previous frame.
  10. 10. The method of claim 5 wherein said at least one reference area is, for each of said selected areas, a different preselected area of a previous frame.
  11. 11. The method of claim 3 wherein said signatures and said parametized signals are derived at least in part from the frequency spectrum of said audio portion.
  12. 12. The method of claim 11 wherein each digital word of said signatures and said paramatized signals is derived by comparing selected frequency bands of said audio portion to at least one reference band, each of said selected bands providing a bit of said digital word.
  13. 13. The method of claim 1 further comprising reducing the amount of data on which said searching step is performed.
  14. 14. The method of claim 13 wherein said data reduction step comprises associating the digital word representing a designated frame of each of said segments with the signature of said segment, said association being nonexclusive, said searching step comprising, for each digital word in said parametized monitored signal, searching said library for any stored signature for which said digital word represents said designated frame.
  15. 15. A method of continuous pattern recognition of broadcast segments, said method comprising:
    constructing a digital signature from a known sample of a segment to be recognized by digitally parametizing said segment to form a string of digital words, each of said words representing one frame of said segment, identifying a word representing a designated frame in said segment, the association with said segment of the word representing said designated frame being nonexclusive, selecting a plurality of additional portions from amontrandom frame locations throughout said segment in accordance with a set of predefined rules, and storing in a library of signatures the digital words representing said designated frame and said additional frames along with information representing the offsets of said additional frames relative to said designated frame;
    monitoring a broadcast signal;
    digitally parametizing said monitored signal; and
    for each monitored digital word of said parametized monitored signal, searching said library for any signature for which said word repre- ments said designated frame, and comparing the additional words of any such signature with the words of said parametized monitored signal at said offsets relative to said monitored digital word.
  16. 16. The method of claim 15 wherein said signatures and said parametized signals are derived from the video portion of said segments and said monitored signal.
  17. 17. The method of claim 15 wherein said signatures and said parametized signals are derived from both the audio and video portions of said segments and said monitored signals.
  18. 18. The method of claim 16 wherein said signatures and said parametized signals are derived from the luminance of said video portion.
  19. 19. The method of claim 18 wherein each digital word of said signature and said parametized signals is derived by comparing the average luminances of selected areas of a frame of said segment to the average luminance of at least one reference area, each of said selected areas providing a bit of said digital word.
  20. 20. The method of claim 19 wherein said selected areas are asymmetrically spaced about the center of said frame.
  21. 21. The method of claim 19 wherein said at least one reference area is said entire frame.
  22. 22. The method of claim 19 wherein said at least one reference area is, for each of said selected areas, a different preselected area of said frame.
  23. 23. The method of claim 19 wherein said at least one reference area is, for each of said selected areas, the corresponding area of a previous frame.
  24. 24. The method of claim 19 wherein said at least one reference area is, for each of said selected areas, a different preselected area of a previous frame.
  25. 25. The method of claim 17 wherein said signatures and said parametized signals are derived at least in part from the frequency spectrum of said audio portion.
  26. 26. The method of claim 25 wherein each digital word of said signatures and said parametized signals are derived by comparing selected frequency bands of said audio portion to at least one reference band, each of said selected bands providing one bit of said digital word.
  27. 27. Apparatus for continuous pattern recognition of broadcast segments, said apparatus comprising:
    means for constructing a digital signature from a known sample of a segment to be recognized by digitally parametizing said segments, selecting portions from among random frame locations throughout said parametized segment in accordance with a set of predefined rules to form said signature, and associating with said signature the frame locations of said portions;
    means for storing a library of signatures and associated frame locations, each signature in said library being identified with a particular segment to be recognized;
    means for monitoring a broadcast signal;
    means for digitally parametizing said monitored signal;
    means for searching said library for any signature potentially associated with each frame of said parametized monitored signal and, using the frame location information associated with said signature, for comparing each of said potentially associated stored signatures to the appropriate frames of said parametized monitored signal.
  28. 28. The apparatus of claim 27 wherein said constructing means operates on the video portion of said segment.
  29. 29. The apparatus of claim 27 wherein said constructing means operates on both the audio and video portions of said segment.
  30. 30. Apparatus for continuous pattern recognition of broadcast segments, said apparatus comprising:
    means for constructing a digital signature from a known sample of a segment to be identified by digitally parametizing said segment to form a string of digital words, each of said words representing one frame of said segment, identifying a word representing a designated frame in said segment, the association with said segment of the word representing said designated frame being nonexclusive, selecting a plurality of additional portions from among random frame locations throughout said segment in accordance with a set of predefined rules, and storing in a library of signatures the digital words representing said designated frame and said additional frames along with the offsets of said additional frames relative to said designated frame;
    means for monitoring a broadcast signal;
    means for digitally parametizing said monitored signal; and
    means for searching said library for any signature for which any monitored digital word represents said designated frame and comparing the additional words of any said signature with the words of said parametized monitored signal at said offsets relative to said monitored digital word.
  31. 31. The apparatus of Claim 30 wherein said constructing means operates on the video portion of said segment.
  32. 32. The apparatus of claim 30 wherein said constructing means operates on both the audio and video portions of said segment.
  33. 33. A system for continuous pattern recognition of broadcast segments, said system comprising:
    means for constructing a digital signature from a known sample of a segment to be recognized by digitally parametizing said segments, selecting portions from among random frame locations throughout said parametized segment in accordance with a set of predefined rules to form said signature, and associating with said signature the frame locations of said portions;
    means for storing a library of signatures and associated frame locations, each signature in said library, being identified with a particular segment to be recognized;
    means for monitoring a broadcast signal;
    means for digitally parametizing said monitored signal;
    means for searching said library for any signature potentially associated with each frame of said parametized monitored signal and, using the frame location information associated with said signature, for comparing each of said potentially associated stored signatures to the appropriate frames of said parametized monitored signal;
    means for detecting, in said monitoredsignal, the occurrence of artifacts characteristic of potential unknown segments to be recognized; and
    means for classifying and identifying said potential unknown segments.
  34. 34. The system of claim 33 further comprising:
    a plurality of local sites, each of said sites located in a different geographic region for monitoring broadcast signals in said region;
    a central site; and
    a communications network linking said central site and said plurality of local sites; wherein:
    each of said local sites maintains a local library of segment signatures applicable to broadcast signals in its geographic region, each of said local sites having at least said storing means, said monitoring means, said searching means, said comparing means, and said detecting means;
    said central site has said constructing means and maintains a global library containing all of the information in all of said local libraries; and
    said classifying and identifying means comprises:
    means at said local site for generating compressed audio and video information, a temporary digital signature, and parametized monitored signal information for a potential unknown segment not found in the respective local library and for transmitting at least said parametized monitored signal information and said temporary digital signature for a potential unknown segment via said communications network to said central site;
    means at said central Bite for search ing and comparing signatures stored in said global library with said transmitted parametized monitored signal information;
    means at said central site for grouping together like potential unknown segments received by said central site from said local sites and not found in said global library;
    means at said central site for requesting at least one of said compressed audio and video information for at least one of said grouped potential unknown segments and for allowing an operator to play back said at least one of said audio and video information to classify said segment and to instruct said constructing means to automatically construct a signature for said segment; and
    means for adding said constructed signature to said global library and for transmitting it via said communications network to said local libraries.
  35. 35. The system of claim 34 wherein said grouping means comprises:
    means for comparing the temporary digital signatures of other potential unknown segments to a parametized potential unknown segment;
    for all potential unknown segments matching a given temporary digital signature, means for temporally aligning the parametized monitored signal information of said segments; and
    means for constructing a best fit to said aligned parametized monitored signal information.
  36. 36. The system of claim 34 further comprising means for transmitting from each of said local sites to said central site information concerning the occurrence of broadcast segments and means at said central site for logging said information.
  37. 37. The system of claim 36 further comprising means at said local site for storing the temporary digital signature of a potential unknown segment and for logging the occurrences of said potential unknown segment based on said stored temporary signature, and means for transmitting said log information to said central site after said central site has identified said potential unknown segment.
  38. 38. For use in a system for continuous pattern recognition of broadcast segments, said system including: .
    a plurality of local sites, each of said sites located in a different geographic region for monitoring broadcast signals in said region;
    a central site; and
    a communications network linking said central site and said plurality of local sites;
    each of said local sites maintaining a local library of segment signatures applicable to broadcast signals in its geographic region and having at least means for monitoring a broadcast signal, means for searching said local library for any signature potentially associated with each frame of said parametized monitored signal and for comparing said signatures to said parametized monitored signal, said means for detecting, in said monitored signal, the occurrence of artifacts characteristic of potential unknown segments to be recognized; and
    said central site maintaining a global library containing all of the information stored in all of said local libraries; the method of classi- tying and identifying said potental unknown segments, said method comprising:
    parametizing at one of said local sites said potential unknown segment;
    constructing at said local site a temporary digital signature for said potential unknown segment;
    generating at said local site compressed digitized audio and video information for said potential unknown segment;
    transmitting said parametized unknown segment and said temporary digital signature, and, as determined by said central site at least one of said compressed audio and video information from said local site to said central site;
    comparing the sigantures in said global library to said parametized unknown segment to determine if said unknown segment was previously received by another of said local sites and if so replacing said temporary signature at said local site with the appropriate global signature;
    grouping together like unknown segments received from several local sites;
    allowing an operator to play back said at least one of said compressed audio and video information to identify said unknown segments;
    constructing a new global signature for said identified signal;
    transmitting said new global signature to those of said local sites for which it is appropriate.
  39. 39. The method of claim 38 wherein said grouping step comprises:
    comparing the temporary digital signatures of other potential unknown segments to a parametized potential unknown segment;
    for all potential unknown segments matched by a given temporary digital signature, temporally aligning the parametized signal information of said segments; and
    constructing a best fit to said aligned parametized signal information.
  40. 40. The method of claim 39 wherein said step of constructing a best fit comprises polling each bit position of such aligned parametized signal information and assigning to the corresponding bit position of said best fit the value of the majority of parametized segments in said bit location.
  41. 41. The method of claim 38 further comprising confirming said new global signature by testing said new global signature against each potential unknown segment in said group.
  42. 42. A method for continuous pattern recognition of broadcast segments, each of said segments having a constant portion and a variable portion, said method comprising:
    constructing a signature from a known sample of the constant portion of such a segment to be recognized;
    recording additional data from known samples of said variable portion;
    storing said signature and said additional data;
    associating with said stored signature an indication of the existence of said variable portion;
    monitoring a broadcast signal;
    identifying the constant portion of a broadcast segment in said monitored broadcast signal with said signature; and
    using said additional data to identify the variable portion of said broadcast segment.
  43. 43. The method of claim 42 wherein:
    - said step of recording additional data comprises constructing a second signature for said variable portion; and
    said using step comprises identifying the variable portion of said broadcast segment with said second signature.
  44. 44. The method of claim 42 wherein:
    said step of recording additional data comprises recording at least one video frame of said variable portion; and
    said using step comprises performing a direct comparison of said at least one video frame and at least one frame of said monitored broadcast signal.
  45. 45. Apparatus for continuous pattern recognition of broadcast segments, each of said segments having a constant portion and a variable portion, said apparatus comprising:
    means for constructing a signature from a known sample of the constant portion of such a segment to be recognized;
    means for recording additional data from known samples of said variable portion;
    means for storing said signature andsaid additional data;
    means for associating with said stored signature an indication of the existence of said variable portion;
    means for monitoring a broadcast signal;
    means for identifying the constant portion of a broadcast segment in said monitored broadcast signal with said signature; and
    means for using said additional data to identify the variable portion of said broadcast segment.
  46. 46. The apparatus of claim 45 wherein:
    said recording means comprises means for constructing a second signature for said variable portion; and
    said using means comprises identifying the variable portion of said broadcast segment with said second signature.
  47. 47. The apparatus of claim 45 wherein:
    said recording means comprises means for recording at least one video frame of said variable portion; and
    said using means comprises means for performing a direct comparison of said at least one video frame and at least one frame of said monitored broadcast signal.
EP87303968A 1986-05-02 1987-05-01 Method, apparatus and system for recognising broadcast segments Expired - Lifetime EP0248533B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US06/859,134 US4739398A (en) 1986-05-02 1986-05-02 Method, apparatus and system for recognizing broadcast segments
US859134 1986-05-02

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0248533A2 true EP0248533A2 (en) 1987-12-09
EP0248533A3 EP0248533A3 (en) 1989-09-06
EP0248533B1 EP0248533B1 (en) 1994-08-31

Family

ID=25330135

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP87303968A Expired - Lifetime EP0248533B1 (en) 1986-05-02 1987-05-01 Method, apparatus and system for recognising broadcast segments

Country Status (6)

Country Link
US (1) US4739398A (en)
EP (1) EP0248533B1 (en)
JP (3) JPS6324786A (en)
AU (1) AU585809B2 (en)
CA (1) CA1323415C (en)
DE (1) DE3750437T2 (en)

Cited By (30)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4814883A (en) * 1988-01-04 1989-03-21 Beam Laser Systems, Inc. Multiple input/output video switch for commerical insertion system
GB2258065A (en) * 1991-07-26 1993-01-27 Mcconnells Developments Limite Television programme and advertising data analysis
WO1995006985A1 (en) * 1993-08-31 1995-03-09 Interessengemeinschaft für Rundfunkschutzrechte GmbH Schutzrechtsverwertung & Co. KG Process and device for detecting undesirable video scenes
WO1996027840A1 (en) * 1995-03-04 1996-09-12 Televitesse Systems Inc. Automatic broadcast monitoring system
WO1997015999A2 (en) * 1995-10-27 1997-05-01 Digital D.J. Inc. Broadcast system transmitting supplementary data with the broadcast program
AU678163B2 (en) * 1992-04-30 1997-05-22 Arbitron Inc. Method and system for recognition of broadcast segments
WO1998035492A2 (en) * 1997-02-06 1998-08-13 Telexis Corporation Method and apparatus for recognising video sequences
CN1047902C (en) * 1993-10-27 1999-12-29 尼尔逊媒介研究股份有限公司 Audience measurement system
ES2141039A1 (en) * 1998-01-30 2000-03-01 Mayo Audiovisual S A Automatic system for detecting and recognizing televised announcements
US7277852B2 (en) 2000-10-23 2007-10-02 Ntt Communications Corporation Method, system and storage medium for commercial and musical composition recognition and storage
WO2008106441A1 (en) 2007-02-27 2008-09-04 Landmark Digital Services Llc System and method for monitoring and recognizing broadcast data
EP2360639A1 (en) * 2009-03-13 2011-08-24 Nec Corporation Image identifier matching device
GB2483250A (en) * 2010-08-31 2012-03-07 British Broadcasting Corp Producing edit decision list by comparing edited video with source video
WO2015086076A1 (en) * 2013-12-12 2015-06-18 Metaio Gmbh Method for determining a similarity value between a first image and a second image
US9906834B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2018-02-27 Inscape Data, Inc. Methods for identifying video segments and displaying contextually targeted content on a connected television
US9955192B2 (en) 2013-12-23 2018-04-24 Inscape Data, Inc. Monitoring individual viewing of television events using tracking pixels and cookies
US10080062B2 (en) 2015-07-16 2018-09-18 Inscape Data, Inc. Optimizing media fingerprint retention to improve system resource utilization
US10169455B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2019-01-01 Inscape Data, Inc. Systems and methods for addressing a media database using distance associative hashing
US10192138B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2019-01-29 Inscape Data, Inc. Systems and methods for reducing data density in large datasets
US10375451B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2019-08-06 Inscape Data, Inc. Detection of common media segments
US10405014B2 (en) 2015-01-30 2019-09-03 Inscape Data, Inc. Methods for identifying video segments and displaying option to view from an alternative source and/or on an alternative device
US10482349B2 (en) 2015-04-17 2019-11-19 Inscape Data, Inc. Systems and methods for reducing data density in large datasets
WO2020039260A3 (en) * 2018-08-24 2020-04-09 Genpact Luxembourg S.A R.L Systems and methods for segmentation of report corpus using visual signatures
US10873788B2 (en) 2015-07-16 2020-12-22 Inscape Data, Inc. Detection of common media segments
US10902048B2 (en) 2015-07-16 2021-01-26 Inscape Data, Inc. Prediction of future views of video segments to optimize system resource utilization
US10949458B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2021-03-16 Inscape Data, Inc. System and method for improving work load management in ACR television monitoring system
US10983984B2 (en) 2017-04-06 2021-04-20 Inscape Data, Inc. Systems and methods for improving accuracy of device maps using media viewing data
US11272226B2 (en) 2014-12-01 2022-03-08 Inscape Data, Inc. System and method for continuous media segment identification
US11272248B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2022-03-08 Inscape Data, Inc. Methods for identifying video segments and displaying contextually targeted content on a connected television
US11308144B2 (en) 2015-07-16 2022-04-19 Inscape Data, Inc. Systems and methods for partitioning search indexes for improved efficiency in identifying media segments

Families Citing this family (294)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JPS6356091A (en) * 1986-08-26 1988-03-10 Video Res:Kk Recognition device for television commercial broadcasting
US4858000A (en) * 1988-09-14 1989-08-15 A. C. Nielsen Company Image recognition audience measurement system and method
US5031228A (en) * 1988-09-14 1991-07-09 A. C. Nielsen Company Image recognition system and method
US5019899A (en) * 1988-11-01 1991-05-28 Control Data Corporation Electronic data encoding and recognition system
US7594250B2 (en) * 1992-04-02 2009-09-22 Debey Henry C Method and system of program transmission optimization using a redundant transmission sequence
JPH0666738B2 (en) * 1990-04-06 1994-08-24 株式会社ビデオ・リサーチ CM automatic confirmation device
US6175312B1 (en) 1990-05-29 2001-01-16 Microchip Technology Incorporated Encoder and decoder microchips and remote control devices for secure unidirectional communication
CA2036205C (en) * 1990-06-01 1996-11-19 Russell J. Welsh Program monitoring unit
JPH05509409A (en) * 1990-06-21 1993-12-22 レイノルズ ソフトウエア,インコーポレイティド Wave analysis/event recognition method and device
US5121440A (en) * 1990-08-30 1992-06-09 Monolithic Resources Corporation Analog video character recognition system
US5200822A (en) * 1991-04-23 1993-04-06 National Broadcasting Company, Inc. Arrangement for and method of processing data, especially for identifying and verifying airing of television broadcast programs
US8352400B2 (en) 1991-12-23 2013-01-08 Hoffberg Steven M Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-factored interface therefore
US10361802B1 (en) 1999-02-01 2019-07-23 Blanding Hovenweep, Llc Adaptive pattern recognition based control system and method
US7242988B1 (en) 1991-12-23 2007-07-10 Linda Irene Hoffberg Adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus and method and human-factored interface therefore
US6850252B1 (en) 1999-10-05 2005-02-01 Steven M. Hoffberg Intelligent electronic appliance system and method
US5903454A (en) 1991-12-23 1999-05-11 Hoffberg; Linda Irene Human-factored interface corporating adaptive pattern recognition based controller apparatus
US6400996B1 (en) 1999-02-01 2002-06-04 Steven M. Hoffberg Adaptive pattern recognition based control system and method
US6418424B1 (en) 1991-12-23 2002-07-09 Steven M. Hoffberg Ergonomic man-machine interface incorporating adaptive pattern recognition based control system
US6678461B1 (en) 1992-04-10 2004-01-13 Avid Technology, Inc. Media recorder for capture and playback of live and prerecorded audio and/or video information
US6058236A (en) * 1992-04-10 2000-05-02 Avid Technology, Inc. System and method for digitally capturing video segments from a video assist of a film camera
US5721788A (en) * 1992-07-31 1998-02-24 Corbis Corporation Method and system for digital image signatures
GB9221678D0 (en) * 1992-10-15 1992-11-25 Taylor Nelson Group Limited Identifying a received programme stream
US5437050A (en) * 1992-11-09 1995-07-25 Lamb; Robert G. Method and apparatus for recognizing broadcast information using multi-frequency magnitude detection
CA2106143C (en) * 1992-11-25 2004-02-24 William L. Thomas Universal broadcast code and multi-level encoded signal monitoring system
JPH08511889A (en) * 1993-06-28 1996-12-10 ダウ、ベネルクス、ナームロゼ、ベノートスハップ Extended inter-program communication server
US5355161A (en) * 1993-07-28 1994-10-11 Concord Media Systems Identification system for broadcast program segments
US5485518A (en) * 1993-09-30 1996-01-16 Yellowstone Environmental Science, Inc. Electronic media program recognition and choice
US5841978A (en) * 1993-11-18 1998-11-24 Digimarc Corporation Network linking method using steganographically embedded data objects
US7313251B2 (en) * 1993-11-18 2007-12-25 Digimarc Corporation Method and system for managing and controlling electronic media
US5822436A (en) * 1996-04-25 1998-10-13 Digimarc Corporation Photographic products and methods employing embedded information
US5768426A (en) * 1993-11-18 1998-06-16 Digimarc Corporation Graphics processing system employing embedded code signals
US7171016B1 (en) 1993-11-18 2007-01-30 Digimarc Corporation Method for monitoring internet dissemination of image, video and/or audio files
US5748763A (en) * 1993-11-18 1998-05-05 Digimarc Corporation Image steganography system featuring perceptually adaptive and globally scalable signal embedding
US5581658A (en) * 1993-12-14 1996-12-03 Infobase Systems, Inc. Adaptive system for broadcast program identification and reporting
US5488425A (en) * 1993-12-22 1996-01-30 At&T Corp. Apparatus for storing video information by recognizing video frames
US7418474B2 (en) * 1994-03-03 2008-08-26 Schwab Barry H Secure identification system
US6353699B1 (en) * 1994-03-03 2002-03-05 Barry H. Schwab Method and apparatus for compiling audio/video information from remote sites into a final video program
US5526427A (en) * 1994-07-22 1996-06-11 A.C. Nielsen Company Universal broadcast code and multi-level encoded signal monitoring system
US7724919B2 (en) * 1994-10-21 2010-05-25 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems for steganographic processing
US6560349B1 (en) * 1994-10-21 2003-05-06 Digimarc Corporation Audio monitoring using steganographic information
US8094949B1 (en) 1994-10-21 2012-01-10 Digimarc Corporation Music methods and systems
WO1996027983A1 (en) * 1995-03-07 1996-09-12 Interval Research Corporation System and method for selective recording of information
US6760463B2 (en) * 1995-05-08 2004-07-06 Digimarc Corporation Watermarking methods and media
US7224819B2 (en) * 1995-05-08 2007-05-29 Digimarc Corporation Integrating digital watermarks in multimedia content
US7486799B2 (en) * 1995-05-08 2009-02-03 Digimarc Corporation Methods for monitoring audio and images on the internet
US7805500B2 (en) * 1995-05-08 2010-09-28 Digimarc Corporation Network linking methods and apparatus
US6965682B1 (en) * 1999-05-19 2005-11-15 Digimarc Corp Data transmission by watermark proxy
US7711564B2 (en) * 1995-07-27 2010-05-04 Digimarc Corporation Connected audio and other media objects
US6829368B2 (en) * 2000-01-26 2004-12-07 Digimarc Corporation Establishing and interacting with on-line media collections using identifiers in media signals
US7562392B1 (en) 1999-05-19 2009-07-14 Digimarc Corporation Methods of interacting with audio and ambient music
US6577746B1 (en) * 1999-12-28 2003-06-10 Digimarc Corporation Watermark-based object linking and embedding
US6505160B1 (en) * 1995-07-27 2003-01-07 Digimarc Corporation Connected audio and other media objects
US6411725B1 (en) * 1995-07-27 2002-06-25 Digimarc Corporation Watermark enabled video objects
US7505605B2 (en) * 1996-04-25 2009-03-17 Digimarc Corporation Portable devices and methods employing digital watermarking
US8180844B1 (en) 2000-03-18 2012-05-15 Digimarc Corporation System for linking from objects to remote resources
JP3625344B2 (en) * 1996-11-05 2005-03-02 株式会社ビデオリサーチ Viewing channel detector
US8306811B2 (en) * 1996-08-30 2012-11-06 Digimarc Corporation Embedding data in audio and detecting embedded data in audio
US6002443A (en) 1996-11-01 1999-12-14 Iggulden; Jerry Method and apparatus for automatically identifying and selectively altering segments of a television broadcast signal in real-time
US5999689A (en) * 1996-11-01 1999-12-07 Iggulden; Jerry Method and apparatus for controlling a videotape recorder in real-time to automatically identify and selectively skip segments of a television broadcast signal during recording of the television signal
US7269330B1 (en) 1996-11-01 2007-09-11 Televentions, Llc Method and apparatus for controlling a video recorder/player to selectively alter a video signal
US6771316B1 (en) 1996-11-01 2004-08-03 Jerry Iggulden Method and apparatus for selectively altering a televised video signal in real-time
US6088484A (en) * 1996-11-08 2000-07-11 Hughes Electronics Corporation Downloading of personalization layers for symbolically compressed objects
US6263507B1 (en) * 1996-12-05 2001-07-17 Interval Research Corporation Browser for use in navigating a body of information, with particular application to browsing information represented by audiovisual data
US5893062A (en) 1996-12-05 1999-04-06 Interval Research Corporation Variable rate video playback with synchronized audio
US6675383B1 (en) 1997-01-22 2004-01-06 Nielsen Media Research, Inc. Source detection apparatus and method for audience measurement
DE19728099A1 (en) * 1997-07-02 1999-01-07 Klaus Dr Ing Schulze Method and device for recognizing unique image sequences
JPH1155201A (en) 1997-07-29 1999-02-26 Sony Corp Device, method and system for information processing and transmitting medium
JPH11122203A (en) * 1997-10-09 1999-04-30 Video Research:Kk Broadcast confirmation system, video source production device used for the system and broadcast confirmation device
US6166780A (en) * 1997-10-21 2000-12-26 Principle Solutions, Inc. Automated language filter
US7139031B1 (en) 1997-10-21 2006-11-21 Principle Solutions, Inc. Automated language filter for TV receiver
US6972802B2 (en) * 1997-10-21 2005-12-06 Bray J Richard Language filter for home TV
US6961954B1 (en) 1997-10-27 2005-11-01 The Mitre Corporation Automated segmentation, information extraction, summarization, and presentation of broadcast news
US6080816A (en) * 1997-11-10 2000-06-27 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Coatings that contain reactive silicon oligomers
US6173271B1 (en) * 1997-11-26 2001-01-09 California Institute Of Technology Television advertising automated billing system
US7689532B1 (en) 2000-07-20 2010-03-30 Digimarc Corporation Using embedded data with file sharing
CA2289519C (en) * 1998-05-12 2001-04-10 Nielsen Media Research, Inc. Audience measurement system for digital television
US7644282B2 (en) 1998-05-28 2010-01-05 Verance Corporation Pre-processed information embedding system
US20100030838A1 (en) * 1998-08-27 2010-02-04 Beepcard Ltd. Method to use acoustic signals for computer communications
IL127569A0 (en) 1998-09-16 1999-10-28 Comsense Technologies Ltd Interactive toys
US6607136B1 (en) 1998-09-16 2003-08-19 Beepcard Inc. Physical presence digital authentication system
WO2000021020A2 (en) 1998-10-02 2000-04-13 Comsense Technologies, Ltd. Card for interaction with a computer
US8332478B2 (en) 1998-10-01 2012-12-11 Digimarc Corporation Context sensitive connected content
US6246803B1 (en) 1998-12-27 2001-06-12 The University Of Kansas Real-time feature-based video stream validation and distortion analysis system using color moments
US6934461B1 (en) * 1999-01-05 2005-08-23 Interval Research Corporation Low attention recording, with particular application to social recording
US7904187B2 (en) 1999-02-01 2011-03-08 Hoffberg Steven M Internet appliance system and method
US8364136B2 (en) 1999-02-01 2013-01-29 Steven M Hoffberg Mobile system, a method of operating mobile system and a non-transitory computer readable medium for a programmable control of a mobile system
US6289514B1 (en) 1999-03-29 2001-09-11 Qcom Tv, Inc. System and method for the near-real time capture and reporting of large population consumer behaviors concerning television use
US7565294B2 (en) * 1999-05-19 2009-07-21 Digimarc Corporation Methods and systems employing digital content
US20020032734A1 (en) 2000-07-26 2002-03-14 Rhoads Geoffrey B. Collateral data combined with user characteristics to select web site
US8095796B2 (en) * 1999-05-19 2012-01-10 Digimarc Corporation Content identifiers
US7302574B2 (en) * 1999-05-19 2007-11-27 Digimarc Corporation Content identifiers triggering corresponding responses through collaborative processing
US6871180B1 (en) 1999-05-25 2005-03-22 Arbitron Inc. Decoding of information in audio signals
US7194752B1 (en) 1999-10-19 2007-03-20 Iceberg Industries, Llc Method and apparatus for automatically recognizing input audio and/or video streams
US7174293B2 (en) * 1999-09-21 2007-02-06 Iceberg Industries Llc Audio identification system and method
US8019609B2 (en) 1999-10-04 2011-09-13 Dialware Inc. Sonic/ultrasonic authentication method
US7155735B1 (en) * 1999-10-08 2006-12-26 Vulcan Patents Llc System and method for the broadcast dissemination of time-ordered data
US6469749B1 (en) * 1999-10-13 2002-10-22 Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. Automatic signature-based spotting, learning and extracting of commercials and other video content
CA2809775C (en) * 1999-10-27 2017-03-21 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Audio signature extraction and correlation
US7191462B1 (en) * 1999-11-08 2007-03-13 Kendyl A. Román System for transmitting video images over a computer network to a remote receiver
US6329489B1 (en) 1999-12-20 2001-12-11 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours And Company Process for producing reactive silane oligomers
US6397041B1 (en) 1999-12-22 2002-05-28 Radio Propagation Services, Inc. Broadcast monitoring and control system
US6757682B1 (en) * 2000-01-28 2004-06-29 Interval Research Corporation Alerting users to items of current interest
US6737957B1 (en) 2000-02-16 2004-05-18 Verance Corporation Remote control signaling using audio watermarks
US6834308B1 (en) 2000-02-17 2004-12-21 Audible Magic Corporation Method and apparatus for identifying media content presented on a media playing device
US20040255334A1 (en) * 2000-03-28 2004-12-16 Gotuit Audio, Inc. Methods and apparatus for seamlessly changing volumes during playback using a compact disk changer
FR2807275B1 (en) * 2000-04-04 2003-01-24 Mobiclick SYSTEM ALLOWING TO TRANSMIT TO A USER INFORMATION RELATING TO A SOUND SEQUENCE WHICH THEY LISTEN TO OR LISTENED TO
CN100592788C (en) * 2000-04-14 2010-02-24 日本电信电话株式会社 Method, system, and apparatus for acquiring information concerning broadcast information
JP4507351B2 (en) * 2000-04-27 2010-07-21 ソニー株式会社 Signal processing apparatus and method
US8121843B2 (en) * 2000-05-02 2012-02-21 Digimarc Corporation Fingerprint methods and systems for media signals
US7617509B1 (en) 2000-06-23 2009-11-10 International Business Machines Corporation Method and system for automated monitoring of quality of service of digital video material distribution and play-out
US7853664B1 (en) * 2000-07-31 2010-12-14 Landmark Digital Services Llc Method and system for purchasing pre-recorded music
JP3775186B2 (en) * 2000-08-10 2006-05-17 日本電気株式会社 Broadcast confirmation system, broadcast confirmation apparatus and method, and recording medium recorded with broadcast confirmation program
US8010988B2 (en) * 2000-09-14 2011-08-30 Cox Ingemar J Using features extracted from an audio and/or video work to obtain information about the work
US8205237B2 (en) 2000-09-14 2012-06-19 Cox Ingemar J Identifying works, using a sub-linear time search, such as an approximate nearest neighbor search, for initiating a work-based action, such as an action on the internet
US7129972B2 (en) * 2000-09-25 2006-10-31 Canon Kabushiki Kaisha Image sensing device for transmitting images
US7562012B1 (en) 2000-11-03 2009-07-14 Audible Magic Corporation Method and apparatus for creating a unique audio signature
US20020072982A1 (en) 2000-12-12 2002-06-13 Shazam Entertainment Ltd. Method and system for interacting with a user in an experiential environment
WO2002051063A1 (en) * 2000-12-21 2002-06-27 Digimarc Corporation Methods, apparatus and programs for generating and utilizing content signatures
US8103877B2 (en) * 2000-12-21 2012-01-24 Digimarc Corporation Content identification and electronic tickets, coupons and credits
KR100400542B1 (en) * 2001-02-28 2003-10-08 엘지전자 주식회사 System software upgrade apparatus and method using advertisement for digital television
US7359889B2 (en) * 2001-03-02 2008-04-15 Landmark Digital Services Llc Method and apparatus for automatically creating database for use in automated media recognition system
US7197160B2 (en) * 2001-03-05 2007-03-27 Digimarc Corporation Geographic information systems using digital watermarks
US9219708B2 (en) * 2001-03-22 2015-12-22 DialwareInc. Method and system for remotely authenticating identification devices
EP1490767B1 (en) 2001-04-05 2014-06-11 Audible Magic Corporation Copyright detection and protection system and method
US7248715B2 (en) * 2001-04-06 2007-07-24 Digimarc Corporation Digitally watermarking physical media
US7046819B2 (en) * 2001-04-25 2006-05-16 Digimarc Corporation Encoded reference signal for digital watermarks
US8572640B2 (en) * 2001-06-29 2013-10-29 Arbitron Inc. Media data use measurement with remote decoding/pattern matching
US7529659B2 (en) * 2005-09-28 2009-05-05 Audible Magic Corporation Method and apparatus for identifying an unknown work
US6968337B2 (en) * 2001-07-10 2005-11-22 Audible Magic Corporation Method and apparatus for identifying an unknown work
US7877438B2 (en) * 2001-07-20 2011-01-25 Audible Magic Corporation Method and apparatus for identifying new media content
WO2003009277A2 (en) * 2001-07-20 2003-01-30 Gracenote, Inc. Automatic identification of sound recordings
US8972481B2 (en) 2001-07-20 2015-03-03 Audible Magic, Inc. Playlist generation method and apparatus
US20030135623A1 (en) * 2001-10-23 2003-07-17 Audible Magic, Inc. Method and apparatus for cache promotion
US20030131350A1 (en) 2002-01-08 2003-07-10 Peiffer John C. Method and apparatus for identifying a digital audio signal
WO2003062960A2 (en) * 2002-01-22 2003-07-31 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarking and fingerprinting including symchronization, layering, version control, and compressed embedding
US20030154493A1 (en) * 2002-02-14 2003-08-14 Kagle Jonathan C. Identifying unique broadcasts
US7461392B2 (en) * 2002-07-01 2008-12-02 Microsoft Corporation System and method for identifying and segmenting repeating media objects embedded in a stream
US6766523B2 (en) * 2002-05-31 2004-07-20 Microsoft Corporation System and method for identifying and segmenting repeating media objects embedded in a stream
US20040091111A1 (en) * 2002-07-16 2004-05-13 Levy Kenneth L. Digital watermarking and fingerprinting applications
EP1384849B1 (en) 2002-07-22 2010-11-10 Hunter Douglas Industries B.V. Rail for fabric blind and method of attaching rail to a fabric
US7239981B2 (en) 2002-07-26 2007-07-03 Arbitron Inc. Systems and methods for gathering audience measurement data
US9711153B2 (en) 2002-09-27 2017-07-18 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Activating functions in processing devices using encoded audio and detecting audio signatures
US8959016B2 (en) 2002-09-27 2015-02-17 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Activating functions in processing devices using start codes embedded in audio
US7222071B2 (en) * 2002-09-27 2007-05-22 Arbitron Inc. Audio data receipt/exposure measurement with code monitoring and signature extraction
ES2507642T3 (en) 2002-10-15 2014-10-15 Verance Corporation Media supervision, management and information system
US7978874B2 (en) * 2002-10-21 2011-07-12 Digimarc Corporation Digital watermarking for workflow by tracking content or content identifiers with respect to time
US7483835B2 (en) * 2002-12-23 2009-01-27 Arbitron, Inc. AD detection using ID code and extracted signature
US8332326B2 (en) * 2003-02-01 2012-12-11 Audible Magic Corporation Method and apparatus to identify a work received by a processing system
US7359006B1 (en) * 2003-05-20 2008-04-15 Micronas Usa, Inc. Audio module supporting audio signature
US7509180B2 (en) * 2003-05-23 2009-03-24 Microsoft Corporation Extending digital rights management and authentication to audio speakers
WO2004109737A2 (en) * 2003-06-02 2004-12-16 Infocus Corporation Lamp assembly for a projection device
AU2003249319A1 (en) 2003-06-20 2005-01-28 Nielsen Media Research, Inc Signature-based program identification apparatus and methods for use with digital broadcast systems
US20050044561A1 (en) * 2003-08-20 2005-02-24 Gotuit Audio, Inc. Methods and apparatus for identifying program segments by detecting duplicate signal patterns
US7369677B2 (en) 2005-04-26 2008-05-06 Verance Corporation System reactions to the detection of embedded watermarks in a digital host content
US20060239501A1 (en) 2005-04-26 2006-10-26 Verance Corporation Security enhancements of digital watermarks for multi-media content
US20070039018A1 (en) * 2005-08-09 2007-02-15 Verance Corporation Apparatus, systems and methods for broadcast advertising stewardship
US9055239B2 (en) * 2003-10-08 2015-06-09 Verance Corporation Signal continuity assessment using embedded watermarks
CN1883198A (en) * 2003-11-17 2006-12-20 皇家飞利浦电子股份有限公司 Commercial insertion into video streams based on surrounding program content
US8738763B2 (en) 2004-03-26 2014-05-27 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Research data gathering with a portable monitor and a stationary device
US7483975B2 (en) 2004-03-26 2009-01-27 Arbitron, Inc. Systems and methods for gathering data concerning usage of media data
US20060031885A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2006-02-09 Vulcan Inc. Management and non-linear presentation of music-related broadcasted or streamed multimedia content
US20060031916A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2006-02-09 Vulcan Inc. Management and non-linear presentation of broadcasted or streamed multimedia content
US20060031879A1 (en) * 2004-04-30 2006-02-09 Vulcan Inc. Management and non-linear presentation of news-related broadcasted or streamed multimedia content
US8953908B2 (en) * 2004-06-22 2015-02-10 Digimarc Corporation Metadata management and generation using perceptual features
US20060002479A1 (en) * 2004-06-22 2006-01-05 Fernandes Felix C A Decoder for H.264/AVC video
US8130746B2 (en) 2004-07-28 2012-03-06 Audible Magic Corporation System for distributing decoy content in a peer to peer network
US8406607B2 (en) 2004-08-12 2013-03-26 Gracenote, Inc. Selection of content from a stream of video or audio data
MX2007002071A (en) * 2004-08-18 2007-04-24 Nielsen Media Res Inc Methods and apparatus for generating signatures.
US7386542B2 (en) * 2004-08-30 2008-06-10 The Mitre Corporation Personalized broadcast news navigator
KR20070100975A (en) 2005-01-14 2007-10-15 코닌클리케 필립스 일렉트로닉스 엔.브이. A method and a system for constructing virtual video channel
GB0500838D0 (en) * 2005-01-15 2005-02-23 Accentus Plc Catalytic reactor
US7492821B2 (en) * 2005-02-08 2009-02-17 International Business Machines Corporation System and method for selective image capture, transmission and reconstruction
US8020004B2 (en) 2005-07-01 2011-09-13 Verance Corporation Forensic marking using a common customization function
US8781967B2 (en) * 2005-07-07 2014-07-15 Verance Corporation Watermarking in an encrypted domain
CN103000210A (en) 2005-10-21 2013-03-27 尼尔逊媒介研究股份有限公司 Methods and apparatus for metering portable media players
US9015740B2 (en) 2005-12-12 2015-04-21 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Systems and methods to wirelessly meter audio/visual devices
CN101371472B (en) * 2005-12-12 2017-04-19 尼尔逊媒介研究股份有限公司 Systems and methods to wirelessly meter audio/visual devices
WO2007073484A2 (en) * 2005-12-20 2007-06-28 Arbitron Inc. Methods and systems for conducting research operations
US7627878B2 (en) * 2005-12-23 2009-12-01 Eloda Inc. Method and System for automated auditing of advertising
US7559657B2 (en) 2006-01-30 2009-07-14 Infocus Corporation Projection device
PT1826932E (en) * 2006-02-22 2011-10-03 Media Evolution Technologies Inc Method and apparatus for generating digital audio signatures
KR101583268B1 (en) 2006-03-27 2016-01-08 닐슨 미디어 리서치 인코퍼레이티드 Methods and systems to meter media content presented on a wireless communication device
US7735101B2 (en) 2006-03-28 2010-06-08 Cisco Technology, Inc. System allowing users to embed comments at specific points in time into media presentation
JP4665836B2 (en) * 2006-05-31 2011-04-06 日本ビクター株式会社 Music classification device, music classification method, and music classification program
EP2030439B1 (en) 2006-06-15 2018-09-19 The Nielsen Company (US), LLC Methods and apparatus to meter content exposure using closed caption information
US7661121B2 (en) * 2006-06-22 2010-02-09 Tivo, Inc. In-band data recognition and synchronization system
KR20090031771A (en) 2006-07-12 2009-03-27 아비트론 인코포레이티드 Methods and systems for compliance confirmation and incentives
US20080051029A1 (en) * 2006-08-25 2008-02-28 Bradley James Witteman Phone-based broadcast audio identification
WO2008043082A2 (en) 2006-10-05 2008-04-10 Splunk Inc. Time series search engine
WO2008070050A2 (en) * 2006-12-04 2008-06-12 Swarmcast, Inc. Automatic configuration of embedded media player
US8312558B2 (en) 2007-01-03 2012-11-13 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. System and method of managing protected video content
US8107419B2 (en) * 2007-02-19 2012-01-31 Celtro Ltd Method and system for improving bandwidth utilization over a fixed network
AU2008218716B2 (en) 2007-02-20 2012-05-10 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus for characterizing media
WO2008137385A2 (en) 2007-05-02 2008-11-13 Nielsen Media Research, Inc. Methods and apparatus for generating signatures
US8006314B2 (en) 2007-07-27 2011-08-23 Audible Magic Corporation System for identifying content of digital data
CA2858944C (en) 2007-11-12 2017-08-22 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus to perform audio watermarking and watermark detection and extraction
US8165451B2 (en) 2007-11-20 2012-04-24 Echostar Technologies L.L.C. Methods and apparatus for displaying information regarding interstitials of a video stream
US8165450B2 (en) * 2007-11-19 2012-04-24 Echostar Technologies L.L.C. Methods and apparatus for filtering content in a video stream using text data
US8136140B2 (en) * 2007-11-20 2012-03-13 Dish Network L.L.C. Methods and apparatus for generating metadata utilized to filter content from a video stream using text data
GB2467273B (en) * 2007-12-11 2013-01-23 Ambx Uk Ltd Processing a content signal
US9984369B2 (en) 2007-12-19 2018-05-29 At&T Intellectual Property I, L.P. Systems and methods to identify target video content
US8037256B2 (en) * 2007-12-20 2011-10-11 Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. Programmable address processor for graphics applications
AU2008347134A1 (en) 2007-12-31 2009-07-16 Arbitron, Inc. Survey data acquisition
US8930003B2 (en) 2007-12-31 2015-01-06 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Data capture bridge
US8457951B2 (en) 2008-01-29 2013-06-04 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus for performing variable black length watermarking of media
CN102982810B (en) * 2008-03-05 2016-01-13 尼尔森(美国)有限公司 Generate the method and apparatus of signature
US8606085B2 (en) * 2008-03-20 2013-12-10 Dish Network L.L.C. Method and apparatus for replacement of audio data in recorded audio/video stream
US8245262B2 (en) * 2008-04-07 2012-08-14 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. System and method for synchronization of television signals associated with multiple broadcast networks
US8156520B2 (en) 2008-05-30 2012-04-10 EchoStar Technologies, L.L.C. Methods and apparatus for presenting substitute content in an audio/video stream using text data
US20090307741A1 (en) * 2008-06-09 2009-12-10 Echostar Technologies L.L.C. Methods and apparatus for dividing an audio/video stream into multiple segments using text data
US8259938B2 (en) 2008-06-24 2012-09-04 Verance Corporation Efficient and secure forensic marking in compressed
WO2010006334A1 (en) 2008-07-11 2010-01-14 Videosurf, Inc. Apparatus and software system for and method of performing a visual-relevance-rank subsequent search
US9124769B2 (en) 2008-10-31 2015-09-01 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus to verify presentation of media content
US10631068B2 (en) 2008-11-26 2020-04-21 Free Stream Media Corp. Content exposure attribution based on renderings of related content across multiple devices
US9986279B2 (en) 2008-11-26 2018-05-29 Free Stream Media Corp. Discovery, access control, and communication with networked services
US9386356B2 (en) 2008-11-26 2016-07-05 Free Stream Media Corp. Targeting with television audience data across multiple screens
US10419541B2 (en) 2008-11-26 2019-09-17 Free Stream Media Corp. Remotely control devices over a network without authentication or registration
US9519772B2 (en) 2008-11-26 2016-12-13 Free Stream Media Corp. Relevancy improvement through targeting of information based on data gathered from a networked device associated with a security sandbox of a client device
US10977693B2 (en) 2008-11-26 2021-04-13 Free Stream Media Corp. Association of content identifier of audio-visual data with additional data through capture infrastructure
US8180891B1 (en) 2008-11-26 2012-05-15 Free Stream Media Corp. Discovery, access control, and communication with networked services from within a security sandbox
US9154942B2 (en) 2008-11-26 2015-10-06 Free Stream Media Corp. Zero configuration communication between a browser and a networked media device
US9961388B2 (en) 2008-11-26 2018-05-01 David Harrison Exposure of public internet protocol addresses in an advertising exchange server to improve relevancy of advertisements
US10880340B2 (en) 2008-11-26 2020-12-29 Free Stream Media Corp. Relevancy improvement through targeting of information based on data gathered from a networked device associated with a security sandbox of a client device
US10334324B2 (en) 2008-11-26 2019-06-25 Free Stream Media Corp. Relevant advertisement generation based on a user operating a client device communicatively coupled with a networked media device
US10567823B2 (en) 2008-11-26 2020-02-18 Free Stream Media Corp. Relevant advertisement generation based on a user operating a client device communicatively coupled with a networked media device
US9026668B2 (en) 2012-05-26 2015-05-05 Free Stream Media Corp. Real-time and retargeted advertising on multiple screens of a user watching television
US9390167B2 (en) 2010-07-29 2016-07-12 Soundhound, Inc. System and methods for continuous audio matching
US8588579B2 (en) * 2008-12-24 2013-11-19 Echostar Technologies L.L.C. Methods and apparatus for filtering and inserting content into a presentation stream using signature data
US8407735B2 (en) * 2008-12-24 2013-03-26 Echostar Technologies L.L.C. Methods and apparatus for identifying segments of content in a presentation stream using signature data
US8510771B2 (en) * 2008-12-24 2013-08-13 Echostar Technologies L.L.C. Methods and apparatus for filtering content from a presentation stream using signature data
US8281395B2 (en) * 2009-01-07 2012-10-02 Micron Technology, Inc. Pattern-recognition processor with matching-data reporting module
US8326127B2 (en) * 2009-01-30 2012-12-04 Echostar Technologies L.L.C. Methods and apparatus for identifying portions of a video stream based on characteristics of the video stream
US8199651B1 (en) 2009-03-16 2012-06-12 Audible Magic Corporation Method and system for modifying communication flows at a port level
US8438596B2 (en) 2009-04-08 2013-05-07 Tivo Inc. Automatic contact information transmission system
WO2010135623A1 (en) 2009-05-21 2010-11-25 Digimarc Corporation Robust signatures derived from local nonlinear filters
US10116972B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2018-10-30 Inscape Data, Inc. Methods for identifying video segments and displaying option to view from an alternative source and/or on an alternative device
US8437617B2 (en) * 2009-06-17 2013-05-07 Echostar Technologies L.L.C. Method and apparatus for modifying the presentation of content
US8490131B2 (en) * 2009-11-05 2013-07-16 Sony Corporation Automatic capture of data for acquisition of metadata
US8934758B2 (en) 2010-02-09 2015-01-13 Echostar Global B.V. Methods and apparatus for presenting supplemental content in association with recorded content
US20110197224A1 (en) * 2010-02-09 2011-08-11 Echostar Global B.V. Methods and Apparatus For Selecting Advertisements For Output By A Television Receiver Based on Social Network Profile Data
EP3418917B1 (en) * 2010-05-04 2022-08-17 Apple Inc. Methods and systems for synchronizing media
US9026034B2 (en) 2010-05-04 2015-05-05 Project Oda, Inc. Automatic detection of broadcast programming
US9311708B2 (en) 2014-04-23 2016-04-12 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Collaborative alignment of images
US9413477B2 (en) 2010-05-10 2016-08-09 Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc Screen detector
US9508011B2 (en) * 2010-05-10 2016-11-29 Videosurf, Inc. Video visual and audio query
US9838753B2 (en) 2013-12-23 2017-12-05 Inscape Data, Inc. Monitoring individual viewing of television events using tracking pixels and cookies
US9047371B2 (en) 2010-07-29 2015-06-02 Soundhound, Inc. System and method for matching a query against a broadcast stream
US8838977B2 (en) 2010-09-16 2014-09-16 Verance Corporation Watermark extraction and content screening in a networked environment
EP2659482B1 (en) 2010-12-30 2015-12-09 Dolby Laboratories Licensing Corporation Ranking representative segments in media data
US8786785B2 (en) * 2011-04-05 2014-07-22 Microsoft Corporation Video signature
US9035163B1 (en) 2011-05-10 2015-05-19 Soundbound, Inc. System and method for targeting content based on identified audio and multimedia
US8732739B2 (en) 2011-07-18 2014-05-20 Viggle Inc. System and method for tracking and rewarding media and entertainment usage including substantially real time rewards
US8923548B2 (en) 2011-11-03 2014-12-30 Verance Corporation Extraction of embedded watermarks from a host content using a plurality of tentative watermarks
US8533481B2 (en) 2011-11-03 2013-09-10 Verance Corporation Extraction of embedded watermarks from a host content based on extrapolation techniques
US8682026B2 (en) 2011-11-03 2014-03-25 Verance Corporation Efficient extraction of embedded watermarks in the presence of host content distortions
US8615104B2 (en) 2011-11-03 2013-12-24 Verance Corporation Watermark extraction based on tentative watermarks
US8745403B2 (en) 2011-11-23 2014-06-03 Verance Corporation Enhanced content management based on watermark extraction records
US9696336B2 (en) 2011-11-30 2017-07-04 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Multiple meter detection and processing using motion data
US9547753B2 (en) 2011-12-13 2017-01-17 Verance Corporation Coordinated watermarking
US9323902B2 (en) 2011-12-13 2016-04-26 Verance Corporation Conditional access using embedded watermarks
US10957310B1 (en) 2012-07-23 2021-03-23 Soundhound, Inc. Integrated programming framework for speech and text understanding with meaning parsing
US9571606B2 (en) 2012-08-31 2017-02-14 Verance Corporation Social media viewing system
US8726304B2 (en) 2012-09-13 2014-05-13 Verance Corporation Time varying evaluation of multimedia content
US9106964B2 (en) 2012-09-13 2015-08-11 Verance Corporation Enhanced content distribution using advertisements
US8869222B2 (en) 2012-09-13 2014-10-21 Verance Corporation Second screen content
US9081778B2 (en) 2012-09-25 2015-07-14 Audible Magic Corporation Using digital fingerprints to associate data with a work
US9992729B2 (en) 2012-10-22 2018-06-05 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Systems and methods for wirelessly modifying detection characteristics of portable devices
US9106953B2 (en) 2012-11-28 2015-08-11 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Media monitoring based on predictive signature caching
CN104520719B (en) 2012-11-30 2017-12-08 尼尔森(美国)有限公司 Use more gauge checks of exercise data and processing
US9183849B2 (en) 2012-12-21 2015-11-10 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Audio matching with semantic audio recognition and report generation
US9158760B2 (en) 2012-12-21 2015-10-13 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Audio decoding with supplemental semantic audio recognition and report generation
US9195649B2 (en) 2012-12-21 2015-11-24 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Audio processing techniques for semantic audio recognition and report generation
US8645984B1 (en) * 2013-02-05 2014-02-04 Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. Method and system for verifying content authenticity in smart TV
US9262794B2 (en) 2013-03-14 2016-02-16 Verance Corporation Transactional video marking system
US9325381B2 (en) 2013-03-15 2016-04-26 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods, apparatus and articles of manufacture to monitor mobile devices
US9161074B2 (en) 2013-04-30 2015-10-13 Ensequence, Inc. Methods and systems for distributing interactive content
US9251549B2 (en) 2013-07-23 2016-02-02 Verance Corporation Watermark extractor enhancements based on payload ranking
US9208334B2 (en) 2013-10-25 2015-12-08 Verance Corporation Content management using multiple abstraction layers
US10203399B2 (en) 2013-11-12 2019-02-12 Big Sky Financial Corporation Methods and apparatus for array based LiDAR systems with reduced interference
US9507849B2 (en) 2013-11-28 2016-11-29 Soundhound, Inc. Method for combining a query and a communication command in a natural language computer system
US9292488B2 (en) 2014-02-01 2016-03-22 Soundhound, Inc. Method for embedding voice mail in a spoken utterance using a natural language processing computer system
US11295730B1 (en) 2014-02-27 2022-04-05 Soundhound, Inc. Using phonetic variants in a local context to improve natural language understanding
CN106170988A (en) 2014-03-13 2016-11-30 凡瑞斯公司 The interactive content using embedded code obtains
US9360554B2 (en) 2014-04-11 2016-06-07 Facet Technology Corp. Methods and apparatus for object detection and identification in a multiple detector lidar array
US9794313B2 (en) 2014-05-09 2017-10-17 Cisco Technology, Inc. Methods and systems to facilitate synchronization of multiple media streams
US9564123B1 (en) 2014-05-12 2017-02-07 Soundhound, Inc. Method and system for building an integrated user profile
US10036801B2 (en) 2015-03-05 2018-07-31 Big Sky Financial Corporation Methods and apparatus for increased precision and improved range in a multiple detector LiDAR array
US9866816B2 (en) 2016-03-03 2018-01-09 4D Intellectual Properties, Llc Methods and apparatus for an active pulsed 4D camera for image acquisition and analysis
US10785329B2 (en) 2017-01-05 2020-09-22 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus to facilitate meter to meter matching for media identification
US11025972B2 (en) 2018-04-08 2021-06-01 Qligent Corporation Method and system for analyzing audio, video, and audio-video media data streams
US10911824B2 (en) 2018-11-05 2021-02-02 The Nielsen Company (Us), Llc Methods and apparatus to generate reference signatures
RU2704484C1 (en) * 2018-12-26 2019-10-29 Кирилл Владимирович Мальцев Method of media user preferences determination
US11172269B2 (en) 2020-03-04 2021-11-09 Dish Network L.L.C. Automated commercial content shifting in a video streaming system
US20240087586A1 (en) * 2021-01-29 2024-03-14 Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. Acoustic pattern determination

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3919479A (en) * 1972-09-21 1975-11-11 First National Bank Of Boston Broadcast signal identification system
FR2559002A1 (en) * 1984-01-27 1985-08-02 Gam Steffen Method and device for detecting audiovisual information broadcast by a transmitter.
EP0161512A1 (en) * 1984-04-26 1985-11-21 A.C. Nielsen Company Program identification system

Family Cites Families (33)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2330241A (en) * 1941-10-17 1943-09-28 W O Neil Radio receiving device
US2630525A (en) * 1951-05-25 1953-03-03 Musicast Inc System for transmitting and receiving coded entertainment programs
US3004104A (en) * 1954-04-29 1961-10-10 Muzak Corp Identification of sound and like signals
US3070798A (en) * 1958-06-09 1962-12-25 Nielsen A C Co System for determining the listening habits of wave signal receiver users
GB898607A (en) * 1958-06-09 1962-06-14 Nielsen A C Co Improvements in or relating to methods of and apparatus for monitoring the use of radio receivers
US3148245A (en) * 1958-12-22 1964-09-08 Nielsen A C Co System for determining the listening habits of wave signal receiver users
US3396240A (en) * 1964-09-28 1968-08-06 Honeywell Inc Data channel monitor
US3415947A (en) * 1965-02-24 1968-12-10 Honeywell Inc Data channel monitor
US3466394A (en) * 1966-05-02 1969-09-09 Ibm Voice verification system
US3845391A (en) * 1969-07-08 1974-10-29 Audicom Corp Communication including submerged identification signal
JPS5619141B1 (en) * 1970-10-24 1981-05-06
US3700815A (en) * 1971-04-20 1972-10-24 Bell Telephone Labor Inc Automatic speaker verification by non-linear time alignment of acoustic parameters
US3885217A (en) * 1973-07-11 1975-05-20 Computer Specifics Corp Data transmission system
US4025851A (en) * 1975-11-28 1977-05-24 A.C. Nielsen Company Automatic monitor for programs broadcast
US4244029A (en) * 1977-12-12 1981-01-06 Goodyear Aerospace Corporation Digital video correlator
US4225967A (en) * 1978-01-09 1980-09-30 Fujitsu Limited Broadcast acknowledgement method and system
US4420769A (en) * 1978-03-22 1983-12-13 Novak Albert P Device for the automatic editing, at the receiver, of unwanted program material from broadcast electrical signals
US4281217A (en) * 1978-03-27 1981-07-28 Dolby Ray Milton Apparatus and method for the identification of specially encoded FM stereophonic broadcasts
US4227177A (en) * 1978-04-27 1980-10-07 Dialog Systems, Inc. Continuous speech recognition method
US4200861A (en) * 1978-09-01 1980-04-29 View Engineering, Inc. Pattern recognition apparatus and method
US4230990C1 (en) * 1979-03-16 2002-04-09 John G Lert Jr Broadcast program identification method and system
US4305101A (en) * 1979-04-16 1981-12-08 Codart, Inc. Method and apparatus for selectively recording a broadcast
US4390904A (en) * 1979-09-20 1983-06-28 Shelton Video Editors, Inc. Automatic circuit and method for editing commercial messages from television signals
US4283735A (en) * 1979-09-21 1981-08-11 David Jagger Method and apparatus for selectively deleting during video tape recording
US4466122A (en) * 1981-02-17 1984-08-14 Sidney Auerbach Discriminator for pattern recognition
SE8106186L (en) * 1981-10-20 1983-04-21 Hans Olof Kohler PROCEDURE AND DEVICE FOR DETERMINING THE COMPLIANCE OF AN ANALYTICAL SIGNAL WITH AT LEAST ONE REFERENCE SIGNAL
US4520404A (en) * 1982-08-23 1985-05-28 Kohorn H Von System, apparatus and method for recording and editing broadcast transmissions
US4450531A (en) * 1982-09-10 1984-05-22 Ensco, Inc. Broadcast signal recognition system and method
US4499601A (en) * 1982-10-18 1985-02-12 Matthews Gordon H Method and apparatus for automatically detecting and playing desired audio segments over a broadcast receiver.
US4547804A (en) * 1983-03-21 1985-10-15 Greenberg Burton L Method and apparatus for the automatic identification and verification of commercial broadcast programs
US4635096A (en) * 1983-04-08 1987-01-06 Sony Corporation Test signal generator
GB2138642B (en) * 1983-04-22 1986-08-20 Video Res Audience rating measuring system for television receivers and video tape recorders
US4677466A (en) * 1985-07-29 1987-06-30 A. C. Nielsen Company Broadcast program identification method and apparatus

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3919479A (en) * 1972-09-21 1975-11-11 First National Bank Of Boston Broadcast signal identification system
FR2559002A1 (en) * 1984-01-27 1985-08-02 Gam Steffen Method and device for detecting audiovisual information broadcast by a transmitter.
EP0161512A1 (en) * 1984-04-26 1985-11-21 A.C. Nielsen Company Program identification system

Non-Patent Citations (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
JOURNAL OF THE SMPTE, vol. 84, March 1975, pages 162-163, New York, US; G. AUERBACH: "A pattern-recognition system for monitoring video and audio signals" *

Cited By (49)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4814883A (en) * 1988-01-04 1989-03-21 Beam Laser Systems, Inc. Multiple input/output video switch for commerical insertion system
GB2258065A (en) * 1991-07-26 1993-01-27 Mcconnells Developments Limite Television programme and advertising data analysis
AU678163B2 (en) * 1992-04-30 1997-05-22 Arbitron Inc. Method and system for recognition of broadcast segments
WO1995006985A1 (en) * 1993-08-31 1995-03-09 Interessengemeinschaft für Rundfunkschutzrechte GmbH Schutzrechtsverwertung & Co. KG Process and device for detecting undesirable video scenes
US5870151A (en) * 1993-08-31 1999-02-09 Koerber; Matthias Method and equipment for the detection of undesired video scenes
CN1047488C (en) * 1993-08-31 1999-12-15 联合企业股份有限公司和无线电产业保护两合公司 Process and device for detecting undesirable video scenes
CN1047902C (en) * 1993-10-27 1999-12-29 尼尔逊媒介研究股份有限公司 Audience measurement system
WO1996027840A1 (en) * 1995-03-04 1996-09-12 Televitesse Systems Inc. Automatic broadcast monitoring system
WO1997015999A2 (en) * 1995-10-27 1997-05-01 Digital D.J. Inc. Broadcast system transmitting supplementary data with the broadcast program
WO1997015999A3 (en) * 1995-10-27 1997-07-24 Digital D J Inc Broadcast system transmitting supplementary data with the broadcast program
WO1998035492A2 (en) * 1997-02-06 1998-08-13 Telexis Corporation Method and apparatus for recognising video sequences
WO1998035492A3 (en) * 1997-02-06 1998-10-22 Televitesse Systems Inc Method and apparatus for recognising video sequences
ES2141039A1 (en) * 1998-01-30 2000-03-01 Mayo Audiovisual S A Automatic system for detecting and recognizing televised announcements
US7277852B2 (en) 2000-10-23 2007-10-02 Ntt Communications Corporation Method, system and storage medium for commercial and musical composition recognition and storage
WO2008106441A1 (en) 2007-02-27 2008-09-04 Landmark Digital Services Llc System and method for monitoring and recognizing broadcast data
EP2360639B1 (en) * 2009-03-13 2016-11-16 Nec Corporation Image identifier matching device
EP2360639A1 (en) * 2009-03-13 2011-08-24 Nec Corporation Image identifier matching device
US9906834B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2018-02-27 Inscape Data, Inc. Methods for identifying video segments and displaying contextually targeted content on a connected television
US11080331B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2021-08-03 Inscape Data, Inc. Systems and methods for addressing a media database using distance associative hashing
US11272248B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2022-03-08 Inscape Data, Inc. Methods for identifying video segments and displaying contextually targeted content on a connected television
US10949458B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2021-03-16 Inscape Data, Inc. System and method for improving work load management in ACR television monitoring system
US10820048B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2020-10-27 Inscape Data, Inc. Methods for identifying video segments and displaying contextually targeted content on a connected television
US10169455B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2019-01-01 Inscape Data, Inc. Systems and methods for addressing a media database using distance associative hashing
US10185768B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2019-01-22 Inscape Data, Inc. Systems and methods for addressing a media database using distance associative hashing
US10375451B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2019-08-06 Inscape Data, Inc. Detection of common media segments
US10271098B2 (en) 2009-05-29 2019-04-23 Inscape Data, Inc. Methods for identifying video segments and displaying contextually targeted content on a connected television
US10192138B2 (en) 2010-05-27 2019-01-29 Inscape Data, Inc. Systems and methods for reducing data density in large datasets
GB2483250A (en) * 2010-08-31 2012-03-07 British Broadcasting Corp Producing edit decision list by comparing edited video with source video
WO2015086076A1 (en) * 2013-12-12 2015-06-18 Metaio Gmbh Method for determining a similarity value between a first image and a second image
US9955192B2 (en) 2013-12-23 2018-04-24 Inscape Data, Inc. Monitoring individual viewing of television events using tracking pixels and cookies
US11039178B2 (en) 2013-12-23 2021-06-15 Inscape Data, Inc. Monitoring individual viewing of television events using tracking pixels and cookies
US10284884B2 (en) 2013-12-23 2019-05-07 Inscape Data, Inc. Monitoring individual viewing of television events using tracking pixels and cookies
US10306274B2 (en) 2013-12-23 2019-05-28 Inscape Data, Inc. Monitoring individual viewing of television events using tracking pixels and cookies
US11863804B2 (en) 2014-12-01 2024-01-02 Inscape Data, Inc. System and method for continuous media segment identification
US11272226B2 (en) 2014-12-01 2022-03-08 Inscape Data, Inc. System and method for continuous media segment identification
US11711554B2 (en) 2015-01-30 2023-07-25 Inscape Data, Inc. Methods for identifying video segments and displaying option to view from an alternative source and/or on an alternative device
US10945006B2 (en) 2015-01-30 2021-03-09 Inscape Data, Inc. Methods for identifying video segments and displaying option to view from an alternative source and/or on an alternative device
US10405014B2 (en) 2015-01-30 2019-09-03 Inscape Data, Inc. Methods for identifying video segments and displaying option to view from an alternative source and/or on an alternative device
US10482349B2 (en) 2015-04-17 2019-11-19 Inscape Data, Inc. Systems and methods for reducing data density in large datasets
US10873788B2 (en) 2015-07-16 2020-12-22 Inscape Data, Inc. Detection of common media segments
US10902048B2 (en) 2015-07-16 2021-01-26 Inscape Data, Inc. Prediction of future views of video segments to optimize system resource utilization
US10080062B2 (en) 2015-07-16 2018-09-18 Inscape Data, Inc. Optimizing media fingerprint retention to improve system resource utilization
US11308144B2 (en) 2015-07-16 2022-04-19 Inscape Data, Inc. Systems and methods for partitioning search indexes for improved efficiency in identifying media segments
US11451877B2 (en) 2015-07-16 2022-09-20 Inscape Data, Inc. Optimizing media fingerprint retention to improve system resource utilization
US11659255B2 (en) 2015-07-16 2023-05-23 Inscape Data, Inc. Detection of common media segments
US10674223B2 (en) 2015-07-16 2020-06-02 Inscape Data, Inc. Optimizing media fingerprint retention to improve system resource utilization
US10983984B2 (en) 2017-04-06 2021-04-20 Inscape Data, Inc. Systems and methods for improving accuracy of device maps using media viewing data
US11275933B2 (en) 2018-08-24 2022-03-15 Genpact Luxembourg S.Á R.L Systems and methods for segmentation of report corpus using visual signatures
WO2020039260A3 (en) * 2018-08-24 2020-04-09 Genpact Luxembourg S.A R.L Systems and methods for segmentation of report corpus using visual signatures

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
AU7243787A (en) 1987-11-12
JP2702361B2 (en) 1998-01-21
CA1323415C (en) 1993-10-19
JPH066834A (en) 1994-01-14
US4739398A (en) 1988-04-19
DE3750437T2 (en) 1995-04-06
JP2702647B2 (en) 1998-01-21
EP0248533B1 (en) 1994-08-31
EP0248533A3 (en) 1989-09-06
AU585809B2 (en) 1989-06-22
JPH0569356B2 (en) 1993-09-30
JPH066833A (en) 1994-01-14
JPS6324786A (en) 1988-02-02
DE3750437D1 (en) 1994-10-06

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US4739398A (en) Method, apparatus and system for recognizing broadcast segments
US4857999A (en) Video monitoring system
AU678163B2 (en) Method and system for recognition of broadcast segments
US7194752B1 (en) Method and apparatus for automatically recognizing input audio and/or video streams
US5319453A (en) Method and apparatus for video signal encoding, decoding and monitoring
US6978047B2 (en) Method and apparatus for storing digital video content provided from a plurality of cameras
EP0367585A2 (en) Electronic data encoding and recognition system
US6061056A (en) Television monitoring system with automatic selection of program material of interest and subsequent display under user control
US7064796B2 (en) Method and system for re-identifying broadcast segments using statistical profiles
MXPA03004846A (en) Apparatus and method for measuring tuning of a digital broadcast receiver.
JPH11505682A (en) Automatic broadcast monitoring system
EP3776263B1 (en) System and method for detecting repeating content, including commercials, in a video data stream using audio-based and video-based automated content recognition
CN110677718B (en) Video identification method and device
US5987150A (en) Video capturing using on-screen graphics
CN109120896B (en) Security video monitoring guard system
EP1973351A1 (en) Monitor
CA2628654C (en) Method and system for updating a broadcast segment recognition database
US7260642B2 (en) Method and system for real-time monitoring image transmission
JPH03173291A (en) Method for generating digital sign from video signal or tv transmitting frame
CN109543511A (en) Video frequency identifying method, system and device based on figure line mutation frame and feature calculation
US7826674B1 (en) Content signal analysis
US20060098880A1 (en) Method and apparatus for storing digital video content provided from a plurality of cameras
GB2327167A (en) Identification of television commercials
WO1995034166A1 (en) Method and apparatus for video signal encoding, decoding and monitoring

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: CONTROL DATA CORPORATION

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19900209

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19920427

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: CERIDIAN CORPORATION

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3750437

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19941006

ET Fr: translation filed
ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: STUDIO TORTA SOCIETA' SEMPLICE

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20030411

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20030424

Year of fee payment: 17

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20030722

Year of fee payment: 17

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20040501

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20041201

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20040501

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20050131

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20050501