CN117236891A - Method and device for formulating first pile test project of advanced pile and computer equipment - Google Patents
Method and device for formulating first pile test project of advanced pile and computer equipment Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN117236891A CN117236891A CN202311254097.4A CN202311254097A CN117236891A CN 117236891 A CN117236891 A CN 117236891A CN 202311254097 A CN202311254097 A CN 202311254097A CN 117236891 A CN117236891 A CN 117236891A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- verified
- list
- test
- item
- advanced
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 214
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 56
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 51
- 238000012216 screening Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 25
- 238000010230 functional analysis Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 29
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 claims description 29
- 230000001502 supplementing effect Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000009472 formulation Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 239000000203 mixture Substances 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 abstract description 4
- 230000001105 regulatory effect Effects 0.000 description 7
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 description 5
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 4
- 150000003839 salts Chemical class 0.000 description 3
- 238000010998 test method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000009960 carding Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000009792 diffusion process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004992 fission Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000010438 heat treatment Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000002688 persistence Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M Ilexoside XXIX Chemical compound C[C@@H]1CC[C@@]2(CC[C@@]3(C(=CC[C@H]4[C@]3(CC[C@@H]5[C@@]4(CC[C@@H](C5(C)C)OS(=O)(=O)[O-])C)C)[C@@H]2[C@]1(C)O)C)C(=O)O[C@H]6[C@@H]([C@H]([C@@H]([C@H](O6)CO)O)O)O.[Na+] DGAQECJNVWCQMB-PUAWFVPOSA-M 0.000 description 1
- 230000010485 coping Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010612 desalination reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000013101 initial test Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000013535 sea water Substances 0.000 description 1
- 229910052708 sodium Inorganic materials 0.000 description 1
- 239000011734 sodium Substances 0.000 description 1
Landscapes
- Testing And Monitoring For Control Systems (AREA)
Abstract
The application relates to a method, a device and computer equipment for making an advanced stack type first stack test project. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring an advanced heap type system equipment list and a design file, screening the system equipment list and the design file according to a supervision principle to obtain an item to be verified, performing functional analysis on the function of the item to be verified to obtain an initial list to be verified, and determining a target list to be verified according to the test scheme of each first item to be verified in the initial list to be verified and the state of the advanced heap type. According to the embodiment of the application, the target list to be verified is determined according to the test scheme of each first item to be verified in the initial list to be verified and the state of the advanced heap, so that the screening process is simplified, and the problem of excessive test items of the first heap of the machine set is solved.
Description
Technical Field
The application relates to the technical field of nuclear power station design, in particular to a method and a device for formulating an advanced stack type first stack test project and computer equipment.
Background
In recent years, more and more new ideas are available for the utilization of nuclear energy. In 2002, according to the development targets of economy, safety, persistence and nuclear non-diffusion of the fourth-generation nuclear energy system, the GIF forum selects six types of stacks with development potential, namely an advanced stack type, of a sodium-cooled fast reactor, a lead-cooled fast reactor, a gas-cooled fast reactor, a supercritical water reactor, an ultra-temperature gas-cooled reactor and a molten salt reactor. Advanced heap models introduce a number of new conceptual designs and items with new design features. The nuclear power station can be roughly divided into six main stages of site selection, design, construction, debugging, operation and retirement, wherein the debugging is an important verification of nuclear power reactor design and an important guarantee before operation comprises a pre-operation test and a first start-up test. Therefore, the debugging stage has the characteristics of wide involved area, large workload, time tightness, high difficulty and the like.
In the traditional technology, the first stack test item of the advanced pressurized water reactor nuclear power station in the debugging stage is formulated through the steps of new concept design, new design characteristic item carding and classifying, item configuration decomposition, performance analysis, debugging test item, content characteristic evaluation, executable prejudgment, alternative scheme analysis, test method formulation, test window selection and the like.
However, the method has the problem of excessive test items of the first pile of the unit.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of the foregoing, it is desirable to provide a method, an apparatus, and a computer device for making an advanced stack test item, which can reduce the number of unit stack test items.
In a first aspect, the present application provides a method for formulating an advanced heap type first heap test item. The method comprises the following steps:
acquiring a system equipment list and a design file of an advanced heap;
screening the system equipment list and the design file according to a supervision principle to obtain an item to be verified;
performing functional analysis on the function of the object to be verified to obtain an initial list to be verified;
and determining a target list to be verified according to the test scheme of each first item to be verified in the initial list to be verified and the state of the advanced heap.
In one embodiment, the determining the target to-be-verified list according to the test scheme of each first to-be-verified item in the initial to-be-verified list and the state of the advanced heap includes:
supplementing the initial list to be verified according to the first heap test item of each existing heap type and/or the application of the advanced heap type to obtain an intermediate list to be verified;
and determining a target list to be verified based on the test scheme of each second item to be verified in the intermediate list to be verified and the state of the advanced heap.
In one embodiment, the determining the target to-be-verified list based on the test scheme of each second to-be-verified item in the intermediate to-be-verified list and the state of the advanced heap includes:
taking a second item to be verified, of which the test scheme meets preset conditions, as a first pile test item;
and determining the target list to be verified according to the first pile of test items.
In one embodiment, the method further comprises:
if the test conditions required by the test scheme include that the state of the advanced stack is a critical state, determining that the test scheme meets the preset conditions.
In one embodiment, the method further comprises:
if the planned test time corresponding to the test scheme is slower than the preset progress requirement time of the reactor engineering, the complexity of the bench or the complexity of the test is greater than the preset complexity, and the test cost is greater than the preset cost, determining that the test scheme meets the preset condition.
In one embodiment, the screening the system device list and the design file according to the supervision principle to obtain the to-be-verified item includes:
and screening the system equipment list and the design file according to the rule guide of the reactor and the safety inspection content of the supervision department to obtain the object to be verified.
In a second aspect, the application also provides a first pile test item making device of the advanced pile type. The device comprises:
the acquisition module is used for acquiring the advanced heap type system equipment list and the design file;
the screening module is used for screening the system equipment list and the design file according to the supervision principle to obtain an item to be verified;
the analysis module is used for carrying out functional analysis on the functions of the to-be-verified object item to obtain an initial to-be-verified list;
and the determining module is used for determining a target list to be verified according to the test scheme of each first item to be verified in the initial list to be verified and the state of the advanced heap.
In a third aspect, the application also provides a computer device comprising a memory storing a computer program and a processor implementing the steps of any of the methods described above when the computer program is executed by the processor.
In a fourth aspect, the application also provides a computer readable storage medium having stored thereon a computer program which when executed by a processor performs the steps of any of the methods described above.
In a fifth aspect, the application also provides a computer program product comprising a computer program which, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of any of the methods described above.
According to the method, the device and the computer equipment for making the first heap test item of the advanced heap type, the system equipment list and the design file of the advanced heap type are obtained, the system equipment list and the design file are screened according to the supervision principle to obtain the item to be verified, the function of the item to be verified is analyzed to obtain the initial list to be verified, and the target list to be verified is determined according to the test scheme of each first item to be verified in the initial list to be verified and the state of the advanced heap type. According to the embodiment of the application, the target list to be verified is determined according to the test scheme of each first item to be verified in the initial list to be verified and the state of the advanced heap, so that the screening process is simplified, and the problem of excessive test items of the first heap of the machine set is solved.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a diagram illustrating an internal architecture of a computer device according to an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 2 is a schematic flow chart of a method for establishing an advanced heap type first heap test item according to an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 3 is a flowchart of a method for determining a target to-be-verified list according to an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 4 is a flowchart of another method for determining a target to-be-verified list according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 5 is a flow chart of a method for preparing a first-reactor test item in a debugging stage of an advanced reactor type nuclear power station according to an embodiment of the present application;
FIG. 6 is a flowchart of another method for creating a first reactor test item for an advanced reactor nuclear power plant debugging stage according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 7 is a block diagram of a first pile test item making apparatus for advanced pile according to an embodiment of the present application.
Detailed Description
The present application will be described in further detail with reference to the drawings and examples, in order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present application more apparent. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the application.
In recent years, more and more new ideas are available for the utilization of nuclear energy. In 2002, according to the development targets of economy, safety, persistence and nuclear non-diffusion of the fourth-generation nuclear energy system, the GIF forum selects six types of stacks with development potential, namely an advanced stack type, of a sodium-cooled fast reactor, a lead-cooled fast reactor, a gas-cooled fast reactor, a supercritical water reactor, an ultra-temperature gas-cooled reactor and a molten salt reactor. Advanced heap models introduce a number of new conceptual designs and items with new design features. The nuclear power station can be roughly divided into six main stages of site selection, design, construction, debugging, operation and retirement, wherein the debugging is an important verification of nuclear power reactor design and an important guarantee before operation comprises a pre-operation test and a first start-up test. Therefore, the debugging stage has the characteristics of wide involved area, large workload, time tightness, high difficulty and the like.
In the prior art, the first stack test item of the advanced pressurized water reactor nuclear power station in the debugging stage is formulated through the steps of new concept design, new design characteristic item carding and classifying, item configuration decomposition, performance analysis, debugging test item, content characteristic evaluation, executable pre-judgment, alternative scheme analysis, test method formulation, test window selection and the like 。
However, the method has the problem of excessive test items of the first pile of the unit.
The method for formulating the advanced heap type first heap test project provided by the embodiment of the application can be applied to an application environment shown in figure 1. Fig. 1 is an internal structure diagram of a computer device, which may be a server, according to an embodiment of the present application, and the internal structure diagram may be as shown in fig. 1. The computer device includes a processor, a memory, and a network interface connected by a system bus. Wherein the processor of the computer device is configured to provide computing and control capabilities. The memory of the computer device includes a non-volatile storage medium and an internal memory. The non-volatile storage medium stores an operating system, computer programs, and a database. The internal memory provides an environment for the operation of the operating system and computer programs in the non-volatile storage media. The network interface of the computer device is used for communicating with an external terminal through a network connection. The computer program when executed by the processor implements a method for formulating an advanced heap first heap trial project.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the structure shown in FIG. 1 is merely a block diagram of some of the structures associated with the present inventive arrangements and is not limiting of the computer device to which the present inventive arrangements are applied, and that a particular computer device may include more or fewer components than shown in FIG. 1, or may combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 2, fig. 2 is a flow chart of a method for preparing an advanced heap type first heap test item, which is provided in an embodiment of the present application, and the method may be applied to the computer device in fig. 1, and the method includes the following steps:
s201, acquiring a system equipment list and a design file of an advanced heap type.
In the embodiment of the application, the system equipment list can comprise equipment information of reactor equipment, system information of a system, structure information of a structure and the like. The design file may include system functions of the system device, system operating parameters, security functions, non-security functions, alarm signals, etc.
S202, screening the system equipment list and the design file according to the supervision principle to obtain the item to be verified.
In embodiments of the application, regulatory guidelines may include regulatory guidelines of the reactor and security scrutiny of regulatory authorities.
Illustratively, the regulatory HAD103/02 "nuclear power plant commissioning" focuses on first-heap testing on testing the correctness of new equipment and new concepts; the introduction of SSG/28 Commissioning for Nuclear Power Plants focuses on the first-pile test that a totally new, unique or unique design feature is adopted in a nuclear power plant; regulations RG1.68 INITIAL TEST PROGRAMS FOR WATER-COOLED NUCLEAR POWER PLANTS focus on first-reactor testing is on new design features relating to the structure, system, or components of a new reactor. Thus, regulatory guidelines may be derived that focus on newly designed devices or concepts. In the process of debugging and supervising the EPR first pile unit, the supervision departments summarize the supervision project selection principles, namely the uniqueness, the safety importance, the programs with safety criteria, the equipment for coping with over-design reference accidents, the containment related test and the reactor core physical test. Thus, it can be derived that regulatory authorities focus on security and newly designed devices. And screening the system equipment list and the design file according to the supervision principle to obtain the item to be verified.
And S203, performing functional analysis on the function of the object to be verified to obtain an initial list to be verified.
The functions of the item to be authenticated may include secure functions and non-secure functions.
In the embodiment of the application, the function analysis is carried out on the function of the object to be verified, if the function of the object to be verified is fully applied to precedent, special verification is not needed, and the function is not added into the initial list to be verified; if the function of the item to be verified is not fully applied to the precedent, the initial list to be verified is added.
S204, determining a target list to be verified according to the test scheme and the state of the advanced heap of each first item to be verified in the initial list to be verified.
In the embodiment of the application, the target to-be-verified list can be determined by the following method: according to the first heap test item of each existing heap type and/or the application of the advanced heap type, supplementing an initial list to be verified to obtain an intermediate list to be verified; and determining a target list to be verified based on the test scheme and the state of the advanced heap of each second item to be verified in the intermediate list to be verified.
In the embodiment of the application, a system equipment list and a design file of an advanced heap type are acquired, the system equipment list and the design file are screened according to a supervision principle to obtain an object to be verified, then the function of the object to be verified is analyzed to obtain an initial list to be verified, and a target list to be verified is determined according to the test scheme of each first object to be verified in the initial list to be verified and the state of the advanced heap type. According to the embodiment of the application, the target list to be verified is determined according to the test scheme of each first item to be verified in the initial list to be verified and the state of the advanced heap, so that the screening process is simplified, and the problem of excessive test items of the first heap of the machine set is solved.
Referring to fig. 3, fig. 3 is a flowchart of a method for determining a target to-be-verified manifest according to an embodiment of the present application. Based on the above embodiment, the step S204 may include the following steps:
s301, supplementing the initial list to be verified according to the first heap test item of each existing heap type and/or the application of the advanced heap type to obtain an intermediate list to be verified.
In the embodiment of the application, the existing pile type can comprise a high-temperature gas cooled pile, a molten salt pile, a sodium pile, a small pressurized water pile and the like. The advanced heap type heating system can be used for nuclear heating, sea water desalination, island power supply, load rapid response and the like.
Alternatively, the intermediate manifest to be verified may be obtained by:
and analyzing the first heap test items of the existing heap types, and supplementing the initial list to be verified according to the first heap test items of the existing heap types to obtain an intermediate list to be verified. Or analyzing the application of the advanced heap, and supplementing the initial list to be verified to obtain an intermediate list to be verified according to the items to be verified which have important application and need to be verified in the first heap test. Or, supplementing the initial list to be verified according to the first heap test item of each existing heap type and the application of the advanced heap type to obtain an intermediate list to be verified.
S302, determining a target list to be verified based on the test scheme and the state of the advanced heap of each second item to be verified in the intermediate list to be verified.
In the embodiment of the application, the target to-be-verified list can be determined by the following method: and taking the second item to be verified, of which the test scheme meets the preset condition, as a first pile test item, and determining a target list to be verified according to the first pile test item. Optionally, the preset condition may include that the state of the test condition in the test scheme including the advanced stacking is a critical state, or the planned test time corresponding to the test scheme is slower than the preset progress requirement time of the reactor engineering, the complexity of the bench or the complexity of the test is greater than the preset complexity, and the test cost is greater than the preset cost.
In the embodiment of the application, the initial list to be verified is supplemented to obtain an intermediate list to be verified according to the first heap test item of each existing heap type and/or the application of the advanced heap type; and determining a target list to be verified based on the test scheme and the state of the advanced heap of each second item to be verified in the intermediate list to be verified. In the embodiment of the application, the initial list to be verified is supplemented to obtain the intermediate list to be verified according to the first heap test item of each existing heap type and/or the application of the advanced heap type, so that the target list to be verified in the embodiment of the application is more comprehensive, has more pertinence to special application, and can better meet the formulation requirement of the advanced first heap test of the heap type.
Referring to fig. 4, fig. 4 is a flowchart of another method for determining a target to-be-verified list according to an embodiment of the present application. The present embodiment relates to how to determine a manner of target to-be-verified list based on the test scheme and the state of the advanced heap for each second to-be-verified item in the intermediate to-be-verified list. On the basis of the above embodiment, the step S302 may include the following steps:
s401, taking a second item to be verified, of which the test scheme meets preset conditions, as a first pile test item.
The test protocol may include test conditions and test steps; alternatively, the test protocol may include test conditions, test procedures, acceptance criteria, and the like.
Optionally, in the embodiment of the present application, the test scheme meeting the preset condition may include the following cases: if the test conditions in the test scheme include that the state of the advanced stack is a critical state, determining that the test scheme meets the preset conditions. Or if the planned test time corresponding to the test scheme is slower than the preset progress requirement time of the reactor engineering, the complexity of the bench or the test complexity is greater than the preset complexity, and the test cost is greater than the preset cost, determining that the test scheme meets the preset condition.
S402, determining a target list to be verified according to the first pile test item.
In the embodiment of the application, the second item to be verified, which is the first item to be verified and is provided with the test scheme meeting the preset condition, is used as the first item to be verified, and the target list to be verified is determined according to the first item to be verified, so that the first item to be verified is reduced, the workload of a designer is reduced, and the investment of manpower, material resources and financial resources in first item debugging is reduced.
On the basis of the embodiment, the method may include the following:
if the test conditions required by the test scheme include that the state of the advanced stack is a critical state, determining that the test scheme meets the preset conditions.
The critical state is that the number of new neutrons generated by nuclear fission just meets the requirement of the reactor for continuous fission.
In the embodiment of the application, the test condition of the item to be verified is analyzed, and if the test condition comprises that the state of the advanced heap is a critical state, the item to be verified is taken as a first heap test item.
On the basis of the embodiment, the method can further comprise the following steps:
if the planned test time corresponding to the test scheme is slower than the preset progress requirement time of the reactor engineering, the complexity of the bench or the complexity of the test is greater than the preset complexity, and the test cost is greater than the preset cost, determining that the test scheme meets the preset condition.
Bench test is a test performed on a coreless bench for the purpose of measuring and calculating parameters of a thermal fluid, verifying performance of equipment, and the like. In embodiments of the present application, the planned test time may include a build stand time and an execution test time. If the item to be verified cannot meet the requirements of the engineering progress of the reactor in time, the test is complex or the bench is complex, the test cost is high, and the bench test cannot be carried out, the item to be verified is taken as a first-pile test item.
In the above embodiment, the second item to be verified for which the test scheme satisfies the preset condition is taken as the first heap test item. In the embodiment of the application, all items to be verified which can be subjected to bench test are not used as the first-heap test items, so that the first-heap test items are reduced, and the workload of designers and the workload of advanced heap debugging are reduced.
On the basis of the above embodiment, in S202 described above, the following steps may be included:
and screening the system equipment list and the design file according to the rule guide of the reactor and the safety inspection content of the supervision department to obtain the item to be verified.
Referring to fig. 5, fig. 5 is a flowchart of a method for preparing a first stack test item in a debugging stage of an advanced stack nuclear power plant according to an embodiment of the present application. The method comprises the following steps:
s501, acquiring a system equipment list and a design file of an advanced heap type.
S502, screening the system equipment list and the design file according to the supervision principle to obtain the item to be verified.
S503, performing functional analysis on the function of the object to be verified to obtain an initial list to be verified.
S504, supplementing the initial list to be verified according to the first heap test item of each existing heap type and/or the application of the advanced heap type to obtain an intermediate list to be verified.
S505, designing a test scheme according to the list to be verified, wherein the test scheme comprises test conditions, test steps, acceptance criteria and the like.
S506, taking the second item to be verified in the middle item to be verified list of which the test scheme meets the preset condition as a first pile test item.
S507, determining a target list to be verified according to the first pile test item.
Referring to fig. 6, fig. 6 is a flowchart of another method for preparing a first stack test item in an advanced stack nuclear power plant debugging stage according to an embodiment of the present application. The method comprises the following steps:
s601, preliminarily determining a list to be verified.
Screening the advanced heap system equipment list and the design file according to the latest requirements of the rule guide and the security check key of the supervision department to obtain an item list to be verified, and performing functional analysis on functions of the items to be verified in the item list to be verified to obtain a first function list to be verified. The first list of functions to be verified is the initial list to be verified.
S602, perfecting a list to be verified.
And supplementing the first function list to be verified according to the first heap test item of each existing heap type and/or the important application of the advanced heap type to obtain a second function list to be verified. The second list of functions to be verified is the intermediate list to be verified.
S603, determining a list to be verified.
And designing a test scheme according to the second to-be-verified function list, and analyzing test conditions in the test scheme. If the test condition comprises that the state of the advanced heap is a critical state, taking the item to be verified as a first heap test item, and adding the first heap test item into a first heap test list; if the item to be verified can be tested without critical state, but the bench test cannot be performed, taking the item to be verified as a first-heap test item, and adding the first-heap test item into a first-heap test list. The first test list is the target list to be verified.
It should be understood that, although the steps in the flowcharts related to the above embodiments are sequentially shown as indicated by arrows, these steps are not necessarily sequentially performed in the order indicated by the arrows. The steps are not strictly limited to the order of execution unless explicitly recited herein, and the steps may be executed in other orders. Moreover, at least some of the steps in the flowcharts described in the above embodiments may include a plurality of steps or a plurality of stages, which are not necessarily performed at the same time, but may be performed at different times, and the order of the steps or stages is not necessarily performed sequentially, but may be performed alternately or alternately with at least some of the other steps or stages.
Based on the same inventive concept, the embodiment of the application also provides an advanced stack type first stack test item making device for realizing the advanced stack type first stack test item making method. The implementation scheme of the device for solving the problems is similar to the implementation scheme described in the above method, so the specific limitation in the embodiment of the device for preparing the first pile test item of one or more advanced pile types provided below can be referred to the limitation of the method for preparing the first pile test item of the advanced pile type hereinabove, and will not be repeated here.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 7, fig. 7 is a block diagram of a first pile test item making apparatus for advanced pile according to an embodiment of the present application, where the apparatus 700 includes:
an acquiring module 701, configured to acquire a system device list and a design file of an advanced heap;
the screening module 702 is configured to screen the system equipment list and the design file according to a supervision principle to obtain an item to be verified;
the analysis module 703 is used for performing functional analysis on the function of the item to be verified to obtain an initial list to be verified;
and the determining module 704 is configured to determine a target to-be-verified list according to the test schemes and the state of the advanced heap of each first to-be-verified item in the initial to-be-verified list.
In one embodiment, the determining module 704 further includes:
the supplementing unit is used for supplementing the initial list to be verified according to the first heap test item of each existing heap type and/or the application of the advanced heap type to obtain an intermediate list to be verified;
and the determining unit is used for determining the target list to be verified based on the test scheme of each second item to be verified in the intermediate list to be verified and the state of the advanced heap.
In one embodiment, the determining unit is specifically configured to take a second item to be verified, where the test scheme meets a preset condition, as a first pile of test items; and determining a target list to be verified according to the first pile of test items.
In one embodiment, the apparatus 700 further comprises:
if the test conditions required by the test scheme include that the state of the advanced stack is a critical state, determining that the test scheme meets the preset conditions.
In one embodiment, the apparatus 700 further comprises:
if the planned test time corresponding to the test scheme is slower than the preset progress requirement time of the reactor engineering, the complexity of the bench or the complexity of the test is greater than the preset complexity, and the test cost is greater than the preset cost, determining that the test scheme meets the preset condition.
In one embodiment, the screening module 702 is specifically configured to screen the system equipment list and the design file according to the rules and regulations of the reactor and the security inspection content of the regulatory department, so as to obtain the item to be verified.
The above-mentioned each module in the advanced stack type first stack test item formulation apparatus may be implemented in whole or in part by software, hardware, and combinations thereof. The above modules may be embedded in hardware or may be independent of a processor in the computer device, or may be stored in software in a memory in the computer device, so that the processor may call and execute operations corresponding to the above modules.
In one embodiment, a computer device is provided comprising a memory and a processor, the memory having stored therein a computer program, the processor when executing the computer program performing the steps of:
acquiring a system equipment list and a design file of an advanced heap;
screening the system equipment list and the design file according to the supervision principle to obtain an item to be verified;
performing functional analysis on the function of the object to be verified to obtain an initial list to be verified;
and determining a target list to be verified according to the test scheme and the state of the advanced heap of each first item to be verified in the initial list to be verified.
In one embodiment, the processor when executing the computer program further performs the steps of:
according to the first heap test item of each existing heap type and/or the application of the advanced heap type, supplementing an initial list to be verified to obtain an intermediate list to be verified;
and determining a target list to be verified based on the test scheme and the state of the advanced heap of each second item to be verified in the intermediate list to be verified.
In one embodiment, the processor when executing the computer program further performs the steps of:
taking a second item to be verified, of which the test scheme meets preset conditions, as a first pile test item;
and determining a target list to be verified according to the first pile of test items.
In one embodiment, the processor when executing the computer program further performs the steps of:
if the test conditions required by the test scheme include that the state of the advanced stack is a critical state, determining that the test scheme meets the preset conditions.
In one embodiment, the processor when executing the computer program further performs the steps of:
if the planned test time corresponding to the test scheme is slower than the preset progress requirement time of the reactor engineering, the complexity of the bench or the complexity of the test is greater than the preset complexity, and the test cost is greater than the preset cost, determining that the test scheme meets the preset condition.
In one embodiment, the processor when executing the computer program further performs the steps of:
and screening the system equipment list and the design file according to the rule guide of the reactor and the safety inspection content of the supervision department to obtain the item to be verified.
In one embodiment, a computer readable storage medium is provided having a computer program stored thereon, which when executed by a processor, performs the steps of:
acquiring a system equipment list and a design file of an advanced heap;
screening the system equipment list and the design file according to the supervision principle to obtain an item to be verified;
performing functional analysis on the function of the object to be verified to obtain an initial list to be verified;
and determining a target list to be verified according to the test scheme and the state of the advanced heap of each first item to be verified in the initial list to be verified.
In one embodiment, the computer program when executed by the processor further performs the steps of:
according to the first heap test item of each existing heap type and/or the application of the advanced heap type, supplementing an initial list to be verified to obtain an intermediate list to be verified;
and determining a target list to be verified based on the test scheme and the state of the advanced heap of each second item to be verified in the intermediate list to be verified.
In one embodiment, the computer program when executed by the processor further performs the steps of:
taking a second item to be verified, of which the test scheme meets preset conditions, as a first pile test item;
and determining a target list to be verified according to the first pile of test items.
In one embodiment, the computer program when executed by the processor further performs the steps of:
if the test conditions required by the test scheme include that the state of the advanced stack is a critical state, determining that the test scheme meets the preset conditions.
In one embodiment, the computer program when executed by the processor further performs the steps of:
if the planned test time corresponding to the test scheme is slower than the preset progress requirement time of the reactor engineering, the complexity of the bench or the complexity of the test is greater than the preset complexity, and the test cost is greater than the preset cost, determining that the test scheme meets the preset condition.
In one embodiment, the computer program when executed by the processor further performs the steps of:
and screening the system equipment list and the design file according to the rule guide of the reactor and the safety inspection content of the supervision department to obtain the item to be verified.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that implementing all or part of the above-described methods in accordance with the embodiments may be accomplished by way of a computer program stored on a non-transitory computer readable storage medium, which when executed may comprise the steps of the embodiments of the methods described above. Any reference to memory, storage, database, or other medium used in embodiments provided herein may include at least one of non-volatile and volatile memory. The nonvolatile Memory may include Read-Only Memory (ROM), magnetic tape, floppy disk, flash Memory, optical Memory, or the like. Volatile memory can include random access memory (Random Access Memory, RAM) or external cache memory. By way of illustration, and not limitation, RAM can be in the form of a variety of forms, such as static random access memory (Static Random Access Memory, SRAM) or dynamic random access memory (Dynamic Random Access Memory, DRAM), and the like.
The technical features of the above embodiments may be arbitrarily combined, and all possible combinations of the technical features in the above embodiments are not described for brevity of description, however, as long as there is no contradiction between the combinations of the technical features, they should be considered as the scope of the description.
The foregoing examples illustrate only a few embodiments of the application, which are described in detail and are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the application. It should be noted that it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that several variations and modifications can be made without departing from the spirit of the application, which are all within the scope of the application. Accordingly, the scope of protection of the present application is to be determined by the appended claims.
Claims (10)
1. The method for formulating the first heap test project of the advanced heap type is characterized by comprising the following steps:
acquiring a system equipment list and a design file of an advanced heap;
screening the system equipment list and the design file according to a supervision principle to obtain an item to be verified;
performing functional analysis on the function of the object to be verified to obtain an initial list to be verified;
and determining a target list to be verified according to the test scheme of each first item to be verified in the initial list to be verified and the state of the advanced heap.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the determining the target to-be-verified list according to the test scheme of each first to-be-verified item in the initial to-be-verified list and the state of the advanced heap type includes:
supplementing the initial list to be verified according to the first heap test item of each existing heap type and/or the application of the advanced heap type to obtain an intermediate list to be verified;
and determining a target list to be verified based on the test scheme of each second item to be verified in the intermediate list to be verified and the state of the advanced heap.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the determining the target to-be-verified list based on the test scheme of each second to-be-verified item in the intermediate to-be-verified list and the state of the advanced heap type comprises:
taking a second item to be verified, of which the test scheme meets preset conditions, as a first pile test item;
and determining the target list to be verified according to the first pile of test items.
4. A method according to claim 3, characterized in that the method further comprises:
and if the test conditions required by the test scheme include that the state of the advanced stack type is a critical state, determining that the test scheme meets the preset conditions.
5. A method according to claim 3, characterized in that the method further comprises:
if the planned test time corresponding to the test scheme is slower than the preset progress requirement time of the reactor engineering, the complexity of the bench or the complexity of the test is greater than the preset complexity, and the test cost is greater than the preset cost, determining that the test scheme meets the preset condition.
6. The method according to any one of claims 1-5, wherein the screening the system device list and the design file according to the supervision principle to obtain the item to be verified includes:
and screening the system equipment list and the design file according to the rule guide of the reactor and the safety inspection content of the supervision department to obtain the item to be verified.
7. An advanced stack type first stack test item formulation apparatus, comprising:
the acquisition module is used for acquiring the advanced heap type system equipment list and the design file;
the screening module is used for screening the system equipment list and the design file according to a supervision principle to obtain an item to be verified;
the analysis module is used for carrying out functional analysis on the functions of the to-be-verified object items to obtain an initial to-be-verified list;
and the determining module is used for determining a target list to be verified according to the test scheme of each first item to be verified in the initial list to be verified and the state of the advanced heap.
8. A computer device comprising a memory and a processor, the memory storing a computer program, characterized in that the processor implements the steps of the method of any of claims 1 to 6 when the computer program is executed.
9. A computer readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, characterized in that the computer program, when being executed by a processor, implements the steps of the method of any of claims 1 to 6.
10. A computer program product comprising a computer program, characterized in that the computer program, when being executed by a processor, implements the steps of the method of any of claims 1 to 6.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202311254097.4A CN117236891A (en) | 2023-09-26 | 2023-09-26 | Method and device for formulating first pile test project of advanced pile and computer equipment |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202311254097.4A CN117236891A (en) | 2023-09-26 | 2023-09-26 | Method and device for formulating first pile test project of advanced pile and computer equipment |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN117236891A true CN117236891A (en) | 2023-12-15 |
Family
ID=89098123
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202311254097.4A Pending CN117236891A (en) | 2023-09-26 | 2023-09-26 | Method and device for formulating first pile test project of advanced pile and computer equipment |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN117236891A (en) |
-
2023
- 2023-09-26 CN CN202311254097.4A patent/CN117236891A/en active Pending
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US11562114B2 (en) | Apparatus and method for safety analysis evaluation with data-driven workflow | |
| CN106201856A (en) | A kind of multi version performance test methods and device | |
| CN111581191B (en) | Nuclear safety data verification method, device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| Kim et al. | A new approach to quantify safety benefits of disaster robots | |
| Martin et al. | Progress in international best estimate plus uncertainty analysis methodologies | |
| CN108877969B (en) | Nuclear power theoretical model establishing and verifying method, system and terminal equipment | |
| Zhou et al. | A method for software vulnerability detection based on improved control flow graph | |
| Xi et al. | An automation test strategy based on real platform for digital control system software in nuclear power plant | |
| Németh et al. | Verification of a primary-to-secondary leaking safety procedure in a nuclear power plant using coloured Petri nets | |
| JP7406383B2 (en) | Nuclear plant risk assessment system, risk assessment method, and risk assessment program | |
| CN117236891A (en) | Method and device for formulating first pile test project of advanced pile and computer equipment | |
| Hecht | Use of SysML to generate failure modes and effects analyses for microgrid control systems | |
| CN108983714B (en) | Method and device for monitoring state of unit of million-kilowatt nuclear power station and terminal equipment | |
| CN113536580A (en) | Method and system for determining nuclear reactor test loop power and neutron flux density | |
| Zhu et al. | Development of vacuum vessel design and analysis module for CFETR integration design platform | |
| Munera | Modeling of individual risk attitudes in decision making under uncertainty: an application to nuclear power | |
| Mazzini et al. | Analyses of Feedwater Trip With SBO Sequence of VVER1000 Reactor | |
| Ma et al. | Supervisory control in partially observable petri nets with sensor reduction | |
| Guo | Model-Based Cyber-Security Framework for Nuclear Power Plant | |
| CN114334194B (en) | High-temperature gas cooled reactor helium gas leakage early warning method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| US20240136078A1 (en) | Apparatus and Method for Diganosis and Prediction of Severe Accidents in Nuclear Power Plant using Artificial Intelligence and Storage Medium Storing Instructions to Performing Method for Digonosis and Prediction of Severe Accidents in Nuclear Power Plant | |
| Srinivas et al. | A level-1 PSA based systemic approach to optimal technical specifications of safety systems in nuclear power plants | |
| Wang et al. | Fault diagnosis of backward conflict-free Petri nets by generalized markings | |
| CN116680905A (en) | Method and system for analyzing uncertainty and sensitivity of serious accident of reactor | |
| He et al. | Research on the Verification and Validation Method of Safety Analysis Software in Nuclear Power Plants |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |