EP0003134B1

EP0003134B1 - Magnetic brush development apparatus

Info

Publication number: EP0003134B1
Application number: EP19790100081
Authority: EP
Inventors: Manabu Mochizuki; Masahide Harada; Mitsuo Tanaka; Kouji Suzuki; Kazuaki Tagawa; Kazuo Kobayashi
Original assignee: Ricoh Co Ltd
Current assignee: Ricoh Co Ltd
Priority date: 1978-01-11
Filing date: 1979-01-11
Publication date: 1981-10-14
Also published as: CA1135046A; EP0031503B1; EP0031503A2; EP0003134A1; EP0031503A3

Description

The present invention relates to a magnetic brush development apparatus for use in electrophotographic copying apparatus or electrostatic recording apparatus.
The magnetic brush development apparatus is an apparatus for attracting a developer containing magnetic powder therein to a non-magnetic support member in which magnets are disposed, and for bringing the developer into contact with a latent electrostatic image bearing member at an image development section in order to develop the latent electrostatic image. The name of the magnetic brush comes from that the developer becomes like a brush due to the magnetic force of the magnets disposed in the non-magnetic support member.
As the developer that can be employed in the magnetic brush development apparatus, there are a two-component type developer comprising non-magnetic toner and magnetic carrier, and a one-component type developer consisting of magnetic toner. The one-component type developer can be classified into an electrically conductive toner and an electrically insulating toner.
Image development is performed by the toner charged to the opposite polarity to that of a latent electrostatic image being electrostatically attracted to the latent electrostatic image. In case of the two-component type developer, the particle size of toner is smaller than that of carrier particles and the toner is triboelectrically charged so that the toner clings to the carrier and a magnetic brush is formed. In the one-component type devleoper, the electrically conductive toner is charged by injection of charges or by electrostatic induction, while the electrically insulating toner is triboelectrically charged by some member of a developer container with which the toner contacts or during the transportation of the toner.
In case of the two-component type developer, the toner is securely charged, but some means for maintaining the mixing ratio of the toner and the carrier or the toner concentration is necessary in order to obtain a developed image of a predetermined image density. In contrast to this, in case of the one-component type developer, it is unnecessary to control the toner concentration and simple in handling the toner although the charging of the toner is not always sufficient.
A sleeve-shaped or cylindrical member and an endless belt-shaped member are known as the non-magnetic support members for forming a magnetic brush thereon by attracting the developer thereto. Plural magnets arranged in a radial manner and a single rod magnet having magnetic poles on the peripheral surface thereof are known as the magnets to be disposed in the non-magnetic support member. The photoconductors for use in electrophotographic copying apparatus and the dielectric member for electrostatic recording apparatus are known as the latent image bearing members. The shapes of the latent image bearing members are drum-like, endless-belt-like, plate-like and sheet-like.
Either or both of the non-magnetic support member for holding the magnetic brush thereon and the magnets disposed inside the non-magnetic support member are moved relative to each other, so that the magnetic brush formed on the non-magnetic support member is moved on the non-magnetic support member. The latent image bearing member is also moved at a predetermined speed and the magnetic brush on the non-magnetic support member comes in contact with the surface of the latent electrostatic image bearing member at a predetermined position where the non-magnetic support member and the latent electrostatic image bearing member come closest to each other, namely at a development section, so that the latent electrostatic image on the latent image bearing member is developed continuously.
The magnetic brushes on the non-magnetic support member are formed along the lines of magnetic force distributed on the non-magnetic support member 1 among the magnets 2, 3, 4 and 5 which are disposed in the non-magnetic support member as shown in Fig. 1. In Fig. 1, the distribution of the magnetic lines of force among only the magnets 2, 3 and 4 are shown. Each line of magnetic force starts from the magnetic pole N and returns to the magnetic pole S, and the magnetic field is strongest at each magnetic pole. The magnetic brush becomes highest at each magnetic pole and lowest in between two adjacent magnets. The magnetic brush stands out at each magnetic pole as shown by reference numeral 6 in Fig. 2. Therefore, normally, the magnets are arranged so that each magnetic pole of the magnets is located in the development section and development is performed by the highest portion of the magnetic brush.
Generally, the image density of developed image depends upon development time. The development time here means a period of time in which developer is in contact with a latent electrostatic image bearing member. Therefore, in the magnetic brush development apparatus the development time is a period of time in which the magnetic brush is in contact with a latent electrostatic image bearing member at the development position.
As mentioned previously, since the latent image bearing member is moved at a predetermined speed, the period of time in which the magnetic brush is in contact with the latent image bearing member is related to the contact width w of the magnetic brush in contact with the latent image bearing member. Therefore, the development efficiency, namely the image density of developed image per unit time can be increased by broadening the contact width w.
A one of the conventional techniques for making the contact width w great, an apparatus is known in which a plurality of non-magnetic support members for supporting the magnetic brush thereon are disposed in close proximity to the surface of a latent electrostatic image bearing member, whereby the contact width w can be substantially increased. However, this apparatus has some shortcomings that the apparatus is oversized and expensive. In order to eliminato such shortcomings, it is necessary to increase the contact width w by a single non-magnetic supporting member.
In the magnetic brush development apparatus as shown in Fig. 2, the contact width w of the magnetic brush is related to a gap d in the development section between a latent electrostatic image bearing member 7 and a non-magnetic support member 1 since the magnetic brush stands out at each magnetic pole. The contact width w is greater in the bottom portion of the magnetic brush than in the top portion of the magnetic brush. Therefore, the smaller the gap d, the greater the contact width w.
However, there is a limitation in reducing the gap d, since the smaller the gap d, the greater pressure the toner receives at the gap d, so that blocking of the toner occurs by the toner being solidified under the pressure. When the blocking of the toner occurs, the solidified toner scratches the latent electrostatic image or the surface of the latent image bearing member. Therefore, in order to increase the development efficiency, it is important to reduce the gap d to the extent that blocking of the toner does not occur.
Since the gap d is related to the contact width w and accordingly to the development time, images with an uneven density are formed when the gap d changes during development.
In the conventional magnetic brush development apparatus, a spacer roller is disposed between a non-magnetic sleeve and a photoconductor in order to maintain a minimum gap d.
However, as mentioned previously, since there is a limit in increasing the development efficiency by reducing the gap d, it is necessary to increase the contact width w by some other method for raising the development efficiency. Furthermore, it is known that the image density is not varied when the contact width w is large enough even if the gap d is changed to some extent. Therefore, it is more advantageous to increase the contact width w by some method.
As another method of increasing the contact width w, there is proposed a method of increasing the width of the magnet in the development section. However, the larger the magnet, the greater the magnetic flux density and the stronger the magnetic brush, which may cause a risk of disturbing the latent image on the photoconductor when the surface of the photoconductor is brushed by the strong magnetic brush.
As a further method of increasing the contact width w, there is known a method of disposing two magnets 8 and 9 with a space therebetween and with their magnetic poles arranged in the same direction in the development section as shown in Fig. 3. In this method, a magnetic field is formed so as to have a peak of magnetic field intensity right above the two magnets 8 and 9, so that the contact width w of the magnetic brush 6 with the photoconductor 7 is increased in comparison with the conventional magnetic brush development apparatus as shown in Fig. 4. However, this method has the following shortcomings in comparison with the above-mentioned conventional methods. Namely, more magnets are necessary, and the assembling of the apparatus is more difficult, and since the magnetic fields of the two magnets are directly oppositely in between the two magnets, the magnetic toner or the magnetic carrier existing on the portion above the space between the two magnets is magnetized in the polarity opposite to that of the magnetic toner or the magnetic carrier in the other portion, so that the chainlike arrangement of the toner or the carrier is interrupted by the two magnets. The oppositely directed' magnetic fields of the two magnets 8 and 9 are shown in Fig. 5, in which the lines of magnetic force starting from the N pole are directed to the S pole in the respective magnets 8 and 9, so that the lines of magnetic force starting from the respective N poles are oppositely directed.
Moreover it is known from DE A 25 45 494 to provide a magnet inside a non-magnetic support member of a magnetic brush development apparatus which magnet has substantially one magnetic pole portion capable of producing a magnetic field having a plurality of peaks in the intensity of said magnetic field in said development section. This field distribution is obtained by magnetising radially a cylindrical magnet in such a way that one longitudinal section of the cylinder is provided with two distinct poles of the same polarity which poles are located one beside the other in close proximity.
In the magnetic brush development process of a magnetic brush development apparatus, the development force can be represented by the following formula:
where F represents the development force, and Fc represents the electrostatic attraction of a photoconductor for attracting the developer thereto, and F_m represents the magnetic attraction for attracting the developer magnetically in the magnetic brush development apparatus.
From the above formula, it can be seen that the magnetic attraction F, serves as a negative bias with respect to the development force in the magnetic brush development apparatus. Referring to Fig. 6, there is shown a development characteristic of the magnetic brush development, by employing the magnetic attraction F_m as a parameter, with the amount of toner deposition M as ordinate and surface charge Q of a photoconductor as abscissa. The solid line indicates a development characteristic when the magnetic attraction F_m is comparatively small while the broken line indicates a development characteristic when the magnetic attraction F_m is comparatively great In either case, the development time is set constant. As can be seen from Fig. 6, when the magnetic attraction F_m is small, the toner deposition begins to be saturated even if the surface charge Q is comparatively small. Accordingly, uneven development hardly occurs. Furthermore, when the magnetic attraction F_m is set small, the amount of toner deposition M during a predetermined development time becomes greater than that in the case where the magnetic attraction F_m is set great and accordingly, the development time can be shortened in comparison with that in the case of a great magnetic attraction F_m when an equal amount of toner deposition is required. However, when the magnetic attraction F_m is set small, background appears in the copy and sharpness of image is lowered, so that setting the magnetic attraction F_m at a low level has an adverse effect on the image quality.
An object of the invention is to provide a magnetic brush development apparatus having an excellent development efficiency with uneven development obviated by broadening the width of a magnetic brush which is in contact with a latent electrostatic image bearing member.
A further object of the invention is to provide a magnetic brush development apparatus whose construction is simple and which can be assembled easily.
According to the invention in a magnetic brush development apparatus according to the opening clause of claim 1 the magnetic pole portion is of such a form that the peaks located upstream of the movement of said latent electrostatic image bearing member are lower than the peaks located downstream of the movement of said latent electrostatic image bearing member.
For a better understanding of the invention, reference is made to the following detailed description of the invention to be read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein:

Fig. 1 is a schematic microscopic sectional view of the formation of a magnetic brush in a conventional magnetic brush development apparatus.
Fig. 2 is a schematic macroscopic sectional view of the magnetic brush of Fig. 1.
Fig. 3 is a schematic microscopic sectional view of the formation of a magnetic brush in another conventional magnetic brush development apparatus.
Fig. 4 is a schematic macroscopic sectional view of the magnetic brush of Fig. 3.
Fig. 5 is a partially enlarged view of the magnetic brush of Fig. 3.
Fig. 6 is a graph of a development characteristic of a magnetic brush development apparatus by use of the magnetic attraction as a parameter.
Fig. 7 is a schematic sectional view of an embodiment of a magnetic brush development apparatus of the present invention.
Fig. 8 is an enlarged schematic sectional view of a main portion of the magnetic brush development apparatus of Fig. 7.
Fig. 9 is a graph showing the distribution of the intensity of magnetic field on the surface of a non-magnetic sleeve in which the magnet of Fig. 7 is employed.
Fig. 10 is an enlarged schematic sectional view of a main portion of a further embodiment of a magnetic brush development apparatus of the invention.
Fig. 11 is a graph showing the distribution of the intensity of magnetic field on the surface of a non-magnetic sleeve in which the magnet of Fig. 10 is employed.
Fig. 12 is an enlarged schematic sectional view of a main portion of a still further embodiment of a magnetic brush development apparatus of the invention.
Fig. 13 is a graph showing the distribution of the intensity of magnetic field on the surface of a non-magnetic sleeve in which the magnet of Fig. 12 is employed.

The magnets for the present invention can be made by various methods. The simplest method is to mold a ferromagnetic material and magnetize it and form a concave portion in the thus made magnet as desired by a diamond cutter. Another method is to form a desired concave portion in a ferromagnetic material first and to magnetize it later. A further method is to join together magnets or cause a ferromagnetic material to adhere to the projecting portions of a magnet. In the above-mentioned examples, the magnets are composed of pieces of magnets. However, one magnetic rod with predetermined concave portions at desired magnetic pole portions can be used as well.
In Fig. 7, there is schematically shown a magnetic brush development apparatus according to the present invention. In Fig. 7, reference numeral 21 represents a non-magnetic sleeve which is rotated counterclockwise. In the non-magnetic sleeve 21, there is disposed a magnet 22. Part of the non-magnetic sleeve 21 faces a drum-shaped latent electrostatic image bearing member or a photoconductor drum 23 with a predetermined space therebetween. The magnet 22 has a magnetic pole, for instance, an N pole, facing the surface of the photoconductor drum 23 through the non-magnetic sleeve 21 in a development section, so that a magnetic field is formed in the development section on the non-magnetic sleeve 21. A magnet (not shown) for transporting developer is incorporated in the non-magnetic sleeve 21. As is enlarged in Fig. 8, in the magnetic pole portion of the magnet 22, there is formed a groove 24 which is eccentrically located closer to the surface of the photoconductor drum 23. Viewed from the rotating direction of the photoconductor drum 23, a first magnetic pole portion 25 is formed in the magnet 22, upstream of the groove 24, and a second magnetic portion 26 is formed downstream of the groove 24. The first magnetic portion 25 is broader than the second portion 26.
In this case, due to the groove 24 formed in the magnetic pole portion of the magnet 22, a magnetic field having two peaks in the distribution of the intensity of the magnetic field is obtained, and the magnetic flux density of the second magnetic pole portion 26 is higher than that of the first magnetic pole portion 25 as can be seen from the distribution of the magnetic force on the non-magnetic sleeve 21 in Fig. 9.
Therefore, in developing a latent electrostatic image on the photoconductor drum 23, firstly the developer is deposited uniformly on the latent electrostatic image by the comparatively weak magnetic field produced by the first magnetic pole portion 25 which is located upstream in view of the rotation of the photoconductor drum 23, and secondly the latent electrostatic image is completely developed by the comparatively strong magnetic field produced by the second magnetic pole portion 26 which is located downstream of the first magnetic pole portion 25, whereby a high quality image with a uniform image density and without background can be obtained.
In Fig. 10, there is shown partially an enlarged schematic sectional view of a further embodiment of the present invention. In Fig. 10, in the magnetic pole portion of the magnet, there is formed a first magnetic pole portion 27 which is formed with a predetermined first space away from the outer peripheral surface of the non-magnetic sleeve 21, and a second magnetic pole portion 28 with a second space away from the outer peripheral surface of the non-magnetic sleeve 21. The first space is greater than the second space, so that the second magnetic pole portion 28 constitutes a stepped end portion of the magnetic pole portion of Fig. 10. In this case, the first magnetic pole portion 27 is located upstream of the second magnetic pole portion 28, viewed from the rotation of the photoconductor drum 23.
In this embodiment, the intensity of the magnetic field is distributed as shown in Fig. 12, so that the effect similar to that of the embodiment of Fig. 8 can be obtained.
In Fig. 12, there is shown partially an enlarged schematic sectional view of a still further embodiment of the present invention. In the magnetic pole portion of the magnet of this embodiment, there are formed two grooves 39 and 30 which are spaced away from each other, and a first magnetic pole portion 31, a second magnetic pole portion 32, and a third magnetic pole portion 33 which are separated by the two grooves 39 and 30. Of the three magnetic pole portions 31, 32 and 39, the first and second magnetic pole portions 31 and 32, which are located upstream of the third magnetic pole portion 33, are equally spaced away from the outer peripheral surface of the non-magnetic sleeve 21, while the third magnetic pole portion 33 is located closer to the non-magnetic sleeve 21 than the first two magnetic pole portions 31 and 32. In this embodiment, the curve of the intensity of the magnetic field has three peaks as shown in Fig. 13. Of the three peaks of the intensity of the magnetic field, the peak existing most downstream of the rotation of the photoconductor drum 23 is the highest, which indicates the greatest magnetic force. In this embodiment, the developer is deposited uniformly on a latent electrostatic image on the drum 23 by the comparatively weak magnetic field of the first and second magnetic pole portions 31 and 32 and the latent image is then completely developed by the comparatively strong magnetic field produced by the third magnetic pole portion 33.

Claims

1. A magnetic brush development apparatus in which a developer containing magnetic powder therein is attracted to a non-magnetic support member (27) having a magnet (22) therein, and said developer attracted to said non-magnetic support member is brought into contact with a latent electrostatic image bearing member (23) in a development section for developing said latent electrostatic image, said magnet (22) having substantially one magnetic pole portion capable of producing a magnetic field having a plurality of peaks in the intensity of said magnetic field in said development section, characterized in that the magnetic pole portion is of such a form that the peaks located upstream of the movement of said latent electrostatic image bearing member are lower than the peaks located downstream of the movement of said latent electrostatic image. bearing member (23).

2. A magnetic brush development apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said magnet (22) has a first magnetic pole portion (25) and a second magnetic pole portion (26), which are separated by a groove portion (24) formed in said magnet, said groove portion (24) extending in the direction normal to the movement of said latent electrostatic image bearing member (23), and said first magnetic pole portion (25) being located upstream of said groove portion (24), and said second magnetic pole portion (26) being located downstream of said groove portion (24), viewed from the movement of said latent electrostatic image bearing member (23), and said first magnetic pole portion (25) being broader than said second magnetic pole portion (26).

3. A magnetic brush development apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said magnet (22) has a first magnetic pole portion (27) and a second magnetic pole portion (28), each of which is located normal to the movement of said latent electrostatic image bearing member (23), and said first magnetic pole portion (27) being located upstream of said second magnetic pole portion (28), viewed from the movement of said latent electrostatic image bearing member (23), and the top portion of said second magnetic pole portion (28) is closer to said non-magnetic support member than that of said first magnetic pole portion (27).

4. A magnetic brush development apparatus as claimed in claim 1, wherein said magnet (22) has a first magnetic pole portion (31), a second magnetic pole portion (32) and a third magnetic pole portion (33), each of which is separated by two parallel grooves (29, 30) formed in said magnet (22), extending in the direction normal to the movement of said latent electrostatic image bearing member (23), said first magnetic pole portion (31 ) and said second magnetic pole portion (32) being located upstream of said third magnetic pole portion (33), viewed from the movement of said latent electrostatic image bearing member (23), and the top portion of said third magnetic pole portion (33) is closer to said latent electrostatic image bearing member (23) than those of said first and second magnetic pole portions (31, 32).