CN115936351A - Helicopter efficiency evaluation framework oriented to demand analysis - Google Patents
Helicopter efficiency evaluation framework oriented to demand analysis Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN115936351A CN115936351A CN202211459253.6A CN202211459253A CN115936351A CN 115936351 A CN115936351 A CN 115936351A CN 202211459253 A CN202211459253 A CN 202211459253A CN 115936351 A CN115936351 A CN 115936351A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- view
- equipment
- helicopter
- analysis
- capacity
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02T—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES RELATED TO TRANSPORTATION
- Y02T90/00—Enabling technologies or technologies with a potential or indirect contribution to GHG emissions mitigation
Landscapes
- Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)
Abstract
The invention provides a helicopter efficiency evaluation framework oriented to demand analysis, which comprises a combat system layer, a helicopter control layer and a helicopter control layer, wherein the combat system layer is used for analyzing the capacity demand, the composition and the mutual relationship among the compositions of a combat system and developing the efficiency evaluation of the combat system; the equipment system layer is used for analyzing the capability requirements, the composition and the interrelation among the compositions of the equipment system according to the capability requirements, the composition and the interrelation among the compositions of the combat system obtained by the analysis of the combat system layer and developing the efficiency evaluation of the equipment system; and the helicopter equipment layer is used for analyzing the capability requirements of the helicopter equipment and developing the efficiency evaluation of the helicopter equipment according to the capability requirements, the composition and the mutual relationship among the compositions of the equipment system obtained by the analysis of the equipment system layer. The invention can analyze the capacity requirements of the operation system, the equipment system and the helicopter equipment under the background of informatization and systematization operation, and can develop the efficiency evaluation of the operation system, the equipment system and the helicopter equipment under different operation scenes.
Description
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of helicopter system engineering, and particularly relates to a helicopter efficiency evaluation framework oriented to demand analysis.
Background
Helicopter efficiency evaluation is a technology for constructing an index system according to capacity requirements and acquiring index data to evaluate based on the index system. The efficiency evaluation mainly adopts a reduction method, namely, an upper-layer index evaluation value is obtained through polymerization of a lower-layer index.
Performance evaluation in the field of global percussion systems ([ 1] Liu Zhizhao, li Yangong, hu Xiaofeng, li Wei. A view-based equipment performance simulation evaluation flow design [ J ]. Air-space defense, 2020,3 (1): 80-86) 9 performance simulation views such as EV 1-EV 9 are designed based on a DoDAF2.0 framework, and a view-based equipment performance simulation flow is constructed. Efficiency evaluation in the field of fighters ([ 2] Sun Peng, yang Jianjun. Fourth generation fighter operational efficiency evaluation [ J ] aeronautical missile, 2010, 6.
Therefore, the performance evaluation is mainly carried out by developing the design of an index system according to the weapon equipment capacity at present, and the performance cannot be evaluated according to different combat scenes of the equipment.
Disclosure of Invention
The purpose of the invention is: a helicopter performance evaluation framework oriented to demand analysis is provided. The invention can analyze the capacity requirements of the operation system, the equipment system and the helicopter equipment under the background of informatization and systematization operation, and can develop the efficiency evaluation of the operation system, the equipment system and the helicopter equipment under different operation scenes.
The technical scheme of the invention is as follows. A demand analysis oriented helicopter performance evaluation framework comprising: a combat system layer, an equipment system layer and a helicopter equipment layer; the combat system layer is used for analyzing the capability requirements, the composition and the mutual relationship among the compositions of the combat system and developing the efficiency evaluation of the combat system; the equipment system layer is used for analyzing the capability requirements, the composition and the interrelation among the compositions of the equipment system according to the capability requirements, the composition and the interrelation among the compositions of the combat system obtained by the analysis of the combat system layer and developing the efficiency evaluation of the equipment system; and the helicopter equipment layer is used for analyzing the capability requirements of the helicopter equipment and developing the efficiency evaluation of the helicopter equipment according to the capability requirements, the composition and the mutual relationship among the compositions of the equipment system obtained by the analysis of the equipment system layer.
In the helicopter efficiency evaluation framework oriented to demand analysis, the combat system layer, the equipment system layer and the helicopter equipment layer are all formed by four dimensions, namely a demand analysis dimension, a capability analysis dimension, a comprehensive design dimension and an efficiency evaluation dimension.
In the helicopter performance evaluation framework oriented to the demand analysis, in a combat system layer, a demand analysis dimension comprises a combat system mission task analysis view and a combat system scene description view; the capability analysis dimension comprises a combat system capability demand view and a combat system capability decomposition view; the comprehensive design dimension comprises a battle system composition view, a battle system activity analysis view and a battle system activity-capacity mapping view; the effectiveness evaluation dimension comprises a combat system capability-effectiveness mapping view, a combat system effectiveness index decomposition view, a combat system effectiveness data view and a combat system effectiveness evaluation result view.
In the above helicopter performance evaluation framework oriented to demand analysis, the operational process of the combat system layer is as follows:
the method comprises the steps that a combat system mission task analysis view generates a combat system mission and task list, input is provided for a combat system scene description view, an initial combat system capacity requirement is generated on the basis of the combat system scene description view through the combat system capacity requirement view and is decomposed into a combat system capacity decomposition view, the combat system capacity requirement view simultaneously provides input for a combat system composition view, a system framework generated through the combat system composition view is the basis of the combat system activity analysis view, meanwhile, the combat system activity analysis view generates a combat activity list, a combat system activity-capacity mapping view generates a capacity requirement mapping, the capacity requirement generated through the capacity requirement mapping serves as the input of the combat system capacity decomposition view, the combat system capacity-capacity mapping view is mapped as a capacity index, the combat system capacity index decomposition view obtains a capacity index system through layer-by-layer decomposition, the combat system capacity index decomposition view, the capacity index system is calculated or simulated to obtain capacity evaluation data, and the capacity evaluation data is aggregated into a combat system capacity data view, and finally a combat system capacity evaluation result is generated.
In the helicopter efficiency evaluation framework oriented to demand analysis, in an equipment system layer, a demand analysis dimension comprises an equipment system mission task analysis view and an equipment system scene description view; the capacity analysis dimension comprises an equipment system capacity requirement view and an equipment system capacity decomposition view; the comprehensive design dimension comprises a battle system and equipment system mapping view, an equipment system activity analysis view and an equipment system activity-capacity mapping view; the performance evaluation dimension comprises an equipment system capacity-performance mapping view, an equipment system performance index decomposition view, an equipment system performance data view and an equipment system performance evaluation result view.
In the above helicopter performance evaluation framework oriented to demand analysis, the working process of the equipment system layer is as follows:
the equipment system mission task analysis view generates an equipment system mission and task list on the basis of an operation system mission task analysis view, an equipment system scene description view generates a scene description on the basis of an equipment system mission task analysis view and an operation system scene description view, an equipment system capacity requirement view generates an initial equipment system capacity requirement on the basis of an equipment system scene description view and decomposes the initial equipment system capacity requirement into an equipment system capacity decomposition view, the equipment system capacity requirement view simultaneously provides input for an operation system and an equipment system mapping view, a system architecture generated by the operation system and the equipment system mapping view is the basis of equipment system activity analysis view analysis, the equipment system activity analysis view generates an operation activity list, and an equipment system activity-capacity mapping view generates a capacity requirement mapping, the capacity requirement generated by the capacity requirement mapping is used as the input of the equipment system capacity decomposition view on the one hand, and on the other hand, the equipment system activity-capacity mapping view is used as a capacity index, the equipment system capacity index decomposition view is decomposed to obtain a capacity index system layer by layer, the performance evaluation data is calculated or simulated to obtain performance evaluation data, and the performance evaluation data is generated into a final equipment system performance evaluation view.
In the helicopter efficiency evaluation framework oriented to demand analysis, in a helicopter equipment layer, a demand analysis dimension comprises a helicopter equipment mission task analysis view and a helicopter equipment scene description view; the capability analysis dimension comprises a helicopter equipment initial capability requirement view and a helicopter equipment capability requirement view; the comprehensive design dimension comprises a helicopter equipment interface interaction view, a helicopter equipment activity analysis view and a helicopter equipment activity-capability mapping view; the performance evaluation dimension comprises a helicopter equipment capacity-performance mapping view, a helicopter equipment performance index decomposition view, a helicopter equipment performance data view and a helicopter equipment performance evaluation result view.
In the above helicopter performance evaluation framework oriented to demand analysis, the working process of the helicopter equipment layer is as follows:
the helicopter equipment mission task analysis view generates a helicopter equipment mission and task list on the basis of an equipment system mission analysis view, a helicopter equipment scene description view generates a scene description on the basis of a helicopter equipment mission analysis view and an equipment system scene description view, a helicopter equipment initial capacity requirement view generates an initial helicopter equipment capacity requirement on the basis of a helicopter equipment scene description view and an equipment system capacity decomposition view and decomposes the initial helicopter equipment capacity requirement into a helicopter equipment capacity requirement view, the equipment initial capacity requirement view simultaneously provides input for a helicopter equipment interface interaction view and a helicopter equipment activity analysis view, the helicopter equipment interface interaction view receives a capacity interaction relation generated by an equipment system activity-capacity mapping view, an interface requirement is generated and used as input of a helicopter equipment activity analysis view, a combat activity list generated by the helicopter equipment activity analysis view is provided for the helicopter equipment activity-capacity mapping view to generate a capacity requirement which is used as input of the helicopter equipment capacity requirement view on the one hand, and on the other hand, the helicopter equipment capacity-capacity mapping view generates efficiency data by mapping the helicopter equipment capacity-capacity mapping view, the helicopter equipment capacity analysis view generates an efficiency index system, calculates or simulates the efficiency data to obtain a helicopter equipment capacity evaluation result, and integrates the helicopter equipment performance evaluation data into a final equipment evaluation view.
The invention has the beneficial technical effects that:
compared with the prior art, the efficiency evaluation method realizes the efficiency evaluation of three levels of the combat system layer, the equipment system layer and the helicopter equipment layer through the requirement analysis and the efficiency index mapping, and is an efficiency evaluation framework oriented to combat requirements.
On one hand, the efficiency evaluation is developed based on the scene requirement, and is closer to the combat requirement; on the other hand, each level is mutually pulled, so that the efficiency evaluation is systematized, the application scene of the efficiency evaluation is promoted, and the flow of the efficiency evaluation is determined.
Specifically, the invention has the following technical effects:
firstly, a three-layer four-dimensional requirement analysis and efficiency evaluation framework is provided, and the steps are elaborated in detail, so that the requirement demonstration and efficiency evaluation flow of helicopter equipment is clear;
secondly, based on the requirement analysis, capability analysis, comprehensive design and efficiency evaluation of the scene development operation system, equipment system and helicopter equipment, each step is advanced layer by layer, and the information transmission relation of each step is given, so that the operation is easy;
thirdly, performance evaluation is carried out on a combat system, an equipment system and a helicopter equipment layer, so that the capacity requirement of each layer can be verified, and the credibility of requirement analysis is ensured;
and fourthly, efficiency evaluation is carried out based on scenes, so that the efficiency evaluation is closer to the combat demand, and the evaluation result has more practical value.
Drawings
Fig. 1 is a schematic view of the framework of the invention.
Detailed Description
The invention comprises the following steps:
1) The military requirement analysis of the helicopter is carried out by adopting the thought of 'capability-based', mission tasks of a combat system are analyzed, a typical scene is designed, the capability requirement of the combat system, the system composition and the interrelation thereof are analyzed, and the effectiveness evaluation of the combat system is carried out;
2) Based on mission tasks, combat scenes and capability analysis results of the combat system, carrying out equipment system task analysis, designing the combat scenes of the equipment system, analyzing the capability requirements of the equipment system, equipment composition and the interrelation thereof, and carrying out equipment system efficiency evaluation;
3) The method comprises the steps of carrying out helicopter task analysis based on mission tasks, operation scenes and capability analysis results of an equipment system, designing the operation scenes of helicopter equipment, analyzing capability requirements of a helicopter and interface relations with other equipment, and carrying out efficiency evaluation of the helicopter equipment.
The specific implementation mode of the invention is as follows:
1. analyzing design requirements of a combat system
Firstly, analyzing the possible direction of conflict according to the national security strategy, the military strategy and the international situation, analyzing the fighting intentions of the enemy and the my, and analyzing the mission of the fighting system of our through an ORV-1 analysis view. According to the completion standard of mission tasks and the regional environment where conflicts occur, the factors such as combat time, process, force and the like are designed through a scene description view ORV-2 of a combat system.
2. Combat system capability analysis and comprehensive design
On the basis of a battle system scene, the battle processes of two parties are analyzed in detail, the abilities of the two parties involved in the battle in the aspects of information reconnaissance, command control, firepower striking, logistics support, information confrontation and the like are analyzed, and a battle system ability demand view OCV-1 is formed. According to the mission and the capability of the combat mission, the prior combat formation is considered, and a combat system is designed to form a view ODV-1, such as a ground assault group, an air assault group, a sea assault group and the like. And analyzing the combat activities of all the components and the information interaction relation among all the activities through the activity analysis view ODV-2 of the combat system to obtain a combat activity list. And constructing a combat activity-combat capability mapping matrix to obtain an combat system activity-capability mapping view ODV-3. And decomposing the fighting capacity to the component parts of the fighting system to obtain the capacity requirement OCV-2 of each fighting component.
3. Effectiveness assessment of combat systems
Aiming at the capacity requirements of different levels obtained by the campaign-capacity mapping view ODV-3 of the combat system, the assessment indexes of each requirement are mapped to obtain a capacity-efficiency mapping view OEV-1 of the combat system. Comprehensively analyzing the levels of the efficiency evaluation indexes from the combat effect and the combat loss dimension, and designing an efficiency evaluation index system OEV-2 of a combat system. For each efficiency index, the efficiency evaluation index value OEV-3 is obtained through means of formula calculation, expert scoring, statistics, simulation tests and the like, and finally the battle system efficiency evaluation result view OEV-4 is obtained through aggregation.
4. Design requirements of analytical equipment systems
Decomposing the mission task ORV-1 of the combat system to the used equipment system to obtain an equipment system mission task analysis view SRV-1, and combining the combat scene to obtain an equipment system task list. On the basis of the scene description of the combat system, scene elements related to the equipment system are analyzed, and the equipment system scene description SRV-2 is obtained by combining with an equipment system task list.
5. Equipment system capability analysis and comprehensive design
On the basis of an equipment system scene, the fighting processes of the two parties are analyzed in detail, the capabilities of the two parties in the aspects of information reconnaissance, command control, firepower striking, logistics support, information countermeasure and the like are analyzed, and an equipment system capability demand view SCV-1 is formed. According to the mission task and the capability of the equipment, the existing equipment structure is considered, and an equipment system composition view SDV-1 is designed, such as aerial delivery equipment, low-altitude striking equipment and the like. And analyzing the activities of all the component equipment and the information interaction relation among the activities through an equipment system activity analysis view SDV-2 to obtain an equipment activity list. And constructing an equipment activity-equipment capacity mapping matrix to obtain an equipment system activity-capacity mapping view SDV-3. And decomposing the equipment system capacity to the component parts of the equipment system to obtain the capacity requirement SCV-2 of each equipment component.
6. Equipment system performance evaluation
And mapping the assessment indexes of each requirement aiming at the capability requirements of different levels obtained by the equipment system activity-capability mapping view SDV-3 to obtain an equipment system capability-efficiency mapping view SEV-1. And comprehensively analyzing the levels of the efficiency evaluation indexes from the combat effect and the combat loss dimension, and designing an efficiency evaluation index system SEV-2 of the equipment system. And obtaining an efficiency evaluation index value SEV-3 for each efficiency index through means of formula calculation, expert scoring, statistics, simulation tests and the like, and finally obtaining an equipment system efficiency evaluation result view SEV-4 through aggregation.
7. Analyzing design requirements of helicopter equipment
Decomposing the mission task SRV-1 of the equipment system to helicopter equipment to obtain a helicopter equipment mission task analysis view ERV-1, and obtaining a helicopter equipment task list by combining a battle scene. On the basis of the equipment system scene description, scene elements related to the helicopter equipment system are analyzed, and the helicopter equipment local scene description ERV-2 is obtained by combining a helicopter equipment task list.
8. Helicopter equipment capability analysis and comprehensive design
On the basis of a local scene of helicopter equipment, the combat processes of the equipment of both sides are analyzed in detail, and the capabilities of the helicopter equipment in the aspects of information reconnaissance, command control, firepower striking, maneuvering transportation, service support, electronic countermeasure and the like are analyzed by combining a tactical law and an application rule of the helicopter equipment, so that the original capability requirement ECV-1 of the helicopter equipment is formed. Analyzing the interaction relation between the helicopter and other equipment according to mission tasks and the capability of the helicopter equipment to obtain an interface requirement EDV-1 of the helicopter equipment, and analyzing the combat activity EDV-2, activities and information interaction relation among the activities of the helicopter equipment by using an activity diagram to obtain an equipment activity list. And constructing a helicopter equipment activity-equipment capacity mapping matrix to obtain an equipment system activity-capacity mapping view EDV-3. Based on the analysis result, the helicopter equipment requirements are perfected, and a helicopter equipment capacity requirement view ECV-2 is obtained.
9. Helicopter equipment performance assessment
And mapping the assessment indexes of each requirement aiming at the helicopter capacity requirements obtained by the helicopter equipment activity-capacity mapping view EDV-3 to obtain a helicopter equipment capacity-efficiency mapping view EEV-1. And comprehensively analyzing the levels of the efficiency evaluation indexes from the combat effect and the combat loss dimension, and designing an efficiency evaluation index system EEV-2 of the helicopter equipment. And obtaining an efficiency evaluation index value EEV-3 for each efficiency index through means of formula calculation, expert scoring, statistics, simulation tests and the like, and finally obtaining a helicopter equipment efficiency evaluation result view SEV-4 through aggregation.
The helicopter efficiency evaluation framework oriented to demand analysis combines demand analysis and efficiency evaluation of a combat system, an equipment system and helicopter equipment, is convenient for demand argumentation personnel to use, can form clear demand argumentation and efficiency evaluation flows through the use of the framework, is close to combat practice, and enables the helicopter equipment to be rapidly integrated into the combat system.
The invention relates to a capability requirement analysis and efficiency evaluation framework in the military requirement demonstration application process of large-scale complex products like helicopters, and the like, and can also be widely applied to the capability requirement analysis and efficiency evaluation of other large-scale complex products (such as spaceflight, ships, weapons and the like).
Claims (8)
1. A demand analysis oriented helicopter performance evaluation framework, comprising: a combat system layer, an equipment system layer and a helicopter equipment layer; the combat system layer is used for analyzing the capability requirements, the composition and the mutual relationship among the compositions of the combat system and developing the efficiency evaluation of the combat system; the equipment system layer is used for analyzing the capability requirements, the composition and the interrelation among the compositions of the equipment system according to the capability requirements, the composition and the interrelation among the compositions of the combat system obtained by the analysis of the combat system layer and developing the efficiency evaluation of the equipment system; and the helicopter equipment layer is used for analyzing the capability requirements of the helicopter equipment and developing the efficiency evaluation of the helicopter equipment according to the capability requirements, the composition and the mutual relation among the compositions of the equipment system obtained by the analysis of the equipment system layer.
2. The demand analysis oriented helicopter performance evaluation framework of claim 1 wherein said tactical architecture level, equipment architecture level and helicopter equipment level are each comprised of four dimensions, a demand analysis dimension, a capability analysis dimension, a composite design dimension and a performance evaluation dimension.
3. The demand analysis oriented helicopter performance evaluation framework of claim 2, wherein in the tactical hierarchy level, the demand analysis dimension comprises a tactical mission task analysis view (ORV-1) and a tactical scenario description view (ORV-2); the capacity analysis dimension comprises a combat system capacity demand view (OCV-1) and a combat system capacity decomposition view (OCV-2); the comprehensive design dimension comprises a combat system composition view (ODV-1), a combat system activity analysis view (ODV-2) and a combat system activity-capacity mapping view (ODV-3); the effectiveness evaluation dimension comprises a battle system capability-effectiveness mapping view (OEV-1), a battle system effectiveness index decomposition view (OEV-2), a battle system effectiveness data view (OEV-3) and a battle system effectiveness evaluation result view (OEV-4).
4. The demand analysis oriented helicopter performance evaluation framework of claim 3, wherein the operational process of the tactical hierarchy level is as follows:
the operational system mission task analysis view (ORV-1) generates an operational system mission and task list, provides input for an operational system scene description view (ORV-2), the operational system capacity demand view (OCV-1) generates initial operational system capacity demand on the basis of the operational system scene description view (ORV-2), and is decomposed into a combat system capability decomposition view (OCV-2), the combat system capability demand view (OCV-1) provides input for the combat system composition view (ODV-1), the system architecture generated by the combat system composition view (ODV-1) is the basis of the analysis of the combat system activity analysis view (ODV-2), meanwhile, a battle system activity analysis view (ODV-2) generates a battle activity list, and a battle system activity-capacity mapping view (ODV-3) generates a capacity demand mapping, wherein capacity demands generated by the capacity demand mapping are used as input of a battle system capacity decomposition view (OCV-2) on one hand and mapped into a capacity index through a battle system capacity-capacity mapping view (OEV-1) on the other hand, through layer-by-layer decomposition, an effectiveness index system is obtained from an effectiveness index decomposition view (OEV-2) of the combat system, then the effectiveness index system is calculated or simulated to obtain effectiveness evaluation data, then the effectiveness evaluation data is aggregated into an effectiveness data view (OEV-3) of the combat system, and finally an effectiveness evaluation result view (OEV-4) of the combat system is generated.
5. The demand analysis oriented helicopter performance evaluation framework of claim 3, wherein in the equipment architecture layer, the demand analysis dimension comprises an equipment architecture mission task analysis view (SRV-1) and an equipment architecture scenario description view (SRV-2); the capability analysis dimension comprises an equipment system capability requirement view (SCV-1) and an equipment system capability decomposition view (SCV-2); the comprehensive design dimension comprises a battle system and equipment system mapping view (SDV-1), an equipment system activity analysis view (SDV-2) and an equipment system activity-capability mapping view (SDV-3); the performance evaluation dimension comprises an equipment system capacity-performance mapping view (SEV-1), an equipment system performance index decomposition view (SEV-2), an equipment system performance data view (SEV-3) and an equipment system performance evaluation result view (SEV-4).
6. The demand analysis oriented helicopter performance evaluation framework of claim 5, wherein the equipment hierarchy layer operates as follows:
an equipment system mission task analysis view (SRV-1) generates an equipment system mission and task list on the basis of a combat system mission task analysis view (ORV-1), an equipment system scene description view (SRV-2) generates a scene description on the basis of the equipment system mission task analysis view (SRV-1) and the combat system scene description view (ORV-2), an equipment system capacity requirement view (SCV-1) generates an initial equipment system capacity requirement on the basis of the equipment system scene description view (SRV-2) and decomposes the initial equipment system capacity requirement into an equipment system capacity decomposition view (SCV-2), the equipment system capacity requirement view (SCV-1) provides input for both a layer-by-layer combat system and an equipment system mapping view (SDV-1), a system architecture generated by the combat system and equipment system mapping view (SDV-1) is the basis of the equipment system activity analysis view (SDV-2) analysis, while the equipment system activity analysis view (SDV-2) generates an activity mapping view, and generates an activity mapping view (SDV-3) as an activity index, and on the other hand, the equipment system capacity decomposition view (SCV-2) generates an equipment capacity requirement index by the equipment system capacity decomposition view (SDV-2), and calculating or simulating the efficiency index system to obtain efficiency evaluation data, then aggregating the efficiency evaluation data into an equipment system efficiency data view (SEV-3), and finally generating a combat system efficiency evaluation result view (SEV-4).
7. The demand analysis oriented helicopter performance evaluation framework of claim 5, wherein in the helicopter equipment layer, the demand analysis dimensions include a helicopter equipment mission analysis view (ERV-1) and a helicopter equipment scenario description view (ERV-2); the capability analysis dimension comprises a helicopter equipment initial capability requirement view (ECV-1) and a helicopter equipment capability requirement view (ECV-2); the comprehensive design dimension comprises a helicopter equipment interface interaction view (EDV-1), a helicopter equipment activity analysis view (EDV-2) and a helicopter equipment activity-capability mapping view (EDV-3); the performance evaluation dimension comprises a helicopter equipment capacity-performance mapping view (EEV-1), a helicopter equipment performance index decomposition view (EEV-2), a helicopter equipment performance data view (EEV-3) and a helicopter equipment performance evaluation result view (EEV-4).
8. The demand analysis oriented helicopter performance evaluation framework of claim 7, wherein the helicopter equipment layer operates as follows:
the helicopter equipment mission task analysis view (ERV-1) generates a helicopter equipment mission and task list on the basis of an equipment architecture mission task analysis view (SRV-1), the helicopter equipment scene description view (ERV-2) generates a scene description on the basis of the helicopter equipment mission task analysis view (ERV-1) and the equipment architecture scene description view (SRV-2), the helicopter equipment initial capability requirement view (ECV-1) generates an initial helicopter equipment capability requirement on the basis of the helicopter equipment scene description view (ERV-2) and the equipment architecture capability decomposition view (SCV-2) and decomposes the initial helicopter equipment capability requirement into the helicopter equipment capability requirement view (ECV-2), the equipment initial capacity requirement view (ECV-1) provides input for a helicopter equipment interface interaction view (EDV-1) and a helicopter equipment activity analysis view (EDV-2) at the same time, the helicopter equipment interface interaction view (EDV-1) takes on capacity interaction relation generated by an equipment system activity-capacity mapping view (SDV-3) to generate an interface requirement as input of the helicopter equipment activity analysis view (EDV-2), a fighting activity list generated by the helicopter equipment activity analysis view (EDV-2) is provided for the helicopter equipment activity-capacity mapping view (EDV-3) to generate a capacity requirement, and on the one hand, the equipment initial capacity requirement view (ECV-1) serves as input of the helicopter equipment capacity requirement view (ECV-2), on the other hand, the helicopter equipment capacity-efficiency mapping view (EEV-1) is mapped into an efficiency index, an efficiency index system is obtained from the helicopter equipment efficiency index decomposition view (EEV-2), efficiency evaluation data is obtained by calculating or simulating the efficiency index system, then the efficiency evaluation data is aggregated into a helicopter equipment efficiency data view (EEV-3), and finally a helicopter equipment efficiency evaluation result view (EEV-4) is generated.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211459253.6A CN115936351A (en) | 2022-11-17 | 2022-11-17 | Helicopter efficiency evaluation framework oriented to demand analysis |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211459253.6A CN115936351A (en) | 2022-11-17 | 2022-11-17 | Helicopter efficiency evaluation framework oriented to demand analysis |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN115936351A true CN115936351A (en) | 2023-04-07 |
Family
ID=86648273
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211459253.6A Pending CN115936351A (en) | 2022-11-17 | 2022-11-17 | Helicopter efficiency evaluation framework oriented to demand analysis |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN115936351A (en) |
-
2022
- 2022-11-17 CN CN202211459253.6A patent/CN115936351A/en active Pending
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US8336775B2 (en) | Aerospace-ground integration testbed | |
| Handley et al. | Human view dynamics—The NATO approach | |
| CN116051319A (en) | Tactical collaborative combat simulation training system and tactical collaborative combat simulation training method | |
| CN113312789A (en) | Simulation system and method based on multi-information fusion | |
| Sheehan | Next steps in joint force integration | |
| Edwards et al. | Whole systems trade analysis | |
| CN115936351A (en) | Helicopter efficiency evaluation framework oriented to demand analysis | |
| Stevens et al. | Augmented reality technology in US army training (WIP) | |
| Timian et al. | Report Out of the C4I Study Group | |
| CN114722644A (en) | Cluster countermeasure simulation scenario editing modeling method and modeling system | |
| Jia et al. | An operational effectiveness evaluation method of the swarming UAVs air combat system | |
| Soh | Determining Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance (ISR) system effectiveness, and integration as part of force protection and system survivability | |
| Powell | Control of entity interactions in a hierarchical variable resolution simulation | |
| McColl et al. | Test-bed for integrated ground control station experimentation and rehearsal: crew performance and authority pathway concept development | |
| Downes et al. | Using agent-based modeling and human-in-the-loop simulation to analyze army acquisition programs | |
| Hardy et al. | Advanced distributed simulation: decade in review and future challenges | |
| Brett et al. | The combat automation requirements testbed (CART) task 5 interim report: modeling a strike fighter pilot conducting a time critical target mission | |
| Vandepeer et al. | Linking missions to scenarios for analysis of military macro-systems | |
| Paley et al. | Designing optimal organizational structures for combat information centers in the next generation of navy ships | |
| Smith | Wargaming | |
| Song et al. | Role-Based Vehicle-Level CGF Entity Model Code Framework | |
| Pirnie et al. | Analysis of Special Operations Forces in Decision Aids: Current Shortfalls | |
| Qin et al. | Confrontation Simulation Platform Based on Spatio-temporal Agents | |
| Oregon et al. | Smart fires: A COTS approach to tactical fire support using a smartphone | |
| Moses et al. | Changing Strategies for Training Military Units |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |