CN212077583U - Railway bridge - Google Patents

Abstract

The utility model belongs to the bridge engineering field. The embodiment of the utility model provides a railway bridge, including the roof beam body and a plurality of piers, the pier sets up in the roof beam body below and with the roof beam body connection in order to support the roof beam body; in the vertical direction, the width of each pier along the extension direction of the beam body is a fixed value, and the fixed value and the corresponding height value of the pier are in positive correlation. And adjusting the size of the pier to ensure that the width along the extension direction of the beam body is in positive correlation with the height value of the pier, so that the rigidity along the extension direction of the beam body is basically the same, and the load along the extension direction of the beam body is uniformly borne by all piers.

Description

Railway bridge

Technical Field

The utility model belongs to the bridge engineering field especially relates to a railroad bridge.

Background

With the increasing economic development and technological means, railways are continuously extended to mountainous areas. In the face of the characteristic of complex terrain in mountainous areas, the continuous system bridge is widely applied by virtue of good structural rigidity and economy. Compared with a mountain highway continuous system bridge, the problems that the structural rigidity of a high pier is difficult to meet the requirement and the rigidity matching difficulty of the high pier and the low pier is large are often encountered in the design process of the mountain railway continuous system bridge. In the design of the related high pier of the railway bridge in the mountainous area, a broom-shaped pier is adopted, as shown in fig. 1, the front view of the pier is shown, the broom-shaped pier is divided into two sections in the vertical direction, the width of the pier along the extension direction of a beam body and the width of the pier perpendicular to the extension direction of the beam body are linearly increased from top to bottom, the upper section S1 of the pier is steep in gradient, the lower section S2 is gentle in gradient, the form is just like a broom, the slope is released through the two sections from top to bottom, the bottom section of the pier is greatly improved, the rigidity of the pier is improved, but due to the large size, the workload of concrete is greatly increased, and the construction.

SUMMERY OF THE UTILITY MODEL

In view of this, the embodiment of the utility model provides a railroad bridge to solve mountain area railroad bridge structural rigidity and be difficult to satisfy the technical problem who requires.

For solving the technical problem, the embodiment of the utility model provides a technical scheme is so realized:

the embodiment of the utility model provides a railroad bridge, this railroad bridge includes:

a beam body; a plurality of piers disposed under the girder and connected with the girder to support the girder; in the vertical direction, the width of each pier along the extension direction of the beam body is a fixed value, and the fixed value and the corresponding height value of the pier are in positive correlation, so that the rigidity of each pier along the extension direction of the beam body is basically the same.

Furthermore, the width of each pier along the direction perpendicular to the extension direction of the beam body is increased from top to bottom.

Further, the width of each pier along the direction perpendicular to the extension direction of the beam body is linearly increased from top to bottom according to the slope rate.

Further, different ramp rates may be adopted for different piers.

Further, the plurality of piers includes:

the height difference between any two first piers is less than 5 m;

the height difference between any two second piers is less than 10 meters; the height value of the second pier is larger than that of the first pier, and the height difference is in the range of 45-55 m.

Further, the first pier and the second pier are both hollow piers.

Further, the cross-sectional area, perpendicular to the vertical direction, of the first pier is smaller than the cross-sectional area, perpendicular to the vertical direction, of the second pier.

Further, along the direction of perpendicular the roof beam body extension, the rigidity of first pier is greater than the rigidity of second pier.

Further, the beam body connecting the first pier and the second pier is a continuous beam.

Further, the beam body is a rigid frame continuous beam.

The embodiment of the utility model provides a railway bridge, including the roof beam body and a plurality of piers, the pier sets up in the roof beam body below and with the roof beam body connection in order to support the roof beam body; in the vertical direction, the width of each pier along the extension direction of the beam body is a fixed value, and the fixed value and the corresponding height value of the pier are in positive correlation, so that the rigidity of each pier along the extension direction of the beam body is basically the same. The requirement on the overall rigidity of the railway bridge is far higher than that of a highway bridge, and the required rigidity of the low pier is much higher than that of the high pier due to the height difference of the piers caused by the topography; the embodiment of the utility model provides a size of adjustment pier makes the width along the extending direction of the roof beam body and the high value of pier be positive correlation to make each pier along the rigidity basically the same that the extending direction of the roof beam body required, make the load along the extending direction of the roof beam body evenly undertake jointly by the height pier, thereby reduced the degree of difficulty that mountain area railway bridge structural rigidity meets the demands.

Drawings

In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings needed to be used in the embodiments will be briefly described below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious for those skilled in the art to obtain other drawings without creative efforts.

FIG. 1 is a front view of a broom-shaped pier commonly used for railroad bridges;

fig. 2 is a schematic structural diagram of a railroad bridge according to an embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 3 is a front view of a pier of a railroad bridge provided by an embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 4a is a schematic view of a basic structure of a railroad bridge according to an embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 4b is a schematic view of another basic structure of a railroad bridge according to an embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 4c is a schematic view of another basic structure of a railroad bridge according to an embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 5 is a side view of a pier of a railroad bridge according to an embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 6 is a side view of another bridge pier of a railroad bridge according to an embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 7 is a cross-sectional view of a pier of a railroad bridge according to an embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 8 is a cross-sectional view of another pier of a railroad bridge according to an embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 9 is a cross-sectional view of another pier of a railroad bridge according to an embodiment of the present invention;

description of reference numerals:

1. a beam body; 2. a bridge pier; 21. a first bridge pier; 211. a first pier; 212. a second bridge pier; 22. a second bridge pier; 221. a first bridge pier; 222. a second bridge pier; 223. a third second bridge pier; 201. the bottom of the pier; 202. jacking a pier; 3. a foundation; 31. foundation piles; 32. a bearing platform; H. the height of a pier; l1, the width of the pier 2 in the extending direction of the beam 1; l101, the width of the first pier 21 in the extending direction of the beam 1; l102, the width of the second pier 22 in the extending direction of the beam 1; l2, width in a direction perpendicular to the beam extension; l210, the width of the pier bottom 21 in the direction perpendicular to the extension of the beam; l220, the width of the pier coping 22 in the direction perpendicular to the extension direction of the beam body; A. a flat slope section; B. a steep slope section; C. a low concave section; D. steep slope section

Detailed Description

In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present invention more clearly understood, the present invention is further described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not intended to limit the invention.

The individual features described in the embodiments can be combined in any suitable manner without departing from the scope, for example different embodiments and aspects can be formed by combining different features. In order to avoid unnecessary repetition, various combinations of the specific features of the present invention are not described separately.

In the following description, references to the terms "first", "second", and the like are simply to distinguish between different objects and do not denote the same or a relationship between the two. It should be understood that the references to "above" and "below" are to be interpreted as referring to the orientation during normal use. The extending direction of the girder, i.e., the direction in which the size of the girder is the largest, and the cross section of the pier means a section perpendicular to the extending direction of the girder.

It should be noted that the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrase "comprising an … …" does not exclude the presence of other like elements in a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises the element.

The embodiment of the utility model provides a railway bridge can be applied to the bridge engineering field, because the requirement of railway bridge bulk stiffness is far greater than public road bridge roof beam, and the relief reason pier has the difference in height, therefore the not pier of co-altitude influences the difference to the rigidity of bridge. The size of the pier and the structure of the beam body are adjusted, so that the rigidity required by each pier is basically the same, and the load along the extension direction of the beam body can be uniformly borne by the high pier and the low pier together.

As shown in fig. 2, the railroad bridge includes a girder 1 and a plurality of piers 2, the piers 2 are located below the girder 1 and connected to the girder 1, the girder 1 serves as a running surface of a train, and the piers 2 support the girder 1. As shown in fig. 3, a front view of the bridge piers 2, that is, in fig. 2, when the width L1 of each bridge pier 2 in the extending direction of the beam body 1 is a constant value and the constant value L1 of the width is in a positive correlation with the height H of the corresponding bridge pier 2 when viewed from the outside to the inside, that is, when the bridge height of the first bridge pier 21 is smaller than the bridge height of the second pier 22 among the bridge piers 2, the width of the second pier 22 in the extending direction of the beam body 1 is larger than the width of the first pier 21. In the railway bridge, under the condition that the width values of the piers in the extending direction of the beam body are the same, the higher the height of the piers is, the larger the bending moment of the bottom 201 of the pier generated by the same shearing force is, and the larger the horizontal displacement of the top 202 of the pier is, the smaller the rigidity of the piers is. Therefore, in order to enhance the structural integrity of the railroad bridge, in the plurality of piers 2, the width of the second pier 22 in the extending direction of the girder 1 is greater than the width of the second pier 22, so that the difference of the rigidity of the whole bridge structure in the extending direction of the girder 1 due to the heights of the piers can be reduced, and the rigidity of each pier 2 in the extending direction of the girder 1 is substantially the same.

In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 2, the railroad bridge further includes a foundation 3, the pier 2 transfers the load borne by the girder 1 to the foundation 3, and the foundation 3 transfers the load borne to the foundation. The foundation 3 can adopt a pile foundation, a well digging foundation, an enlarged foundation and the like as required.

In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 4a, the foundation 3 is a pile foundation consisting of a plurality of foundation piles 31 driven or sunk into the soil and a cap 32 connecting the piers. The external force is distributed to each foundation pile 31 through the bearing platform 32, and then the force is transmitted to the surrounding soil and deep soil through the foundation piles 31, belongs to a deep foundation, and is suitable for deep and thick soil. Among all deep foundations, the pile foundation has the advantages of being the lightest in structure, high in construction mechanization degree, fast in construction progress and the like, and is an economical foundation structure.

In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 4b, the foundation 3 is a well-digging foundation, which is an old and common deep foundation type, and has the advantages of high rigidity and good stability. Compared with a pile foundation, the bridge has the advantages of slight deflection under the action of load, better seismic performance and particular suitability for bridges which have higher requirements on the bearing capacity of the foundation and are sensitive to deflection of the foundation.

In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 4c, the foundation 3 is an enlarged foundation, i.e. a massive solid foundation built by rock or concrete, and the embedding depth can be shallower than that of other types of foundations, and the structure is simple. Because the material used cannot bear large tensile stress, the thickness-width ratio of the foundation needs to be large enough to form a rigid foundation without flexural deformation when stressed. In order to save material, the vertical surface of the foundation is usually built into a step shape.

As shown in fig. 5, the pier 2 is in a side view, that is, the width L2 in a direction perpendicular to the direction in which the beam extends increases from top to bottom when viewed from left to right or from right to left in fig. 2. In order to increase the rigidity and the bearing capacity of the bridge, the width L210 of the bridge bottom 21 in the direction perpendicular to the extension direction of the bridge body is greater than the width L220 of the bridge pier top in the direction perpendicular to the extension direction of the bridge body, so that the cross-sectional area of the bridge bottom 21 parallel to the bridge body 1 is greater than that of the bridge pier top 22.

The width L2 of the pier 2 in the direction in which the vertical girder 1 extends increases linearly from top to bottom according to a gradient rate. In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 6, which is a side view of the bridge pier 2, the width of the bridge pier 2 in the direction perpendicular to the extension direction of the beam 1 is increased by two different slope rates from top to bottom in the vertical direction, the upper section S1 of the bridge pier has a steep slope, and the lower section S2 of the bridge pier has a gentle slope, and the bottom section of the bridge pier is greatly increased by two slope steps from top to bottom, so as to improve the rigidity of the bridge pier. Preferably, as shown in fig. 5, the width L2 of the pier 2 along the direction in which the vertical beam 1 extends increases linearly from top to bottom at the same slope rate, that is, the pier 2 is a straight slope pier with a unidirectional slope, and the straight slope pier has the advantages of small volume, small construction difficulty and beautiful appearance.

In some embodiments, the slope rate of the bridge piers 2 is in a range of 40: 1-70: 1, and the bridge piers 2 with different pier heights H can adopt a uniform slope rate in the slope rate range, and can also adopt different slope rates according to requirements. According to the terrain requirement, the second pier 22 is higher in pier height H than the first pier 21 and is designed in the region, farthest from the foundation, of the beam body 1, the rigidity of the second pier 22 is smaller, in order to increase the rigidity, a smaller slope rate in a slope rate range can be adopted, in order to increase the rigidity, the rigidity of the first pier 21 is larger, and in order to increase the consistency of the rigidity of the whole bridge structure, a larger slope rate in the slope rate range can be adopted. The bridge piers 2 have a slope rate in the direction perpendicular to the extension direction of the beam body from top to bottom, the rigidity of the bridge perpendicular to the extension direction of the beam body is influenced, the bridge is similar to a cantilever beam in the direction perpendicular to the extension direction of the bridge, the transverse rigidity of the bridge is low, the rigidity of the bridge perpendicular to the extension direction of the beam body is lower due to the narrower span of the railway bridge, the slope rate of the first bridge pier 21 is a key point influencing the rigidity of the direction perpendicular to the extension direction of the beam body, and the slope rate of the second bridge pier can be consistent with that of the first bridge pier.

Due to the terrain, the height H of each pier 2 can be different, and the height difference of piers 2 of the same type (such as between a plurality of first piers or between a plurality of second piers) is within a certain range, so that the consistency of the whole bridge structure and the running stability of a train can be ensured. Specifically, the difference between the height values of any two first piers 21 is less than 5 meters, and the difference between the height values of any two second piers 22 is less than 10 meters. For the piers 2 of different types, specifically, the height value of the second pier 22 is larger than that of the first pier 21, and the height difference is in the range of 45 meters to 55 meters, so that the consistency of the whole bridge structure can be ensured, and the whole rigidity required by train running can be achieved.

The first pier 21 and the second pier 22 are both hollow piers. In the design of the bridge, the pier 2 has the difference of solid and hollow, the pier with the pier height H of 3-15 m is a solid pier, and the pier with the pier height H of more than 20 m is a hollow pier. The utility model provides an among the railroad bridge, pier 2's high H all is greater than 20 meters, therefore first pier 21 and second pier 22 adopt hollow mound, and hollow mound has that the sectional area is little, the dead weight is light and structural rigidity advantage such as good, utilizes reinforcing bar + concrete's mode to fill the pier, just so makes the firm and durable more of pier to the cost also can obtain corresponding reduction.

As shown in fig. 7 and 8, the cross-sectional area perpendicular to the vertical direction of the first pier 21 is smaller than the cross-sectional area perpendicular to the vertical direction of the second pier 22. In a bridge construction, when piers have the same cross-sectional area, the smaller the height of the pier is, the greater the rigidity thereof is, and the pier with the greater rigidity needs to bear a greater external load. Since the height of the first pier 21 is smaller than the height of the second pier 22, the cross-sectional area of the first pier 21 needs to be reduced, and the cross-sectional area of the second pier 22 needs to be increased. The width L2 of the pier 2 perpendicular to the direction in which the girder extends is limited by the conditions of the cross-sectional area of the pier 2 perpendicular to the vertical direction and the width L1 of the pier 2 in the direction in which the girder 1 extends, and the cross-sectional area of the pier 2 perpendicular to the vertical direction is adjusted by adjusting the width L2 of the pier 2 perpendicular to the direction in which the girder extends, so that the bearing capacity of the pier 2 is adjusted, and the pier 2 has sufficient safety.

In some embodiments, the influence of the wall thickness of the pier 2 on the pier rigidity is small, but the stress state of the pier can be influenced, and the cross-sectional area of the pier 2 perpendicular to the vertical direction can be adjusted by adjusting the wall thickness of the pier 2.

In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 9, the pier 2 may have a rectangular cross-section perpendicular to the vertical direction, which has the advantages of saving concrete masonry and being simple and easy to construct, but is disposed in a place where water is present, and has a large resistance to water and is easily washed away. Therefore, the section of the pier 2 perpendicular to the vertical direction is in a rectangular section with a chamfer angle, and the section is suitable for water-free or positions close to the bank where the flow velocity of water flow is small and mountain areas cross valleys.

In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 7, the shape of the cross section of the pier 2 perpendicular to the vertical direction may be a round-ended cross section, that is, the middle of the cross section is rectangular, and two ends are respectively provided with an arc, so that the pier is suitable for a region with water, can enable water to smoothly pass through the pier, can reduce scouring and pressure of flowing water, and is a commonly used pier.

Since a bridge is similar to a cantilever beam in the direction perpendicular to the extending direction of the bridge, in the bridge construction, the pier with the smaller height has the larger rigidity in the direction perpendicular to the extending direction of the bridge, so that the rigidity of the first pier 21 perpendicular to the extending direction of the bridge is larger than that of the second pier 22 perpendicular to the extending direction of the bridge.

The continuous beam has good structural rigidity without an expansion joint, and in order to fully utilize the rigidity of the first pier 21 perpendicular to the extending direction of the bridge, the first pier 21 and the second pier 22 can be connected by using the continuous beam body 1, so that the first pier 21 and the second pier 22 can jointly play a role, and the rigidity of the whole bridge perpendicular to the extending direction of the bridge is improved. The two ends of the girder 1 in the extending direction of the girder 1 may have expansion joints, and the bridge connected to the piers other than the first pier 21 and the second pier 22 is not limited to a continuous girder.

The beam body 1 of the continuous system bridge can be a rigid frame continuous beam body, the beam body 1 of the rigid frame continuous bridge is continuous without an expansion joint, so that a train can smoothly run, the connection mode of the bridge pier 2 and the beam body 1 is consolidation, a large support is not arranged, expensive cost is saved, and construction is facilitated. The continuous rigid frame bridge has great bending rigidity in the forward direction and great torsional rigidity in the transverse direction, can well meet the stress requirement of large span, has more reasonable internal force distribution, reasonably selects the rigidity of the pier, can effectively reduce the bending moment in the main beam, and is favorable for increasing the span.

In some embodiments, the continuous system bridge can be a cable-stayed bridge of a tower beam pier consolidation system, namely a beam body, a tower column and a pier are consolidated to form a rigid frame system of a multipoint elastic support, a large support is not arranged, expensive cost is saved, the integral rigidity of the structure is high, and the deflection of the beam body is reduced.

In some embodiments, as shown in fig. 2, the mountain railway often has large topographic relief, the distance between the line beam body 1 at the section a and the foundation is less than that between the line beam body 1 at the section C and the foundation, the section a is a flat slope section, the section C is a low concave section, the section B, D is a steep slope section, the section B, D is not suitable for being provided with too many piers, but at least one pier is provided.

In some embodiments, in order to reduce the influence of the piers 2 with different heights on the overall rigidity of the bridge, the beam bodies in the range of B, C, D are arranged into a combined rigid frame continuous beam. The rigid frame continuous beam body 11 of the railway bridge is fixedly connected with a plurality of piers 2, wherein the rigid frame continuous beam body comprises 2 first piers 21: first pier 211 and second pier 212; 3 second bridge piers 22: first second pier 221, second pier 222 and third second pier 223 are rigid frame continuous bridges with six holes.

Specifically, the height H1 of the first pier 211 and the second pier 212 is 70.5m, the width L101 in the extending direction of the beam body 1 is 5.0m, the wall thickness is 1.3, the section width L220 of the pier top 202 perpendicular to the extending direction of the beam body 1 is 10.5m, and the outer contour of the first pier 21 is 40:1 slope rate linear change, inner contour according to 100: the slope rate is 1, the section width L210 of the pier bottom 201 perpendicular to the extending direction of the beam body 1 is 14.025m, and the wall thickness of the first pier 21 perpendicular to the extending direction of the beam body is changed from 1.0m to 1.923m from top to bottom.

Specifically, the pier heights H2 of the first second pier 221, the second pier 222 and the third second pier 223 are 122m, 122m and 124m respectively, the width L102 in the extending direction of the beam body 1 is a fixed value of 8.5m, the wall thickness is 1.2, the section width L220 of the pier top 202 perpendicular to the extending direction of the beam body 1 is 10.5m, and the outer contour of the second pier 22 is 40:1 slope rate linear change, inner contour according to 100: the slope rate is changed linearly, the section widths L210 of the pier bottom 201 perpendicular to the extending direction of the beam body 1 are respectively 16.6m, 16.6m and 16.7m, and the wall thickness of the second pier 22 perpendicular to the extending direction of the beam body is changed from 1.0m to 2.695m, 2.695m and 2.725m from top to bottom.

The railway bridge is subjected to bridge forming simulation, the structural rigidity along the extension direction of the bridge body 1 is 3141.3KN/m, and the rigidities of the first pier 211, the second pier 212, the first pier 221, the second pier 222 and the third pier 223 along the extension direction of the bridge body 1 are 656.1kN/m, 631.5kN/m, 628.4kN/m, 600.7kN/m and 624.6kN/m in sequence. Under the action of load and self gravity, the plurality of piers 2 basically have consistent contributions to the bearing capacity and rigidity of the structure along the extension direction of the beam body 1. First pier 211, No. two first piers 212, No. one second pier 221, No. two second pier 222 and No. three second pier 223 are along the contribution of the perpendicular to roof beam body 1 extending direction rigidity in proper order: 30%, 13%, 12% and 32%. Under the action of load and self gravity, first pier 211 and second pier 212 contribute more than 60% to the bearing capacity and rigidity of the structure along the direction perpendicular to the extension direction of beam body 1.

The above description is only exemplary of the present invention and should not be taken as limiting the scope of the present invention, as any modifications, equivalents, improvements and the like made within the spirit and principles of the present invention are intended to be included within the scope of the present invention.

Claims (10)

1. A railroad bridge, comprising:

a beam body;

a plurality of piers disposed under the girder and connected with the girder to support the girder; in the vertical direction, the width of each pier along the extension direction of the beam body is a fixed value, and the fixed value and the corresponding height value of the pier are in positive correlation, so that the rigidity of each pier along the extension direction of the beam body is basically the same.

2. The railroad bridge of claim 1, wherein each of the piers increases in width from top to bottom in a direction perpendicular to a direction in which the girder extends.

3. The railroad bridge of claim 2, wherein the width of each pier along a direction perpendicular to the extension direction of the girder increases linearly from top to bottom according to a slope rate.

4. The railroad bridge of claim 3, wherein different ramp rates are available for different ones of the piers.

5. The railroad bridge of claim 1, wherein the plurality of piers comprises:

the height difference between any two first piers is less than 5 m;

the height difference between any two second piers is less than 10 meters; the height value of the second pier is larger than that of the first pier, and the height difference is in the range of 45-55 m.

6. The railroad bridge of claim 5, wherein the first pier and the second pier are both hollow piers.

7. The railroad bridge of claim 6, wherein a cross-sectional area perpendicular to the vertical direction of the first pier is smaller than a cross-sectional area perpendicular to the vertical direction of the second pier.

8. The railroad bridge of claim 5, wherein the first pier has a stiffness greater than a stiffness of the second pier in a direction perpendicular to an extension of the beam.

9. The railroad bridge of claim 5, wherein the beam body connecting the first pier and the second pier is a continuous beam.

10. The railroad bridge of claim 9, wherein the beam body is a rigid frame continuous beam.

Images