CN116628801A - Nonlinear earthquake motion damage analysis method for reinforced concrete sluice-foundation-water system - Google Patents
Nonlinear earthquake motion damage analysis method for reinforced concrete sluice-foundation-water system Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN116628801A CN116628801A CN202310513180.2A CN202310513180A CN116628801A CN 116628801 A CN116628801 A CN 116628801A CN 202310513180 A CN202310513180 A CN 202310513180A CN 116628801 A CN116628801 A CN 116628801A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- sluice
- damage
- concrete
- gate
- displacement
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 230000006378 damage Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 82
- XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N water Substances O XLYOFNOQVPJJNP-UHFFFAOYSA-N 0.000 title claims abstract description 51
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 45
- 239000011150 reinforced concrete Substances 0.000 title claims abstract description 28
- 239000004567 concrete Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 52
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 42
- 229910000831 Steel Inorganic materials 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- 239000010959 steel Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 34
- 239000007787 solid Substances 0.000 claims abstract description 16
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 11
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 8
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 7
- 230000001808 coupling effect Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 238000013016 damping Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 230000005855 radiation Effects 0.000 claims abstract description 4
- 238000006073 displacement reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 48
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 38
- 230000004044 response Effects 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 14
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000001228 spectrum Methods 0.000 claims description 12
- 230000001133 acceleration Effects 0.000 claims description 11
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 239000000463 material Substances 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000009466 transformation Effects 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000011144 upstream manufacturing Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 230000002787 reinforcement Effects 0.000 claims description 7
- 230000008859 change Effects 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012669 compression test Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 239000012530 fluid Substances 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 230000003938 response to stress Effects 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000009864 tensile test Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000012546 transfer Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 230000010354 integration Effects 0.000 claims description 2
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims 1
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 abstract description 2
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000011160 research Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005336 cracking Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000035939 shock Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003068 static effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000017105 transposition Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000009825 accumulation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004566 building material Substances 0.000 description 1
- 238000010835 comparative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000009977 dual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000005484 gravity Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000149 penetrating effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000035882 stress Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000013316 zoning Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/10—Geometric CAD
- G06F30/13—Architectural design, e.g. computer-aided architectural design [CAAD] related to design of buildings, bridges, landscapes, production plants or roads
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E02—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING; FOUNDATIONS; SOIL SHIFTING
- E02B—HYDRAULIC ENGINEERING
- E02B7/00—Barrages or weirs; Layout, construction, methods of, or devices for, making same
- E02B7/20—Movable barrages; Lock or dry-dock gates
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
- G06F30/23—Design optimisation, verification or simulation using finite element methods [FEM] or finite difference methods [FDM]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2119/00—Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
- G06F2119/02—Reliability analysis or reliability optimisation; Failure analysis, e.g. worst case scenario performance, failure mode and effects analysis [FMEA]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F2119/00—Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
- G06F2119/14—Force analysis or force optimisation, e.g. static or dynamic forces
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Structural Engineering (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Civil Engineering (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Architecture (AREA)
- Mechanical Engineering (AREA)
- Testing Of Devices, Machine Parts, Or Other Structures Thereof (AREA)
Abstract
本发明公开了一种钢筋混凝土水闸—地基—水体系统非线性地震动损伤分析方法,根据水闸闸室结构特点,建立了包含地基、水体、闸墩、闸底板、钢闸门、上部启闭机房结构以及钢筋的水闸闸室结构三维有限元模型,采用有限元数值模拟技术,基于粘弹性人工边界条件,考虑无限地基辐射阻尼效应、混凝土动态损伤、钢筋混凝土的粘结滑移作用以及水体和水闸结构的流固耦合作用,对水闸闸室结构进行了非线性地震动损伤分析。本发明有效地弥补现阶段水闸闸室结构抗震分析过程中存在的缺陷,提高了水闸结构地震损伤分析的准确性。
The invention discloses a nonlinear ground motion damage analysis method for a reinforced concrete sluice-foundation-water body system. According to the structural characteristics of a sluice chamber, a structure including a foundation, a water body, a gate pier, a gate floor, a steel gate, and an upper hoist room is established. And the three-dimensional finite element model of the sluice chamber structure of the steel bar, using the finite element numerical simulation technology, based on the viscoelastic artificial boundary conditions, considering the radiation damping effect of the infinite foundation, the dynamic damage of the concrete, the bond-slip effect of the reinforced concrete, and the water body and the sluice structure Based on the fluid-solid coupling effect of the sluice chamber structure, the nonlinear seismic damage analysis is carried out. The invention effectively makes up for the defects existing in the anti-seismic analysis process of the sluice chamber structure at the present stage, and improves the accuracy of the seismic damage analysis of the sluice structure.
Description
技术领域technical field
本发明涉及抗震安全分析,具体涉及一种钢筋混凝土水闸—地基—水体系统非线性地震动损伤分析方法。The invention relates to anti-seismic safety analysis, in particular to a non-linear earthquake damage analysis method for a reinforced concrete sluice-foundation-water system.
背景技术Background technique
水闸具有挡水、泄水的双重作用,在水利工程中应用十分广泛。水闸结构抗震分析研究是水闸结构安全复核的重要内容之一,近年来,国内外在水闸结构抗震分析研究方面做了大量的研究。起初,闸室结构抗震分析研究主要通过手工计算,进行了大量的简化工作,建立简化模型,进行粗略的计算。随着有限元法的快速发展和计算机的广泛应用,闸室结构的分析方法也有了质的飞跃。近年来,利用有限元数值模拟技术对闸室结构进行抗震分析研究已经成为了解决闸室结构抗震问题的关键技术手段。目前,国内外学者主要通过拟静力法、振型分解反应谱法和时程分析法来研究闸室结构的抗震性能,然而,现有关于水闸结构抗震分析的研究主要针对线弹性混凝土结构,考虑混凝土动态损伤和钢筋混凝土粘结滑移作用对水闸结构进行抗震分析的研究目前还无人涉及。众所周知,水闸闸室段一般为钢筋混凝土结构,而钢筋混凝土是一种非常复杂的建筑材料,它同时具有塑性、压碎、开裂等复杂的力学行为,在三维空间下,这些极其复杂的力学行为变的更加难以确定,仅对水闸结构进行混凝土结构线弹性分析有失偏颇。同时,闸室薄壁结构在强震作用下易发生贯穿性裂缝,目前国内学者对水闸结构在地震作用下可能发生的破坏模式研究较少,对水闸结构非线性地震损伤破坏机理的研究也寥寥无几。Sluices have dual functions of retaining water and releasing water, and are widely used in water conservancy projects. Seismic analysis of sluice structures is one of the important contents of the safety review of sluice structures. In recent years, a lot of research has been done on the seismic analysis of sluice structures at home and abroad. Initially, the research on the seismic analysis of the lock chamber structure was mainly done by manual calculation, and a lot of simplification work was done, a simplified model was established, and rough calculations were performed. With the rapid development of the finite element method and the wide application of computers, the analysis method of lock chamber structure has also made a qualitative leap. In recent years, the use of finite element numerical simulation technology to carry out seismic analysis and research on lock chamber structures has become a key technical means to solve the seismic problems of lock chamber structures. At present, scholars at home and abroad mainly use the quasi-static method, mode decomposition response spectrum method and time-history analysis method to study the seismic performance of the sluice structure. However, the existing research on the seismic analysis of the sluice structure mainly focuses on the linear elastic concrete structure. Considering the dynamic damage of concrete and the bond-slip effect of reinforced concrete, no one has been involved in the research on the seismic analysis of sluice structures. As we all know, the sluice chamber section is generally a reinforced concrete structure, and reinforced concrete is a very complex building material, which has complex mechanical behaviors such as plasticity, crushing, and cracking. In three-dimensional space, these extremely complex mechanical behaviors It is more difficult to determine the change, and it is biased to only analyze the linear elasticity of the concrete structure for the sluice structure. At the same time, the thin-walled structure of the sluice chamber is prone to penetrating cracks under strong earthquakes. At present, domestic scholars have little research on the possible failure modes of sluice structures under earthquakes, and there are few studies on the nonlinear seismic damage mechanism of sluice structures. Not much.
另外,现有研究成果均采用附加质量法折算水闸地震动水压力。事实上,附加质量法主要研究坝前无限域水体对刚性的坝面动水压力问题,而对于水闸结构而言,闸室段内水体的振动与重力坝、拱坝等库水的无限水域的水体振动不同,闸墩两面均承受水压力作用,其动水压力的影响更为显著。因此,采用附加质量法模拟作用于水闸上的地震动水压力欠妥。In addition, the existing research results all use the additional mass method to convert the seismic shock pressure of the sluice. In fact, the additional mass method mainly studies the hydrodynamic pressure problem of the infinite water body in front of the dam on the rigid dam surface, while for the sluice structure, the vibration of the water body in the lock chamber section and the infinite water area of the gravity dam, arch dam, etc. The vibration of the water body is different, both sides of the gate pier bear the action of water pressure, and the influence of the dynamic water pressure is more significant. Therefore, it is inappropriate to use the additional mass method to simulate the seismic shock hydraulic pressure acting on the sluice.
综上,现有分析方法基本采用线弹性分析方法,未考虑混凝土的材料非线性损伤,也未考虑钢筋混凝土的相互作用,导致对水闸的地震损伤分析不准确。In summary, the existing analysis methods basically adopt the linear elastic analysis method, which does not consider the nonlinear damage of concrete materials, nor the interaction of reinforced concrete, which leads to inaccurate analysis of earthquake damage of sluices.
发明内容Contents of the invention
发明目的:本发明的目的是提供一种钢筋混凝土水闸—地基—水体系统非线性地震动损伤分析方法,解决现有分析方法基本采用线弹性分析方法,未考虑混凝土的材料非线性损伤,也未考虑钢筋混凝土的相互作用,对水闸的地震损伤分析不准确的问题。Purpose of the invention: the purpose of this invention is to provide a kind of reinforced concrete sluice-foundation-water body system nonlinear ground motion damage analysis method, solve existing analysis method and adopt linear elastic analysis method basically, do not consider the material nonlinear damage of concrete, also do not Considering the interaction of reinforced concrete, the seismic damage analysis of sluices is not accurate.
技术方案:本发明所述的钢筋混凝土水闸—地基—水体系统非线性地震动损伤分析方法,,包括以下步骤:Technical solution: The non-linear earthquake damage analysis method for reinforced concrete sluice-foundation-water system of the present invention comprises the following steps:
(1)根据水闸闸室的结构尺寸和配筋情况,建立三维水闸闸室结构有限元模型模型中包括地基、水体、闸底板、闸墩、钢闸门、交通桥、上部启闭机房结构以及混凝土内钢筋;(1) According to the structural size and reinforcement of the sluice chamber, establish a three-dimensional sluice chamber structure finite element model. The model includes foundation, water body, gate floor, gate pier, steel gate, traffic bridge, upper hoist room structure and concrete Inner reinforcement;
(2)基于有限元分析,考虑无限地基辐射阻尼效应、混凝土动态损伤、钢筋混土的粘结滑移作用以及水体和水闸结构的流固耦合作用,输入预设的材料参数、边界条件和不同荷载进行非线性地震动损伤计算,得到地震荷载作用下闸室结构各部位的动力响应;(2) Based on finite element analysis, considering the infinite foundation radiation damping effect, concrete dynamic damage, bond-slip effect of reinforced concrete, and fluid-solid coupling effect of water body and sluice structure, input preset material parameters, boundary conditions and different Non-linear ground motion damage calculation is carried out to obtain the dynamic response of each part of the lock chamber structure under the earthquake load;
(3)基于步骤(2)的计算结果,选取位移、应力及损伤值最大的区域的特征点,绘制特征点处位移、应力及损伤值随地震历时的变化曲线。(3) Based on the calculation results of step (2), select the feature points in the area with the largest displacement, stress and damage value, and draw the change curve of displacement, stress and damage value at the feature point with the earthquake duration.
(4)根据损伤值随地震历时的变化曲线,确定损伤区域截面面积占比,依据损伤区域截面面积占比判定闸室结构破坏水平。(4) According to the change curve of the damage value with the earthquake duration, the proportion of the cross-sectional area of the damaged area is determined, and the structural damage level of the lock chamber is determined according to the proportion of the cross-sectional area of the damaged area.
其中,所述步骤(1)中地基单元范围以闸底板上游、下游、左侧、右侧以及底部高程为准,分别向上游、下游、左岸、右岸以及竖直向下延伸2倍闸室高度,闸室高度为启闭机房顶部高程与闸底板底部高程之差;上下游水体单元节点与闸墩和钢闸门节点共用;钢筋单元节点与混凝土单元节点不共用,采用插值形式进行计算,在单弹簧联结单元法中,根据如下公式计算钢筋节点的法向位移,具体公式如下:Wherein, the scope of the foundation unit in the step (1) is based on the upstream, downstream, left, right and bottom elevations of the sluice floor, respectively extending to the upstream, downstream, left bank, right bank and vertically downward twice the height of the sluice chamber , the height of the lock chamber is the difference between the elevation of the top of the hoist room and the bottom of the gate floor; the upstream and downstream water body unit nodes are shared with the gate piers and steel gate nodes; In the spring coupling element method, the normal displacement of the steel bar node is calculated according to the following formula, and the specific formula is as follows:
式中,为局部坐标系下钢筋节点第i维的位移值;n为模型维数;rij为插值系数,即坐标转换矩阵元素;uj为整体坐标系下混凝土节点第j维的位移值。In the formula, is the displacement value of the i-th dimension of the reinforcement node in the local coordinate system; n is the model dimension; r ij is the interpolation coefficient, that is, the element of the coordinate transformation matrix;
所述步骤(2)中有限元计算时,混凝土采用四参数动态损伤本构模型,其破坏准则为:During the finite element calculation in the step (2), the concrete adopts a four-parameter dynamic damage constitutive model, and its failure criterion is:
式中:ε*为等效应变;A、B、C、D为四个试验常数,可通过单轴拉伸试验、单轴压缩试验、双轴等压试验以及三轴压缩试验联合求得;I′1=(ε1+ε2+ε3)/3为应变张量第一不变量;为最大主应变;/>为应变偏量第二不变量;/>J′3=ε1ε2ε3为应变偏量第三不变量;ε1,ε2,ε3分别为三向主应变;εm表示球应力下的应变。In the formula: ε * is equivalent strain; A, B, C, D are four test constants, which can be obtained through uniaxial tensile test, uniaxial compression test, biaxial isostatic test and triaxial compression test; I′ 1 = (ε 1 +ε 2 +ε 3 )/3 is the first invariant of the strain tensor; is the maximum principal strain; /> is the second invariant of strain deviation; /> J′ 3 =ε 1 ε 2 ε 3 is the third invariant of strain deviation; ε 1 , ε 2 , ε 3 are three-dimensional principal strains; ε m is the strain under spherical stress.
在地震荷载作用下,混凝土不可避免地存在软化段的卸载与重新加载过程,本次模拟中残余应变计算采用如下公式:Under the action of earthquake load, the unloading and reloading process of the softened section of concrete is inevitable. The following formula is used for the calculation of residual strain in this simulation:
式中,εp为残余应变值;ε0=ft/E为混凝土抗拉强度下的极限应变,ft为混凝土抗拉强度,E为混凝土弹性模量;εun为卸载点处应变值;In the formula, ε p is the residual strain value; ε 0 = f t /E is the ultimate strain under the tensile strength of concrete, f t is the tensile strength of concrete, E is the modulus of elasticity of concrete; ε un is the strain value at the unloading point ;
钢筋-混凝土间的相互作用通过基于混合坐标系的单弹簧联结单元法进行模拟,其中钢筋与混凝土之间的相互作用方程如下:The interaction between steel bar and concrete is simulated by the single spring coupling element method based on the hybrid coordinate system, where the interaction equation between steel bar and concrete is as follows:
式中,Δu、Δu*和ΔF、ΔF*分别为Oxyz和O*x*y*z*坐标系中位移向量增量和荷载向量增量;k和k*分别为Oxyz和O*x*y*z*坐标系中刚度矩阵;ks和r为坐标转换矩阵;rT为坐标转换矩阵的转置矩阵。In the formula, Δu, Δu * and ΔF, ΔF * are the displacement vector increment and load vector increment in the Oxyz and O * x * y * z * coordinate system respectively; k and k * are Oxyz and O * x * y respectively * z * The stiffness matrix in the coordinate system; k s and r are the coordinate transformation matrix; r T is the transposition matrix of the coordinate transformation matrix.
采用势流体单元模拟地震作用下闸前后水体与闸墩和钢闸门之间的流固耦合作用,其控制方程如下:The potential fluid element is used to simulate the fluid-solid coupling between the water body before and after the gate, the gate pier and the steel gate under the earthquake, and the governing equation is as follows:
式中,P代表动水压力,c为水中声波波速,为拉普拉斯算子,/>为动水压力对时间的二阶导数;In the formula, P represents the hydrodynamic pressure, c is the sound wave velocity in water, is the Laplacian operator, /> is the second derivative of hydrodynamic pressure with respect to time;
在水体和闸墩、闸底板以及钢闸门之间设置流固耦合边界,以此来模拟水体和钢闸门之间的能量传递,具体如下:The fluid-solid coupling boundary is set between the water body and the gate pier, the gate floor and the steel gate to simulate the energy transfer between the water body and the steel gate, as follows:
式中,n为流固耦合面上流体域的外法线方向;为流固耦合面上沿法向的绝对加速度,ρ为水体密度;In the formula, n is the outer normal direction of the fluid domain on the fluid-solid interface surface; is the absolute acceleration along the normal direction on the fluid-solid interface surface, and ρ is the water body density;
基于标准设计反应谱采用三角级数展开的方法生成2条地震加速度时程曲线,并通过积分生成速度和位移时程曲线,计算过程中基于粘弹性人工边界条件,从地基底部垂直输入速度波和位移波。Based on the standard design response spectrum, two seismic acceleration time-history curves are generated by triangular series expansion method, and the velocity and displacement time-history curves are generated by integration. In the calculation process, based on viscoelastic artificial boundary conditions, the velocity wave and displacement wave.
所述步骤(3)中位移包括顺河向位移、横河向位移以及竖直向位移,应力包括第一主应力和第三主应力;绘制的特征点处位移、应力曲线以地震历时为横轴,以位移或应力响应为纵轴;绘制的损伤值随地震历时的变化曲线以地震历时为横轴,以损伤值为纵轴。Displacement in the described step (3) includes displacement along the river, displacement along the river and vertical displacement, and stress includes the first principal stress and the third principal stress; the displacement and stress curves at the characteristic points of the drawing take the earthquake duration as horizontal axis, with the displacement or stress response as the vertical axis; the plotted damage value versus earthquake duration curve has the earthquake duration as the horizontal axis, and the damage value as the vertical axis.
所述步骤(4)中,用地震作用下闸室结构混凝土损伤区域截面面积占比大小判定闸室结构不同破坏水平,具体判定标准如下:In the step (4), the different damage levels of the lock chamber structure are determined by using the ratio of the area of the concrete damaged area of the lock chamber structure under the earthquake, and the specific judgment criteria are as follows:
判别标准 Criterion
有益效果:本发明根据水闸闸室结构特点,建立了包含地基、水体、闸墩、闸底板、钢闸门、上部启闭机房结构以及钢筋的水闸闸室结构三维有限元模型,采用有限元数值模拟,基于粘弹性人工边界条件,考虑无限地基辐射阻尼效应、混凝土动态损伤、钢筋混凝土的粘结滑移作用以及水体和水闸结构的流固耦合作用,建立了对水闸闸室结构进行了非线性地震动损伤分析的方法,有效地弥补现阶段水闸闸室结构抗震分析过程中存在的缺陷,提高了水闸结构地震损伤分析的准确性。Beneficial effects: according to the structural characteristics of the sluice chamber, the present invention establishes a three-dimensional finite element model of the sluice chamber structure including foundation, water body, gate pier, gate floor, steel gate, upper hoist room structure and steel bars, and adopts finite element numerical simulation , based on viscoelastic artificial boundary conditions, considering the infinite foundation radiation damping effect, concrete dynamic damage, bond-slip effect of reinforced concrete, and fluid-solid coupling between water body and sluice structure, a nonlinear seismic analysis of the sluice chamber structure is established. The method of dynamic damage analysis can effectively make up for the defects in the seismic analysis process of the sluice chamber structure at the present stage, and improve the accuracy of the seismic damage analysis of the sluice structure.
附图说明Description of drawings
图1是防洪闸中孔闸室结构整体有限元模型;Fig. 1 is the overall finite element model of the flood control sluice chamber structure;
图2是防洪闸中孔闸室结构有限元模型;Figure 2 is the finite element model of the flood control gate chamber structure;
图3是防洪闸闸墩和闸底板有限元模型;Fig. 3 is the finite element model of the pier and the bottom plate of the flood control gate;
图4防洪闸钢闸门有限元模型;Fig. 4 The finite element model of the flood gate steel gate;
图5防洪闸启闭机房有限元模型Fig. 5 Finite element model of hoist machine room for flood control gate
图6是防洪闸启闭机房排架柱内钢筋有限元模型有限元模型;Fig. 6 is the finite element model of the reinforcement finite element model in the bent column of the hoist room of the flood control gate;
图7是防洪闸公路桥有限元模型;Fig. 7 is the finite element model of the flood control highway bridge;
图8是防洪闸钢闸门和闸前水体有限元模型;Figure 8 is the finite element model of the steel gate of the flood control gate and the water body in front of the gate;
图9是标准设计反应谱;Fig. 9 is a standard design response spectrum;
图10是x向加速度时程曲线;Fig. 10 is the time-history curve of acceleration in x direction;
图11是y向加速度时程曲线;Fig. 11 is the y direction acceleration time history curve;
图12是x向速度时程曲线;Fig. 12 is x direction velocity time history curve;
图13是y向速度时程曲线;Fig. 13 is y direction velocity time history curve;
图14是x向位移时程曲线;Fig. 14 is the time-history curve of displacement in x direction;
图15是y向位移时程曲线;Fig. 15 is the y direction displacement time history curve;
图16中孔闸室结构特征点位置示意图;Figure 16 Schematic diagram of the location of structural feature points in the sluice chamber;
图17是特征点A处顺河向位移时程曲线;Figure 17 is the time-history curve of the displacement along the river at the characteristic point A;
图18是特征点B处第一主应力时程曲线;Fig. 18 is the time-history curve of the first principal stress at the characteristic point B;
图19是不同计算方法下中孔闸室结构特征点A处横河向位移计算结果对比;Figure 19 is a comparison of the calculation results of the lateral displacement at the structural feature point A of the mesopore sluice chamber under different calculation methods;
图20是不同计算方法下中孔闸室结构特征点B处第一主应力计算结果对比;Figure 20 is a comparison of the calculation results of the first principal stress at the structural feature point B of the mesopore lock chamber under different calculation methods;
图21是特征点B处损伤值时程曲线;Fig. 21 is the time history curve of the damage value at the characteristic point B;
图22是0.50s时刻中孔闸室结构损伤示意图;Figure 22 is a schematic diagram of structural damage of the mesoporous lock chamber at 0.50s;
图23是2.60s时刻中孔闸室结构损伤示意图;Figure 23 is a schematic diagram of structural damage of the mesoporous lock chamber at 2.60s;
图24是6.85s时刻中孔闸室结构损伤示意图;Figure 24 is a schematic diagram of structural damage of the mesoporous lock chamber at 6.85s;
图25是14.85s时刻中孔闸室结构损伤示意图。Fig. 25 is a schematic diagram of structural damage of the mesoporous lock chamber at 14.85s.
具体实施方式Detailed ways
下面结合附图和具体实例对本发明进行进一步说明。The present invention will be further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and specific examples.
某防洪闸工程所在区域地震烈度为VIII度,该防洪闸共计6孔,每孔宽度6m,2孔一联,共计三联。本次计算主要对中孔一联闸室结构进行非线性地震动损伤分析。根据防洪闸结构特点,建立包括地基、水体、闸底板、闸墩、钢闸门、公路桥、上部启闭机房以及钢筋的三维有限元模型,具体模型如说明书附图1-8所示。其中,地基单元范围以闸底板上游、下游、左侧、右侧以及底部高程为准,分别向上游、下游、左岸、右岸以及竖直向下延伸2倍闸室高度,其中闸室高度为启闭机房顶部高程与闸底板底部高程之差。同时,为便于建立模型,上下游水体单元节点与闸墩和钢闸门节点共用;钢筋单元节点与混凝土单元节点不共用,采用插值形式进行计算,在单弹簧联结单元法中,根据如下公式计算钢筋节点的法向位移,具体公式如下:The seismic intensity of the area where a flood control gate project is located is VIII degree. The flood control gate has a total of 6 holes, each with a width of 6m, and 2 holes in a row, making a total of three holes. In this calculation, the nonlinear seismic damage analysis is mainly performed on the structure of the middle-hole-coupled lock chamber. According to the structural characteristics of the flood control gate, a three-dimensional finite element model including foundation, water body, gate floor, gate pier, steel gate, highway bridge, upper hoist room and steel bars is established. The specific model is shown in Figure 1-8 of the manual. Among them, the scope of the foundation unit is based on the upstream, downstream, left, right and bottom elevations of the gate floor, respectively extending to the upstream, downstream, left bank, right bank and vertically downward twice the height of the lock chamber, where the height of the lock chamber is The difference between the elevation of the top of the closed machine room and the elevation of the bottom of the gate floor. At the same time, in order to facilitate the establishment of the model, the upstream and downstream water body unit nodes are shared with the pier and steel gate nodes; the steel bar unit nodes are not shared with the concrete unit nodes, and the interpolation method is used for calculation. In the single spring coupling element method, the steel bar is calculated according to the following formula The normal displacement of the node, the specific formula is as follows:
式中,为局部坐标系下钢筋节点第i维的位移值;n为模型维数;rij为插值系数,即坐标转换矩阵元素;uj为整体坐标系下混凝土节点第j维的位移值。In the formula, is the displacement value of the i-th dimension of the reinforcement node in the local coordinate system; n is the model dimension; r ij is the interpolation coefficient, that is, the element of the coordinate transformation matrix;
中孔闸室结构正常蓄水位工况下闸前闸后水位如表1所示。Table 1 shows the water level in front of the gate and behind the gate under the normal water storage level condition of the middle-hole lock chamber structure.
表1防洪闸闸室结构闸前后水深表Table 1 Water depth table before and after the structural gate of the flood control gate chamber
本次计算过程中混凝土采用四参数动态损伤本构模型,其破坏准则为:In this calculation process, the concrete adopts a four-parameter dynamic damage constitutive model, and its failure criterion is:
式中:ε*为等效应变;A、B、C、D为四个试验常数,可通过单轴拉伸试验、单轴压缩试验、双轴等压试验以及三轴压缩试验联合求得;I′1=(ε1+ε2+ε3)/3为应变张量第一不变量;为最大主应变;/>为应变偏量第二不变量;/>J′3=ε1ε2ε3为应变偏量第三不变量;ε1,ε2,ε3分别为三向主应变;εm表示球应力下的应变。In the formula: ε * is equivalent strain; A, B, C, D are four test constants, which can be obtained through uniaxial tensile test, uniaxial compression test, biaxial isostatic test and triaxial compression test; I′ 1 = (ε 1 +ε 2 +ε 3 )/3 is the first invariant of the strain tensor; is the maximum principal strain; /> is the second invariant of strain deviation; /> J′ 3 =ε 1 ε 2 ε 3 is the third invariant of strain deviation; ε 1 , ε 2 , ε 3 are three-dimensional principal strains; ε m is the strain under spherical stress.
在地震荷载作用下,混凝土不可避免地存在软化段的卸载与重新加载过程,本次模拟中残余应变计算采用如下公式:Under the action of earthquake load, the unloading and reloading process of the softened section of concrete is inevitable. The following formula is used for the calculation of residual strain in this simulation:
式中,εp为残余应变值;ε0=ft/E为混凝土抗拉强度下的极限应变,ft为混凝土抗拉强度,E为混凝土弹性模量;εun为卸载点处应变值。In the formula, ε p is the residual strain value; ε 0 = f t /E is the ultimate strain under the tensile strength of concrete, f t is the tensile strength of concrete, E is the modulus of elasticity of concrete; ε un is the strain value at the unloading point .
钢筋-混凝土间的相互作用通过基于混合坐标系的单弹簧联结单元法进行模拟,其中钢筋与混凝土之间的相互作用方程为The interaction between steel bar and concrete is simulated by the single spring coupling element method based on the hybrid coordinate system, where the interaction equation between steel bar and concrete is
式中,Δu、Δu*和ΔF、ΔF*分别为Oxyz和O*x*y*z*坐标系中位移向量增量和荷载向量增量;k和k*分别为Oxyz和O*x*y*z*坐标系中刚度矩阵;ks;r为坐标转换矩阵;rT为坐标转换矩阵的转置矩阵。In the formula, Δu, Δu * and ΔF, ΔF * are the displacement vector increment and load vector increment in the Oxyz and O * x * y * z * coordinate system respectively; k and k * are Oxyz and O * x * y respectively * z * The stiffness matrix in the coordinate system; k s ; r is the coordinate transformation matrix; r T is the transposition matrix of the coordinate transformation matrix.
采用势流体单元模拟地震作用下闸前后水体与闸墩和钢闸门之间的流固耦合作用,其控制方程如下:The potential fluid element is used to simulate the fluid-solid coupling between the water body before and after the gate, the gate pier and the steel gate under the earthquake, and the governing equation is as follows:
式中,P代表动水压力,c为水中声波波速,为拉普拉斯算子,/>为动水压力对时间的二阶导数。In the formula, P represents the hydrodynamic pressure, c is the sound wave velocity in water, is the Laplacian operator, /> is the second derivative of hydrodynamic pressure with respect to time.
在水体和闸墩、闸底板以及钢闸门之间设置流固耦合边界,以此来模拟水体和钢闸门之间的能量传递,具体如下:The fluid-solid coupling boundary is set between the water body and the gate pier, the gate floor and the steel gate to simulate the energy transfer between the water body and the steel gate, as follows:
式中,n为流固耦合面上流体域的外法线方向;为流固耦合面上沿法向的绝对加速度,ρ为水体密度。In the formula, n is the outer normal direction of the fluid domain on the fluid-solid interface surface; is the absolute acceleration along the normal direction on the fluid-solid interface surface, and ρ is the water body density.
防洪闸中孔闸室结构材料参数见表2所示。The structural material parameters of the flood control sluice chamber are shown in Table 2.
表2防洪闸中孔闸室结构闸室结构混凝土材料参数Table 2 Concrete material parameters of the chamber structure of the middle hole chamber structure of the flood control gate
需要指出,根据《水工建筑物抗震设计标准》(GB 51247-2018),混凝土材料弹模在静弹模的基础上提高50%,混凝土动态抗压强度标准值较静态抗压强度标准值提高20%,混凝土动态抗拉强度标准值取动态抗压强度标准值的10%。另外,本次数值模拟计算过程中水体密度为1000kg/m3,体积模量为2.3GPa。It should be pointed out that according to the "Standards for Seismic Design of Hydraulic Structures" (GB 51247-2018), the elastic modulus of concrete materials is increased by 50% on the basis of the static elastic modulus, and the standard value of the dynamic compressive strength of concrete is higher than the standard value of the static compressive strength 20%, the standard value of concrete dynamic tensile strength is 10% of the standard value of dynamic compressive strength. In addition, the density of the water body is 1000kg/m 3 and the bulk modulus is 2.3GPa during the numerical simulation calculation process.
由《中国地震动参数区划图》(GB18306-2015)可知,该防洪闸枢纽工程地区地震设防烈度为VIII度,本工程地基反应谱特征周期Tg取0.35s。根据《水工建筑物抗震设计标准》(GB 51247-2018)规定取值,该防洪闸中孔闸室结构的水平向设计加速度代表值αh=0.2g。同时,根据《水工建筑物抗震设计标准》(GB 51247-2018)表4.3.3中规定,水闸结构反应谱最大值的代表值βmax取2.25,水闸应同时考虑顺河流方向和垂直河流方向的水平向地震作用。According to the "Zoning Map of Seismic Motion Parameters in China" (GB18306-2015), the seismic fortification intensity of the flood control gate project area is VIII degree, and the characteristic period T g of the foundation response spectrum of this project is taken as 0.35s. According to the values stipulated in the "Standards for Seismic Design of Hydraulic Structures" (GB 51247-2018), the representative value of the horizontal design acceleration of the flood gate chamber structure α h =0.2g. At the same time, according to Table 4.3.3 of the "Standards for Seismic Design of Hydraulic Structures" (GB 51247-2018), the representative value β max of the maximum response spectrum of the sluice structure is taken as 2.25, and the sluice should consider both the direction along the river and the direction perpendicular to the river. horizontal seismic action.
附图9为本次计算所采用的设计反应谱示意图,按此设计反应谱采用三角级数展开的方法生成2条地震加速度时程,2条地震加速度时程曲线如附图10-11所示,速度和位移时程曲线分别如附图12-13和附图14-15所示,计算过程中基于粘弹性人工边界条件,从地基底部垂直输入速度波和位移波。Attached Figure 9 is a schematic diagram of the design response spectrum used in this calculation. According to this design response spectrum, two seismic acceleration time histories are generated using the method of triangular series expansion, and the two seismic acceleration time history curves are shown in Figures 10-11 , the velocity and displacement time-history curves are shown in Figures 12-13 and 14-15, respectively. The calculation process is based on viscoelastic artificial boundary conditions, and the velocity wave and displacement wave are input vertically from the bottom of the foundation.
基于上述材料参数和荷载参数,对防洪闸闸室结构进行了非线性地震动损伤分析。为了便于分析钢筋混凝土闸室结构地震作用下的位移、加速度、应力以及损伤分布等响应结果,在该防洪闸中孔闸室结构选取一定数量的特征点,特征点位置如附图16所示。Based on the above material parameters and load parameters, the nonlinear seismic damage analysis of the flood control sluice chamber structure is carried out. In order to facilitate the analysis of the response results of displacement, acceleration, stress, and damage distribution of the reinforced concrete lock chamber structure under earthquake action, a certain number of feature points are selected in the middle hole lock chamber structure of the flood control gate, and the positions of the feature points are shown in Figure 16.
以顺河向位移为例,附图17给出了基于钢筋混凝土动态损伤时程分析方法中孔闸室结构特征点A处横河向和顺河向位移时程曲线。可以看出,地震作用下,特征点A处顺河向位移均随地震荷载往复震荡,且由于考虑了混凝土材料的非线性,地震荷载结束时,特征点A处存在残余位移。另外,特征点A处顺河向位移最大值(绝对值)为12.98mm,出现在12.58s时刻。另外,需要指出的是,从特征点A处顺河向位移曲线可知,位移变化规律呈发散趋势,这主要是因为在VIII度地震作用下,该防洪闸中孔闸室结构排架柱出现了损伤破坏。Taking the displacement along the river as an example, Figure 17 shows the time-history curves of displacement in the cross-river direction and along the river direction at the characteristic point A of the mid-hole sluice chamber structure based on the reinforced concrete dynamic damage time-history analysis method. It can be seen that under the earthquake, the displacement along the river at the feature point A reciprocates with the seismic load, and due to the consideration of the nonlinearity of the concrete material, there is a residual displacement at the feature point A at the end of the seismic load. In addition, the maximum (absolute value) displacement along the river at feature point A is 12.98mm, which occurs at 12.58s. In addition, it should be pointed out that, from the displacement curve along the river at the characteristic point A, the displacement change law shows a divergent trend, which is mainly because the bent columns of the middle hole lock chamber structure of the flood control sluice appeared under the action of a magnitude VIII earthquake. damage damage.
以第一主应力为例,附图18给出了基于钢筋混凝土动态损伤时程分析方法中孔闸室结构特征点B处第一主应力时程曲线。同样可以看出,地震作用下特征点B处第一主应力和均随时间不断变化,其中,B处第一主应力在1.22s时刻出现最大值,为2.26MPa。Taking the first principal stress as an example, Fig. 18 shows the time history curve of the first principal stress at the characteristic point B of the sluice chamber structure based on the reinforced concrete dynamic damage time history analysis method. It can also be seen that the sum of the first principal stress at the characteristic point B under the earthquake is constantly changing with time, and the first principal stress at B has a maximum value at 1.22s, which is 2.26MPa.
为了验证计算结果的正确性,分别采用线弹性振型分解反应谱法、线弹性时程分析方法以及基于混凝土动态损伤时程分析方法对中孔闸室结构进行动力计算,各计算结果对比如下。In order to verify the correctness of the calculation results, the linear elastic mode decomposition response spectrum method, the linear elastic time-history analysis method, and the dynamic damage time-history analysis method based on concrete were used to perform dynamic calculations on the structure of the mesopore lock chamber. The comparison of the calculation results is as follows.
附图19给出了不同方法计算下中孔闸室结构特征点A处顺河向位移计算结果对比情况。由图可知,基于线弹性时程分析方法中孔闸室结构特征点A处横河向位移计算结果较基于线弹性振型分解反应谱法计算结果偏小,符合一般规律。同时,考虑钢筋混凝土相互作用后,基于损伤钢筋混凝土时程分析方法计算结果较基于损伤混凝土时程分析方法计算结果明显偏小,这主要是因为钢筋的存在,减小了中孔闸室结构在地震作用下的动力响应。另外,基于损伤钢筋混凝土时程分析方法河基于损伤混凝土时程分析方法计算结果均较基于线弹性振型分解反应谱法计算结果偏大,这是因为VIII度地震作用下考虑混凝土损伤后,闸室结构排架柱出现不同程度的震损破坏,且计算结果呈发散趋势。Figure 19 shows the comparison of the calculation results of the displacement along the river direction at the structural feature point A of the lower middle hole sluice chamber by different methods. It can be seen from the figure that the calculation result of the lateral displacement at the characteristic point A of the sluice chamber structure based on the linear elastic time history analysis method is smaller than the calculation result based on the linear elastic mode decomposition response spectrum method, which conforms to the general law. At the same time, after considering the interaction of reinforced concrete, the calculation results based on the time-history analysis method based on damaged reinforced concrete are obviously smaller than those based on the time-history analysis method based on damaged concrete. This is mainly because the existence of steel bars reduces the Dynamic response under earthquake action. In addition, the calculation results based on the time-history analysis method of damaged reinforced concrete and the time-history analysis method based on damaged concrete are larger than those based on the linear elastic mode decomposition response spectrum method. The bent columns of the room structure have different degrees of earthquake damage, and the calculation results show a divergent trend.
附图20给出了不同方法计算下中孔闸室结构特征点B处第一主应力计算结果对比情况。可以看出,基于线弹性时程分析方法中孔闸室结构特征点B处第一主应力计算结果较基于线弹性振型分解反应谱法计算结果偏小,符合一般规律。同时,考虑混凝土损伤后,特征点B处第一主应力计算结果较基于线弹性时程分析方法计算结果明显偏小,这主要是因为地震荷载作用下,混凝土的损伤开裂对应力有一定程度的释放,减小了中孔闸室结构的应力响应。Figure 20 shows the comparison of the calculation results of the first principal stress at the structural characteristic point B of the lower middle hole lock chamber calculated by different methods. It can be seen that the calculation result of the first principal stress at the characteristic point B of the sluice chamber structure based on the linear elastic time history analysis method is smaller than the calculation result based on the linear elastic mode decomposition response spectrum method, which conforms to the general law. At the same time, after considering the concrete damage, the calculation result of the first principal stress at the feature point B is obviously smaller than the calculation result based on the linear elastic time history analysis method, which is mainly because the damage cracking of concrete has a certain degree of influence on the stress release, reducing the stress response of the mesoporous lock chamber structure.
综上所述,通过不同计算结果的对比分析,同样可以验证本次采用的钢筋混凝土动态损伤模型的正确性。To sum up, through the comparative analysis of different calculation results, the correctness of the reinforced concrete dynamic damage model adopted this time can also be verified.
为了分析闸室结构非线性地震损伤破坏机理,附图21给出了基于钢筋混凝土动态损伤时程分析方法中孔闸室结构特征点B处损伤值时程曲线。结合特征点B处第一主应力时程曲线可以看出,特征点B处1s时出现较大第一主应力,其最大拉应力数值(2.26MPa)已经超过素混凝土动态抗拉强度,此时开始出现损伤破坏,其损伤值达到了0.48,且随着地震历时的增加,于2s、3s时又出现较大第一主应力,尽管此时第一主应力数值未超过素混凝土动态抗拉强度,但由于此时混凝土已经发生一定程度的损伤破坏,因此在该拉应力作用下其损伤数值持续增大,其最终损伤数值达到了0.64。In order to analyze the non-linear earthquake damage mechanism of the lock chamber structure, Figure 21 shows the time history curve of the damage value at the characteristic point B of the lock chamber structure based on the reinforced concrete dynamic damage time history analysis method. Combined with the time-history curve of the first principal stress at feature point B, it can be seen that a large first principal stress appears at feature point B at 1s, and its maximum tensile stress value (2.26MPa) has exceeded the dynamic tensile strength of plain concrete. Damage and destruction began to appear, and its damage value reached 0.48, and with the increase of the earthquake duration, a larger first principal stress appeared at 2s and 3s, although the value of the first principal stress did not exceed the dynamic tensile strength of plain concrete at this time , but because the concrete has been damaged to a certain extent at this time, its damage value continues to increase under the action of the tensile stress, and its final damage value reaches 0.64.
为了更进一步揭示该防洪闸非线性地震损伤累计过程,附图22-25分别给出了不同时刻基于钢筋混凝土动态损伤时程分析方法防洪闸中孔闸室结构损伤示意图。可以看出,地震刚开始阶段,闸室结构整体未发生损伤,随着地震历时增加,闸室结构在第一主应力较大部位开始逐步出现损伤,且损伤数值和损伤区域随着地震荷载的持续逐渐增大,直至地震荷载结束。另外,由图可知,2.6s以后防洪闸中孔闸室结构第一层排架柱各折角部位损伤数值已超过0.5,且损伤区域已有贯穿整个排架柱横截面的趋势,随着地震历时的增加,该趋势逐渐明显,直至最后发生损伤破坏。In order to further reveal the nonlinear seismic damage accumulation process of the flood control sluice, Figures 22-25 respectively show structural damage diagrams of the flood control sluice mid-hole sluice chamber based on the dynamic damage time history analysis method of reinforced concrete at different times. It can be seen that at the initial stage of the earthquake, the overall structure of the lock chamber was not damaged. As the duration of the earthquake increased, the structure of the lock chamber began to be damaged gradually at the part with the larger first principal stress, and the damage value and damage area increased with the increase of the earthquake load. Continue to gradually increase until the end of the seismic load. In addition, it can be seen from the figure that after 2.6s, the damage value of each corner of the bent column on the first floor of the flood control sluice structure has exceeded 0.5, and the damage area has a tendency to run through the entire cross section of the bent column. This trend becomes more and more obvious until the final damage occurs.
为了判定闸室结构不同破坏水平,根据图21的损伤值时程曲线,计算得到地震结束时,启闭机房结构混凝土排架柱横截面损伤区域截面面积占比已达到了82%。In order to determine the different damage levels of the gate chamber structure, according to the damage value time history curve in Figure 21, it is calculated that at the end of the earthquake, the proportion of the cross-sectional area of the damaged area of the concrete bent column of the hoist room structure has reached 82%.
基于上述计算结果,采用地震作用下闸室结构混凝土损伤区域截面面积占比大小来判定闸室结构不同破坏水平,具体判别标准如下:Based on the above calculation results, the ratio of the cross-sectional area of the concrete damage area of the lock chamber structure under earthquake action is used to determine the different damage levels of the lock chamber structure. The specific criteria are as follows:
判别标准 Criterion
Claims (5)
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202310513180.2A CN116628801A (en) | 2023-05-09 | 2023-05-09 | Nonlinear earthquake motion damage analysis method for reinforced concrete sluice-foundation-water system |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202310513180.2A CN116628801A (en) | 2023-05-09 | 2023-05-09 | Nonlinear earthquake motion damage analysis method for reinforced concrete sluice-foundation-water system |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN116628801A true CN116628801A (en) | 2023-08-22 |
Family
ID=87596523
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202310513180.2A Pending CN116628801A (en) | 2023-05-09 | 2023-05-09 | Nonlinear earthquake motion damage analysis method for reinforced concrete sluice-foundation-water system |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN116628801A (en) |
Cited By (2)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN117973117A (en) * | 2024-01-12 | 2024-05-03 | 三峡金沙江云川水电开发有限公司 | Non-uniform main aftershock sequence earthquake motion input method and device suitable for dynamic analysis of high arch dam |
CN118095020A (en) * | 2024-04-28 | 2024-05-28 | 湖南百舸水利建设股份有限公司 | Construction method of porous flood diversion gate |
-
2023
- 2023-05-09 CN CN202310513180.2A patent/CN116628801A/en active Pending
Cited By (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN117973117A (en) * | 2024-01-12 | 2024-05-03 | 三峡金沙江云川水电开发有限公司 | Non-uniform main aftershock sequence earthquake motion input method and device suitable for dynamic analysis of high arch dam |
CN118095020A (en) * | 2024-04-28 | 2024-05-28 | 湖南百舸水利建设股份有限公司 | Construction method of porous flood diversion gate |
CN118095020B (en) * | 2024-04-28 | 2024-07-12 | 湖南百舸水利建设股份有限公司 | Construction method of porous flood diversion gate |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN116628801A (en) | Nonlinear earthquake motion damage analysis method for reinforced concrete sluice-foundation-water system | |
CN111814374B (en) | Seismic response analysis and safety assessment method of arch dam during construction | |
Mazars et al. | A new modelling strategy for the behaviour of shear walls under dynamic loading | |
CN111159805B (en) | Seismic safety analysis method for sluice chamber structure | |
Cao et al. | Research on steel plate shear walls stiffened with X-shaped restrainers: Hysteretic behavior and effect of height-to-thickness ratio of steel plate | |
Li et al. | Experimental and numerical assessment on seismic performance of Earth adobe walls | |
CN113239427A (en) | Method for enhancing lateral deformation resistance mechanical property of existing pile foundation | |
Han et al. | Cyclic behavior of high-performance fiber-reinforced cementitious composite corner joints | |
Han et al. | Cyclic behavior of RC OMF beam-corner column joints under unidirectional and bidirectional loadings | |
Hao et al. | Seismic performance of the ancient pagoda wall strengthened with GFRP bars embedded in the horizontal mortar joint under in-plane cyclic loading | |
Zhang et al. | Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete frame substructure with cast-in-place slab on independent foundation | |
Hertanto | Seismic assessment of pre-1970s reinforced concrete structure | |
Ren et al. | The application of BIM technology in the research on seismic performance of shear wall structure of prefabricated residential buildings | |
Li et al. | Behavior of flat grouted connections subjected to lateral pressure and vertical load | |
CN116541934A (en) | Analysis method for earthquake resistance of aging reinforced concrete sluice structure | |
CN115595988A (en) | Design method of pile-anchor-support combined supporting structure | |
Ortega et al. | Seismic behaviour assessment of vernacular isolated buildings | |
Ding et al. | Study on the seismic performance of a new straw ecological composite wall structure | |
Kheyroddin et al. | Strengthening of historical masonry buildings with fiber reinforced polymers (FRP) | |
Zhang et al. | Study on in-plane/out-of-plane seismic performance of masonry-infilled RC frame with openings and a new type of flexible connection | |
Shao et al. | Study on the Bearing Capacity of High‐Cap Inclined Pile Foundations | |
Alhassani et al. | Experimental and Numerical Modeling of Connected and Disconnected Piled Raft | |
CN119416584A (en) | Method for generating seismic vulnerability curve of sluice chamber structure | |
CN114218660B (en) | Method for obtaining parameters of equivalent diaphragm wall based on discrete numerical method | |
Zhou et al. | Seismic analysis for nuclear power safety related bridge |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |