EP0037279B1 - Analog carburetor - Google Patents
Analog carburetor Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- EP0037279B1 EP0037279B1 EP81301380A EP81301380A EP0037279B1 EP 0037279 B1 EP0037279 B1 EP 0037279B1 EP 81301380 A EP81301380 A EP 81301380A EP 81301380 A EP81301380 A EP 81301380A EP 0037279 B1 EP0037279 B1 EP 0037279B1
- Authority
- EP
- European Patent Office
- Prior art keywords
- fuel
- valve
- pressure
- air
- flow
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired
Links
- 239000000446 fuel Substances 0.000 claims description 224
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 claims description 76
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 claims description 23
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 claims description 20
- 238000011084 recovery Methods 0.000 claims description 19
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000002485 combustion reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000013016 damping Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000001447 compensatory effect Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000010355 oscillation Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 17
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 14
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 description 11
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 10
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000001276 controlling effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000007493 shaping process Methods 0.000 description 7
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000002706 hydrostatic effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 235000019504 cigarettes Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 238000011067 equilibration Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000002347 injection Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000007924 injection Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 3
- 208000002193 Pain Diseases 0.000 description 2
- 238000013459 approach Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004323 axial length Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000012528 membrane Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000036407 pain Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000889 atomisation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005452 bending Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011217 control strategy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013078 crystal Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009510 drug design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012423 maintenance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011089 mechanical engineering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N mercury Chemical compound [Hg] QSHDDOUJBYECFT-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052753 mercury Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003071 parasitic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002093 peripheral effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005086 pumping Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004513 sizing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000243 solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000087 stabilizing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013024 troubleshooting Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02M—SUPPLYING COMBUSTION ENGINES IN GENERAL WITH COMBUSTIBLE MIXTURES OR CONSTITUENTS THEREOF
- F02M69/00—Low-pressure fuel-injection apparatus ; Apparatus with both continuous and intermittent injection; Apparatus injecting different types of fuel
- F02M69/16—Low-pressure fuel-injection apparatus ; Apparatus with both continuous and intermittent injection; Apparatus injecting different types of fuel characterised by means for metering continuous fuel flow to injectors or means for varying fuel pressure upstream of continuously or intermittently operated injectors
- F02M69/18—Low-pressure fuel-injection apparatus ; Apparatus with both continuous and intermittent injection; Apparatus injecting different types of fuel characterised by means for metering continuous fuel flow to injectors or means for varying fuel pressure upstream of continuously or intermittently operated injectors the means being metering valves throttling fuel passages to injectors or by-pass valves throttling overflow passages, the metering valves being actuated by a device responsive to the engine working parameters, e.g. engine load, speed, temperature or quantity of air
- F02M69/20—Low-pressure fuel-injection apparatus ; Apparatus with both continuous and intermittent injection; Apparatus injecting different types of fuel characterised by means for metering continuous fuel flow to injectors or means for varying fuel pressure upstream of continuously or intermittently operated injectors the means being metering valves throttling fuel passages to injectors or by-pass valves throttling overflow passages, the metering valves being actuated by a device responsive to the engine working parameters, e.g. engine load, speed, temperature or quantity of air the device being a servo-motor, e.g. using engine intake air pressure or vacuum
-
- F—MECHANICAL ENGINEERING; LIGHTING; HEATING; WEAPONS; BLASTING
- F02—COMBUSTION ENGINES; HOT-GAS OR COMBUSTION-PRODUCT ENGINE PLANTS
- F02M—SUPPLYING COMBUSTION ENGINES IN GENERAL WITH COMBUSTIBLE MIXTURES OR CONSTITUENTS THEREOF
- F02M7/00—Carburettors with means for influencing, e.g. enriching or keeping constant, fuel/air ratio of charge under varying conditions
- F02M7/12—Other installations, with moving parts, for influencing fuel/air ratio, e.g. having valves
- F02M7/22—Other installations, with moving parts, for influencing fuel/air ratio, e.g. having valves fuel flow cross-sectional area being controlled dependent on air-throttle-valve position
Definitions
- any fuel-air metering device which is not a positive displacement device will have fuel governed by the incompressible flow equation (Bernoulli's equation) and will have the air flow governed by the compressible flow equation.
- These equations are exact in the same physical sense that the basic equations of Newtonian physics are exact, and in the same sense that the tabulated thermodynamic functions (for instance, entropy, enthalpy, and internal energy) are exact functions.
- the present invention fuel-air metering system involves only the compressible flow equation for air flows, the incompressible flow equation governing the fuel flow, and simple geometry. It is therefore a fundamentally simpler system than that involved with injection systems using solenoid valves, and also a much simpler system than conventional carburetors which have a multiplicity of interlocking air-fuel control systems which interact in complex and analytically intractable ways.
- the inventors have considered a number of practical economic and structural issues.
- the system is designed to be compatible with inexpensive low pressure diaphragm fuel pumps, although it is also compatible with higher fuel pressure systems.
- Any system designed to meter to high accuracy must have parts built to a similarly high level of accuracy, but the inventors have taken pains to make sure that the parts of the system which must be made to close tolerances can be made so by simple manufacturing techniques.
- issues of durability as well as dynamic response have been considered.
- the present invention is adapted to easily connect with either conventional control via diaphragms or with electronic air/fuel ratio controls of one sort or another.
- the interaction of the metering system with its control system is in each case analytically clear and straightforward.
- the parts involved in the control system can be made with relatively large absolute dimensions, so that they can be made to high relative accuracies.
- the present invention relates to a metering system of the said general type, but is characterised in that the air by-pass includes the upstream restrictor, a pressure recovery intermediate chamber from which the control pressure downstream of the upstream restrictor is tapped and a downstream restrictor, the effective flow orifice of upstream restrictor being large in relation to the effective flow orifice of downstream restrictor, air valve and fuel valve being shaped and arranged in such a way that the effective apertures of the two valves remain in substantially constant proportion to each other at all operating positions of said valves, whereby the airflow valve comprises a smoothly convergent upstream face and a cusp on the downstream side and the fuel flow valve comprises at least in its strongly retracting position a smoothly convergent passage on the upstream side and a sudden expansion on the downstream side and wherein the variable area fuel flow valve obeys the fuel flow relation where the coefficient of discharge C f is substantially constant over the Reynolds number range relevant for any set A, and where ⁇ P f is the fuel pressure differential across the valve at well defined pressure tap
- Figures 1 and 2 show the air circuit and fuel circuit of the metering system in schematic form.
- a throttle plate 1 pivots on shaft 12 in an air flow passage 3.
- Throttle plate 1 is specially shaped with smoothly convergent surfaces and with a vortex stabilizing contour on the upwardly pivoted side.
- This aerodynamic shaping of the throttle valve is required to achieve an air throttle having a coefficient of discharge at each opening position which is relatively insensitive to variations in Mach Number and Reynolds Number which occur due to variations in the pressure drop across the throttle.
- This shaping is important: Conventional throttle plates exhibit variations in coefficient of discharge of as much as 30 percent, and this variation in coefficient of discharge is quite unacceptable in the current metering system.
- a small fraction of the air flow past the carburetor passes through an air flow bypass system which generates a pressure differential used to control the fuel pressure differential across the fuel valve.
- Intake air passes into opening 4 at approximately stagnation pressure with respect to throttle 1 and this flow is sucked past a fixed orifice 5 which discharges into a relatively open passage 6.
- Air from passage 6 is sucked past fixed orifice 7 into passage 8.
- Passage 8 is located in a position where it is in contact with a pressure which approximates the vena contracta static pressure downstream of throttle 1.
- Orifice 7 is significantly smaller than orifice 5.
- the pressure drop across orifice 5 is small, so that air flowing past orifice 5 acts as an approximately incompressible fluid, in good analogy with the incompressible liquid fuel.
- Orifice 7 is designed to have a coefficient of discharge insensitive to Reynolds Number and Mach Number.
- the air flow past orifice 7 varies in almost exact proportion to the air flow per unit area past air throttle 1.
- the air flow past orifice 5 is exactly equal to the flow past orifice 7, and the pressure drop across orifice 5 varies to good approximation with the square of flow through orifice 5.
- the pressure drop across orifice 5 is therefore a good signal for proportional control of fuel pressure drop across the fuel valve. Movement of needle 9 changes the effective flow area of orifice 5, and changing this flow area is a convenient way of changing the air fuel ratio supplied by the system.
- Figure 2 shows the fuel control arrangement which includes a fuel valve opening in proportion to the air throttle opening and a negative feedback fuel pressure drop regulation system controlling pressure drop across this valve in proportion to the pressure drop across air orifice 5.
- a fuel valve opening in proportion to the air throttle opening
- a negative feedback fuel pressure drop regulation system controlling pressure drop across this valve in proportion to the pressure drop across air orifice 5.
- slotted shaft plug valve 12a On the same shaft as throttle shaft 12 is slotted shaft plug valve 12a, which rotates within a receiving passage so as to have an effective flow area varying in precise proportion to the opening of air throttle 1.
- this slotted shaft is on the throttle shaft, so that there is a zero lag and extremely positive linkage between fuel valve opening and air throttle opening.
- Fuel air metering requires that the pressure drop across slotted shaft valve 12a vary in proportion to the pressure drop across orifice 5.
- the pressure drop across fuel valve 12a is varied in proportion to the pressure differential across air flow orifice 5 by fuel pressure regulator assembly 13, 14, 15, 16.
- a very low friction air piston 13 (which may have to be supported on hydrostatic bearings) is connected on its left face to a connecting passage 22 which connects to passage 6 at the pressure downstream of orifice 5.
- On the right side of air piston 13 is the pressure upstream of orifice 5, which is communicated by connecting passage 20.
- the pressure drop across orifice 5 therefore produces a leftward force on piston 13 equal to the area of piston 13 times the pressure drop across orifice 5.
- This leftward force is transmitted by a thin cylindrical connecting rod 15 to fuel control piston valve 14 which rides in a cylinder on essentially frictionless hydrostatic gasoline bearings.
- the fuel control valve piston 14 is connected on its left side to fuel pressure upstream of fuel valve 12a by passage 21, and on its right side is connected downstream of valve 12a by passage 16; the pressure differential across the fuel valve 12a generates a rightward force on piston 14 equal to this pressure drop times the area of piston 14.
- the rightward force from piston 14 balances the leftward force from air piston 13; if the system is not in equilibrium, it will tend to move axially.
- Axial motion of assembly 14, 15, 13 will rapidly change the pressure drop across piston 14, and this change will act to restore equilibrium.
- Axial motion of piston 14 opens and closes fuel flow area to passage 16, and the orifice forced by piston 14 and passage 16 is the only orifice in series with fuel valve 12a. Passage 16 feeds fuel to the engine.
- Assembly 14,15,13 acts as a servo controlled valve system controlling the pressure drop across the sleeve of piston 14 (the pressure difference between passage 11 and passage 16). Because passage 16 is the only outlet for fuel which flows past valve 12a, the axial position of piston 14 directly controls the pressure drop across valve 12a, and hence the fuel flow of the metering system. If assembly 13, 15, 14 doesn't stick, piston 14 will move to an axial position producing an exact force balance.
- a force balance between fuel piston 14 and air piston 13 means that the fuel pressure drop across fuel valve 12a is proportional to the pressure drop across air orifice 5, which is what is required to produce a set air-fuel ratio from the analog carburetor.
- the fuel flow control system of Figure 2 will work well if details are well handled and if the fuel pressure supplied to passage 10 is sufficient and smooth enough.
- a fuel air metering system such as that shown on Figures 1 and 2 has operated successfully and with excellent accuracy on a test stand at Southwest Research Institute. The function of the system is rather simple and straightforwardly described with exact mathematics. Air flow past an air throttle 1 obeys to excellent approximation the standard compressible flow equation found in engineering textbooks.
- the air flow throttle is positively linked with a fuel flow valve so that the fuel flow metering area is proportional to air throttle opening.
- a two orifice in series air bypass system generates a flow signal closely proportional to the square of the mass flow per unit area past the throttle.
- a negative feedback fuel regulator assembly controls fuel pressure drop across the fuel metering valve in proportion to the signal generated in this bypass system by regulating the flow resistance of an orifice in series with the fuel valve, thereby varying flow until pressure drop across the fuel control valve is in balance.
- FIG. 3 shows solutions to these problems and has other advantages.
- the air flow passages and fuel flow passages in the metering system of Figure 3 are very closely analogous to those of Figures 1 and 2.
- the air flow passages analogous to Figure 1 are as follows: throttle 42 pivots in generally rectangular passage 40 and forms a variable area air throttle.
- the coefficient of discharge of air throttle 42 has been shown experimentally to be very insensitive to Mach Number and Reynolds Number variations.
- Flow from throttle 42 proceeds to downstream passage 44, and attaches in the form of a coanda wall attached stream to this wall.
- Well upstream of throttle 42 is pick up passage 46, which is shown schematically (in a proper system pick up 46 would be in a large enough passage so that it was picking up air at upstream stagnation pressure).
- Flow from pick up passage 46 moves through low flow resistance passage 45 and passes through orifice 48, which is analogous to orifice 5.
- Downstream of orifice 48 is relatively large passage 49, which is large enough to dissipate the velocity of flow from orifice 48 and feed a relatively homogenous air flow to downstream orifice 50, which is analogous to orifice 7.
- Orifice 50 feeds passage 51 which is connected to the wall of passage 44 on which the high speed flow from air throttle 42 is attached.
- the dowrstream corner of the connection between passage 51 and air flow passage 44 is curved at 54, so flow from passage 51 merges smoothly with the main airflow and passage 51 contains a fluid at a pressure very close to the downstream vena contractá static pressure of air throttle 42.
- Variation of the effective open area of orifice 48 as a function of engine intake manifold vacuum is obtained by diaphragm assembly 66, 68, 70, which moves needle 60, carried by diaphragm 58, in response to variations in the pressure of passage 56, which passage taps passage 51.
- the diaphragm control for needle 60 achieves a controlled enrichment of the mixture at low intake manifold vacuums.
- Diaphragm assembly 66, 68, 70 separates two chambers, chamber or large passage 49 is at the downstream pressure of orifice 48 and the other chamber 64 is at the upstream pressure of orifice 48.
- the diaphragm assembly functions analogously to piston 13 in Figure 2.
- Thin diaphragm 66 joins around its outside at peripheral connection 67 and is mounted on diaphragm cup 68.
- Cup 68 is rigidly connected to circular rod 70 which rides in bushing 72 so that rod 70 and bushing 72 provide axial alignment of the diaphragm assembly.
- the rightward side of the diaphragm assembly is at the pressure of chamber 64 which is connected through passage 47 to passage 45, approximately upstream throttle stagnation pressure.
- Diaphragm assembly 66, 68 produces a leftward force on connecting rod 98 carried in bushing 99 to form part of a servo-controlled fuel valve assembly very analogous to the assembly 13 14, 15 of Figure 2.
- the fuel flow circuit is analogous to Figure 2, and is partly shown schematically with details shown with respect to the fuel control servo valve arrangement.
- Pressurized fuel in relatively large passage 84 is supplied by a pumping arrangement (not shown) and fuel from passage 84 passes convergently into rectangular passage 82 which is closed off by slotted plug valve 80, which is shown schematically on Figure 3 and is preferred to be on the same shaft as the air throttle 42, in a manner further shown in Figure 5.
- Flow past slotted plug variable area valve 80 flows into a large expansion area 86, in a flow pattern characterized by Reynolds Number insensitivity and approximately complete dissipation downstream flow energy by turbulence, so that the pressure in passage 86 approximates the vena contracta static pressure directly downstream of plug valve 80.
- Passage 86 is large and characterized by low fluid resistance. Passage 86 feeds passage 88, of similarly low resistance.
- Large passage 88 flows from a relatively large area into a piston controlled servo valve area.
- Piston 95 rides on cylinder sleeve 91.
- ports 90 In sleeve 91 are symetrically located ports 90, which ports are arranged so that side forces on piston 95 due to pressure drops from the pressure of passage 88 to the pressure of passage ports 90 do not produce any net side forces tending to stick piston 95.
- Piston 95 has a knife edged shape on its piston skirt, and axial motion of piston 95 in sleeve 91 moves the knife edged skirt opening and closing ports 90 so that the interaction of piston 95 with ports 90 forms a servo controlled valve.
- Ports 90 feed an annular passage 92 around the outside of sleeve 91, and passage 92 feeds passage 110.
- Passage 110 feeds fuel to the airstream (and hence to the engine) via a distribution port arrangement 111, 112 described further in Figure 7.
- Static friction of piston 95 in cylinder sleeve 91 is further balanced by hydrostatic pressure balancing holes 93 symetrically spaced in sleeve 91, which holes serve to center piston 95 in the manner of a hydrostatic bearing.
- Piston 95 opening and closing ports 90 is a servo controlled valve which operates in close analogy to piston 14 of Figure 2.
- On the right side of piston 95 is a pressure very near to the downstream vena contracta static pressure downstream of variable area control valve 80. It has been found experimentally that with pistons 95 skirt knife edge as shown, the fluid motion near piston 95 has very small effects on the pressure on this side of the piston.
- On the left side of piston 95 is chamber 100 which connects through a laminar filter 102 positioned in passage 101 and passage 103 with the pressure at pick-up port 104.
- the laminar flow filter 102 (which can be conveniently formed of a conventional cigarette filter) functions well to damp any oscillation in servo-piston valve 95, since any axial motion of piston 95 requires that flow pass through this filter. It turns out that damping directly proportional to the axial velocity of piston 95 is precisely what is required for error free servo mechanism performance.
- the laminar flow filter provides this damping and also serves to filter small particles which might otherwise cause piston 95 to stick in cylinder sleeve 91.
- the function of the servo controlled valve assembly 91, 95, 98, 66, 68, 70 is substantially superior to that of the system shown in Figure 2.
- the diaphragm arrangement has been shown to have essentially vanishing hysteresis and static friction. Engine vibration is sufficient to essentially eliminate static friction in connecting rod 98 and compensating rod 70.
- the arrangement of ports 90 and 93 within sleeve 91 substantially eliminates the sticking of piston 95 within the cylinder sleeve 91 if these parts are carefully made.
- the assembly forms an extremely accurate negative feedback servomechanism system, which is well damped by the laminar resistance of the cigarette filter in passage 101. This system has been shown to obey the equations which would be predicted in a free body diagram to an exceptional degree of exactness.
- Air bag accumulator arrangement 115,116,118 is shown schematically to show how the two requirements can be satisfied at once.
- Inside container 115 is relatively flexible air bag 116 which contains air under pressure.
- mechanical grid 118 At the connection between air bag 116 and passage 84 is mechanical grid 118, which serves to constrain the expansion of bag 116 toward passage 84.
- Figure 3 also shows a simple and effective evaporative emission control, which closes off flow to passage 110 when the engine stops and fuel pressure in passage 84 drops.
- the system is intended to be used with a fuel pump arranged to leak down pressure when the engine stops. Such a pump is not shown, although many such pumps will occur to those skilled in the art.
- a plug carrier 120 coaxial with piston 95 carries spring-piston arrangement 124, 122, with piston 122 slidably carried within the cylindrical passage 120 and sealed with a relatively low friction O-ring seal 130. Piston 122 is pushed rightward by spring 124.
- Port 126 and thence the passage containing spring 124 is connected to an engine manifold pressure (connection not shown).
- engine manifold pressure connection not shown.
- the pressure force in chamber 100 forces piston 122 leftward to the position shown.
- pressure in chamber 100 drops and spring 124 pushes piston 122 rightward, until piston 122 contacts piston 95 and pushes piston 95 to a position which fully closes ports 90 as well as ports 93. After this point fuel leakage from the system is negligible. The system therefore controls evaporative emissions.
- the operation of the servo controlled valve depends for its accuracy on a very low friction, low hysteresis and low spring constant characteristic of the diaphragm 66.
- a diaphragm shape we derived analytically has been tested experimentally and has the exceptionally low stiffness characteristics required (stiffness and hysteresis values more than a factor of 10 less than those characteristic of conventional diaphragms).
- the shape of diaphragm 66 in Figure 3 is the shape of this diaphragm when the diaphragm is undeformed (when the pressure drop across the diaphragm is negligibly small).
- the shape of the diaphragm is significantly different from conventional diaphragm shapes, and points in the diaphragm are shifted outward radially compared to the geometric shapes which are typical of the prior art. For example, consider point 129 on diaphragm 66. When the pressure drop across diaphragm 66 becomes significant, pressure forces will serve to change the shape of the diaphragm so that point 129 shifts radially inward. Virtually all other points on the diaphragm will similarly move inward radially.
- diaphragm stiffness occurs because of circumferential stretching which occurs as the diaphragm moves axially, and the buckled form of the diaphragm shape 66 totally eliminates these circumferential stress terms, and in consequence, produces a diaphragm which is an order of magnitude less stiff than that of prior art diaphragms.
- the diaphragm shaping of 66 is useful, since it permits diaphragms to be used in devices of much higher precision than has heretofore been possible.
- diaphragm 66 The resistance of diaphragm 66 to axial motion within the control range relevant to the servo control valve motion of piston 95 is essentially negligible, so that the diaphragm serves as an effectively zero friction piston which produces a force ideally suited for controlling servo valve piston 95.
- throttle 42 The detailed shape of throttle 42 is important. First it can be clearly seen that the open area of throttle 42 varies as the angle ⁇ increases according to the formula It should be clear that the projected open area of plug valve 80 with respect to its generally rectangular passage should be a quite similar equation
- the K. can be the same for both the fuel valve and the air valve, in which case the projected open area of both valves will vary in exact proportion.
- the air projected open area varies according to essentially the same relation, so that for both sorts of throttle valves a close proportioning between fuel flow valve area and air flow valve area is possible with a system which puts both valves on the same shaft.
- throttle 42 the shape of throttle 42 is arranged specifically so that it is very insensitive in its coefficient of discharge to variations in Mach Number and Reynolds Number which occur across it due to variations in the intake manifold vacuum of the system engine downstream passage 44.
- a smoothly convergent curve 142 which constrains the convergent streamlines upstream of the throttle valve, tending to stabilize the coefficient of discharge of the throttle.
- cusp 143 On the downstream side of the throttle 42 is cusp 143, which is arranged to stabilize a parasitic vortex driven by the high speed stream past the throttle. This vortex smoothly merges with this high speed stream and tends strongly to stabilize the shape of the vena contracta downstream of the throttle plate independently of Mach Number.
- a throttle plate like throttle 42 is essentially Mach Number and Reynolds Number insensitive for all the manifold vacuums which occur at each angle of throttle opening.
- maximum Mach Numbers may not be higher than .3, while the Mach Number range past the throttle plate will vary from Mach 1 to perhaps Mach .2 when the throttle is more nearly closed.
- Shaping the air throttle for Mach and Reynolds Number insensitivity is important for the practical performance of the present invention metering system.
- the variation of coefficient of discharge with Mach Number is around 30 percent and this variation entails an unacceptable 30 percent variation in air fuel ratio from the metering system.
- Figure 3 also shows an extremely inexpensive and exactly analytic system for enriching the mixture under conditions of very low manifold vacuum operation.
- Connecting Rod 98 has one end at the pressure of passage 88, and the other end at the typically much lower pressure of chamber 49, so that a rightward error force is produced by rod 98 equal to the cross sectional area of rod 98 times the pressure difference between passages 88 and 49.
- connecting rod 70 is also at the pressure of passage 88, since it communicates with passage 88 through passage 87. There is therefore a leftward force on connecting rod 70 equal to the cross sectional area of rod 70 times the pressure difference between passage 88 and chamber 64.
- the pressure differential between chamber 49 and and chamber 64 is typically much smaller than the pressure differential between either chamber and passage 88.
- FIG. 3 shows as many details of the present invention metering system as can be readily placed in one drawing. There are details which, because of graphics, were not shown.
- the pickup of upstream air at 46 and the passages feeding the air orifice 48 are too small, and the pickup at 46 will not pick up air at true upstream stagnation pressure. This imposes an error, but one skilled in fluid mechanics can readily design an pickup analogous to 46 which does read approximately stagnation pressure upstream of the throttle plate.
- a pickup in the air cleaner passage (not shown) will read an excellent approximation of upstream stagnation pressure. In this case as in all others the difference between stagnation and static pressure becomes insignificant as velocities become very small.
- Figure 4 shows a two orifice in series flow system which corresponds closely to that in a metering system developed by the inventors, and particularly shows orifice shapes having coefficients of discharge which are insensitive to either Reynolds Number or Mach Number change in the operating range of the system.
- Block 145 is provided with chamber 146, which has a very large cross sectional area with respect to orifice 148, which corresponds to orifice 48 in Figure 3 and orifice 5 in Figure 1.
- a control needle 160 partly blocks off the cross sectional area of orifice 148. Flow past orifice 148 flows into chamber 149, and it can be seen that the cross section directly downstream of orifice 148 expands very suddenly so as to essentially eliminate pressure recovery of the flow downstream orifice 148.
- orifice 148 The smoothly convergent shape of orifice 148, with its large upstream passage and sudden expansion downstream produces an orifice which has a coefficient of discharge which is extremely constant so that the mass flow past orifice 148 obeys its theoretical flow equation to excellent accuracy.
- Orifice 148 is insensitive to Reynolds Number because the shape of orifice 148 constrains the flow streamlines in a pattern which is essentially invariant over the range of pressure drops relevant to orifice 148.
- the flow pattern downstream of orifice 148 is also effectively uniform over the range of flows relevant to the orifice.
- Chamber 149 is analogous to chamber 49 in Figure 3 and passage 6 in Figure 1. Chamber 149 is sufficiently large and sufficiently open so that the flow condition of the flow in the chamber as it approaches downstream orifice 150 is quite uniform.
- Orifice 150 is analogous to orifice 7 in Figure 1, and connects chamber 149 with chamber 151, which chamber is connected so that it is at the static downstream pressure directly downstream of the air throttle.
- the curvature of orifice 150 is also such as to produce an extremely constant coefficient of discharge, and the cross sectional area of orifice 150 is controlled with control needle 152.
- Axial motion of either needle 160 or 152 will change the air fuel ratio of a metering system connected to the flow block of Figure 4. It should be noted with respect to orifice 150 that the upstream flow is open and cleanly converging, and the flow from orifice 150 flows into a very expanded cross sectional area of chamber 151.
- Orifice 150 is designed to have a coefficient of discharge of nearly one, which means that the minimum cross sectional area of the flow streamlines occurs quite near the outlet plane of orifice 150 rather than farther downstream. Orifices with coefficients of discharge nearly one and no divergent sections are automatically insensitive to Mach Number, since compressibility effects cannot change the shape of their flow streamlines.
- the shape of orifice 150 should be carefully coordinated with the relatively narrow taper angle of needle 152 to assure that, for the range of needle axial position relevant to the system, the orifice 150 is always a convergent orifice, and never becomes a convergent divergent passage because of the interaction of the areas of the needle 152 and orifice 150.
- a rectangularly slotted shaft 161, carrying a seal 168 rides in a closely fitted receiver sleeve 162 having generally rectangular flow passages in it, and slotted shaft 161 is one part of the throttle shaft which also actuates the air throttle shown in phantom lines as 172.
- the flow in the fuel valve is from left to right, and surface 164 forms a smoothly convergent passage shape which will be characterized by exceptionally thin boundary layers because of the rapid change in static pressure of the flow streamlines as they flow towards the gap between plug slot 160 and bottom surface 166 of sleeve 162.
- the trigonometric relation of the opening gap area to twist angle ⁇ is exactly proportional to the relation of the gap between throttle 172 and air passage surface 174 shown in phantom lines, and it is easy to arrange things so that the projected flow area of both valves varies in exact proportion.
- the shape of air throttle 172 is such that the coefficient of discharge of air throttle 172 is extremely insensitive to variations in Mach Number and Reynolds Number across this throttle. It is required that the coefficient of discharge as a function of shaft angle of the valve formed by slotted shaft 161 and receiver sleeve 162 also be characterized by an insensitivity of coefficient of discharge to variations in pressure drop (and hence Reynolds Number) across this valve. Because the fuel flow valve handles an incompressible fluid, Mach Number is not relevant, but Reynolds Number insensitivity matters.
- Figure 5A is a view from the inlet passage.
- Fuel from a relatively large inlet passage 179 flows into the generally rectangular passage of sleeve 162 through rounding entrance curvature 176, and flows through the rectangular passage until it contacts convergent surface 164, passing through the gap between surface 166 and 164 which forms the projected flow area of the valve.
- a number of issues illustrated in Figure 5A are important. First of all, the relatively large area of the passage 179 is important.
- valve When the valve is in relatively open condition, it behaves as two orifices in series, the first being the fixed orifice formed by curved surfaces 176 and the second being the orifice formed for the gap between surface 166 and the end point of surface 164 on slotted shaft 161.
- curvature of curved surface 176 it is therefore possible to change the coefficient of discharge (and therefore the effective flow area) of the valve of Figure 5 as a function of shaft rotation. This must be done empirically, but it is relatively convenient to shape the rounded surfaces of 176 in such a way that the coefficient of discharge of the fuel valve and the air throttle match closely at all values of shaft angle.
- Reynolds Number insensitivity of the fuel valve also requires that the flow conditions downstream of the valve be properly controlled.
- Figures 5B in combination with Figure 5 shows how this can be done conveniently.
- slotted shaft 161 rotates counterclockwise in Figure 5 the fuel valve opens and there is a gap between surface 166 and surface 164 through which fuel passes.
- the high velocity fuel through this gap rushes downstream, and it is desirable to dissipate the velocity of this flow into turbulence with minimum pressure recovery if the fuel valve is to show optimal Reynolds Number insensitivity.
- Reynolds Number insensitivity, and minimum pressure recovery are achieved by the most sudden convenient expansion of the fuel in the downstream section, and by arranging flow patterns to prevent wall attached streams from forming.
- Coanda wall attached streams should be avoided since such attached streams are conducive to larger values of pressure recovery than otherwise occur downstream of the fuel valve.
- Downstream of surface 166 is cutaway surface 170 which assures that the high velocity flow stream cannot attach to the lower wall of the downstream passage.
- the high velocity jet from the fuel valve expands rapidly, and the passage from the rectangular passage 184 to open passage 186 is also an abrupt opening conducive to small or zero pressure recovery.
- Figures 5, 5A and 5B show a fuel valve with a projected open area which varies in precise proportion with the projected open area of the air throttle valve, the fuel valve is built for an extremely constant coefficient of discharge over the range of Reynolds Numbers across which it must operate, and the shaping of curvatures 176 in the valve permits the coefficient of discharge of the fuel valve in relation to the air valve to be programmed as any desirable function of shaft angle 8.
- FIG. 3 and 5 side views of Mach Number insensitive rectangular air throttle have been shown.
- Figure 6 shows a view of the downstream side of the throttle plate of Figure 3, showing a notched section for the idle air flow of the system.
- Throttle 42 is adapted to pivot on a shaft fitting through hole 192, shown in dashed lines. As the throttle pivots open, the open area between edge 194 and the left side of the rectangular passage in which the air throttle pivots opens for air flow. When the throttle is fully closed, there is still need for a minimum idle air flow and this idle flow passes through notch 195, which is adapted to produce a stable wall attached stream airflow downstream of the notch. This high speed stream is useful for downstream mixing purposes.
- Figure 7 is a view of the fuel input passage shown at 111 and 112 of Figure 3, showing how the axial distribution of fuel into the high speed air stream past the air throttle is achieved, and how this distribution varies as the throttle shaft rotates. It is well to look first at Figure 3 to see the fuel introduction ports at 111 and the passage 112, both in the vicinity of the opening edge of air throttle 42. Figure 7 shows an axial cut-away of this passage.
- the passage is characterised by a multiplicity of holes, 111, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204 and 205. When the throttle is fully closed and only the idle flow is passing, only hole 111 is open, and fuel from metering passage 110, shown in Figure 3, feeds directly to hole 111.
- the throttle As the throttle rotates to open position, (depicted diagrammatically by dashed lines 195, 194 in Figure 7) the throttle first uncovers hole 200 then hole 201 then hole 202 then hole 203 then 204 and finally 205, so that after the throttle is part way open fuel is being distributed evenly along the axial length of throttle 42, for even introduction to the downstream passage 40 and to the engine.
- This smooth axial distribution of fuel into the air stream is convenient for mixing arrangements downstream of air throttle 42.
- Figure 8 is analogous to Figure 4, but shows an upstream orifice arrangement designed to produce 50 percent pressure recovery downstream of the upstream orifice.
- chamber 245 is linked by passage 280 with the upstream pressure side 282 of a diaphragm assembly 270 used in the metering system control assembly, and the pressure in chamber 245 is approximately stagnation pressure upstream of the air throttle. Flow from chamber 245 passes through smoothly convergent nozzle 248, where the flow passes into cylindrical passage 253.
- the ratio of orifice minimum cross sectional diameter to the diameter of cylindrical passage 253 is equal to .62, which is a value taken from Fluid Meters, sixth edition, 1971, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, New York, Page 221, the value being chosen to produce 50 percent pressure recovery.
- nozzle 248 Directly downstream of nozzle 248 is pressure tap 246; which connects to the low stream pressure side 284 of the diaphragm, shown schematically as assembly 270.
- Flow from cylindrical passage 253 proceeds to open chamber 249, which feeds downstream orifice 250.
- Flow past orifice 250 expands to passage 251, which is strictly analogous to chamber 151 in Figure 4, and passage 251 is at the vena contracta static pressure downstream of the air throttle.
- Figure 9 shows the most important compressible flow relations, plotting particularly the mass flow per unit area versus the mass flow per unit area which would occur at sonic velocity as a function of pressure drop across a perfect orifice.
- the flow relations in Figure 9 are exact, and are used with precision in the two orifice in series passage and for the flow characteristics past the air throttle valve.
- Figure 9 is copied from Page 197 of The Internal Combustion Engine in Theory and Practice, Volume 2, by Charles Fayette Taylor, MIT Press, copyright 1968.
- the horizontal axis of Figure 9 is plotted in terms of two inversely related variables, the first being % ⁇ P across the orifice, and the second being the pressure ratio across the orifice.
- the vertical axis plots two important functions, the first shows the ratio of mass flow to mass flow at sonic velocity which happens at various pressure drops. It is notable that 50 percent of the mass flow which would occur at sonic velocity already occurs at a pressure drop of 6 percent.
- the compressibility function ⁇ 1>2' Reference to Figure 9 may be useful on a number of occasions when considering the mathematical analysis of the metering system, and evaluating its precision.
- the objective of a fuel-air metering system is to control air/fuel ratios as a function of engine control variables.
- Equation 5 hen
- both A a C a and A f C vary with rotation angle 8 of a shaft
- Equation 8 Both sides of Equation 8 are proportional to the massflow of air per unit of effective air flow orifice area.
- Equation @ says that to get a constant air/fuel ratio from a metering system having a constant ratio of effective orifice areas between its fuel metering orifice and its air metering orifice, it is both necessary and sufficient that the pressure drop across the fuel metering orifice, ⁇ P f , be regulated in proportion to the square of the massflow per unit effective area past the airflow orifice.
- Equation @ should look familiar to anyone who knows carburetors, since a venturi metering system has the suction of fuel into the airstream, ⁇ P fv , proportional to the square of massflow of air M av divided by ⁇ 2 , with ⁇ 2 a slowly moving function if the air venturi is large in relation to the air throttle opening.
- both A av C av and A fv C fv are fixed, so that are in constant ratio, in analogy with the requirements of equation .
- the present invention metering approach has the airflow metering orifice and the fuel flow metering orifice each varying as engine load is varied, with the ratio held constant.
- Fuel-air metering systems for automobiles operate over a 30:1 to 50:1 range of massflows. For a venturi this involves ⁇ P fv ranges between 900:1 and 2500:1. Accurate fuel metering over this vast pressure range is never practical, so the carburetor requires separate idle systems, transition systems, and full power systems, and there are metering problems as these systems turn on or off.
- the pressure range required for fuel metering is much less, by the ratio
- This smaller range is a much more practical range of ⁇ P f to build hardware for, and it is therefore possible to build a metering system which involves only one basic fuel metering circuit to handle the entire flow range of engine requirements.
- the present invention also has the practical advantage that ⁇ P f varies roughly with intake manifold vacuum, and so is conveniently large under the low load conditions where auto engines operate most of the time. For a venturi system, ⁇ P fv , is very small under these same low load conditions, making precise fuel-air metering at low loads very difficult with a carburetor.
- ⁇ P f the pressure drop across the variable fuel valve, ⁇ P f , must be varied in proportion to the square of the massflow of air per unit effective open area past the air throttle valve. In the present invention this is done by producing a signal which varies in proportion to [( ⁇ 2 ⁇ ) ⁇ P a ] 2 with a specially designed two orifice in series bypass system, and controlling ⁇ P f in exact proportion to that signal with a regulator arrangement.
- This regulator system will require some detailed discussion, but at this point assume a regulator is available such that ⁇ P f varies in exact proportion to pressure drop across an air diaphragm
- the diaphragm can have one side connected to a chamber located between the two orifices, with the downstream orifice O d connecting the chamber to static pressure downstream the air throttle and the upstream orifice O " connecting the chamber with the stagnation pressure upstream of the air throttle valve. On the other side of the diaphragm is the stagnation pressure upstream of the air throttle. With this arrangement, the pressure drop across the diaphragm is equal to the pressure drop across the upstream orifice O u ,
- Orifices O " and O d are in series, and therefore, instantaneous massflow rates past the two orifices must match at equilibrium:
- Equation @ Satisfaction of Equation @ satisfies the requirements for the required constant air/fuel ratio.
- the two orifice in series analogy is a very good one, and the departure of the analogy from perfection can be calculated exactly (assuming that the pressure downstream of O d and the pressure upstream of O u exactly correspond to the upstream stagnation and downstream static pressures of the air flow throttle valve, a matter which will be dealt with later).
- M Od is exactly proportional to r o u max so a x% pressure drop in 0 u produces an x% reduction in M Od under choked (sonic flow) conditions.
- This condition @ can be satisfied by controlling the shape of convergent surfaces 17b shown in Figures 5 and 5A. This shaping is straightforward, and must be done empirically for each metering system design.
- air/fuel ratio varies exactly in proportion to n when ⁇ P od and ⁇ P a are small (the condition which occurs at relatively wide open throttle operating conditions).
- M f is exactly proportional to 1/n, which shows that for the low ⁇ P od case is exactly proportional to n.
- air/fuel ratio varies directly with the effective area of orifice O u , A ou C ou , and varies approximately inversely with the effective area of O d A Od Cod. Control of therefore, can be achieved by varying A ou C ou , by varying A Od C od , or by varying both in combination.
- Orifices O d and O u can be built conveniently large, (with O d large enough to pass as much as 1 ⁇ 4 of the engine idle flow).
- the large size of these orifices permits A ou C ou and A od C od to be controlled to an accuracy uncommon in fuel-air metering systems. Modulation of A Od C Od or A ou C ou can be done with large shaped needles, which are also conducive to high accuracy.
- either orifice O u or O d could be replaced by two or more orifices in parallel, for instance
- This 1/e value can readily be held to something like five milliseconds, which is very fast for a metering system.
- the equilibration time of the servo controlled fuel valve for example, the time for axial adjustment of piston rod 95 in Figure 3, is not so fast as adjustment in the air bypass system itself, but can be made extremely fast.
- the rate at which the fuel servo equilibrates is mostly determined by the laminar damping coefficient of cigarette filter 102, which can be readily controlled.
- This equilibration time can be tested with an arrangement which puts a quick pulse of fuel into a passage such as 86 of Figure 3, and which then monitors the time for equilibrium with a piezo electric crystal.
- the system 1/e can readily be held below 30 milliseconds and therefore the dynamic response to the current metering system can be exceptionally fast. It is worth noting that with orifice sizes corresponding to diaphragm fuel pump pressures the dynamic errors in the metering system during an acceleration are errors from the rich side (which is the safe side) so that nothing analogous to an accelerator pump is required by the function of the metering system curve per se.
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Combustion & Propulsion (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Fuel-Injection Apparatus (AREA)
- Control Of The Air-Fuel Ratio Of Carburetors (AREA)
Description
- It is the purpose of the present invention to produce an intrinsically accurate and inexpensive fuel-air metering device for internal combustion engines. The necessity for accurate fuel-air metering to I.C. engines is well understood by those skilled in the art. As pressures to improve engine efficiency increase and particularly as pressures to reduce exhaust emissions become more intense, the requirements for metering systems have become more stringent. At present, these stringent requirements are forcing fuel-air metering systems to become more and more expensive, and are also involving increased maintenance problems. It is extremely difficult to reproducibly program carburetors with the accuracy required, and carburetors also have problems with lags and with pulsating fuel flows due to air bleeds. Fuel injection systems of one sort or another are replacing carburetors in many applications, but these units tend to be expensive. One virtue of fuel injection systems is improved distribution of fuel from cylinder to cylinder. However, one of the inventors has, with his colleagues Kenneth Kriesel and Charles Siewert, invented a mixing vortex system with essentially perfect cylinder to cylinder distribution. This mixer eliminates the distribution advantage of multiple fuel point introduction. The present invention was worked out to replace a conventional carburetor upstream of this vortex mixing device, and is designed from the first principles of the fluid dynamics governing the fuel and air flowto produce accurate and programmable fuel-air metering in an inexpensive way.
- An important objective of the inventors was to work out a design which could be made to function precisely, and with the function of the system in very close agreement with precise mathematical formulas. A system which can be modelled precisely by straightforward mathematical formulas has significant practical advantages, in that it requires less development, permits rational design changes in the system to be made, and permits the system to be straightforwardly programmed according to specified requirements.
- It is important to emphasize that all fuel-air metering systems must function on the basis of the fundamental laws of fluid mechanics. As a minimum, any fuel-air metering device which is not a positive displacement device will have fuel governed by the incompressible flow equation (Bernoulli's equation) and will have the air flow governed by the compressible flow equation. These equations are exact in the same physical sense that the basic equations of Newtonian physics are exact, and in the same sense that the tabulated thermodynamic functions (for instance, entropy, enthalpy, and internal energy) are exact functions. In real systems, the mathematical equations governing a physical event are never true to perfect exactness because of unavoidable errors in shape or measurement, and because of physical effects which complicate the equations excessively. With the flow passage shapes typically used in prior art carburetors the flow behavior of the passages generally differs by so much from the basic flow equations that the basic equations have had limited practical value. Consequently carburetor and other fuel-air metering devices have evolved on an empirical basis. However, there are flow passage shapes which do in fact follow simple mathematical flow relations with excellent accuracy; if proper care is given to geometrical shapes the difference between mathematically predicted flow and real flow may be too small to easily measure. The details which must be tended to to produce this close correspondence between theory and reality are somewhat complicated, and explanation of these details form a significant part of this application.
- One of the very important objectives in designing the present invention fuel-air metering system was to produce structures where the errors in the flow equations were extremely small and exactly calculable, so that the system would obey the flow equations to an extremely good level of approximation. By taking pains with the structures to see that the fluid mechanical equations are in fact met to excellent approximation, it is possible to have a system which can be predicted and designed reliably on the basis of precise and straightforward mathematics. The present invention metering system involves only the compressible flow equation for air flows, the incompressible flow equation governing the fuel flow, and simple geometry. It is therefore a fundamentally simpler system than that involved with injection systems using solenoid valves, and also a much simpler system than conventional carburetors which have a multiplicity of interlocking air-fuel control systems which interact in complex and analytically intractable ways.
- In addition to the more mathematical aspects of the metering system design, the inventors have considered a number of practical economic and structural issues. For example, the system is designed to be compatible with inexpensive low pressure diaphragm fuel pumps, although it is also compatible with higher fuel pressure systems. Any system designed to meter to high accuracy must have parts built to a similarly high level of accuracy, but the inventors have taken pains to make sure that the parts of the system which must be made to close tolerances can be made so by simple manufacturing techniques. In addition, issues of durability as well as dynamic response have been considered.
- Another issue of importance is the flexibility of the system with respect to different control strategies. The present invention is adapted to easily connect with either conventional control via diaphragms or with electronic air/fuel ratio controls of one sort or another. The interaction of the metering system with its control system is in each case analytically clear and straightforward. In addition, the parts involved in the control system can be made with relatively large absolute dimensions, so that they can be made to high relative accuracies.
- It is the purpose of this disclosure to teach one of ordinary skill in automotive engineering to make and use the current invention fuel-air metering system. With this end in mind, the mathematical relations involved in the metering system have been set out formally and in considerable detail. Moreover, specific design issues relevant to the accuracy of the fuel-air metering system in practice are addressed.
- In U.S. Patent No. 3,409,276 there has already been described an air/fuel metering system for an internal combustion engine in which there are a fuel valve and an interlinked air throttle valve, in which the fuel pressure drop across the fuel flow valve is regulated by an additional valve in the fuel flow passage which is controlled by forces derived from the pressure difference of the fuel pressure immediately upstream and downstream of the fuel flow valve and the pressure difference of the air pressure immediately upstream and downstream of an upstream restrictor in a by-pass leading from the upstream side to the downstream side of the airflow valve and including a second restrictor downstream of the upstream restrictor.
- The present invention relates to a metering system of the said general type, but is characterised in that the air by-pass includes the upstream restrictor, a pressure recovery intermediate chamber from which the control pressure downstream of the upstream restrictor is tapped and a downstream restrictor, the effective flow orifice of upstream restrictor being large in relation to the effective flow orifice of downstream restrictor, air valve and fuel valve being shaped and arranged in such a way that the effective apertures of the two valves remain in substantially constant proportion to each other at all operating positions of said valves, whereby the airflow valve comprises a smoothly convergent upstream face and a cusp on the downstream side and the fuel flow valve comprises at least in its strongly retracting position a smoothly convergent passage on the upstream side and a sudden expansion on the downstream side and wherein the variable area fuel flow valve obeys the fuel flow relation
- The following detailed description and drawings illustrate preferred embodiments of this invention.
-
- Figure 1 shows an air flow passage with a specially adapted butterfly valve and with a two orifice in series air flow bypass system which generates the signal for controlling fuel pressure drop across a fuel control valve.
- Figure 2 shows the fuel flow control arrangement, including a fuel flow control valve linked directly to the butterfly valve throttle shaft and a regulation arrangement which sets the pressure drop across this variable orifice in proportion to the pressure drop across the upstream orifice of the two orifice in series bypass system shown in Figure 1.
- Figure 3 shows a fuel air metering system with several of the fluid mechanical details more clearly shown. Figure 3 is partly schematic, and shows the fuel control valve and air throttle in different places, although both of these valves are on the same shaft in the preferred form of the invention. Figure 3 particularly shows the shape of the air throttle and details of the design of the pressure regulation system.
- Figure 4 shows a two orifice in series flow system in one of the preferred forms of the invention, illustrating particularly orifice shapes having coefficients of discharge which are insensitive to either Reynold's Number or Mach Number in the operating range of the system.
- Figure 5 is a cross-section of the fuel flow control valve which is linked directly to the air throttle, showing details important in producing a valve which obeys the proper geometrical equations and exhibits insensitivity of coefficient of discharge to Reynold's Number.
- Figure 5A is a sectional view taken on line AA of Figure 5, showing the upstream or convergent portion of the valve of Figure 5.
- Figure 5B is a sectional view taken along line BB of Figure 5, showing the shape of the outlet of the valve producing very sudden expansions for minimum pressure recovery and minimum Reynold's Number sensitivity of the valve. With the minimized pressure recovery downstream of the valve, the flow in the downstream passages is nearly equal to the vena contracta static pressure downstream the variable orifice of Figure 5.
- Figure 6 is a view of the downstream side of the throttle plate of Figure 3, showing a notched section for the idle air flow of the system.
- Figure 7 is a plan view of the passage shown at 111 and 112 of Figure 3, showing how the axial distribution of fuel into the high speed air stream is achieved, and how this distribution varies as the throttle opens.
- Figure 8 is analogous to Figure 4 and shows an upstream orifice arrangement where approximately 50 percent pressure recovery is obtained downstream of the upstream orifice. By making the diaphragm ΔP equal to the maximum ΔP of this orifice compressibility effects which would otherwise slightly degrade the accuracy of the metering system can be avoided.
- Figure 9 shows important compressible flow relations, plotting particularly both the
- In the present metering system, the exact proportioning of fuel to air is obtained by achieving two conditions:
- 1. The metering system air control valve (throttle) and the fuel control valve are on the same throttle shaft (or are otherwise positively linked) and are arranged so that the effective flow areas of the air valve and the fuel valve stay in a fixed proportion as both valves open and close together.
- 2. The fuel flow per unit effective fuel valve area is maintained in fixed proportion to the air flow per unit effective air throttle area. This requires that the pressure drop across the fuel valve be controlled to vary in exact proportion with the square of the mass flow of air per unit area past the air throttle valve. This pressure regulation is achieved by a variable restriction servo-valve which controls the pressure drop across the linked fuel valve in proportion to the pressure drop across the upstream orifice of a two orifice in series air flow bypass system.
- Figures 1 and 2 show the air circuit and fuel circuit of the metering system in schematic form.
- Referring to Figure 1, a
throttle plate 1 pivots onshaft 12 in anair flow passage 3.Throttle plate 1 is specially shaped with smoothly convergent surfaces and with a vortex stabilizing contour on the upwardly pivoted side. This aerodynamic shaping of the throttle valve is required to achieve an air throttle having a coefficient of discharge at each opening position which is relatively insensitive to variations in Mach Number and Reynolds Number which occur due to variations in the pressure drop across the throttle. This shaping is important: Conventional throttle plates exhibit variations in coefficient of discharge of as much as 30 percent, and this variation in coefficient of discharge is quite unacceptable in the current metering system. - A small fraction of the air flow past the carburetor passes through an air flow bypass system which generates a pressure differential used to control the fuel pressure differential across the fuel valve. Intake air passes into opening 4 at approximately stagnation pressure with respect to
throttle 1 and this flow is sucked past a fixedorifice 5 which discharges into a relativelyopen passage 6. Air frompassage 6 is sucked past fixed orifice 7 into passage 8. Passage 8 is located in a position where it is in contact with a pressure which approximates the vena contracta static pressure downstream ofthrottle 1. Orifice 7 is significantly smaller thanorifice 5. The pressure drop acrossorifice 5 is small, so that air flowingpast orifice 5 acts as an approximately incompressible fluid, in good analogy with the incompressible liquid fuel. Since the pressure drop acrossorifice 5 is small, the pressure drop across fixed orifice 7 is almost exactly equal to the pressure drop acrossair throttle 1. Orifice 7 is designed to have a coefficient of discharge insensitive to Reynolds Number and Mach Number. The air flow past orifice 7 varies in almost exact proportion to the air flow per unit areapast air throttle 1. The air flowpast orifice 5 is exactly equal to the flow past orifice 7, and the pressure drop acrossorifice 5 varies to good approximation with the square of flow throughorifice 5. The pressure drop acrossorifice 5 is therefore a good signal for proportional control of fuel pressure drop across the fuel valve. Movement ofneedle 9 changes the effective flow area oforifice 5, and changing this flow area is a convenient way of changing the air fuel ratio supplied by the system. - Figure 2 shows the fuel control arrangement which includes a fuel valve opening in proportion to the air throttle opening and a negative feedback fuel pressure drop regulation system controlling pressure drop across this valve in proportion to the pressure drop across
air orifice 5. On the same shaft asthrottle shaft 12 is slotted shaft plug valve 12a, which rotates within a receiving passage so as to have an effective flow area varying in precise proportion to the opening ofair throttle 1. In preferred forms of the invention, this slotted shaft is on the throttle shaft, so that there is a zero lag and extremely positive linkage between fuel valve opening and air throttle opening. - Fuel air metering requires that the pressure drop across slotted shaft valve 12a vary in proportion to the pressure drop across
orifice 5. The pressure drop across fuel valve 12a is varied in proportion to the pressure differential acrossair flow orifice 5 by fuelpressure regulator assembly passage 22 which connects topassage 6 at the pressure downstream oforifice 5. On the right side ofair piston 13 is the pressure upstream oforifice 5, which is communicated by connectingpassage 20. The pressure drop acrossorifice 5 therefore produces a leftward force onpiston 13 equal to the area ofpiston 13 times the pressure drop acrossorifice 5. This leftward force is transmitted by a thincylindrical connecting rod 15 to fuelcontrol piston valve 14 which rides in a cylinder on essentially frictionless hydrostatic gasoline bearings. The fuelcontrol valve piston 14 is connected on its left side to fuel pressure upstream of fuel valve 12a bypassage 21, and on its right side is connected downstream of valve 12a bypassage 16; the pressure differential across the fuel valve 12a generates a rightward force onpiston 14 equal to this pressure drop times the area ofpiston 14. At equilibrium the rightward force frompiston 14 balances the leftward force fromair piston 13; if the system is not in equilibrium, it will tend to move axially. - Axial motion of
assembly piston 14, and this change will act to restore equilibrium. Axial motion ofpiston 14 opens and closes fuel flow area topassage 16, and the orifice forced bypiston 14 andpassage 16 is the only orifice in series with fuel valve 12a.Passage 16 feeds fuel to the engine.Assembly passage 16 is the only outlet for fuel which flows past valve 12a, the axial position ofpiston 14 directly controls the pressure drop across valve 12a, and hence the fuel flow of the metering system. Ifassembly piston 14 will move to an axial position producing an exact force balance. - A force balance between
fuel piston 14 andair piston 13 means that the fuel pressure drop across fuel valve 12a is proportional to the pressure drop acrossair orifice 5, which is what is required to produce a set air-fuel ratio from the analog carburetor. - The fuel flow control system of Figure 2 will work well if details are well handled and if the fuel pressure supplied to
passage 10 is sufficient and smooth enough. A fuel air metering system such as that shown on Figures 1 and 2 has operated successfully and with excellent accuracy on a test stand at Southwest Research Institute. The function of the system is rather simple and straightforwardly described with exact mathematics. Air flow past anair throttle 1 obeys to excellent approximation the standard compressible flow equation found in engineering textbooks. The air flow throttle is positively linked with a fuel flow valve so that the fuel flow metering area is proportional to air throttle opening. A two orifice in series air bypass system generates a flow signal closely proportional to the square of the mass flow per unit area past the throttle. A negative feedback fuel regulator assembly controls fuel pressure drop across the fuel metering valve in proportion to the signal generated in this bypass system by regulating the flow resistance of an orifice in series with the fuel valve, thereby varying flow until pressure drop across the fuel control valve is in balance. - The air flow relations in the air flow system shown in Figure 1 work very well, but there are some practical problems of detail in the fuel control system shown in Figure 2. First of all, the details of valve 12a are not shown in enough detail to show how it can have an effective flow area which varies in precise proportion to the air throttle. There are a number of problems with the control system otherwise. Both
fuel control piston 14 andair piston 13 are prone to excessive friction and sticking. Friction or sticking can produce significant metering errors. The pressure drop between passage 11 andpassage 16 produces a sideward force betweenpiston 14 and the cylinder in which it rides, and this force makes the motion of 14 unacceptably sticky. It is very difficult to produce anair piston 13 with the very low friction required of the system, particularly if a durable system is required, and stickyness ofpiston 13 is also a cause of inaccuracy. Even if the friction inpistons rod 15 was also zero, there would be an error in the system due to a pressure imbalance across the cross sectional area of connectingrod 15. There is also the issue of the servo mechanical stability of the servo controlled valve formed bypiston 14 and its cylinder opening topassage 16. The system is a non-linear negative feedback servo of a sort which is susceptible to oscillation, so that the system needs an exactly linear damping characteristic if it is to operate accurately. - Figure 3 shows solutions to these problems and has other advantages. The air flow passages and fuel flow passages in the metering system of Figure 3 are very closely analogous to those of Figures 1 and 2. The air flow passages analogous to Figure 1 are as follows:
throttle 42 pivots in generallyrectangular passage 40 and forms a variable area air throttle. The coefficient of discharge ofair throttle 42 has been shown experimentally to be very insensitive to Mach Number and Reynolds Number variations. Flow fromthrottle 42 proceeds to downstream passage 44, and attaches in the form of a coanda wall attached stream to this wall. Well upstream ofthrottle 42 is pick uppassage 46, which is shown schematically (in a proper system pick up 46 would be in a large enough passage so that it was picking up air at upstream stagnation pressure). Flow from pick uppassage 46 moves through lowflow resistance passage 45 and passes throughorifice 48, which is analogous toorifice 5. Downstream oforifice 48 is relativelylarge passage 49, which is large enough to dissipate the velocity of flow fromorifice 48 and feed a relatively homogenous air flow todownstream orifice 50, which is analogous to orifice 7.Orifice 50 feeds passage 51 which is connected to the wall of passage 44 on which the high speed flow fromair throttle 42 is attached. The dowrstream corner of the connection between passage 51 and air flow passage 44 is curved at 54, so flow from passage 51 merges smoothly with the main airflow and passage 51 contains a fluid at a pressure very close to the downstream vena contractá static pressure ofair throttle 42. - Variation of the effective open area of
orifice 48 as a function of engine intake manifold vacuum is obtained bydiaphragm assembly needle 60, carried bydiaphragm 58, in response to variations in the pressure ofpassage 56, which passage taps passage 51. The diaphragm control forneedle 60 achieves a controlled enrichment of the mixture at low intake manifold vacuums. -
Diaphragm assembly large passage 49 is at the downstream pressure oforifice 48 and theother chamber 64 is at the upstream pressure oforifice 48. The diaphragm assembly functions analogously topiston 13 in Figure 2.Thin diaphragm 66 joins around its outside atperipheral connection 67 and is mounted ondiaphragm cup 68.Cup 68 is rigidly connected tocircular rod 70 which rides inbushing 72 so thatrod 70 andbushing 72 provide axial alignment of the diaphragm assembly. The rightward side of the diaphragm assembly is at the pressure ofchamber 64 which is connected throughpassage 47 topassage 45, approximately upstream throttle stagnation pressure. On the left side of the diaphragm assembly ischamber 49, which is at the pressure directly downstream oforifice 48.Diaphragm assembly rod 98 carried inbushing 99 to form part of a servo-controlled fuel valve assembly very analogous to theassembly 13 14, 15 of Figure 2. - The fuel flow circuit is analogous to Figure 2, and is partly shown schematically with details shown with respect to the fuel control servo valve arrangement. Pressurized fuel in relatively
large passage 84 is supplied by a pumping arrangement (not shown) and fuel frompassage 84 passes convergently intorectangular passage 82 which is closed off by slotted plug valve 80, which is shown schematically on Figure 3 and is preferred to be on the same shaft as theair throttle 42, in a manner further shown in Figure 5. Flow past slotted plug variable area valve 80 flows into alarge expansion area 86, in a flow pattern characterized by Reynolds Number insensitivity and approximately complete dissipation downstream flow energy by turbulence, so that the pressure inpassage 86 approximates the vena contracta static pressure directly downstream of plug valve 80.Passage 86 is large and characterized by low fluid resistance.Passage 86 feeds passage 88, of similarly low resistance. Large passage 88 flows from a relatively large area into a piston controlled servo valve area. - Piston 95 rides on cylinder sleeve 91. In sleeve 91 are symetrically located
ports 90, which ports are arranged so that side forces on piston 95 due to pressure drops from the pressure of passage 88 to the pressure ofpassage ports 90 do not produce any net side forces tending to stick piston 95. Piston 95 has a knife edged shape on its piston skirt, and axial motion of piston 95 in sleeve 91 moves the knife edged skirt opening andclosing ports 90 so that the interaction of piston 95 withports 90 forms a servo controlled valve.Ports 90 feed an annular passage 92 around the outside of sleeve 91, and passage 92feeds passage 110.Passage 110 feeds fuel to the airstream (and hence to the engine) via adistribution port arrangement pressure balancing holes 93 symetrically spaced in sleeve 91, which holes serve to center piston 95 in the manner of a hydrostatic bearing. - Piston 95 opening and
closing ports 90 is a servo controlled valve which operates in close analogy topiston 14 of Figure 2. On the right side of piston 95 is a pressure very near to the downstream vena contracta static pressure downstream of variable area control valve 80. It has been found experimentally that with pistons 95 skirt knife edge as shown, the fluid motion near piston 95 has very small effects on the pressure on this side of the piston. On the left side of piston 95 is chamber 100 which connects through alaminar filter 102 positioned inpassage 101 and passage 103 with the pressure at pick-upport 104. The laminar flow filter 102 (which can be conveniently formed of a conventional cigarette filter) functions well to damp any oscillation in servo-piston valve 95, since any axial motion of piston 95 requires that flow pass through this filter. It turns out that damping directly proportional to the axial velocity of piston 95 is precisely what is required for error free servo mechanism performance. The laminar flow filter provides this damping and also serves to filter small particles which might otherwise cause piston 95 to stick in cylinder sleeve 91. - The function of the servo controlled
valve assembly rod 98 and compensatingrod 70. The arrangement ofports passage 101. This system has been shown to obey the equations which would be predicted in a free body diagram to an exceptional degree of exactness. - It is useful in the operation of the metering system of Figure 3 to have a relatively steady pressure in
passage 84, and yet it is commercially useful to work with cheap diaphragm fuel pumps which produce fluctuating pressures. Air bag accumulator arrangement 115,116,118 is shown schematically to show how the two requirements can be satisfied at once. Insidecontainer 115 is relativelyflexible air bag 116 which contains air under pressure. At the connection betweenair bag 116 andpassage 84 ismechanical grid 118, which serves to constrain the expansion ofbag 116 towardpassage 84. When pressure inpassage 84 is below the air pressure inbag 116,bag 116 will expand hard againstgrid 118, and the accumulator will act as though it is almost incompressible (the rate of accumulation with pressure change will be nearly zero if pressure is below a set air bag pressure). When the pressure inpassage 84 becomes significantly larger than this air bag set pressure, however, thebag 116 will be compressed in pressure and will reduce in volume, so that fuel frompassage 84 will flow withincontainer 115. Under these conditions, theaccumulator bag 116 will serve very strongly to damp out pressure fluctuations which might otherwise occur from a pulsating pump. Many such accumulator arrangements are known, and they can be made inexpensively. - All aspects of Figure 3 analogous to the passages in Figure 1 and Figure 2 have now been described. Figure 3 also shows a simple and effective evaporative emission control, which closes off flow to
passage 110 when the engine stops and fuel pressure inpassage 84 drops. The system is intended to be used with a fuel pump arranged to leak down pressure when the engine stops. Such a pump is not shown, although many such pumps will occur to those skilled in the art. In the evaporative control system, aplug carrier 120 coaxial with piston 95 carries spring-piston arrangement piston 122 slidably carried within thecylindrical passage 120 and sealed with a relatively low friction O-ring seal 130.Piston 122 is pushed rightward byspring 124.Port 126 and thence thepassage containing spring 124 is connected to an engine manifold pressure (connection not shown). When fuel pressure in chamber 100 is at the values corresponding to engine operation, the pressure force in chamber 100forces piston 122 leftward to the position shown. When, however, the engine is shut off, pressure in chamber 100 drops andspring 124 pushespiston 122 rightward, untilpiston 122 contacts piston 95 and pushes piston 95 to a position which fully closesports 90 as well asports 93. After this point fuel leakage from the system is negligible. The system therefore controls evaporative emissions. The axial length ofrod 98 andcompensation rod 70 are arranged with respect to piston 95, sleeve 91, and the end ofbushing 72, so that piston 95 stops in a position which fully closes off all passages topassage 110 when the engine is turned off. With cranking of the engine,piston 122 quickly shifts leftward and the system meters with negative feedbackservo valve assembly - The operation of the servo controlled valve depends for its accuracy on a very low friction, low hysteresis and low spring constant characteristic of the
diaphragm 66. We found experimentally that present art diaphragms have excessively large spring constants and too much hysteresis for the accuracy we were attempting to get from the metering system. However, a diaphragm shape we derived analytically has been tested experimentally and has the exceptionally low stiffness characteristics required (stiffness and hysteresis values more than a factor of 10 less than those characteristic of conventional diaphragms). The shape ofdiaphragm 66 in Figure 3 is the shape of this diaphragm when the diaphragm is undeformed (when the pressure drop across the diaphragm is negligibly small). As can be seen from the figure, the shape of the diaphragm is significantly different from conventional diaphragm shapes, and points in the diaphragm are shifted outward radially compared to the geometric shapes which are typical of the prior art. For example, consider point 129 ondiaphragm 66. When the pressure drop acrossdiaphragm 66 becomes significant, pressure forces will serve to change the shape of the diaphragm so that point 129 shifts radially inward. Virtually all other points on the diaphragm will similarly move inward radially. This means that the circumference of the diaphragm at any point will tend to be compressed by the inward radial motion of the diaphragm due to pressure forces, since circumference is proportional to radius. Pressure forces therefore deform the diaphragm, putting the diaphragm membrane in a circumferential compression. The membrane is exceptionally thin, and buckles rather than taking circumferential compression. At first glance, this buckling might be expected to stiffen the diaphragm and it does stiffen the diaphragm with respect to first order bending terms. However, the bulk of diaphragm stiffness occurs because of circumferential stretching which occurs as the diaphragm moves axially, and the buckled form of thediaphragm shape 66 totally eliminates these circumferential stress terms, and in consequence, produces a diaphragm which is an order of magnitude less stiff than that of prior art diaphragms. The diaphragm shaping of 66 is useful, since it permits diaphragms to be used in devices of much higher precision than has heretofore been possible. The resistance ofdiaphragm 66 to axial motion within the control range relevant to the servo control valve motion of piston 95 is essentially negligible, so that the diaphragm serves as an effectively zero friction piston which produces a force ideally suited for controlling servo valve piston 95. - The detailed shape of
throttle 42 is important. First it can be clearly seen that the open area ofthrottle 42 varies as the angle θ increases according to the formula - Referring again to throttle 42, the shape of
throttle 42 is arranged specifically so that it is very insensitive in its coefficient of discharge to variations in Mach Number and Reynolds Number which occur across it due to variations in the intake manifold vacuum of the system engine downstream passage 44. On the upstream side ofthrottle 42 is a smoothlyconvergent curve 142, which constrains the convergent streamlines upstream of the throttle valve, tending to stabilize the coefficient of discharge of the throttle. On the downstream side of thethrottle 42 iscusp 143, which is arranged to stabilize a parasitic vortex driven by the high speed stream past the throttle. This vortex smoothly merges with this high speed stream and tends strongly to stabilize the shape of the vena contracta downstream of the throttle plate independently of Mach Number. It has been found experimentally at Southwest Research Institute that a throttle plate likethrottle 42 is essentially Mach Number and Reynolds Number insensitive for all the manifold vacuums which occur at each angle of throttle opening. When the throttle is nearly open, maximum Mach Numbers may not be higher than .3, while the Mach Number range past the throttle plate will vary fromMach 1 to perhaps Mach .2 when the throttle is more nearly closed. Shaping the air throttle for Mach and Reynolds Number insensitivity is important for the practical performance of the present invention metering system. For conventional flat throttle plates, the variation of coefficient of discharge with Mach Number is around 30 percent and this variation entails an unacceptable 30 percent variation in air fuel ratio from the metering system. - Figure 3 also shows an extremely inexpensive and exactly analytic system for enriching the mixture under conditions of very low manifold vacuum operation. Connecting
Rod 98 has one end at the pressure of passage 88, and the other end at the typically much lower pressure ofchamber 49, so that a rightward error force is produced byrod 98 equal to the cross sectional area ofrod 98 times the pressure difference betweenpassages 88 and 49. However, connectingrod 70 is also at the pressure of passage 88, since it communicates with passage 88 throughpassage 87. There is therefore a leftward force on connectingrod 70 equal to the cross sectional area ofrod 70 times the pressure difference between passage 88 andchamber 64. The pressure differential betweenchamber 49 and andchamber 64 is typically much smaller than the pressure differential between either chamber and passage 88. - If the cross sectional areas of
con rod 99 and compensatingrod 70 were matched, these effects would cancel and the force on piston 95 would be very closely proportional to the pressure drop acrossorifice 48. However, if compensatingrod 70 has larger diameter than connectingrod 98, as happens in Figure 3, there is an extra leftward force due to the oversize ofrod 70 and the relation between fuel ΔP and air ΔP becomes as follows: - This relation is convenient, and provides an automatic enrichment of the mixture at very low intake manifold vacuums. When the Mach Number across the air throttle and across
orifice 48 is large, the effect ofrod 70 oversize is negligible, but as velocities past the air throttle decrease, pressure drops acrossorifice 48 decline as the square, so that at low manifold vacuums the leftward force ofcon rod 70 becomes significant. It can be readily arranged for the sizing ofrod 98 and compensatingrod 70 to be such as to produce significant enrichment only at very low intake manifold vacuums (for example one inch of mercury or less). The power enrichment function which occurs because of mismatch of diameters ofrods rods system compensating needle 60 inorifice 48 would likewise be unnecessary. - Figure 3 shows as many details of the present invention metering system as can be readily placed in one drawing. There are details which, because of graphics, were not shown. The pickup of upstream air at 46 and the passages feeding the
air orifice 48 are too small, and the pickup at 46 will not pick up air at true upstream stagnation pressure. This imposes an error, but one skilled in fluid mechanics can readily design an pickup analogous to 46 which does read approximately stagnation pressure upstream of the throttle plate. For many purposes, a pickup in the air cleaner passage (not shown) will read an excellent approximation of upstream stagnation pressure. In this case as in all others the difference between stagnation and static pressure becomes insignificant as velocities become very small. An analogous argument can be made with respect to errors in the pressure in chamber 100 due to the placement ofpickup 104 in the fuel line. These errors can be very small indeed if the cross sectional area ofpassage 84 is very much larger than the flow cross sectional area of the fully opened slotted valve 80. Analogously, it is useful to have the cross sectional area inpassage 86 very much larger than the maximum cross sectional area of a fully opened valve 80. - Figure 4 shows a two orifice in series flow system which corresponds closely to that in a metering system developed by the inventors, and particularly shows orifice shapes having coefficients of discharge which are insensitive to either Reynolds Number or Mach Number change in the operating range of the system.
Block 145 is provided withchamber 146, which has a very large cross sectional area with respect toorifice 148, which corresponds to orifice 48 in Figure 3 andorifice 5 in Figure 1. Acontrol needle 160 partly blocks off the cross sectional area oforifice 148. Flowpast orifice 148 flows intochamber 149, and it can be seen that the cross section directly downstream oforifice 148 expands very suddenly so as to essentially eliminate pressure recovery of the flowdownstream orifice 148. The smoothly convergent shape oforifice 148, with its large upstream passage and sudden expansion downstream produces an orifice which has a coefficient of discharge which is extremely constant so that the mass flowpast orifice 148 obeys its theoretical flow equation to excellent accuracy.Orifice 148 is insensitive to Reynolds Number because the shape oforifice 148 constrains the flow streamlines in a pattern which is essentially invariant over the range of pressure drops relevant toorifice 148. The flow pattern downstream oforifice 148 is also effectively uniform over the range of flows relevant to the orifice.Chamber 149 is analogous tochamber 49 in Figure 3 andpassage 6 in Figure 1.Chamber 149 is sufficiently large and sufficiently open so that the flow condition of the flow in the chamber as it approachesdownstream orifice 150 is quite uniform.Orifice 150 is analogous to orifice 7 in Figure 1, and connectschamber 149 withchamber 151, which chamber is connected so that it is at the static downstream pressure directly downstream of the air throttle. The curvature oforifice 150 is also such as to produce an extremely constant coefficient of discharge, and the cross sectional area oforifice 150 is controlled withcontrol needle 152. Axial motion of eitherneedle orifice 150 that the upstream flow is open and cleanly converging, and the flow fromorifice 150 flows into a very expanded cross sectional area ofchamber 151.Orifice 150 is designed to have a coefficient of discharge of nearly one, which means that the minimum cross sectional area of the flow streamlines occurs quite near the outlet plane oforifice 150 rather than farther downstream. Orifices with coefficients of discharge nearly one and no divergent sections are automatically insensitive to Mach Number, since compressibility effects cannot change the shape of their flow streamlines. The shape oforifice 150 should be carefully coordinated with the relatively narrow taper angle ofneedle 152 to assure that, for the range of needle axial position relevant to the system, theorifice 150 is always a convergent orifice, and never becomes a convergent divergent passage because of the interaction of the areas of theneedle 152 andorifice 150. If orifice 150-152 became convergent divergent, the flow of airpast orifice 150 would depart appreciably from the compressible flow equation for which the metering system is designed. One can be assured of smooth convergence in a system such asorifice 150 withneedle 152 if the minimum convergence angle oforifice 150 is the same as the apex angle ofneedle 152. The two orifice in series system of Figure 4 has orifices which obey theoretical flow equations to an extremely high degree of accuracy. - The function of the metering system requires that the air throttle and fuel control valve be arranged so that the effective flow areas of the air throttle and fuel valve stay in a fixed and programmed proportion as the air and fuel valves open and close. Figures 5, 5A, and 5B illustrate how this is done, and show an arrangement where the projected open flow area of the fuel valve is proportional to the projected open area of the air throttle valve with both projected areas varying according to the simple trigonometric equation
- Referring to Figure 5, a rectangularly slotted
shaft 161, carrying aseal 168 rides in a closelyfitted receiver sleeve 162 having generally rectangular flow passages in it, and slottedshaft 161 is one part of the throttle shaft which also actuates the air throttle shown in phantom lines as 172. The flow in the fuel valve is from left to right, and surface 164 forms a smoothly convergent passage shape which will be characterized by exceptionally thin boundary layers because of the rapid change in static pressure of the flow streamlines as they flow towards the gap betweenplug slot 160 andbottom surface 166 ofsleeve 162. The trigonometric relation of the opening gap area to twist angle θ is exactly proportional to the relation of the gap betweenthrottle 172 andair passage surface 174 shown in phantom lines, and it is easy to arrange things so that the projected flow area of both valves varies in exact proportion. As has already been discussed, the shape ofair throttle 172 is such that the coefficient of discharge ofair throttle 172 is extremely insensitive to variations in Mach Number and Reynolds Number across this throttle. It is required that the coefficient of discharge as a function of shaft angle of the valve formed by slottedshaft 161 andreceiver sleeve 162 also be characterized by an insensitivity of coefficient of discharge to variations in pressure drop (and hence Reynolds Number) across this valve. Because the fuel flow valve handles an incompressible fluid, Mach Number is not relevant, but Reynolds Number insensitivity matters. - The flow shaping details on the fuel valve required to achieve Reynolds Number insensitivity and also to program the coefficient discharge of the fuel valve as a function of rotation to the desired relation with the air valve is shown in Figures 5 with section Figure 5A taken on section AA and Figure 5B taken on section BB. Figure 5A is a view from the inlet passage. Fuel from a relatively
large inlet passage 179 flows into the generally rectangular passage ofsleeve 162 through roundingentrance curvature 176, and flows through the rectangular passage until it contacts convergentsurface 164, passing through the gap betweensurface passage 179 is important. Because of this large area, velocities inpassage 179 are small, and therefore the difference between stagnation pressures and static pressures shrinks to insignificance. The upstream pressure tap for the fuel regulator piston assembly, forexample port 104 in Figure 3 should be in such a large section so that the pressure pickup will see pressure closely approximating stagnation pressure atsurface 164. Another important issue is the rounded curvature of entrance surfaces 176, where the flow goes from the much larger passage to the rectangular slot leading tosurface 164. When the fuel valve is operated at angles which are relatively closed, the pressure drop across this entrance section is relatively insignificant, but the pressure drop at the entrance surfaces 176 and directly downstream of them becomes quite significant as the valve opens. When the valve is in relatively open condition, it behaves as two orifices in series, the first being the fixed orifice formed bycurved surfaces 176 and the second being the orifice formed for the gap betweensurface 166 and the end point ofsurface 164 on slottedshaft 161. By changing the curvature ofcurved surface 176, it is therefore possible to change the coefficient of discharge (and therefore the effective flow area) of the valve of Figure 5 as a function of shaft rotation. This must be done empirically, but it is relatively convenient to shape the rounded surfaces of 176 in such a way that the coefficient of discharge of the fuel valve and the air throttle match closely at all values of shaft angle. In the mathematical write-up which follows the point is made that variations for pressure tap position and other problems may be compensated by changing the ratio of coefficient of discharge between the air valve and fuel valve in a controlled way as a function of shaft angle. It is by changing the curvature ofsurfaces 176 that this may be most conveniently accomplished. - Reynolds Number insensitivity of the fuel valve also requires that the flow conditions downstream of the valve be properly controlled. Figures 5B in combination with Figure 5 shows how this can be done conveniently. As slotted
shaft 161 rotates counterclockwise in Figure 5 the fuel valve opens and there is a gap betweensurface 166 andsurface 164 through which fuel passes. The high velocity fuel through this gap rushes downstream, and it is desirable to dissipate the velocity of this flow into turbulence with minimum pressure recovery if the fuel valve is to show optimal Reynolds Number insensitivity. For small values of throttle opening this is almost automatic but the problem becomes more difficult as the throttle valves open. Reynolds Number insensitivity, and minimum pressure recovery, are achieved by the most sudden convenient expansion of the fuel in the downstream section, and by arranging flow patterns to prevent wall attached streams from forming. Coanda wall attached streams should be avoided since such attached streams are conducive to larger values of pressure recovery than otherwise occur downstream of the fuel valve. Downstream ofsurface 166 iscutaway surface 170 which assures that the high velocity flow stream cannot attach to the lower wall of the downstream passage. The high velocity jet from the fuel valve expands rapidly, and the passage from therectangular passage 184 to open passage 186 is also an abrupt opening conducive to small or zero pressure recovery. In order to reduce pressure recovery further, it is desirable that the axial width ofpassage 184 be increased beyond that shown in the drawing, although this is usually not necessary for ordinary system accuracy. With the sudden expansions, the fluid pressure in large passage 186 becomes very close to the vena contracta static pressure for which the fuel flow equation is exactly defined. This minimal pressure recovery is convenient from a control point of view, because it permits the entire fuel flow past the fuel valve to be used as the pressure regulating pressure reference flow. Referring to Figure 3 for context, the pressure in passage 88 and directly upstream of piston valve 95 will be very close to the static vena contracta pressure downstream of the fuel valve. The advantage of this will be clarified in the following mathematical write-up. In summary, Figures 5, 5A and 5B show a fuel valve with a projected open area which varies in precise proportion with the projected open area of the air throttle valve, the fuel valve is built for an extremely constant coefficient of discharge over the range of Reynolds Numbers across which it must operate, and the shaping ofcurvatures 176 in the valve permits the coefficient of discharge of the fuel valve in relation to the air valve to be programmed as any desirable function of shaft angle 8. - In Figures 3 and 5 side views of Mach Number insensitive rectangular air throttle have been shown. Figure 6 shows a view of the downstream side of the throttle plate of Figure 3, showing a notched section for the idle air flow of the system.
Throttle 42 is adapted to pivot on a shaft fitting throughhole 192, shown in dashed lines. As the throttle pivots open, the open area betweenedge 194 and the left side of the rectangular passage in which the air throttle pivots opens for air flow. When the throttle is fully closed, there is still need for a minimum idle air flow and this idle flow passes throughnotch 195, which is adapted to produce a stable wall attached stream airflow downstream of the notch. This high speed stream is useful for downstream mixing purposes. - Figure 7 is a view of the fuel input passage shown at 111 and 112 of Figure 3, showing how the axial distribution of fuel into the high speed air stream past the air throttle is achieved, and how this distribution varies as the throttle shaft rotates. It is well to look first at Figure 3 to see the fuel introduction ports at 111 and the
passage 112, both in the vicinity of the opening edge ofair throttle 42. Figure 7 shows an axial cut-away of this passage. The passage is characterised by a multiplicity of holes, 111, 200, 201, 202, 203, 204 and 205. When the throttle is fully closed and only the idle flow is passing,only hole 111 is open, and fuel frommetering passage 110, shown in Figure 3, feeds directly tohole 111. Under this idle condition fuel is therefore introduced to the very high velocity air stream past the idle slot for distribution and atomization. Under these conditions air flows throughholes passage 112 so that the flowpast hole 111 is a mixture of fuel and air. Covering each of holes 200-205 is laminar resistance material (which can be either of paper or of finely woven mesh) 206, which serves as a laminar resistance element for flowpast holes 200 to 205. As the throttle rotates to open position, (depicted diagrammatically by dashedlines hole 200 then hole 201 then hole 202 then hole 203 then 204 and finally 205, so that after the throttle is part way open fuel is being distributed evenly along the axial length ofthrottle 42, for even introduction to thedownstream passage 40 and to the engine. This smooth axial distribution of fuel into the air stream is convenient for mixing arrangements downstream ofair throttle 42. - Figure 8 is analogous to Figure 4, but shows an upstream orifice arrangement designed to produce 50 percent pressure recovery downstream of the upstream orifice. By taking the pressure drop across the diaphragm or piston arrangement to be equal to the maximum pressure drop across this upstream orifice but having pressure recovery prior to the downstream orifice this flow arrangement eliminates compressibility effects which would otherwise slightly degrade the accuracy of the metering system. Referring to Figure 8,
chamber 245 is linked bypassage 280 with theupstream pressure side 282 of adiaphragm assembly 270 used in the metering system control assembly, and the pressure inchamber 245 is approximately stagnation pressure upstream of the air throttle. Flow fromchamber 245 passes through smoothlyconvergent nozzle 248, where the flow passes intocylindrical passage 253. The ratio of orifice minimum cross sectional diameter to the diameter ofcylindrical passage 253 is equal to .62, which is a value taken from Fluid Meters, sixth edition, 1971, the American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York, New York, Page 221, the value being chosen to produce 50 percent pressure recovery. Directly downstream ofnozzle 248 ispressure tap 246; which connects to the lowstream pressure side 284 of the diaphragm, shown schematically asassembly 270. Flow fromcylindrical passage 253 proceeds to openchamber 249, which feedsdownstream orifice 250. Flowpast orifice 250 expands topassage 251, which is strictly analogous tochamber 151 in Figure 4, andpassage 251 is at the vena contracta static pressure downstream of the air throttle. The flow arrangement of Figure 8 has mathematical advantages with respect to accuracy which will be discussed in the mathematical write-up, but this advantage is purchased at the cost of having orifice 248 a fixed orifice without a variable control needle, so that a system which would otherwise have two control needles must work withsingle needle 252 if the flow arrangement of Figure 8 is to be used. - The design issues addressed in Figures 1-8 involve a good deal bf attention to fluid mechanical details which permit the metering system to operate as a precision instrument. In addition, the precision of the metering system rests on the exactness of basic laws of fluid mechanics. Figure 9 shows the most important compressible flow relations, plotting particularly the mass flow per unit area versus the mass flow per unit area which would occur at sonic velocity as a function of pressure drop across a perfect orifice. The flow relations in Figure 9 are exact, and are used with precision in the two orifice in series passage and for the flow characteristics past the air throttle valve. Figure 9 is copied from Page 197 of The Internal Combustion Engine in Theory and Practice, Volume 2, by Charles Fayette Taylor, MIT Press, copyright 1968. The horizontal axis of Figure 9 is plotted in terms of two inversely related variables, the first being %ΔP across the orifice, and the second being the pressure ratio across the orifice. The vertical axis plots two important functions, the first
- In the drawings, it has been shown how to produce metering elements which obey the governing inviscid flow equations to extremely high accuracy. Referring to generally
schematic drawings 1 and 2, it has been shown how to produce an air throttle valve with a coefficient of discharge as a function of throttle rotation which is very insensitive to variations in pressure drop across the throttle, so that flow across the throttle can be described by the simple isentropic flow equation. It has been shown how to build an upstream orifice analogous toorifice 5 of Figure 1 which is characterized by a coefficient of discharge which is Reynolds Number insensitive so that the flow equation acrossorifice 5 can be characterized by the simple isentropic flow equation. It has been shown how to produce a downstream orifice analogous to orifice 7 of Figure 1 which has a coefficient of discharge insensitive to pressure drops across it, so that flow past orifice 7 can be characterized by a simple and exact isentropic flow equation. On the fuel side, it has been shown how to build a fuel valve with an effective flow area varying in precise and programmed relation to the effective flow area of the air valve, and how to make this fuel valve so that its coefficient of discharge at each value of throttle rotation is insensitive to the variations in Reynolds Number which occur in its operating range. Therefore the fuel valve flow characteristic can be defined by a straightforward and exact incompressible flow equation. It has been shown how to produce a control of the pressure drop across the variable fuel valve which varies in precise and calculable relation with the pressure drop of an upstream orifice analogous toorifice 5. The reason for showing these things was to build a system which was precisely describable by exact equations. - At Southwest Research Institute we have built a fuel air metering system with fluid mechanical details closely following the details of the drawings. We have found that the measured flows in the system follow the flows of the theoretical equations to high accuracy, to the point where it is often impossible to detect deviations between theory and experiment because of the resolution limits of our (carefully made) experimental equipment.
- The following analysis makes clear the rational mathematical basis of the present invention metering system. The analysis involves many equations, but the accuracy with which the metering system components fit the equations is so high that the analysis is quite reliable. The notation and analysis is done in close analogy with the analysis of "Carburetor Flow Equations" on
Pages 195 and 199 of The Internal Combustion Engine in Theory and Practice, Volume 2, by Charles Fayette Taylor, MIT Press, copyright 1968. The following analysis offers an excellent base for design of our fuel air metering system. The analysis is also very useful as a guide to trouble shooting if a metering system according to the present invention departs from the predicted equations. By using these equations, the source of the trouble can be quickly identified, and fixes to the trouble generally suggest themselves rapidly. The analysis has the following list of variables, which correspond closely to those in Professor Taylor's book: - g=the gravitational constant
- subscripts "oi" means "outlet or inlet";
- consequently subscripts "ou" and "od" means "outlet upstream" and "outlet downstream" respectively when related to A, C or Φ
- b, K, KI, K2, K3, K4 are constants
- e is the logarithmic base
- The objective of a fuel-air metering system is to control air/fuel ratios as a function of engine control variables.
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
- Both sides of Equation ⑧ are proportional to the massflow of air per unit of effective air flow orifice area.
-
- In words, Equation @ says that to get a constant air/fuel ratio from a metering system having a constant ratio of effective orifice areas between its fuel metering orifice and its air metering orifice, it is both necessary and sufficient that the pressure drop across the fuel metering orifice, △Pf, be regulated in proportion to the square of the massflow per unit effective area past the airflow orifice.
- Equation @ should look familiar to anyone who knows carburetors, since a venturi metering system has the suction of fuel into the airstream, △Pfv, proportional to the square of massflow of air Mav divided by Φ2, with Φ2 a slowly moving function if the air venturi is large in relation to the air throttle opening.
-
- With a simple venturi system, both Aav Cav and Afv Cfv are fixed, so that
- The practical advantage of this variation is very great. Consider a venturi carburetor: if the butterfly throttle valve opening varies over a factor of 10, with engine load controlled so the pressure drop across the butterfly is maintained constant, ΔPfv, will vary by about a factor of 100 (exactly a factor of 100 if
- Because the pressure drop across the butterfly is unchanged, the massflow of air per unit effective butterfly valve opening area is unchanged, but a 100 fold pressure drop variation has occurred in the venturi. With a system according to the current invention, the fuel flow metering orifice would vary in proportion to the butterfly airflow orifice, and the metering pressure drop across the fuel metering valve, APt, would not have to change at all. The lower variation of ΔPf with the current invention is an important practical advantage, because it holds the ΔPf, range within reasonable limits.
- Fuel-air metering systems for automobiles operate over a 30:1 to 50:1 range of massflows. For a venturi this involves ΔPfv ranges between 900:1 and 2500:1. Accurate fuel metering over this vast pressure range is never practical, so the carburetor requires separate idle systems, transition systems, and full power systems, and there are metering problems as these systems turn on or off. For a system where KAf Cf=Aa Cd, the pressure range required for fuel metering is much less, by the ratio
-
- To satisfy Equation the pressure drop across the variable fuel valve, ΔPf, must be varied in proportion to the square of the massflow of air per unit effective open area past the air throttle valve. In the present invention this is done by producing a signal which varies in proportion to [(Φ2 √σ) √△Pa]2 with a specially designed two orifice in series bypass system, and controlling △Pf in exact proportion to that signal with a regulator arrangement. This regulator system will require some detailed discussion, but at this point assume a regulator is available such that △Pf varies in exact proportion to pressure drop across an air diaphragm
- The diaphragm can have one side connected to a chamber located between the two orifices, with the downstream orifice Od connecting the chamber to static pressure downstream the air throttle and the upstream orifice O" connecting the chamber with the stagnation pressure upstream of the air throttle valve. On the other side of the diaphragm is the stagnation pressure upstream of the air throttle. With this arrangement, the pressure drop across the diaphragm is equal to the pressure drop across the upstream orifice Ou,
-
-
-
- Compressibility effects exist for flow past both these orifices, but the importance of compressibility effects varies greatly with the magnitude of the ΔP across the orifice. For very small pressure drops the compressibility effects are so small that the flow equation for air approximates the incompressible flow equation which governs the fuel flow. If the area of upstream orifice O" is much larger than the area of downstream orifice Od, the great majority of the pressure drop across the system occurs across orifice Od. For example, if
Equation ⑩. - With
-
-
-
-
-
- The two orifice in series analogy is a very good one, and the departure of the analogy from perfection can be calculated exactly (assuming that the pressure downstream of Od and the pressure upstream of Ou exactly correspond to the upstream stagnation and downstream static pressures of the air flow throttle valve, a matter which will be dealt with later).
-
-
-
- For the maximum ΔPa case the analogy is imperfect, but the analogy is still a good one with errors which can be exactly calculated. For large ΔPa, flow past orifice Od is sonic. Sonic velocity is proportional to for a near perfect gas like air. For air, the Joule-Thompson coefficient is such that the temperature change due to throttling is negligibly small for the small ΔP past Ou. Therefore, at choked flow for Od the following equation holds (unless there is heat transfer within the two orifice in series bypass system.
- At sonic flow past Od, MOd is exactly proportional to ro
u max so a x% pressure drop in 0u produces an x% reduction in MOd under choked (sonic flow) conditions. -
-
-
-
-
- This means that an n% ΔPou introduces an error at choked flow conditions of 1/2 n%. Evaluation of two orifice in series flow system at ra'S between choked pressure drops and very small pressure drops shows that the error function varies smoothly, and in an exactly calculable way, between the very low pressure drop and choked flow extremes. Therefore, if
- It can be shown that the variation of
- In addition to inherent mathematical imperfections of the analogy system, real analogy systems have practical problems because of the problems associated with pressure taps.
- The requirement that pressure downstream of Od and pressure upstream of Ou exactly correspond to the proper stagnation pressure upstream and static pressure downstream of air controller butterfly valve for all values of valve shaft θ is hard to meet. For a set θ, errors due to connection placements upstream and downstream of the two orifice in series analogy system can be compensated to a high degree of exactness by compensatory changes in coefficients of discharge. (The exactness of this compensation can be very good for this butterfly valve system, since for normal engine operation the range of Reynolds numbers is only about 4:1 and Reynolds numbers are very high in any case, so long as periodic flow mode shifts, for example large scale vortex growth and shedding, are guarded against.)
- Therefore, because of imperfections in the flow connections (pressure pickups) the ratio
- An exactly symmetrical argument to the argument leading to Equation @ can be made concerning the pressure pickups for the fuel pressure regulation system which is required to make Pf=K5 ΔPdiaphragm true. Again, the flow connections in the fuel system may not pick up true upstream stagnation pressures and probably will not pick up true downstream static vena contracta pressures. Imperfections in the fuel pressure pickups will introduce errors so that, even with @ satisfied, there will be an error function which can be expressed, since the fuel valve and the air valve are linked, as
-
- This condition @ can be satisfied by controlling the shape of convergent surfaces 17b shown in Figures 5 and 5A. This shaping is straightforward, and must be done empirically for each metering system design.
-
-
-
-
-
-
- The algebra for this low ΔPod case is as follows.
-
-
-
-
-
- When ΔPod becomes large enough for important compressibility effects,
-
- The foregoing analysis is very good if
-
- Orifices Od and Ou can be built conveniently large, (with Od large enough to pass as much as ¼ of the engine idle flow). The large size of these orifices permits Aou Cou and Aod Cod to be controlled to an accuracy uncommon in fuel-air metering systems. Modulation of AOd COd or Aou Cou can be done with large shaped needles, which are also conducive to high accuracy. It should also be clear that either orifice Ou or Od could be replaced by two or more orifices in parallel, for instance
- In this way, several stepped needles, each set to compensate for an engine variable and each having a limited range of authority, can be built into the two orifice in series analogy system which regulates ΔPf. Because of the large absolute sizes of the orifices Ou and Od, and the simplicity of the relation
- The above analysis is exact if the fluid mechanical details described in the drawings are properly attended to. A reasonably skilled fluid mechanical designer, preceding with design according to the present invention, should have his system fit its basic equations within an accuracy of roughly ± one half of one percent. The designer should also be able to quickly pinpoint troubles, and also rationally program the system. For example, in Figure 3 connecting
rod 99 and compensatingrod 70 are not of the same diameter and in consequence the air fuel ratio of the metering system will tend to richen at very low intake manifold vacuums. The exact effect for specific values of rod diameters should be clear, and should fit mathematics very closely. Similarly, changing the shape of entrance curvature surfaces 176 as in Figure 5A can serve to shift the air fuel ratio of the metering system as some systematic function of throttle shaft angle 8. - Very exact analysis of the dynamic response of the metering system is possible. Since the fuel valve and air valve are on the same shaft, there is no lag between fuel valve and air valve opening, but lags do occur because it takes finite time for equilibration to happen in the two orifice in series system and in the fuel regulator servo valve system. The time for equilibrium in the two orifice in series air flow bypass system is extremely fast. Typically, 1/e response of the analogy passage occurs in approximately the time it takes for the downstream orifice to pass the mass flow required to change the density in the volume between the two orifices to equilibrium value. For a 1 percent change in density this is the time it takes to pass 1 percent of the chamber volume between the orifices past the downstream orifice. This 1/e value can readily be held to something like five milliseconds, which is very fast for a metering system. The equilibration time of the servo controlled fuel valve, for example, the time for axial adjustment of piston rod 95 in Figure 3, is not so fast as adjustment in the air bypass system itself, but can be made extremely fast. The rate at which the fuel servo equilibrates is mostly determined by the laminar damping coefficient of
cigarette filter 102, which can be readily controlled. This equilibration time can be tested with an arrangement which puts a quick pulse of fuel into a passage such as 86 of Figure 3, and which then monitors the time for equilibrium with a piezo electric crystal. Thesystem 1/e can readily be held below 30 milliseconds and therefore the dynamic response to the current metering system can be exceptionally fast. It is worth noting that with orifice sizes corresponding to diaphragm fuel pump pressures the dynamic errors in the metering system during an acceleration are errors from the rich side (which is the safe side) so that nothing analogous to an accelerator pump is required by the function of the metering system curve per se. - We believe that we have now disclosed everything required to permit men skilled in the fluid mechanical and mechanical engineering arts to produce a metering system of simple and relatively inexpensive construction and unprecedented accuracy.
Claims (19)
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US13604880A | 1980-03-31 | 1980-03-31 | |
US136048 | 1980-03-31 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
EP0037279A1 EP0037279A1 (en) | 1981-10-07 |
EP0037279B1 true EP0037279B1 (en) | 1985-07-31 |
Family
ID=22471013
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
EP81301380A Expired EP0037279B1 (en) | 1980-03-31 | 1981-03-30 | Analog carburetor |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
EP (1) | EP0037279B1 (en) |
JP (1) | JPS57500523A (en) |
BR (1) | BR8107982A (en) |
DE (1) | DE3171540D1 (en) |
MX (1) | MX151719A (en) |
WO (1) | WO1981002913A1 (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
JPS58138258A (en) * | 1982-02-10 | 1983-08-17 | Hitachi Ltd | Fuel supply device |
Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR958922A (en) * | 1950-03-21 | |||
DE1278790B (en) * | 1965-06-23 | 1968-09-26 | Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm | Device for regulating the continuous supply of liquid fuel to internal combustion engines |
US3409276A (en) * | 1968-01-22 | 1968-11-05 | Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm | Control mechanism for fuel injection apparatus |
DE1576340A1 (en) * | 1967-11-28 | 1970-04-23 | Enneking Dr Rer Nat Heinz | Laminar controlled fuel injection |
DE1922345A1 (en) * | 1969-05-02 | 1971-03-25 | Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm | Device for regulating the continuous supply of liquid fuel in internal combustion engines |
US3807710A (en) * | 1972-03-16 | 1974-04-30 | L Bergamini | Carburetor system |
US4228777A (en) * | 1979-02-01 | 1980-10-21 | The Bendix Corporation | Fuel control |
Family Cites Families (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US1369419A (en) * | 1921-02-22 | Edward b | ||
US2733901A (en) * | 1956-02-07 | sutton | ||
US1450762A (en) * | 1917-08-06 | 1923-04-03 | Master Carbureter Corp | Carburetor |
GB413306A (en) * | 1933-01-11 | 1934-07-11 | Charles Jeens Grace | Improvements in or relating to carburettors for use with internal combustion engines |
US2269275A (en) * | 1936-02-05 | 1942-01-06 | Zenith Carburateurs Soc Gen | Carburetor |
GB504217A (en) * | 1937-07-15 | 1939-04-21 | Solex | Improvements in and relating to carburation systems for internal combustion engines |
FR924712A (en) * | 1941-12-09 | 1947-08-13 | Groupement Francais Pour Le Developpement Des Recherches Aeronautiques | Improvements to fuel injection and fuel injection systems in engines |
US2491760A (en) * | 1948-04-20 | 1949-12-20 | George M Holley | Pressure carburetor |
GB718381A (en) * | 1951-10-18 | 1954-11-10 | Allan Stanley Wiltshire | Improvements in or relating to carburettors |
FR92542E (en) * | 1967-05-30 | 1968-11-22 | Sibe | Improvements to carburettors for internal combustion engines |
US3903215A (en) * | 1973-08-31 | 1975-09-02 | Gen Motors Corp | Sonic throttle carburetor |
IT995765B (en) * | 1973-10-10 | 1975-11-20 | Alfa Romeo Spa | VACUUM CARBURETOR CHECK TA |
US4000224A (en) * | 1974-12-19 | 1976-12-28 | Harold Phelps, Inc. | Carburetor and fuel supply system |
-
1981
- 1981-03-26 BR BR8107982A patent/BR8107982A/en unknown
- 1981-03-26 JP JP50149881A patent/JPS57500523A/ja active Pending
- 1981-03-26 WO PCT/US1981/000388 patent/WO1981002913A1/en unknown
- 1981-03-30 MX MX18659681A patent/MX151719A/en unknown
- 1981-03-30 DE DE8181301380T patent/DE3171540D1/en not_active Expired
- 1981-03-30 EP EP81301380A patent/EP0037279B1/en not_active Expired
Patent Citations (7)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
FR958922A (en) * | 1950-03-21 | |||
DE1278790B (en) * | 1965-06-23 | 1968-09-26 | Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm | Device for regulating the continuous supply of liquid fuel to internal combustion engines |
DE1576340A1 (en) * | 1967-11-28 | 1970-04-23 | Enneking Dr Rer Nat Heinz | Laminar controlled fuel injection |
US3409276A (en) * | 1968-01-22 | 1968-11-05 | Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm | Control mechanism for fuel injection apparatus |
DE1922345A1 (en) * | 1969-05-02 | 1971-03-25 | Messerschmitt Boelkow Blohm | Device for regulating the continuous supply of liquid fuel in internal combustion engines |
US3807710A (en) * | 1972-03-16 | 1974-04-30 | L Bergamini | Carburetor system |
US4228777A (en) * | 1979-02-01 | 1980-10-21 | The Bendix Corporation | Fuel control |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
MX151719A (en) | 1985-02-15 |
BR8107982A (en) | 1982-03-09 |
WO1981002913A1 (en) | 1981-10-15 |
JPS57500523A (en) | 1982-03-25 |
DE3171540D1 (en) | 1985-09-05 |
EP0037279A1 (en) | 1981-10-07 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
US3949714A (en) | Fuel-air metering and induction system | |
US3965221A (en) | Fluid flow device and liquid metering | |
US4015571A (en) | Fuel-air mixture controller for internal combustion engines | |
US2377607A (en) | Method and apparatus for forming a charge | |
US4318868A (en) | Analog carburetor | |
EP0037279B1 (en) | Analog carburetor | |
US3097664A (en) | Fluid flow regulator | |
US4085723A (en) | Fuel control system for internal combustion engine | |
US5860407A (en) | Gaseous fuel control system for engines | |
US2899948A (en) | groves | |
GB2065779A (en) | Gas turbine fuel system | |
CA1146824A (en) | Analog carburetor | |
US4285313A (en) | Air flow measuring device | |
US3409276A (en) | Control mechanism for fuel injection apparatus | |
US4436110A (en) | Pressure regulating systems | |
US4125102A (en) | Fuel control system for internal combustion engine | |
US3374800A (en) | Gas turbine engine control having by-pass valve means | |
US2809022A (en) | Carburetors | |
JPS591965B2 (en) | Area flow metering device | |
US3815562A (en) | Pressure compensated air throttle and air-fuel control system | |
US2526635A (en) | Fuel air ratio instrument | |
US3987132A (en) | Fluid flow regulation | |
US2558921A (en) | Carburetor | |
US2509994A (en) | Carburetor | |
US2713869A (en) | Fluid pressure regulator |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PUAI | Public reference made under article 153(3) epc to a published international application that has entered the european phase |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009012 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT SE |
|
17P | Request for examination filed |
Effective date: 19820402 |
|
ITF | It: translation for a ep patent filed | ||
GRAA | (expected) grant |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009210 |
|
AK | Designated contracting states |
Designated state(s): DE FR GB IT SE |
|
REF | Corresponds to: |
Ref document number: 3171540 Country of ref document: DE Date of ref document: 19850905 |
|
ET | Fr: translation filed | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: SE Effective date: 19860331 |
|
PLBE | No opposition filed within time limit |
Free format text: ORIGINAL CODE: 0009261 |
|
STAA | Information on the status of an ep patent application or granted ep patent |
Free format text: STATUS: NO OPPOSITION FILED WITHIN TIME LIMIT |
|
26N | No opposition filed | ||
GBPC | Gb: european patent ceased through non-payment of renewal fee | ||
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: FR Free format text: LAPSE BECAUSE OF NON-PAYMENT OF DUE FEES Effective date: 19861128 |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: DE Effective date: 19861202 |
|
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: FR Ref legal event code: ST |
|
PG25 | Lapsed in a contracting state [announced via postgrant information from national office to epo] |
Ref country code: GB Effective date: 19881118 |
|
EUG | Se: european patent has lapsed |
Ref document number: 81301380.2 Effective date: 19870224 |