CN116341295A - Road stability assessment method and system based on underground pipeline - Google Patents

Road stability assessment method and system based on underground pipeline Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN116341295A
CN116341295A CN202310619670.0A CN202310619670A CN116341295A CN 116341295 A CN116341295 A CN 116341295A CN 202310619670 A CN202310619670 A CN 202310619670A CN 116341295 A CN116341295 A CN 116341295A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
underground pipeline
influence
road
underground
stability
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202310619670.0A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN116341295B (en
Inventor
唐煜
彭璐
冯笑凡
罗翥
文龙
李凯
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport
Original Assignee
Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport filed Critical Research Institute of Highway Ministry of Transport
Priority to CN202310619670.0A priority Critical patent/CN116341295B/en
Publication of CN116341295A publication Critical patent/CN116341295A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN116341295B publication Critical patent/CN116341295B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management
    • G06Q10/06Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
    • G06Q10/063Operations research, analysis or management
    • G06Q10/0639Performance analysis of employees; Performance analysis of enterprise or organisation operations
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T17/00Three dimensional [3D] modelling, e.g. data description of 3D objects
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2113/00Details relating to the application field
    • G06F2113/14Pipes
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2113/00Details relating to the application field
    • G06F2113/16Cables, cable trees or wire harnesses
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2119/00Details relating to the type or aim of the analysis or the optimisation
    • G06F2119/14Force analysis or force optimisation, e.g. static or dynamic forces

Abstract

The invention relates to the field of urban road safety evaluation, in particular to a road stability evaluation method and system based on underground pipelines. The method provided by the invention comprises the following steps: acquiring underground pipeline information of a road to be analyzed; building an underground pipeline influence intensity model and an underground pipeline degradation influence intensity model respectively, and respectively obtaining a first influence intensity value and a second influence intensity value by combining the models with underground pipeline information; respectively obtaining the road standard bearing capacity of a road to be analyzed and the underground pipeline standard bearing capacity; obtaining a first influence degree by combining the first influence intensity value with the road standard bearing capacity; obtaining a second influence degree by combining the second influence intensity value with the standard bearing capacity of the underground pipeline; and summarizing the first influence degree and the second influence degree, and evaluating the influence degree of the underground pipeline on the road stability. The method can accurately evaluate the influence degree of the underground pipeline on the road stability, and has important significance for guaranteeing the road safety.

Description

Road stability assessment method and system based on underground pipeline
Technical Field
The invention relates to the field of urban road safety evaluation, in particular to a road stability evaluation method and system based on underground pipelines.
Background
Underground pipelines are often buried under roads as an important component of urban infrastructure. The underground pipeline is in a soil environment for a long time and is influenced by the stress and the load of surrounding soil bodies, so that the deformation and the sedimentation of the surrounding soil bodies of the underground pipeline are caused, and even the damage and the rupture of the underground pipeline can be caused. These problems can affect not only the normal operation of the underground pipeline, but also the stability of the surrounding road. In particular, today, when the urban process is accelerated, the number and scale of underground pipelines are increasing, and the service life of many pipelines is approaching or exceeding the expected life, so that the problem of safety of the underground pipelines is attracting more and more attention. In this context, it is particularly important to evaluate the stability of the underground pipeline. Through accurate measurement of deformation and settlement of soil around the underground pipeline and detection and evaluation of fatigue problems, alternating load, corrosion and other factors in the underground pipeline, potential safety hazards of the underground pipeline can be found and prevented in an early stage, so that stability and traffic safety of surrounding roads are guaranteed.
Currently, the road stability assessment based on underground pipelines mainly includes the following aspects: 1. how to accurately measure the deformation and sedimentation conditions of the soil around the underground pipeline, and evaluate the influence of the underground pipeline on the stability of the current road based on the deformation and sedimentation conditions of the soil around the underground pipeline. 2. How to evaluate the influence of the degradation degree of the underground pipeline on the stability of the current road aiming at the underground pipeline with fatigue problems, alternating load, rust and other factors in long-time service. 3. How to comprehensively evaluate the influence of the underground pipeline on the stability of the current road based on the safety conditions of soil surrounding the underground pipeline and the underground pipe.
Disclosure of Invention
In order to solve the problems of the prior art and meet the actual needs, in a first aspect, the invention provides a road stability evaluation method based on an underground pipeline, which aims to accurately evaluate the influence of the underground pipeline on the road stability, including deformation and settlement of surrounding soil and the degradation degree of the underground pipeline. The road stability assessment method based on the underground pipeline comprises the following steps: acquiring underground pipeline information of a road to be analyzed; building an underground pipeline influence intensity model, and combining the underground pipeline information through the underground pipeline influence intensity model to obtain a first influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on road stability; building an underground pipeline degradation influence intensity model, and combining the underground pipeline information through the underground pipeline degradation influence intensity model to obtain a second influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on road stability; respectively obtaining the road standard bearing capacity of a road to be analyzed and the underground pipeline standard bearing capacity; the first influence intensity value is combined with the road standard bearing capacity to obtain a first influence degree of soil layers around the underground pipeline on road stability; the second influence intensity value is combined with the standard bearing capacity of the underground pipeline to obtain a second influence degree of the underground pipeline on the road stability; and summarizing the first influence degree and the second influence degree, and evaluating the influence degree of the underground pipeline on the road stability. The invention provides a method for comprehensively and accurately evaluating the influence of an underground pipeline on the road stability, which provides scientific basis for the management and maintenance of the road stability by respectively quantifying the influence degree of soil layers around the underground pipeline on the road stability and the influence degree of the underground pipeline on the road stability; and by comprehensively considering factors such as soil deformation and sedimentation conditions around the underground pipeline, degradation degree of the underground pipeline and the like, the influence of the underground pipeline on the road stability is accurately estimated. The road stability evaluation method based on the underground pipeline can evaluate the influence degree of the underground pipeline on the road stability more accurately, and has important significance for guaranteeing the road safety and preventing accidents.
Optionally, the obtaining the underground pipeline information of the road to be analyzed includes the following steps: providing GPR equipment, and selecting a probe and a detection frequency according to the road to be analyzed; setting a datum line on the road to be analyzed, and scanning the road to be analyzed along the datum line by utilizing the GPR equipment; acquiring a scanning result of the GPR equipment, wherein the scanning result comprises an underground pipeline image, the resistivity of the underground pipeline and the dielectric constant of the underground pipeline; and obtaining the underground pipeline information according to the underground pipeline image, the relative dielectric constant of the underground pipeline and the resistance of the underground pipeline. The invention adopts GPR technology to detect the underground pipeline information, thus nondestructively acquiring the underground pipeline information, avoiding damaging the existing pipeline and ensuring the safety.
Optionally, the building of the underground pipeline influence intensity model, and the combination of the underground pipeline information with the underground pipeline influence intensity model, to obtain a first influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on the road stability, includes the following steps: by regarding the soil layer around the underground pipeline as a semi-infinite elastic medium, an underground pipeline influence strength model is built, and the underground pipeline influence strength model meets the following formula:
Figure SMS_1
wherein->
Figure SMS_2
Representing the first influence intensity of the soil layer around the underground pipeline on the road stability, < >>
Figure SMS_3
Represents an empirical factor of influence of sedimentation of the soil layer around the underground pipeline, < ->
Figure SMS_4
Representing the difference in sedimentation height of the soil layer around the underground line,/->
Figure SMS_5
Representing the sedimentation width of the soil layer around the underground pipeline, < >>
Figure SMS_6
Calculated aspect ratio parameter representing soil layer surrounding the underground line, < ->
Figure SMS_7
Poisson's ratio representing the soil layer surrounding the underground pipeline; substituting the underground pipeline information into the underground pipeline influence intensity model to obtain a first influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on road stability.
Optionally, the building an underground pipeline degradation influence intensity model, and combining the underground pipeline information through the underground pipeline degradation influence intensity model, to obtain a second influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on road stability, including the following steps: according to longitudinal stress analysis of the underground pipeline, building an underground pipeline degradation influence strength model, wherein the underground pipeline degradation influence strength model meets the following formula:
Figure SMS_9
wherein->
Figure SMS_12
Representing the second influence intensity of the underground pipeline itself on the road stability,/->
Figure SMS_14
Represents an empirical factor of the deterioration of the underground pipeline itself, +.>
Figure SMS_10
Indicating the severity of the surrounding soil layer->
Figure SMS_11
Indicating the distance of the upper surface of the underground line from the surface, < + >>
Figure SMS_13
Indicating the diameter of the underground pipeline>
Figure SMS_15
Represents the friction angle between the underground line and the surrounding soil layer, < >>
Figure SMS_8
The non-drainage shear strength of the surrounding soil layer is represented; substituting the underground pipeline information into the underground pipeline degradation influence intensity model to obtain a second influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on road stability.
Optionally, the first degree of influence satisfies the following formula:
Figure SMS_16
wherein->
Figure SMS_17
Indicating the first degree of influence of the soil layer surrounding the underground line on the road stability,/->
Figure SMS_18
Representing the first influence intensity of the soil layer around the underground pipeline on the road stability, < >>
Figure SMS_19
Indicating road standard bearing capacity.
Optionally, the second degree of influence satisfies the following formula:
Figure SMS_20
wherein->
Figure SMS_21
Representing a second degree of influence of the underground line itself on the road stability,/->
Figure SMS_22
Representing the second influence intensity of the underground pipeline itself on the road stability,/->
Figure SMS_23
Indicating the standard load capacity of the underground utility.
Optionally, the summarizing the first and second degrees of influence evaluates the subsurfaceThe influence degree of the pipeline on the road stability comprises the following steps: and building a road stability influence degree evaluation model by utilizing the first influence degree and the second influence degree, wherein the road stability influence degree evaluation model meets the following formula:
Figure SMS_24
wherein->
Figure SMS_25
Indicating the extent of influence of the underground pipeline on the road stability, +.>
Figure SMS_26
Indicating the first degree of influence of the soil layer surrounding the underground line on the road stability,/->
Figure SMS_27
A second degree of influence of the underground pipeline itself on road stability is represented; substituting the specific values of the first influence degree and the second influence degree into the road stability influence degree evaluation model to obtain the influence degree value of the underground pipeline on the road stability.
Optionally, the step of summarizing the first influence degree and the second influence degree, and evaluating the influence degree of the underground pipeline on the road stability further includes the following steps: and constructing an influence degree correction model, and correcting the road stability influence degree evaluation model by using the influence degree correction model. According to the method, the evaluation result is corrected by constructing the influence degree correction model, so that the reliability of evaluation is further improved.
Optionally, the modified road stability influence degree evaluation model satisfies the following formula:
Figure SMS_30
Figure SMS_32
wherein->
Figure SMS_34
Indicating the extent of influence of the underground pipeline on the road stability, +.>
Figure SMS_29
Indicating the first degree of influence of the soil layer surrounding the underground line on the road stability,/->
Figure SMS_33
Representing a second degree of influence of the underground line itself on the road stability,/->
Figure SMS_35
Analysis correction value representing the structure of the underground structure, +.>
Figure SMS_36
Representing the empirical factor of the area calculation error influence, +.>
Figure SMS_28
Representing the area of the ith block pattern surrounded by the modeling theory boundary and the underground structure diagram boundary, ++>
Figure SMS_31
Representing the total area of all the graphics enclosed by the boundaries of the subsurface structure map.
In order to efficiently perform the road stability assessment method based on the underground pipeline provided by the invention, the invention also provides a road stability assessment system based on the underground pipeline. The underground pipeline-based road stability assessment system includes one or more processors; the system comprises one or more input devices, one or more output devices and a memory, wherein the processor, the input devices, the output devices and the memory are connected through a bus, the memory is used for storing a computer program, the computer program comprises program instructions, and the processor is configured to call the program instructions to execute the road stability assessment method based on the underground pipeline provided by the first aspect of the invention. The road stability evaluation system based on the underground pipeline has compact structure and stable performance, and can efficiently execute the road stability evaluation method based on the underground pipeline, thereby improving the overall applicability and practical application capability of the road stability evaluation system based on the underground pipeline.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a road stability evaluation method based on underground pipelines according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a flowchart of obtaining information of an underground pipeline according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a baseline setting provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 4 is a block diagram of a road stability evaluation system based on an underground pipeline according to an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
Specific embodiments of the invention will be described in detail below, it being noted that the embodiments described herein are for illustration only and are not intended to limit the invention. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. However, it will be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art that: no such specific details are necessary to practice the invention. In other instances, well-known circuits, software, or methods have not been described in detail in order not to obscure the invention.
Throughout the specification, references to "one embodiment," "an embodiment," "one example," or "an example" mean: a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment or example is included within at least one embodiment of the invention. Thus, the appearances of the phrases "in one embodiment," "in an embodiment," "one example," or "an example" in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment or example. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable combination and/or sub-combination in one or more embodiments or examples. Moreover, those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the illustrations provided herein are for illustrative purposes and that the illustrations are not necessarily drawn to scale.
In an alternative embodiment, please refer to fig. 1, fig. 1 is a flowchart of a road stability evaluation method based on an underground pipeline according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in fig. 1, the road stability evaluation method based on the underground pipeline comprises the following steps:
and S01, acquiring underground pipeline information of the road to be analyzed.
Geological radar (GPR) is a non-invasive subsurface detection technique that detects the nature of subsurface structures and materials by transmitting high frequency electromagnetic waves and receiving reflected signals. The method can quickly and accurately acquire underground information under the condition of not damaging the earth surface, and is suitable for detecting underground pipelines, tunnels, rock-soil horizons, hydrogeological conditions and the like. In an alternative embodiment, please refer to fig. 2, fig. 2 is a flowchart of obtaining underground pipeline information according to an embodiment of the present invention. The step S01 shown in fig. 2 of obtaining the underground pipeline information of the road to be analyzed includes the following steps:
and S011, providing GPR equipment, and selecting a probe and a detection frequency according to the road to be analyzed.
S012, setting a datum line on the road to be analyzed, and scanning the road to be analyzed along the datum line by using the GPR equipment. Referring to fig. 3, fig. 3 is a schematic diagram of a baseline setting according to an embodiment of the invention. In fig. 3, a solid line represents a road edge, a broken line parallel to the road edge is a road center line, and a broken line perpendicular to the road center line is a reference line. As shown in fig. 3, the reference line is set equidistantly perpendicular to the center line of the road.
S013, acquiring a scanning result of the GPR device, wherein the scanning result comprises an underground pipeline image, the resistivity of the underground pipeline and the dielectric constant of the underground pipeline.
And S014, obtaining the underground pipeline information according to the underground pipeline image, the relative dielectric constant of the underground pipeline and the resistance of the underground pipeline. The underground pipeline information comprises an underground pipeline material parameter, an underground pipeline structure parameter, underground pipeline position information and an underground pipeline surrounding soil layer parameter.
Further, in step S014, a 3D model of the pipeline can be constructed using the pipeline image, and when constructing the pipeline 3D model, the irregular image boundary in the pipeline image obtained by the GPR apparatus is generally considered as a polygon surrounded by piecewise straight lines. Therefore, the underground pipeline structural parameters, the underground pipeline position information and the actual underground pipeline structural parameters acquired based on the 3D model of the underground pipeline have certain errors. In step S014, the relative dielectric constant and resistivity of the underground pipeline are used to obtain the material parameters of the underground pipeline and the soil layer data around the underground pipeline, which can be performed by referring to the existing data table, wherein, the material parameters of the underground pipeline/the soil layer parameters around the underground pipeline are partially shown in the following table:
Figure SMS_37
and comparing the data obtained by the GPR equipment with the contents of the table to obtain the corresponding underground pipeline material parameters and the soil layer parameters around the underground pipeline.
And S02, building an underground pipeline influence intensity model, and combining the underground pipeline information through the underground pipeline influence intensity model to obtain a first influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on road stability.
As non-soil layer impurities, the soil layer around the underground pipeline can be settled to a certain extent due to the influence of factors such as alternating load and the like in service, so that the structural strength of the pavement is changed. According to the underground pipeline information obtained in the step S01, and by combining with the rock-soil mechanics principle, the soil layer around the underground pipeline is regarded as a semi-infinite elastic medium, and an underground pipeline influence strength model is established. The stability influence of the underground pipeline to the road surface to be analyzed can be obtained through the underground pipeline influence intensity model by taking the stability influence of the underground pipeline to the road surface to be analyzed as non-soil layer impurities into consideration.
In an alternative embodiment, the building the underground pipeline influence intensity model and combining the underground pipeline information through the underground pipeline influence intensity model to obtain a first influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on road stability includes the following steps:
s021, constructing an underground pipeline influence strength model by taking the soil layer around the underground pipeline as a semi-infinite elastic medium.
In this embodiment, the built underground pipeline influence intensity model satisfies the following formula:
Figure SMS_38
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure SMS_39
representing the first influence intensity of the soil layer around the underground pipeline on the road stability, < >>
Figure SMS_40
The experimental factors of the sedimentation influence of soil layers around the underground pipeline are represented, and the experimental factors are verified by experiments and discussed by experts, and the experimental factors are +.>
Figure SMS_41
The value is 2.9784%>
Figure SMS_42
Representing the difference in sedimentation height of the soil layer around the underground line,/->
Figure SMS_43
Representing the sedimentation width of the soil layer around the underground pipeline, < >>
Figure SMS_44
Calculated aspect ratio parameter representing soil layer surrounding the underground line, < ->
Figure SMS_45
Representing poisson's ratio of the soil layer surrounding the underground pipeline.
S022, substituting the underground pipeline information into the underground pipeline influence intensity model to obtain a first influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on road stability.
In this embodiment, the road to be analyzed is a road surface with longer service time and worse condition, and the corresponding underground pipeline information is obtained after scanning by the GPR device. The information of the underground pipeline is clear: the underground pipeline under the road to be analyzed is a rigid pipeline, the sedimentation height difference of soil layers around the underground pipeline is 0.13 meter, the sedimentation width of the soil layers around the underground pipeline is 0.01 meter, and the soil layers around the underground pipelineThe calculated aspect ratio parameter of the soil layer is 7, and the poisson ratio of the soil layer around the underground pipeline is 0.43. Further, substituting the above-mentioned underground pipeline information into the underground pipeline influence intensity model to obtain a corresponding first influence intensity value:
Figure SMS_46
s03, building an underground pipeline degradation influence intensity model, and combining the underground pipeline information through the underground pipeline degradation influence intensity model to obtain a second influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on road stability.
It will be appreciated that the underground pipeline deteriorates over time, and if the pipeline is subjected to a pressure exceeding its deteriorated load-carrying capacity, problems such as cracking, hollowing and water seepage occur, thereby affecting the strength of the road structure on the ground. Further, when the underground pipeline is subjected to soil layer load, the soil body at the position of the underground pipeline is subjected to external force to generate corresponding stress and strain, so that the underground pipeline degradation influence strength model is built based on the bearing capacity of the underground pipeline, and the longitudinal bearing capacity of the underground pipeline is mainly analyzed.
In an optional embodiment, the building an underground pipeline degradation influence intensity model and combining the underground pipeline information through the underground pipeline degradation influence intensity model to obtain a second influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on road stability includes the following steps:
s031, building an underground pipeline degradation influence strength model according to longitudinal stress analysis of the underground pipeline.
In this embodiment, the built underground pipeline degradation influence intensity model satisfies the following formula:
Figure SMS_47
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure SMS_49
representing the second influence intensity of the underground pipeline itself on the road stability,/->
Figure SMS_51
Represents the empirical factor of the deterioration of the underground pipeline, and is verified by experiments and discussed by experts to be +.>
Figure SMS_53
The value is 0.1735%>
Figure SMS_50
Indicating the severity of the surrounding soil layer->
Figure SMS_52
Indicating the distance of the upper surface of the underground line from the surface, < + >>
Figure SMS_54
Indicating the diameter of the underground pipeline>
Figure SMS_55
Represents the friction angle between the underground line and the surrounding soil layer, < >>
Figure SMS_48
Indicating the non-drainage shear strength of the surrounding soil layer.
S032, substituting the underground pipeline information into the underground pipeline degradation influence intensity model to obtain a second influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on road stability.
In this embodiment, the road to be analyzed is a road surface with longer service time and worse condition, and the corresponding underground pipeline information is obtained after scanning by the GPR device. The underground pipeline information is clear: the soil layer around the underground pipeline is 18.53 kilonewtons per cubic meter, the distance between the upper surface of the underground pipeline and the ground surface is 33.1 meters, the diameter of the underground pipeline is 0.45 meter, the friction angle between the underground pipeline and the surrounding soil layer is 85 degrees, the non-drainage shear strength of the surrounding soil layer is 24.13 kilopascals, and further, the information of the underground pipeline is substituted into the underground pipeline degradation influence strength model to obtain a corresponding second influence strength value:
Figure SMS_56
s04, respectively obtaining the standard bearing capacity of the road to be analyzed and the standard bearing capacity of the underground pipeline.
It should be appreciated that the impact of an underground pipeline on road stability can be divided into two aspects: first, the presence of the pipeline itself can have an impact on road stability, such as sedimentation, etc., which refers to the "first impact strength value" of the pipeline; second, the degree of deterioration of the pipeline itself will also have an effect on road stability, which is referred to as the "second impact strength value" of the pipeline. The first criterion for influencing the intensity value should therefore be a criterion for the load-bearing capacity of the road to be analyzed, i.e. it will have an influence on the road stability when the presence of the underground line makes the road subjected to a force exceeding the road load-bearing capacity criterion. The second criterion for influencing the strength value should be the standard bearing capacity of the underground pipeline, i.e. the load capacity that the pipeline itself can withstand. Further, specific values of the road standard bearing capacity and the underground pipeline standard bearing capacity can be adaptively adjusted according to the region where the road to be analyzed is located.
In an alternative embodiment, road standard bearing capacity is determined by consulting the relevant specifications of the "CJJ 37-2012 (2016 edition) City road engineering Specification" and the like
Figure SMS_57
Set to 4.5MP; by consulting relevant specifications of DB13 (J)/T8340-2020 underground pipe network nodular cast iron drainage pipeline design standard, the standard bearing capacity of the underground pipe network is +.>
Figure SMS_58
Set to 3.6MP.
And S05, obtaining a first influence degree of soil layers around the underground pipeline on road stability by utilizing the first influence intensity value and combining the road standard bearing capacity.
Step S05 achieves the purpose of evaluating the influence of the underground pipeline on the stability of the current road based on the deformation and settlement conditions of the soil around the underground pipeline, namely step S054 utilizes the first influence intensity value to combine with the road standard bearing capacity to calculate the first influence degree of the soil around the underground pipeline on the stability of the road. The first influence degree can help engineers determine the influence degree of soil layers around the underground pipeline on the road, and further corresponding measures are taken to ensure the stability and safety of the road. For example, if the calculation result indicates that the soil layer around the underground line has a relatively large degree of influence on the stability of the road, engineers may consider taking some measures such as reinforcing the road structure or constructing the road with stronger materials to ensure the stability and safety of the road.
In an alternative embodiment, the step S05 uses the first influence intensity value in combination with the road standard bearing capacity to obtain a first influence degree of the soil layer around the underground pipeline on the road stability, where the first influence degree satisfies the following formula:
Figure SMS_59
wherein->
Figure SMS_60
Indicating the first degree of influence of the soil layer surrounding the underground line on the road stability,/->
Figure SMS_61
Representing the first influence intensity of the soil layer around the underground pipeline on the road stability, < >>
Figure SMS_62
Indicating road standard bearing capacity.
Further, based on the underground pipeline influence intensity model constructed in the embodiment of step S02, the first influence degree in this embodiment further satisfies the following formula:
Figure SMS_63
wherein->
Figure SMS_64
Represents an empirical factor of influence of sedimentation of the soil layer around the underground pipeline, < ->
Figure SMS_65
Representing the surrounding earth of an underground pipelineSedimentation height difference of layer, +.>
Figure SMS_66
Representing the sedimentation width of the soil layer around the underground pipeline, < >>
Figure SMS_67
Calculated aspect ratio parameter representing soil layer surrounding the underground line, < ->
Figure SMS_68
Representing poisson's ratio of the soil layer surrounding the underground pipeline.
S06, utilizing the second influence intensity value to combine the standard bearing capacity of the underground pipeline to obtain the second influence degree of the underground pipeline on the road stability.
Step S06 achieves the objective of evaluating the degree of influence thereof on the road stability based on the degree of deterioration of the underground pipeline itself. Step S054 combines the second influence intensity value with the standard bearing capacity of the underground pipeline, and obtains the second influence degree of the underground pipeline on the road stability through calculation, so that engineers can be helped to know the influence degree of the condition of the underground pipeline, and accordingly proper maintenance and maintenance plans are formulated, safe and reliable operation of the underground pipeline is ensured, and meanwhile, the stability and safety of the road are ensured. For example, if the calculation result shows that the influence degree of the underground pipeline is large, engineers can take some measures, such as strengthening maintenance and servicing work, and timely replace the aged pipeline so as to prolong the service life of the aged pipeline and ensure the safety of the road and the underground pipeline.
In an alternative embodiment, the step S05 uses the first influence intensity value in combination with the road standard bearing capacity to obtain a first influence degree of the soil layer around the underground pipeline on the road stability, where the first influence degree satisfies the following formula:
Figure SMS_69
wherein->
Figure SMS_70
Representing the second influence of the underground pipeline on the road stabilityDegree (f)>
Figure SMS_71
Representing the second influence intensity of the underground pipeline itself on the road stability,/->
Figure SMS_72
Indicating the standard load capacity of the underground utility.
Further, based on the underground pipeline influence intensity model constructed in the embodiment of step S02, the first influence degree in this embodiment further satisfies the following formula:
Figure SMS_73
wherein, the method comprises the steps of, wherein,
Figure SMS_74
represents an empirical factor of the deterioration of the underground pipeline itself, +.>
Figure SMS_75
Indicating the severity of the surrounding soil layer->
Figure SMS_76
Indicating the distance of the upper surface of the underground line from the surface, < + >>
Figure SMS_77
Indicating the diameter of the underground pipeline>
Figure SMS_78
Represents the friction angle between the underground line and the surrounding soil layer, < >>
Figure SMS_79
Indicating the non-drainage shear strength of the surrounding soil layer.
S07, summarizing the first influence degree and the second influence degree, and evaluating the influence degree of the underground pipeline on the road stability.
Step S07 achieves comprehensive evaluation of the influence on the stability of the current road based on the soil around the underground pipeline and the safety condition of the underground pipe itself by summarizing the first influence degree and the second influence degree. The influence of the underground pipeline on the road stability can be more comprehensively known through comprehensive evaluation, and more accurate basis is provided for engineers to take corresponding measures.
In an alternative embodiment, the step S07 sums the first influence level and the second influence level, and evaluates the influence level of the underground pipeline on the road stability, including the steps of:
s071, constructing a road stability influence degree evaluation model by using the first influence degree and the second influence degree, wherein the road stability influence degree evaluation model satisfies the following formula:
Figure SMS_80
wherein, the method comprises the steps of, wherein,
Figure SMS_81
indicating the extent of influence of the underground pipeline on the road stability, +.>
Figure SMS_82
Indicating the first degree of influence of the soil layer surrounding the underground line on the road stability,/->
Figure SMS_83
Representing a second degree of influence of the underground pipeline itself on the stability of the road.
S072, substituting the specific values of the first influence degree and the second influence degree into the road stability influence degree evaluation model to obtain the influence degree value of the underground pipeline on the road stability.
Further, based on the formulas of the first influence degree and the second influence degree obtained in the above embodiment, respectively, the road stability influence degree evaluation model proposed in the present embodiment also satisfies the following formulas:
Figure SMS_86
wherein->
Figure SMS_91
Indicating road standard bearing capacity->
Figure SMS_95
Represents an empirical factor of influence of sedimentation of the soil layer around the underground pipeline, < ->
Figure SMS_87
Representing the difference in sedimentation height of the soil layer around the underground line,/->
Figure SMS_90
Representing the sedimentation width of the soil layer around the underground pipeline, < >>
Figure SMS_94
Calculated aspect ratio parameter representing soil layer surrounding the underground line, < ->
Figure SMS_97
Poisson's ratio, which indicates the soil layer around the underground line,/->
Figure SMS_84
Represents an empirical factor of the deterioration of the underground pipeline itself, +.>
Figure SMS_89
Indicating standard bearing capacity of underground pipeline>
Figure SMS_93
Indicating the severity of the surrounding soil layer->
Figure SMS_96
Indicating the distance of the upper surface of the underground utility from the surface,
Figure SMS_85
indicating the diameter of the underground pipeline>
Figure SMS_88
Represents the friction angle between the underground line and the surrounding soil layer, < >>
Figure SMS_92
Indicating the non-drainage shear strength of the surrounding soil layer.
It should be understood that, if the information such as the pipeline structural parameter and the pipeline position information in the pipeline information in step S01 is obtained by performing 3D model construction using the pipeline image obtained by the GPR, the modeling is performed by considering the irregular image boundary in the pipeline image as a polygon surrounded by the piecewise straight line when constructing the pipeline 3D model. Therefore, the underground pipeline structural parameters, the underground pipeline position information and the actual underground pipeline structural parameters acquired based on the 3D model of the underground pipeline have certain errors.
In an alternative embodiment, to eliminate the error, the step S07 sums the first influence level and the second influence level to evaluate the influence level of the underground pipeline on the road stability, and further includes the steps of: setting up an influence degree correction model, wherein the influence degree correction model meets the following formula:
Figure SMS_99
wherein->
Figure SMS_103
Analysis correction value representing the structure of the underground structure, +.>
Figure SMS_105
Representing the empirical factor of the area calculation error influence, +.>
Figure SMS_100
Representing the area of the ith block pattern surrounded by the modeling theory boundary and the underground structure diagram boundary, ++>
Figure SMS_102
Representing the total area of all the graphics enclosed by the boundaries of the underground structure diagram; and correcting the road stability influence degree assessment model by using the influence degree correction model, wherein the corrected road stability influence degree assessment model meets the following formula: />
Figure SMS_104
Wherein->
Figure SMS_106
Indicating the extent of influence of the underground pipeline on the road stability, +.>
Figure SMS_98
Indicating the first degree of influence of the soil layer surrounding the underground line on the road stability,/->
Figure SMS_101
Representing a second degree of influence of the underground pipeline itself on the stability of the road.
Further, based on the road stability influence degree evaluation model obtained in the above embodiment, the corrected road stability influence degree evaluation model further satisfies the following formula:
Figure SMS_108
wherein->
Figure SMS_113
Indicating road standard bearing capacity->
Figure SMS_117
Represents an empirical factor of influence of sedimentation of the soil layer around the underground pipeline, < ->
Figure SMS_109
Representing the difference in sedimentation height of the soil layer around the underground line,/->
Figure SMS_114
Representing the sedimentation width of the soil layer around the underground pipeline, < >>
Figure SMS_118
Calculated aspect ratio parameter representing soil layer surrounding the underground line, < ->
Figure SMS_120
Poisson's ratio, which indicates the soil layer around the underground line,/->
Figure SMS_107
Represents an empirical factor of the deterioration of the underground pipeline itself, +.>
Figure SMS_111
Indicating standard bearing capacity of underground pipeline>
Figure SMS_115
Indicating the severity of the surrounding soil layer->
Figure SMS_119
Indicating the distance of the upper surface of the underground line from the surface, < + >>
Figure SMS_110
Indicating the diameter of the underground pipeline>
Figure SMS_112
Represents the friction angle between the underground line and the surrounding soil layer, < >>
Figure SMS_116
Indicating the non-drainage shear strength of the surrounding soil layer. According to the method, the evaluation result is corrected by constructing the influence degree correction model, so that the reliability of evaluation is further improved.
The invention provides a method for comprehensively and accurately evaluating the influence of an underground pipeline on the road stability, which provides scientific basis for the management and maintenance of the road stability by respectively quantifying the influence degree of soil layers around the underground pipeline on the road stability and the influence degree of the underground pipeline on the road stability; and by comprehensively considering factors such as soil deformation and sedimentation conditions around the underground pipeline, degradation degree of the underground pipeline and the like, the influence of the underground pipeline on the road stability is accurately estimated. It will be appreciated that in urban construction, the laying of underground pipelines is very common, such as running water pipes, natural gas pipes, electric power lines, etc., and the presence of these pipelines may have a certain effect on the road stability. Therefore, considering the factors of underground pipelines has important significance for guaranteeing the stability and safety of the road when designing and constructing the road.
In an alternative embodiment, in order to effectively perform the road stability assessment method based on the underground pipeline provided by the invention, the invention further provides a road stability assessment system based on the underground pipeline. In an alternative embodiment, please refer to fig. 4, fig. 4 is a diagram illustrating a road stability evaluation system based on an underground pipeline according to an embodiment of the present invention. As shown in fig. 4, the underground pipeline-based road stability assessment system includes one or more processors; the road stability evaluation system comprises one or more input devices, one or more output devices and a memory, wherein the processor, the input devices, the output devices and the memory are connected through a bus, the memory is used for storing a computer program, the computer program comprises program instructions, and the processor is configured to call the program instructions and execute the road stability evaluation method based on the underground pipeline. The road stability evaluation system based on the underground pipeline, provided by the invention, has the advantages of compact structure and stable performance, and can be used for efficiently and accurately implementing the road stability evaluation method based on the underground pipeline.
In yet another alternative embodiment, the processor 401 may be a central processing unit (Central Processing Unit, CPU), but may also be other general purpose processor, digital signal processor (Digital Signal Processor, DSP), application specific integrated circuit (Application Specific Integrated Circuit, ASIC), off-the-shelf programmable gate array (Field Programmable Gate Array, FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic device, discrete hardware components, or the like. The general purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor may be any conventional processor or the like. The input device 402 may be used to input underground pipeline information of a road to be analyzed. The output device 403 may display the road stability evaluation result based on the underground pipeline obtained by the present invention. The memory 404 may include read only memory and random access memory and provide instructions and data to the processor 401. A portion of memory 404 may also include non-volatile random access memory. For example, memory 404 may also store information of device type.
Finally, it should be noted that: the above embodiments are only for illustrating the technical solution of the present invention, and not for limiting the same; although the invention has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, it will be understood by those of ordinary skill in the art that: the technical scheme described in the foregoing embodiments can be modified or some or all of the technical features thereof can be replaced by equivalents; such modifications and substitutions do not depart from the spirit of the invention, and are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims and description.

Claims (10)

1. The road stability assessment method based on the underground pipeline is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
acquiring underground pipeline information of a road to be analyzed;
building an underground pipeline influence intensity model, and combining the underground pipeline information through the underground pipeline influence intensity model to obtain a first influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on road stability;
building an underground pipeline degradation influence intensity model, and combining the underground pipeline information through the underground pipeline degradation influence intensity model to obtain a second influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on road stability;
respectively obtaining the road standard bearing capacity of a road to be analyzed and the underground pipeline standard bearing capacity;
the first influence intensity value is combined with the road standard bearing capacity to obtain a first influence degree of soil layers around the underground pipeline on road stability;
the second influence intensity value is combined with the standard bearing capacity of the underground pipeline to obtain a second influence degree of the underground pipeline on the road stability;
and summarizing the first influence degree and the second influence degree, and evaluating the influence degree of the underground pipeline on the road stability.
2. The method for evaluating the stability of a road based on an underground pipeline according to claim 1, wherein the step of acquiring the underground pipeline information of the road to be analyzed comprises the steps of:
providing GPR equipment, and selecting a probe and a detection frequency according to the road to be analyzed;
setting a datum line on the road to be analyzed, and scanning the road to be analyzed along the datum line by utilizing the GPR equipment;
acquiring a scanning result of the GPR equipment, wherein the scanning result comprises an underground pipeline image, the resistivity of the underground pipeline and the dielectric constant of the underground pipeline;
and obtaining the underground pipeline information according to the underground pipeline image, the relative dielectric constant of the underground pipeline and the resistance of the underground pipeline.
3. The method for evaluating the road stability based on the underground pipeline according to claim 1, wherein the building of the underground pipeline influence intensity model and the combination of the underground pipeline information by the underground pipeline influence intensity model obtain a first influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on the road stability comprises the following steps:
by regarding the soil layer around the underground pipeline as a semi-infinite elastic medium, an underground pipeline influence strength model is built, and the underground pipeline influence strength model meets the following formula:
Figure QLYQS_1
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_2
representing the first influence intensity of the soil layer around the underground pipeline on the road stability, < >>
Figure QLYQS_3
Represents an empirical factor of influence of sedimentation of the soil layer around the underground pipeline, < ->
Figure QLYQS_4
Representing the difference in sedimentation height of the soil layer around the underground line,/->
Figure QLYQS_5
Representing the sedimentation width of the soil layer around the underground pipeline, < >>
Figure QLYQS_6
Calculated aspect ratio parameter representing soil layer surrounding the underground line, < ->
Figure QLYQS_7
Poisson's ratio representing the soil layer surrounding the underground pipeline;
substituting the underground pipeline information into the underground pipeline influence intensity model to obtain a first influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on road stability.
4. The method for evaluating the road stability based on the underground pipeline according to claim 1, wherein the constructing the underground pipeline degradation influence intensity model and combining the underground pipeline information through the underground pipeline degradation influence intensity model to obtain a second influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on the road stability comprises the following steps:
according to longitudinal stress analysis of the underground pipeline, building an underground pipeline degradation influence strength model, wherein the underground pipeline degradation influence strength model meets the following formula:
Figure QLYQS_8
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_9
representing the second influence intensity of the underground pipeline itself on the road stability,/->
Figure QLYQS_10
Represents an empirical factor of the deterioration of the underground pipeline itself, +.>
Figure QLYQS_11
Indicating the severity of the surrounding soil layer->
Figure QLYQS_12
Representing the distance between the upper surface of the underground pipeline and the ground surface,/>
Figure QLYQS_13
Indicating the diameter of the underground pipeline>
Figure QLYQS_14
Represents the friction angle between the underground line and the surrounding soil layer, < >>
Figure QLYQS_15
The non-drainage shear strength of the surrounding soil layer is represented;
substituting the underground pipeline information into the underground pipeline degradation influence intensity model to obtain a second influence intensity value of the underground pipeline on road stability.
5. The underground pipeline-based road stability assessment method of claim 3, wherein the first degree of influence satisfies the following formula:
Figure QLYQS_16
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_17
indicating the first degree of influence of the soil layer surrounding the underground line on the road stability,/->
Figure QLYQS_18
Representing the first influence intensity of the soil layer around the underground pipeline on the road stability, < >>
Figure QLYQS_19
Indicating road standard bearing capacity.
6. The method of claim 4, wherein the second degree of influence satisfies the following equation:
Figure QLYQS_20
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_21
representing a second degree of influence of the underground line itself on the road stability,/->
Figure QLYQS_22
Representing the second influence intensity of the underground pipeline itself on the road stability,/->
Figure QLYQS_23
Indicating the standard load capacity of the underground utility.
7. The method for evaluating the road stability based on the underground pipeline according to claim 2, wherein the step of summarizing the first influence level and the second influence level, and evaluating the influence level of the underground pipeline on the road stability comprises the steps of:
and building a road stability influence degree evaluation model by utilizing the first influence degree and the second influence degree, wherein the road stability influence degree evaluation model meets the following formula:
Figure QLYQS_24
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_25
indicating the extent of influence of the underground pipeline on the road stability, +.>
Figure QLYQS_26
Indicating the first degree of influence of the soil layer surrounding the underground line on the road stability,/->
Figure QLYQS_27
A second degree of influence of the underground pipeline itself on road stability is represented;
substituting the specific values of the first influence degree and the second influence degree into the road stability influence degree evaluation model to obtain the influence degree value of the underground pipeline on the road stability.
8. The method of claim 7, wherein the step of summarizing the first and second degrees of influence and evaluating the degree of influence of the underground pipeline on the road stability further comprises the steps of:
and constructing an influence degree correction model, and correcting the road stability influence degree evaluation model by using the influence degree correction model.
9. The underground pipeline-based road stability evaluation method according to claim 8, wherein the modified road stability influence degree evaluation model satisfies the following formula:
Figure QLYQS_28
,/>
Figure QLYQS_29
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_30
indicating the extent of influence of the underground pipeline on the road stability, +.>
Figure QLYQS_31
Indicating the first degree of influence of the soil layer surrounding the underground line on the road stability,/->
Figure QLYQS_32
Representing a second degree of influence of the underground line itself on the road stability,/->
Figure QLYQS_33
Dividing into underground structure diagramCorrection value analysis->
Figure QLYQS_34
Representing the empirical factor of the area calculation error influence, +.>
Figure QLYQS_35
Representing the area of the ith block pattern surrounded by the modeling theory boundary and the underground structure diagram boundary, ++>
Figure QLYQS_36
Representing the total area of all the graphics enclosed by the boundaries of the subsurface structure map.
10. An underground pipeline-based road stability assessment system, comprising one or more processors; one or more input devices, one or more output devices and a memory, the processor, the input devices, the output devices and the memory being connected by a bus, the memory for storing a computer program comprising program instructions, the processor being configured to invoke the program instructions to perform the underground pipeline-based road stability assessment method of any of claims 1-9.
CN202310619670.0A 2023-05-30 2023-05-30 Road stability assessment method and system based on underground pipeline Active CN116341295B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310619670.0A CN116341295B (en) 2023-05-30 2023-05-30 Road stability assessment method and system based on underground pipeline

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310619670.0A CN116341295B (en) 2023-05-30 2023-05-30 Road stability assessment method and system based on underground pipeline

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN116341295A true CN116341295A (en) 2023-06-27
CN116341295B CN116341295B (en) 2023-07-25

Family

ID=86893377

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202310619670.0A Active CN116341295B (en) 2023-05-30 2023-05-30 Road stability assessment method and system based on underground pipeline

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN116341295B (en)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050115337A1 (en) * 2002-03-13 2005-06-02 Minoru Tarumi Device and method for inspecting inside of underground pipe line and method of inspecting concrete on inside of underground pipe line for deterioration
CN105318859A (en) * 2014-08-01 2016-02-10 上海凯盾工程技术有限公司 Method for directly measuring and monitoring sedimentation deformation of underground pipeline and building structure and device of method
CN107782785A (en) * 2017-09-08 2018-03-09 中冶建筑研究总院有限公司 A kind of underground utilities security assessment method
CN111027240A (en) * 2019-11-14 2020-04-17 哈尔滨工业大学(深圳) Buried pipeline safety assessment method and related equipment
CN113569312A (en) * 2021-06-21 2021-10-29 山东大学 Method for evaluating and pre-controlling safety margin of empty road under urban underground construction scene
CN115238553A (en) * 2022-07-27 2022-10-25 北京科技大学 Method and system for dividing dangerous area of buried pipeline leakage erosion

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20050115337A1 (en) * 2002-03-13 2005-06-02 Minoru Tarumi Device and method for inspecting inside of underground pipe line and method of inspecting concrete on inside of underground pipe line for deterioration
CN105318859A (en) * 2014-08-01 2016-02-10 上海凯盾工程技术有限公司 Method for directly measuring and monitoring sedimentation deformation of underground pipeline and building structure and device of method
CN107782785A (en) * 2017-09-08 2018-03-09 中冶建筑研究总院有限公司 A kind of underground utilities security assessment method
CN111027240A (en) * 2019-11-14 2020-04-17 哈尔滨工业大学(深圳) Buried pipeline safety assessment method and related equipment
CN113569312A (en) * 2021-06-21 2021-10-29 山东大学 Method for evaluating and pre-controlling safety margin of empty road under urban underground construction scene
CN115238553A (en) * 2022-07-27 2022-10-25 北京科技大学 Method and system for dividing dangerous area of buried pipeline leakage erosion

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN116341295B (en) 2023-07-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Li et al. Numerical simulation and full-scale test on dynamic response of corroded concrete pipelines under multi-field coupling
Santos et al. A state-of-the-art review on roughness quantification methods for concrete surfaces
Robert et al. Equation to predict maximum pipe stress incorporating internal and external loadings on buried pipes
Koo et al. Innovative method for assessment of underground sewer pipe condition
Lu et al. A unified displacement function to analytically predict ground deformation of shallow tunnel
Rakitin et al. Centrifuge testing to simulate buried reinforced concrete pipe joints subjected to traffic loading
KR20090106257A (en) The method to estimate realtime-quantitative stability of the tunnel under construction and it&#39;s system
Zhang et al. Numerical interpretation of pressurized corroded cast iron pipe tests
Lay et al. Full-scale physical testing of a buried reinforced concrete pipe under axle load
Zamanian et al. A high-fidelity computational investigation of buried concrete sewer pipes exposed to truckloads and corrosion deterioration
Moore et al. Performance of two-dimensional analysis: Deteriorated metal culverts under surface live load
Shou et al. Numerical analysis of the mechanical behaviors of pressurized underground pipelines rehabilitated by cured-in-place-pipe method
Haque et al. Load-testing program to evaluate pile-setup behavior for individual soil layers and correlation of setup with soil properties
CN103196642A (en) Method for quickly detecting and assessing heavy equipment passing ability of small-and-medium span concrete bridge
Li et al. Impact of erosion voids and internal corrosion on concrete pipes under traffic loads
MacDougall et al. Measured load capacity of buried reinforced concrete pipes
CN116341296B (en) Road collapse probability assessment method
Barla et al. Revisiting large size direct shear testing of rock mass foundations
Kuliczkowska et al. The structural integrity of corroded concrete sewers
Robert et al. Effects of operational loads on buried water pipes using field tests
CN116341295B (en) Road stability assessment method and system based on underground pipeline
Garcia et al. Behaviour of bell and spigot joints in buried reinforced concrete pipelines
Zhu et al. Quantitative model for residual bearing capacity of corroded reinforced concrete pipe based on failure mode
Chen et al. Fatigue performance evaluation for an orthotropic steel bridge deck based on field hotspot stress measurements
Hanjari Structural behaviour of deteriorated concrete structures

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant