CN117119600A - CCE allocation method, device, network equipment and storage medium - Google Patents

CCE allocation method, device, network equipment and storage medium Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN117119600A
CN117119600A CN202311090045.8A CN202311090045A CN117119600A CN 117119600 A CN117119600 A CN 117119600A CN 202311090045 A CN202311090045 A CN 202311090045A CN 117119600 A CN117119600 A CN 117119600A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
uplink
downlink
cce
cces
user
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202311090045.8A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
陈少科
张伟
彭飞
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Ruijie Networks Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Ruijie Networks Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Ruijie Networks Co Ltd filed Critical Ruijie Networks Co Ltd
Priority to CN202311090045.8A priority Critical patent/CN117119600A/en
Publication of CN117119600A publication Critical patent/CN117119600A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00Local resource management
    • H04W72/12Wireless traffic scheduling
    • H04W72/121Wireless traffic scheduling for groups of terminals or users
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00Local resource management
    • H04W72/50Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources
    • H04W72/54Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on quality criteria
    • H04W72/542Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on quality criteria using measured or perceived quality
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04WWIRELESS COMMUNICATION NETWORKS
    • H04W72/00Local resource management
    • H04W72/50Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources
    • H04W72/56Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on priority criteria
    • H04W72/563Allocation or scheduling criteria for wireless resources based on priority criteria of the wireless resources

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
  • Signal Processing (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

The embodiment of the application provides a CCE allocation method, a device, network equipment and a storage medium, wherein the method comprises the following steps: determining the expected CCE number of each uplink user and the expected CCE number of each downlink user in a target TTI; determining a target CCE number based on a sum of an uplink expected total number and a downlink expected total number; the uplink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all uplink users, and the downlink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all downlink users; and performing CCE allocation based on a comparison result between the number of target CCEs and the number of available CCEs of the current TTI. In the embodiment, the CCE is allocated more reasonably by considering uplink and downlink scheduling users in the CCE allocation process.

Description

CCE allocation method, device, network equipment and storage medium
Technical Field
The embodiment of the application relates to the technical field of communication, in particular to a CCE allocation method, a CCE allocation device, network equipment and a storage medium.
Background
In the fifth generation mobile communication technology (english: 5th Generation Mobile Communication Technology, abbreviated as 5G) system, a control channel element (english: control Channel Element, abbreviated as CCE) resource is used on a physical layer downlink control channel (english: physical Downlink Control Channel, abbreviated as PDCCH), control information for scheduling downlink grants of a physical layer downlink shared channel (english: physical Uplink Shared Channel, abbreviated as PDSCH) is transmitted, and control information for scheduling uplink grants of a physical layer uplink shared channel (english: physical Uplink Shared Channel, abbreviated as PUSCH) is transmitted.
In the multi-user scheduling scenario, CCE resources need to be allocated in order to reduce the cases where CCE resources are exclusively used by grant information in a certain direction.
In the related art, CCEs are allocated for uplink users and downlink according to a preset ratio, that is, a fixed number of CCEs are used for uplink and downlink.
However, the above approach does not refer to specific requirements for upstream and downstream. If the number of users in a certain direction is large, more CCEs are needed, but the CCE allocation failure can be caused due to fixed proportion; in the direction of less users, many idle CCEs can be used, so that CCE resource waste is caused. Therefore, the above approach cannot achieve CCE rational allocation.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the application provides a CCE allocation method, a CCE allocation device, network equipment and a storage medium, which are used for reasonably performing CCE allocation.
In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a first CCE allocation method, where the method includes:
determining the expected CCE number of each uplink user and the expected CCE number of each downlink user in a target transmission time interval (English: transmission Time Interval, abbreviated as TTI);
determining a target CCE number based on a sum of an uplink expected total number and a downlink expected total number; wherein, the uplink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all uplink users, and the downlink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all downlink users;
And performing CCE allocation based on a comparison result between the target CCE number and the number of available CCEs of the current TTI.
In the scheme, all uplink users and all downlink users needing to be scheduled are determined in the target TTI; for users needing to be scheduled, determining the corresponding expected CCE number (namely the required CCE number) of the users, namely considering the requirement situation of all the users needing to be scheduled; synthesizing all uplink users to obtain the expected total number (the total number of CCEs required by the uplink users) of the uplink in the TTI; synthesizing all downlink users to obtain the downlink expected total number (CCE total number required by the downlink users) in the TTI; by comparing the total number of the target CCEs of the uplink and downlink (the total number of CCEs required by the uplink and downlink users) with the number of the available CCEs of the current TTI, whether the available CCEs meet the requirements of the uplink and downlink users can be determined, and then the available CCEs can be reasonably allocated based on the comparison result. And the CCE is more reasonably allocated because the allocation process considers the users of uplink and downlink scheduling.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE allocation is performed based on a comparison result between the target CCE number and the number of available CCEs of the current TTI, including:
and if the target CCE number is smaller than or equal to the available CCE number, allocating the CCE with the corresponding expected CCE number for each uplink user, and allocating the CCE with the corresponding expected CCE number for each downlink user.
According to the scheme, the CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users can be met by the large probability of the available CCEs according to the situation that the target CCE number is smaller than or equal to the number of the available CCEs, the corresponding expected CCEs can be directly allocated to each uplink user, and the corresponding expected CCEs can be allocated to each downlink user, so that the needed CCEs can be allocated to the uplink and downlink users, and the requirements of the uplink and downlink users on the CCEs can be met.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE allocation is performed based on a comparison result between the target CCE number and the number of available CCEs of the current TTI, including:
if the number of the target CCEs is larger than the number of the available CCEs, determining a weight value corresponding to each uplink user and determining a weight value corresponding to each downlink user;
based on the weight values corresponding to all uplink users, carrying out weighted calculation on the expected CCE numbers of all uplink users to obtain the uplink weighted expected total number; based on the weight values corresponding to all the downlink users, carrying out weighted calculation on the expected CCE numbers of all the downlink users to obtain the downlink weighted expected total number;
determining a first uplink number and a first downlink number based on the uplink weighted expected total number, the downlink weighted expected total number, and the number of available CCEs;
And performing CCE allocation based on the first uplink number or the first downlink number.
According to the scheme, if the target CCE number is larger than the available CCE number, the available CCE is indicated to be incapable of meeting CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users; weight information of uplink and downlink scheduling needs to be considered, and CCEs are selectively allocated to uplink and downlink users; after the weight value corresponding to each uplink user and the weight value corresponding to each downlink user are determined, carrying out weight calculation on the expected CCE quantity of all uplink users based on the weight values corresponding to all uplink users to obtain an uplink weight expected total number; based on the weight values corresponding to all the downlink users, carrying out weighted calculation on the expected CCE numbers of all the downlink users to obtain the downlink weighted expected total number; determining a first uplink quantity which has a limiting effect on uplink allocation and a first downlink quantity which has a limiting effect on downlink allocation by combining the quantity of available CCEs; based on the first uplink number or the first downlink number, allocation restriction is performed on a direction, so that CCEs are allocated to uplink and downlink users more selectively.
In some optional embodiments, the weight value corresponding to each uplink user is determined by:
Based on a first preset corresponding relation, determining a weight value corresponding to the service type of any uplink user as the weight value corresponding to the uplink user; the first preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the uplink service type and the weight value, and the higher the priority of the uplink service type is, the larger the corresponding weight value is;
the weight value corresponding to each downlink user is determined by the following method:
based on a second preset corresponding relation, determining a weight value corresponding to the service type of any downlink user as the weight value corresponding to the downlink user; the second preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the downlink service type and the weight value, and the higher the priority of the downlink service type is, the larger the corresponding weight value is.
According to the scheme, the first preset corresponding relation is set, the first preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the uplink service type and the weight value, and the higher the priority of the uplink service type is, the larger the corresponding weight value is; determining a weight value corresponding to the service type of the uplink user as the weight value corresponding to the uplink user, so that the weight value accurately reflects the service importance degree of the corresponding user; a second preset corresponding relation is further arranged, the second preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the downlink service type and the weight value, and the higher the priority of the downlink service type is, the larger the corresponding weight value is; determining a weight value corresponding to the service type of the downlink user as the weight value corresponding to the downlink user, so that the weight value accurately reflects the service importance degree of the corresponding user; therefore, when the available CCE can not meet the CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users, CCE is selectively allocated to the uplink and downlink users, and transmission of important business can be ensured when CCE resources are tense.
In some alternative embodiments, determining the first uplink number and the first downlink number based on the uplink weighted expected total number, the downlink weighted expected total number, and the number of available CCEs includes:
determining the sum of the uplink weighted expected total number and the downlink weighted expected total number as a target weighted expected total number;
determining a ratio between the uplink weighted expected total number and the target weighted expected total number as a first uplink proportion;
performing rounding calculation on the product between the number of the available CCEs and the first uplink proportion to obtain the first uplink number;
and determining the difference between the number of available CCEs and the first uplink number as the first downlink number.
According to the scheme, if the target CCE number is larger than the available CCE number, the available CCE is indicated to be incapable of meeting CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users; weight information of uplink and downlink scheduling needs to be considered, and CCEs are selectively allocated to uplink and downlink users; after determining the uplink weighted expected total number and the downlink weighted expected total number; determining a target weighted expected total number under the influence of the weight based on the sum of the uplink weighted expected total number and the downlink weighted expected total number; the ratio (first uplink proportion) between the uplink weighted expected total number and the target weighted expected total number represents the ratio of the uplink user demand to CCE under the influence of the weight; performing rounding calculation on the product between the number of available CCEs and the first uplink proportion to obtain a first uplink number which plays a role in limiting uplink allocation; the first uplink number is subtracted from the number of available CCEs to obtain a first downlink number defining the downlink allocation.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE allocation is performed based on the first uplink number or the first downlink number, including:
determining a first difference between the uplink weighted expected total and the uplink expected total and a second difference between the downlink weighted expected total and the downlink expected total;
if the first difference value is smaller than or equal to the second difference value, distributing CCE for the first target downlink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the downlink user from high to low; the number of CCEs allocated to the first target downlink user is smaller than or equal to the first downlink number, and the first target downlink user is a part or all of downlink users;
distributing CCE for the first target uplink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the uplink user from high to low; the first target uplink user is a part or all of the uplink users.
In the above scheme, the influence of the uplink weight is reflected due to the first difference between the uplink weighted expected total number and the uplink expected total number; a second difference between the downlink weighted expected total and the downlink expected total reflecting the impact of the weight in the downlink direction; if the first difference value is smaller than or equal to the second difference value, indicating that the influence of the weight in the downlink direction is larger, performing CCE allocation restriction on the downlink direction based on the first downlink quantity, namely, the quantity of CCEs allocated for the downlink user is smaller than or equal to the first downlink quantity; because the number of target CCEs is larger than the number of available CCEs, the available CCEs cannot meet the CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users, and then the downlink users without CCE resources may exist in the downlink direction; the downlink users are ordered from high to low according to the priority of the service types, CCEs are allocated to the downlink users according to the order, namely, the CCEs are allocated to the downlink users with high service type priority first, if the CCEs are not allocated to the downlink users, but the quantity of the CCEs allocated to the downlink users reaches the first quantity, the CCEs are not allocated to the downlink users with low service type priority; the uplink users are ordered from high to low according to the priority of the service types, CCEs are allocated to the uplink users in sequence, namely, CCEs are allocated to the uplink users with high service type priority, if CCEs are not allocated to the uplink users, but CCE resources are not allocated to the uplink users with low service type priority, the influence of weights is balanced, and normal transmission of the service with higher uplink and downlink priorities is further ensured.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE allocation is performed based on the first uplink number or the first downlink number, including:
determining a first difference between the uplink weighted expected total and the uplink expected total and a second difference between the downlink weighted expected total and the downlink expected total;
if the first difference value is larger than the second difference value, distributing CCE for a second target uplink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the uplink user from high to low; the number of CCEs allocated to the second target uplink user is smaller than or equal to the first uplink number, and the second target uplink user is a part or all of uplink users;
distributing CCE for the second target downlink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the downlink users from high to low; wherein the second target downlink user is a part or all of the downlink users.
In the above scheme, the influence of the uplink weight is reflected due to the first difference between the uplink weighted expected total number and the uplink expected total number; a second difference between the downlink weighted expected total and the downlink expected total reflecting the impact of the weight in the downlink direction; if the first difference is larger than the second difference, indicating that the influence of the uplink weight is larger, performing CCE allocation restriction on the uplink direction based on the first uplink data, namely, the number of CCEs allocated for the uplink user is smaller than or equal to the first uplink data; because the number of target CCEs is larger than the number of available CCEs, the available CCEs cannot meet the CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users, and then uplink users without CCE resources may exist in the uplink direction; the method comprises the steps that uplink users are ordered according to the priority of service types from high to low, CCEs are allocated to the uplink users according to the order, namely, CCEs are allocated to the uplink users with high service type priority first, if the CCEs are not allocated to the uplink users, but the quantity of the CCEs allocated to the uplink users reaches the first uplink quantity, CCEs are not allocated to the uplink users with low service type priority; the downlink users are ordered from high to low according to the priority of the service types, CCEs are allocated to the downlink users in sequence, namely, the downlink users with high service type priority are allocated with CCEs first, if the downlink users are not allocated with CCEs, but no CCE resource exists, the CCEs are not allocated to the downlink users with low service type priority, so that the weight influence is balanced, and the normal transmission of the service with higher uplink and downlink priorities is further ensured.
In some alternative embodiments, the number of available CCEs for the current TTI is determined by:
and determining the difference between the total number of CCEs and the number of common scheduling CCEs of the current TTI as the number of the available CCEs.
According to the scheme, the difference between the total number of CCEs and the number of common scheduling CCEs of the current TTI is determined as the number of available CCEs, so that CCE resources required by common scheduling information are not occupied by uplink and downlink users, meanwhile, available CCEs of the uplink and downlink users are accurately determined, and only the CCEs participate in subsequent uplink and downlink allocation, so that the ordered allocation of the CCEs is ensured.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE allocation is performed based on a comparison result between the target CCE number and the number of available CCEs of the current TTI, including:
if the target CCE number is greater than the available CCE number, determining the ratio between the uplink expected total number and the target CCE number as a second uplink proportion;
performing rounding calculation on the product between the number of the available CCEs and the second uplink proportion to obtain a second uplink number;
determining the difference between the number of available CCEs and the second uplink number as a second downlink number;
And performing CCE allocation based on the second uplink quantity and the second downlink quantity.
According to the scheme, if the target CCE number is larger than the available CCE number, the available CCE is indicated to be incapable of meeting CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users; based on the number of CCEs desired in the uplink and downlink, the CCEs are directly allocated according to the desired CCE proportion, and when the CCEs are insufficient, the uplink CCEs and the downlink CCEs are allocated in an equalizing manner.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE allocation is performed based on the second uplink number and the second downlink number, including:
distributing CCEs of the second uplink quantity to a third target uplink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the uplink users from high to low; wherein, the third target uplink user is a part of uplink users;
distributing CCEs of the second downlink quantity to a third target downlink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the downlink users from high to low; the third target downlink user is a part of downlink users.
In the above scheme, since the target CCE number is greater than the available CCE number and the available CCE is allocated according to the expected CCE ratio, the available CCE cannot meet the CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users, and then users without CCE resources exist in the uplink and downlink directions; the uplink users are ordered from high to low according to the priority of the service types, CCEs are allocated to the uplink users according to the order, namely, CCEs are allocated to the uplink users with high service type priority first, if CCEs are not allocated to the uplink users, but the quantity of the CCEs allocated to the uplink users reaches the second uplink quantity, CCEs are not allocated to the uplink users with low service type priority; the downlink users are ordered from high to low according to the priority of the service types, CCEs are allocated to the downlink users according to the order, namely, the CCEs are allocated to the downlink users with high service type priority, if the CCEs are not allocated to the downlink users, but the quantity of the CCEs allocated to the downlink users reaches the second downlink quantity, the CCEs are not allocated to the downlink users with low service type priority, and the normal transmission of the service with higher uplink and downlink priorities is further ensured.
In some alternative embodiments, determining the desired number of CCEs for each uplink user and the desired number of CCEs for each downlink user at the target TTI includes:
determining the expected CCE quantity of each uplink user based on the channel quality indication of each uplink user in the target TTI; and determining the expected CCE number of each downlink user based on the channel quality indication of each downlink user in the target TTI; or alternatively
Determining the expected CCE quantity of each uplink user based on the channel quality indication of each uplink user in the target TTI and the weight value of each uplink user; and determining the expected CCE number of each downlink user based on the channel quality indication of each downlink user in the target TTI and the weight value of each downlink user.
In some alternative embodiments, determining the desired number of CCEs for each uplink user based on the channel quality indication for each uplink user at the target TTI includes:
based on a third preset corresponding relation, determining the number of CCEs corresponding to the channel quality indication of any uplink user as the expected number of the CCEs of the uplink user;
determining the expected number of CCEs for each downlink user based on the channel quality indication for each downlink user at the target TTI, comprising:
based on the third preset corresponding relation, determining the number of CCEs corresponding to the channel quality indication of any downlink user as the expected number of CCEs of the downlink user;
The third preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the channel quality indication and the CCE quantity, and the larger the channel quality indication is, the smaller the corresponding CCE quantity is.
According to the scheme, the third preset corresponding relation is set, the third preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the channel quality indication and the CCE quantity, and the larger the channel quality indication is, the smaller the corresponding CCE quantity is; determining the number of CCEs corresponding to the channel quality indication of the uplink/downlink user as the expected number of CCEs of the uplink/downlink user; if the channel quality indication is larger, the channel quality is better, the number of the corresponding expected CCEs is smaller, and the waste of CCE resources is reduced; if the channel quality indication is smaller, the channel quality is poorer, the number of the corresponding expected CCEs is larger, and effective transmission is ensured; so that the desired number of CCEs accurately reflects the CCE requirements of the corresponding user.
In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a first CCE allocation apparatus, including:
a user determining module, configured to determine an expected CCE number of each uplink user and an expected CCE number of each downlink user in a target TTI;
the CCE determining module is used for determining the target CCE quantity based on the sum of the uplink expected total number and the downlink expected total number; wherein, the uplink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all uplink users, and the downlink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all downlink users;
And the CCE allocation module is used for performing CCE allocation based on the comparison result between the target CCE number and the number of available CCEs of the current TTI.
In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a network device, including at least one processor and at least one memory, where the memory stores a computer program, and when the program is executed by the processor, causes the processor to perform the CCE allocation method according to any one of the first aspects.
In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a computer readable storage medium storing a computer program executable by a processor, which when run on the processor, causes the processor to perform the CCE allocation method of any of the first aspects described above.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application, the drawings that are needed in the description of the embodiments will be briefly described below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present application, and other drawings may be obtained according to these drawings without inventive effort for a person skilled in the art.
Fig. 1 is a flow chart of a first CCE allocation method provided in an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 2 is a flow chart of a second CCE allocation method provided in an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 3 is a flow chart of a third CCE allocation method provided in an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 4 is a flowchart of a fourth CCE allocation method provided in an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 5 is a flowchart of a fifth CCE allocation method provided in an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 6 is a flowchart of a sixth CCE allocation method provided in an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 7 is a schematic structural diagram of a CCE allocation apparatus provided in an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 8 is a schematic structural diagram of a network device according to an embodiment of the present application.
Detailed Description
In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present application more apparent, the present application will be described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings, and it is apparent that the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present application, not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of the application without making any inventive effort, are intended to be within the scope of the application.
The terms "first," "second," and the like, are used for descriptive purposes only and are not to be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly indicating the number of technical features indicated. Thus, a feature defining "a first" or "a second" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more such feature. In the description of the present application, unless otherwise indicated, the meaning of "a plurality" is two or more.
In the description of the present application, it should be noted that, unless explicitly stated and limited otherwise, the term "connected" should be interpreted broadly, and for example, it may be directly connected, or it may be indirectly connected through an intermediate medium, or it may be communication between two devices. The specific meaning of the above terms in the present application can be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art according to the specific circumstances.
And using CCE resources on the PDCCH in the 5G system, transmitting control information for scheduling downlink grant of the PDSCH, and transmitting control information for scheduling uplink grant of the PUSCH.
In the multi-user scheduling scenario, CCE resources need to be allocated in order to reduce the cases where CCE resources are exclusively used by grant information in a certain direction.
In the related art, CCEs are allocated for uplink users and downlink according to a preset ratio, that is, a fixed number of CCEs are used for uplink and downlink.
However, the above approach does not refer to specific requirements for upstream and downstream. If the number of users in a certain direction is large, more CCEs are needed, but the CCE allocation failure can be caused due to fixed proportion; in the direction of less users, many idle CCEs can be used, so that CCE resource waste is caused. Therefore, the above approach cannot achieve CCE rational allocation.
In some embodiments, the ratio of the downlink CCEs is adjusted by calculating the uplink CCE usage rate within a period of time, and when the uplink CCE usage rate is greater than the uplink high threshold, the ratio of the downlink CCEs is adjusted down, so as to dynamically adjust the ratio of the uplink CCEs to the downlink CCEs.
However, the demands of uplink and downlink on CCEs are dynamically changed, and even according to the historical CCE utilization, the current CCE demand may not be satisfied, for example, the base station side wants to schedule a large number of uplink users, but the historical uplink grant CCE utilization is low, the ratio of CCEs of the uplink grant is small, and the scheduling of the uplink users may not be satisfied. Therefore, although this method realizes dynamic CCE allocation, the allocation method is not reasonable.
In view of this, an embodiment of the present application proposes a CCE allocation method, apparatus, network device, and storage medium, where the method includes: determining the expected CCE number of each uplink user and the expected CCE number of each downlink user in a target TTI; determining the expected CCE quantity of each uplink user based on the channel quality indication of each uplink user; determining the expected CCE quantity of each downlink user based on the channel quality indication of each downlink user; determining a target CCE number based on a sum of an uplink expected total number and a downlink expected total number; wherein, the uplink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all uplink users, and the downlink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all downlink users; and performing CCE allocation based on a comparison result between the target CCE number and the number of available CCEs of the current TTI.
In the scheme, all uplink users and all downlink users needing to be scheduled are determined in the target TTI; for users needing to be scheduled, determining the corresponding expected CCE number (namely the required CCE number) of the users, namely considering the requirement situation of all the users needing to be scheduled; synthesizing all uplink users to obtain the expected total number (the total number of CCEs required by the uplink users) of the uplink in the TTI; synthesizing all downlink users to obtain the downlink expected total number (CCE total number required by the downlink users) in the TTI; by comparing the total number of the target CCEs of the uplink and downlink (the total number of CCEs required by the uplink and downlink users) with the number of the available CCEs of the current TTI, whether the available CCEs meet the requirements of the uplink and downlink users can be determined, and then the available CCEs can be reasonably allocated based on the comparison result. And the CCE is more reasonably allocated because the allocation process considers the users of uplink and downlink scheduling.
The following describes the technical scheme of the present application and how the technical scheme of the present application solves the above technical problems with reference to the drawings and specific embodiments. The following embodiments may be combined with each other, and the same or similar concepts or processes may not be described in detail in some embodiments.
Fig. 1 is a flow chart of a first CCE allocation method provided in an embodiment of the present application, as shown in fig. 1, including the following steps:
step S101: and determining the expected CCE number of each uplink user and the expected CCE number of each downlink user in the target TTI.
In this embodiment, the target TTI may be each TTI, or any TTI in each period (a period may include multiple TTIs), or the next TTI when determining CCE allocation imbalance, etc., and may be specifically set according to practical applications.
And determining all uplink users and all downlink users needing to be scheduled in the target TTI.
For example, through a scheduling module, a Round Robin (r) algorithm, an orthogonal fair scheduling (Proportional Fail, PF) algorithm, or other common scheduling algorithm of a base station medium access control (Medium Access Control, MAC) layer is used to schedule multiple users, so as to achieve fairness of user scheduling and quality of service (QoS, quality of Service) of the users, and output uplink users and downlink users to be scheduled in a target TTI.
In this embodiment, for each uplink user that needs to be scheduled, the corresponding expected CCE number (i.e., the number of CCEs required by the uplink user) is determined based on the channel quality indication of the uplink user; for each downlink user needing to be scheduled, determining a corresponding expected CCE number (namely the required CCE number) based on the channel quality indication of the downlink user; thereby taking into account the needs of all users that need to be scheduled.
Step S102: the target CCE number is determined based on a sum of the uplink expected total number and the downlink expected total number.
Wherein the uplink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all uplink users, and the downlink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all downlink users.
In this embodiment, all uplink users are integrated to obtain the expected total number of uplink (the total number of CCEs required by the uplink users) in the TTI; and integrating all downlink users to obtain the expected total number (the total number of CCEs required by the downlink users) of the downlink in the TTI.
Illustratively, the expected total number of uplinksWherein, CCE_NUM i The expected CCE number of the ith uplink user is equal to or more than 1 and equal to or less than n, and n is the total number of the uplink users;
total number of downlink expectationsWherein, CCE_NUM j The expected CCE quantity of the jth downlink user is more than or equal to 1 and less than or equal to m, and m is the total number of the downlink users;
target CCE number all_exp_cce_num=ul_all_exp_cce_num+dl_all_exp_cce_num.
Step S103: and performing CCE allocation based on a comparison result between the target CCE number and the number of available CCEs of the current TTI.
In the scheme, all uplink users and all downlink users needing to be scheduled are determined in the target TTI; for users needing to be scheduled, determining the corresponding expected CCE number (namely the required CCE number) of the users, namely considering the requirement situation of all the users needing to be scheduled; synthesizing all uplink users to obtain the expected total number (the total number of CCEs required by the uplink users) of the uplink in the TTI; synthesizing all downlink users to obtain the downlink expected total number (CCE total number required by the downlink users) in the TTI; by comparing the total number of the target CCEs of the uplink and downlink (the total number of CCEs required by the uplink and downlink users) with the number of the available CCEs of the current TTI, whether the available CCEs meet the requirements of the uplink and downlink users can be determined, and then the available CCEs can be reasonably allocated based on the comparison result. And the CCE is more reasonably allocated because the allocation process considers the users of uplink and downlink scheduling.
In some alternative embodiments, the number of available CCEs for the current TTI may be determined by, but not limited to, the following:
and determining the difference between the total number of CCEs and the number of common scheduling CCEs of the current TTI as the number of the available CCEs.
In practice, different numbers of PDCCHs under orthogonal frequency division multiplexing (English: orthogonal Frequency Division Multiplexing, abbreviated OFDM) symbols correspond to different CCE total numbers. At a bandwidth of 100MHZ, the total number of CCEs can be found as shown in table 1:
TABLE 1
PDCCH symbol number Total number of CCEs
1 45
2 90
3 135
Table 1 is merely an example, and the present embodiment does not specifically limit the total number of CCEs.
In the implementation, the common scheduling information also needs CCE resources, CCE is allocated to the common scheduling information, and the rest of the common scheduling information can be allocated to uplink and downlink users;
based on this, the present embodiment determines the difference between the total number of CCEs and the number of common scheduling CCEs of the current TTI as the number of available CCEs, which are available CCEs for uplink and downlink users, and only those CCEs participate in subsequent uplink and downlink allocation.
The embodiment does not specifically limit the above-mentioned common scheduling messages, such as system information block1 (english: system Information Block, abbreviated SIB 1), other system messages (english: other System Information, abbreviated Other SI), paging (english: paging) messages, random access reply (english: random Access Response, abbreviated RAR) messages, contention resolution (english: contention Resolution, abbreviated CR) messages, common control channel (english: common Control Channel, abbreviated CCCH), and the like.
According to the scheme, the difference between the total number of CCEs and the number of common scheduling CCEs of the current TTI is determined as the number of available CCEs, so that CCE resources required by common scheduling information are not occupied by uplink and downlink users, meanwhile, available CCEs of the uplink and downlink users are accurately determined, and only the CCEs participate in subsequent uplink and downlink allocation, so that the ordered allocation of the CCEs is ensured.
In some alternative embodiments, the step S102 may be implemented by, but not limited to, the following ways:
determining the expected CCE quantity of each uplink user based on the channel quality indication of each uplink user in the target TTI; and determining the expected CCE number of each downlink user based on the channel quality indication of each downlink user in the target TTI; or alternatively
Determining the expected CCE quantity of each uplink user based on the channel quality indication of each uplink user in the target TTI and the weight value of each uplink user; and determining the expected CCE number of each downlink user based on the channel quality indication of each downlink user in the target TTI and the weight value of each downlink user.
In this embodiment, the expected CCE number of each uplink/downlink user may be determined directly based on the channel quality indication; the expected number of CCEs for each uplink/downlink user may also be determined in combination with the weight values.
In some alternative embodiments, determining the desired number of CCEs for each uplink user based on the channel quality indication for each uplink user at the target TTI may be accomplished by, but is not limited to, the following:
based on a third preset corresponding relation, determining the number of CCEs corresponding to channel quality indication (English: channel Quality Indicator, abbreviated as CQI) of any uplink user as the expected number of CCEs of the uplink user;
based on the channel quality indication for each downlink user at the target TTI, determining the desired number of CCEs for each downlink user may be accomplished by, but is not limited to, the following:
based on the third preset corresponding relation, determining the number of CCEs corresponding to the channel quality indication of any downlink user as the expected number of CCEs of the downlink user;
the third preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the channel quality indication and the CCE quantity, and the larger the channel quality indication is, the smaller the corresponding CCE quantity is.
In the implementation, if the channel quality indication is larger, the channel quality is better, and in order to reduce the waste of CCE resources, the transmission requirement can be met by using fewer CCEs; if the channel quality indication is smaller, the channel quality is worse, more CCEs need to be allocated to bear the control information of single authorization so as to ensure effective transmission;
Based on this, a third preset corresponding relation is provided in this embodiment, where the third preset corresponding relation includes a correspondence between a channel quality indication and the number of CCEs, and the larger the channel quality indication is, the smaller the number of CCEs is;
and determining the quantity of CCEs corresponding to the channel quality indication of the uplink/downlink user as the expected quantity of the CCEs of the uplink/downlink user, so that the expected quantity of the CCEs accurately reflects the CCE requirements of the corresponding user.
The third preset correspondence may be shown in table 2:
TABLE 2
CQI Number of CCE
1 Z1
2 Z2
3 Z3
4 Z4
…… ……
12 Z12
13 Z13
14 Z14
15 Z15
Wherein, Z1-Z15 are gradually decreased in whole, i.e. Z1 is more than Z2 and more than … … is more than Z14 and more than Z15; alternatively, there may be some CCEs that are adjacent to each other in the same number, for example, z1=z2 > z3=z4 … … > z14=z15, and the present embodiment is not limited thereto.
The above table 2 is merely illustrative, and the third preset correspondence relationship is not specifically limited in this embodiment.
According to the scheme, the third preset corresponding relation is set, the third preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the channel quality indication and the CCE quantity, and the larger the channel quality indication is, the smaller the corresponding CCE quantity is; determining the number of CCEs corresponding to the channel quality indication of the uplink/downlink user as the expected number of CCEs of the uplink/downlink user; if the channel quality indication is larger, the channel quality is better, the number of the corresponding expected CCEs is smaller, and the waste of CCE resources is reduced; if the channel quality indication is smaller, the channel quality is poorer, the number of the corresponding expected CCEs is larger, and effective transmission is ensured; so that the desired number of CCEs accurately reflects the CCE requirements of the corresponding user.
Fig. 2 is a flow chart of a second CCE allocation method provided in an embodiment of the present application, where, as shown in fig. 2, the method includes the following steps:
step S201: and determining the expected CCE number of each uplink user and the expected CCE number of each downlink user in the target TTI.
Step S202: the target CCE number is determined based on a sum of the uplink expected total number and the downlink expected total number.
Wherein the uplink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all uplink users, and the downlink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all downlink users.
The specific implementation manner of the steps S201 to S202 may refer to the above embodiment, and will not be described herein.
Step S203: and if the target CCE number is smaller than or equal to the available CCE number, allocating the CCE with the corresponding expected CCE number for each uplink user, and allocating the CCE with the corresponding expected CCE number for each downlink user.
In the implementation, if the number of the target CCEs is smaller than or equal to the number of the available CCEs, the large probability of the available CCEs is indicated to be capable of meeting the CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users;
based on this, in this embodiment, CCEs of a desired number of CCEs are allocated to each uplink user, and CCEs of a desired number of CCEs are allocated to each downlink user.
The embodiment does not specifically limit the specific allocation manner, and is exemplary:
firstly, distributing CCEs with the corresponding expected CCE number to each uplink user, and distributing CCEs with the corresponding expected CCE number to the downlink user after the uplink user CCE is distributed;
or firstly, distributing the CCEs with the corresponding expected CCE number for each downlink user, and then distributing the CCEs with the corresponding expected CCE number for the uplink user after the downlink user CCE distribution is completed.
According to the scheme, the CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users can be met by the large probability of the available CCEs according to the situation that the target CCE number is smaller than or equal to the number of the available CCEs, the corresponding expected CCEs can be directly allocated to each uplink user, and the corresponding expected CCEs can be allocated to each downlink user, so that the needed CCEs can be allocated to the uplink and downlink users, and the requirements of the uplink and downlink users on the CCEs can be met.
Fig. 3 is a flow chart of a third CCE allocation method provided in an embodiment of the present application, where, as shown in fig. 3, the method includes the following steps:
step S301: and determining the expected CCE number of each uplink user and the expected CCE number of each downlink user in the target TTI.
Step S302: the target CCE number is determined based on a sum of the uplink expected total number and the downlink expected total number.
Wherein the uplink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all uplink users, and the downlink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all downlink users.
The specific implementation manner of the steps S301 to S302 may refer to the above embodiment, and will not be described herein.
Step S303: and if the target CCE number is greater than the available CCE number, determining a weight value corresponding to each uplink user and determining a weight value corresponding to each downlink user.
In the implementation, if the number of the target CCEs is greater than the number of the available CCEs, the available CCEs cannot meet the CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users; weight information of uplink and downlink scheduling needs to be considered, and CCEs are selectively allocated to uplink and downlink users;
based on this, the present embodiment needs to determine the weight value corresponding to each uplink user and the weight value corresponding to each downlink user for performing the subsequent weighting calculation.
Step S304: based on the weight values corresponding to all uplink users, carrying out weighted calculation on the expected CCE numbers of all uplink users to obtain the uplink weighted expected total number; and carrying out weighted calculation on the expected CCE quantity of all the downlink users based on the weight values corresponding to all the downlink users to obtain the downlink weighted expected total number.
As described above, if the target CCE number is greater than the number of available CCEs, it is indicated that the available CCEs cannot meet CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users; the number of expected CCEs is adjusted by considering the weight information of uplink and downlink scheduling, namely the uplink weighted expected total number and the downlink weighted expected total number are the numbers after weight adjustment, so that CCEs are selectively allocated to uplink and downlink users based on the weight information of uplink and downlink scheduling;
based on this, in this embodiment, after determining the weight value corresponding to each uplink user and the weight value corresponding to each downlink user, the number of expected CCEs of all uplink users needs to be weighted based on the weight values corresponding to all uplink users, so as to obtain an uplink weighted expected total number; and carrying out weighted calculation on the expected CCE quantity of all the downlink users based on the weight values corresponding to all the downlink users to obtain the downlink weighted expected total number.
Step S305: and determining a first uplink quantity and a first downlink quantity based on the uplink weighted expected total number, the downlink weighted expected total number and the quantity of the available CCEs.
The uplink weighted expected total number is a weighted adjustment of the expected CCE number of the uplink user, and the downlink weighted expected total number is a weighted adjustment of the expected CCE number of the downlink user; it is also necessary to refer to the number of available CCEs to determine a first uplink number defining uplink allocations and a first downlink number defining downlink allocations.
Step S306: and performing CCE allocation based on the first uplink number or the first downlink number.
As described above, the first uplink number defines uplink allocation, and the first downlink number defines downlink allocation; based on the first uplink number or the first downlink number, allocation limitation is performed on one direction, and CCEs are allocated to uplink and downlink users more selectively by combining weight information of uplink and downlink scheduling.
According to the scheme, if the target CCE number is larger than the available CCE number, the available CCE is indicated to be incapable of meeting CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users; weight information of uplink and downlink scheduling needs to be considered, and CCEs are selectively allocated to uplink and downlink users; after the weight value corresponding to each uplink user and the weight value corresponding to each downlink user are determined, carrying out weight calculation on the expected CCE quantity of all uplink users based on the weight values corresponding to all uplink users to obtain an uplink weight expected total number; based on the weight values corresponding to all the downlink users, carrying out weighted calculation on the expected CCE numbers of all the downlink users to obtain the downlink weighted expected total number; determining a first uplink quantity which has a limiting effect on uplink allocation and a first downlink quantity which has a limiting effect on downlink allocation by combining the quantity of available CCEs; based on the first uplink number or the first downlink number, allocation restriction is performed on a direction, so that CCEs are allocated to uplink and downlink users more selectively.
In some optional embodiments, the determining the weight value corresponding to each uplink user may be implemented by, but not limited to, the following manner:
based on a first preset corresponding relation, determining a weight value corresponding to the service type of any uplink user as the weight value corresponding to the uplink user;
the first preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the uplink service type and the weight value, and the higher the priority of the uplink service type is, the larger the corresponding weight value is.
In some optional embodiments, the above determination of the weight value corresponding to each downlink and uplink user may be implemented by, but not limited to, the following ways:
based on a second preset corresponding relation, determining a weight value corresponding to the service type of any downlink user as the weight value corresponding to the downlink user;
the second preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the downlink service type and the weight value, and the higher the priority of the downlink service type is, the larger the corresponding weight value is.
In the implementation, if the number of the target CCEs is greater than the number of the available CCEs, the available CCEs cannot meet the CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users; weight information of uplink and downlink scheduling needs to be considered, and CCEs are selectively allocated to uplink and downlink users;
Because the priorities of different service types are different, CCEs need to be allocated for the corresponding uplink users/downlink users preferentially aiming at the service type with high priority, so that the normal operation of the service is ensured.
Based on this, the embodiment sets a first preset corresponding relation between the uplink service type and the weight value, and the higher the priority of the uplink service type is, the larger the corresponding weight value is;
and determining a weight value corresponding to the service type of the uplink user as the weight value corresponding to the uplink user based on the first preset corresponding relation, so that the weight value accurately reflects the service importance degree of the corresponding user, and then selectively distributing CCE (control channel element) for the uplink user and the downlink user.
The first preset correspondence may be shown in table 3:
TABLE 3 Table 3
Because the uplink and downlink services are different, the embodiment also sets a second preset corresponding relation between the downlink service type and the weight value, and the higher the priority of the downlink service type is, the larger the corresponding weight value is;
and determining a weight value corresponding to the service type of the downlink user as the weight value corresponding to the downlink user based on the second preset corresponding relation, so that the weight value accurately reflects the service importance degree of the corresponding user, and then selectively distributing CCE (control channel element) for the uplink and downlink users.
The second preset correspondence may be shown in table 4:
TABLE 4 Table 4
Descending downwardsOf the service type of (a) Weight value
New user plane transmission Y1
User plane retransmission Y2
Novel RRC control plane data transfer Y3
RRC control plane data retransmission Y4
Voice data retransmission Y5
New transmission of voice data Y6
…… ……
Tables 3 and 4 are merely illustrative, and in practice, other service types may be involved, and the service types may correspond to other weight values, etc., which is not specifically limited in this embodiment.
In some optional embodiments, the weight values in the first preset corresponding relationship and the second preset corresponding relationship are both greater than or equal to 1, so as to facilitate subsequent calculation.
According to the scheme, the first preset corresponding relation is set, the first preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the uplink service type and the weight value, and the higher the priority of the uplink service type is, the larger the corresponding weight value is; determining a weight value corresponding to the service type of the uplink user as the weight value corresponding to the uplink user, so that the weight value accurately reflects the service importance degree of the corresponding user; a second preset corresponding relation is further arranged, the second preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the downlink service type and the weight value, and the higher the priority of the downlink service type is, the larger the corresponding weight value is; determining a weight value corresponding to the service type of the downlink user as the weight value corresponding to the downlink user, so that the weight value accurately reflects the service importance degree of the corresponding user; therefore, when the available CCE can not meet the CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users, CCE is selectively allocated to the uplink and downlink users, and transmission of important business can be ensured when CCE resources are tense.
In some alternative embodiments, the step S305 may be implemented by, but not limited to, the following ways:
determining the sum of the uplink weighted expected total number and the downlink weighted expected total number as a target weighted expected total number;
determining a ratio between the uplink weighted expected total number and the target weighted expected total number as a first uplink proportion;
performing rounding calculation on the product between the number of the available CCEs and the first uplink proportion to obtain the first uplink number;
and determining the difference between the number of available CCEs and the first uplink number as the first downlink number.
By way of example only, and not by way of limitation, target weighted expected total all_exp_cce_with_weight=ul_all_exp cce_num_with_weight+dl_all_exp_cce_num_wit h_weight; wherein ul_all_exp_cce_num_with_weight is an uplink weighted expected total number, dl_all_exp_cce_num_with_weight is a downlink weighted expected total number;
first uplink proportion ul_cce_ratio=ul_all_exp_cce_num_with_weight/all_exp_cce_with_weight; the ul_all_exp_cce_num_with_weight is the uplink weighting expected total number, and all_exp_cce_with_weight is the target weighting expected total number;
first uplink data Or (F)>
Where FREE CCE NUM is the number of available CCEs, UL CCE RATIO is the first uplink scale,for the rounding up operation, ++>Is a round-down operation.
First downlink quantity dl_cce_num=free_cce_num-ul_cce_num; where FREE CCE NUM is the number of available CCEs and UL CCE NUM is the first uplink number.
According to the scheme, if the target CCE number is larger than the available CCE number, the available CCE is indicated to be incapable of meeting CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users; weight information of uplink and downlink scheduling needs to be considered, and CCEs are selectively allocated to uplink and downlink users; after determining the uplink weighted expected total number and the downlink weighted expected total number; determining a target weighted expected total number under the influence of the weight based on the sum of the uplink weighted expected total number and the downlink weighted expected total number; the ratio (first uplink proportion) between the uplink weighted expected total number and the target weighted expected total number represents the ratio of the uplink user demand to CCE under the influence of the weight; performing rounding calculation on the product between the number of available CCEs and the first uplink proportion to obtain a first uplink number which plays a role in limiting uplink allocation; the first uplink number is subtracted from the number of available CCEs to obtain a first downlink number defining the downlink allocation.
In some alternative embodiments, the step S305 may be implemented by, but not limited to, the following ways:
determining the sum of the uplink weighted expected total number and the downlink weighted expected total number as a target weighted expected total number;
determining a ratio between the downlink weighted expected total number and the target weighted expected total number as a first downlink proportion;
performing rounding calculation on the product between the number of the available CCEs and the first downlink proportion to obtain the first downlink number;
and determining the difference between the number of available CCEs and the first downlink number as the first uplink number.
In the implementation, the downlink occupation ratio (the ratio between the downlink weighted expected total number and the target weighted expected total number is determined to be the downlink occupation ratio) can be calculated first; further, the product between the number of available CCEs and the downlink occupation proportion is rounded, so that a first downlink number is obtained; the difference between the number of available CCEs and the first downlink number is determined as the first uplink number, and the specific calculation process may refer to the above embodiment, which is not described herein.
Fig. 4 is a flow chart of a fourth CCE allocation method provided in an embodiment of the present application, where, as shown in fig. 4, the method includes the following steps:
Step S401: and determining the expected CCE number of each uplink user and the expected CCE number of each downlink user in the target TTI.
Step S402: the target CCE number is determined based on a sum of the uplink expected total number and the downlink expected total number.
Wherein the uplink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all uplink users, and the downlink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all downlink users.
Step S403: and if the target CCE number is greater than the available CCE number, determining a weight value corresponding to each uplink user and determining a weight value corresponding to each downlink user.
Step S404: based on the weight values corresponding to all uplink users, carrying out weighted calculation on the expected CCE numbers of all uplink users to obtain the uplink weighted expected total number; and carrying out weighted calculation on the expected CCE quantity of all the downlink users based on the weight values corresponding to all the downlink users to obtain the downlink weighted expected total number.
Step S405: and determining a first uplink quantity and a first downlink quantity based on the uplink weighted expected total number, the downlink weighted expected total number and the quantity of the available CCEs.
The specific implementation manner of steps S401 to S405 may refer to the above embodiment, and will not be described herein.
Step S406: a first difference between the uplink weighted expected total and the uplink expected total and a second difference between the downlink weighted expected total and the downlink expected total are determined.
Because the embodiment is based on the uplink weighted expected total number and the downlink weighted expected total number, the influence of the weight is introduced into the determined uplink first downlink number, and sometimes the phenomenon that the CCE allocated by one party exceeds the requirement due to the overlarge influence of the weight, and the CCE may not be allocated enough in the other direction, so that the CCE allocation is unbalanced can occur.
Based on this, the present embodiment determines a first difference between the uplink weighted expected total number and the uplink expected total number, the difference reflecting the influence of the uplink weight; determining a second difference between the downlink weighted expected total and the downlink expected total, the difference reflecting the effect of the weight in the downlink direction;
based on the two differences, it can be determined which weights affect the overweight, so that the allocation restriction is made based on the number of allocations of the weights affecting the overweight party.
Step S407: and if the first difference value is smaller than or equal to the second difference value, distributing CCE to the first target downlink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the downlink user from high to low.
The number of CCEs allocated to the first target downlink user is smaller than or equal to the first downlink number, and the first target downlink user is a part or all of downlink users.
As described above, the first difference reflects the influence of the weight in the uplink direction, and the second difference reflects the influence of the weight in the downlink direction;
if the first difference is smaller than or equal to the second difference, indicating that the influence of the downlink weight is larger, performing CCE allocation restriction on the downlink direction based on the first downlink quantity, namely, the quantity of CCEs allocated for the downlink user is smaller than or equal to the first downlink quantity.
For example, since the target CCE number is greater than the available CCE number, the available CCEs cannot meet CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users, and there may be downlink users without CCE resources in the downlink direction;
in order to ensure normal transmission of the service with high priority, the downlink users are ordered from high to low according to the priority of the service types, and CCEs are allocated to the downlink users in order, namely, the downlink users with high priority of the service types are allocated with CCEs first, if the downlink users are not allocated with CCEs, but the number of the CCEs allocated to the downlink users reaches the first downlink number, the CCEs are not allocated to the downlink users with low priority of the service types.
The first target downlink user is a downlink user capable of distributing CCE under the limitation of a first downlink data, and if CCE can be distributed to all downlink users, the first target downlink user is a full downlink user; if CCE cannot be allocated to all downlink users, the first target downlink user is the downlink user with partial service type priority higher.
Step S408: and allocating CCEs to the first target uplink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the uplink user from high to low.
The first target uplink user is a part or all of the uplink users.
As described above, the first difference reflects the influence of the weight in the uplink direction, and the second difference reflects the influence of the weight in the downlink direction;
if the first difference is smaller than or equal to the second difference, the influence of the weight in the downlink direction is larger, and the CCE allocation limitation is not performed on the uplink direction, namely, the number of the CCEs allocated for the uplink user can exceed the first uplink number, and after the CCEs are allocated for the downlink user, all the rest CCEs can be allocated for the uplink user.
For example, since the target CCE number is greater than the available CCE number, the available CCEs cannot meet CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users, and then there may be uplink users without CCE resources in the uplink direction;
In order to ensure normal transmission of the service with high priority, the embodiment sorts the uplink users according to the priority of the service types from high to low, and allocates CCEs to the uplink users according to the order, namely allocates CCEs to the uplink users with high priority of the service types first, and if there are uplink users without CCEs allocated, but no CCE resource exists, does not allocate CCEs to the uplink users with low priority of the service types.
The first target uplink user is an uplink user capable of distributing CCE under the rest CCE quantity, and if CCE can be distributed to all uplink users, the first target uplink user is all uplink users; if CCE cannot be allocated to all uplink users, the first target uplink user is the uplink user with higher priority of partial service types.
In the above scheme, the influence of the uplink weight is reflected due to the first difference between the uplink weighted expected total number and the uplink expected total number; a second difference between the downlink weighted expected total and the downlink expected total reflecting the impact of the weight in the downlink direction; if the first difference value is smaller than or equal to the second difference value, indicating that the influence of the weight in the downlink direction is larger, performing CCE allocation restriction on the downlink direction based on the first downlink quantity, namely, the quantity of CCEs allocated for the downlink user is smaller than or equal to the first downlink quantity; because the number of target CCEs is larger than the number of available CCEs, the available CCEs cannot meet the CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users, and then the downlink users without CCE resources may exist in the downlink direction; the downlink users are ordered from high to low according to the priority of the service types, CCEs are allocated to the downlink users according to the order, namely, the CCEs are allocated to the downlink users with high service type priority first, if the CCEs are not allocated to the downlink users, but the quantity of the CCEs allocated to the downlink users reaches the first quantity, the CCEs are not allocated to the downlink users with low service type priority; the uplink users are ordered from high to low according to the priority of the service types, CCEs are allocated to the uplink users in sequence, namely, CCEs are allocated to the uplink users with high service type priority, if CCEs are not allocated to the uplink users, but CCE resources are not allocated to the uplink users with low service type priority, the influence of weights is balanced, and normal transmission of the service with higher uplink and downlink priorities is further ensured.
Fig. 5 is a flow chart of a fifth CCE allocation method provided in an embodiment of the present application, where, as shown in fig. 5, the method includes the following steps:
step S501: and determining the expected CCE number of each uplink user and the expected CCE number of each downlink user in the target TTI.
Step S502: the target CCE number is determined based on a sum of the uplink expected total number and the downlink expected total number.
Wherein the uplink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all uplink users, and the downlink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all downlink users.
Step S503: and if the target CCE number is greater than the available CCE number, determining a weight value corresponding to each uplink user and determining a weight value corresponding to each downlink user.
Step S504: based on the weight values corresponding to all uplink users, carrying out weighted calculation on the expected CCE numbers of all uplink users to obtain the uplink weighted expected total number; and carrying out weighted calculation on the expected CCE quantity of all the downlink users based on the weight values corresponding to all the downlink users to obtain the downlink weighted expected total number.
Step S505: and determining a first uplink quantity and a first downlink quantity based on the uplink weighted expected total number, the downlink weighted expected total number and the quantity of the available CCEs.
Step S506: a first difference between the uplink weighted expected total and the uplink expected total and a second difference between the downlink weighted expected total and the downlink expected total are determined.
The specific implementation manner of steps S501 to S506 may refer to the above embodiment, and will not be described herein.
Step S507: and if the first difference value is larger than the second difference value, distributing CCE to the second target uplink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the uplink user from high to low.
The number of CCEs allocated to the second target uplink user is smaller than or equal to the first uplink number, and the second target uplink user is a part or all of the uplink users.
As described above, the first difference reflects the influence of the weight in the uplink direction, and the second difference reflects the influence of the weight in the downlink direction;
if the first difference is greater than the second difference, the uplink weight is larger, and the uplink CCE is allocated and limited based on the first uplink data, namely the number of CCEs allocated for the uplink user is smaller than or equal to the first uplink data.
For example, since the target CCE number is greater than the available CCE number, the available CCEs cannot meet CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users, and then there may be uplink users without CCE resources in the uplink direction;
In order to ensure normal transmission of the service with high priority, the embodiment sorts the uplink users according to the priority of the service types from high to low, and allocates CCEs to the uplink users according to the order, namely allocates CCEs to the uplink users with high priority of the service types first, and if there are uplink users without CCEs allocated to the uplink users, the number of CCEs allocated to the uplink users reaches the first uplink number, then CCEs will not be allocated to the uplink users with low priority of the service types.
The second target uplink user is an uplink user capable of distributing CCE under the limitation of the first uplink number, and if CCE can be distributed to all uplink users, the second target uplink user is all uplink users; if CCE cannot be allocated to all uplink users, the second target uplink user is the uplink user with higher priority of partial service types.
Step S508: and allocating CCE for the second target downlink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the downlink users from high to low.
Wherein the second target downlink user is a part or all of the downlink users.
As described above, the first difference reflects the influence of the weight in the uplink direction, and the second difference reflects the influence of the weight in the downlink direction;
If the first difference is larger than the second difference, the influence of the uplink weight is larger, and the downlink CCE allocation is not limited, namely the number of the CCEs allocated for the downlink user can exceed the first downlink number, and after the CCEs are allocated for the uplink user, all the rest CCEs can be allocated for the downlink user.
For example, since the target CCE number is greater than the available CCE number, the available CCEs cannot meet CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users, and there may be downlink users without CCE resources in the downlink direction;
in order to ensure normal transmission of the service with high priority, the downlink users are ordered from high to low according to the priority of the service types, and CCEs are allocated to the downlink users in order, namely, the downlink users with high priority of the service types are allocated with CCEs first, and if the downlink users have no CCEs and have no CCE resource, the downlink users with low priority of the service types are not allocated with CCEs.
The second target downlink user is a downlink user capable of distributing CCE under the rest CCE quantity, and if CCE can be distributed to all downlink users, the second target downlink user is a full downlink user; if CCE can not be allocated to all downlink users, the second target downlink user is the downlink user with higher priority of partial service type.
In the above scheme, the influence of the uplink weight is reflected due to the first difference between the uplink weighted expected total number and the uplink expected total number; a second difference between the downlink weighted expected total and the downlink expected total reflecting the impact of the weight in the downlink direction; if the first difference is larger than the second difference, indicating that the influence of the uplink weight is larger, performing CCE allocation restriction on the uplink direction based on the first uplink data, namely, the number of CCEs allocated for the uplink user is smaller than or equal to the first uplink data; because the number of target CCEs is larger than the number of available CCEs, the available CCEs cannot meet the CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users, and then uplink users without CCE resources may exist in the uplink direction; the method comprises the steps that uplink users are ordered according to the priority of service types from high to low, CCEs are allocated to the uplink users according to the order, namely, CCEs are allocated to the uplink users with high service type priority first, if the CCEs are not allocated to the uplink users, but the quantity of the CCEs allocated to the uplink users reaches the first uplink quantity, CCEs are not allocated to the uplink users with low service type priority; the downlink users are ordered from high to low according to the priority of the service types, CCEs are allocated to the downlink users in sequence, namely, the downlink users with high service type priority are allocated with CCEs first, if the downlink users are not allocated with CCEs, but no CCE resource exists, the CCEs are not allocated to the downlink users with low service type priority, so that the weight influence is balanced, and the normal transmission of the service with higher uplink and downlink priorities is further ensured.
Fig. 6 is a flowchart of a sixth CCE allocation method provided in an embodiment of the present application, where, as shown in fig. 6, the method includes the following steps:
step S601: and determining the expected CCE number of each uplink user and the expected CCE number of each downlink user in the target TTI.
Step S602: the target CCE number is determined based on a sum of the uplink expected total number and the downlink expected total number.
Wherein the uplink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all uplink users, and the downlink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all downlink users.
Step S603: and if the target CCE number is larger than the available CCE number, determining the ratio between the uplink expected total number and the target CCE number as a second uplink proportion.
If the number of the target CCEs is larger than the number of the available CCEs, the available CCEs cannot meet the CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users; in this embodiment, regardless of which direction weight has a larger influence, uplink and downlink CCEs are allocated directly according to the ratio of the uplink expected total number to the downlink expected total number;
illustratively, a second uplink proportion, i.e. the proportion of CCEs allocated uplink, is determined according to the ratio between the desired total number of uplink and the target number of CCEs.
Step S604: and carrying out rounding calculation on the product between the number of the available CCEs and the second uplink proportion to obtain a second uplink number.
In this embodiment, after determining the proportion of CCEs allocated in the uplink, the second uplink number, that is, the number of CCEs allocated in the uplink, is determined based on the number of available CCEs.
Step S605: and determining the difference between the number of the available CCEs and the second uplink number as a second downlink number.
In this embodiment, after determining the number of CCEs allocated in the uplink, the second downlink number is further determined based on the number of available CCEs, that is, the number of CCEs allocated in the downlink.
Step S606: and performing CCE allocation based on the second uplink quantity and the second downlink quantity.
According to the scheme, if the target CCE number is larger than the available CCE number, the available CCE is indicated to be incapable of meeting CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users; based on the number of CCEs desired in the uplink and downlink, the CCEs are directly allocated according to the desired CCE proportion, and when the CCEs are insufficient, the uplink CCEs and the downlink CCEs are allocated in an equalizing manner.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE allocation is performed based on the second uplink number and the second downlink number, including:
distributing CCEs of the second uplink quantity to a third target uplink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the uplink users from high to low; wherein, the third target uplink user is a part of uplink users;
Distributing CCEs of the second downlink quantity to a third target downlink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the downlink users from high to low; the third target downlink user is a part of downlink users.
In the above scheme, since the target CCE number is greater than the available CCE number and the available CCE is allocated according to the expected CCE ratio, the available CCE cannot meet the CCE requirements of all uplink and downlink users, and then users without CCE resources exist in the uplink and downlink directions; the uplink users are ordered from high to low according to the priority of the service types, CCEs are allocated to the uplink users according to the order, namely, CCEs are allocated to the uplink users with high service type priority first, if CCEs are not allocated to the uplink users, but the quantity of the CCEs allocated to the uplink users reaches the second uplink quantity, CCEs are not allocated to the uplink users with low service type priority; the downlink users are ordered from high to low according to the priority of the service types, CCEs are allocated to the downlink users according to the order, namely, the CCEs are allocated to the downlink users with high service type priority, if the CCEs are not allocated to the downlink users, but the quantity of the CCEs allocated to the downlink users reaches the second downlink quantity, the CCEs are not allocated to the downlink users with low service type priority, and the normal transmission of the service with higher uplink and downlink priorities is further ensured.
In implementation, for the case that the number of target CCEs is greater than the number of available CCEs, in addition to allocating CCEs to uplink and downlink users according to the order of the priority of the service types of the uplink and downlink users from high to low, a priority threshold may be set, and when the number of the allocated CCEs is greater than or equal to the priority threshold, the number of the allocated CCEs is equal to the expected number of CCEs; when the number of CCEs allocated is smaller than the priority threshold, the number of CCEs allocated is smaller than the expected number of CCEs.
As shown in fig. 7, an embodiment of the present application provides a CCE allocation apparatus 700, including:
a user determining module 701, configured to determine an expected CCE number of each uplink user and an expected CCE number of each downlink user in a target TTI;
a CCE determining module 702 configured to determine a target CCE number based on a sum of an uplink expected total number and a downlink expected total number; wherein, the uplink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all uplink users, and the downlink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all downlink users;
a CCE allocation module 703, configured to perform CCE allocation based on a comparison result between the target CCE number and the number of available CCEs in the current TTI.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE determination module 702 is configured to:
Determining the expected CCE quantity of each uplink user based on the channel quality indication of each uplink user in the target TTI; and determining the expected CCE number of each downlink user based on the channel quality indication of each downlink user in the target TTI; or alternatively
Determining the expected CCE quantity of each uplink user based on the channel quality indication of each uplink user in the target TTI and the weight value of each uplink user; and determining the expected CCE number of each downlink user based on the channel quality indication of each downlink user in the target TTI and the weight value of each downlink user.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE allocation module 703 is specifically configured to:
and if the target CCE number is smaller than or equal to the available CCE number, allocating the CCE with the corresponding expected CCE number for each uplink user, and allocating the CCE with the corresponding expected CCE number for each downlink user.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE allocation module 703 is specifically configured to:
if the number of the target CCEs is larger than the number of the available CCEs, determining a weight value corresponding to each uplink user and determining a weight value corresponding to each downlink user;
based on the weight values corresponding to all uplink users, carrying out weighted calculation on the expected CCE numbers of all uplink users to obtain the uplink weighted expected total number; based on the weight values corresponding to all the downlink users, carrying out weighted calculation on the expected CCE numbers of all the downlink users to obtain the downlink weighted expected total number;
Determining a first uplink number and a first downlink number based on the uplink weighted expected total number, the downlink weighted expected total number, and the number of available CCEs;
and performing CCE allocation based on the first uplink number or the first downlink number.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE allocation module 703 is specifically configured to:
based on a first preset corresponding relation, determining a weight value corresponding to the service type of any uplink user as the weight value corresponding to the uplink user; the first preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the uplink service type and the weight value, and the higher the priority of the uplink service type is, the larger the corresponding weight value is;
in some alternative embodiments, CCE allocation module 703 is specifically configured to:
based on a second preset corresponding relation, determining a weight value corresponding to the service type of any downlink user as the weight value corresponding to the downlink user; the second preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the downlink service type and the weight value, and the higher the priority of the downlink service type is, the larger the corresponding weight value is.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE allocation module 703 is specifically configured to:
Determining the sum of the uplink weighted expected total number and the downlink weighted expected total number as a target weighted expected total number;
determining a ratio between the uplink weighted expected total number and the target weighted expected total number as a first uplink proportion;
performing rounding calculation on the product between the number of the available CCEs and the first uplink proportion to obtain the first uplink number;
and determining the difference between the number of available CCEs and the first uplink number as the first downlink number.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE allocation module 703 is specifically configured to:
determining a first difference between the uplink weighted expected total and the uplink expected total and a second difference between the downlink weighted expected total and the downlink expected total;
if the first difference value is smaller than or equal to the second difference value, distributing CCE for the first target downlink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the downlink user from high to low; the number of CCEs allocated to the first target downlink user is smaller than or equal to the first downlink number, and the first target downlink user is a part or all of downlink users;
distributing CCE for the first target uplink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the uplink user from high to low; the first target uplink user is a part or all of the uplink users.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE allocation module 703 is specifically configured to:
determining a first difference between the uplink weighted expected total and the uplink expected total and a second difference between the downlink weighted expected total and the downlink expected total;
if the first difference value is larger than the second difference value, distributing CCE for a second target uplink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the uplink user from high to low; the number of CCEs allocated to the second target uplink user is smaller than or equal to the first uplink number, and the second target uplink user is a part or all of uplink users;
distributing CCE for the second target downlink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the downlink users from high to low; wherein the second target downlink user is a part or all of the downlink users.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE allocation module 703 is specifically configured to:
if the target CCE number is greater than the available CCE number, determining the ratio between the uplink expected total number and the target CCE number as a second uplink proportion;
performing rounding calculation on the product between the number of the available CCEs and the second uplink proportion to obtain a second uplink number;
Determining the difference between the number of available CCEs and the second uplink number as a second downlink number;
and performing CCE allocation based on the second uplink quantity and the second downlink quantity.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE allocation module 703 is specifically configured to:
distributing CCEs of the second uplink quantity to a third target uplink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the uplink users from high to low; wherein, the third target uplink user is a part of uplink users;
distributing CCEs of the second downlink quantity to a third target downlink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the downlink users from high to low; the third target downlink user is a part of downlink users.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE determination module 702 is further configured to determine the number of available CCEs for the current TTI by:
and determining the difference between the total number of CCEs and the number of common scheduling CCEs of the current TTI as the number of the available CCEs.
In some alternative embodiments, CCE determination module 702 is configured to:
based on a third preset corresponding relation, determining the number of CCEs corresponding to the channel quality indication of any uplink user as the expected number of the CCEs of the uplink user;
In some alternative embodiments, CCE determination module 702 is configured to:
based on the third preset corresponding relation, determining the number of CCEs corresponding to the channel quality indication of any downlink user as the expected number of CCEs of the downlink user;
the third preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the channel quality indication and the CCE quantity, and the larger the channel quality indication is, the smaller the corresponding CCE quantity is.
Based on the same technical concept, the embodiment of the present application further provides a network device 800, as shown in fig. 8, including at least one processor 801 and a memory 802 connected to the at least one processor, where a specific connection medium between the processor 801 and the memory 802 is not limited in the embodiment of the present application, and in fig. 8, the connection between the processor 801 and the memory 802 is exemplified by a bus 803. The buses may be divided into address buses, data buses, control buses, etc. For ease of illustration, only one thick line is shown in fig. 8, but not only one bus or one type of bus.
The processor 801 is a control center of the network device, and may implement data processing by executing or executing instructions stored in the memory 802 and invoking data stored in the memory 802 by connecting various interfaces and lines to various parts of the network device. Alternatively, the processor 801 may include one or more processing units, and the processor 801 may integrate an application processor and a modem processor, wherein the application processor primarily processes operating systems, user interfaces, application programs, etc., and the modem processor primarily processes issuing instructions. It will be appreciated that the modem processor described above may not be integrated into the processor 801. In some embodiments, processor 801 and memory 802 may be implemented on the same chip, or they may be implemented separately on separate chips in some embodiments.
The processor 801 may be a general purpose processor such as a central processing unit (english: central Processing Unit, abbreviated CPU), digital signal processor, application specific integrated circuit (english: application Specific Integrated Circuit, abbreviated ASIC), field programmable gate array or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic device, discrete hardware components, and may implement or perform the methods, steps, and logic blocks disclosed in embodiments of the application. The general purpose processor may be a microprocessor or any conventional processor or the like. The steps of the method disclosed in connection with the CCE allocation method embodiments may be embodied directly in hardware processor execution or in a combination of hardware and software modules in a processor.
Memory 802, as a non-volatile computer-readable storage medium, may be used to store non-volatile software programs, non-volatile computer-executable programs, and modules. The Memory 802 may include at least one type of storage medium, and may include, for example, flash Memory, a hard disk, a multimedia card, a card-type Memory, a random access Memory (english: random Access Memory, abbreviated as RAM), a static random access Memory (english: static Random Access Memory, abbreviated as SRAM), a programmable Read-Only Memory (english: programmable Read Only Memory, abbreviated as PROM), a Read-Only Memory (english: ROM), a charged erasable programmable Read-Only Memory (english: electrically Erasable Programmable Read-Only Memory, abbreviated as EEPROM), a magnetic Memory, a magnetic disk, an optical disk, and the like. Memory 802 is any other medium that can be used to carry or store desired program code in the form of instructions or data structures and that can be accessed by a computer, but is not limited to such. The memory 802 of embodiments of the present application may also be circuitry or any other device capable of performing storage functions for storing program instructions and/or data.
In an embodiment of the present application, the memory 802 stores a computer program that, when executed by the processor 801, causes the processor 801 to perform:
determining the expected CCE number of each uplink user and the expected CCE number of each downlink user in a target TTI;
determining a target CCE number based on a sum of an uplink expected total number and a downlink expected total number; wherein, the uplink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all uplink users, and the downlink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all downlink users;
and performing CCE allocation based on a comparison result between the target CCE number and the number of available CCEs of the current TTI.
In some alternative embodiments, the processor 801 specifically performs:
determining the expected CCE quantity of each uplink user based on the channel quality indication of each uplink user in the target TTI; and determining the expected CCE number of each downlink user based on the channel quality indication of each downlink user in the target TTI; or alternatively
Determining the expected CCE quantity of each uplink user based on the channel quality indication of each uplink user in the target TTI and the weight value of each uplink user; and determining the expected CCE number of each downlink user based on the channel quality indication of each downlink user in the target TTI and the weight value of each downlink user.
In some alternative embodiments, the processor 801 specifically performs:
and if the target CCE number is smaller than or equal to the available CCE number, allocating the CCE with the corresponding expected CCE number for each uplink user, and allocating the CCE with the corresponding expected CCE number for each downlink user.
In some alternative embodiments, the processor 801 specifically performs:
if the number of the target CCEs is larger than the number of the available CCEs, determining a weight value corresponding to each uplink user and determining a weight value corresponding to each downlink user;
based on the weight values corresponding to all uplink users, carrying out weighted calculation on the expected CCE numbers of all uplink users to obtain the uplink weighted expected total number; based on the weight values corresponding to all the downlink users, carrying out weighted calculation on the expected CCE numbers of all the downlink users to obtain the downlink weighted expected total number;
determining a first uplink number and a first downlink number based on the uplink weighted expected total number, the downlink weighted expected total number, and the number of available CCEs;
and performing CCE allocation based on the first uplink number or the first downlink number.
In some optional embodiments, the weight value corresponding to each uplink user is determined by:
Based on a first preset corresponding relation, determining a weight value corresponding to the service type of any uplink user as the weight value corresponding to the uplink user; the first preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the uplink service type and the weight value, and the higher the priority of the uplink service type is, the larger the corresponding weight value is;
the weight value corresponding to each downlink user is determined by the following method:
based on a second preset corresponding relation, determining a weight value corresponding to the service type of any downlink user as the weight value corresponding to the downlink user; the second preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the downlink service type and the weight value, and the higher the priority of the downlink service type is, the larger the corresponding weight value is.
In some alternative embodiments, the processor 801 specifically performs:
determining the sum of the uplink weighted expected total number and the downlink weighted expected total number as a target weighted expected total number;
determining a ratio between the uplink weighted expected total number and the target weighted expected total number as a first uplink proportion;
performing rounding calculation on the product between the number of the available CCEs and the first uplink proportion to obtain the first uplink number;
And determining the difference between the number of available CCEs and the first uplink number as the first downlink number.
In some alternative embodiments, the processor 801 specifically performs:
determining a first difference between the uplink weighted expected total and the uplink expected total and a second difference between the downlink weighted expected total and the downlink expected total;
if the first difference value is smaller than or equal to the second difference value, distributing CCE for the first target downlink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the downlink user from high to low; the number of CCEs allocated to the first target downlink user is smaller than or equal to the first downlink number, and the first target downlink user is a part or all of downlink users;
distributing CCE for the first target uplink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the uplink user from high to low; the first target uplink user is a part or all of the uplink users.
In some alternative embodiments, the processor 801 specifically performs:
determining a first difference between the uplink weighted expected total and the uplink expected total and a second difference between the downlink weighted expected total and the downlink expected total;
If the first difference value is larger than the second difference value, distributing CCE for a second target uplink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the uplink user from high to low; the number of CCEs allocated to the second target uplink user is smaller than or equal to the first uplink number, and the second target uplink user is a part or all of uplink users;
distributing CCE for the second target downlink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the downlink users from high to low; wherein the second target downlink user is a part or all of the downlink users.
In some alternative embodiments, the processor 801 specifically performs:
if the target CCE number is greater than the available CCE number, determining the ratio between the uplink expected total number and the target CCE number as a second uplink proportion;
performing rounding calculation on the product between the number of the available CCEs and the second uplink proportion to obtain a second uplink number;
determining the difference between the number of available CCEs and the second uplink number as a second downlink number;
and performing CCE allocation based on the second uplink quantity and the second downlink quantity.
In some alternative embodiments, the processor 801 specifically performs:
Distributing CCEs of the second uplink quantity to a third target uplink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the uplink users from high to low; wherein, the third target uplink user is a part of uplink users;
distributing CCEs of the second downlink quantity to a third target downlink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the downlink users from high to low; the third target downlink user is a part of downlink users.
In some alternative embodiments, the number of available CCEs for the current TTI is determined by:
and determining the difference between the total number of CCEs and the number of common scheduling CCEs of the current TTI as the number of the available CCEs.
In some alternative embodiments, the processor 801 specifically performs:
based on a third preset corresponding relation, determining the number of CCEs corresponding to the channel quality indication of any uplink user as the expected number of the CCEs of the uplink user;
the processor 801 specifically performs:
based on the third preset corresponding relation, determining the number of CCEs corresponding to the channel quality indication of any downlink user as the expected number of CCEs of the downlink user;
the third preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the channel quality indication and the CCE quantity, and the larger the channel quality indication is, the smaller the corresponding CCE quantity is.
Based on the same technical idea, the embodiments of the present application also provide a computer-readable storage medium storing a computer program executable by a processor, which when run on the processor, causes the processor to perform the steps of the CCE allocation method described above.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that embodiments of the present application may be provided as a method, system, or computer program product. Accordingly, the present application may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the present application may take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including, but not limited to, disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, and the like) having computer-usable program code embodied therein.
The present application is described with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to the application. It will be understood that each flow and/or block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of flows and/or blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, embedded processor, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the function specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
While preferred embodiments of the present application have been described, additional variations and modifications in those embodiments may occur to those skilled in the art once they learn of the basic inventive concepts. It is therefore intended that the following claims be interpreted as including the preferred embodiments and all such alterations and modifications as fall within the scope of the application.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications and variations can be made to the present application without departing from the spirit or scope of the application. Thus, it is intended that the present application also include such modifications and alterations insofar as they come within the scope of the appended claims or the equivalents thereof.

Claims (15)

1. A control channel element, CCE, allocation method, the method comprising:
determining the expected CCE number of each uplink user and the expected CCE number of each downlink user in a target Transmission Time Interval (TTI);
determining a target CCE number based on a sum of an uplink expected total number and a downlink expected total number; wherein, the uplink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all uplink users, and the downlink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all downlink users;
and performing CCE allocation based on a comparison result between the target CCE number and the number of available CCEs of the current TTI.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the desired number of CCEs for each uplink user and the desired number of CCEs for each downlink user in the target TTI comprises:
determining the expected CCE quantity of each uplink user based on the channel quality indication of each uplink user in the target TTI; and determining the expected CCE number of each downlink user based on the channel quality indication of each downlink user in the target TTI; or alternatively
Determining the expected CCE quantity of each uplink user based on the channel quality indication of each uplink user in the target TTI and the weight value of each uplink user; and determining the expected CCE number of each downlink user based on the channel quality indication of each downlink user in the target TTI and the weight value of each downlink user.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein performing CCE allocation based on a comparison between the target number of CCEs and a number of available CCEs for a current TTI comprises:
and if the target CCE number is smaller than or equal to the available CCE number, allocating the CCE with the corresponding expected CCE number for each uplink user, and allocating the CCE with the corresponding expected CCE number for each downlink user.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein performing CCE allocation based on a comparison between the target number of CCEs and a number of available CCEs for a current TTI comprises:
if the number of the target CCEs is larger than the number of the available CCEs, determining a weight value corresponding to each uplink user and determining a weight value corresponding to each downlink user;
based on the weight values corresponding to all uplink users, carrying out weighted calculation on the expected CCE numbers of all uplink users to obtain the uplink weighted expected total number; based on the weight values corresponding to all the downlink users, carrying out weighted calculation on the expected CCE numbers of all the downlink users to obtain the downlink weighted expected total number;
Determining a first uplink number and a first downlink number based on the uplink weighted expected total number, the downlink weighted expected total number, and the number of available CCEs;
and performing CCE allocation based on the first uplink number or the first downlink number.
5. A method according to claim 2 or 4, characterized in that the weight value corresponding to each uplink user is determined by:
based on a first preset corresponding relation, determining a weight value corresponding to the service type of any uplink user as the weight value corresponding to the uplink user; the first preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the uplink service type and the weight value, and the higher the priority of the uplink service type is, the larger the corresponding weight value is;
the weight value corresponding to each downlink user is determined by the following method:
based on a second preset corresponding relation, determining a weight value corresponding to the service type of any downlink user as the weight value corresponding to the downlink user; the second preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the downlink service type and the weight value, and the higher the priority of the downlink service type is, the larger the corresponding weight value is.
6. The method of claim 4, wherein determining a first uplink number and a first downlink number based on the uplink weighted expected total number, the downlink weighted expected total number, and the number of available CCEs comprises:
Determining the sum of the uplink weighted expected total number and the downlink weighted expected total number as a target weighted expected total number;
determining a ratio between the uplink weighted expected total number and the target weighted expected total number as a first uplink proportion;
performing rounding calculation on the product between the number of the available CCEs and the first uplink proportion to obtain the first uplink number;
and determining the difference between the number of available CCEs and the first uplink number as the first downlink number.
7. The method of claim 4, wherein CCE allocation based on the first uplink number or the first downlink number comprises:
determining a first difference between the uplink weighted expected total and the uplink expected total and a second difference between the downlink weighted expected total and the downlink expected total;
if the first difference value is smaller than or equal to the second difference value, distributing CCE for the first target downlink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the downlink user from high to low; the number of CCEs allocated to the first target downlink user is smaller than or equal to the first downlink number, and the first target downlink user is a part or all of downlink users;
Distributing CCE for the first target uplink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the uplink user from high to low; the first target uplink user is a part or all of the uplink users.
8. The method of claim 4, wherein CCE allocation based on the first uplink number or the first downlink number comprises:
determining a first difference between the uplink weighted expected total and the uplink expected total and a second difference between the downlink weighted expected total and the downlink expected total;
if the first difference value is larger than the second difference value, distributing CCE for a second target uplink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the uplink user from high to low; the number of CCEs allocated to the second target uplink user is smaller than or equal to the first uplink number, and the second target uplink user is a part or all of uplink users;
distributing CCE for the second target downlink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the downlink users from high to low; wherein the second target downlink user is a part or all of the downlink users.
9. The method of claim 1, wherein performing CCE allocation based on a comparison between the target number of CCEs and a number of available CCEs for a current TTI comprises:
If the target CCE number is greater than the available CCE number, determining the ratio between the uplink expected total number and the target CCE number as a second uplink proportion;
performing rounding calculation on the product between the number of the available CCEs and the second uplink proportion to obtain a second uplink number;
determining the difference between the number of available CCEs and the second uplink number as a second downlink number;
and performing CCE allocation based on the second uplink quantity and the second downlink quantity.
10. The method of claim 9, wherein CCE allocation based on the second uplink number and the second downlink number comprises:
distributing CCEs of the second uplink quantity to a third target uplink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the uplink users from high to low; wherein, the third target uplink user is a part of uplink users;
distributing CCEs of the second downlink quantity to a third target downlink user according to the order of the priority of the service types of the downlink users from high to low; the third target downlink user is a part of downlink users.
11. The method of claim 1, wherein the number of available CCEs for the current TTI is determined by:
And determining the difference between the total number of CCEs and the number of common scheduling CCEs of the current TTI as the number of the available CCEs.
12. The method of claim 2, wherein determining the desired number of CCEs for each uplink user based on the channel quality indication for each uplink user at the target TTI comprises:
based on a third preset corresponding relation, determining the number of CCEs corresponding to the channel quality indication of any uplink user as the expected number of the CCEs of the uplink user;
determining the expected number of CCEs for each downlink user based on the channel quality indication for each downlink user at the target TTI, comprising:
based on the third preset corresponding relation, determining the number of CCEs corresponding to the channel quality indication of any downlink user as the expected number of CCEs of the downlink user;
the third preset corresponding relation comprises the correspondence between the channel quality indication and the CCE quantity, and the larger the channel quality indication is, the smaller the corresponding CCE quantity is.
13. A control channel element, CCE, allocation apparatus, characterized in that the apparatus comprises:
a user determining module, configured to determine an expected CCE number of each uplink user and an expected CCE number of each downlink user in a target transmission time interval TTI;
The CCE determining module is used for determining the target CCE quantity based on the sum of the uplink expected total number and the downlink expected total number; wherein, the uplink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all uplink users, and the downlink expected total number is the sum of expected CCE numbers of all downlink users;
and the CCE allocation module is used for performing CCE allocation based on the comparison result between the target CCE number and the number of available CCEs of the current TTI.
14. A network device comprising at least one processor and at least one memory, wherein the memory stores a computer program that, when executed by the processor, causes the processor to perform the method of any of claims 1 to 12.
15. A computer readable storage medium, characterized in that it stores a computer program executable by a computer, which when run on the computer causes the computer to perform the method according to any one of claims 1 to 12.
CN202311090045.8A 2023-08-28 2023-08-28 CCE allocation method, device, network equipment and storage medium Pending CN117119600A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202311090045.8A CN117119600A (en) 2023-08-28 2023-08-28 CCE allocation method, device, network equipment and storage medium

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202311090045.8A CN117119600A (en) 2023-08-28 2023-08-28 CCE allocation method, device, network equipment and storage medium

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN117119600A true CN117119600A (en) 2023-11-24

Family

ID=88797913

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202311090045.8A Pending CN117119600A (en) 2023-08-28 2023-08-28 CCE allocation method, device, network equipment and storage medium

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN117119600A (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN101895988B (en) Control channel resource allocation method and device
US9814061B2 (en) Data scheduling method and device
CN102223722B (en) Downlink transmission method and equipment
CN106851747B (en) Dynamic resource allocation method and device in mobile communication system
CN101883401B (en) Resource scheduling method and device of feedback information
JP6845350B2 (en) Resource allocation method, first node and second node
WO2020143773A1 (en) Transmission resource selection method and apparatus
US20130188564A1 (en) Resource allocation in an orthogonal frequency division multiplexing system
CN102404862B (en) Method for PDCCH (Physical Downlink Control Channel) resource allocation in LTE (Long Term Evolution) system
CN102238627A (en) Resource allocating method and device of downlink shared channel
CN105554893A (en) Time-frequency resource distribution method and time-frequency resource distribution device for LTE system
CN111757468A (en) Resource allocation method and device, storage medium and electronic device
CN101998640A (en) Resource allocation method and base station
CN111163526B (en) Downlink resource mapping method, device, computer equipment and storage medium
CN109862534B (en) Resource allocation method and device
CN117119600A (en) CCE allocation method, device, network equipment and storage medium
CN113905448B (en) Wireless network resource scheduling method, device and equipment
CN105530705A (en) Method and device for allocating downlink control channel resources
CN115022968A (en) Resource allocation indicating method, resource allocation obtaining method, base station and user terminal
WO2018148947A1 (en) Resource allocation method and device
CN111224761B (en) Uplink scheduling method and device
CN115243378B (en) Resource allocation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN113329446B (en) Resource allocation method and device for network slices
CN111684852A (en) Resource allocation method, device and computer readable storage medium
CN101541083B (en) Method and device for allocating uplink resource

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination