CN117408567A - General performance management and evaluation method and system - Google Patents
General performance management and evaluation method and system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN117408567A CN117408567A CN202311505444.6A CN202311505444A CN117408567A CN 117408567 A CN117408567 A CN 117408567A CN 202311505444 A CN202311505444 A CN 202311505444A CN 117408567 A CN117408567 A CN 117408567A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- assessment
- task
- manager
- period
- personal
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 59
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 19
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 54
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 48
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 44
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 230000000737 periodic effect Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000012937 correction Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000005096 rolling process Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 claims description 4
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 11
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 8
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 7
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000001502 supplementing effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013468 resource allocation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011282 treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013473 artificial intelligence Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000003550 marker Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002035 prolonged effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011002 quantification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000002407 reforming Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
- G06Q10/06398—Performance of employee with respect to a job function
Abstract
The invention relates to the technical field of performance assessment, in particular to a general performance management and evaluation method and system. The scheme includes inputting a top layer design of a current unit, dividing and decomposing the top layer design into assessment indexes of the unit in a preset time period in the future according to the top layer design to form a plurality of task groups, acquiring all period ambiguous assessment tasks, setting specific period assessment indexes, setting corresponding universal task assessment templates according to the period assessment indexes and the task groups, calculating personal assessment indexes of each employee according to the universal task assessment templates, and updating personal assessment indexes of a manager at the upper level and corresponding employees according to the personal assessment indexes. According to the scheme, by setting a general performance evaluation system and combining dynamic variable performance evaluation rules, the enterprise dynamic assessment of different staff is fairer and more equitable, and can be clearly quantized.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of performance assessment, in particular to a general performance management and evaluation method and system.
Background
In performance management, a phenomenon is often seen that staff in an enterprise are better improved for their own performance, and various means are often used to "dig a basement". This is because employees are the basis and premise for the development of an enterprise, and employees want the enterprise to be able to provide better compensation, better welfare treatments for them. In order to better hold the employee, many businesses also take some action, such as performance assessment of the employee.
Before the technology of the invention, the existing performance assessment system has certain disadvantages, on one hand, staff clearly define own performance assessment schemes, and the proportion and the score of the schemes in execution determine the resource allocation proportion of the staff, so that the staff is caused to excessively pursue high assessment indexes in performance assessment to a great extent; on the other hand, the assessment process is not universal because each person has different work types and modes, and the managed content is different, and part of the work is difficult to quantitatively evaluate, so that great contribution is made to the company and cannot be evaluated and recorded.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of the above problems, the invention provides a general performance management and evaluation method and system, which combines a dynamic variable performance evaluation rule by setting a general performance evaluation system, so that the enterprise dynamic assessment of different staff is fairer and more fair and can be clearly quantified.
According to a first aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, a general performance management and evaluation method is provided.
In one or more embodiments, preferably, the general performance management and assessment method includes:
inputting a top layer design of a current unit, wherein the top layer design is an assessment index of the unit in a preset time period in the future;
dividing and decomposing according to the top layer design to form a plurality of task groups;
acquiring all period ambiguous assessment tasks and setting specific period assessment indexes;
setting a corresponding universal task assessment template according to the periodic assessment index and the task group;
according to the universal task assessment template, calculating the personal assessment index of each employee;
and updating the personal assessment indexes of the upper-level manager and the corresponding staff according to the personal assessment indexes.
In one or more embodiments, preferably, the inputting a top-level design of the current unit, where the top-level design is an assessment index of the unit in a preset time period in the future, specifically includes:
setting a current unit performance assessment group, wherein each member of the unit performance assessment group provides the lowest performance assessment index;
and taking a union set of the lowest performance assessment indexes of each member in the unit performance assessment group, and forming the top-level design of the current unit.
In one or more embodiments, preferably, the dividing and decomposing according to the top layer design form a plurality of task groups, which specifically includes:
obtaining an organization structure of a current unit, and confirming management level division;
dividing and splitting the task into a plurality of task grouping sets according to the management level;
and dividing the top-level design into a plurality of task groups along with the task grouping set.
In one or more embodiments, preferably, the acquiring all cycle ambiguous assessment tasks, setting a specific cycle assessment index specifically includes:
judging the assessment time length of all assessment indexes in each task group, wherein the assessment time length of part of tasks exceeds the total time length of the whole assessment period to serve as first-class period ambiguous tasks;
taking the task which cannot determine the assessment period as a second-class period ambiguous task;
acquiring the first-class period ambiguous task, and calculating update assessment quantity by using a first calculation formula;
acquiring the second-class period ambiguous task, and calculating update assessment quantity by using a second calculation formula;
the first calculation formula is as follows:
；
wherein A is updated assessment quantity, Z is total assessment quantity, C is assessment duration of a task, and T is total duration of the whole assessment period;
the second calculation formula is as follows:
A=Z P ×（1+B）；
wherein Z is P And B is a fluctuation coefficient set by a previous level assessment manager in real time in order to not determine the total assessment amount of the task of the assessment period.
In one or more embodiments, preferably, setting a corresponding universal task assessment template according to the cycle assessment index and the task group specifically includes:
acquiring the period and updating assessment quantity of all tasks;
forming basic assessment of each assessed person according to the periodic assessment index and the task group;
setting a universal task assessment template, wherein the universal task assessment template comprises three parts, namely a basic assessment part, an additional assessment part and a dynamic assessment part;
extracting the current basic assessment score, the additional assessment score and the dynamic assessment score, and calculating a general performance assessment result by using a third calculation formula;
the third calculation formula is as follows:
D=k 1A +k 2E +k 3F；
wherein D is a general type checking result, k 1A The initial value is 0, k as the basic assessment score 2E For additional assessment score, the initial value is 0, k 3F The initial value is 0, which is the score of the dynamic assessment.
In one or more embodiments, preferably, the calculating, according to the universal task assessment template, a personal assessment index of each employee specifically includes:
judging whether the current person to be evaluated is a manager, if so, calculating a basic assessment score in performance assessment by a seventh calculation formula;
updating the personal assessment index of the manager by using a third calculation formula;
updating the correction coefficient by using an eighth calculation formula;
updating the personal assessment index of the employee corresponding to the manager by using the new correction coefficient;
the seventh calculation formula is:
k 1A =1.1×Σi=n i=1k 1A_i；
wherein k is 1A Based on the assessment score, i is the number of the lower staff member of the manager, n is the total number of the lower staff member of the manager, and k 1A_i A basic assessment score for the ith subordinate staff member of the manager;
the eighth calculation formula is:
X=D + ÷D -；
wherein, D+ is the personal assessment index of the manager, and D-is the personal assessment index of the manager at last time.
In one or more embodiments, preferably, updating the personal assessment index of the upper manager and the corresponding staff according to the personal assessment index specifically includes:
judging whether the current person to be evaluated is a manager, if so, calculating a basic assessment score in performance assessment by a seventh calculation formula;
updating the personal assessment index of the manager by using a third calculation formula;
updating the correction coefficient by using an eighth calculation formula;
updating the personal assessment index of the employee corresponding to the manager by using the new correction coefficient;
the seventh calculation formula is:
k 1A =1.1×Σi=n i=1k 1A_i；
wherein i is the number of the lower staff member of the manager, n is the total number of the lower staff members of the manager, and k 1A_i A basic assessment score for the ith subordinate staff member of the manager;
the eighth calculation formula is:
X=D + ÷D -；
wherein, D+ is the personal assessment index of the manager, and D-is the personal assessment index of the manager at last time.
According to a second aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, a general performance management and assessment system is provided.
In one or more embodiments, preferably, the generic performance management and assessment system comprises:
the top layer design module is used for inputting the top layer design of the current unit, wherein the top layer design is an assessment index of the unit in a preset time period in the future;
the task group splitting module is used for dividing and decomposing according to the top layer design to form a plurality of task groups;
the multi-period analysis module is used for acquiring all period ambiguous assessment tasks and setting specific period assessment indexes;
the universal analysis module is used for setting a corresponding universal task assessment template according to the periodic assessment index and the task group;
the rolling updating module is used for calculating the personal assessment index of each employee according to the universal task assessment template;
and the assessment display module is used for updating the personal assessment indexes of the upper-level manager and the corresponding staff according to the personal assessment indexes.
According to a third aspect of embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a computer readable storage medium having stored thereon computer program instructions which, when executed by a processor, implement a method according to any of the first aspect of embodiments of the present invention.
According to a fourth aspect of embodiments of the present invention there is provided an electronic device comprising a memory and a processor, the memory being for storing one or more computer program instructions, wherein the one or more computer program instructions are executable by the processor to implement the method of any of the first aspects of embodiments of the present invention.
The technical scheme provided by the embodiment of the invention can comprise the following beneficial effects:
in the scheme of the invention, a dynamic assessment mechanism is added for tasks with unknown period or changeable period in the performance management and assessment process, so that dynamic general assessment of staff is realized.
According to the scheme, the difficulty of performance generation in different time periods is comprehensively considered in combination with the benefits and potential benefits generated by the corresponding performance, so that the performance update of corresponding rolling is realized.
Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objectives and other advantages of the invention will be realized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in the written description and claims thereof as well as the appended drawings.
The technical scheme of the invention is further described in detail through the drawings and the embodiments.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings that are needed in the description of the embodiments will be briefly described below, it being obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and that other drawings may be obtained according to these drawings without inventive effort for a person skilled in the art.
Fig. 1 is a flow chart of a generic performance management and assessment method according to one embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 2 is a flow chart of a top-level design of an input current unit in a generic performance management and assessment method according to an embodiment of the present invention, wherein the top-level design is a check index of a unit in a future preset time period.
Fig. 3 is a flow chart of a generic performance management and assessment method according to an embodiment of the present invention, wherein the generic performance management and assessment method is divided and decomposed according to the top-level design to form a plurality of task groups.
Fig. 4 is a flowchart of a general performance management and evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present invention, in which all cycle ambiguous assessment tasks are acquired and specific cycle assessment indexes are set.
Fig. 5 is a flowchart of setting a corresponding generic task assessment template according to a periodic assessment index and a task group in a generic performance management and assessment method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 6 is a flowchart of calculating a personal assessment index for each employee according to the generic task assessment template in a generic performance management and assessment method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 7 is a flowchart of updating personal assessment indicators of a superordinate manager and corresponding employees according to the personal assessment indicators in a general performance management and assessment method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 8 is a block diagram of a generic performance management and assessment system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
Fig. 9 is a block diagram of an electronic device in one embodiment of the invention.
Detailed Description
In some of the flows described in the specification and claims of the present invention and in the foregoing figures, a plurality of operations occurring in a particular order are included, but it should be understood that the operations may be performed out of order or performed in parallel, with the order of operations such as 101, 102, etc., being merely used to distinguish between the various operations, the order of the operations themselves not representing any order of execution. In addition, the flows may include more or fewer operations, and the operations may be performed sequentially or in parallel. It should be noted that, the descriptions of "first" and "second" herein are used to distinguish different messages, devices, modules, etc., and do not represent a sequence, and are not limited to the "first" and the "second" being different types.
The following description of the embodiments of the present invention will be made clearly and completely with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which it is apparent that the embodiments described are only some embodiments of the present invention, but not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of the invention without making any inventive effort, are intended to fall within the scope of the invention.
In performance management, a phenomenon is often seen that staff in an enterprise are better improved for their own performance, and various means are often used to "dig a basement". This is because employees are the basis and premise for the development of an enterprise, and employees want the enterprise to be able to provide better compensation, better welfare treatments for them. In order to better hold the employee, many businesses also take some action, such as performance assessment of the employee.
Before the technology of the invention, the existing performance assessment system has certain disadvantages, on one hand, staff clearly define own performance assessment schemes, and the proportion and the score of the schemes in execution determine the resource allocation proportion of the staff, so that the staff is caused to excessively pursue high assessment indexes in performance assessment to a great extent; on the other hand, the assessment process is not universal because each person has different work types and modes, and the managed content is different, and part of the work is difficult to quantitatively evaluate, so that great contribution is made to the company and cannot be evaluated and recorded.
The embodiment of the invention provides a general performance management and evaluation method and a system. According to the scheme, by setting a general performance evaluation system and combining dynamic variable performance evaluation rules, the enterprise dynamic assessment of different staff is fairer and more equitable, and can be clearly quantized.
According to a first aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, a general performance management and evaluation method is provided.
Fig. 1 is a flow chart of a generic performance management and assessment method according to one embodiment of the present invention.
In one or more embodiments, preferably, the general performance management and assessment method includes:
s101, inputting a top layer design of a current unit, wherein the top layer design is an assessment index of the unit in a preset time period in the future;
s102, dividing and decomposing according to the top layer design to form a plurality of task groups;
s103, acquiring all period ambiguous assessment tasks and setting specific period assessment indexes;
s104, setting a corresponding universal task assessment template according to the period assessment index and the task group;
s105, calculating the personal assessment index of each employee according to the universal task assessment template;
s106, updating personal assessment indexes of the manager at the upper level and corresponding staff according to the personal assessment indexes.
In the embodiment of the invention, first, the top layer design is carried out, the task splitting is further completed, the task design with unknown period is completed according to the splitting result, the comprehensive assessment in the whole assessment period is further completed, finally, the updating of the rolling artificial intelligence is carried out, and the comprehensive consideration of the difficulty of performance generation in different periods and the corresponding benefits and potential benefits of performance generation is realized.
Fig. 2 is a flow chart of a top-level design of an input current unit in a generic performance management and assessment method according to an embodiment of the present invention, wherein the top-level design is a check index of a unit in a future preset time period.
As shown in fig. 2, in one or more embodiments, preferably, the top level design of the current unit is input, where the top level design is an assessment indicator of the unit in a future preset time period, and specifically includes:
s201, setting a current unit performance assessment group, wherein each member of the unit performance assessment group provides the lowest performance assessment index;
s202, taking a union set of the lowest performance assessment indexes of each member in the unit performance assessment group, and forming a top-level design of the current unit.
In the embodiment of the invention, the top-level design is actually an integral assessment index of the whole unit, the index is actually integrated, and comprises a plurality of branch assessment contents, and when the branch assessment contents are partially completed, the top-level task is completed. Therefore, when designing the assessment index of the top-level design, the core is to determine a minimum completion criterion, and only if the minimum completion criterion is confirmed, the assessment index of the upper-level can be confirmed based on the minimum completion criterion.
Fig. 3 is a flow chart of a generic performance management and assessment method according to an embodiment of the present invention, wherein the generic performance management and assessment method is divided and decomposed according to the top-level design to form a plurality of task groups.
As shown in fig. 3, in one or more embodiments, preferably, the dividing and decomposing according to the top layer design form a plurality of task groups specifically includes:
s301, acquiring an organization structure of a current unit, and confirming management level division;
s302, dividing and splitting the task into a plurality of task grouping sets according to the management level;
s303, dividing the top-level design into a plurality of task groups according to the task grouping set.
In the embodiment of the invention, after acquiring the set of the top-level assessment tasks, the following core is to split at different levels, in the process, corresponding task splitting is determined according to the basic level number firstly, and then different task groups are formed according to task splitting; each task group corresponds to an assessment index of a person.
Specifically, in the process of grouping tasks at different levels, grouping is completed through the following procedures:
s3001, acquiring the task grouping set, dividing the task grouping set into a plurality of core tasks and a plurality of non-core tasks, wherein the core tasks which meet a core task judgment formula are core tasks, the non-core tasks which do not meet the core task judgment formula are non-core tasks, and dividing the top-level design into a plurality of task groups according to one core task and a plurality of non-core tasks in each task group;
s3002, updating the management level and the importance score in the adjustment task judgment formula at intervals of 10 days;
s3003, after the management level and the importance score change, calculating a core judgment margin again;
s3004, reforming the core task and the non-core task;
s3005, if no core task appears in a certain task group, a newly added core task can be selected to be incorporated into the task group and used as an supplementing part, wherein the supplementing part can carry out additional division in the performance assessment process, and if the supplementing part is completed, the original performance assessment total division can be doubled;
the core task judging formula is as follows:
DZ=GL×PF≥PY
wherein GL is the management level, PF is the importance score, PY is the core judgment margin, and DZ is the dynamic comprehensive importance;
the core judgment margin is as follows:
PY=G DZ (ZS)；
wherein ZS is the total number of task groups, G DZ () The method is used for extracting the function of the minimum core judgment margin when the number of task groups with the dynamic comprehensive importance degree larger than or equal to the core judgment margin is ZS in real time.
Wherein the management level is related to the staff position level, and the higher the position level is, the larger the management level is.
In the embodiment of the invention, grouping is completed through the flow, so that the universality is improved, and the decentralized autonomous and independent coordination of the performance management and control and organization architecture is realized, so that the subsequent dynamic variable performance evaluation rule can be smoothly implemented, and the key point in the scheme of the invention is realized.
Fig. 4 is a flowchart of a general performance management and evaluation method according to an embodiment of the present invention, in which all cycle ambiguous assessment tasks are acquired and specific cycle assessment indexes are set.
As shown in fig. 4, in one or more embodiments, preferably, the acquiring all period ambiguous assessment tasks, setting a specific period assessment index specifically includes:
s401, judging the assessment time of all assessment indexes in each task group, wherein the assessment time of part of tasks exceeds the total time of the whole assessment time to serve as a first-type period ambiguous task;
s402, taking a task which cannot determine the assessment period as a second-class period ambiguous task;
s403, acquiring the first-class period ambiguous task, and calculating update assessment quantity by using a first calculation formula;
s404, acquiring the second class period ambiguous task, and calculating update assessment quantity by using a second calculation formula;
the first calculation formula is as follows:
；
wherein A is updated assessment quantity, Z is total assessment quantity, C is assessment duration of a task, and T is total duration of the whole assessment period;
the second calculation formula is as follows:
A=Z P ×（1+B）；
wherein Z is P And B is a fluctuation coefficient set by a previous level assessment manager in real time in order to not determine the total assessment amount of the task of the assessment period.
In the embodiment of the invention, after the personal assessment index is determined, the automatic adjustment of the assessment index is needed, in this case, two kinds of task change are needed to be considered, the first case is the problem that the task period is ambiguous, in this case, the task period is possibly prolonged and exceeds the assessment period, in this case, comprehensive quantification is needed, and quantitative assessment tasks in different stages are determined; another situation is that the period of the assessment task is changeable, and the change of the assessment period is automatically assessed in this situation.
Fig. 5 is a flowchart of setting a corresponding generic task assessment template according to a periodic assessment index and a task group in a generic performance management and assessment method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
As shown in fig. 5, in one or more embodiments, preferably, the setting a corresponding generic task assessment template according to the cycle assessment index and the task group specifically includes:
s501, acquiring the period and the update assessment quantity of all tasks;
s502, forming basic assessment of each assessed person according to the periodic assessment index and the task group;
s503, setting a universal task assessment template, wherein the universal task assessment template comprises three parts, namely basic assessment, additional assessment and dynamic assessment;
s504, extracting current basic assessment scores, additional assessment scores and dynamic assessment scores, and calculating a general performance assessment result by using a third calculation formula;
the third calculation formula is as follows:
D=k 1A +k 2E +k 3F；
wherein D is a general type checking result, k 1A The initial value is 0, k as the basic assessment score 2E For additional assessment score, the initial value is 0, k 3F The initial value is 0, which is the score of the dynamic assessment.
In the embodiment of the invention, after the analysis of all tasks with unknown periods is obtained, a universal task template can be formed by combining the analysis of all tasks with period determination, and the universal task template is the key for analyzing all performance assessment scores, and the analysis method of the tasks of each person can be automatically confirmed through the template.
Fig. 6 is a flowchart of calculating a personal assessment index for each employee according to the generic task assessment template in a generic performance management and assessment method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
As shown in fig. 6, in one or more embodiments, preferably, the calculating, according to the universal task assessment template, a personal assessment index of each employee specifically includes:
s601, judging whether the current person to be evaluated is a manager, and if so, calculating and obtaining a basic assessment score in performance assessment by a seventh calculation formula;
s602, updating personal assessment indexes of management staff by using a third calculation formula;
s603, updating the correction coefficient by using an eighth calculation formula;
s604, updating the personal assessment index of the staff corresponding to the manager by using the new correction coefficient;
the seventh calculation formula is:
k 1A =1.1×Σi=n i=1k 1A_i；
wherein k is 1A Based on the assessment score, i is the number of the lower staff member of the manager, n is the total number of the lower staff member of the manager, and k 1A_i A basic assessment score for the ith subordinate staff member of the manager;
the eighth calculation formula is:
X=D + ÷D -；
wherein, D+ is the personal assessment index of the manager, and D-is the personal assessment index of the manager at last time.
In the embodiment of the invention, after confirming the task analysis method of each corresponding person, the task analysis of scrolling is further completed, in this case, firstly, whether a quantifiable marker node exists in the current task needs to be analyzed in a scrolling way, if not, whether procedural scoring exists, and the performance result of the corresponding person is determined by the procedural scoring way to update and quantify.
Fig. 7 is a flowchart of updating personal assessment indicators of a superordinate manager and corresponding employees according to the personal assessment indicators in a general performance management and assessment method according to an embodiment of the present invention.
As shown in fig. 7, in one or more embodiments, preferably, updating the personal assessment index of the upper manager and the corresponding employee according to the personal assessment index specifically includes:
s701, judging whether the current person to be evaluated is a manager, if so, calculating and obtaining a basic assessment score in performance assessment by a seventh calculation formula;
s702, updating personal assessment indexes of management staff by using a third calculation formula;
s703, updating the correction coefficient by using an eighth calculation formula;
s704, updating the personal assessment index of the staff corresponding to the manager by using the new correction coefficient;
the seventh calculation formula is:
k 1A =1.1×Σi=n i=1k 1A_i；
wherein i is the number of the lower staff member of the manager, and n is the managerTotal number of staff members, k 1A_i A basic assessment score for the ith subordinate staff member of the manager;
the eighth calculation formula is:
X=D + ÷D -；
wherein, D+ is the personal assessment index of the manager, and D-is the personal assessment index of the manager at last time.
In the embodiment of the invention, after each performance assessment is finished, the dynamically adjusted performance assessment is published, and the concrete data change basis in the assessment process is published; each formed basis is subjected to overall on-line assessment in the assessment execution period, the assessors mainly comprise the upper-level manager of the whole performance assessment change basis formulator, the upper-level manager comprehensively evaluates the change basis of the assessment data, and the score of the basis is used as the assessment content of 10% of assessment items of the performance assessment change basis formulator.
According to a second aspect of the embodiments of the present invention, a general performance management and assessment system is provided.
Fig. 8 is a block diagram of a generic performance management and assessment system in accordance with one embodiment of the present invention.
In one or more embodiments, preferably, the generic performance management and assessment system comprises:
a top layer design module 801, configured to input a top layer design of a current unit, where the top layer design is an assessment index of the unit in a preset time period in the future;
the task group splitting module 802 is configured to divide and decompose according to the top-level design to form a plurality of task groups;
the multi-period analysis module 803 is configured to obtain all period ambiguous assessment tasks and set specific period assessment indexes;
the general analysis module 804 is configured to set a corresponding general task assessment template according to the cycle assessment index and the task group;
the rolling update module 805 is configured to calculate a personal assessment index of each employee according to the universal task assessment template;
and the assessment display module 806 is configured to update the personal assessment index of the upper manager and the corresponding employee according to the personal assessment index.
In the embodiment of the invention, a system suitable for different structures is realized through a series of modularized designs, and the system can realize closed-loop, reliable and efficient execution through acquisition, analysis and control.
According to a third aspect of embodiments of the present invention, there is provided a computer readable storage medium having stored thereon computer program instructions which, when executed by a processor, implement a method according to any of the first aspect of embodiments of the present invention.
According to a fourth aspect of an embodiment of the present invention, there is provided an electronic device. Fig. 9 is a block diagram of an electronic device in one embodiment of the invention. The electronic device shown in fig. 9 is a general-purpose performance management and evaluation device. The electronic device can be a smart phone, a tablet computer and the like. As shown, the electronic device 900 includes a processor 901 and a memory 902. The processor 901 is electrically connected to the memory 902. The processor 901 is a control center of the electronic device 900, connects respective parts of the entire terminal using various interfaces and lines, and performs various functions of the terminal and processes data by running or calling a computer program stored in the memory 902 and calling data stored in the memory 902, thereby performing overall monitoring of the terminal.
In this embodiment, the processor 901 in the electronic device 900 loads instructions corresponding to the processes of one or more computer programs into the memory 902 according to the following steps, and the processor 901 executes the computer programs stored in the memory 902, so as to implement various functions: inputting a top layer design of a current unit, wherein the top layer design is used as an assessment index of the unit in a preset time period in the future, dividing and decomposing according to the top layer design to form a plurality of task groups, acquiring all periodic undefined assessment tasks, setting specific periodic assessment indexes, setting corresponding universal task assessment templates according to the periodic assessment indexes and the task groups, calculating individual assessment indexes of each employee according to the universal task assessment templates, and updating individual assessment indexes of a manager at the upper level and corresponding employees according to the individual assessment indexes.
Memory 902 may be used to store computer programs and data. The memory 902 stores a computer program having instructions executable in a processor. The computer program may constitute various functional modules. The processor 901 executes various functional applications and data processing by calling a computer program stored in the memory 902.
The technical scheme provided by the embodiment of the invention can comprise the following beneficial effects:
in the scheme of the invention, a dynamic assessment mechanism is added for tasks with unknown period or changeable period in the performance management and assessment process, so that dynamic general assessment of staff is realized.
According to the scheme, the difficulty of performance generation in different time periods is comprehensively considered in combination with the benefits and potential benefits generated by the corresponding performance, so that the performance update of corresponding rolling is realized.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that embodiments of the present invention may be provided as a method, system, or computer program product. Accordingly, the present invention may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the present invention may take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including, but not limited to, magnetic disk storage, optical storage, and the like) having computer-usable program code embodied therein.
The present invention is described with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each flow and/or block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of flows and/or blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, embedded processor, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the function specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the present invention without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, it is intended that the present invention also include such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.
Claims (10)
1. A general performance management and assessment method, the method comprising:
inputting a top layer design of a current unit, wherein the top layer design is an assessment index of the unit in a preset time period in the future;
dividing and decomposing according to the top layer design to form a plurality of task groups;
acquiring all period ambiguous assessment tasks and setting specific period assessment indexes;
setting a corresponding universal task assessment template according to the periodic assessment index and the task group;
according to the universal task assessment template, calculating the personal assessment index of each employee;
and updating the personal assessment indexes of the upper-level manager and the corresponding staff according to the personal assessment indexes.
2. The universal performance management and assessment method according to claim 1, wherein the top-level design of the current unit is input, wherein the top-level design is an assessment index of the unit in a preset time period in the future, and specifically comprises:
setting a current unit performance assessment group, wherein each member of the unit performance assessment group provides the lowest performance assessment index;
and taking a union set of the lowest performance assessment indexes of each member in the unit performance assessment group, and forming the top-level design of the current unit.
3. The universal performance management and assessment method according to claim 1, wherein the dividing and decomposing according to the top layer design forms a plurality of task groups, specifically comprising:
obtaining an organization structure of a current unit, and confirming management level division;
dividing and splitting the task into a plurality of task grouping sets according to the management level;
and dividing the top-level design into a plurality of task groups along with the task grouping set.
4. The universal performance management and assessment method according to claim 1, wherein the acquiring all cycle ambiguous assessment tasks, setting specific cycle assessment indicators, specifically comprises:
judging the assessment time length of all assessment indexes in each task group, wherein the assessment time length of part of tasks exceeds the total time length of the whole assessment period to serve as first-class period ambiguous tasks;
taking the task which cannot determine the assessment period as a second-class period ambiguous task;
acquiring the first-class period ambiguous task, and calculating update assessment quantity by using a first calculation formula;
acquiring the second-class period ambiguous task, and calculating update assessment quantity by using a second calculation formula;
the first calculation formula is as follows:
；
wherein A is updated assessment quantity, Z is total assessment quantity, C is assessment duration of a task, and T is total duration of the whole assessment period;
the second calculation formula is as follows:
A=Z P ×（1+B）；
wherein Z is P And B is a fluctuation coefficient set by a previous level assessment manager in real time in order to not determine the total assessment amount of the task of the assessment period.
5. The universal performance management and evaluation method as defined in claim 1, wherein the setting of the corresponding universal task assessment template according to the periodic assessment index and the task group specifically includes:
acquiring the period and updating assessment quantity of all tasks;
forming basic assessment of each assessed person according to the periodic assessment index and the task group;
setting a universal task assessment template, wherein the universal task assessment template comprises three parts, namely a basic assessment part, an additional assessment part and a dynamic assessment part;
extracting the current basic assessment score, the additional assessment score and the dynamic assessment score, and calculating a general performance assessment result by using a third calculation formula;
the third calculation formula is as follows:
D=k 1A +k 2E +k 3F；
wherein D is a general type checking result, k 1A Based on the assessment scoreNumber, initial value is 0, k 2E For additional assessment score, the initial value is 0, k 3F The initial value is 0, which is the score of the dynamic assessment.
6. The universal performance management and assessment method according to claim 1, wherein the calculating the personal assessment index of each employee according to the universal task assessment template specifically comprises:
judging whether the current person to be evaluated is a manager, if so, calculating a basic assessment score in performance assessment by a seventh calculation formula;
updating the personal assessment index of the manager by using a third calculation formula;
updating the correction coefficient by using an eighth calculation formula;
updating the personal assessment index of the employee corresponding to the manager by using the new correction coefficient;
the seventh calculation formula is:
k 1A =1.1×Σi=n i=1k 1A_i；
wherein k is 1A Based on the assessment score, i is the number of the lower staff member of the manager, n is the total number of the lower staff member of the manager, and k 1A_i A basic assessment score for the ith subordinate staff member of the manager;
the eighth calculation formula is:
X=D + ÷D -；
wherein, D+ is the personal assessment index of the manager, and D-is the personal assessment index of the manager at last time.
7. The universal performance management and assessment method according to claim 1, wherein updating the personal assessment indicators of the upper level manager and the corresponding staff according to the personal assessment indicators specifically comprises:
judging whether the current person to be evaluated is a manager, if so, calculating a basic assessment score in performance assessment by a seventh calculation formula;
updating the personal assessment index of the manager by using a third calculation formula;
updating the correction coefficient by using an eighth calculation formula;
updating the personal assessment index of the employee corresponding to the manager by using the new correction coefficient;
the seventh calculation formula is:
k 1A =1.1×Σi=n i=1k 1A_i；
wherein i is the number of the lower staff member of the manager, n is the total number of the lower staff members of the manager, and k 1A_i A basic assessment score for the ith subordinate staff member of the manager;
the eighth calculation formula is:
X=D + ÷D -；
wherein, D+ is the personal assessment index of the manager, and D-is the personal assessment index of the manager at last time.
8. A generic performance management and assessment system for implementing the method of any one of claims 1-7, the system comprising:
the top layer design module is used for inputting the top layer design of the current unit, wherein the top layer design is an assessment index of the unit in a preset time period in the future;
the task group splitting module is used for dividing and decomposing according to the top layer design to form a plurality of task groups;
the multi-period analysis module is used for acquiring all period ambiguous assessment tasks and setting specific period assessment indexes;
the universal analysis module is used for setting a corresponding universal task assessment template according to the periodic assessment index and the task group;
the rolling updating module is used for calculating the personal assessment index of each employee according to the universal task assessment template;
and the assessment display module is used for updating the personal assessment indexes of the upper-level manager and the corresponding staff according to the personal assessment indexes.
9. A computer readable storage medium, on which computer program instructions are stored, which computer program instructions, when executed by a processor, implement the method of any of claims 1-7.
10. An electronic device comprising a memory and a processor, wherein the memory is configured to store one or more computer program instructions, wherein the one or more computer program instructions are executed by the processor to implement the method of any of claims 1-7.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202311505444.6A CN117408567A (en) | 2023-11-13 | 2023-11-13 | General performance management and evaluation method and system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202311505444.6A CN117408567A (en) | 2023-11-13 | 2023-11-13 | General performance management and evaluation method and system |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN117408567A true CN117408567A (en) | 2024-01-16 |
Family
ID=89488941
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202311505444.6A Pending CN117408567A (en) | 2023-11-13 | 2023-11-13 | General performance management and evaluation method and system |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN117408567A (en) |
Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004039000A (en) * | 2003-10-27 | 2004-02-05 | Business Net Corp:Kk | Personnel rating system, storage medium, and program |
| JP2006201858A (en) * | 2005-01-18 | 2006-08-03 | Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The | Human resource development support system |
| CN114240142A (en) * | 2021-12-15 | 2022-03-25 | 北京维卓网络科技有限公司 | Performance assessment processing method |
| WO2022267047A1 (en) * | 2021-06-25 | 2022-12-29 | 京东方科技集团股份有限公司 | Performance appraisal method and performance appraisal system for pre-hospital emergency personnel |
| CN116485220A (en) * | 2022-12-30 | 2023-07-25 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Staff performance assessment method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN116957385A (en) * | 2023-06-14 | 2023-10-27 | 中远海运科技股份有限公司 | 360-degree performance assessment method and system for shipping enterprise staff |
| CN117217612A (en) * | 2023-09-27 | 2023-12-12 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | Task index digital control method and system |
-
2023
- 2023-11-13 CN CN202311505444.6A patent/CN117408567A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (7)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| JP2004039000A (en) * | 2003-10-27 | 2004-02-05 | Business Net Corp:Kk | Personnel rating system, storage medium, and program |
| JP2006201858A (en) * | 2005-01-18 | 2006-08-03 | Chugoku Electric Power Co Inc:The | Human resource development support system |
| WO2022267047A1 (en) * | 2021-06-25 | 2022-12-29 | 京东方科技集团股份有限公司 | Performance appraisal method and performance appraisal system for pre-hospital emergency personnel |
| CN114240142A (en) * | 2021-12-15 | 2022-03-25 | 北京维卓网络科技有限公司 | Performance assessment processing method |
| CN116485220A (en) * | 2022-12-30 | 2023-07-25 | 中国石油化工股份有限公司 | Staff performance assessment method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
| CN116957385A (en) * | 2023-06-14 | 2023-10-27 | 中远海运科技股份有限公司 | 360-degree performance assessment method and system for shipping enterprise staff |
| CN117217612A (en) * | 2023-09-27 | 2023-12-12 | 广东电网有限责任公司 | Task index digital control method and system |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 王成强 等: "分布式绩效管理系统", 管理科学, 5 March 2013 (2013-03-05), pages 149 - 151 * |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Hu et al. | Clash relevance prediction based on machine learning | |
| Hausberg et al. | Research streams on digital transformation from a holistic business perspective: a systematic literature review and citation network analysis | |
| CN112153426B (en) | Content account management method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110738564A (en) | Post-loan risk assessment method and device and storage medium | |
| CN108563739A (en) | Weather data acquisition methods and device, computer installation and readable storage medium storing program for executing | |
| Niehoff | Aligning digitalisation and sustainable development? Evidence from the analysis of worldviews in sustainability reports | |
| CN109214448B (en) | Non-performance person training method, system, terminal and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN101540022A (en) | Knowledge transfer in a project environment | |
| CN110895495A (en) | Human error analysis method, system, computer device and storage medium | |
| CN114819924A (en) | Enterprise information push processing method and device based on portrait analysis | |
| CN111950625A (en) | Risk identification method and device based on artificial intelligence, computer equipment and medium | |
| CN103942739A (en) | Method for construction of construction project risk knowledge base | |
| CN115936895A (en) | Risk assessment method, device and equipment based on artificial intelligence and storage medium | |
| CN114201212A (en) | Configuration file processing method and device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| CN114201328A (en) | Fault processing method and device based on artificial intelligence, electronic equipment and medium | |
| CN111882113B (en) | Enterprise mobile banking user prediction method and device | |
| Matviienko et al. | Governmental Management and Regulatory Measures for Advancing AI in the Ukrainian Energy Sector as a Basis for Rapid and Sustainable Development of the Ukrainian Economy | |
| CN112990583A (en) | Method and equipment for determining mold entering characteristics of data prediction model | |
| Cayvaz et al. | Analysis of supply chain disruption factors under the effect of covid-19 pandemic via neutrosophic fuzzy dematel | |
| CN117408567A (en) | General performance management and evaluation method and system | |
| CN111652282A (en) | Big data based user preference analysis method and device and electronic equipment | |
| CN113642669B (en) | Feature analysis-based fraud prevention detection method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN113176873B (en) | Method and device for information management, electronic equipment and medium | |
| CN114154048A (en) | Method and device for constructing recommendation model, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN111783487A (en) | Fault early warning method and device for card reader equipment |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |