EP0223484A2 - Pet food and component of pet food and method of producing the same - Google Patents

Pet food and component of pet food and method of producing the same Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0223484A2
EP0223484A2 EP86308569A EP86308569A EP0223484A2 EP 0223484 A2 EP0223484 A2 EP 0223484A2 EP 86308569 A EP86308569 A EP 86308569A EP 86308569 A EP86308569 A EP 86308569A EP 0223484 A2 EP0223484 A2 EP 0223484A2
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
pet food
sps
ase
soy
component
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP86308569A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0223484B1 (en
EP0223484A3 (en
Inventor
Flemming Mark Christensen
Hans Aage Sejr Olsen
Columbus O'donnell Lee Boyce
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Novo Nordisk AS
Original Assignee
Novo Nordisk AS
Novo Industri AS
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Novo Nordisk AS, Novo Industri AS filed Critical Novo Nordisk AS
Publication of EP0223484A2 publication Critical patent/EP0223484A2/en
Publication of EP0223484A3 publication Critical patent/EP0223484A3/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0223484B1 publication Critical patent/EP0223484B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K10/00Animal feeding-stuffs
    • A23K10/10Animal feeding-stuffs obtained by microbiological or biochemical processes
    • A23K10/14Pretreatment of feeding-stuffs with enzymes
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A23FOODS OR FOODSTUFFS; TREATMENT THEREOF, NOT COVERED BY OTHER CLASSES
    • A23KFODDER
    • A23K50/00Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals
    • A23K50/40Feeding-stuffs specially adapted for particular animals for carnivorous animals, e.g. cats or dogs
    • CCHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
    • C12BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
    • C12YENZYMES
    • C12Y302/00Hydrolases acting on glycosyl compounds, i.e. glycosylases (3.2)
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC
    • Y10STECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y10S426/00Food or edible material: processes, compositions, and products
    • Y10S426/805Pet food for dog, cat, bird, or fish

Definitions

  • pet food is understood to mean a food for dogs and/or cats, and also that the pet food is of the dry type, of the soft-dry type, of the semi-moist type, or of the canned type.
  • Dry pet food is economical extruded chrunchy products.
  • Major components are corn, wheat, soybean oil meal, meat/bone meal and tallow.
  • the dry products are among the least palatable for the pets.
  • the product may be coated with an enzymatically treated fat and protein mixture, for instance as described in US 3 857 968.
  • a more chewy and palatable product is obtained with the soft-dry product types, that may contain meat or meat by-pro­ducts.
  • the soft-dry pet food contains meat by-products, propylene glycol and glycerol.
  • Propylene glycol is used for preservation purposes in order to lower the water activity
  • glycerol is used as a plastilizer in order to create a chewy and meat-like texture upon extrusion.
  • the dry and the soft-dry product types are most often made by blending the dry components (corn, wheat, soybean oil meal, meat/bone meal, vitamin/mineral mix) and extruding the blend upon addition of steam, water and eventually propylene glycol/glycerol. Both single and double screw extruders are used.
  • the dried pellets from the extruder may be coated with fat or a gravy for palatability improvement.
  • the semi-moist product types constitutes a more ex­pensive product category, offering the pet a more meat-like product with better appearance and palatability.
  • semi-moist pet food processing a cooked slurry of meat, meat by-products, corn syrup, water and propylene glycol is mixed and cooked with soy grits, soy bean oil meal and vitamin/mineral mix, before it is extruded and formed into noodles or chunks.
  • the most palatable and most expensive pet food product category is the canned products.
  • the main-ingredients are meat and meat by-products along with TVP (textured vegetable protein) chunks, soy grits and vitamin/mineral mix.
  • the palatability of pet food may be considerably im­proved by an enzymatic pretreatment of the ingredients.
  • US 4 39l 829 and US 4 393 085 describe that an amylase and a protease pretreatment of farinaceous and proteinaceous ingredients of an extruded pet food improve the palatability thereof.
  • All pet foods contain, as a component, a proteinaceous material of vegetable or animal origin e.g. a soy based material.
  • a proteinaceous material of vegetable or animal origin e.g. a soy based material.
  • pet foods can be improved considerably in regard to palatability and elasticity, if the proteinaceous material is exposed to an enzymatic modification, viz. a treatment with an SPS-ase preparation in aqueous medium.
  • the pet food according to the invention comprising as a component a proteinaceous material is characterized by the fact that the proteinaceous material is treated with an SPS-­ase preparation in an aqueous medium.
  • the pet food according to the invention has a better palatability and elasticity than conventional pet foods.
  • the need for addition of propylene glycol which conventionally is added to pet foods in order to reduce water activity below the critical level for microorganism growth, is eliminated or at least reduced considerably. It is assumed that this effect is related to the fact that the pet food according to the invention has an increased soluble sugar content due to the action of the SPS-ase.
  • proteinaceous material is understood to comprise any proteinaceous material suited for pet food, e.g. whole ground corn (maize), whole ground wheat, whole ground faba beans, whole ground peas, any soy based material, whole ground rape, whole ground barley, whole ground rye, meat/bone meal, and blood meal.
  • whole ground corn whole ground wheat
  • whole ground faba beans whole ground peas
  • any soy based material whole ground rape, whole ground barley, whole ground rye, meat/bone meal, and blood meal.
  • at least l0% by weight of the pet food composition is derived from vegetable proteinaceous material.
  • SPS-ase preparation is understood to mean a preparation of SPS-ase, as described and defined in UK patent application No. 2 ll5 820 A. It has been found that a similar elasticity improving effect does not appear, if a similar treatment is carried out with ALCALASE proteinase or a mixture of PECTINEX pectinase and CELLUCLAST cellulase, and thus, it is assumed that the active principle pertaining to the treatment of the proteinaceous material with an SPS-ase preparation is the SPS-ase enzyme itself. However, the applicant does not want to be bound to this hypothesis.
  • the term "the proteinaceous material is treated with an SPS-ase preparation in an aqueous medium” is understood to mean that the proteinaceous material and the SPS-­ase preparation are brought together at such pH, temperature and concentration in an aqueous medium, that at least a substantial part of the enzymatic process takes place.
  • the enzyma­tic process is carried out to completion, e.g.
  • the proteinaceous material is of vegetable origin. Such proteinaceous materials are easily available in large quantities.
  • the proteinaceous material of vegetable origin is a soy based material.
  • Soy based materials are cheap and already frequently used as a component in pet food.
  • soy based material is understood to mean any soy based material, e.g. whole soy beans, soy bean meal, soy flakes, or soy concentrate.
  • soy bean meal is the preferred, soy based material according to the invention, as soy bean meal is economical and simultaneously well suited both for treatment with the SPS-ase preparation and for incorporation into the pet food as a constituent.
  • soy based material is soy meal.
  • Soy meal is one of the cheapest soy protein sources, but even so a fully satis­factory pet food can be produced on soy meal basis.
  • the SPS-ase preparation is producible by means of Aspergillus aculeatus CBS l0l.43. In this way a fully satis­factory SPS-ase preparation is provided and thus a pet food with fully satisfactory palatability and elasticity.
  • the enzymatic treatment is carried out to comple­tion or substantially to completion. In this manner a pet food with fully satisfactory palatability and elasticity is provided.
  • the invention comprises a component of pet food for use in the pet food according to the invention, which com­ponent comprises a proteinaceous material, which is treated with an SPS-ase preparation in an aqueous medium.
  • the proteinaceous material is of vegetable origin. Such proteinaceous materials are easily avail­able in large quantities.
  • the proteinaceous material of vegetable origin is a soy based material. Soy based materials are cheap and already frequently used as a component in pet food.
  • the soy based material is soy meal.
  • Soy meal is one of the cheapest soy protein sources, but even so a fully satisfactory pet food can be produced on the basis of this component of pet food.
  • the SPS-ase preparation is producible by means of Aspergillus aculeatus CBS l0l.43. In this way a fully satisfactory SPS-ase preparation is provided, and thus a com­ponent of a pet food giving rise to a pet food with fully satis­factory palatability and elasticity.
  • the enzymatic treatment is carried out to completion or substantially to completion. In this manner a component of a pet food is provided giving rise to a pet food with fully satisfactory palatability and elasticity.
  • the pet food according to the invention can be produced by extrusion, as indicated above, but several other methods may be used as well, provided that the starch is gelatinized in admixture with the SPS-ase treated proteinaceous material.
  • the dry formulations were fed to the extruder with a rate of 35 kg/h. Directly after the feed funnel water was added with a rate of 6.0 - 6.5 kg/h by means of a piston pump. The water contained 2.5% w/w of potassium sorbate.
  • the temperature in the screw houses Nos. 2 - 5 were kept constant at l50°C, whereas screw house No. l was cooled.
  • the extrudate was pressed through two cylindrical nozzles with a diameter of 6 mm each. The rotational speed of the screws was 300 rpm. Directly downstream the exit nozzle of the extruder the extrudate was cut into small pellets by means of a rotating knife.
  • the elasticity was measured by means of an Instron apparatus.
  • the sample to be tested is placed below a flat pressure plate in the Instron apparatus. With a velocity of 20 mm/minute the pressure plate is directed towards the sample, which is compressed to-l/3 of the original sample height.
  • the force required for the compression is recorded as a function of the compression (as a "working curve") with a coupled writing recorder with a paper velocity of 200 mm/minute. Five consecutive compressions were performed.
  • the data from the elasticity test can be used for the hardness determination, as the hardness is the initial gradient on the l′ working curve.
  • the hardness is the hardness of the not deformed sample, expressed as pressure per length unit of compression, e.g. in N/mm3.
  • a and B were tested, A being a pet food according to the invention, and B being a corresponding prior art pet food control.
  • Composition of A 50% wheat meal ("Unika” from Valsem ⁇ llen) 25% meat bone meal (from DLG) 25% jet-cooked soy meal, treated with SPS-ase
  • the jet-cooked soy meal treated with SPS-ase was prepared in the following manner.
  • the SPS-ase-treated soy meal was mixed with wheat meal and meat/bone meal according to the above proportions.
  • the dry mixture was extruded as described previously, with the following exceptions: the rate was 50 kg/h, water was added at a rate of 9.5 - l0.0 kg/h, and the extrudate was pressed through one cylindrical nozzle with a diameter of 7 mm.
  • Samples of A and B were stored at ambient temperature (20 - 25°C) for 9 months. Subsequently, both samples were in­spected. Sample B (without SPS-ase treatment) had turned green/grey, was covered with mold and had an unpleasant odour. Sample A (with SPS-ase treatment) showed no sign of microbial deterioration and appeared as when extruded 9 months earlier. None of the samples A and B contained propylene glycol.
  • compositions of A and B in this example differed slightly from the composition of A and B in example 2, as shown below:
  • a in this example 40% whole ground corn 20% whole ground wheat 20% meat- and bone-meal 20% jet-cooked soy flour, treated with SPS-ase B in this example 40% whole ground corn 20% whole ground wheat 20% meat- and bone-meal 20% soy flour
  • Feeding trials comprising 20 dogs of various breeds and sizes were conducted at a kennel. A table of the participating dogs is shown in Table 2.
  • l2 dogs were fed for l4 days, 4 dogs for ll days, 2 dogs for 7 days and 2 dogs for 4 days with the A and B pellets.
  • the elasticity and hardness data for the pellets A and B are compared to data for the commercial soft-dry product "Love Me Tender Chunks" from Quaker Oats, vide Table l.
  • the A product is much superior both to the reference product B and to the commercial product.
  • a product and the commercial product are much softer than B.
  • the soft texture of the A product is due to the SPS-ase treatment of the soy flour ingredient, while commercial products are soft due to the addition of propylene glycol.
  • SPS-ase treatment gives rise to a pet fod, which is soft and elastic, while propylene glycol generates softness, but only little elasticity of the pet food.

Landscapes

  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Polymers & Plastics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Zoology (AREA)
  • Animal Husbandry (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Food Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Microbiology (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • Physiology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Biotechnology (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
  • Birds (AREA)
  • Fodder In General (AREA)
  • Feed For Specific Animals (AREA)

Abstract

In the pet food the proteinaceous component is treated with a SPS-ase preparation in aqueous medium. In this way a decisive improvement in regard to the elasticity and palatability of the pet food is obtained, and pets, especially dogs, clearly prefer this pet food over a normal, known pet food.

Description

  • The art describing pet food is huge. Just to mention a few examples reference is made to patent application No. PCT/US 82/0ll98, BE patent No. 856 265, GB patent No. 2 04l 7l7, and US patent Nos. 4 l90 679, 4 393 085, 4 055 676, 3 959 5ll, 3 202 5l4, 3 6l7 300, 3 857 968, 4 l58 706, and 4 39l 829.
  • For the purpose of this specification with claims, it is intended that the term pet food is understood to mean a food for dogs and/or cats, and also that the pet food is of the dry type, of the soft-dry type, of the semi-moist type, or of the canned type.
  • Dry pet food is economical extruded chrunchy products. Major components are corn, wheat, soybean oil meal, meat/bone meal and tallow. The dry products are among the least palatable for the pets. In order to increase palatability the product may be coated with an enzymatically treated fat and protein mixture, for instance as described in US 3 857 968.
  • A more chewy and palatable product is obtained with the soft-dry product types, that may contain meat or meat by-pro­ducts. Besides the ingredients mentioned above for the dry pro­ducts the soft-dry pet food contains meat by-products, propylene glycol and glycerol. Propylene glycol is used for preservation purposes in order to lower the water activity, and glycerol is used as a plastilizer in order to create a chewy and meat-like texture upon extrusion.
  • The dry and the soft-dry product types are most often made by blending the dry components (corn, wheat, soybean oil meal, meat/bone meal, vitamin/mineral mix) and extruding the blend upon addition of steam, water and eventually propylene glycol/glycerol. Both single and double screw extruders are used. The dried pellets from the extruder may be coated with fat or a gravy for palatability improvement.
  • The semi-moist product types constitutes a more ex­pensive product category, offering the pet a more meat-like product with better appearance and palatability. In semi-moist pet food processing a cooked slurry of meat, meat by-products, corn syrup, water and propylene glycol is mixed and cooked with soy grits, soy bean oil meal and vitamin/mineral mix, before it is extruded and formed into noodles or chunks.
  • The most palatable and most expensive pet food product category is the canned products. The main-ingredients are meat and meat by-products along with TVP (textured vegetable protein) chunks, soy grits and vitamin/mineral mix.
  • The palatability of pet food may be considerably im­proved by an enzymatic pretreatment of the ingredients. Reference can be made to US. 3 857 968, which describes that lipase and protease treatment of fat and protein containing ingredients improves palatability. US 4 39l 829 and US 4 393 085 describe that an amylase and a protease pretreatment of farinaceous and proteinaceous ingredients of an extruded pet food improve the palatability thereof.
  • Research efforts are directed mainly towards better palatability, better meatlike feel in regard to e.g. elasticity, and better nutritional value coupled to a reasonable price.
  • All pet foods contain, as a component, a proteinaceous material of vegetable or animal origin e.g. a soy based material. Reference can be made to e.g. US 3 202 5l4, example l, wherein it is indicated that 36.5% of the pet food consists of soy flakes.
  • Now, surprisingly, according to the invention it has been found that pet foods can be improved considerably in regard to palatability and elasticity, if the proteinaceous material is exposed to an enzymatic modification, viz. a treatment with an SPS-ase preparation in aqueous medium.
  • Thus, the pet food according to the invention compris­ing as a component a proteinaceous material is characterized by the fact that the proteinaceous material is treated with an SPS-­ase preparation in an aqueous medium. Surprisingly it has been found that the pet food according to the invention has a better palatability and elasticity than conventional pet foods. Also, surprisingly it has been found, mainly in relation to pet food of the soft dry type, that the need for addition of propylene glycol, which conventionally is added to pet foods in order to reduce water activity below the critical level for microorganism growth, is eliminated or at least reduced considerably. It is assumed that this effect is related to the fact that the pet food according to the invention has an increased soluble sugar content due to the action of the SPS-ase.
  • For the purpose oi this specification with claims it is intended that the term proteinaceous material is understood to comprise any proteinaceous material suited for pet food, e.g. whole ground corn (maize), whole ground wheat, whole ground faba beans, whole ground peas, any soy based material, whole ground rape, whole ground barley, whole ground rye, meat/bone meal, and blood meal. According to the invention it is preferred that at least l0% by weight of the pet food composition is derived from vegetable proteinaceous material.
  • Also, for the purpose of this specification with claims it is intended that the term SPS-ase preparation is understood to mean a preparation of SPS-ase, as described and defined in UK patent application No. 2 ll5 820 A. It has been found that a similar elasticity improving effect does not appear, if a similar treatment is carried out with ALCALASE proteinase or a mixture of PECTINEX pectinase and CELLUCLAST cellulase, and thus, it is assumed that the active principle pertaining to the treatment of the proteinaceous material with an SPS-ase preparation is the SPS-ase enzyme itself. However, the applicant does not want to be bound to this hypothesis.
  • Also, for the purpose of this specification with claims it is intended that the term "the proteinaceous material is treated with an SPS-ase preparation in an aqueous medium" is understood to mean that the proteinaceous material and the SPS-­ase preparation are brought together at such pH, temperature and concentration in an aqueous medium, that at least a substantial part of the enzymatic process takes place. Preferably the enzyma­tic process is carried out to completion, e.g. by treatment of l00 g of proteinaceous material, which may be jet-cooked soy meal, slurried with 400-800 ml of water with an SPS-ase prepara­tion with an SPS-ase activity between 20 and 200 SPSU/g (as defined in AF 20l/l-GB-a, available on request from NOVO INDUSTRI A/S, 2880 Bagsværd, Novo Alle, Denmark) at a pH of 4-6.5 and a temperature of 40-55°C for 4-24 hours. Thus, this above process roughly corresponds to the process for treatment of vegetable protein described in US 4.483.874.
  • In a preferred embodiment of the pet food according to the invention the proteinaceous material is of vegetable origin. Such proteinaceous materials are easily available in large quantities.
  • In a preferred embodiment of the pet food according to the invention the proteinaceous material of vegetable origin is a soy based material. Soy based materials are cheap and already frequently used as a component in pet food. For the purpose of this specification with claims it is intended that the term soy based material is understood to mean any soy based material, e.g. whole soy beans, soy bean meal, soy flakes, or soy concentrate. However, soy bean meal is the preferred, soy based material according to the invention, as soy bean meal is economical and simultaneously well suited both for treatment with the SPS-ase preparation and for incorporation into the pet food as a constituent.
  • In a preferred embodiment of the pet food according to the invention the soy based material is soy meal. Soy meal is one of the cheapest soy protein sources, but even so a fully satis­factory pet food can be produced on soy meal basis.
  • In a preferred embodiment of the pet food according to the invention the SPS-ase preparation is producible by means of Aspergillus aculeatus CBS l0l.43. In this way a fully satis­factory SPS-ase preparation is provided and thus a pet food with fully satisfactory palatability and elasticity.
  • In a preferred embodiment of the pet food according to the invention the enzymatic treatment is carried out to comple­tion or substantially to completion. In this manner a pet food with fully satisfactory palatability and elasticity is provided.
  • Also the invention comprises a component of pet food for use in the pet food according to the invention, which com­ponent comprises a proteinaceous material, which is treated with an SPS-ase preparation in an aqueous medium.
  • In a preferred embodiment of the component of pet food according to the invention the proteinaceous material is of vegetable origin. Such proteinaceous materials are easily avail­able in large quantities.
  • In a preferred embodiment of the component of pet food according to the invention the proteinaceous material of vegetable origin is a soy based material. Soy based materials are cheap and already frequently used as a component in pet food.
  • In a preferred embodiment of the component of pet food according to the invention the soy based material is soy meal. Soy meal is one of the cheapest soy protein sources, but even so a fully satisfactory pet food can be produced on the basis of this component of pet food.
  • In a preferred embodiment of the component of pet food according to the invention the SPS-ase preparation is producible by means of Aspergillus aculeatus CBS l0l.43. In this way a fully satisfactory SPS-ase preparation is provided, and thus a com­ponent of a pet food giving rise to a pet food with fully satis­factory palatability and elasticity.
  • In a preferred embodiment of the component of pet food according to the invention the enzymatic treatment is carried out to completion or substantially to completion. In this manner a component of a pet food is provided giving rise to a pet food with fully satisfactory palatability and elasticity.
  • The pet food according to the invention can be produced by extrusion, as indicated above, but several other methods may be used as well, provided that the starch is gelatinized in admixture with the SPS-ase treated proteinaceous material.
  • In the following the pet food according to the in­vention will be illustrated by some examples.
  • Example l
  • Five pet foods, I - V with the following compositions were provided:
    • Pet food I: 50%-wheat meal ("Unika" from Valsemøllen, Postbox l42, 670l Esbjerg, Denmark)
      25% bone meal (from DLG, Axelborg, Vesterbrogade 44, l503 Copenhagen V, Denmark)
      25% soy meal (Soyamel l3 from Aarhus Oliefabrik, M.P. Bruunsgade 27, Postbox 50, 8l00 Arhus C).
    • Pet food II: Like I, but the last component was jet-cooked soy meal. The jet-cooked soy meal was prepared in the following manner:
      79.9 kg of defatted soy meal (Sojamel l3 from Aarhus Oliefabrik A/S) was mixed with 295 l of water. The slurry was jet-cooked at l50°C for 30 seconds and subsequently spray-dried.
    • Pet food III: Like I, but the last component was SPS-ase treated soy meal. The SPS-ase treated soy meal was made as follows:
      75 kg of defatted soy meal (Sojamel l3 from Aarhus Oliefabrik A/S) was mixed with 285 l of water. The slurry was jet-cooked at l50°C for 30 seconds. pH was adjusted to 4.5 by addition of 2200 ml of l2 N HCl. SPS-ase treatment was carried out for 24 hours at 45°C by addition of l407 g of the SPS-ase containing enzyme preparation SP-249 PPS l540, as described in NOVO ENZYME INFORMATION IB-297b-GB. After hydrolysis the SPS-ase preparation was inactivated by heating the slurry to 85°C for 2 minutes, and subsequently the slurry was spray­dried.
    • Pet food IV: Like I, but the last component was protease treated soy meal. The protease treated soy meal was prepared as follows:
      33.3 kg of defatted soy meal (Sojamel l3 from Aarhus Oliefabrik A/S) was mixed with l86 l of water. Protease treatment was carried out at 55°C and pH = 8 by addition of 35l g of the alkaline protease Alcalase 0.6 L, as described in NOVO INFORMATION LEAFLET B-207c-GB. Hydrolysis was carried on until a degree of hydrolysis of 3% was reached, as described in NOVO INFORMATION LEAFLET B-l63f-GB. After hydrolysis the enzyme was in­activated by lowering the pH to 4.0 for 30 min., and subsequently the slurry was spray-dried.
    • Pet food V: Like IV, but the double amount of Alcalase 0.6 L was used, and the hydrolysis was carried on to a degree of hydrolysis of l0%.
  • The formulations I - V were extruded on a Werner & Pfleiderer Continua C 37 double screw extruder with an L/D pro­portion of 22 (L/D = length of screw/diameter of screw) corresponding to a holding time in the extruder of 0.75 minutes to l minute.
  • The dry formulations were fed to the extruder with a rate of 35 kg/h. Directly after the feed funnel water was added with a rate of 6.0 - 6.5 kg/h by means of a piston pump. The water contained 2.5% w/w of potassium sorbate. The temperature in the screw houses Nos. 2 - 5 were kept constant at l50°C, whereas screw house No. l was cooled. The extrudate was pressed through two cylindrical nozzles with a diameter of 6 mm each. The rotational speed of the screws was 300 rpm. Directly downstream the exit nozzle of the extruder the extrudate was cut into small pellets by means of a rotating knife.
  • The elasticity was measured by means of an Instron apparatus. The sample to be tested is placed below a flat pressure plate in the Instron apparatus. With a velocity of 20 mm/minute the pressure plate is directed towards the sample, which is compressed to-l/3 of the original sample height. The force required for the compression is recorded as a function of the compression (as a "working curve") with a coupled writing recorder with a paper velocity of 200 mm/minute. Five consecutive compressions were performed. The elasticity in % is defined as the proportion between the area below the 5′ and l′ working curve i.e.

    elasticity =
    Figure imgb0001
    × l00%
  • The data from the elasticity test can be used for the hardness determination, as the hardness is the initial gradient on the l′ working curve. Thus, the hardness is the hardness of the not deformed sample, expressed as pressure per length unit of compression, e.g. in N/mm³.
  • The samples I, II, IV, and V showed no remarkable difference in regard to elasticity and softness, whereas the SPS-ase treated sample III had a much softer and much more elastic texture.
  • Comparative Instron-measurements were made on samples of I and III. The samples were also analyzed for percentage of dry matter.
  • The results were:
    Pet food I: % of dry matter = 82.0%
    Pet food III: % of dry matter = 83.0%
    and
    Figure imgb0002
  • Thus, by treating the soy based fraction of a pet food with an SPS-ase, a pet food with improved elasticity and greater softness may be obtained.
  • Example 2
  • Two pet foods, A and B, were tested, A being a pet food according to the invention, and B being a corresponding prior art pet food control.
  • Composition of A:
    50% wheat meal ("Unika" from Valsemøllen)
    25% meat bone meal (from DLG)
    25% jet-cooked soy meal, treated with SPS-ase
  • The jet-cooked soy meal treated with SPS-ase, was prepared in the following manner.
  • 33 kg of defatted soy meal (ground "White Flakes 09" from Aarhus Oliefabrik A/S) was mixed with 222 l of water. The slurry was jet-cooked at l50°C for 25 seconds. pH was adjusted to 4.52 by addition of l350 ml l2 N HCl. SPS-ase-treatment was carried out for 24 hours at 45°C by addition of 638 g of the SPS-ase-containing enzyme preparation SP 249 PPS l6l2, as described in NOVO ENZYME INFORMATION IB 297c-GB. This enzyme preparation has an SPS-ase-activity of 30 SPSU/g. After hydro­lysis the temperature of the slurry was raised to 85°C for 2 minutes in order to inactivate the SPS-ase-preparation. Finally the slurry was spray-dried.
  • The SPS-ase-treated soy meal was mixed with wheat meal and meat/bone meal according to the above proportions. The dry mixture was extruded as described previously, with the following exceptions: the rate was 50 kg/h, water was added at a rate of 9.5 - l0.0 kg/h, and the extrudate was pressed through one cylindrical nozzle with a diameter of 7 mm.
  • The extruded pet food A exhibited the following characteristics:
    % protein (N × 6.25) = 33.0% (based on dry matter)
    % dry matter             = 80.3%
    Composition of B:
    Like A, but last component was 25% plain defatted soy meal.
  • The extruded pet food B exhibited the following characteristics:
    % protein (N × 6.25) = 3l.8% (based on dry substance)
    % dry matter             = 79.9%
  • By means of the Instron Apparatus it was shown that A had a l7% higher elasticity and a l7% lower hardness than B.
  • Furthermore, dog feeding experiments were carried out with pet foods A and B. Five dogs (Nos. 447, 467, 476, 48l, and 486) were fed with pet foods A and B for two days. Each forenoon each of the five dogs were offered 2 batches of 320 g each, one batch of pet food A, and one batch of pet food B. The two batches were served simultaneously, allowing the dogs a free choice between the two batches. It was found that each dog first was sniffing to both batches, whereafter they started to eat batch A. None of the dogs started to eat batch B, before they had finished batch-A. Two dogs (Nos. 48l and 486) ate up both batches within minutes. Late in the afternoon the rest of the dogs had eaten up the entire amount of batch A, but hardly touched batch B. The next morning the remainder of batch B had been eaten as well.
  • Samples of A and B were stored at ambient temperature (20 - 25°C) for 9 months. Subsequently, both samples were in­spected. Sample B (without SPS-ase treatment) had turned green/grey, was covered with mold and had an unpleasant odour. Sample A (with SPS-ase treatment) showed no sign of microbial deterioration and appeared as when extruded 9 months earlier. None of the samples A and B contained propylene glycol.
  • Example 3
  • As in example 2, two pet foods, A and B, were tested, A being a pet food according to the invention, and B being a corresponding prior art pet food control. The compositions of A and B in this example differed slightly from the composition of A and B in example 2, as shown below:
    A in this example 40% whole ground corn
    20% whole ground wheat
    20% meat- and bone-meal
    20% jet-cooked soy flour, treated with SPS-ase
    B in this example 40% whole ground corn
    20% whole ground wheat
    20% meat- and bone-meal
    20% soy flour
  • Otherwise the preparation of the two pet foods, in­cluding the SPS-ase treatment and the extrusion, were carried out exactly as indicated in example 2. The elasticity test was carried out as in example 2, with the following exceptions: l) the velocity of the pressure plate was l00 mm/minute 2) the paper velocity was l000 mm/minute, and 3) the samples were compressed to l/2 of the original sample height.
  • Feeding trials comprising 20 dogs of various breeds and sizes were conducted at a kennel. A table of the participating dogs is shown in Table 2.
  • l2 dogs were fed for l4 days, 4 dogs for ll days, 2 dogs for 7 days and 2 dogs for 4 days with the A and B pellets.
  • Each day the dogs were offered simultaneously 2 bowls with A and B, respectively. Each portion was of the order of 25 g pellets/kg body weight. Thus a small dog of l0 kg was simultaneously offered 250 g A and 250 g B, while a big dog of 50 kg was offered l250 g A and l250 g B. The dog was allowed to eat for 45 minutes, after which time the bowls were removed, and the remaining amount of pellets were weighed.
  • For every day of feeding the position of the bowls was reversed in order that the dogs would have to make a deliberate choice, as to which feed it preferred.
  • To ease the interpretation of the results the pre­ference percentages for A and B, respectively, are defined as
    Figure imgb0003
    EA = daily consumption of A
    EB = daily consumption of B
  • Results
  • The dry substance (H) and protein (P) analysis gave the following results:
    Figure imgb0004
    The elasticity and hardness data are given in Table l, and the results of the big feeding trial is outlined in Table 2.
  • Discussion
  • The elasticity and hardness data for the pellets A and B are compared to data for the commercial soft-dry product "Love Me Tender Chunks" from Quaker Oats, vide Table l.
  • In order to simplify the numerous data in Table l, the average elasticity and hardness data are calculated:
    Figure imgb0005
  • With regard to elasticity the A product is much superior both to the reference product B and to the commercial product.
  • The low elasticity score for "Tender Chunks" is due to the fact, that these pellets break when being pressed together.
  • There is no statistically significant difference between the elasticity of B and "Tender Chunks".
  • When looking at the hardness data, big differences are seen, too. The A product and the commercial product are much softer than B. However, the soft texture of the A product is due to the SPS-ase treatment of the soy flour ingredient, while commercial products are soft due to the addition of propylene glycol.
  • Therefore, SPS-ase treatment gives rise to a pet fod, which is soft and elastic, while propylene glycol generates softness, but only little elasticity of the pet food.
  • The results of the feeding trial may briefly be summarized as follows:
    Figure imgb0006
  • From both sets of data it appears that the dogs have a strong preference for the A product. It is not clear, whether the preference for A is due to its softer and more elastic structure, or if it is due simply to a better taste obtained by the enzyme treatment. It is most likely a combination of these factors, that causes the A preference.
  • There is no obvious explanation of the fact, that dog no. l5 had a different taste and chose product B. It is hardly a question of breeds, as two dogs of the same kind (No. 7 and No. l4) preferred product A.
  • During the trial the dogs were only fed with product A and B. A few dogs had occasionally problems with diarrhoea, but it was by no means a general problem. Quite frequently diarrhoea is caused by overfeeding, rather than by "high osmotic" in­gredients in the pet food.
    Figure imgb0007
    Figure imgb0008
  • The features disclosed in the foregoing description, and in the following claims may, both separately and in any combination thereof, be material for realising the in­vention in diverse forms thereof.

Claims (13)

1. Pet food comprising as a component a proteinaceous material, wherein the proteinaceous material has been treated with an SPS-ase pre­paration in an aqueous medium.
2. Pet food according to claim l, wherein the proteinaceous material is of vegetable origin.
3. Pet food according to claim 2 wherein the proteinaceous material of vegetable origin is a soy based material.
4. Pet food according to claim 3, wherein the soy based material is soy meal.
5. Pet food according to claim l to 4, wherein the SPS-ase pre­paration is producible by means of Aspergillus aculeatus CBS l0l.43.
6. Pet food according to claim l to 5, wherein the enzymatic treatment is carried out to completion or substantially to com­pletion.
7. Component of pet food for use in the pet food according to claim l to 6, wherein the component comprises a proteinaceous material, which has, been treated with an SPS-ase preparation in an aqueous medium.
8. Component according to claim 7, wherein the proteinaceous material is of vegetable origin.
9. Component according to claim 8, wherein the proteinaceous material of vegetable origin is a soy based material.
l0. Component according to claim 9, wherein the soy based material is soy meal.
11. Component according to claim 7 to l0, wherein the SPS-ase pre­paration is producible by means of Aspergillus aculeatus CBS l0l.43.
12. Component according to claim 7 to ll, wherein the enzymatic treatment is carried out to completion or substantially to com­pletion.
13. A method of preparing a component of pet food, which method comprises treating proteinaceous material with an SPS-ase preparation in an aqueous medium.
EP86308569A 1985-11-04 1986-11-03 Pet food and component of pet food and method of producing the same Expired - Lifetime EP0223484B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
DK506385A DK153042C (en) 1985-11-04 1985-11-04 KAELEDYRSFODER
DK5063/85 1985-11-04

Publications (3)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0223484A2 true EP0223484A2 (en) 1987-05-27
EP0223484A3 EP0223484A3 (en) 1989-04-26
EP0223484B1 EP0223484B1 (en) 1992-01-22

Family

ID=8139134

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP86308569A Expired - Lifetime EP0223484B1 (en) 1985-11-04 1986-11-03 Pet food and component of pet food and method of producing the same

Country Status (5)

Country Link
US (1) US4784860A (en)
EP (1) EP0223484B1 (en)
JP (1) JPH0691796B2 (en)
DE (1) DE3683602D1 (en)
DK (1) DK153042C (en)

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007035112A1 (en) * 2005-09-23 2007-03-29 Universitetet For Miljø- Og Biovitenskap Process for increasing the nutritional value in consumable products such as animal feed, especially fish feed

Families Citing this family (22)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
DK14292D0 (en) * 1992-02-06 1992-02-06 Novo Nordisk As PROCEDURES FOR TREATING POTATO PULP
US5508172A (en) * 1992-10-13 1996-04-16 Ralston Purina Company Modified soy fiber material of improved sensory properties
AU1092297A (en) * 1995-12-07 1997-06-27 Novo Nordisk A/S Selective inactivation of enzyme activities
US6126978A (en) * 1996-10-25 2000-10-03 T.F.H. Publications, Inc. Edible dog chew
US6093427A (en) * 1997-09-03 2000-07-25 T.F.H.Publications, Inc. Vegetable-based dog chew
US6110521A (en) * 1996-10-25 2000-08-29 T.F.H. Publications, Inc. Wheat and casein dog chew with modifiable texture
US6180161B1 (en) 1996-10-25 2001-01-30 T.F.H. Publications, Inc. Heat modifiable edible dog chew
US5941197A (en) * 1997-01-17 1999-08-24 T.F.H. Publications, Inc. Carrot-based dog chew
US6086940A (en) * 1996-10-25 2000-07-11 T.F.H. Publications, Inc. High starch content dog chew
US5827565A (en) * 1996-10-25 1998-10-27 T.F.H. Publications, Inc. Process for making an edible dog chew
US6117477A (en) 1998-03-18 2000-09-12 Kal Kan Foods, Inc. Multicomponent food product and methods of making and using the same
US6093441A (en) * 1998-07-15 2000-07-25 Tfh Publications, Inc. Heat modifiable peanut dog chew
US6056991A (en) * 1998-07-15 2000-05-02 Tfh Publications, Inc. Turkey and rice dog chew with modifiable texture
US6403142B1 (en) * 1998-12-11 2002-06-11 Ralston Purina Company Hypoallergenic pet food
US6506401B1 (en) * 1999-01-28 2003-01-14 H. J. Heinz Company Filled edible product, and system and method for production of a filled edible product
US20060062892A1 (en) * 2004-09-17 2006-03-23 Merrick Tyler W Dry pet food with kibble, dried vegetables and dried meat jerky pieces
EP2373185B1 (en) * 2009-01-02 2018-08-08 Nestec S.A. Food compositions having a realistic meat-like appearance, feel and texture
US20100233347A1 (en) 2009-03-13 2010-09-16 Uhrhan Richard B Food compositions having a realistic meat-like appearance, feel, and texture
US10104903B2 (en) 2009-07-31 2018-10-23 Mars, Incorporated Animal food and its appearance
JP6452616B2 (en) * 2012-12-04 2019-01-16 ネステク ソシエテ アノニム Simulated loaf food composition
JP6712603B2 (en) 2015-02-16 2020-06-24 マース インコーポレーテッドMars Incorporated Kibble that meshes
MX2017013715A (en) 2015-04-28 2018-03-02 Mars Inc Process of preparing a sterilized wet pet food product.

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2013753A1 (en) * 1968-07-26 1970-04-10 Roehm & Haas Gmbh
US4391829A (en) * 1981-08-13 1983-07-05 General Foods Corporation Dual enzyme digestion for a dog food of improved palatability
US4393085A (en) * 1981-08-13 1983-07-12 General Foods Corporation Enzyme digestion for a dog food of improved palatability
GB2115820A (en) * 1981-12-22 1983-09-14 Novo Industri As Improvement in and relating to an enzyme for decomposition of a high molecular carbohydrate, the isolated high molecular carbohydrate, a method for selection of a microorganism producing such enzyme and a method for production of such enzyme

Family Cites Families (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US4478939A (en) * 1981-12-24 1984-10-23 Novo Industri A/S SPS, SPS-ase and method for producing SPS-ase
US4483874A (en) * 1982-05-06 1984-11-20 Novo Industri A/S Preparation of milk substitute

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
FR2013753A1 (en) * 1968-07-26 1970-04-10 Roehm & Haas Gmbh
US4391829A (en) * 1981-08-13 1983-07-05 General Foods Corporation Dual enzyme digestion for a dog food of improved palatability
US4393085A (en) * 1981-08-13 1983-07-12 General Foods Corporation Enzyme digestion for a dog food of improved palatability
GB2115820A (en) * 1981-12-22 1983-09-14 Novo Industri As Improvement in and relating to an enzyme for decomposition of a high molecular carbohydrate, the isolated high molecular carbohydrate, a method for selection of a microorganism producing such enzyme and a method for production of such enzyme

Cited By (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO2007035112A1 (en) * 2005-09-23 2007-03-29 Universitetet For Miljø- Og Biovitenskap Process for increasing the nutritional value in consumable products such as animal feed, especially fish feed

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
JPH0691796B2 (en) 1994-11-16
US4784860A (en) 1988-11-15
EP0223484B1 (en) 1992-01-22
EP0223484A3 (en) 1989-04-26
DK506385D0 (en) 1985-11-04
DE3683602D1 (en) 1992-03-05
DK153042C (en) 1989-01-02
JPS62107748A (en) 1987-05-19
DK153042B (en) 1988-06-13
DK506385A (en) 1987-05-05

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP0223484B1 (en) Pet food and component of pet food and method of producing the same
US4713250A (en) Dog food palatability enhancer and process
US4391829A (en) Dual enzyme digestion for a dog food of improved palatability
CA1172093A (en) Dual enzyme digestion for a dog food of improved palatability
US4418086A (en) Expanded textured protein product and method for making same
CN101917870B (en) Method for enhancing pet food palatability
US4190679A (en) Meaty textured pet food
CA1053499A (en) Meat-like dry pet food
US4284652A (en) Matrix, product therewith, and process
US4211797A (en) Dry dog food of improved palatability
US6926917B2 (en) Dry pet food with increased palatability and method of production
GB2156305A (en) Encapsulated lipids
AU2621999A (en) Moisture-reduced, formulated food product
WO1995021540A1 (en) Animal food palatability improving composition and process
US4743459A (en) Canine biscuit containing discrete meat and/or meat by-product particles and method for making same
US5186961A (en) Method and composition for maintaining animals on a keratin-containing diet
US4296132A (en) Dog food of improved acceptability
CA1099982A (en) Matrix for a food product employing said matrix and process for preparing
JPH034175B2 (en)
CA1172092A (en) Palatability of dog food increased by selective treatment of meat meal
JP2960949B2 (en) Pet food for dogs and cats and feeding method thereof
WO2007035112A1 (en) Process for increasing the nutritional value in consumable products such as animal feed, especially fish feed
CA1202517A (en) Expanded textured protein product and method for making same
CN111372465A (en) Pork skin derived emulsions for use in palatability enhancers

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A2

Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR GB LI NL SE

PUAL Search report despatched

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009013

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A3

Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR GB LI NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19890419

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: NOVO-NORDISK A/S

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19900723

RAP1 Party data changed (applicant data changed or rights of an application transferred)

Owner name: NOVO NORDISK A/S

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE CH DE FR GB LI NL SE

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3683602

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19920305

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
EAL Se: european patent in force in sweden

Ref document number: 86308569.2

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Payment date: 19961118

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: CH

Payment date: 19961121

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Payment date: 19961128

Year of fee payment: 11

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19961230

Year of fee payment: 11

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: SE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19971104

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LI

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19971130

Ref country code: CH

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19971130

Ref country code: BE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19971130

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: NOVO NORDISK A/S

Effective date: 19971130

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19980601

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

EUG Se: european patent has lapsed

Ref document number: 86308569.2

NLV4 Nl: lapsed or anulled due to non-payment of the annual fee

Effective date: 19980601

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: 732E

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: GB

Ref legal event code: IF02

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 20041028

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 20041104

Year of fee payment: 19

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 20041109

Year of fee payment: 19

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20051103

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060601

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee

Effective date: 20051103

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 20060731

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

Effective date: 20060731