CN116879452A - Method for simultaneously detecting various aniline genotoxic impurities in pirenzenenaphthalene - Google Patents

Method for simultaneously detecting various aniline genotoxic impurities in pirenzenenaphthalene Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN116879452A
CN116879452A CN202310929452.7A CN202310929452A CN116879452A CN 116879452 A CN116879452 A CN 116879452A CN 202310929452 A CN202310929452 A CN 202310929452A CN 116879452 A CN116879452 A CN 116879452A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
mobile phase
solution
toluidine
acetonitrile
aniline
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202310929452.7A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
毕红娜
杨杰
解春文
于晓燕
胡醒
王文笙
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Beijing Dayin High Tech Children Medicine Research Institute Co ltd
Shandong Dyne Marine Biopharmaceutical Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Beijing Dayin High Tech Children Medicine Research Institute Co ltd
Shandong Dyne Marine Biopharmaceutical Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Beijing Dayin High Tech Children Medicine Research Institute Co ltd, Shandong Dyne Marine Biopharmaceutical Co Ltd filed Critical Beijing Dayin High Tech Children Medicine Research Institute Co ltd
Priority to CN202310929452.7A priority Critical patent/CN116879452A/en
Publication of CN116879452A publication Critical patent/CN116879452A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N30/00Investigating or analysing materials by separation into components using adsorption, absorption or similar phenomena or using ion-exchange, e.g. chromatography or field flow fractionation
    • G01N30/02Column chromatography
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N30/00Investigating or analysing materials by separation into components using adsorption, absorption or similar phenomena or using ion-exchange, e.g. chromatography or field flow fractionation
    • G01N30/02Column chromatography
    • G01N30/04Preparation or injection of sample to be analysed
    • G01N30/06Preparation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N30/00Investigating or analysing materials by separation into components using adsorption, absorption or similar phenomena or using ion-exchange, e.g. chromatography or field flow fractionation
    • G01N30/02Column chromatography
    • G01N30/26Conditioning of the fluid carrier; Flow patterns
    • G01N30/28Control of physical parameters of the fluid carrier
    • G01N30/34Control of physical parameters of the fluid carrier of fluid composition, e.g. gradient
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N30/00Investigating or analysing materials by separation into components using adsorption, absorption or similar phenomena or using ion-exchange, e.g. chromatography or field flow fractionation
    • G01N30/02Column chromatography
    • G01N30/04Preparation or injection of sample to be analysed
    • G01N2030/042Standards
    • G01N2030/047Standards external

Landscapes

  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Life Sciences & Earth Sciences (AREA)
  • Chemical & Material Sciences (AREA)
  • Analytical Chemistry (AREA)
  • Biochemistry (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Immunology (AREA)
  • Pathology (AREA)
  • Investigating Or Analyzing Non-Biological Materials By The Use Of Chemical Means (AREA)

Abstract

The application provides a method for simultaneously detecting various aniline genotoxic impurities in pirenzenenaphthalene. The method employs high performance liquid chromatography, which includes: taking potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution as mobile phase A, acetonitrile as mobile phase B, acetonitrile for dissolving and diluting the pirenzenenaphthalene to prepare a sample solution, acetonitrile-mobile phase A solution for dissolving and diluting the reference substance to prepare a reference substance solution stock solution, and acetonitrile for diluting the reference substance solution stock solution to prepare a reference substance solution; wherein the plurality of aniline genotoxic impurities are aniline, o-toluidine and p-toluidine. The method has wide linear range, can reach a detection limit as low as 0.0336 mug/mL, has a quantitative limit as low as 0.001%, has incomparable advantages in repeatability and durability, and has higher precision and accuracy.

Description

Method for simultaneously detecting various aniline genotoxic impurities in pirenzenenaphthalene
Technical Field
The application relates to the field of chemical drug analysis and detection, in particular to a method for simultaneously detecting various aniline genotoxic impurities in pirenzenenaphthalene.
Background
Any discussion of the prior art throughout the specification should in no way be considered as an admission that such prior art is widely known or forms part of common general knowledge in the field.
Pirenzenenaphthalene (Perampanel, trade name Fycompa) chemical name [2- (6 '-oxo-1' -phenyl-1 ',6' -dihydro- [2,3 '-bipyridyl ] -5' -yl) benzonitrile ] tri-quarterhydrate, is a non-competitive alpha-amino-3 hydroxy-5 methyl-4 isoxazole receptor (AMPAR) antagonist, is an antiepileptic drug developed by japan sanitary pharmacy (EISAI) company, and is used for the adjuvant treatment of partial seizures in children aged 12 years and older (with or without secondary global seizures).
The process route of the pirenzenenaphthalene is to take o-bromophenylacetic acid and aniline as starting materials, and to produce the pirenzenenaphthalene through condensation, cyanidation and cyclization. Genotoxic impurities are mainly derived from starting materials, intermediates, reagents and reaction byproducts in the raw material synthesis process, and can also be generated by degradation in drug storage.
The international coordination of human drug registration (ICH) mandates guidelines for evaluating and controlling DNA-reactive (mutagenic) impurities in drugs to limit potential carcinogenic risk-ICH M7 (R1), aiming at providing a viable framework for identification, classification, characterization and control of mutagenic impurities for controlling potential carcinogenic risk of impurities. A common method for limiting genotoxic impurities is the toxicological attention threshold method (TTC), which requires a TTC value of 1.5 μg/d for genotoxic impurities in bulk drugs and formulations. In the study on pirenzenenaphthalene, the control limit was calculated as the maximum daily dose, which was 12mg, and thus the control limit for each genotoxic impurity was 0.0125%.
The limit of genotoxic impurities is low, and most detection methods also use LC-MS or GC-MS for detection; because the LC-MS or GC-MS instrument is more expensive, most of the QC departments of pharmaceutical enterprises do not have the detection conditions of LC-MS or GC-MS, so the development of the conventional liquid chromatography method for detecting the genotoxic impurities has more practicability.
Disclosure of Invention
The application provides a detection method for simultaneously detecting 3 aniline genotoxic impurities in pirenzenenaphthalene, which has the advantages of strong specificity, high accuracy, high precision, good durability and the like.
Specifically, the application provides the following technical scheme.
The inventor researches and analyzes the technical process for synthesizing the pirenzenenaphthalene, and finds that the related genotoxic impurities mainly comprise: aniline, o-toluidine and p-toluidine.
Thus, in a first aspect of the present application there is provided the use of one or more of aniline, o-toluidine, p-toluidine as a control in the quality control of a drug substance of pirenzenenaphthalene or a formulation thereof.
In a second aspect of the present application, there is provided a method for simultaneously detecting a plurality of anilines genotoxic impurities in pirenzenenaphthalene, said method employing high performance liquid chromatography comprising:
taking potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution as mobile phase A, acetonitrile as mobile phase B, acetonitrile for dissolving and diluting the pirenzenenaphthalene to prepare a sample solution, acetonitrile-mobile phase A solution for dissolving and diluting the reference substance to prepare a reference substance solution stock solution, and acetonitrile for diluting the reference substance solution stock solution to prepare a reference substance solution;
wherein the plurality of aniline genotoxic impurities are aniline, o-toluidine and p-toluidine.
In some embodiments of the application, the pH of mobile phase a is 4-5.
In the embodiment of the application, the separation effect between aniline and p-toluidine is particularly easy to be influenced by the pH value, wherein the peak of aniline and p-toluidine is difficult to separate when the pH value of the mobile phase A is below 4, and the separation effect is good when the pH value is above 4 although the separation effect is poor when the pH value is 4.
In some embodiments of the application, the mobile phase A is 0.018 to 0.022mol/L potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution, preferably 0.02mol/L potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution. In embodiments of the application, good separation of three impurities can be achieved without adjusting the pH when mobile phase a is within this concentration range, and the degree of separation can be greater than 5.
In some embodiments of the application, the acetonitrile-mobile phase A solution has a volume ratio of acetonitrile to mobile phase A of 20-30:70-80, preferably 20:80.
In some embodiments of the present application, other control solvents, such as 50% acetonitrile-mobile phase A, e.g., 0.05% to 0.2% phosphoric acid solution-acetonitrile (80:20), etc., have also been tried, and as a result, are not ideal, and may have a lower degree of tailing and/or separation between impurities, or even be difficult to separate.
In some embodiments of the application, the method may comprise:
taking a pirenzenenape sample, precisely weighing, adding acetonitrile for dissolving and diluting to a scale, and shaking uniformly to prepare a sample solution;
respectively weighing reference substances of aniline, o-toluidine and p-toluidine, placing into a same measuring flask, dissolving with acetonitrile-mobile phase A solution, diluting to scale, shaking, and collecting as reference substance solution stock solution;
precisely measuring a reference substance solution stock solution, diluting with acetonitrile to a required scale, and shaking to obtain a reference substance solution;
and respectively precisely measuring the sample solution and the reference substance solution, injecting into a high performance liquid chromatograph, and calculating the contents of the aniline, the o-toluidine and the p-toluidine in the sample solution by adopting an external standard method according to peak areas.
In some embodiments of the application, the chromatographic conditions of the method are:
chromatographic column: octadecylsilane chromatographic column;
mobile phase a:0.018 to 0.022mol/L of potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution, preferably 0.02mol/L of potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution;
mobile phase B: acetonitrile;
flow rate: 0.95-1.05 mL/min, preferably 1.0mL/min;
column temperature: 33-37 ℃, preferably 35 ℃;
detection wavelength: 230-234 nm, preferably 232nm;
sample injection amount: 10 mu L.
In some embodiments of the application, the method comprises: linear gradient elution was performed using mobile phase a and mobile phase B, wherein the linear gradient elution procedure was:
the ratio of the mobile phase A to the mobile phase B is kept at 75:25 within 0-25 min;
25-40 min, reducing the proportion of the mobile phase A, and simultaneously increasing the proportion of the mobile phase B to 20:80;
the ratio of the mobile phase A is increased and the ratio of the mobile phase B is reduced to 75:25 in 40-41 min;
and (4) keeping the ratio of the mobile phase A to the mobile phase B at 75:25 in 41-50 min.
In some embodiments of the application, the linear range of aniline is 0.0671-2.2371 mug/mL, the linear range of para-toluidine is 0.1305-2.1755 mug/mL, the linear range of ortho-toluidine is 0.1328-2.2131 mug/mL, all correlation coefficient r values are greater than 0.999, which shows that the method of the application has good linear relation, and the conversion of signal and concentration can be performed by a linear equation in the linear range studied, so as to obtain accurate content or impurity determination result.
In some embodiments of the application, the detection limit of the method is as low as 0.0336 μg/mL, i.e., more than 0.0004% of impurities in pirenzenenaphthalene can be detected, and the quantification limit can be as low as 0.001% (10 ppm).
In some embodiments of the application, the method for detecting and calculating 3 anilide genotoxic impurities (aniline, p-toluidine and o-toluidine) in pirenzenenaphthalene comprises:
1. chromatographic conditions:
instrument: agilent 1260
Chromatographic column: inertisl ODS-3V C18 (250 mm. Times.4.6 mm,5 μm);
mobile phase a:0.02mol/L potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution (natural pH of about 4.63);
mobile phase B: acetonitrile;
flow rate: 1.0mL/min;
column temperature: 35 ℃;
detection wavelength: 232nm;
sample injection amount: 10. Mu.L;
gradient elution, elution procedure is as shown in table 1:
table 1: gradient elution procedure
Time (minutes) Mobile phase a (%) Mobile phase B (%)
0 75 25
25 75 25
30 20 80
40 20 80
41 75 25
50 75 25
2. Detection method
(1) Preparing test solution
Taking 80mg of a pirenzenenaphthalene sample, precisely weighing, placing into a 10mL measuring flask, adding acetonitrile for dissolution, diluting to a scale, and shaking uniformly to obtain the product;
(2) Preparing reference substance solution
Respectively taking about 25mg of each of aniline, o-toluidine and p-toluidine reference substances, precisely weighing, placing into the same 25mL measuring flask, dissolving with acetonitrile-mobile phase A (20:80), diluting to scale, shaking uniformly, and taking as reference substance solution stock solution; precisely measuring 0.1mL of reference substance solution stock solution, placing into a 100mL measuring flask, diluting to scale with acetonitrile, and shaking to obtain the final product;
(3) Respectively precisely measuring the sample solution and the reference solution, injecting into a liquid chromatograph, recording the chromatograms, and calculating the contents of aniline, o-toluidine and p-toluidine in the sample solution by adopting an external standard method according to peak areas;
wherein, the content calculation formula is:
content (%) =f of each genotoxic impurity in test solution Average of ×A i ×V i /m i ×100%
Wherein: f=m s ×c s /(V s ×A s );
Wherein: f is a response factor; m is m s Weighing the sample amount of each genotoxic impurity in the reference substance solution;
c s content,%; v (V) s Is used as reference substance in solutionTotal dilution volume of sex impurities; a is that s Peak area for each genotoxic impurity in the control solution; f (f) Average of Is the average value of the response factors; a is that i Peak areas of genotoxic impurities in the sample solution; m is m i Is the sample weighing amount of the test sample; v (V) i Is the dilution volume of the test sample.
The specific features described in the above embodiments of the present application may be combined in any suitable manner, and in order to avoid unnecessary repetition, various possible combinations are not described further.
The numerical ranges recited herein include all numbers within the range and include any two values within the range, unless specifically stated otherwise. For example, 4-5, which includes all values between 4-5, and which includes a range of values (4.37-4.63) consisting of any two values (e.g., 4.1, 4.37, 4.63) within the range; the different values of the same index appearing in all embodiments of the application can be combined arbitrarily to form a range value.
Advantages of the present application compared to the prior art include: the method for simultaneously detecting 3 aniline genotoxic impurities in the pirenzenenaphthalene, namely the aniline, the p-toluidine and the o-toluidine can well separate the three impurities and measure the content of the three impurities, has strong specificity, high accuracy and precision and good durability, and is suitable for accurately controlling the 3 aniline genotoxic impurities in the pirenzenenaphthalene.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are included to provide a further understanding of the application and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments of the application and together with the description serve to explain the application. Embodiments of the present application are described in detail below with reference to the attached drawing figures, wherein:
FIG. 1 is a chromatogram of a control solution at different mobile phase pH in example 2 (aniline, p-toluidine and o-toluidine in order from left to right).
FIG. 2 is a chromatogram of the control solution in example 3 (elution procedure of Table 2).
FIG. 3 is a chromatogram of the control solution in example 3 (elution procedure of Table 1).
FIG. 4 is a chromatogram of the control solution of example 4.
FIG. 5 is a hollow white solvent chromatogram of example 5.
FIG. 6 is a chromatogram of the sample solution in example 5.
FIG. 7 is a chromatogram of the sample solution of example 5, wherein peak 1 is aniline; peak 2 is p-toluidine; peak 3 is o-toluidine.
FIG. 8 is a standard graph of aniline in example 5.
FIG. 9 is a standard graph of o-toluidine in example 5.
FIG. 10 is a standard graph of p-toluidine in example 5.
Detailed Description
The application will be further illustrated with reference to specific examples. It is to be understood that these examples are illustrative of the present application and are not intended to limit the scope of the present application. The experimental procedures, which do not address the specific conditions in the examples below, are generally carried out under conventional conditions or under conditions recommended by the manufacturer.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art. The reagents or materials used in the present application may be purchased in conventional manners, and unless otherwise indicated, they may be used in conventional manners in the art or according to the product specifications. In addition, any methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the methods of the present application. The preferred methods and materials described herein are presented for illustrative purposes only.
The instrument and reagent information used in the following examples of the application are shown in the following table:
example 1
The present embodiment provides a method for simultaneously detecting 3 kinds of aniline genotoxic impurities (aniline, p-toluidine and o-toluidine) in pirenzenenaphthalene, in which 3 batches (220916, 220919, 220920) of pirenzenenaphthalene raw material medicines are weighed respectively, and the content of 3 kinds of aniline genotoxic impurities (aniline, p-toluidine and o-toluidine) in pirenzenenaphthalene is detected and calculated. The method comprises the following steps:
1. chromatographic conditions:
instrument: agilent 1260
Chromatographic column: inertisl ODS-3V C18 (250 mm. Times.4.6 mm,5 μm);
mobile phase a:0.02mol/L potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution (natural pH of about 4.63);
mobile phase B: acetonitrile;
flow rate: 1.0mL/min;
column temperature: 35 ℃;
detection wavelength: 232nm;
sample injection amount: 10 mu L.
Gradient elution, elution procedure is as shown in table 1:
table 1: gradient elution procedure
Time (minutes) Mobile phase a (%) Mobile phase B (%)
0 75 25
25 75 25
30 20 80
40 20 80
41 75 25
50 75 25
2. Detection method
(1) Preparing test solution
Taking 80mg of a pirenzenenaphthalene sample, precisely weighing, placing into a 10mL measuring flask, adding acetonitrile for dissolution, diluting to a scale, and shaking uniformly to obtain the product;
(2) Preparing reference substance solution
Respectively taking about 25mg of each of aniline, o-toluidine and p-toluidine reference substances, precisely weighing, placing into the same 25mL measuring flask, dissolving with acetonitrile-mobile phase A (20:80), diluting to scale, shaking uniformly, and taking as reference substance solution stock solution; precisely measuring 0.1mL of reference solution stock solution, placing into a 100mL measuring flask, diluting to scale with acetonitrile, and shaking to obtain the final product.
(3) And respectively precisely measuring the sample solution and the reference solution, injecting into a liquid chromatograph, recording the chromatograms, and calculating the contents of the aniline, the o-toluidine and the p-toluidine in the sample solution by adopting an external standard method according to peak areas.
Wherein, the content calculation formula is:
content (%) =f of each genotoxic impurity in test solution Average of ×A i ×V i /m i ×100%
Wherein: f=m s ×c s /(V s ×A s );
Wherein: f is a response factor; m is m s Weighing the sample amount of each genotoxic impurity in the reference substance solution;
c s content,%; v (V) s The total dilution volume of each genotoxic impurity in the reference substance solution; a is that s Peak area for each genotoxic impurity in the control solution; f (f) Average of Is the average value of the response factors; a is that i Peak areas of genotoxic impurities in the sample solution; m is m i Is the sample weighing amount of the test sample; v (V) i Is the dilution volume of the test sample.
Results: no aniline, o-toluidine and p-toluidine are detected in the 3 batches of pirenzenenaphthalene bulk drugs.
Example 2
The pH of mobile phase A was changed to 3.79, 4.37 and 4 from 0.02mol/L potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution (natural pH of about 4.63) by adjusting the pH to 3.79, 4.37 and 4, respectively, as compared with example 1, and the control solution was again examined in the same manner as in example 1, the examination results being shown in FIG. 1, which shows chromatograms of mobile phase A at pH of 3.79, 4, 4.37 and 4.63, respectively, wherein aniline, p-toluidine and o-toluidine were sequentially listed from left to right in FIG. 1.
As a result, it was found that the separation effect between aniline and p-toluidine was easily affected by pH, and the mobile phase a was difficult to separate at pH of 4 or less, but was able to separate at pH of 4, but was inferior in degree of separation, and was good at pH of more than 4, but the separation effect was more excellent at pH of not adjusting pH alone, that is, the mobile phase a was separated with 0.02mol/L potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution (natural pH of about 4.63).
Example 3
Compared with example 1, the mobile phase A, the solvent and the elution procedure were changed, and the same as example 1, wherein the mobile phase A was a 0.1% ammonium acetate solution (pH was adjusted to 4.0 with glacial acetic acid), the control solvent was 50% acetonitrile-mobile phase A, the gradient elution conditions were as shown in Table 2, and the detection results are shown in FIG. 2.
Table 2: gradient elution procedure
According to the detection result, the baseline fluctuation is large, the signal intensity change is not obvious due to the large baseline fluctuation, the detection limit and the quantitative limit are increased, the analysis sensitivity is low, the integral data is unstable, and the precision and the accuracy of the result are obviously affected.
The elution procedure was adjusted based on the above method, and elution was performed according to the elution procedure shown in table 1, the detection results are shown in fig. 3, and table 3 shows the chromatogram of the control solution. The results show that baseline fluctuations are slightly improved compared to the above method, but there are still larger fluctuations, and the degree of separation of aniline from p-toluidine is lower, both of which are poorly separated.
Example 4
The control solvent was changed to 50% acetonitrile-mobile phase A as compared to example 1, except that example 1 was followed.
The detection results are shown in FIG. 4. The result shows that trailing phenomenon exists in three impurities of the aniline, the p-toluidine and the o-toluidine, the separation degree of the p-toluidine and the o-toluidine is low, and the separation effect is poor.
Example 5Method investigation
The methods described in example 1 were examined for specificity, limit of detection and limit of quantification, linearity and range, accuracy, repeatability, precision, stability and durability of the solution, respectively, and the methods and results were as follows:
1. methodological verification
1.1 specificity
Each impurity localization solution: respectively taking about 25mg of each of aniline, o-toluidine and p-toluidine reference substances, precisely weighing, placing into different 25mL measuring flasks, dissolving with acetonitrile-mobile phase A (20:80, mobile phase A is 0.02mol/L potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution) and diluting to scale, shaking uniformly, and taking as each impurity stock solution; accurately measuring 0.1mL of each impurity stock solution, placing into different 100mL measuring bottles, diluting to scale with acetonitrile, and shaking to obtain the final product.
Test solution: taking about 80mg of the product, placing in a 10mL measuring flask, adding acetonitrile for dissolving and diluting to a scale, and shaking uniformly to obtain the product.
Sample addition test solution: about 80mg of the product is taken, placed in a 10mL measuring flask, 0.1mL of each of aniline, o-toluidine and p-toluidine stock solution is precisely added, and the mixture is dissolved and diluted to a scale by acetonitrile, and is uniformly shaken to obtain the product.
According to the chromatographic conditions of example 1, a blank solution, i.e., acetonitrile-mobile phase A (20:80, mobile phase A is 0.02mol/L potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution), each impurity locating solution, a sample solution and a sample-adding sample solution are respectively injected, chromatograms are recorded, detection results are shown in fig. 5-7 and Table 3, wherein the blank solvent chromatograms are shown in fig. 5, the sample solution chromatograms are shown in fig. 6, the sample-adding sample solution chromatograms are shown in fig. 7, the results show that the separation degree between impurities is greater than 5, and the method of example 1 has good specificity.
Table 3: results of the proprietary test
1.2 detection limit and quantitative limit
Respectively taking appropriate amounts of aniline, o-toluidine and p-toluidine as reference substances, respectively gradually diluting to low concentration, injecting into a liquid chromatograph, and recording chromatogram. The concentration of the signal to noise ratio S/N is more than or equal to 3 is used as the detection limit concentration, and the concentration of the signal to noise ratio S/N is more than or equal to 10 is used as the quantitative limit concentration. The results are shown in Table 4.
Table 4: limit of detection and limit of quantification results
The detection limit and the quantitative limit concentration of each impurity are smaller than the report limit concentration, and both meet the requirements, so that the method of the embodiment 1 is good in sensitivity, the detection limit can be as low as 0.0336 mug/mL, and the impurity higher than 0.0004% in the pirenzenenaphthalene can be detected.
1.3 linearity and Range
Linear stock solution: precisely measuring aniline, o-toluidine and p-toluidine stock solutions respectively by 1mL, placing into the same 10mL measuring flask, diluting to scale with acetonitrile, and shaking uniformly to obtain the final product.
The quantitative limit concentration was taken as a linear 1 solution.
0.5mL, 1.0mL, 1.5mL and 2.0mL of the linear stock solution were precisely measured, placed in 10mL measuring flasks, diluted to the scale with acetonitrile, and shaken well to obtain solutions of linearity 2 (50%), linearity 3 (100%), linearity 4 (150%) and linearity 5 (200%).
According to the chromatographic conditions of example 1, linear regression analysis was performed with the concentration (C) as the abscissa (X-axis) and the peak area (A) as the ordinate (Y-axis), and the r-value of each impurity was greater than 0.999 and approximately 1 in the quantitative limit to 200% limit concentration range, and the Y-axis intercept deviation was within 2%, and the linearity was good. The results are shown in FIGS. 8-10 and Table 5, wherein FIG. 8 is a standard graph of aniline, FIG. 9 is a standard graph of o-toluidine, and FIG. 10 is a standard graph of p-toluidine.
Table 5: results of the Linear test
Name of the name Quadratic equation r y-axis intercept deviation Concentration range
Aniline y=44.5676x-0.6796 0.9998 1.55% 0.0671μg/mL~2.2371μg/mL
Para-toluidine y=35.5926x-0.4305 0.9999 1.22% 0.1305μg/mL~2.1755μg/mL
O-toluidine y=36.8111x-0.4334 0.9998 1.19% 0.1328μg/mL~2.2131μg/mL
1.4 accuracy
A control solution stock was prepared as described in example 1.
50% level test solution: about 80mg of the product is taken, placed in a 10mL measuring flask, 50 mu L of each impurity reference substance solution stock solution is precisely added, acetonitrile is added for dissolution, dilution is carried out to scale, and shaking is carried out uniformly. Triplicate formulations were prepared.
100% level test solution: about 80mg of the product is taken, placed in a 10mL measuring flask, 100 mu L of each impurity reference substance solution stock solution is precisely added, acetonitrile is added for dissolution, dilution is carried out to scale, and shaking is carried out uniformly. Triplicate formulations were prepared.
150% level test solution: about 80mg of the product is taken, placed in a 10mL measuring flask, 150 mu L of each impurity reference substance solution stock solution is precisely added, acetonitrile is added for dissolution, dilution is carried out to scale, and shaking is carried out uniformly. Triplicate formulations were prepared.
Test solution: taking about 80mg of the product, placing in a 10mL measuring flask, adding acetonitrile for dissolving and diluting to a scale, and shaking uniformly to obtain the product. Recovery was calculated according to the external standard method according to the chromatographic conditions of example 1, and the detection results are shown in Table 6.
Table 6: recovery test results
As shown in the table above, the average value of the recovery rate of each impurity at three concentration levels is in the range of 80.0% -120.0%, and the RSD% of the recovery rate results of 9 samples is less than 10%, which proves that the method has good accuracy.
1.5 repeatability
2 portions of control solution were prepared in parallel as described in example 1;
6 parts of test solutions were prepared in parallel according to the method described in example 1;
the detection was carried out according to the chromatographic conditions of example 1, and the content of each impurity was calculated according to the external standard method. The results are shown in Table 7.
Table 7: results of the repeatability test
As shown in the table above, the content RSD% of the aniline, the o-toluidine and the p-toluidine is less than 1.0%, which indicates that the repeatability of the method is good.
1.6 intermediate precision
Taking the same batch of samples, adopting different testers to test by adopting different instruments at different times according to the preparation method of the repeated test sample solution, carrying out intermediate precision test according to the repeated test operation, preparing six samples of the sample solution in parallel, measuring the content of each impurity in the samples, and evaluating the intermediate precision of the method by combining the repeated test results. The results are shown in Table 8.
Table 8: results of intermediate precision test
As shown in the table above, the RSD of each genotoxic impurity content in 12 samples is within 5%, which indicates that the intermediate precision of the method is good.
1.7 solution stability
The control solution was prepared as described in example 1 and the sample solution was prepared as described in example 5, part 1.1, and the sample solution was placed at room temperature and measured at time points of 0,3,6,9, 12, 24, 48, 72h, respectively, according to the chromatographic conditions of example 1. The results are shown in tables 9 and 10.
Table 9: reference substance solution
Table 10: sample adding test solution
Time (h) Area of aniline peak Peak area of p-toluidine O-toluidine peak area
0 49.973 35.606 38.036
3 49.688 35.833 38.111
6 49.818 35.888 38.329
9 50.008 35.382 37.821
12 50.570 36.170 38.052
24 50.243 35.773 38.804
48 50.130 36.109 38.783
72 50.499 36.548 38.644
RSD(%) 0.7 1.1 1.0
The test results show that the peak areas of the aniline, the o-toluidine and the p-toluidine in the control solution and the sample-adding test solution in 72 hours are not obviously changed, and the solution is proved to be stable in 72 hours.
1.8 durability
Under the conditions of changing detection wavelength (230-234 nm), column temperature (33-37 ℃), flow rate (0.95-1.05 mL/min), concentration of monopotassium phosphate solution (0.018-0.022 mol/L), changing different chromatographic columns and the like, the content change condition of each genotoxic impurity in the sample solution and the separation degree condition of each impurity are examined. The detailed results are shown in Table 11.
Table 11: durability test results
The test results show that under the detection conditions, the RSD% of the content change of the aniline, the o-toluidine and the p-toluidine is within 10%, and the method has good durability.
Taken together, the methodology validation results demonstrate that: the method described in example 1 is used for determining the content of 3 aniline genotoxic impurities in the pirenzenenaphthalene, has strong specificity, high accuracy and precision and good durability, and is suitable for accurately controlling the 3 aniline genotoxic impurities in the pirenzenenaphthalene.
The foregoing description is only a preferred embodiment of the present application, and the present application is not limited thereto, but it is to be understood that modifications and equivalents of some of the technical features described in the foregoing embodiments may be made by those skilled in the art, although the present application has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present application should be included in the protection scope of the present application.

Claims (10)

1. A method for simultaneously detecting a plurality of aniline genotoxic impurities in pirenzenenaphthalene, which is characterized by adopting high performance liquid chromatography and comprising the following steps:
taking potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution as mobile phase A, acetonitrile as mobile phase B, acetonitrile for dissolving and diluting the pirenzenenaphthalene to prepare a sample solution, acetonitrile-mobile phase A solution for dissolving and diluting the reference substance to prepare a reference substance solution stock solution, and acetonitrile for diluting the reference substance solution stock solution to prepare a reference substance solution;
wherein the plurality of aniline genotoxic impurities are aniline, o-toluidine and p-toluidine.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the pH of mobile phase a is 4-5.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein mobile phase a is 0.018 to 0.022mol/L potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution.
4. The method according to claim 1, wherein the volume ratio of acetonitrile to mobile phase a in the acetonitrile-mobile phase a solution is 20-30:70-80.
5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the mobile phase A is a 0.02mol/L potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution, and the volume ratio of acetonitrile to mobile phase A in the acetonitrile-mobile phase A solution is 20:80.
6. The method according to claim 1, characterized in that the method comprises:
taking a pirenzenenape sample, precisely weighing, adding acetonitrile for dissolving and diluting to a scale, and shaking uniformly to prepare a sample solution;
respectively weighing reference substances of aniline, o-toluidine and p-toluidine, placing into a same measuring flask, dissolving with acetonitrile-mobile phase A solution, diluting to scale, shaking, and collecting as reference substance solution stock solution;
precisely measuring a reference substance solution stock solution, diluting with acetonitrile to a required scale, and shaking to obtain a reference substance solution;
and respectively precisely measuring the sample solution and the reference substance solution, injecting into a high performance liquid chromatograph, and calculating the contents of the aniline, the o-toluidine and the p-toluidine in the sample solution by adopting an external standard method according to peak areas.
7. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, wherein the chromatographic conditions are:
chromatographic column: octadecylsilane chromatographic column
Mobile phase a: 0.018-0.022 mol/L potassium dihydrogen phosphate solution
Mobile phase B: acetonitrile
Flow rate: 0.95-1.05 mL/min
Column temperature: 33-37 DEG C
Detection wavelength: 230-234 nm
Sample injection amount: 10 mu L.
8. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 6, characterized in that the method comprises: linear gradient elution was performed using mobile phase a and mobile phase B, with the linear gradient elution procedure:
the ratio of the mobile phase A to the mobile phase B is kept at 75:25 within 0-25 min;
25-40 min, reducing the proportion of the mobile phase A, and simultaneously increasing the proportion of the mobile phase B to 20:80;
the ratio of the mobile phase A is increased and the ratio of the mobile phase B is reduced to 75:25 in 40-41 min;
and (4) keeping the ratio of the mobile phase A to the mobile phase B at 75:25 in 41-50 min.
9. The method according to any one of claims 1 to 5, wherein in the method, the linear range of aniline is 0.0671 μg/mL to 2.2371 μg/mL, the linear range of para-toluidine is 0.1305 μg/mL to 2.1755 μg/mL, and the linear range of ortho-toluidine is 0.1328 μg/mL to 2.2131 μg/mL.
10. The application of one or more of aniline, o-toluidine and p-toluidine as reference substances in the quality control of pirenzenepamine bulk drug or preparation thereof.
CN202310929452.7A 2023-07-26 2023-07-26 Method for simultaneously detecting various aniline genotoxic impurities in pirenzenenaphthalene Pending CN116879452A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310929452.7A CN116879452A (en) 2023-07-26 2023-07-26 Method for simultaneously detecting various aniline genotoxic impurities in pirenzenenaphthalene

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310929452.7A CN116879452A (en) 2023-07-26 2023-07-26 Method for simultaneously detecting various aniline genotoxic impurities in pirenzenenaphthalene

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN116879452A true CN116879452A (en) 2023-10-13

Family

ID=88258552

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202310929452.7A Pending CN116879452A (en) 2023-07-26 2023-07-26 Method for simultaneously detecting various aniline genotoxic impurities in pirenzenenaphthalene

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN116879452A (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN107543872B (en) Method for separating and determining edoxaban tosylate hydrate and isomer impurities thereof by chiral high performance liquid chromatography
CN115097023B (en) High performance liquid chromatography detection method for zomib amine related substances
CN108802206A (en) Method that is a kind of while measuring main component and the content of major impurity in cefotaxime sodium and tazobactam sodium for injection
CN111208215B (en) Method for detecting impurity 2-mercaptobenzothiazole in ceftriaxone sodium
CN114994205B (en) Method for detecting related impurities in deferasirox granules
CN116879452A (en) Method for simultaneously detecting various aniline genotoxic impurities in pirenzenenaphthalene
CN106645494B (en) According to a detection method of the piperazine azoles starting material in relation to substance
CN113820409B (en) Method for detecting related substances in mother nucleus of moxifloxacin
CN114965749A (en) Detection method of related substances in sulpiride bulk drug
CN111307985B (en) Method for detecting genotoxic impurities in antihypertensive drug intermediate
CN114689767A (en) Method for detecting aripiprazole raw material and related substances of aripiprazole preparation
CN117630202B (en) Method for detecting buspirone hydrochloride intermediate impurities
CN107966498B (en) Method for detecting solvent residue in Idelalis
CN115728419B (en) Detection method for simultaneously determining various potential genotoxic impurities of bupivacaine hydrochloride
CN110441437A (en) A kind of measuring method of Michaelis acid content
CN115128184B (en) Method for determining thiourea content in pramipexole dihydrochloride raw material by using HPLC external standard method
CN109738536A (en) A method of benzaldehyde and nitrobenzaldehyde are separated with high performance liquid chromatography
CN112034058B (en) Method for detecting isomer impurities in vincamine
CN113640446B (en) Method for detecting 6-chloro-1, 3-indoline-2-ketone related substances
CN114441677B (en) Method for simultaneously detecting multiple gene impurities of vilanafloc triphenylacetate
CN111060629B (en) Method for detecting related substances of lifusy
CN116718707A (en) Method for detecting genotoxic impurities in pirenzepine bulk drug
CN115436525A (en) LLTS-M3 and detection method and application of related substances thereof
CN116429937A (en) Detection method for related substances in pirenzepine bulk drug and application thereof
CN116400002A (en) N, N-dimethylethanolamine detection method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination