CN116308917A - Teaching quality evaluation method, system, medium and equipment based on Internet education - Google Patents
Teaching quality evaluation method, system, medium and equipment based on Internet education Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN116308917A CN116308917A CN202310188096.8A CN202310188096A CN116308917A CN 116308917 A CN116308917 A CN 116308917A CN 202310188096 A CN202310188096 A CN 202310188096A CN 116308917 A CN116308917 A CN 116308917A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- teaching
- target
- evaluation
- teacher
- index
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 45
- 238000013441 quality evaluation Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 24
- 238000011156 evaluation Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 158
- 239000011159 matrix material Substances 0.000 claims description 52
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 50
- 238000004364 calculation method Methods 0.000 claims description 5
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 description 10
- 230000006870 function Effects 0.000 description 8
- 238000012545 processing Methods 0.000 description 7
- 238000010276 construction Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 6
- 230000008569 process Effects 0.000 description 5
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 4
- 238000005516 engineering process Methods 0.000 description 4
- 230000008878 coupling Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000010168 coupling process Methods 0.000 description 3
- 238000005859 coupling reaction Methods 0.000 description 3
- 230000009471 action Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000006978 adaptation Effects 0.000 description 2
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000013461 design Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000011161 development Methods 0.000 description 2
- 230000006872 improvement Effects 0.000 description 2
- 238000007689 inspection Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012797 qualification Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000001303 quality assessment method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000004590 computer program Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003993 interaction Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012986 modification Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000004048 modification Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000012544 monitoring process Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000003287 optical effect Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000004451 qualitative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000004445 quantitative analysis Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000009877 rendering Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000012552 review Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/20—Education
- G06Q50/205—Education administration or guidance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
- G06F17/16—Matrix or vector computation, e.g. matrix-matrix or matrix-vector multiplication, matrix factorization
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06Q—INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management; Enterprise or organisation planning; Enterprise or organisation modelling
- G06Q10/063—Operations research, analysis or management
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/30—Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Strategic Management (AREA)
- Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
- Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
- Economics (AREA)
- Educational Administration (AREA)
- Mathematical Physics (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Marketing (AREA)
- Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
- Computational Mathematics (AREA)
- General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
- Educational Technology (AREA)
- Entrepreneurship & Innovation (AREA)
- Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
- Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
- General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Quality & Reliability (AREA)
- Computing Systems (AREA)
- Operations Research (AREA)
- Game Theory and Decision Science (AREA)
- Development Economics (AREA)
- Primary Health Care (AREA)
- Algebra (AREA)
- Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
- Electrically Operated Instructional Devices (AREA)
Abstract
A teaching quality evaluation method, system, medium and equipment based on Internet education relate to the technical field of Internet teaching, and the method comprises the steps of obtaining target teaching information of a target course; determining teaching evaluation indexes according to the target teaching information; obtaining student scoring data of a target student experiencing the target course on the target course and index scoring data of a mutual evaluation teacher participating in the target course on each teaching evaluation index dimension of the target course; calculating the weight of each teaching evaluation index, multiplying each weight by the corresponding index scoring data respectively, and adding to obtain teacher scoring data; and taking the sum of the teacher scoring data and the student scoring data as a teaching quality scoring result of the target course. By adopting the technical scheme provided by the application, the evaluation accuracy of the on-line teaching quality can be improved, so that the teaching quality is improved.
Description
Technical Field
The application relates to the technical field of internet teaching, in particular to a teaching quality evaluation method, system, medium and equipment based on internet education.
Background
On the premise that the national importance of the education field is continuously improved, the modern information technology promotes continuous improvement and development of teaching modes and teaching methods. In particular, the combination of internet science and technology and the education field is used as a new education form, the internet education uses the internet as a channel and a platform, the advantages of the internet education resources are exerted, various information technology means and expression forms are utilized, digital education content propagation is developed for users with different demands, and high-quality education services are provided at any time and any place.
The existing information technology means plays a role in assisting teaching to a great extent, so that the online teaching is applied to specific practice, but the popularity of the online teaching is not very high, and many schools cannot make very good when facing to the online teaching of the new things, and in this case, the development of teaching quality monitoring is an important part of content.
The current education industry still evaluates a class according to the traditional teaching quality evaluation mode, and a teacher usually evaluates the class by means of personal experience or simply evaluates the class according to the examination result of students. But for on-line teaching taking internet education as a background, as great difference exists between on-line teaching and off-line teaching, the evaluation accuracy of the on-line teaching quality is lower due to the fact that the traditional teaching quality evaluation mode is too one-sided.
Disclosure of Invention
The application provides a teaching quality evaluation method, system, medium and equipment based on Internet education, which can improve the evaluation accuracy of on-line teaching quality, thereby improving the teaching quality.
In a first aspect, the present application provides a teaching quality evaluation method based on internet education, which adopts the following technical scheme:
acquiring target teaching information of a target course;
determining teaching evaluation indexes according to the target teaching information;
obtaining student scoring data of students experiencing the target course on the target course and index scoring data of mutual evaluation teachers participating in the target course on each teaching evaluation index dimension of the target course;
calculating the weight of each teaching evaluation index, multiplying each weight by the corresponding index scoring data respectively, and adding to obtain teacher scoring data;
and taking the sum of the teacher scoring data and the student scoring data as a teaching quality scoring result of the target course.
By adopting the technical scheme, the corresponding teaching evaluation indexes are determined according to the target teaching information, so that mutual evaluation teachers score the teaching evaluation indexes in dimension for the target courses, the weights of the teaching evaluation indexes are calculated scientifically, the weights are multiplied by the corresponding scores to obtain teacher scoring data, and the student scoring data are combined to obtain the scoring result of the target courses, so that the target courses are comprehensively evaluated in teaching and learning, and the accuracy of on-line teaching quality evaluation is improved.
Optionally, the determining the teaching evaluation index according to the target teaching information includes: determining a teaching chapter in the target teaching information; determining at least one first-level teaching evaluation index according to the teaching chapter and the corresponding relation between the preset teaching chapter and the teaching evaluation index; determining at least one secondary teaching evaluation index in the primary teaching evaluation indexes, and forming the teaching evaluation indexes by the primary evaluation indexes and the secondary evaluation indexes.
By adopting the technical scheme, at least one first-level teaching evaluation index is determined according to the teaching section, the first-level teaching evaluation index and the second-level evaluation index in the first-level teaching evaluation index are used as teaching evaluation indexes, and the teaching quality is quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed through construction of the teaching evaluation indexes.
Optionally, the acquiring the student scoring data of the target student experiencing the target course for the target course includes: receiving test results of the plurality of hall-following tests, and forming score of each target student according to the test results; the multiple hall-following tests are sent to a student end of a target student for multiple hall-following tests according to the teaching progress of the target course by a lecturer end of a master teacher participating in the target course, so that the target student completes the hall-following tests within a preset time; generating personalized questionnaires of all the target students according to the score of the achievement and sending the personalized questionnaires to the student end so that the target students score the personalized questionnaires; and receiving the questionnaire scores of the personalized questionnaires, and taking the questionnaire scores as the scoring data of the target students on the target courses.
By adopting the technical scheme, the personalized questionnaire of each student can be generated relatively pertinently according to the test results of the students on a plurality of tests along with the hall, and the quality of the target course can be evaluated by the students according to the scoring of the questionnaire as the scoring data of the target students on the target course.
Optionally, the obtaining the index scoring data of the target course on each teaching evaluation index dimension by the mutual evaluation teacher participating in the target course includes: generating a course video when the target course is finished, and sending the course video to a teacher end of the mutual evaluation teacher so that the mutual evaluation teacher can score according to each teaching evaluation index; and receiving index scoring data of each teaching evaluation index sent by the teacher side.
By adopting the technical scheme, the course video of the target course is sent to the mutual evaluation teacher so as to acquire the index scoring data of the mutual evaluation teacher on the target teaching in the dimension of each teaching evaluation index, and the quality evaluation of the mutual evaluation teacher on the target course can be realized.
Optionally, the calculating the weight of each evaluation index includes: receiving comparison values of the mutual evaluation teacher on the first-level teaching evaluation indexes; establishing a positive-negative matrix according to the comparison value;
taking the average value of the sum of each transverse vector in the positive-negative matrix as the weight of each first-level teaching evaluation index; the positive-negative matrix is:
the a ij Comparing the i-th level teaching evaluation index with the j-th level teaching evaluation index.
By adopting the technical scheme, the positive-negative matrix is established according to the comparison value of the mutual evaluation teacher on the first-stage teaching evaluation indexes, and the weight of each first-stage teaching evaluation index is calculated through the positive-negative matrix, so that the weight of each first-stage teaching evaluation index is set more scientifically and reasonably.
Optionally, after taking the average value of the sum of each transverse vector in the positive-negative matrix as the weight of each first-level teaching evaluation index, the method further includes the following steps: consistency test is carried out on the positive and negative matrixes according to a test formula; the test formula is as follows:
the Y is a test value, the lambda is a characteristic value of the positive-negative matrix, the n is the order of the positive-negative matrix, and the B is an average consistency index scale; when the check value is smaller than a preset check value, determining that the positive-negative matrix is reasonable; and when the check value is not smaller than a preset check value, determining that the positive-negative matrix is unreasonable, and re-executing the step of receiving the comparison value of the mutual evaluation teacher to each level of teaching evaluation index until the check value is smaller than the preset check value.
By adopting the technical scheme, the inspection value of the positive and negative matrix is calculated through the inspection formula, and the consistency detection can be carried out on the positive and negative matrix, so that whether the positive and negative matrix is reasonable or not is judged, the unreasonable positive and negative matrix needs to be reconstructed, and non-objective factors in matrix construction are avoided.
Optionally, after the obtaining the quality score result, the method further includes: comparing the teaching quality scoring result with a standard quality scoring result to generate a teaching quality report of the target course, wherein the teaching quality report comprises teaching feedback suggestions of each teaching evaluation index.
By adopting the technical scheme, the teaching feedback suggestions of each teaching evaluation index can be obtained according to the teaching quality report, so that a master teacher can know the advantages and defects of teaching a target course, and the teaching quality can be improved according to the teaching feedback suggestions.
In a second aspect of the present application, there is provided an internet education based teaching quality evaluation system, the system comprising:
the teaching information acquisition module is used for acquiring target teaching information of a target course;
the evaluation index determining module is used for determining teaching evaluation indexes according to the target teaching information;
the scoring data acquisition module is used for acquiring scoring data of students experiencing the target course on the target course and scoring data of index of teachers participating in the target course on each teaching evaluation index dimension of the target course;
the teacher grading calculation module is used for calculating the weight of each teaching evaluation index, multiplying each weight by the corresponding index grading data and adding the corresponding index grading data to obtain teacher grading data;
and the teaching quality scoring module is used for taking the sum of the teacher scoring data and the student scoring data as a teaching quality scoring result of the target course.
In a third aspect the present application provides a computer storage medium storing a plurality of instructions adapted to be loaded by a processor and to perform the above-described method steps.
In a fourth aspect of the present application, there is provided an electronic device comprising: a processor and a memory; wherein the memory stores a computer program adapted to be loaded by the processor and to perform the above-mentioned method steps.
In summary, one or more technical solutions provided in the embodiments of the present application at least have the following technical effects or advantages:
1. according to the method, corresponding teaching evaluation indexes are determined according to the target teaching information, so that mutual evaluation teachers score the target courses in the dimension of the teaching evaluation indexes, the weight of each teaching evaluation index is calculated scientifically, the weight is multiplied by the corresponding score to obtain teacher scoring data, and then the student scoring data are combined to obtain the scoring result of the target courses, so that the target courses are comprehensively evaluated in teaching and learning, and the accuracy of online teaching quality evaluation is improved;
2. according to the method, a positive-negative matrix is established according to the comparison value of the mutual evaluation teacher to the first-level teaching evaluation indexes, and the weight of each first-level teaching evaluation index is calculated through the positive-negative matrix, so that the weight of each first-level teaching evaluation index is set more scientifically and reasonably;
3. the method and the device calculate the check value of the positive and negative matrix through the check formula, and can carry out consistency detection on the positive and negative matrix, so that whether the positive and negative matrix is reasonable or not can be judged, the unreasonable positive and negative matrix needs to be reconstructed, and non-objective factors in matrix construction are avoided.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic flow chart of a teaching quality evaluation method based on internet education provided in an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 2 is a schematic structural module diagram of a teaching quality evaluation system based on internet education according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of an electronic device according to the disclosure in an embodiment of the present application.
Reference numerals illustrate: 1. the teaching information acquisition module; 2. an evaluation index determination module; 3. a scoring data acquisition module; 4. a teacher grading calculation module; 5. a teaching quality scoring module; 300. an electronic device; 301. a processor; 302. a communication bus; 303. a user interface; 304. a network interface; 305. a memory.
Detailed Description
In order to make those skilled in the art better understand the technical solutions in the present specification, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present specification will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present specification, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present application, but not all embodiments.
In the description of embodiments of the present application, words such as "for example" or "for example" are used to indicate examples, illustrations or descriptions. Any embodiment or design described herein as "such as" or "for example" should not be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments or designs. Rather, the use of words such as "or" for example "is intended to present related concepts in a concrete fashion.
In the description of the embodiments of the present application, the term "plurality" means two or more. For example, a plurality of systems means two or more systems, and a plurality of screen terminals means two or more screen terminals. Furthermore, the terms "first," "second," and the like, are used for descriptive purposes only and are not to be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly indicating an indicated technical feature. Thus, a feature defining "a first" or "a second" may explicitly or implicitly include one or more such feature. The terms "comprising," "including," "having," and variations thereof mean "including but not limited to," unless expressly specified otherwise.
The following description of the embodiments of the present application will be made clearly and completely with reference to the accompanying drawings of the embodiments of the present application, and it is apparent that the described embodiments are only some embodiments of the present application, not all embodiments.
In one embodiment, as shown in fig. 1, a flow chart of a teaching quality evaluation method based on internet education is specifically provided. The method is mainly applied to computer equipment, and the specific method comprises the following steps:
step 10: and obtaining target teaching information of the target course.
Specifically, in the embodiment of the present application, the target course refers to a course to be evaluated on the current line, the target teaching information refers to relevant course information included in the current on-line course, and the target teaching information may include: a teaching title, a teaching target, a teaching duration, a teaching master teacher, a teaching target student, and the like.
Illustratively, before the on-line course formally starts, the teacher inputs related information of the target course, such as the course PPT, into the computer device in advance, which can be further understood as pre-defining the target course in advance, and when the starting time of the target course is reached, the computer device acquires the target teaching information of the target course, such as the acquired target course is a mathematical course, and the target teaching information is a parallelogram.
Step 20: and determining teaching evaluation indexes according to the target teaching information.
Specifically, the teaching evaluation index may be understood as an evaluation index for each teaching chapter in the embodiment of the present application, where the teaching evaluation index may include at least one primary evaluation index, where one primary evaluation index further includes at least one secondary evaluation index, and for example, a primary evaluation index of a property of a teaching title being a parallelogram includes: the teaching system comprises a teaching state, a teaching attitude, teaching contents, a teaching effect, teaching efficiency and the like, wherein the first-level evaluation indexes are a plurality of second-level evaluation indexes comprising definition review of a parallelogram, reasoning of the property of the parallelogram, application of the property of the parallelogram and the like in the teaching contents.
Further, the target teaching information includes a teaching title, for example, the teaching title is parallelogram, the teaching section described by the teaching title is obtained, the teaching section can be understood as knowledge positioning of the teaching title, for example, the teaching section of parallelogram is eight-grade math lower-chapter fourth section, a corresponding relation between a teaching section and a teaching evaluation index is prestored in the computer device, at least one first-stage teaching evaluation index can be determined according to the current teaching section, and since each first-stage teaching evaluation index is only one large category and cannot be relatively aimed at the current target course, at least one second-stage teaching evaluation index in the first-stage teaching evaluation indexes needs to be determined, and the second-stage teaching evaluation index can be understood as further subdivision of the target course based on the first-stage teaching evaluation index. And forming the first-level assessment index and the second-level teaching assessment index into a teaching assessment index of the target teaching. The construction of the teaching evaluation index is helpful for carrying out quantitative and qualitative analysis on the teaching quality.
Step 30: and acquiring student scoring data of target students experiencing the target courses on the target courses, and index scoring data of mutual evaluation teachers participating in the target courses on each teaching evaluation index dimension of the target courses.
Specifically, the teaching quality evaluation of the class is mainly performed aiming at all activities of 'teaching' of the teacher and 'learning' of the student in the teaching process, the teacher is a main body of 'teaching' in the teaching activity, and the actual teaching condition of the teacher is supervised and checked by a teaching supervision group teacher. Therefore, in the embodiment of the application, the mutual evaluation teacher can be a teaching supervision group teacher composed of experienced high-level teaching teams, and can objectively, comprehensively and comprehensively evaluate aspects of the teaching attitude, the teaching method, the teaching content, the teaching effect, the professional quality and the like of the master teacher. Students are used as a main body of 'school' in the teaching process, and the evaluation of the students on teachers can reflect the problems of teaching activities. In the embodiment of the application, the target students can refer to all students experiencing the current online target course or some students randomly extracted.
In this embodiment of the application, the computer device is wirelessly connected with the teacher end and the student end respectively, and the teacher end and the student end can be intelligent devices such as a computer, a tablet, a mobile phone and the like. The teacher who accords with the teacher qualification standard can log in through the account number at the teacher end, give lessons of the target courses through the teacher end, and the teacher who accords with the mutual evaluation teacher qualification standard can log in through the account number at the teacher end, and score the index of the target course in each teaching evaluation index dimension at the teacher end. The target students experiencing the target courses can log in through the student end and establish communication connection with the teacher end of the master teacher through the student end, so that the target students can participate in teaching of the master teacher on the target courses, and interaction communication between the master teacher and the target students can be achieved.
On the basis of the above embodiment, the step of obtaining the student scoring data of the target students experiencing the target courses for the target courses and the index scoring data of the target courses on each teaching evaluation index dimension by the mutual evaluation teachers participating in the target courses may further include the steps of:
step 301: and receiving test results of multiple hall-following tests, and generating score of each target student according to the test results.
Specifically, in the embodiment of the application, the along-with-the-hall test refers to a plurality of along-with-the-hall test tasks sent to the student end of the target student by the lecturer end of the master teacher participating in the target course according to the teaching progress of the target course, and further can be understood as the homework tasks arranged on the online class by the teacher.
Further, a teacher participating in the target course timely sends the hall-following test tasks to the student end of the target student according to the actual course progress, so that the target student can complete the hall-following test and submit the hall-following test within the preset time, the computer equipment and the teacher end can both receive the test results of the hall-following test, the computer equipment acquires multiple hall-following test results of each target student, and the score of each target student is generated according to the correct errors of each test question in the test results.
Step 302: and generating personalized questionnaires of all target students according to the score, sending the personalized questionnaires to a student end, receiving the questionnaire scores of the personalized questionnaires, and taking the questionnaire scores as scoring data of the target students on target courses.
Specifically, in the embodiment of the application, the personalized questionnaire refers to that the computer equipment analyzes the alignment of each test question in the multiple along-with-the-hall test of each target student based on the test result, and the answer time of each test question to generate a corresponding questionnaire test question.
Further, after the target course is finished, the computer equipment generates personalized questionnaires of all target students based on the score of the score, and sends the personalized questionnaires to a student end so that the target students can answer the score based on the personalized questionnaires, the rated personalized questionnaires are uploaded to the computer equipment, and the computer equipment calculates the questionnaire score of all the target students and takes the questionnaire score as scoring data of the target students for the target course. The specific personalized questionnaire is generated through the along-with-hall test results of the students, and the personalized questionnaire is more fit with the actual learning situation of each student, so that inaccurate quality evaluation of the students on the target courses is avoided when the individual learning abilities of the students are different but are the same questionnaire.
Step 303: and generating a course video when the target course is finished, transmitting the course video to a teacher end of the mutual evaluation teacher, and receiving index scoring data of each teaching evaluation index transmitted by the teacher end.
Specifically, since the teacher gives lessons on line and when the current lesson needs to carry out teaching quality assessment, the on-line lesson recording can be carried out, when the target lesson is finished, the teacher sends the screen recording video to the computer equipment, the computer equipment generates the lesson video according to the information of the teacher, the information of the target lesson, the information of the target student and the screen recording video, and sends the lesson video of the target lesson to the teacher end of the mutual evaluation teacher, and the mutual evaluation teacher can be a teaching supervision group consisting of experienced and high-level teaching teams selected according to the target lesson, for example, the target lesson is a junior-two math lesson, and the mutual evaluation teacher can be a math teaching group length in the junior middle of the school, a math advanced teacher, each math teacher with more senior, and the like.
Further, the teacher end of the inter-assessment teacher receives the course video, and the inter-assessment teacher can score the first-stage assessment index and the second-stage assessment index based on the teaching assessment index according to how the teacher selects teaching contents, the teaching mode, whether to fully prepare teaching resources, whether to effectively utilize an on-line platform, whether to obtain good on-line teaching results, classroom performances of target students and the like in the course video, and the scores of the second-stage assessment indexes are added to obtain scores of the first-stage assessment indexes, so that index scoring data of the teaching assessment indexes are obtained.
Step 40: and calculating the weight of each teaching evaluation index, multiplying each weight by corresponding index scoring data respectively, and adding to obtain teacher scoring data.
Specifically, since the content and teaching targets of each target course are different, teaching evaluation indexes for evaluating different target courses are different, the importance degree of each teaching index is also different, and the accuracy of evaluating the teaching quality of the target courses can be further improved by calculating the weight of each teaching index of the target courses.
On the basis of the above embodiment, the step of calculating weights of the teaching evaluation indexes, multiplying the weights by corresponding index scoring data and adding the obtained teacher scoring data may further include the steps of:
step 401: and receiving comparison values of the mutual evaluation teacher on the teaching evaluation indexes of each level.
Specifically, after scoring each level of teaching evaluation index, the mutual evaluation teacher compares each level of teaching evaluation index with each other, and under the unified decision of each mutual evaluation teacher, the comparison value of each two levels of teaching evaluation index is obtained. In order to keep the comparison values given by the respective mutual evaluation teachers consistent, a comparison scale is established in the embodiments of the present application. The comparison scale is 1 when two elements are equally important, 3 when one element is slightly more important than the other element, 5 when one element is significantly more important than the other element, 7 when one element is strongly important than the other element, 9 when one element is positively more important than the other element, and 2, 4, 6, 8 when two elements are intermediate values of the above comparison scales.
Illustratively, when there are four primary teaching evaluation indexes, the four primary teaching evaluation indexes may be a 1 、a 2 、a 3 A) 4 Then a 1 Relative to a 2 Is a 12 ，a 2 Relative to a 1 Is a 21 And a 12 Is a as 21 Is the inverse of (c). Such as a 1 Relative to a 2 Obviously important, then the value a is compared 12 5, then a 2 Relative to a 1 Is a 21 1/5.
Step 402: and establishing a positive-negative matrix according to the comparison value.
Specifically, a positive-negative matrix is established according to the comparison value between every two teaching evaluation indexes, and the weight of each teaching evaluation index is calculated through the positive-negative matrix.
Illustratively, when there are four primary teaching evaluation indexes, the positive-negative matrix may be:
and taking the average value of the sum of each transverse vector in the positive and negative matrix as the weight of each level of teaching evaluation index.
Step 403: and carrying out consistency test on the positive and negative matrixes according to a test formula.
Specifically, in order to avoid non-objectivity in the construction of the positive-negative matrix, the consistency test is performed on the positive-negative matrix according to a test formula. The test formula is
Wherein Y is a test value, lambda is a characteristic value of the positive-negative matrix, n is the order of the positive-negative matrix, and B is an average consistency index scale. For a positive reciprocal matrix, there is a corresponding consistency index value, usually identified as a constant value. For example, when the order n of the positive-negative matrix is 1 and 2, the average uniformity index scale B is 0, when the order n of the positive-negative matrix is 3, the average uniformity index scale B is 0.58, and when the order n of the positive-negative matrix is 4, the average uniformity index scale B is 0.9.
Step 404: and when the check value is smaller than the preset check value, determining that the positive and negative matrix is reasonable.
Step 405: when the check value is not smaller than the preset check value, the positive-negative matrix is unreasonable, and the step of receiving the comparison value between the teaching evaluation indexes of each level by the mutual evaluation teacher is executed again until the check value is smaller than the preset check value.
Specifically, in the embodiment of the present application, the preset test value is 0.1, when the test value of the positive-negative matrix is calculated to be smaller than the preset test value, it is determined that the positive-negative matrix is reasonable, then the average value of the sum of each transverse vector in the positive-negative matrix is directly used as the weight of each level of teaching evaluation index, and each weight is multiplied by the corresponding index scoring data respectively and added to obtain teacher scoring data. When the check value of the positive and negative matrix is not smaller than the preset check value, the positive and negative matrix is unreasonable, and the mutual evaluation teacher needs to adjust the positive and negative matrix again, namely, the step of receiving the comparison value between the mutual evaluation teacher and each level of teaching evaluation index is carried out again until the check value is smaller than the preset check value, and the non-objectivity factor in the construction matrix can be avoided through consistency check of the positive and negative matrix.
Step 50: and taking the sum of teacher scoring data and student scoring data as a teaching quality scoring result of the target course.
Specifically, after teacher grading data are calculated, the sum of the teacher grading data and student grading data is used as a teaching quality grading result of a target course, and teacher and student are combined to comprehensively evaluate teaching and learning of the target course, so that accuracy of on-line teaching quality evaluation is improved.
On the basis of the above embodiment, as an optional embodiment, after the step of obtaining the teaching quality scoring result, the following steps may be further included:
comparing the teaching quality scoring result with the standard teaching quality scoring, generating a teaching quality report of the target course, judging whether each level of teaching evaluation index in the teaching quality scoring result of the target course is lower than the teaching evaluation index in the teaching quality scoring of the corresponding standard, if so, outputting a teaching feedback suggestion if not, and if not, outputting a dominance suggestion of the target course if so, so that a master teacher can learn the dominance and the defect of teaching of the target course, and then can make effective and feasible improvement measures according to the teaching feedback suggestion to improve the teaching quality.
The following are system embodiments of the present application, which may be used to perform method embodiments of the present application. For details not disclosed in the system embodiments of the present application, please refer to the method embodiments of the present application.
Referring to fig. 3, a schematic diagram of a teaching quality evaluation system based on internet education provided in an embodiment of the present application may include: the system comprises a teaching information acquisition module 1, an evaluation index determination module 2, a scoring data acquisition module 3, a teacher scoring calculation module 4 and a teaching quality scoring module 5, wherein:
the teaching information acquisition module 1 is used for acquiring target teaching information of a target course;
the evaluation index determining module 2 is used for determining teaching evaluation indexes according to the target teaching information;
a scoring data obtaining module 3, configured to obtain scoring data of students experiencing the target course for the target course, and scoring data of indexes of mutual scoring teachers participating in the target course for the target course in each teaching evaluation index dimension;
the teacher grading calculation module 4 is used for calculating the weight of each teaching evaluation index, multiplying each weight by the corresponding index grading data respectively and adding the weights to obtain teacher grading data;
and the teaching quality scoring module 5 is used for taking the sum of the teacher scoring data and the student scoring data as a teaching quality scoring result of the target course.
It should be noted that: in the system provided in the above embodiment, when implementing the functions thereof, only the division of the above functional modules is used as an example, in practical application, the above functional allocation may be implemented by different functional modules according to needs, that is, the internal structure of the device is divided into different functional modules, so as to implement all or part of the functions described above. In addition, the system and method embodiments provided in the foregoing embodiments belong to the same concept, and specific implementation processes of the system and method embodiments are detailed in the method embodiments, which are not repeated herein.
The application also discloses electronic equipment. Referring to fig. 3, fig. 3 is a schematic structural diagram of an electronic device according to the disclosure in an embodiment of the present application. The electronic device 300 may include: at least one processor 301, at least one network interface 304, a user interface 303, a memory 305, at least one communication bus 302.
Wherein the communication bus 302 is used to enable connected communication between these components.
The user interface 303 may include a Display screen (Display), a Camera (Camera), and the optional user interface 303 may further include a standard wired interface, and a wireless interface.
The network interface 304 may optionally include a standard wired interface, a wireless interface (e.g., WI-FI interface), among others.
Wherein the processor 301 may include one or more processing cores. The processor 301 utilizes various interfaces and lines to connect various portions of the overall server, perform various functions of the server and process data by executing or executing instructions, programs, code sets, or instruction sets stored in the memory 305, and invoking data stored in the memory 305. Alternatively, the processor 301 may be implemented in hardware in at least one of digital signal processing (Digital Signal Processing, DSP), field programmable gate array (Field-Programmable Gate Array, FPGA), programmable logic array (Programmable Logic Array, PLA). The processor 301 may integrate one or a combination of several of a central processing unit (Central Processing Unit, CPU), an image processor (Graphics Processing Unit, GPU), and a modem etc. The CPU mainly processes an operating system, a user interface, an application program and the like; the GPU is used for rendering and drawing the content required to be displayed by the display screen; the modem is used to handle wireless communications. It will be appreciated that the modem may not be integrated into the processor 301 and may be implemented by a single chip.
The Memory 305 may include a random access Memory (Random Access Memory, RAM) or a Read-Only Memory (Read-Only Memory). Optionally, the memory 305 includes a non-transitory computer readable medium (non-transitory computer-readable storage medium). Memory 305 may be used to store instructions, programs, code, sets of codes, or sets of instructions. The memory 305 may include a stored program area and a stored data area, wherein the stored program area may store instructions for implementing an operating system, instructions for at least one function (such as a touch function, a sound playing function, an image playing function, etc.), instructions for implementing the above-described respective method embodiments, etc.; the storage data area may store data or the like involved in the above respective method embodiments. Memory 305 may also optionally be at least one storage device located remotely from the aforementioned processor 301. Referring to fig. 3, an operating system, a network communication module, a user interface module, and an application program of a teaching quality evaluation method based on internet education may be included in the memory 305 as a computer storage medium.
In the electronic device 300 shown in fig. 3, the user interface 303 is mainly used for providing an input interface for a user, and acquiring data input by the user; and processor 301 may be configured to invoke an application program in memory 305 that stores an internet education-based teaching quality assessment method that, when executed by one or more processors 301, causes electronic device 300 to perform the method as described in one or more of the embodiments above. It should be noted that, for simplicity of description, the foregoing method embodiments are all expressed as a series of action combinations, but it should be understood by those skilled in the art that the present application is not limited by the order of actions described, as some steps may be performed in other order or simultaneously in accordance with the present application. Further, those skilled in the art will also appreciate that the embodiments described in the specification are all preferred embodiments, and that the acts and modules referred to are not necessarily required in the present application.
In the foregoing embodiments, the descriptions of the embodiments are emphasized, and for parts of one embodiment that are not described in detail, reference may be made to related descriptions of other embodiments.
In the several embodiments provided herein, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus may be implemented in other ways. For example, the apparatus embodiments described above are merely illustrative, such as a division of units, merely a division of logic functions, and there may be additional divisions in actual implementation, such as multiple units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not performed. Alternatively, the coupling or direct coupling or communication connection shown or discussed with each other may be through some service interface, device or unit indirect coupling or communication connection, electrical or otherwise.
The units described as separate units may or may not be physically separate, and units shown as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one place, or may be distributed over a plurality of network units. Some or all of the units may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of this embodiment.
In addition, each functional unit in each embodiment of the present application may be integrated in one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units may be integrated in one unit. The integrated units may be implemented in hardware or in software functional units.
The integrated units, if implemented in the form of software functional units and sold or used as stand-alone products, may be stored in a computer readable memory. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present application may be embodied in essence or a part contributing to the prior art or all or part of the technical solution in the form of a software product stored in a memory, including several instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server or a network device, etc.) to perform all or part of the steps of the methods of the embodiments of the present application. And the aforementioned memory includes: various media capable of storing program codes, such as a U disk, a mobile hard disk, a magnetic disk or an optical disk.
The foregoing is merely exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure and is not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure. That is, equivalent changes and modifications are contemplated by the teachings of this disclosure, which fall within the scope of the present disclosure. Other embodiments of the disclosure will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the disclosure.
This application is intended to cover any adaptations, uses, or adaptations of the disclosure following, in general, the principles of the disclosure and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice within the art to which the disclosure pertains. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a scope and spirit of the disclosure being indicated by the claims.
Claims (10)
1. The teaching quality evaluation method based on the Internet education is characterized by comprising the following steps of:
acquiring target teaching information of a target course;
determining teaching evaluation indexes according to the target teaching information;
obtaining student scoring data of a target student experiencing the target course on the target course and index scoring data of a mutual evaluation teacher participating in the target course on each teaching evaluation index dimension of the target course;
calculating the weight of each teaching evaluation index, multiplying each weight by the corresponding index scoring data respectively, and adding to obtain teacher scoring data;
and taking the sum of the teacher scoring data and the student scoring data as a teaching quality scoring result of the target course.
2. The method for evaluating the teaching quality based on the internet education according to claim 1, wherein the determining the teaching evaluation index according to the target teaching information comprises:
determining a teaching chapter in the target teaching information;
determining at least one first-level teaching evaluation index according to the teaching chapter and the corresponding relation between the preset teaching chapter and the teaching evaluation index;
determining at least one secondary teaching evaluation index in the primary teaching evaluation indexes, and forming the teaching evaluation indexes by the primary evaluation indexes and the secondary evaluation indexes.
3. The method for evaluating the teaching quality of internet education according to claim 1, wherein the acquiring the student scoring data of the target course by the target student experiencing the target course comprises:
receiving test results of multiple hall-following tests, and generating score of each target student according to the test results, wherein the multiple hall-following tests are that a lecturer end of a teacher participating in the target course sends multiple hall-following tests to a student end of a target student according to the teaching progress of the target course, so that the target student completes the hall-following tests within preset time; generating personalized questionnaires of all the target students according to the score of the achievement and sending the personalized questionnaires to the student end so that the target students score the personalized questionnaires;
and receiving the questionnaire scores of the personalized questionnaires, and taking the questionnaire scores as the scoring data of the target students on the target courses.
4. The method for evaluating the teaching quality of the internet education according to claim 1, wherein the obtaining the index scoring data of the target course in each of the teaching evaluation index dimensions by the mutual evaluation teacher participating in the target course comprises:
generating a course video when the target course is finished, and sending the course video to a teacher end of the mutual evaluation teacher so that the mutual evaluation teacher can score according to each teaching evaluation index;
and receiving index scoring data of each teaching evaluation index sent by the teacher side.
5. The teaching quality evaluation method based on internet education according to claim 1, wherein the calculating the weight of each of the evaluation indexes comprises:
receiving comparison values of the mutual evaluation teacher on the first-level teaching evaluation indexes;
establishing a positive-negative matrix according to the comparison value;
taking the average value of the sum of each transverse vector in the positive-negative matrix as the weight of each first-level teaching evaluation index;
the positive-negative matrix is:
the a ij Comparing the i-th level teaching evaluation index with the j-th level teaching evaluation index.
6. The teaching quality evaluation method based on internet education according to claim 5, further comprising the steps of:
consistency test is carried out on the positive and negative matrixes according to a test formula;
the test formula is as follows:
the Y is a test value, the lambda is a characteristic value of the positive-negative matrix, the n is the order of the positive-negative matrix, and the B is an average consistency index scale;
when the check value is smaller than a preset check value, determining that the positive-negative matrix is reasonable;
and when the check value is not smaller than a preset check value, determining that the positive-negative matrix is unreasonable, and re-executing the step of receiving the comparison value of the mutual evaluation teacher to each level of teaching evaluation index until the check value is smaller than the preset check value.
7. The method for evaluating the teaching quality based on the internet education according to claim 1, wherein after the result of the scoring the teaching quality is obtained, further comprising:
comparing the teaching quality scoring result with a standard quality score to generate a teaching quality report of the target course, wherein the teaching quality report comprises teaching feedback suggestions of each teaching evaluation index.
8. An internet education based teaching quality evaluation system, the system comprising:
the teaching information acquisition module (1) is used for acquiring target teaching information of a target course;
the assessment index determining module (2) is used for determining teaching assessment indexes according to the target teaching information;
the scoring data acquisition module (3) is used for acquiring scoring data of students experiencing the target course on the target course and scoring data of indexes of the target course on each teaching evaluation index dimension by mutual evaluation teachers participating in the target course;
the teacher grading calculation module (4) is used for calculating the weight of each teaching evaluation index, multiplying each weight by the corresponding index grading data respectively and adding the corresponding index grading data to obtain teacher grading data;
and the teaching quality scoring module (5) is used for taking the sum of the teacher scoring data and the student scoring data as a teaching quality scoring result of the target course.
9. A computer readable storage medium storing a plurality of instructions adapted to be loaded by a processor and to perform the method of any one of claims 1 to 7.
10. An electronic device comprising a processor, a memory for storing instructions, and a transceiver for communicating with other devices, the processor for executing instructions stored in the memory to cause the electronic device to perform the method of any one of claims 1-7.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310188096.8A CN116308917A (en) | 2023-03-02 | 2023-03-02 | Teaching quality evaluation method, system, medium and equipment based on Internet education |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310188096.8A CN116308917A (en) | 2023-03-02 | 2023-03-02 | Teaching quality evaluation method, system, medium and equipment based on Internet education |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN116308917A true CN116308917A (en) | 2023-06-23 |
Family
ID=86828113
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310188096.8A Pending CN116308917A (en) | 2023-03-02 | 2023-03-02 | Teaching quality evaluation method, system, medium and equipment based on Internet education |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN116308917A (en) |
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN117807631A (en) * | 2023-12-29 | 2024-04-02 | 北京万讯博通科技发展有限公司 | Online evaluation method and system based on multiparty security calculation |
-
2023
- 2023-03-02 CN CN202310188096.8A patent/CN116308917A/en active Pending
Cited By (1)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CN117807631A (en) * | 2023-12-29 | 2024-04-02 | 北京万讯博通科技发展有限公司 | Online evaluation method and system based on multiparty security calculation |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Cimermanová | The Effect of Learning Styles on Academic Achievement in Different Forms of Teaching. | |
| Chaipidech et al. | A personalized learning system-supported professional training model for teachers' TPACK development | |
| CN105159924A (en) | Learning resource pushing method and system | |
| CN109754349B (en) | Intelligent teacher-student matching system for online education | |
| CN105070130A (en) | Level assessment method and level assessment system | |
| Yang et al. | Development and validation of the STEM Teaching Self-efficacy Scale (STSS) for early childhood teachers | |
| Kai et al. | Predicting Student Retention from Behavior in an Online Orientation Course. | |
| Veerasamy et al. | Using early assessment performance as early warning signs to identify at-risk students in programming courses | |
| Wang | Exploring general versus task-specific assessments of metacognition in university chemistry students: A multitrait–multimethod analysis | |
| KR20200091537A (en) | An online examination service system based on difficulty of questions | |
| Wiedmann et al. | Measuring teachers’ competence to monitor student interaction in collaborative learning settings | |
| CN116308917A (en) | Teaching quality evaluation method, system, medium and equipment based on Internet education | |
| CN111553555A (en) | Training method, training device, computer equipment and storage medium | |
| Carver et al. | Understanding the impact of assumptions on experimental validity | |
| CN107909278A (en) | A kind of method and system of program capability comprehensive assessment | |
| US20220198949A1 (en) | System and method for determining real-time engagement scores in interactive online learning sessions | |
| Akayuure | Classroom assessment literacy levels of Mathematics teachers in Ghanaian senior high schools | |
| Saleh et al. | Predicting student performance using data mining and learning analysis technique in Libyan Higher Education | |
| Dewi et al. | Improvement of Science Teachers’ Competence in Developing the Integrated Sciences Worksheets Based on Scientific Literacy to Support the Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum | |
| Zhang et al. | Interventions to promote teachers’ perceptions about STEM education: A meta-analysis | |
| Auchter et al. | The impact of business simulations as a teaching method on entrepreneurial competencies and motivation—A review of 10 years of evaluation research in entrepreneurship education | |
| Neill et al. | Does the use of technological interventions improve student academic achievement in mathematics and language arts for an identified group of at-risk middle school students? | |
| Papadopoulos et al. | Concurrent and retrospective metacognitive judgements as feedback in audience response systems: Impact on performance and self-assessment accuracy | |
| CN115619600A (en) | Method and system for intelligently evaluating practical operation capability of student user | |
| Jablonski et al. | How digital tools support the validation of outdoor modelling results |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |