CN1881863A - Apparatus and method for confirming re-transmission policy in arrangement - Google Patents
Apparatus and method for confirming re-transmission policy in arrangement Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN1881863A CN1881863A CN 200510076666 CN200510076666A CN1881863A CN 1881863 A CN1881863 A CN 1881863A CN 200510076666 CN200510076666 CN 200510076666 CN 200510076666 A CN200510076666 A CN 200510076666A CN 1881863 A CN1881863 A CN 1881863A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- message
- retransmission
- last item
- negotiation
- retransmit
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Communication Control (AREA)
- Data Exchanges In Wide-Area Networks (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a device and relative method for confirming the consulted retransmit strategy, wherein said device comprises: an input device, a retransmit account device, a timing decider, a report analyzer and an output device; can received the report; the retransmit account device is used to store the send times of one report; the timing decider is used to execute one retransmit service in an appointed time space; the report analyzer is used to analyze if the received report meets the retransmit condition; the output device outputs the judge result of retransmission; and the timing decider and the report analyzer are matched with the retransmit account device to decide the judged result. The invention can add the retransmissions without affecting the safety, to improve the consult success.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to network communication field, specifically, the present invention is the method and apparatus of the re-transmission policy in a kind of definite negotiation.
Background technology
Along with the extensive use of IP agreement, the safety of IP protocol network becomes the problem that people pay close attention to gradually.The IP agreement itself is the agreement of an opening, does not comprise security feature.IP expressly wraps in the transmission course, may be distorted, eavesdrop, forge, and its fail safe is subjected to serious threat.
IPsec (IP Secunty) is the security mechanism on the IP layer, the IP packet is provided protections such as confidentiality, integrality, anti-playback.Security association SA (Security Association) is that IPsec protects employed strategy set to packet, comprises employed confidentiality and integrity algorithm, key etc.
The SA of IPsec can also can be set up by automatic negotiation by manual configuration.Usually, the automatic negotiation of IPsec SA is to use IKE (Internet Key Exchange) to finish.IKE carries out two-way authentication, and interchange key information negotiates IPsec SA.
The negotiation of IKE is divided into two stages: phase I and second stage.Phase I is used for setting up the passage of a safety between the both sides of communication, protect follow-up negotiation.The second stage phase I carries out after consulting successfully, is used to consult IPsec SA.
In order to improve the reliability of ike negotiation, the transmission of message has retransmission mechanism.In three RFC documents (RFC2408 ISAKMP, RFC2409 IKE, RFC2412 OAKLEY) of IKE, OAKLEY has stipulated " re-transmission, overtime and error message ".Wherein mentioned, if the sender does not obtain recipient's response in the time that allows, then message will the person of being sent out be retransmitted, the following a piece of news of correspondence in receiving agreement.In addition, in " error message ", it is that swap time is long that regulation has TIMEOUT, implication, the state collapse; Also stipulated AUTHENTICATION_FAILURE, implication is signature or hash function failure.The number of times that explanation retransmits to the regulation of these two kinds of error messages is limited, can cause the failure consulted to the failure of the authentication of message and completeness check in addition.
According to above-mentioned content, existing retransmission mechanism is as described below:
After if one message sends, within the regular hour, do not receive the message of response, will retransmit this message.Reach maximum times (a predefined fixed value) if retransmit, then consulted and to fail, finish negotiation state.Before reaching maximum retransmission, if can receive the corresponding back message using of the other side, then finish to retransmit, consult to proceed.But, if before reaching maximum retransmission, received a message, and this message not a legal message (there are some mistake in header or text), then consultation meeting stops.
The reason that illegal message produces has multiple, may be that the processing of opposite end is wrong, may be in the message transmission procedure because the network environment problem causes message destroyed, and also may be has the third party deliberately to distort or implement to disturb.Above-mentioned various situations are adopted the termination negotiation method without exception, no doubt can not influence fail safe, but some negotiations that originally can finish also are through with at this point.In addition, the last item message can not retransmit on one's own initiative, only sends once, and thinks that the other side can receive this message.If the other side is for a certain reason, can not receive this message, this side who receives the last item message can't finish the negotiation flow process, consult failure after reaching maximum retransmission.
According to above analysis, there are some problems in existing retransmission mechanism, makes the both sides that consult can not consult success under some situations that originally can continue to consult.
Summary of the invention
The present invention proposes the equipment and the method for the re-transmission policy in a kind of definite negotiation, determined the new principle that retransmits, and enlarge the scene that retransmits according to new principle.
The new principle that retransmits is: do not receive the message that need receive, and fail to determine that the other side has not possessed the ability that continues negotiation, at this moment retransmit.
So-called " message that need receive " is meant according to agreement, after local terminal sends a message, and the message that the other side should respond.So-called " not receiving the message that need receive " is meant and do not receive message in the regular hour, or received the other side's re-transmission message, or received illegal message.So-called " failing to determine " is meant whether the negotiation state of not knowing the other side within the regular hour finishes, and thinks that in this case the other side still can hold consultation.Still can not finish negotiation if passed through the regular hour, have mistake in the legal message of perhaps receiving, think that then the other side has not possessed the ability that continues negotiation from the other side.
According to the new principle that retransmits, the re-transmission scene of expansion comprises:
● when receiving a message, be an illegal message, can not stop consulting, receive that not any message handles, continue just to retransmit every the regular hour but be used as if judge this.
● sending one of the last item message can consult not stopping at once, but waits for a period of time, and can respond the other side's message in during this period of time, and this section stand-by period can think that the other side has received the last item message after finishing.
The equipment of the re-transmission policy in definite negotiation of the present invention comprises: input unit, retransmission count device, timing determination device, message analyzing device and output device;
Described input unit is used to receive the message that local terminal is received;
Described retransmission count device is used to deposit the number of times that a certain message sent;
Described timing determination device is used for carrying out a re-transmission task through a designated time intervals decision;
Described message analyzing device is used to analyze the condition whether message that local terminal receives meets re-transmission;
Described output device is used to export whether need the judged result that retransmits;
Described timing determination device and described message analyzing device all need and the acting in conjunction of described retransmission count device, with the result of decision judgement.
Described timing determination device and described retransmission count device acting in conjunction decision judged result is specifically: regularly determination device determines according to the state of retransmission count device whether needs are proceeded to retransmit after through a retransmission time interval.
Described several message analyzing device and described retransmission count device acting in conjunction decision judged result is specifically: message analyzing device is when judging that a message meets the condition that local terminal responds, and the state according to the retransmission count device determines whether needs are proceeded to retransmit again.
The method of the re-transmission policy in definite negotiation of the present invention may further comprise the steps:
The first step is determined local terminal maximum retransmission and retransmission time interval, and local terminal sends a message to the opposite end;
In second step,, then retransmit according to the retransmission time interval of determining if do not receive any message that send the opposite end, do not receive message or legal message yet if reach maximum retransmission, think that then the other side does not possess the ability that continues negotiation, handle, finish negotiation state according to consulting failure;
The 3rd step, if receive the message that send the opposite end, judge whether this message is the re-transmission message of opposite end, if the re-transmission message of opposite end just retransmits corresponding last message, re-transmission will be subjected to the restriction of maximum retransmission; Otherwise changeed for the 4th step;
The 5th step, judge whether the message of sending described opposite end is legal, if it is illegal, then retransmit according to the retransmission time interval of determining, do not receive message or legal message yet if reach maximum retransmission, think that then the other side does not possess the ability that continues negotiation, handle, finish negotiation state according to consulting failure;
In the 6th step, after sending the last item message, a side who sends the last item message finishes to consult.
Described the 6th step also comprises following processing procedure after a side who sends the last item message is sending the last item message: wait for a period of time, if a side who sends the last item message is after sending the last item message, number of retransmissions reaches maximum restriction in the time of waiting for, think that the other side can't receive the last item message, finish negotiation state according to the processing of the merit of failing to consultations; If a side who sends the last item message is after sending the last item message, number of retransmissions does not reach maximum restriction in the time of wait, thinks that then the other side has handled the last item message, can finish negotiation state by consulting successful processing.
The described stand-by period can be set to be no less than opposite end retransmission time interval for the first time.
Judging in described the 5th step that the message sent described opposite end is whether legal specifically comprises: whether header content is legal, whether the summation of the length of appointment is consistent in total length and each load head length territory of message after the deciphering, and whether the hashed value in the HASH load is correct.
The present invention proposes a kind of new principle that retransmits in negotiation, according to this principle, under the prerequisite that does not influence fail safe, the scene that can retransmit has increased, and has therefore increased the negotiation probability of successful, has improved the robustness of system.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is the re-transmission policy flow chart during the present invention consults;
Fig. 2 (a)-(f) is the re-transmission policy schematic diagram of masters in IKE second stage of the present invention (using three messages) negotiation;
Fig. 3 (a)-(c) is the re-transmission policy schematic diagram of passive side in IKE second stage of the present invention (using three messages) negotiation;
Fig. 4 is the equipment schematic that the present invention determines re-transmission policy.
Embodiment
The equipment of the re-transmission policy during as shown in Figure 4, the present invention determines to consult comprises following several means:
● input unit is used to receive the message that local terminal is received.
● the retransmission count device is used to deposit the number of times that a certain message sent.
● the timing determination device is used for carrying out a re-transmission task through a designated time intervals decision.
● message analyzing device is used to analyze the condition whether message that local terminal receives meets re-transmission.Message analyzing device is a most important device in this equipment, and it judges that the method whether message meets retransmission condition meets the re-transmission scene that enlarges according to the new principle that retransmits.
● whether output device, being used to export needs the judged result that retransmits.
Regularly determination device and message analyzing device all need and the acting in conjunction of retransmission count device, with the result of decision judgement.Regularly determination device will determine whether needs continue to retransmit according to the state of retransmission count device after through a retransmission time interval.Message analyzing device should determine also whether needs are proceeded to retransmit according to the state of retransmission count device when judging that a message meets the condition that local terminal responds.Therefore determine jointly specific to the judgement of a re-transmission policy, or by timing determination device and retransmission count device, or determine jointly by message analyzing device and retransmission count device.
As shown in Figure 1, the present invention specifically may further comprise the steps:
The first, determine a maximum retransmission and a rule of calculating retransmission time interval, under the situation of not receiving any message, the retransmission time interval of determining according to rule retransmits, up to reaching maximum retransmission.Reach maximum retransmission, think that then the other side does not possess the ability that continues negotiation, handle, finish negotiation state according to consulting failure.
The second, receiving under the situation of message determine whether this message is the other side's re-transmission message, if the other side retransmits message, just retransmitting corresponding last message, re-transmission will be subjected to the restriction of maximum retransmission.
The 3rd, under the situation of receiving the re-transmission message that message and definite this message are not the other side, judge the legitimacy of message, if it is illegal, treat as and do not receive this message, be similar to step 2 and carry out retransmission process, re-transmission will be subjected to the restriction of maximum retransmission.
The 4th, a side who sends the last item message finishes to consult after sending the last item message.
The 4th above-mentioned step can be improved, take following a kind of passive re-transmission policy: a side who sends the last item message is after sending the last item message, do not finish negotiation state immediately, but wait for a period of time, if the other side has sent the re-transmission message during this period of time, then local terminal is responded the corresponding retransmission message, and this re-transmission will be subjected to the restriction of maximum retransmission.This is because the last item message may not received in the opposite end, if the last item message is not received in the opposite end, then consults not finish, and the opposite end has the ability to continue to consult.If a side who sends the last item message is after sending the last item message, number of retransmissions reaches maximum restriction in the time of wait, thinks that the other side can't receive the last item message of local terminal, should finish negotiation state according to the processing of the merit of failing to consultations; If a side who sends the last item message is after sending the last item message, number of retransmissions does not reach maximum restriction in the time of wait, thinks that then the other side has handled the last item message, can finish negotiation state by consulting successful processing.When local terminal when sending a side of the last item message, the stand-by period that sends the last item message belongs to local policy, but should be advisable to be no less than the opposite end retransmission time interval first time, do not receive under the situation of local terminal the last item message in the opposite end that like this local terminal can receive the re-transmission message of opposite end as far as possible.Because the opposite end can take different re-transmission policies, we only need to consider the re-transmission characteristics of known realization, and it is just passable to get a suitable stand-by period.
Be described in further detail below in conjunction with the enforcement of accompanying drawing, provided an embodiment here technical scheme of the present invention:
The IKE agreement is that IPSEC consults IPSEC SA, and wherein second stage has three or four messages in consulting.The re-transmission policy of employing is described by the situation of consulting three messages of use below.
Concerning the initiator:
● the initiator sends article one message.If in retransmission time interval, do not receive the second message, then can retransmit article one message, up to reaching maximum retransmission.Shown in Fig. 2 (a).The re-transmission of any message reaches maximum times, all will make to consult failure, finishes negotiation state.
● if the initiator has received a message, check then whether it is legal, comprise whether header content is legal, whether the summation of the length of appointment is consistent in total length and each load head length territory of the message after the deciphering, and whether the hashed value in the HASH load is correct or the like.If illegal, then treat as and do not receive the second message, continue to retransmit article one message, up to reaching maximum retransmission.Shown in Fig. 2 (d).If message is legal, then carry out corresponding subsequent processing, to the wrong and faultless situation of message, respectively shown in Fig. 2 (b) and Fig. 2 (c).
● if the initiator can send the 3rd message, then adds a task of timer simultaneously, makes the negotiation state normal termination after waiting for a period of time.During this period of time,, then under the restriction of maximum retransmission, retransmit the 3rd message, before retransmitting, need to check the legitimacy of the second message of re-transmission certainly if the other side has retransmitted the second message.Shown in Fig. 2 (e), Fig. 2 (f).
Concerning the side of response:
● receive article one message.If it is illegal to be checked through article one message, though or legal wrong, then consult failure, finish negotiation state.Shown in Fig. 3 (a).If receive legal and faultless article one message, then send the second message.Shown in Fig. 3 (b).
If ● in retransmission time interval, do not receive the 3rd message, then retransmit the second message, up to reaching maximum retransmission.Shown in Fig. 3 (c).
If ● in retransmission time interval, receive legal and faultless the 3rd message, then consulted successfully, finished negotiation state.
The IKE Aggressive Mode has three messages, and its re-transmission policy that adopts is similar to above-mentioned steps.
If response side sends the last item message (using the situation of four messages or IKE phase I holotype such as the IKE second stage) of agreement, the wait of then sending subsequently after the message appears at response side, and remaining processing and above-mentioned steps are similar.
Claims (7)
1. an equipment of determining the re-transmission policy in the negotiation is characterized in that described equipment comprises: input unit, retransmission count device, timing determination device, message analyzing device and output device;
Described input unit is used to receive the message that local terminal is received;
Described retransmission count device is used to deposit the number of times that a certain message sent;
Described timing determination device is used for carrying out a re-transmission task through a designated time intervals decision;
Described message analyzing device is used to analyze the condition whether message that local terminal receives meets re-transmission;
Described output device is used to export whether need the judged result that retransmits;
Described timing determination device and described message analyzing device all need and the acting in conjunction of described retransmission count device, with the result of decision judgement.
2. equipment as claimed in claim 1, it is characterized in that, described timing determination device and described retransmission count device acting in conjunction decision judged result is specifically: regularly determination device determines according to the state of retransmission count device whether needs are proceeded to retransmit after through a retransmission time interval.
3. equipment as claimed in claim 1, it is characterized in that described several message analyzing device and described retransmission count device acting in conjunction decision judged result specifically: message analyzing device is when judging that a message meets the condition that local terminal responds, and the state according to the retransmission count device determines whether needs are proceeded to retransmit again.
4. a method of determining the re-transmission policy in the negotiation is characterized in that, said method comprising the steps of:
The first step is determined local terminal maximum retransmission and retransmission time interval, and local terminal sends a message to the opposite end;
In second step,, then retransmit according to the retransmission time interval of determining if do not receive any message that send the opposite end, do not receive message or legal message yet if reach maximum retransmission, think that then the other side does not possess the ability that continues negotiation, handle, finish negotiation state according to consulting failure;
The 3rd step, if receive the message that send the opposite end, judge whether this message is the re-transmission message of opposite end, if the re-transmission message of opposite end just retransmits corresponding last message, re-transmission will be subjected to the restriction of maximum retransmission; Otherwise changeed for the 4th step;
The 5th step, judge whether the message of sending described opposite end is legal, if it is illegal, then retransmit according to the retransmission time interval of determining, do not receive message or legal message yet if reach maximum retransmission, think that then the other side does not possess the ability that continues negotiation, handle, finish negotiation state according to consulting failure;
In the 6th step, after sending the last item message, a side who sends the last item message finishes to consult.
5. method as claimed in claim 4, it is characterized in that, described the 6th step also comprises following processing procedure after a side who sends the last item message is sending the last item message: wait for a period of time, if a side who sends the last item message is after sending the last item message, number of retransmissions reaches maximum restriction in the time of waiting for, think that the other side can't receive the last item message, finish negotiation state according to the processing of the merit of failing to consultations; If a side who sends the last item message is after sending the last item message, number of retransmissions does not reach maximum restriction in the time of wait, thinks that then the other side has handled the last item message, can finish negotiation state by consulting successful processing.
6. method as claimed in claim 5 is characterized in that, the described stand-by period can be set to be no less than opposite end retransmission time interval for the first time.
7. as claim 4 or 5 described methods, it is characterized in that, judging in described the 5th step that the message sent described opposite end is whether legal specifically comprises: whether header content is legal, whether the summation of the length of appointment is consistent in total length and each load head length territory of message after the deciphering, and whether the hashed value in the HASH load is correct.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNB2005100766666A CN100512086C (en) | 2005-06-13 | 2005-06-13 | Apparatus and method for confirming re-transmission policy in arrangement |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNB2005100766666A CN100512086C (en) | 2005-06-13 | 2005-06-13 | Apparatus and method for confirming re-transmission policy in arrangement |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN1881863A true CN1881863A (en) | 2006-12-20 |
| CN100512086C CN100512086C (en) | 2009-07-08 |
Family
ID=37519858
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CNB2005100766666A Expired - Fee Related CN100512086C (en) | 2005-06-13 | 2005-06-13 | Apparatus and method for confirming re-transmission policy in arrangement |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN100512086C (en) |
Cited By (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2008025232A1 (en) * | 2006-08-22 | 2008-03-06 | Zte Corporation | A repeat control method in enhanced uplink asynchronous hybrid automatic repeat request |
| CN101247326B (en) * | 2007-02-16 | 2012-02-08 | 瑞昱半导体股份有限公司 | Wireless transmission device and correlated method |
| CN101359968B (en) * | 2007-07-31 | 2012-07-04 | 三星电子株式会社 | Apparatus and method for setting timer and counter in mobile communication system |
| CN102868522A (en) * | 2012-09-12 | 2013-01-09 | 汉柏科技有限公司 | Processing method for abnormality of IKE (internet key exchange) negotiation |
| CN107172112A (en) * | 2016-03-07 | 2017-09-15 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | A kind of computer documents transmission method and device |
| CN109218121A (en) * | 2017-07-03 | 2019-01-15 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Machinery of consultation, device and the equipment of Air conduct measurement parameter |
| CN109639553A (en) * | 2018-12-25 | 2019-04-16 | 杭州迪普科技股份有限公司 | IPSec machinery of consultation and device |
-
2005
- 2005-06-13 CN CNB2005100766666A patent/CN100512086C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
Cited By (12)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2008025232A1 (en) * | 2006-08-22 | 2008-03-06 | Zte Corporation | A repeat control method in enhanced uplink asynchronous hybrid automatic repeat request |
| CN101132260B (en) * | 2006-08-22 | 2010-06-23 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Retransmission control method for reinforcing uplink asynchronous mixed automatic retransmission request |
| US8121048B2 (en) | 2006-08-22 | 2012-02-21 | Zte Corporation | Repeat control method in enhanced uplink asynchronous hybrid automatic repeat request |
| CN101247326B (en) * | 2007-02-16 | 2012-02-08 | 瑞昱半导体股份有限公司 | Wireless transmission device and correlated method |
| CN101359968B (en) * | 2007-07-31 | 2012-07-04 | 三星电子株式会社 | Apparatus and method for setting timer and counter in mobile communication system |
| CN102868522A (en) * | 2012-09-12 | 2013-01-09 | 汉柏科技有限公司 | Processing method for abnormality of IKE (internet key exchange) negotiation |
| CN102868522B (en) * | 2012-09-12 | 2016-04-20 | 汉柏科技有限公司 | A kind of processing method of ike negotiation exception |
| CN107172112A (en) * | 2016-03-07 | 2017-09-15 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | A kind of computer documents transmission method and device |
| CN107172112B (en) * | 2016-03-07 | 2020-10-02 | 阿里巴巴集团控股有限公司 | Computer file transmission method and device |
| CN109218121A (en) * | 2017-07-03 | 2019-01-15 | 中兴通讯股份有限公司 | Machinery of consultation, device and the equipment of Air conduct measurement parameter |
| CN109639553A (en) * | 2018-12-25 | 2019-04-16 | 杭州迪普科技股份有限公司 | IPSec machinery of consultation and device |
| CN109639553B (en) * | 2018-12-25 | 2021-04-27 | 杭州迪普科技股份有限公司 | IPSec (Internet protocol Security) negotiation method and device |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN100512086C (en) | 2009-07-08 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN1881863A (en) | Apparatus and method for confirming re-transmission policy in arrangement | |
| US6823387B1 (en) | System and method for enhancing a server's ability to withstand a “SYN flood” denial of service attack | |
| JP5043957B2 (en) | Provide secure application-to-application communication for mobile operating environments | |
| AU2004217318B2 (en) | Using TCP to authenticate IP source addresses | |
| TW518864B (en) | Methods and system for defeating TCP SYN flooding attacks | |
| CN1251446C (en) | Method of defending network transmission control protocol sync message from overflowing attack | |
| CN1536847A (en) | Method for authority discrimination grouping and effective loading | |
| EP2343851A1 (en) | Network authentication method, corresponding system and client device | |
| CN1535527A (en) | Method and transaction interface for secure data exchange between distinguishable networks | |
| CN1921488A (en) | Method for preventing forgery of source address based on signature authentication inside IPv6 sub network | |
| CN1630248A (en) | SYN flooding attack defence method based on connection request authentication | |
| CN1802017A (en) | Identification method for preventing replay attack | |
| JP2011504332A (en) | WAPI Unicast Secret Key Negotiation Method | |
| CN1157664C (en) | SSLL proxy method with MIME data type filter technology | |
| CN110995662B (en) | Data transmission method and system based on multi-path network media | |
| KR101463873B1 (en) | Method and apparatus for preventing data loss | |
| CN1719813A (en) | Safety gateway with SSL protection function and method | |
| US7634655B2 (en) | Efficient hash table protection for data transport protocols | |
| CN1571407A (en) | A safety authentication method based on media gateway control protocol | |
| KR101020470B1 (en) | Methods and apparatus for blocking network intrusion | |
| CN1845549A (en) | Method for enquiring IPSec tunnel state | |
| CN1567900A (en) | A method for implementing message forwarding control in routing equipment | |
| CN1750456A (en) | Cookie-based mechanism providing lightweight authentication of layer-2 frames | |
| CN1731784A (en) | Safety management method for hyper text transport protocol service | |
| CN1881870A (en) | Method for safety communication between devices |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| ASS | Succession or assignment of patent right |
Owner name: HAIAN RONGHAI MACHINERY MANUFACTURING CO., LTD. Free format text: FORMER OWNER: ZTE CORPORATION Effective date: 20140917 |
|
| C41 | Transfer of patent application or patent right or utility model | ||
| COR | Change of bibliographic data |
Free format text: CORRECT: ADDRESS; FROM: 518057 SHENZHEN, GUANGDONG PROVINCE TO: 226600 NANTONG, JIANGSU PROVINCE |
|
| TR01 | Transfer of patent right |
Effective date of registration: 20140917 Address after: 226600 Hu Hu Industrial Park, Haian County, Nantong, Jiangsu province (14 sets of Guanghua Village) Patentee after: HAIAN COUNTY RONGHAI MACHINERY MANUFACTURING CO., LTD. Address before: 518057 Nanshan District high tech Industrial Park, Guangdong, South Road, science and technology, ZTE building, legal department Patentee before: ZTE Corporation |
|
| CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20090708 Termination date: 20160613 |
|
| CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |