Fire Retardant Composition
* This invention relates to coatings based on poly¬ meric resins and more particularly to fire-retardant coating compositions.
A distinction should be made among fire or flame
5 resistance and fire or flame retardancy. For purposes of the present invention, flame-resistant materials are defined as those that will not burn on contact with a flame, or if ignited, will not propagate the flame. For example, under ordinary atmospheric, tem-
10 perature and pressure conditions, ceramic, cemen- titious and structural metal materials are considered to be flame resistant.
Fire retardant materials, for purposes of the present invention, are those that when exposed to a
15 flame in an appropriate.oxidizing atmosphere, will ignite, but will propagate the flame reluctantly or very slowly. Examples of such materials are the synthetic polymer-based formulations described in U.S. Patents 3,121,067; 3,287,312; 3,514,424; 3,524,761;
20 3,524,901; 3,699,041; 3,748,317; 3,766,065; 3,783,133; 3,816,367; 3,897,387; 3,940,549; 4,191,675; 4,225,649; 4,243,579; 4,341,381; 4,430,470; 4,464,495; and many others. It is apparent that the use of polymeric coatings on flammable substrates to inhibit flame
25 spread is old in the art.
Such coatings as are based upon silicone rubbers or fluorocarbons impart good fire retardancy, but tend to be expensive and do not adhere well to many • substrates. Coatings based on epoxy resins tend to be
30 rigid and are difficult to apply, at least in the
field, in a thin layer to a substrate. Phenolic-based formulations tend to form a rigid char that does not adhere well. Polyurethanes, in addition to exhibiting poor thermal stablility, may form toxic degradation products upon exposure to flames.
Particularly, such diverse organizations as the single-ply roofing industry, the Federal Aviation Agency, and the U.S. Navy, among others, have been searching for improved materials for reduction of flame spread and the prevention or reduction of the danger of "flash over", indicating that there is a current need for an improved fire-retardant coating.
It is, therefore, a primary object of the present invention to provide an improved fire-retardant, poly- mer-based coating composition that can be applied to various flammable substrates to provide reduced flame spread. It is another object of the present invention to provide a coating composition of the character described, which composition exhibits good adhesion to a variety of substrates, provides regulated gas escape, and assists in the formation of of non-burning char. Still a further object of the present invention is to provide a coating composition of the character described that is relatively inexpensive, has good environmental stability and can be prepared and applied with ease using conventional equipment. Other objects of the present invention will in part be obvious and will in part appear hereinafter.
The invention, therefore, comprises the com- position possessing the features, properties and the
constituents, and the article of manufacture possesses the characteristics, properties and relation of ele¬ ments, all as exemplified in the detailed disclosure hereinafter set forth and the scope of the invention of which will be indicated in the claims.
Accordingly, in one aspect of the present inven¬ tion, there is provided a coating composition suitable for application to a flammable substrate for forming thereon a fire-retardant coating. The composition generally comprises an intimate mixture of a water emulsion of an ethylene-vinyl chloride copolymer with a finely powdered or comminuted zinc borate or a mix¬ ture of powdered aluminum trihydrate and zinc borate. The formulation preferably also optionally contains a thickener to maintain the powdered material in suspen¬ sion, and an agent to impart fluidity and enhance dispersing action.
The foregoing fluid composition possesses a number of advantageous characteristics. Because it is water based, the coating equipment used to apply it to a substrate can be cleaned simply with soap and water and requires no expensive, possibly toxic or explo¬ sive, organic cleaning solvents. The composition of the invention dries at room temperature in a manner quite similar to the drying of latex paint, and forms a flexible coat that can, within reasonable limits, expand, contract and bend with the substrate.
The formulation is simply prepared by thoroughly mixing the ethylene-vinyl chloride copolymer, pre- ferably in emulsion or latex form, with the inorganic
powder, water and the thickening and dispersing agents. The powder is zinc borate with or without admixed aluminum trihydrate, added in a weight amount that can vary from as little as 4.5 to 32 parts per hundred of the final composition. The weight ratio of zinc borate in any such mix should be not less than 1:6 to the aluminum trihydrate. A known thickener such as cross-linked acrylic copolymer emulsion, gum, cellulose derivative or the like, is used to limit settling of the powder and control viscosity. A pre¬ ferred dispersing agent used is an alkali salt of a carboxylate polyelectrolyte, typically the proprietary agent known as Tamol 850, which when mixed in the com¬ position in minor and discretionary amount serves to enhance dispersion of the inorganic powder throughout the mixture and to impart fluidity to the mixture. In this mixture, the use of zinc borate or aluminum trihydrate-zinc borate mix imparts a significant reduction in flame response over the use of the ethylene-vinyl chloride/acrylic binder alone or the binder mixed with only aluminum trihydrate.
In a preferred embodiment, an ethylene-vinyl chloride copolymer emulsion is compounded with the thickener, typically an acrylic emulsion, in a ratio, by weight, of about 20:1, but this ratio can vary bet¬ ween about 10:1 to 50:1. A typical composition of the present invention of 100 parts by weight of the final composition, contains between 30 and 35 parts of the mixed emulsions, between 30 and 45 parts of water, between 30 and 35 parts of the zinc borate or zinc
borate/aluminum trihydrate mix, and between 0.3 and 0.6 parts of the dispersing agent, if desired. Inasmuch as these weight percentages are based upon an emulsion that is nominally 50% by weight water and a thickener that is 70% by weight water, the dry weight percentages of ethylene-vinyl chloride and thickener in one hundred parts by weight of the final com¬ position, can range from about 15/0.2 to 17/1 parts ethylene-vinyl chloride/thickener. One preferred embodiment then contains by weight about 33 parts mixed emulsions, about 40 parts of water, about 30.1 parts zinc borate or zinc borate/aluminum trihydrate and about 0.5 parts of the dispersing agent. In the preferred embodiment, the powder or pigment is a mix- ture of aluminum trihydrate and zinc borate in about a 3:1 weight ratio.
The foregoing composition exhibits a viscosity similar to that of an ordinary latex paint, and can be applied by any of the methods known for applying such paint, e.g., spraying, brushing, dipping, and the like.
The following examples, which are meant to be illustrative and not limiting, are provided to further describe the present invention and to detail the per- formance characteristics under test conditions for a coating formed by drying the present composition on a substrate. In all of the examples, the parts given are by weight.
EXAMPLE I A coating mix is prepared by compounding in a
mixer the following formulation in parts by weight: water — 271.5, aluminum trihydrate — 207.3, zinc borate — 69.1, ethylene-vinyl chloride copolymer emulsion (50% percent water) — 303.9, acrylic emulsion (70% percent water) — 15.2. The order in which materials are added to the mixer is not important with respect to the fire retar- dant properties attained, but to obtain good disper¬ sion, the mixture should be made in the following order: water, dispersant, powdered inorganics, ethylene- vinyl chloride emulsion and thickener. The mixture was agitated for sufficient time to obtain a smooth, complete dispersion of the materials with respect to one another. The final mixture was applied to a test strip (12" long) of unsized, uncoated closely-woven cotton muslin (2.5 oz/yd2) by passing the latter through a size press nip at which the coating was introduced. The coated muslin was permitted to dry and the coated material thereon constituted approxima¬ tely 15 percent by weight of the dried, coated fabric.
The coated fabric was subject to testing in accordance with ASTM F501-77 to provide the following results:
FLAME TIME AFTER GLOW TIME BURN LENGTH (Sec.) (Sec.) (In.)
0 0 4
EXAMPLE II A formulation was prepared substantially as set forth in Example I, omitting zinc borate and using 276.4 parts of aluminum trihydrate instead of the mix- ture of the two inorganic materials. A test strip of the same cotton muslin was coated in the same manner with the same weight percent of the formulation and subjected to the same flame test with the following results: FLAME TIME AFTER GLOW TIME BURN LENGTH
(Sec.) (Sec.) (In.)
16.8 0 12 (entire)
EXAMPLE III A coating formulation was prepared in the same manner and proportions as set forth in Example I except that no aluminum trihydrate was used, the amount of zinc borate being adjusted to 276.4 parts, sodium salt of a carboxylate polyelectrolyte — 4.6, As described in Example I, a muslin strip was coated but with the formulation of Example III to provide the same weight percentage of dried coating. The dried, coated strip was subjected to the same test with the following results:
FLAME TIME AFTER GLOW TIME BURN LENGTH (Sec.) (Sec.) (In.)
0 0 4.8
EXAMPLE IV A formulation was prepared in accordance with the procedure and' amounts as set forth in Example I except that the ratio of alumi-num trihydrate to zinc borate was changed to 6:1. A muslin strip was coated in accordance with the procedure and dried to provide a coated substrate of the same weight percent coating as in the preceding Examples, and when tested in the same test, yielded the following results: FLAME TIME AFTER GLOW TIME BURN LENGTH (Sec.) (Sec.) (In.)
3.75 0 6.5
EXAMPLE V As a comparative basis for the tests conducted in the four preceding Examples, a strip of the uncoated, unsized 2.5 oz/yd2 close-weave cotton muslin was sub¬ jected to the same test with the following results: FLAME TIME AFTER GLOW TIME BURN LENGTH (Sec.) (Sec.) (In.) Not applicable 300 12 (entire)
From the results determined from the preceding Examples, it is apparent the present formulation yields a substantially superior flame-retardant coating. While the composition of the invention has been described, in the examples, as being applied to cotton fabric, it is to be understood that it may be applied to a wide variety of substrates possessing various degrees of flammability, for example, wood and other cellulosic sheathing, foamed polyurethanes and nitri-
les, fabrics, calendered polymeric sheeting and boards, and the like.
It will thus be seen that the objects set forth above, among those made apparent by the preceding description, are efficiently obtained. Since certain changes may be made in the composition and articles set forth in the examples, without departing from the scope of this invention, it is intended that all matter contained in the above description shall be interpreted as illustrative and not in a limiting sense.