CN116992545A - Large deformation grading method for ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried depth soft rock tunnel - Google Patents
Large deformation grading method for ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried depth soft rock tunnel Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN116992545A CN116992545A CN202311132352.8A CN202311132352A CN116992545A CN 116992545 A CN116992545 A CN 116992545A CN 202311132352 A CN202311132352 A CN 202311132352A CN 116992545 A CN116992545 A CN 116992545A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- ultra
- strength
- surrounding rock
- deformation
- tunnel
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
- 239000011435 rock Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 160
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 49
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 230000006835 compression Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000007906 compression Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012669 compression test Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012417 linear regression Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000005070 sampling Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012876 topography Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 abstract description 13
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 abstract description 5
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000009412 basement excavation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005422 blasting Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000009795 derivation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011835 investigation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000005476 size effect Effects 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
- G06F30/13—Architectural design, e.g. computer-aided architectural design [CAAD] related to design of buildings, bridges, landscapes, production plants or roads
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
- G06F30/23—Design optimisation, verification or simulation using finite element methods [FEM] or finite difference methods [FDM]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T17/00—Three dimensional [3D] modelling, e.g. data description of 3D objects
- G06T17/20—Finite element generation, e.g. wire-frame surface description, tesselation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2119/00—Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
- G06F2119/14—Force analysis or force optimisation, e.g. static or dynamic forces
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Computer Graphics (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Excavating Of Shafts Or Tunnels (AREA)
- Investigation Of Foundation Soil And Reinforcement Of Foundation Soil By Compacting Or Drainage (AREA)
Abstract
The application discloses a large deformation grading method for an ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried depth soft rock tunnel, which relates to the field of soft rock tunnels and comprises the following steps: firstly, obtaining large deformation grading parameters; the large deformation classification parameters include: surrounding rock strength, surrounding rock strength stress ratio and deformation rate; then classifying the large deformation of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel based on a preset judging standard by combining the obtained large deformation classification parameters; the grading scheme provided by the application is simple and reasonable, the grading parameter is convenient and reliable to take value, and the design requirement of the on-site tunnel construction dynamic support structure can be met.
Description
Technical Field
The application relates to the field of soft rock tunnels, in particular to a large deformation grading method for an ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel.
Background
The statements in this section merely provide background information related to the present disclosure and may not constitute prior art.
The problem of surrounding rock large deformation caused by ultra-high ground stress ultra-large deep buried tunnel construction is a great scientific difficulty facing underground engineering construction, different from common tunnel large deformation, the deformation rate is higher, the deformation amount is larger, the deformation duration is longer, the surrounding rock deformation is more serious, the damage form of a supporting structure is more complex, the collapse risk of the surrounding rock and the supporting structure of the tunnel is high, and serious personal safety threat and economic loss can be caused for normal construction of operators and the tunnel.
At present, students have developed related technical researches on the problem of large deformation of tunnels and classification methods, but a unified and applicable large deformation classification scheme is not formed so far. The method for classifying the large deformation of the tunnel is complicated, and the special geological environment of the ultra-large deep buried high ground stress tunnel is less considered; most grading methods are in a reconnaissance design stage, and are difficult to be applied to a tunnel construction stage. The currently proposed large-deformation classification scheme involves up to 6 classification parameters, and the parameter values are not easy to determine; and part is mainly used for the investigation design stage; the current proposed method for classifying the uneven large deformation takes the whole deformation of the tunnel as a core classification parameter, and the classification parameter is too single and the universality is to be improved. Therefore, aiming at the defects of the existing grading method, how to provide a rapid and effective large-deformation grading method so as to better guide the construction of the on-site tunnel is particularly important.
Disclosure of Invention
The application aims at: aiming at the problems that the existing ultra-high ground stress ultra-large deep buried tunnel supporting structure design is difficult to meet the dynamic construction process, and the existing tunnel deformation is not matched with the supporting structure, is inconsistent, and the like, thereby causing the phenomena that the tunnel surrounding rock deformation cannot be effectively controlled, the supporting structure is seriously damaged, and the like, the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried soft rock tunnel large deformation grading method is provided, the tunnel deformation grade is defined according to the depending tunnel surrounding rock strength stress ratio, surrounding rock strength and deformation rate, so that reasonable deformation control measures are adopted in advance, the tunnel construction is better served, the tunnel safe and efficient construction is realized, and the problems are solved.
The technical scheme of the application is as follows:
the method for grading the large deformation of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel comprises the following steps:
step S1: obtaining large deformation grading parameters; the large deformation classification parameters include: surrounding rock strength, surrounding rock strength stress ratio and deformation rate;
step S2: and classifying the large deformation of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel based on a preset judgment standard by combining the obtained large deformation classification parameters.
Further, the surrounding rock strength obtaining method comprises the following steps:
step A: performing on-site tunnel surrounding rock sampling to obtain a surrounding rock sample, then respectively carrying out point load and uniaxial compression test to determine the strength of the surrounding rock sample, and establishing a fitting relation between the point load strength and the uniaxial compression strength according to a large number of test results;
and (B) step (B): measuring the point load strength of the surrounding rock of the field tunnel, and rapidly obtaining the uniaxial compressive strength of the surrounding rock of the field tunnel based on the fitting relation;
step C: and obtaining the surrounding rock strength of the surrounding rock of the field tunnel based on the uniaxial compressive strength of the surrounding rock of the field tunnel and combining the Hoek-Brown strength criterion.
Further, the step a includes:
and establishing different fitting relation curves according to the point load strength and the uniaxial compressive strength test data of a large number of surrounding rock samples, and determining the best matching relation of the two fitting relation curves according to the fitting correlation.
Further, the different fitting relationships include:
linear and logarithmic relationships;
wherein the linear relationship is: sigma (sigma) c =aI S(50) +b;
The logarithmic relation is: sigma (sigma) c =aln(I S(50) )+b;
Wherein: sigma (sigma) c Is uniaxial compressive strength, I S(50) For point load strength, a and b are constants.
Further, the step C includes:
σ cmass =σ c1 S a
wherein: sigma (sigma) cmass For the strength of surrounding rock, sigma c1 The uniaxial compressive strength of the surrounding rock of the field tunnel is shown, and S and a are experimental parameters of rock mass mechanics.
Further, the rock mass mechanics empirical parameter S is calculated by the following formula:
the rock mass mechanics empirical parameter a is calculated by the following formula:
wherein: GSI is a geological strength index, and D is a disturbance degree parameter for representing the excavated rock mass.
Further, the surrounding rock strength stress ratio acquisition method comprises the following steps:
step one: establishing a three-dimensional finite element model with complex topography and landform characteristics;
step two: carrying out regression inversion analysis on the tunnel stress field by adopting a multiple linear regression analysis method in combination with the ground stress actual measurement data with limited ground survey data, determining the distribution characteristics and the size of the tunnel initial stress field, and determining the principal stress of each mileage section so as to obtain the maximum principal stress;
step three: and calculating the stress ratio of the surrounding rock strength based on the maximum main stress and the surrounding rock strength.
Further, the third step includes:
α=σ cmass /σ max
wherein: alpha is the stress ratio of surrounding rock strength and sigma max Is the maximum principal stress.
Further, the deformation rate obtaining method comprises the following steps:
and calculating according to the single-day convergence deformation corresponding to the monitoring section.
Further, the evaluation criteria are as follows:
when the strength of the surrounding rock is more than 8MPa, the stress ratio of the strength of the surrounding rock is more than 0.5, and the deformation rate is less than 1cm & d -1 When the tunnel is in the high deformation level, the tunnel is in the high deformation level;
when the strength of the surrounding rock is between 6 and 8MPa, the stress ratio of the strength of the surrounding rock is between 0.25 and 0.5, and the deformation rate is between 1 and 3 cm.d -1 When the deformation grade is in between, the large deformation grade of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel is judged to be slight;
when the strength of the surrounding rock is between 4 and 6MPa, the stress ratio of the strength of the surrounding rock is between 0.15 and 0.25, and the deformation rate is between 3 and 6 cm.d -1 When the deformation grade of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel is medium;
when the strength of the surrounding rock is between 2 and 4MPa, the stress ratio of the strength of the surrounding rock is between 0.05 and 0.15, and the deformation rate is between 6 and 10 cm.d -1 When the deformation grade is in between, judging that the large deformation grade of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel is serious;
when the strength of the surrounding rock is less than 2MPa, the stress ratio of the strength of the surrounding rock is less than 0.05, and the deformation rate is more than 10cm & d -1 And when the deformation grade of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel is judged to be extremely serious.
Compared with the prior art, the application has the beneficial effects that:
the method for grading the large deformation of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel comprises the following steps: firstly, obtaining large deformation grading parameters; the large deformation classification parameters include: surrounding rock strength, surrounding rock strength stress ratio and deformation rate; then classifying the large deformation of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel based on a preset judging standard by combining the obtained large deformation classification parameters; the method is characterized in that the deformation grade of the tunnel is defined according to the strength stress ratio, the surrounding rock strength and the deformation rate of the surrounding rock of the supported tunnel so as to take reasonable deformation control measures in advance, thereby better serving the construction of the tunnel construction, realizing the safe and efficient construction of the tunnel, having simple and reasonable grading scheme, having convenient and reliable grading parameter values and meeting the design requirement of the on-site tunnel construction dynamic support structure.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a large deformation grading method of an ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a method for acquiring the strength of surrounding rock;
fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of a method for obtaining a maximum main stress of a tunnel line.
Detailed Description
It is noted that relational terms such as "first" and "second", and the like, are used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. Moreover, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrase "comprising one … …" does not exclude the presence of other like elements in a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises the element.
The features and capabilities of the present application are described in further detail below in connection with examples.
Example 1
Referring to fig. 1, the method for grading the large deformation of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel specifically comprises the following steps:
step S1: obtaining large deformation grading parameters; the large deformation classification parameters include: surrounding rock strength, surrounding rock strength stress ratio and deformation rate;
step S2: and classifying the large deformation of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel based on a preset judgment standard by combining the obtained large deformation classification parameters.
In this embodiment, the method for obtaining the surrounding rock strength is as follows:
step A: performing on-site tunnel surrounding rock sampling to obtain a surrounding rock sample, then respectively carrying out point load and uniaxial compression test to determine the strength of the surrounding rock sample, and establishing a fitting relation between the point load strength and the uniaxial compression strength according to a large number of test results; thereby facilitating the calculation of the corresponding uniaxial compressive strength according to the point load strength in the later period;
and (B) step (B): measuring the point load strength of the surrounding rock of the field tunnel, and rapidly obtaining the uniaxial compressive strength of the surrounding rock of the field tunnel based on the fitting relation;
step C: based on the uniaxial compressive strength of the surrounding rock of the field tunnel, combining with the Hoek-Brown strength criterion to obtain the surrounding rock strength of the surrounding rock of the field tunnel; according to the uniaxial compressive strength of each tunnel rock sample, the influences of the joint cracks, the size effect and the like of the surrounding rock are comprehensively considered and disclosed, the conventional rock mechanical parameters are corrected and converted into the rock mechanical parameters, the surrounding rock strength is further obtained, and the solving process is shown in figure 2.
In this embodiment, specifically, the step a includes:
and establishing different fitting relation curves according to the point load strength and the uniaxial compressive strength test data of a large number of surrounding rock samples, and determining the best matching relation of the two fitting relation curves according to the fitting correlation.
In this embodiment, specifically, the different fitting relationship curves include:
linear and logarithmic relationships;
wherein the linear relationship is: sigma (sigma) c =aI S(50) +b;
The logarithmic relation is: sigma (sigma) c =aln(I S(50) )+b;
Wherein: sigma (sigma) c Is uniaxial compressive strength, I S(50) For point load strength, a and b are constants.
In this embodiment, specifically, the step C includes:
σ cmass =σ c1 S a
wherein: sigma (sigma) cmass For the strength of surrounding rock, sigma c1 The uniaxial compressive strength of the surrounding rock of the field tunnel is shown, and S and a are experimental parameters of rock mass mechanics.
In this embodiment, specifically, the empirical parameter S of rock mass mechanics is calculated by the following formula:
the rock mass mechanics empirical parameter a is calculated by the following formula:
wherein: GSI is a geological strength index, and D is a disturbance degree parameter for representing the excavated rock mass.
In this embodiment, further, a derivation process of a calculation formula of the surrounding rock strength is provided, which is specifically as follows:
wherein: sigma (sigma) 1 Sum sigma 3 Is the maximum principal stress and the minimum principal stress when the rock mass is broken, m b S and a are empirical parameters of rock mass mechanics; while in the rock mass excavation process, controlled blasting and mechanical excavation are strictly adopted, so D=0, and the rock strength test adopts a uniaxial compressive strength test, so sigma 3 =0, whereby the calculation formula of the surrounding rock strength is as follows:
σ cmass =σ 1 =σ c1 S a
in this embodiment, specifically, as shown in fig. 3, the method for obtaining the surrounding rock strength stress ratio is as follows:
step one: establishing a three-dimensional finite element model with complex topography and landform characteristics;
step two: carrying out regression inversion analysis on a tunnel line stress field by adopting a multiple linear regression analysis method (least square method or ridge regression method) in combination with ground stress actual measurement data with limited ground survey data, determining the distribution characteristics and the size of the tunnel line initial stress field, and determining the principal stress of each mileage section so as to obtain the maximum principal stress;
step three: and calculating the stress ratio of the surrounding rock strength based on the maximum main stress and the surrounding rock strength.
In this embodiment, specifically, the third step includes:
α=σ cmass /σ max
wherein: alpha is the stress ratio of surrounding rock strength and sigma max Is the maximum principal stress.
In this embodiment, the deformation rate obtaining method specifically includes the following steps:
the deformation rate (namely the surrounding rock deformation rate) not only can measure the severity of tunnel deformation, but also is an important parameter for representing the release speed of the deformation performance of the excavated surrounding rock, and the value of the deformation rate can be calculated according to the single-day convergence deformation corresponding to the monitoring section.
In this embodiment, the evaluation criteria are specifically as follows:
when the strength of the surrounding rock is more than 8MPa, the stress ratio of the strength of the surrounding rock is more than 0.5, and the deformation rate is less than 1cm & d -1 When the tunnel is in the high deformation level, the tunnel is in the high deformation level;
when the strength of the surrounding rock is between 6 and 8MPa, the stress ratio of the strength of the surrounding rock is between 0.25 and 0.5, and the deformation rate is between 1 and 3 cm.d -1 When the deformation grade is in between, the large deformation grade of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel is judged to be slight;
when the strength of the surrounding rock is between 4 and 6MPa, the stress ratio of the strength of the surrounding rock is between 0.15 and 0.25, and the deformation rate is between 3 and 6 cm.d -1 When the deformation grade of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel is medium;
when the strength of the surrounding rock is between 2 and 4MPa, the stress ratio of the strength of the surrounding rock is between 0.05 and 0.15, and the deformation rate is between 6 and 10 cm.d -1 When the deformation grade is in between, judging that the large deformation grade of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel is serious;
when the strength of the surrounding rock is less than 2MPa, the stress ratio of the strength of the surrounding rock is less than 0.05, and the deformation rate is more than 10cm & d -1 And when the deformation grade of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel is judged to be extremely serious.
I.e. the criteria for evaluation are shown in table 1.
Table 1 criteria for evaluation
The above examples merely illustrate specific embodiments of the application, which are described in more detail and are not to be construed as limiting the scope of the application. It should be noted that it is possible for a person skilled in the art to make several variants and modifications without departing from the technical idea of the application, which fall within the scope of protection of the application.
This background section is provided to generally present the context of the present application and the work of the presently named inventors, to the extent it is described in this background section, as well as the description of the present section as not otherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neither expressly nor impliedly admitted as prior art against the present application.
Claims (10)
1. The large deformation grading method for the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
step S1: obtaining large deformation grading parameters; the large deformation classification parameters include: surrounding rock strength, surrounding rock strength stress ratio and deformation rate;
step S2: and classifying the large deformation of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel based on a preset judgment standard by combining the obtained large deformation classification parameters.
2. The grading method for large deformation of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried soft rock tunnel according to claim 1, wherein the surrounding rock strength obtaining method is as follows:
step A: performing on-site tunnel surrounding rock sampling to obtain a surrounding rock sample, then respectively carrying out point load and uniaxial compression test to determine the strength of the surrounding rock sample, and establishing a fitting relation between the point load strength and the uniaxial compression strength according to a large number of test results;
and (B) step (B): measuring the point load strength of the surrounding rock of the field tunnel, and rapidly obtaining the uniaxial compressive strength of the surrounding rock of the field tunnel based on the fitting relation;
step C: and obtaining the surrounding rock strength of the surrounding rock of the field tunnel based on the uniaxial compressive strength of the surrounding rock of the field tunnel and combining the Hoek-Brown strength criterion.
3. The method for grading the large deformation of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried soft rock tunnel according to claim 2, wherein the step a comprises:
and establishing different fitting relation curves according to the point load strength and the uniaxial compressive strength test data of a large number of surrounding rock samples, and determining the best matching relation of the two fitting relation curves according to the fitting correlation.
4. A method of grading large deformations of ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried soft rock tunnel according to claim 3, characterized in that said different fitted relationship curves comprise:
linear and logarithmic relationships;
wherein the linear relationship is: sigma (sigma) c =aI S(50) +b;
The logarithmic relation is: sigma (sigma) c =aln(I S(50) )+b;
Wherein: sigma (sigma) c Is uniaxial compressive strength, I S(50) For point load strength, a and b are constants.
5. The grading method for large deformation of ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried soft rock tunnel according to claim 4, wherein the step C comprises:
σ cmass =σ c1 S a
wherein: sigma (sigma) cmass For the strength of surrounding rock, sigma c1 The uniaxial compressive strength of the surrounding rock of the field tunnel is shown, and S and a are experimental parameters of rock mass mechanics.
6. The grading method for large deformation of ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried soft rock tunnel according to claim 5, wherein the empirical parameter S of rock mass mechanics is calculated by the following formula:
the rock mass mechanics empirical parameter a is calculated by the following formula:
wherein: GSI is a geological strength index, and D is a disturbance degree parameter for representing the excavated rock mass.
7. The grading method for large deformation of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried soft rock tunnel according to claim 5, wherein the surrounding rock strength stress ratio obtaining method is as follows:
step one: establishing a three-dimensional finite element model with complex topography and landform characteristics;
step two: carrying out regression inversion analysis on the tunnel stress field by adopting a multiple linear regression analysis method in combination with the ground stress actual measurement data with limited ground survey data, determining the distribution characteristics and the size of the tunnel initial stress field, and determining the principal stress of each mileage section so as to obtain the maximum principal stress;
step three: and calculating the stress ratio of the surrounding rock strength based on the maximum main stress and the surrounding rock strength.
8. The method for grading the large deformation of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried soft rock tunnel according to claim 7, wherein the third step comprises:
α=σ cmass /σ max
wherein: alpha is the stress ratio of surrounding rock strength and sigma max Is the maximum principal stress.
9. The grading method for large deformation of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried soft rock tunnel according to claim 1, wherein the deformation rate obtaining method is as follows:
and calculating according to the single-day convergence deformation corresponding to the monitoring section.
10. The grading method for large deformation of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried soft rock tunnel according to claim 1, wherein the evaluation criteria are as follows:
when the strength of the surrounding rock is more than 8MPa, the stress ratio of the strength of the surrounding rock is more than 0.5, and the deformation rate is less than 1cm & d -1 When the tunnel is in the high deformation level, the tunnel is in the high deformation level;
when the strength of the surrounding rock is between 6 and 8MPa, the stress ratio of the strength of the surrounding rock is between 0.25 and 0.5, and the deformation rate is between 1 and 3 cm.d -1 When the deformation grade is in between, the large deformation grade of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel is judged to be slight;
when the strength of the surrounding rock is between 4 and 6MPa, the stress ratio of the strength of the surrounding rock is between 0.15 and 0.25, and the deformation rate is between 3 and 6 cm.d -1 When the deformation grade of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel is medium;
when the strength of the surrounding rock is between 2 and 4MPa, the stress ratio of the strength of the surrounding rock is between 0.05 and 0.15, and the deformation rate is between 6 and 10 cm.d -1 When the time is in between, the judgment is overThe large deformation grade of the high-ground-stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel is serious;
when the strength of the surrounding rock is less than 2MPa, the stress ratio of the strength of the surrounding rock is less than 0.05, and the deformation rate is more than 10cm & d -1 And when the deformation grade of the ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried deep soft rock tunnel is judged to be extremely serious.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202311132352.8A CN116992545B (en) | 2023-09-04 | 2023-09-04 | Large deformation grading method for ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried depth soft rock tunnel |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202311132352.8A CN116992545B (en) | 2023-09-04 | 2023-09-04 | Large deformation grading method for ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried depth soft rock tunnel |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN116992545A true CN116992545A (en) | 2023-11-03 |
CN116992545B CN116992545B (en) | 2024-08-02 |
Family
ID=88523305
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202311132352.8A Active CN116992545B (en) | 2023-09-04 | 2023-09-04 | Large deformation grading method for ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried depth soft rock tunnel |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN116992545B (en) |
Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105350972A (en) * | 2015-10-26 | 2016-02-24 | 中铁二十局集团有限公司 | High-ground-stress weak surrounding rock tunnel excavation construction method |
CN106644728A (en) * | 2017-02-24 | 2017-05-10 | 中国矿业大学(北京) | Point loading test analysis method based on surrounding rock classification of super-large section tunnel |
CN107748103A (en) * | 2017-09-01 | 2018-03-02 | 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 | A kind of tunnel Rockburst Prediction Method, equipment, storage medium and system |
CN110513146A (en) * | 2019-08-30 | 2019-11-29 | 东北大学 | A kind of prospective design stage tunnel surrounding large deformation stage division |
CN111594178A (en) * | 2020-04-28 | 2020-08-28 | 北京交通大学 | Construction control method for sewing horizontal extrusion large deformation of single-track railway tunnel with soft rock |
CN113360998A (en) * | 2021-07-14 | 2021-09-07 | 四川绵九高速公路有限责任公司 | Large deformation trend dynamic judgment and construction decision method for large deformation tunnel |
US20220112806A1 (en) * | 2020-10-13 | 2022-04-14 | Institute Of Rock And Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy Of Sciences | Safety early warning method and device for full-section tunneling of tunnel featuring dynamic water and weak surrounding rock |
CN114352358A (en) * | 2021-12-28 | 2022-04-15 | 中南大学 | Dynamic grading control method and system for large deformation of high-ground-stress deep-buried soft rock tunnel |
CN115163125A (en) * | 2022-07-29 | 2022-10-11 | 中南大学 | Differential grading control method and system suitable for asymmetric extrusion soft rock tunnel |
-
2023
- 2023-09-04 CN CN202311132352.8A patent/CN116992545B/en active Active
Patent Citations (9)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105350972A (en) * | 2015-10-26 | 2016-02-24 | 中铁二十局集团有限公司 | High-ground-stress weak surrounding rock tunnel excavation construction method |
CN106644728A (en) * | 2017-02-24 | 2017-05-10 | 中国矿业大学(北京) | Point loading test analysis method based on surrounding rock classification of super-large section tunnel |
CN107748103A (en) * | 2017-09-01 | 2018-03-02 | 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 | A kind of tunnel Rockburst Prediction Method, equipment, storage medium and system |
CN110513146A (en) * | 2019-08-30 | 2019-11-29 | 东北大学 | A kind of prospective design stage tunnel surrounding large deformation stage division |
CN111594178A (en) * | 2020-04-28 | 2020-08-28 | 北京交通大学 | Construction control method for sewing horizontal extrusion large deformation of single-track railway tunnel with soft rock |
US20220112806A1 (en) * | 2020-10-13 | 2022-04-14 | Institute Of Rock And Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy Of Sciences | Safety early warning method and device for full-section tunneling of tunnel featuring dynamic water and weak surrounding rock |
CN113360998A (en) * | 2021-07-14 | 2021-09-07 | 四川绵九高速公路有限责任公司 | Large deformation trend dynamic judgment and construction decision method for large deformation tunnel |
CN114352358A (en) * | 2021-12-28 | 2022-04-15 | 中南大学 | Dynamic grading control method and system for large deformation of high-ground-stress deep-buried soft rock tunnel |
CN115163125A (en) * | 2022-07-29 | 2022-10-11 | 中南大学 | Differential grading control method and system suitable for asymmetric extrusion soft rock tunnel |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
Title |
---|
李国良;刘志春;朱永全;: "兰渝铁路高地应力软岩隧道挤压大变形规律及分级标准研究", 现代隧道技术, no. 01, 15 February 2015 (2015-02-15), pages 66 - 72 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN116992545B (en) | 2024-08-02 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Wang et al. | Bayesian characterization of correlation between uniaxial compressive strength and Young's modulus of rock | |
Villaescusa et al. | Stress measurements from oriented core | |
CN110864966B (en) | Compressibility evaluation method suitable for fractured rock | |
Lim et al. | In-situ stress and microcracking in granite cores with depth | |
CN106526128B (en) | Method for acquiring strength parameters of fractured rock mass | |
CN107907409B (en) | Method, equipment and storage equipment for determining rock cracking stress | |
CN109740119B (en) | Rapid estimation method for uniaxial compressive strength of surrounding rock of TBM tunneling tunnel | |
Tuncay et al. | Comparison of stresses obtained from acoustic emission and compact conical-ended borehole overcoring techniques and an evaluation of the Kaiser effect level | |
CN116861704B (en) | Dynamic rapid prediction method for large deformation grade of high-ground-stress soft rock tunnel | |
CN113820750A (en) | Method for quantitatively predicting mudstone structural cracks based on elastoplasticity mechanics | |
Li et al. | Shrink-swell index database for Melbourne | |
CN109765097B (en) | Tunnel surrounding rock rapid classification method based on RPD drilling machine | |
Liu et al. | Case study: using the point load test to estimate rock strength of tunnels constructed by a tunnel boring machine | |
Karaman et al. | Effect of the specimen length on ultrasonic P-wave velocity in some volcanic rocks and limestones | |
CN113109228A (en) | Coal mine geological drilling-based method for determining permeability coefficient of loose confined aquifer | |
CN110231407B (en) | Method for judging effectiveness of carbonate rock cover layer | |
Strub-Klein | A statistical analysis of first-year level ice uniaxial compressive strength in the Svalbard area | |
CN104678455A (en) | Terrestrial fracture-cavern reservoir identification method | |
CN109763812B (en) | Hydrate exploitation mechanical stability quantitative analysis method based on mole-coulomb theory | |
KR101722934B1 (en) | Engineering geological rock classification method of disintegrated rock | |
CN116992545B (en) | Large deformation grading method for ultra-high ground stress ultra-large buried depth soft rock tunnel | |
Georgiannou et al. | A laboratory study of post-rupture strength | |
Pineda et al. | Testing block samples from silty deposits | |
Mazzoli et al. | ‘Diffuse faulting’in the Machu Picchu granitoid pluton, Eastern Cordillera, Peru | |
Kang et al. | Evaluation of core disking rock stress and tensile strength via the compact conical-ended borehole overcoring technique |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |