CN1691025A - Management system and method for scrutiny of supplier achievement - Google Patents
Management system and method for scrutiny of supplier achievement Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN1691025A CN1691025A CN 200410027104 CN200410027104A CN1691025A CN 1691025 A CN1691025 A CN 1691025A CN 200410027104 CN200410027104 CN 200410027104 CN 200410027104 A CN200410027104 A CN 200410027104A CN 1691025 A CN1691025 A CN 1691025A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- supplier
- scoring
- performance
- urging
- mark
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a suppliers' performance scrutiny management system and method. The system supplies a server, a database and multiple client computers; wherein, the server comprises a purchasing amount load module to load all amounts of suppliers to database, a data collection module to obtain suppliers' data in grade table, a judgment module to judge if the grade tables of all suppliers is completed, a track and urge module to send e-mail to supervise grade; a score sum module to sum scores; an ordering module to order the suppliers according to request. The system can grade, sum, and order for all suppliers, build completed material record for all performance index and supplies corresponding basis for strategic decision of management and purchasing suppliers.
Description
[technical field]
The present invention relates to a supplier management technology, refer to the administrative skill that a kind of supplier performance is assessed especially.
[background technology]
Each functional department when in general, enterprise begins plays a role relatively independently.For example production division adjusts unit cost to drop to minimum by a large amount of productions, does not consider the stock of finished product, also can not notice because of stock make stock's capacity and circulating capital and reduce.When normal operation that stock's overstocked problem and circulating capital shortage problem influenced enterprise, enterprise just recognizes the cooperation that needs at least to a certain degree between production, circulation and treasurer's department.In the logistics system, each functional department such as the logistics of enterprise and the marketing, production, management cooperatively interacts the realization of common guarantee enterprise general objective in the early stage.Therefore, initial logistics system mainly is the coordination at each functional department of enterprises.It is the system management that resource planning, distribution and the control procedure of material object dispensing, production support and procurement business are carried out.After setting up a kind of coordination system of internal function efficiently, it is very outstanding that circulation between enterprise and tranaction costs just seem, so the notion of Integrated Logistics occurred.
Integrated Logistics (Integrated Logistics) is one of the most influential logistics trend in 20 end of the centurys, its basic meaning be meant between the different functional departments or between the different enterprise by the cooperation in the logistics, reach the effect that improves logistic efficiency, reduces logistics cost.Integrated Logistics or logistics integrated comprises three kinds of forms: vertically integrated logistics, horizontal integration logistics and logistics network.
The vertically integrated logistics requires enterprise will provide the supplier and the user of product or transportation service etc. to include range of management in, and as a centre point of logistics management.The vertically integrated logistics requires enterprise all to realize management to logistics in each process from starting material to user; Require enterprise to utilize enterprise's self-condition foundation and development and supplier and user's cooperative relationship, form coalition power, win competitive edge.Deep development along with the vertically integrated logistics, to the continuous expansion of logistics research range, under enterprise operation grouping of the world economy and international background, American Michael Porter has at first proposed the notion of " value chain ", and on this basis, formed more complete supply chain theory.Supply chain is meant and relates to the upstream and downstream industrial integration system that enterprise constituted that product or service is offered all links of ultimate consumer.Supply chain management is emphasized the cooperation relation of core enterprise and relevant enterprise, embodies management integration by methods such as information sharing, exchange of technology and cooperation, most optimum distribution of resources and effective value chain incentive mechanisms.Supply chain is the extension to the vertically integrated logistics, it pays close attention to flowing of commodity rather than the function of traditional concept is cut apart or component efficiency, it satisfies client's needs by to the coordination from the production of raw material, semi-manufacture and finished product, supply, sale logistics and cash flow, information flow up to ultimate consumer's whole process with this.
Follow punctualization (Just-In-Time, JIT) and total quality control (supplier selection problem becomes and becomes more and more important for Total QualityManagement, TQM) the extensive employing of theory in supply chain.The notice that the strategic supplier is selected has improved in many enterprises, to make great efforts to reduce the risk that supplier brings.If enterprise wants to carry out total quality control under the supply chain environment, enterprise must scan all aspects of commercial activity, particularly to supplier's examination.In addition, the needs of its still global manufacturing and global competition.Therefore, under the supply chain management environment, who has caught the supplier as " middle industry ", and who just might be active in the competition that globalizes, and supplier's selection problem is also just become the strategic decision that today, all enterprises can not be ignored.
Have, select in supplier's the process, the purchasing department of enterprise need make various forms, need each department to cooperate the examination of carrying out supplier, mark again and gather and rank etc., be convenient to therefrom select outstanding supplier, make the supply chain benign development of enterprise.
In sum, outstanding supplier therefrom selects in the purchasing department that must provide the perfect supplier of a cover to assess system provides every data to be beneficial to enterprise, solve simultaneously that required before the purchasing department various forms, all departments' scoring made in the process are uneven, scoring gathers difficulty in that supplier is assessed, can't rank and artificial problems such as error
[summary of the invention]
Fundamental purpose of the present invention is to provide a kind of supplier performance to assess management system, it can comprehensively weigh supplier's performance performance, subsector and comprehensive all departments mark, gather, rank, every performance indicators to supplier is set up the complete information record, for supplier management, the buying ruse of war formulation relevant foundation is provided.
Another object of the present invention is to provide a kind of supplier performance to assess management system, it can provide the scoring person who does not finish scoring regularly with urging function, with urging scoring person to mark.
The present invention discloses a kind of supplier performance and assesses management system.This system provides a server, a database and a plurality of client computer.Server be used for receiving and obtaining each supplier's grade form data, calculate total points, to the scoring person who does not finish scoring follow the ordering of urging, mark, inquire about and the mark generation of summary sheet; Database is used to store MSDSs such as each supplier's grade form, procurement value table, scoring person's information table, standards of grading and foundation table; Client computer links to each other with server by network, and it provides interactive interface, and the user can carry out corresponding operating by this interface login native system.
The present invention also provides a kind of supplier performance to assess management method.This method comprises the steps: (a) login native system; (b) generate blank supplier grade form of current month; (c) mark is set and gathers time point and all supplier's procurement value importing time points; (d) a plurality of inspection supplier grade forms and with urging time point are set, and initialization is zero with urging number of times; (e) import each supplier's procurement value; (f) receive the scoring person of all departments to each item rating of corresponding supplier to each supplier's grade form; (g) whether the field of judging required scoring in each supplier's grade form marks fully; (h) to urge be that send Email is followed and urged scoring person if scoring not exclusively then follow, gets back to step (g), if scoring fully then finishes to follow to urge; (i) gather the data that time point then obtains in each supplier's grade form and generate all departments' scoring summary sheet if arrived mark; (j) sort on request according to summary sheet.
[description of drawings]
Fig. 1 is the enforcement hardware structure figure that supplier of the present invention performance is assessed management system.
Fig. 2 is the functional block diagram of server of the present invention.
Fig. 3 is the weight synoptic diagram of each scoring point of the present invention.
Fig. 4 is the mark summary sheet of the present invention to certain series products supplier.
Fig. 5 is the not scoring person table fully that the present invention generates.
Fig. 6 is that supplier of the present invention performance is assessed the management system operation process chart.
[embodiment]
As shown in Figure 1, be the enforcement hardware structure figure that supplier of the present invention performance is assessed management system.Server 1 links to each other with a plurality of client computers 2 by network 4, links to each other with database 3 by connection 5 simultaneously.
Server 1 provides a series of software function modules (as shown in Figure 2), be used for receiving and obtaining each supplier's grade form data, calculate total points, to the scoring person who does not finish scoring follow the ordering of urging, mark, inquire about and the mark generation of summary sheet.MSDSs such as database 3 storage vendor's list tables, each supplier's grade form, procurement value table, scoring person's information table, standards of grading and foundation table.Wherein scoring person's information table writes down scoring person's ID, password, department, email address, upper-level leader's email address and the supplier of this scoring person department correspondence.The procurement value table is the two-dimentional Excel form of an expansion, the supplier that the longitudinal axis is corresponding all, and the department that transverse axis is corresponding all, the procurement value of setting at every month imports time point, for example imports each supplier's procurement value in 12 days every month to this table.The scoring weight table has been described four shared weights of scoring point that supplier is marked, as shown in Figure 5.Supplier's grade form comprises vendor name, name of product, scoring person ID, performance self-criticism time period, standards of grading, score value detail, scoring explanation and score field.Described database can be oracle database or sybase database etc., and present embodiment is to carry out with the Lotus Notes database in the Domino system.
A plurality of client computers 2 provide interactive interface, and the user can carry out corresponding operating by this interface login native system.
Described network can be intranet (Intranet), Internet (Internet) or other type network.Described database connect can be the open type data storehouse connect (Open DatabaseConnectivity, ODBC), perhaps the Java database connect (Java DatabaseConnectivity, JDBC).
As shown in Figure 2, be the functional block diagram of server of the present invention.This server 1 provides an authority managing and controlling module 10, is used for management and control scoring person's scoring authority.Wherein, each scoring person has a cover scoring ID and a password, and scoring person enters system with own scoring ID and password own the linchpin partly marked.One system initialization module 11, it is the scoring input that is used for when beginning in every month, forbidding historical month, generate all blank supplier grade forms, of that month mark is set to be gathered time point, procurement value importing time point, a plurality of quantitative check supplier's grade forms is set and carries out regularly following the time point of urging, and will be with urging number of times to be initialized as zero, even with urging time number variable N=0.One procurement value imports module 12, be that the procurement value that is used at every month imports time point, for example should month before 12 days every month all suppliers' procurement value import in the procurement value table in the database 3, procurement value is defined as the total charge of all product purchasings that this department in this scoring month purchases to this supplier.Desired data be obtained and be inquired about to one data collection module 13 can in each the supplier's grade form from database 3.One judge module 14 can be inquired about the procurement value table, judges whether that according to each supplier's procurement value needs mark for this supplier, if the procurement value of this supplier's correspondence is zero or empty, does not need scoring, otherwise needs scoring; Reach in a plurality of predefined inspections with urging time point inspection supplier grade form, judge whether scoring person marks fully for each supplier, marked if all procurement values have greater than zero supply commercial city, think that then scoring person has finished scoring, otherwise think and do not finish whole scorings.One with urging module 15, every month predefined a plurality of inspections with urge time point timed sending mail give the incomplete scoring person of scoring and upper-level leader thereof and calculate with urge this scoring person with urging number of times, send out mail for the first time with urging counting since this month.One mark summarizing module 16, being used for gathering time point at mark combines the procurement value weighted mean of the scoring of all departments by this department, computing method are: at the scoring of all departments, be weighted on average by all departments' procurement value, calculate each supplier's comprehensive grading (as shown in Figure 4).One order module 17 is used for being aggregated into supplier's performance according to the scoring summary sheet by product category and assesses list.
As shown in Figure 3, be the weight signal table of each scoring point of the present invention.This table comprises total score value 200, quality 201, price 202, supply chain 203, engineering 204.Wherein total score value 200 refers to the respectively total points of scoring point, gets centesimal system 100 minutes; 201, one of qualities scoring point is represented the quality of supplier products, and shared weight is 35%; 202, one of prices scoring point is represented the cost performance of supplier products, and shared weight is 35%; 203, one scorings of supply chain point, shared weight is 20%; 204, one scorings of engineering point is represented the technical support of supplier to product, and shared weight is 10%.
As shown in Figure 4, be the scoring summary sheets of all departments of the present invention to the supplier of a certain product.This table gathers time point at every month mark, and for example 20 days every month by obtaining in data collection module 13 each supplier's grade form from database 3, calculates and be stored in the database 3 by mark summarizing module 16 again.This table comprises vendor name 300, product 301, supplier's performance self-criticism cycle 302, department 303, procurement value 304, quality 305, price 306, supply chain 307, engineering 308, PTS 309, weight 310, total points 311 and centesimal system total points 312.Wherein, vendor name 300 provides the vendor name of product 301; Supplier's performance self-criticism cycle 302 is time periods assessing supplier's performance; Department 303 is department names of product purchasing 301; Procurement value 304 (this example is in U.S. dollar) is the total charge that product 301 that these suppliers of buying of department 303 provide is spent; Quality 305 is scoring points assessing supplier's performance, shows the quality of supplier products; Price 306 is scoring points assessing supplier's performance, shows the cost performance of supplier products; Supply chain 307 is scoring points assessing supplier's performance, shows supplier's supply chain support status; Engineering 308 shows that this supplier provides the situation of technical support, for example after sale service of providing of supplier etc.; PTS 309, show the comprehensive evaluation score of this department to this supplier, computing method are: the mark summation of each scoring point of certain department and each scoring point weight sum are divided by, there is not the weight of the scoring point of scoring not count, as shown in Figure 3, the quality score 23.4 of department 2, price score 30.5, supply chain score 18.8, the gross score sum of three scoring points is 72.7, the weight sum of three scoring points is 90, and then PTS 309 is three scoring point mark sums 72.7 and three scorings value that weight sum 90 is divided by of department 2, promptly 80.8; Weight 310 is the shared scoring proportion of each scoring point, and wherein the weight of scoring point quality 305 is .35, and the weight of scoring point price 306 is .35, and the weight of scoring point supply chain 307 is .20, and the weight of scoring point engineering 308 is .10.Wherein scoring point engineering is relevant with product, this item rating of the product needed that has, and the product that has does not need this item rating.The numerical value of all above-mentioned these fields is data collection module 13 and obtains in each supplier's grade form from database 3.Total points 311, wherein the total points of procurement value 304 correspondences is summations of all departments' procurement value, the pairing total points of other each scoring point is a weighted mean value, algorithm is: quality 305 (total points)=(procurement value of the quality * department 2 of the procurement value+department 2 of the quality * department 1 of department 1+... the procurement value of the n of quality * department of the n of department)/the procurement value sum of a n department, the algorithm of price 306 (total points), supply chain 307 (total points), engineering 308 (total points) and PTS 309 (total points) is the same.As shown in Figure 3, the numerical value of total points 311 fields of quality 305 is 35*48909+23.4*23581+29*156768+35*413183+32.6*1238+25*133 331+31.3*61834+35*48528=32.4.Centesimal system total points 312 represents that every item rating accounts for the number percent when total points, the value of being divided by for total points 311 and weight 310 as the centesimal system total points 312 of quality 305, i.e. 32.4/35=92.5.
As shown in Figure 5, be not scoring person table fully of the present invention.This table is to generate when every month mark summarizing module 16 gathers mark.Carried out still judging whether to have finished scoring when mark gathers at every month,, then generate this table and be stored in the database 3 if still have the complete person that do not mark by judge module 14.Department 401 is the department managers 402 that do not finish the scoring person place of scoring, is the email address of not finishing the person in charge of scoring person department of scoring; Scoring person 403, are the names of not finishing the scoring person of scoring; The part 404 of not marking is scoring point titles that scoring person does not finish scoring; Phone 405 is phones of not finishing the scoring person of scoring; Mailbox 406 is email addresses of not finishing the scoring person of scoring.
As shown in Figure 6, be operation process chart of the present invention.At first, every month beginning of the month, for example generated all blank supplier grade forms by system initialization module 11 in 1 day every month, and forbid the scoring input in historical month, of that month mark is set gathers time point, procurement value importing time point, a plurality of quantitative check supplier's grade form and follow the time point of urging, and initialization is zero (step S600) with urging number of times.At every month sometime, for example each scoring person is with ID and password login native system before 10 days every month, and system receives the scoring that scoring person carries out linchpin supplier, and deposits in each supplier's grade form in the database 3 (step S601).Of that month procurement value at systemic presupposition imports time point, for example before 12 days every month with the form of regulation with all should scoring month in one's duty suppliers procurement value import procurement value table (step S602) in the database 3; Carry out comprehensive evaluation by mark summarizing module 16 according to the score and the shared weight of each scoring point in each supplier's grade form, promptly calculate the PTS of all departments, and deposit in each supplier's grade form (step S603) each supplier.All supplier's grade form and the procurement value tables of judge module 14 inquiries judge whether that procurement value is that zero supplier is marked (step S604), if then this supplier's grade form calcellation (step S605) of supplier's grade form that has said circumstances is arranged; To there not being supplier's grade form of said circumstances, follow the very first time point of urging time point in default a plurality of inspections, all supplier's grade forms of daily inspection in every month the 13rd for example, judge all supplier's grade forms whether mark (step S606) fully, basis for estimation is: if for certain department, certain class supplier, certain item rating point, greater than zero or be empty, then the explanation scoring is complete, changes step S612 over to greater than the value of each scoring point field of zero supplier for all procurement values; Otherwise by with urging module 15 to carry out the first time, promptly send the mailbox of mail, remind scoring person's scoring, and make with urging times N=N+1 (step S607) to scoring person with urging; Then next default inspection with urging time point, for example checked once more whether mark (step S608) fully at 16 days every month, still have scoring person not finish scoring if judge, then carry out promptly sending mail once more in scoring person's mailbox with urging for the second time, calculate to follow and urge times N=N+1, and this mail is sent in its upper-level leader's mailbox (step S609) simultaneously; Next remaining default inspection, continue to check whether finished scoring that repeating step S608 is to step S609 with urging time point; Last mark gathers time point, for example still checked and judged whether still to mark in 20 days every month not exclusively (step S610) by judge module 14, if still have scoring person not finish scoring, then by system's generation form as shown in Figure 5, the staff list of not finishing scoring is shown (step S611), and send Email is to the people on the list and the person in charge (step S613) thereof; Simultaneously from each supplier's grade form, obtain data by data acquisition module 13, calculate each supplier's total points and centesimal system total points by mark summarizing module 16 according to computation rule again, thereby generate the scoring summary sheet (SCORE SUMMARY) (as shown in Figure 4) (step S612) of all departments single-vendor; Obtaining desired data by order module 17 from the scoring summary sheet of above each single-vendor again sorts from big to small according to total points, or a certain class supplier sorted, if certain class supplier is sorted, then can screen such supplier earlier by order module 17, and then sort, generate supplier's list (step S614).At last, each scoring person can inquire about monthly record/season record/annual record/any stage record/arbitrary supplier's record (step S615) in own authority.
Claims (12)
1. supplier's performance is assessed management system, can subsector and comprehensive all departments to supplier mark, gather, rank, and can timed sending mail reminder scoring person mark, this system comprises a server, a database and a plurality of client computer, it is characterized in that, wherein:
Each supplier's grade form is provided, and this table comprises at product required scoring point and the shared weight of each scoring point;
Database is used to store each supplier's grade form, supplier information and performance and assesses information needed;
Server is used for that supplier is carried out performance and assesses, and it comprises:
One authority managing and controlling module is used for management and control scoring person's authority;
One system initialization module is used to generate all blank supplier grade forms of current month, forbids the scoring input in historical month and a plurality of quantitative check supplier's grade forms is set and follows the inspection of urging scoring person to follow and urge time point;
One procurement value imports module, be used to import all departments to all procurement values of each supplier to the procurement value table;
One judge module is used to judge whether each supplier's grade form marks fully;
One with urging module, is used in a plurality of inspections with urging time point timed sending Email to scoring person's mailbox and the person in charge's mailbox thereof completely of not marking;
One mark summarizing module is used for the procurement value weighted mean of the scoring of all departments by this department combined;
One order module is used for being aggregated into supplier's performance according to the mark summary sheet by product category and assesses list.
2. supplier as claimed in claim 1 performance is assessed management system, it is characterized in that, wherein the authority managing and controlling module gives each scoring person one cover scoring ID and password, and scoring person enters system with own scoring ID and password and the own supplier that has jurisdiction over is had jurisdiction over to mark marks.
3. supplier as claimed in claim 1 performance is assessed management system, it is characterized in that, wherein system initialization module also is provided with mark and gathers time point, procurement value and import time point and will be zero with urging number of times to be initialized as.
4. supplier as claimed in claim 1 performance is assessed management system, it is characterized in that, wherein with urging the module also will be with urging number of times to add up 1 during to scoring person's mailbox at each timed sending Email.
5. supplier's performance is assessed management method, its can subsector and comprehensive all departments to supplier mark, gather, rank, and can timed sending mail reminder scoring person mark, this method provides a server, see through network be connected more than a client computer and by connecting the database that links to each other, it is characterized in that this method comprises the steps:
Procurement value table and scoring person's information table are provided;
Generate all blank supplier grade forms of current month;
Mark is set gathers time point and procurement value importing time point;
A plurality of inspections are set with urging time point with quantitative check supplier grade form and timed sending mail;
Initialization is zero with urging number of times;
The scoring person of all departments mark at the supplier that all departments had jurisdiction over and the procurement value that imports each supplier to the procurement value table;
Whether the supplier that judgement is marked has procurement value;
In a plurality of inspections with urging the time point inspection and judge whether each supplier's grade form marks fully;
If scoring not exclusively, then send Email is given scoring person and is begun to calculate with urging number of times; Generate all departments' scoring summary sheet;
Generate the supplier of all departments list;
The inquiry supplier of all departments list.
6. supplier as claimed in claim 5 performance is assessed management method, it is characterized in that, quality, price, supply chain and four scorings of engineering point are wherein arranged in supplier's grade form, the shared weight difference of above-mentioned four scorings point.
7. supplier as claimed in claim 6 performance is assessed management method, it is characterized in that, wherein the scoring person of all departments marks to the supplier who is had jurisdiction over and may further comprise the steps:
Scoring person is with ID and password login native system;
Scoring person marks to have jurisdiction over scoring point.
8. supplier as claimed in claim 5 performance is assessed management method, it is characterized in that, judges wherein whether the supplier who is marked has procurement value further to comprise step:
If the supplier who has been marked does not have procurement value, then supplier's grade form of this supplier's correspondence cancels.
9. supplier as claimed in claim 5 performance is assessed management method, it is characterized in that, judges wherein whether supplier's grade form marks to may further comprise the steps fully:
, with urging time point to continue to judge whether supplier's grade form marks fully, then send mail and follow to scoring person and urge and should follow and urge mail to send to its person in charge in a plurality of inspections if scoring is incomplete;
The repetition previous step is rapid, gathers time point up to mark.
10. supplier as claimed in claim 9 performance is assessed management method, it is characterized in that, wherein still comprises step:
Whenever be about to urging number of times to add up 1 with urging once.
11. supplier as claimed in claim 10 performance is assessed management method, wherein still comprises step:
If judging supplier before mark gathers time point marks fully, then finish with urging.
12. supplier as claimed in claim 5 performance is assessed management method, it is characterized in that, wherein generates all departments' scoring summary sheet and may further comprise the steps:
Gather time point to mark, obtain the data in each supplier's grade form, calculate the total points of each scoring point by each scoring point weighted-average method.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN 200410027104 CN1691025A (en) | 2004-04-29 | 2004-04-29 | Management system and method for scrutiny of supplier achievement |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN 200410027104 CN1691025A (en) | 2004-04-29 | 2004-04-29 | Management system and method for scrutiny of supplier achievement |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN1691025A true CN1691025A (en) | 2005-11-02 |
Family
ID=35346464
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN 200410027104 Pending CN1691025A (en) | 2004-04-29 | 2004-04-29 | Management system and method for scrutiny of supplier achievement |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN1691025A (en) |
Cited By (13)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102467539A (en) * | 2010-11-15 | 2012-05-23 | 中国移动通信集团山东有限公司 | Data sheet calling method and device |
| CN102708717A (en) * | 2012-05-16 | 2012-10-03 | 深圳市海云天科技股份有限公司 | Method and system for carrying out testing by electronic writing board |
| CN103136622A (en) * | 2011-11-29 | 2013-06-05 | 北京建龙重工集团有限公司 | On-line management method for project contracting enterprise evaluation |
| CN104412283A (en) * | 2012-07-05 | 2015-03-11 | 弗莱克斯电子有限责任公司 | Method and system for controlling supply chains |
| CN105373866A (en) * | 2015-12-15 | 2016-03-02 | 南京欣网互联信息技术有限公司 | Online diagnostic system and method for e-commerce mode prediction |
| CN108022111A (en) * | 2017-11-27 | 2018-05-11 | 广东广凌信息科技股份有限公司 | A kind of purchasing system cloud platform |
| CN108415921A (en) * | 2017-09-25 | 2018-08-17 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Supplier recommends method, apparatus and computer readable storage medium |
| CN108428037A (en) * | 2017-10-31 | 2018-08-21 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Electronic device, the method and storage medium for adjusting supplier |
| CN109460920A (en) * | 2018-11-12 | 2019-03-12 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Outsourcing Risk management method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| CN111598660A (en) * | 2020-05-14 | 2020-08-28 | 杭州乐顺科技有限公司 | Computer screening device and method for screening suppliers and storage medium |
| US20210012288A1 (en) * | 2019-07-11 | 2021-01-14 | David Mroczka | Method and system for guidance of artificial intelligence and human agent teaming |
| CN112784234A (en) * | 2021-01-29 | 2021-05-11 | 北京译泰教育科技有限公司 | Supplier management method |
| US11209553B2 (en) | 2016-05-24 | 2021-12-28 | Flex Ltd. | Systems and methods for active supply chain monitoring |
-
2004
- 2004-04-29 CN CN 200410027104 patent/CN1691025A/en active Pending
Cited By (17)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN102467539B (en) * | 2010-11-15 | 2014-09-03 | 中国移动通信集团山东有限公司 | Data sheet calling method and device |
| CN102467539A (en) * | 2010-11-15 | 2012-05-23 | 中国移动通信集团山东有限公司 | Data sheet calling method and device |
| CN103136622A (en) * | 2011-11-29 | 2013-06-05 | 北京建龙重工集团有限公司 | On-line management method for project contracting enterprise evaluation |
| CN102708717A (en) * | 2012-05-16 | 2012-10-03 | 深圳市海云天科技股份有限公司 | Method and system for carrying out testing by electronic writing board |
| CN104412283A (en) * | 2012-07-05 | 2015-03-11 | 弗莱克斯电子有限责任公司 | Method and system for controlling supply chains |
| CN104992258A (en) * | 2012-07-05 | 2015-10-21 | 爱利门图供应链管理(开曼)有限公司 | Method and system for controlling supply chains |
| CN104412283B (en) * | 2012-07-05 | 2017-12-01 | 弗莱克斯电子有限责任公司 | For controlling the method and system of supply chain |
| US10146214B2 (en) | 2012-07-05 | 2018-12-04 | Flextronics Ap, Llc | Method and system for collecting supply chain performance information |
| CN105373866A (en) * | 2015-12-15 | 2016-03-02 | 南京欣网互联信息技术有限公司 | Online diagnostic system and method for e-commerce mode prediction |
| US11209553B2 (en) | 2016-05-24 | 2021-12-28 | Flex Ltd. | Systems and methods for active supply chain monitoring |
| CN108415921A (en) * | 2017-09-25 | 2018-08-17 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Supplier recommends method, apparatus and computer readable storage medium |
| CN108428037A (en) * | 2017-10-31 | 2018-08-21 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Electronic device, the method and storage medium for adjusting supplier |
| CN108022111A (en) * | 2017-11-27 | 2018-05-11 | 广东广凌信息科技股份有限公司 | A kind of purchasing system cloud platform |
| CN109460920A (en) * | 2018-11-12 | 2019-03-12 | 平安科技（深圳）有限公司 | Outsourcing Risk management method, device, computer equipment and storage medium |
| US20210012288A1 (en) * | 2019-07-11 | 2021-01-14 | David Mroczka | Method and system for guidance of artificial intelligence and human agent teaming |
| CN111598660A (en) * | 2020-05-14 | 2020-08-28 | 杭州乐顺科技有限公司 | Computer screening device and method for screening suppliers and storage medium |
| CN112784234A (en) * | 2021-01-29 | 2021-05-11 | 北京译泰教育科技有限公司 | Supplier management method |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Kilic et al. | Modified two-phase fuzzy goal programming integrated with IF-TOPSIS for green supplier selection | |
| Cohen et al. | Service parts logistics: a benchmark analysis | |
| Shore et al. | Evaluating the information sharing capabilities of supply chain partners: A fuzzy logic model | |
| Gunasekaran et al. | A framework for supply chain performance measurement | |
| Erdem et al. | Development of a decision support system for supplier evaluation and order allocation | |
| Wu et al. | The supplier selection application based on two methods: VIKOR algorithm with entropy method and Fuzzy TOPSIS with vague sets method | |
| US20010041996A1 (en) | Method of and system for valuing elements of a business enterprise | |
| CN1691025A (en) | Management system and method for scrutiny of supplier achievement | |
| Avlonitis | The identification of weak industrial products | |
| Hsu et al. | The impacts of supply chain management systems on information sharing and integrated-performance | |
| Tuan et al. | A fuzzy credibility-based chance-constrained optimization model for multiple-objective aggregate production planning in a supply chain under an uncertain environment | |
| CN1624699A (en) | Supplier selection system and method | |
| Adak et al. | Imperfect production in three-layer supply chain systems incorporating deterioration and screening effect | |
| Chen et al. | Automobile components procurement using a DEA-TOPSIS-FMIP approach with all-unit quantity discount and fuzzy factors | |
| Stefanovic et al. | Application of data mining for supply chain inventory forecasting | |
| ur Rahman et al. | Proposing Multi-item Replenishment model for an Inventory Management System of Malaysia’s SMEs | |
| Aldhaheri | Sustainable Inventory Management Model for High-Volume Material with Limited Storage Space under Stochastic Demand and Supply | |
| Routroy et al. | Development of decision framework for warehouse decisions in supply chain network | |
| Harrison Jr | Exploring the bullwhip effect in supply chain management: Identifying constraints and unblocking bottlenecks with data analytics | |
| Batarlienė et al. | «3PL» SERVICE IMPROVEMENT OPORTUNITIES IN TRANSPORT COMPANIES | |
| Zimon | Tools of managerial accounting in production management | |
| McCosh et al. | The financial management of quality as a strategy | |
| Muslimah et al. | Supply Chain Collaboration for Ensuring Retail Product Availability at Glaxosmithkline | |
| Iyer | Effective SAP SD | |
| GRACE | Administration and Management in partial fulfillment of the Requirements for the award of a Degree of Bachelors of Business Administration and Management |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| C06 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| C12 | Rejection of a patent application after its publication | ||
| RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Open date: 20051102 |