CN116611736A - Skill level evaluation system, method, equipment and medium for metering operation and maintenance - Google Patents

Skill level evaluation system, method, equipment and medium for metering operation and maintenance Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN116611736A
CN116611736A CN202310590390.1A CN202310590390A CN116611736A CN 116611736 A CN116611736 A CN 116611736A CN 202310590390 A CN202310590390 A CN 202310590390A CN 116611736 A CN116611736 A CN 116611736A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
type
fault
evaluation
technical
scheme
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Pending
Application number
CN202310590390.1A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Inventor
严杰峰
江智添
戴航
王馨然
蔡金彪
韦景康
潘庆生
刘攸坚
王博
洪训山
岑志荣
盖佳麒
张倩玮
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Guangdong Power Grid Co Ltd
Foshan Power Supply Bureau of Guangdong Power Grid Corp
Original Assignee
Guangdong Power Grid Co Ltd
Foshan Power Supply Bureau of Guangdong Power Grid Corp
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Guangdong Power Grid Co Ltd, Foshan Power Supply Bureau of Guangdong Power Grid Corp filed Critical Guangdong Power Grid Co Ltd
Priority to CN202310590390.1A priority Critical patent/CN116611736A/en
Publication of CN116611736A publication Critical patent/CN116611736A/en
Pending legal-status Critical Current

Links

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • G06Q10/06398—Performance of employee with respect to a job function
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F16/20—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor of structured data, e.g. relational data
    • G06F16/28—Databases characterised by their database models, e.g. relational or object models
    • G06F16/284—Relational databases
    • G06F16/285—Clustering or classification
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/20—Administration of product repair or maintenance
    • Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y04—INFORMATION OR COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES HAVING AN IMPACT ON OTHER TECHNOLOGY AREAS
    • Y04S—SYSTEMS INTEGRATING TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO POWER NETWORK OPERATION, COMMUNICATION OR INFORMATION TECHNOLOGIES FOR IMPROVING THE ELECTRICAL POWER GENERATION, TRANSMISSION, DISTRIBUTION, MANAGEMENT OR USAGE, i.e. SMART GRIDS
    • Y04S10/00—Systems supporting electrical power generation, transmission or distribution
    • Y04S10/50—Systems or methods supporting the power network operation or management, involving a certain degree of interaction with the load-side end user applications

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
  • Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Operations Research (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The application discloses a skill level evaluating system, a method, equipment and a medium for metering operation and maintenance, wherein the system comprises: the input module is used for inputting a technical scheme, equipment types, fault types and fault troubleshooting answers into the type library; the association module is used for editing the association relation among the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type and the skill level; the reference setting module is used for setting the number of technical schemes, equipment types, fault types, skill types and question types and corresponding weights in the evaluation, and triggering a type library to call the corresponding number to generate evaluation items so that the personnel to be evaluated can evaluate the answer questions; and the evaluation module is used for respectively evaluating the scores of the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type, the skill type and the question type according to the correct answer number and the corresponding set number, and evaluating and obtaining the overall score according to each weight. Therefore, the problem that the evaluation of the post competence of metering operation and maintenance is not comprehensive in the prior art is solved.

Description

Skill level evaluation system, method, equipment and medium for metering operation and maintenance
Technical Field
The application relates to the technical field of electric power, in particular to a skill level evaluation system, method, equipment and medium for metering operation and maintenance.
Background
The post competence training and assessment work of the metering operation and maintenance is mainly used for training and assessment according to a scene type question bank. After the operation of the evaluation personnel is completed, the evaluation personnel scores the completion condition and result of the evaluation personnel. For the commentator, whether a certain working scene of the work species passes or not is displayed; for the evaluation personnel, only the evaluation personnel can judge whether the evaluation personnel can be skilled in developing the work of the scene. However, for both parties, there is no guidance of related operability as to whether the various technical schemes, equipment types and fault types related to the work can meet the corresponding skill level requirements.
At present, training and checking equipment based on fault scenes is developed in the industry, but the analysis and judgment are mainly performed on whether the result of processing the fault by personnel is correct, so that the analysis of the overall mastering condition of the technical skill level which the personnel needs to master corresponding to the training and checking level is lacked, the overall condition of the personnel cannot be comprehensively known by the evaluation personnel, and the guidance of the practical training direction which should be enhanced in the future is lacked.
Disclosure of Invention
The application provides a skill level evaluation system, method, equipment and medium for metering operation and maintenance, which are used for solving the problem that the evaluation of the post competence of metering operation and maintenance is not comprehensive in the prior art.
In view of this, a first aspect of the present application provides a skill level assessment system for metering operations, the system comprising: the system comprises an input module, a type library, an association module, a reference setting module and an evaluation module;
the input module is used for responding to a user input instruction and inputting a technical scheme, equipment type, fault type and fault troubleshooting answers to the type library;
the type library is used for storing the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type and the fault troubleshooting answer, and pre-storing a question library type and a skill level;
the association module is used for editing the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type and the association relation with the skill level;
the reference setting module is used for setting the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type, the skill type, the number of the question types and the corresponding weights in the evaluation, triggering the type library to call the corresponding number to generate evaluation items, and enabling personnel to be evaluated to answer and evaluate according to the evaluation items;
the evaluation module is used for respectively evaluating the scores of the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type, the skill type and the question type according to the correct answer number and the corresponding set number, and obtaining an overall score according to the weights.
Optionally, the evaluating the scores of the technical solution, the equipment type, the fault type, the skill type and the question type according to the correct answer number and the corresponding set number respectively specifically includes:
technical scheme score = number of corresponding fault detail correct answers/number of settings under the selected technical scheme;
device type score = number of correct answers/number of settings for the corresponding fault detail under the device;
fault type score = number of correct answers to corresponding fault details/number of set-up skill level;
question type score = number of corresponding fault detail correct answers under question type/number of settings.
Optionally, the evaluating obtains an overall score according to each weight, which specifically includes:
total score = corresponding weight to the technical solution score + corresponding weight to the equipment type score + corresponding weight to the fault type score + corresponding weight to the skill level score + corresponding weight to the topic type score.
Optionally, the question bank type specifically includes: theoretical question bank and real operation question bank.
Optionally, the technical scheme includes: semi-wireless, semi-carrier, full-wireless, full-carrier, 485 bus, and hybrid networking.
Optionally, the device type specifically includes: concentrator, summary list, user list, and collector.
Optionally, the fault type specifically includes: line faults, body faults, parameter faults, and zone faults.
The second aspect of the application provides a skill level evaluation method for metering operation and maintenance, which comprises the following steps:
after responding to the user input instruction, inputting a technical scheme, a device type, a fault type and a fault troubleshooting answer into a database;
editing the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type and the association relation with skill level;
after the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type, the skill type, the number of question types and the corresponding weights are set in the evaluation, triggering the database to call the corresponding number to generate an evaluation item, so that a person to be evaluated can answer and evaluate according to the evaluation item;
and respectively evaluating the scores of the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type, the skill type and the question type according to the correct answer number and the corresponding set number, and evaluating to obtain an overall score according to the weights.
A third aspect of the present application provides a skill level assessment apparatus for metering an operation, the apparatus comprising a processor and a memory:
the memory is used for storing program codes and transmitting the program codes to the processor;
the processor is configured to execute the steps of the skill level evaluation method for metering the operation and maintenance according to the instructions in the program code.
A fourth aspect of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium storing program code for executing the skill level evaluating method of metering operation and maintenance according to the second aspect.
From the above technical scheme, the application has the following advantages:
the skill level evaluation system for metering operation and maintenance provided by the application effectively solves the problem that the overall situation of the self level cannot be comprehensively known by the evaluation personnel due to the lack of analysis of the overall mastering situation of the technical skill level mastered by the personnel corresponding to the training and assessment level only aiming at whether the result of processing the fault by the personnel is correct or not by the training and assessment equipment in the metering operation and maintenance industry at present, and provides guidance for the management personnel and the training personnel to pointedly strengthen the practical training direction.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic structural diagram of a skill level evaluation system for metering operation and maintenance according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 2 is a flow chart of a method for evaluating skill level of metering operation and maintenance according to an embodiment of the present application.
Detailed Description
In order to make the present application better understood by those skilled in the art, the following description will clearly and completely describe the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application with reference to the accompanying drawings, and it is apparent that the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present application, not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of the application without making any inventive effort, are intended to be within the scope of the application.
Referring to fig. 1, a skill level evaluation system for metering operation and maintenance provided in an embodiment of the present application includes: the system comprises an input module, a type library, an association module, a reference setting module and an evaluation module;
the input module 101 is used for responding to a user input instruction and inputting a technical scheme, a device type, a fault type and a fault troubleshooting answer to the type library;
it should be noted that, the functions of the input module include: technical scheme input, equipment type input, fault type input, and fault troubleshooting answer input, for example:
the technical scheme is input to provide selection: functions of semi-radio (scheme 1), semi-carrier (scheme 2), full-radio (scheme 3), full-carrier (scheme 4), 485 bus (scheme 4) and hybrid networking (scheme 5)
Device type entry provides selection: the concentrator (equipment type 1), the summary list (equipment type 2), the user list (equipment type 3) and the collector (equipment type 4) enter a fault type input function;
fault type entry provides selection: and recording the functions of fault details, carrying out setting assignment on the bound training table body after the setting is selected, and carrying out specific integration circuit fault (fault type 1), body fault (fault type 2), parameter fault (fault type 3) and table zone fault (fault type 4) on the selection of the fault details.
Troubleshooting answer entry provides selection: and recording a fault checking answer function, and simultaneously judging consistency with fault details recorded by fault type recording.
The type library 102 is used for storing technical schemes, equipment types, fault types and fault troubleshooting answers, and pre-storing question library types and skill levels;
it should be noted that the question bank type library includes: a theoretical question bank (question bank 1) and an actual question bank (question bank 2);
the technical scheme library comprises the following steps: semi-wireless (scheme 1), semi-carrier (scheme 2), full-wireless (scheme 3), full-carrier (scheme 4), 485 bus (scheme 4), hybrid networking (scheme 5), and adding technical scheme types;
the device type library includes: concentrator (device type 1), summary (device type 2), user table (device type 3), collector (device type 4), add device type;
the fault type library includes: line fault (fault type 1), body fault (fault type 2), parameter fault (fault type 3), zone fault (fault type 4), adding fault type;
further, the method further comprises the following steps: a skill level library comprising: primary (level 1), intermediate (level 2), high (level 3), technician (level 4), high technician (level 5), add skill level.
The association module 103 is used for editing the association relation between the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type and the skill level;
the association module is an association database of technical schemes, equipment types, fault types and skill levels, and provides an association relation editing function of the technical schemes, the equipment types, the fault types, the skill levels, the first-level fault detail classification and the second-level fault detail classification.
The reference setting module 104 is configured to set the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type, the skill type, the number of question types, and the corresponding weights during evaluation, and then trigger the type library to call the corresponding number to generate an evaluation item, so that a person to be evaluated performs answer evaluation according to the evaluation item;
it should be noted that, the reference setting module provides a setting function of five dimensional evaluation calculation score reference values included in the evaluation function, including: technical scheme reference setting, equipment type reference setting, fault type reference setting, skill type reference setting and question type reference setting; and after the corresponding weight, the trigger type library calls the corresponding quantity to generate evaluation items, so that the personnel to be evaluated can evaluate the answer according to the evaluation items.
And the evaluation module 105 is used for respectively evaluating the scores of the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type, the skill type and the question type according to the correct answer number and the corresponding set number, and evaluating and obtaining the overall score according to each weight.
The evaluation module includes: technical scheme evaluation, equipment type evaluation, fault type evaluation, skill type evaluation and question type evaluation, and further comprises the following steps: and (5) overall evaluation. Wherein:
and (3) evaluating the technical scheme: the comprehensive evaluation score of the evaluation personnel in the dimension of the technical scheme is calculated according to the types of the technical scheme included in the technical scheme library, and a radar chart is generated according to the set reference value of the technical scheme reference setting. Technical solution score=number of correct answers/number of settings of corresponding fault details under the selected technical solution, for example, the examinee selects a half-carrier solution before setting in real operation, 7 fault details are set under the solution, and the technical solution score of the examinee half-carrier is 5/7×100=71 score for 5 answers. And performing multiple operations, namely accumulating the correct answer questions of the examinee and the set number and then calculating the score. The unset technical scheme is calculated according to 0 point.
Device type evaluation: the comprehensive evaluation score of the evaluation personnel in the equipment type dimension is calculated according to the equipment types included in the equipment type library, and a radar chart is generated according to the set reference value of the equipment type reference setting. Device type score = number of correct answers to the corresponding fault details/number of settings under the device, e.g. the test taker sets 10 fault details of the concentrator (without distinguishing fault types), and the score for the test taker concentrator is 8/10 x 100 = 80 score for 8 answers. And performing multiple operations, namely accumulating the correct answer questions of the examinee and the set number and then calculating the score. The unset device types are calculated in 0 points.
And (3) evaluating fault types: the comprehensive evaluation score of the evaluation personnel in the fault type dimension is calculated according to the fault types included in the fault type library, and a radar chart is generated according to the set reference value of the fault type reference setting. Fault type score = number of correct answers/number of settings for the corresponding fault detail for that fault type 100%. For example, the test taker sets 5 faults of the line faults under the total table, sets 3 faults of the line faults under the user table, and gives 4 faults under the total table and 2 faults under the user table, so that the score of the test taker line faults is (4+2)/(5+3) ×100=75. And performing multiple operations, namely accumulating the correct answer questions of the examinee and the set number, and then calculating a score, namely, 6/8 for the first time and 7/9 for the second time, namely, the score of the type of the equipment of the examinee= (6+7)/(8+9) ×100=76 minutes. The unset fault type is calculated in 0 points.
Skill type evaluation: the comprehensive evaluation score of the reference personnel in the skill type dimension is calculated according to the skill type included in the skill level library, and a radar chart is generated according to the set reference value of the skill level reference setting. Skill level score = correct answer number/setting number of corresponding fault details under the skill level, for example, the examinee sets 10 high-level worker fault details, and the score of the examinee is 9/10×100=90 score for 9 answers. And performing multiple operations, namely accumulating the correct answer questions of the examinee and the set number and then calculating the score. The unset skill level was calculated as 0 points.
Question type evaluation: the comprehensive evaluation score of the evaluation personnel in the question type dimension is set according to the question type included in the question type library and the set reference value is set according to the question type reference to generate a radar chart. Question type score = number/number of correct fault details answers corresponding to the question type, for example, 10 fault details are set for the test taker's actual operation (without distinguishing the equipment type, skill level, fault type and technical scheme), and 7 answers are set, then the test taker's actual operation score = 7/10 x 100 = 70 points. And performing multiple operations, namely accumulating the correct answer questions of the examinee and the set number and then calculating the score. Calculated on a 0 point basis without theoretical or practical testing.
Further, overall evaluation: the method is characterized in that overall evaluation scores of evaluation personnel in five dimensions of technical scheme evaluation, equipment type evaluation, fault type evaluation, skill type evaluation and question type evaluation are evaluated, and radar graphs of individuals and units are generated according to reference values set by overall evaluation references according to evaluation types included in a type library.
Wherein, individual evaluation overall score = skill level score x 20% + topic type score x 20% + technical solution score x 20% + equipment type score x 20% + fault type score x 20%;
unit evaluation score = all personal skill class score ×20% + all personal topic type score ×20% + all personal technical plan score ×20% + all personal device type score ×20% + all personal fault type score ×20%. (20% as set forth in this paragraph are default values for reference function 50).
The skill level evaluation system for metering operation and maintenance provided by the embodiment of the application effectively solves the problem that the overall situation of the self level cannot be comprehensively known by the evaluation personnel due to the lack of analysis of the overall mastering situation of the technical skill level mastered by the personnel corresponding to the training and assessment level only aiming at whether the result of processing the fault by the personnel is correct or not by the training and assessment equipment in the metering operation and maintenance industry at present, and provides guidance for the management personnel and the training personnel in a targeted manner.
The above is a skill level evaluation system for metering operation and maintenance provided in the embodiment of the present application, and the following is a skill level evaluation method for metering operation and maintenance provided in the embodiment of the present application.
Referring to fig. 2, a method for evaluating skill level of metering operation and maintenance according to an embodiment of the present application includes:
step 201, after responding to a user input instruction, inputting a technical scheme, a device type, a fault type and a fault troubleshooting answer into a database;
step 202, editing the association relation among the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type and the skill level;
step 203, after setting the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type, the skill type, the number of the question types and the corresponding weights in the evaluation, triggering a database to call the corresponding number to generate an evaluation item, so that a person to be evaluated carries out answer evaluation according to the evaluation item;
and 204, respectively evaluating the scores of the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type, the skill type and the question type according to the correct answer number and the corresponding set number, and evaluating to obtain an overall score according to each weight.
Further, in an embodiment of the present application, a skill level evaluating device for measuring operation and maintenance is provided, where the device includes a processor and a memory:
the memory is used for storing program codes and transmitting the program codes to the processor;
the processor is configured to execute the steps of the skill level evaluation method for metering the operation and maintenance according to the instructions in the program code.
Further, in an embodiment of the present application, a computer readable storage medium is provided, where the computer readable storage medium is used to store program code, where the program code is used to execute the skill level evaluation method for metering operation and maintenance according to the foregoing method embodiment.
It will be clear to those skilled in the art that, for convenience and brevity of description, the specific working procedures of the above-described system and unit may refer to the corresponding procedures in the foregoing method embodiments, which are not repeated here.
The terms "first," "second," "third," "fourth," and the like in the description of the application and in the above figures, if any, are used for distinguishing between similar objects and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the data so used may be interchanged where appropriate such that the embodiments of the application described herein may be implemented, for example, in sequences other than those illustrated or otherwise described herein. Furthermore, the terms "comprises," "comprising," and "having," and any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, system, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of steps or elements is not necessarily limited to those steps or elements expressly listed but may include other steps or elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus.
It should be understood that in the present application, "at least one (item)" means one or more, and "a plurality" means two or more. "and/or" for describing the association relationship of the association object, the representation may have three relationships, for example, "a and/or B" may represent: only a, only B and both a and B are present, wherein a, B may be singular or plural. The character "/" generally indicates that the context-dependent object is an "or" relationship. "at least one of" or the like means any combination of these items, including any combination of single item(s) or plural items(s). For example, at least one (one) of a, b or c may represent: a, b, c, "a and b", "a and c", "b and c", or "a and b and c", wherein a, b, c may be single or plural.
In the several embodiments provided in the present application, it should be understood that the disclosed systems, devices, and methods may be implemented in other manners. For example, the apparatus embodiments described above are merely illustrative, e.g., the division of the units is merely a logical function division, and there may be additional divisions when actually implemented, e.g., multiple units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted or not performed. Alternatively, the coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed with each other may be an indirect coupling or communication connection via some interfaces, devices or units, which may be in electrical, mechanical or other form.
The units described as separate units may or may not be physically separate, and units shown as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed on a plurality of network units. Some or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.
In addition, each functional unit in the embodiments of the present application may be integrated in one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units may be integrated in one unit. The integrated units may be implemented in hardware or in software functional units.
The integrated units, if implemented in the form of software functional units and sold or used as stand-alone products, may be stored in a computer readable storage medium. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present application may be embodied essentially or in part or all of the technical solution or in part in the form of a software product stored in a storage medium, including instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device, etc.) to perform all or part of the steps of the method according to the embodiments of the present application. And the aforementioned storage medium includes: u disk, mobile hard disk, read-Only Memory (ROM), random access Memory (Random Access Memory, RAM), magnetic disk or optical disk, etc.
The above embodiments are only for illustrating the technical solution of the present application, and not for limiting the same; although the application has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that: the technical scheme described in the foregoing embodiments can be modified or some technical features thereof can be replaced by equivalents; such modifications and substitutions do not depart from the spirit and scope of the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present application.

Claims (10)

1. A skill level evaluation system for metering an operation and maintenance, comprising: the system comprises an input module, a type library, an association module, a reference setting module and an evaluation module;
the input module is used for responding to a user input instruction and inputting a technical scheme, equipment type, fault type and fault troubleshooting answers to the type library;
the type library is used for storing the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type and the fault troubleshooting answer, and pre-storing a question library type and a skill level;
the association module is used for editing the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type and the association relation with the skill level;
the reference setting module is used for setting the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type, the skill type, the number of the question types and the corresponding weights in the evaluation, triggering the type library to call the corresponding number to generate evaluation items, and enabling personnel to be evaluated to answer and evaluate according to the evaluation items;
the evaluation module is used for respectively evaluating the scores of the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type, the skill type and the question type according to the correct answer number and the corresponding set number, and obtaining an overall score according to the weights.
2. The skill level evaluation system for measuring operation and maintenance according to claim 1, wherein the evaluating the scores of the technical solution, the equipment type, the fault type, the skill type and the question type according to the correct answer number and the corresponding set number respectively specifically includes:
technical scheme score = number of corresponding fault detail correct answers/number of settings under the selected technical scheme;
device type score = number of correct answers/number of settings for the corresponding fault detail under the device;
fault type score = number of correct answers to corresponding fault details/number of set-up skill level;
question type score = number of corresponding fault detail correct answers under question type/number of settings.
3. The system for evaluating the skill level of a metric operation and maintenance according to claim 2, wherein the evaluating obtains an overall score according to each weight, and specifically comprises:
total score = corresponding weight to the technical solution score + corresponding weight to the equipment type score + corresponding weight to the fault type score + corresponding weight to the skill level score + corresponding weight to the topic type score.
4. The system for evaluating the skill level of a metering operation and maintenance according to claim 1, wherein the question bank type specifically comprises: theoretical question bank and real operation question bank.
5. The system for skill level assessment of a metering operation and maintenance according to claim 1, wherein the technical scheme comprises: semi-wireless, semi-carrier, full-wireless, full-carrier, 485 bus, and hybrid networking.
6. The system for skill level assessment of a metering operation according to claim 1, wherein the equipment type comprises: concentrator, summary list, user list, and collector.
7. The system for skill level assessment of a metering operation according to claim 1, wherein the fault type specifically comprises: line faults, body faults, parameter faults, and zone faults.
8. A skill level evaluation method for metering operation and maintenance, which is characterized by comprising the following steps:
after responding to the user input instruction, inputting a technical scheme, a device type, a fault type and a fault troubleshooting answer into a database;
editing the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type and the association relation with skill level;
after the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type, the skill type, the number of question types and the corresponding weights are set in the evaluation, triggering the database to call the corresponding number to generate an evaluation item, so that a person to be evaluated can answer and evaluate according to the evaluation item;
and respectively evaluating the scores of the technical scheme, the equipment type, the fault type, the skill type and the question type according to the correct answer number and the corresponding set number, and evaluating to obtain an overall score according to the weights.
9. A skill level evaluation device for metering an operation, the device comprising a processor and a memory:
the memory is used for storing program codes and transmitting the program codes to the processor;
the processor is configured to execute the metric dimension skill level evaluation method of claim 8 according to instructions in the program code.
10. A computer readable storage medium storing program code for performing the metric dimension skill level assessment method of claim 8.
CN202310590390.1A 2023-05-23 2023-05-23 Skill level evaluation system, method, equipment and medium for metering operation and maintenance Pending CN116611736A (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310590390.1A CN116611736A (en) 2023-05-23 2023-05-23 Skill level evaluation system, method, equipment and medium for metering operation and maintenance

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310590390.1A CN116611736A (en) 2023-05-23 2023-05-23 Skill level evaluation system, method, equipment and medium for metering operation and maintenance

Publications (1)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN116611736A true CN116611736A (en) 2023-08-18

Family

ID=87679592

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202310590390.1A Pending CN116611736A (en) 2023-05-23 2023-05-23 Skill level evaluation system, method, equipment and medium for metering operation and maintenance

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN116611736A (en)

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN105868106B (en) The test method and test system of ultrasonic device reliability
CN111401722B (en) Intelligent decision method and intelligent decision system
CN110569159A (en) Baffle generation method, device, equipment and computer storage medium
Gong et al. Faster mutation-based fault localization with a novel mutation execution strategy
CN109800995A (en) A kind of grid equipment fault recognition method and system
CN115221982B (en) Traction power supply operation and maintenance method and device, terminal and storage medium
CN107038108A (en) The method of testing and device of software
CN112365361A (en) Power metering data quality physical examination method based on rule base
CN114997741A (en) Maintenance plan risk assessment method, system and equipment
Engström Regression test selection and product line system testing
CN110991858A (en) Cross-border power grid networking project evaluation method and related device
Barzegkar-Ntovom et al. Methodology for evaluating equivalent models for the dynamic analysis of power systems
CN112380759B (en) Smart electric meter service life prediction method based on deep learning and CoxPH model
CN116611736A (en) Skill level evaluation system, method, equipment and medium for metering operation and maintenance
CN114666774B (en) Identification matching system and method of Bluetooth equipment
CN114519437B (en) Cloud-based micro-service method and system for fault diagnosis analysis and repair reporting
CN115269415A (en) Interface test system and method based on simulation scene use case
CN113159537B (en) Assessment method and device for new technical project of power grid and computer equipment
Zapata-Jaramillo et al. On the relationship of ISO/IEC 9126 metrics and the alpha states of the SEMAT kernel
CN115372752A (en) Fault detection method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN110837464A (en) Test case processing method and device
CN116302762B (en) Evaluation method and system for fault location application based on red-blue countermeasure
CN110400030A (en) A kind of assessment method and system, storage medium handling dynamic problem ability
CN113433506B (en) Ammeter fault analysis method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN113900865B (en) Intelligent power grid equipment automatic test method, system and readable storage medium

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination