CN117903272A - Application of soybean gene GsPP C-51 in improving drought tolerance of plants - Google Patents
Application of soybean gene GsPP C-51 in improving drought tolerance of plants Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN117903272A CN117903272A CN202410245819.8A CN202410245819A CN117903272A CN 117903272 A CN117903272 A CN 117903272A CN 202410245819 A CN202410245819 A CN 202410245819A CN 117903272 A CN117903272 A CN 117903272A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- gspp
- soybean
- drought
- plants
- gene
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 244000068988 Glycine max Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 88
- 235000010469 Glycine max Nutrition 0.000 title claims abstract description 81
- 241000196324 Embryophyta Species 0.000 title claims abstract description 51
- 108090000623 proteins and genes Proteins 0.000 title claims abstract description 48
- 230000024346 drought recovery Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 26
- 241000219195 Arabidopsis thaliana Species 0.000 claims abstract description 19
- 102000004169 proteins and genes Human genes 0.000 claims abstract description 6
- 125000003275 alpha amino acid group Chemical group 0.000 claims abstract 2
- 239000002773 nucleotide Substances 0.000 claims description 3
- 125000003729 nucleotide group Chemical group 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 abstract description 39
- 230000009261 transgenic effect Effects 0.000 abstract description 30
- 230000008641 drought stress Effects 0.000 abstract description 22
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 abstract description 18
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 abstract description 14
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 abstract description 9
- 230000002018 overexpression Effects 0.000 abstract description 8
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 abstract description 8
- 230000036579 abiotic stress Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-YKALOCIXSA-N (+)-Abscisic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)/C=C(/C)\C=C\[C@@]1(O)C(C)=CC(=O)CC1(C)C JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-YKALOCIXSA-N 0.000 description 88
- FCRACOPGPMPSHN-UHFFFAOYSA-N desoxyabscisic acid Natural products OC(=O)C=C(C)C=CC1C(C)=CC(=O)CC1(C)C FCRACOPGPMPSHN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 44
- 241000219194 Arabidopsis Species 0.000 description 35
- 239000008118 PEG 6000 Substances 0.000 description 31
- 229920002584 Polyethylene Glycol 6000 Polymers 0.000 description 31
- MTHSVFCYNBDYFN-UHFFFAOYSA-N diethylene glycol Chemical compound OCCOCCO MTHSVFCYNBDYFN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 31
- 239000005090 green fluorescent protein Substances 0.000 description 22
- 108010043121 Green Fluorescent Proteins Proteins 0.000 description 20
- 102000004144 Green Fluorescent Proteins Human genes 0.000 description 20
- 230000035882 stress Effects 0.000 description 18
- YGSDEFSMJLZEOE-UHFFFAOYSA-N salicylic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)C1=CC=CC=C1O YGSDEFSMJLZEOE-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 16
- 230000012010 growth Effects 0.000 description 14
- ZNJFBWYDHIGLCU-HWKXXFMVSA-N jasmonic acid Chemical compound CC\C=C/C[C@@H]1[C@@H](CC(O)=O)CCC1=O ZNJFBWYDHIGLCU-HWKXXFMVSA-N 0.000 description 14
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 14
- 108700028369 Alleles Proteins 0.000 description 13
- ATNHDLDRLWWWCB-AENOIHSZSA-M chlorophyll a Chemical compound C1([C@@H](C(=O)OC)C(=O)C2=C3C)=C2N2C3=CC(C(CC)=C3C)=[N+]4C3=CC3=C(C=C)C(C)=C5N3[Mg-2]42[N+]2=C1[C@@H](CCC(=O)OC\C=C(/C)CCC[C@H](C)CCC[C@H](C)CCCC(C)C)[C@H](C)C2=C5 ATNHDLDRLWWWCB-AENOIHSZSA-M 0.000 description 12
- 229930002875 chlorophyll Natural products 0.000 description 11
- 235000019804 chlorophyll Nutrition 0.000 description 11
- 102000016938 Catalase Human genes 0.000 description 10
- 108010053835 Catalase Proteins 0.000 description 10
- 239000013598 vector Substances 0.000 description 10
- 102000003992 Peroxidases Human genes 0.000 description 9
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 9
- 239000002131 composite material Substances 0.000 description 9
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 9
- 108040007629 peroxidase activity proteins Proteins 0.000 description 9
- OUUQCZGPVNCOIJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M Superoxide Chemical compound [O-][O] OUUQCZGPVNCOIJ-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 8
- FJKROLUGYXJWQN-UHFFFAOYSA-N papa-hydroxy-benzoic acid Natural products OC(=O)C1=CC=C(O)C=C1 FJKROLUGYXJWQN-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 8
- 229960004889 salicylic acid Drugs 0.000 description 8
- 101000611262 Caenorhabditis elegans Probable protein phosphatase 2C T23F11.1 Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 101000688229 Leishmania chagasi Protein phosphatase 2C Proteins 0.000 description 7
- 239000012634 fragment Substances 0.000 description 7
- ZNJFBWYDHIGLCU-UHFFFAOYSA-N jasmonic acid Natural products CCC=CCC1C(CC(O)=O)CCC1=O ZNJFBWYDHIGLCU-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 7
- WSMYVTOQOOLQHP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Malondialdehyde Chemical compound O=CCC=O WSMYVTOQOOLQHP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 6
- 238000002474 experimental method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 239000005556 hormone Substances 0.000 description 6
- 229940088597 hormone Drugs 0.000 description 6
- 229940118019 malondialdehyde Drugs 0.000 description 6
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 description 6
- 102000004190 Enzymes Human genes 0.000 description 5
- 108090000790 Enzymes Proteins 0.000 description 5
- 238000011529 RT qPCR Methods 0.000 description 5
- 238000000692 Student's t-test Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000035784 germination Effects 0.000 description 5
- 230000000996 additive effect Effects 0.000 description 4
- 230000033228 biological regulation Effects 0.000 description 4
- 210000001339 epidermal cell Anatomy 0.000 description 4
- 238000005286 illumination Methods 0.000 description 4
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 description 4
- 239000011148 porous material Substances 0.000 description 4
- 238000012353 t test Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 4
- JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-LXGGSRJLSA-N 2-cis-abscisic acid Chemical compound OC(=O)/C=C(/C)\C=C\C1(O)C(C)=CC(=O)CC1(C)C JLIDBLDQVAYHNE-LXGGSRJLSA-N 0.000 description 3
- WEVYAHXRMPXWCK-UHFFFAOYSA-N Acetonitrile Chemical compound CC#N WEVYAHXRMPXWCK-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 241000589158 Agrobacterium Species 0.000 description 3
- LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N Ethanol Chemical compound CCO LFQSCWFLJHTTHZ-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- MHAJPDPJQMAIIY-UHFFFAOYSA-N Hydrogen peroxide Chemical compound OO MHAJPDPJQMAIIY-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 108091092195 Intron Proteins 0.000 description 3
- OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N Methanol Chemical compound OC OKKJLVBELUTLKV-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 3
- 108091023040 Transcription factor Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 102000040945 Transcription factor Human genes 0.000 description 3
- 101150011790 UBI3 gene Proteins 0.000 description 3
- 238000002835 absorbance Methods 0.000 description 3
- 150000001413 amino acids Chemical group 0.000 description 3
- 238000000540 analysis of variance Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000002299 complementary DNA Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000002068 genetic effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000007788 liquid Substances 0.000 description 3
- 230000033001 locomotion Effects 0.000 description 3
- 239000003375 plant hormone Substances 0.000 description 3
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000011664 signaling Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000004960 subcellular localization Effects 0.000 description 3
- 241000589156 Agrobacterium rhizogenes Species 0.000 description 2
- IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N Atomic nitrogen Chemical compound N#N IJGRMHOSHXDMSA-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 2
- 239000002028 Biomass Substances 0.000 description 2
- 108091026890 Coding region Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 108700024394 Exon Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 241000208125 Nicotiana Species 0.000 description 2
- 235000002637 Nicotiana tabacum Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 108700019535 Phosphoprotein Phosphatases Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 102000045595 Phosphoprotein Phosphatases Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010047313 Protein phosphatase 2C Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 238000012300 Sequence Analysis Methods 0.000 description 2
- FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M Sodium chloride Chemical compound [Na+].[Cl-] FAPWRFPIFSIZLT-UHFFFAOYSA-M 0.000 description 2
- 102000019197 Superoxide Dismutase Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 108010012715 Superoxide dismutase Proteins 0.000 description 2
- 238000003556 assay Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000031018 biological processes and functions Effects 0.000 description 2
- 210000004027 cell Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 210000000349 chromosome Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 2
- 239000013604 expression vector Substances 0.000 description 2
- 239000000284 extract Substances 0.000 description 2
- 102000054766 genetic haplotypes Human genes 0.000 description 2
- 230000007614 genetic variation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001404 mediated effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000035772 mutation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 235000015097 nutrients Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 239000001267 polyvinylpyrrolidone Substances 0.000 description 2
- 235000013855 polyvinylpyrrolidone Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 229920000036 polyvinylpyrrolidone Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000000306 recurrent effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003938 response to stress Effects 0.000 description 2
- 229920006395 saturated elastomer Polymers 0.000 description 2
- 230000007226 seed germination Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000035945 sensitivity Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000002689 soil Substances 0.000 description 2
- 230000014793 stomatal movement Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000006228 supernatant Substances 0.000 description 2
- 210000001519 tissue Anatomy 0.000 description 2
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 239000010455 vermiculite Substances 0.000 description 2
- 229910052902 vermiculite Inorganic materials 0.000 description 2
- 235000019354 vermiculite Nutrition 0.000 description 2
- 108091032973 (ribonucleotides)n+m Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100028247 Abl interactor 1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102100028221 Abl interactor 2 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101100028368 Arabidopsis thaliana AHG1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100242413 Arabidopsis thaliana HAB1 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101100135282 Arabidopsis thaliana HAB2 gene Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 108020004705 Codon Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 208000005156 Dehydration Diseases 0.000 description 1
- 102100023227 E3 SUMO-protein ligase EGR2 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102100023226 Early growth response protein 1 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 102100021717 Early growth response protein 3 Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 241000460040 Erica benthamiana Species 0.000 description 1
- 108050001152 Histone acetyltransferase GCN5 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102100022901 Histone acetyltransferase KAT2A Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 101000724225 Homo sapiens Abl interactor 1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000724231 Homo sapiens Abl interactor 2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101001049692 Homo sapiens E3 SUMO-protein ligase EGR2 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101001049697 Homo sapiens Early growth response protein 1 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 101000896450 Homo sapiens Early growth response protein 3 Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 238000003657 Likelihood-ratio test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 102000043136 MAP kinase family Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091054455 MAP kinase family Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 240000004658 Medicago sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000017587 Medicago sativa ssp. sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 241000207746 Nicotiana benthamiana Species 0.000 description 1
- 240000007594 Oryza sativa Species 0.000 description 1
- 235000007164 Oryza sativa Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 229910019142 PO4 Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 108091082748 PP2C family Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000042597 PP2C family Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 244000046052 Phaseolus vulgaris Species 0.000 description 1
- 102000006831 Protein phosphatase 2C Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 238000002123 RNA extraction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000010802 RNA extraction kit Methods 0.000 description 1
- MTCFGRXMJLQNBG-UHFFFAOYSA-N Serine Natural products OCC(N)C(O)=O MTCFGRXMJLQNBG-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 235000021307 Triticum Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 244000098338 Triticum aestivum Species 0.000 description 1
- HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N Zinc Chemical compound [Zn] HCHKCACWOHOZIP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 1
- 230000006518 acidic stress Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000654 additive Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000003698 anagen phase Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009412 basement excavation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000001110 calcium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910001628 calcium chloride Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 229930002868 chlorophyll a Natural products 0.000 description 1
- 229930002869 chlorophyll b Natural products 0.000 description 1
- NSMUHPMZFPKNMZ-VBYMZDBQSA-M chlorophyll b Chemical compound C1([C@@H](C(=O)OC)C(=O)C2=C3C)=C2N2C3=CC(C(CC)=C3C=O)=[N+]4C3=CC3=C(C=C)C(C)=C5N3[Mg-2]42[N+]2=C1[C@@H](CCC(=O)OC\C=C(/C)CCC[C@H](C)CCC[C@H](C)CCCC(C)C)[C@H](C)C2=C5 NSMUHPMZFPKNMZ-VBYMZDBQSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 230000008645 cold stress Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000007796 conventional method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012272 crop production Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012043 crude product Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000007405 data analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003247 decreasing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002950 deficient Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006735 deficit Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001419 dependent effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 210000002615 epidermis Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007717 exclusion Effects 0.000 description 1
- 244000037666 field crops Species 0.000 description 1
- 108020001507 fusion proteins Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 102000037865 fusion proteins Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 238000010353 genetic engineering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011521 glass Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000003630 growth substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000000589 high-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003054 hormonal effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000015784 hyperosmotic salinity response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011534 incubation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010534 mechanism of action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000877 morphologic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013642 negative control Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009074 negative regulation of seed germination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 229910052757 nitrogen Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 210000004940 nucleus Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 238000001543 one-way ANOVA Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000008723 osmotic stress Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000037361 pathway Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000010452 phosphate Substances 0.000 description 1
- NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K phosphate Chemical compound [O-]P([O-])([O-])=O NBIIXXVUZAFLBC-UHFFFAOYSA-K 0.000 description 1
- 238000013081 phylogenetic analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001766 physiological effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008635 plant growth Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013612 plasmid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000843 powder Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000002360 preparation method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000001681 protective effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000009467 reduction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 102000037983 regulatory factors Human genes 0.000 description 1
- 108091008025 regulatory factors Proteins 0.000 description 1
- 230000025469 response to water deprivation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002441 reversible effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 235000009566 rice Nutrition 0.000 description 1
- 239000004576 sand Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011780 sodium chloride Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000009331 sowing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 241000894007 species Species 0.000 description 1
- 238000007619 statistical method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 210000000130 stem cell Anatomy 0.000 description 1
- 230000015378 stomatal closure Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000000126 substance Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002459 sustained effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000010474 transient expression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005303 weighing Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000011701 zinc Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052725 zinc Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C07—ORGANIC CHEMISTRY
- C07K—PEPTIDES
- C07K14/00—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof
- C07K14/415—Peptides having more than 20 amino acids; Gastrins; Somatostatins; Melanotropins; Derivatives thereof from plants
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
- C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
- C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
- C12N15/8201—Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation
- C12N15/8202—Methods for introducing genetic material into plant cells, e.g. DNA, RNA, stable or transient incorporation, tissue culture methods adapted for transformation by biological means, e.g. cell mediated or natural vector
- C12N15/8205—Agrobacterium mediated transformation
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C12—BIOCHEMISTRY; BEER; SPIRITS; WINE; VINEGAR; MICROBIOLOGY; ENZYMOLOGY; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING
- C12N—MICROORGANISMS OR ENZYMES; COMPOSITIONS THEREOF; PROPAGATING, PRESERVING, OR MAINTAINING MICROORGANISMS; MUTATION OR GENETIC ENGINEERING; CULTURE MEDIA
- C12N15/00—Mutation or genetic engineering; DNA or RNA concerning genetic engineering, vectors, e.g. plasmids, or their isolation, preparation or purification; Use of hosts therefor
- C12N15/09—Recombinant DNA-technology
- C12N15/63—Introduction of foreign genetic material using vectors; Vectors; Use of hosts therefor; Regulation of expression
- C12N15/79—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts
- C12N15/82—Vectors or expression systems specially adapted for eukaryotic hosts for plant cells, e.g. plant artificial chromosomes (PACs)
- C12N15/8241—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology
- C12N15/8261—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield
- C12N15/8271—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance
- C12N15/8273—Phenotypically and genetically modified plants via recombinant DNA technology with agronomic (input) traits, e.g. crop yield for stress resistance, e.g. heavy metal resistance for drought, cold, salt resistance
Landscapes
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
- Genetics & Genomics (AREA)
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
- Biomedical Technology (AREA)
- Organic Chemistry (AREA)
- Biotechnology (AREA)
- Molecular Biology (AREA)
- Wood Science & Technology (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Zoology (AREA)
- Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Biophysics (AREA)
- Biochemistry (AREA)
- Microbiology (AREA)
- Plant Pathology (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Cell Biology (AREA)
- Botany (AREA)
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
- Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
- Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
- Breeding Of Plants And Reproduction By Means Of Culturing (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses an application of soybean gene GsPP C-51 in improving drought tolerance of plants, wherein soybean gene GsPP C-51 is a gene encoding protein of an amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1. Drought, PEG and exogenous ABA treatment significantly induced GsPP C-51 expression; gsPP2C-51 overexpression improves drought tolerance of transgenic hairy root complex soybean plants and transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana, and enhances SOD, POD and CAT activity under drought stress, but does not improve salt and cold tolerance. These results provide a basis for resolving the role of GsPP C-51-a1 in soybean abiotic stress responses.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the field of genetic engineering, and particularly relates to application of soybean gene GsPP C-51 in improving drought tolerance of plants.
Background
Sustainable production of soybeans is threatened by unpredictable climate change, especially sustained drought in many parts of the world. Over the last decades, global crop production losses amount to about 300 million dollars (Gupta et al, 2020) due to frequent drought, which reduces soybean yield by about 40% (Specht et al, 1999). Annual wild soybeans (g.soja) are considered as ancestors of cultivated soybeans (Broich and Palmer, 1980) and have higher drought resistance than cultivated soybeans. Although the overall economic trait of wild soybeans is inferior to that of cultivated soybeans, the potential of utilizing wild soybeans to improve cultivated soybeans, particularly in widening the genetic basis of cultivated soybeans, has been recognized and demonstrated one by one (La et al, 2019; prince et al, 2015). Therefore, it is important to search for drought tolerance genes of wild soybeans and transfer them into cultivated soybeans.
Many morphological and physiological traits have been used as indicators for detecting drought tolerant QTLs (quantitative trait loci), such as canopy wilting, water use efficiency, root system-related traits, and seed-related traits. Hwang et al (2015) used canopy wilting as an indicator to evaluate the phenotype of R2 to R5 and identified eight QTL clusters in five Recombinant Inbred (RIL) populations. Steketee et al (2020) detected 45 SNP (single nucleotide polymorphism sites) associated with the canopy wilting index based on 162 soybean lines of Maturity Group (MG) VI-VIII. WUE (water use efficiency) is one of important physiological traits related to drought resistance. Plant WUE is generally defined as biomass accumulated per unit of water usage. In recent years, genetic variation of WUE has been reported for many field crops, including soybean (Liu et al, 2005a; mian et al, 1998). Assessment of canopy wilting and WUE is often affected by subjective awareness of the person and growth phase of the soybean, and typically requires a period of time to elapse. In this team, growth-related traits such as plant height, stem dry weight, root length, etc. are considered suitable indicators of drought resistance, as all individual biological processes will ultimately be reflected in plant growth and biomass. Liu et al (2005 b) identified 5, 3 and 5 QTLs, respectively, using relative values of dry root weight, total root length and root volume. Khan et al (2018) identified 111 drought-tolerant QTLs with a high proportion of QTL x environmental interactions for 262 alleles using root and aerial length as an indicator; the genetic variation accounts for 88.55-95.92% of the phenotypic variation (Wang et al 2020). Using 24694 multiallelic markers, 75 and 64 QTLs were detected using relative strain and strain height as indicators.
Many transcription factors have been reported to be involved in the regulation of drought response, such as MYB (Du et al 2012), ERF (Zhai et al 2017), NAC (Yang et al 2020), DREB (Chen et al 2007; kidokoro et al 2015) and PP2C (Moli et al 2020). Here, PP2Cs (protein phosphatase 2C gene) is one of the largest transcription factor families in soybean, but little research has been conducted. The plant hormone ABA (abscisic acid) plays an important role in the regulation of the response under abiotic stress, in particular drought stress. ABA has been shown to be involved in the regulation of abiotic stress signaling by ABA-dependent and ABA-independent gene expression. The key regulator of the ABA signaling network is a subset of serine/threonine phosphatases, represented by type 2C protein phosphatases (PP 2 Cs). PP2Cs in Arabidopsis are divided into ten groups (A-J) (Schweighofer et al, 2004). In soybean, PP2C is divided into 10 subfamilies (A, B, C, D, E, F, F2, G, H, and I) (Chen et al, 2018 a). Group A of Arabidopsis PP2C consists of ABI1, ABI2, HAB1, HAB2, AHG1 and AtPP2CA, and has been shown to be a negative regulator of ABA signaling and response. Some members of branch B have been shown to be negative regulators of MAPK activity (Li et al 2020; zhang et al 2020). Members of the C-arm, including POLTERGEIST and POLTERGEIS-LIKE, are involved in stem cell identity and stem and root meristems (Cober et al, 2010; fang et al, 2017). In branch E, EGR1, EGR2 and EGR3 are negative growth regulators that inhibit growth during drought stress (Sun et al, 2018), and AtPP2C6-6 can interact with histone acetyltransferase GCN5 to regulate stress response genes (Cen et al, 2020). A branched I protein phosphatase 2C, taPP2C158, interacts with TaSnRK1.1 and dephosphorylates it, is a negative regulator of wheat drought tolerance. However, little is known about PP2C branch F1 in soybean or other plants, especially in stress response to drought.
Disclosure of Invention
The technical problems to be solved by the invention are as follows: the gene capable of improving the drought tolerance of soybeans and the application thereof are provided against the problems of insufficient application of wild soybean resources, limited drought tolerance gene excavation, little research on F1 type PP2C genes and the like.
The technical scheme of the invention is as follows: the application of soybean gene GsPP C-51 in improving plant drought tolerance, wherein soybean gene GsPP C-51 is a gene encoding protein of an amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1.
Because of the degeneracy of the codons, the gene encoding the protein of the amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No.1 may have a number of different sequences, preferably the nucleotide sequence of the soybean gene GsPP C-51 is shown in SEQ ID No. 2.
Further, plant drought tolerance is improved by overexpressing soybean gene GsPP C-51 in plants.
Further, the plant is soybean or arabidopsis thaliana.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following beneficial effects:
Drought, PEG and exogenous ABA treatment induced expression of GsPP C-51-a1 significantly; over-expression of GsPP C-51-a1 increased drought tolerance of transgenic hairy root complex soybean plants and transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana, and enhanced SOD, POD and CAT activity under drought stress, but did not increase salt and cold tolerance. These results provide a basis for resolving the role of GsPP C-51-a1 in soybean abiotic stress responses.
Drawings
Fig. 1 soybean parental drought resistance evaluation, (a) two parental growth states in greenhouse under Drought Treatment (DT) and Control (CK), bar=10 cm; (B) Under drought stress, the relative aerial part dry weight of N24852 (RSDW) is higher than NN1138-2; (C) Parental growth status under hydroponic (CK) and 15% PEG6000 (PEG) treatments, bar=10 cm;
(D) N24852 has a higher RSDW under PEG stress than NN 1138-2; (E-G) frequency distribution of SojaCSSLP population RSDW in the E1, E2 and E3 environments, respectively; data are mean ± SD (standard deviation); statistical significance was determined by a two-tailed t-test: * P <0.05 and P <0.001.
FIG. 2 expression and characterization of Glyma.14G162100, (A) relative expression of Glyma.14G162100 in two parental soybean leaves under 15% PEG6000 stress with soybean UBI3 gene as internal reference, data analysis using one-way analysis of variance followed by Fisher protected minimal significant differences (P=0.05); (B) Homology relationship of Glyma14g162100 between soybean and different species, glyma14g162100 belongs to F1 group of PP2C based on homology with Arabidopsis; (C) GsPP2 subcellular localization of 2C-51 in tobacco epidermal cells, green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) is a control containing only GFP coding region. Scale bar, 20 μm; (D) Sequence differences of the Glyma14g162100 gene in the 247 soybean germplasm populations, with the black boxes representing exons; the horizontal lines between the black boxes are introns; the gray box is the UTR region, a1-a4 representing the four haplotypes of Glyma14g 162100; the data in the wild (wild) and cultivated (cultivated) columns represent the amount of soybean material per haplotype/allele.
FIG. 3 variation of expression of transgenic hairy root complex soybean plants and GsPP C-51-a1 under PEG treatment, (A) hairy root complex plants containing 15% PEG6000, GFP representing empty vector pBinGFP4 as control; gsPP2C-51-a1 represents over-expression GsPP C-51-a1;0h, 2h, 6h, 12h and 24h represent the time of 15% PEG6000 treatment of plants, respectively; RW stands for plant rehydration after 24 hours of treatment; (B) Treating the hairy root composite soybean plant with PEG6000 for different time leaf forms; (C) Fresh weight of 4cm 2 leaves; (D) 35S GsPP2C-51-a1 was overexpressed in hairy root complex plants before treatment (0 h), with soybean UBI3 gene as an internal reference; (E) GmPP2 relative expression of 2C-51-a1 in hairy roots, with soybean UBI3 gene as internal control; data are mean ± SD, statistical significance determined by a two-tailed t-test: * P <0.05, P <0.01 and P <0.001, ns, are not significant.
FIG. 4 shows the growth state of Arabidopsis thaliana under water-deficient stress, (A) the morphology of Arabidopsis thaliana after three weeks of drought stress; (B and C) fresh and dry weight of Arabidopsis thaliana; (D) morphology of arabidopsis after drought treatment and rehydration; (E) fresh weight of arabidopsis thaliana, wild type arabidopsis thaliana; GFP represents the Arabidopsis empty vector transformants #11 and #12 are two independent overexpressing GsPP C-51-a1 lines; data are mean ± SD, statistical significance determined by a two-tailed t-test: * P <0.01.
FIG. 5 germination and growth of Arabidopsis under ABA treatment, (A and B) germination of Arabidopsis grown on 1/2MS medium (Mock) and 2. Mu.M ABA, respectively; (C) GsPP2 germination and overexpression investigation analysis of 2C-51-a1 Arabidopsis after 3 weeks under 2. Mu.M ABA stress, wild type Arabidopsis; GFP represents the Arabidopsis empty vector transformants #11 and #12 are two independent overexpressing GsPP C-51-a1 lines; (D) Morphology of Arabidopsis grown on 1/2MS medium (Moc k); (E) Arabidopsis thaliana adults were grown on 4.0. Mu.M ABA for two weeks; (F) Chlorophyll levels of WT and both transgenic lines under Mock and ABA treatment, white streaks of 1 cm; data are mean ± standard deviation, statistical significance determined by double-sided t-test: * P <0.001; ns, is not significant.
FIG. 6GsPP stomatal movement of 2C-51-a1 overexpressing lines under ABA and PEG treatment, (A) stomatal in mock treatment (stomatal open solution; SOS) (upper panel), 80. Mu.M ABA (middle panel) and 20% PEG6000 (lower panel) of 4 week old WT and GsPP2C-51-a1 overexpressing transgenic lines #11 and #12, 100 stomata per genotype, photographs taken at 60 x magnification under the bright field of an Olympus BX53 fluorescence microscope, scale bar, 2 μm; (B) Graph of percentage of different types of stomata (closed and open) in WT and GsPP C-51-a1 overexpressing transgenic lines in control, ABA and PEG treatments.
FIG. 7 hormone and enzyme activity of GsPP C-51-a1 transgenic lines under drought stress, abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic Acid (JA), salicylic Acid (SA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), peroxidase (POD), catalase (CAT), malondialdehyde (MDA) and hydrogen peroxide (H 2O2) #11 and #12, gsPP C-51-a1 overexpressing transgenic lines, numerical data were collected in fresh leaves and analyzed using one-way variance analysis, then Fisher protected minimal significance difference (P=0.05), data as mean.+ -. SD.
Detailed Description
The experimental methods in the following examples are conventional methods unless otherwise specified. The test materials used in the examples described below, unless otherwise specified, were purchased from commercial sources.
1. Experimental materials and methods
1. Experimental materials
An improved wild soybean chromosome fragment substitution line population SojaCSSLP5 (Liu et al, 2021) consisting of 177 CSSL and 1366 SNPLDB markers was used for drought studies. Its parents are NN1138-2 (G.max) which is a elite variety used as recurrent parent and N24852 (G.soja); the latter is an annual wild soybean with a strong drought tolerance and is used as a donor parent. The CSSL of ,BC3F8、BC3F7、BC3F6、(BC2F3)BC1F6、(BC2F2)BC2F6、BC4F7、BC5F6、BC4F6 and BC 5F6 generations in 177 CSSL are 23, 12, 3, 62, 3, 25, 14, 21 and 14, respectively.
A chinese germplasm population consisting of 247 parts of material, including 85 parts wild soybean and 162 parts cultivated soybean, was used, these materials were sequenced at 30 x depth for source analysis of identified genes/alleles.
2. Parent and SojaCSSLP population drought resistance identification
First, drought resistance of both parents under water stress and 15% PEG6000 conditions, respectively, was evaluated. In the greenhouse of the south Beijing jiangpu test station (N31 DEG 02', E118 DEG 04'), the drought tolerance of SojaCSSLP and the parents was evaluated in 3 environments of 2016 spring (E1), summer (E2) and 2017 spring (E3). The design of a split area is adopted, saturated water is used as a control, water shortage is used as drought stress, and three biological processes are repeated. Soybean seeds were sown in a pot (diameter 10.0cm, depth 12.5cm, weight 60.0 g) containing about 1800 g of dry sand and 400mL of Hoagland solution. Sowing 5 seeds, and keeping two robust seedlings after emergence of seedlings for subsequent experiments. The border pots around the test material were considered as guard bars. The water in the flowerpot is saturated until drought stress begins after the recurrent parent NN1138-2 grows true leaves and fully expands. For the drought stress group, the moisture content was measured every other day by a weighing method and recorded as W WC, and W WC was maintained at 10%, 5% and 1% when NN1138-2 of the control group was in stages V0-V1, V1-V2 and V2-V3, respectively. For the control group, the pots always maintained sufficient water. After one month, plants from the aerial parts (above cotyledonary nodes) were harvested and placed in separate paper bags. And then dried in an oven at 90 c for 2 days. From the water deficit treated and control aerial dry weight data, sojaCSSLP and parental RSDW values were calculated as: RSDW = W SDT/WSCK, where W SDT is the dry weight of the drought treated aerial parts and W SCK is the dry weight of the control aerial parts.
3. Determination of QTL/fragment and candidate Gene
QTL analysis the RSTEP-LRT-ADD model in ICIMAPPING V4.1 software (additive QTL likelihood ratio test based on stepwise regression) was used and the LOD threshold was set to 2.5. The additive effects (Add) and phenotypic variances of QTL interpretation are estimated from the markers at the highest peaks. Based on the detected QTL/fragment, candidate gene predictions are based on the GO (gene ontology) annotation in SoyBase (http:// soyb ase. Org) of genes related to water, salt stress or hormonal stress. Sequence analysis of candidate genes was based on resequencing data of the two parents (depths of N24852 and NN1138-2 were 11X and 9X, respectively). To analyze the expression level of candidate genes under drought conditions, parents 0h, 6h, 12h and 24h were treated with 15% PEG6000, their leaves and root systems were collected and immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at-80 ℃ for subsequent qRT-PCR.
4. RNA extraction and qRT-PCR
Total RNA was extracted from 100mg of tissue per sample using RNA extraction kit (TIANGEN). cDNA was synthesized by using PRIME SCRIPT RT MASTER Mix kit (TAKARA, japan). Fluorescent quantitative PC R (qRT-PCR) was performed using LIGHTCYCLE R and 480 systems (Roche) and SYBR Premix Ex Taq kit (TAKARA, japan). The PCR mixture contained 10ng cDNA, 0.75. Mu.L of 10. Mu.M forward and reverse primer, 12.5. Mu. LSYBR Premix Ex Taq (Takara), and water was added to give a final volume of 25. Mu.L. PCR conditions were 95℃for 30 seconds followed by 95℃for 5 seconds and 54℃for 30 seconds, 40 cycles. GmUBI3 was used as an internal control. Three biological replicates were performed in all assays and the relative expression of GsPP C-51 in soybean was calculated using the 2 -ΔΔCt method.
5. Construction of transgenic vectors
For GsPP C-51-a1 (allele a1 of GsPP C-51 in N24852) over-expression, full-length cDNA was amplified from wild-type soybean N24852 and cloned into plant binary vector pBinGFP to yield over-expression vector pBinGFP S:: gsPP2C51-a1. The vector was then introduced into Arabidopsis col-0 by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. pBinGFP35S GsPP C-51-a1 was transformed into A.rhizogenes strain K599, and the hypocotyl of soybean (williams) was infected to obtain transgenic soybean hairy root complex plants.
6. Subcellular localization
For subcellular localization, an expression vector pBinGFP S carrying Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) GsPP C-51-a1 was introduced into leaf epidermal cells of 3 to 4 week old Nicotiana benthamiana plants by Agrobacterium EHA105 (Batistic et al, 2010). The expression position of GsPP C-51-a1 protein was observed in tobacco leaves 2-3 days after incubation using a laser scanning confocal microscope (Zeiss LSM 780).
7. Preparation of GsPP C-51-a1 transgenic soybean hairy root composite plant
Williams82 seeds were grown on nutrient-loaded soil: vermiculite is in a flowerpot with a volume ratio of 1:1. When the seedling true leaves are fully developed, the hypocotyl below the cotyledonary node is created with a surgical knife to create a 1cm long wound. The wound was then infected with K599 prepared containing pBinGFP S::: gsPP2C-51-a1 plasmid. As a negative control, empty vector was used for the same treatment. The hypocotyl and A.rhizogenes were co-cultured in an illumination incubator at a temperature of 25℃and an illumination/darkness cycle of 16h/8h for 5 days with a humidity of about 80% -90%. When the hairy root is about 1cm long, the root of the plant itself is removed and replaced with the hairy root. Then the plants were hydroponic in a light incubator in Hoagland solution at 25℃with a humidity of 60% and a light/dark cycle of 16h/8h. After two weeks, all plants were transferred to a new Hoagland solution containing 15% PEG 6000. Roots were collected after treatment for 0 hours, 2 hours, 6 hours, 12 hours, 24 hours and rehydration for 24 hours, respectively, and subjected to quantitative qRT-PCR analysis of GsPP C-51-a1, and fresh leaves of 4cm 2 (2 cm. Times.2 cm) were weighed to evaluate drought resistance.
8. Germination and growth of GsPP C-51-a1 transgenic Arabidopsis under ABA stress
The identified T 1 transgenic line was selected with GFP and grown for production of T 2 and T 3 seeds. Seedlings (T 2 or T 3) with single copy GsPP C-51-a1 inserts were then identified and used for further analysis. About 50 seeds of two over-expressed GsPP C-51-a1 strains (# 11 and # 12) were grown with WT on 1/2MS medium plates containing 2. Mu.M ABA, incubated for 3 days at 4℃for vernalization, and then transferred to an illumination incubator at 22℃under long day (16 h illumination/8 h darkening) conditions. For the vertical growth assay, the medium plates were placed vertically on a rack. After two weeks of growth, the germination rate (appearance of radicle) of the seeds was identified. All experiments were repeated three times and the mean and standard error calculated.
9. Response of transgenic arabidopsis to drought, low temperature, salt and ABA stresses
Two experiments were performed on arabidopsis drought treatment as described by Sakamoto et al (2004), with slight modifications. Drought treatment 1: arabidopsis thaliana seeds of the wild type Arabidopsis thaliana (WT), empty vector (GFP) and overexpressing GsPP C-51-a1 (GsPP C-51-a 1-OE) lines germinated and grown on 1/2MS medium for 10 days. The plants were then transferred to 9 cm pots filled with 1:3 (v: v) nutrient soil: vermiculite. They were grown at a relative humidity of 45% + -5% with 16h light at 22℃and 8h dark at 20 ℃. After 7 days of growth under sufficient water, watering was stopped and drought stress was initiated for three weeks. Drought treatment 2: and drought-treating the arabidopsis plants for four weeks without watering, and then recovering watering. On the eighth day after re-watering, the growth status of the plants was evaluated. All plants in both experiments were then harvested to measure fresh and dry weight.
Abscisic acid (ABA), salt and cold treatment. Wild-type and over-expressed GsPP C-51-a1 Arabidopsis seedlings were transferred to 1/2MS medium containing 4. Mu.M ABA. After two weeks, all leaves were collected to measure chlorophyll content. For salt tolerance and cold resistance analysis, arabidopsis plants were grown on 1/2MS medium at 100mM NaCl and 4℃for three weeks. The growth of wild type and transgenic plants under ABA, salt and cold stress was then evaluated.
10. Measurement of chlorophyll content
Total chlorophyll content was determined according to Zhang et al (2015) and chlorophyll was extracted from fresh leaf tissue of Arabidopsis with 95% pre-chilled ethanol. The extract was centrifuged at 12000rpm for 10min at 4℃and absorbance at 649nm and 664nm was measured using a UV-1800 spectrophotometer. Chlorophyll content was calculated according to LICHTENTHALER (1987):
Ca=13.36A664-5.19A649
Cb=27.43A649-8.12A664
Ca+b=5.24A664+22.24A649,
Wherein Ca, cb and Ca+b are the concentrations of chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll, respectively; a 664 and A 649 are absorbance values at 664nm and 649nm, respectively.
11. Air hole movement observation
The air hole movement was observed as described by Singh et al (2015), but with slight modifications. Briefly, from 4-week-old Arabidopsis thaliana WT and GsPP C-51-a1-OE plants (grown at 22 ℃, 60% relative humidity, 16h light/8 h darkness) grown in an open-pore solution (SOS: 50mmol L -1KCl、0.2mmol L-1CaCl2 and 10mmol L -1 MES-KOH, pH 6.15) under white light (150. Mu. Mol m -2s-1) for 2h, an epidermis of Arabidopsis thaliana was obtained. For ABA and PEG treatments, epidermal cells were analyzed under bright field under white light (under fluorescent microscope (Olym pus, BX 53) in 150 μmol L -1 ABA and 15% PEG6000 SOS buffer and examined for pore sizes under random field.
12. Determination of hormone and enzyme Activity
Leaf samples were removed and ground to a powder. The ground sample was accurately weighed in a glass test tube. Then 10 volumes of acetonitrile solution (volume ratio 10:1) and 4 μl of the internal standard mixture at a concentration of 100ng mL -1 were added, respectively. The mixture was mixed, extracted overnight at 4 ℃, centrifuged at 12000g for 5min, and the supernatant transferred to a new centrifuge tube for concentration. After concentration, redissolved with 400. Mu.L of 80% methanol/water solution and passed through a 0.22 μm filter. The plant hormones abscisic acid (ABA), jasmonic Acid (JA) and Salicylic Acid (SA) were measured by ESI-HPLC-MS/MS method at a flow rate of 0.3mL min -1 and by agilent 1290 high performance liquid chromatograms and AB Qtrap6500 mass spectrometer (Zhang et al 2022). The column temperature was 30℃and the amount of sample introduced was 2. Mu.L.
Fresh leaves were placed in a phosphate liquid (1:9 w/v) (PBS) buffer to 50mM, pH 7.8, 1% (w/v) insoluble polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) in an ice bath. The homogenate was centrifuged at 8000g, 10min, 4℃and the supernatant of the crude product was used for the enzyme extract. Malondialdehyde (MDA) content, H 2O2 content, peroxidase (POD), superoxide dismutase (SOD) and Catalase (CAT) activity were measured using commercial kits (BC 0025, BC3595, BC0090, BC0175, BC0205, solarbio, china). The absorbance values were 532nm, 415nm, 470nm, 560nm and 240nm, respectively.
13. Statistical analysis of phenotypes
RSDW descriptive statistics, including frequency distribution, mean, range, coefficient of Variation (CV), genetic power (h 2), and analysis of variance (ANOVA), were calculated based on a random model using PROC-GLM procedure of SAS procedure. For transgenic arabidopsis plants and composite soybean plants, the effect of drought, ABA and PEG treatments on fresh or dry weight was analyzed using Student t test. The data for gene expression, hormone content and enzyme activity were analyzed using analysis of variance, followed by minimal significant differences using Fisher's protection.
2. Experimental results
1. Revealing wild QTL/fragment and candidate gene related to drought tolerance based on SojaCSSLP population
Under drought stress and 15% PEG6000 treatment, the relative aerial dry weight (RSDW) values of the two soybean parents under both stresses were 0.58vs.0.44 and 0.68vs.0.37, respectively (a-D in fig. 1), indicating that the relative aerial dry weight (RSDW) of the wild soybean parent N24852 during the young stage was higher than that of the cultivated soybean parent NN1138-2. To reveal the drought resistance QTL of wild soybean N24852, drought tolerance studies were performed on soybean shoots under three environments (E1, E2 and E3) using SojaCSSLP populations derived from N24852 and NN1138-2. RSDW was observed to have a wide range of phenotypic variations and significant differences (ranging from 0.32 to 0.77) in SojaCSSLP (E-G in fig. 1).
Using ICIMAPPING software, 6 QTLs associated with drought tolerance were detected, accounting for 22.08%, 31.43% and 19.20% phenotypic variation in three environments, respectively (table 1). Of all QTLs, only gm14_ldb_21 could be detected in three environments, which explained the 7.79%, 13.89% and 12.99% phenotypic variation, respectively. This suggests that Gm14_LDB_21 is a stable drought-resistant QTL/fragment, which is located on chromosome 14, similar to the position of MPW14.1 previously reported by Wang et al. Therefore, gm14_ldb_21 is an important QTL/fragment related to drought resistance.
Table 1 QTL identification of RSDW in SojaCSSLP5
RSDW, relative value of dry weight of aerial parts. LOD, logarithm of ratio; PVE, percentage of phenotypic variation explained by single QTL; additive effects of the ADD, N24852 alleles. E represents an Environment (Environment).
To determine drought tolerance genes from wild soybean N24852, annotation analysis was performed on all genes of the gm14_ldb_21 region. Four candidate genes, glyma14G102900, glyma114G103100, glyma14G105900 and Glyma14G162100 (http:// soybase org) were predicted based on GO information (Table 2). They are associated with water, ABA and jasmonic acid stress and belong to WRKY, ZINC file and PP2C transcription factors, respectively (table 2). Sequence analysis showed that there were SNP differences in the gene regions of Glyma114G103100, glyma14G105900 and Glyma14G162100 between the wild (N24852) and cultivated (NN 1138-2) parents (Table 2).
Table 2Gm14_LDB_21 major QTL/fragment major candidate genes
I. s and NS represent introns, synonymous mutation and non-synonymous mutation, respectively, of the gene.
To compare the differences in expression of 4 candidate genes under drought stress, two parents NN1138-2 and N24852 were treated with 15% PEG6000 during soybean seedling stage. qRT-PCR analysis showed that only Glym a g162100 showed a trend of increasing and decreasing with time after 0h, 6h, 12h and 24h treatments and reached a peak at 12h (a in fig. 2), and that the expression level of Glyma14g162100 in wild soybean N24852 was significantly higher at 12h than cultivar NN1138-2. The above results indicate that Glyma14g162100 may be a drought-resistant candidate gene for Gm14_LDB_21.
Phylogenetic analysis was performed based on the full-length protein sequence of Glyma14G162100, and the results showed that the gene was homologous to Phvul.001G075400, medtr G028300, os05G49730 and AT2G29380 in kidney bean, alfalfa, rice and Arabidopsis, respectively (FIG. 2B). Meanwhile, there are 66 genes homologous to Glyma14g162100 in soybean. Based on previous studies by Chen et al, glyma14g162100 belongs to PP2C-51 of group F1 of PP2C family. Thus, it was designated Gs PP2C-51. To determine the expression position of GsPP C-51 in plant cells, its coding sequence was fused to a Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP) driven by the 2X CaMV35S promoter. GsPP2C-51-GFP was infiltrated into the E.benthamiana epidermal cells by Agrobacterium using a transient expression system. As shown in FIG. 2C, gsPP C-51-GFP fusion proteins were located in the nucleus.
2. Allelic variation of GsPP C-51 allele in Chinese germplasm population and SojaCSSLP5
A chinese germplasm population consisting of 247 parts of material, wherein 85 parts of wild soybean and 162 parts of cultivated soybean. All materials were sequenced to a depth of about 30×. In this population, glyma.14g162100 contains 3 exons and 2 introns, encoding 386 amino acids (D in FIG. 2), with 4 SNPs detected in the gene region. Based on the sequence data, four allele types (a 1-a 4) were identified in wild soybeans, whereas only a1 and a2 were found in cultivated soybeans, which should be inherited by wild soybeans (D in FIG. 2). Thus, in this germplasm population, all alleles of Glyma14g162100 in cultivated soybeans were inherited from wild soybeans, without any new alleles, 32% of a1 in wild soybeans, 71% of a1 in cultivated soybeans, and 24% of a2 in wild soybeans, 29% of a2 in cultivated soybeans. It follows that evolution of Glyma14g162100 from wild to cultivated was mainly the exclusion of the a3 and a4 alleles, except for the change in allele frequency. In SojaCS SLP, the additive effect of a1 and a2 is calculated, the a1 effect being +0.70 and the a2 effect being-0.01 (D in FIG. 2). Thus, the present case speculates that the a1 allele has the function of positively regulating soybean drought tolerance, and that the a1 allele has inherited from wild soybeans to most cultivars (115 of 162 varieties) in the chinese soybean germplasm population.
3. Verification of drought tolerance of GsPP C-51-a1 Using Soy hairy root composite plants
To verify the effect of GsPP C-51-a1 (or Glyma.14g162100-a 1) on drought stress, transgenic soybean hairy root complex plants were evaluated for response to 15% PEG 6000. There was no significant difference in fresh leaf weight between control and GsPP C-51-a1 transgenic composite plants prior to PEG treatment (A-C in FIG. 3). After 2 hours of treatment with PEG, the leaf weight of the control (GFP) was reduced and significantly lower than the weight of the transgenic composite plants. Control leaves began to wilt 6h after PEG stress, and rehydration treatment (RW) after PEG stress was relieved failed to recover. However, for transgenic composite plants, leaves began to wilt 24 hours after PEG stress and remained viable after 24 hours of re-watering. The relative expression data showed that GsPP C-51-a1 was expressed higher in roots of transgenic complex plants at 0h than in empty vector transformed plants (GFP) (FIG. 3D), meaning 35S: gsPP2C-51-a1 was overexpressed in complex plants prior to treatment. The time expression of GsPP C-51-a1 in the hairy roots of transgenic composite plants was then analyzed. The expression level of GsPP C-51-a1 was induced by PEG treatment and accumulated to the highest level 6 hours after PEG stress (E in FIG. 3). Furthermore, the expression level of GsPP C-51-a1 in the complex plants after 24 hours of rehydration was significantly lower than before the onset of PEG stress. The result shows that GsPP C-51-a1 is induced by osmotic stress, and the drought resistance of the soybean composite plant can be obviously improved.
4. Over-expression of GsPP C-51-a1 improves drought tolerance in Arabidopsis thaliana
In order to further verify the function of GsPP C-51-a1, the present case also performed stable genetic transformation in Arabidopsis. After screening with GFP, two independent transgenic arabidopsis lines (# 11 and # 12) were obtained. The effect of GsPP C-51-a1 was tested under drought stress by two experiments (drought stress 1 and drought stress 2) using #11, #12, WT and empty vector transformed plants (GFP) (FIG. 4). In drought treatment 1, arabidopsis was subjected to drought treatment for three weeks after one week of growth in the incubator, whereby it was found that the fresh and dry weights of transgenic Arabidopsis lines (# 11 and # 12) were higher than those of WT and GFP plants (A-C in FIG. 4). In drought treatment 2, one week old arabidopsis plants were dried by suppressing moisture until the leaves of the plants withered, and then re-watered. After two days, the overexpressing lines (# 11 and # 12) survived and maintained higher fresh weights, but the WT and GFP plants failed to recover (D and E in fig. 4). These results indicate that GsPP C-51-a1 transgenic plants have higher drought tolerance compared to wild type plants, indicating that GsPP C-51-a1 is a positive regulator of drought response.
5. GsPP2C-51-a1 improves physiological characteristics of drought resistance of arabidopsis thaliana
GsPP2C-51-a1 can improve drought tolerance of plants, but the mechanism of action is not clear. The physiological properties of the GsPP C-51-a1-OE strain from germinated to adult Arabidopsis were then analyzed. GO notes show GsPP C-51 might respond to regulation of ABA (Table 2). Therefore, the scheme firstly researches the response mechanism of GsPP C-51-a1 genes to ABA. To examine the sensitivity of GsPP C-51-a1 to exogenous ABA, arabidopsis seeds were germinated on 1/2MS medium with two concentrations of ABA (0 and 2.0. Mu.M) (FIG. 5). Under normal conditions (0. Mu.M ABA), there was no significant difference in seed germination rates for WT, GFP and GsPP C-51-a1-OE Arabidopsis plants (FIGS. 5A and C). Under 2.0. Mu.M exogenous ABA treatment, the seed germination rates of WT, GFP and two GsPP C-51-a1-OE lines were 0, 50% and 50%, respectively (B and C in FIG. 5). These results indicate that GsPP C-51-a1 overexpression mitigates ABA-mediated inhibition of seed germination.
Chlorophyll content and pore movement of adult arabidopsis thaliana are important physiological regulatory factors for drought resistance. In the absence of ABA treatment, there was no significant difference in chlorophyll content between WT and GsPP C-51-a1-OE arabidopsis plants (D and F in fig. 5). However, under 4.0 μm ABA treatment, the leaves of WT senesced (yellow), and the chlorophyll content of seedlings of #11 and #12 was higher than WT (E and F in fig. 5). In addition, arabidopsis plants were also subjected to cold (4 ℃) and salt (100 mM) stress treatments. The results showed that GsPP C-51-OE Arabidopsis plants exhibited the same growth state as WT, which means that GsP P C-51-a1 did not have the ability to withstand cold and salt.
GsPP2C-51-a1 to increase drought resistance may regulate stomatal movement. Thus, this document discusses whether GsPP C-51-a1 affects the sensitivity of protective cells to ABA and PEG in Arabidopsis. At2 hours of 80.0 μM ABA treatment, most of the stomata in WT (93.3%) were closed, whereas the stomata in the transgenic arabidopsis lines showed insensitivity to ABA, with about 85.0% of the stomata remaining open (fig. 6). However, at2 hours of 15% PEG6000 treatment, 94.17%, 84.7% and 86.6% of the pores in WT, #11 and #12, respectively, were closed (fig. 6). These results indicate that GsPP C-51-a1 is sensitive to PEG stress, but it is independent of the ABA pathway, resulting in insensitivity to ABA.
The results show that GsPP C-51-a1 is insensitive to ABA and cannot induce the stomatal closure and the chlorophyll content reduction of transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Then, gsPP C-51-a1 is how does it improve drought tolerance? Some plant hormones and physiological substances are involved in plant response to drought stress, so the present case measured the hormone content and physiological parameters of GsPP C-51-a1-OE lines and wild-type Arabidopsis thaliana with or without drought stress treatment. After the onset of drought stress, the levels of the hormones ABA (abscisic acid), JA (jasmonic acid) and SA (salicylic acid) increased in both GsPP C-51-a1-OE lines (# 11 and # 12), whereas the levels of ABA and SA in GsPP C-51-a1-OE lines were higher than that of WT (FIG. 7). SOD (superoxide), POD (peroxidase), CAT (catalase) and MDA (malondialdehyde) levels were comparable between GsPP C-51-a1-OE lines and WT without drought stress. Under drought stress, the SOD, POD and CAT activities of GsPP C-51-a1-OE plants were all increased. Furthermore, the SOD and CAT increase significantly more than the WT in GsPP C-51-a1-OE systems. Interestingly, the H 2O2 (hydrogen peroxide) content did not change significantly between normal and drought stress and between the transgenic line and WT. These results indicate that GsPP C-51-a1-OE Arabidopsis plants may have enhanced stress resistance due to increased hormone levels of ABA and SA and increased enzyme activities of SOD, POD and CAT.
Claims (4)
1. The application of soybean gene GsPP C-51 in improving plant drought tolerance, wherein soybean gene GsPP C-51 is a gene encoding protein of an amino acid sequence shown in SEQ ID No. 1.
2. The use according to claim 1, wherein the nucleotide sequence of soybean gene GsPP C-51 is shown as SEQ ID No. 2.
3. The use according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the drought tolerance of the plant is improved by over-expressing the soybean gene GsPP C-51 in the plant.
4. The use according to claim 3, wherein the plant is soybean or arabidopsis thaliana.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202410245819.8A CN117903272A (en) | 2024-03-05 | 2024-03-05 | Application of soybean gene GsPP C-51 in improving drought tolerance of plants |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202410245819.8A CN117903272A (en) | 2024-03-05 | 2024-03-05 | Application of soybean gene GsPP C-51 in improving drought tolerance of plants |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN117903272A true CN117903272A (en) | 2024-04-19 |
Family
ID=90696169
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202410245819.8A Pending CN117903272A (en) | 2024-03-05 | 2024-03-05 | Application of soybean gene GsPP C-51 in improving drought tolerance of plants |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN117903272A (en) |
-
2024
- 2024-03-05 CN CN202410245819.8A patent/CN117903272A/en active Pending
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Wang et al. | Genetic variation in ZmVPP1 contributes to drought tolerance in maize seedlings | |
Wang et al. | Enhanced expression of phospholipase C 1 (ZmPLC1) improves drought tolerance in transgenic maize | |
Park et al. | ASR enhances environmental stress tolerance and improves grain yield by modulating stomatal closure in rice | |
Zhang et al. | Over-expression of TsCBF1 gene confers improved drought tolerance in transgenic maize | |
Magwanga et al. | Genome wide identification of the trihelix transcription factors and overexpression of Gh_A05G2067 (GT‐2), a novel gene contributing to increased drought and salt stresses tolerance in cotton | |
Feng et al. | Identification of the AQP members involved in abiotic stress responses from Arabidopsis | |
Hou et al. | A novel ABA-responsive TaSRHP gene from wheat contributes to enhanced resistance to salt stress in Arabidopsis thaliana | |
Guo et al. | Cloning and characterization of SiDHN, a novel dehydrin gene from Saussurea involucrata Kar. et Kir. that enhances cold and drought tolerance in tobacco | |
BRPI0413917B1 (en) | non-transgenic mutagenized rice ahas nucleic acid, isolated ahas polypeptide, and weed control method within the vicinity of a rice plant | |
Hu et al. | Identification of loci and candidate genes responsible for pod dehiscence in soybean via genome-wide association analysis across multiple environments | |
Cabello et al. | The sunflower transcription factor HaHB11 confers tolerance to water deficit and salinity to transgenic Arabidopsis and alfalfa plants | |
MX2008016224A (en) | Improved yield and stress tolerance in transgenic plants. | |
Teng et al. | Heterologous expression of a novel Zoysia japonica salt-induced glycine-rich RNA-binding protein gene, ZjGRP, caused salt sensitivity in Arabidopsis | |
Zuo et al. | Overexpression of ICE1, a regulator of cold-induced transcriptome, confers cold tolerance to transgenic Zoysia japonica | |
Wang et al. | Overexpression of a common wheat gene GALACTINOL SYNTHASE3 enhances tolerance to zinc in Arabidopsis and rice through the modulation of reactive oxygen species production | |
Tamirisa et al. | A cyclin dependent kinase regulatory subunit (CKS) gene of pigeonpea imparts abiotic stress tolerance and regulates plant growth and development in Arabidopsis | |
CN108359674A (en) | Rice serine/threonine protein kitase gene OsSAPK8 coded sequences and its application | |
CN113046360A (en) | Maize genes ZMSPL1 and ZMSPL2 and uses thereof | |
CN115044605B (en) | Application of LRRK1 gene in regulation and control of rice ascorbic acid content and salt tolerance | |
Jeong et al. | Overexpression of ATHG1/AHL23 and ATPG3/AHL20, Arabidopsis AT-hook motif nuclear-localized genes, confers salt tolerance in transgenic Zoysia japonica | |
Habib et al. | Dehydrin responsive HVA1 driven inducible gene expression enhanced salt and drought tolerance in wheat | |
Kim et al. | Overexpression of the Arabidopsis vacuolar H+-pyrophosphatase AVP1 gene in rice plants improves grain yield under paddy field conditions | |
CN101812462B (en) | Application of rice GT transcription factor family gene OsGT gamma-1 in controlling salt tolerance of rice | |
Zhang et al. | The Dendrobium catenatum DcCIPK24 increases drought and salt tolerance of transgenic Arabidopsis | |
Xu et al. | Overexpression of the transcription factor NtNAC2 confers drought tolerance in tobacco |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |