DE102018003014A1 - Experiment for the detection of space waves 2 - Google Patents

Abstract

A physical double-slit experiment for investigating photon properties, characterized in that a Serge Haroshe microresonator is placed in front of the double slit, and this microresonator appropriately retains the photons fired by the photon gun for a certain time in that microresonator, during which time the photonic space waves become continue to propagate through the double slit and that on a suitable detector after the double slit the interference caused by the double slit of the space waves is visually or electronically displayed or registered.

Description

STATE OF THE ART

The existence of space waves is currently not in the sights of science. However, the detection of space waves would fundamentally change the knowledge of the world, because space waves could be the fundamental property of matter / 1 /. Also, the space waves can be associated with the known phenomenon of redshift of light spectra in space. Moreover, the space waves may be the explanation for the fact that these light spectra even undergo a red / blue shift. The space waves further provide an explanation for some quantum phenomena, e.g. for the particle restriction.

At present, scientists assume that distant stars are moving away from us because their light spectrum has a red shift. It remains completely unclear how the Doppler shift is explained in light - light is created and behaves differently than sound waves.

In addition, it has not been experimentally excluded that the room itself could cause an effect in the sense of a red shift of the spectrum. The present invention is intended to enable the problem of space waves to be investigated experimentally.

THEORETICAL FOUNDATIONS. ANOTHER WORLD CLARIFICATION

In December 2014, for understandable reasons, we dealt with the relatively simpler challenge of explaining the double-slit experiment, which does not shoot photons but electrons / 2 /. The electron moves toward the double slit and no one could deny, so our viewpoint that this electron would precede an electromagnetic wave. A negative electric charge finally flies through the empty space, before the electron and after the electron an electromagnetic wave spreads in all directions. However, according to the well-known formula E = mc ² , the electron is slower than the wave, because the electron is a mass particle, but there is no other possibility. The electron "rolls" on its shaft and is "systemically" connected to it, so our idea. According to his spin, it would occupy a certain position on the wave, eg occupy a preferred wave trough, 1 above. As the distance increases, however, the electron must slide back in its position and this would not do it continuously, but if the tension is sufficient, then jump to the next wave trough.

The electron and the electromagnetic wave here will behave similarly as the electromagnetic wave and the electrons in the circular resonance in orbit around the atom, which we described in December 2014/2 /. At this resonance, the occupation of electrons is also erratic, details can be found there. The experiment described in this work should prove that this wave is still effective without the electron and can be experimentally detected.

The previous quantum mechanics considers the electron as a particle with wave properties. This view inherently leads to the necessity of a complicated mathematical inventory that must theoretically justify these particular properties of a state "times particles, times waves". The entry of chance and probability calculus in quantum theory was thus legitimized According to this so-called dual principle, the electron appears as a wave and sometimes as a particle. It is surprising, however, that the physicists have accepted such an exotic view quite uncritically.

Quantum theory has repeatedly shown that the probability calculus can very successfully describe this "exotic" behavior of the electron. That's not what it's all about here - after all, it's legitimate for random events to be treated this way. At this point we do not question the previous quantum theoretical approach. We are looking for a way to describe the behavior of the electron in other ways. The purpose of this description is to "free" the electron of its randomness.

Random events are always in the flow of knowledge and only remain random until the conditions for their deterministic description have been met.

In the experiment of 2014 we have to prove that the electron as a charged particle in motion will always produce a wave / 2 /. The electron can only be particles, one that is always accompanied by a wave.

It is a fundamentally different view than the previous interpretation of the nature of the electron. Importantly, this new view holds open the possibility of describing the electron with the well-known classical means of wave theory.

If we ascribe to the electron an electromagnetic wave attached to it, we can also explain the problem of quantum entanglement - two electrons with different spin, which roll onto a common electromagnetic wave, appear quantum entangled / 1 /.

In turn, the wave description can generate any number of electromagnetic waves carrying pairs of quantum-entangled electrons. This would open up completely new possibilities in the development of quantum computers. For that reason alone, it would be advisable to pursue this new approach with the necessary intensity.

The advantages of the new interpretation of the properties of electrons lie in the simplified mathematical handling of the theoretical relationships. In addition, this new perspective will help us better understand the world around us and more easily explain the physics of some phenomena on Earth and in space.

The description of the experiment in December 2017 described the problem of entanglement in both electrons and photons / 1 /. The problem is similar for the photons, as for the electrons, with the difference that the photons "roll" on a space wave. Again, the principle of dualism does not exist: one does not have the problem of particles or waves, but the systemic relationship of particles plus waves. In this work, an experiment was proposed to detect the front of the skywave.

This would give us the opportunity to identify the space waves as such and to explore their properties.

WHAT ARE ROOM WAVES

Spatial waves can quite formally be considered as the ultimate fundamental properties of matter. This formalism has a great chance of proving true. Besides, it will simply help us solve some challenges in physics and cosmic science. An essential advantage is that we could describe the space with the classical wave theory.

We have described above the image of the electron so that the elementary particle not only moves forward at high speed, but also rotates incredibly fast. The electron generates an electromagnetic wave radiating in all directions. Similar to the electron, all elementary particles rotate and move. This way of presenting oneself in the world in such a different way obviously represents a fundamental property of matter. However, a basic property must have meaning and, above all, be purpose-oriented. The basic question is: If charged particles and the electron emit electromagnetic waves, what do the non-charged particles generate?

This type of uncharged particle to move and turn extremely fast, would mean first and foremost that they emit space waves in analogy to the electron. On the other hand, the charged particles are also matter particles, so the second assumption would be that the charged particles generate both electromagnetic and space waves.

According to this assumption, each particle of matter sends out its own space wave. Each mass in the room is therefore positioned in the middle of its own spatial field, which radiates radiantly and can not be shielded by anything, 2 ,

WHAT IS ROOM?

Space is this ominous nothing around us and everywhere in the universe. The ultimate property of space is that space can penetrate everything and be shielded by nothing. Next, as the next property of space, we know that matter can move freely and undisturbed in space. Empirically, it seems that we have experienced so far that no one and nothing from the material world can influence space. Below we will show what new rules there are. But at this point, we wonder why gravitation is the only exception and should be able to bend space according to the current prevailing view? We will deal with this question in more detail below.

THE GRAVITATION AND THE ROOM RECYCLING

We usually have a completely wrong idea of the extent of our solar system. Let us imagine, e.g. before, the sun would be as big as a large apple sense (about 10.8 cm) and that this apple sensation would hang directly in front of us in the air. At this presentation, the planet Uranus is then as big as a pea (about 0.39 cm). Relatively, however, this planet would be at a distance of 450m from us. Despite this huge distance, the little little thing is still in the grip of a fixed relationship to the orange sun.

We go further. If we demote the sun to a point tiny, the vanishes Uranus completely out of sight. The curvature of space in the direction of Uranus is still a full 4.5m, in addition to a sun that can not be perceived. Unlike the beautiful pictures of the cosmologists, this picture is highly irritating: First and foremost, because this tiny, punctate sun is supposed to bend the huge space to Uranus and beyond so vigorously that Uranus and not only he is in free fall around the sun and will rotate around it. The obvious problem should be considered first of all from the energetic side. Can the sun handle this daunting task, and is there any gravity at all as the weakest of all forces that would be strong enough?

Below, we give a model in which the space around a mass body is not curved, only the local space around a second mass body receives a space gradient, which "presses" this second mass body in the direction of the first mass body.

Somehow, it must be clear to everyone that there are forces in space that claim to be something incredibly fundamental. The space that positions and controls the sun and the planets can not be a simple structure, and in no case does it represent any void. This space is bursting with energy, tensing its structures so tightly that even the tiniest of them Agitation on the one hand (eg elementary particles as well as the sun in the whole) is immediately answered with a reaction on the far side (eg planet).

If the space were made of particles, then these particles must interact with each other via a force field, nothing else would be mediated. Generally speaking, space only has the potential to represent a force field, even if particles should exist in it. A force field would certainly be plausible for the room, but which one? For such an interaction as described above, electromagnetic waves or the light would be much too slow. We have to be prepared for the fact that the waves of space are much, much faster than the light. Maybe that's why they have not been measured yet. They would already be there much earlier than any measurement and have set up a state of equilibrium. We need to develop new experimental concepts that take into account this peculiarity of the spatial waves.

THE TYPE OF SPATIAL RECYCLING

The space is everywhere, it permeates every kind of matter and every mass body is in space. Basically, the room is straightforward. For a point mass in the universe alone, there should be no preferred straightness, which will lead to an idea as shown in Figure 2. All directions around the mass body are equivalent, so cosmology obviously has a problem with the curvature of space - how is this space supposed to curve? "In the opinion of the physicists, we can not imagine how the real mass M will deform the 3D space around us." However, we should nevertheless do this because scientific cosmology is involved in a contradiction here.

Because one can not imagine a 3D curvature of space, cosmology is content with a space of two dimensions and draws fascinating images, such as spatial bodies, like the earth, turning around a mass like the sun. The problem can not be greater than what is shown on these known pictures: a non-existent, unreal, two-dimensional space sufficiently and sufficiently explains a completely real rotation, e.g. a real earth around its real sun. This confusion of different categories is certainly not allowed in any science.

THE GRAVITY LENSES

Current cosmology further explains how the same two-dimensional space model builds a gravitational lens around a mass body. Once again, we have the same contradiction as described above under b): A nonexistent, non-real, two-dimensional space elegantly guides the real ray of light around the 3D real mass body and shows how the real state of the stars seems to shift. The effect of creating a kind of light scattering lens, which is triggered by gravity.

For reality, this model would be an inappropriate concept, because the 3D space in its deformation within a mass body would rather give a convergent lens. In Section 2.4, we show that a 3D space gradient arises within a mass body, which under certain circumstances may be curved. Outside of this mass body, the space gradient appears linear. Gravity itself is explained as a side effect of the space gradient.

The gravitational lenses in the form currently described in cosmology can by no means function real.

At this point we are again confronted with a problem that generally calls into question the credibility of gravity models.

Below we show that refractive spatial lenses exist real, but that they have little to do with gravitation. Their effects are caused as a result of space swirl around rotating mass bodies and space swirls in mass-free space-the space in space appears to be characterized by previously unperceived dynamics.

• . Das Prinzip der Teilchen- Dualität s. auch Abschn. 2.0, bzw. /1/und /2/
• . Die Teilchenverschränkung, s. auch /1/
• . Die Teilchen/Raum Beziehung, s. auch Abschn. 2.1
• . Die Lichtgeschwindigkeit im Vakuum
• . Die Theorien von Albert Einstein
• . Die Gravitation. Die Gravitationslinsen
• . Die Planetenbewegung
• . Die Gravitationsformel nach Newton für bewegliche Massekörper
• . Dunkle Masse und dunkle Energie

It is clear from what has been said so far that a better explanation for the following questions would be desirable both in cosmology and in quantum mechanics:

• , The principle of particle duality s. also Sects. 2.0, resp. / 1 / and / 2 /
• , The particle entanglement, s. also / 1 /
• , The particle / space relationship, s. also section 2.1
• , The speed of light in a vacuum
• , The theories of Albert Einstein
• , The gravity. The gravitational lenses
• , The planetary movement
• , Newton's gravitational formula for moving mass bodies
• , Dark mass and dark energy

WHY IS THE LIGHT SPEED IN THE VACUUM CONSTANT?

We are used to identifying light with photons. And similar to the sound waves, we also find a Doppler effect in the light. But we have serious differences in both phenomena. While in the sound, the sound wave is organically connected to the Schalsender and can be influenced by the speed of this transmitter, the photon springs from its generator jumped and would have to lose the organic connection with the light emitter in the sequence. The photon is "pinched off" from the circular resonance as an energy quantum / 1 /, / 2 /. These circular resonances are formed around the atom at precisely defined distances from the atomic center, and the electrons jump in between, even by absorbing or emitting energy quanta. In mathematics, this phenomenon is known as discontinuity, signaling a break in functional connectivity.

Because the photon has no mass, it will not follow the movement of the light transmitter. A photon "decoupled" from the light emitter does not represent an inertial particle and after decoupling it is placed on its own (autonomously) at birth (within an infinitely short time). Quite unlike a bullet, which is shot down from the train at speed v. The ball has mass m and is sluggish at $${\text{F}}_{\text{T}}=\text{m dv}/\text{dt}=0\text{at v}=\text{Constant}$$

In this background, the photon acts as an autonomous system, because it is decoupled from the light transmitter "infinitely fast". His "birth" from the circular resonance of the electron always takes place under identical initial conditions. For the standing observer, therefore, the photon's propagation in space vacuum always remains constant and at constant speed, regardless of whether the transmitter would move forwards or backwards. Another question is why the photon does not lose energy during its flight and does not become "tired". It seems that the photon / space relationship is a very special one and that the photon in space is always being re-born (all or nothing law, for example in terms of quantum fluctuation?), S. also / 1 / and / 2 /.

In fact, this statement means that the speed of light must not be mystified because it does not qualitatively differ from other speeds. It also seems at first glance that there is no reason to consider the speed of light as a limiting factor for other parameters in cosmology. At the moment we just do not know any higher speeds.

The consequences of the photon decoupling from the light transmitter must be explained in more detail here.

In his time, Albert Einstein had the ingenious idea of including time in order to always be able to ensure the same speed of light in a vacuum. If e.g. a light transmitter (say, a spaceship today) would shoot a photon at 200,000 km / s, so he thought, the time would have to slow down so that the photon could keep its constant 300 000 km / s. But because the photon makes its decoupling from the circular resonance of the electron in an infinitely short time and then autonomously maintains its always constant velocity in vacuum, the condition demanded by Einstein is not necessary. This means that a spaceship can shoot a photon even from 400 000 km / s, and that this photon, as a non-inertial system, will maintain its constant velocity in vacuum without restriction.

The limit postulated by Einstein with the speed of light with all its consequences can not be supported for this reason. At first we do not want to exclude that very high speeds are material Objects would have an influence eg on the mass or on the passage of time.

The elegance of the well-known Lorenz / Einstein equations reminds us to be especially careful here. But we have to be prepared for these equations to be replaced in the future by new experiments and experiences.

THE EINSTEIN'S PARADOXON

Since December 2017 (/ 1 /) a lot has started to move. The solution to a challenge that I would like to call the Einstein paradox has come to my mind during the following thinking experiment.

We are looking at two spaceships RS1 and RS2 moving at very high speed v parallel to each other and forward through space, 3 , On board the RS1 there is a photon cannon and aboard the RS2 a point photon receiver. If at the time 1, cf. 3 , a photon, or a photon beam in the direction RS2 and shot perpendicular to the direction of flight, the punctiform receiver of RS2 never receive the light. When the photon is at the height of RS2 arrived, the spaceship will always be a bit further forward.

So that the spaceship RS2 To "see" light, the photon gun must be pointed at an exactly defined angle to the direction of flight. Only in this case, the photon becomes the point-shaped transmitter on RS2 in position 2, s. 3 , Star Wars would only work that way.

When the perpendicular photon and the angle photon are fired from position 1 simultaneously, the resting observer becomes a vertical path S1 and an angular distance S2 observe that are equal to each other. That means the pilot of the spaceship RS1 only then a signal at the RS2 can send if he would tilt the photon gun. In the light beam with the constant speed of light to the second spaceship, the pilot of the spaceship RS1 wait for the success of his action as long as it is observed by the dormant observer. The spaceship RS1 can not move the fired light beam parallel with forward.

The most famous equation of the 20th century with the right triangle of the distances traveled by the light and the time relation with the factor v / c can not be written for this reason. A paradoxical situation has arisen: Either we are making a mistake here, or will modern physics get into an explanation - Inertial and non-inertial systems obviously should not be confused with each other.

The spaceship RS2 on the other hand, will always be able to see light photons, if at RS1 not a photon gun, but a lamp is mounted. A lamp as a light source sends photons in all directions, s. 3 , Among them are also photons, which will fulfill the required direction with the mentioned angular photons.

In cosmology, it is also claimed that at very high speeds of an observer, the space would adapt in the shape of the high speed - resting objects undergo a characteristic deformation for the fast observer. One wonders what this room would do if many material objects (observers) criss-crossed the room at high speeds. Obviously the room remains as it is, only for the fast-moving observer do the material elements distributed in space appear deformed, as a kind of optical illusion, unlike when the observer is at rest.

THE DOPPLEREFFEKT

The result of the logic with the light decoupled from the light emitter is that a measuring system oriented to the photons should not actually detect a Doppler effect. Here a contradiction arises to the measurements, which attribute a Doppler effect to the light and the question:

Since the free photon of the light emitter appears systemically decoupled, how should the Doppler effect affect the reception of the light?

As a result, a mediator must exist between the photon and the light emitter, and this can only be a sky wave onto which the photon can roll unrestrictedly. This space wave positions the photon in relation to the light emitter, and this position, like the electron on the electromagnetic wave, can only be changed abruptly along that space wave. Only in this context does the Doppler shift of light receive a physically meaningful interpretation.

We recall that the positioning of two photons on a common space wave was also used as an explanation for the phenomenon of entanglement / 1 /. The meaning of the space waves for the explanation of some questions of cosmology are therefore an unmistakable indication of their secure existence.

The existence of the Doppler effect in light is the actual proof that the space waves exist. In the red or blue shift of the light spectrum, the photons are only the indicators of a deep fundamental property of each particle of matter to be surrounded by space waves and constantly send them out.

THE ROTVERSCIEBUNG STERNENLICHTS

First, the cosmologists are convinced that the space is constantly expanding, the facts should speak for it. In this case, the redshift is caused because it is also the light-carrying space wave is pulled apart and thus the light spectrum in the direction of a redshift.

The crucial question that comes to mind here is whether space in its structure can position matter in such a way that it will take matter with it as it expands? Matter can finally move freely in space. But that means that she can just stand still in the room expansion? The evidence to the contrary must be found in any case. Thus, the Doppler effect of starlight, as far as the actual motion of the stars is concerned, could be more or less a delusion.

We have already assumed that the Spatial Wave positions the photon firmly, but at the same time does not restrict the motion of the photon. In this sense, space can indeed expand and permeate matter without restriction. But evidence must be found that this expansion of space is followed by matter. Like the photon, matter can move freely in space. Because of this, the redshift of the starlight does not necessarily mean that the stars fly apart. We will look at the question in more detail below.

Second, it must be ruled out that the redshift may simply be caused by the movement of light through the room. Here is the talk not of a light fatigue, as one might think. The redshift could result from the interaction between the space wave of light and the space itself.

If the Doppler effect is oriented to the properties of the space wave, the light spectra remain "sharpened" on the space waves. The light photons make the Doppler effect visible, they apparently do not produce it. The light spectra are only the indicators of the associated space waves.

It seems that the Big Bang hypothesis can not be substantiated by a redshift of the starlight alone. A spatial expansion in addition is not sufficient for this hypothesis. Space, matter, and light are obviously in an unknown relationship to each other.

In any case, we need defined conditions that allow us to unravel the connections further. Space probes, rotating nearby stars and rotating distant stars can give us valuable clues. There is obviously the need to devise new experiments and to rearrange old observations in this sense. It has to be checked how light and space interact with other light sources. This consideration also requires the observation that the light of the Andromeda galaxy has a blue shift. This galaxy may be moving towards our galaxy much faster than previously thought. As a result, it would not only be able to compensate for the red shift due to the spatial expansion, but also outdo it in the direction of blue shift.

The other question is whether the universe will see more galaxies with a blue shift. With the large number of galaxies, there must also be some that move in our direction. Or is it only possible to observe red light after a certain distance? This in turn supports the thesis that space would cause the redshift of the light of distant galaxies.

The photon alone is out of the question as the cause of the phenomenon of the blue-red shift. All that remains is the space wave carrying this photon, which is still organically connected to the inertial system of the light transmitter. She is the more important player in this event, which is important for the emergence of the Doppler effect.

For the Doppler effect, then, only the space wave would be responsible, on which the photon in question rolls forward through the room. And this space wave should already have been there, even before the photon has escaped from the electron orbit. The electron, on the other hand, from which the photon has been pinched off, consequently produces not only an electromagnetic wave but also a space wave. Only in this way can it be explained that the systemic relationship photon / space wave can react to the movements of the light emitter. In this way one comes to the conclusion that every particle of matter, in this special case the electron, constantly maintains a space wave in space. This space wave would not be triggered by the photon, but by the particle itself, the photon will be pinched off the electron orbit only in due course and will probably "roll" onto an existing space wave. A space wave with a wavefront triggered by the photon itself could therefore become questionable, but it can not be excluded, cf. to the explanations in / 1 /. For this the problem must be solved by suitable experiments.

It should be clear that the waves of space belong to the ultimate fundamental property of all matter. These waves of space penetrate all matter and can not be shielded. They act like rails on which light photons and electromagnetic waves propagate. Around all mass bodies, these space waves must cause turbulence and form potential differences as a space potential distribution. However, they have not been able to measure them yet, obviously because this option has not yet been considered as a task.

THE PLANET MOVEMENT, THE ROLE OF THE MOVEMENT IN COSMOS

One might think that the planetary motions in today's computer technology have long been known and understood above all in the smallest detail. This does not seem to be the case. When we gave a new explanation for gravitation in December 2017/1 /, it became clear to us that planetary motion now has to be newly included in the consideration.

In the patent application of December 2017, space waves were used to illustrate how gravitation arises / 1 /. The space waves were marked there by their space vectors and one can explain with these space vectors not only the gravitation, but also the planetary motions.

Here we consider the simplest case where the mass M ₁ is alone in the cosmos. This mass we represent as a compact mass body, which consists of a number of elemental masses and these Elementarmassen with M ₁₀ . M ₁₂ etc. are numbered, s. 4 ,

The crowd M ₁ radiates into the cosmos its characteristic summary spatial field. This summary space field is in 4 is characterized by a space vector and this space vector is directed against the cosmic space field, or against the cosmic space vector. We will ignore the cosmic space vector first, later it will be included extra in the calculus.

erscheinen. Je nachdem wie die Massedichte sich verändert, kann der Raumgradient (Gravitation) in Richtung Zentrum der Masse M₁ auch nicht linear werden (Raumkrümmung).Each elementary mass also radiates a spatial field, or a space vector, in the radial direction; between the individual elemental masses, a superposition of the space vectors takes place, whereby a space potential is built up. When rectified space vectors add up, "more space" arises. If space vectors are directed against each other, a "space deficit" arises. On the 4 is shown by the elemental masses M _1i get a surplus of space from the cosmic side, towards the mass M ₁₀ against it a space deficit. The Elementarmassen are therefore in the direction M ₁₀ dressed. The resulting space gradient we can call accustomed as gravity. The space vectors from the direction of the center of mass M ₁ will depend on the mass in the enclosed sphere, ie they will be proportional to the mass density

appear. Depending on how the mass density changes, the space gradient (gravitation) can move towards the center of the mass M ₁ also do not become linear (space curvature).

The total mass M ₁ radiates its summary space field into the universe. Long since the lines of force, this force field is effective throughout the universe. The intensity of this force field is the mass of M ₁ proportional and is the square of the radius R ² around the crowd M ₁ decrease, because the imaginary spherical surface around this mass M ₁ with the square of this radius increases. If we consider the cosmic space field, or the cosmic space vector, the space vector coming from all sides becomes the mass of the vectors M ₁ deducted. That means that around the mass M ₁ a space deficit arises, the amount of which increases with the radius of the imaginary spherical surface around the mass M ₁ is getting smaller.

In the otherwise homogeneous cosmos, it becomes towards the mass M ₁ create a linear potential trap. This potential trap is directed from all directions and aims at the center of mass M ₁ , For incoming beams, the mass would M ₁ act as a condenser lens.

A second mass M ₂ receives at the summation of in 4 plotted space vectors an additional local space potential drop in the direction of the mass M ₁ What we would call the gravitational effect between the two masses. We point out that this effect is local around the crowd M ₂ done and that this effect is not around the mass M ₁ extends.

In reality, the two masses M ₁ and M ₂ not alone in the universe, so that the local gravitational effect eg on the mass M ₂ is changed from the whole cosm according to the effect of a total space vector.

THE DARK ENERGY

Let us further assume that the cosmic component of the space vector acts from all directions, as with the mass M on the 5 is shown. If we include the field vectors within the mass M We will find that the global spatial effect aims to pull the elemental masses apart. It builds a space potential from the inside out.

This is a surprising finding because until now it has been thought that the global spatial effect on a mass would cancel each other out.

Judging from this statement, the accumulation of material in space is only given the opportunity to stay together if it develops enough cohesion to develop an inner cohesion (sufficient gravitational effect) that would overcome the outer space's pull. A gas cloud e.g. which does not build up sufficient critical mass density for this cohesion, is distributed apart in the empty cosmos.

When calculating the critical mass to survive a mass body in the cosmos must be taken into account that compact masses are held together by electromagnetic forces

This principle works in the whole cosmos, as well as here on earth. We could do this with e.g. explain why gases tend to dilute in space more and more.

The advantages of viewing with the space vectors are obvious: not only have we found an explanation for gravity, but also in general the cause of the increase in entropy.

But we still see the really great discovery ahead of us. What works locally in a mass body in the cosmos also applies to the entire universe. Suppose that, on a global scale, the myriad of galaxies are similar to the elemental races on Earth 5 , But this would mean that in the construction of the universe, a principle was originally built per se: the omnipresent and unshieldable space drifts from principle and from the beginning all masses distributed in space.

At the same time, space is also the inner force that drives apart all the masses in outer space, just as the raisins are inflated apart in a rising yeast dough.

Incidentally, with the new model, we also find the cause of the enigmatic dark energy that has been causing much headaches to the cosmologists lately. It also seems very important to note that our theory, with one of the most expensive experiments in cosmology, has already been experimentally confirmed. further.

THE GRAVITARY LAW TO NEWTON

At this point we would like to add that Newton's law of gravitation is justified, because the two mass bodies in the law build up radial spatial fields whose intensity is proportional to the mass of the individual space body. However, we must incorporate some new points of view and some corrections into this law.

gilt vom Prinzip her für ruhenden Massekörper. Aber auch für rotierende und stabile Systeme, wie z.B. für die Sonne und Erde führt dieses Gesetz ebenfalls zu einem befriedigenden Ergebnis. In diesem konkreten Fall, weil die besondere Situation der Rotationen im Raum mit einem Faktor verrechnet wird, der in die Gravitationskonstante eingehen würde.Newton's law of gravitation $${\text{F}}_{\text{G}}=\text{G}/{\text{<figure-callout id="2" label="R" filenames="DE102018003014A1\_0006.png,DE102018003014A1\_0009.png" state="{{state}}">R</figure-callout>}}^2,{\text{M}}_1,{\text{<figure-callout id="2" label="M" filenames="DE102018003014A1\_0006.png,DE102018003014A1\_0009.png" state="{{state}}">M</figure-callout>}}_2$$

applies in principle for resting mass body. But also for rotating and stable systems, such as for the sun and earth, this law also leads to a satisfactory result. In this specific case, because the particular situation of the rotations in space is calculated by a factor that would enter the gravitational constant.

The special in the situation on the 4 is that these are resting mass bodies in the room.

THE DARK MASS IN THE UNIVERSE

In reality, the compact masses are rotating M ₁ and M ₂ (S. 4 ) around their centers and move forward. At first, therefore, we will be rotating a compact mass M to look at your own center, s. 6 ,

From the previous remarks, we had learned that around a compact mass in the cosmos, a space deficit arises, which strives to inflate the mass body. But if the mass body would turn around its center fast enough, the cosmic space field and the space field of the rotating mass will be swirled, like that on the 6 is shown schematically. The turbulence does not mean that a vortex should form like a water vortex. These are opposing force fields whose lines of force are sheared against each other. The drawing only indicates what the rotation in the room might look like. Exact calculations will make mathematicians and better render them in computer simulations.

The line of force coming from the cosmos 2 becomes on one turn, unlike the force line 1 , not demolished. The force field of the mass M interacts with her in a dynamic interaction. The cosmic force field is bulged in the direction of rotation, deflecting the force field of the mass against the direction of rotation.

As can be seen from this drawing, the space deficit becomes around the rotating mass M go over with increasing rotational speed in a surplus space. Both force fields no longer work in opposite directions. To the mass M arise circular areas with the same direction. In other words, the rotation of the mass causes the cosmos to repel the mass. In other words, the mass is formulated M as a result of the rotation squeezed from all sides. Because of this rotation alone, a bulge of space arises as a surplus of space around the mass. Such a spatial constellation could have a meaning for us on earth, which we will certainly fully understand in detail in the future.

Could e.g. be that the Van Allen contactor belt is also around the earth in connection with this circular space bulge?

Important: At this point we find the probably single and measurable interaction between matter and the vast universe. We are fully aware that one has to be very careful with this conclusion. Just keep in mind that this may completely eliminate the need for dark matter in the room. The room gets a tremendous momentum that nobody has ever noticed. The space is alive, huge cosmic eddies are now recognized, as the true gathering place of matter and as the birthplace of suns, planets and galaxies. The cosmos suddenly becomes painfully real. Flat cosmic worlds, parallel universes, journeys into the past and even ominous wormholes and other assertions must be forgotten as imaginary creations. Above all, we will learn to deal with real challenges in the cosmos. With the project "Gravity Probe B" it has already been proven that space is a force field. Now new experiments and new measuring methods have to be devised, which are also adapted to the theoretical considerations. The great Einstein has been right, that at the beginning of all experimental research must have a good theory.

THE "GRAVITATIONLINSEN"

The gravitational lenses now take shape: Under certain conditions, a light beam that can be moved towards the mass can be directed around the space bulge described above. This space bead is created only by the rotation of the mass M around its own center, 6 , Only in this way is it possible for a gravitational lens to be formed. Actually, it is a spatial lens because it has little to do with gravity. In the vicinity of this space bulge, gravitation, if we want to retain this name, will rather be given a negative sign.

What we have now learned is the surprising finding that the rotation of cosmic masses is a survival strategy of mass accumulation in space. Cosmic gases also have a chance to form gas planets and gaseous suns with the help of the rotation. It is precisely this effect that we observe in the vast cosmos: nothing is at rest in space, everything is in constant rotation around some center: rotation organizes matter into what we observe in the cosmos - cosmic turbulences are the nursery of all the suns, planets and galaxies. Free from Matter Whirling in the cosmos should also exist and they also form huge space lenses for light rays.

Between two masses M ₁ and M ₂ that are in the midst of the cosmos and at rest, creates an attraction that we have described above, 4 , For this attraction was already calculated by Isaac Newton the known relationship. Suppose, however, that the two masses move parallel to each other through space with velocity v, s. 7 , The space vectors around the masses thereby experience characteristic alignment with the result that the space vectors are now summed at an angle. The space potential, or the attraction between the two masses (gravitational effect) will thereby decrease. From a certain speed, the gravitational effect would have to turn even in a repulsion. In the known law of gravity, a correction factor must be inserted which depends on the speed v of the movement. In Isaac Newton's well-known equation, space vectors are now cross-multiplied for the two masses and the correction factor is shown as a function of velocity. We must therefore allow that gravity in the real case can also assume a negative sign. $${\text{F}}_{\text{G}}=\text{G}/{\text{<figure-callout id="2" label="R" filenames="DE102018003014A1\_0006.png,DE102018003014A1\_0009.png" state="{{state}}">R</figure-callout>}}^2,\overrightarrow{{\text{M}}_1}\times \overrightarrow{{\text{<figure-callout id="2" label="M" filenames="DE102018003014A1\_0006.png,DE102018003014A1\_0009.png" state="{{state}}">M</figure-callout>}}_2}\left(\text{v}\right)$$

In the cosmos, the velocities of spatial bodies are constant over long periods of time. Therefore, the correction factor from Eq. (3) in a concrete case goes into the gravitational constant G one. This makes it clear that under certain boundary conditions the gravitational equation according to Newton, Eq. (2), is still valid. About the gravitational constant G must be rescheduled in this equation. It was previously calculated only for resting mass body.

THE MOVEMENT STABILITY IN COSMOS

Space, we conclude, puts pressure on all rotating masses. Compared to the relationship at rest, two masses will presumably be positioned in a rotating disc bubble, which in turn will exert pressure on the surrounding space.

In the general case, two masses rotate M ₁ and M ₂ in the same direction around its own axis and the mass M ₂ additionally also in the same direction around the mass M ₁ , The fact that the planetary bodies turn in the universe predominantly or only in this sense does not seem to be accidental. As a result, an equilibrium state can obviously be achieved which will satisfy mathematical criteria for highest stability.

In the otherwise homogeneous picture of the cosmos, the rotation of M ₁ and M ₂ the two masses a kind of rotary bubble in space. According to the principle of minimum effect, this rotation bubble is flattened into a rotating disk. This rotating disk bubble is obviously the preferred state not only for the planetary situations in a solar system, but also in the entire cosmos for all galaxies in space.

When the speed effect causes a mass M ₁ a second mass rotating about it M ₂ would ultimately repel, and the cosmic space would also repel this rotating second mass results for the rotating mass M ₂ a state of equilibrium and a locally acting stability corridor from which it can not escape, or only with difficulty, s. 8th , The degree of freedom of the mass M ₂ is strictly limited in this stability corridor and always "knows" the mass M ₂ where she has to move.

The fact is: rotating masses rotate in their orbit just because they have a stability corridor there.

In the previous ideas about centrifugal force and gravity you can not find this urgently needed stability corridor. Even in the case of the earth, a very high stability of the orbit can be observed, which could not be explained solely with the previous gravity centrifugal model. According to our imagination, the mass moves M ₂ into a force valley (s. 8th ), where the gravity centrifugal model would be the mass M ₂ move on the top of a force mountain, s. 9 , In the 8th with the valley we find a stability corridor in which 9 with the mountain we find only one stability line, up along the summit. For the stability of the movement, we have ideas here that differ day and night. Obviously, the model with gravitational centrifugal force is not fit for reality. Consider, for example, all the terrible cosmic catastrophes in which the earth has been involved since its creation, such as moon formation.

Each rotational movement and the velocity forward of rotating bodies around a center is determined by whether a state of stability for the space body can form over time. The local cosmic space field, rotation and forward motion first have to be exactly coordinated with each other. This process is to be understood in the BEING. If a spiral galaxy shows deviations, it may have been "working" for millennia to achieve the perfect. Some observations in the cosmos must also be thought of as "global in time" and not immediately derive a new mode of action from the deviations.

DISCUSSION

The model of the space waves will fundamentally change our understanding of cosmological relationships. It wonders why the waves have not been considered before? Are these waves of space not so present that they could have been "seen" by all researchers? Or are we in a situation similar to the problem of space waves, as in the saying that the trees would block the view to see the forest?

In light properties, in the Doppler effect, in the double-slit experiment, in the problem of entanglement, and in planetary motion, we find a rational explanation only when space waves are considered.

Matter and space must be so closely related to each other that the thought imposes itself, the space would disappear if we were to remove all matter from space.

With the new theoretical model offered here, new experiments have to be designed. Only by means of practical measurements will it have to be confirmed to what extent a theoretical consideration would be free from speculation. With the assumption that the waves of space are the fundamentally fundamental property of matter, as we have shown, many contradictions in the way we have seen are dispelled at the same time.

It is also an essential finding that gravitation is a side effect of the distribution of space potential and not vice versa. As a result, the gravitons do not exist, the physicists would be able to completely abandon the search for the "gravitons".

The computers must be supplied with new data and the calculations could now show that in nature there is an order in which no mystical phenomena would have room. Cosmologists can breathe a sigh because everything will have a natural explanation. We have shown that the global space field pulls matter apart. Other scientists will calculate whether this effect is sufficient to explain the dark energy in space. The space field, the waves of space and the space vectors will give physics the place it deserves as an exact science.

The model with the waves of space seems like an enlightenment. It suits every challenge both in quantum theory and in cosmology. It is coherent in every direction, so that the thought imposes itself, that it is right.

THE BIG BANG

The Big Bang hypothesis is based on the idea that the formation of matter was centrifugal. But what if the formation of matter was centripetally? Then perhaps we would not have the mysterious need for space inflation, the Big Bang would have been expanding more and more from the periphery and may still do so today. The space deficit in this periphery could e.g. offer an additional explanation for the enigmatic dark energy. This dark energy is currently unnecessarily worrying the cosmologist.

In addition, the phenomena associated with the Big Bang are also well conceivable, unless a big bang has happened, but when two existing universes, ours and an anti-universe, have crashed into each other. This would e.g. explain why there are so many empty bubbles in the universe. These bubbles were probably created, because here matter could have met directly with antimatter.

Another observation is supposed to have shown that in the cosmos in many places concentric rings of matter up to three in number, which emanate from their own center. In the work of 2014/2 / we have written about cosmological bubbles and resonance waves in the distribution of matter.

In the case of the annular accumulation of matter around a center, the explanation could be that big bang explosions took place in which limited amounts of energy were transferred from the centers into matter, this time centrifugally.

One could imagine that extraterrestrials could have done similar experiments at CERN here. The bubbles in space could also be said to have the same reason, but with the difference that there was an asymmetry towards antimatter. In general, one could build much imaginative but unnecessary speculation in this context.

But it seems to be more important for us to leave things as they are. The experiments in CERN must be ostracized worldwide. Physicists, leave our tiny home earth alone, humanity and life do not need your games with fate! If our explanations for gravitation, for light, for dark energy, for dark matter and much more are correct, we would like to claim that we even saved the world from the clutches of "progress" in the sense of CERN's attempts to have. But the fact that the experiments at CERN have not yet hunted us into "nothingness" can also be seen as a clear indication that the Big Bang hypothesis is wrong. It may be that the physicists want to prove the opposite to us with the CERN experiments, unfortunately, there would be no one who can document this success praising in the case of success.

DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

In 2012, the Nobel Prize for Physics was awarded in half to the Frenchman Serge Haroche. This scientist and his collaborators have trapped light photons in a microresonator and managed to measure these photons without destroying them. It is a pioneering achievement, but it shows us that the uncertainty relation, much discussed in quantum mechanics, can be overcome by a corresponding methodology. In 2014, we defined the uncertainty relation as the inability to use a measurement system in which the observer can measure without interfering in the measured phenomenon / 2 /.

In this context, let us recall the innumerable irrational speculations in the professional world aimed at justifying the alleged role of the observer and, more generally, of human consciousness in the real world. At times, this idea degenerated into such a connection that, in this context, it was or is still assumed that there is a cosmic intelligence that is supposed to shape our consciousness in an orienting way and all the time.

Since Max Planck we realize that there is a quantum world, but obviously we have gotten over time a sometimes sprawling quantum theory that fills the quantum world in part as it is able to explain.

Serge Haroche has locked the light in a microresonator and allowed it to spread 40,000 miles through the space between two mirrors. Technologically, it is now possible that you build a similar resonator, which is many meters long. If the light losses are compensated while mirroring, the light beam from a light source will travel millions of kilometers back and forth through a vacuum. At the end of any runtime, this light beam is usually examined as to whether this light beam has undergone a red shift of its spectrum relative to the reference light beam. The reference light beam is fed directly from the same light source by redirection of the measuring apparatus. With such a measuring technique, the proof could be provided, if at all and how the space itself could cause a red shift of the light spectrum.

Only when this question is satisfactorily resolved can the relationship determined be transferred to space. Until then, all speculations for conditions in space must be approached with caution, from the big bang to the idea of flying apart star clusters.

Using the experimental setup of Serge Haroche, an experiment is proposed here that is used to identify space waves. As the photons are held back in the Haroche microresonator, their space waves continue to propagate unhindered. It is based on the idea that space waves can not be shielded. When the microresonator is placed in front of a double slit, the space waves cause interference on the screen while the photons are being held back. It is appropriate to display this interference in a suitable manner on the screen. For this, the photon wall proposed by us in 2017 can be used in front of the detector / 1 /. There may also be other solutions for a detector that will respond to space waves.

Summary, will be submitted later

references

1. /1/ Petrow, JM (2017) Experiment for the Proof of Spatial Waves, Dt. Patent and Trademark Office, Zweibrückenstraße, Munich, Germany
2. / 2 / Petrow, JM (2014) The Jordan & Jordan Experiment Explaining the Double-Column Trial in Quantum Theory, Dt. Patent and Trademark Office. Zweibrückenstraße, Munich, Germany
3. / 3 / Petrov, JM (1990a). Theory of Microcirculation, Part 1-4: The misinterpretations in Starling's hypothesis of microcirculation. Z. entire inn. Med. 45, H18, 531-535 ,

ANNEX, STATEMENT IN OWN PROPERTY

The story we are talking about began in December 2014. At that time, I was interested in the design and purpose of the large particle accelerator at CERN. I found the best lecture on the internet and caught an author who seemed to have no boundless enthusiasm for the CERN project. Among other things, this author reported that they, the scientists at CERN, are working with energies at the ultimate impact of the protons on each other, which would be quite close to the Big Bang. And in the lecture was announced firm intentions to surpass these energies in the coming years by several times. You have to wake up to this revelation. Very close to the Big Bang was very close, but what if these CERN scholars actually manage to get there !? This question arose because in the environment of the Big Bang everything is irradiated in nothing but energy and there certainly would not be found the longed-for paradise for us humans. Did the physicists go mad?

In the aftermath I had studied the current popular ideas of cosmologists and physicists - about the theory of relativity, about quantum mechanics, in particular the quantum fluctuations, about the big bang anyway, but also about huge dark energy and mysterious dark matter.

I knew it already, but now I have understood even better that the big bang is something where Nothing but energy is and is supposedly the big bang also from a nothing, for which one has chosen in scholarly sense the cute sounding name of the singularity. The likelihood that the big bang will ever take place should have been frighteningly low and vain at the time, but since the waiting time there was infinitely available as a possibility, it happened at some point, the Big Bang as the beginning of everything.

I have also understood that the empty space that surrounds us is tense and bursting with unimaginable amounts of energy. And somehow the thought seemed plausible that this room also contains the possibility to release this energy in a huge explosion. The likelihood of this happening may be diminishing, but, and that's what it's all about here, at CERN, many bright minds are busily working to bring coincidence to fruition. Her work seemed to literally tickle the sleeping devil's stomach, as in a fairy tale.

The research at CERN is a bare reality and it shows a terrible side: From the word usage of the physicists working there, one can conclude that they do not even know what they are getting involved with in these experiments. They hope for the appearance of black holes, sometimes for finding gravitational particles, sometimes for the particles of dark matter. The physicists have no reliable scientific predictions and, above all, proven expectations. Which does not prevent them in the least from trying to teach us how natural and friendly the cosmos with all its powers should be. The powers in the cosmos have somehow brought us humans out, so the plausible explanation, they must therefore also be life-friendly. Here it seems that, for example, trying to wrest something positive from an atomic bomb.

The fact that these cosmic forces can annihilate us human beings in a fraction of a second completely emotionless leaves these physicists out of the question as possible: A struggle of life on earth for millions of years to survive would have been in vain in a matter of seconds. Does the shifted view of the CERN physicists represent a total loss of reality?

The reality with us on earth is a completely different one. Placed on a miniature sphere of the cosmic dimension, we race people through an extremely hostile environment and literally hang on a physical silk thread in the midst of an infinitely empty and extremely cold cosmos. Compared to the earth, a very thin layer of air is our protection and our one and all home and it borders on miracles that we can keep this home determined and unchanged year after year. Specifically related to the earth, the cosmos provides us with remarkably stable conditions.

With this background, the bustle of the physicists at CERN is scary and full of uncertainty. When I shared my fears with a professor of theoretical physics, I elicited only a smile and a slight shrug. The experiment in CERN seems to be the storm forge of our time - who can resist it?

What we all can do is to use ourselves to help solve the challenges that in cosmology and quantum mechanics, out of all theoretical reasoning, root out.

The realization that some ideas in science can be dare and full of inconsistency, I had already experienced once in 1988 when I discovered my new theory about the heart / circulation (published in 1990 in German / 3 /). Just as in cardiology at the time, I now have the feeling that I am standing in front of a shaky building in scientific cosmology. I therefore ask the reader to understand that I am a little unsure and even have fears that I can be 100% right with my remarks.

The reaction of the established in the physics scientific elite is to be seen. When I addressed the elite physiologists with my new theory of circulation in 1992, the sustained response was a silence on my person and my work. A professor working at the University of Aachen very kindly formulated my aspiration that one should "not pee at monuments". The Rostock physiologists responded somewhat choleric - my 1991 submitted PhD thesis is still in the University Archives with the title "not submitted". Twelve years later, in 2004, an elite English physiologist published a scholarly article in the journals plagiarized with my work.

QUOTES INCLUDE IN THE DESCRIPTION

This list of the documents listed by the applicant has been generated automatically and is included solely for the better information of the reader. The list is not part of the German patent or utility model application. The DPMA assumes no liability for any errors or omissions.

Cited non-patent literature

• Petrov, J.M. (2017) Experiment for the detection of space waves, Dt. Patent and Trademark Office, Zweibrückenstraße, Munich, Germany [0121]
• Petrov, J.M. (2014) The Jordan & Jordan Experiment Explaining the Double-Column Experiment in Quantum Theory, Dt. Patent and Trademark Office. Zweibrückenstraße, Munich, Germany [0121]
• Petrov, J.M. (1990a). Theory of Microcirculation, Part 1-4: The misinterpretations in Starling's hypothesis of microcirculation. Z. entire inn. Med. 45, H18, 531-535 [0121]

Claims (3)

A physical double-slit experiment for investigating photon properties, characterized in that a Serge Haroshe microresonator is placed in front of the double slit, and this microresonator appropriately retains the photons fired by the photon gun for a certain time in that microresonator, during which time the photonic space waves become propagate further through the double slit and that on a suitable detector after the double slit, the interference of the space waves triggered by the double slit is visually or electronically displayed or registered. Physical double-slit experiment for the investigation of the photon properties after the Claim 1 , characterized in that after the double slit and in front of the photon detector, a photon curtain of transversely flying photons is installed and that this photon curtain is plane parallel to the detector and the photons of this curtain collide with the detector only when they come in the course of the experiment by an incoming from the double slit effect to be influenced. The experiments are to be carried out with the aim to detect an existing interference of space waves, which precede the retained in the microresonator experimental photons. Physical double-slit experiment for the investigation of the photon properties after the Claim 1 and 2 , characterized in that the test photons are usually fired from a photon gun, wherein the distances between the photon gun, the microresonator and the double slit are to be classified according to the practical conditions to optimum yield. If necessary, experiments should also be carried out in which the experimental photons are intercepted directly at the double slit in a suitable manner and are thereby prevented from passing through the double slit.

Images