CN117973875A - Fuzzy inference system-based risk assessment modeling method for ore pulp water delivery system - Google Patents

Fuzzy inference system-based risk assessment modeling method for ore pulp water delivery system Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN117973875A
CN117973875A CN202410356673.4A CN202410356673A CN117973875A CN 117973875 A CN117973875 A CN 117973875A CN 202410356673 A CN202410356673 A CN 202410356673A CN 117973875 A CN117973875 A CN 117973875A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
fuzzy
ore pulp
risk assessment
water delivery
modeling method
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202410356673.4A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN117973875B (en
Inventor
张吴瑾山
李卓睿
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Kunming University of Science and Technology
Original Assignee
Kunming University of Science and Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Kunming University of Science and Technology filed Critical Kunming University of Science and Technology
Priority to CN202410356673.4A priority Critical patent/CN117973875B/en
Publication of CN117973875A publication Critical patent/CN117973875A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN117973875B publication Critical patent/CN117973875B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02ATECHNOLOGIES FOR ADAPTATION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02A20/00Water conservation; Efficient water supply; Efficient water use
    • Y02A20/152Water filtration

Landscapes

  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of ore pulp pipeline risk assessment, and discloses a modeling method for risk assessment of an ore pulp water delivery system based on a fuzzy inference system, which comprises the following steps: and establishing a comprehensive parameter list of the failure result of the water pipeline, modeling the water pipeline in the ore pulp system by adopting fuzzy logic, verifying the established model, and evaluating the risk of the water pipeline. The fuzzy reasoning system-based risk assessment modeling method for the ore pulp water delivery system fills the gap between data by using the fuzzy reasoning system, and improves the accuracy of the model; according to the invention, economic, social, environmental, operation characteristics, maintenance complexity and other factors are comprehensively considered, so that the solving result is more fit with engineering reality, and various risk types of the pipeline can be clearly distinguished.

Description

Fuzzy inference system-based risk assessment modeling method for ore pulp water delivery system
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of risk assessment of ore pulp pipelines, in particular to a risk assessment modeling method of an ore pulp water delivery system based on a fuzzy reasoning system.
Background
Most areas rich in mineral resources are distributed in remote mountainous areas or remote areas, which are relatively far from the main urban areas. Thus, the transportation problem becomes particularly important when transporting these mineral resources from the mining site to the processing plant or other site. Conventional newly built railway, highway and other transportation trunks require huge investments, lengthy construction periods, and often are accompanied by serious environmental damage. This has led to an increasing need for transportation methods that seek more cost-effective and environmentally friendly characteristics.
The pulp pipeline system is gradually exposed to the head angle due to the unique advantages, however, the failure of the water pipeline in the system often leads to the stagnation of the whole workflow, so that the accurate risk assessment of the water pipeline is very important. When pipes fail, the costs associated with repairing such pipe failures are very high, including not only replacement of the pipe, but also many other indirect costs, such as loss of property due to flooding, and disruption of critical facilities such as mining companies, steel smelters, etc.
In recent years, technicians put forward several risk assessment models of water pipelines, although good results are achieved, gaps still exist between data, and the overall influence of faults and related complexity is not considered, so that the accuracy of identification of the risk assessment models under partial conditions is low.
Disclosure of Invention
(One) solving the technical problems
Aiming at the defects of the prior art, the invention provides a fuzzy reasoning system-based risk assessment modeling method for an ore pulp water delivery system, which has the advantages of accurate identification and the like and solves the technical problems.
(II) technical scheme
In order to achieve the above purpose, the present invention provides the following technical solutions: a fuzzy reasoning system-based ore pulp water delivery system risk assessment modeling method comprises the following steps:
s1, establishing a comprehensive parameter list of the failure result of a water pipeline;
S2, modeling a water conveying pipeline in the ore pulp system by adopting fuzzy logic;
S3, verifying the established model;
and S4, evaluating the risk of the water conveying pipeline.
As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the comprehensive parameter list includes economic impact, environmental impact, operation characteristics, social impact and update complexity,
Parameters in the economic impact include water cost loss, system update loss, and system maintenance cost;
Parameters in the environmental impact include costs incurred to the surrounding environment and the likelihood of occurrence of natural disasters;
parameters in the operating characteristics include financial impact, available labor, pipe diameter, system shut down time, and pipe pressure;
parameters in the social impact include traffic impact, water quality impact, financial loss costs and customer satisfaction;
parameters in the update complexity include terrain impact and pipe depth.
As a preferable technical scheme of the invention, the specific process of the step S2 is as follows:
S2.1, determining a membership function used.
S2.2, establishing a fuzzy rule base according to the membership function.
S2.3, mapping the given clear quantitative input to the output fuzzy set according to the membership function and the rule.
S2.4, combining all output fuzzy sets into one fuzzy set according to the aggregation operation by utilizing a summation operator, wherein the fuzzy set is used for representing all truncated values in the output membership function.
S2.5, converting the fuzzy output set into clear ratings by a defuzzification method of an area gravity center method, wherein the range of the fuzzy output set is within [0,5 ].
S2.6, defining the rating in [0,5 ].
As a preferred technical solution of the present invention, the verification process in step S3 specifically includes the following steps:
S3.1, carrying out band-pass test on the model, and checking model behaviors of three wave bands to represent the best, medium and worst conditions; if the parameters represent the best case, the model should give the best output;
S3.2, estimating a first-order sensitivity index and a total sequence sensitivity index based on sensitivity analysis of global variance.
As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the membership function in step S2.1The expression is as follows:
Wherein, Representing the domain of discussionIs a combination of the two elements,Representation ofIs a set of random variations in the (c),Representation ofIn order to getAs a fuzzy set of elastic boundaries,In order to obscure the number of experiments,Representing a limit operation.
As a preferred technical scheme of the present invention, the specific process in the step S2.2 is as follows:
S2.2.1, introducing a comprehensive parameter list established in the S1;
S2.2.2, weighting each parameter in the comprehensive parameter list, and the specific expression is as follows:
Wherein, Representing parameters/>Membership degree of/>Representing a binary set.
S2.2.3, using the IF-THEN rule to show the dependency relationship among 16 parameters in the step S1, and completing the establishment of the fuzzy rule base.
As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the transfer function in step S2.5The expression is as follows:
Wherein, Representation of parameters/>Membership functions of (a) are provided.
As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the step S2.6 determines the rating in [0,5] in the step S2.5, and the specific expression is as follows:
Wherein, Representing the rating.
As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the first-order sensitivity index expression in the step S3.2 is as follows:
Wherein, Representing sensitivity,/>Representing the output of the model function,/>Is the decomposition variance of the Sobol operator.
As a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the expression of the total sequence sensitivity index in the step S3.2 is as follows:
Wherein, Representing the overall sequential sensitivity index,/>For/>Is input,/>Condition expectations representing contributions of respective inputs to output variances,/>Represented as the variance of the outputs of the respective input pairs.
Compared with the prior art, the invention provides a fuzzy reasoning system-based risk assessment modeling method for an ore pulp water delivery system, which has the following beneficial effects:
The invention fills the gap between data by using a fuzzy reasoning system. Firstly, the influence of a plurality of risk factors on failure results is synthesized, and the risk condition of the system is comprehensively evaluated; then, processing the mutual relation between the uncertainty and the subjective information through fuzzy logic; finally, an IF-THEN is used for constructing a rule base among various parameters, so that the accuracy of the model is improved; factors such as economy, society, environment, operation characteristics, maintenance complexity and the like are comprehensively considered, so that a solving result is more fit with engineering reality; the invention develops a comprehensive parameter list capable of comprehensively reflecting the failure result of the water pipe, uses the IF-THEN rule to express the dependency relationship among the selected parameters, builds 381 fuzzy rules in total, and can clearly distinguish the types of various risks of the pipe through the comprehensive fuzzy rules.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a parameter framework of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a comparative schematic diagram of experimental results of the present invention;
fig. 4 is a flow chart of step S2 of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The following description of the embodiments of the present invention will be made clearly and fully with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which it is evident that the embodiments described are only some, but not all embodiments of the invention; all other embodiments, which can be made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of the invention without making any inventive effort, are intended to be within the scope of the invention.
In order to further verify the accuracy of the method of the invention, an analysis is performed by taking a mining company as an example; the mining company is provided with a pulp water delivery pipeline, and the company can provide engineering knowledge to develop and verify data of the proposed fuzzy inference system and related parameters such as materials, diameters, pipeline identification numbers and the like, so as to provide related parameters for the whole water delivery pipeline; the failure rating results of 2340 pipe sections obtained from the water pipe of the mining company are connected to the whole data set for verifying the accuracy of the method according to the present invention, and the specific process is shown in fig. 1-4, and includes the following steps:
S1, establishing a comprehensive parameter list of the failure result of the water pipeline, wherein the comprehensive parameter list comprises economic influence, environmental influence, operation characteristics, social influence and update complexity, and the comprehensive parameter list comprises the following components:
parameters in economic impact include water cost loss, system update loss, and system maintenance cost;
Parameters in the environmental impact include costs incurred to the surrounding environment and the likelihood of natural disasters occurring;
Parameters in the operating characteristics include financial impact, available labor, pipe diameter, system shut down time, and pipe pressure;
Parameters in social impact include traffic impact, water quality impact, financial loss costs and customer satisfaction;
Parameters in update complexity include terrain impact and pipe depth.
S2, modeling a water pipeline in the ore pulp system by adopting fuzzy logic.
S2.1, determining a membership function used, wherein the specific expression is as follows:
Wherein, Representing the domain/>An inherent element of (1)/>Representation/>Is a set of random variations in the (c),Representation/>Middle and/>Fuzzy set as elastic boundary,/>The number of fuzzy experiments.
When (when)When the frequency is increased, the membership frequency tends to be stable, and the stable value of the membership frequency is called/>Pair/>The expression is as follows:
S2.2, developing a fuzzy rule base according to the membership function;
S2.2.1, introducing a comprehensive parameter list established in the S1;
S2.2.2, weighting each parameter in the comprehensive parameter list, and the specific expression is as follows:
Wherein, Representing parameters/>Membership degree of/>Representing a binary set.
S2.2.3, using the IF-THEN rule table, shows the dependency between the 16 parameters in step S1:
According to the dependency relationship, the establishment of a fuzzy rule base among 16 parameters is completed, and the specific process is as follows:
constructing rule bases in each influence module, obtaining the influence of the comprehensive parameters on the system according to the influence of each different factor on the system under each influence module, wherein table 1 is a fuzzy rule base in the economic influence module; the construction method of the complexity fuzzy rule base is similar to that of environmental influence, operation characteristics, social influence and update.
TABLE 1
And constructing a fuzzy rule base of the comprehensive parameter list according to the influence of each comprehensive parameter on the system, as shown in table 2.
TABLE 2
S2.3, mapping the given clear quantitative input to the output fuzzy set according to the membership function and the rule.
S2.4, combining all output fuzzy sets into one fuzzy set according to the aggregation operation by utilizing a summation (sum of rule output sets) operator, and representing all truncated values in the output membership function.
S2.5, converting the fuzzy output set into clear ratings by using a defuzzification method of an area gravity center method, wherein the range of the fuzzy output set is within [0,5], and the specific expression is as follows:
Wherein, Representation of parameters/>Membership functions of (a) are provided.
S2.6, determining the rating in [0,5] in the step S2.5, wherein the specific expression is as follows:
s3, verifying the established model, which comprises the following steps:
s3.1, carrying out band-pass test on the model, and checking model behaviors of three wave bands to represent the best, medium and worst conditions; if the parameters represent the best case, the model should give the best output.
S3.2, estimating a first-order sensitivity index and a total sequence sensitivity index in a 95% confidence interval based on sensitivity analysis of global variance:
S3.2.1, first order sensitivity index expression is as follows:
Wherein, Representing sensitivity,/>Representing the output of the model function,/>The decomposition variance of the Sobol operator;
s3.2.2, the expression of the total sequence sensitivity index is as follows:
Wherein, Representing the overall sequential sensitivity index,/>For/>Is input,/>Condition expectations representing contributions of respective inputs to output variances,/>Represented as the variance of the outputs of the respective input pairs.
S4, evaluating risks of the water conveying pipeline
Model results based on root mean square error) And mean absolute error (/ >)) Evaluating the scores; these are commonly used model verification indicators that can be estimated as follows:
Wherein, For/>Model output of the individual samples; /(I)Representing an actual result of the actual fault data; /(I)For/>Prediction error of individual samples; /(I)Is the number of samples used for verification; /(I)And/>Can range from a fraction of 0 to ≡, a lower value is desirable for both indicators; the above cases are obtained by using the model provided by the inventionAnd/>Score estimates of 0.96 and 0.76, respectively, indicate that the model results are acceptable.
FIG. 3 is a graph showing the results of predicting the accuracy of the samples used by fuzzy inference system modeling (FIS) and by failure probability modeling (LOF), respectively, wherein the accuracy of the prediction can reach 96% and is obviously higher than that of the samples used by the fuzzy inference system modeling (FIS) and the failure probability modeling (LOF).
Although embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes, modifications, substitutions and alterations can be made therein without departing from the principles and spirit of the invention, the scope of which is defined in the appended claims and their equivalents.

Claims (10)

1. A fuzzy reasoning system-based ore pulp water delivery system risk assessment modeling method is characterized by comprising the following steps of: the method comprises the following steps:
s1, establishing a comprehensive parameter list of the failure result of a water pipeline;
S2, modeling a water conveying pipeline in the ore pulp system by adopting fuzzy logic;
S3, verifying the established model;
and S4, evaluating the risk of the water conveying pipeline.
2. The fuzzy inference system-based risk assessment modeling method for an ore pulp water delivery system, as claimed in claim 1, is characterized in that: the comprehensive parameter list includes economic impact, environmental impact, operational characteristics, social impact, and update complexity:
Parameters in the economic impact include water cost loss, system update loss, and system maintenance cost;
Parameters in the environmental impact include costs incurred to the surrounding environment and the likelihood of occurrence of natural disasters;
parameters in the operating characteristics include financial impact, available labor, pipe diameter, system shut down time, and pipe pressure;
parameters in the social impact include traffic impact, water quality impact, financial loss costs and customer satisfaction;
parameters in the update complexity include terrain impact and pipe depth.
3. The fuzzy inference system-based risk assessment modeling method for an ore pulp water delivery system, as claimed in claim 2, is characterized in that: the specific process of the step S2 is as follows:
S2.1, determining a membership function used;
S2.2, establishing a fuzzy rule base according to the membership function;
s2.3, mapping given clear quantitative input to an output fuzzy set according to membership functions and rules;
S2.4, combining all output fuzzy sets into one fuzzy set according to aggregation operation by utilizing a summation operator, wherein the fuzzy set is used for representing all truncated values in an output membership function;
S2.5, converting the fuzzy output set into clear ratings by a defuzzification method of an area gravity center method, wherein the range of the fuzzy output set is within [0,5 ];
S2.6, defining the rating in [0,5 ].
4. The fuzzy inference system-based risk assessment modeling method for an ore pulp water delivery system, as claimed in claim 1, is characterized in that: the verification process of step S3 specifically includes the following steps:
S3.1, carrying out band-pass test on the model, and checking model behaviors of three wave bands to represent the best, medium and worst conditions; if the parameters represent the best case, the model should give the best output;
S3.2, estimating a first-order sensitivity index and a total sequence sensitivity index based on sensitivity analysis of global variance.
5. A fuzzy inference system-based risk assessment modeling method for a pulp water delivery system as defined in claim 3, wherein: the membership function in step S2.1The expression is as follows:
Wherein, Representing the domain/>An inherent element of (1)/>Representation/>A randomly varying set of (1)/>Representation/>Middle and/>Fuzzy set as elastic boundary,/>For the number of fuzzy experiments,/>Representing a limit operation.
6. The fuzzy inference system-based risk assessment modeling method for an ore pulp water delivery system of claim 5, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the specific process in the step S2.2 is as follows:
S2.2.1, introducing a comprehensive parameter list established in the S1;
S2.2.2, weighting each parameter in the comprehensive parameter list, and the specific expression is as follows:
Wherein, Representing parameters/>Membership degree of/>Representing a binary set;
s2.2.3, using the IF-THEN rule to show the dependency relationship among 16 parameters in the step S1, and completing the establishment of the fuzzy rule base.
7. The fuzzy inference system-based risk assessment modeling method for an ore pulp water delivery system of claim 5, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the transfer function in said step S2.5The expression is as follows:
Wherein, Representation of parameters/>Membership functions of (a) are provided.
8. The fuzzy inference system-based risk assessment modeling method for an ore pulp water delivery system of claim 7, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the step S2.6 determines the rating in [0,5] in the step S2.5, and the specific expression is as follows:
Wherein, Representing the rating.
9. The fuzzy inference system-based risk assessment modeling method for an ore pulp water delivery system according to claim 4, wherein the modeling method is characterized by comprising the following steps: the first-order sensitivity index expression in the step S3.2 is as follows:
Wherein, Representing sensitivity,/>Representing the output of the model function,/>Is the decomposition variance of the Sobol operator.
10. The fuzzy inference system-based risk assessment modeling method for an ore pulp water delivery system of claim 9, wherein the method comprises the following steps: the expression of the total sequential sensitivity index in step S3.2 is as follows:
Wherein, Representing the overall sequential sensitivity index,/>For/>Is input,/>Condition expectations representing contributions of respective inputs to output variances,/>Represented as the variance of the outputs of the respective input pairs.
CN202410356673.4A 2024-03-27 2024-03-27 Fuzzy inference system-based risk assessment modeling method for ore pulp water delivery system Active CN117973875B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202410356673.4A CN117973875B (en) 2024-03-27 2024-03-27 Fuzzy inference system-based risk assessment modeling method for ore pulp water delivery system

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202410356673.4A CN117973875B (en) 2024-03-27 2024-03-27 Fuzzy inference system-based risk assessment modeling method for ore pulp water delivery system

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN117973875A true CN117973875A (en) 2024-05-03
CN117973875B CN117973875B (en) 2024-06-11

Family

ID=90849787

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202410356673.4A Active CN117973875B (en) 2024-03-27 2024-03-27 Fuzzy inference system-based risk assessment modeling method for ore pulp water delivery system

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN117973875B (en)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ITRM20010775A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-06-30 Proteo Srl AUTOMATIC SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING THE EXCELLENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGY OF A COMPLEX INDUSTRIAL SYSTEM, IN PARTICULAR MANAGEMENT OF RE
CN107886235A (en) * 2017-11-08 2018-04-06 重庆科技学院 A kind of Fire risk assessment method for coupling certainty and uncertainty analysis
KR101934667B1 (en) * 2018-02-07 2019-01-02 고려대학교 산학협력단 Method and system for estimation of habitat suitability using fuzzy modeling
CN111126853A (en) * 2019-12-25 2020-05-08 华北水利水电大学 Fuzzy FMEA-based hydraulic engineering risk early warning analysis method and system
AU2021101942A4 (en) * 2021-04-15 2021-06-03 Huazhong University Of Science And Technology A safety risk evaluation and control method for subway approaching excavation
CN117289605A (en) * 2023-10-13 2023-12-26 深圳菲力科能源科技有限公司 Fuzzy logic energy storage system control method

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
ITRM20010775A1 (en) * 2001-12-28 2003-06-30 Proteo Srl AUTOMATIC SYSTEM FOR DETERMINING THE EXCELLENT MANAGEMENT STRATEGY OF A COMPLEX INDUSTRIAL SYSTEM, IN PARTICULAR MANAGEMENT OF RE
CN107886235A (en) * 2017-11-08 2018-04-06 重庆科技学院 A kind of Fire risk assessment method for coupling certainty and uncertainty analysis
KR101934667B1 (en) * 2018-02-07 2019-01-02 고려대학교 산학협력단 Method and system for estimation of habitat suitability using fuzzy modeling
CN111126853A (en) * 2019-12-25 2020-05-08 华北水利水电大学 Fuzzy FMEA-based hydraulic engineering risk early warning analysis method and system
AU2021101942A4 (en) * 2021-04-15 2021-06-03 Huazhong University Of Science And Technology A safety risk evaluation and control method for subway approaching excavation
CN117289605A (en) * 2023-10-13 2023-12-26 深圳菲力科能源科技有限公司 Fuzzy logic energy storage system control method

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
ALI DOLATSHAHI ZAND,等: "Designing an Intelligent Control Philosophy in Reservoirs of Water Transfer Networks in Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition System Stations", 《 INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF AUTOMATION AND COMPUTING》, 31 October 2021 (2021-10-31), pages 694 - 717 *
解红: "基于层次分析法的输水隧洞风险评估方法的应用", 《水利技术监督》, 30 June 2023 (2023-06-30), pages 223 - 228 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN117973875B (en) 2024-06-11

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US11720816B2 (en) Predicting pipe failure
Choudhry et al. Cost and schedule risk analysis of bridge construction in Pakistan: Establishing risk guidelines
Fayek et al. Predicting industrial construction labor productivity using fuzzy expert systems
Senouci et al. Fuzzy-based model for predicting failure of oil pipelines
El-Abbasy et al. Condition prediction models for oil and gas pipelines using regression analysis
Jeong et al. Prediction of flexible pavement deterioration in relation to climate change using fuzzy logic
Marzouk et al. A methodology for prioritizing water mains rehabilitation in Egypt
El-Abbasy et al. Unpiggable oil and gas pipeline condition forecasting models
Opila Structural condition scoring of buried sewer pipes for risk-based decision making
Assad et al. Data mining algorithms for water main condition prediction—comparative analysis
Chik et al. Estimation of the short-term probability of failure in water mains
Shafiee et al. A multi-criteria decision model to mitigate the operational risks of offshore wind infrastructures
CN117973875B (en) Fuzzy inference system-based risk assessment modeling method for ore pulp water delivery system
Li et al. A hybrid algorithm for inspection planning of subsea pipelines subject to corrosion-fatigue degradation
Sarkar Decision tree analysis for project risk mitigation options for underground metro rail project
Kim et al. Increasing reliability of participatory sensing for utility pole condition assessment using fuzzy inference
Geara et al. Hybrid inspection-monitoring approach for optimal maintenance planning
St. Clair et al. Development of a fuzzy inference performance index for ferrous drinking water pipelines
Ettehadtavakkol et al. Stochastic optimization and uncertainty analysis for E&P projects: A case in offshore gas field development
Chapman et al. Problem-solving methodology design on the run
Schoenhardt et al. Why projects fail (and what we can do about it)
Burhani et al. Application of logistic regression in resolving influential risk factors subject to corrosion under insulation
Huang et al. Improving Bridge Deterioration Modelling Using Rainfall Data from the Bureau of Meteorology.
Patel Methodology to Enhance the Reliability of Drinking Water Pipeline Performance Analysis
Guliyeva Energy consumption, economic growth and CO2 emissions in Azerbaijan

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant