CN116151681A

CN116151681A - Workload assessment method and electronic equipment

Info

Publication number: CN116151681A
Application number: CN202310179973.5A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 于悦
Original assignee: China Tower Co Ltd
Current assignee: China Tower Co Ltd
Priority date: 2023-02-17
Filing date: 2023-02-17
Publication date: 2023-05-23

Abstract

The application discloses a workload assessment method and electronic equipment, and belongs to the technical field of computers. The method comprises the following steps: acquiring a request for evaluating project workload and a project to be evaluated; splitting the item to be evaluated according to the function points of the item to be evaluated to determine sub-items corresponding to different function points; based on the type of each function point, determining the workload of the sub-item corresponding to each function point; and determining the total workload of the item to be evaluated based on the workload of the sub-item corresponding to each functional point.

Description

Workload assessment method and electronic equipment

Technical Field

The application belongs to the technical field of computers, and particularly relates to a workload assessment method and electronic equipment.

Background

The existing software system workload assessment work is only carried out in the forms of manual form filling, form collection and form review on line, on-line management means are lacked, public, transparent and standardized management cannot be achieved, and the settlement efficiency is low.

Disclosure of Invention

The embodiment of the application aims to provide a workload evaluation method and electronic equipment, which can solve the problem of low settlement efficiency of the existing workload evaluation mode.

In a first aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a method for evaluating workload, where the method includes:

acquiring a request for evaluating project workload and a project to be evaluated;

splitting the item to be evaluated according to the function points of the item to be evaluated to determine sub-items corresponding to different function points;

based on the type of each function point, determining the workload of the sub-item corresponding to each function point;

and determining the total workload of the item to be evaluated based on the workload of the sub-item corresponding to each functional point.

Optionally, the acquiring the request for evaluating the project workload and the project to be evaluated includes:

acquiring first information corresponding to the request for evaluating the project workload, wherein the first information comprises number information;

based on the number information, the item to be evaluated and second information of the item to be evaluated are obtained from a database, wherein the second information comprises total function point information.

Optionally, the splitting the item to be evaluated according to the function point of the item to be evaluated to determine sub-items corresponding to different function points includes:

Determining different sub-function point information based on the total function point information;

and splitting the item to be evaluated based on the different sub-function point information to obtain different sub-items, wherein each sub-function point information corresponds to one sub-item.

Optionally, the sub-functional point information includes a first parameter including foreground interface information, background logic processing information, flow development information, interface development information, and data service/configuration class information,

the determining the workload of the sub-item corresponding to each function point based on the type of each function point comprises the following steps:

and determining the evaluation workload of the sub-item corresponding to each piece of sub-function point information based on the first parameter of each piece of sub-function point information, wherein the evaluation workload of the sub-item corresponding to the sub-function point information is the workload of the sub-item corresponding to the function point.

Optionally, the determining the total workload of the item to be evaluated based on the workload of the sub-item corresponding to each function point includes:

acquiring a workload summarizing request and third information corresponding to the workload summarizing request, wherein the third information comprises serial number information;

Determining the evaluation workload of the sub-item corresponding to each piece of sub-function point information of the item to be evaluated based on the third information corresponding to the workload summarization request;

transmitting fourth information to the first user side, wherein the fourth information comprises the evaluation workload of the sub-items corresponding to each piece of sub-function point information of the item to be evaluated;

receiving fifth information sent by the first user side, wherein the fifth information comprises actual workload of sub-items corresponding to each piece of sub-function point information of the item to be evaluated;

based on the fifth information, determining the total workload of the item to be evaluated.

Optionally, the determining, based on the fifth information, a total workload of the item to be evaluated includes:

transmitting the fifth information to a second user side;

receiving sixth information sent by the second user side, wherein the sixth information comprises the review workload of the sub-items corresponding to each piece of sub-function point information of the item to be evaluated;

based on the fifth information and the sixth information, a total workload of the item to be evaluated is determined.

Optionally, in a case that the review workload of the sub item corresponding to the sub function point information is consistent with the actual workload, determining the total workload of the item to be evaluated based on the fifth information and the sixth information includes:

And determining the sum of actual workload of the sub-items corresponding to each piece of sub-function point information of the item to be evaluated as the total workload of the item to be evaluated.

Optionally, in a case that the review workload of the sub item corresponding to the sub function point information is inconsistent with the actual workload, determining the total workload of the item to be evaluated based on the fifth information and the sixth information includes:

transmitting seventh information to the second user side, wherein the seventh information comprises the fifth information and the sixth information;

receiving eighth information sent by the second user terminal, wherein the eighth information comprises review result description of the fifth information and the sixth information by the second user terminal;

determining complaint workload of each sub-function point information of the item to be evaluated, which is determined by the review result description, the review workload of the sub-item corresponding to the sub-function point information and the actual workload of the sub-item corresponding to the sub-function point information, based on the eighth information;

and determining the sum of complaint workload of the sub-items corresponding to each piece of sub-function point information of the item to be evaluated as the total workload of the item to be evaluated.

Optionally, after the determining the total workload of the item to be evaluated based on the workload of the sub-item corresponding to each of the function points, the method further includes:

acquiring a query request of workload assessment of the item to be assessed;

and based on the query request, the complaint workload of the sub-item corresponding to each piece of sub-function point information of the item to be evaluated is called and displayed.

In a second aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a workload assessment apparatus, the apparatus including:

the acquisition module is used for acquiring a request for evaluating project workload and a project to be evaluated;

the first determining module is used for splitting the item to be evaluated according to the function points of the item to be evaluated so as to determine sub-items corresponding to different function points;

the second determining module is used for determining the workload of the sub-item corresponding to each function point based on the type of each function point;

and the third determining module is used for determining the total workload of the item to be evaluated based on the workload of the sub-item corresponding to each functional point.

In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides an electronic device, including a processor and a memory storing a program or instructions executable on the processor, the program or instructions implementing the steps of the workload assessment method according to the first aspect when executed by the processor.

In a fourth aspect, embodiments of the present application provide a readable storage medium having stored thereon a program or instructions which, when executed by a processor, implement the steps of the workload assessment method according to the first aspect.

In the embodiment of the application, offline collection, statistics and change of the workload are changed into online evaluation, reporting and summarization, so that the efficiency of workload statistics and settlement is greatly improved, and the project closing period can be shortened. In addition, in the calculation process of the workload, the workload of each sub-item after splitting can be counted respectively, then the workload of each sub-item is summarized, the total workload of the item to be evaluated is obtained, the calculation of the workload is more refined, and the accuracy and the rationality of the result are improved.

Drawings

FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for evaluating workload according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a task page to be handled of a workload assessment application provided by an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a workload evaluation main page of the workload evaluation application according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram of a split-order page of a demand function for workload assessment application according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram of an expert assignment page of a workload assessment application provided by an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 6 is a schematic diagram of an expert review page of a workload assessment application provided by an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 7 is a schematic diagram of a technical manager review page of a workload assessment application provided by an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 8 is a schematic diagram of a technical manager complaint page of an assessment application for workload provided by an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 9 is a second schematic diagram of a technical manager complaint page of the workload assessment application provided by the embodiments of the present application;

fig. 10 is a schematic structural diagram of a workload assessment device according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 11 is a schematic technical architecture diagram of a workload assessment device according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 12 is a functional architecture diagram of a workload assessment device according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;

FIG. 13 is a schematic diagram of a physical architecture of a workload assessment device according to an embodiment of the present application;

fig. 14 is a schematic structural diagram of an electronic device according to an embodiment of the present application.

Detailed Description

Technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present application, and it is apparent that the described embodiments are some embodiments of the present application, but not all embodiments. All other embodiments obtained by a person of ordinary skill in the art based on the embodiments in the present application are within the scope of the protection of the present application.

The terms first, second and the like in the description and in the claims, are used for distinguishing between similar objects and not necessarily for describing a particular sequential or chronological order. It is to be understood that the data so used may be interchanged, as appropriate, such that embodiments of the present application may be implemented in sequences other than those illustrated or described herein, and that the objects identified by "first," "second," etc. are generally of a type and not limited to the number of objects, e.g., the first object may be one or more. Furthermore, in the description and claims, "and/or" means at least one of the connected objects, and the character "/", generally means that the associated object is an "or" relationship.

The workload assessment method provided by the embodiment of the application is described in detail below through specific embodiments and application scenes thereof with reference to the accompanying drawings.

As shown in fig. 1, the workload assessment method provided in the embodiment of the present application includes the following steps:

step S1, acquiring a request for evaluating project workload and a project to be evaluated,

the execution subject of the workload evaluation method provided in this embodiment may be a workload evaluation application, which may be applied to electronic devices such as mobile phones and computers, and may be used for data management of subjects such as enterprises and factories. The user receives the request for evaluating the project workload on the evaluation application of the workload, a link for evaluating the project workload appears on an application operation interface, the user clicks the link to enter a processing interface, and the to-be-evaluated project requiring the evaluated workload is acquired on the processing interface.

For example, the project to be evaluated for the workload to be evaluated may be a new functional software application which is independently developed by a main body such as an enterprise, a factory, etc., the workload may be estimated by a user before the new functional software application is online, and after the new functional software application is online and runs for a period of time, the new functional software application is evaluated by the workload evaluation method of the embodiment, so as to obtain a practical and reasonable workload.

Step S2, splitting the item to be evaluated according to the function points of the item to be evaluated to determine sub-items corresponding to different function points,

an item to be evaluated may be provided with one or more function points, which represent functions that the item to be evaluated may fulfil. When one item to be evaluated has a plurality of function points, the item to be evaluated is split according to the number of the function points, each function point corresponds to one sub-item, in the subsequent workload statistics process, the workload of each sub-item after splitting can be counted respectively, then the workload of each sub-item is summarized, the total workload of the item to be evaluated is obtained, the calculation of the workload is more refined, and the accuracy and rationality of the result are improved.

Step S3, based on the type of each function point, determining the workload of the sub item corresponding to each function point,

it will be appreciated that, in order to implement different functional points, the difficulty of developing different types of functional points is different, and one or more parameters may be selected from the foreground interface, background logic processing, flow development, interface development, and data service/configuration categories as evaluation criteria in determining the workload of the sub-items. If the foreground interface and the background logic process are selected as parameters for evaluating the workload of the target sub-item, the development difficulty of the foreground interface of the target sub-item can be simple, general and difficult, the development difficulty of the background logic process of the target sub-item can be simple, general and difficult, different development difficulties correspond to different workload coefficients, and the workload coefficients corresponding to the development difficulty of the foreground interface of the target sub-item and the workload coefficients corresponding to the development difficulty of the background logic process of the target sub-item are added to obtain the workload of the target sub-item.

And S4, determining the total workload of the item to be evaluated based on the workload of the sub-item corresponding to each functional point.

One item to be evaluated is provided with one or more function points, each function point corresponds to one sub-item, and after the workload of the sub-item corresponding to each function point is determined based on the type of each function point, the sum of the workload of the sub-items corresponding to each function point is the total workload of the item to be evaluated. By the method, offline collection, statistics and change of the workload are changed into online evaluation, reporting and summarization, so that the efficiency of workload statistics and settlement is greatly improved, and the project closing period can be shortened. In addition, in the calculation process of the workload, the workload of each sub-item after splitting can be counted respectively, then the workload of each sub-item is summarized, the total workload of the item to be evaluated is obtained, the calculation of the workload is more refined, and the accuracy and the rationality of the result are improved.

Optionally, step S1, obtaining a request for evaluating a workload of an item and an item to be evaluated, includes:

acquiring a request for evaluating the project workload and first information corresponding to the request for evaluating the project workload, wherein the first information comprises number information,

if the user receives a request for evaluating the workload of the project in the evaluation application of the workload, clicking a link to enter a to-be-handled task page of the evaluation application of the workload shown in fig. 2, and acquiring first information corresponding to the request for evaluating the workload of the project in the to-be-handled task page, wherein the first information comprises number information which is unique and corresponds to the request for evaluating the workload of the project, and the user can inquire the details of the request for evaluating the workload of the corresponding project through the number information. The numbering information may be a work order number as shown in fig. 2.

The first information also includes, as shown in fig. 2, a work order title (IT workload review), a presenter (a presenter), a presentation time (first time), a presenter attribution (a department), a work order type, a current handler (B handler), a current task (workload assessment), a related module/sub-module, a flow name (IT workload review flow), and a flow arrival time (second time). In the first information, the work order title may be a flow title, an office automation (Office Automation, OA) title, a task title, the work order number may be a flow number, an OA number, a task number, and the work order type may be a flow type, an OA type, or a task type. The current task may also be the current OA, the current flow. The flow name may also be an OA name, a task name.

The user enters the workload assessment home page of the workload assessment application shown in FIG. 3 through links in the to-do task page shown in FIG. 2. The method comprises the steps that the method can be obtained in a workload evaluation main page, the to-be-evaluated items and second information of the to-be-evaluated items, which are sent by a database and correspond to a request for evaluating the workload, are obtained, the second information comprises total function point information, the total function point information can be a first-level function (A requirement) shown in fig. 3, the function of solving the A requirement can be realized by knowing the to-be-evaluated items through the total function point information, and accordingly the workload of the to-be-evaluated items is evaluated according to the development difficulty of realizing the function.

The second information also includes, as shown in fig. 3, a demand number, a sub-demand number, information related to a system (C system), a vendor (D vendor), a module (E module), and the like. In the second information, the requirement number may be a question number or a technical number. The primary function may be a general function, a main function.

Through the first information and the second information, after the workload assessment is completed, the request for assessing the workload of the project can be checked with the project to be assessed, so that the condition that the request for assessing the workload of the project does not correspond to the project to be assessed is avoided, and errors in work are reduced.

Optionally, step S2, splitting the item to be evaluated according to the function point of the item to be evaluated to determine sub-items corresponding to different function points, includes:

based on the total function point information, different sub function point information is determined,

as shown in fig. 3, the workload evaluation main page further includes a task splitting column, a function splitting link exists under the task splitting column, the user clicks the function splitting link and enters the required function splitting sub-page shown in fig. 4, and sub-function point information determined by the total function point information, namely, the primary function, namely, the secondary (function point) can be seen on the interface shown in fig. 4.

Based on different sub-function point information, the project to be evaluated can be split, each sub-project corresponds to one sub-function point information, and each sub-project can be evaluated in workload. Referring to fig. 3, fig. 3 further includes an evaluation progress bar, which is denoted as 0/3 at this time, where 0 indicates the number of sub-items for which the evaluation of the workload is completed, and 3 indicates the total number of sub-items formed by splitting the to-be-evaluated items, and the evaluation task completion situation can be timely obtained through the evaluation progress bar, so that the use experience of the user is enhanced.

referring to fig. 4, each piece of sub-function point information includes foreground interface information, background logic processing information, flow development information, interface development information and data service/configuration category information, and the user can select corresponding development difficulties according to the above 5 pieces of development information, for example, the development difficulties of each piece of development information correspond to different workload coefficients.

Optionally, step S3 includes:

When the workload of the target sub-item is evaluated, corresponding development difficulties are respectively selected according to development parameters such as foreground interface information, background logic processing information, flow development information, interface development information, data service/configuration category information and the like, the development difficulty of each development information corresponds to different workload coefficients, and the sum of the workload coefficients corresponding to the development difficulty of 5 development parameters is the evaluation workload of the target sub-item. It should be noted that, taking the case shown in fig. 4 as an example, when the workload is evaluated, the estimated workload of the project to be evaluated may be obtained, where the estimated workload is estimated according to the development difficulty of the development parameters before the project is online, the evaluation workload is evaluated by the project manager after the project is online for a period of time, and the estimated workload may provide a reference for the project manager, so that the evaluation workload is more reasonable.

Optionally, step S4, determining the total workload of the item to be evaluated based on the workload of the sub-item corresponding to each of the function points, includes:

acquiring a workload summarizing request and third information corresponding to the workload summarizing request, wherein the third information comprises serial number information,

it should be noted that, in the process of evaluating the workload of each sub-item of each item to be evaluated and determining the total workload of the item to be evaluated, typically, in different time periods, the workload of each sub-item of the item to be evaluated is evaluated by the item manager at the beginning of the month, in the month, the technical manager receives a workload summary request sent by the item manager on the workload evaluation application, and third information, which includes number information for confirming whether the current processing task is correct or not.

The third information also includes a single title, a presenter time, a presenter attribution, a work order type, a current handler, a current task, a related module/sub-module, a flow name, and a flow arrival time. Based on the third information described above, the technical manager can further confirm the current processing job content.

Determining the evaluation workload of the sub-item corresponding to each piece of sub-function point information of the item to be evaluated based on the third information corresponding to the workload summarization request,

Based on the numbering information, the technology manager may obtain an evaluation workload corresponding to each sub-item of the item to be evaluated determined by the item manager.

Sending fourth information to the first user side, wherein the fourth information comprises the evaluation workload of the sub-items corresponding to each piece of sub-function point information of the item to be evaluated,

the first user side is a review expert, and the technical manager sends the acquired evaluation workload corresponding to each sub-item of the item to be evaluated, which is determined by the item manager, to the review expert. The expert assignment page of the evaluation application of the workload shown in fig. 5 displays selectable expert information including a review expert name, a unit, etc., and project information including information concerning a system, a manufacturer, a function point, etc. The expert assignment page has an assignment taskbar, and clicking on the assignment under the assignment taskbar may send a link to the expert review page of the workload assessment application shown in FIG. 6 to the selected expert. Fig. 6 includes fourth information including an evaluation workload of a sub-item corresponding to each piece of sub-function point information of the item to be evaluated determined by the item manager.

Receiving fifth information sent by the first user side, wherein the fifth information comprises actual workload of sub-items corresponding to each piece of sub-function point information of the item to be evaluated,

the first user side, i.e. the review expert, determines the actual workload of each sub-item of the item to be evaluated based on the actual operation condition after the item is online in the expert review page shown in fig. 6. After the determination of the actual workload of all the sub-items of the item to be evaluated is completed, fifth information containing the actual workload is sent back to the application end.

And according to the actual workload of the item to be evaluated, which is determined by the evaluation expert, summarizing and summing to obtain the total workload of the item to be evaluated, wherein in the step, the evaluation expert combines the actual running condition of the item to be evaluated on the basis of the evaluation result of the technical manager, so that the total workload of the item to be evaluated is obtained, and the rationality of the total workload of the item to be evaluated is improved.

transmitting the fifth information to a second user terminal,

The application end sends fifth information containing the actual workload of each sub-item of the item to be evaluated to a second user end, and the second user end is the technical manager.

Receiving sixth information sent by the second user side, wherein the sixth information comprises the review workload of the sub-items corresponding to each piece of sub-function point information of the item to be evaluated,

after the second user side, i.e. the technical manager clicks on the link sent by the application side, the technical manager enters a technical manager review page of the workload assessment application shown in fig. 7, and the technical manager determines review workload, i.e. the workload after the verification shown in fig. 7, according to the sub-function point information of each sub-item and the actual running condition.

The project manager determines the total workload of the project to be evaluated based on the fifth information including the actual workload and the sixth information including the checked workload. Under the condition of expert evaluation, the project manager carries out secondary evaluation according to the running condition of the project to be evaluated after being on line, so as to obtain the checked workload, and the checked workload and the rechecked workload are comprehensively considered to determine the total workload of the project to be evaluated, so that the rationality of the total workload is further improved.

It can be understood that when the actual workload determined by the review expert is consistent with the review workload determined by the technical manager, the review expert is consistent with the judgment of the technical manager, so that the sum of the actual workload or the sum of the review workload of the sub-items corresponding to each piece of sub-function point information of the item to be evaluated can be determined as the total workload of the item to be evaluated, and the rationality of the total workload of the item to be evaluated is ensured.

The technical manager complaint page of the workload assessment application shown in fig. 8 is filled in under the confirmation result column shown in fig. 8 when the technical manager does not fill in the review workload or when the review workload is consistent with the actual workload, and the sum of the actual workload or the sum of the review workload of each sub-item of the item to be assessed is determined as the total workload of the item to be assessed.

transmitting seventh information to the second user terminal, wherein the seventh information comprises the fifth information and the sixth information,

if the review workload of the sub-project is inconsistent with the actual workload, the judgment of the review expert and the technical manager is not unified, and at the moment, the project manager sends seventh information containing the review workload and the actual workload to a second user side, namely the technical manager, so that the technical manager can complain. The complaints are filled in under the confirmation result column shown in fig. 8, and the technical manager carries out complaint processing.

The technical manager complaint page of the workload assessment application shown in fig. 9 integrates the estimated workload, the assessment workload, the actual workload, the rechecking workload and the actual running condition of the item to be assessed after being on line, and makes a rechecking result description. It should be emphasized that the estimated workload, the actual workload, and the review workload all need to be determined based on development parameters such as foreground interface information, background logic processing information, flow development information, interface development information, and data service/configuration category information of the sub-items, and development difficulty of each development parameter.

The review result description may be a judgment of the actual workload made by the consent review expert, a judgment of the review workload made by the consent technical manager, or a complaint workload taking an average of the actual workload and the review workload as a sub-item. And determining the sum of complaint workload of each sub-item as the total workload of the item to be evaluated. According to the workload assessment method, the estimated workload is obtained before the item to be assessed is online, and the final complaint workload is obtained according to the estimated workload, the actual workload and the rechecked workload through a plurality of review processes after the item to be assessed is online, so that the total workload of the item to be assessed is determined, and the accuracy and the rationality of the total workload are ensured.

acquiring a query request of workload assessment of the item to be assessed;

It can be understood that after the evaluation of the workload of the item to be evaluated is completed, if the workload evaluation process of the item to be evaluated is required to be queried, the complaint workload of the sub-item corresponding to each piece of function point information of the item to be evaluated can be invoked and displayed, or the estimated workload, the evaluation workload, the actual workload, the rechecking workload and the complaint workload of each sub-item can be invoked and displayed, so that the user can acquire the workload composition of the item to be evaluated more intuitively, and the use experience of the user is improved.

According to the workload assessment method provided by the embodiment of the application, the execution subject can be a workload assessment device.

In the embodiment of the present application, an example of a method for evaluating a workload performed by a workload evaluation device is taken as an example, and the workload evaluation device 100 provided in the implementation of the present application is described with reference to fig. 10. The workload assessment device 100 includes:

An obtaining module 101, configured to obtain a request for evaluating a workload of an item and an item to be evaluated;

the first determining module 102 is configured to split the item to be evaluated according to the function points of the item to be evaluated, so as to determine sub-items corresponding to different function points;

a second determining module 103, configured to determine, based on a type of each function point, a workload of a sub-item corresponding to each function point;

and a third determining module 104, configured to determine a total workload of the item to be evaluated based on the workload of the sub-item corresponding to each of the function points.

Optionally, the obtaining module 101 is further configured to:

Optionally, the first determining module 102 is further configured to:

the second determining module 103 is further configured to:

Optionally, the third determining module 104 is further configured to:

transmitting the fifth information to a second user side;

Optionally, in the case that the review workload of the sub item corresponding to the sub function point information is consistent with the actual workload, the third determining module 104 is further configured to:

Optionally, in the case that the review workload of the sub item corresponding to the sub function point information is inconsistent with the actual workload, the third determining module 104 is further configured to:

Optionally, the device further comprises a query module, and the query module is used for:

acquiring a query request of workload assessment of the item to be assessed;

and based on the query request, the actual workload of the sub-item corresponding to each piece of sub-function point information of the item to be evaluated is called and displayed.

According to the device 100 provided by the embodiment, the item to be evaluated can be split into a plurality of sub-items according to the function points of the item to be evaluated, the workload of each sub-item is determined according to the type of the function point of each sub-item, and finally the total workload of the item to be evaluated is obtained by summarizing.

It should be noted that, the workload assessment device provided in the embodiment of the present application can implement all technical processes of the workload assessment method, and achieve the same technical effects, so that repetition is avoided, and no further description is provided herein.

Alternatively, as shown in fig. 11, a technical architecture of a workload assessment device is schematically shown, where the technical architecture may be hierarchically divided into a presentation layer, a service layer, a persistence layer, and a database, where the services of the bottom layer provide support for the applications of the upper layer, and each layer bears corresponding functional responsibilities. The presentation layer comprises a PC end and a Mobile end, wherein the PC end can adopt JQuery1.6, jsp2.0 and Flex4.0 technologies, and the Mobile end can adopt SeaJS2.1.1 and AppFramework2.0 technologies. The business layer can adopt a Spring2.5 framework, a CXF2.2 (Celtrix and Xfire) framework, can be packaged by an open source flow Jbpm3.2, and can use an open source Quartz1.8 component for scheduling. The persistence layer can adopt hibernate, the cache component can use Ehache, and the sharing cache can use Redis cache fusion technology. The database may use an oracle relational database. The interface between the business layer and the persistence layer is a data access object (Data Access Object, DAO), and the interface between the presentation layer and the business layer is a Service class.

Optionally, as shown in fig. 12, a functional architecture of a workload assessment apparatus is schematically shown, where the functional architecture is classified into a hierarchy of page presentation, business modeling, external service, system maintenance, and the like, and the page presentation includes: helium work order, work order draft, work order processing, work order comment, work order log, work order association, work order search, management work order, message pushing and other functions.

The business modeling comprises two parts of form modeling and flow modeling, wherein the form modeling comprises form layout, form attribute, field management and field attribute. The process modeling comprises link management, process attribute, personnel management, authority management, event attribute and task management.

The external service comprises a WEB interface and information pushing, wherein the WEB interface comprises an external building bill, external work bill information acquisition and external closing bill. The information pushing comprises a butt-joint mobile terminal (ME), a business portal and an OA, a unified api interface and information pushing are provided, an external system can be used for creating a work order through the interface, work order information is acquired, and the external system actively closes the order.

The system maintenance is used as a service work order management module, and can realize overtime work order reminding function maintenance, flow action maintenance, work order page display content maintenance, special parameter maintenance, data dictionary maintenance, working time maintenance, approval chain maintenance, mobile terminal (mobile phone) processing link maintenance, log template maintenance, pending page maintenance and the like.

Optionally, as shown in fig. 13, the physical architecture of a workload assessment device is implemented by separating front end and back end in a multi-node deployment manner, and the PC end, the mobile end, and an external system use a nginx reverse proxy to distribute access traffic to each service node in a polling manner, where the service node includes a plurality of single application (including front end) nodes and a single application-scheduling node. The server pressure is reduced, physical machines, cloud platform network structures and the like are utilized, the existing server resources can be utilized to the greatest extent, and the investment of cost is reduced. The database comprises a main oracle relational database and a standby oracle relational database.

The device in the embodiment of the application may be an electronic device, or may be a component in an electronic device, for example, an integrated circuit or a chip. The electronic device may be a terminal, or may be other devices than a terminal. By way of example, the electronic device may be a mobile phone, a tablet computer, a notebook computer, a palm computer, a vehicle-mounted electronic device, a mobile internet appliance (Mobile Internet Device, MID), an augmented reality (augmented reality, AR)/Virtual Reality (VR) device, a robot, a wearable device, an ultra-mobile personal computer (UMPC), a netbook or a personal digital assistant (personal digital assistant, PDA), etc., and the non-mobile electronic device may also be a server, a network attached storage (Network Attached Storage, NAS), a personal computer (personal computer, PC), a Television (TV), a teller machine or a self-service machine, etc., without being limited thereto.

Optionally, as shown in fig. 14, the embodiment of the present application further provides an electronic device 1400, including a processor 1401 and a memory 1402, where the memory 1402 stores a program or an instruction that can be executed on the processor 1401, where the program or the instruction implements each step of the above-mentioned workload estimation method embodiment when executed by the processor 1401, and the steps achieve the same technical effects, and are not repeated herein for avoiding repetition.

The electronic device in the embodiment of the application includes the mobile electronic device and the non-mobile electronic device described above.

The embodiment of the present application further provides a readable storage medium, where a program or an instruction is stored on the readable storage medium, and when the program or the instruction is executed by a processor, the program or the instruction implements each process of the foregoing workload assessment method embodiment, and the same technical effects can be achieved, so that repetition is avoided, and no further description is given here.

Wherein the processor is a processor in the electronic device described in the above embodiment. The readable storage medium includes a computer readable storage medium such as a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a random access Memory (Random Access Memory, RAM), a magnetic disk or an optical disk, and the like.

It should be noted that, in this document, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrase "comprising one … …" does not exclude the presence of other like elements in a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises the element. Furthermore, it should be noted that the scope of the methods and apparatus in the embodiments of the present application is not limited to performing the functions in the order shown or discussed, but may also include performing the functions in a substantially simultaneous manner or in an opposite order depending on the functions involved, e.g., the described methods may be performed in an order different from that described, and various steps may also be added, omitted, or combined. Additionally, features described with reference to certain examples may be combined in other examples.

From the above description of the embodiments, it will be clear to those skilled in the art that the above-described embodiment method may be implemented by means of software plus a necessary general hardware platform, but of course may also be implemented by means of hardware, but in many cases the former is a preferred embodiment. Based on such understanding, the technical solutions of the present application may be embodied essentially or in a part contributing to the prior art in the form of a computer software product stored in a storage medium (such as ROM/RAM, magnetic disk, optical disk), comprising several instructions for causing a terminal (which may be a mobile phone, a computer, a server, an air conditioner, or a network device, etc.) to perform the method described in the embodiments of the present application.

The foregoing is merely specific embodiments of the present application, but the scope of the present application is not limited thereto, and any person skilled in the art can easily think about changes or substitutions within the technical scope of the present application, and the changes or substitutions are intended to be covered by the scope of the present application. Therefore, the protection scope of the present application shall be subject to the protection scope of the claims.

Claims

1. A method of workload assessment, the method comprising:

2. The workload assessment method according to claim 1, wherein the acquiring a request for assessing a workload of an item and the item to be assessed comprises:

3. The workload assessment method according to claim 2, wherein splitting the item to be assessed according to the function point of the item to be assessed to determine sub-items corresponding to different function points comprises:

4. The method for workload assessment according to claim 3, wherein the sub-function point information comprises a first parameter comprising foreground interface information, background logic processing information, flow development information, interface development information and data service/configuration class information,

5. The method of claim 4, wherein determining the total workload of the item under evaluation based on the workload of the sub-item corresponding to each of the function points, comprises:

6. The workload assessment method according to claim 5, wherein the determining the total workload of the item to be assessed based on the fifth information comprises:

Transmitting the fifth information to a second user side;

7. The method according to claim 6, wherein in a case where the review workload of the sub-item corresponding to the sub-function point information is identical to the actual workload, the determining the total workload of the item to be evaluated based on the fifth information and the sixth information includes:

8. The method for evaluating the workload according to claim 6, wherein in the case where the review workload of the sub-item corresponding to the sub-function point information is inconsistent with the actual workload, the determining the total workload of the item to be evaluated based on the fifth information and the sixth information includes:

9. The method of workload assessment according to claim 8, wherein after said determining the total workload of said item under assessment based on the workload of the sub-item corresponding to each of said function points, said method further comprises:

acquiring a query request of workload assessment of the item to be assessed;

10. An electronic device comprising a processor and a memory storing a program or instructions executable on the processor, which when executed by the processor, implement the steps of the method of assessing workload according to any one of claims 1 to 9.