EP0210732A1 - A balistic body stabilized by flexible fins - Google Patents

A balistic body stabilized by flexible fins Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0210732A1
EP0210732A1 EP86304396A EP86304396A EP0210732A1 EP 0210732 A1 EP0210732 A1 EP 0210732A1 EP 86304396 A EP86304396 A EP 86304396A EP 86304396 A EP86304396 A EP 86304396A EP 0210732 A1 EP0210732 A1 EP 0210732A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
fin
projectile
fins
connecting member
balistic
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP86304396A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0210732B1 (en
Inventor
David Mishne
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd
State of Israel
Original Assignee
Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd
State of Israel
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd, State of Israel filed Critical Rafael Advanced Defense Systems Ltd
Priority to AT86304396T priority Critical patent/ATE50360T1/en
Publication of EP0210732A1 publication Critical patent/EP0210732A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0210732B1 publication Critical patent/EP0210732B1/en
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical
Expired - Lifetime legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F42AMMUNITION; BLASTING
    • F42BEXPLOSIVE CHARGES, e.g. FOR BLASTING, FIREWORKS, AMMUNITION
    • F42B10/00Means for influencing, e.g. improving, the aerodynamic properties of projectiles or missiles; Arrangements on projectiles or missiles for stabilising, steering, range-reducing, range-increasing or fall-retarding
    • F42B10/02Stabilising arrangements
    • F42B10/04Stabilising arrangements using fixed fins
    • F42B10/06Tail fins

Definitions

  • the present invention concerns the stabilization of flying ballistic bodies such as missiles, rockets and bombs, whether self-propelled or not.
  • flying ballistic bodies such as missiles, rockets and bombs, whether self-propelled or not.
  • projectiles it being understood that this term refers to fin-stabilized projectiles.
  • the invention concerns an improvement in the aerodynamic stabilization of projectiles.
  • the aerodynamic stability is one of the main considerations in the design of projectiles, whether launched from landborne, seaborne or airborne launchers or, whether dropped from an aircraft.
  • Conventionally aerodynamic stability is achieved by means of stabilizing fins and the larger the surface of the stabilizing fins the better the aerodynamic stability.
  • geometric constraints which restrict the space available for launching. For example, in the arming of fighter aircraft, the geometry of the aircraft has to be taken into account; or in case of landborne or seaborne launchers the design of the latter must be considered. In consequence of this, restrictions are put on the span of the stabilizing fins, which restrictions are incompatible with considerations of stability.
  • a further drawback inherent in large size stabilizing fins, whether static or of the popout type, is the fact that the larger the diameter of a flying projectile the easier becomes its detection by radar.
  • each fin is connected to the body by a twistable connecting member, the location of connection of each fin being rearward of the aerodynamic centre thereof.
  • the connecting members may, for example, be in form of torsion bars or helical springs and may be made of metal or of suitable plastic material.
  • the projectile diagrammatically illustrated in Fig. 1 comprises a body 1 having at its rear a number of stabilizing fins 2 each connected to body 1 by means of a helical spring 3.
  • Fig. 2 the fraction of the body 1 shown in Fig. 1 is signified by the longitudinal axis 1'.
  • the point CGB shown on line l' signifies the centre of gravity of the body.
  • the point CGP on fin 2 signifies the centre of gravity of the fin and the point AC the aerodynamic centre thereof.
  • the projectile moves at an angular velocity q and at a translatory velocity v with an angle of attack a formed between the trajectory and the axis 1' which means that the projectile oscillates about its theoretical trajectory.
  • the angle of attack a,each stabilizing fin 2 is deflected by being turned around the spiral spring 3 by which it is connected to body 1 forming with the axis of the latter an angle 6.
  • the oscillation of the projectile about the trajectory is gradually attenuated which means that the angle of attack a is diminished, whereby in turn the deflection angle 6 of the fins is equally diminished.
  • Fig. 3 there are shown two attenuation curves of the oscillations of a fin stabilized projectile.
  • the drawn out curve shows the attentuation of a projectile with twistably connected fins according to the invention
  • the dashed curve shows the attenuation of a projectile having the same geometry and flying under the same conditions with rigidly connected fins.
  • the curves show the reduction of the angle of attack a as a function of time and while the drawnout curve shows that with a projectile according to the invention the angle of attack a diminishes rapidly and after three seconds is reduced to less than half the original, the attenuation of the angle of attack a with a conventional missile with rigidly connected stabilizing fins of the same size and geometry, is much slower.

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Fluid Mechanics (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Aiming, Guidance, Guns With A Light Source, Armor, Camouflage, And Targets (AREA)
  • Footwear And Its Accessory, Manufacturing Method And Apparatuses (AREA)
  • Finger-Pressure Massage (AREA)
  • Arc-Extinguishing Devices That Are Switches (AREA)
  • Non-Metallic Protective Coatings For Printed Circuits (AREA)
  • Polishing Bodies And Polishing Tools (AREA)
  • Formation Of Insulating Films (AREA)
  • Professional, Industrial, Or Sporting Protective Garments (AREA)
  • Motor Or Generator Cooling System (AREA)

Abstract

A fin stabilized projectile (1) in which each fin (2) is connected to the body by a twistable connecting member (3), the location of connection of each fin being rearward of the serodynamic centre thereof.

Description

  • The present invention concerns the stabilization of flying ballistic bodies such as missiles, rockets and bombs, whether self-propelled or not. In the following all such flying ballistic bodies will be referred to for short as "projectiles", it being understood that this term refers to fin-stabilized projectiles.
  • More specifically the invention concerns an improvement in the aerodynamic stabilization of projectiles.
  • The aerodynamic stability is one of the main considerations in the design of projectiles, whether launched from landborne, seaborne or airborne launchers or, whether dropped from an aircraft. Conventionally aerodynamic stability is achieved by means of stabilizing fins and the larger the surface of the stabilizing fins the better the aerodynamic stability. However, there exist geometric constraints which restrict the space available for launching. For example, in the arming of fighter aircraft, the geometry of the aircraft has to be taken into account; or in case of landborne or seaborne launchers the design of the latter must be considered. In consequence of this, restrictions are put on the span of the stabilizing fins, which restrictions are incompatible with considerations of stability.
  • It thus occurs quite often that projectiles are developed which are insufficiently stabilized with the result that the ballistic performance of such projectiles is highly sensitive to atmospheric interferences and geometric tolerances which in turn results in inaccurate performance expressed in terms of high dispersion.
  • It has already been proposed to overcome .hese defects by means of popout stabilizing fins which merge out of the body of the projectile after its launching but this solution turned out to be complicated and unreliable and to cause an undesired increase of the body weight of the projectile.
  • Another proposed solution for improving the aerodynamic stability of projectiles is to shift the centre of gravity forward. However this solution requires the addition of considerable dead weight at the front part of the projectile which reduces the payload for a given propulsion.
  • A further drawback inherent in large size stabilizing fins, whether static or of the popout type, is the fact that the larger the diameter of a flying projectile the easier becomes its detection by radar.
  • It is accordingly the object of the present invention to overcome the above-described deficiencies by providing a new type of fin stabilization for projectiles.
  • In accordance with the present invention there is provided a fin stabilized projectile in which each fin is connected to the body by a twistable connecting member, the location of connection of each fin being rearward of the aerodynamic centre thereof.
  • It has been found in accordance with the present invention that projectiles with twistably connected fins have a significantly larger stabilizing effect than rigidly connected fins of the same size and geometry. In flight, when the projectile oscillates about its theoretical trajectory in consequence of atmospheric interferences, the twistably connected fins are deflected out of their rest position whereby the oscillation of the projectile is automatically attenuated. The extent to which the connecting members can be twisted can be determined empirically for each specific design.
  • The connecting members may, for example, be in form of torsion bars or helical springs and may be made of metal or of suitable plastic material.
  • The invention will now be described, by way of example only, with reference to the accompanying drawings in which:
    • Fig. 1 is a fragmentary diagrammatic elevation of a projectile with twistably connected stabilizing fins according to the invention;
    • Fig. 2 shows in a diagrammatic manner the flight stabilizing effect of twistably connected fin according to the invention; and
    • Fig. 3 is a comparative oscillation attenuation diagram.
  • The projectile diagrammatically illustrated in Fig. 1 comprises a body 1 having at its rear a number of stabilizing fins 2 each connected to body 1 by means of a helical spring 3.
  • In Fig. 2 the fraction of the body 1 shown in Fig. 1 is signified by the longitudinal axis 1'. The point CGB shown on line l' signifies the centre of gravity of the body. The point CGP on fin 2 signifies the centre of gravity of the fin and the point AC the aerodynamic centre thereof. The projectile moves at an angular velocity q and at a translatory velocity v with an angle of attack a formed between the trajectory and the axis 1' which means that the projectile oscillates about its theoretical trajectory. In consequence the angle of attack a,each stabilizing fin 2 is deflected by being turned around the spiral spring 3 by which it is connected to body 1 forming with the axis of the latter an angle 6. As a result of the deflection of the stabilizing fins 2 the oscillation of the projectile about the trajectory is gradually attenuated which means that the angle of attack a is diminished, whereby in turn the deflection angle 6 of the fins is equally diminished.
  • In Fig. 3 there are shown two attenuation curves of the oscillations of a fin stabilized projectile. The drawn out curve shows the attentuation of a projectile with twistably connected fins according to the invention, and the dashed curve shows the attenuation of a projectile having the same geometry and flying under the same conditions with rigidly connected fins. The curves show the reduction of the angle of attack a as a function of time and while the drawnout curve shows that with a projectile according to the invention the angle of attack a diminishes rapidly and after three seconds is reduced to less than half the original, the attenuation of the angle of attack a with a conventional missile with rigidly connected stabilizing fins of the same size and geometry, is much slower.
  • The invention is further illustrated by the following example:
    • For imparting a satisfactory aerodynamic stability to a projectile weighing 200 kg. having a diameter of 40 cms. and being 4 m. long and flying at a low altitude at a velocity of 250 m/sec., conventional rigidly connected fins are required having a span of 70 cm. If, however, the fins are twistably mounted in accordance with the invention using a torsion bar of a hardness of 2,000 kg and each mounted 10 cm. sec behind the aerodynamic centre of the stabilizer, the surface of the fins can be reduced by 20% as compared to rigidly connected stabilizers of the same size and geometry. Such a reduction is of great value, for example, for air to ground bombs mounted on and launched from the lower face of the wings of an aircraft.
  • For further comparison, if the surface area of rigidly connected stabilizing fins were reduced by 20% the stability would be reduced four times and such a missile would perform inaccurately.
  • The features disclosed in the foregoing description, in the following claims and/or in the accompanying drawings may, both separately and in any combination thereof, be material for realising the invention in diverse forms thereof.

Claims (5)

1. A fin stabilized proiectile in which each fin (2) is connected to the body by a twistable connecting member (3), the location of connection of each fin being rearward of the aerodynamic centre thereof.
2. A projectile according to Claim 1 wherein said twistable connecting member (3) is a torsion bar.
3. A projectile according to Claim 1 wherein said twistable connecting member is a helical spring.
4. A projectile according to any one of Claims 1 to 3 wherein said twistable connecting member (3) is of metal.
S. A projectile according to any one of Claims 1 to 3 wherein said twistable connecting member (3) is of plastic material.
EP86304396A 1985-06-27 1986-06-09 A balistic body stabilized by flexible fins Expired - Lifetime EP0210732B1 (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
AT86304396T ATE50360T1 (en) 1985-06-27 1986-06-09 BALLISTIC BODY STABILIZED BY COMPLIANT FINS.

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
IL75653A IL75653A (en) 1985-06-27 1985-06-27 Ballistic body stabilized by deflectable fins
IL75653 1985-06-27

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0210732A1 true EP0210732A1 (en) 1987-02-04
EP0210732B1 EP0210732B1 (en) 1990-02-07

Family

ID=11056028

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP86304396A Expired - Lifetime EP0210732B1 (en) 1985-06-27 1986-06-09 A balistic body stabilized by flexible fins

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0210732B1 (en)
AT (1) ATE50360T1 (en)
DE (1) DE3668987D1 (en)
IL (1) IL75653A (en)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2393604A (en) * 1943-02-10 1946-01-29 William F Berger Bomb stabilizer
US2584826A (en) * 1946-05-31 1952-02-05 Gulf Research Development Co Aerodynamic surface for dirigible bombs
US4198016A (en) * 1978-06-12 1980-04-15 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Floating canard with geared tab
US4351503A (en) * 1975-02-03 1982-09-28 Mordeki Drori Stabilized projectiles

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US2393604A (en) * 1943-02-10 1946-01-29 William F Berger Bomb stabilizer
US2584826A (en) * 1946-05-31 1952-02-05 Gulf Research Development Co Aerodynamic surface for dirigible bombs
US4351503A (en) * 1975-02-03 1982-09-28 Mordeki Drori Stabilized projectiles
US4198016A (en) * 1978-06-12 1980-04-15 The United States Of America As Represented By The Secretary Of The Navy Floating canard with geared tab

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
IL75653A0 (en) 1985-10-31
ATE50360T1 (en) 1990-02-15
EP0210732B1 (en) 1990-02-07
DE3668987D1 (en) 1990-03-15
IL75653A (en) 1991-07-18

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US5141175A (en) Air launched munition range extension system and method
US5154370A (en) High lift/low drag wing and missile airframe
US2470120A (en) Method of bombing from fast moving planes
US3935817A (en) Penetrating spear
US4519315A (en) Fire and forget missiles system
US3000597A (en) Rocket-propelled missile
US3964696A (en) Method of controlling the spin rate of tube launched rockets
US5112006A (en) Self defense missile
US3018692A (en) Rotatable rocket launcher
US4337911A (en) Non-spinning projectile
US3048086A (en) Rocket-bomb firing apparatus
US3637167A (en) Missile steering system
EP0210732B1 (en) A balistic body stabilized by flexible fins
US5159151A (en) Missile nose fairing assembly
US3964391A (en) Dispenser-launched munition with two-stage spin-imparting vanes
US5430449A (en) Missile operable by either air or ground launching
RU2327949C1 (en) Missile
EP2329216B1 (en) Multi-stage hyper-velocity kinetic energy missile
RU2064655C1 (en) Aerodynamic canard configuration guides missile
US3434417A (en) Bomb braking system
EP1087201B1 (en) Method and device for correcting the trajectory of a spinstabilised projectile
US6402087B1 (en) Fixed canards maneuverability enhancement
Vergez Tactical missile guidance with passive seekers under high off-boresight launch conditions
US2692094A (en) Composite aircraft
RU2814624C1 (en) Missile stabilizer

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: A1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19870623

17Q First examination report despatched

Effective date: 19881114

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): AT BE CH DE FR GB IT LI LU NL SE

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: NL

Effective date: 19900207

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19900207

Ref country code: AT

Effective date: 19900207

Ref country code: IT

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF FAILURE TO SUBMIT A TRANSLATION OF THE DESCRIPTION OR TO PAY THE FEE WITHIN THE PRE;WARNING: LAPSES OF ITALIAN PATENTS WITH EFFECTIVE DATE BEFORE 2007 MAY HAVE OCCURRED AT ANY TIME BEFORE 2007. THE CORRECT EFFECTIVE DATE MAY BE DIFFERENT FROM THE ONE RECORDED.SCRIBED TIME-LIMIT

Effective date: 19900207

Ref country code: LI

Effective date: 19900207

Ref country code: SE

Effective date: 19900207

Ref country code: CH

Effective date: 19900207

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19900207

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 50360

Country of ref document: AT

Date of ref document: 19900215

Kind code of ref document: T

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3668987

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19900315

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: CH

Ref legal event code: PL

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19900609

EN Fr: translation not filed
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: LU

Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES

Effective date: 19900630

NLV1 Nl: lapsed or annulled due to failure to fulfill the requirements of art. 29p and 29m of the patents act
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee
PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19910301