CN116668450A - Block chain-based edge computing multidimensional trust evaluation method and system - Google Patents
Block chain-based edge computing multidimensional trust evaluation method and system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN116668450A CN116668450A CN202310290575.0A CN202310290575A CN116668450A CN 116668450 A CN116668450 A CN 116668450A CN 202310290575 A CN202310290575 A CN 202310290575A CN 116668450 A CN116668450 A CN 116668450A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- domain
- trust
- node
- service provider
- blockchain
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 49
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 230000004927 fusion Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 17
- 238000013210 evaluation model Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 15
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims description 18
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 claims description 8
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000001965 increasing effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005259 measurement Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000015572 biosynthetic process Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000007423 decrease Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002708 enhancing effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012854 evaluation process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002452 interceptive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000002265 prevention Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000003786 synthesis reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/104—Peer-to-peer [P2P] networks
- H04L67/1044—Group management mechanisms
- H04L67/1053—Group management mechanisms with pre-configuration of logical or physical connections with a determined number of other peers
- H04L67/1057—Group management mechanisms with pre-configuration of logical or physical connections with a determined number of other peers involving pre-assessment of levels of reputation of peers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/1001—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network for accessing one among a plurality of replicated servers
- H04L67/10015—Access to distributed or replicated servers, e.g. using brokers
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/10—Protocols in which an application is distributed across nodes in the network
- H04L67/104—Peer-to-peer [P2P] networks
- H04L67/1061—Peer-to-peer [P2P] networks using node-based peer discovery mechanisms
- H04L67/1068—Discovery involving direct consultation or announcement among potential requesting and potential source peers
- H04L67/107—Discovery involving direct consultation or announcement among potential requesting and potential source peers with limitation or expansion of the discovery scope
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network arrangements or protocols for supporting network services or applications
- H04L67/01—Protocols
- H04L67/12—Protocols specially adapted for proprietary or special-purpose networking environments, e.g. medical networks, sensor networks, networks in vehicles or remote metering networks
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02D—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
- Y02D10/00—Energy efficient computing, e.g. low power processors, power management or thermal management
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Computer Networks & Wireless Communication (AREA)
- Signal Processing (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Medical Informatics (AREA)
- Multi Processors (AREA)
Abstract
本发明涉及一种基于区块链的边缘计算多维信任评估方法和系统,包括:确定基于区块链的分布式物联网边缘计算架构;以确定的基于区块链的分布式物联网边缘计算架构为基础,建立信任评估模型,对服务结束后提供服务的节点进行域内信任评估和域间信任融合与信誉计算,得到各服务提供节点的最终信誉值。本发明以域作为整体对服务提供节点进行多维度的信任评估,得到适合物联网边缘计算环境的轻量级可扩展的可信评估模型,借助不确定性理论对域内的评估反馈信息及QoS表现等级进行处理整合,从表现度和稳定度两个指标衡量服务的可信度,既能准确描述服务的性能表现,同时也能刻画服务性能的动态性和不确定性。本发明可以广泛应用于物联网技术领域。
The present invention relates to a blockchain-based edge computing multi-dimensional trust evaluation method and system, including: determining a blockchain-based distributed IoT edge computing architecture; determining a blockchain-based distributed IoT edge computing architecture Based on this, a trust evaluation model is established, and the intra-domain trust evaluation and inter-domain trust fusion and reputation calculation are performed on the nodes that provide services after the service ends, and the final reputation value of each service provider node is obtained. The present invention uses the domain as a whole to perform multi-dimensional trust evaluation on the service provider nodes, obtains a lightweight and scalable trusted evaluation model suitable for the edge computing environment of the Internet of Things, and uses the uncertainty theory to evaluate feedback information and QoS performance in the domain It can not only accurately describe the performance of the service, but also describe the dynamics and uncertainty of the service performance. The present invention can be widely applied to the technical field of Internet of things.
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及一种基于区块链的边缘计算多维信任评估方法和系统,属于物联网技术领域。The invention relates to a block chain-based edge computing multi-dimensional trust evaluation method and system, belonging to the technical field of the Internet of Things.
背景技术Background technique
随着5G技术的普及,物联网终端节点的数量急剧增加,而由于终端节点的资源限制和网络环境的动态性,在物联网边缘计算环境中,建立一对一的准确的信任评估是一个巨大的挑战。许多研究人员在物联网环境中提出了一种基于区块链的信任评估模型,他们将信任视为一个整体,信任值对应于二元体验(即,正面或负面),这在许多情况下可能会产生不准确的评估结果,并且没有考虑网络环境的动态性。一些研究者声称,可以通过将信任视为多个可信属性的综合,为决策提供更精确的推理。还有一些研究者声称,可信服务应满足请求节点的要求,其性能应稳定,也就是说,其时间序列客观QoS数据和来自请求节点的主观反馈评级应具有良好的中心趋势、窄的变化范围和低的变化频率。然而,在传统的物联网信任评估系统中,很难涵盖上述三个特征。With the popularization of 5G technology, the number of IoT terminal nodes has increased dramatically, and due to the resource constraints of terminal nodes and the dynamic nature of the network environment, it is a huge challenge to establish one-to-one accurate trust evaluation in the IoT edge computing environment. challenge. Many researchers have proposed a blockchain-based trust evaluation model in the context of IoT, they consider trust as a whole, and trust values correspond to binary experiences (i.e., positive or negative), which in many cases may Can produce inaccurate assessment results and does not take into account the dynamic nature of the network environment. Some researchers claim that it is possible to provide more precise reasoning for decision-making by viewing trust as the synthesis of multiple trustworthy attributes. There are also some researchers who claim that a trusted service should meet the requirements of requesting nodes and its performance should be stable, that is, its time-series objective QoS data and subjective feedback ratings from requesting nodes should have a good central trend, narrow variation range and low frequency of change. However, in traditional IoT trust evaluation systems, it is difficult to cover the above three characteristics.
目前,现有的信任评估模型可分为集中式模型和分散式模型。在去中心化信任评估机制中,终端节点评估与其交互的节点的信任值,增加了资源受限终端节点的负担。而集中式信任管理模型通常依赖于第三方信任管理中心来评估和存储整个网络中端节点的信任值,这可能会导致信任评估的不透明、延迟、拥塞甚至单点故障。At present, existing trust evaluation models can be divided into centralized models and decentralized models. In the decentralized trust evaluation mechanism, end nodes evaluate the trust value of the nodes they interact with, increasing the burden on resource-constrained end nodes. The centralized trust management model usually relies on a third-party trust management center to evaluate and store the trust value of end nodes in the entire network, which may lead to opacity, delay, congestion and even single point of failure of trust evaluation.
发明内容Contents of the invention
针对上述问题,本发明的目的是提供一种基于区块链的边缘计算多维信任评估方法和系统,该方法在准确的信任需求和资源约束条件下,构建一个适合动态物联网边缘计算环境的以区块链为交互方式的多维信任评估模型,对于风险防范、服务选择、推荐和决策具有重要意义。In view of the above problems, the purpose of the present invention is to provide a multi-dimensional trust evaluation method and system for edge computing based on blockchain. Under the accurate trust requirements and resource constraints, the method constructs a dynamic IoT edge computing environment suitable for the following Blockchain is an interactive multi-dimensional trust evaluation model, which is of great significance for risk prevention, service selection, recommendation and decision-making.
为实现上述目的,本发明采取以下技术方案:To achieve the above object, the present invention takes the following technical solutions:
第一方面,本发明提供一种基于区块链的边缘计算多维信任评估方法,包括以下步骤:In the first aspect, the present invention provides a blockchain-based edge computing multi-dimensional trust evaluation method, comprising the following steps:
确定基于区块链的分布式物联网边缘计算架构;Determine the blockchain-based distributed IoT edge computing architecture;
以确定的基于区块链的分布式物联网边缘计算架构为基础,建立信任评估模型,对服务结束后提供服务的节点进行域内信任评估和域间信任融合与信誉计算,得到各服务提供节点的域信任值及最终信誉值。Based on the determined blockchain-based distributed IoT edge computing architecture, a trust evaluation model is established, and the intra-domain trust evaluation and inter-domain trust fusion and reputation calculation are performed on the nodes that provide services after the service is over, and the information of each service provider node is obtained. Domain trust value and final reputation value.
进一步,所述基于区块链的分布式物联网边缘计算架构,包括:域节点层和边缘服务器层;Further, the blockchain-based distributed edge computing architecture of the Internet of Things includes: a domain node layer and an edge server layer;
所述域节点层内配置有若干根据地理位置划分的多个域,每个域内均配置有一个域管理节点以及若干域节点,所述域管理节点和各域节点通过覆盖网络协议或底层网络协议彼此通信;所述域管理节点用于定期收集域内的主观反馈评级信息和客观QoS值,并对这些数据处理后得到信任数据发送至边缘服务器层;所述域节点用于向域管理节点提供服务提供节点的主观反馈评级信息;所述服务提供节点为能够提供服务的边缘服务器或域节点;The domain node layer is configured with a plurality of domains divided according to geographical locations, and each domain is configured with a domain management node and several domain nodes. The domain management node and each domain node are connected through an overlay network protocol or an underlying network protocol Communicate with each other; the domain management node is used to regularly collect subjective feedback rating information and objective QoS values in the domain, and after processing these data, obtain trust data and send it to the edge server layer; the domain node is used to provide services to the domain management node Provide the subjective feedback rating information of the node; the service providing node is an edge server or a domain node that can provide services;
所述边缘服务器层内配置有若干边缘服务器及区块链,所述边缘服务器用于向域节点提供服务,同时维护区块链正常运行。Several edge servers and blockchains are configured in the edge server layer, and the edge servers are used to provide services to domain nodes and maintain the normal operation of the blockchain.
进一步,所述以确定的基于区块链的分布式物联网边缘计算架构为基础,建立信任评估模型,对服务结束后提供服务的节点进行域内信任评估和域间信任融合与信誉计算,得到各服务提供节点的最终信誉值,包括:Further, based on the determined blockchain-based distributed IoT edge computing architecture, a trust evaluation model is established, and intra-domain trust evaluation and inter-domain trust fusion and reputation calculation are performed on nodes providing services after the service ends, and various The service provides the final reputation value of the node, including:
基于服务提供节点在各域内服务属性的表现度和稳定度,计算得到服务提供节点在各域内的信任度;Based on the expressiveness and stability of the service attribute of the service provider node in each domain, the trust degree of the service provider node in each domain is calculated;
基于服务提供节点在各域内的信任度,计算得到服务提供节点的最终信誉值。Based on the trust degree of the service provider node in each domain, the final reputation value of the service provider node is calculated.
进一步,所述基于服务提供节点在各域内服务属性的表现度和稳定度,计算得到服务提供节点在各域内的信任度,包括:Further, the calculation of the trust degree of the service providing node in each domain based on the performance and stability of the service attribute of the service providing node in each domain includes:
根据服务提供节点spj的承诺表现等级以及域服务节点对其的监控表现等级,计算得到服务提供节点spj的属性实际表现等级;According to the commitment performance level of the service provider node sp j and the monitoring performance level of the domain service node, the actual performance level of the attribute of the service provider node sp j is calculated;
对收集的各属性实际表现等级信息进行整合,并对服务提供节点在整个域中各服务属性的表现度和稳定度进行计算;Integrate the collected information on the actual performance level of each attribute, and calculate the performance and stability of each service attribute of the service provider node in the entire domain;
构建自适应属性权重机制,并基于服务提供节点在整个域中各服务属性的表现度和稳定度,计算得到服务提供节点的域内信任度。An adaptive attribute weight mechanism is constructed, and based on the performance and stability of each service attribute of the service provider node in the entire domain, the intra-domain trust degree of the service provider node is calculated.
进一步,所述对收集的各属性实际表现等级信息进行整合,并对服务提供节点在整个域中各服务属性的表现度和稳定度进行计算,包括:Further, the integration of the collected information on the actual performance level of each attribute, and the calculation of the performance and stability of each service attribute of the service provider node in the entire domain include:
采用概率语言元素对服务提供节点在整个域中各属性的表现进行表示;Use probabilistic language elements to represent the performance of each attribute of the service provider node in the entire domain;
基于服务提供节点在整个域中的每个属性性能的表示,计算服务提供节点的属性表现度;Based on the representation of each attribute performance of the service provider node in the entire domain, calculate the attribute expressiveness of the service provider node;
基于信息熵,计算服务提供节点的属性稳定度。Based on the information entropy, the calculation service provides the attribute stability of the node.
进一步,所述基于服务提供节点在各域内的信任度,计算得到服务提供节点的最终信誉值,包括:Further, the calculation of the final reputation value of the service provider node based on the trust degree of the service provider node in each domain includes:
根据服务提供商在每个域中的交互次数,计算权重信息;Calculate the weight information based on the number of interactions of the service provider in each domain;
根据权重信息,对服务提供节点在各域内的信任度进行域间信任融合;According to the weight information, inter-domain trust fusion is performed on the trust degree of the service provider node in each domain;
查询区块链获得上一时间窗口该服务提供节点的信誉值,计算得到第h个时间窗口服务提供节点的最终信誉值。Query the blockchain to obtain the reputation value of the service provider node in the previous time window, and calculate the final reputation value of the service provider node in the hth time window.
进一步,所述第h个时间窗口服务提供节点的最终信誉值为:Further, the hth time window service provides the final reputation value of the node for:
其中,和/>表示第h个时间窗口和第h-1个时间窗口服务提供节点的最终信誉值;Th(A(xi),spj)表示服务提供节点spj在第h个时间窗口,在域A(xi)的信任度;/>表示域间信任融合时,各域信任值所占的权重信息;|spj→A(xi)|h表示spj与域A(xi)内节点在第h个时间窗口的交互次数;μ1,1-μ1分别表示当前时间窗口所计算的信任的权重和上一个时刻信誉值所占的权重。in, and /> Indicates the final reputation value of the h-th time window and the h-1th time window service provider node; T h (A( xi ), sp j ) means that the service provider sp j in the h-th time window, in domain A ( xi ) trust degree; /> Indicates the weight information of the trust value of each domain when inter-domain trust fusion; |sp j →A(xi ) | h indicates the number of interactions between sp j and nodes in domain A(xi ) in the hth time window; μ 1 , 1-μ 1 represent the weight of the trust calculated in the current time window and the weight of the reputation value at the previous moment, respectively.
第二方面,本发明提供一种基于区块链的边缘计算多维信任评估系统,包括:In the second aspect, the present invention provides a blockchain-based edge computing multi-dimensional trust evaluation system, including:
架构确定模块,用于确定基于区块链的分布式物联网边缘计算架构;The architecture determination module is used to determine the blockchain-based distributed IoT edge computing architecture;
信任评估模块,用于以确定的基于区块链的分布式物联网边缘计算架构为基础,建立信任评估模型,对服务结束后提供服务的节点进行域内信任评估和域间信任融合与信誉计算,得到各服务提供节点的最终信誉值,用于服务请求节点选择更好的服务提供节点。The trust evaluation module is used to establish a trust evaluation model based on the determined blockchain-based distributed IoT edge computing architecture, and perform intra-domain trust evaluation and inter-domain trust fusion and reputation calculation for the nodes that provide services after the service ends. The final reputation value of each service provider node is obtained, which is used for the service request node to select a better service provider node.
第三方面,本发明提供一种存储一个或多个程序的计算机可读存储介质,所述一个或多个程序包括指令,所述指令当由计算设备执行时,使得所述计算设备执行所述方法中的任一方法。In a third aspect, the present invention provides a computer-readable storage medium storing one or more programs, the one or more programs including instructions that, when executed by a computing device, cause the computing device to execute the described any of the methods.
第四方面,本发明提供一种计算设备,包括:一个或多个处理器、存储器及一个或多个程序,其中一个或多个程序存储在所述存储器中并被配置为所述一个或多个处理器执行,所述一个或多个程序包括用于执行所述方法中的任一方法的指令。In a fourth aspect, the present invention provides a computing device, including: one or more processors, memory and one or more programs, wherein one or more programs are stored in the memory and configured as the one or more executed by a processor, the one or more programs including instructions for performing any of the methods.
本发明由于采取以上技术方案,其具有以下优点:The present invention has the following advantages due to the adoption of the above technical scheme:
(1)本发明提出以域作为整体对服务提供节点进行多维度的信任评估,实现了一个适合物联网边缘计算环境的轻量级的可扩展的可信评估模型。(1) The present invention proposes to conduct multi-dimensional trust evaluation on service provider nodes by taking the domain as a whole, and realizes a lightweight and scalable trust evaluation model suitable for the edge computing environment of the Internet of Things.
(2)本发明借助不确定性理论(犹豫模糊集合理论)对域内的评估反馈信息及QoS表现等级进行处理整合,从表现度和稳定度两个指标衡量服务的可信度,既能准确描述服务的性能表现,同时也能刻画服务性能的动态性和不确定性。(2) The present invention uses uncertainty theory (hesitation fuzzy set theory) to process and integrate evaluation feedback information and QoS performance levels in the domain, and measure service credibility from two indicators of performance and stability, which can accurately describe The performance of the service can also describe the dynamics and uncertainty of the service performance.
(3)本发明提出自适应的属性权重机制,将各属性的权重与域内节点对该属性的反馈次数关联起来,更加精确的衡量该服务提供节点的总体表现(3) The present invention proposes an adaptive attribute weight mechanism, which associates the weight of each attribute with the number of feedback times of the attribute by nodes in the domain, and more accurately measures the overall performance of the service provider node
(4)本发明借助区块链智能合约技术,实现了节点身份数据的快速验证、信任证据的防篡改、信任数据的跨域共享及域间信任数据的融合。(4) With the help of blockchain smart contract technology, the present invention realizes rapid verification of node identity data, tamper-proof trust evidence, cross-domain sharing of trust data and fusion of inter-domain trust data.
因此,本发明可以广泛应用于物联网技术领域。Therefore, the present invention can be widely applied to the technical field of the Internet of Things.
附图说明Description of drawings
通过阅读下文优选实施方式的详细描述,各种其他的优点和益处对于本领域普通技术人员将变得清楚明了。附图仅用于示出优选实施方式的目的,而并不认为是对本发明的限制。在整个附图中,用相同的附图标记表示相同的部件。在附图中:Various other advantages and benefits will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment. The drawings are only for the purpose of illustrating a preferred embodiment and are not to be considered as limiting the invention. Throughout the drawings, the same reference numerals are used to refer to the same parts. In the attached picture:
图1是本发明实施例中基于区块链的架构图;Fig. 1 is an architecture diagram based on block chain in the embodiment of the present invention;
图2是本发明实施例中边缘计算信任评估框架图。Fig. 2 is a framework diagram of edge computing trust evaluation in an embodiment of the present invention.
具体实施方式Detailed ways
为使本发明实施例的目的、技术方案和优点更加清楚,下面将结合本发明实施例的附图,对本发明实施例的技术方案进行清楚、完整地描述。显然,所描述的实施例是本发明的一部分实施例,而不是全部的实施例。基于所描述的本发明的实施例,本领域普通技术人员所获得的所有其他实施例,都属于本发明保护的范围。In order to make the purpose, technical solutions and advantages of the embodiments of the present invention more clear, the following will clearly and completely describe the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention in conjunction with the drawings of the embodiments of the present invention. Apparently, the described embodiments are some, not all, embodiments of the present invention. All other embodiments obtained by those skilled in the art based on the described embodiments of the present invention belong to the protection scope of the present invention.
需要注意的是,这里所使用的术语仅是为了描述具体实施方式,而非意图限制根据本申请的示例性实施方式。如在这里所使用的,除非上下文另外明确指出,否则单数形式也意图包括复数形式,此外,还应当理解的是,当在本说明书中使用术语“包含”和/或“包括”时,其指明存在特征、步骤、操作、器件、组件和/或它们的组合。It should be noted that the terminology used here is only for describing specific implementations, and is not intended to limit the exemplary implementations according to the present application. As used herein, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise, the singular is intended to include the plural, and it should also be understood that when the terms "comprising" and/or "comprising" are used in this specification, they mean There are features, steps, operations, means, components and/or combinations thereof.
在异构的物联网边缘计算环境中,服务类型的多样性导致评估属性的多样性,这对于构建包含多个属性的信任评估模型来说是一项巨大的工作量。本发明的一些实施例中,提供一种基于区块链的边缘计算多维信任评估方法,采用集中与分散式信任评估相结合的评估方式,并借助区块链技术实现节点身份的认证,信任数据的自动评估与共享。首先,将具有相似位置的终端节点划分为一个域,并将该域作为一个整体来评估服务提供节点的表现。每个域选择资源能力较强的节点作为域管理节点(domain administrator,DA),其定期收集服务提供节点在该域中的每个属性性能数据(请求节点的主观反馈及QoS实际表现等级),然后将其转换为概率语言元素(probabilistic linguistic elements,PLEs)形式,这种表示方式同时考虑定性变量及其分布属性,能更好地反映服务表现的动态性和不确定性,然后计算出服务提供节点的各属性在该域中的表现度,并基于信息熵理论计算各属性的稳定度,从表现度和稳定度两个指标衡量各属性的表现,其次,提出自适应的属性权重机制,基于服务提供节点在该域内各属性的反馈次数确定各属性权重,计算服务提供节点在各域的信任值。最后,将服务提供节点在各域的信任值进行加权,并查询区块链得到服务提供节点在上一时刻的声誉值,最终得到服务提供节点的当前信誉值。In a heterogeneous IoT edge computing environment, the diversity of service types leads to the diversity of evaluation attributes, which is a huge workload for building a trust evaluation model that includes multiple attributes. In some embodiments of the present invention, a blockchain-based edge computing multi-dimensional trust evaluation method is provided, which adopts an evaluation method combining centralized and decentralized trust evaluation, and uses blockchain technology to realize node identity authentication and trust data automatic evaluation and sharing. First, terminal nodes with similar locations are divided into a domain, and the domain as a whole is used to evaluate the performance of service-providing nodes. Each domain selects a node with strong resource capability as the domain administrator (DA), which regularly collects the performance data of each attribute of the service provider node in the domain (the subjective feedback of the requesting node and the actual performance level of QoS), Then it is converted into the form of probabilistic linguistic elements (PLEs), which considers both qualitative variables and their distribution attributes, which can better reflect the dynamics and uncertainty of service performance, and then calculate the service provision The expression degree of each attribute of the node in this domain, and calculate the stability of each attribute based on the information entropy theory, and measure the performance of each attribute from the two indicators of expression degree and stability. Secondly, an adaptive attribute weight mechanism is proposed, based on The feedback times of each attribute of the service provider node in the domain determines the weight of each attribute, and calculates the trust value of the service provider node in each domain. Finally, the trust value of the service provider node in each domain is weighted, and the blockchain is queried to obtain the reputation value of the service provider node at the previous moment, and finally the current reputation value of the service provider node is obtained.
与之相对应地,本发明的另一些实施例中提供一种基于区块链的边缘计算多维信任评估系统、设备和存储介质。Correspondingly, other embodiments of the present invention provide a blockchain-based edge computing multi-dimensional trust evaluation system, device and storage medium.
实施例1Example 1
如图1、图2所示,本实施例提供一种基于区块链的边缘计算多维信任评估方法,其包括以下步骤:As shown in Figure 1 and Figure 2, this embodiment provides a blockchain-based edge computing multi-dimensional trust assessment method, which includes the following steps:
1)确定基于区块链的分布式物联网边缘计算架构。1) Determine the blockchain-based distributed IoT edge computing architecture.
如图1所示,本实施例采用的分布式物联网边缘计算架构中,分为边缘服务器层和域节点层。其中,边缘服务器层内配置有若干边缘服务器及由边缘服务器维护的区块链;域节点层内配置有若干根据地理位置划分的多个域,每个域内均配置有一个域管理节点(DA)以及若干域节点;域管理节点和各域节点通过覆盖网络协议或底层网络协议彼此通信。As shown in FIG. 1 , the distributed IoT edge computing architecture adopted in this embodiment is divided into an edge server layer and a domain node layer. Among them, the edge server layer is configured with a number of edge servers and the blockchain maintained by the edge server; the domain node layer is configured with a number of domains divided according to geographical location, and each domain is configured with a domain management node (DA) And several domain nodes; the domain management node and each domain node communicate with each other through the overlay network protocol or the underlying network protocol.
具体地,下面对架构中涉及的四个组件,即边缘服务器、域节点、域管理节点和区块链分别进行介绍。Specifically, the four components involved in the architecture, namely edge server, domain node, domain management node and blockchain are introduced respectively below.
域节点:指在特定地理位置内请求服务的固定或移动节点。由于资源限制,这些域节点充当区块链的客户端,只保留区块链的Merkle根。在与服务提供节点交互之后,域节点向域管理节点提供服务提供节点的主观反馈评级信息。其中,服务提供节点指可以提供服务的节点,包含边缘服务器及资源能力较强,可提供服务的域节点,其可以在域内提供服务,也可以跨域提供服务。Domain Node: Refers to a fixed or mobile node requesting service within a specific geographic location. Due to resource constraints, these domain nodes act as clients of the blockchain, keeping only the Merkle root of the blockchain. After interacting with the service providing node, the domain node provides the subjective feedback rating information of the service providing node to the domain management node. Among them, the service provider node refers to a node that can provide services, including edge servers and domain nodes with strong resource capabilities that can provide services, and can provide services within a domain or across domains.
域管理节点(DA):指域中具有强大计算能力和存储能力的固定节点,它充当区块链的全节点,也是整个域的管理节点,其负责定期收集域内的主观反馈评级信息和客观QoS(quality of service,服务质量)值,然后处理这些信任数据并将其提交给区块链进行进一步处理。除此之外,它还负责域内的QoS性能监控。Domain management node (DA): refers to a fixed node with strong computing power and storage capacity in the domain. It acts as a full node of the blockchain and is also the management node of the entire domain. It is responsible for regularly collecting subjective feedback rating information and objective QoS in the domain (quality of service, quality of service) value, and then process these trust data and submit it to the blockchain for further processing. In addition to this, it is also responsible for QoS performance monitoring within the domain.
边缘服务器:指具有强大计算和存储能力的固定服务器,这些边缘服务器通常位于基站附近,可以向其他请求节点提供服务,并负责维护区块链的正常运行,其充当区块链的全节点,负责验证。Edge server: refers to a fixed server with powerful computing and storage capabilities. These edge servers are usually located near the base station, can provide services to other requesting nodes, and are responsible for maintaining the normal operation of the blockchain. They act as full nodes of the blockchain and are responsible for verify.
区块链:区块链因其共识机制和相同的分布式存储副本而具有高可靠性的优势,本发明将区块链技术应用于分布式物联网边缘计算架构,从而显著增强了边缘计算网络的安全性。Blockchain: Blockchain has the advantage of high reliability due to its consensus mechanism and the same distributed storage copy, and this invention applies blockchain technology to the distributed edge computing architecture of the Internet of Things, thereby significantly enhancing the edge computing network security.
某一段时间内,所有域提交的信任数据都保存在一个区块里,也就是说这个时间段的信任数据放在这个区块,下一个时间段的信任数据放在下一个区块,形成区块链。区块链中各种交易数据的格式如下表1所示。ID表示事务编号,事务类型由TE(信任证据)、QC(QoS性能)、IR(身份注册)、LTV(本地信任值更新)组成。除了智能合约之外,各种事务都通过表1所示的数据格式打包成块进行存储。一旦这些事务被打包成块,就不能被篡改或删除。In a certain period of time, the trust data submitted by all domains are stored in a block, that is to say, the trust data of this period of time is placed in this block, and the trust data of the next period of time is placed in the next block, forming a block chain. The format of various transaction data in the blockchain is shown in Table 1 below. ID represents the transaction number, and the transaction type consists of TE (trust evidence), QC (QoS performance), IR (identity registration), and LTV (local trust value update). In addition to smart contracts, various transactions are packaged into blocks through the data format shown in Table 1 for storage. Once these transactions are packaged into blocks, they cannot be tampered with or deleted.
表1交易数据格式Table 1 Transaction data format
2)以确定的基于区块链的分布式物联网边缘计算架构为基础,建立信任评估模型,对服务结束后提供服务的节点进行域内信任评估和域间信任融合与信誉计算,得到各服务提供节点的最终信誉值,用于服务请求节点选择更好的服务提供节点。2) Based on the determined blockchain-based distributed IoT edge computing architecture, a trust evaluation model is established, and the intra-domain trust evaluation and inter-domain trust fusion and reputation calculation are performed on the nodes that provide services after the service ends, and the results of each service provider are obtained. The final reputation value of the node is used for the service request node to select a better service provider node.
如图2所示,本实施例中建立的信任评估模型分为两层,第一层是域内信任评估,可以从表现度和稳定度两个指标进行计算;另一层是跨域信任融合与信誉评估,即在第h个时间窗口中融合服务提供节点在每个域的信任值,然后查询区块链获得上一时间窗口该服务提供节点的信誉值,得到第h个时间窗口的最终信誉值。As shown in Figure 2, the trust evaluation model established in this embodiment is divided into two layers. The first layer is intra-domain trust evaluation, which can be calculated from two indicators of performance and stability; the other layer is cross-domain trust fusion and Reputation evaluation, that is, integrate the trust value of the service provider node in each domain in the hth time window, and then query the blockchain to obtain the reputation value of the service provider node in the previous time window, and obtain the final reputation of the hth time window value.
2.1)基于服务提供节点在各域内服务属性的表现度和稳定度,计算得到服务提供节点在各域内的信任度。2.1) Calculate the trust degree of the service provider node in each domain based on the performance degree and stability degree of the service attribute of the service provider node in each domain.
为了更准确地衡量服务可信度,本发明构建了两个指标来评估服务提供节点的信任度。第一个是表现度,主要用于衡量每个属性的性能,第二个是稳定度,主要用于衡量每个属性的动态性和不确定性。具体评估过程如下:In order to measure service credibility more accurately, the present invention constructs two indicators to evaluate the trust of service providing nodes. The first is expressiveness, which is mainly used to measure the performance of each attribute, and the second is stability, which is mainly used to measure the dynamics and uncertainty of each attribute. The specific evaluation process is as follows:
2.1.1)根据服务提供节点spj的承诺表现等级以及域管理节点对其的监控表现等级,计算得到服务提供节点spj的属性实际表现等级。2.1.1) According to the commitment performance level of the service provider node sp j and the monitoring performance level of the domain management node, the actual performance level of the attribute of the service provider node sp j is calculated.
通过对服务提供节点spj的属性监控表现等级与服务提供节点的承诺表现等级进行对比,计算得到服务提供节点提供服务的属性实际表现等级,计算公式为:By comparing the attribute monitoring performance level of the service provider node sp j with the commitment performance level of the service provider node, the actual performance level of the attribute provided by the service provider node is calculated, and the calculation formula is:
其中,表示在第h个时间窗口中服务提供节点spj向域节点A(xi,yk)提供服务时属性的监控表现等级;/>表示服务提供节点spj向域节点A(xi,yk)承诺的表现等级;/>表示在第h个时间窗口中服务提供节点spj向域节点A(xi,yk)提供服务的属性实际表现等级。in, Indicates the monitoring performance level of the attribute when the service provider node sp j provides service to the domain node A( xi ,y k ) in the hth time window;/> Indicates the performance level promised by the service provider node sp j to the domain node A( xi ,y k );/> Indicates the actual performance level of the attribute that the service providing node sp j provides service to the domain node A( xi , yk ) in the hth time window.
2.1.2)对步骤2.1.1)收集的各属性实际表现等级信息进行整合,并对服务提供节点在整个域中各服务属性的表现度和稳定度进行计算。2.1.2) Integrate the actual performance level information of each attribute collected in step 2.1.1), and calculate the performance and stability of each service attribute of the service provider node in the entire domain.
具体地,包括以下步骤:Specifically, the following steps are included:
2.1.2.1)采用概率语言元素对服务提供节点在整个域中各属性的表现进行表示。2.1.2.1) Use probabilistic language elements to express the performance of each attribute of the service provider node in the entire domain.
为了准确地聚合域内每个请求节点的反馈信息,同时考虑其定性变量及其分布特性,本发明采用概率语言元素(PLEs)来表示服务提供节点提供服务属性的表现。概率语言元素(PLEs)定义如下:In order to accurately aggregate the feedback information of each requesting node in the domain, while considering its qualitative variables and their distribution characteristics, the present invention adopts Probabilistic Language Elements (PLEs) to represent the representation of service attributes provided by service providing nodes. Probabilistic Language Elements (PLEs) are defined as follows:
定义1.假设S={sα|α=1,2,...,τ}为语言术语集合,概率语言变量(probabilistic linguistic elements,PLEs)为 其中sl(pl)为语言术语变量sl及相应的概率pl,#L(p)是L(p)中语言术语的数量。Definition 1. Suppose S={s α |α=1,2,...,τ} is a set of linguistic terms, and the probabilistic linguistic elements (PLEs) are Where s l (p l ) is the language term variable s l and the corresponding probability p l , #L(p) is the number of language terms in L(p).
定义2.假设S=(sα|α=1,2,...,τ}为语言术语集合,对于概率语言变量L(p)=(sl(p(l))|sl∈S,l=1,..#L(p)},L(p)的期望值为:Definition 2. Suppose S=(s α |α=1,2,...,τ} is a set of language terms, for probabilistic language variables L(p)=(s l (p (l) )|s l ∈ S , l=1, ..#L(p)}, the expected value of L(p) is:
其中,fl为语言术语sl的下标。where f l is the subscript of the linguistic term s l .
因此,服务提供节点在整个域中的每个属性性能可以表示为:Therefore, the performance of each attribute of a service provider node in the entire domain can be expressed as:
其中,|sl|表示域内请求节点提供关于spj的某一特定属性的反馈评级为sl的数量。Among them, |s l | represents the number of requesting nodes in the domain that provide feedback ratings of s l on a certain attribute of sp j .
2.1.2.2)基于服务提供节点在整个域中的每个属性性能的表示,计算服务提供节点的属性表现度。2.1.2.2) Based on the representation of each attribute performance of the service provider node in the entire domain, calculate the attribute expressiveness of the service provider node.
其中,服务提供节点spj在第h个时间窗口在域A(xi)内各属性的表现向量为:Among them, the performance vector of each attribute of the service provider sp j in the domain A( xi ) in the hth time window is:
其中,表示服务提供节点spj在第h个时间窗口在域A(xi)内第q个属性表现。为了便于后续计算,将PLE方式表示的属性表现采用公式(1)转换为数值表示,如下公式所示in, Indicates that the service provider node spj behaves in the qth attribute in domain A( xi ) in the hth time window. In order to facilitate subsequent calculations, the attribute representation represented by the PLE method is converted into a numerical representation using formula (1), as shown in the following formula
2.1.2.3)基于信息熵,计算服务提供节点的属性稳定度。2.1.2.3) Based on the information entropy, calculate the attribute stability of the service provider node.
使用信息熵作为度量工具,因为它适用于衡量以概率表示的信息的不确定性,PLE中表达的信息恰好满足这些条件。信息熵表示系统有序程度的度量,变量的不确定性越大,信息熵就越大。Information entropy is used as a measurement tool because it is suitable for measuring the uncertainty of information expressed in probability, and the information expressed in PLE meets these conditions exactly. Information entropy represents the measurement of the order degree of the system, the greater the uncertainty of the variable, the greater the information entropy.
定义3.假设概率语言元素为:L(p)的信息熵定义为Definition 3. Suppose the probabilistic language elements are: The information entropy of L(p) is defined as
其中,z设置为1.28。Among them, z is set to 1.28.
稳定度计算公式为The formula for calculating the stability is
st(L(p))=τ*(1-H(L(p))) (7)st(L(p))=τ*(1-H(L(p))) (7)
其中,τ表示自适应调节因子,取决于E(L(p)的大小,它可以防止一些稳定性高但性能差的服务提供节点获得高的信任值。0≤β≤1用于控制τ的最小值,当β固定时,E(L(p)越接近于1,τ值越大。在计算本地信任值时,当恶意服务的比例较高或网络环境不稳定时,可以通过调整β来提高稳定度的权重。Δ>0表示用于调整函数曲线下降率的常数。因此,可以得到其表示spj在第h个时间窗口,在域A(xi)中的第q个属性的稳定度。Among them, τ represents an adaptive adjustment factor, depending on the size of E(L(p), it can prevent some service provider nodes with high stability but poor performance from obtaining high trust values. 0≤β≤1 is used to control the value of τ The minimum value, when β is fixed, the closer E(L(p) is to 1, the larger the τ value. When calculating the local trust value, when the proportion of malicious services is high or the network environment is unstable, it can be adjusted by adjusting β Increase the weight of the stability. Δ>0 represents a constant used to adjust the decline rate of the function curve. Therefore, it can be obtained It represents the stability of the qth attribute of sp j in the domain A( xi ) in the hth time window.
2.1.3)构建自适应属性权重机制,并基于服务提供节点在整个域中各服务属性的表现度和稳定度,计算得到服务提供节点的域内信任度。2.1.3) Build an adaptive attribute weight mechanism, and calculate the intra-domain trust degree of the service provider node based on the performance and stability of each service attribute of the service provider node in the entire domain.
其中,服务提供节点spj在第h个时间窗口,在域A(xi)的信任度表示为:Among them, the trust degree of service provider sp j in domain A( xi ) in the hth time window is expressed as:
其中,σ1和(1-σ1)分别表示性能度和稳定性度的权重,表示在第h个时间窗口,第q个属性的权重。其基本思想是,域评估某个属性的次数越多,表示域内请求节点就越重视该属性。Among them, σ 1 and (1-σ 1 ) represent the weights of performance degree and stability degree respectively, Indicates the weight of the qth attribute in the hth time window. The basic idea is that the more times a domain evaluates an attribute, the more attention it is paid to the requesting nodes in the domain.
其中,表示A(xi)在第h个时间窗口对spj提交的第q个属性的反馈数量。in, Indicates the number of feedbacks of the qth attribute submitted by A( xi ) to sp j in the hth time window.
2.2)基于服务提供节点在各域内的信任度,计算得到服务提供节点的最终信誉值。2.2) Calculate the final reputation value of the service provider node based on the trust degree of the service provider node in each domain.
具体地,包括以下步骤:Specifically, the following steps are included:
2.2.1)根据服务提供商在每个域中的交互次数,计算权重信息;2.2.1) Calculate the weight information according to the interaction times of the service provider in each domain;
2.2.2)根据权重信息,对服务提供节点在各域内的信任度进行域间信任融合;2.2.2) According to the weight information, inter-domain trust fusion is performed on the trust degree of the service provider node in each domain;
2.2.3)查询区块链获得上一时间窗口该服务提供节点的信誉值,计算得到第h个时间窗口的最终信誉值。2.2.3) Query the blockchain to obtain the reputation value of the service provider node in the previous time window, and calculate the final reputation value of the hth time window.
第h个时间窗口,服务提供节点spj的信誉计算表达式为In the hth time window, the reputation calculation expression of the service providing node sp j is
其中,和/>表示第h个时间窗口和第h-1个时间窗口服务提供节点的最终信誉值;/>表示域间信任融合时,各域信任值所占的权重信息;|spj→A(xi)|h表示spj与域A(xi)内节点在第h个时间窗口的交互次数;μ1,1-μ1分别表示当前时间窗所计算的信任的权重和上一个时刻信誉值所占的权重。in, and /> Indicates the final reputation value of the hth time window and the h-1th time window service provider node; /> Indicates the weight information of the trust value of each domain when inter-domain trust fusion; |sp j →A(xi ) | h indicates the number of interactions between sp j and nodes in domain A(xi ) in the hth time window; μ 1 , 1-μ 1 represent the weight of the trust calculated in the current time window and the weight of the reputation value at the previous moment respectively.
实施例2Example 2
上述实施例1提供了基于区块链的边缘计算多维信任评估方法,与之相对应地,本实施例提供一种基于区块链的边缘计算多维信任评估系统。本实施例提供的系统可以实施实施例1的基于区块链的边缘计算多维信任评估方法,该系统可以通过软件、硬件或软硬结合的方式来实现。例如,该系统可以包括集成的或分开的功能模块或功能单元来执行实施例1各方法中的对应步骤。由于本实施例的系统基本相似于方法实施例,所以本实施例描述过程比较简单,相关之处可以参见实施例1的部分说明即可,本实施例提供的系统的实施例仅仅是示意性的。Embodiment 1 above provides a multi-dimensional trust evaluation method for edge computing based on blockchain, and correspondingly, this embodiment provides a multi-dimensional trust evaluation system for edge computing based on blockchain. The system provided in this embodiment can implement the blockchain-based edge computing multi-dimensional trust evaluation method of Embodiment 1, and the system can be implemented by software, hardware, or a combination of software and hardware. For example, the system may include integrated or separate functional modules or functional units to execute corresponding steps in the methods of Embodiment 1. Since the system of this embodiment is basically similar to the method embodiment, the description process of this embodiment is relatively simple. For relevant information, please refer to the part of the description of Embodiment 1. The embodiment of the system provided by this embodiment is only illustrative .
本实施例提供的基于区块链的边缘计算多维信任评估系统,包括:The blockchain-based edge computing multi-dimensional trust evaluation system provided in this embodiment includes:
架构确定模块,用于确定基于区块链的分布式物联网边缘计算架构;The architecture determination module is used to determine the blockchain-based distributed IoT edge computing architecture;
信任评估模块,用于以确定的基于区块链的分布式物联网边缘计算架构为基础,建立信任评估模型,对服务结束后提供服务的节点进行域内信任评估和域间信任融合与信誉计算,得到各服务提供节点的域信任值及最终信誉值,用于服务请求节点选择更好的服务提供节点。The trust evaluation module is used to establish a trust evaluation model based on the determined blockchain-based distributed IoT edge computing architecture, and perform intra-domain trust evaluation and inter-domain trust fusion and reputation calculation for the nodes that provide services after the service ends. The domain trust value and final reputation value of each service provider node are obtained, which are used for the service request node to select a better service provider node.
实施例3Example 3
本实施例提供一种与本实施例1所提供的基于区块链的边缘计算多维信任评估方法对应的处理设备,处理设备可以是用于客户端的处理设备,例如手机、笔记本电脑、平板电脑、台式机电脑等,以执行实施例1的方法。This embodiment provides a processing device corresponding to the blockchain-based edge computing multi-dimensional trust evaluation method provided in Embodiment 1. The processing device may be a processing device for a client, such as a mobile phone, a notebook computer, a tablet computer, Desktop computer etc., to carry out the method of embodiment 1.
所述处理设备包括处理器、存储器、通信接口和总线,处理器、存储器和通信接口通过总线连接,以完成相互间的通信。存储器中存储有可在所述处理器上运行的计算机程序,所述处理器运行所述计算机程序时执行本实施例1所提供的基于区块链的边缘计算多维信任评估方法。The processing device includes a processor, a memory, a communication interface and a bus, and the processor, the memory and the communication interface are connected through the bus to complete mutual communication. A computer program that can run on the processor is stored in the memory, and the processor executes the blockchain-based edge computing multi-dimensional trust evaluation method provided in Embodiment 1 when running the computer program.
在一些实施例中,存储器可以是高速随机存取存储器(RAM:Random AccessMemory),也可能还包括非不稳定的存储器(non-volatile memory),例如至少一个磁盘存储器。In some embodiments, the memory may be a high-speed random access memory (RAM: Random Access Memory), and may also include a non-volatile memory, such as at least one disk memory.
在另一些实施例中,处理器可以为中央处理器(CPU)、数字信号处理器(DSP)等各种类型通用处理器,在此不做限定。In some other embodiments, the processor may be a central processing unit (CPU), a digital signal processor (DSP) and other types of general-purpose processors, which are not limited herein.
实施例4Example 4
本实施例1的基于区块链的边缘计算多维信任评估方法可被具体实现为一种计算机程序产品,计算机程序产品可以包括计算机可读存储介质,其上载有用于执行本实施例1所述的基于区块链的边缘计算多维信任评估方法的计算机可读程序指令。The blockchain-based multi-dimensional trust evaluation method for edge computing in Embodiment 1 can be embodied as a computer program product, and the computer program product can include a computer-readable storage medium loaded with a method for executing the method described in Embodiment 1. Computer-readable program instructions for a blockchain-based edge computing multi-dimensional trust assessment method.
计算机可读存储介质可以是保持和存储由指令执行设备使用的指令的有形设备。计算机可读存储介质例如可以是但不限于电存储设备、磁存储设备、光存储设备、电磁存储设备、半导体存储设备或者上述的任意组合。A computer readable storage medium may be a tangible device that holds and stores instructions for use by an instruction execution device. A computer readable storage medium may be, for example, but is not limited to, an electrical storage device, a magnetic storage device, an optical storage device, an electromagnetic storage device, a semiconductor storage device, or any combination of the above.
最后应当说明的是:以上实施例仅用以说明本发明的技术方案而非对其限制,尽管参照上述实施例对本发明进行了详细的说明,所属领域的普通技术人员应当理解:依然可以对本发明的具体实施方式进行修改或者等同替换,而未脱离本发明精神和范围的任何修改或者等同替换,其均应涵盖在本发明的权利要求保护范围之内。Finally, it should be noted that: the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present invention and not to limit them. Although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the above embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the art should understand that: the present invention can still be Any modifications or equivalent replacements that do not depart from the spirit and scope of the present invention shall fall within the protection scope of the claims of the present invention.
Claims (10)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202310290575.0A CN116668450A (en) | 2023-03-23 | 2023-03-23 | Block chain-based edge computing multidimensional trust evaluation method and system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202310290575.0A CN116668450A (en) | 2023-03-23 | 2023-03-23 | Block chain-based edge computing multidimensional trust evaluation method and system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN116668450A true CN116668450A (en) | 2023-08-29 |
Family
ID=87714209
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202310290575.0A Pending CN116668450A (en) | 2023-03-23 | 2023-03-23 | Block chain-based edge computing multidimensional trust evaluation method and system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN116668450A (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN116996521A (en) * | 2023-09-28 | 2023-11-03 | 江西农业大学 | Cross-chain interaction system and method of relay committee based on trust evaluation model |
CN117155947A (en) * | 2023-08-30 | 2023-12-01 | 国网山东省电力公司德州供电公司 | A method and system for highly reliable real-time sharing of data resources |
-
2023
- 2023-03-23 CN CN202310290575.0A patent/CN116668450A/en active Pending
Cited By (4)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN117155947A (en) * | 2023-08-30 | 2023-12-01 | 国网山东省电力公司德州供电公司 | A method and system for highly reliable real-time sharing of data resources |
CN117155947B (en) * | 2023-08-30 | 2024-04-09 | 国网山东省电力公司德州供电公司 | High-reliability real-time sharing method and system for data resources |
CN116996521A (en) * | 2023-09-28 | 2023-11-03 | 江西农业大学 | Cross-chain interaction system and method of relay committee based on trust evaluation model |
CN116996521B (en) * | 2023-09-28 | 2023-12-15 | 江西农业大学 | Cross-chain interaction system and method of relay committee based on trust evaluation model |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Lin et al. | ELECTRE II method to deal with probabilistic linguistic term sets and its application to edge computing | |
CN109408734B (en) | A collaborative filtering recommendation method integrating information entropy similarity and dynamic trust | |
CN116668450A (en) | Block chain-based edge computing multidimensional trust evaluation method and system | |
Viji Rajendran et al. | Hybrid model for dynamic evaluation of trust in cloud services | |
CN112292666B (en) | Distributed standard registry of cloud computing environment | |
Deng et al. | A trust evaluation system based on reputation data in mobile edge computing network | |
CN114357455B (en) | Trust method based on multidimensional attribute trust evaluation | |
US20230177527A1 (en) | Block chain system, and biological product monitoring method and device | |
Li et al. | Method of resource estimation based on QoS in edge computing | |
Wang et al. | A dynamic trust model in internet of things | |
CN111582394B (en) | A group assessment method, device, equipment and medium | |
Mujawar et al. | Behavior and feedback based trust computation in cloud environment | |
Li et al. | Incentive-based federated learning for digital-twin-driven industrial mobile crowdsensing | |
CN115021929B (en) | Trust management method and device for computing power network, storage medium and electronic equipment | |
WO2022156731A1 (en) | Information processing method and device, server and user equipment | |
CN105119751A (en) | Service evaluation and selection method based on environment real-time perceiving | |
CN109857928B (en) | User preference prediction method based on multivariate credit evaluation | |
Smithamol et al. | TMM: trust management middleware for cloud service selection by prioritization | |
Benkerrou et al. | Credit and honesty-based trust assessment for hierarchical collaborative IoT systems | |
CN105071961B (en) | A kind of the service quality prediction technique and device of Web service | |
CN116016378B (en) | Edge-to-edge cooperative method for instant scheduling of multi-service heterogeneous resources of power distribution network | |
Li et al. | SCCAF: A Secure and Compliant Continuous Assessment Framework in Cloud‐Based IoT Context | |
Zhou et al. | Load balancing prediction method of cloud storage based on analytic hierarchy process and hybrid hierarchical genetic algorithm | |
CN106936642A (en) | A kind of method and system for carrying out trust negotiation under complicated cloud environment | |
Wang et al. | Blockchain-based multidimensional trust management in edge computing |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |