CN115811741B - Base station determining method, device, equipment and storage medium - Google Patents

Base station determining method, device, equipment and storage medium Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN115811741B
CN115811741B CN202211467813.2A CN202211467813A CN115811741B CN 115811741 B CN115811741 B CN 115811741B CN 202211467813 A CN202211467813 A CN 202211467813A CN 115811741 B CN115811741 B CN 115811741B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
base station
candidate base
determining
candidate
difference
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN202211467813.2A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN115811741A (en
Inventor
董事
赵晨晨
李欣阳
韦胜宝
黄玉锋
罗敏妍
苏嘉亮
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
China United Network Communications Group Co Ltd
Original Assignee
China United Network Communications Group Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by China United Network Communications Group Co Ltd filed Critical China United Network Communications Group Co Ltd
Priority to CN202211467813.2A priority Critical patent/CN115811741B/en
Publication of CN115811741A publication Critical patent/CN115811741A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN115811741B publication Critical patent/CN115811741B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Classifications

    • YGENERAL TAGGING OF NEW TECHNOLOGICAL DEVELOPMENTS; GENERAL TAGGING OF CROSS-SECTIONAL TECHNOLOGIES SPANNING OVER SEVERAL SECTIONS OF THE IPC; TECHNICAL SUBJECTS COVERED BY FORMER USPC CROSS-REFERENCE ART COLLECTIONS [XRACs] AND DIGESTS
    • Y02TECHNOLOGIES OR APPLICATIONS FOR MITIGATION OR ADAPTATION AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGE
    • Y02DCLIMATE CHANGE MITIGATION TECHNOLOGIES IN INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES [ICT], I.E. INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES AIMING AT THE REDUCTION OF THEIR OWN ENERGY USE
    • Y02D30/00Reducing energy consumption in communication networks
    • Y02D30/70Reducing energy consumption in communication networks in wireless communication networks

Landscapes

  • Mobile Radio Communication Systems (AREA)

Abstract

The application provides a method, a device, equipment and a storage medium for determining a base station. The method comprises the following steps: determining the difference degree of the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the configuration information of the base station to be removed and at least one candidate base station, wherein the configuration information comprises longitude and latitude, base station height, RSRP and SINR; obtaining estimated construction difficulty grade scores and estimated construction costs of each candidate base station from a candidate base station database; determining construction parameters corresponding to each candidate base station according to the difference degree, the estimated construction difficulty grade score and the estimated construction cost corresponding to each candidate base station, wherein the construction parameters are inversely related to construction possibility; and determining a target base station for replacing the base station to be removed from at least one candidate base station according to the parameter scores corresponding to each candidate base station. The method provides scientific basis for determining the position of the replacement base station, and solves the problem that time is required to be consumed in the method for determining the base station by relying on experience of engineers.

Description

Base station determining method, device, equipment and storage medium
Technical Field
The present disclosure relates to the field of communications technologies, and in particular, to a method, an apparatus, a device, and a storage medium for determining a base station.
Background
As a switching center in the communication process, the base station plays an important role in improving the communication coverage and guaranteeing the communication quality of users.
The operation of removing the complement points of the base station is to re-perform the operation of selecting the address of the secondary base station in the area. The site selection of the base station is a matter of consideration. Besides the network topology relation with all surrounding neighbor base stations, the construction cost and the construction difficulty degree are often the key of whether the base stations can be constructed or not. In actual engineering, the base station removal and repair point work mostly depends on the experience of engineers to perform investigation, and the rationality of the formed network topology structure design result is difficult to be ensured, so that uncertainty is brought to the subsequent network design.
The operation of removing and repairing points is carried out in a traditional mode, the operation is not different from the planning and construction operation of newly adding a base station, the planning operation is complicated, and a large amount of manpower, material resources and financial resources are consumed. And meanwhile, station parameters and resource allocation conditions of the existing station to be removed are not secondarily utilized.
Disclosure of Invention
The application provides a method, a device, equipment and a storage medium for determining a base station, which are used for solving the problems that the traditional mode planning work is complicated, a large amount of manpower, material resources and financial resources are consumed, and site parameters and resource allocation conditions of the existing site to be removed are not secondarily utilized.
In one aspect, the present application provides a method for determining a base station, including:
determining the difference degree of the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the configuration information of the base station to be removed and at least one candidate base station, wherein the configuration information comprises longitude and latitude, base station height, RSRP and SINR, and the difference degree is used for representing the difference between the candidate base station and the base station to be removed;
obtaining estimated construction difficulty grade scores and estimated construction costs of each candidate base station from a candidate base station database;
determining construction parameters corresponding to each candidate base station according to the difference degree, the estimated construction difficulty grade score and the estimated construction cost corresponding to each candidate base station, wherein the construction parameters are inversely related to construction possibility;
and determining a target base station for replacing the base station to be removed from at least one candidate base station according to the parameter scores corresponding to each candidate base station.
Optionally, the determining, according to respective configuration information of the base station to be removed and at least one candidate base station, a degree of difference between the base station to be removed and each candidate base station includes:
determining the distance between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the longitude and latitude of the base station to be removed and the longitude and latitude of the candidate base station;
determining the station height difference between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the station height of the base station to be removed and the station height of the candidate base station;
determining the RSRP difference of the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the RSRP of the base station to be removed and the RSRP of the candidate base station;
determining SINR differences of the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the SINR of the base station to be removed and the SINR of the candidate base station;
and determining the difference degree between the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the distance, the station height difference, the RSRP difference and the SINR difference.
Optionally, the determining the difference degree between the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the distance, the station altitude difference, the RSRP difference and the SINR difference includes:
and determining the difference degree of the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the distance, the station height difference, the RSRP difference, the SINR difference and the weight corresponding to each RSRP difference.
Optionally, the determining the distance between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the longitude and latitude of the base station to be removed and the longitude and latitude of the candidate base station includes:
converting the longitude and latitude of the base station to be removed and the longitude and latitude of the candidate base station into the same coordinate system, and determining the radian of the base station to be removed and the radian of the candidate base station;
and determining the distance between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the radian of the base station to be removed and the radian of the candidate base station.
Optionally, the determining the construction parameter corresponding to each candidate base station according to the difference degree, the estimated construction difficulty level score and the estimated construction cost corresponding to each candidate base station includes:
and carrying out weighted summation processing according to the difference degree, the estimated construction difficulty grade score, the estimated construction cost and the weight corresponding to each candidate base station to obtain construction parameters corresponding to each candidate base station.
Optionally, before the obtaining the estimated construction difficulty level score of each candidate base station from the candidate base station database, the method further includes:
acquiring property sensitivity, resident sensitivity and surrounding environment conditions of the candidate base station;
and determining the estimated construction difficulty level score of the candidate base station according to the property sensitivity, the resident sensitivity and the surrounding environment condition, and storing the estimated construction difficulty level score into the candidate base station database.
Optionally, before obtaining the estimated construction cost of each candidate base station from the candidate base station database, the method includes:
acquiring estimated cost of machine room matched construction cost, base station equipment, lease cost, electric charge and installation cost of the candidate base station;
and obtaining estimated construction cost of the candidate base station according to estimated construction cost of the machine room matched with the candidate base station, base station equipment, lease cost, electric charge and installation cost, and storing the estimated construction cost into the candidate base station database.
In another aspect, the present application provides a base station determining apparatus, including:
the first determining module is used for determining the difference degree of the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the configuration information of the base station to be removed and at least one candidate base station, wherein the configuration information comprises longitude and latitude, base station height, RSRP and SINR, and the difference degree is used for representing the difference between the candidate base station and the base station to be removed;
the acquisition module is used for acquiring the estimated construction difficulty level score and the estimated construction cost of each candidate base station from the candidate base station database;
the second determining module is used for determining construction parameters corresponding to each candidate base station according to the difference degree corresponding to each candidate base station, the estimated construction difficulty level score and the estimated construction cost, wherein the construction parameters are inversely related to the construction possibility;
and the third determining module is used for determining a target base station for replacing the base station to be removed from among the at least one candidate base station according to the parameter scores corresponding to each candidate base station.
In a possible implementation manner, the first determining module is specifically configured to:
determining the distance between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the longitude and latitude of the base station to be removed and the longitude and latitude of the candidate base station;
determining the station height difference between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the station height of the base station to be removed and the station height of the candidate base station;
determining the RSRP difference of the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the RSRP of the base station to be removed and the RSRP of the candidate base station;
determining SINR differences of the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the SINR of the base station to be removed and the SINR of the candidate base station;
and determining the difference degree between the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the distance, the station height difference, the RSRP difference and the SINR difference.
In a possible implementation manner, the first determining module is specifically configured to:
and determining the difference degree of the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the distance, the station height difference, the RSRP difference, the SINR difference and the weight corresponding to each RSRP difference.
In a possible implementation manner, the first determining module is specifically configured to:
converting the longitude and latitude of the base station to be removed and the longitude and latitude of the candidate base station into the same coordinate system, and determining the radian of the base station to be removed and the radian of the candidate base station;
and determining the distance between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the radian of the base station to be removed and the radian of the candidate base station.
In a possible implementation manner, the second determining module is specifically configured to:
and carrying out weighted summation processing according to the difference degree, the estimated construction difficulty grade score, the estimated construction cost and the weight corresponding to each candidate base station to obtain construction parameters corresponding to each candidate base station.
In one possible implementation manner, the acquiring module is specifically configured to:
acquiring property sensitivity, resident sensitivity and surrounding environment conditions of the candidate base station;
and determining the estimated construction difficulty level score of the candidate base station according to the property sensitivity, the resident sensitivity and the surrounding environment condition, and storing the estimated construction difficulty level score into the candidate base station database.
In one possible implementation manner, the acquiring module is specifically configured to:
acquiring estimated cost of machine room matched construction cost, base station equipment, lease cost, electric charge and installation cost of the candidate base station;
and obtaining estimated construction cost of the candidate base station according to estimated construction cost of the machine room matched with the candidate base station, base station equipment, lease cost, electric charge and installation cost, and storing the estimated construction cost into the candidate base station database.
In a third aspect of the present application, there is provided an electronic device, comprising:
a processor and a memory;
the memory stores computer-executable instructions;
the processor executes computer-executable instructions stored in the memory to cause the electronic device to perform the method of any one of the first aspects.
In a fourth aspect of the present application, there is provided a computer-readable storage medium having stored therein computer-executable instructions which, when executed by a processor, are adapted to carry out a method of determining a driver of a hardware peripheral as in any of the first aspects.
The application provides a method, a device, equipment and a storage medium for determining a base station, wherein the method determines the difference degree between the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the configuration information of the base station to be removed and at least one candidate base station; obtaining estimated construction difficulty grade scores and estimated construction costs of each candidate base station from a candidate base station database; determining construction parameters corresponding to each candidate base station according to the difference degree, the estimated construction difficulty grade score and the estimated construction cost corresponding to each candidate base station; and determining a target base station for replacing the base station to be removed from at least one candidate base station according to the parameter scores corresponding to each candidate base station. According to the method, the difference between the candidate base station and the base station to be removed is calculated, meanwhile, the estimated construction difficulty and the estimated construction cost are considered, the construction parameters of the candidate base station are determined, and the method is different from the traditional method of determining by means of experience of engineers, time is saved, and meanwhile, the rationality of a result is ensured.
Drawings
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate embodiments consistent with the application and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the application.
Fig. 1 is a specific application scenario diagram of a method for determining a base station provided in the present application;
fig. 2 is a flowchart of a method for determining a base station according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 3 is a flowchart second of a method for determining a base station according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 4 is a schematic structural diagram of a determining device of a base station according to an embodiment of the present application;
fig. 5 is a hardware configuration diagram of a determining device of a base station according to an embodiment of the present application.
Specific embodiments thereof have been shown by way of example in the drawings and will herein be described in more detail. These drawings and the written description are not intended to limit the scope of the inventive concepts in any way, but to illustrate the concepts of the present application to those skilled in the art by reference to specific embodiments.
Detailed Description
Reference will now be made in detail to exemplary embodiments, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings. When the following description refers to the accompanying drawings, the same numbers in different drawings refer to the same or similar elements, unless otherwise indicated. The implementations described in the following exemplary examples are not representative of all implementations consistent with the present application. Rather, they are merely examples of apparatus and methods consistent with some aspects of the present application as detailed in the accompanying claims.
Fig. 1 is a specific application scenario diagram of a method for determining a base station provided in the present application. As shown in fig. 1, the application scenario includes: base station 101 to be torn down, candidate base station a102, candidate base station B103, and candidate base station C104.
The base station to be removed refers to an existing base station in a designated area, but needs to be removed for some reason. The candidate base stations are a plurality of base stations which are manually and preliminarily screened and meet the function of replacing the base station to be removed in the appointed area.
Illustratively, the base station 101 to be removed needs to be removed due to property relationship, and there are three candidate base station positions in the designated area: candidate base station a102, candidate base station B103, and candidate base station C104. In order to determine which of the three locations to construct a new base station, firstly, it is necessary to consider that the new base station needs to meet the communication requirements of a specified area with a topology network formed by base stations in surrounding neighboring cells, secondly, it is necessary to consider the cost of constructing the base station, and most importantly, it is necessary to consider the properties and the wishes of neighboring residents. If the site selection is performed according to the traditional method by engineers according to experience, not only the rationality of the network topology structure formed by the new base station is difficult to ensure, but also repeated and large amount of attempts and correction are needed, and a long time is needed.
The method comprehensively considers the difference degree, the estimated construction difficulty and the estimated construction cost corresponding to each candidate base station by taking configuration information of the base station to be removed as one of site selection evaluation standards of the candidate base station, determines construction parameters inversely related to construction possibility of the candidate base station, provides scientific basis for determining the position of the candidate base station, and simultaneously avoids the problem that time is required to be consumed by the method for determining the base station by relying on experience of engineers.
The method for determining the base station aims to solve the technical problems in the prior art.
The following describes the technical solutions of the present application and how the technical solutions of the present application solve the above technical problems in detail with specific embodiments. The following embodiments may be combined with each other, and the same or similar concepts or processes may not be described in detail in some embodiments. Embodiments of the present application will be described below with reference to the accompanying drawings.
Fig. 2 is a flowchart of a method for determining a base station according to an embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 2, the method of the present embodiment includes:
s201, determining the difference degree of the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the configuration information of the base station to be removed and at least one candidate base station, wherein the configuration information comprises longitude and latitude, base station height, RSRP and SINR, and the difference degree is used for representing the difference between the candidate base station and the base station to be removed;
in this embodiment, the configuration information is a geographic location of the base station and an inherent attribute, where the geographic location of the base station is represented by longitude and latitude, and the inherent attribute includes a height of the base station, RSRP and SINR. Wherein RSRP is the serving cell and neighbor reference signal received power (Reference Signal Receiving Power), representing the serving cell and neighbor average signal strength values. The radiation range of a base station comprises several cells around the base station, each cell radiating in a different direction. For a point, the signals come from several base stations around it, the signals do not overlap, so the RSRP itself is an average value. SINR is an abbreviation of signal to interference plus noise ratio (Signal to Interference plus Noise Ratio) and refers to the ratio of the strength of a received useful signal to the strength of a received interfering signal (noise and interference).
The base station to be removed is a base station to be removed, but the base station to be removed is subjected to a plurality of considerations in site selection. Meanwhile, the base station to be removed also bears the communication task in the appointed area, and after the removal, the new base station needs to bear the functions and tasks of the original base station. In order to fully utilize the site parameters and configuration information of the base station to be removed, the site parameters and the configuration information are used as standards for measuring candidate base stations, and the difference degree between the base station to be removed and the candidate set station is calculated. The smaller the difference degree corresponding to the candidate set station, the greater the construction possibility of the candidate base station is.
S202, obtaining estimated construction difficulty level scores and estimated construction costs of each candidate base station from a candidate base station database;
in this embodiment, the estimated difficulty of construction mainly refers to the factor of the surrounding environment, which is one of the main indexes for evaluating candidate base stations. Because the base station to be removed needs to be removed, it is likely that this is due to environmental factors. For example, properties are against building base stations in the area, or residents complaining about the existence of base stations, etc. If the base station is constructed without prior investigation and preparation, the base station is very likely to become a to-be-removed base station, which greatly increases the construction cost of the base station. When the predicted construction difficulty is digitized, a mode of firstly determining the grade and then determining the grading is adopted.
The estimated construction cost is an index that has to be considered for evaluating candidate base stations. Construction costs include various costs such as the cost of land renters and the cost of electricity. While different addressing means different base station devices, e.g. a site that is further away from the base station to be removed means that the device requires more power. It is therefore necessary to estimate the construction costs and incorporate them into an index of evaluation of candidate base stations.
In this embodiment, both the estimated difficulty level score and the estimated cost of construction need to be prepared before selecting the candidate base station, because both often require more time.
In one possible manner, before obtaining the estimated construction difficulty level score of each candidate base station from the candidate base station database, the method of the present application further includes:
acquiring property sensitivity, resident sensitivity and surrounding environment conditions of the candidate base station;
and determining the estimated construction difficulty level score of the candidate base station according to the property sensitivity, the resident sensitivity and the surrounding environment condition, and storing the estimated construction difficulty level score into a candidate base station database.
In this embodiment, the estimated difficulty of construction is divided into three aspects: property sensitivity, resident sensitivity, and ambient conditions. The property sensitivity refers to whether the property agrees with the construction of the base station, the resident sensitivity refers to whether the resident agrees with the construction of the base station, the surrounding environment condition refers to whether the site selection of the base station is suitable for the construction of the base station, and for example, if the site selection is in a place with complex terrain or a place unsuitable for the construction, the construction cost and time of the base station are greatly improved.
When the candidate base station property sensitivity and resident sensitivity are obtained, the modes of interview investigation, questionnaire investigation and the like can be adopted to widely strive for the property and resident opinion, and a reasonable and reliable basis is provided for the site selection of the subsequent base station.
When the estimated construction difficulty grade score is obtained, firstly, the property sensitivity, the resident sensitivity and the surrounding environment condition are respectively graded and scored. For example, questionnaire property sensitivity and resident sensitivity may be designed to count 10 points against base station construction, to count 5 points against base station construction, and to count 1 point against base station construction. The ambient conditions are classified into three classes: the method is very suitable for the first-stage construction base station, the second-stage construction base station, the 5-stage construction base station and the third-stage construction base station, and the 10-stage construction base station. Then adding to obtain total score, and estimating the construction difficulty level according to the total score, wherein the estimated construction difficulty level is one level, for example, the total score is less than or equal to 7 score; the total score is more than 7 and less than or equal to 11, and the estimated construction difficulty degree is two-level; the total score is greater than 11, and the estimated construction difficulty degree is three-level. And then, the scores are given to different grades of the estimated construction difficulty, as shown in table 1.
TABLE 1
Estimated difficulty of construction Grade scoring
Simple (one star difficulty) 1
General (two-star difficulty) 3
Difficulty (three stars difficulty) 5
After obtaining the estimated construction difficulty grade scores of the candidate base stations, the ratings and scores of the process are stored into a candidate base station database for subsequent checking and taking.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that, when obtaining the estimated construction difficulty level score, various modes including respective scoring may be adopted, and the scoring criteria may be set by themselves. And when the weighting processing is carried out at the same time, the weight can be adjusted.
In one possible implementation, before obtaining the estimated construction cost of each candidate base station from the candidate base station database, the method includes:
acquiring estimated cost of machine room matched construction cost, base station equipment, lease cost, electric charge and installation cost of a candidate base station;
and obtaining estimated construction cost of the candidate base station according to estimated construction cost of the machine room matched with the candidate base station, base station equipment, lease cost, electric charge and installation cost, and storing the estimated construction cost into a candidate base station database.
In this embodiment, the estimated construction cost of the candidate base station is divided into five aspects: the machine room is matched with construction cost, base station equipment, lease cost, electric charge and installation cost. The estimated cost in the fifth aspect needs professional departments to estimate. After the estimated construction cost of the base station including the matched construction cost of the machine room, the base station equipment, the lease cost, the electricity cost and the installation cost is obtained, the data are stored in a candidate base station database for subsequent checking and taking.
S203, determining construction parameters corresponding to each candidate base station according to the difference degree, the estimated construction difficulty level score and the estimated construction cost corresponding to each candidate base station, wherein the construction parameters are inversely related to the construction possibility;
in this embodiment, the construction parameter is inversely related to the construction probability as an index for evaluating the construction probability of the candidate base station. Because the construction parameters consider the corresponding difference degree of each candidate base station, namely the smaller and better the difference between the candidate base station and the base station to be removed is, the lower the estimated construction difficulty level score and the estimated construction cost are.
When determining the construction parameters corresponding to each candidate base station according to the difference degree, the estimated construction difficulty grade score and the estimated construction cost corresponding to each candidate base station, the data normalization processing is needed to prevent the numerical value of one aspect from being too large and dilute the influence of the other two aspects. After normalization processing, a direct addition method can be adopted to obtain construction parameters corresponding to each candidate base station.
In a possible implementation manner, determining the construction parameters corresponding to each candidate base station according to the difference degree, the estimated construction difficulty level score and the estimated construction cost corresponding to each candidate base station includes:
and carrying out weighted summation processing according to the difference degree, the estimated construction difficulty grade score, the estimated construction cost and the weight corresponding to each candidate base station to obtain construction parameters corresponding to each candidate base station.
In this embodiment, three weights are respectively set to correspond to the difference degree, estimated construction difficulty level score and estimated construction corresponding to each candidate base stationCost. Wherein, the difference degree S corresponding to the ith candidate base station (i) The corresponding weight is alpha 1 Estimated construction difficulty level score C (i) The corresponding weight is alpha 2 Estimated construction cost G (i) The corresponding weight is alpha 3 The construction parameter omega of the ith candidate base station (i) The following formula is available.
ω (i) =S (i) α 1 +C (i) α 2 +G (i) α 3 .
By setting different weights, the importance of the three aspects can be represented. For example, the scoring weight of the estimated construction difficulty level is set to be 0.5, the corresponding difference degree of each candidate base station is set to be 0.3, the estimated construction cost is set to be 0.2, and the importance of the estimated construction difficulty level on the base station site selection is highlighted.
S204, determining a target base station for replacing the base station to be removed in at least one candidate base station according to the parameter scores corresponding to each candidate base station.
In this embodiment, since the construction parameters are inversely related to the construction possibility, the construction parameters of the target base station for replacing the base station to be removed are the smallest construction parameters among all the candidate base stations.
The embodiment provides a method for determining a base station, which determines the difference degree between a base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to respective configuration information of the base station to be removed and at least one candidate base station; obtaining estimated construction difficulty grade scores and estimated construction costs of each candidate base station from a candidate base station database; determining construction parameters corresponding to each candidate base station according to the difference degree, the estimated construction difficulty grade score and the estimated construction cost corresponding to each candidate base station; and determining a target base station for replacing the base station to be removed from at least one candidate base station according to the parameter scores corresponding to each candidate base station. According to the method, the base station to be removed is used as an evaluation reference, the difference degree between the candidate base station and the base station to be removed is calculated, meanwhile, the estimated construction difficulty and the estimated construction cost are considered, the construction parameters of the candidate base station are determined, and the method is different from the traditional method which relies on experience determination of engineers, so that time is saved, and meanwhile, the rationality of a result is ensured.
Fig. 3 is a flowchart second of a method for determining a base station according to an embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 3, the method of the present embodiment, based on the embodiment shown in fig. 2, describes in detail the process of determining the degree of difference between the base station to be removed and each candidate base station based on the distance, the station height difference, the RSRP difference, and the SINR difference.
S301, converting the longitude and latitude of the base station to be removed and the longitude and latitude of the candidate base station into the same coordinate system, and determining the radian of the base station to be removed and the radian of the candidate base station;
in this embodiment, in order to calculate the distance between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station, the radian of the base station to be removed and the candidate base station in the same coordinate system is required to be differed, and then the distance between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station is obtained according to the radian difference. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the selection of the same coordinate system herein may take the form of the Mars coordinate system GCJ-02 or other coordinate systems.
S302, determining the distance between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the radian of the base station to be removed and the radian of the candidate base station.
In this embodiment, according to the radians of the base station to be removed and the candidate base station in the same coordinate system, the radian difference between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station is obtained, and the radian difference is substituted into a corresponding distance calculation formula to obtain the distance between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station, which is denoted as D (i).
S303, determining the station height difference between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the station height of the base station to be removed and the station height of the candidate base station;
in this embodiment, the absolute value of the station difference between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station is calculated, and is denoted as L (i) herein.
S304, determining the RSRP difference of the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the RSRP of the base station to be removed and the RSRP of the candidate base station;
in this embodiment, the absolute value of the RSRP difference between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station is calculated, here denoted as RSRP (i).
S305, determining SINR difference between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the SINR of the base station to be removed and the SINR of the candidate base station;
in this embodiment, the absolute value of the SINR difference between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station is calculated, denoted herein as SINR (i).
S306, determining the difference degree between the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the distance, the station height difference, the RSRP difference and the SINR difference and the corresponding weights.
In this embodiment, on the basis of the above steps, there is one configuration information vector [ D ] for the i-th candidate base station (i) ,L (i) ,RSRP (i) ,SINR (i) ]After normalization processing is carried out on the four data, a new configuration information vector d is obtained (i) ,l (i) ,rsrp (i) ,sinr (i) ]. Setting an initial weight vector [ W ] D ,W L ,W RSRP ,W SINR ] T The variance matrix is:
the embodiment provides a method for determining a base station, which comprises the steps of converting the longitude and latitude of the base station to be removed and the longitude and latitude of a candidate base station into the same coordinate system, and determining the radian of the base station to be removed and the radian of the candidate base station; and determining the distance between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the radian of the base station to be removed and the radian of the candidate base station. Determining the station height difference between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the station height of the base station to be removed and the station height of the candidate base station; determining the RSRP difference of the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the RSRP of the base station to be removed and the RSRP of the candidate base station; determining SINR difference between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the SINR of the base station to be removed and the SINR of the candidate base station; and determining the difference degree of the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the distance, the station height difference, the RSRP difference and the SINR difference and the weights corresponding to the base station height difference, the RSRP difference and the SINR difference. The method is characterized in that the longitude and latitude of the base station to be removed, the distance of the candidate base station, the station height, RSRP and SINR are considered, and the difference degree of the longitude and the latitude of the base station to be removed, the distance of the candidate base station, the station height, the RSRP and the SINR is measured in a weighting mode, so that the final determined candidate base station is the closest to the base station to be removed, and the screening result is more scientific.
Fig. 4 is a schematic structural diagram of a base station determining device according to an embodiment of the present application. The apparatus of this embodiment may be in the form of software and/or hardware. As shown in fig. 4, a base station determining apparatus 400 provided in the embodiment of the present application includes a first determining module 401, an obtaining module 402, a second determining module 403 and a third determining module 404,
a first determining module 401, configured to determine a degree of difference between the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to respective configuration information of the base station to be removed and at least one candidate base station, where the configuration information includes latitude and longitude, base station height, RSRP and SINR, and the degree of difference is used to characterize a difference between the candidate base station and the base station to be removed;
an obtaining module 402, configured to obtain, from a candidate base station database, a predicted construction difficulty level score and a predicted construction cost of each candidate base station;
a second determining module 403, configured to determine a construction parameter corresponding to each candidate base station according to the difference degree, the estimated construction difficulty level score, and the estimated construction cost corresponding to each candidate base station, where the construction parameter is inversely related to the construction likelihood;
and a third determining module 404, configured to determine, according to the parameter score corresponding to each candidate base station, a target base station for replacing the base station to be removed from at least one candidate base station.
In a possible implementation manner, the first determining module is specifically configured to:
determining the distance between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the longitude and latitude of the base station to be removed and the longitude and latitude of the candidate base station;
determining the station height difference between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the station height of the base station to be removed and the station height of the candidate base station;
determining the RSRP difference of the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the RSRP of the base station to be removed and the RSRP of the candidate base station;
determining SINR difference between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the SINR of the base station to be removed and the SINR of the candidate base station;
and determining the difference degree between the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the distance, the station height difference, the RSRP difference and the SINR difference.
In a possible implementation manner, the first determining module is specifically configured to:
and determining the difference degree of the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the distance, the station height difference, the RSRP difference and the SINR difference and the weights corresponding to the base station height difference, the RSRP difference and the SINR difference.
In a possible implementation manner, the first determining module is specifically configured to:
converting the longitude and latitude of the base station to be removed and the longitude and latitude of the candidate base station into the same coordinate system, and determining the radian of the base station to be removed and the radian of the candidate base station;
and determining the distance between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the radian of the base station to be removed and the radian of the candidate base station.
In a possible implementation manner, the second determining module is specifically configured to:
and carrying out weighted summation processing according to the difference degree, the estimated construction difficulty grade score, the estimated construction cost and the weight corresponding to each candidate base station to obtain construction parameters corresponding to each candidate base station.
In one possible implementation manner, the acquiring module is specifically configured to:
acquiring property sensitivity, resident sensitivity and surrounding environment conditions of the candidate base station;
and determining the estimated construction difficulty level score of the candidate base station according to the property sensitivity, the resident sensitivity and the surrounding environment condition, and storing the estimated construction difficulty level score into a candidate base station database.
In one possible implementation manner, the acquiring module is specifically configured to:
acquiring estimated cost of machine room matched construction cost, base station equipment, lease cost, electric charge and installation cost of a candidate base station;
and obtaining estimated construction cost of the candidate base station according to estimated construction cost of the machine room matched with the candidate base station, base station equipment, lease cost, electric charge and installation cost, and storing the estimated construction cost into a candidate base station database.
The device for determining the base station provided in this embodiment may be used to execute the above method embodiment, and its implementation principle and technical effects are similar, and this embodiment will not be described herein.
Fig. 5 is a hardware configuration diagram of a determining device of a base station according to an embodiment of the present application. As shown in fig. 5, the base station determining apparatus 500 includes:
a processor 501 and a memory 502;
the memory stores computer-executable instructions;
the processor executes computer-executable instructions stored in the memory 502 to cause the electronic device to perform the method of determining a base station as described above.
It should be understood that the processor 501 may be a central processing unit (in english: central Processing Unit, abbreviated as CPU), or may be other general purpose processors, digital signal processors (in english: digital Signal Processor, abbreviated as DSP), application specific integrated circuits (in english: application Specific Integrated Circuit, abbreviated as ASIC), or the like. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor may be any conventional processor or the like. The steps of a method disclosed in connection with the present invention may be embodied directly in a hardware processor for execution, or in a combination of hardware and software modules in a processor for execution. The memory 502 may include a high-speed random access memory (in english: random Access Memory, abbreviated as RAM), and may further include a Non-volatile memory (in english: NVM), such as at least one magnetic disk memory, and may also be a U-disk, a removable hard disk, a read-only memory, a magnetic disk, or an optical disk.
The embodiment of the application correspondingly provides a computer readable storage medium, wherein computer execution instructions are stored in the computer readable storage medium, and the computer execution instructions are used for realizing the method for determining the base station when being executed by the processor.
Other embodiments of the present application will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. This application is intended to cover any variations, uses, or adaptations of the application following, in general, the principles of the application and including such departures from the present disclosure as come within known or customary practice within the art to which the application pertains. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only, with a true scope and spirit of the application being indicated by the following claims.
It is to be understood that the present application is not limited to the precise arrangements and instrumentalities shown in the drawings, which have been described above, and that various modifications and changes may be effected without departing from the scope thereof. The scope of the application is limited only by the appended claims.

Claims (8)

1. A method for determining a base station, comprising:
determining the difference degree of the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the configuration information of the base station to be removed and at least one candidate base station, wherein the configuration information comprises longitude and latitude, base station height, RSRP and SINR, and the difference degree is used for representing the difference between the candidate base station and the base station to be removed;
obtaining estimated construction difficulty grade scores and estimated construction costs of each candidate base station from a candidate base station database;
determining construction parameters corresponding to each candidate base station according to the difference degree, the estimated construction difficulty grade score and the estimated construction cost corresponding to each candidate base station, wherein the construction parameters are inversely related to construction possibility; the estimated construction difficulty level score is related to property sensitivity, resident sensitivity and surrounding environment conditions; the estimated construction cost is related to estimated cost of matched construction cost, base station equipment, lease cost, electric charge and installation cost of a machine room;
determining a target base station for replacing the base station to be removed from at least one candidate base station according to the parameter scores corresponding to each candidate base station;
the determining the difference between the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the configuration information of the base station to be removed and at least one candidate base station comprises the following steps:
determining the distance between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the longitude and latitude of the base station to be removed and the longitude and latitude of the candidate base station;
determining the station height difference between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the station height of the base station to be removed and the station height of the candidate base station;
determining the RSRP difference of the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the RSRP of the base station to be removed and the RSRP of the candidate base station;
determining SINR differences of the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the SINR of the base station to be removed and the SINR of the candidate base station;
determining the difference degree between the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the distance, the station height difference, the RSRP difference and the SINR difference;
the determining the difference degree between the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the distance, the station height difference, the RSRP difference and the SINR difference comprises:
and determining the difference degree of the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the distance, the station height difference, the RSRP difference, the SINR difference and the weight corresponding to each RSRP difference.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the determining the distance between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the latitude and longitude of the base station to be removed and the latitude and longitude of the candidate base station comprises:
converting the longitude and latitude of the base station to be removed and the longitude and latitude of the candidate base station into the same coordinate system, and determining the radian of the base station to be removed and the radian of the candidate base station;
and determining the distance between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the radian of the base station to be removed and the radian of the candidate base station.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the construction parameters for each candidate base station based on the difference, the estimated construction difficulty level score, and the estimated construction cost for each candidate base station comprises:
and carrying out weighted summation processing according to the difference degree, the estimated construction difficulty grade score, the estimated construction cost and the weight corresponding to each candidate base station to obtain construction parameters corresponding to each candidate base station.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein prior to obtaining the estimated construction difficulty level score for each candidate base station from the candidate base station database, further comprising:
acquiring property sensitivity, resident sensitivity and surrounding environment conditions of the candidate base station;
and determining the estimated construction difficulty level score of the candidate base station according to the property sensitivity, the resident sensitivity and the surrounding environment condition, and storing the estimated construction difficulty level score into the candidate base station database.
5. The method of claim 1, wherein prior to obtaining the estimated construction cost for each candidate base station from the candidate base station database, comprising:
acquiring estimated cost of machine room matched construction cost, base station equipment, lease cost, electric charge and installation cost of the candidate base station;
and obtaining estimated construction cost of the candidate base station according to estimated construction cost of the machine room matched with the candidate base station, base station equipment, lease cost, electric charge and installation cost, and storing the estimated construction cost into the candidate base station database.
6. A base station determining apparatus, comprising:
the first determining module is used for determining the difference degree of the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the configuration information of the base station to be removed and at least one candidate base station, wherein the configuration information comprises longitude and latitude, base station height, RSRP and SINR, and the difference degree is used for representing the difference between the candidate base station and the base station to be removed;
the acquisition module is used for acquiring the estimated construction difficulty level score and the estimated construction cost of each candidate base station from the candidate base station database;
the second determining module is used for determining construction parameters corresponding to each candidate base station according to the difference degree corresponding to each candidate base station, the estimated construction difficulty level score and the estimated construction cost, wherein the construction parameters are inversely related to the construction possibility;
a third determining module, configured to determine, according to the parameter score corresponding to each candidate base station, a target base station for replacing the base station to be removed from among the at least one candidate base station;
the first determining module is specifically configured to determine a distance between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the latitude and longitude of the base station to be removed and the latitude and longitude of the candidate base station; determining the station height difference between the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the station height of the base station to be removed and the station height of the candidate base station; determining the RSRP difference of the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the RSRP of the base station to be removed and the RSRP of the candidate base station; determining SINR differences of the base station to be removed and the candidate base station according to the SINR of the base station to be removed and the SINR of the candidate base station; determining the difference degree between the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the distance, the station height difference, the RSRP difference and the SINR difference;
the first determining module is specifically configured to determine a degree of difference between the base station to be removed and each candidate base station according to the distance, the station altitude difference, the RSRP difference, the SINR difference, and the weights corresponding to the RSRP difference and the SINR difference.
7. An electronic device, comprising: a processor and a memory;
the memory stores computer-executable instructions;
the processor executing computer-executable instructions stored in the memory to cause the electronic device to perform the method of any one of claims 1 to 5.
8. A computer readable storage medium, characterized in that the computer readable storage medium has stored therein computer executable instructions for implementing a method of determining a base station according to any of the claims 1 to 5 when executed by a processor.
CN202211467813.2A 2022-11-22 2022-11-22 Base station determining method, device, equipment and storage medium Active CN115811741B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202211467813.2A CN115811741B (en) 2022-11-22 2022-11-22 Base station determining method, device, equipment and storage medium

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202211467813.2A CN115811741B (en) 2022-11-22 2022-11-22 Base station determining method, device, equipment and storage medium

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN115811741A CN115811741A (en) 2023-03-17
CN115811741B true CN115811741B (en) 2024-04-09

Family

ID=85483760

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202211467813.2A Active CN115811741B (en) 2022-11-22 2022-11-22 Base station determining method, device, equipment and storage medium

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN115811741B (en)

Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108601029A (en) * 2018-03-15 2018-09-28 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Base station construction appraisal procedure and device
WO2020224544A1 (en) * 2019-05-06 2020-11-12 华为技术有限公司 Address selection method and apparatus, and computer readable storage medium
CN114641015A (en) * 2020-12-16 2022-06-17 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Network evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium

Family Cites Families (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
JP7132505B2 (en) * 2018-12-26 2022-09-07 日本電信電話株式会社 Station placement design method, station placement design device, and station placement design program

Patent Citations (3)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN108601029A (en) * 2018-03-15 2018-09-28 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Base station construction appraisal procedure and device
WO2020224544A1 (en) * 2019-05-06 2020-11-12 华为技术有限公司 Address selection method and apparatus, and computer readable storage medium
CN114641015A (en) * 2020-12-16 2022-06-17 中国联合网络通信集团有限公司 Network evaluation method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium

Non-Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Base Station (BS) classification (FDD) (3GPP TR 25.951 version 6.3.0 Release 6).ETSI TR 125 951.2006,(第V6.3.0期),全文. *
RTR/TSGR-0425951v630.Technical Report Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS) *
无线基站选址技术;王江超;;信息与电脑(理论版);20170823(第16期);全文 *
面向5G移动通信的基站选址方法及优化策略研究;郑俊杰;王先峰;罗顺湖;;电信网技术;20171115(第11期);全文 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN115811741A (en) 2023-03-17

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN109495913B (en) Interference evaluation method and device
CN107846688B (en) Wireless network site planning method and device based on multiple operators
CN104410978A (en) Method and device of evaluating site planning
CN114641015B (en) Network evaluation method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN110798804B (en) Indoor positioning method and device
CN111325561A (en) Intelligent complaint processing method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN112492275B (en) Layout method, device and storage medium of regional monitoring points
CN112950243A (en) 5G station address planning method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN110675206A (en) Group rental discovery method, device, equipment and computer readable medium
CN113395704A (en) 5G base station site selection method and device
CN115811741B (en) Base station determining method, device, equipment and storage medium
CN114828026A (en) Base station planning method, device, equipment, storage medium and program product
CN115474206A (en) Real-time people number determination method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium
CN103582042B (en) A kind of method and apparatus determining adjacent area
CN115480307A (en) Power grid earthquake evaluation method and related equipment
CN110839257B (en) Network quality evaluation method, device and storage medium
CN111278037B (en) Cell value evaluation method and device
CN109803268B (en) Method and device for determining associated sector and computer readable storage medium
CN112543460B (en) Base station coverage management method, device, network equipment and readable storage medium
CN107659941B (en) Method and device for allocating frequency spectrum resources among cells in sensing system
CN112584313B (en) Weak coverage area positioning method, device, equipment and computer storage medium
CN115396908B (en) Network evaluation method, device and storage medium
CN111934896B (en) Elevated road terminal user identification method and device and computing equipment
CN113807013B (en) Method and device for processing top data, electronic equipment and readable storage medium
CN115413022B (en) Base station position identification method, device, equipment and storage medium

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant