CN115941010A - IRS (intelligent resilient system) assisted de-cellular large-scale MIMO (multiple input multiple output) system beam forming method based on branch definition - Google Patents

IRS (intelligent resilient system) assisted de-cellular large-scale MIMO (multiple input multiple output) system beam forming method based on branch definition Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN115941010A
CN115941010A CN202211396158.6A CN202211396158A CN115941010A CN 115941010 A CN115941010 A CN 115941010A CN 202211396158 A CN202211396158 A CN 202211396158A CN 115941010 A CN115941010 A CN 115941010A
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
irs
theta
representing
beam forming
node
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Granted
Application number
CN202211396158.6A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN115941010B (en
Inventor
王同
李俊豪
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Shenzhen Graduate School Harbin Institute of Technology
Original Assignee
Shenzhen Graduate School Harbin Institute of Technology
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Shenzhen Graduate School Harbin Institute of Technology filed Critical Shenzhen Graduate School Harbin Institute of Technology
Priority to CN202211396158.6A priority Critical patent/CN115941010B/en
Publication of CN115941010A publication Critical patent/CN115941010A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN115941010B publication Critical patent/CN115941010B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02DCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
    • Y02D30/00Reducing energy consumption in communication networks
    • Y02D30/70Reducing energy consumption in communication networks in wireless communication networks

Landscapes

  • Radio Transmission System (AREA)

Abstract

The invention discloses an IRS assisted de-cellular large-scale MIMO system beam forming method based on branch definition, which is based on the WSR maximization problem of an IRS assisted CF-mMIMO system, considers the condition that the IRS phase is more practical discrete, and takes the constraint conditions of the maximum transmission power of an access point end and the feasible solution of the IRS phase as constraint conditions, and firstly decouples the original optimization problem into two sub-optimization problems through a Lagrange dual transformation algorithm: the access end active beam forming problem and the IRS end passive beam forming problem. For the passive beam forming problem of the IRS terminal, a passive beam forming algorithm based on branch definition is provided, and then the original non-convex optimization problem which is very challenging is solved by alternately optimizing two sub-problems. The passive beam forming algorithm based on branch definition provided by the invention is obviously superior to the MM beam forming algorithm in a low-quantization bit scene, and is more suitable for practical application scenes.

Description

IRS (intelligent resilient system) assisted de-cellular large-scale MIMO (multiple input multiple output) system beam forming method based on branch definition
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of wireless communication, and particularly relates to an IRS (intelligent resilient station) assisted de-cellular large-scale MIMO (multiple input multiple output) system beam forming method based on branch definition.
Background
A Cell Free large Multiple Input Multiple Output (CF-mimo) system introduces a network concept of "centering on users", so that users can be served by a large number of Access Points (APs) around, the problem of serious intercell interference in the conventional cellular network is solved, and the system becomes one of key technologies in the sixth Generation (6 g, six Generation) mobile communication. As the number of APs increases, a large amount of energy consumption and backhaul network overhead are inevitably brought, and the energy efficiency of the system is reduced. In order to solve the problem of large energy consumption caused by a large number of AP deployed in CF-mMIMO, an Intelligent Reflection Surface (IRS) is widely researched and applied as one of key technologies in 6G mobile communication. The IRS is different from the traditional amplifying and forwarding relay, does not have receiving and transmitting functions, and only has the function of reflecting incident signals, so that the energy consumption is less. The CF-mMIMO system assisted by the IRS can improve the energy efficiency of the system and reduce the energy consumption of the system on one hand; on the other hand, the coverage area of the system can be increased, and reliable communication is provided for users in a 'shadow area'.
In an IRS-assisted CF-mimo system, how to design the phase shift parameters of the IRS such that the objective function, i.e. WSR, is maximized is a key issue. Because the constraint conditions of the optimization problem to be solved contain non-convex Signal-to-Interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) expressions and unit modulus phase constraint expressions, the problem is difficult to obtain an optimal solution, and the complexity of the solution is high. Currently, the main beamforming method is, for example, semi-Definite Relaxation (SDR) beamforming, and by introducing additional variables, the method converts an original non-convex optimization problem into a Semi-Definite Programming (SDP) problem, and then can solve the problem by using a conventional convex optimization solver. Some beamforming methods are approximate solutions by constructing approximation subproblems of the original problem, such as an optimization-Minimization (MM) beamforming method, in each iteration, a substitute objective function satisfying KKT (Karush-Kuhn-Tucker) conditions is first constructed, so that an upper bound of the original optimization problem can be obtained, then solutions are performed on the subproblems, and finally algorithm convergence obtains a suboptimal solution of the original optimization problem.
In the traditional intelligent reflective surface assisted de-cellular massive MIMO system, much existing work is to obtain the maximum WSR gain, and when considering the IRS phase model, the phase is assumed to be continuous, that is, the IRS phase can be arbitrarily set within [0,2 pi ]. However, in actual hardware implementation, only discrete multi-bit phases can be achieved, and as the number of bits increases, the difficulty and cost of hardware implementation also increase, so that it is of great significance to consider a more practical intelligent reflective surface-assisted cellular massive MIMO system model.
To solve the non-convex WSR maximization optimization problem, there are two main methods at present: the first method is to obtain a convex problem by relaxing the original problem and then solve the convex problem by using a traditional convex optimization solver; and secondly, constructing an approximate subproblem, and constructing a subproblem meeting the KKT condition in each iteration of the algorithm, so that the subproblem is solved, and finally, convergence is carried out to obtain a suboptimal solution of the original optimization problem. However, the above beamforming method is only suitable for the case where the IRS phase is continuous, and even some studies consider the IRS phase dispersion, the case where the phase is relaxed to be continuous first, and then the above beamforming method is used to solve the problem. Therefore, the existing beamforming method cannot obtain the optimal solution when the IRS phase is discrete, and a globally optimal beamforming method needs to be designed.
Disclosure of Invention
Aiming at the problems, the invention provides an IRS-assisted de-cellular massive MIMO system beam forming method based on branch definition, in an IRS-assisted CF-mMIMO system, the WSR maximization optimization problem is solved by designing the beam forming method, a more practical IRS-assisted CF-mMIMO system model is considered, and particularly, the IRS phase is considered to be discrete rather than continuous. Aiming at a considered practical system model, firstly, a WSR (wireless sensor network) maximization optimization problem is provided, an objective function is WSR, constraint conditions are AP (access point) maximum transmission energy and IRS (infrared receiver station) phase constraint, and a globally optimal beam forming algorithm is provided to solve the non-convex WSR maximization optimization problem.
The invention provides an IRS-assisted de-cellular massive MIMO system beam forming method based on branch definition, which comprises the following steps:
constructing an IRS assisted de-cellular large-scale MIMO system model, wherein the model comprises M access points, K single-antenna users and R IRS, wherein the M access points are all provided with N antennas, and phase shift parameters of the IRS are set to be discrete and a desirable discrete set of phase shifts of all units of the IRS is obtained;
determining a WSR maximization problem P1 of an IRS assisted de-cellular large-scale MIMO system model, which specifically comprises the following steps:
taking the precoding matrixes of all access points and the phase shift matrixes of all IRSs as decision variables, taking WSR maximization as an optimization target, and limiting the sum of the absolute values of the precoding vectors from each access point to all users not to exceed the threshold of the absolute value of the precoding vector of the access point as a WSR maximization problem P1;
obtaining an optimization problem P2 by carrying out Lagrange dual conversion and quadratic conversion on the WSR maximization problem P1 in sequence;
solving a global optimal solution of an optimization problem P2 by a passive beam forming algorithm based on branch definition, wherein the passive beam forming algorithm based on branch definition specifically comprises the following steps:
building a search tree
Figure BDA0003933708010000021
For->
Figure BDA0003933708010000022
Solving the lower bound and the upper bound of each node in each node associated with the feasible discrete set, wherein the feasible discrete set represents a discrete value set which all IRS units can adopt in algorithm iteration;
in each iteration, selecting a father node, branching the father node into two child nodes according to a node branching rule, and respectively solving the lower bound and the upper bound of the two child nodes;
updating search trees using boundary update rules
Figure BDA00039337080100000314
When the difference between the upper bound and the lower bound is lower than the allowable error with the increase of the iteration number, the global optimal solution of the optimization problem P2 is obtained by solving.
Further, in the process of constructing the IRS-assisted de-cellular massive MIMO system model, the SINR of the kth user is determined according to the equivalent channel and the precoding vector from the access point to the kth user k The specific expression is as follows:
Figure BDA0003933708010000031
wherein, the first and the second end of the pipe are connected with each other,
Figure BDA0003933708010000032
representing the equivalent channels of the M access points to the k-th user,
Figure BDA0003933708010000033
representing the precoding vectors of the M access points to the k-th user,
Figure BDA0003933708010000034
representing the precoding vectors, σ, of the M access points to the ith user 2 Representing the variance of the noise distribution.
Further, the specific expression of the WSR maximization problem P1 is:
Figure BDA0003933708010000035
wherein the decision variables
Figure BDA0003933708010000036
Precoding matrix, decision variable representing all access points
Figure BDA0003933708010000037
A phase shift matrix representing all IRSs, <' >>
Figure BDA0003933708010000038
Weight, SINR, representing the kth user k Representing the signal-to-interference-and-noise ratio, w, of the kth user m,k Represents the precoding of the mth access point to the kth user, based on the measured values>
Figure BDA0003933708010000039
Representing a set of access points, theta r,u Represents the phase shift of the u-th unit of the r-th IRS>
Figure BDA00039337080100000310
Represents the IRS set, is selected>
Figure BDA00039337080100000311
Set of cells, p, representing IRS max Represents the maximum downlink transmission energy, <' > in each access point>
Figure BDA00039337080100000312
Denotes theta r,u A discrete set of preferences.
Further, the obtaining of the optimization problem P2 by sequentially performing lagrangian dual conversion and quadratic transformation on the WSR maximization problem P1 specifically includes:
p1 is decoupled into the following parts by a Lagrange dual conversion method:
Figure BDA00039337080100000313
wherein the objective function
Figure BDA0003933708010000041
γ=[γ 12 ,…,γ K ] T For an introduced K-dimensional auxiliary variable, <' >>
Figure BDA0003933708010000042
Represents an equivalent channel of M access points to the kth user, and->
Figure BDA0003933708010000043
Precoding vectors representing M access points to kth user, based on the precoding vector>
Figure BDA0003933708010000044
Representing precoding vectors of M access points to an ith user;
through secondary transformation, P1.1 is simplified to obtain
Figure BDA0003933708010000045
Wherein
Figure BDA0003933708010000046
ξ=[ξ 1 ,…,ξ K ] T
Figure BDA0003933708010000047
q i,k (Θ)=a i,kH b i,k ,μ k =η k (1+γ k ) And theta denotes a diagonal element of the phase shift matrix theta,
Figure BDA0003933708010000048
F m indicating the channel between the mth access point and all IRSs, g k Represents the channel between all IRS and the kth user; />
Further simplifying P1.2, and finally obtaining an optimization problem P2 as follows:
Figure BDA0003933708010000049
wherein f is 3 (θ)=θ H Λθ-2Re{θ H ν},
Figure BDA00039337080100000410
Wherein b is k,k Is b i,k A value of mid i = k>
Figure BDA00039337080100000411
Is represented by i,k And (6) conjugation. .
Further, the passive beamforming algorithm based on branch definition specifically comprises the following steps:
determining the lower and upper bounds of the optimization problem P2:
let Θ = θ H The optimization problem P2 is converted into:
Figure BDA00039337080100000412
wherein g (theta ) = Tr (Lambda theta) -2Re { theta H ν},
Figure BDA00039337080100000413
A set of discrete values that represent the units of each IRS, RU being the dimension of θ;
relaxing the constraint, P2.1 is converted to P2.2:
Figure BDA0003933708010000051
wherein the feasible region
Figure BDA0003933708010000052
The set of (a) is: />
Figure BDA0003933708010000053
Let theta t Is an optimal solution for P2.2, then the lower bound of P2.1->
Figure BDA0003933708010000054
The obtained solution theta t Is projected to
Figure BDA0003933708010000055
Get up->
Figure BDA0003933708010000056
unit is a function, x = for an N-dimensional vector[x 1 ,…x N ] T ,/>
Figure BDA0003933708010000057
Upper bound of P2.1->
Figure BDA0003933708010000058
Wherein->
Figure BDA0003933708010000059
Representing a discrete value set which all IRS units in the t-th algorithm iteration can adopt;
node division: in the t-th iteration, the ith with the smallest lower bound is selected Dividing each node, and dividing a feasible region corresponding to the node with the minimum lower bound
Figure BDA00039337080100000510
Evenly divided into left and right parts, i.e. <' >>
Figure BDA00039337080100000511
And &>
Figure BDA00039337080100000512
Wherein:
Figure BDA00039337080100000513
and (3) updating the boundary: for two nodes obtained by node division, respectively solving to obtain the corresponding nodes
Figure BDA00039337080100000514
Figure BDA00039337080100000515
According to>
Figure BDA00039337080100000516
And &>
Figure BDA00039337080100000517
Smaller values of (A) update the upper bound, lower bound, and optimal solution scoreIs g (theta) corresponding to tt ) And &>
Figure BDA00039337080100000518
Further, the passive beamforming algorithm based on branch definition is implemented by the following steps:
step 1, setting the iteration times t =0, and setting a threshold limiting parameter epsilon =10 -4
Step 2, obtaining a discrete value set which is advisable for all IRS units in algorithm iteration
Figure BDA00039337080100000519
Assigning an initial value;
step 3, calculating an initial solution { theta ] through P2.2 tt };
Step 4, by
Figure BDA00039337080100000520
Obtaining a solution of P2.1;
step 5, calculating the lower bound of P2.1
Figure BDA00039337080100000521
Upper bound>
Figure BDA00039337080100000522
Step 6, corresponding the nodes
Figure BDA00039337080100000523
Joining a search tree pick>
Figure BDA00039337080100000524
Performing the following steps;
step 7, letting t = t +1;
step 8, selecting search tree
Figure BDA00039337080100000525
Has a minimum lower bound->
Figure BDA00039337080100000526
A node of (2);
step 9, deleting the minimum lower bound
Figure BDA00039337080100000527
A node of (2);
step 10, will have a minimum lower bound
Figure BDA00039337080100000528
Is corresponding to the node of->
Figure BDA00039337080100000529
Divided into two sub-sets->
Figure BDA00039337080100000530
And &>
Figure BDA00039337080100000531
Step 11, for
Figure BDA00039337080100000532
Solving for a P2.2 correspondence>
Figure BDA00039337080100000533
And &>
Figure BDA00039337080100000534
Step 12, if
Figure BDA00039337080100000535
Then it is updated->
Figure BDA00039337080100000536
The corresponding optimal solution is updated to £ or>
Figure BDA00039337080100000537
Step 13, for
Figure BDA00039337080100000538
Solving for a P2.2 correspondence>
Figure BDA00039337080100000539
And &>
Figure BDA00039337080100000540
Step 14, if
Figure BDA0003933708010000061
Then it is updated->
Figure BDA0003933708010000062
The corresponding optimal solution is updated to £ or>
Figure BDA0003933708010000063
Step 15, corresponding two branch nodes
Figure BDA0003933708010000064
And &>
Figure BDA0003933708010000065
Is added and/or is>
Figure BDA0003933708010000066
Step 16, if
Figure BDA0003933708010000067
Returning to execution of step 6-step 15, if->
Figure BDA0003933708010000068
Outputting the optimal result theta =θ t
The invention provides a branch definition-based beam forming method for an IRS-assisted de-cellular large-scale MIMO system, which establishes a WSR maximization problem of the IRS-assisted CF-mMIMO system, considers the more practical discrete condition of the IRS phase, and takes the constraint conditions of the maximum transmission power at the AP end and the feasible solution of the IRS phase. The method comprises the following steps of firstly decoupling an original optimization problem into two sub-optimization problems through a Lagrange dual transformation algorithm: the active beam forming problem of the AP end and the passive beam forming problem of the IRS end. For the passive beam forming problem of the IRS terminal, a passive beam forming algorithm based on branch definition is provided, and then the original non-convex optimization problem which is very challenging is solved by alternately optimizing two sub-problems. Simulation results show that the passive beam forming algorithm provided by the invention is obviously superior to the MM beam forming algorithm in a low-quantization bit scene, and is more suitable for practical application scenes.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a flowchart illustrating a beamforming method for an IRS-assisted de-cellular massive MIMO system based on branch definition according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an IRS-assisted CF-mMIMO system model structure according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of an IRS-assisted CF-mMIMO system channel in an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a graph of WSR as a function of the number of iterations of the algorithm in an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 5 is a graph of WSR as a function of the number of quantization bits in an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The present invention will be described in further detail with reference to the drawings and examples. It is to be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the invention and are not limiting of the invention. It should be further noted that, for the convenience of description, only some of the structures related to the present invention are shown in the drawings, not all of the structures.
Before discussing exemplary embodiments in more detail, it should be noted that some exemplary embodiments are described as processes or methods depicted as flowcharts. Although a flowchart may describe the steps as a sequential process, many of the steps can be performed in parallel, concurrently or simultaneously. In addition, the order of the steps may be rearranged. The process may be terminated when its operations are completed, but may have additional steps not included in the figure. The processes may correspond to methods, functions, procedures, subroutines, and the like.
As shown in fig. 1, an IRS-assisted de-cellular massive MIMO system beamforming method based on branch definition in an embodiment includes the following steps:
constructing an IRS assisted de-cellular large-scale MIMO system model, wherein the model comprises M access points, K single-antenna users and R IRS, wherein the access points are all provided with N antennas, and phase shift parameters of the IRS are set to be discrete and a desirable discrete set of phase shifts of all units of the IRS is obtained;
determining a WSR maximization problem P1 of an IRS-assisted de-cellular massive MIMO system model, specifically:
taking the precoding matrixes of all access points and the phase shift matrixes of all IRSs as decision variables, taking WSR maximization as an optimization target, and limiting the sum of the absolute values of the precoding vectors from each access point to all users not to exceed the threshold of the absolute value of the precoding vector of the access point as a WSR maximization problem P1;
obtaining an optimization problem P2 by sequentially carrying out Lagrange dual conversion and quadratic conversion on the WSR maximization problem P1;
solving a global optimal solution of an optimization problem P2 by a passive beam forming algorithm based on branch definition, wherein the passive beam forming algorithm based on branch definition specifically comprises the following steps:
building a search tree
Figure BDA0003933708010000071
For->
Figure BDA0003933708010000072
Solving the lower bound and the upper bound of each node in each node associated with the feasible discrete set, wherein the feasible discrete set represents a discrete value set which all IRS units can adopt in algorithm iteration;
in each iteration, selecting a father node, branching the father node into two child nodes according to a node branching rule, and respectively solving the lower bound and the upper bound of the two child nodes;
updating search trees using boundary update rules
Figure BDA0003933708010000073
When the difference between the upper bound and the lower bound is lower than the allowable error with the increase of the iteration number, the global optimal solution of the optimization problem P2 is obtained by solving.
The specific implementation process is as follows:
(1) Intelligent reflection surface assisted large-scale de-cellular MIMO system model
The system structure of the intelligent reflective surface aided large-scale cellular MIMO system model of the present embodiment is shown in fig. 2, and the system model includes M APs, where each AP has N antennas and K single-antenna users. In order to further increase the capacity of the system and reduce the energy consumption, R IRSs are introduced, wherein the number of units of each IRS is U, and each IRS is provided with a controller connected with the IRS to control the phase shift of each unit. Order to
Figure BDA0003933708010000074
Figure BDA0003933708010000075
Respectively representing AP, IRS unit, index set of user. In the embodiment, the system works in a time division duplex mode and comprises three stages: uplink training, downlink data transmission, uplink data transmission.
In a specific implementation, the phase shift parameter of the IRS is set to be discrete rather than continuous, taking into account practical hardware limitations. Let L represent the number of bits per cell, then each cell can be configured with L =2 l The possible quantization levels. Order to
Figure BDA0003933708010000076
The phase shift matrix representing the r-th IRS can be expressed as:
Θ r =diag(θ r,1 ,…,θ r,U ) (1)
wherein theta is r,u Phase shift, θ, of the u-th element representing the r-th IRS r,u The preferred discrete set is:
Figure BDA0003933708010000077
in the IRS-assisted CF-mimo system, each AP needs to estimate channels of all users, specifically, a channel between the mth AP and the kth user is composed of a direct channel from the mth AP to the kth user and an rxu reflection channel, an equivalent channel diagram is shown in fig. 3, and an equivalent channel from the mth AP to the kth user may be given by the following formula:
Figure BDA0003933708010000081
wherein
Figure BDA0003933708010000082
Represents a direct channel from the mth AP to the kth user, in conjunction with a channel selection algorithm>
Figure BDA0003933708010000083
And &>
Figure BDA0003933708010000084
Representing the channel between the mth AP and the r-th IRS and the channel between the r-th IRS and the k-th user, respectively.
The embodiment mainly considers the downlink transmission scene, and during downlink transmission, the mth AP transmits a signal x to all users m Can be expressed as:
Figure BDA0003933708010000085
wherein
Figure BDA0003933708010000086
Representing the precoding vector, s, from the m-th AP to the i-th user i Representing the signal transmitted to the ith user. The signal received by the kth user can be expressed as:
Figure BDA0003933708010000087
wherein
Figure BDA0003933708010000088
Equivalent channels and precoding vectors representing all APs through kth user, respectively, <' > based on the channel condition>
Figure BDA0003933708010000089
Representing the noise energy received by the k-th user, where σ 2 Representing the variance of the noise distribution. And w i Should satisfy the energy limit of each AP, let ρ max Representing the maximum downlink transmission energy per AP, then:
Figure BDA00039337080100000810
the signal received by the user is re-expressed as:
Figure BDA00039337080100000811
then, the Signal-to-interference-plus-noise Ratio (SINR) of the kth user can be expressed as:
Figure BDA00039337080100000812
(2) WSR maximization problem of intelligent reflection surface assisted de-cellular massive MIMO system
The WSRs of all users can be expressed as:
Figure BDA0003933708010000091
wherein
Figure BDA0003933708010000092
Representing the weight of the kth user, the WSR maximum problem for all end users can be expressed as: />
Figure BDA0003933708010000093
Wherein the decision variables are
Figure BDA0003933708010000094
Respectively representing the precoding matrix of all APs and the phase shift matrix of all IRS. It can be observed that the objective function is non-convex and the two decision variables are coupled to each other, and by the lagrange dual conversion method, P1.1 can be decoupled as:
Figure BDA0003933708010000095
wherein the objective function f (Θ, W, γ) is:
Figure BDA0003933708010000096
wherein γ = [ γ = 12 ,…,γ K ] T For the introduced K-dimensional auxiliary variable, f k (Θ, W) can be expressed as:
Figure BDA0003933708010000097
fix (theta, W), let
Figure BDA0003933708010000098
Figure BDA0003933708010000099
The calculation is as follows:
Figure BDA00039337080100000910
by fixing (W, γ), P1.2 can be expressed as:
Figure BDA00039337080100000911
wherein
Figure BDA00039337080100000912
μ k =η k (1+γ k ) Then, the method is further simplified by using a quadratic transformation method to obtain:
Figure BDA00039337080100000913
wherein:
Figure BDA00039337080100000914
in the formula (17), in order to correspond to the argument Θ of the function on the left side of the formula, (Θ) represents the right end
Figure BDA00039337080100000915
Contains theta.
Order to
Figure BDA0003933708010000101
Further mixing q with i,k (Θ) reduces to:
q i,k (Θ)=a i,kH b i,k (18)
wherein
Figure BDA0003933708010000102
Diagonal element, 1, representing the phase shift matrix Θ RU Is a full 1 vector of RU length, greater than or equal to>
Figure BDA0003933708010000103
Present in formula (17->
Figure BDA0003933708010000104
b i,k Indicates that for the kth user (K also takes the value from 1-K), i is any of 1-K, b k,k That is, for the k-th user i = k, a i,k And a k,k As well. Fixing theta can obtain optimal xi = [ xi ] 1 ,…,ξ K ] T Wherein xi is k Comprises the following steps:
Figure BDA0003933708010000105
fixed ξ, one can get:
Figure BDA0003933708010000106
further, the last term of equation (17) may be simplified to:
Figure BDA0003933708010000107
bringing (21) into (20) yields:
f 2 (Θ)=-θ H Λθ+2Re{θ H ν}-δ (22)
wherein:
Figure BDA0003933708010000108
Figure BDA0003933708010000109
Figure BDA00039337080100001010
wherein [ ·] * Represents conjugation, i.e.
Figure BDA00039337080100001011
Is represented by a i,k Conjugation, then, P2.2 can be converted to:
Figure BDA00039337080100001012
wherein f is 3 (θ)=θ H Λθ-2Re{θ H ν}。
(3) Global optimal beamforming algorithm
In order to solve the problem of P2.3, a globally optimal passive beamforming algorithm based on Branch and Bound (BnB) is provided to solve the problem, and the algorithm can obtain a globally optimal solution of the passive beamforming problem.
In the concrete implementation process, the
Figure BDA0003933708010000111
Sets of discrete values desirable for a unit representing each IRS>
Figure BDA0003933708010000112
Represents the set of discrete values that all IRS units may assume in the t-th iteration of the algorithm. The core idea of the BnB algorithm is to establish a search tree @>
Figure BDA0003933708010000113
For->
Figure BDA0003933708010000114
Neutralization feasible discrete set->
Figure BDA0003933708010000115
For each associated node, the lower bound and upper bound of the node may be determined. In each iteration, a parent node is selected and branched into two child nodes according to a node branching rule. Then, the lower and upper bounds of the two child nodes are solved separately. Next, the search tree is updated using boundary update rules>
Figure BDA0003933708010000116
The upper limit of (2). As the number of iterations increases, the difference between the upper and lower bounds becomes lower than the allowed error e. The details of the BnB algorithm are as follows:
(1) lower and upper bounds for optimization problem
P2.3 was first converted to:
Figure BDA0003933708010000117
where RU is the dimension of θ, θ i Is the ith dimension thereof, let Θ = θ H Then P2.4 is equivalent to:
Figure BDA0003933708010000118
wherein g (Θ, θ) = Tr (Λ Θ) -2Re { θ { (θ) } H V, in order to get the lower bound of P2.5, relaxing the constraint, P2.5 can be converted into:
Figure BDA0003933708010000119
where Tr is the trace operation of the matrix,
Figure BDA00039337080100001110
representing the matrix theta-theta H Is a semi-positive decision matrix in which row fields @>
Figure BDA00039337080100001111
The set of (a) is:
Figure BDA00039337080100001112
and for all of the j's,
Figure BDA00039337080100001113
let theta t Is an optimal solution for P2.6, then P2.5Lower bound of (2)
Figure BDA00039337080100001114
Then the obtained solution theta is t Projected to->
Figure BDA00039337080100001115
Get up->
Figure BDA00039337080100001116
A unit is defined as a function, for an N-dimensional vector x = [ x ] 1 ,…x N ] T ,/>
Figure BDA0003933708010000121
The function of this function is to unitize the size of each dimension of the vector x.
Then, the upper bound of P2.5
Figure BDA0003933708010000122
(2) Node partitioning
In the t-th iteration, the ith with the smallest lower bound is selected Dividing each node, and dividing the feasible region corresponding to the node
Figure BDA0003933708010000123
Evenly divided into left and right parts, i.e. <' >>
Figure BDA0003933708010000124
And &>
Figure BDA0003933708010000125
Wherein:
Figure BDA0003933708010000126
(3) updating boundaries
For the two nodes obtained by the division in the last step, the corresponding nodes can be obtained by respectively solving
Figure BDA0003933708010000127
Then according to >>
Figure BDA0003933708010000128
And &>
Figure BDA0003933708010000129
The smaller value of (c) updates the upper bound, the lower bound and the corresponding optimal solution to be g (theta) respectively tt ) And &>
Figure BDA00039337080100001210
The global optimal beamforming algorithm based on the branch definition algorithm is summarized in the following algorithm 1:
Figure BDA00039337080100001211
Figure BDA0003933708010000131
in order to better embody the effect of the present invention, the embodiment verifies the proposed beamforming algorithm based on branch definition through simulation to solve the WSR maximization problem. Suppose that there are 6 APs in a scene, each AP has 4 antennas, 2 IRS, and the number of each IRS unit is 120,4 users. The channel model takes into account the direct path component and the non-direct path component, assuming that the maximum transmission power per AP is 5dbm. Consider the actual case where the IRS phase is discrete 4 bits and assume that all users have a weight of 1. In simulation, the active beam forming of the AP end is realized by using a Weighted Minimum Mean Square Error (WMMSE) algorithm; for passive beamforming at the IRS end, a proposed branch definition-based algorithm and an MM algorithm as a comparison are considered; and the IRS is considered to be closed, and only the situation of active beam forming at the AP end is taken as reference. Fig. 4 shows the variation of WSR with the number of iterations of the joint beamforming algorithm. For the case of IRS closure, WSR is a straight line. Both curves of the joint beamforming can converge quickly and the WSR is significantly higher than the case of IRS off, which illustrates the effectiveness of the IRS-side passive beamforming. In addition, the beam forming algorithm based on branch definition provided by the invention has obvious WSR gain compared with the MM beam forming algorithm, and the global optimality of the beam forming algorithm based on branch definition is verified in performance.
As shown in fig. 5, which shows the WSR as a function of the quantization bit number of IRS, it can be observed that the slopes of the two curves become gradually smaller as the quantization bit number increases, because the WSR gain due to the increase of the quantization bit number gradually approaches the case where the IRS phase is continuous (i.e., the quantization bit number is infinite). In addition, when the equivalent bit number is 1, the passive beamforming algorithm based on branch definition has significant gain compared with the passive beamforming algorithm based on MM, which shows that the passive beamforming algorithm based on branch definition provided by the invention is more applicable in a low-quantization bit scene, and the low-quantization bit is also beneficial to reducing the difficulty of actual hardware design and the calculation time of the beamforming algorithm.
It can be seen from the embodiments that the beam forming method for the IRS-assisted de-cellular large-scale MIMO system based on branch definition provided by the present invention establishes the WSR maximization problem of the IRS-assisted CF-MIMO system, considers the case that the IRS phase is more practical discrete, and has the constraint conditions of the maximum transmission power at the AP end and the feasible solution at the IRS end. The method comprises the following steps of firstly decoupling an original optimization problem into two sub-optimization problems through a Lagrange dual transformation algorithm: the active beam forming problem of the AP end and the passive beam forming problem of the IRS end. For the IRS-end passive beam forming problem, a passive beam forming algorithm based on branch definition is provided, and then the original non-convex optimization problem which is very challenging is solved by alternately optimizing two sub-problems. Simulation results show that the passive beam forming algorithm provided by the invention is obviously superior to the MM beam forming algorithm in a low-quantization bit scene, and is more suitable for practical application scenes.
In this document, the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process or method that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process or method.
The foregoing is a more detailed description of the invention in connection with specific preferred embodiments and it is not intended that the invention be limited to these specific details. For those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains, several simple deductions or substitutions can be made without departing from the spirit of the invention, and all shall be considered as belonging to the protection scope of the invention.

Claims (6)

1. An IRS-assisted de-cellular massive MIMO system beam forming method based on branch definition is characterized by comprising the following steps:
constructing an IRS assisted de-cellular large-scale MIMO system model, wherein the model comprises M access points, K single-antenna users and R IRS, wherein the M access points are all provided with N antennas, and phase shift parameters of the IRS are set to be discrete and a desirable discrete set of phase shifts of all units of the IRS is obtained;
determining a WSR maximization problem P1 of an IRS-assisted de-cellular massive MIMO system model, specifically:
taking the precoding matrixes of all access points and the phase shift matrixes of all IRSs as decision variables, taking WSR maximization as an optimization target, and limiting the sum of the absolute values of the precoding vectors from each access point to all users not to exceed the threshold of the absolute value of the precoding vector of the access point as a WSR maximization problem P1;
obtaining an optimization problem P2 by sequentially carrying out Lagrange dual conversion and quadratic conversion on the WSR maximization problem P1;
solving a global optimal solution of an optimization problem P2 by a passive beam forming algorithm based on branch definition, wherein the passive beam forming algorithm based on branch definition specifically comprises the following steps:
building a search tree
Figure FDA0003933708000000011
For->
Figure FDA0003933708000000012
Solving the lower bound and the upper bound of each node in each node associated with the feasible discrete set, wherein the feasible discrete set represents a discrete value set which all IRS units can adopt in algorithm iteration;
in each iteration, selecting a father node, branching the father node into two child nodes according to a node branching rule, and respectively solving the lower bound and the upper bound of the two child nodes;
updating search trees using boundary update rules
Figure FDA0003933708000000013
When the difference between the upper bound and the lower bound is lower than the allowable error with the increase of the iteration number, the global optimal solution of the optimization problem P2 is obtained by solving.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein in the process of constructing the IRS-assisted de-cellular massive MIMO system model, the SINR of the kth user is determined according to an equivalent channel and a precoding vector from an access point to the kth user k The specific expression is as follows:
Figure FDA0003933708000000014
wherein, the first and the second end of the pipe are connected with each other,
Figure FDA0003933708000000015
representing the equivalent channels of the M access points to the k-th user,
Figure FDA0003933708000000016
representing the precoding vectors of the M access points to the k-th user,
Figure FDA0003933708000000017
representing the precoding vectors, σ, of the M access points to the ith user 2 Representing the variance of the noise distribution.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein the WSR maximization problem P1 is expressed as follows:
Figure FDA0003933708000000021
Figure FDA0003933708000000022
Figure FDA0003933708000000023
wherein the decision variables are
Figure FDA0003933708000000024
Precoding matrix, decision variable representing all access points
Figure FDA0003933708000000025
A phase shift matrix representing all IRSs, <' >>
Figure FDA0003933708000000026
Weight, SINR, representing the kth user k Representing the signal-to-interference-and-noise ratio, w, of the kth user m,k Represents the precoding of the mth access point to the kth user, based on the measured values>
Figure FDA0003933708000000027
Representing a set of access points, theta r,u Represents the phase shift of the u-th unit of the r-th IRS>
Figure FDA0003933708000000028
Represents the IRS set, is selected>
Figure FDA0003933708000000029
Set of cells, p, representing IRS max Represents the maximum downlink transmission energy in each access point, in conjunction with the maximum downlink transmission energy in each access point>
Figure FDA00039337080000000210
Denotes theta r,u A discrete set of values is desirable.
4. The method as claimed in claim 3, wherein the optimization problem P2 is obtained by sequentially performing lagrangian dual transformation and quadratic transformation on the WSR maximization problem P1, and the method specifically includes:
p1 is decoupled into the following parts by a Lagrange dual conversion method:
Figure FDA00039337080000000211
Figure FDA00039337080000000212
Figure FDA00039337080000000213
wherein the objective function
Figure FDA00039337080000000214
γ=[γ 12 ,…,γ K ] T For an introduced K-dimensional auxiliary variable, <' >>
Figure FDA00039337080000000215
Represents an equivalent channel of M access points to the kth user, and->
Figure FDA00039337080000000216
Represents the precoding vectors from the M access points to the k-th user, based on the precoding vectors>
Figure FDA00039337080000000217
Representing precoding vectors of M access points to an ith user;
through secondary transformation, P1.1 is simplified to obtain
Figure FDA00039337080000000218
Figure FDA00039337080000000219
Wherein
Figure FDA00039337080000000220
Figure FDA0003933708000000031
q i,k (Θ)=a i,kH b i,k ,μ k =η k (1+γ k ) Theta denotes the diagonal element of the phase shift matrix theta, phi>
Figure FDA0003933708000000032
F m Indicating the channel between the mth access point and all IRSs, g k Represents the channel between all IRS and the kth user;
further simplifying P1.2, and finally obtaining an optimization problem P2 as follows:
Figure FDA0003933708000000033
Figure FDA0003933708000000034
wherein f is 3 (θ)=θ H Λθ-2Re{θ H ν},
Figure FDA0003933708000000035
Wherein b is k,k Is b i,k Value of mid i = k>
Figure FDA0003933708000000036
Is represented by i,k And (6) conjugation. />
5. The method as claimed in claim 4, wherein the passive beamforming algorithm based on finger definitions specifically comprises:
determining a lower bound and an upper bound of the optimization problem P2:
let Θ = θ H The optimization problem P2 is converted into:
Figure FDA0003933708000000037
Figure FDA0003933708000000038
diag(Θ)=1 RU ,
Θ=θθ H ,
wherein g (theta ) = Tr (Lambda theta) -2Re { theta H ν},
Figure FDA0003933708000000039
A set of discrete values that represent the units of each IRS, RU being the dimension of θ;
relaxing the constraint, P2.1 is converted to P2.2:
Figure FDA00039337080000000310
Figure FDA00039337080000000311
diag(Θ)=1 RU ,
Θ≥θθ H ,
in which the feasible region
Figure FDA00039337080000000312
The set of (a) is: />
Figure FDA00039337080000000313
Tr represents the trace operation of matrix, theta is not less than theta H Representing the matrix theta-theta H Is a semi-positive definite matrix, let θ t Is an optimal solution for P2.2, then the lower bound of P2.1->
Figure FDA00039337080000000314
The obtained solution theta t Is projected to
Figure FDA00039337080000000315
Get up->
Figure FDA00039337080000000316
unit is a function, x = [ x ] for an N-dimensional vector 1 ,…x N ] T ,/>
Figure FDA0003933708000000041
Upper bound of P2.1->
Figure FDA0003933708000000042
Wherein +>
Figure FDA0003933708000000043
Representing a discrete value set which all IRS units in the t-th algorithm iteration can adopt;
node division: in the t-th iteration, the ith with the smallest lower bound is selected Dividing each node, and dividing a feasible domain corresponding to the node with the minimum lower bound
Figure FDA0003933708000000044
Divided evenly into two parts, i.e. [ right ] and left>
Figure FDA0003933708000000045
And &>
Figure FDA0003933708000000046
Wherein: />
Figure FDA0003933708000000047
And (3) updating the boundary: for two nodes obtained by node division, respectively solving to obtain the corresponding nodes
Figure FDA0003933708000000048
Figure FDA0003933708000000049
According to>
Figure FDA00039337080000000410
And &>
Figure FDA00039337080000000411
The smaller value of (c) updates the upper bound, the lower bound and the optimal solution to be g (theta) respectively tt ) And &>
Figure FDA00039337080000000412
6. The method of claim 5, wherein the passive beamforming algorithm based on finger definitions is implemented by:
step 1, setting the iteration times t =0, and setting a threshold limiting parameter epsilon =10 -4
Step 2, a discrete value set A which is advisable for all IRS units in algorithm iteration t Assigning an initial value;
step 3, calculating an initial solution { theta ] through P2.2 tt };
Step 4, by
Figure FDA00039337080000000413
Obtaining a solution of P2.1; />
Step 5, calculating the lower bound of P2.1
Figure FDA00039337080000000414
Upper bound->
Figure FDA00039337080000000415
Step 6, corresponding the nodes
Figure FDA00039337080000000416
Joining a search tree pick>
Figure FDA00039337080000000417
Performing the following steps;
step 7, letting t = t +1;
step 8, selecting search tree
Figure FDA00039337080000000418
Has a minimum lower bound>
Figure FDA00039337080000000419
A node of (2);
step 9, delete has minimumLower bound
Figure FDA00039337080000000420
A node of (2);
step 10, will have a minimum lower bound
Figure FDA00039337080000000421
In response to a node of->
Figure FDA00039337080000000422
Divided into two sub-sets->
Figure FDA00039337080000000423
And &>
Figure FDA00039337080000000424
Step 11, for
Figure FDA00039337080000000425
Solving for a P2.2 correspondence>
Figure FDA00039337080000000426
And &>
Figure FDA00039337080000000427
Step 12, if
Figure FDA00039337080000000428
Then update a->
Figure FDA00039337080000000429
The corresponding optimal solution is updated to £ or>
Figure FDA00039337080000000430
Step 13, for
Figure FDA00039337080000000431
Solving for P2.2 corresponding +>
Figure FDA00039337080000000432
And &>
Figure FDA00039337080000000433
Step 14, if
Figure FDA00039337080000000434
Then it is updated->
Figure FDA00039337080000000435
The corresponding optimal solution is updated to &>
Figure FDA00039337080000000436
Step 15, corresponding two branch nodes
Figure FDA00039337080000000437
And &>
Figure FDA00039337080000000438
Add or>
Figure FDA00039337080000000439
Step 16, if
Figure FDA00039337080000000440
Returning to execution of step 6-step 15, if->
Figure FDA00039337080000000441
Outputting the optimal result theta =θ t 。/>
CN202211396158.6A 2022-11-09 2022-11-09 IRS auxiliary honeycomb removing large-scale MIMO system beam forming method based on branch definition Active CN115941010B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202211396158.6A CN115941010B (en) 2022-11-09 2022-11-09 IRS auxiliary honeycomb removing large-scale MIMO system beam forming method based on branch definition

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202211396158.6A CN115941010B (en) 2022-11-09 2022-11-09 IRS auxiliary honeycomb removing large-scale MIMO system beam forming method based on branch definition

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN115941010A true CN115941010A (en) 2023-04-07
CN115941010B CN115941010B (en) 2024-04-16

Family

ID=86651827

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202211396158.6A Active CN115941010B (en) 2022-11-09 2022-11-09 IRS auxiliary honeycomb removing large-scale MIMO system beam forming method based on branch definition

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN115941010B (en)

Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN112073107A (en) * 2020-09-17 2020-12-11 南通大学 Multi-group and multicast combined beam forming algorithm design based on intelligent reflecting surface
CN113179109A (en) * 2021-04-26 2021-07-27 南京盛航海运股份有限公司 Honeycomb-removing large-scale MIMO uplink spectrum efficiency optimization method
CN113225108A (en) * 2021-03-18 2021-08-06 北京邮电大学 Robust beam forming method for assisting multi-cell coordinated multi-point transmission by intelligent reflector
CN113315547A (en) * 2021-05-28 2021-08-27 北京邮电大学 Robust joint transmission beam optimization method for intelligent reflecting surface assisted multiple cells
US20210288698A1 (en) * 2020-03-10 2021-09-16 University Of Electronic Science And Technology Of China Method for Intelligent Reflecting Surface Aided Terahertz Secure Communication System
CN114268350A (en) * 2021-11-10 2022-04-01 华南理工大学 Robust beam forming design method under non-ideal channel in intelligent reflector auxiliary communication

Patent Citations (6)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
US20210288698A1 (en) * 2020-03-10 2021-09-16 University Of Electronic Science And Technology Of China Method for Intelligent Reflecting Surface Aided Terahertz Secure Communication System
CN112073107A (en) * 2020-09-17 2020-12-11 南通大学 Multi-group and multicast combined beam forming algorithm design based on intelligent reflecting surface
CN113225108A (en) * 2021-03-18 2021-08-06 北京邮电大学 Robust beam forming method for assisting multi-cell coordinated multi-point transmission by intelligent reflector
CN113179109A (en) * 2021-04-26 2021-07-27 南京盛航海运股份有限公司 Honeycomb-removing large-scale MIMO uplink spectrum efficiency optimization method
CN113315547A (en) * 2021-05-28 2021-08-27 北京邮电大学 Robust joint transmission beam optimization method for intelligent reflecting surface assisted multiple cells
CN114268350A (en) * 2021-11-10 2022-04-01 华南理工大学 Robust beam forming design method under non-ideal channel in intelligent reflector auxiliary communication

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN115941010B (en) 2024-04-16

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN113225108B (en) Robust beam forming method for intelligent reflector-assisted multi-cell coordinated multi-point transmission
CN113300747B (en) Wave beam training method in intelligent reflection surface assisted millimeter wave system
CN111865387A (en) Beam forming design method of intelligent reflector assisted wireless communication system
CN113315547A (en) Robust joint transmission beam optimization method for intelligent reflecting surface assisted multiple cells
CN113873575B (en) Intelligent reflector assisted non-orthogonal multiple access unmanned aerial vehicle air-ground communication network energy-saving optimization method
CN110365388B (en) Low-complexity millimeter wave multicast beam forming method
CN114070365B (en) Intelligent reflection surface assisted low-radio-frequency-complexity multi-user MIMO uplink spectrum efficiency optimization method
CN113949607A (en) Robust beam design method of intelligent reflecting surface cell-free system
CN115173901A (en) IRS (intelligent communications system) -assisted MISO (multiple input single output) wireless energy-carrying communication system energy efficiency maximization method
CN114640379A (en) Beam optimization method and system based on intelligent reflecting area array element grouping
CN112803978B (en) Intelligent surface MISO system joint beam forming method based on successive approximation
Zhang et al. Fronthaul compression and beamforming optimization for uplink C-RAN with intelligent reflecting surface-enhanced wireless fronthauling
Ekbal et al. Distributed transmit beamforming in cellular networks-a convex optimization perspective
CN114785387B (en) Intelligent omnidirectional plane-assisted multi-user MISO downlink weighting and rate optimization method
CN115379478B (en) Robust energy consumption optimization method based on RIS auxiliary digital energy simultaneous transmission network
CN115941010A (en) IRS (intelligent resilient system) assisted de-cellular large-scale MIMO (multiple input multiple output) system beam forming method based on branch definition
CN116033461A (en) Symbiotic radio transmission method based on STAR-RIS assistance
CN114826833A (en) Communication optimization method and terminal for CF-mMIMO in IRS-assisted MEC
CN115021779A (en) RIS assisted MIMO system discrete phase shift design method and apparatus
CN114337902A (en) IRS (inter-cell interference) assisted millimeter wave multi-cell interference suppression method
CN115733533B (en) IRS auxiliary honeycomb removing large-scale MIMO system beam forming method based on manifold
CN116470938B (en) IRS auxiliary communication service quality fairness combined beam forming optimization method and device
CN115173914B (en) Multi-intelligent reflector auxiliary communication active and passive beam forming iterative optimization method
CN114025368B (en) Distributed intelligent reflection surface assisted D2D communication method and system
CN114363931B (en) Symbiotic radio system of multiple access point scenes and resource allocation method and medium thereof

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
CB02 Change of applicant information
CB02 Change of applicant information

Address after: 518000 Taoyuan Street, Nanshan District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province

Applicant after: Harbin University of Technology (Shenzhen) (Shenzhen Institute of science and technology innovation Harbin University of Technology)

Address before: 518000 Taoyuan Street, Nanshan District, Shenzhen City, Guangdong Province

Applicant before: HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY (SHENZHEN)

GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant