CN1622079A - Legal information logic node formulation method - Google Patents

Legal information logic node formulation method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN1622079A
CN1622079A CN 200310105763 CN200310105763A CN1622079A CN 1622079 A CN1622079 A CN 1622079A CN 200310105763 CN200310105763 CN 200310105763 CN 200310105763 A CN200310105763 A CN 200310105763A CN 1622079 A CN1622079 A CN 1622079A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
numbering
certain
legal
paragraph
information
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN 200310105763
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
韩朝晖
徐文倩
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Individual
Original Assignee
Individual
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Individual filed Critical Individual
Priority to CN 200310105763 priority Critical patent/CN1622079A/en
Publication of CN1622079A publication Critical patent/CN1622079A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The law information logic node expressing method is the technological scheme including analyzing and classifying law information as title, law prescription, judicial explanation, etc.; predicating in required paragraphs of characters or graphs in tree structure; and numbering these paragraphs based on the logic relationship among the paragraphs for precise location. The present invention expands the formulation of low information platform, raises the precision of technological formulation of low information platform, expands the information processing space of the low information platform and provides the intelligent search with powerful technological support.

Description

Legal information logic node statement method
Technical field
The present invention relates to a kind of information processing and disposal route, specifically, it relates to a kind of legal information logic node statement method.
Background technology
As everyone knows, legal informations such as all kinds of laws of China, rules even contract, article all are to adopt the statement of clause method at present, this method basic fundamental characteristics are, with the bar is the basic unit of explaining, the logical relation structure is adopted linear structure between bar and the bar, and the numbering of clause location is adopted the positive integer order.This expression method major advantage is simple in structure, easy operating, so though it used historical more thousand, its technical characterictic does not still become along practising so far.It is no doubt good to sustain its quality through age, but things have changed with the lapse of time, epoch have been developed into information society at present, the frequency of social upsurge and range are than far from each other before thousand, in the face of make rapid progress, numerous and complicated, new situation, new problem changeable, its statement of various legal informations as standard people social activities important evidence is but still being continued to use the old times method, and this has the anxiety of taking measures regardless of changes in circumstances unavoidably.The clause method utmost point of perfection really need not to change? facts have proved, really not so.From practical application and current social demand, mainly contain following several big drawback with clause method statement legal information: first, the logical relation structure is adopted linear structure between clause method bar and the bar, this makes legislative interpretation, important legal information such as judicial explanation can't be present in the same legal document with harmonies such as law-making stipulations, be unfavorable for the information contents such as law-making stipulation are done the location, quantitative defines or studies and judges, thereby both influenced the efficient of people's awareness information, influence the precision of information statement again, and legal information is if any increasing, modification such as delete, original logical organization relation promptly becomes incoherent, and former ordering is difficult to maintain.The second, corresponding with the linear structure relation, to clause ordering location, this makes each clause position change once definite inconvenience just all linked with one another to the clause method by the positive integer order, thus frequent, the complicated social change of difficult adaptation.For example, current social new situation, new problem emerge in an endless stream, the social management activity needs positive strain effectively to regulate and control, to this legal information if still by positive integer rule numbers location, then meet the former numbering of information changing and promptly very easily cause confusion, occur thereby cause problem such as to quote by former numbering unavoidably.The 3rd, most legal informations all have the internal logic relation of comparatively rigorous complexity, only be difficult to distinct these relations by the normal words statement, many theoretical its rules that disclose such as logistics that people are ad hoc for this reason, but the clause method is not applied to relevant knowledge the technical finesse of legal information legibly, and this causes legal information to go wrong link such as understanding or quote unavoidably.For example, it is of common occurrence in the actual life same social concern to be done the different judicial phenomenons of handling, and the normal custom of these people is laid the blame on for due to the artificial factor, thereby very easily ignore the leak of legal information statement technology, has encouraged growing of denial of justice problem thus.The 4th; often there is effectiveness difference in different legal informations; conflict also appears in content often, and legal information can be divided into polytypes such as law-making stipulation, judicial explanation, legal principle explanation usually, the existing clause method of this many difference is not all done properly technology distinguish.The 5th, legal information needs to do processing such as increasing, delete, reclassify often, and this relates to the problem of the processing of legal information being handled or is called data operation, and this existing clause method is not reserved enough technical finesse spaces.The 6th, legal information is in the application in practice process, often relate to the retrospect problem, good legal information expression method should be able to provide more wide in range technology platform support, with support before the change and information after the change harmony be present in the same legal document, make relevant information be easy to search, distinguish or quote, but existing clause expression method does not provide technology platform support in this respect.Therefore how the 7th, social management is an extremely complicated system engineering, and all kinds of legal informations of close association accumulate over a long period more vast as the open sealy with it, and information needed is retrieved on convenient and efficient ground, also is that legal information statement method is not allowed the important technological problems of avoiding.The clause method only provides the straightforward procedure of searching by title and numbering to this, this can not satisfy the needs of current social management far away.The 8th, there are two kinds of methods the our times various countries substantially to the statement of legal information, a kind of method is the legal precedent method, another kind method is the clause method, present these two kinds of methods have mutually learns from other's strong points to offset one's weaknesses, and which kind of technology is the trend of Rong Heing therefore adopt legal precedent and law are organically combined each other, also be the new problem that new period legal information expression method faces, this existing text method do not possessed enough technology solve the space.To sum up, probe into the clause method and why have many drawbacks, trace it to its cause, no doubt can lay the blame on its formation and improve historied limitation, but more underlying causes is that also people's subjective understanding has mistaken ideas.On the human social development history, people are long-time unilateral to be thought, the statement of legal information does not belong to technical matters and is the historical evolution or the problem of artificial regulation, though so the statement that people for a long time have recognized that the processing of legal issue and legal information all with knowledge close association such as logistics, and this has been done goed deep into thorough theoretical research, but many achievements are failed the fine technical finesse that is applied to the legal information statement.In addition, current develop rapidly along with computer science, needs for the information intelligent processing, people have carried out intensive research to the information processing technology, data structure has been born, many theoretical results such as discrete digital, these are all handled the processing of legal information from a certain aspect the technical know-how support are provided, so Combining law information feature, integrated use logistics, relevant knowledges such as data structure, build complete function early, adaptive faculty is strong, the convenient legal information statement technology platform of using, promptly well-timed, again to promoting China's legal construction process, improve social management efficient and have extremely important realistic meaning.
Summary of the invention
The objective of the invention is to overcome the deficiencies in the prior art, provide a kind of complete function, adaptability to changes Gong location strong, conveniently application statement, location to explain, locate the legal information logic node statement method of investigation, quantitative decision making, differentiation effectiveness, caution conflict, intelligent retrieval.
Technical scheme of the present invention is, legal information is decomposed or reduce different types such as title, law-making stipulation, judicial explanation by rule, explained with the character of certain paragraph or figure etc. on demand, logical organization between these paragraphs is used tree, according to certain rules these paragraphs are numbered, numbering must embody the logical organization relation between these paragraphs, with accurate location.
The present invention can also comprise such technical scheme, its main points are, the paragraph that includes such type in the statement content, its content is relevant paragraph content or relevant case are decomposed by rule or to be labeled as certain phrase or certain sentence or certain paragraph or certain numbering, indicates logical relation between these phrases or sentence or paragraph or the numbering with logic connective or logical connective etc.
The present invention can also comprise such technical scheme, its main points are, the numbering of paragraph is made up of literal or letter or number or symbol etc., and includes the sign of distinguishing contents such as rendeing a service grade, conflict caution, type difference in the content of the numbering of paragraph or paragraph.
The present invention can also comprise such technical scheme, and its main points are except that providing conventional by the search methods such as numbering or ordering, also to provide the search method by key element retrieval by window legal informations such as subjective and objective features for the retrieval of explaining content.Main points are, earlier legal provisions or relevant case etc. being done careful technology by subjective and objective feature according to certain rule decomposes, each is decomposed key element is numbered according to certain rules, numbering is merged into certain numbering combination according to certain rules, the corresponding certain legal information of each numbering combination, with decomposing key element, decompose the key element numbering, numbering establishment keys such as combination, corresponding legal provisions, so, key element condition according to certain searches key according to certain rules and can find pairing legal provisions or case solution etc.
The present invention can also comprise such technical scheme, and its main points are, includes the paragraph of such type in the statement content, the paragraph content statement be before legal information is revised for information about.
The present invention can also comprise such technical scheme, and its main points are that the information content can not have the statement of antinomy character.
Compared with prior art, the present invention has following beneficial effect:
1, because logic node statement method base frame is adopted tree type logical relation structure, thus, widen the technology statement range of this information statement platform of legal information statement method, made polytype legal informations such as law-making stipulation, judicial explanation can be present in phase among the same legal information carrier.
2, because logic node statement method base frame is adopted tree type logical relation structure, double its coding rule is corresponding with the tree characteristics, thereby improved the technology statement precision of information statement platform, be beneficial to legal information is done location statement, location explanation, positioning and quantitative analysis etc.
3, because logic node statement method base frame is adopted tree type logical relation structure, thereby expand the information processing space of information statement platform, made operations such as the statement method can better adapt to the increasing of information, deletes, modification.
4, because logic node statement method has adopted the technology to described information labeling logical relation, thereby further promoted the statement precision of legal information, also dealing with the work for the other technologies processing of the information of carrying out simultaneously provides technical support.
5, because logic node statement method has adopted novel numbering and caution technology, thus for the effectiveness grade of effectively distinguishing each legal information, whether conflict, type difference etc. provides technical support.
6,, improve recall precision and retrieval effectiveness thereby not only be beneficial to, and provide powerful technical support for further implementing intelligent retrieval because logic node statement method has increased the retrieval technique by the key element retrieval.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 is the tree type logical relation structure of representing with tree type representation.
Fig. 2 is the tree type logical relation structure of representing with recessed table representation.
Fig. 3 is the illustration that legal information mark internal logic is concerned with logical connective and logic connective.
Fig. 4 is the illustration of the numbering of legal information.
Fig. 5 is the illustration by the search method of subjective and objective characteristic factor retrieval by window legal information.
Embodiment
Basic technical features of the present invention is, the one, the logical relation of each message unit is adopted tree, the 2nd, with logical connective or logical operator etc. the internal logic relation of unit is for information about indicated, the 3rd, the corresponding location of employing and tree relation numbering technology, and include the sign of distinguishing contents such as rendeing a service grade, conflict caution, type difference in numbering or the message unit content, the 4th, increase search method in the search method by factor retrieval by window legal informations such as subjective and objective features.
Below in conjunction with accompanying drawing the present invention is further described.
Accompanying drawing 1 is the statement of tree type logical relation structure being done with tree type representation directly perceived, and accompanying drawing 2 is statements directly perceived of tree type logical relation structure being done with recessed table representation, and wherein A, B etc. represent each information representation unit respectively.In the relevant theoretical file of data structure, generally these message units are called node (perhaps node), the present invention is along the name of practising these theories, so name nominating of the present invention is legal information logic node statement method.In the practical application, these message units still can bar etc. name nominating, because of that problem that relates to artificial regulation, do not do in the file of the present invention and give unnecessary details.In the theoretical file of relevant data structure, definition to tree is not quite similar, but it can be described substantially like this, that is: tree is the finite K of collective (n>0) that comprises n node, and one of definition concerns N on K, concern that N meets the following conditions: (a) have and only have a node k0 ∈ K, it does not have the forerunner for concerning N.Node k0 is called the root of tree.(b) except that node k0, each node among the K all has and only has a forerunner for concerning N.(c) there is a sequence node k0 in any node k ∈ K except that node k0, k1 ... ks makes that k0 is exactly a tree root, and ks=k, ordered pair<ki-1, ki>∈ N (1≤i≤s).Such sequence node is called the paths from root to node k.
Accompanying drawing 3 is the illustrations that legal information mark internal logic concerned with logical connective and logic connective, wherein, in A, B, C, D four formulas and or etc. the horizontal line before and after the logical connective represent the relevant laws information content, the ∧ in B, F, G three formulas, ∨ two logic connectives are represented respectively and or two kinds of logical connectives.In the practical application, the optional scope of logical connective is comparatively wide in range, be far above and or two kinds such simple, can be as required in the concrete operations and be determined use with reference to correlation theory.Indicate form as for logical relation, can take the form in the illustration of Fig. 3 in the practical application, but be can be more simple and clear, also can adopt forms such as process flow diagram the information content.
Accompanying drawing 4 is illustrations of the numbering of legal information, and letter such as A wherein, B can be as the label symbol of the node of a certain type, also can be as the numeral of a certain system, and it uses 3,0,1 in effect and (4) etc. digital identical.(4)! There is the sign of conflict in symbology statement information.In the illustration of accompanying drawing 3, the technology that the numbering of (4) has adopted literal, letter, numeral, symbol combination to number, Bian Hao advantage is range and the precision that is beneficial to expansion information location like this.Concrete how the numbering is the problem of artificial regulation in the concrete application process because of being limited to, so can't exhaustive list in the illustration the concrete pattern of numbering, but the technical key point of numbering must be clear, that is exactly, one wants to embody the characteristics of tree, mainly be the path of distinct root node to each concrete node, the 2nd, each node types should have differentiation, and the 3rd, want to embody differences such as effectiveness grade, conflict caution in each node serial number or the content.
Accompanying drawing 5 is the illustrations by the search method of factor retrieval by window legal informations such as subjective and objective feature, wherein, point to the horizontal line of A, B, C, D four letters and representing the relevant key element of the legal information that decomposes by subjective and objective feature, ABCD four letters combine and are promptly representing the combination of each legal information key element, and the logical relation between each key element is and relation, this combination corresponding the node corresponding Position Number, and the node location numbering promptly corresponding corresponding legal information content.Accompanying drawing 5 is a kind of form by the search method of factor retrieval by window legal informations such as subjective and objective feature, in the practical application, legal information decomposes key element and can corresponding letter also can corresponding numeral waits other character, numbering combination can embody between each key element and logical relation, the also logical relation of the other types that can embody, this can set as required.For the concrete application form of key, can adopt the expression form of accompanying drawing 5, also can adopt form more intuitively or flexibly such as chart.

Claims (7)

1, a kind of legal information logic node statement method, it is characterized in that, legal information is decomposed or reduce different types such as title, law-making stipulation, judicial explanation by rule, explained with the character of certain paragraph or figure etc. on demand, logical organization between these paragraphs is used tree, according to certain rules these paragraphs are numbered, numbering must embody the logical organization relation between these paragraphs, with accurate location.
2, legal information logic node statement method as claimed in claim 1, it is characterized in that, include such technology in the statement content, its content is that relevant paragraph content or relevant case etc. are decomposed into certain phrase or certain sentence or certain paragraph or certain numbering on demand, indicates logical relation between these phrases or sentence or paragraph or the numbering with logic connective or logical connective etc.
3, certain paragraph as claimed in claim 1, it is characterized in that, the numbering of paragraph is made up of literal or letter or number or symbol etc., and includes the sign of distinguishing contents such as rendeing a service grade, conflict caution, type difference in the content of the numbering of paragraph or paragraph.
4, legal information logic node statement method as claimed in claim 1 is characterized in that, except that providing conventional by the search methods such as numbering or ordering, also provides the search method by factor retrieval by window legal informations such as subjective and objective features for the retrieval of explaining content.
5, search method by factor retrieval by window legal informations such as subjective and objective features as claimed in claim 4, it is characterized in that, earlier legal provisions or relevant case etc. being done careful technology by subjective and objective feature according to certain rule decomposes, each is decomposed key element is numbered according to certain rules, numbering is merged into certain numbering combination according to certain rules, the corresponding certain legal provisions of each numbering combination, with decomposing key element, decompose the key element numbering, the numbering combination, establishment keys such as corresponding legal information, so, according to certain condition, search key according to certain rules and can find corresponding legal provisions of institute or case solution.
6, legal information logic node statement method as claimed in claim 1 is characterized in that, includes the paragraph of such type in the statement content, and what paragraph content was explained is that legal information is revised before for information about.
7, the character of certain paragraph as claimed in claim 1 or figure is characterized in that, the statement of antinomy character can not be arranged.
CN 200310105763 2003-11-30 2003-11-30 Legal information logic node formulation method Pending CN1622079A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN 200310105763 CN1622079A (en) 2003-11-30 2003-11-30 Legal information logic node formulation method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN 200310105763 CN1622079A (en) 2003-11-30 2003-11-30 Legal information logic node formulation method

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN1622079A true CN1622079A (en) 2005-06-01

Family

ID=34757399

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN 200310105763 Pending CN1622079A (en) 2003-11-30 2003-11-30 Legal information logic node formulation method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN1622079A (en)

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8838650B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2014-09-16 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for preprocessing a plurality of documents for search and for presenting search result
CN111079378A (en) * 2019-12-13 2020-04-28 深圳市兴之佳科技有限公司 Automatic numbering method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium

Cited By (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US8838650B2 (en) 2006-08-29 2014-09-16 International Business Machines Corporation Method and apparatus for preprocessing a plurality of documents for search and for presenting search result
CN111079378A (en) * 2019-12-13 2020-04-28 深圳市兴之佳科技有限公司 Automatic numbering method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
EP3928168B1 (en) Automatic extraction of assets data from engineering data sources
Jayram et al. Avatar information extraction system.
CN111428054A (en) Construction and storage method of knowledge graph in network space security field
CN107203468B (en) AST-based software version evolution comparative analysis method
US8073849B2 (en) Method and system for constructing data tag based on a concept relation network
CN101706807A (en) Method for automatically acquiring new words from Chinese webpages
CN113553420A (en) Power grid fault handling regulation recommendation method and system based on knowledge graph
CN105955951A (en) Message filtering method and device
CN110674310A (en) Knowledge graph-based industrial Internet of things identification method
Meroño-Peñuela et al. Linked humanities data: The next frontier? A case-study in historical census data
CN109902142B (en) Character string fuzzy matching and query method based on edit distance
CN116384889A (en) Intelligent analysis method for information big data based on natural language processing technology
CN105550169A (en) Method and device for identifying point of interest names based on character length
Fan et al. A differential testing approach for evaluating abstract syntax tree mapping algorithms
CN110941757A (en) Big data based policy information query pushing system and method
CN1622079A (en) Legal information logic node formulation method
Yang et al. Development and application of a field knowledge graph and search engine for pavement engineering
Phillips et al. Artificial Intelligence & Smart City Ethics: A Systematic Review
CN107016487A (en) A kind of index system modeling and modeling method based on environmental protection management
CN106980695B (en) Component retrieval method in power field and storage method thereof
Li et al. C-CIS: A Chinese competitive intelligence system based on the internet
CN116702902A (en) Hydrologic data map reasoning and knowledge base construction method
Frej et al. Notification and recommendation services for web communities
Lyu et al. GPB and BAC: two novel models towards building an intelligent motor fault maintenance question answering system
CN114328830A (en) Hierarchical retrieval and multi-dimensional classification method for information clue discovery

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
C06 Publication
PB01 Publication
C10 Entry into substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
C12 Rejection of a patent application after its publication
RJ01 Rejection of invention patent application after publication