CN115829781A - Iron and steel production enterprise carbon emission management method - Google Patents
Iron and steel production enterprise carbon emission management method Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN115829781A CN115829781A CN202211551017.7A CN202211551017A CN115829781A CN 115829781 A CN115829781 A CN 115829781A CN 202211551017 A CN202211551017 A CN 202211551017A CN 115829781 A CN115829781 A CN 115829781A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- emission
- carbon
- production
- steel
- carbon emission
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Classifications
-
- Y—GENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
- Y02—TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
- Y02P—CLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN THE PRODUCTION OR PROCESSING OF GOODS
- Y02P90/00—Enabling technologies with a potential contribution to greenhouse gas [GHG] emissions mitigation
- Y02P90/80—Management or planning
- Y02P90/84—Greenhouse gas [GHG] management systems
Landscapes
- General Factory Administration (AREA)
Abstract
The invention relates to a carbon emission management method for iron and steel production enterprises, which comprises the following steps: tracking and obtaining production data of each batch of steel products, and determining the carbon emission level of each production process; based on the obtained carbon emission levels for each production run, a carbon footprint report for the batch of steel products is generated. According to the invention, the carbon emission level of each batch of steel products in each production process is determined, and the carbon footprint report is correspondingly generated, so that an enterprise can be helped to establish a complete carbon footprint of the steel products, the steel production enterprise is supported to carry out the authentication work of green low-carbon products, and the product competitiveness of the enterprise is comprehensively improved; the invention can generate carbon footprints aiming at different steel grades and different production batches of the same steel grade, thereby exactly knowing the carbon emission level of each main steel product and the carbon emission composition condition of each production process forming the production link of the steel products, and facilitating the fine and targeted management of steel production enterprises.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to a carbon emission management method for iron and steel manufacturing enterprises.
Background
The proportion of the total carbon emission of the steel industry to the total carbon emission of the whole country is about 15%, and the high proportion makes the steel industry become the department with the highest carbon emission ratio in the manufacturing industry. Therefore, the national level specially provides a 'method for accounting and reporting greenhouse gas emission and a guideline (trial) for Chinese iron and steel manufacturing enterprises' for the production of steel, and correspondingly sets up the national standard GB/T32151.5-2015 part 5 for accounting and reporting the greenhouse gas emission: iron and steel manufacturing enterprises for helping and guiding the iron and steel manufacturing enterprises to scientifically and reasonably develop carbon emission accounting and reporting activities in the production process. The method is very helpful and meaningful for accurately mastering the total carbon emission and the primary structure of each steel production enterprise and further summarizing and even mastering the corresponding conditions of the whole steel industry.
However, this results in macroscopic data on carbon emission levels and structure throughout the steel production enterprise. For a flow-type steel production process consisting of various complex machining conversion processes, macroscopic carbon emission data at an enterprise level cannot go deep downwards so as to reflect the carbon emission condition of each constituent sub-process, and therefore, the sub-processes cannot be sequenced according to macroscopic information of carbon emission, and therefore, targeted emission reduction measures and optimization activities are taken for important sub-processes of carbon emission. In addition, the main steel products of the steel production enterprises are usually not classified into one type, and the macroscopic carbon emission data of the enterprise level cannot be subdivided into a certain type of specific products, so that the carbon emission level of each main steel product and the carbon emission constitution of each production sub-process forming the production link of the type of the product cannot be known exactly.
Disclosure of Invention
The invention relates to a carbon emission management method for iron and steel manufacturing enterprises, which can at least solve part of defects in the prior art.
The invention relates to a carbon emission management method for iron and steel production enterprises, which comprises the following steps:
tracking and obtaining production data of each batch of steel products, and determining the carbon emission level of each production process;
based on the obtained carbon emission levels for each production run, a carbon footprint report for the batch of steel products is generated.
As one embodiment, the method for managing carbon emissions of an iron and steel manufacturing plant further comprises:
and collecting historical carbon emission level data of the same steel product, performing carbon emission historical level evaluation and/or peer analysis, judging whether carbon emission adjustment and optimization are needed, and providing quantitative guidance for selection and implementation of carbon reduction measures.
As one embodiment, the method for managing carbon emissions of an iron and steel manufacturing plant further comprises:
and comparing the carbon emission level data of the current batch of steel products with the historical carbon emission level data of the same batch of steel products, and when the carbon emission level fluctuates according to the comparison result, acquiring the production operation conditions and production process parameters of the current batch and the historical batch for comparison, performing attribution analysis on the fluctuation phenomenon of the carbon emission, and determining the main influence factors of the carbon emission fluctuation, thereby capturing the working gravity center of carbon emission control.
In one embodiment, the method for determining the carbon emission level of a manufacturing process comprises the steps of,
s1, defining a carbon emission accounting boundary of a current process;
s2, identifying an emission source based on the defined carbon emission accounting boundary;
s3, aiming at the identified characteristics of the emission sources, making a corresponding data acquisition scheme and an acquisition instrument configuration strategy, and collecting emission activity level data of each emission source in real time on line;
and obtaining an emission factor of each emission source;
s4, calculating the carbon emission value of the current process according to the emission activity level data of each emission source and the emission factor of each emission source
S5, calculating the carbon emission intensity of the current process according to the following formula
Wherein, P is the production of the process product of the current process in the accounting period.
As one embodiment, the emissions sources include a direct emissions source, an upstream emissions source, and a credit emissions source, wherein,
direct emissions are carbon dioxide emissions generated by production activities within the carbon emissions accounting boundaries;
the upstream emission is carbon dioxide emission corresponding to input materials and energy sources which occur outside the carbon emission accounting boundary but are closely related to production activities within the carbon emission accounting boundary;
the credit emissions are carbon dioxide emissions corresponding to the material and energy output from within the carbon emissions accounting boundaries.
In one embodiment, S4 is calculated by the following formula
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
subscripts d, u, c denote direct, upstream and credit emissions sources, respectively;
the corner marks i, j, k represent the number of direct, upstream and credit discharge sources, respectively.
As one embodiment, identifying the emissions source first identifies necessary production inputs and outputs within the carbon emissions accounting boundaries, the necessary production inputs and outputs including raw materials, fuels, auxiliary raw materials, energy carriers, process products, byproducts, and solid waste; and identifying each identified emission source item by item to classify the types of the emission sources.
As an embodiment, the method for obtaining the emission factor includes:
for the condition that the emission source is fuel, raw materials, products or byproducts, the emission factor adopts a default value issued by a government competent department, or entrusts a professional organization to carry out regular detection according to a corresponding standard, or adopts an effective detection value provided in a related party settlement certificate;
for the discharge factor of the outsourcing power, selecting the corresponding regional power grid discharge factor published by government competent departments in the recent year according to the power grid scribing of the enterprise production region; for the emission factor of outsourcing heating power, the latest official data released by government authorities are adopted.
The invention has at least the following beneficial effects:
according to the invention, the production data of each batch of steel products are tracked and obtained, and the carbon emission level of each production process is determined, so that a carbon footprint report of the batch of steel products can be generated, an enterprise can be helped to establish a complete carbon footprint of the steel products, the iron and steel production enterprise is supported to carry out the authentication work of green low-carbon products, the green and low-carbon attributes of the enterprise products are added on the basis of the cost and quality competitive attributes, and the competitiveness of the enterprise products is further comprehensively improved.
The invention can generate carbon footprints aiming at different steel grades and different production batches of the same steel grade, thereby exactly knowing the carbon emission level of each main steel product and the carbon emission composition condition of each production process forming the production link of the steel products, and facilitating the fine and targeted management of steel production enterprises.
The method can accurately determine the carbon emission intensity of the steel production process, can dynamically master the carbon emission level and the change condition of the steel production process, is convenient for steel production enterprises to adjust and optimize the carbon emission in time, and also provides quantitative guidance for the selection and implementation of carbon reduction measures. Meanwhile, production personnel can conveniently combine the operating conditions and the process parameter variation conditions of the production process to carry out attribution analysis on the fluctuation phenomenon of the carbon emission and determine the main influence factors of the carbon emission fluctuation, so that the working gravity center of carbon emission control is grasped, and the effective control of the carbon emission from the process level of the iron and steel production enterprises is facilitated.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the embodiments of the present invention or the technical solutions in the prior art, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art will be briefly described below, it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and for those skilled in the art, other drawings can be obtained according to the drawings without creative efforts.
FIG. 1 is a schematic process diagram of a method for managing carbon emissions from an iron and steel manufacturing enterprise according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a schematic view of a sub-process configuration of a converter steelmaking process according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram illustrating a sub-process configuration of a blast furnace ironmaking process according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram showing the sub-steps of the raw material sintering step according to the embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention are clearly and completely described below, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
Example one
The embodiment of the invention provides a carbon emission management method for an iron and steel production enterprise, which comprises the following steps:
tracking and obtaining production data of each batch of steel products, and determining the carbon emission level of each production process;
based on the obtained carbon emission levels for each production run, a carbon footprint report for the batch of steel products is generated.
Wherein, the production process of the steel product generally mainly comprises a raw material treatment process, an ironmaking process, a steelmaking process and a steel rolling process; in the raw material treatment process, the raw material sintering process and the coking process belong to the key carbon emission points; the iron-making process is generally a blast furnace iron-making process; the steel-making process may be a converter steel-making process or an electric furnace steel-making process according to the difference of the processes, and in the embodiment, the continuous casting process is divided into a sub-process of the steel-making process; the steel rolling process is based on the process characteristics, and the carbon emission level is relatively low.
According to the invention, the production data of each batch of steel products are tracked and obtained, and the carbon emission level of each production process is determined, so that a carbon footprint report of the batch of steel products can be generated, an enterprise can be helped to establish a complete carbon footprint of the steel products, the iron and steel production enterprise is supported to carry out the authentication work of green low-carbon products, the green and low-carbon attributes of the enterprise products are added on the basis of the cost and quality competitive attributes, and the competitiveness of the enterprise products is further comprehensively improved.
In the generated carbon footprint report, the batch of the steel products, the performance parameters of the steel products, the production data of each generation procedure and the carbon emission level of each generation procedure can be correspondingly corresponded, so that production personnel can conveniently master the main influence factors of the carbon emission level of each generation procedure.
Further, the carbon emission management method for the steel manufacturing enterprise further comprises the following steps:
and collecting historical carbon emission level data of the same steel product, performing historical carbon emission level evaluation and/or peer-to-peer analysis, judging whether carbon emission adjustment and optimization are needed, and providing quantitative guidance for selection and implementation of carbon reduction measures.
Further, the carbon emission management method for the steel manufacturing enterprise further comprises the following steps:
and comparing the carbon emission level data of the current batch of steel products with the historical carbon emission level data of the same batch of steel products, and when the carbon emission level fluctuates according to the comparison result, acquiring the production operation conditions and the production process parameters of the current batch and the historical batches subjected to comparison, carrying out attribution analysis on the fluctuation phenomenon of the carbon emission, and determining the main influence factors of the carbon emission fluctuation, so that the working gravity center of the carbon emission control is accurately grasped.
Example two
The embodiment of the invention provides a method for determining the carbon emission level of a production process, which can be used in the first embodiment.
As shown in fig. 1, the method comprises the following steps:
s1, defining a carbon emission accounting boundary of a current process;
s2, identifying an emission source based on the defined carbon emission accounting boundary;
s3, aiming at the identified characteristics of the emission sources, making a corresponding data acquisition scheme and an acquisition instrument configuration strategy, and collecting emission activity level data of each emission source in real time on line;
and obtaining emission factors of each emission source;
s4, calculating the carbon emission value of the current process according to the emission activity level data of each emission source and the emission factor of each emission source
S5, calculating the carbon emission intensity of the current process according to the following formula
Wherein, P is the production of the process product of the current process in the accounting period.
In one embodiment, as shown in FIG. 1, the emissions sources include a direct emissions source, an upstream emissions source, and a credit emissions source, wherein:
(1) Direct emissions are carbon dioxide emissions generated by production activities within the carbon emissions accounting boundaries; specifically, the method comprises the steps of discharging caused by activities such as fuel combustion, raw material process reaction and the like in the current working procedure;
(2) The upstream emission is carbon dioxide emission corresponding to input materials and energy sources which occur outside the carbon emission accounting boundary but are closely related to production activities within the carbon emission accounting boundary; the system specifically comprises upstream discharge corresponding to auxiliary raw materials (such as oxygen, nitrogen, argon, compressed air, industrial fresh water, soft water, desalted water and the like) and energy carriers (such as electric power, steam and the like);
(3) The credit emission is the carbon dioxide emission corresponding to the materials and energy output from the carbon emission accounting boundary; wherein, the process products transmitted between processes or directly transmitted to the outside of the enterprise gate are considered to be directly discharged as credit deduction at the process carbon discharge accounting boundary, and the deduction is calculated by the credit discharge factor of the externally used by-products (for example, the converter steel-making process is taken as an example, the by-products include converter gas and converter slag).
Further, in S4, the following formula is used for calculation
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
subscripts d, u, c denote direct, upstream and credit emissions sources, respectively;
the corner marks i, j, k represent the number of direct, upstream and credit discharge sources, respectively.
Further preferably, when identifying the emission source, identifying necessary production inputs and outputs within the carbon emission accounting boundaries, the necessary production inputs and outputs including raw materials, fuels, auxiliary raw materials, energy carriers, process products, byproducts, and solid waste; and identifying the identified emission sources item by item to classify the types of the emission sources, namely identifying and classifying the carbon emissions corresponding to the input and output according to a direct emission source, an upstream emission source and a credit emission source.
In one embodiment, the method for obtaining the emission factor comprises the following steps:
for the condition that the emission source is fuel, raw materials, products or byproducts, the emission factor adopts a default value issued by a government competent department, or entrusts a professional organization to carry out regular detection according to a corresponding standard, or adopts an effective detection value provided in a related party settlement certificate;
for the discharge factor of the outsourcing power, selecting the corresponding regional power grid discharge factor published by government competent departments in the recent year according to the power grid scribing of the enterprise production region; for the emission factor of outsourcing heating power, the latest official data released by government authorities are adopted.
In one embodiment, the carbon emission accounting boundary is determined by the range from materials and energy provided by a previous process and a public and auxiliary system to all production steps involved in the production completion of a process product; generally, a repair and maintenance facility or the like that serves the current process does not serve as a carbon emission accounting boundary.
EXAMPLE III
In the second embodiment, when the current process is a converter steelmaking process, the converter steelmaking process roughly includes the respective sub-processes shown in fig. 2.
The carbon emission accounting boundary specifically comprises molten iron, scrap steel, fuel gas, bulk materials (flux, alloy, pig iron and the like), compressed air, industrial fresh water, desalted water, soft water, nitrogen, oxygen, argon, steam, electric power and the like consumed by process production, and process products and byproducts (casting blanks, converter slag and the like) obtained by process production. Preferably, the carbon emission accounting boundaries do not include storage processing and transportation of various types of materials and energy in previous processes.
As the following table illustrates the emissions sources identified based in part on the delineated carbon emissions accounting boundaries:
for S3, those skilled in the art can formulate a corresponding data acquisition scheme and collection instrument configuration strategy according to specific emission source characteristics. Taking converter gas as an example, the measured parameters comprise gas flow, C element content and net heat value, and the carbon emission activity level data corresponding to the converter gas can be accurately obtained through multi-parameter detection cooperation; for gas flow, including but not limited to, the orifice plate detection mode, and for C element content and net calorific value, the detection test mode can be adopted.
Example four
In the second embodiment, when the current process is a blast furnace iron making process, the blast furnace iron making process substantially includes the respective sub-processes shown in fig. 3.
The carbon emission accounting boundary specifically comprises coke, fuel gas, bulk materials (fusing agent and coal injection), compressed air, industrial fresh water, soft water, nitrogen, oxygen, steam, electric power and the like consumed by the process production, and process products and byproducts (molten iron, blast furnace slag and the like) obtained by the process production. Preferably, the carbon emission accounting boundaries do not include storage processing and transportation of various types of materials and energy in previous processes.
As shown in the following table, the emissions sources identified based in part on the delineated carbon emissions accounting boundaries are exemplified:
EXAMPLE five
In the second embodiment, when the previous step is a raw material sintering step, the raw material sintering step substantially includes the respective sub-steps shown in fig. 4.
The carbon emission accounting boundary specifically comprises fuel gas, solid fuel, flux, compressed air, industrial fresh water, desalted water, steam, electric power and the like consumed by process production. Preferably, the carbon emission accounting boundaries do not include storage processing and transportation of various types of materials and energy in previous processes.
As shown in the following table, the emissions sources identified based in part on the delineated carbon emissions accounting boundaries are exemplified:
the above description is only for the purpose of illustrating the preferred embodiments of the present invention and is not to be construed as limiting the invention, and any modifications, equivalents, improvements and the like that fall within the spirit and principle of the present invention are intended to be included therein.
Claims (8)
1. A carbon emission management method for steel manufacturing enterprises is characterized by comprising the following steps:
tracking and obtaining production data of each batch of steel products, and determining the carbon emission level of each production process;
based on the obtained carbon emission levels for each production run, a carbon footprint report for the batch of steel products is generated.
2. The method of managing carbon emissions from an iron and steel manufacturing enterprise of claim 1, further comprising:
and collecting historical carbon emission level data of the same steel product, performing carbon emission historical level evaluation and/or peer analysis, judging whether carbon emission adjustment and optimization are needed, and providing quantitative guidance for selection and implementation of carbon reduction measures.
3. The method of managing carbon emissions from an iron and steel manufacturing enterprise of claim 1, further comprising:
and comparing the carbon emission level data of the current batch of steel products with the historical carbon emission level data of the same batch of steel products, and when the carbon emission level fluctuates according to the comparison result, acquiring the production operation conditions and production process parameters of the current batch and the historical batch for comparison, performing attribution analysis on the fluctuation phenomenon of the carbon emission, and determining the main influence factors of the carbon emission fluctuation, thereby capturing the working gravity center of carbon emission control.
4. The method of managing carbon emissions from an iron and steel manufacturing enterprise of claim 1, wherein the method of determining the carbon emission level of the manufacturing process comprises the steps of,
s1, defining a carbon emission accounting boundary of a current process;
s2, identifying an emission source based on the defined carbon emission accounting boundary;
s3, aiming at the identified characteristics of the emission sources, making a corresponding data acquisition scheme and an acquisition instrument configuration strategy, and collecting emission activity level data of each emission source in real time on line;
and obtaining an emission factor of each emission source;
s4, calculating a carbon emission value E of the current process according to the emission activity level data of each emission source and the emission factor of each emission source CO2 ；
S5, calculating the carbon emission intensity of the current process according to the following formula
Wherein, P is the production of the process product of the current process in the accounting period.
5. The method of managing carbon emissions from iron and steel manufacturing enterprises of claim 4, wherein: the emissions sources include a direct emissions source, an upstream emissions source, and a credit emissions source, wherein,
direct emissions are carbon dioxide emissions generated by production activities within the carbon emissions accounting boundaries;
the upstream emission is carbon dioxide emission corresponding to input materials and energy sources which occur outside the carbon emission accounting boundary but are closely related to production activities within the carbon emission accounting boundary;
the credit emissions are carbon dioxide emissions corresponding to the materials and energy output from the carbon emissions accounting boundary.
6. The method for managing carbon emissions of iron and steel manufacturing enterprises of claim 5, wherein in S4, the following formula is used for calculation
Wherein the content of the first and second substances,
subscripts d, u, c denote direct, upstream and credit emissions sources, respectively;
the corner marks i, j, k represent the number of direct, upstream and credit discharge sources, respectively.
7. The method of managing carbon emissions from iron and steel manufacturing enterprises of claim 5, wherein: when identifying an emission source, identifying necessary production input and output within a carbon emission accounting boundary range, wherein the necessary production input and output comprise raw materials, fuels, auxiliary raw materials, energy carriers, process products, byproducts and solid wastes; and identifying each identified emission source item by item to classify the types of the emission sources.
8. The iron and steel manufacturing enterprise carbon emission management method of claim 4, wherein the emission factor obtaining method comprises:
for the condition that the emission source is fuel, raw materials, products or byproducts, the emission factor adopts a default value issued by a government competent department, or entrusts a professional organization to carry out regular detection according to a corresponding standard, or adopts an effective detection value provided in a related party settlement certificate;
for the discharge factor of the outsourcing power, selecting the corresponding regional power grid discharge factor published by government competent departments in the recent year according to the power grid scribing of the enterprise production region; for the emission factor of outsourcing heating power, the latest official data released by government authorities are adopted.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211551017.7A CN115829781A (en) | 2022-12-05 | 2022-12-05 | Iron and steel production enterprise carbon emission management method |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211551017.7A CN115829781A (en) | 2022-12-05 | 2022-12-05 | Iron and steel production enterprise carbon emission management method |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN115829781A true CN115829781A (en) | 2023-03-21 |
Family
ID=85545190
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211551017.7A Pending CN115829781A (en) | 2022-12-05 | 2022-12-05 | Iron and steel production enterprise carbon emission management method |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN115829781A (en) |
-
2022
- 2022-12-05 CN CN202211551017.7A patent/CN115829781A/en active Pending
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Sun et al. | Material and energy flows of the iron and steel industry: Status quo, challenges and perspectives | |
| Hernandez et al. | How resource-efficient is the global steel industry? | |
| Worrell et al. | Productivity benefits of industrial energy efficiency measures | |
| Farla et al. | The quality of energy intensity indicators for international comparison in the iron and steel industry | |
| Yi et al. | Environmental impact assessment of China's primary aluminum based on life cycle assessment | |
| US20220340827A1 (en) | System and method for intelligent gasification blending | |
| Hasanbeigi | Steel Climate Impact | |
| Matino et al. | Quantification of energy and environmental impacts in uncommon electric steelmaking scenarios to improve process sustainability | |
| CN116432897A (en) | Industrial park carbon emission accounting method considering uncertain factors | |
| CN116822714A (en) | Steel product carbon footprint management method and system based on life cycle evaluation | |
| CN115829352A (en) | Method for determining carbon emission level in steel production process | |
| Zhang et al. | Energy and exergy analyses of an integrated iron and steel making process | |
| CN115829781A (en) | Iron and steel production enterprise carbon emission management method | |
| CN117237160A (en) | Enterprise carbon emission accounting method and system | |
| CN116882775A (en) | Steel industry carbon asset management system and method | |
| Sultanguzin et al. | Optimizing the production of coke, coal chemicals, and steel on the basis of environmental and energy criteria | |
| Larsson | Process integration in the steel industry: Possibilities to analyse energy use and environmental impacts for an integrated steel mill | |
| Rudyka et al. | Innovations in coke production, market trends: insights from the Eurocoke 2019 Summit | |
| Meunier et al. | Energy efficiency in the steel industry with emphasis on developing countries | |
| CN103870881A (en) | Input-output method-based blast furnace-converter long-process steel production process CO2 emission examining method | |
| Fang et al. | Life cycle assessment of carbon footprint in dual-phase automotive strip steel production | |
| WO2024092727A1 (en) | Carbon emission evaluation model, evaluation method and evaluation system for long-procedure iron and steel enterprise | |
| Biberman et al. | Conflicts Between GHG Accounting Methodologies in the Steel Industry | |
| CN114381569B (en) | Converter system gas recovery optimization comprehensive evaluation method | |
| CN104008422A (en) | Blast furnace-converter long-process steel production process carbon dioxide examination method based on ISO standards |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |