Summary of the invention
The quality of the water extract of the objective of the invention is to set up that a kind of method is easy, stable, precision is high, the method for the finger-print of favorable reproducibility and standard finger-print thereof being controlled sarcandra or " heat-clearing inflammation-diminishing " capsule made from water extract.
Technical scheme of the present invention is with extraction process by water conventional in the herbal pharmaceutical industry, get the Chinese crude drug sarcandra and be raw material and get the sarcandra water extract or get the finger-print that QINGRE XIAOYANNING JIAONANG that the sarcandra water extract makes adopts high performance liquid chromatography to establish and come control of quality, its method is carried out as follows:
The preparation of step 1, need testing solution: get sarcandra, the boiling secondary, merging filtrate, be condensed into thick paste, low temperature drying, be ground into fine powder, get fine powder and be made into the aqueous solution that contains the 10mg fine powder among every 1ml, or the content of directly getting QINGRE XIAOYANNING JIAONANG is made into the aqueous solution that contains the 10mg fine powder among every 1ml;
The preparation of step 2, reference substance solution: get isofraxidin and be made into the aqueous solution that contains 0.1mg concentration among every 1ml;
The foundation of step 3, finger-print: precision is got need testing solution and each 10 μ l of object of reference solution respectively, inject high performance liquid chromatograph respectively, according to high effective liquid chromatography for measuring, the record chromatogram, the finger-print (seeing accompanying drawing 1) that settles the standard should have eight above characteristic fingerprint peaks, with the retention time of the chromatographic peak of isofraxidin is 1 to calculate relative relative retention time, and each characteristic peak relative retention time is respectively 0.22+0.01,0.27 ± 0.01,0.49 ± 0.01,0.55 ± 0.01,1.00 (S), 1.12 ± 0.03,1.23 ± 0.01,1.45 ± 0.01; The similarity of test sample finger-print and standard finger-print must not be less than 0.90.
Adopt different high performance liquid chromatographs and select for use the appearance time, retention time, peak area of eight characteristic peaks of its standard finger-print of difference of chromatographic condition can be different, the present invention through repeatedly, repeatedly test and condition grope, establish preferable chromatographic condition to be: octadecylsilane chemically bonded silica is a stationary phase; 0.1% acetate methanol solution-0.1% acetic acid aqueous solution is a moving phase, linear gradient elution; Flow velocity is 0.5ml/min; Detect wavelength 340nm; Column temperature is 40 ℃; Calculate with isofraxidin, theoretical cam curve is not less than 20000.
Superiority of the present invention is: set up the standard finger-print of sarcandra water extract, conveniently distinguished the positive vacation of heat-clearing inflammation-diminishing product, can control the quality of product effectively; This method reappearance, good stability, method of operating is easy, precision is high.
Elaborate technical scheme of the present invention below in conjunction with embodiment and accompanying drawing thereof.
Specific embodiments
The foundation of embodiment 1, standard finger-print.
Concrete operation method is as follows:
The formulations prepared from solutions of step 1, test sample: sample 1, get sarcandra 2192kg, decocting twice each two hours, filters merging filtrate, be condensed into thick paste, fine powder is worn in low temperature drying, gets fine powder 219kg, be settled to 25ml after getting the dissolving of fine powder 0.25g water, promptly get the aqueous solution that contains the 10mg fine powder among the 1ml;
Sample 2~14, get 13 batches of QINGRE XIAOYANNING JIAONANGs that Jingxiutang (Pharmaceutical) Co., Ltd., Guangzhou produces, lot number is 011114,011241,011242,020101,020102,020103,020104,020105,020106,020107,020108,020109,020110, be settled to 25ml after respectively getting the dissolving of capsule 's content fine powder 0.25g water, promptly;
The preparation of step 2, object of reference solution: precision takes by weighing the isofraxidin standard items 1mg that the calibrating of Chinese biological goods is provided, and places the 10ml measuring bottle, and water dissolving and rare pool promptly get the aqueous solution that contains 0.1mg concentration among the 1ml to scale;
The foundation of step 3, standard finger-print:
Adopt Agilent 1100 high performance liquid chromatographs, with Agilent Hypersil ODS post (5-Micron, 4.0mm * 250mm), octadecylsilane chemically bonded silica is a stationary phase, 0.1% acetate methanol solution-0.1% acetic acid aqueous solution is a moving phase, linear gradient elution; Flow velocity is 0.5ml/min; Detect wavelength 340nm; Column temperature is 40 ℃; Calculate with isofraxidin, theoretical cam curve is 24576.
Get object of reference solution 10 μ l and inject high performance liquid chromatograph, get high-efficient liquid phase chromatogram, see accompanying drawing 2;
Get need testing solution 10 μ l and inject high performance liquid chromatograph, get high-efficient liquid phase chromatogram;
With need testing solution sample 1, continuous sample introduction is totally 5 times in one day, writes down the retention time and the area of each chromatographic peak, is reference with the isofraxidin, calculates relative retention time and peak area ratio and RSD such as table 1 and table 2
Table 1 relative retention time variation situation
Relative retention time | On average | ????RSD% |
????1 | ????2 | ????3 | ????4 | ????5 |
????0.224 | ????0.222 | ????0.225 | ????0.225 | ????0.225 | ??0.224 | ????0.58% |
????0.27 | ????0.271 | ????0.271 | ????0.271 | ????0.271 | ??0.271 | ????0.17% |
????0.485 | ????0.49 | ????0.488 | ????0.488 | ????0.488 | ??0.488 | ????0.37% |
????0.544 | ????0.547 | ????0.547 | ????0.547 | ????0.545 | ??0.546 | ????0.26% |
????1 | ????1 | ????1 | ????1 | ????1 | ??1 | ????0.00% |
????1.116 | ????1.111 | ????1.111 | ????1.114 | ????1.114 | ??1.113 | ????0.19% |
????1.226 | ????1.222 | ????1.222 | ????1.225 | ????1.225 | ??1.224 | ????0.15% |
????1.447 | ????1.444 | ????1.442 | ????1.444 | ????1.444 | ??1.444 | ????0.12% |
Table 2 peak area ratio precision
Peak area ratio | On average | ????RSD% |
????1 | ????2 | ????3 | ????4 | ????5 |
????0.432 | ????0.427 | ????0.427 | ????0.432 | ????0.427 | ??0.429 | ????0.64% |
????1.351 | ????1.333 | ????1.333 | ????1.351 | ????1.333 | ??1.34 | ????0.74% |
????2.189 | ????2.16 | ????2.16 | ????2.176 | ????2.147 | ??2.166 | ????0.75% |
????2.338 | ????2.32 | ????2.32 | ????2.338 | ????2.307 | ??2.325 | ????0.57% |
????1 | ????1 | ????1 | ????1 | ????1 | ??1 | ????0.00% |
????1.986 | ????2 | ????1.973 | ????2 | ????1.987 | ??1.989 | ????0.57% |
????5.73 | ????5.667 | ????5.627 | ????5.689 | ????5.613 | ??5.665 | ????0.84% |
????0.257 | ????0.253 | ????0.253 | ????0.257 | ????0.253 | ??0.255 | ????0.86% |
As seen from table, the RSD of each chromatographic peak relative retention time and peak area ratio illustrates instrument stabilizer all less than 2%; Need testing solution has good stability within one day at normal temperatures.
The finger-print of sample 2~14 is seen accompanying drawing 3.The fingerprint peaks retention time sees Table 3; The relative retention time of fingerprint peaks sees Table 4; The peak area value of fingerprint peaks sees Table 5; The fingerprint peaks area ratio sees Table 6;
Table 3 heat-clearing inflammation-diminishing fingerprint peaks retention time (min)
Lot number | Peak 1 | Peak 2 | Peak 3 | Peak 4 | Peak 5 | Peak 6 | Peak 7 | Peak 8 |
??011114 | ??6.55 | ??7.97 | ??14.44 | ??16.12 | ??29.49 | ??33.04 | ??36.30 | ??42.76 |
??011241 | ??6.57 | ??7.96 | ??14.42 | ??16.1 | ??29.38 | ??32.86 | ??36.11 | ??42.56 |
??011242 | ??6.59 | ??7.95 | ??14.35 | ??15.95 | ??29.18 | ??32.73 | ??36.09 | ??42.55 |
??020101 | ??6.57 | ??7.99 | ??14.48 | ??16.16 | ??29.45 | ??32.94 | ??36.19 | ??42.66 |
??010202 | ??6.59 | ??7.96 | ??14.38 | ??15.95 | ??29.21 | ??32.84 | ??36.18 | ??42.67 |
??020103 | ??6.59 | ??7.95 | ??14.34 | ??15.95 | ??29.17 | ??32.7 | ??36.06 | ??42.56 |
??020104 | ??6.59 | ??8.08 | ??14.64 | ??16.3 | ??29.59 | ??32.36 | ??36.36 | ??42.78 |
??020105 | ??6.57 | ??7.97 | ??14.43 | ??16.11 | ??29.42 | ??32.93 | ??36.18 | ??42.63 |
??020106 | ??6.58 | ??8.04 | ??14.58 | ??16.26 | ??29.56 | ??33.02 | ??36.28 | ??42.75 |
??020107 | ??6.59 | ??7.98 | ??14.39 | ??16.01 | ??29.23 | ??32.8 | ??36.13 | ??42.6 |
??020108 | ??6.59 | ??7.98 | ??14.43 | ??16.01 | ??29.22 | ??32.83 | ??36.17 | ??42.63 |
??020109 | ??6.6 | ??8.09 | ??14.66 | ??16.33 | ??29.58 | ??33.1 | ??36.37 | ??42.8 |
??020110 | ??6.59 | ??7.97 | ??14.38 | ??15.98 | ??29.19 | ??32.75 | ??36.08 | ??42.57 |
Table 4 heat-clearing inflammation-diminishing fingerprint peaks relative retention time
Lot number | Peak 1 | Peak 2 | Peak 3 | Peak 4 | Peak 5 | Peak 6 | Peak 7 | Peak 8 |
????011114 | ??0.22 | ??0.27 | ??0.49 | ??0.55 | ??1.00 | ??1.12 | ??1.23 | ??1.45 |
????011241 | ??0.22 | ??0.27 | ??0.49 | ??0.55 | ??1.00 | ??1.12 | ??1.23 | ??1.45 |
????011242 | ??0.23 | ??0.27 | ??0.49 | ??0.55 | ??1.00 | ??1.12 | ??1.24 | ??1.46 |
????020101 | ??0.22 | ??0.27 | ??0.49 | ??0.55 | ??1.00 | ??1.12 | ??1.23 | ??1.45 |
????010202 | ??0.23 | ??0.27 | ??0.49 | ??0.55 | ??1.00 | ??1.12 | ??1.24 | ??1.46 |
????020103 | ??0.23 | ??0.27 | ??0.49 | ??0.55 | ??1.00 | ??1.12 | ??1.24 | ??1.46 |
????020104 | ??0.22 | ??0.27 | ??0.49 | ??0.55 | ??1.00 | ??1.09 | ??1.23 | ??1.45 |
????020105 | ??0.22 | ??0.27 | ??0.49 | ??0.55 | ??1.00 | ??1.12 | ??1.23 | ??1.45 |
????020106 | ??0.22 | ??0.27 | ??0.49 | ??0.55 | ??1.00 | ??1.12 | ??1.23 | ??1.45 |
????020107 | ??0.23 | ??0.27 | ??0.49 | ??0.55 | ??1.00 | ??1.12 | ??1.24 | ??1.46 |
????020108 | ??0.23 | ??0.27 | ??0.49 | ??0.55 | ??1.00 | ??1.12 | ??1.24 | ??1.46 |
????020109 | ??0.22 | ??0.27 | ??0.50 | ??0.55 | ??1.00 | ??1.12 | ??1.23 | ??1.45 |
????020110 | ??0.23 | ??0.27 | ??0.49 | ??0.55 | ??1.00 | ??1.12 | ??1.24 | ??1.46 |
From the analysis result of 13 batches of heat-clearing inflammation-diminishing products, fingerprint peaks retention time and relative retention time are more stable
Table 5 heat-clearing inflammation-diminishing fingerprint peaks area value
Lot number | Peak 1 | Peak 2 | Peak 3 | Peak 4 | Peak 5 | Peak 6 | Peak 7 | Peak 8 |
??011114 | ??253.04 | ??611 | ??1024.31 | ??1049.86 | ??811.83 | ??950.12 | ??2434.14 | ??114.74 |
??011241 | ??101.07 | ??553.21 | ??960.38 | ??997.13 | ??633.08 | ??398.73 | ??1443.87 | ??75.37 |
??011242 | ??196.8 | ??761.71 | ??1292.26 | ??1343.28 | ??865.36 | ??679.72 | ??2861.92 | ??143.37 |
??020101 | ??127.42 | ??739.22 | ??1246.12 | ??1284.74 | ??882.85 | ??730.82 | ??2780.9 | ??152.06 |
??020202 | ??140.59 | ??715.88 | ??1251.68 | ??1443.95 | ??687.08 | ??697.88 | ??2807.33 | ??151.34 |
?020103 |
?175.38 |
?875.85 |
?1397.09 |
?1446.98 |
?967.64 |
?907.3 |
?3650.31 |
?183.18 |
?020104 |
?105.78 |
?762.14 |
?1235.33 |
?1248.18 |
?779.44 |
?666.46 |
?3144.95 |
?174.03 |
?020105 |
?111.6 |
?820.59 |
?1300.95 |
?1318.68 |
?935.19 |
?722.42 |
?3195.28 |
?183.23 |
?020106 |
?102.11 |
?740.53 |
?1209.13 |
?1215.38 |
?179.29 |
?565.21 |
?3233.44 |
?177.34 |
?020107 |
?151.64 |
?757.19 |
?1255.38 |
?1298.67 |
?861.17 |
?787.38 |
?3111.7 |
?156.38 |
?020108 |
?120.23 |
?557.96 |
?923.45 |
?974.46 |
?597.48 |
?594.09 |
?2439.05 |
?122.54 |
?020109 |
?190.64 |
?581.5 |
?951 |
?1015.51 |
?513.64 |
?886.36 |
?2405.18 |
?107.53 |
?020110 |
?116.16 |
?541.65 |
?896.04 |
?964.52 |
?424.12 |
?545.52 |
?2378.97 |
?111.94 |
Table 6 heat-clearing inflammation-diminishing fingerprint peaks area ratio
Lot number | Peak 1 | Peak 2 | Peak 3 | Peak 4 | Peak 5 | Peak 6 | Peak 7 | Peak 8 |
??011114 | ??0.312 | ??0.753 | ??1.262 | ??1.293 | ??1.000 | ??1.170 | ??2.998 | ??0.141 |
??011241 | ??0.160 | ??0.874 | ??1.517 | ??1.575 | ??1.000 | ??0.630 | ??2.281 | ??0.119 |
??011242 | ??0.227 | ??0.880 | ??1.493 | ??1.552 | ??1.000 | ??0.785 | ??3.307 | ??0.166 |
??020101 | ??0.144 | ??0.837 | ??1.411 | ??1.455 | ??1.000 | ??0.828 | ??3.150 | ??0.172 |
??020202 | ??0.205 | ??1.042 | ??1.822 | ??2.102 | ??1.000 | ??1.016 | ??4.086 | ??0.220 |
??020103 | ??0.181 | ??0.905 | ??1.444 | ??1.495 | ??1.000 | ??0.938 | ??3.772 | ??0.189 |
??020104 | ??0.136 | ??0.978 | ??1.585 | ??1.601 | ??1.000 | ??0.855 | ??4.035 | ??0.223 |
??020105 | ??0.119 | ??0.877 | ??1.391 | ??1.410 | ??1.000 | ??0.772 | ??3.417 | ??0.196 |
??020106 | ??0.570 | ??4.130 | ??6.744 | ??6.779 | ??1.000 | ??3.152 | ??18.035 | ??0.989 |
??020107 | ??0.176 | ??0.879 | ??1.458 | ??1.508 | ??1.000 | ??0.914 | ??3.613 | ??0.182 |
??020108 | ??0.201 | ??0.934 | ??1.546 | ??1.631 | ??1.000 | ??0.994 | ??4.082 | ??0.205 |
??020109 | ??0.371 | ??1.132 | ??1.851 | ??1.977 | ??1.000 | ??1.726 | ??4.683 | ??0.209 |
??020110 | ??0.274 | ??1.277 | ??2.113 | ??2.274 | ??1.000 | ??1.286 | ??5.609 | ??0.264 |
Can know that from The above results the RSD of relative retention time, peak area ratio is less, illustrate that the reappearance of this method is good.
Test according to above-mentioned sample, finger-print settles the standard, see accompanying drawing 1, eight above characteristic fingerprint peaks are arranged, with the retention time of the chromatographic peak of isofraxidin is 1 to calculate relative relative retention time, and each characteristic peak relative retention time is respectively 0.22 ± 0.01,0.27 ± 0.01,0.49 ± 0.01,0.55 ± 0.01,1.00 (S), 1.12 ± 0.03,1.23 ± 0.01,1.45 ± 0.01; The finger-print of 13 batch samples and the similarity of standard finger-print are calculated result such as table 7 with area of computer aided similarity computer software
Table 7.13 batch heat-clearing inflammation-diminishing finger-print similarity result of calculation
011114 | ?011241 | ?011242 | ?020101 | ?020102 | ?020103 | ?020104 |
0.9933 | ?0.9680 | ?0.9986 | ?0.9984 | ?0.9987 | ?0.9984 | ?0.9987 |
?020105 |
?020106 |
?020107 |
?020108 |
?020109 |
?020110 |
?0.9992 |
?0.9760 |
?0.9992 |
?0.9994 |
?0.9950 |
?0.9978 |
From table as can be known, each batch products finger-print overall similarity is higher, all more than 0.9.
The chromatographic peak relative retention time of the finger-print of embodiment 2,5 batches of commercial production samples of investigation and the variation situation of peak area ratio reach the similarity with standard finger-print.
Method of operating: the preparation of step 1, need testing solution: the lot number of getting Jingxiutang's production respectively is the heat-clearing inflammation-diminishing of C07202, C07203, C08205, C08206, C08207, be settled to 25ml after getting the dissolving of capsule 's content fine powder 0.25g water, that is, prepare 5 parts of test samples altogether;
Step 2 and three is with embodiment 1
The finger-print of 5 duplicate samples is seen accompanying drawing 4, and the variation situation and the similarity of its chromatographic peak relative retention time and peak area ratio are as table 8~10.
Table 8 relative retention time reappearance
Relative retention time | On average | ????RSD% |
????1 | ????2 | ????3 | ????4 | ????5 |
????0.220 | ????0.222 | ????0.222 | ????0.220 | ????0.221 | ??0.221 | ????0.50% |
????0.272 | ????0.271 | ????0.270 | ????0.271 | ????0.272 | ??0.271 | ????0.31% |
????0.495 | ????0.493 | ????0.492 | ????0.493 | ????0.496 | ??0.494 | ????0.31% |
????0.549 | ????0.550 | ????0.549 | ????0.550 | ????0.553 | ??0.550 | ????0.32% |
????1.000 | ????1.000 | ????1.000 | ????1.000 | ????1.000 | ??1.000 | ????0.00% |
????1.122 | ????1.119 | ????1.119 | ????1.119 | ????1.120 | ??1.120 | ????0.12% |
????1.234 ????1447 | ????1.230 ????1.444 | ????1.230 ????1.442 | ????1.230 ????1.446 | ????1.232 ????1.444 | ??1.231 ??1.445 | ????0.13% ????0.13% |
Table 9 peak area ratio reappearance
Peak area ratio | On average | ?RSD% |
????1 | ????2 | ????3 | ????4 | ????5 |
????0.81 | ????0.77 | ????0.78 | ????0.78 | ????0.78 | ??0.78 | ?1.93% |
????1.59 | ????1.54 | ????1.56 | ????1.56 | ????1.56 | ??1.56 | ?1.15% |
????2.63 | ????2.63 | ????2.59 | ????2.59 | ????2.59 | ??2.61 | ?0.84% |
????2.60 | ????2.60 | ????2.56 | ????2.58 | ????2.55 | ??2.58 | ?0.88% |
????1.00 | ????1.00 | ????1.00 | ????1.00 | ????1.00 | ??0 | ?0% |
????2.46 | ????2.38 | ????2.42 | ????2.42 | ????2.44 | ??2.42 | ?1.22% |
????6.36 ????0.68 | ????6.17 ????0.68 | ????6.28 ????0.67 | ????6.28 ????0.68 | ????6.28 ????0.68 | ??6.27 ??0.68 | ?1.08% ?0.66% |
Can know that from The above results the RSD of relative retention time, peak area ratio is less, illustrate that the reappearance of this method is good.
Similarity result is as follows:
Lot number | ??C07202 | ??C07203 | ??C08205 | ??C08206 | ??C08207 |
Similarity | ??0.9985 | ??0.9963 | ??0.9992 | ??0.9958 | ??0.9928 |