DE202006018396U1 - Device for receiving receiving material, in particular dog waste, with a retaining device - Google Patents

Abstract

contraption for picking up food, in particular dog waste, waste or like, with a bag receiving chamber, in the one with receiving material to be filled One-way bag can be arranged / arranged, characterized the bag receiving chamber has at least one retaining device, that recorded during a first recording process intake Retains in the bag at least one other recording process.

Description

stepped Dog waste must be removed from the owner.

To lift the dog excrement small Aufhebegeräte of rigid Kunsstoff are often used, the two brackets Bü are moved, for example by a tension spring F to each other. 1

Other would be rigid materials also conceivable.

The dog owner moves the brackets with the gripping Ge by means of the handles G A put over the bracket bags B accepts the droppings and is disposed of later. Such Hundekotzangen are also in the applications DE 102 10 691 . De 90 10 808 . DE 297 04 534 and DE 33 01 761 described

Of the Disadvantage of all such published or on the market constructions is the following.

Succeed it does not capture the whole feces with a gripping action, so the whole faeces disposal action failed.

Because would follow up again mean the feces already in the bag back down falls out of the bag.

Consequently the owner only has the option either to use a second bag or the rest Kot but with the hand to record, but what just those Do not appreciate using bags.

Thereby So far, these ironing devices could not really prevail, though they are very good because of their small size to use during a walk are suitable.

The The aim of this invention is therefore to provide a possibility that the owner can access multiple times using the same bag, without already collected feces fall out again.

It So a second chamber K2 must be created, in which the collected Feces remain safe until more feces are recorded.

A very advantageous version of a Kotaufhebers would look like in DE 10 2006 036 141.5 described that the retention chamber K2 is not located above the chamber K1, but that the retention chamber K2 is in the filling direction laterally to the chamber K1. 2

This would be one still mean safe and easier retention of the feces. It would have also the advantage that the Kotaufheber with the grasping Ge each Times maximum wide open can be, even if there is already filling in chamber K2.

The both chambers are separated by a sliding slide S or alternatively by a firmly anchored cross strut Q. The slider S has opposite a cross strut Q the advantage that he after filling the Bag B can be easily pulled out, leaving the entire Bag B can be easily evacuated from the dung-jar.

The Shape of the construction allows that the feces can be easily tilted from chamber K1 in chamber K2. The whole bag is firmly enclosed, so that the owner Faeces can not see, and also not in contact with the filled bag comes. This is especially pleasant, especially if the owner the filled one Bag still needs to carry some distance.

Of the Bag can on its outside Do not get dirty, and there is no danger of that heavy stuffed with dung Bag over following dragging the ground and being injured.

There the weight of the feces lies on the wall WU, there is none Danger that the partially filled bag moves the bag so that no further recording attempt is possible. At the wall WU could There is also a slide, which after opening the easy emptying of the filled bag down possible.

A disadvantage of the integrated chamber K2 could be that the construction becomes relatively wide and, for example, can no longer easily be carried in the jacket pocket. This problem could be avoided in that the whole construction consists of two parts, which are assembled by the owner only immediately before the insertion of the bag in the area of the transition from chamber 1 to chamber 2 3

After filling, the closed bag could also be pushed all the way into the removed chamber 2, which is then closed with a lid and thus allows easy transport to the next waste basket. 4

It would also be conceivable that the device has only the opening Ö, through which the bag B is led to the outside. 5

One would then not have a closed chamber K2, but the first collected feces would be de are also located beyond the crossbar Q, so that a further detection of feces is possible without already taken feces fall out of the bag again.

These Type of construction has opposite Although closed chamber K2 some drawbacks, which is a dangling, dangling Bag brings.

It is more unattractive to look at, danger of contact, the outer surface is slightly soiled or injured while picking up feces, the bag is slightly displaced by the weight of the faeces, so that one further work is difficult.

Of the Advantage is however the smallness of the construction and that of the filled Bag is easier to retrieve from the construction.

Some disadvantages of the open design could be prevented by, for example, a hinged plate AP that can stabilize the dangling bag 6

The design that could unite all the above variants would look like this. 7

The Construction consists of 2 parts, if necessary in the area of the transition from chamber 1 to chamber 2 at the opening Ö are joined together can.

If the construction is used without the chamber 2, so there is a possibility that the user folds the hinged plate AP all the way up and snaps, and thus the device (chamber 1) at the opening Ö completely closes. So the device is like a conventional Kotaufheber to use. That may be enough for small amounts of feces. 8th

If the Foldable Plate AP is folded down in a horizontal position 6 , it is possible to at least stabilize the out through the opening Ö out pouch that he does not drag on the ground. So you can grab several times for excrement, without the once collected feces fall out again.

on the other hand One has the advantage that the filled droppings quickly dissolved and disposed of can be.

If you want to have the Kotbeutel protected, for example, when collecting large amounts of feces, or if the collected feces must be carried very far to the next trash can, it is recommended to attach the stable chamber 2 at the opening Ö by means of fastening connections BV 9

The Foldable plate AP would be in this case folded down and fixed there.

The mobile chamber 2 can permanently fixed permanently at the opening O. stay if the owner does not want to put on and take off much, or the transport of the somewhat bulky Gesamtkontruktion for him no Problem is, e.g. if anyway a bag or backpack is carried.

The but mobile chamber 2 can also be removed, and then can good e.g. be carried in the second jacket pocket, or e.g. attached eyelets by means a snap hook on the belt be worn.

This can be done before the fray paragraph, but even after the feces paragraph then the closed bag B can be pushed completely into the chamber 2, which is then closed after removal with a lid. 4

The chamber 2 can of course remain attached to the chamber 1 until reaching the next bin. It may also be advantageous if the chamber 2 also offers at its bottom a way to empty the filled bag, by means of a removable bottom EP. 7

To the Connecting the chamber 1 with the mobile chamber K2 with fastening connections BV are all known in the art of engineering conceivable. For example, Snaps, hook, Flanging on, screwing on, snapping on, fitting in, fitting in guide rail insert, lock, etc.

The open end of chamber 2 should also attach a lid to close enable, e.g. by inserting or clicking on etc. The bottom EB of chamber 2 should also allow for easy removal and attachment.

Of the Bag B placed in the chamber takes on appropriate size and strength and careful Insert a safe location in the construction, which also through the opening and closing the grasping, or, by the severity of the collected feces not changed significantly becomes.

Nevertheless, it may be advantageous to attach small protrusions or Einklemmmöglichkeiten on the outside of the chamber 1, but in particular also the chamber 2 or the hinged plate AP to the herausra out of the device ing open edge OR of the bag B in addition to fix, so that in particular when repeated Nachfassen after feces trouble-free work is possible.

The Use of bags with an incorporated cord on the open Edge allows additionally such a contraction of the bag that he does not slip can.

Of course it would be too conceivable to dispense with the hinged plate AP. You could then make the opening Ö, that you use the same lid or slider as the removable one Bottom EB closable is. This would then allow various manipulations of the construction.

As in DE 10 2006 036 141.5 mentioned it can also be very advantageous if the dog owner does not have to bend over when picking up the feces or other debris, but can complete the whole stand.

To it has been proposed to extend the device by means of cord or linkage (extendable) let down and depending on the construction of the gripping process with the Trigger foot.

Now Another advantageous construction is presented that effect should that the user standing several times after droppings or other dirt can take hold without bending over to have, and the handling of the whole even with only one hand allows.

The gripping of the feces is accomplished with the already presented Varrianten whose handles G (or other flap mechanisms) but via a linkage GG on the handle H are operated so that the user does not have to bend down. 10

If the owner wants to move the collected feces from chamber 1 to chamber 2, he would have to hold the whole device quite far up. 11 This is very cumbersome, so that it especially when collecting larger amounts of dirt (eg street - or park cleaning) does not seem practicable.

It is therefore an articulated connection GeV needed 12 and 13 ), which controlled by a linkage GS and handle H allows easy pivoting of the actual gripping device.

Of the Pivoting process is like the gripping process each mechanically over linkage controlled (panning GS and gripping GG).

The whole construction can be designed so that both functions can be performed with one hand. 12

Before swiveling, the whole structure is simply lifted off the ground slightly, so that the dirt from chamber 1 in chamber 2 can be easily dropped. 13

Also for the Swivel range can built-in springs F support the mechanics.

One Inserting the construction in the coat pocket could be probably not with this type of construction of the dirt drainer can realize more, but this arrangement is also thought for the "professional recording" of larger amounts of dirt. So is the whole construction, especially the chambers 1 and 2 be so big that possible Much can be taken before the full bag B is emptied got to. For emptying, it may again be advantageous if chamber 2 can be detached from chamber 1. The weight of the entire construction will be kept very low by plastic or other rigid thin materials be used.

When "professionally picking up" large amounts of waste However, there is a danger that the one beyond the grasping Ge open edge of the inserted bag by the multiple Zufassen is injured, or at least a speedy recording of the dirt opposes.

It is therefore the possibility created to accommodate bag B only within the structure, where he then for the purpose of clamping the bag opening inside the device is attached to points P.

There may be Einklemmelemente, brackets, etc. 14

Or but in the final analysis it is all about an inserted bag dispensed, and the whole device then after completion of the work a final cleaning.

Working without a bag is possible with all presented Varrianten. (As examples without pouches drawn the 3 . 7 . 10 . 12 and 14 )

In spite of missing bag B but the opportunity remains as often as possible the device Grasping dirt, without the receiving material always immediately after each shot into a trash bag or bucket got to.

Claims (6)

Device for receiving receiving material, in particular dog waste, refuse or the like, with a bag receiving chamber, in which a one-way bag to be filled with receiving material can be arranged / arranged, characterized in that the bag receiving chamber has at least one retaining device, which at a first Recording process recorded material retained in at least one other recording process in the bag. Apparatus according to claim 1, in which one with receiving material to be filled One-way bag at least can be arranged / arranged in regions, characterized by at least a restraint device, that recorded during a first recording process intake Retains in the bag at least one other recording process. Device according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the device for taking up receiving material has a additional linkage and has a handle, the one pressing allow the user to stand up. Device according to one of the preceding claims, characterized in that the device for picking up receiving material has a gelekige Connection with linkage to handle, which allows easy pivoting. Device according to one of the preceding claims, characterized characterized in that the open edge of the bag does not protrude, but fastened inside the construction in clamped position and so the bag is not damaged by gripping dirt. Device according to one of the preceding claims, characterized characterized in that the device simply without inserted bag is used, causing the retention function not impaired becomes.