CN117462648A - Pharmaceutical composition and application thereof - Google Patents

Pharmaceutical composition and application thereof Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN117462648A
CN117462648A CN202210862109.0A CN202210862109A CN117462648A CN 117462648 A CN117462648 A CN 117462648A CN 202210862109 A CN202210862109 A CN 202210862109A CN 117462648 A CN117462648 A CN 117462648A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
group
composition
pregabalin
pharmaceutically acceptable
acceptable salt
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202210862109.0A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
李福龙
张正平
方芳
杨维东
施婷
陈荣
杨士豹
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Nanjing Ningdan New Drug Technology Co ltd
Original Assignee
Nanjing Ningdan New Drug Technology Co ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Nanjing Ningdan New Drug Technology Co ltd filed Critical Nanjing Ningdan New Drug Technology Co ltd
Priority to CN202210862109.0A priority Critical patent/CN117462648A/en
Publication of CN117462648A publication Critical patent/CN117462648A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K38/00Medicinal preparations containing peptides
    • A61K38/04Peptides having up to 20 amino acids in a fully defined sequence; Derivatives thereof
    • A61K38/06Tripeptides
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/185Acids; Anhydrides, halides or salts thereof, e.g. sulfur acids, imidic, hydrazonic or hydroximic acids
    • A61K31/19Carboxylic acids, e.g. valproic acid
    • A61K31/195Carboxylic acids, e.g. valproic acid having an amino group
    • A61K31/197Carboxylic acids, e.g. valproic acid having an amino group the amino and the carboxyl groups being attached to the same acyclic carbon chain, e.g. gamma-aminobutyric acid [GABA], beta-alanine, epsilon-aminocaproic acid or pantothenic acid
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K31/00Medicinal preparations containing organic active ingredients
    • A61K31/33Heterocyclic compounds
    • A61K31/395Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins
    • A61K31/41Heterocyclic compounds having nitrogen as a ring hetero atom, e.g. guanethidine or rifamycins having five-membered rings with two or more ring hetero atoms, at least one of which being nitrogen, e.g. tetrazole
    • A61K31/425Thiazoles
    • A61K31/428Thiazoles condensed with carbocyclic rings
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61KPREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL OR TOILETRY PURPOSES
    • A61K47/00Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient
    • A61K47/50Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates
    • A61K47/51Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent
    • A61K47/62Medicinal preparations characterised by the non-active ingredients used, e.g. carriers or inert additives; Targeting or modifying agents chemically bound to the active ingredient the non-active ingredient being chemically bound to the active ingredient, e.g. polymer-drug conjugates the non-active ingredient being a modifying agent the modifying agent being a protein, peptide or polyamino acid
    • A61K47/64Drug-peptide, drug-protein or drug-polyamino acid conjugates, i.e. the modifying agent being a peptide, protein or polyamino acid which is covalently bonded or complexed to a therapeutically active agent
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61PSPECIFIC THERAPEUTIC ACTIVITY OF CHEMICAL COMPOUNDS OR MEDICINAL PREPARATIONS
    • A61P25/00Drugs for disorders of the nervous system
    • A61P25/02Drugs for disorders of the nervous system for peripheral neuropathies

Landscapes

  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Veterinary Medicine (AREA)
  • Medicinal Chemistry (AREA)
  • Pharmacology & Pharmacy (AREA)
  • Animal Behavior & Ethology (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Bioinformatics & Cheminformatics (AREA)
  • Epidemiology (AREA)
  • Proteomics, Peptides & Aminoacids (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Gastroenterology & Hepatology (AREA)
  • Molecular Biology (AREA)
  • Biomedical Technology (AREA)
  • Neurology (AREA)
  • Neurosurgery (AREA)
  • Chemical Kinetics & Catalysis (AREA)
  • General Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Nuclear Medicine, Radiotherapy & Molecular Imaging (AREA)
  • Organic Chemistry (AREA)
  • Pharmaceuticals Containing Other Organic And Inorganic Compounds (AREA)

Abstract

The present invention relates to a composition of (S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and a riluzole prodrug, which is useful for the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of neuropathic pain.

Description

Pharmaceutical composition and application thereof
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the field of pharmacy, and relates to a composition of (S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid and a riluzole prodrug and application thereof in preparing medicines for treating neuropathic pain.
Background
Neuropathic Pain (NP) is pain caused by injury or disease of the somatosensory system, and is classified into peripheral neuropathic pain and central neuropathic pain, with clinical peripheral neuropathic pain being common. One study from europe showed a high prevalence of neuropathic pain in the general population of 8.0%. Neuropathic pain is not a single disease, but rather is a syndrome caused by different diseases and lesions, manifesting as a series of symptoms and signs, severely affecting the quality of life of the patient. Postherpetic neuralgia and diabetic peripheral neuropathy are the most common two neuropathic pain types, and long-term pain can affect the sleeping, working and living abilities of patients, and can increase the incidence of affective disorders such as depression, anxiety and the like. There are studies showing that: the quality of life score of the postherpetic neuralgia patients is only 1/2 of that of the normal population. The lack of therapeutic drugs for neuropathic pain is currently treated clinically by using calcium ion channel modulators, antidepressants, local anesthetics and the like. However, due to the complex pathogenesis, existing treatments are not satisfactory and pain in a significant portion of patients is not adequately relieved.
(S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid (pregabalin) is clinically useful in the treatment of peripheral neuralgia in adults, including the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuralgia, fibromyalgia, and postherpetic neuralgia, and is commonly recommended by a number of international guidelines as a first-line drug for the treatment of neuropathic pain. The mechanism of action of pregabalin is thought to regulate the voltage-gated calcium channel α2δ subunit, reducing glutamate, norepinephrine and substance P release. Pregabalin causes adverse reactions such as dizziness and somnolence, and the adverse reactions limit clinical application to a certain extent.
The structural formula of (S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid (pregabalin) is as follows:
(molecular formula C 8 H 17 NO 2 Molecular weight 159.23).
Riluzole (chemical name 2-amino-6-trifluoromethoxybenzothiazole), a drug developed by the company celeofilin for treating Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS), was approved by the us FDA and eu EMA in 1996 and has very important roles in prolonging survival of ALS patients, alleviating symptoms and improving quality of life. The mechanism of action is thought to be related to inhibition of glutamate release, stabilization of the inactive state of voltage-dependent sodium channels, and the interference of intracellular events following neurotransmitter binding to excitatory amino acid receptors. Riluzole has a wide range of pharmacological effects including regulation of glutamate and its transporters, antidepressant, anxiolytic, antiepileptic, analgesic, neuroprotective, etc.
Troriluzole is a prodrug molecule of riluzole, also known as Trigriluzole, BHV-4157, and FC-4157, troriluzole is a novel chemical molecule that regulates glutamate, which is the most excitatory neurotransmitter in humans. The main mechanism of action of Troriluzole is the reduction of glutamate in the nerve synapses. Troriluzole increases glutamate uptake by increasing expression and function of excitatory amino acid transporters located on glial cells (e.g., EAAT 2), the structure of Troriluzole is as follows:
(molecular formula C 15 H 16 F 3 N 5 O 4 S, molecular weight 419.38).
Disclosure of Invention
The technical problems to be solved are as follows: the invention provides a pharmaceutical composition comprising (S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid and a riluzole prodrug, which produces unexpected synergistic effects when used, and can enhance the therapeutic effect against neuropathic pain.
The technical scheme is as follows: a composition for use in the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of neuropathic pain, said composition comprising (S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and a riluzole prodrug or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, said riluzole prodrug having the structure:
the composition is characterized in that the (S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof: the riluzole prodrug or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof has a mass ratio of 16:1-1:60 in terms of free acid or alkali form.
Preferably, the (S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof: the riluzole prodrug or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof has a mass ratio of 8:1-1:30 in terms of free acid or alkali form.
Preferably, the (S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof: the riluzole prodrug or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof has a mass ratio of 4:1-1:30 in terms of free acid or alkali form.
Preferably, the (S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof: the riluzole prodrug or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof has a mass ratio of 4:1-1:12 in terms of free acid or alkali form.
Preferably, the (S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof: the riluzole prodrug or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof has a mass ratio of 3:1-1:6 in terms of free acid or alkali form.
The pharmaceutical composition of the invention can be used for preparing medicines for treating neuropathic pain, wherein the neuropathic pain is preferably peripheral neuropathic pain.
More preferably, the peripheral neuropathic pain is postherpetic neuralgia and neuralgia associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
The beneficial effects are that:
the animal efficacy experiment result shows that the pharmaceutical composition containing the (S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid and the riluzole prodrug can play a synergistic role and enhance the treatment effect of resisting peripheral neuropathic pain.
Detailed Description
The following examples will provide those skilled in the art with a more complete understanding of the invention, but are not intended to limit the invention in any way.
EXAMPLE 1 pharmacodynamic effects of pregabalin, troriluzole compositions on neuropathic pain study 1
1. Materials and methods
1.1 Experimental animal
Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, male, SPF grade, weighing 150-200g.
1.2 Test drug
Medicine name Manufacturer' s
Pregabalin Adamas Reagent, Ltd
The Troriluzole laboratory is synthesized and self-made.
1.3 Experimental method
1.3.1 Preparation of neuropathic pain animal models
The experiments used a model of neuropathic pain induced by ligation of the L5 Spinal Nerve (SNL) alone. Animals were anesthetized with 7% chloral hydrate (420 mg/kg, intraperitoneal injection), rat limbs were fixed prone, placed under an dissecting microscope, back hair removed, and alcohol swabs sterilized. A long incision of about 2-3 cm is cut on the right side of the back vertebra, two spinal nerves L4 and L5 are exposed, the spinal nerves L5 are gently ligated by using a 6-0 number braiding wire, and the adjacent spinal nerves are prevented from being damaged. Double-layer suturing the back incision of the experimental animal, sterilizing with iodophor, and lightly placing into a raising cage to freely move food and drink water.
1.3.2 Method for measuring mechanical pain threshold
All experimental animals were tested for mechanical withdrawal threshold (mechanical withdrawal threshold, MWT) using a mechanical automatic stabbing needle. Placing the experimental animal in a transparent organic glass box with a wire netting at the bottom, applying force to stimulate the hind limb plantar of the experimental animal at a constant speed by using a stabbing needle after the experimental animal is adapted to the experimental animal for 30 min, and recording a reflection threshold (MWT) when the rapid foot shrinkage or the foot throwing reaction of the rat occurs, namely the mechanical pain threshold of the animal.
1.3.3 Measurement and calculation of basic pain threshold of animals
Each experimental animal was measured for a 2-day basal mechanical pain threshold after molding, and the basal mechanical pain threshold of the experimental animal was the average of two times.
1.4 Animal grouping and experimental procedure
The experimental animals were randomly divided into 7 groups, namely, a model control group, a pregabalin group (32 mg/kg), a pregabalin group (0.5 mg/kg), a Troriluzole group (30 mg/kg), a Troriluzole group (2 mg/kg), a pregabalin and Troriluzole composition 16:1 group (pregabalin 32 mg/kg+troriluzole 2 mg/kg), and a pregabalin and Troriluzole composition 1:60 group (pregabalin 0.5 mg/kg+riluzole 30 mg/kg). And the pregabalin and the troilizole are both administrated through oral gastric administration, 10-12 animals are in each group, and the corresponding blank solvent is administrated in a model control group.
SD rats of appropriate body weight were selected to prepare L5-SNL models, and post-operative mechanical pain threshold measurements were initiated at least 7 days after modeling. Animals with significantly reduced postoperative right hind limb pain threshold compared to contralateral hind limb pain threshold were selected for subsequent efficacy testing. Experimental model animals were given the corresponding drugs or vehicle and the mechanical pain threshold of the animals was measured at a time point of 2h after the administration.
1.5 Composition synergy analysis
Evaluation of the synergy of pregabalin and Troriluzole in the composition according to the golden average formula q=e (a+b)/(ea+eb-ea×eb)
Acting as a medicine. Wherein E (a+b) is the improvement rate of the combination drug, ea and Eb are the improvement rates of the drug A (pregabalin) and the drug B (Troriluzole) which are used independently. E= (pain threshold after administration-model value)/(basal value-model value). If the q value is in the range of 0.85-1.15, the two medicines are combined and simply added, and the q value is more than 1.15 and is synergistic, and if the q value is less than 0.85, the two medicines are combined and have antagonism.
1.6 Data statistics
Experimental data are expressed as Mean ± standard error (Mean ± SEM). Differences among groups are analyzed by adopting single factor variance analysis, and groups are separated
Comparison was tested using LSD method, P <0.05 defined as significant difference.
2. Results
The experimental results are shown in Table 1. The mechanical pain threshold of animals (P <0.0001 ) can be significantly improved by pregabalin 32 mg/kg, troriluzole, 30 mg/kg, composition 16:1, and composition 1:60 at 2h after administration. The synergy calculation results show that: the q value of composition 16:1 at 2h post-dose was 1.030 and the q value of composition 1:60 at 2h post-dose was 1.020, indicating no synergy for both composition 16:1 and composition 1:60 at 2h post-dose.
Table 1 mechanical pain threshold (unit: g) for each group of animals
Group of Number of animals Basic value Model value Pain threshold 2h after administration
Model control group 10 28.32±1.42 14.07±0.48 14.90±0.86
Pregabalin group (32 mg/kg) 11 28.59±1.26 13.78±0.83 25.81±1.05****
Pregabalin group (0.5 mg/kg) 11 29.14±1.17 14.83±0.93 14.99±0.74
Troriluzole group (2 mg/kg) 12 28.34±0.73 13.75±0.59 13.89±1.02
Troriluzole group (30 mg/kg) 12 29.06±1.23 13.84±0.60 23.37±0.90****
Composition 16:1 group 11 28.29±1.21 13.59±0.91 25.92±1.09****
Composition 1:60 group 12 28.52±1.37 14.02±0.69 23.34±1.23****
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error, P <0.0001, compared to model control.
EXAMPLE 2 pharmacodynamic effects of pregabalin, troriluzole compositions on neuropathic pain study 2
1. Materials and methods
1.1 Experimental animal
Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, male, SPF grade, weighing 150-200g.
1.2 Test drug
Pregabalin and troiliuzole are as in example 1.
1.3 Experimental method
The preparation of neuropathic pain animal models, the determination of mechanical pain threshold and the measurement and calculation of basic pain threshold of animals are the same as in example 1.
1.4 Animal grouping and experimental procedure
The experimental animals were randomly divided into 7 groups, namely, a model control group, a pregabalin group (32 mg/kg), a pregabalin group (1 mg/kg), a Troriluzole group (30 mg/kg), a Troriluzole group (4 mg/kg), a pregabalin and Troriluzole composition 8:1 group (pregabalin 32 mg/kg+troriluzole 4 mg/kg), and a pregabalin and Troriluzole composition 1:30 group (pregabalin 1 mg/kg+riluzole 30 mg/kg). And the pregabalin and the troilizole are both administrated through oral gastric administration, 10-12 animals are in each group, and the corresponding blank solvent is administrated in a model control group.
SD rats of appropriate body weight were selected to prepare L5-SNL models, and post-operative mechanical pain threshold measurements were initiated at least 7 days after modeling. Animals with significantly reduced postoperative right hind limb pain threshold compared to contralateral hind limb pain threshold were selected for subsequent efficacy testing. Experimental model animals were given the corresponding drugs or vehicle and the mechanical pain threshold of the animals was measured at a time point of 2h after the administration.
1.5 Composition synergy analysis
Composition synergy analysis was as in example 1.
1.6 Data statistics
The data statistics are the same as in example 1.
2. Results
The experimental results are shown in Table 2. The mechanical pain threshold of animals can be significantly improved by pregabalin 32 mg/kg, troriluzole 30 mg/kg, composition 8:1, composition 1:30 at 2h post-administration compared to vehicle control group (P <0.0001 ). The synergy calculation results show that: the q value of composition 8:1 at 2h post-dose was 1.174 and the q value of composition 1:30 at 2h post-dose was 1.162, indicating that both composition 8:1 and composition 1:30 had a synergistic effect at 2h post-dose.
TABLE 2 mechanical pain threshold (unit: g) for animals of each group
Group of Number of animals Basic value Model value Pain threshold 2h after administration
Model control group 10 29.64±1.31 14.91±0.64 15.02±0.77
Pregabalin group (32 mg/kg) 10 28.60±1.38 14.39±0.97 25.65±0.85****
Pregabalin group (1 mg/kg) 10 29.03±0.85 14.74±0.98 14.92±0.89
Troriluzole group (4 mg/kg) 12 28.49±1.34 13.53±1.02 14.04±1.27
Troriluzole group (30 mg/kg) 12 28.52±1.07 13.55±0.79 22.88±0.84****
Composition 8:1 group 12 28.94±1.32 14.26±0.58 28.04±1.11****
Composition 1:30 group 12 29.31±1.27 14.96±0.85 25.43±1.38****
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error, P <0.0001, compared to model control.
EXAMPLE 3 pharmacodynamic effects of pregabalin, troriluzole compositions on neuropathic pain study 3
1. Materials and methods
1.1 Experimental animal
Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, male, SPF grade, weighing 150-200g.
1.2 Test drug
Pregabalin and troiliuzole are as in example 1.
1.3 Experimental method
The preparation of neuropathic pain animal models, the determination of mechanical pain threshold and the measurement and calculation of basic pain threshold of animals are the same as in example 1.
1.4 Animal grouping and experimental procedure
The experimental animals were randomly assigned to 11 groups, namely, the model control group, the pregabalin group (16 mg/kg), the pregabalin group (12 mg/kg), the pregabalin group (2 mg/kg), the troilezole group (24 mg/kg), the troilezole group (12 mg/kg), the troilezole group (4 mg/kg), the pregabalin and troilezole composition 4:1 group (pregabalin 16 mg/kg+troile4 mg/kg), the pregabalin and troilezole composition 3:1 group (pregabalin 12 mg/kg+troilezole 4 mg/kg), the pregabalin and troilezole composition 1:12 group (pregabalin 2 mg/kg+troile24 mg/kg), and the pregabalin and troilezole composition 1:6 group (pregabalin 2 kg+troileole 4/mg/kg). And the pregabalin and the troilizole are both administrated through oral gastric administration, 8-10 animals are in each group, and the corresponding blank solvent is administrated in a model control group.
SD rats of appropriate body weight were selected to prepare L5-SNL models, and post-operative mechanical pain threshold measurements were initiated at least 7 days after modeling. Animals with significantly reduced postoperative right hind limb pain threshold compared to contralateral hind limb pain threshold were selected for subsequent efficacy testing. Experimental model animals were given the corresponding drugs or vehicle and the mechanical pain threshold of the animals was measured at a time point of 2h after the administration.
1.5 Composition synergy analysis
Composition synergy analysis was as in example 1.
1.6 Data statistics
The data statistics are the same as in example 1.
2. Results
The experimental results are shown in Table 3. Pregabalin 16 mg/kg, pregabalin 12 mg/kg, troriluzole 24 mg/kg, composition 4:1, composition 3:1, composition 1:12, composition 1:6 all significantly increased the mechanical pain threshold of animals 2h post-dosing compared to vehicle control (P <0.0001, p=0.0001, p=0.0002, P <0.0001, p=0.0066). The synergy calculation results show that: the q value of composition 4:1 at 2h post-dose was 1.209, the q value of composition 3:1 at 2h post-dose was 1.213, the q value of composition 1:12 at 2h post-dose was 1.200, and the q value of composition 1:6 at 2h post-dose was 1.280, indicating that composition 4:1, composition 3:1, composition 1:12, composition 1:6 all have synergy at 2h post-dose.
TABLE 3 mechanical pain threshold (unit: g) for animals of each group
Group of Number of animals Basic value Model value Pain threshold 2h after administration
Model control group 8 29.26±1.15 15.43±0.57 15.35±0.92
Pregabalin group (16 mg/kg) 8 27.58±1.28 14.37±0.93 22.74±0.85****
Pregabalin group (12 mg/kg) 8 28.43±0.73 15.44±0.79 21.84±0.98***
Pregabalin group (2 mg/kg) 8 28.32±1.29 15.11±0.73 15.15±0.86
Troriluzole group (24 mg/kg) 10 28.57±1.04 13.93±1.12 21.39±0.73***
Troriluzole group (12 mg/kg) 10 29.41±1.29 14.39±1.22 18.32±1.03
Troriluzole group (4 mg/kg) 10 28.91±0.96 13.52±0.75 14.33±1.18
Composition 4:1 group 10 27.87±1.04 13.54±0.89 24.85±1.41****
Composition 3:1 group 10 29.66±0.83 15.17±0.63 24.30±1.22****
Composition 1:12 group 10 28.29±1.19 13.86±1.17 22.71±0.90****
Composition 1:6 group 9 29.16±1.08 14.98±0.91 19.77±1.32**
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error, P <0.01, P <0.001, P <0.0001, compared to model control.
EXAMPLE 4 pharmacodynamic effects of pregabalin, troriluzole compositions on neuropathic pain study 4
1. Materials and methods
1.1 Experimental animal
Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats, male, SPF grade, weighing 150-200g.
1.2 Test drug
Pregabalin and troiliuzole are as in example 1.
1.3 Experimental method
The preparation of neuropathic pain animal models, the determination of mechanical pain threshold and the measurement and calculation of basic pain threshold of animals are the same as in example 1.
1.4 Animal grouping and experimental procedure
The experimental animals were randomly divided into 8 groups, namely, a model control group, a pregabalin group (12 mg/kg), a pregabalin group (2 mg/kg), a troilizole group (12 mg/kg), a troilizole group (4 mg/kg), a pregabalin and troilizole composition 3:1 group (pregabalin 12 mg/kg+troilizole 4 mg/kg), a pregabalin and troilizole composition 1:6 group (pregabalin 2 mg/kg+troilizole 12 mg/kg), a pregabalin and troilizole composition 1:1 group (pregabalin 12 mg/kg+troilizole 12 mg/kg). And the pregabalin and the troilizole are both administrated through oral gastric administration, 8-10 animals are in each group, and the corresponding blank solvent is administrated in a model control group.
SD rats of appropriate body weight were selected to prepare L5-SNL models, and post-operative mechanical pain threshold measurements were initiated at least 7 days after modeling. Animals with significantly reduced postoperative right hind limb pain threshold compared to contralateral hind limb pain threshold were selected for subsequent efficacy testing. Experimental model animals were given the corresponding drugs or vehicle and the mechanical pain threshold of the animals was measured at a time point of 2h after the administration.
1.5 Composition synergy analysis
Composition synergy analysis was as in example 1.
1.6 Data statistics
The data statistics are the same as in example 1.
2. Results
The experimental results are shown in Table 4. Pregabalin 12 mg/kg, troriluzole 12 mg/kg, composition 3:1, composition 1:6, composition 1:1 all significantly increased the mechanical pain threshold (P <0.0001, p=0.0099, P < 0.0001) of animals at 2h post-dose compared to vehicle control. The synergy calculation results show that: the q value of composition 3:1 at 2h post-dose was 1.275, the q value of composition 1:6 at 2h post-dose was 1.297, and the q value of composition 1:1 at 2h post-dose was 1.343, indicating that composition 3:1, composition 1:6, and composition 1:1 all have synergy at 2h post-dose.
TABLE 4 mechanical pain threshold (unit: g) for animals of each group
Group of Number of animals Basic value Model value Pain threshold 2h after administration
Model control group 8 28.38±1.44 13.26±0.96 13.94±1.21
Pregabalin group (12 mg/kg) 8 30.17±0.91 14.11±0.72 21.97±0.88****
Pregabalin group (2 mg/kg) 8 28.85±1.16 13.29±0.99 14.01±0.73
Troriluzole group (12 mg/kg) 10 29.46±1.27 13.87±1.14 17.93±1.20**
Troriluzole group (4 mg/kg) 10 28.49±0.86 14.35±0.79 14.37±1.25
Composition 3:1 group 10 29.74±0.84 14.73±0.92 24.11±0.75****
Composition 1:6 group 10 28.65±1.24 15.02±1.05 20.23±0.87****
Composition 1:1 group 10 30.16±1.22 14.97±1.25 27.67±1.14****
Data are expressed as mean ± standard error, P <0.01, P <0.0001, compared to model control.

Claims (9)

1. A composition for use in the preparation of a medicament for the treatment of neuropathic pain, said composition comprising (S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof and a riluzole prodrug or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof, said riluzole prodrug having the structure:
2. use of any of the compositions according to claim 1, characterized in that said (S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof: the riluzole prodrug or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof has a mass ratio of 16:1-1:60 in terms of free acid or alkali form.
3. Use of any of the compositions according to claim 1, characterized in that said (S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof: the riluzole prodrug or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof has a mass ratio of 8:1-1:30 in terms of free acid or alkali form.
4. Use of any of the compositions according to claim 1, characterized in that said (S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof: the riluzole prodrug or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof has a mass ratio of 4:1-1:30 in terms of free acid or alkali form.
5. Use of any of the compositions according to claim 1, characterized in that said (S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof: the riluzole prodrug or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof has a mass ratio of 4:1-1:12 in terms of free acid or alkali form.
6. Use of any of the compositions according to claim 1, characterized in that said (S) -3-aminomethyl-5-methylhexanoic acid or a pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof: the riluzole prodrug or the pharmaceutically acceptable salt thereof has a mass ratio of 3:1-1:6 in terms of free acid or alkali form.
7. Use according to claims 1-6, characterized in that the neuropathic pain is peripheral neuropathic pain.
8. Use according to claims 1-7, characterized in that the peripheral neuropathic pain is postherpetic neuralgia.
9. Use according to claims 1-7, characterized in that the peripheral neuropathic pain is diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
CN202210862109.0A 2022-07-22 2022-07-22 Pharmaceutical composition and application thereof Pending CN117462648A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210862109.0A CN117462648A (en) 2022-07-22 2022-07-22 Pharmaceutical composition and application thereof

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210862109.0A CN117462648A (en) 2022-07-22 2022-07-22 Pharmaceutical composition and application thereof

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN117462648A true CN117462648A (en) 2024-01-30

Family

ID=89631705

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202210862109.0A Pending CN117462648A (en) 2022-07-22 2022-07-22 Pharmaceutical composition and application thereof

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN117462648A (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
US20150057342A1 (en) Compositions for combined immediate and sustained release of cannabinoids, methods of manufacture and use thereof
US9333215B2 (en) Aqueous solution of 20(R)-ginsenoside RG3 pharmaceutical composition and process thereof
JP7103752B2 (en) Strontium-based compositions and formulations for pain, pruritus and inflammation
CA2957224A1 (en) Method of treating prader-willi syndrome
WO2015022386A1 (en) Combined pharmaceutical preparation for use in treating neuromuscular disorders
JP2010538066A5 (en)
CN107205986A (en) The combination of Ibudilast and Riluzole and its application method
CN117462648A (en) Pharmaceutical composition and application thereof
CN117642162A (en) Pharmaceutical composition and application thereof
CN106361718B (en) The colon target biology adhesion tablet of monosialotetrahexose ganglioside sodium
CN114762689A (en) Pharmaceutical composition containing ligustrazine and application thereof
EP3284462B1 (en) Strontium based compositions and formulations for pain, pruritus, and inflammation
WO2015092538A1 (en) Use of extract or fraction of ophiocordyceps in manufacture of medicament for treatment of sleeping disorder
US20230149343A1 (en) Cannabichromene formulation for pain management
CN117982493A (en) Application of pharmaceutical composition in preparation of medicines for treating and/or preventing pain
Garrido-Suárez et al. Report of cases in patients with acute herpetic neuralgia using a Mangifera indica extract
US20240123008A1 (en) Use of a flavanoid extract obtained from the species talipariti elatum sw, formulations comprising same and treatment method
US20160030499A1 (en) Adaptogenic Compositions And Method For Production Thereof
EP3362059B1 (en) New combination therapies for treating neurological damage
US20200061103A1 (en) Inhibition of neurological disease
CN114788821A (en) Pharmaceutical composition and application thereof
CN113679705A (en) Application of sodium phenylbutyrate and metabolite thereof in preparation of medicine for preventing or treating peripheral nerve pain caused by chemotherapy
CN111297889A (en) A composition for inhibiting gastrointestinal spasm and biliary system spasm, its aqueous solution and its preparation method
Gol'dshtein et al. Gaseous superoxide potentiation of the effect of nonnarcotic analgesics in low doses
Gasthuys Biotransformation in rats of R, S-2-hydroxy-4-methyl selenobutanoic acid (HMSeBA), a new source of organic selenium

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication