CN1585677A - Medium and method for treating tailings of mining activities - Google Patents
Medium and method for treating tailings of mining activities Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN1585677A CN1585677A CNA028225767A CN02822576A CN1585677A CN 1585677 A CN1585677 A CN 1585677A CN A028225767 A CNA028225767 A CN A028225767A CN 02822576 A CN02822576 A CN 02822576A CN 1585677 A CN1585677 A CN 1585677A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- wood
- particles
- tailings
- medium
- wood chips
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 68
- 238000005065 mining Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 25
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 21
- 239000002023 wood Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 109
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 45
- 239000002245 particle Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 36
- 239000010865 sewage Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 9
- 238000009265 vermicomposting Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 238000009264 composting Methods 0.000 claims description 46
- 241000361919 Metaphire sieboldi Species 0.000 claims description 20
- 241000243686 Eisenia fetida Species 0.000 claims description 19
- 239000002361 compost Substances 0.000 claims description 17
- 239000002699 waste material Substances 0.000 claims description 17
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 claims description 13
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 239000011368 organic material Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000002253 acid Substances 0.000 claims description 7
- 244000005700 microbiome Species 0.000 claims description 7
- 238000002156 mixing Methods 0.000 claims description 7
- 241001245688 Eragrostis lehmanniana Species 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000006227 byproduct Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- MUKYLHIZBOASDM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-[carbamimidoyl(methyl)amino]acetic acid 2,3,4,5,6-pentahydroxyhexanoic acid Chemical compound NC(=N)N(C)CC(O)=O.OCC(O)C(O)C(O)C(O)C(O)=O MUKYLHIZBOASDM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 5
- 241000223782 Ciliophora Species 0.000 claims description 5
- 241000819233 Tribulus <sea snail> Species 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 claims description 5
- 229940047183 tribulus Drugs 0.000 claims description 5
- GRYLNZFGIOXLOG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitric acid Chemical compound O[N+]([O-])=O GRYLNZFGIOXLOG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 claims description 4
- 229910017604 nitric acid Inorganic materials 0.000 claims description 4
- 239000002360 explosive Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 241001521901 Tribulus lanuginosus Species 0.000 claims description 2
- 239000011248 coating agent Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 238000000576 coating method Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 239000002344 surface layer Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 239000002351 wastewater Substances 0.000 claims 1
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 73
- 239000010801 sewage sludge Substances 0.000 description 65
- 241001233061 earthworms Species 0.000 description 35
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 29
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 28
- BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N platinum Chemical compound [Pt] BASFCYQUMIYNBI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 27
- 239000002028 Biomass Substances 0.000 description 25
- 239000010949 copper Substances 0.000 description 24
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 24
- 229910001385 heavy metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 23
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 20
- 229910052802 copper Inorganic materials 0.000 description 19
- PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nickel Chemical compound [Ni] PXHVJJICTQNCMI-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 18
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 17
- 229920005610 lignin Polymers 0.000 description 16
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 14
- 230000000813 microbial effect Effects 0.000 description 14
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 13
- 238000011081 inoculation Methods 0.000 description 13
- 229910052759 nickel Inorganic materials 0.000 description 13
- 229910052697 platinum Inorganic materials 0.000 description 13
- 239000000523 sample Substances 0.000 description 13
- 229910002651 NO3 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 12
- 239000000758 substrate Substances 0.000 description 12
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 10
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 10
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000012447 hatching Effects 0.000 description 10
- 244000025254 Cannabis sativa Species 0.000 description 9
- XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N Iron Chemical compound [Fe] XEEYBQQBJWHFJM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 9
- UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulphide Chemical compound [S-2] UCKMPCXJQFINFW-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 9
- 239000001913 cellulose Substances 0.000 description 9
- 229920002678 cellulose Polymers 0.000 description 9
- 239000003673 groundwater Substances 0.000 description 9
- 229910052782 aluminium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 8
- 239000002956 ash Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000011575 calcium Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000003337 fertilizer Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000001963 growth medium Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000011777 magnesium Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000002609 medium Substances 0.000 description 8
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 8
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ammonia Chemical compound N QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- 229910052791 calcium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 7
- 239000012153 distilled water Substances 0.000 description 7
- 229910052749 magnesium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- 239000011572 manganese Substances 0.000 description 7
- 229910052751 metal Inorganic materials 0.000 description 7
- 239000002184 metal Substances 0.000 description 7
- 150000002739 metals Chemical class 0.000 description 7
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 7
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 244000052363 Cynodon dactylon Species 0.000 description 6
- 239000003570 air Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229910052500 inorganic mineral Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 229910052742 iron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 229910052748 manganese Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 235000010755 mineral Nutrition 0.000 description 6
- 239000011707 mineral Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000010815 organic waste Substances 0.000 description 6
- 239000011236 particulate material Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229910052700 potassium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- 229910052708 sodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 6
- NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Nitrate Chemical compound [O-][N+]([O-])=O NHNBFGGVMKEFGY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 241000607142 Salmonella Species 0.000 description 5
- 229910052785 arsenic Inorganic materials 0.000 description 5
- 230000015556 catabolic process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000003153 chemical reaction reagent Substances 0.000 description 5
- 238000006731 degradation reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000004880 explosion Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000000605 extraction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 description 5
- 239000004033 plastic Substances 0.000 description 5
- 229920003023 plastic Polymers 0.000 description 5
- 230000002829 reductive effect Effects 0.000 description 5
- 239000011573 trace mineral Substances 0.000 description 5
- 235000013619 trace mineral Nutrition 0.000 description 5
- CSCPPACGZOOCGX-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetone Chemical compound CC(C)=O CSCPPACGZOOCGX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- 241000339490 Brachyachne Species 0.000 description 4
- RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N Copper Chemical compound [Cu] RYGMFSIKBFXOCR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 4
- DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M Ilexoside XXIX Chemical compound C[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(CC[C@@]3(C(=CC[C@H]4[C@]3(CC[C@@H]5[C@@]4(CC[C@@H](C5(C)C)OS(=O)(=O)[O-])C)C)[C@@H]2[C@]1(C)O)C)C(=O)O[C@H]6[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O6)CO)O)O)O.[Na+] DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M 0.000 description 4
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L Sulfate Chemical compound [O-]S([O-])(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 4
- 231100000704 bioconcentration Toxicity 0.000 description 4
- 229910052799 carbon Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000000460 chlorine Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229910052804 chromium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 239000011651 chromium Substances 0.000 description 4
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000008367 deionised water Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000001035 drying Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000000835 fiber Substances 0.000 description 4
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 4
- 230000001850 reproductive effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 description 4
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 4
- 241000894006 Bacteria Species 0.000 description 3
- 229910019142 PO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 231100000674 Phytotoxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 241000589516 Pseudomonas Species 0.000 description 3
- 241000235070 Saccharomyces Species 0.000 description 3
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910021529 ammonia Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 231100000693 bioaccumulation Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 229910052796 boron Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 229910052801 chlorine Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910021641 deionized water Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000000151 deposition Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000018109 developmental process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002054 inoculum Substances 0.000 description 3
- 229910052745 lead Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 238000011068 loading method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 3
- 235000003715 nutritional status Nutrition 0.000 description 3
- 239000013618 particulate matter Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000008635 plant growth Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 3
- 239000000047 product Substances 0.000 description 3
- -1 sandy loam Substances 0.000 description 3
- 239000002002 slurry Substances 0.000 description 3
- 231100000331 toxic Toxicity 0.000 description 3
- 230000002588 toxic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 235000005474 African couch grass Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-O Ammonium Chemical compound [NH4+] QGZKDVFQNNGYKY-UHFFFAOYSA-O 0.000 description 2
- ZOXJGFHDIHLPTG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Boron Chemical compound [B] ZOXJGFHDIHLPTG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N Calcium Chemical compound [Ca] OYPRJOBELJOOCE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N Carbon Chemical compound [C] OKTJSMMVPCPJKN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 244000152970 Digitaria sanguinalis Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000010823 Digitaria sanguinalis Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 241000588724 Escherichia coli Species 0.000 description 2
- 241001520106 Eustachys Species 0.000 description 2
- 241000186660 Lactobacillus Species 0.000 description 2
- FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N Magnesium Chemical compound [Mg] FYYHWMGAXLPEAU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- CSNNHWWHGAXBCP-UHFFFAOYSA-L Magnesium sulfate Chemical compound [Mg+2].[O-][S+2]([O-])([O-])[O-] CSNNHWWHGAXBCP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- PWHULOQIROXLJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Manganese Chemical compound [Mn] PWHULOQIROXLJO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- WXOMTJVVIMOXJL-BOBFKVMVSA-A O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O[Al](O)O.O[Al](O)O.O[Al](O)O.O[Al](O)O.O[Al](O)O.O[Al](O)O.O[Al](O)O.O[Al](O)O.O[Al](O)OS(=O)(=O)OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](O[C@]2(COS(=O)(=O)O[Al](O)O)O[C@H](OS(=O)(=O)O[Al](O)O)[C@@H](OS(=O)(=O)O[Al](O)O)[C@@H]2OS(=O)(=O)O[Al](O)O)[C@H](OS(=O)(=O)O[Al](O)O)[C@@H](OS(=O)(=O)O[Al](O)O)[C@@H]1OS(=O)(=O)O[Al](O)O Chemical compound O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O.O[Al](O)O.O[Al](O)O.O[Al](O)O.O[Al](O)O.O[Al](O)O.O[Al](O)O.O[Al](O)O.O[Al](O)O.O[Al](O)OS(=O)(=O)OC[C@H]1O[C@@H](O[C@]2(COS(=O)(=O)O[Al](O)O)O[C@H](OS(=O)(=O)O[Al](O)O)[C@@H](OS(=O)(=O)O[Al](O)O)[C@@H]2OS(=O)(=O)O[Al](O)O)[C@H](OS(=O)(=O)O[Al](O)O)[C@@H](OS(=O)(=O)O[Al](O)O)[C@@H]1OS(=O)(=O)O[Al](O)O WXOMTJVVIMOXJL-BOBFKVMVSA-A 0.000 description 2
- DBMJMQXJHONAFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium laurylsulphate Chemical compound [Na+].CCCCCCCCCCCCOS([O-])(=O)=O DBMJMQXJHONAFJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000003513 alkali Substances 0.000 description 2
- BFNBIHQBYMNNAN-UHFFFAOYSA-N ammonium sulfate Chemical compound N.N.OS(O)(=O)=O BFNBIHQBYMNNAN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- RQNWIZPPADIBDY-UHFFFAOYSA-N arsenic atom Chemical compound [As] RQNWIZPPADIBDY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000002585 base Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229910052793 cadmium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- OSGAYBCDTDRGGQ-UHFFFAOYSA-L calcium sulfate Chemical compound [Ca+2].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O OSGAYBCDTDRGGQ-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 2
- 238000005251 capillar electrophoresis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005341 cation exchange Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004927 clay Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000001332 colony forming effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011109 contamination Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002596 correlated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000003599 detergent Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000011038 discontinuous diafiltration by volume reduction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 235000020774 essential nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000012467 final product Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000005188 flotation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005206 flow analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- 210000003736 gastrointestinal content Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000003895 groundwater pollution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000004615 ingredient Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229940039696 lactobacillus Drugs 0.000 description 2
- 230000000670 limiting effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 231100000783 metal toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 239000002068 microbial inoculum Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000010811 mineral waste Substances 0.000 description 2
- MEFBJEMVZONFCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N molybdate Chemical compound [O-][Mo]([O-])(=O)=O MEFBJEMVZONFCJ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 230000007935 neutral effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 150000002823 nitrates Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- QJGQUHMNIGDVPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N nitrogen group Chemical group [N] QJGQUHMNIGDVPM-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000005416 organic matter Substances 0.000 description 2
- VLTRZXGMWDSKGL-UHFFFAOYSA-N perchloric acid Chemical compound OCl(=O)(=O)=O VLTRZXGMWDSKGL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000011669 selenium Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052711 selenium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 239000002893 slag Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000019333 sodium laurylsulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 description 2
- 238000001179 sorption measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 150000004763 sulfides Chemical class 0.000 description 2
- 231100000167 toxic agent Toxicity 0.000 description 2
- 239000003440 toxic substance Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052720 vanadium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- LEONUFNNVUYDNQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N vanadium atom Chemical compound [V] LEONUFNNVUYDNQ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000003643 water by type Substances 0.000 description 2
- RNAMYOYQYRYFQY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 2-(4,4-difluoropiperidin-1-yl)-6-methoxy-n-(1-propan-2-ylpiperidin-4-yl)-7-(3-pyrrolidin-1-ylpropoxy)quinazolin-4-amine Chemical compound N1=C(N2CCC(F)(F)CC2)N=C2C=C(OCCCN3CCCC3)C(OC)=CC2=C1NC1CCN(C(C)C)CC1 RNAMYOYQYRYFQY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229920001817 Agar Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 241001550224 Apha Species 0.000 description 1
- 241001149231 Arachnis x Vanda Species 0.000 description 1
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-M Bicarbonate Chemical compound OC([O-])=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 241001495673 Cenchrus ciliaris Species 0.000 description 1
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M Chloride anion Chemical compound [Cl-] VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- ZAMOUSCENKQFHK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chlorine atom Chemical compound [Cl] ZAMOUSCENKQFHK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000145724 Chloris gayana Species 0.000 description 1
- VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N Chromium Chemical compound [Cr] VYZAMTAEIAYCRO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000289763 Dasygaster padockina Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000017896 Digitaria Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241001303487 Digitaria <clam> Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000001602 Digitaria X umfolozi Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000017898 Digitaria ciliaris Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000005476 Digitaria cruciata Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000006830 Digitaria didactyla Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000005804 Digitaria eriantha ssp. eriantha Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N EDTA Chemical compound OC(=O)CN(CC(O)=O)CCN(CC(O)=O)CC(O)=O KCXVZYZYPLLWCC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 241000380130 Ehrharta erecta Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000014716 Eleusine indica Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241001518928 Eragrostis curvula Species 0.000 description 1
- 244000166124 Eucalyptus globulus Species 0.000 description 1
- 108010014173 Factor X Proteins 0.000 description 1
- VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrochloric acid Chemical compound Cl VEXZGXHMUGYJMC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000019738 Limestone Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 240000007298 Megathyrsus maximus Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000605159 Nitrobacter Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000000020 Nitrocellulose Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000605122 Nitrosomonas Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000033836 Oenothera sinuosa Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000209117 Panicum Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000006443 Panicum miliaceum subsp. miliaceum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000009037 Panicum miliaceum subsp. ruderale Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000042032 Petrocephalus catostoma Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000209504 Poaceae Species 0.000 description 1
- 239000004698 Polyethylene Substances 0.000 description 1
- ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N Potassium Chemical compound [K] ZLMJMSJWJFRBEC-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910006130 SO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 241000124033 Salix Species 0.000 description 1
- BUGBHKTXTAQXES-UHFFFAOYSA-N Selenium Chemical compound [Se] BUGBHKTXTAQXES-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 1
- NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N Sulfur Chemical compound [S] NINIDFKCEFEMDL-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 239000005864 Sulphur Substances 0.000 description 1
- 241000133430 Tinospora Species 0.000 description 1
- 241000221561 Ustilaginales Species 0.000 description 1
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000002835 absorbance Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012445 acidic reagent Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000008272 agar Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013019 agitation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009418 agronomic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003915 air pollution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004411 aluminium Substances 0.000 description 1
- XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N aluminium Chemical compound [Al] XAGFODPZIPBFFR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 125000000129 anionic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 150000001450 anions Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 230000003466 anti-cipated effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000012223 aqueous fraction Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000001479 atomic absorption spectroscopy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001580 bacterial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004071 biological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000037396 body weight Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009835 boiling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009395 breeding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001488 breeding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000011132 calcium sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- YYRMJZQKEFZXMX-UHFFFAOYSA-N calcium;phosphoric acid Chemical compound [Ca+2].OP(O)(O)=O.OP(O)(O)=O YYRMJZQKEFZXMX-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910002091 carbon monoxide Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N carbonic acid Chemical class OC(O)=O BVKZGUZCCUSVTD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 125000002091 cationic group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 150000001768 cations Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229910017052 cobalt Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010941 cobalt Substances 0.000 description 1
- GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N cobalt atom Chemical compound [Co] GUTLYIVDDKVIGB-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 238000004737 colorimetric analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000052 comparative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000012141 concentrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000356 contaminant Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000000875 corresponding effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001461 cytolytic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005202 decontamination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003588 decontaminative effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013400 design of experiment Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001066 destructive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001627 detrimental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000029087 digestion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007865 diluting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 201000010099 disease Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 208000037265 diseases, disorders, signs and symptoms Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 229910000397 disodium phosphate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000000428 dust Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000011067 equilibration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003628 erosive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000035558 fertility Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004720 fertilization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000706 filtrate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010881 fly ash Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013305 food Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000002538 fungal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000007789 gas Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N gold Chemical compound [Au] PCHJSUWPFVWCPO-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 229910052737 gold Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000010931 gold Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000227 grinding Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003306 harvesting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000383 hazardous chemical Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000005802 health problem Effects 0.000 description 1
- QWPPOHNGKGFGJK-UHFFFAOYSA-N hypochlorous acid Chemical compound ClO QWPPOHNGKGFGJK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001727 in vivo Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009616 inductively coupled plasma Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008595 infiltration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001764 infiltration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004255 ion exchange chromatography Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000006028 limestone Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010871 livestock manure Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003050 macronutrient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000021073 macronutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910052943 magnesium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000019341 magnesium sulphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- WPBNNNQJVZRUHP-UHFFFAOYSA-L manganese(2+);methyl n-[[2-(methoxycarbonylcarbamothioylamino)phenyl]carbamothioyl]carbamate;n-[2-(sulfidocarbothioylamino)ethyl]carbamodithioate Chemical compound [Mn+2].[S-]C(=S)NCCNC([S-])=S.COC(=O)NC(=S)NC1=CC=CC=C1NC(=S)NC(=O)OC WPBNNNQJVZRUHP-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 208000005135 methemoglobinemia Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 238000001471 micro-filtration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012543 microbiological analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011785 micronutrient Substances 0.000 description 1
- 235000013369 micronutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000003607 modifier Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000003097 mucus Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 229920001220 nitrocellulos Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 238000010899 nucleation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 235000021232 nutrient availability Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 235000016709 nutrition Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 230000035764 nutrition Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000000287 oocyte Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 150000007524 organic acids Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 235000005985 organic acids Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 125000001477 organic nitrogen group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000003921 particle size analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 244000052769 pathogen Species 0.000 description 1
- 230000002085 persistent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000021317 phosphate Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 150000003013 phosphoric acid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910052698 phosphorus Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 230000000704 physical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000208 phytotoxic Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000000885 phytotoxic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229920000573 polyethylene Polymers 0.000 description 1
- 239000001816 polyoxyethylene sorbitan tristearate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011591 potassium Substances 0.000 description 1
- OTYBMLCTZGSZBG-UHFFFAOYSA-L potassium sulfate Chemical compound [K+].[K+].[O-]S([O-])(=O)=O OTYBMLCTZGSZBG-UHFFFAOYSA-L 0.000 description 1
- 229910052939 potassium sulfate Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 235000011151 potassium sulphates Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 238000003918 potentiometric titration Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001737 promoting effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004064 recycling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 239000012488 sample solution Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007873 sieving Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000010802 sludge Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000004856 soil analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000003900 soil pollution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005527 soil sampling Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009331 sowing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004611 spectroscopical analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006641 stabilisation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011105 stabilization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000004575 stone Substances 0.000 description 1
- QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N sulfuric acid Substances OS(O)(=O)=O QAOWNCQODCNURD-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 150000003467 sulfuric acid derivatives Chemical class 0.000 description 1
- 229910021653 sulphate ion Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000002426 superphosphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- JBQYATWDVHIOAR-UHFFFAOYSA-N tellanylidenegermanium Chemical compound [Te]=[Ge] JBQYATWDVHIOAR-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 125000000101 thioether group Chemical group 0.000 description 1
- 231100000701 toxic element Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 231100000419 toxicity Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 230000001988 toxicity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 231100000027 toxicology Toxicity 0.000 description 1
- 239000010875 treated wood Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000010876 untreated wood Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009423 ventilation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035899 viability Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005406 washing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000002268 wool Anatomy 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B09—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09B—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B09B1/00—Dumping solid waste
- B09B1/004—Covering of dumping sites
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B09—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09B—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- B09B3/00—Destroying solid waste or transforming solid waste into something useful or harmless
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C05—FERTILISERS; MANUFACTURE THEREOF
- C05F—ORGANIC FERTILISERS NOT COVERED BY SUBCLASSES C05B, C05C, e.g. FERTILISERS FROM WASTE OR REFUSE
- C05F17/00—Preparation of fertilisers characterised by biological or biochemical treatment steps, e.g. composting or fermentation
- C05F17/05—Treatments involving invertebrates, e.g. worms, flies or maggots
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P20/00—Technologies relating to chemical industry
- Y02P20/141—Feedstock
- Y02P20/145—Feedstock the feedstock being materials of biological origin
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
- Y02W30/00—Technologies for solid waste management
- Y02W30/30—Landfill technologies aiming to mitigate methane emissions
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
- Y02W30/00—Technologies for solid waste management
- Y02W30/40—Bio-organic fraction processing; Production of fertilisers from the organic fraction of waste or refuse
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02W—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO WASTEWATER TREATMENT OR WASTE MANAGEMENT
- Y02W30/00—Technologies for solid waste management
- Y02W30/50—Reuse, recycling or recovery technologies
- Y02W30/78—Recycling of wood or furniture waste
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Environmental & Geological Engineering (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Tropical Medicine & Parasitology (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Insects & Arthropods (AREA)
- Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
- General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Fertilizers (AREA)
- Processing Of Solid Wastes (AREA)
Abstract
This invention provides a medium and method for treating tailing bodies of mining activities including the steps of vermicomposting a mixture of wood particles and sewage; applying the mixture to the tailing bodies; and planting vegetation on the tailing bodies.
Description
Introduction and background
The present invention relates to a medium and a method for treating mining active tailings (tailings).
Human activities such as mining generate large amounts of waste that pose economic and environmental problems. This is because not only does the treatment of these wastes require expensive large areas of land, but the wastes also contaminate the soil, ground water and air. In particular, the mining of platinum, gold and other minerals has considerable environmental impact due to the creation of large tailing dams (tailing dams). Tailings are produced as a slime waste stream during mineral processing and are essentially biologically non-growing media with limited water holding capacity and high percentage of alkali saturation. In addition, tailings also contain high concentrations of potentially environmentally toxic heavy metals that can leach into groundwater.
The Walmsley (1987) study showed that although the tailings are not saline, they contain high concentrations of manganese, iron and sulphur, which are phytotoxic at high concentrations. For example, platinum tailings consist primarily of sand (75%) and silt (20%), with the remaining 5% of the particles being clay and negligible organic components. The above factors complicate the proper vegetation restoration of the tailings to achieve the pre-mining land application potential and lead to environmental degradation of the area. In addition to inorganic tailings, the mining of platinum further produces large amounts of organic waste, namely eucalyptus willow (Saligna folium alpiniae oxyphyllae) wood chips and sewage sludge. The tailing dam poses a series of environmental hazards including air, dust and groundwater pollution due to its physical and chemical properties, while the dumped wood chips add to the risk of fire during the hot, dry summer months.
The wood chips generated upon extraction of platinum originate from the explosion of underground complete wood pillars. The result is that the wood chips and ore are processed together during the initial grinding and extraction stages of mineral processing. The wood chip fraction is separated as a by-product by screening before the platinum is extracted. Due to the explosion, wood chips contain high concentrations of nitrates, which are already high enough to cause health problems when they penetrate into groundwater, such as methemoglobinemia (DWAF 1996). At present, wood chips are incinerated at high cost.
Thus, slime, wood chips and sewage pose ecological and environmental liability to the mining industry.
The primary purpose of the tailings remediation program is to restore the site to its pre-contaminated condition, which often includes vegetation restoration to stabilize the treated soil. This is difficult and expensive due to the difficulty in obtaining topsoil and the lack of organic matter, elemental imbalances and the lack of essential nutrients in the tailings dam. In one attempt to address these problems, topsoil is either planted from other areas (which then need to be rehabilitated) or treated regularly with inorganic fertilizers, which is expensive and ecologically intolerable. Most residual mine dumps are currently reconstituted by growing grass on the dumps. However, promoting viable and sustainable vegetation is a problem due to the ineffectiveness and phytotoxicity of the growth medium.
U.S. patent No. 6,004,069 discloses a method of providing a protective cover of a subatmospheric inorganic composite on sulfide-containing tailings and sulfide-bearing mineral waste, the method comprising the steps of:
i) providing a deposit of sulphide particulate material comprising at least one of tailings comprising sulphide minerals, waste rocks having sulphides and mineral waste having sulphides, the sulphide particulate material having a low water conductivity (hydraulic conductivity), the deposit having an apex and a slope which encloses an angle of more than 0.5 degrees with the horizontal;
ii) depositing a first particulate layer comprising inert fine species having an average particle size of between 10Em and 200.mu.m and a water conductivity of greater than 10.sup. -7cm/sec and a matrix suction value of greater than 4cm of water on the deposit of sulphide particulate material, the first particulate layer being deposited such that the first particulate layer extends over the deposit of sulphide material to a depth of more than 4 cm;
iii) depositing a second particulate layer on the deposit of sulphide particulate material, the second particulate layer comprising inert fine particulate matter having an average particle size between 200.mu.m and 5000.mu.m, a hydraulic conductivity between 10.sup. -3 and 1cm/sec, the hydraulic conductivity of the second particulate layer being at least one order of magnitude higher than the hydraulic conductivity of the first particulate layer, and a matrix suction value, the ratio of the matrix suction value of the second particulate layer to the base mode suction value of the first particulate layer being less than 1: 2, the second particulate layer being deposited to provide for extension of the second particulate layer on the first particulate layer to a depth which is at least 1.5 times the matrix suction value of the second particulate layer measured in cm of water; and the combination of (a) and (b),
iv) depositing a third particulate layer comprising inert coarse particulate matter having an average particulate size greater than 3mm and a water conductivity greater than 1cm/sec on the sulfide particulate material deposit, the third particulate layer being deposited to provide the third particulate layer extending over the second particulate layer to a depth of more than 6 cm.
The inert fine material contained in the first particulate layer is selected from the group consisting of oxidized mill tailings, low sulfide containing mill tailings, desulfurized mill tailings, neutralized mill tailings, loess, fine sand, sandy clay, sandy loam, fly ash, sludge, tillite, alluvial source fine material, and mixtures thereof.
The inert fine particulate material contained in the second particulate layer is selected from the group consisting of granulated slag, granulated desulphurised slag, desulphurised rock, fine sand, fine crushed rock, winter sand and mixtures thereof.
The inert coarse particulate matter contained in the third particulate layer is selected from the group consisting of crushed rock, crushed stone, crushed limestone, pebbles and naturally occurring coarse materials, crushed destructive materials and mixtures thereof.
Some of the disadvantages of the above-described methods are that no organic substances are added to the top layer and that they are relatively complex and expensive due to the many different substances and steps involved. It is not commercially viable.
Object of the Invention
It is therefore an object of the present invention to provide a medium and a method for processing tailings with which the aforementioned problems and disadvantages are overcome or at least alleviated.
Summary of The Invention
According to a first aspect of the present invention there is provided a method of treating a residual ore body of a mining activity, the method including the step of applying wood particles to the residual ore body.
The wood particles may be wood chips recovered from waste wood and may be a by-product of mining activities, more particularly in the form of wood mine pillars that disintegrate in an explosion operation.
The wood chips may be pretreated with an acid.
The acid may be, for example, nitric acid (HNO)3)。
The wood chips can be applied to the top layer of the ore body, for example in the form of a cover layer.
In a preferred form of the method, the wood chips are processed into the tailings bodies, such as by mechanically and/or manually digging the wood chips into the tailings bodies.
The wood chips are preferably processed into the tailings bodies at a level of about 30cm below the external surface of the tailings bodies.
The wood chips can be applied to the residual ore body existing in the form of a dam to restore the dam.
However, in a preferred form of the process, the chips are intermittently applied to the tailings dam during its development.
The wood chips are preferably applied at a rate of 60-90 tons per hectare of tailings dam surface.
Further according to the invention, the method comprises the further step of composting the wood chips before the step of applying the wood chips to the tailing bodies.
Yet further in accordance with the present invention, the step of composting the wood chips comprises the step of composting the wood chips into worms.
The step of composting the wood chips may comprise the further step of mixing the wood chips with another source of organic material.
Other sources of organic material may include contaminated water,
wood chips and sewage may be mixed to enable the formation of compost, which may thereafter be inoculated with worms to enable the formation of a worm compost medium.
The worms may be from the species earthworm (Eisenia fetida).
If the availability of sewage is not a limiting factor, the wood chips and sewage can be mixed in a 3: 1 or 3: 2 ratio.
According to another aspect of the present invention there is provided a tailings dam treated according to the above method of the present invention.
According to another aspect of the invention there is provided a composted medium for treating residual ore bodies of mining activities, the medium comprising a mixture of wood particles and another source of organic material.
The wood particles may be wood chips recovered from waste wood, which are a by-product of mining activities.
The wood chips may be in the form of wood ore pillars that disintegrate in an explosion operation.
Other sources of organic material may be in the form of sewage.
The mixture can be further processed into vermicompost.
The medium further may include a selection of microorganisms.
The invention will now be further described by way of a number of embodiments, with reference to the accompanying drawings and figures. For clarity, the description of the drawings is set forth in the related embodiments.
Example 1
This embodiment refers to the following additional figures, wherein:
FIG. 1.1 is a flow chart of a method according to the invention; and
figure 1.2 is a final view of the dam showing grass growing on its sides to restore the tailings dam.
A mining method including a method of treating or restoring a mineral tailings dam according to the present invention is generally illustrated by the section and flow diagram in fig. 1.1.
The mineral may be, for example, platinum (Pt) ore 10. The mined products and waste, including wood particles in the form of wood chips or wood chips, are indicated at 12. Wood chips originate from well known wood mine props that disintegrate in the explosive operation of mining. The mixture is fed to a flotation stage 14 where the lighter waste wood is separated from the heavier platinum and slurry in a known manner.
The platinum and slurry at outlet 16 are also separated at 20 in a well known manner. The platinum is recovered at 22 and the remaining slurry is pumped to a remote location at 24 to form a tailings dam 26, again in a known manner.
The waste wood at the outlet 18 of the flotation stage 14 is ground and rolled at 28 to form wood chips 30.
It has been determined that known tailings dams contain unacceptably high concentrations of intractable elements that can leach out of the rain and into underground water sources, thereby contaminating those sources. The elemental composition of the chip sample and the tailing dam sample, respectively, is shown in table 1.1, and is water soluble and can be moved as described above and determined by well known extraction procedures.
The elemental composition of the mixture corresponding to that in table 1.1 is shown in table 1.2, where wood chips 30 are applied to the tailings dam 26 as shown in step 32 in fig. 1.1.
From the results of the analyses on the wood chips and the tailings, respectively, it is clear that the tailings contain high concentrations of major elements of calcium (Ca), magnesium (Mg), sodium (Na), Sulfate (SO)4) And chlorine (Cl) concentration. High SO in tailings4The concentration shows the ability to generate acid over time. This is due to the remaining low bicarbonate (HCO) in the sample3) Concentration was confirmed, indicating that the buffer capacity in the tailings was almost exhausted. The need for increased adsorption capacity also passed a high base saturation of 21.48% and 2.09mS cm-1High Electrical Conductivity (EC) indicating that those elements that are not currently bound will be carried by any rain water past the dam into the groundwater. As regards the trace elements, the concentrations of zinc (Zn) and manganese (Mn) and the potentially toxic heavy metals aluminium (Al), nickel (Ni), cobalt (Co) and arsenic (As) exceed the recommended standard values, and they are present in high concentrations in the tailings. In contrast, wood chips provide a means of adsorbing some of the excess elemental concentration despite the high Al concentration.
The negative surface charge of the chips is known to attract and bind certain elements and the results in table 1.2 clearly show that increasing the chip application rate decreases Ca, Mg, K, Na, SO4And the concentration of Cl, Mn, Cu, Zn, Ni and Co. The reduction in the concentration of the above-mentioned elements in the extractable water fraction is also clearly reflected by the lower conductivity (EC) after the application of the increased volume of wood chips. Thus, as wood chip utilization increases, the concentration of elements potentially able to leach into the groundwater gradually decreases.
It has been found that 0.01% nitric acid (HNO) is used3) Solution pretreatment of wood chips will result in lower wood chip applications with the same efficiency in reducing the concentration of potentially toxic elementsAnd (4) rate.
Likewise, as described in more detail in example 5 below, pre-composting wood chips (with or without sewage sludge) to worms may increase the bulk density of the material that must be applied to the tailings and reduce the time period for composting.
It has further been found that the use of 60-90 tons of wood chips per hectare of tailings dam surface produces good results.
With respect to fig. 1.2 showing the tailings dam 26, acid pretreated wood chips are processed into the tailings dam 26 at a level 34 of about 30cm below the tailings dam outer surface 36. The wood chips are preferably machined into the fixed side of the dam intermittently over a period of time as the dam is formed.
It is believed that the negative surface charge of the wood chips significantly increases the Cation Exchange Capacity (CEC), thereby reducing the movement of potentially toxic elements into the groundwater.
The tailings can be further recovered by sowing grass seeds on the above-mentioned side surfaces. It is anticipated that due to the nitrate levels present in the dam sides 38, including the wood chips, less or no inorganic fertilizer is required to promote the growth of the grass 40.
Example 2
This embodiment refers to the following additional figures, wherein:
FIG. 2.1 is a schematic design of the treatment and repetition of the method according to the invention on a platinum slime; and
FIG. 2.2 depicts the display of wood chip applications (0, 5, 15 and 30 tons ha)-1) RDA biplot (biplot) of the relationship of nutrient availability to the growth medium. The species environmental dependence of the first axis was 0.749.
Design of experiments
The experimental site was constructed on a platinum ore tailings dam and monitored at 24X 4m for one and a half years2Small land blocks. The individual designs of the different treatment groups are summarized in fig. 2.1. The experiment consisted of 6 treatments on 3 replicate plots and 4 control plots.
The first 3 treatments were combined according to standard practice with current vegetation restoration and fertiliser on mineralsApplications, but with increased wood chip applications (1: 5 ton ha treatment)-1(ii) a And (3) treatment 2: 15 ton ha-1(ii) a And (3) treatment: 30 ton ha-1). The Zantate treated wood chips and untreated wood chips were applied in a 1: 1 ratio. The following fertilizers were applied in the first 3 treatments:
a) superphosphate 1200kg ha-1
b)NH4SO4 350kg ha-1
c)KCl 400kg ha-1
The first 3 treatments were vegetation reconstruction with a mixture of creeping and rootstocks of bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon) and Cynodon nlemmuensis collected near the tailing dam. Bermuda grass and Cynodon nlemmuensis are planted in the same proportion at 6 rows per plot.
No. 4 treatment with 30 tons ha-1Wood chips and fertilizer applications as used in the previous 3 treatments were modified. The small land is composed of 10kg ha-1Tribulus ciliate (Cenchrus ciliaris) (Molopo), 10kg ha-1Is prepared from Tinospora Gagneria (Chloris gayana) and 5kg ha-1The leaf of Oenothera sinuosa (Eragrostis curvula) (PUK E436) and 5kg ha-1The seed mixture of Eragrostis lehmanniana was used for vegetation restoration.
30 tons ha for treatment 6-1And (3) improving wood chips. Chemical analysis of the tailings (table 2.5) was used to determine the fertilization rate for optimal growth conditions. 800kg ha-1Ammonium Monosulfate (MAP) fertilizer is used to improve the nutrient status of the growth medium. Plots were vegetated with a grass seed mix similar to that used in treatment 5 (table 2.1).
Materials and methods
Botanic measurements
The plants on the site are often used at 1m2Bridge point devices (bridge points) mounted on the frame monitor. Frequency of species and substantial coverage of species thus using 125 points m-2And (4) determining. The standard grass biomass was then determined. Will be at 1m2The standard biomass established in the signal region (quadrant) was trimmed with wool scissors and sorted by species. The biomass was dried at 60 ℃ for 48 hours and weighed.
Soil sampling and analysis
Soil samples (about 500g) were collected with a soil punch. The 50 gram sub-samples were quantified for particle size distribution according to the procedure advocated by the American Society for Testing and Materials (1961). Soil samples were chemically analyzed by the 1: 2(v/v) extraction procedure described by Black (1965) to determine the water-soluble alkaline cationic components (Ca, Mg, K and Na) and trace elements (Fe, Mn, Cu and Zn) and heavy metals (As, Se, Al, Cr, Co, Ni, Pb and Cd).
Water-soluble basic cations (Ca, Mg, K and Na), trace elements (Fe, Mn, Cu, Zn) and heavy metals (As, Se, Al, Cr, Co, Ni, Pb and Cd) were quantified by atomic absorption spectroscopy using spectra.aa-250 (Varian, australia). Anion (F, Cl, NO)3、PO4And SO4) Quantification was performed by ion chromatography (Metrohm 761, switzerland). 75ml of soil was used for 1: 2 extraction analysis. Ammonia (NH)4) The concentration is quantified by the ammonia selective electrode method as described by Banwart et al (1972). Bicarbonate salts (HCO) in soil3) The content of (D) was determined by potentiometric titration with an end point of standard 0.005M HCl solution, pH4.5 (Skougstd et al, 1979). Boron (B) concentrations were determined by the azomethine-H-method described by Barrett (1978) using a VEGA 400 spectroquant with absorbance colorimetry at 420 nm.
The pH and conductivity (EC) of the soil was determined in the 1: 2 extract at 25 ℃ using a WTW LF92 conductivity meter.
Plant, soil and water chemistry data STATISTICA ver.6 (Statsuf)t, inc.2001) were analyzed. The influence of the treatment and the wood chip concentration was investigated by redundancy analysis (ReDudancy analysis) (RDA) (Ter Bfaak and1997). RDA is a limited linear classification (ordering) method and thus is also a direct gradient analysis technique that integrates classification with regression (Ter Braak, 1994). An advantage of applying categorical ranking and direct gradient analysis as an analytical tool is that it can provide graphical results of the relationship between variables and related environmental factors. Screening criteria established by the U.S. Department of Energy (USA Department of Energy) (Efroymson et al, 1997) can be used as toxicology guidelines.
Results
Plant composition
Tables 2.2, 2.3 and 2.4 summarize the species frequency, basic coverage and biomass measured in 6 treated and control plots. During the measurement 14 grass species were encountered. The treatments with the highest abundance of species were treatments 5 and 6, which were seeded with the mixture of species shown in table 2.2. The seed mix used in treatment 4 produced the highest total basal coverage (5.2%). All other treatments, including controls, had very similar basal coverage (+ -3%). The total biomass between plots was not significantly different due to the high variation in standard biomass. The total biomass was highest in the plots treated with treatment 6. This is mainly due to the activity of Tribulus terrestris.
Tribulus ciliate variety Molopo is the most successful species established from seeds, based on frequency, basal coverage and biomass results. Other species which also performed satisfactorily were the Tribulus ciliate variety Gayndah (treatment 6), Eragrostis lehmanniana (Lehmann's LoveGrass) (treatments 4-5) and Saxatilis flexuosa (treatment 4). Surprisingly, a large crabgrass (Digitaria riantha) that generally performs very well in restored areas (Smuts FingerGrass) (Mentis 2000) cannot be established on experimental plots. One possible reason for the unsuccessful establishment of the crabgrass is the drying conditions at the beginning of the experiment.
Chemical properties of soil
3 samples were taken from the tailings for chemical quantification and to determine the fertilizer application of treatment 6 (table 2.5). Samples 2 and 3 are very similar chemically, but the nutrient concentration in sample 1 is considerably greater than in the first two samples. This shows a high variability in the chemical composition of the sample. The 1: 2 water extract (Table 2.5) further showed that heavy metal toxicity to plants could be a serious problem in the unmodified tailings. Plant growth can be affected As a result of increased soil solution concentrations of Pb, Cr, Co, Se, and in particular As (Efrotmson 1997).
The results of the 1: 2 water extract program shown in Table 2.6 show the concentration of elements in the soil solution that can be adsorbed by plants at 2 months in 2002. Generally, the concentrations of macroelements (Ca, Mg and K) are slightly lower than the preferred concentrations for effective growth. The available phosphates and nitrates in soil solutions have also been exhausted due to assimilation by plants. NO3And PO4Will be the limiting factor for plant growth.
In addition to Cu, no potential micronutrient toxicity occurs at the existing pH levels. Cu is as high asUp to 0.827 mu mol/dm3Is present at an elevated concentration (potential level of phytotoxicity according to Efroymson (1997) of 0.94. mu. mol/dm3)。
The pH of the growth medium remained alkaline (average pH of all treatments: 7.8. + -. 0.025). The low EC also confirms the low nutrient status of the growth medium and further shows that salinity is not relevant. The sodium adsorption ratio SAR is also lower than the recommended value of 1, indicating the absence of potential soil sodium (solubility).
By comparing table 2.5 and table 2.6 it is possible to determine the change in chemical properties of the tailings due to time, plant growth and application of wood chips. The concentration of all macroelements in the tailings is considerably reduced. The sulfate concentration remained relatively the same or slightly decreased in the control plot and the plot treated with the low concentration wood chips. In treatment 6, the sulphate concentration in the growth medium solution was also considerably reduced, which is comparable to the use of 30 tons ha-1Other treatments of wood chip treatment are less typical than others. The concentrations of the trace elements Fe, Mn and Cu are increased to show the solubility of these elementsAnd (4) increasing. However, there is a decrease in zinc and boron concentrations. The pH of the soil solution remains relatively the same as about 7.8. The conductivity at the end of the study also dropped considerably from 2.267mS/cm (unmodified tailings) to 0.296 mS/cm.
To elucidate the effect of increasing wood chip application on the chemistry of the tailings, RDA was performed and the results are shown as a two-way graph of RDA of species (chemical variables) versus wood chip application as a factor (fig. 2.2). Since only one variable is examined, both the canonical axis (canonical axis) and the substance class classification alignment axis (organization axis) are represented on the first classification alignment axis. Chemical variables as species were 74.9% correlated with wood chip application as environmental factor. According to fig. 2.2, the most relevant chemical variables to the chip application gradient are B, P and Cu (positive correlation) and pH (negative correlation). The pH of the medium will acidify with increasing chip application and the concentration of B and especially Cu will increase. Because of the macronutrient concentration (Ca, Mg, K, Na, SO)4) And Conductivity (EC) is weakly correlated with the first sorting axis, these variables are less affected by increased application of wood chips.
Fig. 2.7 shows the correlation matrix between soil chemical variables. The salinity of the growth medium is due in large part to sulfates and in particular calcium sulfate, potassium sulfate, and magnesium sulfate. Calcium, magnesium and potassium are also highly relevant. However sodium is better associated with chloride. Iron, manganese and copper are homogeneously interrelated. The only significant negative correlation is between iron and ammonium.
Conclusions and suggestions
From the vegetation reconstruction results, many species that are particularly useful in highly diverse mixtures cannot be established. The results show that a seed mixture of Tribulus ciliate, Eragrostis lehmanniana, Panicum paniculatum (Panicum maximum) and Gerberia pseudolaris is sufficient. Finger grass (eleusineecofacana) is the most successful pioneer species. A possible reason for poor performance of the Fidelian grassland species is the low seeding rate of 1-2 kg/ha. Seeds (mass-sown species) must be sown at a rate of not less than 5kg/ha to ensure successful establishment. Tillers and runners of bermudagrass and Cynodon nlemmuensis may also be planted in the intervals for erosion control. Use of bermuda grass in place of Cynodon nlemmfuensis is preferred because bermuda grass is indigenous to the area, more drought tolerant and can form more effective coverage. The results also show that the seed mix of treatment 4 was more successful than the seed mixes of treatments 5 and 6. In treatment 4, less species were applied, but the same results were obtained as for the seed mixtures used in treatments 5 and 6. Both seed mixes provided the same amount of coverage, while the basic coverage of treatment 4 was higher than that of treatments 5 and 6. Depending on the results, different seed mixtures should also not affect biomass production. Biomass is more affected by the establishment of a particular species (in this case tribulus ciliaris) than by the total composition of the seed mixture.
The chemical growth conditions of the tailings were considerably improved during the experiment. The greatest considerations regarding the soil nutrient status of the improved slime material are its low fertility and the potential for the presence of trace elements and heavy metal toxicity, especially copper, chromium, selenium and arsenic. Despite the potential for phytotoxicity, the vigor and strength of life of grasses appears to be satisfactory. If the chemical compositions before and after the tailings are compared, the tailings are easy to seep. This may be a considerable consideration with respect to groundwater contamination.
Improved plots are expected to have elevated NO due to the initial high nitrate concentration in tailings and wood chips3Concentration, however, this is not the case. One possible explanation for this is NO3High fluidity, which results in a large amount of NO3Exudation and high rate of plant uptake, which explains the vigor of the plants (Mengel)&Kirby, 1987). A further explanation is that some inorganic nitrogen is fixed as organic nitrogen by soil microorganisms due to nitrogen fixation at high C/N ratio (Tainton 2000).
Example 3
This embodiment refers to the following additional figures, wherein:
figure 3.1 depicts the temperature (° c) profile of the composting and worm composting system during the first 28 days. SS, sewage sludge; WC, wood chips; EM, microbial inoculation; e/w, earthworms;
FIG. 3.2CO describing composting and vermicomposting System in the first 28 days2(%) graph. SS, sewage sludge; WC, wood chips; EM, microbial inoculation; e/w, earthworms; and
FIG. 3.3 depicts O of composting and Worm composting System during the previous 28 days2(%) graph. SS, sewage sludge; WC, wood chips; EM, microbial inoculation; e/w, earthworm.
Materials and methods
Inoculation of organic waste, earthworms and microorganisms
Samples of air-dried Wood Chips (WC) and Sewage Sludge (SS) were obtained from platinum ore. The earthworm (e/w) species used were earthworms (Eisenia fetida) ("cutworm") which are earth-surface type and potential waste composting worms (Edwards and Bohlen, 1996). The breeding stock of earthworms (Eisenia fetida) used in this study was maintained on livestock manure at a temperature of + -25 ℃. Only mature zonal worms were used for the purposes of this study. A commercial microbial preparation (EMTM) was used for the inoculation experiments, which consisted mainly of Pseudomonas, Lactobacillus and Saccharomyces species.
Compost and vermicompost experiments
The application of a mixing ratio of 3: 1 (dry weight kg)-1) WC and SS mixture of (a). The dry ingredients were mixed and humidified with distilled water to a moisture content of 70% (by weight). A study was conducted on 5 treatment groups with 3 replicates, consisting of WC + SS, WC + SS + EM, WC + SS + e/w, WC + SS + EM + e/w and WC mixtures. The substrate was placed in a plastic box (60X 40X 30cm), placed in an environmental chamber (25 ℃) and composted for 28 days. Treatment with earthwormsIn the middle, 100 mature earthworms were introduced after a 28 day composting period to avoid exposing the earthworms to the high temperatures possible during the initial thermophilic phase of composting.
Physical and chemical parameters
From day 0 (referring to the time of initial mixing of the waste before decomposition) to day 28, CO2And O2And portable CO for temperature2And O2Analyzer (Gas Data PCO)2) And (6) measuring. As long as CO is present2Increase or O2Decreasing beyond the level in the air, the ventilation is manually increased to reverse the trend.
At the beginning and end of the experiment, the Total Solids (TS), Volatile Solids (VS), ash content, particle size distribution, NH were determined4 +、NO3 -、NO2 -pH, total and soil available P (P-Bray 1), Total Organic Carbon (TOC),% lignin and% cellulose.
TS was determined as a residue dried at 80 ℃ for 23 hours, and VS was determined by graying the dried sample at 550 ℃ for 8.5 hours (APHA et al, 1989). The particle size distribution was determined by sieving 100g of the material through sieves having mesh openings of 4.75, 4.00, 2.00 and 1.00mm, respectively. Particle sizes are reported as geometric mean and geometric standard deviation as described by Ndegwa and Thompson (2001).
Anionic NO3 -、NO2 -Determined by Capillary Electrophoresis (Waters Quanta 4000, Capillary Electrophoresis System, Waters, Mass.) as described by Heckenberg et al (1989). NH (NH)4 +The concentration is quantified by the ammonia selective electrode method as described by Banwart et al (1972). The pH of the substrate was determined in the 1: 2 extract at 25 ℃ after an equilibration period of 12 hours with intermittent agitation using a calibrated pH meter (Radiometer PHM 80, Copenhagen).
P[ Total]The concentration was determined colorimetrically by the vanadium molybdate (vanadomolybdate) method. This required pipetting 200mL of the digested sample solution into a 50-mL volumetric flask, adding 10mL of vanadium molybdate reagent to the flask and diluting the volume with deionized water and mixing. After 10 minutes, the concentration was read on a colorimetric Continuous Flow Analysis System (Continuous Flow Analysis System, Squalar, the Netherlands).
TOC was determined by a separate laboratory using the Walkley-Black method (Walkley and Black, 1934), while P-Bray 1 was determined using Bray extractant number 1 (Bray and Kurtz, 1945).
% NDF,% lignin and% cellulose
% NDF (neutral detergent fiber, i.e. insoluble component of plant cells),% woodThe lignin and% cellulose were determined according to Rowland and Roberts (1999). For NDF determination, samples were air dried and milled (< 1 mm). The percent dry material was determined by drying the air dried sample at 105 ℃ for 3 hours and determining the dry weight correction factor; namely, it is100/% of dried substance。
The reagent consists of 18.61g EDTA and 6.81g Na dissolved in 500mL deionized water2B4O710H2O, then 30g of Sodium Lauryl Sulfate (SLS) and 10mL of 2-etoxyethaneol are added. 4.56g of anhydrous Na2HPO4Dissolved in water alone, mixed with other solutions and finally diluted to 1000 mL.
0.5g of the air-dried material was placed in 250-mL, Erlenmeyer flask and 100mL of neutral detergent reagent was added. The solution was boiled and boiled for 1 hour. While still hot, the solution was filtered through a pre-weighed sinter (No. 2) while gentle suction was applied. The residue was washed with 3X 50mL boiling deionized water and then acetone until no more color was removed while applying suction until the fibers appeared dry. The fibers were then dried at 105 ℃ for 2 hours, cooled to room temperature in a desiccator and weighed.
The percent NDF is calculated from the following equation:
%NDF=100 dry weight correction factor X [ (sinter + weight of fiber) - (sinter weight)]/Sample weight
For lignin determination, the reagent used was 720mL diluted with 540mL deionized water to 72% (w/v) concentrated sulfuric acid. The sinter is treated with cooled (15 ℃ C.) H2SO4The reagent is half-filled and stirred with a glass rod into a smooth paste and when it dries is filled H by refilling2SO4While maintaining the liquid level. After 3 hours the acid was filtered off in vacuo and the contents were washed with hot water and acetone until the residue was free of acid reagent. The sinter was subsequently dried at 105 ℃ for 2 hours, cooled in a desiccator and reweighed. It was then ignited at 550 ℃, cooled in a desiccator and weighed again. The percent lignin is then calculated from the following equation:
% lignin ═ lignin(100X Dry weight correction factor)) X [ (weight of sinter + Lignin + Ash) - (weight of sinter + Ash)]/Sample weight
% cellulose is determined by subtracting% lignin from% NDF.
Microbiological analysis
The amount of viable aerobic colony-forming units was quantified by plate count as the number of colony-forming units (CFU) present in each 1g of sample developed in 48 hours. The samples were inoculated on Chromocult agar at 25 ℃. Coli (e.coli) and Salmonella (Salmonella) were determined by the method specified by the british standard institute (british standards institute) (1998) for independent laboratories.
Statistical analysis of data
SigmaStat was used as data in this study®Computer software package analysis was performed and all values are expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation). The probability level for statistical significance was P < 0.05, and either parametric or non-parametric tests were used to compare different treatment groups.
Results and discussion
The temperature profile in the composting phase (first 28 days) of the different treatments is shown in figure 3.1. None of the treatments had a temperature rise above 33 ℃, which did not meet the requirements of EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) PFRP (Process to fungal reduction pathogens) contained in US-EPA 40 CFR Part503 (Hay, 1996). Although temperature development is an indicator of microbial activity (Jimenez and Garcia, 1991), the reduced temperatures observed may be a result of high moisture content (70%) of the material rather than microbial deficiencies. Thus, it is possible that higher temperatures can be reached if the initial moisture content of the material is lower upon loading. On the other hand, low temperatures may help preserve N in the composted material, as high temperatures may cause N to be NH at an early stage of composting3High losses in the form (Sanch ez-Mondero et al 2001).
According to low temperature and EPA requirements one decides to perform analyses of total coliform, escherichia coli and salmonella in the final product. The presence of coliform bacteria is often used as an indicator of the overall hygienic quality of soil and water environments and is easy to detect (Hassen et al, 2001). Coli is the most representative bacterium of the faecal coliform group (Le Minor, 1984) and is therefore useful as an indicator of the presence of faecal coliforms. The presence of salmonella is considered a major problem of the hygienic quality of the compost, since it can cause diseases from contamination (Hay, 1996).
Coli or salmonella was not detected in any of the products, which means that the final product in this study should be safe for general distribution. The total number of coliforms is 2430 and 2903CFU g-1In the meantime.
Percentage of CO in air2And O2The levels are shown in figures 3.2 and 3.3, with the maximum activity observed on the first 8 days. This corresponds to the temperature rise observed, which is normal in the usual composting process (Tuomela et al, 2000). Nutrient parameters (TOC, P) treated differently at loading[ Total]、P-Bray 1、NH4、NO2And NO3) Shown in table 3.1, and upon loading, no significant difference in the measured parameters was observed between the treatments with SS (P > 0.05). The average percent change in these parameters after composting and worm composting is shown in table 3.2. There was no significant difference in the mean percent change in TOC among the different groups (P > 0.05). This is because the temperature is not higher than 33 ℃ and C and CO are present in the treatment2The fact that the form is least lost from the system.
All treatments with SS showed a significant increase in total P from 78.60- > 100%. Although all treatments showed an increase in P-Bray 1 values, the increase was statistically significant only in the SS + WC and SS + WC + EM groups (P < 0.05). Ghosh et al (1999) found that the organic waste from worm composting released relatively large amounts of P-Bray 1. They attribute this to the fact that earthworms acquire P as a nutrient for their synthesis in vivo and release the remaining P in a mineralized form, and presume that vermicompost may be an effective method for producing better P nutrition from organic waste. This is in contrast to other studies of soluble P reduction after composting (Vuorinen and saharanen, 1997) and after worm composting (Ndegwa and Thompson, 2001).
The concentration of N in the composted waste material is one of the most important factors in research to determine its agronomic value, and NH4And NO3Is of most interest because it is directly assimilable by the root system of the plant (Sanch é z-Mondero et al 2001). NH in all treatments containing SS4Display 92.57->A significant (P < 0.05) decrease of 100%, whereas the WC treatment showed an increase over 100% with a practical final value of 1.77. + -. 0.80mmol L-1。NO2The levels of (c) showed a significant (P < 0.05) increase in all treatments with SS, while no significant (P > 0.05) change was observed in WC treatments. According to Sanch ez-Mondero et al (2001), compostedNO in the material2Is a clear indication of anaerobic conditions during composting. This is due to the high moisture content of the material, which leads to the development of an anaerobic microenvironment. All treatment groups showed NO3Significant (P < 0.05) increase over 100%. This can be explained by the fact that nitrogen-containing compounds evolve during composting as follows:
However, there were differences in the following range of significance (P < 0.05) between the different treatments; SS + WC + e/w and SS + WC + EM + e/w > SS + WC and SS + WC + EM > WC.
At the end of the study, NO3Is higher than NH4This indicates that the correct composting process was performed (Finstein and Miller, 1985). Further, NH in all the treatments in the range of 0.011 to 0.0016 except in the WC treatment (0.27)4∶NO3All below 0.16 (Table 3.2), which is an indicator of compost maturity (Zucconi and de Bertoldi, 1987). There were no significant (P > 0.05) differences between the proportions in the SS-containing treatment, showing no differences in the evolution of nitrogen-containing products between compost, microbial inoculation and vermi compost.
The physical parameters (TS, VS, ash,% NDF,% lignin and% cellulose) and pH of the different treatments at the beginning of the experiment are shown in table 3.3, where no significant (P > 0.05) differences were observed in the parameters between the different groups. The average percent change in these parameters after the end of composting and worm composting is shown in table 3.4, where no significant (P > 0.05) difference was observed in WC treatment. The pH of WC showed a 5.75% decrease (P > 0.05) after 112 days of composting and worm composting, while those treated with sewage sludge showed an increase between 13.67 and 26.47%, and were both statistically significant (P < 0.05). This follows the alkaline trend of the pH during composting, where an initial decrease is observed due to the formation of organic acids, followed by an increase as a result of the release of ammonium (Tuomela et al, 2000). TS and ash content showed an overall increase, while VS and lignin showed an overall decrease, but these changes were statistically significant only in the treatment of vermicompost (P < 0.05).
According to Neuhauser et al (1988), an increase in the ash content and a decrease in VS are indicators of the stabilization of the compost material. The increase in TS is due to the fact that the worm composted material is physically degraded and therefore has an increased density, and the moisture content of the material (as a function of TS) is significantly lower. The material was also observed to show a volume reduction, although this was not quantitative. This volume reduction and moisture content reduction is associated with reduced handling and transportation costs.
The% NDF and% cellulose decreased significantly (P < 0.05) in all treatments with SS, and there was no significant (P > 0.05) difference between the different treatments. Cellulose degradation is associated with microbial biomass (Entry and Bachman, 1995) and can also be used by surface earthworms as a direct food source (Zhang et al, 2000), but reduces soil biomass after passing through the earthworm gut (Zhang et al, 2000), which may explain why cellulose decomposition is partially higher in earthworm-free treatments, although not statistically significant (P > 0.05). A significant (P < 0.05) reduction in% lignin was observed only in the treatment of two worm composts. This is due to lignin degradation regulated by the thickness of the material (Tuomela et al, 2000) and the fact that earthworms feed, grind and digest organic waste, converting it into finer material (Aranda et al, 1999).
Entry and Bachman (1995) also postulated that cellulose rather than lignin degradation is associated with microbial biomass, while Faure and Deschamps (1991) found that inoculation of organic waste with cellulolytic and lignin-lytic bacteria had no effect on degradation. Further, earthworms can consume materials with high lignin content, resulting in a persistent population size (Senpati et al, 1999).
The results of the particle size analysis are given in table 3.5 and expressed as geometric mean and geometric standard deviation and percent change. Worm composting with EM inoculation has the largest reduction in particle size, followed by no inoculation worm composting. These two groups also showed low heterogeneity, represented by a higher geometric standard deviation, observed. This is due to the presence of biologically inactive materials such as plastics (a by-product of an explosion used in mining) in the wood chips.
Thus, from the decrease in TS and VS and the increase in ash content, it is presumed that vermicomposting industrially produced wood chips and sewage sludge is better than composting it alone. It was also shown that only worm composting showed a significant reduction of lignin and that the addition of microbial inoculation did not increase the rate of decomposition.
Example 4
This embodiment refers to the following additional figures, wherein:
fig. 4 depicts a graph of mean body weight (g) ± SD of earthworms (e.fetida) (n 150) over 84 days. Significant difference (P < 0.05). (SS-sewage sludge; WC-wood chips; EM-microbial inoculation).
Materials and methods
Samples of air-dried Wood Chips (WC) and Sewage Sludge (SS) were again obtained from platinum ore.
The earthworm (e/w) species earthworm (e.fetida) ("tiger worm") was again used. A commercial microbial preparation (EM)TM) For inoculation experiments, the preparation mainly comprises Pseudomonas, Lactobacillus and Saccharomyces species.
Substrates for applications
The application of a mixing ratio of 3: 1 (dry weight kg)-1) WC and SS mixture of (a). The dry ingredients were mixed and humidified with distilled water to a moisture content of 70% (by weight). Each of 2 treatment groups with 3 replicates, consisting of WC + SS and WC + SS + EM mixtures, was studied. The substrate was placed in a plastic worm box (60X 40X 30cm), placed in an environmental chamber (25 ℃) and composted for 28 days. 100 mature worms were introduced after a 28-day composting period. This is done to avoid exposing the worms to the high temperatures possible in the initial thermophilic phase of composting.
Success rate of growth and reproduction
After a 28-day composting period, worm biomass was determined and the moisture content of the substrate was monitored every 14 days during period 94. Biomass was determined by taking 50 worms from each container, washing them in distilled water and drying them on paper towels. It was then weighed in a water-filled weighing boat using a Sartorius balance. This is done to prevent the worms from drying out and thereby affecting the weight of the earthworms.
Viability of egg bags was determined by randomly harvesting 72 egg bags from each container and placing them in multiple dishes filled with distilled water. The water in these dishes was replaced every 3 days to prevent bacterial growth which could negatively impact the results. The hatching egg bags and the number of hatchlings in each egg bag were recorded over 4 weeks.
Heavy metal analysis
Before and at the end of the experiment, 9 earthworms were taken from each group from the substrate. These worms were then placed on wet filter paper in petri dishes for 24 hours to allow for decontamination of their intestinal contents. This is done to prevent misleading of results regarding the actual heavy metal content in body tissue due to the presence of heavy metals in the intestinal content. After this 24 hour period, the worms were washed in distilled water, dried on paper towels and freeze killed. They were weighed individually and frozen (-74 ℃) in multi-top vials for heavy metal analysis in later stages. Substrate samples were also taken, placed in plastic bags and refrigerated until heavy metal analysis. Worms andcompost samples were digested as described by Katz and Jennis (1983). The samples were individually dried and milled and then ash at 550 ℃. They were then placed individually in test tubes and 10mL of 55% nitric acid (HNO) was added3). It was left overnight at room temperature to initiate the digestion process. The samples were heated at 40-60 ℃ for 2 hours, then at 120-130 ℃ for 1 hour the following day, after which they were allowed to cool. 1mL of 70% perchloric acid (HClO) was added and the mixture was heated again at 120 ℃ and 130 ℃ for 1 hour. The sample was allowed to cool before adding 5mL of distilled water. The sample was then heated again at 120-. Allowing the sample to be finally cooled before microfiltration.
The solution was filtered through Whatman No. 6 filter paper to 20cm using a Sartorius microfilter-holder and plastic syringe3In a volumetric flask of (1). Adding distilled water to make up to 20cm3The filtrate of (1). Make the 20cm3The solution was filtered through 0.45 μm Sartorius nitrocellulose filter paper into a polyethylene container and the different metals were analyzed by inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy (ICP-AES).
Statistical analysis of data
SigmaStat was used as data in this study®Computer software package analysis was performed and all values are expressed as mean ± SD (standard deviation). The probability level for statistical significance was P < 0.05, and either parametric or non-parametric tests were used for the comparative treatment groups.
Results
There was no stage during the study where any mortality was observed and the average biomass change of earthworms (e.fetida) is shown in fig. 4. The average biomass of earthworms in the SS + WC treatment was 0.44. + -. 0.01g and that in the SS + WC + EM treatment was 0.43. + -. 0.02g before introduction into the mixture treatment. There was no significant difference between these two values (P > 0.05). On day 14, the average biomass of earthworms reached a maximum of 0.81. + -. 0.02g and 0.77. + -. 0.02g in the SS + WC and SS + WC + EM groups, respectively, which were significantly higher than the initial biomass (P < 0.05). From day 14 to 84, the average biomass decreased to 0.49. + -. 0.03g in SS + WC and 0.51. + -. 0.01g in SS + WC + EM, with a significant difference between the two values (P < 0.05). These values are all significantly higher than the initial biomass (P < 0.05).
The average hatching success rate of the oocytes generated in the SS + WC group was 46.8 ± 2.4% (n ═ 216), and significantly (P < 0.05) was lower than 68.0 ± 2.8% in the SS + WC + EM group. The mean number of hatchings per egg bag was 2.7. + -. 0.1 for SS + WC and 3.0. + -. 0.2 for the SS + WC + EM group, with no significant difference between the two values (P > 0.05).
The heavy metal content of Al, As, Cu and Ni in the two substrate mixtures is summarized in table 4.1 and no significant difference was found for these selected metals (P > 0.05). The initial and final body heavy metal loads present in the earthworm tissue are shown in table 4.2. Initially, there was no statistical difference between the heavy metal content of the earthworm body tissue in the two groups (P > 0.05). At the end of the experiment, the heavy metal content of earthworms in SS + WC was significantly (P < 0.05) higher than that of all heavy metals measured at the beginning, but only lower than 0.05. mu. g.g-1Except for As at the detection limit of (1). Heavy metals showed no significant difference (P > 0.05) after 84 days in earthworms exposed to SS + WC + EM. The bio-concentration factor (BCF) for different heavy metals in the earthworm body tissue after the 84-day worm composting period is shown in table 4.3. It is evident that the BCF of earthworms in the SS + WC group for Al, Cu and Ni is almost twice that in the SS + WC + EM group.
Discussion of the related Art
From the results (fig. 4 and tables 4.1-4.3), it is evident that earthworms in both treatment groups were exposed to a mixture of contaminants including Al, Cu and Ni. This makes the estimation of toxicant action difficult, since the actual risk to the organism is determined by the availability of these toxicants. The effects of Cu (Spurgeon and Hopkin, 1995; Van Gestel et Al, 1991) and Ni (Lock and Janssen, 2002; Scott-Fordsmann et Al, 1998) on growth and reproduction are well documented, but there is currently no or very little information available for Al. In addition, literature on the effect of these metals as a mixture on earthworms (e.fetida) is lacking. With respect to the risks that these metals may pose in the rehabilitation program applications, Al, Cu and Ni are all higher than the range proposed for agricultural use by DWAF (1996). These factors should be considered in selecting the plant species for rehabilitation and monitoring the amount of infiltration of these metals into the groundwater.
Growth data are comparable to previous studies in which earthworms (e.fetida) were found to reach an average biomass of ± 0.45g under optimal conditions (Reinecke et al, 1992). The fact that the average biomass of worms exposed to SS + WC was significantly (P < 0.05) lower than those exposed to SS + WC + EM was a direct cause of the bioavailability of heavy metals in these substrates. However, both groups showed a decrease in biomass after 14 days (fig. 4), which may be attributed to the presence of elevated heavy metal concentrations. Growth can therefore be considered as a parameter to estimate the susceptibility of Al, Cu and Ni to the action of earthworms (e.fetida). This is in contrast to the previous pair of CuNO3Studies of the effect of Cu in its form on growth have found agreement (Reinecke and Reinecke et al, 1996), they found that earthworms (e.fetida) grow at 200 μ g.g-1The substrate concentration of (a) is negatively affected.
Growth is considered an endpoint and it is therefore assumed that vermicomposting of wood chips and sewage sludge using earthworms (e.fetida) is economically feasible. In view of the fact that earthworms perform better in mixtures containing microbial inoculations and end-point with average biomass, it is expected that better results will be produced in large scale worm composting techniques.
The mean hatching success rate, which can be considered as the end point of the reproductive success rate, was significantly (P < 0.05) higher in the SS + WC + EM group than in the SS + WC group, although there was no difference in the mean hatching number between the two (P > 0.05).
Venter and Reinecke (1988) concluded that the average hatching success rate of the bags produced by earthworms (e.fetida) was 73%, and that each bag produced an average of 2.7 hatchlings. The hatching success rate produced by worms in the SS + WC + EM mixture was 68% better than 73% as determined by Venter and Reinecke (1988), but the hatching success rate of the egg sacs in the SS + WC mixture was very low, 45%. With respect to having high Ni (551. mu. g.g)-1) And Cu (315. mu. g.g)-1) Data on incubation success in SS + WC substrate at concentrations are consistent with previous authors' results. LockAnd Janssen (2002) report EC for Ni50Based on the egg pocket production, 362 μ g.g-1Spurgeon and Hopkin (1995)) Worm propagation was found to be significantly reduced in copper contaminated soils. Reinecke and Reinecke (1996) found exposure to 200.mu. g.g-1Earthworms (e.fetida) in copper concentration do not produce egg sacks. Therefore when estimating the potential for using earthworms (e.fetida) in worm compost wood chips and sewage sludge, hatching success is a more sensitive parameter than growth.
The fact that the hatching success rate was higher in the groups inoculated with the microorganisms may be due to the fact that Ni and Cu are less available to the worms, which Ni and Cu have a detrimental effect on the reproductive success. Microorganisms are able to concentrate metals both actively (bioaccumulation) and passively (bioadsorption) (Unz and Shuttleworth, 1996). It has been shown experimentally that Saccharomyces (Simmons et al, 1995) and Pseudomonas (Churchill et al, 1995) show large changes in the bioabsorption of metals, both of which are present in the inoculum. This may provide a possible explanation for the disparity between growth and reproductive success rates observed between the two groups. This fact can be confirmed by the heavy metal body load observed in the earthworm body tissues, where the inoculum-containing worms in the substrate had significantly low (P < 0.05) levels of Al, Cu and Ni, which is also reflected by the calculated BCF.
Conclusion
It is assumed that the growth of earthworms (e.fetida) is not inhibited when used as vermicompost species or microbial inoculated additives for industrially produced wood chips and sewage sludge. The success rate of reproduction of earthworms in the SS + WC-treated group was decreased, and Al, Cu and Ni were biologically accumulated in their body tissues. In contrast, earthworms in the treatment group with the microbial inoculum added did not bioaccumulate any heavy metals in their body tissues and had a significantly higher reproductive success rate than their equivalent in the treatment without the microbial inoculum. This shows that the microorganisms present in the inoculum make the heavy metals present in the wood chips and sewage sludge mixture unusable by their bioadsorption or bioaccumulation.
It therefore appears that the most economically viable route to bioconversion of wood chips and sewage sludge with earthworms (e.fetida) is the addition of microbial inocula.
Example 5
This embodiment refers to the following additional figures, wherein:
fig. 5 is a perspective view of a hay trail (windrow) composting or worm composting media for treating mining motile bodies in accordance with the present invention.
From experimental studies it can be concluded that for successful composting of Wood Chips (WC) and Sewage Sludge (SS) a 3: 1 mixing ratio is required and that the composting/vermicomposting process extends to 4-6 months.
For commercialization of the method according to the invention, the first step is to compost WC and SS for 30 days by constructing a hay column, an example of which is shown in fig. 5. Thereafter the material was covered with a net (to prevent bird predation) and vermicompost was carried out for 4-5 months with earthworms (Eiseniafetida) at a rate of 25g worms per kg material.
As shown in FIG. 5, the optimum size for constructing a hay row is 2 tons of compost mixture per meter of length, 1m high and 2m wide. This means that 50kg earthworms are applied per hay row.
The compost thus obtained and the medium of worm compost are then mixed into the tailings as described in examples 1 and 2 above.
It has been found that the compost and vermicompost media according to the invention provide advantageous alternatives and/or additions to soil improvement using topsoil, and that the subsequent waste wood chips and sewage sludge, which are the main sources of organic carbon and nitrogen, are the sources of essential nutrients and organic matter for the growing organisms when subjected to bioconversion according to the invention. Wood chips are further advantageous organic modifiers in the process of vegetation restoration and the main reason for their use as modifying means is their ability to promote cation exchange capacity, thereby reducing alkali saturation and improving the ability of mucus to adsorb excess salts. Wood chips can also improve the physical properties of the growth medium by increasing water retention. Organic materials can also stimulate biological activity, which is essential for nutrient recycling.
A further advantage of the present process is that the waste produced by mining, such as slime, wood chips and sewage, is used to recover tailings and to reduce soil, groundwater and air pollution.
It will be appreciated that detailed variations to the media and method of treating tailings of a mining activity in accordance with the present invention are possible without departing from the scope of the appended claims.
Claims (31)
1. A method of treating a tailings body of a mining activity, the method comprising the step of applying wood particles to the tailings body.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the wood particles are wood chips recovered from waste wood as a byproduct of a mining activity.
3. A method according to claim 2, wherein the wood chips are in the form of wood ore pillars which disintegrate in an explosive operation.
4. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the wood particles are pre-treated with an acid.
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the acid is nitric acid (HNO)3)。
6. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the wood particles are applied to the surface layer of the gangue bodies.
7. A method according to claim 6, wherein the particles are applied in the form of a coating.
8. A process according to any one of claims 1 to 5 wherein the particles are processed into a residue.
9. A method according to claim 8, wherein the particles are excavated into a tailings body.
10. A method according to claim 8 or claim 9 wherein the particles are processed into the tailings body to a level of about 30cm below the external surface of the tailings body.
11. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the particles are applied to residual ore present in the form of a dam to restore the dam.
12. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 10, wherein the particles are applied to the residuum during its formation.
13. A process according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the wood particles are applied at a rate of 60 to 90 tonnes per hectare of tailings dam surface.
14. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, including the step of composting the wood particles prior to the step of applying the particles to the gangue bodies.
15. The method of claim 14, wherein the step of composting the wood particles comprises the step of vermicomposting the particles.
16. The method of claim 15, wherein the step of composting the wood particles further comprises the step of mixing the particles with another source of organic material.
17. The method of claim 16, wherein the source of the other organic material comprises sewage.
18. The method of claim 17, wherein the wood particles and the wastewater are mixed to form a compost, which may thereafter be inoculated with worms to form a worm compost medium.
19. A method according to claim 18, wherein the worms may be from the species earthworm (Eiseniafetida).
20. A method according to claim 18 or claim 19, wherein the wood particles are mixed with the effluent in a ratio of between 3: 1 and 3: 2.
21. A method according to any one of the preceding claims, which includes the step of growing selected plants on the treated ore residues.
22. The method according to claim 21, wherein the plant is selected from the group consisting of Tribulus ciliate variety Molopo; tribulus terrestris var Gayndah; eragrostis lehmanniana (Lehmann's Love Grass) and Saxatilis flexneri and mixtures thereof.
23. A method of treating a residual ore body in a mining activity substantially as herein described and illustrated.
24. A tailings ore body treated according to the process of any of claims 1 to 23.
25. A composted medium for treating mining motile ore bodies, the medium comprising a mixture of wood particles and another source of organic material.
26. The medium of claim 25, wherein the wood particles are wood chips recovered from waste wood as a byproduct of a mining activity.
27. A medium according to claim 25 or 26, wherein the wood particles are in the form of wood ore pillars which disintegrate in an explosive operation.
28. A medium according to any one of claims 25 to 27 wherein the source of the other organic material is in the form of sewage.
29. The method according to any one of the preceding claims, wherein the mixture is further worm compostable.
30. A medium according to any of claims 25-29, further comprising a selection of microorganisms.
31. A medium for treating residual ore bodies in mining activities substantially as herein described and illustrated.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
ZA2001/8361 | 2001-10-11 | ||
ZA200108361 | 2001-10-11 |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN1585677A true CN1585677A (en) | 2005-02-23 |
CN100430159C CN100430159C (en) | 2008-11-05 |
Family
ID=25589339
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CNB028225767A Expired - Fee Related CN100430159C (en) | 2001-10-11 | 2002-10-11 | Medium and method for treating tailings of mining activities |
Country Status (6)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN100430159C (en) |
AU (1) | AU2002335151B2 (en) |
HK (1) | HK1072395A1 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2389563C2 (en) |
WO (1) | WO2003045594A1 (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA200402219B (en) |
Families Citing this family (1)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN102701826B (en) * | 2012-06-16 | 2014-10-22 | 中国有色桂林矿产地质研究院有限公司 | Method for stacking tailings for reclamation |
Family Cites Families (5)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
GB468388A (en) * | 1935-02-13 | 1937-07-02 | Ig Farbenindustrie Ag | Improvements in the production of cellulose |
GB2219617B (en) * | 1988-06-09 | 1992-08-19 | David William Blowes | Treatment of mine tailings |
US5090843A (en) * | 1991-02-15 | 1992-02-25 | Grigsby Charles O | Chemical seal for waste disposal cover systems |
US6004069A (en) * | 1997-05-29 | 1999-12-21 | Falconbridge Limited | Method for capping mine waste and tailing deposits |
AUPP904699A0 (en) * | 1999-03-05 | 1999-03-25 | Managed Science Pty Ltd | Organic waste recycling device |
-
2002
- 2002-10-11 AU AU2002335151A patent/AU2002335151B2/en not_active Ceased
- 2002-10-11 WO PCT/ZA2002/000155 patent/WO2003045594A1/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2002-10-11 CN CNB028225767A patent/CN100430159C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2002-10-11 RU RU2004114215A patent/RU2389563C2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
-
2004
- 2004-03-19 ZA ZA2004/02219A patent/ZA200402219B/en unknown
-
2005
- 2005-07-12 HK HK05105924A patent/HK1072395A1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
ZA200402219B (en) | 2005-04-26 |
WO2003045594A1 (en) | 2003-06-05 |
CN100430159C (en) | 2008-11-05 |
AU2002335151B2 (en) | 2007-09-13 |
RU2004114215A (en) | 2005-10-27 |
HK1072395A1 (en) | 2005-08-26 |
RU2389563C2 (en) | 2010-05-20 |
AU2002335151A1 (en) | 2003-06-10 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
El-Naggar et al. | Biochar application to low fertility soils: A review of current status, and future prospects | |
Ram et al. | Fly ash for soil amelioration: a review on the influence of ash blending with inorganic and organic amendments | |
Kızılkaya | Cu and Zn accumulation in earthworm Lumbricus terrestris L. in sewage sludge amended soil and fractions of Cu and Zn in casts and surrounding soil | |
Smith | A critical review of the bioavailability and impacts of heavy metals in municipal solid waste composts compared to sewage sludge | |
Lynch et al. | Use of 13C and 15N natural abundance techniques to characterize carbon and nitrogen dynamics in composting and in compost-amended soils | |
Wijesekara et al. | Utilization of biowaste for mine spoil rehabilitation | |
US10351482B1 (en) | Mine waste source for bio-mineral fertilizer to remineralize agricultural soil | |
Kim et al. | Effect of different way of bottom ash and compost application on phytoextractability of cadmium in contaminated arable soil | |
Forján et al. | Increasing the nutrient content in a mine soil through the application of technosol and biochar and grown with Brassica juncea L. | |
Shuman et al. | Zinc forms and plant availability in a compost amended soil | |
Radziemska et al. | Pilot scale use of compost combined with sorbents to phytostabilize Ni-contaminated soil using Lolium perenne L. | |
Abad-Valle et al. | Evaluation of ferrihydrite as amendment to restore an arsenic-polluted mine soil | |
CN108541522B (en) | Vegetation recovery method for acid mine waste dump | |
CN103551376A (en) | Method for stabilization of heavy metal contaminated soil in mining area | |
Visconti et al. | Compost and microbial biostimulant applications improve plant growth and soil biological fertility of a grass-based phytostabilization system | |
Urunmatsoma et al. | Chemical fractionation and heavy metal accumulation in maize (Zea mays) grown on chromated copper arsenate (CCA) contaminated soil amended with cow dung manure | |
Mishra et al. | Effect of vermicomposted municipal solid wastes on growth, yield and heavy metal contents of rice(Oryza sativa) | |
Yu et al. | Remediation potential of spent mushroom substrate on Cd pollution in a paddy soil | |
Pandey et al. | Compost-assisted phytoremediation | |
Pottipati et al. | Large-scale production of a nutrient-rich soil conditioner by optimized biodegradation of vegetable waste: biodiversity and toxicity assessments | |
Eker | Investigation of the usability of industrial mining wastes in agriculture | |
Charan et al. | Vermitechnology transforms hazardous red mud into benign organic input for agriculture: Insights on earthworm-microbe interaction, metal removal, and soil-crop improvement | |
Cheng-Kim et al. | Heavy metal contaminated soil bioremediation via vermicomposting with spent mushroom compost | |
Gul et al. | Speciation of heavy metals during co-composting of livestock manure | |
Liu et al. | Cobalt speciation and phytoavailability in fluvo-aquic soil under treatments of spent mushroom substrate from Pleurotus ostreatus |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HK Ref legal event code: DE Ref document number: 1072395 Country of ref document: HK |
|
C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
REG | Reference to a national code |
Ref country code: HK Ref legal event code: GR Ref document number: 1072395 Country of ref document: HK |
|
C17 | Cessation of patent right | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20081105 Termination date: 20121011 |