CN115938520A - Density matrix model method for electronic structure analysis - Google Patents
Density matrix model method for electronic structure analysis Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN115938520A CN115938520A CN202211703463.5A CN202211703463A CN115938520A CN 115938520 A CN115938520 A CN 115938520A CN 202211703463 A CN202211703463 A CN 202211703463A CN 115938520 A CN115938520 A CN 115938520A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- value
- experimental
- theoretical
- density matrix
- experiment
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Granted
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02E—REDUCTION OF GREENHOUSE GAS [GHG] EMISSIONS, RELATED TO ENERGY GENERATION, TRANSMISSION OR DISTRIBUTION
- Y02E60/00—Enabling technologies; Technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
Landscapes
- Analysing Materials By The Use Of Radiation (AREA)
Abstract
The invention belongs to the field of material subdivision, in particular to a density matrix model method for electronic structure analysis, which comprises the following steps: establishing parametersThe theoretical X-ray diffraction intensity of each diffraction point and the theoretical value of the Compton scattering profile of each momentum are calculated by the electron density matrix model; obtaining the experimental intensity I of each diffraction point through an X-ray single crystal diffraction experiment Experiment of (ii) a The Compton scattering profile J of each momentum is obtained through an X-ray Compton scattering experiment Experiment of (ii) a Establishing a difference function between theoretical intensity and experimental intensity; calculating the minimum value in the difference function by adopting a least square method, and finally obtaining the parameters of the optimal modelThe refined electronic structure in the field of material analysis is obtained through the method; and the subsequent topology analysis and material design are more accurate according to the electronic structure.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of material analysis, in particular to a density matrix model method for electronic structure analysis.
Background
The material science is the foundation and the leader of modern science and technology, and the cognitive level of the material structure and the material structure relationship directly determines the research and development capability of new materials.
The microstructure of the material comprises atomic layer-level structures such as a crystal structure, a local structure, a defect structure and the like, and an electronic structure, wherein the electronic structure fundamentally determines the intrinsic performance of the material. At present, the experimental testing technology of the atomic layer structure of the material has been developed very mature, but the electronic structure experimental testing is always in the exploration stage, although the electronic structure can be obtained by the first theoretical calculation, the theoretical calculation adopts a large number of assumptions, the calculation result has deviation from the actual situation, and the design of the high-performance material is difficult to guide.
Thus, how to obtain experimental electronic structures of materials is a key scientific issue. The solution of the problem is beneficial to realizing the spanning of the experimental research of the material structure of China from atomic layer level to electronic level and accelerating the research and development process of a batch of national defense and civil key functional materials.
Fig. 1 is a schematic diagram of an experimental structure using X-rays in the prior art, where the X-rays are incident on a crystal to be measured, and the X-rays are diffracted after passing through the crystal to be measured, and the experimental electronic structure of the material can be obtained by obtaining high-precision and high-resolution X-ray single crystal diffraction data (position and intensity information), performing electronic structure refinement, and reversely deducing the experimental electronic structure of the material, so that the experimental electronic structure of the material under static and active conditions can be finally obtained, and the electronic structure can be described by using an electronic density, a density matrix, or an electronic wave function.
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of an experimental structure of X-ray Compton scattering from which experimental Compton scattering profile data for each scattering vector can be obtained.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention provides a density matrix model method for electronic structure analysis.
In order to achieve the purpose, the invention adopts the following technical scheme: a density matrix modeling method for electronic structure analysis, comprising: the method comprises the following steps: establishing parametersCalculating the theoretical X-ray diffraction intensity of each diffraction point and the theoretical value of the Compton scattering profile of each momentum;
step two: obtaining the experimental intensity I of each diffraction point through an X-ray single crystal diffraction experiment Experiment of (ii) a The Compton scattering profile J of each momentum is obtained through an X-ray Compton scattering experiment Experiment of ;
Step three: establishing a difference function between theoretical intensity and experimental intensity;
step four: calculating the minimum value in the difference function by adopting a least square method to obtain the parameters of the optimal model
In the first step, a parameterized electron density matrix model function is established:
P i,j is an m multiplied by m parameter matrix which is the parameter needed to be obtained by fine modification; phi is a i (r),φ j (r') are the ith and jth basis functions (i, j =1,2,3, \8230;, m; m is the number of basis functions), respectively, which are known functions. Parameter matrixAnd the density matrix Γ (r, r') may be written in two parts, one part consisting of diagonal elements, each denoted ^ er>Γ (r, r' = r); the other part consists of elements not lying diagonally and are each designated as->Γ(r,r'≠r)。
Namely:
Γ(r,r')=Γ(r,r'=r)+Γ(r,r'≠r)
the diagonal matrix element of the gamma (r, r ') is the electron density rho (r), namely rho (r) = gamma (r, r' = r), and the theoretical structure factor of each diffraction point can be calculated through the Fourier transform of the rho (r)The experimental intensity I of each diffraction point can be obtained through an X-ray single crystal diffraction experiment Experimental values The structural factor is calculated based on the intensity of the diffraction spot>
From the off-diagonal elements of Γ (r, r' ≠ r), the theoretical compton scattering profile J (q) can be derived by fourier transformation, namely:wherein q is the electron momentum; through the X-ray Compton scattering experiment, the experimental Compton scattering profile data of each scattering vector can be obtained
Wherein, the preferred scheme is as follows: obtaining the experimental intensity of each diffraction point kappa through an X-ray single crystal diffraction experimentFurther obtaining the structural factor of the experiment>Meanwhile, experimental Compton scattering profile data of each scattering vector is obtained through an X-ray Compton scattering experiment
Wherein, the preferred scheme is as follows: defining a difference function of the difference between the theoretical value and the experimental value of the matrix density model asWherein the difference function of the difference between the theoretical and experimental values associated with diagonal bins of the density matrix is: />The difference function of the difference between the theoretical and experimental values associated with the non-diagonal elements of the density matrix is: />
Namely:
wherein, the preferred scheme is as follows: calculating by least square methodGets the optimal model parameter pick>
Wherein, the preferred scheme is as follows: calculated by least squares and using Preset->Performing a value operation, comprising: a: randomly selects two groups of parameter values>And &>Each group having m x m parameters to be combined> Substitution intoRespectively obtain>And &>B according to the formula>A is a step size factor, and the value is calculated>I.e. n =3, wherein>And will->Substituted into>Has been calculated>A value; c: likewise in step B the formula for calculating &>(i.e., n = 4) and similarly calculated @>Circulating n steps until>Less than a predetermined precision value, in which case>Has reached a minimum, is taken up>Is an optimum value; d: ->Substituted into>And obtaining a final experimental electron density matrix gamma, namely the refined electronic structure function.
Wherein, the preferred scheme is as follows: step A acquisitionAnd &>First, by combining->And &>Respectively substitute forGet->And &>According to>And &>The diagonal portion of (r, r '= r) and ρ (r) = Γ (r, r' = r) are obtained { [ MEASURED } { (R) } in the corresponding location in the image>And &>According to >>Counting/or>And &>According to>Is calculated out>And &>And according to >>And &>Of the non-diagonal sections Γ (r, r' ≠ r) andget->And &>According to>Is calculated out>And &>By means of>And &>Acquire->And &>
Wherein, the preferred scheme is as follows: the preset precision value is as follows: 0.1 or 0.01 or 0.001, the smaller the preset precision value is, the refinedThe more accurate.
Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that:
calculating theoretical structure factor by establishing parameterized electron density matrix model gamma (r, rAnd compton scatter profile->Obtaining the intensity I of diffraction point by X-ray experiment Experiment of (ii) a And obtaining a Compton scattering profile->The theoretical structural factor is calculated by the least square method>And the experimental structural factor->And the theoretical compton scattering profile->And the experimental compton scattering profile>The parameter value ^ of the electronic wave function model Γ (r, r') is deduced back with the smallest difference between>Thereby obtaining the refined electronic structure in the field of material analysis; therefore, the subsequent topological analysis and material design according to the electronic structure are more accurate.
Drawings
FIG. 1 is a schematic diagram of an experimental structure using X-rays in the prior art;
FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram of a prior art X-ray Compton scattering experiment;
FIG. 3 is a flow chart of a density matrix modeling method for electronic structure analysis in accordance with the present invention;
FIG. 4 shows a non-linear optical crystal material LiB 3 O 5 The asymmetry of the cell structure diagram after the refinement of the invention;
FIG. 5 is a molecular structural diagram of a fluorescent material pyrene after being refined by the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments.
FIG. 3 is a flow chart of a density matrix modeling method for electronic structure analysis according to the present invention, as shown in FIG. 3: the method comprises the following steps: the method comprises the following steps: establishing parametersThe theoretical intensity of each diffraction point is calculated by the electron density matrix model; step two: obtaining the experimental intensity I of each diffraction point through an X-ray single crystal diffraction experiment Experiment of (ii) a Step three: obtaining Compton scattering profile of each momentum by X-ray Compton scattering diffraction experiment>Step four: establishing a difference function between the physical strength and the experimental strength; step five: calculating the minimum value in the difference function by adopting a least square method to obtain the parameter(s) of the optimal model>
The preferred scheme is as follows: further comprising: step four-way over least square method for calculating preset P n The value operation step includes: using by least square calculation
Preset->The value operation step includes: a: randomly selects two groups of parameter values>And &>Each group having m × m parametersWill be
A is a step size factor, and the value is calculated>Wherein +>I.e. n =3, and will ÷>Substituted into> Is calculated out>A value;c: is likewise calculated according to the step B formula>(i.e., n = 4) and similarly calculated @>Cycling n steps until->Less than a predetermined precision value, at which time L (P) n ) Has reached a minimum, is taken up>Is an optimum value; d: ->Substituted into>And obtaining a final experimental electron density matrix gamma, namely the refined electronic structure function.
It obtains to realize step AAnd &>First, by combining->And &>Respectively substitute forGet->And &>According to >>And &>The diagonal portion of (r, r '= r) and ρ (r) = Γ (r, r' = r) are obtained { [ MEASURED } { (R) } in the corresponding location in the image>And &>According toCounting/or>And &>According toIs calculated out>And &>And according to >>And &>And ≠ ≠ r ^ r) and ^ r>Get->And &>According to>Has been calculated>And &>By usingAnd &>Acquire->And &>
The preset precision value is 0.1 or 0.01 or 0.001, and the smaller the preset precision value is, the refinedThe more accurate.
Below by LiB 3 O 5 For example, the analysis process of the density matrix model method for electronic structure analysis of the present invention is verified as follows:
first by X-ray single crystal diffraction experiments, see table 1: under index parameter κ (h, k, l), the index parameter here is understood to be: the position index k (h, k, l) of a certain diffraction spot of the selected X-ray in the whole X-ray detector.
Selecting material LiB 3 O 5 The index parameter k (0, 1,0) (ii) a κ (0, -1, 0); κ (0, 1, -1); κ (0, 1); experimental intensity I of diffraction Point at κ (0, 1, -1) Experiment of (ii) a And obtaining LiB through X-ray Compton scattering diffraction experiment 3 O 5 Compton scatter profiles at momentums q of 1.023,1.133,1.205,1.369, and 1.488, respectivelyIt respectively is as follows: 3.111, 2.788, 2.356, 1.890 and 1.366.
TABLE 1 materials LiB 3 O 5 Experimental Strength at index K (h, k, l)And an experimental structural factor>And a compton scatter profile under momentum q>
TABLE 2 materials LiB 3 O 5 Is selected from the parametersBased on the theoretical structural factor->And compton scatter profile->
By comparing the data in Table 2Into>Get->According toObtain = based on the diagonal portion Γ (r, r' = r) of (a) or (b)>According to>Counting/or>At various indices κ (0, 1, 0); κ (0, -1, 0); κ (0, 1, -1); κ (0, 1); kappa (0, 1, -1) are the values: 1.1254, 0.9877, 15.2874, 13.1221 and 14.5059; based on the momentum q =1.023,1.133,1.205,1.369 and 1.488>The values are respectively: 2.987, 2.011, 1.974, 1.669, 1.158; according toFormula +>According to the formula: according to the formula>Has->
Table 3 shows the material LiB 3 O 5 Is selected from the parametersBased on the theoretical structural factor->And compton scatter profile->
As shown in table 3: the following were calculated according to the same method as above:such that the difference function:in the present embodiment, the precision of λ is set to 0.001, and thus by a two-multiplication formula: />Is calculated out>The value of (a).
TABLE 4 materials LiB 3 O 5 Is selected from the parametersTheoretical structural factor>And compton scatter profile->/>
As shown in table 4: by a two-multiplication formula:wherein A takes a value of 0.01 and is based on an index parameter kappa (0, 1, 0)> By analogy, get out>Is taken and reused
Is calculated out>Value,. Or>Difference value-> In this embodiment, the predetermined accuracy of λ is set to 0.001, so that the two-multiplication value is still required until λ reaches 0.001, and then the value is greater than or equal to ^ 5>
TABLE 5 materials LiB 3 O 5 Selected parameter(s) ofBased on the theoretical structural factor->And compton scatter profile->
TABLE 6 materials LiB 3 O 5 Comparison with theoretical value after refinement by electron density model
Atom(s) | Experimental value of valence state | Theoretical calculation of first character |
As shown in FIG. 3 as the B atom at the B1 position | 2.530 | 2.570 |
As shown in FIG. 3 at the B2 position B atom | 2.548 | 2.593 |
As shown in the B3 position B atom in FIG. 3 | 2.541 | 2.575 |
E.g. O atom in O1 position in FIG. 3 | -1.728 | -1.748 |
O atom in O2 position as in FIG. 3 | -1.755 | -1.787 |
As shown in the O3 position of FIG. 3 as the O atom | -1.690 | -1.707 |
O atom at O4 position in FIG. 3 | -1.689 | -1.710 |
O atom at O5 position as in FIG. 3 | -1.694 | -1.711 |
Such as Li atom in FIG. 3 | 0.938 | 0.934 |
TABLE 6 materials LiB 3 O 5 Comparing the refined electron density model with a theoretical value; and FIG. 4 is a finished LiB 3 O 5 The valence state experimental value of the electron wave function diagram is very close to the first theoretical calculated value, the feasibility of the method is proved, and the method is suitable for the nonlinear optical crystal material LiB 3 O 5 The use of (1).
In the second embodiment of the present invention, an organic fluorescent material pyrene (molecular formula: C16H 10) is taken as an example;
table 7 shows the experimental intensity of organic fluorescent material under pyrene index kappa (h, k, l)And an experimental structural factor->And a compton scatter profile under momentum q>
Table 8 shows the selection parameters of organic fluorescent pyreneBased on the theoretical structural factor->And compton scatter profile->
TABLE 8 data passage of organic fluorescent Material pyreneIs selected and substituted into>To obtainAccording to>Gets ÷ based on the diagonal portion Γ (r, r' = r)>According to >>Calculate->At different indices κ (8, 2, -6); kappa (8, -2, -6); kappa (-8, -2, 6); kappa (-8,2,6); the values at kappa (-8, 2, 5) were 17.1181, 17.2120, 13.5345, 16.8664, 11.9503, respectively. />The values at different momentums q are respectively: 3.1885, 3.0924, 2.778, 2.8755, 2.2218; according to>Formula->Is/are>According to the formula: /> According to the formula>Has->
TABLE 9 selection parameters for organic fluorescent pyreneBased on the theoretical structural factor->And compton scattering profile>
As shown in table 9: the following were calculated according to the same method as above:such difference function:in the present embodiment, the precision of λ is set to 0.01, and thus by a two-multiplication formula: />Is calculated out>The value of (c).
TABLE 10 parameters of the organic fluorescent Material pyreneBased on the theoretical structural factor->And compton scatter profile->
See table 10, by the multiplication formula of two:wherein A is 0.01, and an index parameter κ (8, 2, -6) is selected> By analogy, get out>Is taken and then is reused>Calculate outValue,. Or>Difference value->In this example, the essence of λThe degree is set to 0.01, so the multiplication continues until λ reaches 0.01, until ^ in table 11 is reached>
TABLE 11 selection parameters for the organic fluorescent Material pyreneBased on the theoretical structural factor->And Compton scattering profile
Finally, obtaining the parameter value of the refined electron density matrix model gamma of the organic fluorescent material pyreneTable 12 and fig. 5 show: the valence experimental value obtained after the refining of the method is similar to the first theoretical calculated value, which indicates that the method is feasible.
TABLE 12 is a comparison graph of the experimental value of the valence state of pyrene and the theoretical calculation value of the first character
The invention has the beneficial effects that: with LiB 3 O 5 And organic fluorescent material pyrene, by electron densityComparing the refined model with a theoretical value, and the valence state experimental value is very close to the first theoretical calculated value, so that the feasibility of the method is proved, and the LiB is obtained 3 O 5 And the refined electronic structure of the organic fluorescent material pyrene provides a better basis for subsequent topological analysis and material design according to the electronic structure.
The above description is only for the preferred embodiment of the present invention, but the scope of the present invention is not limited thereto, and any person skilled in the art should be considered to be within the technical scope of the present invention, and the technical solutions and the inventive concepts thereof according to the present invention should be equivalent or changed within the scope of the present invention.
Claims (9)
1. A density matrix modeling method for electronic structural analysis, characterized by: the method comprises the following steps:
the method comprises the following steps: establishing parametersCalculating the theoretical X-ray diffraction intensity of each diffraction point and the theoretical value of the Compton scattering profile of each momentum;
step two: obtaining the experimental intensity I of each diffraction point through an X-ray single crystal diffraction experiment Experiment of (ii) a The Compton scattering profile J of each momentum is obtained through an X-ray Compton scattering experiment Experiment of the invention ;
Step three: establishing a difference function between theoretical intensity and experimental intensity;
2. The method of a density matrix model for electronic structure analysis according to claim 1, wherein in step one, a parameterized electron density matrix model Ψ:
P i,j is an m multiplied by m parameter matrix which is the parameter needed to be obtained by fine modification; phi is a i (r),φ j (r') are the ith and jth basis functions (i, j =1,2,3, \ 8230;, m; m is the number of basis functions) respectively,
the basis functions are known functions.
3. The density matrix modeling method for electronic structure analysis according to claim 2, wherein: the parameter matrixAnd the density matrix Γ (r, r') may both be written in two parts, one part consisting of the diagonal elements, denoted respectively byΓ (r, r' = r); the other part consists of elements on the off-diagonal line, which are respectively marked as->Γ (r, r' ≠ r), i.e.:Γ (r, r ') = Γ (r, r ' = r) + Γ (r, r ' ≠ r), the diagonal matrix element of Γ (r, r ') is the electron density ρ (r), i.e., ρ (r) = Γ (r, r ' = r), and the theoretical structure factor = Γ of each diffraction point can be calculated through fourier transform of ρ (r)>
4. Root of herbaceous plantsThe method of density matrix modeling for electronic structure analysis according to claim 1, wherein the experimental intensity for each diffraction point κ is obtained by X-ray single crystal diffraction experimentFurther obtaining the structural factor of the experimentSimultaneously, through an X-ray Compton scattering experiment, the experimental Compton scattering profile data of each scattering vector is obtained>
5. The method of claim 1, wherein in step three, a difference function defining the difference between theoretical and experimental values of the matrix density model is defined asWherein the difference function of the difference between the theoretical value and the experimental value on the diagonal of the density matrix is:
the difference function of the difference between theoretical and experimental values on the non-diagonal lines of the density matrix is: />I.e. is>
7. The method of claim 6, wherein the calculating is performed by least squares and utilizes Preset>Performing a value operation, comprising:
a: randomly selecting two sets of parameter valuesAnd &>Each group having m x m parameters, willSubstitution intoRespectively obtain->And &>
B according to the formulaA is a step size factor, and the value is calculated>Wherein it is present>I.e. n =3, and will ÷>Substituted into>Is calculated out>A value;
c: also according to the formula of step B(i.e. n = 4) and similarly calculated ÷ based on>Repeating the step n untilLess than a predetermined precision value, at which time L (P) n ) Has reached a minimum, is taken up>Is an optimum value;
8. The method of claim 7, wherein step a obtains the density matrix modelAnd &>First, by combining->And &>Respectively substituted into>To obtainAnd &>According to>And &>The diagonal sections Γ (r, r '= r) and ρ (r) = Γ (r, r' = r) of (f) obtain ÷ r>And &>According to>Calculate->Andaccording to>Is calculated out>And &>And according toAnd &>The non-diagonal parts Γ (r, r' ≠ r) and +>Get->And &>According to>Is calculated out>Andby means of>And &> Acquire->And &>
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202211703463.5A CN115938520B (en) | 2022-12-29 | 2022-12-29 | Density matrix model method for electronic structure analysis |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202211703463.5A CN115938520B (en) | 2022-12-29 | 2022-12-29 | Density matrix model method for electronic structure analysis |
Publications (2)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN115938520A true CN115938520A (en) | 2023-04-07 |
CN115938520B CN115938520B (en) | 2023-09-15 |
Family
ID=86654123
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202211703463.5A Active CN115938520B (en) | 2022-12-29 | 2022-12-29 | Density matrix model method for electronic structure analysis |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN115938520B (en) |
Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105678002A (en) * | 2016-01-12 | 2016-06-15 | 中国科学技术大学 | Plasma particle-field Vlasov-Maxwell system long-term, large-scale and high-fidelity analog method |
CN108121836A (en) * | 2016-11-29 | 2018-06-05 | 鸿之微科技(上海)股份有限公司 | The computational methods and system of Nonequilibrium Electron structure with local rail effect |
CN109033739A (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2018-12-18 | 西安电子科技大学 | Method is determined based on the photoelectric device absorption spectrum of ZnMgO/MgO/ZnO heterojunction material |
CN109402740A (en) * | 2016-12-06 | 2019-03-01 | 中国科学院福建物质结构研究所 | A kind of crystalline material, preparation method and the nonlinear optical crystal comprising it |
CN112652054A (en) * | 2020-12-22 | 2021-04-13 | 上海索骥信息科技有限公司 | DR/CT digital object construction method and system |
CN113223631A (en) * | 2021-05-06 | 2021-08-06 | 吉林大学 | Crystal structure analysis method and system |
CN113653483A (en) * | 2021-07-30 | 2021-11-16 | 电子科技大学 | Multi-detector multifunctional hybrid logging device based on X-ray backscatter |
WO2021243106A1 (en) * | 2020-05-27 | 2021-12-02 | California Institute Of Technology | Systems and methods for determining molecular properties with atomic-orbital-based features |
CN114121168A (en) * | 2021-11-04 | 2022-03-01 | 中国环境科学研究院 | Two-dimensional nanomaterial and organic matter molecule adsorption combination modeling method |
CN114972185A (en) * | 2022-04-19 | 2022-08-30 | 上海大学 | Powder X-ray diffraction pattern expectation maximization algorithm full-spectrum line fitting method based on statistical modeling |
-
2022
- 2022-12-29 CN CN202211703463.5A patent/CN115938520B/en active Active
Patent Citations (10)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN105678002A (en) * | 2016-01-12 | 2016-06-15 | 中国科学技术大学 | Plasma particle-field Vlasov-Maxwell system long-term, large-scale and high-fidelity analog method |
CN108121836A (en) * | 2016-11-29 | 2018-06-05 | 鸿之微科技(上海)股份有限公司 | The computational methods and system of Nonequilibrium Electron structure with local rail effect |
CN109402740A (en) * | 2016-12-06 | 2019-03-01 | 中国科学院福建物质结构研究所 | A kind of crystalline material, preparation method and the nonlinear optical crystal comprising it |
CN109033739A (en) * | 2018-07-27 | 2018-12-18 | 西安电子科技大学 | Method is determined based on the photoelectric device absorption spectrum of ZnMgO/MgO/ZnO heterojunction material |
WO2021243106A1 (en) * | 2020-05-27 | 2021-12-02 | California Institute Of Technology | Systems and methods for determining molecular properties with atomic-orbital-based features |
CN112652054A (en) * | 2020-12-22 | 2021-04-13 | 上海索骥信息科技有限公司 | DR/CT digital object construction method and system |
CN113223631A (en) * | 2021-05-06 | 2021-08-06 | 吉林大学 | Crystal structure analysis method and system |
CN113653483A (en) * | 2021-07-30 | 2021-11-16 | 电子科技大学 | Multi-detector multifunctional hybrid logging device based on X-ray backscatter |
CN114121168A (en) * | 2021-11-04 | 2022-03-01 | 中国环境科学研究院 | Two-dimensional nanomaterial and organic matter molecule adsorption combination modeling method |
CN114972185A (en) * | 2022-04-19 | 2022-08-30 | 上海大学 | Powder X-ray diffraction pattern expectation maximization algorithm full-spectrum line fitting method based on statistical modeling |
Non-Patent Citations (2)
Title |
---|
XIAO-MING JIANG: "Material research from the viewpoint of functional motifs", 《NATIONAL SCIENCE REVIEW》, vol. 09, no. 07, pages 1 - 17 * |
王美婷: "若干氨基酸分子构象与电离能的理论研究", 《中国优秀硕士学位论文全文数据库》, no. 01, pages 005 - 210 * |
Also Published As
Publication number | Publication date |
---|---|
CN115938520B (en) | 2023-09-15 |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN106126925B (en) | A method of it improving reactor core three-dimensional netron-flux density and is finely distributed | |
CN109543912B (en) | Reservoir optimal scheduling decision model generation method based on deep learning | |
Larkoski et al. | The analytic structure of non-global logarithms: convergence of the dressed gluon expansion | |
CN109933877B (en) | Algebraic multiple grid three-dimensional variational data assimilation method | |
Cho et al. | Cell based CMFD formulation for acceleration of whole-core method of characteristics calculations | |
CN109255173A (en) | Consider the structural realism interval computation method of bounded-but-unknown uncertainty | |
Deng et al. | Z 0 boson decays to meson and its uncertainties | |
CN107145721A (en) | A kind of mixing computational methods for obtaining the few group cross-section parameter of fast neutron reactor | |
CN104239446B (en) | A kind of method that sampled point layout is carried out using auxiliary variable data | |
Dessieux et al. | Neutron transmission simulation of texture in polycrystalline materials | |
CN115938520A (en) | Density matrix model method for electronic structure analysis | |
Dessieux et al. | Single crystal to polycrystal neutron transmission simulation | |
CN109934345B (en) | Neutron energy spectrum real number genetic algorithm spectrum solution method with linear constraint | |
CN107103189A (en) | A kind of method of quick carry out reactor critical buckling search | |
CN115017741B (en) | Reconstruction method and device for gas diffusion layer of fuel cell and electronic equipment | |
CN115938519B (en) | Novel method for electronic structure fine modification model | |
CN106934453B (en) | Method for determining cubic material parent phase and child phase orientation relation | |
Ramírez et al. | Standard and inverse site percolation of straight rigid rods on triangular lattices: Isotropic and perfectly oriented deposition and removal | |
CN115966270A (en) | Wave function model method for electronic structure analysis | |
CN111651906B (en) | Efficient solution method for consolidation permeability of large-deformation tailings | |
Taneichi et al. | Transformed statistics for tests of conditional independence in J× K× L contingency tables | |
Zhengxiang et al. | Application and comparison of several intelligent algorithms on Muskingum routing model | |
Jin et al. | Using the residual network module to correct the sub-seasonal high temperature forecast | |
Woodford et al. | Quantifying reliability statistics for electrochemical shock of brittle materials | |
Bukalin et al. | Visualization of the process of neutron-physical calculation of a nuclear reactor |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
GR01 | Patent grant | ||
GR01 | Patent grant |