CN116578476B - Method and device for realizing guarantee simulation of task execution of business process fine depiction - Google Patents
Method and device for realizing guarantee simulation of task execution of business process fine depiction Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN116578476B CN116578476B CN202310427564.2A CN202310427564A CN116578476B CN 116578476 B CN116578476 B CN 116578476B CN 202310427564 A CN202310427564 A CN 202310427564A CN 116578476 B CN116578476 B CN 116578476B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- flow
- service
- task
- business
- main
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 212
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 title claims abstract description 155
- 238000004088 simulation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 36
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 45
- 230000003213 activating effect Effects 0.000 claims description 15
- 230000007246 mechanism Effects 0.000 claims description 14
- 238000003860 storage Methods 0.000 claims description 13
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 claims description 9
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 claims description 6
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 20
- 238000012512 characterization method Methods 0.000 description 18
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 13
- 238000004458 analytical method Methods 0.000 description 12
- 230000006399 behavior Effects 0.000 description 11
- 230000008901 benefit Effects 0.000 description 11
- 230000007704 transition Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000004519 manufacturing process Methods 0.000 description 5
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 4
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005457 optimization Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000004913 activation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000005094 computer simulation Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000001360 synchronised effect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007792 addition Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000002776 aggregation Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004220 aggregation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004075 alteration Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000003542 behavioural effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000011217 control strategy Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000000354 decomposition reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007812 deficiency Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012938 design process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009826 distribution Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000014509 gene expression Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000007774 longterm Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000010606 normalization Methods 0.000 description 1
- 239000013307 optical fiber Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000008520 organization Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000750 progressive effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000005215 recombination Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000006798 recombination Effects 0.000 description 1
- 239000004065 semiconductor Substances 0.000 description 1
- 239000000725 suspension Substances 0.000 description 1
- 230000009897 systematic effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 230000000007 visual effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012800 visualization Methods 0.000 description 1
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3688—Test management for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3684—Test management for test design, e.g. generating new test cases
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F13/00—Interconnection of, or transfer of information or other signals between, memories, input/output devices or central processing units
- G06F13/38—Information transfer, e.g. on bus
- G06F13/42—Bus transfer protocol, e.g. handshake; Synchronisation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F30/00—Computer-aided design [CAD]
- G06F30/20—Design optimisation, verification or simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation; Time management
- G06Q10/103—Workflow collaboration or project management
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Geometry (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method and a device for realizing guarantee simulation of task execution of business process fine depiction, wherein the method comprises the following steps: constructing a corresponding service flow for each service main body in the guarantee service; constructing independent task execution flows for each task born by each service body, wherein the task execution flow of each service body is focused on the service flow related to the service body; the task execution flow among different service main bodies and the different service flows of the same service main body are cooperatively controlled through mutual communication.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of business process modeling, in particular to a method and a device for realizing guarantee simulation of task execution for fine characterization of a business process.
Background
The system business process simulation is a method for modeling and simulation analysis of a complex business process by a computer simulation technology. By simulating various events, behaviors and decision-making processes in the business process, a decision maker can be helped to know and evaluate the advantages and disadvantages of different schemes, optimize and improve the business process, and improve the business efficiency and benefit.
The system business process simulation generally comprises the following main steps:
1. and (3) establishing a model: the actual business process is converted into a computer model, which comprises a process structure, process steps, data flows, business rules and the like.
2. Input data: data to be simulated is input for the model, including various events and parameters in the business process, such as customer arrival time, service time, employee capability, etc.
3. Running simulation: and running a simulation program, simulating the running process of the business process, and recording and analyzing the simulation result.
4. Analysis results: and according to the simulation result, evaluating the performance and benefit of the business process, finding problems and bottlenecks, and providing an optimization and improvement scheme.
5. Optimizing and improving: and optimizing and improving the business process according to the analysis result and the optimization scheme, and improving the business efficiency and benefit.
The system business process simulation can be applied to various industries and fields, such as production and manufacturing, after-sales service, logistics distribution and the like, and is a very valuable tool for decision makers and managers.
The main stream technology of the system business process simulation comprises the following steps:
1. discrete Event Simulation (DES): simulating the course of system operation by simulating the occurrence and processing of discrete events can be used to evaluate the impact of various strategies and decisions under different circumstances.
2. Proxy base simulation (ABS): by building a behavioral model of the proxy entity to describe the process of system operation, various uncertainties and complexities present in the actual scenario may be considered.
3. Systematic kinetic Simulation (SD): by establishing the relation and interaction among the components of the system, the dynamic evolution process of the system is simulated, and the dynamic evolution process can be used for evaluating long-term influence and interaction of complex factors.
The system business process modeling tools have BPMN, UML, petri nets, etc., and these modeling languages provide a set of symbols and rules. Mainstream business modeling software, such as Visio, ARIS, bizagi, that supports these modeling languages can help users quickly create business process models and can automatically generate process documents and reports.
BPMN (BusinessProcessModelandNotation) is a business process modeling standard, which has the following advantages:
easy to understand and use: BPMN provides an intuitive and easy to understand way to describe business processes. The graphical representation thereof can help business analysts, flow designers, developers, and other stakeholders to understand and collaborate more easily.
The readability is strong: the graphical representation of the BPMN criteria allows the flow model to be easily read, interpreted, and communicated. This helps to improve team cooperation efficiency and accuracy, while also helping to reduce the risk of communication misunderstanding.
Support standardization: BPMN is a common standard that can help organizations and industries to achieve process standardization. This normalization helps to reduce the risk of errors and inconsistencies and improves the quality and efficiency of the business process.
Recyclability: BPMN allows reuse of flow models, which can help organizations save time and effort. Reuse of models also helps to maintain consistency and reduce errors in flow design.
The technical scheme for carrying out flow modeling by adopting the BPMN mainly comprises the following steps:
determining a business process range and a target: before modeling begins, the scope and goal of the business process need to be clearly understood. This helps determine the individual elements involved in the process and flow that need to be modeled.
Establishing a flow model: a complete flow model can be built through BPMN symbols and graphics to show the relationships between the various parts of the flow and the flow. Various types of events, tasks, gateways, and other symbols need to be considered and represented when building a flow model.
Explicit flow roles and participants: each business process has roles and participants. Roles refer to entities in a process that perform a particular role, while participants refer to people or organizations associated with roles. To clearly express these concepts, roles and participants need to be defined in BPMN.
Defining flow data and objects: the data and objects in the flow may be represented by defining business objects, data objects, and data stores. This helps determine and incorporate into the flow model all data and objects that need to be used during flow execution.
Optimizing a flow model: once the flow model is established, it can be optimized to ensure that it is efficient and maintainable. Model checking and analysis can be performed using BPMN tools to find problems and bottlenecks in the flow and make necessary adjustments.
Simulation and test flow: the process should be simulated and tested before it is deployed to the production environment. This helps to verify the correctness and feasibility of the flow model and to discover any potential problems.
UML (unified modeling language) is a commonly used modeling language for describing the architecture, structure, and behavior of software systems. In UML, flow modeling is a common modeling manner used to represent business flows, data flows, control flows, etc. in a software system. Has the following advantages:
and (3) visualization: UML flow diagrams are a visual tool that can help developers to better understand the structure and behavior of the system, reducing misunderstandings and errors.
Easy to understand and communicate: because UML flow diagrams use standard symbols and labels, they are easy to understand and communicate, both by developers, administrators, and clients.
Easy to maintain: the UML flow diagram may be continually updated and maintained as the system evolves to reflect actual system changes.
Multifunctional: the UML flow chart can be used not only for software development, but also in the fields of business processes, organization structures and the like.
Standardization: UML is a standardized flow modeling technique with wide application and support that helps to improve work efficiency and quality.
The technical scheme for carrying out flow modeling by adopting UML mainly comprises the following steps:
the determination flow is as follows: and determining a business flow, a data flow or a control flow and the like needing modeling.
Determining use cases: and according to the demand analysis, determining the use cases in the system, namely the user functions which need to be supported in the system.
Identifying an object: all objects associated with the flow are identified, including business entities, interfaces, controllers, databases, and the like.
Drawing a graph: a use case diagram is drawn to represent the relationship between the use case and the participants of the system.
Drawing an activity diagram: and drawing an activity diagram for representing the execution flow of the business flow, the data flow, the control flow and the like.
And (3) drawing a time sequence chart: a timing diagram is drawn to represent timing relationships and messaging between objects.
Drawing a class diagram: class diagrams are drawn to represent classes and relationships between classes in a system, including inheritance, aggregation, association, and the like.
Drawing a state diagram: a state diagram is drawn for representing the behavior and transitions of the object in different states.
The Petri network is mainly used for describing the behaviors of a discrete event system and can capture complex interaction behaviors such as parallelism, synchronism and the like. The advantage of adopting Petri net to carry out flow modeling:
easy to understand and use: the grammar of the Petri net is simple and easy to understand and use, so that the Petri net can be easily mastered by non-professional staff. Furthermore, the Petri net can graphically represent the system so that modeling becomes more intuitive.
Parallel and synchronous behavior can be described: petri networks can efficiently describe parallel and synchronous behavior, which is difficult to describe by other flow modeling methods. This makes Petri nets very useful in describing complex systems, e.g., multiple processes in the system run simultaneously.
Formalized analysis can be performed: petri nets are capable of formal analysis, e.g., state space analysis, deadlock detection, etc. These analyses can help to find problems in the system and improve upon the design process.
The behavior of the system can be modeled: the Petri net may simulate the behavior of the system so that a system designer may test the behavior of the system prior to design. This helps the designer to find and correct possible problems and thereby avoid system failures.
The technical scheme for carrying out flow modeling by adopting the Petri network mainly comprises the following steps:
determining model purpose: the purpose of explicit modeling is, for example, to optimize a production process, evaluate a business process, design an information system, etc.
The identification flow comprises the following steps: the process to be modeled is determined, for example, as steps in a production process, assembly, inspection, etc.
Determining elements and relationships: according to the flow steps, the elements and relationships required in the Petri network are determined. The Petri net consists of two elements: library and transition. The library represents states in the system and transitions represent events or actions in the system. The library and the transitions are connected by arcs (i.e., connecting lines) to represent the relationship between them. The arc is divided into an input arc and an output arc, wherein the input arc represents a precondition that the transition needs to meet, and the output arc represents a result generated after the transition is executed.
Drawing a Petri net: from the determined elements and relationships, a Petri net is drawn using a drawing tool.
Validating the Petri net: and verifying the correctness of the Petri network, and checking whether the problems of deadlock, conflict and the like exist.
Analysis of Petri nets: the Petri network is analyzed, for example, for performance evaluation by simulation operation, flow control strategy adjustment by transition priority, and the like.
Optimizing the Petri net: based on the analysis results, optimization of the Petri net is performed, for example, by adjusting the number and positions of the library and transitions, improving the flow efficiency.
The existing business process modeling techniques listed above, while widely used, suffer from a number of drawbacks and deficiencies, such as:
1) Mainly describing the flow, and aiming at different types of business scenes, lacking specialized flow describing capability, such as equipment guarantee business and the like.
2) These modeling languages and standards strive to normalize and unify, rather than more elaborate, characterization of task execution.
3) Redundancy is easily present in the face of complex business processes, such as the graphical representation of BPMN may result in excessive symbols and redundant information. This can lead to the model becoming complex and difficult to maintain if not controlled.
4) Modeling processes are cumbersome, such as UML flow modeling requires a large number of symbols and labels to be drawn, which takes a lot of time and effort.
5) Lacking scalability, such as when the system becomes very complex, petri nets may become difficult to scale. This is because the graphical representation method in the Petri net may become confusing and modeling and analysis may become more difficult.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve at least one problem in the background art, the invention provides a method and a device for realizing guarantee simulation of task execution for fine characterization of a business process.
According to one aspect of the present invention, there is provided a method for implementing a guarantee simulation of task execution for fine characterization of a business process, including:
constructing a corresponding service flow for each service main body in the guarantee service;
constructing independent task execution flows for each task born by each service body, wherein the task execution flow of each service body is focused on the service flow related to the service body;
the task execution flow among different service main bodies and the different service flows of the same service main body are cooperatively controlled through mutual communication.
Optionally, the business process corresponding to each business body includes a main line process and an auxiliary process, a parallel mechanism is adopted between the main line process and the auxiliary process, the main line process includes a main process and a plurality of sub-processes, and the auxiliary process includes a plurality of auxiliary processes.
Optionally, the task execution flows among different service entities are cooperatively controlled by external communication, and the different service flows of the same service entity are cooperatively controlled by internal communication.
Optionally, the method for realizing the guarantee simulation of task execution for fine characterization of the business process further comprises the following steps:
activating a first target process in a first task of a current service body in a communication mode to serve as a sub-process of a main process in the first task;
activating a main flow in a second task of the current service body as an expansion flow of the main flow in the first task of the current service body in a communication mode;
and activating a second target flow in a second task of the current service body in a communication mode to serve as an expansion sub-flow of an expansion flow in the second task.
Optionally, the method for realizing the guarantee simulation of task execution for fine characterization of the business process further comprises the following steps: and setting the limit number of the business processes.
According to still another aspect of the present invention, there is provided a guarantee simulation implementation apparatus for task execution for fine characterization of a business process, including:
the first construction module is used for constructing a corresponding service flow for each service body in the guarantee service;
the second construction module is used for constructing an independent task execution flow for each task born by each service main body, wherein the task execution flow of each service main body is focused on the service flow related to the service main body;
and the cooperative control module is used for cooperatively controlling the task execution flow among different service main bodies and the different service flows of the same service main body through mutual communication.
Optionally, the business process corresponding to each business body includes a main line process and an auxiliary process, a parallel mechanism is adopted between the main line process and the auxiliary process, the main line process includes a main process and a plurality of sub-processes, and the auxiliary process includes a plurality of auxiliary processes.
Optionally, the task execution flows among different service entities are cooperatively controlled by external communication, and the different service flows of the same service entity are cooperatively controlled by internal communication.
According to a further aspect of the present invention there is provided a computer readable storage medium storing a computer program for performing the method according to any one of the above aspects of the present invention.
According to still another aspect of the present invention, there is provided an electronic device including: a processor; a memory for storing the processor-executable instructions; the processor is configured to read the executable instructions from the memory and execute the instructions to implement the method according to any of the above aspects of the present invention.
The invention constructs the business flow for each main body in the guarantee business, and the business flow has a main and auxiliary flow parallel mechanism. The invention constructs independent task execution flow for each task born by each business body, and the flow is focused on the business process related to the business body. The invention provides a multi-flow mechanism for executing tasks for each business main body, can simultaneously start a main flow and an auxiliary flow, and aims at guaranteeing business clues (such as equipment executing processes and fault monitoring processes) executed in parallel in the business, thereby not only considering different business clues, but also ensuring that the business clues are not mutually interfered, and further leaving fine data in each range. The business processes (business processes of different main bodies and different business processes of the same main body) are cooperatively controlled through mutual communication, so that various basic activities can be immediately activated when conditions are met, and the basic activities are ended in time within a set time length without waiting for a fixed time synchronization signal, thereby ensuring the accuracy of the start and stop time of the activities.
Drawings
Exemplary embodiments of the present invention may be more completely understood in consideration of the following drawings:
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for implementing a security simulation of task execution for fine characterization of a business process according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a business process corresponding to each business entity according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a communication manner of each business process according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of an activation manner of each business process according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of a device for implementing a guarantee simulation of task execution for fine characterization of a business process according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 6 is a block diagram of an electronic device according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
Hereinafter, exemplary embodiments according to the present invention will be described in detail with reference to the accompanying drawings. It should be apparent that the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present invention and not all embodiments of the present invention, and it should be understood that the present invention is not limited by the example embodiments described herein.
It should be noted that: the relative arrangement of the components and steps, numerical expressions and numerical values set forth in these embodiments do not limit the scope of the present invention unless it is specifically stated otherwise.
Fig. 1 shows a schematic flow diagram of a method for implementing a guarantee simulation of task execution for fine characterization of a business process provided by the present invention. As shown in fig. 1, the method for implementing the guarantee simulation of task execution for fine characterization of a business process includes:
step S101: constructing a corresponding service flow for each service main body in the guarantee service;
optionally, the business process corresponding to each business body includes a main line process and an auxiliary process, a parallel mechanism is adopted between the main line process and the auxiliary process, the main line process includes a main process and a plurality of sub-processes, and the auxiliary process includes a plurality of auxiliary processes.
In the embodiment of the invention, in order to ensure each main body in the service, a service flow is constructed, and the service flow has a main and auxiliary flow parallel mechanism. Referring to fig. 2, a main flow 11, an auxiliary flow 11, a sub-flow 111, an auxiliary flow 111, a sub-flow 121, and an auxiliary flow 121 are constructed for the main body 1 in the security service, and a main flow 21, an auxiliary flow 21, a sub-flow 211, an auxiliary flow 211, a sub-flow 221, and an auxiliary flow 222 are constructed for the main body 2 in the security service.
Step S102: constructing independent task execution flows for each task born by each service body, wherein the task execution flow of each service body is focused on the service flow related to the service body;
in the embodiment of the invention, an independent task execution flow is constructed for each task born by each service body, and the flow is focused on the service process related to the body; each business main body executes tasks, provides a multi-flow mechanism, can simultaneously start a main flow and an auxiliary flow, and aims at guaranteeing business clues (such as equipment executing processes and fault monitoring processes which are parallel) executed in parallel in the business, so that different business clues are considered, mutual interference is avoided, and fine data in each range is reserved.
Step S103: the task execution flow among different service main bodies and the different service flows of the same service main body are cooperatively controlled through mutual communication.
Optionally, the task execution flows among different service entities are cooperatively controlled by external communication, and the different service flows of the same service entity are cooperatively controlled by internal communication.
In the embodiment of the invention, the flows (the flows of different main bodies and the flows of different main bodies) are cooperatively controlled through mutual communication. The asynchronous communication mechanism is adopted, so that various basic activities can be activated immediately when conditions are met, and the basic activities are ended in time within a set time length without waiting for a fixed time synchronization signal, thereby ensuring the accuracy of the start and stop time of the activities. Referring to fig. 3, the main flow 11 in the main body 1 is cooperatively controlled with the main flow 21 in the main body 2 by an external communication method, and the main flow 11 in the main body 1 and the auxiliary flow 11 thereof are cooperatively controlled by an internal communication method.
Optionally, the method for realizing the guarantee simulation of task execution for fine characterization of the business process further comprises the following steps: activating a first target process in a first task of a current service body in a communication mode to serve as a sub-process of a main process in the first task; activating a main flow in a second task of the current service body as an expansion flow of the main flow in the first task of the current service body in a communication mode; and activating a second target flow in a second task of the current service body in a communication mode to serve as an expansion sub-flow of an expansion flow in the second task.
In the embodiment of the invention, the business process can activate other business processes (sub-processes or other processes) in a communication mode, so as to achieve the purpose of expanding the processes in the execution of system tasks (multitasking). Referring to fig. 4, the main flow 11 in the main body 1 may activate the sub-flow 111 in the main body 1 by means of communication, and the main flow 11 in the main body 1 may activate the extended flow 12 in the main body 1 by means of communication. The extension flow 12 in the main body 1 may activate the extension sub-flow 121 in the main body 1 by means of communication.
Optionally, the method for realizing the guarantee simulation of task execution for fine characterization of the business process further comprises the following steps: and setting the limit number of the business processes.
In the embodiment of the invention, the capacity limit of the service main body is fully considered, the number of service flow limits can be set, and when the number exceeds the limit, a suspension queuing method is adopted to strictly simulate the capacity and resource limit condition of the service main body when executing certain functions. In addition, each business process of each main body respectively leaves fine business execution process data in the simulation deduction process, and common fuzzy data is not required to be extracted from one comprehensive business process.
In summary, the invention constructs the business process for each main body in the guarantee business, and the business process has a main and auxiliary process parallel mechanism. The invention constructs independent task execution flow for each task born by each business body, and the flow is focused on the business process related to the business body. The invention provides a multi-flow mechanism for executing tasks for each business main body, can simultaneously start a main flow and an auxiliary flow, and aims at guaranteeing business clues (such as equipment executing processes and fault monitoring processes) executed in parallel in the business, thereby not only considering different business clues, but also ensuring that the business clues are not mutually interfered, and further leaving fine data in each range. The business processes (business processes of different main bodies and different business processes of the same main body) are cooperatively controlled through mutual communication, so that various basic activities can be immediately activated when conditions are met, and the basic activities are ended in time within a set time length without waiting for a fixed time synchronization signal, thereby ensuring the accuracy of the start and stop time of the activities. The invention can solve the problem of difficult modeling of equipment guarantee service. A standardized business process model may be built for standardized security subjects for each particular piece of equipment. Therefore, the invention not only can solve the technical problem that the business process cannot be finely depicted, but also can greatly improve the model expandability.
Exemplary apparatus
Fig. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of a device 500 for implementing task execution guarantee simulation for fine characterization of a business process according to an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. As shown in fig. 5, the apparatus 500 includes: the first construction module is used for constructing a corresponding service flow for each service body in the guarantee service;
the second construction module is used for constructing an independent task execution flow for each task born by each service main body, wherein the task execution flow of each service main body is focused on the service flow related to the service main body;
and the cooperative control module is used for cooperatively controlling the task execution flow among different service main bodies and the different service flows of the same service main body through mutual communication.
Optionally, the business process corresponding to each business body includes a main line process and an auxiliary process, a parallel mechanism is adopted between the main line process and the auxiliary process, the main line process includes a main process and a plurality of sub-processes, and the auxiliary process includes a plurality of auxiliary processes.
Optionally, the task execution flows among different service entities are cooperatively controlled by external communication, and the different service flows of the same service entity are cooperatively controlled by internal communication.
Optionally, the device for realizing the guarantee simulation of task execution for fine characterization of the business process further comprises an activation module for:
activating a first target process in a first task of a current service body in a communication mode to serve as a sub-process of a main process in the first task;
activating a main flow in a second task of the current service body as an expansion flow of the main flow in the first task of the current service body in a communication mode;
and activating a second target flow in a second task of the current service body in a communication mode to serve as an expansion sub-flow of an expansion flow in the second task.
Optionally, the device for realizing the guarantee simulation of task execution for fine characterization of the business process further comprises a setting module for: and setting the limit number of the business processes.
The guarantee simulation implementation device for task execution of fine-grained characterization of a business process in an embodiment of the invention corresponds to the guarantee simulation implementation method for task execution of fine-grained characterization of a business process in another embodiment of the invention, and is not described herein.
Exemplary electronic device
Fig. 6 is a structure of an electronic device provided in an exemplary embodiment of the present invention. As shown in fig. 6, the electronic device 60 includes one or more processors 61 and memory 62.
The processor 61 may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU) or other form of processing unit having data processing and/or instruction execution capabilities and may control other components in the electronic device to perform the desired functions.
Memory 62 may include one or more computer program products that may include various forms of computer-readable storage media, such as volatile memory and/or non-volatile memory. The volatile memory may include, for example, random Access Memory (RAM) and/or cache memory (cache), and the like. The non-volatile memory may include, for example, read Only Memory (ROM), hard disk, flash memory, and the like. One or more computer program instructions may be stored on the computer readable storage medium that may be executed by the processor 61 to implement the methods of the software programs of the various embodiments of the present invention described above and/or other desired functions. In one example, the electronic device may further include: an input device 63 and an output device 64, which are interconnected by a bus system and/or other forms of connection mechanisms (not shown).
In addition, the input device 63 may also include, for example, a keyboard, a mouse, and the like.
The output device 64 can output various information to the outside. The output means 64 may include, for example, a display, speakers, a printer, and a communication network and remote output devices connected thereto, etc.
Of course, only some of the components of the electronic device that are relevant to the present invention are shown in fig. 6 for simplicity, components such as buses, input/output interfaces, etc. being omitted. In addition, the electronic device may include any other suitable components depending on the particular application.
Exemplary computer program product and computer readable storage Medium
In addition to the methods and apparatus described above, embodiments of the invention may also be a computer program product comprising computer program instructions which, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform steps in a method according to various embodiments of the invention described in the "exemplary methods" section of this specification.
The computer program product may write program code for performing operations of embodiments of the present invention in any combination of one or more programming languages, including an object oriented programming language such as Java, C++ or the like and conventional procedural programming languages, such as the "C" programming language or similar programming languages. The program code may execute entirely on the user's computing device, partly on the user's device, as a stand-alone software package, partly on the user's computing device, partly on a remote computing device, or entirely on the remote computing device or server.
Furthermore, embodiments of the invention may also be a computer-readable storage medium, having stored thereon computer program instructions, which when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform steps in a method according to various embodiments of the invention described in the "exemplary method" section of the description above.
The computer readable storage medium may employ any combination of one or more readable media. The readable medium may be a readable signal medium or a readable storage medium. The readable storage medium can include, for example, but is not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, or device, or a combination of any of the foregoing. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the readable storage medium would include the following: an electrical connection having one or more wires, a portable disk, a hard disk, random Access Memory (RAM), read-only memory (ROM), erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or flash memory), optical fiber, portable compact disk read-only memory (CD-ROM), an optical storage device, a magnetic storage device, or any suitable combination of the foregoing.
The basic principles of the present invention have been described above in connection with specific embodiments, however, it should be noted that the advantages, benefits, effects, etc. mentioned in the present invention are merely examples and not intended to be limiting, and these advantages, benefits, effects, etc. are not to be considered as essential to the various embodiments of the present invention. Furthermore, the specific details disclosed herein are for purposes of illustration and understanding only, and are not intended to be limiting, as the invention is not necessarily limited to practice with the above described specific details.
In this specification, each embodiment is described in a progressive manner, and each embodiment is mainly described in a different manner from other embodiments, so that the same or similar parts between the embodiments are mutually referred to. For system embodiments, the description is relatively simple as it essentially corresponds to method embodiments, and reference should be made to the description of method embodiments for relevant points.
The block diagrams of the devices, systems, apparatuses, systems according to the present invention are merely illustrative examples and are not intended to require or imply that the connections, arrangements, configurations must be made in the manner shown in the block diagrams. As will be appreciated by one of skill in the art, the devices, systems, apparatuses, systems may be connected, arranged, configured in any manner. Words such as "including," "comprising," "having," and the like are words of openness and mean "including but not limited to," and are used interchangeably therewith. The terms "or" and "as used herein refer to and are used interchangeably with the term" and/or "unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. The term "such as" as used herein refers to, and is used interchangeably with, the phrase "such as, but not limited to.
The method and apparatus of the present invention may be implemented in a number of ways. For example, the methods and apparatus of the present invention may be implemented by software, hardware, firmware, or any combination of software, hardware, firmware. The above-described sequence of steps for the method is for illustration only, and the steps of the method of the present invention are not limited to the sequence specifically described above unless specifically stated otherwise. Furthermore, in some embodiments, the present invention may also be embodied as programs recorded in a recording medium, the programs including machine-readable instructions for implementing the methods according to the present invention. Thus, the present invention also covers a recording medium storing a program for executing the method according to the present invention.
It is also noted that in the systems, devices and methods of the present invention, components or steps may be disassembled and/or assembled. Such decomposition and/or recombination should be considered as equivalent aspects of the present invention. The previous description of the disclosed aspects is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these aspects will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other aspects without departing from the scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the aspects shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
The foregoing description has been presented for purposes of illustration and description. Furthermore, this description is not intended to limit embodiments of the invention to the form disclosed herein. Although a number of example aspects and embodiments have been discussed above, a person of ordinary skill in the art will recognize certain variations, modifications, alterations, additions, and subcombinations thereof.
Claims (7)
1. The method for realizing the guarantee simulation of the task execution of the business process fine depiction is characterized by comprising the following steps:
constructing a corresponding service flow for each service main body in the guarantee service; the business process corresponding to each business main body comprises a main line process and an auxiliary process, a parallel mechanism is adopted between the main line process and the auxiliary process, the main line process comprises a main process and a plurality of sub-processes, and the auxiliary process comprises a plurality of auxiliary processes;
constructing independent task execution flows for each task born by each service body, wherein the task execution flow of each service body is focused on the service flow related to the service body;
activating a first target process in a first task of a current service body in a communication mode to serve as a sub-process of a main process in the first task;
activating a main flow in a second task of the current service body as an expansion flow of the main flow in the first task of the current service body in a communication mode;
and activating a second target flow in a second task of the current service body in a communication mode to serve as an expansion sub-flow of an expansion flow in the second task.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the task execution flows between different business entities are cooperatively controlled using external communication, and wherein the different business flows of the same business entity are cooperatively controlled using internal communication.
3. The method as recited in claim 1, further comprising: and setting the limit number of the business processes.
4. The device for realizing the guarantee simulation of the task execution for the fine depiction of the business process is characterized by comprising the following components:
the first construction module is used for constructing a corresponding service flow for each service body in the guarantee service; the business process corresponding to each business main body comprises a main line process and an auxiliary process, a parallel mechanism is adopted between the main line process and the auxiliary process, the main line process comprises a main process and a plurality of sub-processes, and the auxiliary process comprises a plurality of auxiliary processes;
the second construction module is used for constructing an independent task execution flow for each task born by each service main body, wherein the task execution flow of each service main body is focused on the service flow related to the service main body;
the cooperative control module is used for activating a first target flow in a first task of a current service main body in a communication mode to serve as a sub-flow of a main flow in the first task; activating a main flow in a second task of the current service body as an expansion flow of the main flow in the first task of the current service body in a communication mode; and activating a second target flow in a second task of the current service body in a communication mode to serve as an expansion sub-flow of an expansion flow in the second task.
5. The apparatus of claim 4, wherein the task execution flows between different service entities are cooperatively controlled using external communication, and wherein the different service flows of the same service entity are cooperatively controlled using internal communication.
6. A computer readable storage medium, characterized in that the storage medium stores a computer program for executing the method of any of the preceding claims 1-3.
7. An electronic device, the electronic device comprising:
a processor;
a memory for storing the processor-executable instructions;
the processor is configured to read the executable instructions from the memory and execute the instructions to implement the method of any of the preceding claims 1-3.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310427564.2A CN116578476B (en) | 2023-04-20 | 2023-04-20 | Method and device for realizing guarantee simulation of task execution of business process fine depiction |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310427564.2A CN116578476B (en) | 2023-04-20 | 2023-04-20 | Method and device for realizing guarantee simulation of task execution of business process fine depiction |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN116578476A CN116578476A (en) | 2023-08-11 |
| CN116578476B true CN116578476B (en) | 2024-04-09 |
Family
ID=87533149
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310427564.2A Active CN116578476B (en) | 2023-04-20 | 2023-04-20 | Method and device for realizing guarantee simulation of task execution of business process fine depiction |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN116578476B (en) |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103678815A (en) * | 2013-12-10 | 2014-03-26 | 西北工业大学 | Mechanical product collaborative simulation platform system and simulation method thereof |
| CN111079997A (en) * | 2019-12-03 | 2020-04-28 | 北京仿真中心 | Modeling and collaborative optimization method |
| CN111597318A (en) * | 2020-05-21 | 2020-08-28 | 普信恒业科技发展（北京）有限公司 | Method, device and system for executing business task |
| CN113221321A (en) * | 2021-03-31 | 2021-08-06 | 北京瑞风协同科技股份有限公司 | Simulation and index evaluation method and system based on task equipment fault |
| CN113435033A (en) * | 2021-06-24 | 2021-09-24 | 中国人民解放军军事科学院评估论证研究中心 | Multi-resolution-based complex system operation flow simulation method and system |
| CN114218748A (en) * | 2021-11-12 | 2022-03-22 | 中国电子产品可靠性与环境试验研究所（（工业和信息化部电子第五研究所）（中国赛宝实验室）） | RMS modeling method, apparatus, computer device and storage medium |
Family Cites Families (2)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| US20090083020A1 (en) * | 2007-09-21 | 2009-03-26 | International Business Machines Corporation | Alternate task processing time modeling |
| US20120330859A1 (en) * | 2011-06-27 | 2012-12-27 | International Business Machines Corporation | Interactive business process modeling and simulation |
-
2023
- 2023-04-20 CN CN202310427564.2A patent/CN116578476B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN103678815A (en) * | 2013-12-10 | 2014-03-26 | 西北工业大学 | Mechanical product collaborative simulation platform system and simulation method thereof |
| CN111079997A (en) * | 2019-12-03 | 2020-04-28 | 北京仿真中心 | Modeling and collaborative optimization method |
| CN111597318A (en) * | 2020-05-21 | 2020-08-28 | 普信恒业科技发展（北京）有限公司 | Method, device and system for executing business task |
| CN113221321A (en) * | 2021-03-31 | 2021-08-06 | 北京瑞风协同科技股份有限公司 | Simulation and index evaluation method and system based on task equipment fault |
| CN113435033A (en) * | 2021-06-24 | 2021-09-24 | 中国人民解放军军事科学院评估论证研究中心 | Multi-resolution-based complex system operation flow simulation method and system |
| CN114218748A (en) * | 2021-11-12 | 2022-03-22 | 中国电子产品可靠性与环境试验研究所（（工业和信息化部电子第五研究所）（中国赛宝实验室）） | RMS modeling method, apparatus, computer device and storage medium |
Non-Patent Citations (1)
| Title |
|---|
| 精细化工过程控制技术的发展研究;郑大治;《造纸装备及材料》;第51卷(第4期);第1-3页 * |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN116578476A (en) | 2023-08-11 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN112394922B (en) | Decision configuration method, business decision method and decision engine system | |
| Li et al. | Schedule delay analysis of prefabricated housing production: A hybrid dynamic approach | |
| CN105701008B (en) | System and method for test case generation | |
| US8457996B2 (en) | Model-based business continuity management | |
| Riebisch et al. | UML-based statistical test case generation | |
| Grunske et al. | Model-driven safety evaluation with state-event-based component failure annotations | |
| Sunindyo et al. | Foundations for event-based process analysis in heterogeneous software engineering environments | |
| Müller et al. | Simulation methods | |
| Busch et al. | Peropteryx: Automated improvement of software architectures | |
| Vierhauser et al. | A flexible framework for runtime monitoring of system-of-systems architectures | |
| Dávid et al. | Translating engineering workflow models to DEVS for performance evaluation | |
| US20190377556A1 (en) | Methods and systems for verifying a software program | |
| US20180150378A1 (en) | Verification of model-driven software architecture | |
| Sitton et al. | ESE framework verification by MBSE | |
| CN116578476B (en) | Method and device for realizing guarantee simulation of task execution of business process fine depiction | |
| US8812341B2 (en) | Method and system for optimizing process models | |
| Sedaghatbaf et al. | A method for dependability evaluation of software architectures | |
| Gönczy et al. | Methodologies for model-driven development and deployment: An overview | |
| Thüm et al. | Performance analysis strategies for software variants and versions | |
| CN110928761B (en) | Demand chain and system and method for application thereof | |
| JP2022127958A (en) | Business improvement support device, program, and storage medium storing program | |
| Nezhad et al. | Behavior-driven development for real-time embedded systems | |
| Xie et al. | Design and implementation of bank financial business automation testing framework based on QTP | |
| Chen et al. | Touch: A Textual Programming Language for Developing APPs of Insect Intelligent Building | |
| Busch et al. | Assessing the quality impact of features in component-based software architectures |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |