CN117520188A

CN117520188A - Gateway product test case review method, device and processing equipment

Info

Publication number: CN117520188A
Application number: CN202311579473.7A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 张宇肖
Original assignee: Wuhan Sipuling Technology Co Ltd
Current assignee: Wuhan Sipuling Technology Co Ltd
Priority date: 2023-11-22
Filing date: 2023-11-22
Publication date: 2024-02-06

Abstract

The application provides a method, a device and processing equipment for evaluating test cases of gateway products, which are used for introducing mutually independent evaluation node settings for an evaluation mechanism of the test cases of gateway products, so that evaluation work of the test cases to be evaluated on line can be dispersed in time, and evaluation targets can be completed in an asynchronous mode. The method comprises the following steps: receiving an input case file of a test case to be reviewed by displaying a test case uploading interface of a gateway product test case review system to a tester; transmitting a review task to a preset review node in the system, displaying the use case content of the test case to be reviewed in a task interface of the review task, and recording a review result by the review task through a review component in the task interface, wherein the preset review node comprises at least two nodes, and the review operation of each node is mutually independent; and after the test cases to be reviewed pass through the review of the preset review node, warehousing the test cases to be reviewed.

Description

Gateway product test case review method, device and processing equipment

Technical Field

The application relates to the field of testing, in particular to a gateway product test case review method, a gateway product test case review device and processing equipment.

Background

In the development work of gateway products, the testing link is an important link, and the testing of the gateway products of the current version is efficiently and high-quality finished, so that the high-efficiency and high-quality product development effect can be promoted on the whole level.

Nowadays, an automatic test mode based on test cases is generally adopted to replace a traditional manual test mode, and the quality of the test cases is guaranteed.

However, the inventor of the application finds that in practical application, the test case review mechanism also has problems, so that the review work is difficult to develop, firstly, a lot of personnel are required to participate in a review meeting, and at a fixed time point, all personnel are difficult to participate in, secondly, even if a review meeting is organized, a large number of cases are required to be piled up, the effort of the personnel is limited, and most of the cases are only grass to pass through the field, namely, the existing test case review mechanism is limited to a manual review mode of the review meeting, and the review effect is difficult to play in the practical operation.

Disclosure of Invention

The application provides a method, a device and processing equipment for evaluating test cases of gateway products, which are used for introducing mutually independent evaluation node settings for an evaluation mechanism of the test cases of gateway products, so that evaluation work of the test cases to be evaluated on line can be dispersed in time, evaluation targets can be completed in an asynchronous mode, and the problem that the conventional test case evaluation mechanism is inconvenient for a tester to normally pull up an on-line evaluation meeting and the pain points passed by the evaluation are overcome by the evaluation personnel.

In a first aspect, the present application provides a method for evaluating test cases of a gateway product, where the method includes:

receiving an input case file of a test case to be reviewed by displaying a test case uploading interface of a gateway product test case review system to a tester;

transmitting a review task related to the test case to be reviewed to a preset review node in the system, wherein the task interface of the review task displays the content of the test case to be reviewed, the review task inputs a review result through a review component in the task interface, the preset review node comprises at least two nodes, and the review operation of each node is mutually independent;

And after the test cases to be reviewed pass through the review of the preset review node, warehousing the test cases to be reviewed.

With reference to the first aspect of the present application, in a first possible implementation manner of the first aspect of the present application, sending, in a system, a review task related to a test case to be reviewed to a preset review node includes:

and sending a review task related to the test case to be reviewed to a preset review node in the system, and sending a reminding mail related to the review task of the test case to be reviewed to the preset review node through a preset mail channel.

With reference to the first aspect of the present application, in a second possible implementation manner of the first aspect of the present application, the case content of the test case to be reviewed, which is displayed in the task interface, is displayed in a code format.

With reference to the first aspect of the present application or any one of the possible implementation manners of the first aspect, in a third possible implementation manner of the first aspect of the present application, before sending, in the system, a review task related to a test case to be reviewed to a preset review node, the method further includes:

carrying out loading test on the case file of the test case to be reviewed on line so as to test whether the test case to be reviewed can be normally analyzed and operated;

After the normal analysis and operation of the test case to be reviewed are determined, triggering the transmission of the review task related to the test case to be reviewed to a preset review node in the system.

With reference to the third possible implementation manner of the third aspect of the present application, in a fourth possible implementation manner of the first aspect of the present application, loading test contents of the test case to be reviewed are further displayed in a task interface of a review task of the test case to be reviewed.

With reference to the fourth possible implementation manner of the first aspect of the present application, in a fifth possible implementation manner of the first aspect of the present application, a review column is further configured on a task interface of a review task of a test case to be reviewed, where the review column is used to display an explanation of the case content or the loading test content, which is input by a tester, and is also used to display a review opinion of the case content or the loading test content, which is input by the tester.

With reference to the third possible implementation manner of the first aspect of the present application, in a sixth possible implementation manner of the first aspect of the present application, sending, in a system, a review task related to a test case to be reviewed to a preset review node includes:

after receiving the sending instruction of the tester, sending the review task of the test case to be reviewed about the test case to be reviewed to a preset review node in the system.

In a second aspect, the present application provides a gateway product test case review device, where the device includes:

the receiving unit is used for receiving the recorded case file of the test case to be reviewed by displaying a test case uploading interface of the gateway product test case review system to a tester;

the system comprises a sending unit, a judging unit and a judging unit, wherein the sending unit is used for sending a judging task about a test case to be judged to a preset judging node in the system, the content of the case of the test case to be judged is displayed in a task interface of the judging task, the judging task inputs a judging result through a judging component in the task interface, the preset judging node comprises at least two nodes, and the judging operation of each node is mutually independent;

and the warehousing unit is used for warehousing the test cases to be reviewed after the test cases to be reviewed pass through the preset review node.

With reference to the second aspect of the present application, in a first possible implementation manner of the second aspect of the present application, the sending unit is specifically configured to:

With reference to the second aspect of the present application, in a second possible implementation manner of the second aspect of the present application, the case contents of the test case to be reviewed, which are displayed in the task interface, are displayed in a code format.

With reference to the second aspect of the present application or any one of possible implementation manners of the second aspect, in a third possible implementation manner of the second aspect of the present application, the apparatus further includes a test unit, configured to:

With reference to the third possible implementation manner of the third aspect of the present application, in a fourth possible implementation manner of the second aspect of the present application, loading test contents of the test case to be reviewed are further displayed in a task interface of a review task of the test case to be reviewed.

With reference to the fourth possible implementation manner of the second aspect of the present application, in a fifth possible implementation manner of the second aspect of the present application, a review column is further configured on a task interface of a review task of a test case to be reviewed, where the review column is used for displaying an explanation of the content of the case or the loading test content entered by the tester, and is also used for displaying a review opinion of the content of the case or the loading test content entered by the reviewer.

With reference to the third possible implementation manner of the second aspect of the present application, in a sixth possible implementation manner of the second aspect of the present application, the sending unit is specifically configured to:

In a third aspect, the present application provides a processing device, comprising a processor and a memory, the memory having stored therein a computer program, the processor executing the method provided by the first aspect of the present application or any one of the possible implementations of the first aspect of the present application when calling the computer program in the memory.

In a fourth aspect, the present application provides a computer readable storage medium storing a plurality of instructions adapted to be loaded by a processor to perform the method provided in the first aspect of the present application or any one of the possible implementations of the first aspect of the present application.

From the above, the present application has the following advantages:

aiming at a review target of a gateway product test case, the application receives an input test case file of the test case to be reviewed, and then sends a review task related to the test case to be reviewed to a preset review node in the system, wherein the task interface of the review task displays the content of the test case to be reviewed, the review task inputs a review result through a review component in the task interface, and then the test case to be reviewed enters a warehouse through the review of the preset review node, wherein the preset review node comprises at least two nodes, and the review operation of each node is mutually independent, so that the application introduces mutually independent review node settings for a review mechanism of the test case of the gateway product, and can disperse the review work of the test case to be reviewed in time, complete the review target in an asynchronous mode, and solve the problem that the conventional test case is inconvenient to pass through a review mechanism of the preset review node, and the report of the test case can pass through a high-quality report of the gateway, and the high-efficiency test result is achieved.

Drawings

In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, the drawings that are needed in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below, it being obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present application, and that other drawings may be obtained according to these drawings without inventive effort for a person skilled in the art.

FIG. 1 is a schematic flow chart of a test case review method for a gateway product of the present application;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a scenario of the test case uploading results of the present application;

FIG. 3 is a schematic view of a scenario illustrating the result of content presentation according to the use case of the present application;

FIG. 4 is a schematic view of a scenario in the review column of the present application;

FIG. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of a test case review device for a gateway product of the present application;

fig. 6 is a schematic view of a structure of the processing apparatus of the present application.

Detailed Description

The following description of the embodiments of the present application will be made clearly and fully with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which it is evident that the embodiments described are only some, but not all, of the embodiments of the present application. All other embodiments, which can be made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments herein without making any inventive effort, are intended to be within the scope of the present application.

The terms first, second and the like in the description and in the claims of the present application and in the above-described figures, are used for distinguishing between similar objects and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the data so used may be interchanged where appropriate such that the embodiments described herein may be implemented in other sequences than those illustrated or otherwise described herein. Furthermore, the terms "comprises," "comprising," and "having," and any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, system, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of steps or modules is not necessarily limited to those steps or modules that are expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. The naming or numbering of the steps in the present application does not mean that the steps in the method flow must be executed according to the time/logic sequence indicated by the naming or numbering, and the execution sequence of the steps in the flow that are named or numbered may be changed according to the technical purpose to be achieved, so long as the same or similar technical effects can be achieved.

The division of the modules in the present application is a logical division, and may be implemented in another manner in practical application, for example, a plurality of modules may be combined or integrated in another system, or some features may be omitted or not implemented, and in addition, coupling or direct coupling or communication connection between the modules that are shown or discussed may be through some interfaces, and indirect coupling or communication connection between the modules may be in an electrical or other similar form, which is not limited in this application. The modules or sub-modules described as separate components may or may not be physically separate, or may be distributed in a plurality of circuit modules, and some or all of the modules may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purposes of the present application.

Before introducing the method for evaluating the test case of the gateway product, which is provided by the application, the background content related to the application is first introduced.

The method, the device and the computer readable storage medium for evaluating the gateway product test case can be applied to processing equipment, and are used for introducing mutually independent evaluation node settings for an evaluation mechanism of the gateway product test case, so that evaluation work of the test case to be evaluated on line can be dispersed in time, an evaluation target is completed in an asynchronous mode, and the problem that a tester in the conventional test case evaluation mechanism is generally inconvenient to pull up an on-line evaluation meeting normally and the pain points passed by the evaluation are marked by the evaluation personnel can be solved.

According to the gateway product test case review method, an execution main body can be a gateway product test case review device or different types of processing Equipment such as a server, a physical host or User Equipment (UE) and the like integrated with the gateway product test case review device. The gateway product test case review device can be realized in a hardware or software mode, the UE can be specifically terminal equipment such as a smart phone, a tablet personal computer, a notebook computer, a desktop computer or a personal digital assistant (Personal Digital Assistant, PDA) and the processing equipment can be set in an equipment cluster mode.

It can be understood that the gateway product test case review method provided by the application is developed from the perspective of the gateway product test case review system, and the processing device for executing the application service of the gateway product test case review method provided by the application is the device carrying the gateway product test case review system, and the processing device itself can be the device carrying the gateway product test case review system, in specific operation, the device form and the deployment form can be flexibly adjusted along with the specific application condition of the gateway product test case review system, for example, the gateway product test case review system can be provided in the local area network of a software development company, and the processing device can be a certain device node in the local area network, for example, the gateway product test case review system needs to involve cloud service and Web service, and can be a cloud server, so that the application does not specifically limit the processing device for executing the gateway product test case review method of the application.

Next, the method for evaluating the gateway product test case provided by the application is introduced.

First, referring to fig. 1, fig. 1 shows a flow chart of a method for evaluating a test case of a gateway product according to the present application, where the method for evaluating a test case of a gateway product provided by the present application specifically includes steps S101 to S103 as follows:

step S101, receiving an input case file of a test case to be reviewed by displaying a test case uploading interface of a gateway product test case review system to a tester;

it can be understood that the test case review system for the gateway products is set up to serve the test case review links involved in the development process of the gateway products of the software development company, and the test effect of the gateway products with high efficiency and high quality is promoted by the convenient and efficient review characteristics, so that in the working process of the system, the system is easy to understand, part of links are hooked with users, and the system corresponds to the condition that the system is served by the testers facing the gateway products and the reviewers.

The system can configure a test case uploading interface to provide an uploading inlet of the current test case to be reviewed for the testers.

In the test case uploading interface, it is easy to understand that the configuration is usually performed in a task form, and the creation of task information can be filled by a tester, automatically generated by a system or perfected by the tester on the basis of automatically generating content by the system, wherein the task information can comprise the content of tester information, gateway product information, information of test cases to be reviewed and the like.

Specifically, referring to a schematic view of a scenario of the test case uploading result in the present application shown in fig. 2, it can be seen from fig. 2 that, when a tester uploads a test case to be reviewed through a test case uploading interface, the tester/system configures information such as a file name, a file type, a task state, a product type, a hardware platform, a compiling branch, a topology, a functional characteristic, a priority, a test type, an uploading time, a state, an operation, and the like.

The test case uploading interface is provided with an uploading button, a storage path of the current test case to be reviewed can be designated by a tester to enable the system to automatically extract files, or an uploading window can be configured, the test case to be reviewed of the desktop can be dragged into the window by the tester in a file dragging mode, the system is enabled to extract the dragged files, a specific file entry scheme is flexible, and specific suitability adjustment can be carried out along with actual conditions, so that diversified file entry requirements are met.

In general, test cases to be reviewed, which need to be reviewed by the uploading system, are test cases that need to be reviewed for warehousing by the development node (development progress) in the current situation, and certainly, the test cases that need to initiate the review according to the real-time requirement are not excluded, and are adjusted according to the specific development situation of the gateway product.

For example, the test case to be reviewed may be a test case related to a certain gateway product at a certain preset development node.

In addition, since the review is considered, if the review is not passed or the adjustment/perfection is required, the test case to be reviewed, which is currently about to initiate the review process, may also be the test case after the adjustment/perfection is performed N times, for example, a new test case to be reviewed may be uploaded through a corresponding update portal.

Step S102, a review task related to the test case to be reviewed is sent to a preset review node in the system, wherein the task interface of the review task displays the content of the test case to be reviewed, the review task inputs the review result through a review component in the task interface, the preset review node comprises at least two nodes, and the review operation of each node is mutually independent.

And after the test cases to be reviewed which are required to be reviewed at this time are determined, the gateway product test case review system can advance the specific review process.

Specifically, for the evaluation of the test case of the gateway product, a fixed evaluation node (which is irrelevant to the specific situation of the test case to be evaluated) may be preset in advance, or an evaluation node related to the specific situation of the test case to be evaluated may be preset, for example, an evaluation node related to the tester of the test case to be evaluated, an evaluation node related to the gateway product corresponding to the test case to be evaluated, an evaluation node … assigned in advance to the test case to be evaluated, etc., where it is obvious that the preset evaluation node mentioned here is not an absolute fixed evaluation node, but may be configured in advance with the specific situation, and in the present case, updating of the evaluation node is not excluded.

And presetting the back of each node included in the review node, and then, corresponding individuals or teams need to carry out the review work of the test case to be reviewed on the review task distributed by the system.

It is noted that, for the system for evaluating the gateway product test case constructed by the application, the application has a mutually independent relationship for the evaluation tasks distributed on the system for the preset evaluation nodes (including at least two nodes) on line, in this case, the evaluation staff behind the nodes are mutually independent in the process of performing the evaluation operation, and therefore, the application effectively disperses the evaluation work of the test case to be evaluated on line in time, so that the evaluation targets can be completed in an asynchronous manner for different evaluation nodes.

For example, if the reviewer corresponding to the review node 1 has an idle time in the first time allocated to the review task to schedule the review job for the test case to be reviewed at this time, the review job for the test case to be reviewed at this time may be directly started to be scheduled.

For another example, if the reviewer corresponding to the review node 2 does not have an idle time to schedule the review job of the test case to be reviewed in this time within the first time allocated to the review task, the review job of the test case to be reviewed in this time may be scheduled after waiting for the idle time to occur.

For another example, if the reviewer corresponding to the review node 3 notices that the special condition exists in the gateway product corresponding to the test case to be reviewed or other gateway products within the first time allocated to the review task, the first time-scheduled review task can be abandoned even if the current idle time exists, and the review task is scheduled after waiting for a period of time or after the waiting condition changes, so that a more accurate review effect can be further promoted.

Compared with the traditional online review meeting working mechanism, the online review working mechanism designed by the application does not need to be pulled to the online review meeting by a corresponding user of a review node capable of determining the review result of the test case to be reviewed at the same time by a tester, and therefore the problem that the online review meeting is usually inconvenient to pull by the tester and the pain point passing through the review (grass goes by a pass) in the existing test case review mechanism can be solved.

In addition, it can be seen that, for the review tasks distributed by the gateway product test case review system to the preset review nodes, the specific review processing is performed in the task interface of the distributed review tasks, the review results can be specifically input through the review components therein, for example, the review contents are written in a specific window, the corresponding review contents are determined by clicking the corresponding buttons, and the specific review contents can be processed in specific product forms such as Application (APP), applet, browser-based Web service and the like of the gateway product test case review system.

Therefore, the system environment of the gateway product test case review system is used for completing the review work, and the system environment of the gateway product test case review system is not separated from the system environment of the gateway product test case review system, and the review work is completed outside the system of the gateway product test case review system, so that a complete review environment is provided, the review work realized by the global control gateway product test case review system is more convenient to realize technically, the first time of the detail of the review work realized by the gateway product test case review system can be flexibly updated and adjusted, and the stable, efficient and high-quality review effect can be guaranteed more conveniently.

The gateway product test case review system also displays the case content of the test case to be reviewed in the task interface of the assigned review task, so that a reviewer behind the node can more conveniently learn the case content of the test case to be reviewed, which is required to be reviewed at this time, without downloading the test case to be reviewed on a user line, thereby being more humanized in detail and obtaining better user experience.

Specifically, reference may also be made to a schematic view of a scenario in which the content of the application example is displayed as shown in fig. 3.

Similarly, when the tester initiates the review process of the test case to be reviewed through step S101, the test case uploading interface may also display the content of the test case to be reviewed, so that the tester can confirm whether the abnormal situation exists.

And step S103, after the test case to be reviewed passes through the review of the preset review node, warehousing the test case to be reviewed.

After the review result is made by the review node involved in the review task, the gateway product test case review system can update the review result, if the condition of no pass exists, the system needs to be stopped (related information of the test case to be reviewed can be directly deleted by the way) or is continued to be perfected, if the test case is continued to be perfected, the new review task can be the continuation task of the previous review task or the subtask of the previous review task, which can be flexibly set; otherwise, if all the cases pass, that is, if the test case to be reviewed passes through the preset review node (including a plurality of nodes), the current test case to be reviewed has no problem, the next gateway product development task link can be input, and the next gateway product development task link can be flexibly configured along with the actual situation, and the first thing is to store the test case to be reviewed which passes through the review at present in a warehouse for the next gateway product development task link or related data use requirement.

The method comprises the steps of carrying out warehousing processing on the test cases to be reviewed after the test cases to be reviewed pass through a preset review node, wherein the test cases to be reviewed can be stored locally in a system or can be stored on other equipment, and the method can be flexibly set according to actual needs, so that the method is not limited in detail, and the aim of warehousing storage can be achieved.

As seen from the embodiment shown in FIG. 1, aiming at the evaluation target of the gateway product test case, the application carries out warehouse entry processing on the test case to be evaluated by showing a test case uploading interface of a gateway product test case evaluation system to a tester, and after receiving an input test case file of the test case to be evaluated, sending an evaluation task related to the test case to be evaluated to a preset evaluation node in the system, wherein the task interface of the evaluation task shows the content of the test case to be evaluated, the evaluation task inputs an evaluation result through an evaluation component in the task interface, and then the test case to be evaluated carries out warehouse entry processing on the test case to be evaluated after passing through the preset evaluation node, wherein the preset evaluation node comprises at least two nodes, and the evaluation operation of each node is mutually independent, so that the mutually independent evaluation node setting is introduced for the evaluation mechanism of the test case of the gateway product, the evaluation target can be completed in an asynchronous mode, and the problem that the conventional test case is not normally found by the evaluation line of the conventional evaluation node can be solved, and the conventional evaluation line of the test is high in the conventional evaluation quality is overcome.

The steps of the embodiment shown in fig. 1 and the possible implementation thereof in practical applications will be described in detail.

It can be understood that, in order to ensure that the preset review node learns that the review task corresponding to the test case to be reviewed at this time, which needs to be subjected to review work, exists in the first time, the notification can be performed on the gateway product test case review system (including the category of the review task allocation process in the application), and the notification can also be performed through an external channel of the gateway product test case review system.

Typically, for example, an AI voice call may be initiated to notify, a short message may be sent to remind, an email may be sent to notify, a corresponding system on social media may push a channel/public number to notify, …, etc.

Taking mail as an example, as an implementation manner, step S102 sends, to a preset review node, a review task related to a test case to be reviewed in the system, including:

It can be appreciated that, for the notification approach of the mail, mailbox information of the preset review node is generally required to be configured in advance, so that the push of the reminding mail of the review task can be performed based on the pre-configured mailbox information later, and other notification approaches do so.

Therefore, the first time of the preset review node for the review work of the test case to be reviewed can be promoted in a notification reminding mode from the internal aspect and the external aspect of the gateway product test case review system.

In addition, as mentioned above, the gateway product test case review system also displays the case content of the test case to be reviewed in the task interface of the assigned review task, so that the reviewer behind the node can more conveniently learn the case content of the test case to be reviewed, which needs to be reviewed at this time.

In this way, the problem of intuitiveness and standardability of the content of the test case displayed on line is also considered, so that the display strategy of the test case to be reviewed displayed in the task interface can be started, the corresponding display effect is standardized by deploying the corresponding display strategy, and the more intuitionistic and clear display effect is ensured.

For example, as yet another exemplary implementation, the case content of the test case to be reviewed that is presented in the task interface may be presented in a code format.

It can be understood that when the test case review system for the gateway product displays the test case to be reviewed, if the test case is not particularly set, the test case review system defaults to be performed in a mode of displaying text content of a file, and the automated test case to be reviewed is written by codes, so that the problem of displaying the code with more disordered appearance can be caused.

In this regard, the present application recognizes that the format specification (code format) content of the code of the following example can be followed:

1) Space interval is needed between the keywords and the parameters;

2) The child class method needs to be under the parent class method, and the child class method needs to be indented four spaces more than the parent class method;

3) The key of the code needs to be highlighted;

4) The annotation needs to be displayed in red, and the parameter needs to be displayed in green;

…

under the setting, from the detail level of the sense of the user, a panel behind the preset panel node can develop specific panel work in a standard or more visual code format on line, and whether related problems exist or not can be found more conveniently by using an off-line familiar coding environment.

In addition, in order to ensure a better review effect, the gateway product test case review system built by the application can be designed and configured with a loading test function, and through the loading test function, the test case to be reviewed uploaded by the tester in the step S101 can be subjected to loading test, so that whether the analysis can be normally completed and whether the operation can be normally completed can be known.

In this case, the review tasks allocated to the gateway product test case review system for the test case to be reviewed can be performed under the condition that the test case to be reviewed is determined to be capable of being normally analyzed and operated, so that the reviewer behind the preset review node is helpful to develop more accurate review processing under the condition that the received test case to be reviewed corresponding to the default of the review tasks is capable of being normally analyzed and operated, and does not need to spend effort on considering whether the test case to be reviewed is capable of being normally analyzed and operated, so that effort can be more intensively consumed on other aspects, and the progress of the review work of other aspects can be assisted based on the condition that the test case to be reviewed is capable of being normally analyzed and operated.

In this regard, as yet another exemplary implementation manner, before the step S102 of sending, to the preset review node, a review task regarding the test case to be reviewed in the system, the method for evaluating a test case by using the gateway product of the present application may further include:

It can be understood that the gateway product test case review system can be deployed with special nodes to perform loading operation test on test cases to be reviewed through the loaded loading operation service, so that from the system architecture, a more efficient and high-quality loading operation test effect is stably ensured.

In addition, the loading operation test made by the gateway product test case review system can be understood as online debugging, and compared with the loading operation test made by a local/offline tester side, the loading operation test made by the gateway product test case review system can be utilized to perform more accurate and efficient loading operation test on the test case to be reviewed under different application conditions, so that possible abnormal problems of the test case to be reviewed can be captured, and when problems such as analysis failure, operation failure and the like occur, a tester is required to be informed to timely check the problems and repair the problems.

And the setting of the case content of the test case to be reviewed is displayed in a task interface of the review task distributed for the preset review node corresponding to the gateway product test case review system, and as another exemplary implementation manner, the loading test content of the test case to be reviewed can be displayed in the task interface of the review task of the test case to be reviewed.

It can be understood that the loading test content is not only the loading test result of the test case to be reviewed, but also the dynamic loading test process of the test case to be reviewed, so that the loading test condition of the test case to be reviewed can be reflected to the reviewer more intuitively from a dynamic angle.

In addition, if the displayed loading test content is the loading test content, the loading test content can be configured by the specific use case of the test case to be reviewed, for example, the corresponding loading test content is displayed piece by piece on the test case, so that the dynamic display of the loading test condition with smaller granularity and finer fineness is realized.

When the loading test content of the test case to be reviewed is displayed, in terms of display effect, the background color/font color can be configured in an adding/changing mode, indication is performed in an arrow/line mode and the like, so that the association relationship between the specific test case and the corresponding loading test result is identified, and a more visual display effect is achieved.

Furthermore, in order to promote the intuitiveness of the review work developed in the system of the gateway product test case review system and also the processing efficiency, besides the above-mentioned case contents of the test case to be reviewed and/or the loading test contents of the test case to be reviewed can be displayed, a review column can be displayed for the testers and the reviewers to carry out limited and concise communication in the task interface, thereby being beneficial to realizing more accurate review effects and more efficient review efficiency.

In this regard, as yet another exemplary implementation manner, on the gateway product test case review system, a task interface of a review task of a test case to be reviewed may also be configured with a review bar (which may also be referred to as an exchange bar, a message bar, etc. and is presented in a window/display area manner), where the review bar is used to display an explanation of the content of the use case or the loading test content entered by the tester, and also is used to display a review opinion of the content of the use case or the loading test content entered by the reviewer.

Specifically, referring to a schematic view of a scenario of the review bar of the present application shown in fig. 4, it can be seen from fig. 4 that a specific test case currently targeted in the test cases to be reviewed may be displayed on the left side of the task interface, and the review bar is displayed on the right side.

If the explanation and the review opinion have a correlation, the explanation and the review opinion can be identified according to the configuration of the user, for example, the explanation and the review opinion can be realized by configuring background colors/font colors in an adding/changing mode, indicating in an arrow/line mode, and the like.

In addition, under the condition that online test cases to be evaluated are introduced to carry out loading operation tests, secondary inspection of a tester can be involved when evaluation tasks corresponding to the test cases to be evaluated are distributed, for example, the test cases of the online/local test cases to be evaluated are inspected, for example, the test cases of the test cases to be evaluated, which are displayed by a gateway product test case evaluation system, are inspected, for example, the loading test cases of the test cases to be evaluated, which are displayed by the gateway product test case evaluation system, are inspected, and therefore the quality of the test cases to be evaluated, which correspond to the evaluation tasks distributed by the system later, is further guaranteed.

In this regard, as yet another exemplary implementation, step S102 of sending, in the system, a review task regarding the test case to be reviewed to a preset review node may include:

Wherein the send instruction may be generally configured to trigger execution after the tester clicks a confirm send button in the interface.

The gateway product test case review device is characterized in that the gateway product test case review device comprises a gateway product test case review module, a gateway product test case review module and a gateway product test case review module.

Referring to fig. 5, fig. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of a gateway product test case review device according to the present application, and in this application, a gateway product test case review device 500 may specifically include the following structure:

the receiving unit 501 is configured to receive an input case file of a test case to be reviewed by displaying a test case uploading interface of the gateway product test case review system to a tester;

the sending unit 502 is configured to send, in the system, a review task related to a test case to be reviewed to a preset review node, where the task interface of the review task displays the content of the test case to be reviewed, the review task inputs a review result through a review component in the task interface, the preset review node includes at least two nodes, and review operations of each node are independent from each other;

And the warehousing unit 503 is used for warehousing the test case to be reviewed after the test case to be reviewed passes through the preset review node.

In an exemplary implementation, the sending unit 502 is specifically configured to:

In yet another exemplary implementation, the case content of the test case to be reviewed, which is presented in the task interface, is presented in a code format.

In yet another exemplary implementation, the apparatus further comprises a test unit 504 for:

In yet another exemplary implementation, the loading test content of the test case to be reviewed is also displayed in the task interface of the review task of the test case to be reviewed.

In yet another exemplary implementation manner, the task interface of the review task of the test case to be reviewed is further configured with a review column, where the review column is used for displaying an explanation of the case content or the loading test content entered by the tester and displaying a review opinion of the case content or the loading test content entered by the reviewer.

In yet another exemplary implementation, the sending unit 502 is specifically configured to:

Referring to fig. 6, fig. 6 shows a schematic structural diagram of the processing device, specifically, the processing device may include a processor 601, a memory 602, and an input/output device 603, where the processor 601 is configured to implement steps of a method for evaluating a test case of a gateway product in the corresponding embodiment of fig. 1 when executing a computer program stored in the memory 602; alternatively, the processor 601 is configured to implement functions of each unit in the corresponding embodiment of fig. 5 when executing the computer program stored in the memory 602, and the memory 602 is configured to store the computer program required for the processor 601 to execute the method for evaluating the test case of the gateway product in the corresponding embodiment of fig. 1.

By way of example, a computer program may be partitioned into one or more modules/units, which are stored in the memory 602 and executed by the processor 601 to complete the present application. One or more of the modules/units may be a series of computer program instruction segments capable of performing particular functions to describe the execution of the computer program in a computer device.

The processing devices may include, but are not limited to, a processor 601, memory 602, and input output devices 603. It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the illustrations are merely examples of processing devices and do not constitute a limitation of processing devices, and that more or fewer components than shown may be included, or that certain components may be combined, or that different components may be included, for example, processing devices may also include network access devices, buses, etc., through which processor 601, memory 602, input output device 603, etc. are connected.

The processor 601 may be a central processing unit (Central Processing Unit, CPU), but may also be other general purpose processors, digital signal processors (Digital Signal Processor, DSP), application specific integrated circuits (Application Specific Integrated Circuit, ASIC), field programmable gate arrays (Field-Programmable Gate Array, FPGA) or other programmable logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, or the like. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor may be any conventional processor or the like, which is a control center for a processing device, with various interfaces and lines connecting the various parts of the overall device.

The memory 602 may be used to store computer programs and/or modules, and the processor 601 implements various functions of the computer device by running or executing the computer programs and/or modules stored in the memory 602 and invoking data stored in the memory 602. The memory 602 may mainly include a storage program area and a storage data area, wherein the storage program area may store an operating system, application programs required for at least one function, and the like; the storage data area may store data created according to the use of the processing device, or the like. In addition, the memory may include high-speed random access memory, and may also include non-volatile memory, such as a hard disk, memory, plug-in hard disk, smart Media Card (SMC), secure Digital (SD) Card, flash Card (Flash Card), at least one disk storage device, flash memory device, or other volatile solid-state storage device.

The processor 601 is configured to execute the computer program stored in the memory 602, and may specifically implement the following functions:

It may be clearly understood by those skilled in the art that, for convenience and brevity of description, the specific working process of the above-described device, processing device and corresponding units for evaluating a test case of a gateway product may refer to the description of the method for evaluating a test case of a gateway product in the corresponding embodiment of fig. 1, which is not described herein in detail.

Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that all or a portion of the steps of the various methods of the above embodiments may be performed by instructions, or by instructions controlling associated hardware, which may be stored in a computer-readable storage medium and loaded and executed by a processor.

For this reason, the present application provides a computer readable storage medium, in which a plurality of instructions are stored, where the instructions can be loaded by a processor to execute steps of a method for evaluating a test case of a gateway product in a corresponding embodiment of fig. 1, and specific operations may refer to descriptions of the method for evaluating a test case of a gateway product in a corresponding embodiment of fig. 1, which are not described herein again.

Wherein the computer-readable storage medium may comprise: read Only Memory (ROM), random access Memory (Random Access Memory, RAM), magnetic or optical disk, and the like.

Because the instructions stored in the computer readable storage medium can execute the steps of the method for evaluating the test case of the gateway product in the corresponding embodiment of fig. 1, the method for evaluating the test case of the gateway product in the corresponding embodiment of fig. 1 can achieve the beneficial effects, which can be achieved by the method for evaluating the test case of the gateway product in the corresponding embodiment of fig. 1, see the foregoing description for details, and will not be repeated here.

The method, the device, the processing equipment and the computer readable storage medium for evaluating the gateway product test case provided by the application are described in detail, and specific examples are applied to the explanation of the principle and the implementation of the application, and the explanation of the above examples is only used for helping to understand the method and the core idea of the application; meanwhile, those skilled in the art will have variations in the specific embodiments and application scope in light of the ideas of the present application, and the present description should not be construed as limiting the present application in view of the above.

Claims

1. A method for evaluating test cases of gateway products, the method comprising:

transmitting a review task related to the test case to be reviewed to a preset review node in a system, wherein the task interface of the review task displays the content of the test case to be reviewed, the review task inputs a review result through a review component in the task interface, the preset review node comprises at least two nodes, and the review operation of each node is mutually independent;

and after the test case to be reviewed passes through the review of the preset review node, warehousing the test case to be reviewed.

2. The method of claim 1, wherein the sending, in the system, the review task for the test case to be reviewed to a preset review node comprises:

and sending a review task related to the test case to be reviewed to the preset review node in the system, and sending a reminding mail related to the review task of the test case to be reviewed to the preset review node through a preset mail channel.

3. The method of claim 1, wherein the case content of the test case to be reviewed that is presented in the task interface is presented in a code format.

4. A method according to any one of claims 1 to 3, wherein before sending a review task for the test case to be reviewed to a preset review node in the system, the method further comprises:

and triggering to send a review task related to the test case to be reviewed to a preset review node in the system after the normal analysis and operation of the test case to be reviewed are determined.

5. The method of claim 4, wherein the task interface of the review task of the test case to be reviewed further displays loading test content of the test case to be reviewed.

6. The method of claim 5, wherein the task interface of the review task of the test case to be reviewed is further configured with a review bar, the review bar being used for displaying an explanation of the case content or the loading test content entered by the tester and also for displaying a review opinion of the case content or the loading test content entered by the reviewer.

7. The method of claim 4, wherein transmitting in the system to a preset review node a review task for the test case to be reviewed comprises:

and after receiving the sending instruction of the tester, sending the review task of the test case to be reviewed about the test case to be reviewed to the preset review node in the system.

8. A gateway product test case review device, the device comprising:

the system comprises a sending unit, a judging unit and a judging unit, wherein the sending unit is used for sending a judging task related to the test case to be judged to a preset judging node in the system, the task interface of the judging task displays the content of the test case to be judged, the judging task inputs the judging result through a judging component in the task interface, the preset judging node comprises at least two nodes, and the judging operation of each node is mutually independent;

and the warehousing unit is used for warehousing the test case to be reviewed after the test case to be reviewed passes through the preset review node.

9. A processing device comprising a processor and a memory, the memory having stored therein a computer program, the processor executing the method of any of claims 1 to 7 when invoking the computer program in the memory.

10. A computer readable storage medium storing a plurality of instructions adapted to be loaded by a processor to perform the method of any one of claims 1 to 7.