CN116088457B - Steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method and device of distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model - Google Patents

Steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method and device of distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN116088457B
CN116088457B CN202310371510.9A CN202310371510A CN116088457B CN 116088457 B CN116088457 B CN 116088457B CN 202310371510 A CN202310371510 A CN 202310371510A CN 116088457 B CN116088457 B CN 116088457B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
time
heat
continuous casting
representing
distributed robust
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN202310371510.9A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN116088457A (en
Inventor
宋士吉
牛晟盛
杨琬露
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Tsinghua University
Original Assignee
Tsinghua University
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Tsinghua University filed Critical Tsinghua University
Priority to CN202310371510.9A priority Critical patent/CN116088457B/en
Publication of CN116088457A publication Critical patent/CN116088457A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN116088457B publication Critical patent/CN116088457B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B19/00Programme-control systems
    • G05B19/02Programme-control systems electric
    • G05B19/418Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM]
    • G05B19/41865Total factory control, i.e. centrally controlling a plurality of machines, e.g. direct or distributed numerical control [DNC], flexible manufacturing systems [FMS], integrated manufacturing systems [IMS] or computer integrated manufacturing [CIM] characterised by job scheduling, process planning, material flow
    • GPHYSICS
    • G05CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05BCONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30Nc systems
    • G05B2219/32Operator till task planning
    • G05B2219/32252Scheduling production, machining, job shop
    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02PCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
    • Y02P90/00Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
    • Y02P90/30Computing systems specially adapted for manufacturing

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Manufacturing & Machinery (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Automation & Control Theory (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention provides a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method and device of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, belonging to the technical field of production scheduling and production internal and external resource optimization, wherein the method comprises the following steps: taking the shortest total flow time as an optimization target, taking the furnace processing time as a random variable, and constructing a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model for the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem; considering the correlation between constraint conditions, and converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation according to CVaR approximation and a dual theory; based on an iterative lifting solving algorithm, solving a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation to obtain a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme. In the invention, the uncertainty of the processing time of the furnace is considered, so that the obtained steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme is more in line with the actual situation, the casting interruption phenomenon in the steelmaking continuous casting process can be greatly reduced, and the stability of the production process is improved.

Description

Steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method and device of distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of production scheduling and production internal and external resource optimization, and particularly relates to a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method and device of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model.
Background
Steelmaking continuous casting is one of the most important links in the steel production process, and because the actual processing flow involves more manual links and the uncertain factors such as machine faults, unqualified molten steel quality, planned temporary change and the like, the production cannot be executed according to the plan. As the key working procedures of the upstream and the downstream are connected, the production plan of the upstream and the downstream can be changed along with the change of the production plan, and the overall production efficiency of the iron and steel enterprises is further affected. Therefore, an effective steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method is important for improving production efficiency and reducing production cost.
Early research on the steelmaking continuous casting production scheduling problem is mainly focused on a deterministic model, and the steelmaking continuous casting production scheduling problem is solved by using an operation research-based method, an intelligent optimization algorithm, an expert system, a fuzzy method and the like. However, the uncertainty of the steelmaking continuous casting process is numerous, and the scheduling scheme obtained by the deterministic model cannot achieve good performance, and is not feasible even in many cases. Therefore, aiming at the uncertain factors of the steelmaking continuous casting process, a plurality of scholars research a dynamic scheduling method, so that when an emergency occurs, the steelmaking continuous casting process is rescheduled according to the current production condition. Dynamic scheduling has good effects when dealing with significant impact events, such as long-term machine failures, order additions or deletions, and the like. However, in the steelmaking continuous casting process, the occurrence frequency of non-significant influence events is far greater than that of significant influence events, such as short-term faults of machines, fluctuation of processing time and transportation time, and the like. Rescheduling of the production process is frequently performed against these fluctuations not only wastes a lot of resources, but also makes the production plan unstable. And the dynamic scheduling model considers that the processing environment is determined, so that the obtained rescheduling scheme still cannot solve the problem of future parameter fluctuation.
Aiming at uncertainty factors in the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling process, the current research is limited to a robust optimization method and a random programming method based on an uncertainty set. Robust optimization based on uncertainty sets only considers support set information and therefore has great conservation, while stochastic programming methods generally assume that uncertainty parameters follow a particular distribution, and in practical production environments, exact distributions of uncertainty parameters are often difficult to obtain, especially for new production lines or new machines or workpieces. Compared with the two methods, the robust optimization method based on the distribution function set is more focused by students in recent years, and has been applied to a plurality of brand new fields or problems.
However, the main research work of the robust optimization method based on the distribution function set is based on classical scheduling models of single machine and parallel machine, and only takes the total flow time in a linear form and the like as an optimization target. The prior art does not give a proper model and a model transformation solution scheme, so that the method is not suitable for the production scheduling problem containing uncertain constraints, such as steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of the above, embodiments of the present invention provide a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method and apparatus for a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model to overcome or at least partially solve the above problems.
In a first aspect of the embodiment of the invention, a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is disclosed, and the method comprises the following steps:
taking the shortest total flow time as an optimization target, taking the furnace processing time as a random variable, and constructing a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model for the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem;
considering the correlation between constraint conditions, and converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation according to CVaR approximation and a dual theory;
based on an iterative lifting solving algorithm, solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation to obtain a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme, wherein the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme comprises: all heats and start-up times for the runs.
Optionally, the method further comprises:
aiming at the condition that the constraint conditions are mutually independent, converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on an independent hypothesis;
And solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on the independence assumption based on the iterative lifting solving algorithm to obtain a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme under the constraint independent condition.
Optionally, the constructing a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model of steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem with shortest total flow time as an optimization target and furnace processing time as a random variable includes:
determining parameters and decision variables of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model;
the uncertain furnace processing time is taken as an uncertain parameter of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, the uncertain parameters are specifically unknown respectively, but the uncertain parameters belong to a distribution function set with a support set and known moment information;
determining an objective function of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, wherein the objective function takes minimum total flow time as an optimization target;
and determining constraint conditions of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, wherein the constraint conditions of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model are used for constraining the feasibility of a distribution set and a scheduling scheme obeyed by uncertain processing time.
Optionally, the objective function of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is expressed as:
Figure SMS_4
Wherein (1)>
Figure SMS_10
The function of the upper limit is represented by,
Figure SMS_15
representing a minimum function,/->
Figure SMS_2
Indicating desire(s)>
Figure SMS_6
Representing the aggregate of all runs, +.>
Figure SMS_9
Indicate->
Figure SMS_13
All heat sets in each casting, +.>
Figure SMS_3
Representing distribution(s)>
Figure SMS_7
Representing the distribution function set to which the uncertain process time belongs, < ->
Figure SMS_11
Representing the processing casting time->
Figure SMS_14
Is a continuous casting machine of->
Figure SMS_18
Representing the processing watering time->
Figure SMS_22
Is +.>
Figure SMS_25
Order of (2)>
Figure SMS_28
Representing the watering time->
Figure SMS_16
Start-up time of the first heat of (a),/-)>
Figure SMS_17
Representing the heat +.>
Figure SMS_20
In the process of casting->
Figure SMS_27
Processing time on continuous casting machine, +.>
Figure SMS_1
Indicate->
Figure SMS_5
The third of the number of times>
Figure SMS_8
Total processing time of all heats before the individual heats, +.>
Figure SMS_12
Representing the watering time->
Figure SMS_19
Middle->
Figure SMS_23
Finishing time of each heat, +.>
Figure SMS_24
Representing the watering time->
Figure SMS_26
The sum of the finishing times of all the heats, < >>
Figure SMS_21
Representing the sum of the finishing times of all heats in all runs.
Optionally, the constraint condition of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model includes:
uncertain heat processing time constraints, including: the specific distribution of the uncertain heat processing time is unknown, but the uncertain heat processing time belongs to a distribution function set determined by a support set, a mean value vector and a covariance matrix;
A heat continuity constraint comprising: on the same continuous casting machine, when casting is completed in a certain heat, the subsequent heat reaches the continuous casting machine and can start to process;
a single casting initiation processing time constraint comprising: the starting processing time of each casting time is more than or equal to the preparation time, and the starting processing time of each casting time is more than or equal to the completion time of the first furnace time of the casting time in the last working procedure plus the transportation time;
adjacent runner start machining time constraints, comprising: two adjacent casting times on the same continuous casting machine, wherein the starting processing time of the next casting time is more than or equal to the finishing time plus the preparation time of the previous casting time;
a heat start processing time constraint comprising: in addition to the continuous casting machine, two adjacent heats on the same machine, and the starting processing time of the subsequent heat needs to be more than or equal to the finishing time of the previous heat;
the processing time constraint of the adjacent working procedures of the same furnace number comprises the following steps: in two adjacent processes in the same furnace, the starting processing time of the next process is more than or equal to the finishing time plus the transportation time of the last process.
Optionally, the converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation according to CVaR approximation and dual theory includes:
Converting an objective function in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a general representation form;
and converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint approximation in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a semi-positive constraint through CVaR approximation and a dual theory.
Optionally, the solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation based on the iterative lifting solving algorithm includes:
generating a plurality of constraint factor vectors in advance;
solving an optimal solution and an optimal value of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation according to the value of the constraint factor vector aiming at each constraint factor vector;
updating the value of the constraint factor vector according to the optimal solution and the optimal value, and solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation with the updated value of the constraint factor vector to obtain a new optimal solution and an optimal value;
and after the iteration ending condition is met, obtaining an optimal solution and an optimal value corresponding to the constraint factor vector, and selecting a final optimal solution and an optimal value from the optimal solutions and the optimal values corresponding to the constraint factor vectors.
Optionally, the converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on the independence assumption includes:
converting an objective function in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a general representation form;
and (3) converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a distributed robust independent opportunity constraint by giving the establishment probability of each constraint condition.
Optionally, the solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on the independence assumption based on the iterative lifting solution algorithm includes:
generating a plurality of probability distribution vectors in advance;
aiming at each probability distribution vector, carrying out approximate transformation on the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on the independence assumption according to the value of the probability distribution vector, and obtaining the optimal solution and the optimal value of the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem through solving;
calculating the maximum probability and corresponding parameters which can be established under the optimal solution, updating the value of the probability distribution vector according to the parameters, and continuously calculating a new optimal solution and an optimal value by using the updated probability distribution vector;
And after the iteration ending condition is met, obtaining an optimal solution and an optimal value corresponding to the probability distribution vector, and selecting a final optimal solution and an optimal value from the optimal solutions and the optimal values corresponding to the probability distribution vectors.
In a second aspect of the embodiment of the present invention, a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling apparatus of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is disclosed, the apparatus comprising:
the model building module is used for building a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model for steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem by taking the shortest total flow time as an optimization target and the furnace processing time as a random variable;
the model conversion module is used for converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation according to the correlation between constraint conditions and the CVaR approximation and the dual theory;
the problem solving module is used for solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation based on an iterative lifting solving algorithm to obtain a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme, wherein the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme comprises: all heats and start-up times for the runs.
The embodiment of the invention has the following advantages:
In the embodiment of the invention, the shortest total flow time is taken as an optimization target, the furnace processing time is taken as a random variable, a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model of a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem is constructed, the correlation among constraint conditions is considered, the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is converted into a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation according to CVaR approximation and a dual theory, and the obtained deterministic optimization problem is not convex, so that an iterative lifting solving algorithm is designed, and the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation is solved, so that the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme is obtained. Because the uncertainty of the processing time of the heat is considered in the embodiment, the obtained steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme is more in line with the actual situation, the casting interruption phenomenon in the steelmaking continuous casting process can be greatly reduced, and the stability of the production process is improved.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings that are needed in the description of the embodiments of the present invention will be briefly described below, it being obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and that other drawings may be obtained according to these drawings without inventive effort for a person skilled in the art.
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of steps of a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model provided by an embodiment of the invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a steelmaking continuous casting process according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a flowchart illustrating steps for performing iterative solution based on a CVaR approximation-based distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a flowchart illustrating steps for performing iterative solution on a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on an independence assumption according to an embodiment of the present invention;
fig. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling device of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model provided by an embodiment of the invention.
Detailed Description
In order that the above objects, features and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent, a more particular description of embodiments of the invention will be rendered by reference to the appended drawings, which are illustrated in the appended drawings. All other embodiments, which can be made by those skilled in the art based on the embodiments of the invention without making any inventive effort, are intended to be within the scope of the invention.
The embodiment of the invention provides a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, as shown in fig. 1, fig. 1 is a step flow chart of the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, which comprises steps S101 to S103:
step S101: and constructing a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model of the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem by taking the shortest total flow time as an optimization target and the furnace processing time as a random variable.
As shown in fig. 2, the steelmaking continuous casting production process specifically includes: and three main processes of steelmaking, refining and continuous casting. In the steelmaking stage, the upstream molten iron is transported to a converter, the carbon content in the molten iron is reduced by oxygen blowing, and a furnace of molten steel from the converter is called a heat, which is a basic unit of a steelmaking continuous casting production process; in the refining stage, the furnace number after the steel making is completed is conveyed to a refining furnace, and chemical components in molten steel are further adjusted to remove impurities in the molten steel or alloy components are added to meet different steel grade requirements; in the continuous casting stage, molten steel after refining is transported to a continuous casting machine, molten steel flows from a ladle through a tundish, is solidified into a slab at the bottom of the continuous casting machine through a mold, and a batch of heats having the same chemical composition and continuously cast on the continuous casting machine is called a casting pass. In the whole process, continuous casting is ensured as much as possible for all the heats in one casting, because the same tundish is used for all the heats in one casting, and if casting is interrupted, the tundish needs to be replaced again, which causes a great deal of fixed cost and consumes a great deal of time. Meanwhile, the heat preservation and heating are needed to be carried out again when the furnace number which does not complete continuous casting is remained, so that more economic losses are brought, and the occurrence of the casting breaking times is reduced, namely the production cost is reduced.
In this embodiment, the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem with uncertain furnace processing time is focused on, and a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is established for the problem. The distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model takes the furnace processing time as a random variable, the distribution of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is unknown but belongs to a distribution function set with a support set and known moment information, the total flow time in the steelmaking continuous casting process is taken as an optimization target, and the constraint related to the uncertain processing time is processed by adopting the robust joint opportunity constraint model.
Specifically, the method uses the shortest total flow time as an optimization target, uses the furnace processing time as a random variable, and constructs a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model of steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem, and comprises the steps of A1 to A4:
step A1: parameters and decision variables of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model are determined.
In this embodiment, parameters of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model mainly include:
Figure SMS_49
representing the aggregate of all heats, +.>
Figure SMS_51
Representing the aggregate of all runs, +.>
Figure SMS_53
Representing the set of all machines->
Figure SMS_29
Indicating all processing heats +.>
Figure SMS_42
Is (including continuous casting machine) is +.>
Figure SMS_47
Represents the set of all casters, +. >
Figure SMS_50
Representing the processing casting time->
Figure SMS_44
Is a continuous casting machine of->
Figure SMS_46
Indicate->
Figure SMS_48
All heat sets in each casting, +.>
Figure SMS_55
Representing the heat +.>
Figure SMS_52
In the machine->
Figure SMS_57
Directly subsequent heat of upper processing, +.>
Figure SMS_58
Representing slave machine->
Figure SMS_59
To->
Figure SMS_32
Is (are) transported in time>
Figure SMS_34
Representing the processing heat +.>
Figure SMS_38
Is->
Figure SMS_40
Is directly subsequent to the machine, ">
Figure SMS_30
Representing the processing heat +.>
Figure SMS_33
Is->
Figure SMS_36
Is used for the direct-to-direct preceding machine of (a),
Figure SMS_41
representing the heat +.>
Figure SMS_31
In the machine->
Figure SMS_35
Processing time of the above->
Figure SMS_37
Indicating the preparation time of adjacent runs, +.>
Figure SMS_39
Representing the heat +.>
Figure SMS_43
In the machine->
Figure SMS_45
Sequence number of upper process,/->
Figure SMS_54
Representing the casting time of the same continuous casting machine>
Figure SMS_56
Is directly and subsequently poured for times.
Decision variables of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model mainly comprise:
Figure SMS_60
representing the watering time->
Figure SMS_61
A start-up time for a first heat of the furnace; />
Figure SMS_62
Representing the heat +.>
Figure SMS_63
In the machine->
Figure SMS_64
Start-up time in which>
Figure SMS_65
Step A2: and taking the uncertain furnace processing time as an uncertain parameter of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, wherein the specific distribution of the uncertain parameter is unknown, but the uncertain parameter belongs to a distribution function set with a known support set and moment information.
In this embodiment, considering the case where the processing time of the heat is not determined (that is, the processing time is a random variable), the method is used
Figure SMS_66
Representing the heat +.>
Figure SMS_67
In the machine->
Figure SMS_68
Processing time above, all uncertain processing time constitute vector +.>
Figure SMS_69
Wherein the uncertainty parameter belongs to a set of distribution functions for which the support set and moment information are known, the support set and moment information being known to refer to the type of support set of the set of distribution functions, the support set parameters, the mean vector and the covariance matrix being known. Specifically, vector->
Figure SMS_70
Distribution function set->
Figure SMS_71
The definition is as follows:
Figure SMS_72
wherein (1)>
Figure SMS_73
Is->
Figure SMS_74
Support set of->
Figure SMS_75
And->
Figure SMS_76
Are respectively->
Figure SMS_77
Mean and covariance matrix of (c).
Step A3: and determining an objective function of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, wherein the objective function takes the minimum total flow time as an optimization target.
In this embodiment, the objective function represents the minimum total flow time of all heats in completing all the casts under the condition of uncertainty of the distribution function set of the processing time, namely, the specific meaning of the objective function is as follows: minimizing the total flow-through time.
Specifically, the objective function of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is expressed as:
Figure SMS_78
(equation 1)
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure SMS_81
representing the upper limit function>
Figure SMS_84
Representing a minimum function,/->
Figure SMS_89
Indicating desire(s)>
Figure SMS_80
Representing the aggregate of all runs, +.>
Figure SMS_83
Indicate->
Figure SMS_85
All heat sets in each casting, +. >
Figure SMS_88
Representing distribution(s)>
Figure SMS_79
Representing the distribution function set to which the uncertain process time belongs, < ->
Figure SMS_86
Representing the processing casting time->
Figure SMS_91
Is a continuous casting machine of->
Figure SMS_96
Representing the processing watering time->
Figure SMS_92
Is +.>
Figure SMS_95
Order of (2)>
Figure SMS_99
Representing the watering time->
Figure SMS_103
Start-up time of the first heat of (a),/-)>
Figure SMS_98
Representing the heat +.>
Figure SMS_102
In the process of casting->
Figure SMS_104
Processing time on continuous casting machine, +.>
Figure SMS_105
Indicate->
Figure SMS_82
The third of the number of times>
Figure SMS_87
The total processing time of all the heats before the individual heats,
Figure SMS_90
representing the watering time->
Figure SMS_94
Middle->
Figure SMS_93
The finishing time of each heat is equal to the finishing time of each heat,
Figure SMS_97
representing the watering time->
Figure SMS_100
The sum of the finishing times of all the heats,
Figure SMS_101
representing the sum of the finishing times of all heats in all runs.
Further, since the objective function is the desire to minimize the total flow-through time, the objective function of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model may be rewritten as:
Figure SMS_106
(equation 2)
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure SMS_107
and->
Figure SMS_108
Is uncertain processing time->
Figure SMS_109
And->
Figure SMS_110
Is a mean value of (c). Equation 2 shows that the sum of the finishing times for all heats in all runs is the smallest, i.e., the total flow-through time is the smallest.
Step A4: and determining constraint conditions of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, wherein the constraint conditions of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model are used for constraining the feasibility of a distribution set and a scheduling scheme obeyed by uncertain furnace processing time.
In this embodiment, the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model for the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem includes 6 types of constraint conditions, wherein the 1 type constraint is a distribution set constraint to which the uncertain heat processing time is subjected, and the other 5 types of constraint are feasibility constraint of the scheduling scheme.
Specifically, the constraint condition of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model includes: the method comprises the steps of determining a heat processing time constraint, a heat continuity constraint, a single casting start processing time constraint, an adjacent casting start processing time constraint, a heat start processing time constraint and a heat adjacent process start processing time constraint. Wherein the uncertain heat processing time constraint belongs to a distribution set constraint obeyed by the uncertain heat processing time; the furnace continuity constraint, the single casting time constraint, the adjacent casting time constraint, the furnace start processing time constraint and the adjacent process start processing time constraint of the same furnace belong to the feasibility constraint of a scheduling scheme.
1) An uncertain heat processing time constraint belonging to a set of distribution functions defined by a support set, a mean vector and a covariance matrix.
Uncertain heat processing time
Figure SMS_111
Is unknown, but the uncertain heat treatment time belongs to a supported set +.>
Figure SMS_112
Mean vector->
Figure SMS_113
And covariance matrix->
Figure SMS_114
The determined distribution function is concentrated and expressed as follows:
Figure SMS_115
(equation 3)
2) A heat continuity constraint comprising: on the same continuous casting machine, when a certain heat finishes casting, the subsequent heat has arrived at the continuous casting machine and can start processing, the expression is as follows:
Figure SMS_116
(equation 4)
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure SMS_118
is a mathematical expression of the chance constraint, i.e. the probability that an event is true is not lower than +.>
Figure SMS_121
Figure SMS_123
,/>
Figure SMS_117
Representing the heat +.>
Figure SMS_120
Finishing time of previous heat, +.>
Figure SMS_124
Representing the heat +.>
Figure SMS_126
The time to reach the caster, therefore, equation 4 represents the set of distribution functions +.>
Figure SMS_119
Lower heat->
Figure SMS_122
The time to reach the continuous casting machine is less than or equal to the heat degree +.>
Figure SMS_125
The probability of establishment of the finishing time of the previous heat is equal to or greater than +.>
Figure SMS_127
3) A single casting initiation processing time constraint comprising: the start processing time of each casting time is required to be equal to or longer than the preparation time, and the expression is as follows:
Figure SMS_128
(equation 5)
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure SMS_129
representing the watering time->
Figure SMS_130
Start-up time of the first heat of (a),/-)>
Figure SMS_131
Indicating the preparation time for adjacent runs.
The starting processing time of each casting time is equal to or more than the completion time of the last working procedure of the first furnace time of the casting time plus the transportation time, and the expression is as follows:
Figure SMS_132
(equation 6)
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure SMS_133
representing the watering time->
Figure SMS_134
The first heat of the furnace is added with the completion time of the last process and the transportation time. Equation 6 shows the distribution function set +.>
Figure SMS_135
Lower, watery->
Figure SMS_136
The first heat of (2) has a start processing time of equal to or longer than that of the first heat, and is watered>
Figure SMS_137
The probability of the completion time of the previous process plus the establishment of the transport time is greater than or equal to +.>
Figure SMS_138
4) Adjacent runner start machining time constraints, comprising: two adjacent casting times on the same continuous casting machine, the starting processing time of the next casting time is more than or equal to the finishing time plus the preparation time of the previous casting time, and the expression is as follows:
Figure SMS_139
(equation 7)
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure SMS_141
representing the and the casting times on the same continuous casting machine>
Figure SMS_144
The start processing time of the next casting run,
Figure SMS_146
representing the watering time->
Figure SMS_142
The sum of the completion time of the adjacent casting runs and the preparation time of the adjacent casting runs. Equation 7 shows the distribution function set +.>
Figure SMS_143
Lower, casting times on the same continuous casting machine>
Figure SMS_145
The processing time of the direct subsequent casting time is greater than or equal to +.>
Figure SMS_147
The probability of establishment of the sum of the completion time of (2) and the preparation time of the adjacent casting times is equal to or greater than +.>
Figure SMS_140
5) A heat start processing time constraint comprising: in addition to the continuous casting machine, two adjacent heats on the same machine, the start processing time of the subsequent heat needs to be greater than or equal to the completion time of the previous heat. That is, two heats that are processed on the same machine, the next heat must be processed after the last heat is completed, and the expression is as follows:
Figure SMS_148
(equation 8)
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure SMS_150
representing the heat +.>
Figure SMS_153
Is in machine +.>
Figure SMS_157
Start processing time,/->
Figure SMS_151
Representing the heat +.>
Figure SMS_156
In the machine->
Figure SMS_161
Start processing time,/->
Figure SMS_163
Expressed in machine->
Figure SMS_149
Top heat +.>
Figure SMS_154
And the start-up time of the immediately subsequent heat. Equation 8 shows the distribution function set +.>
Figure SMS_159
In the following, in addition to the continuous casting machine, in the machine +.>
Figure SMS_162
Top heat +.>
Figure SMS_152
The difference between the start processing time of the immediately subsequent heat is greater than or equal to heat +.>
Figure SMS_155
In the machine->
Figure SMS_158
The probability of establishment of the processing time is equal to or greater than +.>
Figure SMS_160
6) The processing time constraint of the adjacent working procedures of the same furnace number comprises the following steps: in two adjacent processes in the same furnace, the starting processing time of the next process is more than or equal to the finishing time plus the transportation time of the last process. That is, for two processes of the same heat, the latter process can be started only when the former process is completed and the heat is transported to the next process, and the expression is as follows:
Figure SMS_164
(equation 9)
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure SMS_166
representing the heat +.>
Figure SMS_170
In the machine->
Figure SMS_172
Starting processing time for starting on the machine immediately following, +.>
Figure SMS_167
Representing slave machine->
Figure SMS_168
To the transport time of the directly subsequent machine. Equation 9 shows the distribution function set +. >
Figure SMS_173
Lower, except for the continuous casting machine, the heat is +.>
Figure SMS_174
In the machine->
Figure SMS_165
The difference between the start processing time and the start processing time of the directly subsequent machine is greater than or equal to the heat>
Figure SMS_169
In the machine->
Figure SMS_171
The probability of establishment of the processing time plus the transport time is equal to or greater than->
Figure SMS_175
In this embodiment, in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model of the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem, the above-mentioned 5-class scheduling scheme feasibility joint opportunity constraint (namely, the heat continuity constraint, the single-casting start processing time constraint, the adjacent-casting start processing time constraint, the heat start processing time constraint, and the same heat adjacent-process start processing time constraint) may be expressed as a general form, as shown in formula 10. When (when)
Figure SMS_176
When the model is called distributed robust associationThe joint opportunity constraint, unlike the distributed robust independent opportunity constraint model, requires that multiple constraints hold at the same time with a certain probability.
Figure SMS_177
(equation 10)
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure SMS_180
and->
Figure SMS_183
Indicating an indeterminate heat treatment time +.>
Figure SMS_185
Uncertainty constraint parameters of influence, +.>
Figure SMS_179
Indicating the steelmaking continuous casting schedule, i.e. the start-up times of all heats and runs,/->
Figure SMS_182
. Equation 10 ensures that all constraints are +. >
Figure SMS_184
Is true. In the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, the furnace processing time is indeterminate +.>
Figure SMS_188
Is unknown, so in order to ensure the robustness of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, for a certain steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme +.>
Figure SMS_178
All constraints need to be met with a certain probability in the worst case. Hypothesis parameter->
Figure SMS_181
And->
Figure SMS_186
About indeterminate heat treatment time +.>
Figure SMS_187
Can be expressed in the following linear form:
Figure SMS_189
(equation 11)
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure SMS_190
is a random vector of length L, and the set of distribution functions is defined as follows:
Figure SMS_191
wherein, support set->
Figure SMS_192
In the form of polyhedron->
Figure SMS_193
And->
Figure SMS_194
The first and second moments are the uncertain heat treatment time, respectively. For the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint as shown in equation 10, it can be rewritten as follows:
Figure SMS_195
(equation 12)
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure SMS_196
in this embodiment, the processing time of the heat is considered as a random variable within a certain distribution set. The common steelmaking continuous casting model is modified based on the method, so that the steelmaking continuous casting model is more reasonable, and a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is provided to determine the start processing time of each casting time and each furnace time in the steelmaking continuous casting process. And the support set in the polyhedral form is introduced into the distribution function set based on the accurate moment information, so that the modeling of the robust joint opportunity constraint model under the distribution function set is given for the first time. So that the obtained distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is more in line with the actual situation of the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem.
Step S102: and taking correlation among constraint conditions into consideration, and converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation according to CVaR approximation and a dual theory.
In this embodiment, in the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem, random variables between different constraints are not completely independent of each other, and omitting the correlation between the constraints in this case often results in performance loss of the final result. Therefore, for the case of independence, a transformation method of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR (Conditional Value at Risk, conditional risk value) approximation and dual theory is provided. Specifically, converting an objective function in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a general representation form; and converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint approximation in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a semi-positive constraint through CVaR approximation and a dual theory.
Specifically, the method for converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint approximation in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into the semi-positive constraint by CVaR approximation and the dual theory comprises the following steps of:
1) The transformation method of CVaR approximation is adopted.
For any arbitrary, using CVaR approximation method
Figure SMS_197
And a given constraint factor vector->
Figure SMS_198
If->
Figure SMS_199
Is a feasible solution of the constraint as shown in formulas 13-16, then +.>
Figure SMS_200
And is also a viable solution to the constraint shown in equation 12.
Figure SMS_201
(equation 13)
Figure SMS_202
(equation 14)
Figure SMS_203
(equation 15)
Figure SMS_204
(equation 16)
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure SMS_205
、/>
Figure SMS_206
、/>
Figure SMS_207
intermediate variables, which are all approximate transformations of CVaR, < >>
Figure SMS_208
,/>
Figure SMS_209
And->
Figure SMS_210
The first and second moments are the uncertain heat treatment time, respectively.
2) The transformation method of dual approximation is adopted.
The present embodiment considers the support set for indefinite processing times as polyhedral, i.e
Figure SMS_211
Then a dual approximation method may be used to give an approximation constraint for the constraint shown in equations 13-16 after the CVaR approximation transformation.
Assume that
Figure SMS_214
Is +.>
Figure SMS_217
For any given +.>
Figure SMS_222
If present->
Figure SMS_213
,/>
Figure SMS_218
,/>
Figure SMS_220
,/>
Figure SMS_224
,/>
Figure SMS_215
,/>
Figure SMS_216
,/>
Figure SMS_221
,/>
Figure SMS_225
,/>
Figure SMS_212
,/>
Figure SMS_219
,/>
Figure SMS_223
,/>
Figure SMS_226
The constraints shown in the following formulas 17 to 25 are satisfied:
Figure SMS_227
(equation 17)
Figure SMS_228
(equation 18)
Figure SMS_229
(equation 19)
Figure SMS_230
(equation 20)
Figure SMS_231
(equation 21)
Figure SMS_232
(equation 22)
Figure SMS_233
(equation 23)
Figure SMS_234
(equation 24)
Figure SMS_235
(equation 25)
Then
Figure SMS_236
Is a viable solution to the constraints shown in equations 13-16.
From this, it can be derived that: when the heat processing time is not determined
Figure SMS_237
When the support set of (a) is a cube,
Figure SMS_238
Expressing the objective function shown in equation 1 as a general expression shown in equation 26, the constraint shown in equation 12 can be approximated to be translated into the constraint shown in equations 27-35, and then the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation is expressed as:
Figure SMS_239
(equation 26)
Figure SMS_240
(equation 27)
Figure SMS_241
(equation 28)
Figure SMS_242
(equation 29)
Figure SMS_243
(equation 30)
Figure SMS_244
(equation 31)
Figure SMS_245
(formula 32)
Figure SMS_246
(equation 33)
Figure SMS_247
(equation 34)
Figure SMS_248
(equation 35)
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure SMS_265
representing the functional relation between the start processing time and the uncertain processing time of each casting and furnace time,/->
Figure SMS_269
Representation->
Figure SMS_274
In uncertain distribution->
Figure SMS_249
Total flow-through time,/>
Figure SMS_254
Representing distribution(s)>
Figure SMS_257
Representing the distribution function set to which the uncertain process time belongs, < ->
Figure SMS_261
Representing the upper limit function>
Figure SMS_252
Representing a minimum function,/->
Figure SMS_256
Indicating the steelmaking continuous casting schedule, i.e. the start-up times of all heats and runs,/->
Figure SMS_259
Representing an uncertain process time random vector, +.>
Figure SMS_263
Belongs to a supported set->
Figure SMS_266
Mean vector->
Figure SMS_270
And covariance matrix->
Figure SMS_272
The determined distribution function set:
Figure SMS_275
the support set is a cube: />
Figure SMS_264
,/>
Figure SMS_268
And->
Figure SMS_273
Respectively indicate->
Figure SMS_277
Upper and lower bounds of>
Figure SMS_250
For a given constraint factor vector, +.>
Figure SMS_255
,/>
Figure SMS_258
,/>
Figure SMS_260
,/>
Figure SMS_251
,/>
Figure SMS_253
,/>
Figure SMS_262
,/>
Figure SMS_267
,/>
Figure SMS_271
,/>
Figure SMS_276
,/>
Figure SMS_278
To approximately translate the intermediate variables.
In summary, we present the constraint factor vector
Figure SMS_279
The approximation of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is converted into a semi-positive constraint method under the condition of fixed value.
In the embodiment, considering that random variables among different constraints are not completely independent of each other in the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem, under the condition that the constraints have correlation, a more general transformation method of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is provided based on CVaR approximation and a dual theory, and the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation is obtained, so that a solving result is more in line with the actual production scheduling problem.
Step S103: based on an iterative lifting solving algorithm, solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation to obtain a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme, wherein the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme comprises: all heats and start-up times for the runs.
In the embodiment, the constraints of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model of the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem are related to each other, so that the model constraint is converted into the semi-positive constraint by adopting CVaR approximation and a dual theory. Due to the differences
Figure SMS_280
The value of (2) can also be obtained by different steelmaking continuous casting scheduling schemes>
Figure SMS_281
Directly and simultaneously->
Figure SMS_282
And->
Figure SMS_283
Optimization then causes the constraints to become non-convex, making the problem difficult to solve.
Therefore, the embodiment designs an iterative lifting solution algorithm to continuously pair
Figure SMS_285
Is improved to give a +.>
Figure SMS_289
. The iterative lifting solution algorithm is fixed +.>
Figure SMS_293
To approximate the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint into a semi-normal constraint to solve, and then to perform the optimization according to the obtained optimal solution>
Figure SMS_286
And the value of (2) is updated so that the objective function can be continuously reduced along with the iterative process. Specifically, note- >
Figure SMS_287
To give +.>
Figure SMS_290
The constraint shown in the formulas 27-35 is satisfied under the value +.>
Figure SMS_292
Is>
Figure SMS_284
To give +.>
Figure SMS_288
The constraint shown in the formulas 27-35 is satisfied under the value +.>
Figure SMS_291
Is a feasible region of (2).
In the first place
Figure SMS_297
In the course of the multiple iterations, inGiven->
Figure SMS_301
The optimal solution is obtained by the lower optimal scheduling scheme>
Figure SMS_304
. Next, fix +.>
Figure SMS_295
In the following
Figure SMS_302
Is to find a new +.>
Figure SMS_306
As a next iteration +.>
Figure SMS_307
. In this way, the loop is continued until the termination condition is satisfied. Note that due to->
Figure SMS_296
To open the set, to ensure that a feasible solution can be taken, the closed set +.>
Figure SMS_298
As->
Figure SMS_300
Of (1), wherein->
Figure SMS_303
,/>
Figure SMS_294
For a small number, choose +.>
Figure SMS_299
. Therefore, in each iteration process, the method is from +.>
Figure SMS_305
A new feasible solution is selected.
Specifically, the solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on the CVaR approximation based on the iterative lifting solving algorithm includes:
generating a plurality of constraint factor vectors in advance;
solving an optimal solution and an optimal value of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation according to the value of the constraint factor vector aiming at each constraint factor vector;
updating the value of the constraint factor vector according to the optimal solution and the optimal value, and solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation with the updated value of the constraint factor vector to obtain a new optimal solution and an optimal value;
And after the iteration ending condition is met, obtaining an optimal solution and an optimal value corresponding to the constraint factor vector, and selecting a final optimal solution and an optimal value from the optimal solutions and the optimal values corresponding to the constraint factor vectors.
Wherein, the optimal solution obtained by each iteration represents the processing starting time of all furnace times and casting times, and the optimal value represents the total flowing time.
In this embodiment, in order to avoid the algorithm iteration process from sinking into local minima, a plurality of constraint factor vectors are selected, and each constraint factor vector is iteratively solved. And stopping the iterative calculation of the current constraint factor vector after the algorithm execution meets the iteration ending condition, wherein the iteration ending condition comprises the following steps: the algorithm iteration number reaches the maximum iteration number upper limit, the number of times that the improvement of the objective function value in the iteration process is smaller than the fixed threshold value in the continuous iteration process reaches the maximum continuous number upper limit, and the constraint factor vector values obtained in the two adjacent iteration processes are the same.
Illustratively, as shown in fig. 3, the complete flow of the iterative lifting solution algorithm includes steps S1 to S11:
step S1: inputting parameters: given parameters in a distribution function set of uncertain process times, including a support set
Figure SMS_308
Mean vector- >
Figure SMS_309
And covariance matrix->
Figure SMS_310
The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Given a fixed threshold +.>
Figure SMS_311
Maximum iteration number upper limit->
Figure SMS_312
And a maximum number of consecutive times upper limit
Figure SMS_313
Step S2: initializing: to avoid the algorithm iteration process being trapped in local minima, generateKInitial constraint factor vector
Figure SMS_314
,/>
Figure SMS_315
Wherein, the method comprises the steps of, wherein,Kis a positive integer;
step S3: let constraint factor vector
Figure SMS_316
Initial optimum->
Figure SMS_317
,/>
Figure SMS_318
Continuous times->
Figure SMS_319
Wherein->
Figure SMS_320
Is a sufficiently large number;
step S4: if it is
Figure SMS_321
Continuing to execute step S5, otherwise jumping to stepS9, performing step S9;
step S5: first, theiIn the course of the multiple iterations, according to a given
Figure SMS_322
Value, solving the transformed semi-normal constraint problem to obtain the optimal value of the problem +.>
Figure SMS_323
And optimal solution->
Figure SMS_324
If->
Figure SMS_325
Then->
Figure SMS_326
Otherwise let->
Figure SMS_327
Step S6: fixing
Figure SMS_328
Take the value, look for belonging to the set +.>
Figure SMS_329
And makes the semi-positive constraint shown in formulas 27-35 feasible +.>
Figure SMS_330
Step S7: if it is
Figure SMS_331
Step S9 is skipped, otherwise step S8 is continuously executed;
step S8: if it is
Figure SMS_332
Jump to step S9, otherwise let +.>
Figure SMS_333
Jumping to step S4;
step S9:recording constraint factor vectors
Figure SMS_334
Corresponding optimum value->
Figure SMS_335
And optimal solution->
Figure SMS_336
Step S10: if it is
Figure SMS_337
Let->
Figure SMS_338
And jumping to the step S3, otherwise continuing to execute the step S11;
step S11: output parameters:
Figure SMS_339
optimal value +. >
Figure SMS_340
And its corresponding optimal solution->
Figure SMS_341
For the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint problem of steelmaking continuous casting scheduling, if the optimal value of the problem is bounded, for the iterative lifting solution algorithm, if the problem is initially
Figure SMS_342
If feasible, the algorithm is a falling algorithm and ends in a finite step, i.e. there is always +.>
Figure SMS_343
Wherein->
Figure SMS_344
Indicate->
Figure SMS_345
Multiple iteration processAnd the algorithm terminates after a finite step and returns to the upper bound of the problem.
In the embodiment, with the shortest total flow time as an optimization target and the furnace processing time as a random variable, a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model of a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem is constructed, correlation among constraint conditions is considered, the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is converted into a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation according to CVaR approximation and a dual theory, the obtained deterministic optimization problem is not convex, an iterative lifting solving algorithm is designed, and the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on the CVaR approximation is solved, so that the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme is obtained. Because the uncertainty of the furnace processing time is considered in the embodiment, the obtained steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme is more in line with the actual situation, the casting interruption phenomenon in the steelmaking continuous casting process can be greatly reduced, and the stability of the production process is improved.
In an alternative embodiment, if each constraint in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint satisfies the independence assumption and the probability of being satisfied is known, the constraint is equivalent to a plurality of distributed robust independent joint opportunity constraints, so the method of solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraints independent of each other in the constraint in the embodiment is to approximately convert the distributed robust independent opportunity constraints to solve the distributed robust independent opportunity constraints.
Specifically, when the constraints in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model are independent of each other, the method further includes step S401 and step S402:
step S401: and aiming at the condition that the constraint conditions are mutually independent, converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on an independence assumption.
Specifically, converting an objective function in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a general representation form; and (3) converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a distributed robust independent opportunity constraint by giving the establishment probability of each constraint condition.
The method for converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into the distributed robust independent opportunity constraint by giving the establishment probability of each constraint condition comprises the following steps:
1) Giving an independence assumption.
For the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint, i.e., any of the constraints shown in equation 10
Figure SMS_346
Random vector
Figure SMS_347
And->
Figure SMS_348
Are independent of each other. The random vectors in many production scheduling model constraints conform to the assumptions described above, such as a hybrid flow shop scheduling problem.
2) And (3) providing a transformation method of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model with independent constraints.
Under the condition that the independence assumption is satisfied, the probability that each constraint is satisfied in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint shown in the formula 12 is also independent, so the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint can be written as follows:
Figure SMS_349
(equation 36)
Thus, the feasible domains corresponding to the following two constraints are equivalent, namely:
Figure SMS_350
(equation 37)
The equivalent relationship between the independence assumption and the above formula 37 is given in the present embodiment
Figure SMS_351
In the fixed case, the multiple distributed robust independent opportunity constraints are equivalent to the distributed robust joint opportunity constraints. Namely:
Figure SMS_352
(equation 38)
Obviously, probability distribution vectors
Figure SMS_353
The change of the value can lead to the change of a feasible domain, so that the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model can be equivalently converted into the following method for searching the optimal probability distribution +. >
Figure SMS_354
Corresponding optimal solution->
Figure SMS_355
Is a problem of (a). The distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on the independence assumption is expressed as:
Figure SMS_356
(equation 39)
Figure SMS_357
(equation 40)/(>
Figure SMS_358
(formula 41)
Figure SMS_359
(equation 42)
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure SMS_369
indicating the start-up time of each heat and cast,/-for each heat>
Figure SMS_362
Representation->
Figure SMS_367
Is (are) feasible domain->
Figure SMS_361
Representing an uncertain heat processing time random vector, < ->
Figure SMS_364
Support set of->
Figure SMS_368
,/>
Figure SMS_370
And->
Figure SMS_374
Respectively indicate->
Figure SMS_378
Upper and lower bounds of>
Figure SMS_363
Representing the functional relation between the start processing time and the uncertain processing time of each casting and furnace time,/->
Figure SMS_366
Representation->
Figure SMS_373
In uncertain distribution->
Figure SMS_375
Total flow-through time,/>
Figure SMS_376
Representing distribution(s)>
Figure SMS_379
Representing the distribution function set to which the uncertain process time belongs, < ->
Figure SMS_365
Representing the upper limit function>
Figure SMS_372
Representing a minimum function,/->
Figure SMS_371
Expressed in uncertain distribution->
Figure SMS_377
Lower probability limit for the establishment of lower events +.>
Figure SMS_360
Representing the probability distribution factor.
Step S402: and solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on the independence assumption based on the iterative lifting solving algorithm to obtain a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme under the constraint independent condition.
In this embodiment, the constraint of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on the independence assumption is non-convex, and it is difficult to directly solve. Note that for the constraint shown in equation 40, if the probability distribution vector is fixed
Figure SMS_380
The constraint can be equivalently converted into +.>
Figure SMS_381
The distributed robust independent opportunity constraint can be converted into a linear programming problem of conservative approximation by using a linear programming approximation method, and then the problem is solved by adopting a traditional mode. Therefore, the present embodiment is implemented by continuously updating +.>
Figure SMS_382
And the values of the (4) are fixed, and the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on the independence assumption is converted into a distributed robust independent opportunity constraint model.
Specifically, the solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on the independence assumption based on the iterative lifting solving algorithm includes:
generating a plurality of probability distribution vectors in advance;
aiming at each probability distribution vector, carrying out approximate transformation on the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on the independence assumption according to the value of the probability distribution vector, and obtaining the optimal solution and the optimal value of the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem through solving;
calculating the maximum probability and corresponding parameters which can be established under the optimal solution, updating the value of the probability distribution vector according to the parameters, and continuously calculating a new optimal solution and an optimal value by using the updated probability distribution vector;
And after the iteration ending condition is met, obtaining an optimal solution and an optimal value corresponding to the probability distribution vector, and selecting a final optimal solution and an optimal value from the optimal solutions and the optimal values corresponding to the probability distribution vectors.
In this embodiment, in order to avoid the algorithm iteration process from sinking into local minima, a plurality of probability distribution vectors are selected, and each probability distribution vector is subjected to iterative solution. And stopping the iterative calculation of the current probability distribution vector after the algorithm execution meets the iteration ending condition, wherein the iteration ending condition comprises the following steps: the algorithm iteration times reach the maximum iteration times upper limit, and the times of the improvement of the objective function value in the continuous iteration process, which is smaller than the fixed threshold value, reach the maximum continuous times upper limit.
Illustratively, as shown in fig. 4, the complete flow of the iterative lifting solution algorithm includes steps C1 to C10:
step C1: inputting parameters: given parameters in a distribution function set of uncertain process times, including a support set
Figure SMS_383
Mean vector->
Figure SMS_384
And covariance matrix->
Figure SMS_385
The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the Given a fixed threshold +.>
Figure SMS_386
Maximum iteration number upper limit->
Figure SMS_387
And a maximum number of consecutive times upper limit
Figure SMS_388
Step C2: initializing: to avoid the algorithm iteration process being trapped in local minima, generate KIndividual probability distribution vectors
Figure SMS_389
,/>
Figure SMS_390
Wherein, the method comprises the steps of, wherein,Kis a positive integer;
step C3: let probability distribution vector
Figure SMS_391
Initial optimum->
Figure SMS_392
,/>
Figure SMS_393
Continuous times->
Figure SMS_394
Wherein->
Figure SMS_395
Is a sufficiently large number;
step C4: if it is
Figure SMS_396
Continuing to execute the step C5, otherwise jumping to the step C8;
step C5: first, theiIn the course of the multiple iterations, according to a given
Figure SMS_397
The values, approximate transformation is performed on the distributed robust independent opportunity constraint in the formula 40, and the optimal value of the problem is obtained through solving>
Figure SMS_398
And optimal solution->
Figure SMS_399
If->
Figure SMS_400
Then->
Figure SMS_401
Otherwise let->
Figure SMS_402
Step C6:
Figure SMS_403
take the value to get each constraint in equation 40 at the current solution +.>
Figure SMS_404
Maximum probability that the following can be true and the corresponding parameter +.>
Figure SMS_405
Thereby calculating +.>
Figure SMS_406
The value of (i.e.)>
Figure SMS_407
Wherein->
Figure SMS_408
Is an adjustment function;
step C7: if it is
Figure SMS_409
Jump to step C8, otherwise let +.>
Figure SMS_410
Jumping to the step C4;
step C8: recording probability distribution vectors
Figure SMS_411
Corresponding optimum value->
Figure SMS_412
And optimal solution->
Figure SMS_413
Step C9: if it is
Figure SMS_414
Let->
Figure SMS_415
And jumping to the step C3, otherwise continuing to execute the step C10;
step C10: output parameters
Figure SMS_416
Optimal value +.>
Figure SMS_417
And its corresponding optimal solution->
Figure SMS_418
In the implementation, aiming at the situation that the constraints are mutually independent, the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint is converted into the distributed robust independent opportunity constraint by giving the establishment probability of each constraint. Furthermore, the method provided by the implementation can be applied to an application scene of an independent constraint problem, such as a mixed flow shop scheduling problem.
In an embodiment of the invention, the processing time of the heat is considered as a random variable within a certain distribution set. The common steelmaking continuous casting model is modified based on the method, so that the steelmaking continuous casting model is more reasonable, and a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is provided for determining the start processing time of each casting time and each furnace time in the steelmaking continuous casting process. And a supporting set in a polyhedral form is introduced into a distribution function set based on accurate moment information, and a modeling and conversion method of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model under the distribution function set is provided for the first time. In addition, under the condition that each constraint has an independence assumption, a transformation method of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is provided; under the condition that the constraints have correlation, a more general transformation method of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is given based on CVaR approximation and dual theory. According to two different conditions of independent relation and correlation between constraint conditions, different iteration lifting methods are designed for solving.
It should be noted that, the technical solutions in the above embodiments may also be applied to various production scheduling scenarios where other constraint conditions are associated and independent, and the technical solutions in the above embodiments may be implemented by programming.
For example, a certain steel company in China is selected as a practical case, and the effect analysis of the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model provided by the implementation of the invention is as follows:
the embodiment is a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem with uncertain processing time, and the performance index is selected as the total flow time and the casting interruption condition. According to actual production conditions and the requirement of simplifying the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, only three main stages, namely steelmaking, refining and continuous casting, are considered in the model; assuming that all heats follow the same process, namely steelmaking, refining and continuous casting; since the order of the heats must be consistent with the downstream process order, it is assumed that the particular machine, the order of the casts, and the heats on each caster are determined. According to actual production data, determining all parameters required by a model, establishing a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model as shown in formulas 1-10, considering the inter-constraint relation, converting the joint opportunity constraint in the model into a semi-positive constraint through CVaR approximation and dual theory methods one by one as shown in formulas 4-9, and finally obtaining an approximate optimal scheduling scheme through an iterative lifting solution algorithm as shown in formulas 27-35.
Experiments are carried out based on two months of actual production data of certain steel company in China, and 5200 effective production records are shared, wherein each record contains information such as furnace number, processing route, steel grade, processing time of each stage and the like. These records are used to estimate the mean and variance of the processing time. Because the production records of some special steels are few, the exact cutting of the estimated heat processing time is very difficult in the actual production process, so the method is suitable for adopting a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model to formulate a daily scheduling schedule and determining the starting processing time of each heat.
In this embodiment, one of all possible processing times of a certain heat is randomly selected as the actual processing time, and then the production is performed according to a given schedule, and if the heat is not started on time, all subsequent processes need to be delayed, resulting in a cut-off. Repeating the above process until all the furnace times are completed, and completing the steelmaking continuous casting production process. In this example, the above experiment was repeated 10 times, and the average total flow-through time and the average number of times of casting off were taken as evaluation indexes of the final model. The actual production system consists of three converters, three refining furnaces and three continuous casting machines, and the processing time of one furnace on three machines in the same stage is the same. And (3) assuming that all machining time are mutually independent, determining the starting machining time of the heat given by the machining position and the machining sequence of the heat, and obtaining a heat scheduling time table, so as to compare the total flow time and the casting interruption times of a robust scheduling scheme and a deterministic scheduling scheme, wherein the deterministic scheduling scheme is obtained by solving a deterministic model which is required to be established by each constraint. The results are shown in tables 1 and 2.
Table 1 deterministic model and distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model
At different positions
Figure SMS_419
Performance comparison under value (Heat collection 1)
Figure SMS_420
Table 2 deterministic model and distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model
At different positions
Figure SMS_421
Performance comparison under value (Heat set 2)/(Fu)>
Figure SMS_422
Tables 1 and 2 respectively show deterministic models
Figure SMS_423
And distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model +.>
Figure SMS_424
Different +.>
Figure SMS_425
Performance of the values. It can be seen from tables 1 and 2 that the average total flow time of the robust scheduling scheme follows +.>
Figure SMS_426
The decrease in value increases and the incidence of interruption of the casting time is increased with + ->
Figure SMS_427
The decrease in value decreases, which indicates that an improvement in the robustness of the scheduling scheme requires a loss of other production performance. The robust scheduling scheme sacrifices a small amount of production performance (i.e., increases the total throughput time) in exchange for a substantial increase in robustness compared to the deterministic scheduling scheme. Deterministic scheduling schemes will lead on average to about 4 break-gate situations, whereas for robust schemes, when +.>
Figure SMS_428
The number of time-to-break casting has been reduced to an average of 0.04 times, with an average total flow-through time of only about 12% increase. It should be noted that other additional costs caused by the outage problem are not taken into account, where the production performance penalty only accounts for the increase in total flow-through time. The robust joint opportunity constraint model trades for stability and continuity of the production process by sacrificing a small number of production performance metrics to some extent. In actual production, the cost reduction due to the increase in production stability tends to be more significant than the performance loss portion of the robust joint opportunity constraint model. Thus, in an uncertain production environment, a robust joint opportunity constraint model is a better choice than a deterministic model.
In summary, the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model can reduce the casting breaking times in the steelmaking continuous casting production process, does not bring great performance loss, and can achieve better trade-off between production performance and production stability. Therefore, the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model can effectively improve the stability of the production process and simultaneously maintain the production efficiency.
The embodiment of the invention also provides a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling device of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, as shown in fig. 5, fig. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling device of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, and the device comprises:
the model building module 51 is used for building a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model of steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem by taking the shortest total flow time as an optimization target and the furnace processing time as a random variable;
the model conversion module 52 is configured to convert the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation according to CVaR approximation and a dual theory, taking into consideration correlation between constraint conditions;
The problem solving module 53 is configured to solve the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation based on an iterative lifting solving algorithm, to obtain a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme, where the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme includes: all heats and start-up times for the runs.
In an alternative embodiment, the apparatus further comprises:
the second model conversion module is used for converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on an independence assumption aiming at the condition that the constraint conditions are mutually independent;
and the second problem solving module is used for solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on the independence assumption based on the iterative lifting solving algorithm to obtain a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme under the constraint independent condition.
In an alternative embodiment, the model building module includes:
the parameter determining module is used for determining parameters and decision variables of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model;
the uncertain parameter module is used for taking uncertain heat processing time as an uncertain parameter of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, wherein the uncertain parameter is not known in specific distribution but belongs to a distribution function set with a support set and known moment information;
The function determining module is used for determining an objective function of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, and the objective function takes the minimum total flow time as an optimization target;
a constraint determining module, configured to determine constraint conditions of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, where the constraint conditions include: the distribution set constraint to which the process time is subject and the feasibility constraint of the scheduling scheme are not determined.
In an alternative embodiment, the constraint determination module includes:
a first constraint determination sub-module for determining an uncertain process time constraint comprising: the uncertain processing time belongs to a distribution function set determined by a support set, a mean value vector and a covariance matrix;
a second constraint determination submodule for determining a heat continuity constraint, comprising: on the same continuous casting machine, when a certain heat finishes casting, the subsequent heat reaches the continuous casting machine and can start to process;
a third constraint determination sub-module for determining a single run start machining time constraint, comprising: the starting processing time of each casting time is more than or equal to the preparation time, and the starting processing time of each casting time is more than or equal to the completion time of the first furnace time of the casting time in the last working procedure plus the transportation time;
A fourth constraint determination submodule for determining adjacent casting start machining time constraints, including: two adjacent casting times on the same continuous casting machine, wherein the starting processing time of the next casting time is more than or equal to the finishing time plus the preparation time of the previous casting time;
a fifth constraint determination submodule for determining a heat start machining time constraint, including: in addition to the continuous casting machine, two adjacent heats on the same machine, and the starting processing time of the subsequent heat needs to be more than or equal to the finishing time of the previous heat;
a sixth constraint determination submodule for determining a start processing time constraint of adjacent processes in the same heat, including: in two adjacent processes in the same furnace, the starting processing time of the next process is more than or equal to the finishing time plus the transportation time of the last process.
In an alternative embodiment, the model transformation module includes:
a first function conversion module, configured to convert an objective function in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a general representation;
the first constraint conversion module is used for converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint approximation in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a semi-positive constraint through CVaR approximation and a dual theory.
In an alternative embodiment, the problem solving module includes:
the first parameter generation module is used for generating a plurality of constraint factor vectors in advance;
the first iterative calculation module is used for solving an optimal solution and an optimal value of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation according to the value of each constraint factor vector;
the first updating calculation module is used for updating the value of the constraint factor vector according to the optimal solution and the optimal value, and continuously solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation with the updated value of the constraint factor vector to obtain a new optimal solution and an optimal value;
and the first result output module is used for obtaining the optimal solution and the optimal value corresponding to the constraint factor vector after the iteration finishing condition is met, and selecting the final optimal solution and the optimal value from the optimal solution and the optimal value corresponding to the constraint factor vectors.
In an alternative embodiment, the second model transformation module includes:
the second function conversion module is used for converting the objective function in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a general representation form;
The second constraint conversion module is used for converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into the distributed robust independent opportunity constraint by giving the establishment probability of each constraint condition.
In an alternative embodiment, the problem solving module includes:
the second parameter generation module is used for generating a plurality of probability distribution vectors in advance;
the second iterative calculation module is used for carrying out approximate transformation on the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on the independence assumption according to the value of each probability distribution vector, and obtaining the optimal solution and the optimal value of the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem through solving;
the second updating calculation module is used for calculating the maximum probability and corresponding parameters which can be established under the optimal solution, updating the value of the probability distribution vector according to the parameters, and continuously calculating a new optimal solution and an optimal value by using the updated probability distribution vector;
and the second result output module is used for obtaining the optimal solution and the optimal value corresponding to the probability distribution vector after the iteration ending condition is met, and selecting the final optimal solution and the optimal value from the optimal solution and the optimal value corresponding to the probability distribution vectors.
In this specification, each embodiment is described in a progressive manner, and each embodiment is mainly described by differences from other embodiments, and identical and similar parts between the embodiments are all enough to be referred to each other.
Embodiments of the present invention are described with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods and apparatus according to embodiments of the invention. It will be understood that each flow and/or block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of flows and/or blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, embedded processor, or other programmable data processing terminal device to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing terminal device, create means for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the function specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
While preferred embodiments of the present invention have been described, additional variations and modifications in those embodiments may occur to those skilled in the art once they learn of the basic inventive concepts. It is therefore intended that the following claims be interpreted as including the preferred embodiment and all such alterations and modifications as fall within the scope of the embodiments of the invention.
Finally, it is further noted that relational terms such as first and second, and the like are used solely to distinguish one entity or action from another entity or action without necessarily requiring or implying any actual such relationship or order between such entities or actions. Moreover, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or terminal that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or terminal. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrase "comprising one … …" does not exclude the presence of other like elements in a process, method, article or terminal device comprising the element.
The invention provides a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method and device of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, and specific examples are applied to illustrate the principle and implementation mode of the invention, and the description of the examples is only used for helping to understand the method and core ideas of the invention; meanwhile, as those skilled in the art will have variations in the specific embodiments and application scope in accordance with the ideas of the present invention, the present description should not be construed as limiting the present invention in view of the above.

Claims (9)

1. A steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is characterized by comprising the following steps:
taking the shortest total flow time as an optimization target, taking the furnace processing time as a random variable, and constructing a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model for the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem;
considering the correlation between constraint conditions, and converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation according to CVaR approximation and a dual theory;
based on an iterative lifting solving algorithm, solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation to obtain a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme, wherein the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme comprises: starting processing time of all furnace times and casting times;
The objective function of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is expressed as:
Figure QLYQS_1
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_4
representing the upper limit function>
Figure QLYQS_8
Representing a minimum function,/->
Figure QLYQS_12
Indicating desire(s)>
Figure QLYQS_3
Representing the aggregate of all runs, +.>
Figure QLYQS_7
Represents all heat sets in the kth casting,/-for>
Figure QLYQS_10
Representing distribution(s)>
Figure QLYQS_15
Representing the distribution function set to which the uncertain process time belongs, < ->
Figure QLYQS_2
Continuous casting machine with a machining run k +.>
Figure QLYQS_6
Representing the heat on a continuous casting machine for processing the heat kiIn the order of (a),
Figure QLYQS_11
at the beginning of the first heat representing the run kBetween (I) and (II)>
Figure QLYQS_14
Representing the processing time of heat i on the continuous casting machine for processing heat k, +.>
Figure QLYQS_5
Representing the total processing time of all heats before the ith heat in the kth casting,/->
Figure QLYQS_9
Indicating the finishing time of the ith heat in the heat k,
Figure QLYQS_13
representing the sum of the finishing times of all heats in run k,/>
Figure QLYQS_16
Representing the sum of the finishing processing time of all furnace times in all casting times;
the uncertain heat processing time constraint of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is expressed as:
Figure QLYQS_17
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_18
representing an indefinite heat treatment time belonging to a supported set +.>
Figure QLYQS_19
Mean vector->
Figure QLYQS_20
And covariance matrix->
Figure QLYQS_21
The set of determined distribution functions, />
Figure QLYQS_22
Representing the mean;
the furnace continuity constraint of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model comprises: on the same caster, when a certain heat finishes casting, the subsequent heat has arrived at the caster and can start working, expressed as:
Figure QLYQS_23
Figure QLYQS_24
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_25
is a mathematical expression of opportunity constraint, and represents that the probability of event establishment is not lower than +.>
Figure QLYQS_28
Figure QLYQS_30
,/>
Figure QLYQS_27
Indicating the finishing time of the heat i immediately preceding the heat,/->
Figure QLYQS_29
Representing the start-up time of heat i on the direct-to-direct-succession machine of the continuous casting machine for processing heat k,/>
Figure QLYQS_31
Representing the processing time of heat i on the direct succession of the continuous casting machine for processing heat k, +.>
Figure QLYQS_32
Representing the furnace number i from processing castingThe transport time of the direct succession machine of the secondary k continuous casting machine to the continuous casting machine, +.>
Figure QLYQS_26
Representing the time of the heat i reaching the continuous casting machine;
the single casting start machining time constraint of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model comprises: the start processing time of each casting pass needs to be equal to or greater than the preparation time, expressed as:
Figure QLYQS_33
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_34
representing the preparation time of adjacent casting times;
the start processing time of each casting time is equal to or greater than the completion time of the last process of the first furnace time of the casting time plus the transportation time, expressed as:
Figure QLYQS_35
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_36
representing the first heat +.>
Figure QLYQS_37
Starting processing time on the direct succession of the continuous casting machine for processing the run k, +.>
Figure QLYQS_38
Representing the first heat +.>
Figure QLYQS_39
The processing time on the directly preceding machine of the continuous casting machine for processing run k,
Figure QLYQS_40
representing the first heat +.>
Figure QLYQS_41
The transit time from the directly preceding machine of the continuous casting machine for processing run k to the continuous casting machine,
Figure QLYQS_42
the completion time of the last process of the first heat of the casting k is added with the transportation time;
the adjacent casting start processing time constraint of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model comprises the following steps: two adjacent casting times on the same continuous casting machine, the starting processing time of the next casting time is more than or equal to the finishing time plus the preparation time of the previous casting time, and the method is expressed as follows:
Figure QLYQS_43
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_44
representing the start-up time of the next shot adjacent to shot k on the same caster,
Figure QLYQS_45
representing the sum of the completion time of a run k and the preparation time of an adjacent run;
the furnace start machining time constraint of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model comprises the following steps: in addition to the continuous casting machine, two adjacent heats on the same machine, the start processing time of the subsequent heat needs to be greater than or equal to the completion time of the previous heat, expressed as:
Figure QLYQS_46
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_47
representing the start-up time of the next heat of heat i on machine j, +.>
Figure QLYQS_48
Representing the processing time of heat i on machine j,/->
Figure QLYQS_49
Indicating the start-up time of heat i on machine j,/->
Figure QLYQS_50
Representing the difference between the start-up times of heat i and the immediately subsequent heat on machine j,/->
Figure QLYQS_51
A machine set representing all processing runs i;
the processing time constraint of the same heat adjacent procedure of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model comprises the following steps: in two adjacent processes in the same furnace, the starting processing time of the next process needs to be more than or equal to the finishing time plus the transportation time of the last process, and the process is expressed as follows:
Figure QLYQS_52
Figure QLYQS_53
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_54
indicating the start processing time of the beginning of heat i on the machine immediately following machine j, +.>
Figure QLYQS_55
Representing the transit time from machine j to the directly following machine.
2. The steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model of claim 1, further comprising:
aiming at the condition that the constraint conditions are mutually independent, converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on an independent hypothesis;
And solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on the independence assumption based on the iterative lifting solving algorithm to obtain a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme under the constraint independent condition.
3. The method for steelmaking continuous casting scheduling by using a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model according to claim 1, wherein the method for constructing the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model for steelmaking continuous casting scheduling by using the shortest total flow time as an optimization target and the heat processing time as a random variable comprises the following steps:
determining parameters and decision variables of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model;
the uncertain furnace processing time is taken as an uncertain parameter of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, the specific distribution of the uncertain parameter is unknown, but the uncertain parameter belongs to a distribution function set with a support set and known moment information;
determining an objective function of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, wherein the objective function takes minimum total flow time as an optimization target;
and determining constraint conditions of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, wherein the constraint conditions of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model are used for constraining the feasibility of a distribution set and a scheduling scheme obeyed by uncertain furnace processing time.
4. The steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model according to claim 3, wherein the constraint conditions of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model comprise:
uncertain heat processing time constraints, including: the specific distribution of the uncertain heat processing time is unknown, but the uncertain heat processing time belongs to a distribution function set determined by a support set, a mean value vector and a covariance matrix;
a heat continuity constraint comprising: on the same continuous casting machine, when casting is completed in a certain heat, the subsequent heat reaches the continuous casting machine and can start to process;
a single casting initiation processing time constraint comprising: the starting processing time of each casting time is more than or equal to the preparation time, and the starting processing time of each casting time is more than or equal to the completion time of the first furnace time of the casting time in the last working procedure plus the transportation time;
adjacent runner start machining time constraints, comprising: two adjacent casting times on the same continuous casting machine, wherein the starting processing time of the next casting time is more than or equal to the finishing time plus the preparation time of the previous casting time;
a heat start processing time constraint comprising: in addition to the continuous casting machine, two adjacent heats on the same machine, and the starting processing time of the subsequent heat needs to be more than or equal to the finishing time of the previous heat;
The processing time constraint of the adjacent working procedures of the same furnace number comprises the following steps: in two adjacent processes in the same furnace, the starting processing time of the next process is more than or equal to the finishing time plus the transportation time of the last process.
5. The steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model according to claim 1, wherein the converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation according to CVaR approximation and dual theory comprises:
converting an objective function in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a general representation form;
and converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint approximation in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a semi-positive constraint through CVaR approximation and a dual theory.
6. The steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model according to claim 1, wherein the solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation based on the iterative lifting solving algorithm comprises:
generating a plurality of constraint factor vectors in advance;
solving an optimal solution and an optimal value of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation according to the value of the constraint factor vector aiming at each constraint factor vector;
Updating the value of the constraint factor vector according to the optimal solution and the optimal value, and solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation with the updated value of the constraint factor vector to obtain a new optimal solution and an optimal value;
and after the iteration ending condition is met, obtaining an optimal solution and an optimal value corresponding to the constraint factor vector, and selecting a final optimal solution and an optimal value from the optimal solutions and the optimal values corresponding to the constraint factor vectors.
7. The steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model according to claim 2, wherein said converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on an independence assumption comprises:
converting an objective function in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a general representation form;
and (3) converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint in the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a distributed robust independent opportunity constraint by giving the establishment probability of each constraint condition.
8. The steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model according to claim 2, wherein the solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on the independence assumption based on the iterative lifting solving algorithm comprises:
Generating a plurality of probability distribution vectors in advance;
aiming at each probability distribution vector, carrying out approximate transformation on the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on the independence assumption according to the value of the probability distribution vector, and obtaining the optimal solution and the optimal value of the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem through solving;
calculating the maximum probability and corresponding parameters which can be established under the optimal solution, updating the value of the probability distribution vector according to the parameters, and continuously calculating a new optimal solution and an optimal value by using the updated probability distribution vector;
and after the iteration ending condition is met, obtaining an optimal solution and an optimal value corresponding to the probability distribution vector, and selecting a final optimal solution and an optimal value from the optimal solutions and the optimal values corresponding to the probability distribution vectors.
9. A steelmaking continuous casting scheduling apparatus of a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model, the apparatus comprising:
the model building module is used for building a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model for steelmaking continuous casting scheduling problem by taking the shortest total flow time as an optimization target and the furnace processing time as a random variable;
the model conversion module is used for converting the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model into a distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation according to the correlation between constraint conditions and the CVaR approximation and the dual theory;
The problem solving module is used for solving the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model based on CVaR approximation based on an iterative lifting solving algorithm to obtain a steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme, wherein the steelmaking continuous casting scheduling scheme comprises: starting processing time of all furnace times and casting times;
the objective function of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is expressed as:
Figure QLYQS_56
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_59
representing the upper limit function>
Figure QLYQS_61
Representing a minimum function,/->
Figure QLYQS_65
Indicating desire(s)>
Figure QLYQS_60
Representing the aggregate of all runs, +.>
Figure QLYQS_64
Represents all heat sets in the kth casting,/-for>
Figure QLYQS_68
Representing distribution(s)>
Figure QLYQS_71
Representing the distribution function set to which the uncertain process time belongs, < ->
Figure QLYQS_57
Continuous casting machine with a machining run k +.>
Figure QLYQS_62
The order of heat i on the continuous casting machine that processes heat k is shown,
Figure QLYQS_66
indicating the start-up time of the first heat of run k, < >>
Figure QLYQS_70
Representing the processing time of heat i on the continuous casting machine for processing heat k, +.>
Figure QLYQS_58
Representing the total processing time of all heats before the ith heat in the kth casting,/->
Figure QLYQS_63
Indicating the finishing time of the ith heat in the heat k,
Figure QLYQS_67
representing the sum of the finishing times of all heats in run k,/>
Figure QLYQS_69
Representing the sum of the finishing processing time of all furnace times in all casting times;
The uncertain heat processing time constraint of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model is expressed as:
Figure QLYQS_72
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_73
representing an indefinite heat treatment time belonging to a supported set +.>
Figure QLYQS_74
Mean vector->
Figure QLYQS_75
And covariance matrix->
Figure QLYQS_76
Defined set of distribution functions->
Figure QLYQS_77
Representing the mean;
the furnace continuity constraint of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model comprises: on the same caster, when a certain heat finishes casting, the subsequent heat has arrived at the caster and can start working, expressed as:
Figure QLYQS_78
Figure QLYQS_79
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_81
is a mathematical expression of opportunity constraint, and represents that the probability of event establishment is not lower than +.>
Figure QLYQS_84
Figure QLYQS_85
,/>
Figure QLYQS_82
Indicating the finishing time of the heat i immediately preceding the heat,/->
Figure QLYQS_83
Representing the start-up time of heat i on the direct-to-direct-succession machine of the continuous casting machine for processing heat k,/>
Figure QLYQS_86
Representing the processing time of heat i on the direct succession of the continuous casting machine for processing heat k, +.>
Figure QLYQS_87
Representing the transport time of heat i from the directly preceding machine of the continuous casting machine processing heat k to the continuous casting machine, +>
Figure QLYQS_80
Representing the time of the heat i reaching the continuous casting machine;
the single casting start machining time constraint of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model comprises: the start processing time of each casting pass needs to be equal to or greater than the preparation time, expressed as:
Figure QLYQS_88
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_89
representing the preparation time of adjacent casting times;
the start processing time of each casting time is equal to or greater than the completion time of the last process of the first furnace time of the casting time plus the transportation time, expressed as:
Figure QLYQS_90
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_91
representing the first heat +.>
Figure QLYQS_92
Starting processing time on the direct succession of the continuous casting machine for processing the run k, +.>
Figure QLYQS_93
Representing the first heat +.>
Figure QLYQS_94
The processing time on the directly preceding machine of the continuous casting machine for processing run k,
Figure QLYQS_95
representing the first heat +.>
Figure QLYQS_96
The transit time from the directly preceding machine of the continuous casting machine for processing run k to the continuous casting machine,
Figure QLYQS_97
the completion time of the last process of the first heat of the casting k is added with the transportation time;
the adjacent casting start processing time constraint of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model comprises the following steps: two adjacent casting times on the same continuous casting machine, the starting processing time of the next casting time is more than or equal to the finishing time plus the preparation time of the previous casting time, and the method is expressed as follows:
Figure QLYQS_98
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_99
representing the start-up time of the next shot adjacent to shot k on the same caster,
Figure QLYQS_100
representing the sum of the completion time of a run k and the preparation time of an adjacent run;
the furnace start machining time constraint of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model comprises the following steps: in addition to the continuous casting machine, two adjacent heats on the same machine, the start processing time of the subsequent heat needs to be greater than or equal to the completion time of the previous heat, expressed as:
Figure QLYQS_101
Wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_102
representing the next heat of heat i on machine jStart-up time of>
Figure QLYQS_103
Representing the processing time of heat i on machine j,/->
Figure QLYQS_104
Indicating the start-up time of heat i on machine j,/->
Figure QLYQS_105
Representing the difference between the start-up times of heat i and the immediately subsequent heat on machine j,/->
Figure QLYQS_106
A machine set representing all processing runs i;
the processing time constraint of the same heat adjacent procedure of the distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model comprises the following steps: in two adjacent processes in the same furnace, the starting processing time of the next process needs to be more than or equal to the finishing time plus the transportation time of the last process, and the process is expressed as follows:
Figure QLYQS_107
Figure QLYQS_108
wherein, the liquid crystal display device comprises a liquid crystal display device,
Figure QLYQS_109
indicating the start processing time of the beginning of heat i on the machine immediately following machine j, +.>
Figure QLYQS_110
Representing the transit time from machine j to the directly following machine.
CN202310371510.9A 2023-04-10 2023-04-10 Steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method and device of distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model Active CN116088457B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310371510.9A CN116088457B (en) 2023-04-10 2023-04-10 Steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method and device of distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202310371510.9A CN116088457B (en) 2023-04-10 2023-04-10 Steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method and device of distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN116088457A CN116088457A (en) 2023-05-09
CN116088457B true CN116088457B (en) 2023-06-27

Family

ID=86199441

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202310371510.9A Active CN116088457B (en) 2023-04-10 2023-04-10 Steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method and device of distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN116088457B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN116484655B (en) * 2023-06-21 2023-08-25 宁波力劲科技有限公司 Multi-objective optimization design method for die clamping mechanism of extrusion casting equipment

Family Cites Families (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN106651089B (en) * 2016-09-19 2020-09-11 清华大学 Modeling and optimization solving method for distribution set robust model of production scheduling problem
CN107544251B (en) * 2017-09-25 2020-05-08 清华大学 Single machine scheduling method for minimizing total stall period based on distributed robust model
CN109214709B (en) * 2018-10-11 2021-10-15 冶金自动化研究设计院 Method for optimizing distribution of oxygen generation system of iron and steel enterprise
CN109858780B (en) * 2019-01-14 2023-01-31 沈阳建筑大学 Steelmaking-continuous casting production scheduling optimization method
CN113075886B (en) * 2021-03-31 2022-08-05 清华大学 Steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method and device based on distributed robust opportunity constraint model

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
加工时间可可控控的炼钢调调度度问题两阶段模型及优化算法;谭园园;宋健海;刘士新;;控制理论与应用(06);全文 *
基于动态约束满足的考虑连铸机故障的炼钢连铸调度算法;王柏琳;李铁克;张春生;张文学;孙彬;;计算机集成制造系统(10);全文 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN116088457A (en) 2023-05-09

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN116088457B (en) Steelmaking continuous casting scheduling method and device of distributed robust joint opportunity constraint model
Cui et al. An improved Lagrangian relaxation approach to scheduling steelmaking-continuous casting process
Xu et al. Energy-efficient steelmaking-continuous casting scheduling problem with temperature constraints and its solution using a multi-objective hybrid genetic algorithm with local search
Rashid et al. Multi-rate modeling and economic model predictive control of the electric arc furnace
Cao et al. An efficient scheduling approach for an iron-steel plant equipped with self-generation equipment under time-of-use electricity tariffs
CN109858780B (en) Steelmaking-continuous casting production scheduling optimization method
Zhao et al. A two-stage scheduling method for hot rolling and its application
Lian et al. An energy-efficient hybrid flow shop scheduling problem in steelmaking plants
CN111401616B (en) Double-layer scheduling method for precast concrete component in supply chain environment
US11638952B2 (en) Steelmaking-and-continuous-casting dispatching method and apparatus based on distributed robust chance-constraint model
CN112884242B (en) Short-process steel enterprise demand response potential analysis method and system
CN111934359A (en) Equipment scheduling management method and system of comprehensive energy system
CN113762811B (en) Method and system for solving non-stalled Job Shop scheduling problem considering overtime
CN109902872B (en) Method and device for combining performance prediction model with product research and development
JP2012133633A (en) Production plan creation device
JP6904157B2 (en) Operation schedule creation method, equipment and programs
Lin et al. Genetic algorithm based on duality principle for bilevel programming problem in steel-making production
Yadollahpour et al. A comprehensive solution for continuous casting production planning and scheduling
JP5375318B2 (en) Method for adjusting concentration and temperature of molten metal component and method for producing steel
CN105242545B (en) A kind of Forecasting Methodology of the coverter pig oxygen flow based on process batch model
Sun et al. The scheduling of steel-making and continuous casting process using branch and cut method via CPLEX optimization
CN113869787A (en) Engineering project comprehensive management and control and evaluation method based on information system
JP6375741B2 (en) Control method of molten steel temperature in steelmaking factory
US20080172277A1 (en) Algorithmic framework for scheduling steelmaking production optimizing the flow of molten iron subject to inventory constraints
Wen et al. Knowledge-Driven Encoding and Decoding Schemes for Solving Energy-Constrained Steelmaking Continuous and Casting Scheduling Problems

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant