EP0077294A1 - Superjet gas agitation process - Google Patents

Superjet gas agitation process Download PDF

Info

Publication number
EP0077294A1
EP0077294A1 EP82810404A EP82810404A EP0077294A1 EP 0077294 A1 EP0077294 A1 EP 0077294A1 EP 82810404 A EP82810404 A EP 82810404A EP 82810404 A EP82810404 A EP 82810404A EP 0077294 A1 EP0077294 A1 EP 0077294A1
Authority
EP
European Patent Office
Prior art keywords
coarse
particle component
particles
dispersion
bed
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
EP82810404A
Other languages
German (de)
French (fr)
Other versions
EP0077294B1 (en
Inventor
Herbert A. Dr. Arbib
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Battelle Development Corp
Original Assignee
Battelle Development Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Battelle Development Corp filed Critical Battelle Development Corp
Publication of EP0077294A1 publication Critical patent/EP0077294A1/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of EP0077294B1 publication Critical patent/EP0077294B1/en
Expired legal-status Critical Current

Links

Images

Classifications

    • FMECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
    • F23COMBUSTION APPARATUS; COMBUSTION PROCESSES
    • F23CMETHODS OR APPARATUS FOR COMBUSTION USING FLUID FUEL OR SOLID FUEL SUSPENDED IN  A CARRIER GAS OR AIR 
    • F23C10/00Fluidised bed combustion apparatus
    • F23C10/002Fluidised bed combustion apparatus for pulverulent solid fuel
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J8/00Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes
    • B01J8/18Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes with fluidised particles
    • B01J8/24Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes with fluidised particles according to "fluidised-bed" technique
    • B01J8/245Spouted-bed technique
    • BPERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
    • B01PHYSICAL OR CHEMICAL PROCESSES OR APPARATUS IN GENERAL
    • B01JCHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROCESSES, e.g. CATALYSIS OR COLLOID CHEMISTRY; THEIR RELEVANT APPARATUS
    • B01J8/00Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes
    • B01J8/18Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes with fluidised particles
    • B01J8/24Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes with fluidised particles according to "fluidised-bed" technique
    • B01J8/32Chemical or physical processes in general, conducted in the presence of fluids and solid particles; Apparatus for such processes with fluidised particles according to "fluidised-bed" technique with introduction into the fluidised bed of more than one kind of moving particles

Definitions

  • the invention relates to an improved method of operating a multisolid fluid bed system such as that disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,084,545.
  • a fine particle component is entrained in a reactor and a coarse particle component is fluidized at the same time in a smaller region at the bottom of the entrained bed.
  • the fine particles are then recycled out the top of the reactor and back through the coarse fluidized bed at the bottom.
  • This multisolid system results in good particle interaction and increased residence times over single bed reactors for reactants introduced therein.
  • the coarse and fine particles are typically not reactants and are generally physically and chemically stable such that they may remain in the reactor for an extended period of time.
  • Fluidizing gas enters at the bottom through a conventional perforated distributor plate providing rather uniform fluidization of the coarse particles across the bed.
  • a settled coarse particle depth of at least about 25 centimeters has been preferred in the prior system for good fluidization and high residence times.
  • fluid agitation reactor and a fluid agitation process are used generically to refer to any apparatus and method for suspending, transporting, or contacting a particulate in an upwardly moving fluid medium.
  • the solid particles may be fluidized, entrained or spouted.
  • fluid agitation processes utilizing one-component, fluidized, entrained or spouted beds of particulates are known in the art.
  • the above-mentioned patent utilizes both an entrained bed and a fluidized bed.
  • adequate lateral mixing and high residence times at low pressure drops in fluid agitation reactors have not been obtainable, to the disadvantage of the technology vis a vis other means for combustion and gasification, for example.
  • Reactors operated according to the inventive fluid agitation method may be utilized for a variety of processes, from simple heat exchange reactions through catalytic reactions and complex chemical reactions. We will predominantly describe the method in connection with our preferred use, which is the combustion of carbonaceous materials, particularly high-sulfur coal and petroleum coke.
  • the particles are caused to interact in such a way that the residence time for reactants is substantially increased, resulting in more complete reactions.
  • the invention is a method for operating a multisolid fluid agitation reactor which comprises forming an entrained bed in a first region with a relatively fine first particle component, forming in a more limited region within the first region, a dispersion of a relatively coarse second particle component preferably comprising a material having long-term physical stability in the fluid agitation process so as to be substantially non-agglomerating and not subject to substantial attrition therein, recycling the fine particles from the entrained bed through the dispersion of coarse particles, and introducing fluid media through at least one orifice forming a fluid jet capable of penetrating a settled bed of the coarse particles in the reactor and thereby forming the dispersion of coarse particles.
  • the fluid jet is produced by adjusting the fluid velocity in the orifice to a level at least equal to the jet penetration velocity of the coarse particles.
  • the actual superficial velocity in the reactor (volume of fluid per unit time divided by the cross-sectional area of the reactor normal to the principal direction of fluid flow) may be either less than or greater than the comparable minimum fluidization velocity of the coarse particles, though it is preferably greater.
  • the fluid medium is preferably a gas and is preferably a reactant.
  • the other reactant may be a solid particulate material, such as coal, which is preferably of such size that it does not settle out.
  • the solid particulate reactant may be entrainable at the superficial velocity, and the inventive method provides high residence times necessary for substantially complete reaction even with such fine particles.
  • the solid particulate reactant may be a carbonaceous fuel in which case the fuel may, for example, be burned or gasified.
  • Heat energy may be withdrawn by conveying a heat transfer medium through boiler tubes in the reactor or through a portion of the recirculation path whereby the fine particles transfer heat to the medium.
  • a prior art multisolid fluidized bed such as described in U.S. 4,084,545 is shown in Figure 1 but, for clarity, the particles are shown as less concentrated than normal.
  • Fluidizing gas enters through conduit 6 into air plenum 11 and through distributor plate 10 having a plurality of holes therethrough. The fluidizing gas is introduced at a superficial velocity which will simultaneously fluidize the coarse particles 3 into a concentrated bed and entrain the fine particles throughout the reactor. The entrained particles may be removed through conduit 12 and recycled through conduit 7.
  • the distributor plate is conventionally designed to admit fluidizing gas substantially uniformly across the bed in order to encourage more uniform mixing and reaction across the bed.
  • the quantity of coarse particles may be on the order of at least about 25 centimeters (settled bed depth), which is then fluidized at 6-9 m/sec superficial velocity in order to provide a deep and dense enough bed to produce residence times sufficient to complete reactions therein.
  • the fluidized bed is typically a discrete region of suspended particles having a definite upper boundary above which the concentration of particles decreases greatly.
  • the present invention provides a very dilute, coarse particle dispersion such as shown in Figures 3 and 4.
  • this dispersion using substantially less coarse particles than the prior method (preferably about 5-15 centimeters settled bed depth) promotes better interaction and residence times than the prior art bed when operated according to the invention.
  • the lower bed depth and new distributor plate also contribute to a lower pressure drop and more economical operation.
  • the gas velocity necessary to fluidize a particulate solid depends on several properties of the solid, including its density and particle size, it is not a function of the bed depth.
  • the jet penetration velocity in the present invention depends on the bed depth and a desired change in fluid velocity may be accomplished without adversely affecting performance by altering bed depth. In the prior fluidization process this would not be possible and a new particulate may have to be used to accommodate the velocity change in order to prevent settling or entrainment of the original particulate.
  • a fluid agitation reactor 1 contains coarse particles 3 in a settled bed 5 ( Figure 2).
  • a fluid medium preferably a gas
  • the jet appears to form a hollow partial channel in the bed ( Figure 2) and then, at the penetration velocity, the jet ejects coarse particles from the surface of the bed ( Figure 3).
  • the penetration velocity (the velocity in the jet itself) for this occurrence must at least equal the entrainment velocity of the coarse particles and is frequently greater depending on the bed properties.
  • the superficial velocity (in the bed) is, of course, much lower due to the enlarged cross section and, contrary to the prior multisolid bed system, may even be lower than the comparable minimum fluidization velocity for the coarse particles.
  • the coarse particles form what we choose to identify as a dispersion of coarse particles.
  • the dispersion is a very non-uniform, dilute suspension of particles in contrast to the uniform, concentrated fluidized beds of coarse particles in the prior method.
  • a single, round orifice tends to form a dispersion of coarse particles which appears similar to a conventional spouted bed and which is not a classic bubbling, fluidized bed with a definite upper boundary of dramatic concentration change.
  • the dispersion is formed by jet penetration of the coarse settled bed.
  • jet or fluid jet we retain the conventional definition of a strong, well- defined stream of fluid, either gas or liquid, issuing from a nozzle or orifice and having a fluid flow path of at least several diameters in length.
  • the dispersion is formed when the coarse particles are temporarily entrained in the fluid jet until the fluid velocity in the jet drops to less than the entrainment velocity of the coarse particles and the particles are deflected outward from the jet into a surrounding region.
  • the particles When the particles are expelled to a lower velocity region, they fall until again contacting a jet of upward moving fluid of sufficient velocity.
  • the dense particles tend to be expelled in a fountain-shaped dispersion to the outside of the reactor where the upward movement of gas is insufficient to support the particles. From there, the particles fall and then recycle back to the orifice or jet. In a reactor with multiple orifices, the particles would be deflected to the outside of each jet and rain down between jets.
  • the jet penetrates the settled bed of dense particles and ejects some of the particles, whenafter the fine particles may be injected into the reactor such as shown in Figure 4.
  • Their presence improves the buoyancy of the dense particles and increases the interstitial velocity of the fluid media between particles such that the depth of the coarse particle dispersion is raised substantially and a highly interactive multisolid bed is created, even at superficial velocities below the comparable minimum fluidization velocity of the dense bed particles.
  • the fluid medium is provided at such rate that the fine particles are entrained in the region I, substantially throughout the reactor, and the coarse particles form the expanded dispersion in the more limited region II.
  • the dispersion of coarse particles stabilizes the fine particles such that region II resembles an expanded, interactive fluidized bed with a clearly identifiable upper boundary.
  • concentration of the fine particles and interaction and residence times are increased by surprising amounts given the dilute nature of the coarse dispersion.
  • Fine particles are recycled through conduit 12, cyclone 8, external heat exchanger 13, and conduit 7 back through the dispersion in region II. Since the gas velocity in the orifice as well as the density of the gas/fine particle mixture both affect the buoyancy of the dense particles, the amount of fine particle recycle can be used to trade-off with the gas velocity in producing optimum operation. For example, if recycle is increased, the gas velocity may be "turned down” to slow a reaction, without significantly affecting the efficiency of the interaction or residence time in the more limited region II (as long as the coarse-particle entrainment velocity is exceeded in the orifice).
  • the residence time of reactants and the pressure drop through the reactor are two properties which critically affect the efficiency and economics of a fluid agitation process. Looking at the prior multisolid bed which produces very good residence times compared with single fluidized beds, it might be reasonable to expect that deeper or more concentrated coarse-particle beds in region II would provide higher residence times and higher pressure drops and that shallow or disperse coarse-particle beds would decrease both residence times and pressure drops. Surprisingly, we have found that our shallow, dispersion of coarse particles may provide both equal or better residence times and lower pressure drops in the multisolid system.
  • the dispersion is produced by providing a distributor plate or nozzle having at least one orifice which forms a fluid jet of fluidizing media capable of penetrating a settled bed of the coarse particles in the reactor.
  • the velocity of the fluid in the orifice must at least equal the entrainment velocity of the coarse particles in the specific fluid medium.
  • the medium may be a gas containing solid particles, in which case the entrainment velocity may be lower than it would be for the gas alone.
  • the capability of a jet to penetrate the settled bed and to thereby meet the condition of the inventive method may depend on many variables in addition to the fluid velocity in the orifice, such as the fluid density, the height of the settled bed, the size and density of the coarse particles, and the size of the orifice. And though we have not derived an absolute relationship which defines the jet penetration in terms of these variables, we believe that it is well within the state of the art to empirically design a system which provides a fluid jet capable of penetrating the settled coarse particle bed in the system and of thereafter forming the dispersion of coarse particles. In fact, prior researchers have derived equations which relate these variables in spouted beds, which may have some analogy to the coarse particle bed of the present system. For example, see Mathur and Gishler, A Technique for Contacting Gases with Coarse Solid Particles, AIChem EJ, [1], pg. 157 (1955).
  • the orifice is preferably a circular opening in a distributor plate but may also have any other shape which can produce a jet with the ability to penetrate the settled bed.
  • One or more orifices may be necessary depending on the size of the reactor.
  • Figures 5 and 6 show two particular embodiments for larger reactors.
  • the smaller dimension of the orifices are preferably much larger than the particle size of the coarse particles.
  • a screen may cover the orifice to prevent particles from filling the orifice when not fluidized.
  • the coarse and fine particulate components preferably have high temperature physical and chemical stability, are substantially inert under the operating conditions and promote efficient mixing and heat transfer. Where oxidizing conditions prevail, the coarse and fine components preferably comprise metals or metal oxides such as iron oxide.
  • metals or metal oxides such as iron oxide.
  • One specific material which may be used as either component is a hematite ore, containing about 93% iron oxide, Fe 2 0 3 , and supplied under the trademark "Speculite" by C.E. Minerals, Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania.
  • the components may alternatively comprise nickel, nickel oxide, or alumina, for example.
  • the coarse and fine components may, in some instances to be discussed below, comprise a reactant such as coke or shale.
  • the fine component may also additionally comprise silica or a reactant such as limestone or dolomite under conditions wherein sulfur capture is desired.
  • a reactant as a coarse or fine particle component.
  • the use of shale or oily rock which comprise hydrocarbons in a substantially inert solid residue may be used as the coarse component, and upon attrition, as the fine fraction. Coal and coke have less residue but may still be used in the same manner.
  • the reactants having a substantially inert residue are easier to incorporate into the method, but all of these reactants are difficult and require close control and planning in order to maintain the necessary coarse particle dispersion and recirculating entrained bed.
  • the addition of fresh reactants and the removal of residue in the correct amounts to maintain the method are critical.
  • the particle size of the fine component particles is preferably in the range of about -16+140 U.S. mesh while the coarser particles are preferably about 1/8-1 inch (0.3-2.5 cm) diameter for the reactors studied. Sizes may be increased in larger reactors.
  • the particle sizes are selected as known in the art given the size of the reactor, the operating conditions and the characteristics of the solid separators used in connection with the system. The present method allows the use of a broad range of particle sizes.
  • the particle fractions should be chosen such that sensitivity to velocity changes (e.g., turn down capability) is not adversely affected. That is, if the difference in particle size between the coarse and fine fractions is too small, a minor variation in superficial velocity may result in a "single" component, circulating fluidized bed without the desired particle interaction.
  • the superficial velocity of the reactor may be very high compared with one bed systems but is preferably held in the range of about 20-40 ft/sec (6.1-12.2 m/sec) for efficient operation.
  • An oxygen containing gas for oxidation reactions and a hydrogen containing gas for reducing reactions are preferred fluidizing media.
  • the fluid media may also comprise a liquid or slurry, such as a coal slurry in the case of a liquifaction reaction.
  • the process may be used with the great variety of reactions now carried out in fluid beds.
  • the preferred reaction is combustion and the preferred reactant is a particulate coal which can be fed to the coarse dispersion along with a finely divided sulfur sorbent such as limestone or dolomite.
  • Lump coal and coal slurries may also be burned or partially burned according to the method. It has been found that reactant particles larger than the coarse particles may be buoyed by the interacting particles of the two beds. For example, large chunks of coal and shale at least about 5 cm in diameter may be burned in the process.
  • the high concentration of coarse particles inhibit vertical and lateral motion of a coarse reactant. In the present coarse particle dispersion, there is little interaction between coarse particles which permits more unobstructed lateral and vertical motion of any coarse reactant such as lump coal.
  • Apparatus similar to that suggested by Figure 4 for practicing the method was constructed and operated to burn particulate coal.
  • the reactor was about 10 inches (25 cm) in diameter and 20 feet (6.1 m) high.
  • the distributor plate contained one orifice 1.4 inches (3.5 cm) in diameter.
  • the coarse particles of 1/4 inch (0.65 cm) alumina were filled to a depth of 6 inches (15.4 cm) and could easily be penetrated by the fluid jet created by applying air pressure to the orifice at a velocity in the orifice of 259 ft/sec (79 m/sec).
  • the fine particle component was a -20+70 U.S. mesh silica sand. The results of a typical run are shown below:
  • the coarse particles were dispersed by application of fluid pressure through the orifice and the fine particles were then introduced above the distributor plate. During regular operation, the fine particles were removed out the top of the reactor, separated from the gas in a cyclone and recycled back through the coarse particle dispersion. The process was run at room temperature.
  • the average residence time of the fine particles in the reactor was measured at three different recycle rates. To determine the effect of the coarse particle dispersion on residence times, experimental runs were made under identical conditions but without the coarse particle dispersion. The results are shown in Table 1.
  • a coarse particle bed only 5 inches (15.4 cm) deep can form a dispersion according to the invention which increases residence times by about 15-25 seconds over the range of experimental conditions.
  • the data also show relatively poor residence times for the perforated plate with a coarse particle dense bed versus the orifice plate with the coarse particle dispersion.
  • the results are not indicative of optimum performance of the prior art processes but show the relative effect of adding a shallow, coarse particle bed.
  • the poor residence times may be in part due to the use of large, dense, coarse particles which have been found to perform better with the orifice plate than with the perforated plate.
  • the settled bed depth which, in both cases, was 6 inches (15.4 cm).
  • Such depth is generally not sufficient for the perforated plate which functions better with at least about 10 inches (25.4 cm) of coarse particles.
  • the present invention has an economic advantage because of the ability to operate at lower pressure drops through the reactor.
  • the settled bed depth of coarse particles was 6 inches (15.4 cm) in each case and the superficial velocity was 20 ft/sec (6.1 m/sec). Simultaneous high residence time and low pressure drop are believed to be surprising advantages of the inventive process in view of the prior multisolid fluidization process.

Abstract

Residence time and mixing of reactants is increased while pressure drops are reduced over prior multisolid fluid beds by creating a dispersion of relatively coarse inert particles and an overlapping entrained bed of relatively fine particles which recirculate through and interact with the dispersion of coarse particles. The dispersion is formed by action of the fluid media expelled through an orifice and producing a fluid jet capable of penetrating a settled bed of the coarse particles.

Description

    Background of the Invention
  • The invention relates to an improved method of operating a multisolid fluid bed system such as that disclosed in U.S. Patent 4,084,545. In the prior system, a fine particle component is entrained in a reactor and a coarse particle component is fluidized at the same time in a smaller region at the bottom of the entrained bed. The fine particles are then recycled out the top of the reactor and back through the coarse fluidized bed at the bottom. This multisolid system results in good particle interaction and increased residence times over single bed reactors for reactants introduced therein. The coarse and fine particles are typically not reactants and are generally physically and chemically stable such that they may remain in the reactor for an extended period of time. Fluidizing gas enters at the bottom through a conventional perforated distributor plate providing rather uniform fluidization of the coarse particles across the bed. A settled coarse particle depth of at least about 25 centimeters has been preferred in the prior system for good fluidization and high residence times.
  • As used herein, the terms fluid agitation reactor and a fluid agitation process are used generically to refer to any apparatus and method for suspending, transporting, or contacting a particulate in an upwardly moving fluid medium. The solid particles may be fluidized, entrained or spouted. In general, fluid agitation processes utilizing one-component, fluidized, entrained or spouted beds of particulates are known in the art. The above-mentioned patent utilizes both an entrained bed and a fluidized bed. However, until the present invention, adequate lateral mixing and high residence times at low pressure drops in fluid agitation reactors have not been obtainable, to the disadvantage of the technology vis a vis other means for combustion and gasification, for example.
  • Summary of the Invention
  • It is an object of the present invention to provide a method of operating a fluid agitation reactor. Reactors operated according to the inventive fluid agitation method may be utilized for a variety of processes, from simple heat exchange reactions through catalytic reactions and complex chemical reactions. We will predominantly describe the method in connection with our preferred use, which is the combustion of carbonaceous materials, particularly high-sulfur coal and petroleum coke.
  • It is a further object of the invention to provide an improved fluid agitation process utilizing separate coarse and fine particle fractions in overlapping beds. The particles are caused to interact in such a way that the residence time for reactants is substantially increased, resulting in more complete reactions.
  • In particular, the invention is a method for operating a multisolid fluid agitation reactor which comprises forming an entrained bed in a first region with a relatively fine first particle component, forming in a more limited region within the first region, a dispersion of a relatively coarse second particle component preferably comprising a material having long-term physical stability in the fluid agitation process so as to be substantially non-agglomerating and not subject to substantial attrition therein, recycling the fine particles from the entrained bed through the dispersion of coarse particles, and introducing fluid media through at least one orifice forming a fluid jet capable of penetrating a settled bed of the coarse particles in the reactor and thereby forming the dispersion of coarse particles.
  • The fluid jet is produced by adjusting the fluid velocity in the orifice to a level at least equal to the jet penetration velocity of the coarse particles. The actual superficial velocity in the reactor (volume of fluid per unit time divided by the cross-sectional area of the reactor normal to the principal direction of fluid flow) may be either less than or greater than the comparable minimum fluidization velocity of the coarse particles, though it is preferably greater.
  • The fluid medium is preferably a gas and is preferably a reactant. The other reactant may be a solid particulate material, such as coal, which is preferably of such size that it does not settle out. The solid particulate reactant may be entrainable at the superficial velocity, and the inventive method provides high residence times necessary for substantially complete reaction even with such fine particles.
  • The solid particulate reactant may be a carbonaceous fuel in which case the fuel may, for example, be burned or gasified. Heat energy may be withdrawn by conveying a heat transfer medium through boiler tubes in the reactor or through a portion of the recirculation path whereby the fine particles transfer heat to the medium.
  • Description of the Drawings
    • Figure 1 shows a prior art multisolid system with a fluidized bed of coarse particles and an entrained bed of relatively fine particles.
    • Figure 2 shows a coarse particle bed according to the invention wherein the fluid medium enters at a velocity not sufficient to completely penetrate the bed.
    • Figure 3 shows the dispersion of coarse particles which is produced in the reactor by application of the fluid media at a preferred velocity.
    • Figure 4 shows the combined interaction of the dispersion of Figure 3 with the fine particles of the entrained bed of the invention.
    • Figure 5 is an example of a reactor having four round orifices for practicing the invention.
    • Figure 6 is an embodiment of the reactor with rectangular orifices in place of the preferred round orifices.
    Detailed Description
  • A prior art multisolid fluidized bed such as described in U.S. 4,084,545 is shown in Figure 1 but, for clarity, the particles are shown as less concentrated than normal. Fluidizing gas enters through conduit 6 into air plenum 11 and through distributor plate 10 having a plurality of holes therethrough. The fluidizing gas is introduced at a superficial velocity which will simultaneously fluidize the coarse particles 3 into a concentrated bed and entrain the fine particles throughout the reactor. The entrained particles may be removed through conduit 12 and recycled through conduit 7.
  • The distributor plate is conventionally designed to admit fluidizing gas substantially uniformly across the bed in order to encourage more uniform mixing and reaction across the bed. In the prior method, the quantity of coarse particles may be on the order of at least about 25 centimeters (settled bed depth), which is then fluidized at 6-9 m/sec superficial velocity in order to provide a deep and dense enough bed to produce residence times sufficient to complete reactions therein. The fluidized bed is typically a discrete region of suspended particles having a definite upper boundary above which the concentration of particles decreases greatly.
  • In contrast to the prior concentrated and deep, coarse particle beds, the present invention provides a very dilute, coarse particle dispersion such as shown in Figures 3 and 4. Surprisingly, this dispersion, using substantially less coarse particles than the prior method (preferably about 5-15 centimeters settled bed depth) promotes better interaction and residence times than the prior art bed when operated according to the invention. The lower bed depth and new distributor plate also contribute to a lower pressure drop and more economical operation. Moreover, whereas the gas velocity necessary to fluidize a particulate solid depends on several properties of the solid, including its density and particle size, it is not a function of the bed depth. To the contrary, the jet penetration velocity in the present invention depends on the bed depth and a desired change in fluid velocity may be accomplished without adversely affecting performance by altering bed depth. In the prior fluidization process this would not be possible and a new particulate may have to be used to accommodate the velocity change in order to prevent settling or entrainment of the original particulate.
  • The present method of starting up a multisolid system is graphically displayed in Figures 2-4 wherein a fluid agitation reactor 1 contains coarse particles 3 in a settled bed 5 (Figure 2). A fluid medium (preferably a gas) enters through conduit 6 and orifice 2 at the minimum velocity which forms a fluid jet capable of penetrating the settled bed 5. Just under jet penetration velocity, the jet appears to form a hollow partial channel in the bed (Figure 2) and then, at the penetration velocity, the jet ejects coarse particles from the surface of the bed (Figure 3). The penetration velocity (the velocity in the jet itself) for this occurrence must at least equal the entrainment velocity of the coarse particles and is frequently greater depending on the bed properties. The superficial velocity (in the bed) is, of course, much lower due to the enlarged cross section and, contrary to the prior multisolid bed system, may even be lower than the comparable minimum fluidization velocity for the coarse particles.
  • The coarse particles form what we choose to identify as a dispersion of coarse particles. The dispersion is a very non-uniform, dilute suspension of particles in contrast to the uniform, concentrated fluidized beds of coarse particles in the prior method. As shown in Figure 3, a single, round orifice tends to form a dispersion of coarse particles which appears similar to a conventional spouted bed and which is not a classic bubbling, fluidized bed with a definite upper boundary of dramatic concentration change.
  • The dispersion is formed by jet penetration of the coarse settled bed. By the term jet or fluid jet, we retain the conventional definition of a strong, well- defined stream of fluid, either gas or liquid, issuing from a nozzle or orifice and having a fluid flow path of at least several diameters in length.
  • The dispersion is formed when the coarse particles are temporarily entrained in the fluid jet until the fluid velocity in the jet drops to less than the entrainment velocity of the coarse particles and the particles are deflected outward from the jet into a surrounding region. When the particles are expelled to a lower velocity region, they fall until again contacting a jet of upward moving fluid of sufficient velocity. As shown in Figure 3, for a single orifice, the dense particles tend to be expelled in a fountain-shaped dispersion to the outside of the reactor where the upward movement of gas is insufficient to support the particles. From there, the particles fall and then recycle back to the orifice or jet. In a reactor with multiple orifices, the particles would be deflected to the outside of each jet and rain down between jets.
  • In practicing the inventive method, the jet penetrates the settled bed of dense particles and ejects some of the particles, whenafter the fine particles may be injected into the reactor such as shown in Figure 4. Their presence improves the buoyancy of the dense particles and increases the interstitial velocity of the fluid media between particles such that the depth of the coarse particle dispersion is raised substantially and a highly interactive multisolid bed is created, even at superficial velocities below the comparable minimum fluidization velocity of the dense bed particles. The fluid medium is provided at such rate that the fine particles are entrained in the region I, substantially throughout the reactor, and the coarse particles form the expanded dispersion in the more limited region II. And although the superficial velocity exceeds the entrainment velocity of the fine particles whereby they are eventually entrained out the top of the reactor, the dispersion of coarse particles stabilizes the fine particles such that region II resembles an expanded, interactive fluidized bed with a clearly identifiable upper boundary. The concentration of the fine particles and interaction and residence times are increased by surprising amounts given the dilute nature of the coarse dispersion.
  • Fine particles are recycled through conduit 12, cyclone 8, external heat exchanger 13, and conduit 7 back through the dispersion in region II. Since the gas velocity in the orifice as well as the density of the gas/fine particle mixture both affect the buoyancy of the dense particles, the amount of fine particle recycle can be used to trade-off with the gas velocity in producing optimum operation. For example, if recycle is increased, the gas velocity may be "turned down" to slow a reaction, without significantly affecting the efficiency of the interaction or residence time in the more limited region II (as long as the coarse-particle entrainment velocity is exceeded in the orifice).
  • The residence time of reactants and the pressure drop through the reactor are two properties which critically affect the efficiency and economics of a fluid agitation process. Looking at the prior multisolid bed which produces very good residence times compared with single fluidized beds, it might be reasonable to expect that deeper or more concentrated coarse-particle beds in region II would provide higher residence times and higher pressure drops and that shallow or disperse coarse-particle beds would decrease both residence times and pressure drops. Surprisingly, we have found that our shallow, dispersion of coarse particles may provide both equal or better residence times and lower pressure drops in the multisolid system.
  • The dispersion is produced by providing a distributor plate or nozzle having at least one orifice which forms a fluid jet of fluidizing media capable of penetrating a settled bed of the coarse particles in the reactor. To penetrate the bed, the velocity of the fluid in the orifice must at least equal the entrainment velocity of the coarse particles in the specific fluid medium. For example, the medium may be a gas containing solid particles, in which case the entrainment velocity may be lower than it would be for the gas alone. Above this minimum velocity, the capability of a jet to penetrate the settled bed and to thereby meet the condition of the inventive method may depend on many variables in addition to the fluid velocity in the orifice, such as the fluid density, the height of the settled bed, the size and density of the coarse particles, and the size of the orifice. And though we have not derived an absolute relationship which defines the jet penetration in terms of these variables, we believe that it is well within the state of the art to empirically design a system which provides a fluid jet capable of penetrating the settled coarse particle bed in the system and of thereafter forming the dispersion of coarse particles. In fact, prior researchers have derived equations which relate these variables in spouted beds, which may have some analogy to the coarse particle bed of the present system. For example, see Mathur and Gishler, A Technique for Contacting Gases with Coarse Solid Particles, AIChem EJ, [1], pg. 157 (1955).
  • For example, for a system utilizing a 24 cm diameter reactor and 0.635 cm average particle diameter alumina particles, we have found that a single orifice 5 cm in diameter can produce a fluid jet which penetrates a 15 cm settled bed of the particles at a velocity in the orifice of 33 m/sec (superficial velocity of 1.6 m/sec). At 48 m/sec in the orifice, a fountain-type coarse particle dispersion is produced such as shown in Figure 3.
  • The orifice is preferably a circular opening in a distributor plate but may also have any other shape which can produce a jet with the ability to penetrate the settled bed. One or more orifices may be necessary depending on the size of the reactor. Figures 5 and 6 show two particular embodiments for larger reactors.
  • The smaller dimension of the orifices (diameter of the round opening, width of a slit) are preferably much larger than the particle size of the coarse particles. (A screen may cover the orifice to prevent particles from filling the orifice when not fluidized.) If the orifices are equal to or smaller than the particles, the condition approaches that experienced in the prior method wherein the jet would not have the ability to penetrate the settled bed unless the bed was so shallow (e.g. a few layers of particles) or the velocity so high as to be impractical in the system.
  • When using multiple orifices in larger reactors, it is necessary to space them apart such that the coarse particles which are temporarily entrained or deflected outward by the fluid jets have space to freefall between adjacent jets, as well as along the wall of the reactor, back to the orifices at the bottom. Otherwise, the bed operates more as the fluidized bed of the prior method. The recycling motion of the dispersion has been found to benefit the particle interaction and reactant residence times. We prefer that the space between orifices be at least about four times their smaller dimension. It may also be desirable to construct low partitions or walls between adjacent orifices.
  • The coarse and fine particulate components preferably have high temperature physical and chemical stability, are substantially inert under the operating conditions and promote efficient mixing and heat transfer. Where oxidizing conditions prevail, the coarse and fine components preferably comprise metals or metal oxides such as iron oxide. One specific material which may be used as either component is a hematite ore, containing about 93% iron oxide, Fe203, and supplied under the trademark "Speculite" by C.E. Minerals, Inc., King of Prussia, Pennsylvania. The components may alternatively comprise nickel, nickel oxide, or alumina, for example. The coarse and fine components may, in some instances to be discussed below, comprise a reactant such as coke or shale. The fine component may also additionally comprise silica or a reactant such as limestone or dolomite under conditions wherein sulfur capture is desired.
  • It has been found that it is theoretically possible, though possibly difficult in practice, to use a reactant as a coarse or fine particle component. For example, the use of shale or oily rock which comprise hydrocarbons in a substantially inert solid residue may be used as the coarse component, and upon attrition, as the fine fraction. Coal and coke have less residue but may still be used in the same manner. The reactants having a substantially inert residue are easier to incorporate into the method, but all of these reactants are difficult and require close control and planning in order to maintain the necessary coarse particle dispersion and recirculating entrained bed. In particular, the addition of fresh reactants and the removal of residue in the correct amounts to maintain the method are critical.
  • The particle size of the fine component particles is preferably in the range of about -16+140 U.S. mesh while the coarser particles are preferably about 1/8-1 inch (0.3-2.5 cm) diameter for the reactors studied. Sizes may be increased in larger reactors. The particle sizes are selected as known in the art given the size of the reactor, the operating conditions and the characteristics of the solid separators used in connection with the system. The present method allows the use of a broad range of particle sizes. However, the particle fractions should be chosen such that sensitivity to velocity changes (e.g., turn down capability) is not adversely affected. That is, if the difference in particle size between the coarse and fine fractions is too small, a minor variation in superficial velocity may result in a "single" component, circulating fluidized bed without the desired particle interaction.
  • The superficial velocity of the reactor may be very high compared with one bed systems but is preferably held in the range of about 20-40 ft/sec (6.1-12.2 m/sec) for efficient operation. An oxygen containing gas for oxidation reactions and a hydrogen containing gas for reducing reactions are preferred fluidizing media. The fluid media may also comprise a liquid or slurry, such as a coal slurry in the case of a liquifaction reaction.
  • The process may be used with the great variety of reactions now carried out in fluid beds. The preferred reaction is combustion and the preferred reactant is a particulate coal which can be fed to the coarse dispersion along with a finely divided sulfur sorbent such as limestone or dolomite. Lump coal and coal slurries may also be burned or partially burned according to the method. It has been found that reactant particles larger than the coarse particles may be buoyed by the interacting particles of the two beds. For example, large chunks of coal and shale at least about 5 cm in diameter may be burned in the process. Moreover, in conventional fluidized beds and, to a lesser extent, in the prior multisolid fluidized beds, the high concentration of coarse particles inhibit vertical and lateral motion of a coarse reactant. In the present coarse particle dispersion, there is little interaction between coarse particles which permits more unobstructed lateral and vertical motion of any coarse reactant such as lump coal.
  • Apparatus similar to that suggested by Figure 4 for practicing the method was constructed and operated to burn particulate coal. The reactor was about 10 inches (25 cm) in diameter and 20 feet (6.1 m) high. The distributor plate contained one orifice 1.4 inches (3.5 cm) in diameter. The coarse particles of 1/4 inch (0.65 cm) alumina were filled to a depth of 6 inches (15.4 cm) and could easily be penetrated by the fluid jet created by applying air pressure to the orifice at a velocity in the orifice of 259 ft/sec (79 m/sec). The fine particle component was a -20+70 U.S. mesh silica sand. The results of a typical run are shown below:
    Figure imgb0001
  • Example 1
  • An experiment was performed to demonstrate the effect of the dispersion of coarse particles on the residence time of the fine particles in the reactor. The 9.5 inch (24 cm) diameter reactor was used with a distributor plate having a single orifice 5.3 cm in diameter. A coarse particle component of 1/4 inch (0.65 cm) alumina beads and a fine particle component of -20+70 U.S. mesh silica sand comprised the dispersion and the entrained bed, respectively. The depth of the settled bed of coarse particles was 6 inches (15.4 cm) and at 20 ft/sec (6.1 m/sec) superficial velocity the settled bed was easily penetrated by the fluid jet from the single orifice. In starting up the reactor, the coarse particles were dispersed by application of fluid pressure through the orifice and the fine particles were then introduced above the distributor plate. During regular operation, the fine particles were removed out the top of the reactor, separated from the gas in a cyclone and recycled back through the coarse particle dispersion. The process was run at room temperature.
  • The average residence time of the fine particles in the reactor was measured at three different recycle rates. To determine the effect of the coarse particle dispersion on residence times, experimental runs were made under identical conditions but without the coarse particle dispersion. The results are shown in Table 1.
    Figure imgb0002
  • It may be seen that a coarse particle bed only 5 inches (15.4 cm) deep can form a dispersion according to the invention which increases residence times by about 15-25 seconds over the range of experimental conditions.
  • For comparison with the same reactor and process Conditions but with the prior art perforated plate type distributor (260-0.38 cm diameter holes) several runs were again made. The results in Table 2 show that residence times were increased only about one second with a dense fluidized bed under the conditions.
    Figure imgb0003
  • The data also show relatively poor residence times for the perforated plate with a coarse particle dense bed versus the orifice plate with the coarse particle dispersion. The results are not indicative of optimum performance of the prior art processes but show the relative effect of adding a shallow, coarse particle bed. The poor residence times may be in part due to the use of large, dense, coarse particles which have been found to perform better with the orifice plate than with the perforated plate. However, it is also due to the settled bed depth which, in both cases, was 6 inches (15.4 cm). Such depth is generally not sufficient for the perforated plate which functions better with at least about 10 inches (25.4 cm) of coarse particles. But even at equal coarse particle depths, the present invention has an economic advantage because of the ability to operate at lower pressure drops through the reactor. In a test run in a 5.5 inch I.D. (14 cm) diameter reactor and with the same coarse and fine components as above, the data shown in Table 3 were measured. The pressure drop is the difference in the air pressure between a point above the distributor plate and a point near the top of the 20 foot (6.1 m) reactor.
    Figure imgb0004
  • The settled bed depth of coarse particles was 6 inches (15.4 cm) in each case and the superficial velocity was 20 ft/sec (6.1 m/sec). Simultaneous high residence time and low pressure drop are believed to be surprising advantages of the inventive process in view of the prior multisolid fluidization process.

Claims (14)

1. A method of operating a fluid agitation reactor which comprises
(A) forming an entrained bed in a first region containing a relatively fine first particle component,
(B) forming in a more limited region within the first region a dispersion of a relatively coarse, second particle component,
(C) recycling the first particle component from the first region through the dispersion in the more limited region, and .
(D) introducing fluid media through at least one orifice forming a fluid jet capable of penetrating a settled bed of the coarse second particle component in the reactor and thereby forming the dispersion of the second particle component.
2. The method of Claim 1 wherein the superficial velocity of the fluid media within the more limited space region is greater than the comparable fluidization velocity of the coarse, second particle component.
3. The method of Claim 1 wherein the fluid media comprises a gas reactant.
4. The method of Claim 1 wherein the orifice diameter is substantially greater than the diameter of individual coarse second particles.
5. The method of Claim 1 wherein the coarse, second particle component essentially comprises a material having a long-term physical stability in the gas agitation process so as to be substantially non-agglomerating and not subject to substantial attrition therein.
6. The method of Claim 3 for reacting a solid, particulate material with the gas reactant comprising
introducing the solid reactant into the reactor at a predetermined rate,
introducing the gas reactant at a rate sufficient to substantially complete reaction of at least one of the reactants, and
selecting the first and second particle components so as to form the dispersion of the second particle component and the entrained bed of the first particle components.
7. The method of Claim 6 wherein the solid reactant is a carbonaceous fuel.
8. The method of Claim 7 wherein the carbonaceous fuel is burned and the heat of combustion is recovered by passing a heat transfer medium through boiler tubes in contact with the first particle component.
9. The method of Claim 1 for combustion or gasification wherein the coarse second particle component comprises a carbonaceous fuel.
10. The method of Claim 9 wherein the coarse second particle component comprises coal, coke or oil shale.
11. A method of starting up a multisolid fluid agitation process comprising a relatively fine first particle component and a relatively coarse second particle component, comprising
(A) forming a settled bed comprising the coarse second particle component in a gas agitation reactor,
(B) introducing fluid media through at least one orifice and forming at least one fluid jet capable of penetrating the settled bed, thereby forming a dispersion of the coarse, second particles,
(C) forming an entrained bed of the first particle component incorporating the dispersion of coarse, second particles, and
(D) recycling fine particles from the entrained bed through the dispersion of coarse second particles.
12. The method of Claim 11 wherein the coarse, second particle component essentially comprises a material having a long-term physical stability in the process so as to be substantially non-agglomerating and not subject to substantial attrition therein.
13. The method of Claim 12 wherein the coarse, second particle component comprises a carbonaceous fuel.
14. The method of Claim 12 wherein the coarse, second particle component comprises coal, coke or oil shale.
EP82810404A 1981-10-09 1982-09-29 Superjet gas agitation process Expired EP0077294B1 (en)

Applications Claiming Priority (2)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
US30993781A 1981-10-09 1981-10-09
US309937 1981-10-09

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
EP0077294A1 true EP0077294A1 (en) 1983-04-20
EP0077294B1 EP0077294B1 (en) 1986-04-16

Family

ID=23200307

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
EP82810404A Expired EP0077294B1 (en) 1981-10-09 1982-09-29 Superjet gas agitation process

Country Status (4)

Country Link
EP (1) EP0077294B1 (en)
JP (1) JPS5864123A (en)
CA (1) CA1184743A (en)
DE (1) DE3270652D1 (en)

Cited By (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1989003968A1 (en) * 1987-10-23 1989-05-05 Torftech Limited Processes in which matter is subjected to fluid flow
EP0776924A2 (en) 1995-11-30 1997-06-04 Mitsubishi Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Polyimide composition and method for producing prepreg and paint using the same
WO2001087989A1 (en) * 2000-05-15 2001-11-22 Dsm N.V. Fluidised bed reactor without gas distribution plate

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP2001276594A (en) * 2000-04-04 2001-10-09 Kunio Kato Method for mixing fine particles with fluidized bed

Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3136705A (en) * 1959-01-09 1964-06-09 Metallgesellschaft Ag Method and apparatus for carrying out physical and chemical processes between finelydivided solids and gases in a fluidized bed
FR2328507A1 (en) * 1975-10-21 1977-05-20 Battelle Development Corp PROCESS FOR TREATMENT OF MATERIALS IN A FLUIDIZED BED SYSTEM
US4103646A (en) * 1977-03-07 1978-08-01 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. Apparatus and method for combusting carbonaceous fuels employing in tandem a fast bed boiler and a slow boiler
US4176623A (en) * 1978-03-08 1979-12-04 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Fluidized bed boiler
EP0033808A1 (en) * 1979-12-26 1981-08-19 Battelle Development Corporation NOx reduction in multisolid fluidized bed combustors

Patent Citations (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US3136705A (en) * 1959-01-09 1964-06-09 Metallgesellschaft Ag Method and apparatus for carrying out physical and chemical processes between finelydivided solids and gases in a fluidized bed
FR2328507A1 (en) * 1975-10-21 1977-05-20 Battelle Development Corp PROCESS FOR TREATMENT OF MATERIALS IN A FLUIDIZED BED SYSTEM
US4103646A (en) * 1977-03-07 1978-08-01 Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. Apparatus and method for combusting carbonaceous fuels employing in tandem a fast bed boiler and a slow boiler
US4176623A (en) * 1978-03-08 1979-12-04 Combustion Engineering, Inc. Fluidized bed boiler
EP0033808A1 (en) * 1979-12-26 1981-08-19 Battelle Development Corporation NOx reduction in multisolid fluidized bed combustors

Cited By (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
WO1989003968A1 (en) * 1987-10-23 1989-05-05 Torftech Limited Processes in which matter is subjected to fluid flow
US5033205A (en) * 1987-10-23 1991-07-23 Mortimer Technology Holdings Limited Processes in which matter is subjected to fluid flow
AU614791B2 (en) * 1987-10-23 1991-09-12 Torftech Limited Processes in which matter is subjected to fluid flow
GR1000169B (en) * 1987-10-23 1991-10-10 Torftech Ltd Procedures during which a material is subject to a liquid flux
EP0776924A2 (en) 1995-11-30 1997-06-04 Mitsubishi Jukogyo Kabushiki Kaisha Polyimide composition and method for producing prepreg and paint using the same
WO2001087989A1 (en) * 2000-05-15 2001-11-22 Dsm N.V. Fluidised bed reactor without gas distribution plate

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
EP0077294B1 (en) 1986-04-16
DE3270652D1 (en) 1986-05-22
JPS5864123A (en) 1983-04-16
CA1184743A (en) 1985-04-02

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Yerushalmi et al. The fast fluidized bed
EP0566785B1 (en) Method for deagglomerating and re-exposing catalyst in a fluid bed reactor
US2357901A (en) Reaction chamber
US4648999A (en) Apparatus for contacting fluid with solid
US2719112A (en) Contacting gases with fluidized subdivided solids
US3197288A (en) Catalytic reactor
US4276062A (en) Fluidized bed systems
FI104053B (en) Apparatus for carrying out reaction between gas and particle-like material in closed space
EP0077294B1 (en) Superjet gas agitation process
US4517162A (en) Apparatus for use in processing a substance in a fluidized bed
US2892773A (en) Fluidized process and apparatus for the transfer of solids in a fluidized system
US4409101A (en) Fluidized bed apparatus
US2762692A (en) Apparatus for solid-liquid contacting
US2662091A (en) Process and means of promoting chemical reactions
Pell et al. Gas-solid operations and equipment
Grace et al. Fluidized beds
US4369045A (en) Fluidized bed gasification process with agglomerated solids removal
US3412898A (en) Powder feeder
US2506221A (en) Catalytic synthesis of hydrocarbons
US2420558A (en) Catalytic conversion of hydrocarbons
Hartman et al. Operation regimes of fluidized beds
US4435364A (en) Fluidized bed gasifier or similar device for simultaneous classification of ash and unreacted coal
US3475326A (en) Transfer line apparatus and method
EP0147445B1 (en) High-velocity multisolid fluidized bed process
US2799359A (en) Contacting solids and gases

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PUAI Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012

AK Designated contracting states

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB IT

17P Request for examination filed

Effective date: 19830811

GRAA (expected) grant

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210

AK Designated contracting states

Kind code of ref document: B1

Designated state(s): BE DE FR GB IT

REF Corresponds to:

Ref document number: 3270652

Country of ref document: DE

Date of ref document: 19860522

ITF It: translation for a ep patent filed

Owner name: MODIANO & ASSOCIATI S.R.L.

ET Fr: translation filed
PLBE No opposition filed within time limit

Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261

STAA Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent

Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT

26N No opposition filed
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Payment date: 19890811

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Payment date: 19890907

Year of fee payment: 8

ITTA It: last paid annual fee
PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Payment date: 19891130

Year of fee payment: 8

PGFP Annual fee paid to national office [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Payment date: 19900921

Year of fee payment: 9

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: BE

Effective date: 19900930

BERE Be: lapsed

Owner name: BATTELLE DEVELOPMENT CORP.

Effective date: 19900930

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: FR

Effective date: 19910530

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: DE

Effective date: 19910601

REG Reference to a national code

Ref country code: FR

Ref legal event code: ST

PG25 Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo]

Ref country code: GB

Effective date: 19910929

GBPC Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee