CN116664084B - Project evaluation management method and system based on Internet of things - Google Patents

Project evaluation management method and system based on Internet of things Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN116664084B
CN116664084B CN202310950076.XA CN202310950076A CN116664084B CN 116664084 B CN116664084 B CN 116664084B CN 202310950076 A CN202310950076 A CN 202310950076A CN 116664084 B CN116664084 B CN 116664084B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
item
evaluated
risk
project
value
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN202310950076.XA
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN116664084A (en
Inventor
周凌云
李军
卢琰
李海威
罗宇恒
黎丽娜
刘良斌
陈晓佳
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Guangdong Science & Technology Infrastructure Center
Original Assignee
Guangdong Science & Technology Infrastructure Center
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Guangdong Science & Technology Infrastructure Center filed Critical Guangdong Science & Technology Infrastructure Center
Priority to CN202310950076.XA priority Critical patent/CN116664084B/en
Publication of CN116664084A publication Critical patent/CN116664084A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN116664084B publication Critical patent/CN116664084B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
    • G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0635—Risk analysis of enterprise or organisation activities
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Landscapes

  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses a project evaluation management method and system based on the Internet of things, and belongs to the technical field of risk management and control. Marking the implementation stage of the project and positioning the risk index; calculating a weight value of a project risk assessment index, and locking a project implementation stage with risk; searching for an interaction incidence relation between items to be evaluated, and calculating a first influence value and a second influence value of the items to be evaluated; calculating the comprehensive risk value of the item to be evaluated, and carrying out early warning prompt; furthermore, when the single item is evaluated, not only the influence condition of the single item on other items is considered, but also the influence condition of the single item on other items is considered, the item can be evaluated in all aspects from the positive aspect and the negative aspect, the prevention can be performed in advance for the item in the developing process, the specific risk item implementation stage can be positioned, the evaluation index of the risk item implementation stage is clearly known, and further, the basis is provided for the countermeasure according to the index.

Description

Project evaluation management method and system based on Internet of things
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of risk management and control, in particular to a project evaluation management method and system based on the Internet of things.
Background
Item assessment is an important tool for improving the quality of a power-assisted item, and is one of main methods for externally presenting the effect and transparency of the item, but due to the characteristics of complexity, high cost, multiple modes and the like, each enterprise still has great challenges in selecting an assessment method and applying an assessment result;
in the prior art, the evaluation of the projects is often carried out one by one based on the individual projects, such as project resources, project technology, project environment, project manpower, finance, project period and the like, and the evaluation is carried out on the individual projects no matter which aspect is carried out; in reality, there are also cases where multiple projects are developed simultaneously, and thus there is still a great disadvantage in terms of evaluation and management of the parallel cases of multiple projects.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention aims to provide a project evaluation management method and system based on the Internet of things, which are used for solving the problems in the background technology.
In order to solve the technical problems, the invention provides the following technical scheme:
project assessment management system based on thing networking, this system includes: the system comprises an information statistics positioning module, a risk analysis module, an association relation analysis module and an early warning prompt module;
the information statistical positioning module is used for uniformly numbering the items to be evaluated and marking each stage of the implementation of the items; combining the project risk assessment indexes to locate the risk indexes of each project implementation stage;
the risk analysis module is used for calculating the weight value of each project risk assessment index according to the risk index positioning; according to the weight value, locking the project implementation stage with risk;
the association relation analysis module is used for searching the interaction association relation existing between the items to be evaluated according to the locked item implementation stage; according to the mutual influence association relation, calculating a first influence value and a second influence value of the item to be evaluated;
the early warning prompt module calculates the comprehensive risk value of the item to be evaluated according to the first influence value and the second influence value; and carrying out early warning prompt on the item to be evaluated according to the comprehensive risk value.
Further, the information statistical positioning module further comprises a project implementation stage statistical unit and a project risk positioning unit;
the project implementation stage statistics unitThe method is used for acquiring all the items to be evaluated and carrying out unified numbering, and marking any one item to be evaluated as I i Wherein i represents an item number; counting any item I to be evaluated i And generates a set of project implementation phases, denoted II i ={V 1 ，V 2 ，...，V N }, wherein V is 1 ，V 2 ，...，V N Respectively represents any item I to be evaluated i The included 1, 2..n project implementation phases;
the project risk positioning unit is used for performing any one project I to be evaluated according to the project risk evaluation index i Corresponding project implementation phase set II i Any one project implementation stage is marked as V by positioning project risk assessment indexes j And generates a risk index positioning set, denoted as VV j ={W 1 ，W 2 ，...，W M }, wherein V is j ∈II i ，W 1 ，W 2 ，...，W M Respectively represent any one project implementation stage V j Included are 1, 2..m item risk assessment indicators.
Further, the risk analysis module further comprises an index weight calculation unit and a project risk locking unit;
the index weight calculation unit performs stage set II according to the project i The risk index positioning set corresponding to each project implementation stage is traversed and counted to count the total occurrence number of any project risk assessment index, and the total occurrence number is marked as C (W J ) Wherein C (W) J ) Represents any item risk assessment index W J The total number of occurrences, J e {1,2,., N x M }, calculates any one item risk assessment index W J The specific calculation formula is Q (W J )=C(W J )/∑ J=1 NM C(W J ) Wherein Q (W) J ) Represents any item risk assessment index W J Weight value of (2);
the project risk locking unit presets a risk index weight threshold, such asFruit item risk assessment index W J If the weight value of the item is greater than or equal to the weight threshold value of the risk index, evaluating the risk index W of the item J Marking; at any one item I to be evaluated i Corresponding project implementation phase set II i The project implementation stage of locking the marked project risk assessment index exists in the project and generating a project I to be assessed i Is denoted as FI i 。
Further, the association analysis module further comprises an association recognition unit and an influence value calculation unit;
the association relation identification unit is used for identifying the association relation of the item I to be evaluated i Searching and evaluating item I among all items to be evaluated i There are associated items to be evaluated, if any one item to be evaluated I X And item I to be evaluated i The existence relation is thatThen represent item I to be evaluated X And item I to be evaluated i Has an interactive incidence relation with FI X Representing item I to be evaluated X Correspondingly generated risk stage sets;
the influence value calculation unit calculates the item I to be evaluated according to the mutual influence association relation i The specific calculation formula is as follows:
IV 1 (I i )=∑ X=g G {num[FI X ∩FI i ]/num(FI X )}
IV 2 (I i )=∑ X=g G {num[FI X ∩FI i ]/num(FI i )}
wherein IV 1 And IV 2 Respectively represent the items I to be evaluated i Is a first influence value and a second influence value of num [ FI ] X ∩FI i ]、num(FI X ) And num (FI) i ) Respectively represent the aggregate FI X ∩FI i Aggregation FI X And aggregate FI i The project implementation stage included inQuantity, G, represents the item I to be evaluated i The maximum number of the item to be evaluated with the mutual influence incidence relation exists, and g represents the item I to be evaluated i There is a minimum number of items to be evaluated that affect the relationship between them.
Further, the early warning prompt module further comprises a comprehensive risk value calculation unit and an internet of things transmission unit;
the comprehensive risk value calculation unit is used for calculating the comprehensive risk value according to the item I to be evaluated i Calculating the first influence value and the second influence value of the item I to be evaluated i Is a comprehensive risk value CRV (I) i )=IV 1 (I i )*IV 2 (I i )；
The internet of things transmission unit presets a comprehensive risk value threshold, if the item I to be evaluated i Is a comprehensive risk value CRV (I) i ) If the risk assessment threshold value is greater than or equal to the comprehensive risk value threshold value, early warning prompt is made, early warning prompt information is transmitted to related responsible persons, the early warning prompt information comprises a risk assessment existence prompt, a risk stage prompt and a mutual influence association relation prompt, and the risk stage prompt is a to-be-assessed item I i The corresponding risk stage set is prompted to be related to the item I to be evaluated by the mutual influence association relation i There are all items to be evaluated that affect the relationship of each other.
The project evaluation management method based on the Internet of things comprises the following steps:
step S100: uniformly numbering the items to be evaluated, and marking each stage of implementing the items; combining the project risk assessment indexes to locate the risk indexes of each project implementation stage;
step S200: calculating a weight value of each item risk assessment index according to the risk index positioning; according to the weight value, locking the project implementation stage with risk;
step S300: searching for the mutual influence association relation existing between the items to be evaluated according to the locked project implementation stage; according to the mutual influence association relation, calculating a first influence value and a second influence value of the item to be evaluated;
step S400: calculating the comprehensive risk value of the item to be evaluated according to the first influence value and the second influence value; and carrying out early warning prompt on the item to be evaluated according to the comprehensive risk value.
Further, the specific implementation process of the step S100 includes:
step S101: acquiring all the items to be evaluated, uniformly numbering, and marking any one item to be evaluated as I i Wherein i represents an item number; counting any item I to be evaluated i And generates a set of project implementation phases, denoted II i ={V 1 ，V 2 ，...，V N }, wherein V is 1 ，V 2 ，...，V N Respectively represents any item I to be evaluated i The included 1, 2..n project implementation phases;
step S102: according to the project risk assessment index, any one project I to be assessed is subjected to i Corresponding project implementation phase set II i Any one project implementation stage is marked as V by positioning project risk assessment indexes j And generates a risk index positioning set, denoted as VV j ={W 1 ，W 2 ，...，W M }, wherein V is j ∈II i ，W 1 ，W 2 ，...，W M Respectively represent any one project implementation stage V j The included 1, 2..m item risk assessment indicators;
according to the method, enterprises or organizations generally formulate detailed risk assessment indexes in terms of coping with project risks, and then perform risk index judgment on each stage of project implementation; therefore, the evaluation of a plurality of parallel projects is firstly carried out on the basis of the level of a single project, and the overall planning of all implementation stages of the project is carried out on the single project in different evaluation periods, so that a project implementation stage set is generated; meanwhile, the risk indexes corresponding to different implementation stages often have differences, so that a risk index positioning set is generated.
Further, the specific implementation process of the step S200 includes:
step S201: implementing phase set II according to project i The risk index positioning set corresponding to each project implementation stage is traversed and counted to count the total occurrence number of any project risk assessment index, and the total occurrence number is marked as C (W J ) Wherein C (W) J ) Represents any item risk assessment index W J The total number of occurrences, J e {1,2,., N x M }, calculates any one item risk assessment index W J The specific calculation formula is Q (W J )=C(W J )/∑ J=1 NM C(W J ) Wherein Q (W) J ) Represents any item risk assessment index W J Weight value of (2);
step S202: presetting a risk index weight threshold, if the project risk assessment index W J If the weight value of the item is greater than or equal to the weight threshold value of the risk index, evaluating the risk index W of the item J Marking; at any one item I to be evaluated i Corresponding project implementation phase set II i The project implementation stage of locking the marked project risk assessment index exists in the project and generating a project I to be assessed i Is denoted as FI i ；
According to the method, the types of the risk indexes made in different construction stages are different, the occurrence times of each risk index are different, meanwhile, the risk assessment indexes formulated by enterprises or organizations generally have certain consideration levels and significance values, such as technical indexes, financial indexes, performance assessment indexes and the like, further, the weight value of the risk assessment indexes is calculated, the weight value reflects the situation that the risk assessment indexes penetrate through each implementation stage, and the greater the weight value is, the more critical the risk assessment indexes are for the whole project; and locking the project implementation stage according to the weight value to generate a risk stage set.
Further, the implementation process of the step S300 includes:
step S301: according to item I to be evaluated i Searching and evaluating item I among all items to be evaluated i There is an associated to-be-evaluatedItems, if any one of items I to be evaluated X And item I to be evaluated i The existence relation is thatThen represent item I to be evaluated X And item I to be evaluated i Has an interactive incidence relation with FI X Representing item I to be evaluated X Correspondingly generated risk stage sets;
step S302: according to the mutual influence association relation, respectively calculating the item I to be evaluated i The specific calculation formula is as follows:
IV 1 (I i )=∑ X=g G {num[FI X ∩FI i ]/num(FI X )}
IV 2 (I i )=∑ X=g G {num[FI X ∩FI i ]/num(FI i )}
wherein IV 1 And IV 2 Respectively represent the items I to be evaluated i Is a first influence value and a second influence value of num [ FI ] X ∩FI i ]、num(FI X ) And num (FI) i ) Respectively represent the aggregate FI X ∩FI i Aggregation FI X And aggregate FI i The number of project implementation phases contained in the system, G represents the number of project implementation phases associated with the project I to be evaluated i The maximum number of the item to be evaluated with the mutual influence incidence relation exists, and g represents the item I to be evaluated i Minimum numbers of items to be evaluated with mutual influence incidence relation exist between the items;
according to the method, different risk stage sets exist in different projects to be evaluated, namely different risk stage emphasis points exist, and further, for a plurality of projects being developed by an enterprise, the mutual influence association relationship among the plurality of projects needs to be further analyzed; meanwhile, according to the mutual influence association relation, a first influence value and a second influence value are calculated, wherein the first influence value represents an item I to be evaluated i The greater the first influence value is, the greater the influence degree on other items to be evaluated is, the item I to be evaluated is i Programs affecting other projectsThe greater the degree; the second influence value represents the other items to be evaluated to item I to be evaluated i The greater the second influence value is indicative of the item I to be evaluated i The greater the degree of influence by other items.
Further, the specific implementation process of the step S400 includes:
step S401: according to item I to be evaluated i Calculating the first influence value and the second influence value of the item I to be evaluated i Is a comprehensive risk value CRV (I) i )=IV 1 (I i )*IV 2 (I i )；
Step S402: presetting a comprehensive risk value threshold value, if the item I to be evaluated i Is a comprehensive risk value CRV (I) i ) If the risk assessment threshold value is greater than or equal to the comprehensive risk value threshold value, early warning prompt is made, early warning prompt information is transmitted to related responsible persons, the early warning prompt information comprises a risk assessment existence prompt, a risk stage prompt and a mutual influence association relation prompt, and the risk stage prompt is a to-be-assessed item I i The corresponding risk stage set is prompted to be related to the item I to be evaluated by the mutual influence association relation i All items to be evaluated with mutual influence association relation exist;
according to the method, the comprehensive risk value of the item to be evaluated is calculated from the front aspect and the back aspect, namely, the first influence value is considered from the front aspect, the second influence value is considered from the back aspect, the larger the comprehensive risk value is, the greater the risk degree of the item to be evaluated is, and then early warning prompt is made, the early warning prompt is quickly transmitted to specific responsible persons of each item through the Internet of things, and further the item with risk, the implementation stage with risk and other items with influence can be specifically mastered, so that the other items can be prevented in advance in the developing process.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the following beneficial effects: in the project evaluation management method and system based on the Internet of things, the project implementation stage is marked, and the risk index is positioned; calculating a weight value of a project risk assessment index, and locking a project implementation stage with risk; searching for an interaction incidence relation between items to be evaluated, and calculating a first influence value and a second influence value of the items to be evaluated; calculating the comprehensive risk value of the item to be evaluated, and carrying out early warning prompt; furthermore, when the single item is evaluated, not only the influence condition of the single item on other items is considered, but also the influence condition of the single item on other items is considered, the item can be evaluated in all aspects from the positive aspect and the negative aspect, the prevention can be performed in advance for the item in the developing process, the specific risk item implementation stage can be positioned, the evaluation index of the risk item implementation stage is clearly known, and further, the basis is provided for the countermeasure according to the index.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings are included to provide a further understanding of the invention and are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate the invention and together with the embodiments of the invention, serve to explain the invention. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of a project evaluation management system based on the Internet of things;
fig. 2 is a schematic step diagram of a project evaluation management method based on the internet of things.
Detailed Description
The following description of the embodiments of the present invention will be made clearly and completely with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which it is apparent that the embodiments described are only some embodiments of the present invention, but not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of the invention without making any inventive effort, are intended to be within the scope of the invention.
Referring to fig. 1-2, the present invention provides the following technical solutions:
referring to fig. 1, in a first embodiment: provided is an item evaluation management system based on the Internet of things, comprising: the system comprises an information statistics positioning module, a risk analysis module, an association relation analysis module and an early warning prompt module;
the information statistical positioning module is used for uniformly numbering the items to be evaluated and marking each stage of the implementation of the items; combining the project risk assessment indexes to locate the risk indexes of each project implementation stage;
the information statistical positioning module further comprises a project implementation stage statistical unit and a project risk positioning unit;
the project implementation stage statistics unit is used for acquiring all the projects to be evaluated and carrying out unified numbering, and marking any one of the projects to be evaluated as I i Wherein i represents an item number; counting any item I to be evaluated i And generates a set of project implementation phases, denoted II i ={V 1 ，V 2 ，...，V N }, wherein V is 1 ，V 2 ，...，V N Respectively represents any item I to be evaluated i The included 1, 2..n project implementation phases;
the project risk positioning unit is used for performing any one project I to be evaluated according to the project risk evaluation index i Corresponding project implementation phase set II i Any one project implementation stage is marked as V by positioning project risk assessment indexes j And generates a risk index positioning set, denoted as VV j ={W 1 ，W 2 ，...，W M }, wherein V is j ∈II i ，W 1 ，W 2 ，...，W M Respectively represent any one project implementation stage V j The included 1, 2..m item risk assessment indicators;
the risk analysis module is used for calculating the weight value of each project risk assessment index according to the risk index positioning; according to the weight value, locking the project implementation stage with risk;
the risk analysis module further comprises an index weight calculation unit and a project risk locking unit;
index weight calculation unit for implementing stage set II according to project i The risk index positioning set corresponding to each project implementation stage is traversed and counted to count the total occurrence number of any project risk assessment index, and the total occurrence number is marked as C (W J ) Wherein C (W) J ) Represents any item risk assessment index W J The total number of occurrences, J e {1,2,., N x M }, calculates any one item risk assessment index W J The specific calculation formula is Q (W J )=C(W J )/∑ J=1 NM C(W J ) Wherein Q (W) J ) Represents any item risk assessment index W J Weight value of (2);
the project risk locking unit presets a risk index weight threshold value, and if the project risk assessment index W J If the weight value of the item is greater than or equal to the weight threshold value of the risk index, evaluating the risk index W of the item J Marking; at any one item I to be evaluated i Corresponding project implementation phase set II i The project implementation stage of locking the marked project risk assessment index exists in the project and generating a project I to be assessed i Is denoted as FI i 。
The association relation analysis module is used for searching the interaction association relation existing between the items to be evaluated according to the locked item implementation stage; according to the mutual influence association relation, calculating a first influence value and a second influence value of the item to be evaluated;
the association relation analysis module further comprises an association relation identification unit and an influence value calculation unit;
the association relation identification unit is used for identifying the item I to be evaluated i Searching and evaluating item I among all items to be evaluated i There are associated items to be evaluated, if any one item to be evaluated I X And item I to be evaluated i The existence relation is thatThen represent item I to be evaluated X And item I to be evaluated i Has an interactive incidence relation with FI X Representing item I to be evaluated X Correspondingly generated risk stage sets;
an influence value calculation unit for calculating the item I to be evaluated according to the mutual influence association relation i Is the first influence of (2)The specific calculation formulas of the value and the second influence value are as follows:
IV 1 (I i )=∑ X=g G {num[FI X ∩FI i ]/num(FI X )}
IV 2 (I i )=∑ X=g G {num[FI X ∩FI i ]/num(FI i )}
wherein IV 1 And IV 2 Respectively represent the items I to be evaluated i Is a first influence value and a second influence value of num [ FI ] X ∩FI i ]、num(FI X ) And num (FI) i ) Respectively represent the aggregate FI X ∩FI i Aggregation FI X And aggregate FI i The number of project implementation phases contained in the system, G represents the number of project implementation phases associated with the project I to be evaluated i The maximum number of the item to be evaluated with the mutual influence incidence relation exists, and g represents the item I to be evaluated i Minimum numbers of items to be evaluated with mutual influence incidence relation exist between the items;
the early warning prompt module calculates the comprehensive risk value of the item to be evaluated according to the first influence value and the second influence value; and carrying out early warning prompt on the item to be evaluated according to the comprehensive risk value;
the early warning prompt module further comprises a comprehensive risk value calculation unit and an internet of things transmission unit;
the comprehensive risk value calculation unit is used for calculating the comprehensive risk value according to the item I to be evaluated i Calculating the first influence value and the second influence value of the item I to be evaluated i Is a comprehensive risk value CRV (I) i )=IV 1 (I i )*IV 2 (I i )；
The internet of things transmission unit is used for presetting a comprehensive risk value threshold value, and if the item I to be evaluated i Is a comprehensive risk value CRV (I) i ) If the risk assessment threshold value is greater than or equal to the comprehensive risk value threshold value, early warning prompt is made, early warning prompt information is transmitted to related responsible persons, the early warning prompt information comprises a project assessment risk prompt, a risk stage prompt and a mutual influence association relation prompt, and the risk stage prompt is a project I to be assessed i Corresponding risk stage set, and mutual influence association relation is prompted to be associated withItem I to be evaluated i There are all items to be evaluated that affect the relationship of each other.
Referring to fig. 2, in the second embodiment: the project evaluation management method based on the Internet of things comprises the following steps:
uniformly numbering the items to be evaluated, and marking each stage of implementing the items; combining the project risk assessment indexes to locate the risk indexes of each project implementation stage;
acquiring all the items to be evaluated, uniformly numbering, and marking any one item to be evaluated as I i Wherein i represents an item number; counting any item I to be evaluated i And generates a set of project implementation phases, denoted II i ={V 1 ，V 2 ，...，V N }, wherein V is 1 ，V 2 ，...，V N Respectively represents any item I to be evaluated i The included 1, 2..n project implementation phases;
according to the project risk assessment index, any one project I to be assessed is subjected to i Corresponding project implementation phase set II i Any one project implementation stage is marked as V by positioning project risk assessment indexes j And generates a risk index positioning set, denoted as VV j ={W 1 ，W 2 ，...，W M }, wherein V is j ∈II i ，W 1 ，W 2 ，...，W M Respectively represent any one project implementation stage V j The included 1, 2..m item risk assessment indicators;
calculating a weight value of each item risk assessment index according to the risk index positioning; according to the weight value, locking the project implementation stage with risk;
implementing phase set II according to project i The risk index positioning set corresponding to each project implementation stage is traversed and counted to count the total occurrence number of any project risk assessment index, and the total occurrence number is marked as C (W J ) Wherein C (W) J ) Representing any one itemEye risk assessment index W J The total number of occurrences, J e {1,2,., N x M }, calculates any one item risk assessment index W J The specific calculation formula is Q (W J )=C(W J )/∑ J=1 NM C(W J ) Wherein Q (W) J ) Represents any item risk assessment index W J Weight value of (2);
presetting a risk index weight threshold, if the project risk assessment index W J If the weight value of the item is greater than or equal to the weight threshold value of the risk index, evaluating the risk index W of the item J Marking; at any one item I to be evaluated i Corresponding project implementation phase set II i The project implementation stage of locking the marked project risk assessment index exists in the project and generating a project I to be assessed i Is denoted as FI i ；
Searching for the mutual influence association relation existing between the items to be evaluated according to the locked project implementation stage; according to the mutual influence association relation, calculating a first influence value and a second influence value of the item to be evaluated;
according to item I to be evaluated i Searching and evaluating item I among all items to be evaluated i There are associated items to be evaluated, if any one item to be evaluated I X And item I to be evaluated i The existence relation is thatThen represent item I to be evaluated X And item I to be evaluated i Has an interactive incidence relation with FI X Representing item I to be evaluated X Correspondingly generated risk stage sets;
according to the mutual influence association relation, respectively calculating the item I to be evaluated i The specific calculation formula is as follows:
IV 1 (I i )=∑ X=g G {num[FI X ∩FI i ]/num(FI X )}
IV 2 (I i )=∑ X=g G {num[FI X ∩FI i ]/num(FI i )}
wherein IV 1 And IV 2 Respectively represent the items I to be evaluated i Is a first influence value and a second influence value of num [ FI ] X ∩FI i ]、num(FI X ) And num (FI) i ) Respectively represent the aggregate FI X ∩FI i Aggregation FI X And aggregate FI i The number of project implementation phases contained in the system, G represents the number of project implementation phases associated with the project I to be evaluated i The maximum number of the item to be evaluated with the mutual influence incidence relation exists, and g represents the item I to be evaluated i Minimum numbers of items to be evaluated with mutual influence incidence relation exist between the items;
for example, the risk phase set corresponding to item 1 to be evaluated is { phase 1, phase 2, phase 3}, the risk phase set corresponding to item 2 to be evaluated is { phase 2, phase 3, phase 4, phase 5}, then FI X ∩FI i = { phase 2, phase 3};
calculating the comprehensive risk value of the item to be evaluated according to the first influence value and the second influence value; and carrying out early warning prompt on the item to be evaluated according to the comprehensive risk value;
according to item I to be evaluated i Calculating the first influence value and the second influence value of the item I to be evaluated i Is a comprehensive risk value CRV (I) i )=IV 1 (I i )*IV 2 (I i )；
Presetting a comprehensive risk value threshold value, if the item I to be evaluated i Is a comprehensive risk value CRV (I) i ) If the risk assessment threshold value is greater than or equal to the comprehensive risk value threshold value, early warning prompt is made, early warning prompt information is transmitted to related responsible persons, the early warning prompt information comprises a project assessment risk prompt, a risk stage prompt and a mutual influence association relation prompt, and the risk stage prompt is a project I to be assessed i Corresponding risk stage set, and interaction association relation is prompted to be matched with item I to be evaluated i There are all items to be evaluated that affect the relationship of each other.
It is noted that relational terms such as first and second, and the like are used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. Moreover, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.
Finally, it should be noted that: the foregoing description is only a preferred embodiment of the present invention and is not intended to limit the present invention, but although the present invention has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art that modifications may be made to the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments, or equivalents may be substituted for some of the technical features thereof. Any modification, equivalent replacement, improvement, etc. made within the spirit and principle of the present invention should be included in the protection scope of the present invention.

Claims (4)

1. The project evaluation management method based on the Internet of things is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
step S100: uniformly numbering the items to be evaluated, and marking each stage of implementing the items; combining the project risk assessment indexes to locate the risk indexes of each project implementation stage;
step S200: calculating a weight value of each item risk assessment index according to the risk index positioning; according to the weight value, locking the project implementation stage with risk;
step S300: searching for the mutual influence association relation existing between the items to be evaluated according to the locked project implementation stage; according to the mutual influence association relation, calculating a first influence value and a second influence value of the item to be evaluated;
step S400: calculating the comprehensive risk value of the item to be evaluated according to the first influence value and the second influence value; and carrying out early warning prompt on the item to be evaluated according to the comprehensive risk value;
the specific implementation process of the step S100 includes:
step S101: acquiring all the items to be evaluated, uniformly numbering, and marking any one item to be evaluated as I i Wherein i represents an item number; counting any item I to be evaluated i And generates a set of project implementation phases, denoted II i ={V 1 ，V 2 ，...，V N }, wherein V is 1 ，V 2 ，...，V N Respectively represents any item I to be evaluated i The included 1, 2..n project implementation phases;
step S102: according to the project risk assessment index, any one project I to be assessed is subjected to i Corresponding project implementation phase set II i Any one project implementation stage is marked as V by positioning project risk assessment indexes j And generates a risk index positioning set, denoted as VV j ={W 1 ，W 2 ，...，W M }, wherein V is j ∈II i ，W 1 ，W 2 ，...，W M Respectively represent any one project implementation stage V j The included 1, 2..m item risk assessment indicators;
the specific implementation process of the step S200 includes:
step S201: implementing phase set II according to project i The risk index positioning set corresponding to each project implementation stage is traversed and counted to count the total occurrence number of any project risk assessment index, and the total occurrence number is marked as C (W J ) Wherein C (W) J ) Represents any item risk assessment index W J The total number of occurrences, J e {1,2,., N x M }, calculates any one item risk assessment index W J The specific calculation formula is Q (W J )=C(W J )/∑ J=1 NM C(W J ) Wherein Q (W) J ) Represents any item risk assessment index W J Weight value of (2);
step S202: presetting a risk index weight threshold, if the project risk assessment index W J If the weight value of the item is greater than or equal to the weight threshold value of the risk index, evaluating the risk index W of the item J Marking; at any one item I to be evaluated i Corresponding project implementation phase set II i The project implementation stage of locking the marked project risk assessment index exists in the project and generating a project I to be assessed i Is denoted as FI i ；
The specific implementation process of the step S300 includes:
step S301: according to item I to be evaluated i Searching and evaluating item I among all items to be evaluated i There are associated items to be evaluated, if any one item to be evaluated I X And item I to be evaluated i The existence relation is FI X ∩FI i Not equal to ∅, then represents item I to be evaluated X And item I to be evaluated i Has an interactive incidence relation with FI X Representing item I to be evaluated X Correspondingly generated risk stage sets;
step S302: according to the mutual influence association relation, respectively calculating the item I to be evaluated i The specific calculation formula is as follows:
IV 1 (I i )=∑ X=g G {num[FI X ∩FI i ]/num(FI X )}
IV 2 (I i )=∑ X=g G {num[FI X ∩FI i ]/num(FI i )}
wherein IV 1 And IV 2 Respectively represent the items I to be evaluated i Is a first influence value and a second influence value of num [ FI ] X ∩FI i ]、num(FI X ) And num (FI) i ) Respectively represent the aggregate FI X ∩FI i Aggregation FI X And aggregate FI i The number of project implementation phases contained in the system, G represents the number of project implementation phases associated with the project I to be evaluated i The maximum number of the item to be evaluated with the mutual influence incidence relation exists between the maximum number and the item to be evaluated, and g represents the item to be evaluatedI i There is a minimum number of items to be evaluated that affect the relationship between them.
2. The method for project evaluation management based on the internet of things according to claim 1, wherein the specific implementation process of step S400 includes:
step S401: according to item I to be evaluated i Calculating the first influence value and the second influence value of the item I to be evaluated i Is a comprehensive risk value CRV (I) i )=IV 1 (I i )*IV 2 (I i )；
Step S402: presetting a comprehensive risk value threshold value, if the item I to be evaluated i Is a comprehensive risk value CRV (I) i ) If the risk assessment threshold value is greater than or equal to the comprehensive risk value threshold value, early warning prompt is made, early warning prompt information is transmitted to related responsible persons, the early warning prompt information comprises a risk assessment existence prompt, a risk stage prompt and a mutual influence association relation prompt, and the risk stage prompt is a to-be-assessed item I i The corresponding risk stage set is prompted to be related to the item I to be evaluated by the mutual influence association relation i There are all items to be evaluated that affect the relationship of each other.
3. An item assessment management system based on the internet of things, the system comprising: the system comprises an information statistics positioning module, a risk analysis module, an association relation analysis module and an early warning prompt module;
the information statistical positioning module is used for uniformly numbering the items to be evaluated and marking each stage of the implementation of the items; combining the project risk assessment indexes to locate the risk indexes of each project implementation stage;
the risk analysis module is used for calculating the weight value of each project risk assessment index according to the risk index positioning; according to the weight value, locking the project implementation stage with risk;
the association relation analysis module is used for searching the interaction association relation existing between the items to be evaluated according to the locked item implementation stage; according to the mutual influence association relation, calculating a first influence value and a second influence value of the item to be evaluated;
the early warning prompt module calculates the comprehensive risk value of the item to be evaluated according to the first influence value and the second influence value; and carrying out early warning prompt on the item to be evaluated according to the comprehensive risk value;
the information statistical positioning module further comprises a project implementation stage statistical unit and a project risk positioning unit;
the project implementation stage statistics unit is used for acquiring all the projects to be evaluated and carrying out unified numbering, and marking any one of the projects to be evaluated as I i Wherein i represents an item number; counting any item I to be evaluated i And generates a set of project implementation phases, denoted II i ={V 1 ，V 2 ，...，V N }, wherein V is 1 ，V 2 ，...，V N Respectively represents any item I to be evaluated i The included 1, 2..n project implementation phases;
the project risk positioning unit is used for performing any one project I to be evaluated according to the project risk evaluation index i Corresponding project implementation phase set II i Any one project implementation stage is marked as V by positioning project risk assessment indexes j And generates a risk index positioning set, denoted as VV j ={W 1 ，W 2 ，...，W M }, wherein V is j ∈II i ，W 1 ，W 2 ，...，W M Respectively represent any one project implementation stage V j The included 1, 2..m item risk assessment indicators;
the risk analysis module further comprises an index weight calculation unit and a project risk locking unit;
the index weight calculation unit performs stage set II according to the project i The risk index positioning set corresponding to each project implementation stage is traversed and counted to count the total occurrence number of any project risk assessment index, and the total occurrence number is marked as C (W J ) Wherein C (W) J ) Represents any item risk assessment index W J The total number of occurrences, J e {1,2,., N x M }, calculates any one item risk assessment index W J The specific calculation formula is Q (W J )=C(W J )/∑ J=1 NM C(W J ) Wherein Q (W) J ) Represents any item risk assessment index W J Weight value of (2);
the project risk locking unit presets a risk index weight threshold value, and if the project risk assessment index W J If the weight value of the item is greater than or equal to the weight threshold value of the risk index, evaluating the risk index W of the item J Marking; at any one item I to be evaluated i Corresponding project implementation phase set II i The project implementation stage of locking the marked project risk assessment index exists in the project and generating a project I to be assessed i Is denoted as FI i ；
The association analysis module further comprises an association identification unit and an influence value calculation unit;
the association relation identification unit is used for identifying the association relation of the item I to be evaluated i Searching and evaluating item I among all items to be evaluated i There are associated items to be evaluated, if any one item to be evaluated I X And item I to be evaluated i The existence relation is thatThen represent item I to be evaluated X And item I to be evaluated i Has an interactive incidence relation with FI X Representing item I to be evaluated X Correspondingly generated risk stage sets;
the influence value calculation unit calculates the item I to be evaluated according to the mutual influence association relation i The specific calculation formula is as follows:
IV 1 (I i )=∑ X=g G {num[FI X ∩FI i ]/num(FI X )}
IV 2 (I i )=∑ X=g G {num[FI X ∩FI i ]/num(FI i )}
wherein IV 1 And IV 2 Respectively represent the items I to be evaluated i Is a first influence value and a second influence value of num [ FI ] X ∩FI i ]、num(FI X ) And num (FI) i ) Respectively represent the aggregate FI X ∩FI i Aggregation FI X And aggregate FI i The number of project implementation phases contained in the system, G represents the number of project implementation phases associated with the project I to be evaluated i The maximum number of the item to be evaluated with the mutual influence incidence relation exists, and g represents the item I to be evaluated i There is a minimum number of items to be evaluated that affect the relationship between them.
4. The item assessment management system based on the internet of things according to claim 3, wherein: the early warning prompt module further comprises a comprehensive risk value calculation unit and an internet of things transmission unit;
the comprehensive risk value calculation unit is used for calculating the comprehensive risk value according to the item I to be evaluated i Calculating the first influence value and the second influence value of the item I to be evaluated i Is a comprehensive risk value CRV (I) i )=IV 1 (I i )*IV 2 (I i )；
The internet of things transmission unit presets a comprehensive risk value threshold, if the item I to be evaluated i Is a comprehensive risk value CRV (I) i ) If the risk assessment threshold value is greater than or equal to the comprehensive risk value threshold value, early warning prompt is made, early warning prompt information is transmitted to related responsible persons, the early warning prompt information comprises a risk assessment existence prompt, a risk stage prompt and a mutual influence association relation prompt, and the risk stage prompt is a to-be-assessed item I i The corresponding risk stage set is prompted to be related to the item I to be evaluated by the mutual influence association relation i There are all items to be evaluated that affect the relationship of each other.
CN202310950076.XA 2023-07-31 2023-07-31 Project evaluation management method and system based on Internet of things Active CN116664084B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310950076.XA CN116664084B (en) 2023-07-31 2023-07-31 Project evaluation management method and system based on Internet of things

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310950076.XA CN116664084B (en) 2023-07-31 2023-07-31 Project evaluation management method and system based on Internet of things

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN116664084A CN116664084A (en) 2023-08-29
CN116664084B true CN116664084B (en) 2024-02-02

Family

ID=87724588

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202310950076.XA Active CN116664084B (en) 2023-07-31 2023-07-31 Project evaluation management method and system based on Internet of things

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN116664084B (en)

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109325681A (en) * 2018-09-14 2019-02-12 长沙理工大学 Two-type fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method for multi-item risk
CN114118816A (en) * 2021-11-30 2022-03-01 建信金融科技有限责任公司 Risk assessment method, device and equipment and computer storage medium
CN116151629A (en) * 2023-04-23 2023-05-23 山东佰腾云智能科技有限公司 Engineering safety supervision system and method based on artificial intelligence
CN116503207A (en) * 2023-03-31 2023-07-28 中建安装集团有限公司 Building construction safety monitoring system and method based on Internet

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
KR102111566B1 (en) * 2019-07-16 2020-05-18 주식회사 지에스아이엘 Multi-Dimensional Risk Matrix and Method for generating thereof

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN109325681A (en) * 2018-09-14 2019-02-12 长沙理工大学 Two-type fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method for multi-item risk
CN114118816A (en) * 2021-11-30 2022-03-01 建信金融科技有限责任公司 Risk assessment method, device and equipment and computer storage medium
CN116503207A (en) * 2023-03-31 2023-07-28 中建安装集团有限公司 Building construction safety monitoring system and method based on Internet
CN116151629A (en) * 2023-04-23 2023-05-23 山东佰腾云智能科技有限公司 Engineering safety supervision system and method based on artificial intelligence

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN116664084A (en) 2023-08-29

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Zhou et al. Empirical analysis of object-oriented design metrics for predicting high and low severity faults
US10229455B2 (en) Credit repair by analysis of trade line properties
Manadhata et al. A formal model for a system’s attack surface
US8489530B2 (en) System and method for root cause analysis of the failure of a manufactured product
US7487545B2 (en) Probabilistic mechanism to determine level of security for a software package
US8214364B2 (en) Modeling user access to computer resources
US9047164B2 (en) Calculating defect density by file and source module
EP3418910A1 (en) Big data-based method and device for calculating relationship between development objects
US20090293121A1 (en) Deviation detection of usage patterns of computer resources
Ali et al. A framework to implement data cleaning in enterprise data warehouse for robust data quality
CN109688091A (en) The method for evaluating quality and device of the threat information of multi-source
CN106991325A (en) The means of defence and device of a kind of software vulnerability
WO2023115856A1 (en) Task exception alert method and apparatus
Goel et al. Can business process reengineering lead to security vulnerabilities: Analyzing the reengineered process
CN111695979A (en) Method, device and equipment for analyzing relation between raw material and finished product
CN116664084B (en) Project evaluation management method and system based on Internet of things
CN113139191B (en) Statistical method for bug disposal repair priority
Gizun et al. Approaches to improve the activity of computer incident response teams
Yakhyaeva et al. Knowledge base system for risk analysis of the multi-step computer attacks
CN115600856A (en) Method, device, equipment and medium for automatically auditing and distributing events
WO2022217712A1 (en) Data mining method and apparatus, and computer device and storage medium
Dutta et al. Aggregation of heterogeneously related information with extended geometric Bonferroni mean and its application in group decision making
CN114022022A (en) Industrial network security risk assessment method, device, equipment and storage medium
Behkamal et al. A metric suite for systematic quality assessment of linked open data
Liao et al. Design of a computer-aided system for risk assessment on information systems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant