EP0226289B1 - Processing of aromatic vacuum gas oil for jet fuel production - Google Patents

Processing of aromatic vacuum gas oil for jet fuel production Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0226289B1
EP0226289B1 EP86307809A EP86307809A EP0226289B1 EP 0226289 B1 EP0226289 B1 EP 0226289B1 EP 86307809 A EP86307809 A EP 86307809A EP 86307809 A EP86307809 A EP 86307809A EP 0226289 B1 EP0226289 B1 EP 0226289B1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
jet fuel
gas oil
feed
vacuum gas
aromatics
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Expired - Lifetime
Application number
EP86307809A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0226289A2 (en
EP0226289A3 (en
Inventor
Kenneth Michael Mitchell
Stuart Shan-San Shih
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
ExxonMobil Oil Corp
Original Assignee
Mobil Oil Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Mobil Oil Corp filed Critical Mobil Oil Corp
Priority to AT86307809T priority Critical patent/ATE72266T1/en
Publication of EP0226289A2 publication Critical patent/EP0226289A2/en
Publication of EP0226289A3 publication Critical patent/EP0226289A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0226289B1 publication Critical patent/EP0226289B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C10PETROLEUM, GAS OR COKE INDUSTRIES; TECHNICAL GASES CONTAINING CARBON MONOXIDE; FUELS; LUBRICANTS; PEAT
    • C10GCRACKING HYDROCARBON OILS; PRODUCTION OF LIQUID HYDROCARBON MIXTURES, e.g. BY DESTRUCTIVE HYDROGENATION, OLIGOMERISATION, POLYMERISATION; RECOVERY OF HYDROCARBON OILS FROM OIL-SHALE, OIL-SAND, OR GASES; REFINING MIXTURES MAINLY CONSISTING OF HYDROCARBONS; REFORMING OF NAPHTHA; MINERAL WAXES
    • C10G65/00Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only
    • C10G65/02Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only
    • C10G65/04Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only including only refining steps
    • C10G65/043Treatment of hydrocarbon oils by two or more hydrotreatment processes only plural serial stages only including only refining steps at least one step being a change in the structural skeleton

Definitions

  • This invention relates to the production of premium jet fuel from aromatic vacuum gas oil.
  • jet fuel Refining petroleum crude oils to obtain jet fuel is well known.
  • the jet fuel must meet certain specifications for freeze point, pour point, smoke point and weight percent sulfur. It may be necessary to subject these fuels to additional processing to meet required specifications.
  • U. S. Patent No. 4,501,926 to LaPierre et al gas oil and H2 contact zeolite beta catalyst to selectively isomerize the paraffinic waxy components in a gas oil feed.
  • U. S. Patent No. 4,501,926 discloses other useful feedstocks, including crude oils, kerosenes, jet fuels, lubricating oil stocks, heating oils and other distillate fractions, whose pour point and viscosity need to be maintained within certain specification limits.
  • U. S. Patent No. 3,573,198 to Parker et al teaches smoke point improvement of jet fuel kerosene fractions by treating a sulfurous kerosene fraction by a two-stage process.
  • the first stage principally desulfurizes and the second stage principally saturates aromatics by contact with a catalyst of alumina, a halogen component, a Group VIII noble metal component and a Group VII-B metallic component.
  • U. S. 3,573,198 does not suggest upstream processing most appropriate for combination with its process. Highly olefinic/aromatic kerosene is the least desirable feed for this process.
  • U. S. Patent No. 4,427,534 to Brunn et al discloses production of jet and diesel fuels from highly aromatic oils using a sulfided, halogen-promoted Group VIB-Group VIII metal on an alumina-containing support.
  • the process has the disadvantage that it employs hydrocracking, which opens aromatic molecules to form paraffinic material. By opening aromatic rings, the hydrocracked products can have a higher pour point than the feed to hydrocracking.
  • the present invention provides a process for producing jet fuel from a vacuum gas oil feed having at least 20 to 50 wt % aromatics and boiling above 343°C (650°F) by contacting the feed with a dewaxing catalyst comprising a hydrogenation component and zeolite beta having a silica:alumina ratio of at least 30:1 at 199-538°C (390° to 1000°F), a pressure of atmospheric to 10,400 kPa (1500 psig), a liquid hourly space velocity of 0.2 to 5.0 hr ⁇ 1, in the presence of hydrogen to produce a dewaxed effluent stream, wherein most aromatics in the feed are unchanged; separating the dewaxed effluent stream into a kerosene fraction containing hydrocarbons boiling below 343°C (650°F) and a heavier fraction; hydrotreating the kerosene fraction with a conventional hydrotreating catalyst under conventional hydrotreating conditions to produce a hydrotreated kerosene stream; and recovering from the hydro
  • the process of the present invention produces jet fuel having a low freeze point and low pour point from a vacuum gas oil boiling above 288°C (550°F) preferably above 343°C (650°F).
  • Vacuum gas oils typically boil in the range from 288 to 566°C (550° to 1050°F), more usually 343 to 454°C (650° to 850°F).
  • the process of the present invention produces jet fuel from highly aromatic (at least 20-50 wt % aromatics) feeds with minimal conversion of aromatics during isomerization of paraffins into jet fuel hydrocarbons, thus improving jet fuel quality by not converting the aromatics into higher pour point paraffins.
  • the process also improves jet fuel quality by mild hydrotreating of the kerosene cut separated from other hydrocarbons in the effluent from isomerization, thus allowing easy processing to produce a jet fuel which meets jet fuel specifications for aromatics content, pour point, freeze point, sulfur content and smoke point.
  • the figure illustrates isomerization dewaxing followed by hydrotreating of a kerosene fraction.
  • the vacuum gas oil feed comprises aromatics, paraffinic, waxy components and sulfur compounds.
  • the vacuum gas oil stream 12 is combined with a hydrogen stream 14 to form a combined stream 16.
  • the vacuum gas oil comes from a vacuum distillation tower (not shown).
  • the combined stream 16 passes into reactor 20, preferably a co-current downflow trickle bed reactor. Feed contacts catalyst comprising a hydrogenation component and zeolite beta to produce a dewaxed effluent stream 22.
  • the aromatics are substantially unchanged in the dewaxing unit 20.
  • the preferred isomerization conditions are a temperature of 199 to 538°C (390° to 1000°F), a pressure of atmospheric to 10,400 kPa (1500 psig), a liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) from 0.2 to 5.0 hr ⁇ 1 and a hydrogen feed rate of 90 to 900, n l/l, normal liters per liter of liquid feed (500 to 5000 SCF/bbl of vacuum gas oil).
  • the temperature is 371 to 454°C (700° to 850°F)
  • the pressure is 2200 to 3500 kpa (300 to 500 psig)
  • the liquid hourly space velocity is 0.5 to 2.0 hr ⁇ 1
  • the hydrogen feed rate is 180 to 540 n l/l (1000 to 3000 SCF/bbl).
  • the dewaxed effluent is separated by separator 30 into a vapor stream 34 and a liquid stream 36.
  • the vapor H2 and C1-C4 hydrocarbons
  • the liquid comprising C5+ hydrocarbons, enters distillation tower 40 which produces a naphtha stream 42, typically C5 to 143°C (290°F) a kerosene stream 46 and a bottoms stream 44.
  • the aromatics impair the subsequent hydrotreating of the kerosene.
  • Tower 40 facilitates downstream hydrotreating of the kerosene because the aromatics (which are not changed much in reactor 20) are still high boiling and concentrate in the bottoms stream 44.
  • the kerosene stream 46 is combined with hydrogen from stream 48 to form a hydrotreater feed stream 49, which enters hydrotreater 50.
  • the kerosene 46 has some olefins and sulfur compounds.
  • the hydrotreater 50 removes some of the sulfur and saturates some of the olefins.
  • Hydrotreater 50 contains conventional hydrotreating catalysts, and operates at conventional conditions.
  • the hydrotreater operates at 1800 to 5600 kPa (250 to 800 psig), a temperature of 240 to 427°C (400° to 800°F), a liquid hourly space velocity from 0.5 to 10.0 hr ⁇ 1, and a hydrogen feed rate of 90 to 900 n l/l (500 to 5000 SCF/bbl).
  • the hydrotreated effluent stream 52 passes from hydrotreater 50 into separator 60 which separates stream 52 into a C4- vapor stream 64 and a C5+ liquid stream 66.
  • the liquid stream 66 passes to a stripper 70.
  • the hydrotreated liquid is preferably steam-stripped by steam, from line 72 into a naphtha stream 74 and a jet fuel stream 76.
  • the jet fuel stream 76 typically comprises 143 to 288°C (290° to 550°F) hydrocarbons.
  • the jet fuel stream 76 has a smoke point within 1 mm of the smoke point of the kerosene stream 46.
  • the jet fuel, stream 76 preferably meets jet fuel smoke point specifications, and may be blended into the refinery jet fuel pool.
  • Boiling point of the jet fuel is related to freeze point.
  • the higher boiling point components have higher freeze points than the lower boiling point components.
  • Distillation cut points can be adjusted by conventional means, e.g., by changing fractionator reflux rates, temperatures, etc.
  • the freeze point may range from -40° to -50°C (-40° to -58°F).
  • the isomerization dewaxing catalyst comprises zeolite beta with a hydrogenation component.
  • Zeolite beta is described in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,308,069 and Re. 28,341.
  • the hydrotreating catalyst and process are conventional.
  • the hydrotreating catalyst is Ni, Mo, Co, W, NiMo, CoMo, etc., on an amorphous support such as alumina.
  • Dewaxing and hydrotreating were run in a 100 cc downflow fixed bed test reactor.
  • the test reactor had a 2.5 cm (1-inch nominal) inside diameter and a 91 cm (36-inch) length, including a 30 cm (12-inch) preheater, a 30 cm (12-inch) catalyst space and a 30 cm (12-inch) bottoms space.
  • 75 cc of catalyst was used.
  • H2 was added at a rate of 360 nl/l (2000 SCF/bbl).
  • Examples 1-5 illustrate prior art processes (Examples 1-4) or processes which do not form part of the state of the art but which are not claimed as the invention (Example 5).
  • the 204-371°C (400-700°F) fraction is a typical light gas oil.
  • the 343-454°C (650-850°F) fraction is a typical aromatic vacuum gas oil, and is preferred feedstock for use in the present invention.
  • This example reports catalyst properties of two hydrotreating catalysts and one isomerization dewaxing catalyst.
  • the isomerization dewaxing catalyst, platinum zeolite beta comprised about 35 wt % alumina 65 wt % zeolite beta to which was added 0.56 wt % platinum.
  • the catalyst was prepared by blending 65 wt % zeolite beta and 35 wt % alumina with water. This was then extruded to 1.6m (1/16") outside diameter pellets and dried at 121°C (250°F) in nitrogen. Then, the catalyst was heated at 2.8°C/min (5°F/min) in nitrogen and calcined in nitrogen for 3 hours at 538°C (1000°F) then calcined in air for 3 hours at 538°C (1000°F).
  • the air-calcined catalyst was steamed 10 hours at 538°C (1000°F) and 1 atm steam pressure.
  • the catalyst was ammonium-exchanged twice at room temperature with 1 normal NH4NO3, washed with water and dried at 121°C (250°F) overnight. Then, the catalyst was exchanged for 12 hours at room temperature with Pt(NH3)4Cl2, at a concentration of 4 milliliters water per gram of platinum salt, with stirring. The catalyst was then washed 4 times until free of chlorine.
  • the washed catalyst was then dried at 121°C (250°F) overnight and calcined for 3 hours at 349°C (660°F) in a 60% air, 40% N2 mixture which has a dew point of -6°C (22°F).
  • the resulting zeolite beta catalyst had an alpha value of 50 based on zeolite.
  • the significance of the alpha value and a method for determining it are described in U. S. Patent No. 4,016,218 and J. Catalysis , 61, 390 etseq (1980).
  • Catalysts having an alpha value based on zeolite of 10 to 150, preferably 10 to 100, or most preferably 30 to 70, are preferred for isomerization dewaxing.
  • Alpha can be changed by steaming, by alkali-exchange or by varying the silica:alumina ratio of the zeolite.
  • the reactor pressure was 2500 kPa (350 psig), the liquid hourly space velocity was 1.0 hr ⁇ 1, the temperature was 416 to 421°C (780° to 790°F), with 356 nl/l (2000 SCF/bbl) of H2.
  • the reactor effluent was distilled to produce a 143 to 288°C (290° to 550°F) fraction, equivalent to stream 46 of the figure.
  • Table 4 lists the properties of the 143°C+ (290°F+) effluent and its 143 to 288°C (290° to 550°F) fraction.
  • the 143 to 288°C (290° to 550°F) fraction meets smoke point requirements, but has too much sulfur (0.67 wt %) and olefins (7.7 vol %).
  • This example demonstrates isomerization-dewaxing followed by hydrotreating of the entire effluent.
  • the entire 143°C+ (290°F+) effluent from the test reactor is hydrotreated using the conventional NiMo/Al2O3 hydrotreating catalyst listed in Table 2.
  • the effluent from hydrotreater was distilled to form a jet fuel fraction 143 to 288°C (290° to 550°F) whose properties are summarized in Table 5.
  • Hydrotreating the entire 143°C (290°F+) dewaxing reactor effluent degraded the jet fuel as shown by its lower smoke point and higher aromatics content compared to the unhydrotreated 143-288°C (290° to 550°F) fraction produced in Example 4 and listed in Table 4.
  • This example demonstrates isomerization-dewaxing of a vacuum gas oil followed by hydrotreating the kerosene fraction of the dewaxed effluent.
  • the dewaxed effluent of Example 4 is fractionated to produce a kerosene fraction of 143 to 288°C (290° to 550°F) representing stream 46 of the figure.
  • This fraction was hydrotreated at varying temperatures using the conventional (NiMo/Al2O3) hydrotreating catalyst of Table 2.
  • the hydrotreated material was stripped to recover a jet fuel product of 143 to 288°C (290° to 550°F). Hydrotreating conditions and jet fuel product properties are listed in Table 5.
  • Example 5 the entire 143°C+ (290°F+) isomerization dewaxing reactor effluent is hydrotreated. Even though the boiling range of the jet fuel product is the same (because of fractionation to obtain a 143 to 288°C product) in Examples 5-8, the jet fuel made in Example 5 is not as good as the jet fuel made in Examples 6-8.
  • Example 6 Increasing the hydrotreating temperature from 316°C (601°F), in Example 6 to 344°C (to 651°F) in Example 7 gave a jet fuel product having less sulfur and a higher smoke point.
  • Example 8 Hydrotreating at 371°C (700°F), in Example 8, gives a jet fuel product with an 18.5 mm smoke point, as opposed to the 20.0 mm smoke point of the product from Example 7.
  • the results in Table 5 indicate that hydrotreating the jet fuel fraction, the 143-288°C (290° to 550°F) fraction, separately from 288°C (550°F+) components, improves the jet fuel quality, as shown by a higher diesel index, higher smoke point and lower volume percent olefins.
  • the 143-288°C (290° to 550°F) fractions after hydrotreating, as shown in Examples 6-8, can be blended directly into refinery jet fuel pools.
  • the present invention provides jet fuel which meets typical freeze point, pour point and smoke point specifications.
  • the process of the present invention can produce jet fuel from 343°C+ (650°F+) feedstocks which are highly aromatic.
  • the process selectively cracks heavy paraffins to jet fuel boiling range materials while it converts little of the heavy aromatics in the feed into the jet fuel fraction.
  • Jet fuel quality is improved by mildly hydrotreating the kerosene cut separately from heavier hydrocarbons.
  • the present invention also removes aromatics from the hydrotreater feedstock by fractionating heavier hydrocarbons away from the kerosene fraction prior to hydrotreating, because aromatics tend to concentrate in the heavier hydrocarbons.
  • Isomerization-dewaxing followed by fractionating and hydrotreating, produces high quality jet fuel at low pressures even from chargestocks containing 20 to 50+ wt. % aromatics. This is significant since refineries will process more heavy crudes which contain more aromatics.

Landscapes

  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Oil, Petroleum & Natural Gas (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Production Of Liquid Hydrocarbon Mixture For Refining Petroleum (AREA)
  • Organic Low-Molecular-Weight Compounds And Preparation Thereof (AREA)
  • Hydrogen, Water And Hydrids (AREA)

Abstract

Premium jet fuel is produced by dewaxing aromatic vacuum gas oil boiling above the specification for jet fuel over zeolite beta and fractionating the dewaxed material to produce a kerosene fraction boiling in the jet fuel range. Conventional hydrotreating of the kerosene fraction produces a premium jet fuel product.

Description

  • This invention relates to the production of premium jet fuel from aromatic vacuum gas oil.
  • Refining petroleum crude oils to obtain jet fuel is well known. The jet fuel must meet certain specifications for freeze point, pour point, smoke point and weight percent sulfur. It may be necessary to subject these fuels to additional processing to meet required specifications.
  • In U. S. Patent No. 4,501,926 to LaPierre et al, gas oil and H₂ contact zeolite beta catalyst to selectively isomerize the paraffinic waxy components in a gas oil feed. U. S. Patent No. 4,501,926 discloses other useful feedstocks, including crude oils, kerosenes, jet fuels, lubricating oil stocks, heating oils and other distillate fractions, whose pour point and viscosity need to be maintained within certain specification limits.
  • However, although a pour point specification may be met by the above, the sulfur in the product may exceed specifications, thus requiring additional processing, typically in a hydrotreater.
  • U. S. Patent No. 3,573,198 to Parker et al teaches smoke point improvement of jet fuel kerosene fractions by treating a sulfurous kerosene fraction by a two-stage process. The first stage principally desulfurizes and the second stage principally saturates aromatics by contact with a catalyst of alumina, a halogen component, a Group VIII noble metal component and a Group VII-B metallic component. U. S. 3,573,198 does not suggest upstream processing most appropriate for combination with its process. Highly olefinic/aromatic kerosene is the least desirable feed for this process.
  • U. S. Patent No. 4,427,534 to Brunn et al discloses production of jet and diesel fuels from highly aromatic oils using a sulfided, halogen-promoted Group VIB-Group VIII metal on an alumina-containing support. The process has the disadvantage that it employs hydrocracking, which opens aromatic molecules to form paraffinic material. By opening aromatic rings, the hydrocracked products can have a higher pour point than the feed to hydrocracking.
  • To produce high quality jet fuel from vacuum gas oil, containing 20 to 50 wt. % aromatics requires severe operating conditions, such as high pressure, to treat aromatic chargestocks by hydrocracking. Hydrocracking can increase pour point. It would be desirable to produce jet fuel at moderate pressure from aromatic chargestocks. This is particularly significant since it is projected that refineries will process a higher proportion of heavy crudes, which are typically aromatic.
  • Accordingly, the present invention provides a process for producing jet fuel from a vacuum gas oil feed having at least 20 to 50 wt % aromatics and boiling above 343°C (650°F) by contacting the feed with a dewaxing catalyst comprising a hydrogenation component and zeolite beta having a silica:alumina ratio of at least 30:1 at 199-538°C (390° to 1000°F), a pressure of atmospheric to 10,400 kPa (1500 psig), a liquid hourly space velocity of 0.2 to 5.0 hr⁻¹, in the presence of hydrogen to produce a dewaxed effluent stream, wherein most aromatics in the feed are unchanged; separating the dewaxed effluent stream into a kerosene fraction containing hydrocarbons boiling below 343°C (650°F) and a heavier fraction; hydrotreating the kerosene fraction with a conventional hydrotreating catalyst under conventional hydrotreating conditions to produce a hydrotreated kerosene stream; and recovering from the hydrotreated kerosene stream a jet fuel product.
  • The process of the present invention produces jet fuel having a low freeze point and low pour point from a vacuum gas oil boiling above 288°C (550°F) preferably above 343°C (650°F). Vacuum gas oils typically boil in the range from 288 to 566°C (550° to 1050°F), more usually 343 to 454°C (650° to 850°F). Furthermore, the process of the present invention produces jet fuel from highly aromatic (at least 20-50 wt % aromatics) feeds with minimal conversion of aromatics during isomerization of paraffins into jet fuel hydrocarbons, thus improving jet fuel quality by not converting the aromatics into higher pour point paraffins. The process also improves jet fuel quality by mild hydrotreating of the kerosene cut separated from other hydrocarbons in the effluent from isomerization, thus allowing easy processing to produce a jet fuel which meets jet fuel specifications for aromatics content, pour point, freeze point, sulfur content and smoke point.
  • The figure illustrates isomerization dewaxing followed by hydrotreating of a kerosene fraction.
  • The vacuum gas oil feed comprises aromatics, paraffinic, waxy components and sulfur compounds. The vacuum gas oil stream 12 is combined with a hydrogen stream 14 to form a combined stream 16. Typically the vacuum gas oil comes from a vacuum distillation tower (not shown). The combined stream 16 passes into reactor 20, preferably a co-current downflow trickle bed reactor. Feed contacts catalyst comprising a hydrogenation component and zeolite beta to produce a dewaxed effluent stream 22. The aromatics are substantially unchanged in the dewaxing unit 20. The preferred isomerization conditions are a temperature of 199 to 538°C (390° to 1000°F), a pressure of atmospheric to 10,400 kPa (1500 psig), a liquid hourly space velocity (LHSV) from 0.2 to 5.0 hr⁻¹ and a hydrogen feed rate of 90 to 900, n l/l, normal liters per liter of liquid feed (500 to 5000 SCF/bbl of vacuum gas oil). Most preferably, the temperature is 371 to 454°C (700° to 850°F), the pressure is 2200 to 3500 kpa (300 to 500 psig) the liquid hourly space velocity is 0.5 to 2.0 hr⁻¹, and the hydrogen feed rate is 180 to 540 n l/l (1000 to 3000 SCF/bbl).
  • The dewaxed effluent is separated by separator 30 into a vapor stream 34 and a liquid stream 36. The vapor (H₂ and C₁-C₄ hydrocarbons) may be recycled, used as fuel gas or separately processed. The liquid, comprising C₅+ hydrocarbons, enters distillation tower 40 which produces a naphtha stream 42, typically C₅ to 143°C (290°F) a kerosene stream 46 and a bottoms stream 44. The aromatics impair the subsequent hydrotreating of the kerosene. Tower 40 facilitates downstream hydrotreating of the kerosene because the aromatics (which are not changed much in reactor 20) are still high boiling and concentrate in the bottoms stream 44. The kerosene stream 46 is combined with hydrogen from stream 48 to form a hydrotreater feed stream 49, which enters hydrotreater 50.
  • The kerosene 46 has some olefins and sulfur compounds. The hydrotreater 50 removes some of the sulfur and saturates some of the olefins. Hydrotreater 50 contains conventional hydrotreating catalysts, and operates at conventional conditions.
  • Typically the hydrotreater operates at 1800 to 5600 kPa (250 to 800 psig), a temperature of 240 to 427°C (400° to 800°F), a liquid hourly space velocity from 0.5 to 10.0 hr⁻¹, and a hydrogen feed rate of 90 to 900 n l/l (500 to 5000 SCF/bbl). The hydrotreated effluent stream 52 passes from hydrotreater 50 into separator 60 which separates stream 52 into a C₄- vapor stream 64 and a C₅+ liquid stream 66.
  • The liquid stream 66 passes to a stripper 70. The hydrotreated liquid is preferably steam-stripped by steam, from line 72 into a naphtha stream 74 and a jet fuel stream 76. The jet fuel stream 76 typically comprises 143 to 288°C (290° to 550°F) hydrocarbons.
  • Preferably, the jet fuel stream 76 has a smoke point within 1 mm of the smoke point of the kerosene stream 46. The jet fuel, stream 76, preferably meets jet fuel smoke point specifications, and may be blended into the refinery jet fuel pool.
  • Boiling point of the jet fuel is related to freeze point. The higher boiling point components have higher freeze points than the lower boiling point components. Distillation cut points can be adjusted by conventional means, e.g., by changing fractionator reflux rates, temperatures, etc. For jet fuel, the freeze point may range from -40° to -50°C (-40° to -58°F).
  • The isomerization dewaxing catalyst comprises zeolite beta with a hydrogenation component. Zeolite beta is described in U.S. Patent Nos. 3,308,069 and Re. 28,341.
  • The hydrotreating catalyst and process are conventional. Typically the hydrotreating catalyst is Ni, Mo, Co, W, NiMo, CoMo, etc., on an amorphous support such as alumina.
  • This invention will be illustrated by the examples. Dewaxing and hydrotreating were run in a 100 cc downflow fixed bed test reactor. The test reactor had a 2.5 cm (1-inch nominal) inside diameter and a 91 cm (36-inch) length, including a 30 cm (12-inch) preheater, a 30 cm (12-inch) catalyst space and a 30 cm (12-inch) bottoms space. 75 cc of catalyst was used. H₂ was added at a rate of 360 nl/l (2000 SCF/bbl).
  • Examples 1-5 illustrate prior art processes (Examples 1-4) or processes which do not form part of the state of the art but which are not claimed as the invention (Example 5).
  • Example 1(Prior Art)
  • The feed properties are shown below.
    Figure imgb0001
  • The 204-371°C (400-700°F) fraction is a typical light gas oil.
  • The 343-454°C (650-850°F) fraction is a typical aromatic vacuum gas oil, and is preferred feedstock for use in the present invention.
  • Example 2 (Prior Art)
  • This example reports catalyst properties of two hydrotreating catalysts and one isomerization dewaxing catalyst.
    Figure imgb0002
  • The isomerization dewaxing catalyst, platinum zeolite beta, comprised about 35 wt % alumina 65 wt % zeolite beta to which was added 0.56 wt % platinum. The catalyst was prepared by blending 65 wt % zeolite beta and 35 wt % alumina with water. This was then extruded to 1.6m (1/16") outside diameter pellets and dried at 121°C (250°F) in nitrogen. Then, the catalyst was heated at 2.8°C/min (5°F/min) in nitrogen and calcined in nitrogen for 3 hours at 538°C (1000°F) then calcined in air for 3 hours at 538°C (1000°F). The air-calcined catalyst was steamed 10 hours at 538°C (1000°F) and 1 atm steam pressure. The catalyst was ammonium-exchanged twice at room temperature with 1 normal NH₄NO₃, washed with water and dried at 121°C (250°F) overnight. Then, the catalyst was exchanged for 12 hours at room temperature with Pt(NH₃)₄Cl₂, at a concentration of 4 milliliters water per gram of platinum salt, with stirring. The catalyst was then washed 4 times until free of chlorine. The washed catalyst was then dried at 121°C (250°F) overnight and calcined for 3 hours at 349°C (660°F) in a 60% air, 40% N₂ mixture which has a dew point of -6°C (22°F).
  • The resulting zeolite beta catalyst had an alpha value of 50 based on zeolite. The significance of the alpha value and a method for determining it are described in U. S. Patent No. 4,016,218 and J. Catalysis, 61, 390 etseq (1980). Catalysts having an alpha value based on zeolite of 10 to 150, preferably 10 to 100, or most preferably 30 to 70, are preferred for isomerization dewaxing. Alpha can be changed by steaming, by alkali-exchange or by varying the silica:alumina ratio of the zeolite.
  • Example 3 (Prior Art)
  • This example shows what can be achieved by hydrotreating alone, hydrotreating follows by isomerization dewaxing, and isomerization dewaxing alone of Arabian Light Gas Oil
    Figure imgb0003
  • The results show that contacting light gas oil with the platinum zeolite beta catalyst produced in high quality jet fuel.
  • Example 4 (Prior Art)
  • This example demonstrates the production of jet fuels from a heavier feed, the vacuum gas oil shown in Table 1. This heavy feed was processed over the platinum zeolite beta catalyst of Example 2. The feed (vacuum gas oil) is within the scope of the invention but the processing (isomerization dewaxing alone) is not.
  • The reactor pressure was 2500 kPa (350 psig), the liquid hourly space velocity was 1.0 hr⁻¹, the temperature was 416 to 421°C (780° to 790°F), with 356 nl/l (2000 SCF/bbl) of H₂. The reactor effluent was distilled to produce a 143 to 288°C (290° to 550°F) fraction, equivalent to stream 46 of the figure. Table 4 lists the properties of the 143°C⁺ (290°F⁺) effluent and its 143 to 288°C (290° to 550°F) fraction. The 143 to 288°C (290° to 550°F) fraction meets smoke point requirements, but has too much sulfur (0.67 wt %) and olefins (7.7 vol %).
    Figure imgb0004
  • Example 5 (Comparison Test)
  • This example demonstrates isomerization-dewaxing followed by hydrotreating of the entire effluent. The entire 143°C⁺ (290°F⁺) effluent from the test reactor is hydrotreated using the conventional NiMo/Al₂O₃ hydrotreating catalyst listed in Table 2. The effluent from hydrotreater was distilled to form a jet fuel fraction 143 to 288°C (290° to 550°F) whose properties are summarized in Table 5. Hydrotreating the entire 143°C (290°F⁺) dewaxing reactor effluent degraded the jet fuel as shown by its lower smoke point and higher aromatics content compared to the unhydrotreated 143-288°C (290° to 550°F) fraction produced in Example 4 and listed in Table 4.
  • Example 6-8 (Invention)
  • This example demonstrates isomerization-dewaxing of a vacuum gas oil followed by hydrotreating the kerosene fraction of the dewaxed effluent. The dewaxed effluent of Example 4 is fractionated to produce a kerosene fraction of 143 to 288°C (290° to 550°F) representing stream 46 of the figure. This fraction was hydrotreated at varying temperatures using the conventional (NiMo/Al₂O₃) hydrotreating catalyst of Table 2. The hydrotreated material was stripped to recover a jet fuel product of 143 to 288°C (290° to 550°F). Hydrotreating conditions and jet fuel product properties are listed in Table 5.
    Figure imgb0005
  • In Example 5, the entire 143°C⁺ (290°F⁺) isomerization dewaxing reactor effluent is hydrotreated. Even though the boiling range of the jet fuel product is the same (because of fractionation to obtain a 143 to 288°C product) in Examples 5-8, the jet fuel made in Example 5 is not as good as the jet fuel made in Examples 6-8.
  • Increasing the hydrotreating temperature from 316°C (601°F), in Example 6 to 344°C (to 651°F) in Example 7 gave a jet fuel product having less sulfur and a higher smoke point.
  • Hydrotreating at 371°C (700°F), in Example 8, gives a jet fuel product with an 18.5 mm smoke point, as opposed to the 20.0 mm smoke point of the product from Example 7.
  • The results in Table 5 indicate that hydrotreating the jet fuel fraction, the 143-288°C (290° to 550°F) fraction, separately from 288°C (550°F⁺) components, improves the jet fuel quality, as shown by a higher diesel index, higher smoke point and lower volume percent olefins. The 143-288°C (290° to 550°F) fractions after hydrotreating, as shown in Examples 6-8, can be blended directly into refinery jet fuel pools.
  • Thus, the present invention provides jet fuel which meets typical freeze point, pour point and smoke point specifications. The process of the present invention can produce jet fuel from 343°C⁺ (650°F⁺) feedstocks which are highly aromatic. The process selectively cracks heavy paraffins to jet fuel boiling range materials while it converts little of the heavy aromatics in the feed into the jet fuel fraction. Jet fuel quality is improved by mildly hydrotreating the kerosene cut separately from heavier hydrocarbons. The present invention also removes aromatics from the hydrotreater feedstock by fractionating heavier hydrocarbons away from the kerosene fraction prior to hydrotreating, because aromatics tend to concentrate in the heavier hydrocarbons.
  • Isomerization-dewaxing, followed by fractionating and hydrotreating, produces high quality jet fuel at low pressures even from chargestocks containing 20 to 50⁺ wt. % aromatics. This is significant since refineries will process more heavy crudes which contain more aromatics.

Claims (7)

  1. A process for produceing jet fuel from a vacuum gas oil feed having at least 20 to 50 wt % aromatics and boiling above 343°C (650°F) by contacting the feed with a dewaxing catalyst comprising a hydrogenation component and zeolite beta having a silica:alumina ratio of at least 30:1 at 199-538°C (390° to 1000°F), a pressure of atmospheric to 10,400 kPa (1500 psig), a liquid hourly space velocity of 0.2 to 5.0 hr⁻¹, in the presence of hydrogen to produce a dewaxed effluent stream, Wherein most aromatics in the feed are unchanged, characterized in that the dewaxed effluent stream is first separated into a kerosene fraction containing hydrocarbons boiling below 343°C (650°F) and a heavier fraction, and that the kerosene fraction is then hydrotreated with a conventional hydrotreating catalyst under conventional hydrotreating conditions to produce a hyorotreated kerosene stream which is recovered as a jet fuel product.
  2. The process of Claim 1, further characterised in that the kerosene fraction boils within the range of 143-288°C (290° to 550°F).
  3. The process of Claim 1 or 2 further characterized in that the dewaxing occurs at a pressure from 2200 to 3500 kPa (300 to 500 psig).
  4. The process of any preceding Claim further characterised in that the hydrogenation component of the dewaxing catalyst comprises 0.1 to 5.0 wt % of a noble metal of Group VIII of the Periodic Table.
  5. The process of Claim, 4 further characterized in that the hydrogenation component is 0.1 to 1.2 wt % platinum.
  6. The process of any preceeding Claim further characterized in that the vacuum gas oil feed boils above 343°C (650°F) and contains more weight % aromatics than paraffins.
  7. The process of any preceeding Claim further characterized in that the vacuum gas oil contains at least 2.0 wt. % sulfur, the dewaxing step converts a portion of the feed to olefins, the kerosene fraction comprises olefins and sulfur, and the conventional hydrotreating removes a portion of the sulfur, and saturates a majority of the olefins in the kerosene fraction.
EP86307809A 1985-10-15 1986-10-09 Processing of aromatic vacuum gas oil for jet fuel production Expired - Lifetime EP0226289B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT86307809T ATE72266T1 (en) 1985-10-15 1986-10-09 PROCESSING OF AROMATIC VACUUM GAS OIL FOR THE PRODUCTION OF JET FUEL.

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US78760085A 1985-10-15 1985-10-15
US787600 1985-10-15

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0226289A2 EP0226289A2 (en) 1987-06-24
EP0226289A3 EP0226289A3 (en) 1988-08-31
EP0226289B1 true EP0226289B1 (en) 1992-01-29

Family

ID=25141995

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP86307809A Expired - Lifetime EP0226289B1 (en) 1985-10-15 1986-10-09 Processing of aromatic vacuum gas oil for jet fuel production

Country Status (8)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0226289B1 (en)
JP (1) JPS6295388A (en)
AT (1) ATE72266T1 (en)
AU (1) AU592372B2 (en)
BR (1) BR8605035A (en)
CA (1) CA1274205A (en)
DE (1) DE3683740D1 (en)
ZA (1) ZA867651B (en)

Families Citing this family (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2013185493A (en) * 2012-03-08 2013-09-19 Mitsubishi Heavy Ind Ltd Fuel supply system, scram jet engine and method of operating the engine
JP6021661B2 (en) 2013-01-30 2016-11-09 三菱重工業株式会社 Fuel supply system, scramjet engine and method of operating the same

Family Cites Families (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4419220A (en) * 1982-05-18 1983-12-06 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalytic dewaxing process
JPS5924791A (en) * 1982-07-31 1984-02-08 Toa Nenryo Kogyo Kk Preparation of low-pour point petroleum product
US4601993A (en) * 1984-05-25 1986-07-22 Mobil Oil Corporation Catalyst composition dewaxing of lubricating oils

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
DE3683740D1 (en) 1992-03-12
EP0226289A2 (en) 1987-06-24
EP0226289A3 (en) 1988-08-31
ATE72266T1 (en) 1992-02-15
AU592372B2 (en) 1990-01-11
ZA867651B (en) 1988-05-25
BR8605035A (en) 1987-07-14
AU6308086A (en) 1987-04-16
CA1274205A (en) 1990-09-18
JPS6295388A (en) 1987-05-01

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
AU671224B2 (en) Distillate fuel production from Fischer-Tropsch wax
CA1196879A (en) Hydrocracking process
US6337010B1 (en) Process scheme for producing lubricating base oil with low pressure dewaxing and high pressure hydrofinishing
US4302323A (en) Catalytic hydroconversion of residual stocks
JP3270545B2 (en) Hydrocarbon reforming method
US4983273A (en) Hydrocracking process with partial liquid recycle
CA2397239C (en) Process for preparation of fuels and lubes in a single integrated hydrocracking system
KR100309488B1 (en) How to manufacture high viscosity oils and intermediate distillates with high viscosity index from heavy petroleum fractions
AU639038B2 (en) Production of gasoline and distillate fuels from cycle oil
EP0433047B1 (en) Production of gasoline and distillate fuels from light cycle oil
US4798665A (en) Combination process for the conversion of a distillate hydrocarbon to maximize middle distillate production
US3941680A (en) Lube oil hydrotreating process
US4011154A (en) Production of lubricating oils
US5552033A (en) Integrated process for increasing C6 to C8 aromatics content in reformate prepared from C9+ aromatics-containing feed
US4283270A (en) Process for removing sulfur from petroleum oils
EP0512652B1 (en) Hydrodecyclization process
US3763033A (en) Lube oil hydrotreating process
EP0226289B1 (en) Processing of aromatic vacuum gas oil for jet fuel production
US4005006A (en) Combination residue hydrodesulfurization and thermal cracking process
US3970543A (en) Production of lubricating oils
US3349023A (en) Combination cracking process for maximizing middle distillate production
EP0318125A2 (en) Heavy oil cracking process
JP2006517254A (en) Process and composition of feedstock preparation usable for the preparation of lower olefins
US3424673A (en) Process for hydrodesulfurizing the lower boiling fraction of a cracked gas oil blend
EP0383395B1 (en) Lubricating base oils

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): AT BE DE FR GB IT NL SE

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): AT BE DE FR GB IT NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19890208

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19890911

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE DE FR GB IT NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 72266

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19920215

Kind code of ref document: T

ET Fr: translation filed
REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3683740

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19920312

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: MODIANO & ASSOCIATI S.R.L.

PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
EAL Se: european patent in force in sweden

Ref document number: 86307809.3

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19950825

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19950922

Year of fee payment: 10

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19950922

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19950926

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19951002

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19951027

Year of fee payment: 10

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: AT

Payment date: 19951030

Year of fee payment: 10

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19961009

Ref country code: AT

Effective date: 19961009

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19961010

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19961031

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: MOBIL OIL CORP.

Effective date: 19961031

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19970501

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 19961009

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19970630

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 19970501

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19970701

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 86307809.3

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.

Effective date: 20051009