CN1329823C - System and method for verifying extendable label language files and reporting contrary mode against them in real time - Google Patents
System and method for verifying extendable label language files and reporting contrary mode against them in real time Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN1329823C CN1329823C CNB031452205A CN03145220A CN1329823C CN 1329823 C CN1329823 C CN 1329823C CN B031452205 A CNB031452205 A CN B031452205A CN 03145220 A CN03145220 A CN 03145220A CN 1329823 C CN1329823 C CN 1329823C
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- xml
- node
- xml document
- local
- parallel tree
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Expired - Fee Related
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/10—Text processing
- G06F40/12—Use of codes for handling textual entities
- G06F40/131—Fragmentation of text files, e.g. creating reusable text-blocks; Linking to fragments, e.g. using XInclude; Namespaces
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/10—Text processing
- G06F40/12—Use of codes for handling textual entities
- G06F40/14—Tree-structured documents
- G06F40/143—Markup, e.g. Standard Generalized Markup Language [SGML] or Document Type Definition [DTD]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F40/00—Handling natural language data
- G06F40/20—Natural language analysis
- G06F40/205—Parsing
- G06F40/221—Parsing markup language streams
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
- Audiology, Speech & Language Pathology (AREA)
- Computational Linguistics (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Multimedia (AREA)
- Document Processing Apparatus (AREA)
- Information Retrieval, Db Structures And Fs Structures Therefor (AREA)
Abstract
A system and method for validating an extensible markup language (XML) document and reporting schema violations in real time. A parallel tree is maintained that includes nodes corresponding to non-native XML elements of the XML document. When changes occur to the XML document, the non-native XML elements corresponding to the changes are marked. The nodes corresponding the marked non-native XML elements are validated against an XML schema that corresponds to the non-native XML markup. The elements and nodes corresponding to errors in the non-native XML markup are then reported to the user according to display indicators in the XML document and the parallel tree.
Description
Technical field
The present invention relates to processing, more particularly, relate to and a kind ofly be used for confirming and report extend markup language (XML) document mode is run counter to the method for situation for word processing file.
Background technology
Various in recent years SGMLs are widely popular.A kind of as wherein, expandable mark language XML is a kind of general SGML, it provides the method for identification, exchange and the various data of processing.Such as, the various documents that XML is used to produce, they can be used for various application programs.Unit in the XML file have NameSpace (namespace) and the pattern (schema) that is associated.
In the expandable mark language XML, NameSpace is used as the unique identification of each XML document usually.Each XML document makes calling program can easily distinguish the XML type relevant with the document by using NameSpace.This unique NameSpace supporting area too divides the tagged element that same name is arranged again just from different files.
In the XML environment, the XML pattern provides the approach of description and verification msg validity.Mode declaration pattern specification which type of element and attribute can be used to be described in content in the XML document, where element can appear at, which element can appear in other elements.The use of pattern has guaranteed the consistance of file structure.Pattern can be produced by the user, is provided support by the SGML as XML usually.By using the xml editor of support mode, the user can handle the XML file, and complys with the mode producing XML document that the user creates.
Usually, stagger the time when the element and the label that insert XML document, xml editor continued refusing user's the making of XML document before mistake is overcome.In this case, if be not inconsistent with pattern, xml editor does not often allow XML document is edited, thereby editing machine can't provide the free-format editor.Another selection of editing machine is to allow the user produce the entire chapter XML document, and then the validity of verifying XML document on the whole.So, the mistake that is occurred during checking need be found out and be corrected.
Summary of the invention
The present invention is intended to carry out extend markup language (XML) document validation, and when the user edited the document, real-time Report mode pattern was run counter to situation (schema violation).Word processor has the extend markup language (local XML (native XML)) that is associated.When the user was associated non-local XML schema file with XML document when, word processor was just used and is had the non-local XML pattern of confirming engine (validationengine) and confirm non-local XML element in the XML document.When the user will insert in the XML document from the non-local XML element of this pattern, parallel tree (parallel tree) was safeguarded by word processor as the object of confirming engine.This tree comprises and is inserted into non-local XML element node corresponding in the XML document.This parallel tree helps prevent the non-local XML tag in the local XML tag interference XML document.Although non-local XML tag coexists as in the identical XML document with local XML tag, this parallel tree still allows to be independent of local XML tag and confirms non-local XML tag separately.
In one embodiment, when being inserted into non-local XML element in the XML document, depend on the context that inserts non-local XML element, node corresponding has been created in the appropriate position in parallel tree at every turn.Accordingly, from XML document during the non-local XML element of deletion, node corresponding has also been deleted from parallel tree at every turn.
Except following the trail of non-local XML element, parallel tree is also being followed the trail of the content of text of non-local XML element.The content of non-local XML element is present in the XML document, rather than in the parallel tree, but parallel tree still remains to the link of element.If desired, be the cause of parallel tree validation, parallel tree can come out content retrieval.Then, this affirmation process just can be confirmed the structural relation between this parallel tree node, and each node limits the content type that its content of text applied.
The reflection that parallel tree is real-time variation in the XML document, and allow real-time confirmation to non-local XML tag.When moment free time after the content of text in non-local XML tag or XML document changes, occurring, confirm by the affirmation engine corresponding to the subtree of the regional parallel tree that changes in the XML document.If not the variation of local XML or content of text has one or more mistakes, confirm that then engine is just with this error notification word processor.Then, according to being used for handling this type of wrong user interface instruction, word processor is all bright this mistake that shows in XML document and parallel tree.
Description of drawings
Fig. 1 has illustrated the example calculation element that can be used in exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a block scheme of implementing example environment of the present invention.
Fig. 3 is the example block scheme according to XML document of the present invention and parallel tree.
Fig. 4 is according to XML document of the present invention and the example block scheme that comprises the parallel tree of mistake.
Fig. 5 is according to the present invention, confirms the example process logic process flow diagram of XML document and reporting errors.
Fig. 6 is according to the present invention, the example process logic process flow diagram that the variation in the XML document is positioned and handles.
Fig. 7 is according to the present invention, confirms the example process logic process flow diagram of XML document.
Fig. 8 is according to the present invention, shows wrong example process logic process flow diagram in XML document and the parallel tree.
Embodiment
In instructions and claims, unless context stipulates that clearly following term all adopts its meaning described here.
Term " SGML " or " ML " are meant the language of the special code in the document, and how some part of its specified documents is explained by application program.In the word processor file, the specific format how tagged element can show with the designed element content or arrange is associated.In other embodiment, as other XML document, described mark may be intended to data of description and not relate to the demonstration problem.
Term " local extend markup language " or " local XML " refer to SGML element that is associated with word processor application and the pattern that is associated with word processor application.
Term " non-local extend markup language " or " non-local XML " refer to user or the establishment of other application program, and defer to the SGML element of the pattern that is different from local XML pattern.
Term " element " is meant the base unit of XML document.Element can comprise attribute, other the piece material (building blocks) of element, content and other XML document.
Term " label " is meant and is inserted into the order of describing document elements in the XML document.Each element is no more than two labels usually: beginning label and end-tag.Empty element (no content) with a label also allows.
Content between the label is as " son " (or offspring) of element.Therefore, other element that is embedded in the element content is called " daughter element " or " child node " or element.Be directly embedded into text in the element content as " this node of Ziwen " of element.Text in daughter element and the element has been formed this element " content " together.
Term " attribute " is meant the additional character that is set to particular value and is associated with element.Element can have an any amount with its associated attributes, comprise there is not attribute.The additional information that attribute is used to not to be included in the element content is associated with element.
The exemplary operation environment
With reference to Fig. 1, be used for implementing an exemplary systems of the present invention and comprise calculation element, as calculation element 100.Basic configuration comprises those parts in the dotted line 108.In basic configuration, calculation element 100 comprises at least one processing unit 102 and system storage 104 usually.The accurate configuration and the type that depend on calculation element, system storage can be (as the RAM) of volatibility, non-volatile (as ROM, flash memory etc.) or the two certain combination.System storage 104 comprises operating system 105 usually, and one or more application programs 106 can comprise routine data 107.In one embodiment, application program 106 comprises the word processor application 120 that tool has xml editor 122.In this configuration, XML document can be opened and edit to word processor application 120 in the free style editing environment.Although here be to illustrate of the present inventionly with word processor application 120, the present invention also has identical applicability to the application program of other type, and this point will be conspicuous concerning those skilled in the art.
Fig. 2 is a block scheme of implementing example environment of the present invention.Example environment 200 shown in Figure 2 comprises that word processor 120, XML document 210, non-local XML pattern 215, XML confirm engine 225 and data structure 230.Data structure 230 comprises misdata 235, parallel tree 220 and synchrodata 240.
In one embodiment, word processor 120 has the name space (namespace) of himself and the pattern of the XML document that is used for being associated with word processor 120.Can be by the setting of the label of word processor 120 mode-definitions and attribute, so that it can be considered as oneself SGML with the formal definition of XML document to a kind of like this degree, i.e. word processor SGML (local XML).Local XML obtains the support of word processor 120, and it can defer to the rule of other SGML, creates the further rule of self simultaneously.Local XML provides and comprises the SGML that enriches display message, these display message usually with such as text formatting (as runic, italic, underscore), paragraph format (as line space, (justification) and similar form align), the word processing listings format (as the form row and column) and the similar form is associated.Then, local XML can use with the user definition pattern that more substantial structures is added to document.
According to the present invention, local XML and non-local XML element can coexist as in the XML document 210, and can confirm respectively.Non-local XML element is associated with non-local XML pattern 215.When non-local XML element is identified, check whether it meets non-local XML pattern 215.As previously described, pattern has been illustrated what label and attribute and has been used to illustrate content in the XML document, and where each label is placed on, and which type of content type can occur in element, which element can occur in other element, guarantees that file organizes in an identical manner.Therefore, when non-local XML element when organizing described in the non-local XML pattern 215, this element is effective.Below in the discussion of Fig. 7 further the affirmation to non-local XML element be illustrated.
XML confirms that engine 225 is to be configured to keep element-tree and according to the module of certain this element-tree of model validation.In brief, can pass to the object that XML confirms engine 225 definition element-trees, as the object corresponding to element in the XML document 210, the pattern pointer as pointing to such as non-local XML pattern, also may be the content of one or more element-tree elements.This information has been arranged, and XML confirms engine 225 just according to the model validation element-tree, and gives calling procedure (calling process) with any report information of running counter to.
When routine operated, according to one embodiment of the present of invention, word processor 120 had been kept several data structures 230 that participate in the non-local XML element affirmation.Parallel tree 220 is the element-trees that comprise corresponding to each non-local XML node element in the XML document 210.In one embodiment, parallel tree 220 is known each element and the content of XML document 210, and XML document 210 is also known the node of parallel tree 220.Therefore, the user can be bright shows the node in the parallel tree 220, and corresponding to the element of this node also bright having shown in XML document 210.Similarly, the part of bright apparent XML document 210 can be directed at the respective nodes of parallel tree 220 by bright apparent.Further the parallel tree of example is described in the discussion of Fig. 3 below.
Misdata 235 comprises the data that turn back to word processor 120 when occurring confirming relevant wrong of element that engine 225 confirms with XML from XML affirmation engine 225.Misdata 235 also can comprise the information that word processor 120 shows error notification.In one embodiment, when occurring confirming mistake, word processor 120 is just reported four independent type of errors.These four type of errors comprise positional fault, invalid content mistake, the wrong and invalid attribute error of content disappearance.Except these four mistakes of mentioning, also can use other dissimilar mistake.Mistake is appointed as the particular error type has simplified the necessary analysis that corrects mistakes.Misdata 235 also can comprise further relevant with mistake information, as about can how to revise the suggestion of the mistake that is shown to the user.The demonstration of error message and relation will further specify in conjunction with Fig. 8.
Synchrodata comprises and is used for parallel tree 220 and XML document 210 are carried out real-time synchronized data.In one embodiment, synchrodata 240 comprises the identifier list that is associated with each element in the XML document 210.Described identifier identifies each element in the XML document 210 uniquely, thereby also identifies each node in the parallel tree 220 uniquely.Synchrodata 240 helps to make the variation that appears in the XML document 210 to realize synchronously with parallel tree 220, is included in the parallel tree 220 and adds or deletion of node.Comprise the interpolation node and will do explanation in conjunction with Fig. 6 to the step example of parallel tree 220.
Shown in Figure 3 is can be according to the example XML document 210 and parallel tree 220 of the present invention's maintenance.XML document 210 had both comprised local XML element, also comprised non-local XML element.Element in the SGML generally includes to be opened label (by "<" and "〉" expression), some content and closes label (by "</" and "〉" represent).In this example, the label that is associated with local XML pattern comprises " w: " (as the element 302) in the label, and the label that is associated with non-local XML pattern comprises " r: " (as the element 304) in the label.The label that is associated with local XML is regarded as with the name space (the word processor name space) of word processor and is associated.Relatively, the label that is associated with non-local XML is " resume " name space as being associated with the different name space in this example.The element of XML document 210 is content further.For example, " work " is included in " target " element, and " Maine 123 " is included in " street " element." street " element is included in " address " element.These elements are defined, according to be non-local XML pattern corresponding to the resume name space (as the resume pattern) that provided by user or other application program in the past." w: " and " r: " prefix is as the succinct symbol of the XML of each name space.
As shown in Figure 2, parallel tree 220 comprises and each non-local XML element associated content.In another embodiment, parallel tree be passed to confirm that engine 225 is confirmed before, described content does not copy in the parallel tree 220.Yet in another embodiment, the content that is copied in the parallel tree 220 is limited to the content that joins with the part correlation that will confirm parallel tree 220.The affirmation of parallel tree 220 is described further in conjunction with Fig. 7.
Fig. 4 is the block scheme of example XML document 410 and the parallel tree 420 that comprises mistake.XML document 410 is similar to XML document shown in Figure 3 210 and parallel tree 220 with parallel tree 420, yet mistake (about non-local XML pattern 215) has been added in the non-local XML tag.This mistake is postcodes by wrong element 432 expressions.According to non-local XML pattern 215, should " postcode " (" zip ") element be the son of setting the address for, or " street " (" street ") element brother (sibling).Yet, in an example shown, because " postcode " is placed with the son in " street ", so should " postcode " element be invalid.According to the present invention, what parallel tree 420 reflected is the son insertion that " postcode " element is used as " street " element.Therefore, when confirming parallel tree 420 some relevant subtree of (or comprise " street " element) according to non-local XML pattern 215, mistake is returned.In this example, word processor 120 identifies the mistake in the XML document 410 with underscore, yet, also can use other display indicator to indicate this mistake.
The sign of mistake is also contained in the parallel tree 420, and wherein, icon 442 expression " postcode " nodes 422 have the mistake that is associated.In another embodiment, other display indicator can be used on and represents the wrong existence that is associated with node in the parallel tree 420.According to shown in example, underlined element in the right click XML document 410 (as wrong element 432) produces wrong 430 (as the right click menu) that show.Mistake shows that 430 have listed the details of relevant mistake, as the type of mistake.Mistake shows that 430 also can comprise the proposal action of attempting to correct mistakes to the user.This proposal action can be interactively, allows the user to select from the possible wrong solution of row.
In addition, on icon 442, stop (hovering) and can be shown to user's out of Memory, as ToolTips 440." ToolTips " is often referred to the non-interactive type display element that additional information is offered the user.For example, shown ToolTips provides text notification " postcode can not in the street ".In one embodiment, for showing mistake demonstration 430 or ToolTips 440, can select chart 442 or wrong element 432, or on them, stop.Relating to the example process that reaches demonstration error indicator in the parallel tree 420 in XML document 410 illustrates in the discussion of Fig. 8.
Detection, affirmation and error reporting
Fig. 5 is according to the present invention, is used for confirming that XML document and Report mode run counter to the logical flow chart of the example process of situation.Process 500 begins at square 501 places, and wherein XML document is just being edited and variation taken place." variation " refers to insert in XML document, revises or deletion XML element, or changes the content of text of non-local XML element.Respond this variation, continue process at square 502 places.
At square 502 places, XML document change is positioned in XML document.Some variation as adding new element, may need further to handle respective nodes is dosed on the parallel tree.In conjunction with Fig. 6 further specify be used for locating with the processing XML document in the example process that changes.Process advances to square 503.
At square 503, the part that changes in the XML document is marked as " dirty "." dirty " be meant subject to confirmation in the XML document or because the part that its validity of described variation is no longer guaranteed.Identifier or other designator can join with the part correlation that XML document changes.In one embodiment, anyly change, parent (parent) father deleted or that be added element is marked as dirty.When process 500 advanced to the dirty part of affirmation, the affirmation engine was just verified described close father and described parent's son.Process continues at square 504 places.
At square 504 places, also be marked as " dirty " corresponding to the parallel tree node of changing unit in the XML document.Identifier or other designator can be associated with the parallel tree node of respective change nidus.In one embodiment, being marked as dirtyly with each element in the XML document and each node associated unique identification symbol in the parallel tree, therefore, is dirty with the part of XML document and the vertex ticks of parallel tree simultaneously.Process continues at decision square 505 places.
At decision square 505 places, made the user who writes or edit XML document and whether reached decision idle or overtime (timeout) point.Free time, the current time point that does not provide the user to be input to word processor of user was provided.The overtime situation that idle condition in the preset time section, do not occur that is meant.If passed through the enough time, then overtime condition will appear.Process is in the circulation of square 505 places, up to idle condition or overtime condition occurring.When reaching idle condition or overtime condition occurring, process advances to square 506.
At square 506 places, the dirty node of described one or more parallel trees is confirmed by the affirmation engine.Parallel tree is to confirm the object of engine or be linked to the affirmation engine, confirms thereby make this tree needn't be delivered to the affirmation engine.The example process of confirming the dirty node of parallel tree is described further in conjunction with Fig. 7.Process continues at decision square 507 places.
At decision square 507 places, according to by the misdata of confirming that engine returns, make the decision that whether has mistake in the non-local XML element of XML document.Confirm that engine turns back to misdata in the word processor, the validity of each node in the parallel tree that expression affirmation engine has been analyzed.In one embodiment, misdata comprises the type of error that appears at word processor.If there is not mistake, then process moves to square 509, and process stops.If there is error, process continues at square 508 places.
At square 508 places, according to the display indicator in XML document and the parallel tree, the user is apprised of non-local XML and confirms mistake in the element.Be described further for user's example process in conjunction with Fig. 8 the error reporting that occurs.Process advances to square 509, and process stops.
Fig. 6 is according to the present invention, changes the logical flow chart of example process in location and the processing XML document.When process 500 shown in Figure 5 entered into square 502, process 600 entered at square 601 places.Process continues at square 602 places.
At square 602 places, determine that XML document has changed the close father of part.For example, in Fig. 4, " street " element in the XML document 410 is the close father of " postcode " element 432.In one embodiment, determined the father, can be marked as dirty so that comprise father and this father offspring's parallel nodes subtree.Because except the direct father who changes node, change the validity that does not influence element usually, guarantee that still whole XML document is effective so confirm father and father's offspring.Determine that the father also helps parallel tree and XML document are carried out synchronization.Then, the father can be used as the designator of change location in the XML document.In one embodiment, the identifier that is associated with the father who changes element is stored in the synchrodata shown in Figure 2 240.Process advances to square 603.
At square 603 places, word processor has determined to change the immediate brother of element.For example, in Fig. 3, " target " element and " address " element are regarded the brother as.Determine that nearest brother helps parallel tree and XML document are carried out synchronization.This nearest brother provides second display indicator of change location in the XML document.In one embodiment, with change the identifier that the element father is associated and be stored in the synchrodata shown in Figure 2 240.In another embodiment, also determined nearest brother in XML document, just changing above the element still be below.Process continues at definite square 604 places.
At decision square 604 places, make whether variation need create new node in parallel tree decision.When in XML document, creating new non-local XML element, need new node.Create in real time the synchronization that this new node keeps XML document and parallel tree.When not needing new node, process moves to square 609, and process turns back to the square 503 of process 500.Yet, if need new node, process to move to square 605.
At square 605 places, create identifier corresponding to new element in the XML document.This identifier has identified the element in the XML document uniquely.Process continues at square 606 places.
At square 606 places, in parallel tree, create no father node.Father in the current parallel tree of no use of this no father node identifies.Process continues at square 607 places.
At square 607 places, relate to the identifier of in XML document, creating element and be associated with no father node.This identifier is associated with no father node word processor can be connected the position of new element in this node and the XML document.In one embodiment, determined, therefore, also determined father in the parallel tree and nearest brother the father of new element in the XML document and nearest brother.Process continues at square 608 places.
At square 608 places, the father node corresponding to father's element of new element in the XML document in the parallel tree is instructed to claim no father node.Then, this new node is presented at the tram in the parallel tree, makes XML document synchronous with parallel tree.Process advances to square 609, turns back to the square 503 of process 500.
Fig. 7 is according to the present invention, confirms the logical flow chart of XML document example process.When process shown in Figure 5 500 entered into square 506, process 700 entered at square 701 places.Process continues at square 702 places.
At square 702 places, be copied to parallel tree with non-local XML element associated content to be confirmed.In one embodiment, the content in the XML document is not included in the parallel tree when initial, if this content is included in the parallel tree, the required storage space of parallel tree will almost be the required storage space of XML document.Only before affirmation, to parallel tree required storage space is minimized content replication.In another embodiment, the content limitation that copies to parallel tree in be labeled as dirty non-local XML element associated content.Process continues at square 703 places.
At square 703 places, the affirmation engine confirms to be labeled as dirty node and its associated content by its non-local XML pattern.This non-local XML pattern states that what label and attribute are used to illustrate the content in the non-local XML element of XML document, and each label can be wherein, and what content can be accepted, and which element can appear in other element.When parallel XML tree was deferred to non-local XML pattern, this parallel XML tree was effective.After finishing affirmation, process advances to square 704.
At square 704 places, for confirm that the content that purpose is included in the parallel tree is deleted from parallel tree.Content deleted from parallel tree just further minimized the required storage space of parallel tree.Process advances to square 705, turns back to the square 507 of process shown in Figure 5 500.
Fig. 8 is according to the present invention, show in the XML document with parallel tree in the logical flow chart of wrong example process.When process 500 shown in Figure 5 entered in the square 508, process 800 entered at square 801 places, and had defined in the non-local XML element that mistake is present in XML document.Process continues at square 802 places.
At square 802 places, assert that by the affirmation engine vicious element has added underscore in XML document.The display indicator's (as runic, italic, wave (squiggly line) etc.) that should be appreciated that other can be used to specify the element that has mistake in the XML document.Process continues at square 803 places.
At square 803 places, done mark corresponding to the node of XML document mistake element in the parallel tree.In one embodiment, icon be placed in this node neighbouring represent corresponding to the element of this node wrong.In one embodiment, to appearing at the type of error that is associated and locates with wrong element, this icon is specific.Process continues at definite square 804 places.
At definite square 804 places, make the user whether right click the decision of bright apparent mistake in XML document.If right click does not take place, process just advances to square 806.Yet if right click has taken place, process just continues at square 805 places.
At square 805 places, response is made in right click, about the details of mistake and the instruction that corrects mistakes the user is presented in demonstration.In another embodiment, other user input, rather than right click can be used to start this mistake and show.This mistake is presented in the discussion of above Fig. 4 and further specifies.Process advances to determines square 806.
At decision square 806, make the user and whether cursor of mouse is rested on decision on the icon in the parallel tree.If user's decision does not rest on cursor of mouse on the mistake, then process advances to square 808, turns back in the square 509 of process 500 shown in Figure 5.When cursor of mouse rested on the icon, process continued at square 807 places.
At square 807 places, the stop of response cursor of mouse on the icon of parallel tree is shown to the user with ToolTips.In one embodiment, the text of ToolTips provides the plain statement that is made a mistake.For example, if the necessary content of specific element, the text of ToolTips may be " this element can not be sky ".In one embodiment, other user imports, rather than rests on the icon with cursor of mouse, can be used to show tooltips.Fig. 4 shows example icon and ToolTips.Process advances to square 808, turns back to the square 509 of process 500 shown in Figure 5.
Above-mentioned explanation, example and data provide the complete description of the manufacturing and the use of file of the present invention.Because many embodiment of the present invention can implement under the situation that does not deviate from purport of the present invention and scope, so the present invention is found in appended claims.
Claims (20)
1. one kind is used for confirming and reports that the XML document pattern runs counter to the method for situation, and wherein XML document comprises local XML and non-local XML, and described method comprises:
Non-local XML change of elements in the localization of XML document;
The part of mark XML document takes place with the variation of expression with described XML document part correlation;
Node in the parallel tree of mark takes place with the expression variation, and wherein said node is corresponding to the part that changes in the XML document;
Confirm the node of parallel tree by corresponding non-local XML pattern;
The misdata of returning according to the affirmation engine of confirming node determines whether there is mistake in the non-local XML element; And
If mistake occurs, then in XML document with in the parallel tree, show error notification.
2. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, the non-local XML change of elements in described location further comprises:
Discern father's element of each non-local XML element that changes;
Discern the nearest fraternal element of each non-local XML element that changes.
3. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, further comprises: when creating new non-local XML element in XML document, create new node in parallel tree.
4. method as claimed in claim 3 is characterized in that, described establishment new node further comprises:
Establishment is corresponding to the identifier of new non-local XML element, and the father's element and the fraternal element of wherein new non-local XML element can be determined from identifier;
In parallel tree, create no father node;
Described identifier is associated with described no father node;
Indication one is claimed described no father node corresponding to the father node of father's element.
5. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, the node of the parallel tree of described affirmation further comprises:
To parallel tree, the part correlation that wherein changes in this content and the XML document joins with content replication;
Confirm the node of content by corresponding non-local XML pattern;
The described content of deletion from parallel tree is so that the storage space of parallel tree minimizes.
6. method as claimed in claim 5 is characterized in that, describedly confirms that by corresponding non-local XML pattern the node of content comprises:
According to non-local XML pattern, check parallel tree with XML affirmation engine.
7. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, further comprises: before confirming parallel tree, determine overtime or when idle condition occurs.
8. the method for claim 1 is characterized in that, described demonstration error notification further comprises:
According to first display indicator, indicate the part that makes a mistake in the XML document;
According to second display indicator, indicate in the parallel tree corresponding to the node partly that makes a mistake in the XML document.
9. method as claimed in claim 8 is characterized in that, imports corresponding to the user of at least one in described first display indicator and second display indicator to produce wrong the demonstration, and the interactive information that provides about described mistake is provided this mistake.
10. method as claimed in claim 8 is characterized in that, imports the generation ToolTips corresponding to the user of at least one in first display indicator and second display indicator, and this ToolTips provides the text message about described mistake.
11. one kind is used for confirming and reports that the XML document pattern runs counter to the system of situation, wherein XML document comprises local XML and non-local XML, it is characterized in that described system comprises:
First parts, be used to create the XML document that comprises first kind element that is associated with an XML pattern and second types of elements that is associated with the 2nd XML pattern, described first parts are configured to produce designator, and at least one in the indication first kind element run counter to a described XML pattern;
Second parts are used for memory node, and described each node is associated with respective element in described first parts, and described first parts and described second parts are synchronous;
The 3rd parts are used to confirm element, and described the 3rd parts are arranged in response to the running counter to information of affirmation misdata is turned back to described first parts.
12. system as claimed in claim 11 is characterized in that, further comprises:
The 4th parts, described the 4th parts are corresponding with misdata, and wherein said the 4th parts are arranged to when the designator that shows in user input and in the XML document and second parts at least one interacts and are created.
13. system as claimed in claim 12 is characterized in that, described the 4th parts further are arranged to the information that shows relevant mistake corresponding to misdata, comprise at least a in type of error, the instruction that corrects mistakes and the wrong statement.
14. one kind is used for confirming and reports that the XML document pattern runs counter to the method for situation, it is characterized in that described XML document comprises local XML and non-local XML, described method comprises:
Non-local XML change of elements in the localization of XML document;
If described variation is then created new node corresponding to the establishment of non-local XML element new in the XML document in parallel tree;
The part of XML document is labeled as is subjected to described variable effect;
Flag node is with the expression generation that changed in parallel tree, wherein said node corresponding in the XML document by part that described variation influenced;
Confirm in the parallel tree node of mark according to corresponded manner;
Determine that mistake in the non-local XML element is whether from the supply misdata of response confirmation node; With
If like this, so just in XML document and parallel tree, show error notification.
15. method as claimed in claim 14 is characterized in that, the non-local XML change of elements in described location further comprises:
Identify the father's element that changes in each non-local XML element;
Identify the nearest fraternal element that changes in each non-local XML element.
16. method as claimed in claim 14 is characterized in that, described establishment new node further comprises:
Establishment is wherein determined the father's element and the fraternal element of new non-local XML element corresponding to the identifier of new non-local XML element from this identifier;
In parallel tree, create no father node;
Identifier is associated with no father node;
Indication one is claimed described no father node corresponding to the father node of father's element.
17. method as claimed in claim 14 is characterized in that, the parallel tree node of described affirmation further comprises:
To parallel tree, wherein said content is corresponding to the described part of XML document with content replication;
Confirm to comprise the node of described content by corresponding non-local XML pattern; With
Content is deleted from parallel tree, so that the storage space of parallel tree minimizes.
18. method as claimed in claim 14 is characterized in that, described demonstration error notification further comprises:
According to described first display indicator, indicate the part that occurs mistake in the XML document;
According to described second display indicator, indicate corresponding to the parallel tree node that occurs error section in the XML document.
19. method as claimed in claim 18 is characterized in that, imports corresponding at least one the user in described first display indicator and described second display indicator to produce wrong the demonstration, provides about this mistake interactive information.
20. method as claimed in claim 18 is characterized in that, imports the generation ToolTips corresponding at least one the user in described first display indicator and described second display indicator, provides about this Error Text information.
Applications Claiming Priority (2)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
US10/184,565 | 2002-06-27 | ||
US10/184,565 US7373595B2 (en) | 2002-06-27 | 2002-06-27 | System and method for validating an XML document and reporting schema violations |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN1472645A CN1472645A (en) | 2004-02-04 |
CN1329823C true CN1329823C (en) | 2007-08-01 |
Family
ID=27733956
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CNB031452205A Expired - Fee Related CN1329823C (en) | 2002-06-27 | 2003-06-25 | System and method for verifying extendable label language files and reporting contrary mode against them in real time |
Country Status (15)
Country | Link |
---|---|
US (1) | US7373595B2 (en) |
EP (1) | EP1376389A3 (en) |
JP (1) | JP2004046849A (en) |
KR (1) | KR100833538B1 (en) |
CN (1) | CN1329823C (en) |
AU (1) | AU2003204868A1 (en) |
BR (1) | BR0302084A (en) |
CA (1) | CA2433243A1 (en) |
MX (1) | MXPA03005875A (en) |
MY (1) | MY137429A (en) |
NO (1) | NO20032945L (en) |
PL (1) | PL360865A1 (en) |
RU (1) | RU2328032C2 (en) |
TW (1) | TW200413960A (en) |
ZA (1) | ZA200304859B (en) |
Families Citing this family (94)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US6013563A (en) * | 1997-05-12 | 2000-01-11 | Silicon Genesis Corporation | Controlled cleaning process |
US7191394B1 (en) | 2000-06-21 | 2007-03-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Authoring arbitrary XML documents using DHTML and XSLT |
US7155667B1 (en) | 2000-06-21 | 2006-12-26 | Microsoft Corporation | User interface for integrated spreadsheets and word processing tables |
US6948135B1 (en) * | 2000-06-21 | 2005-09-20 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and systems of providing information to computer users |
US6883168B1 (en) | 2000-06-21 | 2005-04-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Methods, systems, architectures and data structures for delivering software via a network |
US7346848B1 (en) * | 2000-06-21 | 2008-03-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Single window navigation methods and systems |
US7000230B1 (en) | 2000-06-21 | 2006-02-14 | Microsoft Corporation | Network-based software extensions |
KR100511785B1 (en) * | 2002-12-20 | 2005-08-31 | 한국전자통신연구원 | A System and A Method for Authoring Multimedia Content Description Metadata |
US7415672B1 (en) * | 2003-03-24 | 2008-08-19 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for designing electronic forms |
US7370066B1 (en) * | 2003-03-24 | 2008-05-06 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for offline editing of data files |
US7275216B2 (en) * | 2003-03-24 | 2007-09-25 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for designing electronic forms and hierarchical schemas |
US6908058B2 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2005-06-21 | Suncast Corporation | Hose reel cart with elevated crank handle |
US7913159B2 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2011-03-22 | Microsoft Corporation | System and method for real-time validation of structured data files |
US7296017B2 (en) * | 2003-03-28 | 2007-11-13 | Microsoft Corporation | Validation of XML data files |
US7251777B1 (en) | 2003-04-16 | 2007-07-31 | Hypervision, Ltd. | Method and system for automated structuring of textual documents |
US7409673B2 (en) * | 2003-06-24 | 2008-08-05 | Academia Sinica | XML document editor |
US7406660B1 (en) | 2003-08-01 | 2008-07-29 | Microsoft Corporation | Mapping between structured data and a visual surface |
US7334187B1 (en) | 2003-08-06 | 2008-02-19 | Microsoft Corporation | Electronic form aggregation |
US7657832B1 (en) * | 2003-09-18 | 2010-02-02 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Correcting validation errors in structured documents |
GB2407423A (en) * | 2003-10-23 | 2005-04-27 | Matsushita Electric Ind Co Ltd | Schema driven authoring tool |
US8819072B1 (en) | 2004-02-02 | 2014-08-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Promoting data from structured data files |
US7430711B2 (en) * | 2004-02-17 | 2008-09-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for editing XML documents |
US7774620B1 (en) | 2004-05-27 | 2010-08-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Executing applications at appropriate trust levels |
US20060004729A1 (en) * | 2004-06-30 | 2006-01-05 | Reactivity, Inc. | Accelerated schema-based validation |
KR100636177B1 (en) * | 2004-09-20 | 2006-10-19 | 삼성전자주식회사 | Method and system for managing output of policy based extensible markup language document |
US7692636B2 (en) | 2004-09-30 | 2010-04-06 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for handwriting to a screen |
US7512840B2 (en) * | 2004-10-01 | 2009-03-31 | Diebold, Incorporated | System and method for providing graphical representation and development of a processing application |
US8487879B2 (en) | 2004-10-29 | 2013-07-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Systems and methods for interacting with a computer through handwriting to a screen |
US7836392B2 (en) * | 2004-11-10 | 2010-11-16 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | Layout information for data component |
US7711676B2 (en) * | 2004-11-12 | 2010-05-04 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | Tracking usage of data elements in electronic business communications |
US7818342B2 (en) * | 2004-11-12 | 2010-10-19 | Sap Ag | Tracking usage of data elements in electronic business communications |
US7712022B2 (en) | 2004-11-15 | 2010-05-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Mutually exclusive options in electronic forms |
US7721190B2 (en) * | 2004-11-16 | 2010-05-18 | Microsoft Corporation | Methods and systems for server side form processing |
US7865519B2 (en) * | 2004-11-17 | 2011-01-04 | Sap Aktiengesellschaft | Using a controlled vocabulary library to generate business data component names |
US7797673B2 (en) * | 2004-12-16 | 2010-09-14 | The Mathworks, Inc. | Applying coding standards in graphical programming environments |
US7559020B2 (en) * | 2004-12-30 | 2009-07-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Methods and systems for preserving unknown markup in a strongly typed environment |
US7937651B2 (en) * | 2005-01-14 | 2011-05-03 | Microsoft Corporation | Structural editing operations for network forms |
US7571429B2 (en) | 2005-01-18 | 2009-08-04 | Sharp Laboratories Of America, Inc. | System and method for error reporting |
US8996991B2 (en) | 2005-02-11 | 2015-03-31 | Fujitsu Limited | System and method for displaying an acceptance status |
US7500184B2 (en) | 2005-02-11 | 2009-03-03 | Fujitsu Limited | Determining an acceptance status during document parsing |
US7725834B2 (en) * | 2005-03-04 | 2010-05-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Designer-created aspect for an electronic form template |
US7673228B2 (en) | 2005-03-30 | 2010-03-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Data-driven actions for network forms |
US8010515B2 (en) | 2005-04-15 | 2011-08-30 | Microsoft Corporation | Query to an electronic form |
US20070011665A1 (en) * | 2005-06-21 | 2007-01-11 | Microsoft Corporation | Content syndication platform |
US8200975B2 (en) | 2005-06-29 | 2012-06-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Digital signatures for network forms |
US7617448B2 (en) * | 2005-09-06 | 2009-11-10 | Cisco Technology, Inc. | Method and system for validation of structured documents |
US20070061467A1 (en) * | 2005-09-15 | 2007-03-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Sessions and session states |
US7774321B2 (en) * | 2005-11-07 | 2010-08-10 | Microsoft Corporation | Partial XML validation |
US8001459B2 (en) * | 2005-12-05 | 2011-08-16 | Microsoft Corporation | Enabling electronic documents for limited-capability computing devices |
US8037408B2 (en) * | 2005-12-22 | 2011-10-11 | Sap Ag | Systems and methods of validating templates |
US7533111B2 (en) * | 2005-12-30 | 2009-05-12 | Microsoft Corporation | Using soap messages for inverse query expressions |
US9495356B2 (en) * | 2006-03-30 | 2016-11-15 | International Business Machines Corporation | Automated interactive visual mapping utility and method for validation and storage of XML data |
WO2007114182A1 (en) * | 2006-03-31 | 2007-10-11 | Justsystems Corporation | Data input apparatus, method, and program |
US7992081B2 (en) * | 2006-04-19 | 2011-08-02 | Oracle International Corporation | Streaming validation of XML documents |
US7821667B2 (en) * | 2006-08-10 | 2010-10-26 | Microsoft Corporation | Validation of print configuration documents |
US9535912B2 (en) * | 2006-09-15 | 2017-01-03 | Oracle International Corporation | Techniques for checking whether a complex digital object conforms to a standard |
US8060620B2 (en) * | 2006-10-05 | 2011-11-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Profile deployment using a generic format |
US20080092037A1 (en) * | 2006-10-16 | 2008-04-17 | Oracle International Corporation | Validation of XML content in a streaming fashion |
US20080114797A1 (en) * | 2006-11-14 | 2008-05-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Importing non-native content into a document |
US7921370B1 (en) * | 2006-11-29 | 2011-04-05 | Adobe Systems Incorporated | Object-level text-condition indicators |
EP1933242A1 (en) * | 2006-12-11 | 2008-06-18 | Sitecore A/S | A method for ensuring internet content compliance |
US7716164B2 (en) * | 2006-12-29 | 2010-05-11 | Sap Ag | Layout information for data element |
US8341514B2 (en) * | 2007-01-31 | 2012-12-25 | Microsoft Corporation | Using static data in a markup language |
US7865823B2 (en) * | 2007-06-28 | 2011-01-04 | Intel Corporation | Method and apparatus for schema validation |
US8108768B2 (en) * | 2007-07-20 | 2012-01-31 | International Business Machines Corporation | Improving efficiency of content rule checking in a content management system |
CN101359497A (en) * | 2007-07-30 | 2009-02-04 | 科立尔数位科技股份有限公司 | Method for detecting and showing time stamp and recording media for recording data structure thereof |
US8880564B2 (en) * | 2007-10-11 | 2014-11-04 | Microsoft Corporation | Generic model editing framework |
JP5165998B2 (en) * | 2007-11-14 | 2013-03-21 | 日本電信電話株式会社 | Content diagnosis device and content diagnosis program |
US8719693B2 (en) * | 2008-02-22 | 2014-05-06 | International Business Machines Corporation | Method for storing localized XML document values |
US8020051B2 (en) * | 2008-10-20 | 2011-09-13 | Sap Ag | Message handling in a service-oriented architecture |
TWI385537B (en) * | 2009-05-04 | 2013-02-11 | Univ Nat Taiwan | Assisting method and apparatus for accessing markup language document |
US8200702B2 (en) * | 2009-09-30 | 2012-06-12 | International Business Machines Corporation | Independently variably scoped content rule application in a content management system |
US20110314043A1 (en) * | 2010-06-17 | 2011-12-22 | Microsoft Corporation | Full-fidelity representation of xml-represented objects |
CA2711855A1 (en) | 2010-08-25 | 2010-11-03 | Ibm Canada Limited - Ibm Canada Limitee | Secure third party scripting environment |
US8281236B2 (en) * | 2010-09-08 | 2012-10-02 | Microsoft Corporation | Removing style corruption from extensible markup language documents |
US20120221319A1 (en) * | 2011-02-28 | 2012-08-30 | Andrew Trese | Systems, Methods and Media for Translating Informational Content |
US10140320B2 (en) | 2011-02-28 | 2018-11-27 | Sdl Inc. | Systems, methods, and media for generating analytical data |
US9984054B2 (en) | 2011-08-24 | 2018-05-29 | Sdl Inc. | Web interface including the review and manipulation of a web document and utilizing permission based control |
US9224010B2 (en) | 2011-09-01 | 2015-12-29 | International Business Machines Corporation | Secure document creation from potentially unsecure source templates |
US8739026B2 (en) | 2011-09-06 | 2014-05-27 | Hewlett-Packard Development Company, L.P. | Markup language schema error correction |
US20130091423A1 (en) * | 2011-10-11 | 2013-04-11 | Siemens Aktiengesellschaft | Method and Apparatus for Checking a Structure Conformity for a Piece Of Development Documentation with at Least One Development Document |
US9916306B2 (en) | 2012-10-19 | 2018-03-13 | Sdl Inc. | Statistical linguistic analysis of source content |
CN103914467B (en) * | 2012-12-31 | 2017-07-14 | 鼎捷软件股份有限公司 | Data variation labelling apparatus |
US9524307B2 (en) * | 2013-03-14 | 2016-12-20 | Microsoft Technology Licensing, Llc | Asynchronous error checking in structured documents |
US9501456B2 (en) * | 2013-03-15 | 2016-11-22 | Altova Gmbh | Automatic fix for extensible markup language errors |
US10747390B1 (en) * | 2014-03-27 | 2020-08-18 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Graphical composer for policy management |
US10592068B1 (en) | 2014-03-27 | 2020-03-17 | Amazon Technologies, Inc. | Graphic composer for service integration |
US10552513B1 (en) * | 2015-01-08 | 2020-02-04 | Vmware, Inc. | Computer system entity rendering system |
CN105354020A (en) * | 2015-09-30 | 2016-02-24 | 武汉钢铁(集团)公司 | Json format data analytic method and data receiving end |
JP6365518B2 (en) * | 2015-11-30 | 2018-08-01 | 京セラドキュメントソリューションズ株式会社 | Information processing apparatus and image forming apparatus |
US10031766B2 (en) | 2016-03-08 | 2018-07-24 | Mastercard International Incorporated | Systems and methods for processing extensible markup language data during runtime |
KR101903039B1 (en) * | 2016-11-21 | 2018-10-01 | (주)솔트웍스 | Synchronization apparatus for unitied management system of documents |
CN108959095B (en) * | 2018-07-12 | 2021-11-23 | 中国工程物理研究院计算机应用研究所 | Method for verifying XML document based on XML Schema |
WO2024092553A1 (en) * | 2022-11-02 | 2024-05-10 | Huawei Cloud Computing Technologies Co., Ltd. | Methods and systems for model generation and instantiation of optimization models from markup documents |
Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2001067289A2 (en) * | 2000-03-09 | 2001-09-13 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Method and system for applying xml schema |
US20010029604A1 (en) * | 2001-04-27 | 2001-10-11 | Jacob Dreyband | Descriptive data construct mapping method and apparatus |
Family Cites Families (13)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
US5778402A (en) * | 1995-06-07 | 1998-07-07 | Microsoft Corporation | Method and system for auto-formatting a document using an event-based rule engine to format a document as the user types |
US5829004A (en) * | 1996-05-20 | 1998-10-27 | Au; Lawrence | Device for storage and retrieval of compact contiguous tree index records |
US6558431B1 (en) * | 1998-09-11 | 2003-05-06 | Macromedia, Inc. | Storing valid and invalid markup language in strict and relaxed tables respectively |
US6964010B1 (en) * | 1998-12-14 | 2005-11-08 | International Business Machines Corporation | Formatted-item list control |
US6675355B1 (en) * | 2000-03-16 | 2004-01-06 | Autodesk, Inc. | Redline extensible markup language (XML) schema |
GB0018042D0 (en) * | 2000-07-21 | 2000-09-13 | Monsell Edm Ltd | Method of and software for recordal and validation of changes to markup language files |
WO2003019411A2 (en) * | 2001-08-23 | 2003-03-06 | Xmlcities, Inc. | Method and apparatus for extensible stylesheet designs |
US7281206B2 (en) * | 2001-11-16 | 2007-10-09 | Timebase Pty Limited | Maintenance of a markup language document in a database |
US7024626B2 (en) * | 2001-11-30 | 2006-04-04 | Apple Computer, Inc. | System and method of producing user interface information messages |
US6540142B1 (en) * | 2001-12-17 | 2003-04-01 | Zih Corp. | Native XML printer |
US7962925B2 (en) * | 2002-02-22 | 2011-06-14 | Oracle International Corporation | System and method for XML data binding |
US7890865B2 (en) * | 2002-05-09 | 2011-02-15 | Microsoft Corporation | Methods and apparatuses for providing message information in graphical user interfaces based on user inputs |
US7251697B2 (en) * | 2002-06-20 | 2007-07-31 | Koninklijke Philips Electronics N.V. | Method and apparatus for structured streaming of an XML document |
-
2002
- 2002-06-27 US US10/184,565 patent/US7373595B2/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
-
2003
- 2003-06-17 MY MYPI20032265A patent/MY137429A/en unknown
- 2003-06-20 AU AU2003204868A patent/AU2003204868A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-06-23 ZA ZA200304859A patent/ZA200304859B/en unknown
- 2003-06-23 JP JP2003178496A patent/JP2004046849A/en active Pending
- 2003-06-24 TW TW092117176A patent/TW200413960A/en unknown
- 2003-06-25 CA CA002433243A patent/CA2433243A1/en not_active Abandoned
- 2003-06-25 PL PL03360865A patent/PL360865A1/en unknown
- 2003-06-25 CN CNB031452205A patent/CN1329823C/en not_active Expired - Fee Related
- 2003-06-26 BR BR0302084-3A patent/BR0302084A/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2003-06-26 RU RU2003119091/09A patent/RU2328032C2/en not_active IP Right Cessation
- 2003-06-26 MX MXPA03005875A patent/MXPA03005875A/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2003-06-26 NO NO20032945A patent/NO20032945L/en not_active Application Discontinuation
- 2003-06-26 EP EP03014396A patent/EP1376389A3/en not_active Withdrawn
- 2003-06-26 KR KR1020030041891A patent/KR100833538B1/en not_active IP Right Cessation
Patent Citations (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
WO2001067289A2 (en) * | 2000-03-09 | 2001-09-13 | Electronic Data Systems Corporation | Method and system for applying xml schema |
US20010029604A1 (en) * | 2001-04-27 | 2001-10-11 | Jacob Dreyband | Descriptive data construct mapping method and apparatus |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
AU2003204868A1 (en) | 2004-01-22 |
EP1376389A2 (en) | 2004-01-02 |
CA2433243A1 (en) | 2003-12-27 |
MXPA03005875A (en) | 2005-02-14 |
TW200413960A (en) | 2004-08-01 |
JP2004046849A (en) | 2004-02-12 |
KR20040002736A (en) | 2004-01-07 |
BR0302084A (en) | 2004-09-08 |
PL360865A1 (en) | 2003-12-29 |
NO20032945D0 (en) | 2003-06-26 |
EP1376389A3 (en) | 2007-07-11 |
RU2328032C2 (en) | 2008-06-27 |
NO20032945L (en) | 2003-12-29 |
CN1472645A (en) | 2004-02-04 |
US7373595B2 (en) | 2008-05-13 |
US20040006744A1 (en) | 2004-01-08 |
RU2003119091A (en) | 2005-02-10 |
MY137429A (en) | 2009-01-30 |
KR100833538B1 (en) | 2008-05-29 |
ZA200304859B (en) | 2004-05-04 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN1329823C (en) | System and method for verifying extendable label language files and reporting contrary mode against them in real time | |
US5655130A (en) | Method and apparatus for document production using a common document database | |
US7657832B1 (en) | Correcting validation errors in structured documents | |
US7366729B2 (en) | Schema framework and a method and apparatus for normalizing schema | |
CN109492203A (en) | A kind of nuclear power large-scale synthesis reporting format method of calibration and system | |
EP3358470A1 (en) | Method of preparing documents in markup languages | |
US20100107048A1 (en) | Document processor and document processing method | |
JP3028738B2 (en) | Document common logical information editing device | |
WO2004102380A2 (en) | Method and system for storing pending changes to data | |
US20090077462A1 (en) | Document processing device and document processing method | |
JP2007534036A (en) | Field development of XML schema in database | |
EP1768034A1 (en) | Document processing device and document processing method | |
EP0661650B1 (en) | Document editing apparatus | |
JPH09146931A (en) | Document type definition generating device | |
EP1744256A1 (en) | Document processing device and document processing method | |
CN1973284A (en) | Document processing method and device | |
CN101268438A (en) | Data processing apparatus | |
KR20020050295A (en) | Computer-readable recorded medium on which document creating program is recorded, document creating system, and document creating method | |
CN100472512C (en) | Processing documents in multiple markup representations | |
JP2009217635A (en) | Retrieval condition generation method, retrieval condition generation device, and program | |
JPS63101925A (en) | Control system for logical graphic control level printing | |
CN117555782A (en) | Test case management method, device, equipment, medium and program product | |
Skidmore et al. | Logical Process Design | |
JPH10187424A (en) | Correct and error judgement result display system for graphical editing program | |
JP2008257277A (en) | Document processing device, method and program |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
C06 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
C10 | Entry into substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
C14 | Grant of patent or utility model | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
C17 | Cessation of patent right | ||
CF01 | Termination of patent right due to non-payment of annual fee |
Granted publication date: 20070801 Termination date: 20130625 |