CN115782993B - Method and device for verifying derailment protection range of automatic triggering obstacle - Google Patents
Method and device for verifying derailment protection range of automatic triggering obstacle Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN115782993B CN115782993B CN202310045989.7A CN202310045989A CN115782993B CN 115782993 B CN115782993 B CN 115782993B CN 202310045989 A CN202310045989 A CN 202310045989A CN 115782993 B CN115782993 B CN 115782993B
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- obstacle
- derailment
- numbered
- destination
- line
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Active
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Train Traffic Observation, Control, And Security (AREA)
- Electric Propulsion And Braking For Vehicles (AREA)
Abstract
The invention discloses a method and a device for verifying an automatically triggered barrier derailment protection range, and relates to the technical field of rail transit. The main technical scheme of the invention is as follows: configuring a designated open interface of a train automatic monitoring system in a test environment; the method comprises the steps that a designated line and an automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list corresponding to the designated line are imported into a test environment by utilizing a designated open interface, wherein the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list comprises protection test examples corresponding to all numbered sections in the designated line, and the protection test examples comprise target numbered sections corresponding to the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range; simulating and adding trains in each numbered section in a designated line and activating obstacle derailment positions so as to perform an automatic obstacle derailment protection test; based on the test result corresponding to the automatic derailment protection test of the obstacle, outputting the verification result corresponding to the derailment protection range of the obstacle.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of rail transit, in particular to a method and a device for verifying an automatically triggered barrier derailment protection range.
Background
In rail transit, the detection of the derailment of the obstacle is mainly to detect the object existing in the rail to avoid the damage of the obstacle to the rail vehicle, the information of the obstacle is sent to a train signal system in real time, and after the train signal system receives the information, in order to ensure the running safety of the train, a unified protection distance is adopted to calculate the protection range of the derailment of the obstacle, and the protection range of the derailment of the obstacle is applied in the train signal system, so that no train enters in the range.
At present, the obstacle derailment protection range in the prior art is calculated manually according to the obstacle information and the train position, and is verified manually after the obstacle derailment protection range is obtained. However, the manual processing method easily causes calculation errors or incomplete verification of the derailment protection range of the obstacle, so that the verification efficiency and accuracy of the derailment protection range of the obstacle are low, and the operation safety of the train is further affected.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of the above problems, the invention provides a method and a device for verifying the derailment protection range of an automatic triggering obstacle, which mainly aims to optimize the mode of verifying the derailment protection range of the automatic triggering obstacle, improve the verification efficiency and the accuracy and ensure the driving safety of a train.
In order to solve the technical problems, the invention provides the following scheme:
in a first aspect, the present invention provides a method of verifying an automatically triggered barrier derailment guard range, the method comprising:
configuring a designated open interface of a train automatic monitoring system in a test environment;
importing a specified line and an automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list corresponding to the specified line into the test environment by using the specified open interface, wherein the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list comprises protection test examples corresponding to all numbered sections in the specified line, and the protection test examples comprise target numbered sections corresponding to the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range;
simulating and adding trains in each numbered section in the designated line and activating obstacle derailment positions so as to perform an automatic obstacle derailment protection test;
and outputting a verification result corresponding to the obstacle derailment protection range based on a test result corresponding to the obstacle automatic derailment protection test.
In a second aspect, the present invention provides an apparatus for verifying the extent of protection against derailment of an automatically triggered obstacle, said apparatus comprising:
The first configuration unit is used for configuring a designated open interface of the automatic train monitoring system in the test environment;
the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list comprises protection test examples corresponding to all numbered sections in the appointed circuit, and the protection test examples comprise target numbered sections corresponding to the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range;
a test unit for simulating addition of a train and activation of an obstacle derailment position in each of the numbered sections within the specified line obtained by the import unit, to perform an obstacle automatic derailment protection test;
and the output unit is used for outputting a verification result corresponding to the obstacle derailment protection range based on the test result corresponding to the obstacle automatic derailment protection test obtained by the test unit.
In order to achieve the above object, according to a third aspect of the present invention, there is provided a storage medium including a stored program, wherein the program, when run, controls a device in which the storage medium is located to perform the method of verifying the automatic triggering of the obstacle derailment protection range of the first aspect described above.
To achieve the above object, according to a fourth aspect of the present invention, there is provided a processor for running a program, wherein the program runs to perform the method of verifying the automatic triggering of the derailment guard range of an obstacle of the first aspect.
By means of the technical scheme, when the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range is required to be verified, the specified open interface of the train automatic monitoring system is firstly configured in the test environment, then the specified line and the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list corresponding to the specified line are imported into the test environment by using the specified open interface, wherein the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list comprises protection test examples corresponding to all numbered sections in the specified line, each protection test example comprises a target numbered section corresponding to the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range, then a train is simulated and added in each numbered section in the specified line, and obstacle derailment position is activated to perform an automatic derailment protection test on the basis of the test result corresponding to the automatic derailment protection test of the obstacle, and finally the verification result corresponding to the verification obstacle derailment protection range is output. According to the technical scheme provided by the invention, the appointed line and the list of the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection ranges corresponding to the appointed line can be imported into a test environment based on the appointed open interface, a train is simulated on the appointed line and the obstacle derailment position is activated to test the target number section corresponding to the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range of each protection test instance, and verification processing is carried out based on the obtained test result, namely, the verification efficiency is improved by utilizing automatic simulation verification operation, the accuracy of the verification result is ensured, and the problems that the efficiency is low and the verification accuracy is difficult to ensure because the verification of the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range is completed depending on the labor cost in the prior art can be solved.
The foregoing description is only an overview of the present invention, and is intended to be implemented in accordance with the teachings of the present invention in order that the same may be more clearly understood and to make the same and other objects, features and advantages of the present invention more readily apparent.
Drawings
Various other advantages and benefits will become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments. The drawings are only for purposes of illustrating the preferred embodiments and are not to be construed as limiting the invention. Also, like reference numerals are used to designate like parts throughout the figures. In the drawings:
FIG. 1 is a flow chart of a method for verifying an automatically triggered barrier derailment protection range provided by an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 2 is a flow chart of another method for verifying the scope of protection against derailment of an automatically triggered barrier according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 3 is a block diagram showing the construction of an apparatus for verifying the extent of protection against derailment of an automatically triggered obstacle according to an embodiment of the present invention;
FIG. 4 is a block diagram showing another apparatus for verifying the extent of protection against derailment of an automatically triggered barrier according to an embodiment of the present invention;
Fig. 5 shows a floor plan for providing a designated circuit in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention.
Detailed Description
Exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure will be described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. While exemplary embodiments of the present disclosure are shown in the drawings, it should be understood that the present disclosure may be embodied in various forms and should not be limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the disclosure to those skilled in the art.
At present, the obstacle derailment protection range in the prior art is calculated manually according to the obstacle information and the train position, and is verified manually after the obstacle derailment protection range is obtained. However, the manual processing method easily causes calculation errors or incomplete verification of the derailment protection range of the obstacle, so that the verification efficiency and accuracy of the derailment protection range of the obstacle are low, and the operation safety of the train is further affected. According to the invention, the appointed line and the list of the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection ranges corresponding to the appointed line are imported into a test environment through the appointed open interface, a train is simulated on the appointed line and the obstacle derailment position is activated, so that each protection test instance is tested for automatically triggering the target number section corresponding to the obstacle derailment protection range, and verification processing is carried out based on the obtained test result, namely, the verification efficiency is improved by utilizing automatic simulation verification operation, the accuracy of the verification result is ensured, and the problems that the efficiency is low and the verification accuracy is difficult to ensure because the verification of the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection ranges is completed depending on the labor cost in the prior art can be solved.
Therefore, the embodiment of the invention provides a method for verifying the derailment protection range of an automatic triggering barrier, by which the method can optimize the mode of verifying the derailment protection range of the automatic triggering barrier, improve the verification efficiency and the accuracy, ensure the driving safety of a train, and specifically implement the steps as shown in fig. 1, and comprise the following steps:
101. and configuring a specified open interface of the automatic train monitoring system in the test environment.
It should be noted that, in this embodiment, an important subsystem of the train automatic control system used in the urban rail transit of the train automatic monitoring system (Automatic Train Supervision, ATS) is a set of distributed real-time supervision and control system integrating modern data communication, computer, network and signal technologies. For the embodiment of the invention, a designated open interface is pre-configured in the ATS system, and the designated open interface is specially used for subsequently importing an automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list so as to complete the test of the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range.
102. And importing the specified line and the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list corresponding to the specified line into a test environment by using the specified open interface.
The list of the protection ranges of the automatic triggering obstacle derailment comprises protection test cases corresponding to all numbered sections in a designated line, and the protection test cases comprise target numbered sections corresponding to the protection ranges of the automatic triggering obstacle derailment. It should be noted that in this embodiment, the designated line is the line tested this time, the numbered sections are sections on the line, which are numbered according to the line type, the protection test instance is a use instance capable of automatically triggering the corresponding barrier derailment protection range when the corresponding numbered section is derailed under the test environment, the barrier derailment protection range is a protection range formed by the target numbered sections, the current numbered section is 2, the numbered sections adjacent to the current numbered section left and right are 1 and 3, and the boundary of each numbered section is generally provided with a kilometer sign, therefore, the initial starting kilometer sign corresponding to each numbered section and the preset safety distance set by the line in response to an emergency under the preset running condition can be acquired first, namely, the front end preset safety distance and the rear end preset safety distance in the preset safety distance virtually and externally-expand the position of the initial starting kilometer sign, the initial starting kilometer sign is set to be 2 according to the position of the virtual starting kilometer sign after the virtual starting, the virtual starting kilometer sign is 2, the boundary of the virtual starting kilometer sign is 2, and the boundary of the virtual starting kilometer sign is 1 and the virtual starting kilometer sign after the virtual starting kilometer sign is 3, the initial starting kilometer sign is also fully expanded, and the train is capable of being given to the protection range after the collision is 2, thus the accident sign is avoided, and the accident is avoided, and the train is a protection zone 1 and can be fully expanded, and the accident is a protection zone.
103. And simulating to increase trains and activate obstacle derailment positions in each numbered section in the designated line so as to perform an automatic obstacle derailment protection test.
It should be noted that, in this embodiment, since the above-mentioned step 102 has imported both the designated line and the list of the protection ranges of the automatically triggered obstacle corresponding to the designated line into the test environment, it is possible to simulate and increase the train and activate the obstacle derailment position in each numbered section in the designated line, that is, it is assumed that the obstacle derailment condition exists in a certain numbered section and the train runs in the numbered section in sequence, that is, the protection test instance corresponding to the numbered section is tested to determine whether the protection range of the obstacle derailment corresponding to the numbered section can be accurately automatically triggered, that is, whether the target numbered section corresponding to the protection range of the obstacle derailment in the designated line is lighted, so as to record the test result of each protection test instance to form the test result corresponding to the automatic protection test of the obstacle, so as to execute the subsequent step 104.
104. And finally, outputting a verification result corresponding to the barrier derailment protection range based on a test result corresponding to the barrier automatic derailment protection test.
It should be noted that, in this embodiment, each protection test case is used for completing the test of the obstacle derailment protection range, where the test result is whether the display condition of the obstacle derailment protection range corresponds to the information recorded in the obstacle derailment protection range list, specifically, it is only necessary to perform a marking process on each protection test case in the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list based on the test result, then use the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list after the marking process as a verification result corresponding to the obstacle derailment protection range, and output the verification result corresponding to the obstacle derailment protection range, where the marking process may be a color mark, for example, a non-corresponding standard red, or a pattern mark, for example, a corresponding standard "v", a non-corresponding standard "x", etc., which is not limited by this embodiment, and only needs to ensure that the verification result can be obviously differentiated, thereby improving the verification efficiency and ensuring the accuracy of the verification result.
Based on the implementation manner of fig. 1, it can be seen that, in the method for verifying an automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range provided by the present invention, when the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range needs to be verified, a designated open interface of a train automatic monitoring system is first configured in a test environment, then a designated line and an automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list corresponding to the designated line are imported into the test environment by using the designated open interface, where the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list includes protection test cases corresponding to all numbered sections in the designated line, and each protection test case includes a target numbered section corresponding to the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range, then a train is simulated and added in each numbered section in the designated line, and an obstacle derailment protection test is activated, and finally a verification result corresponding to the verification obstacle derailment protection range is output based on a test result corresponding to the obstacle automatic derailment protection test. According to the technical scheme provided by the invention, the appointed line and the list of the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection ranges corresponding to the appointed line can be imported into a test environment based on the appointed open interface, a train is simulated on the appointed line and the obstacle derailment position is activated to test the target number section corresponding to the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range of each protection test instance, and verification processing is carried out based on the obtained test result, namely, the verification efficiency is improved by utilizing automatic simulation verification operation, the accuracy of the verification result is ensured, and the problems that the efficiency is low and the verification accuracy is difficult to ensure because the verification of the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range is completed depending on the labor cost in the prior art can be solved.
Further, the preferred embodiment of the present invention is described in detail with respect to the process of verifying the derailment protection range of the automatically triggered obstacle based on fig. 1, and the specific steps thereof are as shown in fig. 2, including:
201. and configuring an automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list according to the plan view of the designated line and the preset safety protection distance corresponding to the designated line.
It should be noted that, in this embodiment, the floor plan of the designated line is directly available based on the train signal system, and the floor plan includes all information on the line, which includes but is not limited to: line type (uplink and downlink), kilometer post, zone name, zone type, etc., while the preset safety distance is used to characterize the front and rear safety distance of the train when emergency braking occurs under the preset driving conditions corresponding to the specified line, namely, when the current train is subjected to emergency braking under the preset running condition corresponding to the designated line, the safety distance between the current train and the front train and the safety distance between the current train and the rear train which is prevented from running in can be configured with an automatic triggering barrier derailment protection range list through the two data, and specifically, an initial origin-destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section in the designated line is obtained; acquiring a preset safety distance corresponding to a designated line, wherein the preset safety distance is used for representing the front and rear safety distances of a train when emergency braking occurs under preset running conditions corresponding to the designated line; performing security position mapping on the initial origin-destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section based on a preset security protection distance to obtain a target origin-destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section; determining the derailment protection range of the obstacle corresponding to each numbered section according to the position relation between the target origin-destination kilometer sign corresponding to each numbered section and the initial origin-destination kilometer signs corresponding to other numbered sections; and constructing a protection test instance corresponding to each numbered section by utilizing each numbered section and the obstacle derailment protection range corresponding to each numbered section, and configuring an automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list based on each protection test instance. It should be noted that, in some special lines, a bidirectional operation condition may occur, so that in the mapping process, an uplink line but operation is reversed to a downlink direction and a downlink line but operation is reversed to an uplink direction are added, and the positional relationship specifically refers to a positional intersection relationship between a target origin-destination kilometer label corresponding to each numbered section and an initial origin-destination kilometer label corresponding to other numbered sections, that is, a target origin-destination kilometer label section may be used as a virtual mapping range, and an obstacle derailment protection range of each numbered section is determined based on whether an intersection exists between the virtual mapping range and other numbered sections, and as long as the intersection exists, the other numbered sections with the intersection exist are used as target numbered sections corresponding to the numbered sections.
Specifically, the preset safety distance comprises a front-end preset safety distance and a rear-end preset safety distance; therefore, the specific implementation process of performing the secure location mapping on the initial origin-destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section based on the preset secure protection distance to obtain the target origin-destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section is as follows: acquiring the line type and the running direction of a specified line; when the line type is an uplink line and the running direction is an uplink direction, performing position mapping on the initial origin-destination kilometer post of each numbered section based on a front-end preset safety distance, and performing position mapping on the initial origin-destination kilometer post based on a rear-end preset safety distance to obtain a target origin-destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section; when the line type is an uplink line and the running direction is a downlink direction, performing position mapping on the initial starting point kilometer post of each numbered section based on the front end preset safety distance, and performing position mapping on the initial destination kilometer post based on the rear end preset safety distance to obtain a target starting destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section; when the line type is a downlink line and the running direction is a downlink direction, performing position mapping on the initial starting point kilometer post of each numbered section based on the front end preset safety distance, and performing position mapping on the initial destination kilometer post based on the rear end preset safety distance to obtain a target starting destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section; when the line type is a downlink line and the running direction is an uplink direction, the initial origin-destination kilometer post of each numbered section is mapped based on the front-end preset safety distance, and the initial starting-point kilometer post is mapped based on the rear-end preset safety distance, so that the target origin-destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section is obtained.
Further, the executing process of determining the barrier derailment protection range corresponding to each numbered section according to the position relationship between the target origin-destination kilometer sign corresponding to each numbered section and the initial origin-destination kilometer sign corresponding to other numbered sections is as follows: determining an obstacle derailment protection range corresponding to each numbered section according to the position relation of the target origin-destination kilometer sign corresponding to each numbered section and the initial origin-destination kilometer signs corresponding to other numbered sections, wherein the method comprises the following steps: determining a virtual mapping range corresponding to each target origin-destination kilometer sign based on the target origin-destination kilometer sign corresponding to each numbered section; and taking the numbered sections with the position crossing relation with each virtual mapping range as target numbered sections, and taking the continuous target numbered sections as obstacle derailment protection ranges corresponding to each numbered section.
For example, assuming that the line layout diagram of the specified line is shown in fig. 5, and the front preset safety distance is 50 and the rear preset safety distance is 200, the list corresponding to the above cases is as follows based on the line type and the running direction of the specified line:
the initial list is:
TABLE 1
When the line type is an uplink line and the running direction is an uplink direction:
TABLE 2
When the line type is an uplink line and the running direction is a downlink direction:
TABLE 3 Table 3
When the line type is a downlink line and the running direction is a downlink direction:
TABLE 4 Table 4
When the line type is the downlink and the running direction is the uplink:
TABLE 5
Based on tables 2-5, the final barrier derailment protection range is:
uplink:
downlink line:
TABLE 6
After table 6 is obtained, the guard test cases may be configured based on the correspondence in table 6 so as to perform subsequent test verification operations.
202. And configuring a specified open interface of the automatic train monitoring system in the test environment.
This step is described in conjunction with step 101 in the above method, and the same contents are not repeated here.
203. And importing the specified line and the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list corresponding to the specified line into a test environment by using the specified open interface.
This step is described in conjunction with step 102 in the above method, and the same contents are not repeated here.
204. And simulating to increase trains and activate obstacle derailment positions in each numbered section in the designated line so as to perform an automatic obstacle derailment protection test.
This step is described in conjunction with step 103 in the above method, and the same contents are not repeated here.
205. And marking each protection test case in the list of the automatically triggered obstacle derailment protection ranges based on a test result corresponding to the obstacle automatic derailment protection test.
In this embodiment, the marking process may be a color mark, for example, a non-corresponding red mark, or a pattern mark, for example, a corresponding mark "v", a non-corresponding mark "x", or the like, which is not limited to this embodiment, and only needs to ensure that the mark can be clearly distinguished from the list of automatically triggered obstacle derailment protection ranges.
206. And taking the marked list of the automatically triggered obstacle derailment protection ranges as a verification result corresponding to the obstacle derailment protection ranges, and outputting the verification result corresponding to the obstacle derailment protection ranges.
This step is described in conjunction with step 104 in the above method, and the same contents are not repeated here.
Further, as an implementation of the method embodiments shown in fig. 1-2, the embodiment of the invention provides a device for verifying the derailment protection range of an automatic triggering obstacle, which is used for optimizing the mode of verifying the derailment protection range of the automatic triggering obstacle, improving the verification efficiency and accuracy, and ensuring the driving safety of a train. The embodiment of the device corresponds to the foregoing method embodiment, and for convenience of reading, details of the foregoing method embodiment are not described one by one in this embodiment, but it should be clear that the device in this embodiment can correspondingly implement all the details of the foregoing method embodiment. As shown in fig. 3, the device includes:
A first configuration unit 31 for configuring a designated open interface of the train automatic monitoring system in a test environment;
an importing unit 32, configured to import, into the test environment, a specified line and an auto-triggering obstacle derailment protection range list corresponding to the specified line by using the specified open interface obtained by the first configuration unit 31, where the auto-triggering obstacle derailment protection range list includes protection test cases corresponding to all numbered sections in the specified line, and the protection test cases include target numbered sections corresponding to auto-triggering obstacle derailment protection ranges;
a test unit 33 for simulating addition of a train and activation of an obstacle derailment position in each of the numbered sections within the specified line obtained by the import unit 32, to perform an obstacle automatic derailment protection test;
and an output unit 34, configured to output a verification result corresponding to the obstacle derailment protection range based on the test result corresponding to the obstacle automatic derailment protection test obtained by the test unit 33.
Further, as shown in fig. 4, the apparatus further includes:
a second configuration unit 35, configured to configure the list of automatically triggered obstacle derailment protection ranges according to the floor plan of the specified line and the preset safety distance corresponding to the specified line before the first configuration unit 31.
Further, as shown in fig. 4, the second configuration unit 35 includes:
a first obtaining module 351, configured to obtain an initial origin kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section in the specified line;
the second obtaining module 352 is configured to obtain a preset safety distance corresponding to the specified line, where the preset safety distance is used to characterize a front-rear safety distance of the train when emergency braking occurs under a preset running condition corresponding to the specified line;
a mapping module 353, configured to perform secure location mapping on the initial origin-destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section obtained by the first obtaining module 351 based on the preset security protection distance obtained by the second obtaining module 352, so as to obtain a target origin-destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section;
a determining module 354, configured to determine an obstacle derailment protection range corresponding to each numbered section according to a position relationship between a target origin-destination kilometer sign corresponding to each numbered section obtained by the mapping module 353 and the initial origin-destination kilometer signs corresponding to other numbered sections;
the configuration module 355 is configured to construct a protection test case corresponding to each numbered section by using each numbered section and the protection range of the obstacle derailment corresponding to each numbered section obtained by the determination module 354, and configure the list of the protection ranges of the obstacle derailment triggered automatically based on each protection test case.
Further, as shown in fig. 4, the preset safety distance includes a front preset safety distance and a rear preset safety distance; the mapping module is used for, in particular,
acquiring the line type and the running direction of the appointed line;
when the line type is an uplink line and the running direction is an uplink direction, performing position mapping on the initial origin kilometer post of each numbered section based on the front end preset safety distance, and performing position mapping on the initial starting origin kilometer post based on the rear end preset safety distance, so as to obtain a target origin kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section;
when the line type is an uplink line and the running direction is a downlink direction, performing position mapping on the initial starting point kilometer post of each numbered section based on the front end preset safety distance, and performing position mapping on the initial destination kilometer post based on the rear end preset safety distance to obtain a target destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section;
when the line type is a downlink line and the running direction is a downlink direction, performing position mapping on the initial starting point kilometer post of each numbered section based on the front end preset safety distance, and performing position mapping on the initial destination kilometer post based on the rear end preset safety distance, so as to obtain a target destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section;
When the line type is a downlink line and the running direction is an uplink direction, performing position mapping on the initial origin kilometer post of each numbered section based on the front end preset safety distance, and performing position mapping on the initial starting origin kilometer post based on the rear end preset safety distance, so as to obtain a target origin kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section.
Further, as shown in fig. 4, the determining module includes:
determining a virtual mapping range corresponding to each target origin-destination kilometer sign based on the target origin-destination kilometer sign corresponding to each numbered section;
and taking the numbered sections with the position crossing relation with each virtual mapping range as target numbered sections, and taking the continuous target numbered sections as obstacle derailment protection ranges corresponding to each numbered section.
Further, as shown in fig. 4, the output unit 34 includes:
a processing module 341, configured to perform marking processing on each protection test case in the automatically triggered barrier derailment protection range list based on a test result corresponding to the barrier automatic derailment protection test;
and the output module 342 is configured to take the list of automatically triggered barrier derailment protection ranges after the marking process obtained by the processing module as a verification result corresponding to the barrier derailment protection range, and output the verification result corresponding to the barrier derailment protection range.
Further, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a storage medium, where the storage medium is configured to store a computer program, where the computer program controls a device where the storage medium is located to execute the method for verifying the automatic triggering of the derailment protection range of the obstacle described in fig. 1-2.
Further, an embodiment of the present invention further provides a processor, where the processor is configured to run a program, where the program runs to perform the method for verifying the automatically triggered barrier derailment protection range described in fig. 1-2.
In the foregoing embodiments, the descriptions of the embodiments are emphasized, and for parts of one embodiment that are not described in detail, reference may be made to related descriptions of other embodiments.
It will be appreciated that the relevant features of the methods and apparatus described above may be referenced to one another. In addition, the "first", "second", and the like in the above embodiments are for distinguishing the embodiments, and do not represent the merits and merits of the embodiments.
It will be clear to those skilled in the art that, for convenience and brevity of description, specific working procedures of the above-described systems, apparatuses and units may refer to corresponding procedures in the foregoing method embodiments, which are not repeated herein.
The algorithms and displays presented herein are not inherently related to any particular computer, virtual system, or other apparatus. Various general-purpose systems may also be used with the teachings herein. The required structure for a construction of such a system is apparent from the description above. In addition, the present invention is not directed to any particular programming language. It will be appreciated that the teachings of the present invention described herein may be implemented in a variety of programming languages, and the above description of specific languages is provided for disclosure of enablement and best mode of the present invention.
Furthermore, the memory may include volatile memory, random Access Memory (RAM) and/or nonvolatile memory, such as Read Only Memory (ROM) or flash memory (flash RAM), in a computer readable medium, the memory including at least one memory chip.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that embodiments of the present application may be provided as a method, system, or computer program product. Accordingly, the present application may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment, or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the present application may take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including, but not limited to, disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, and the like) having computer-usable program code embodied therein.
The present application is described with reference to flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams of methods, apparatus (systems) and computer program products according to embodiments of the application. It will be understood that each flow and/or block of the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, and combinations of flows and/or blocks in the flowchart illustrations and/or block diagrams, can be implemented by computer program instructions. These computer program instructions may be provided to a processor of a general purpose computer, special purpose computer, embedded processor, or other programmable data processing apparatus to produce a machine, such that the instructions, which execute via the processor of the computer or other programmable data processing apparatus, create means for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be stored in a computer-readable memory that can direct a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to function in a particular manner, such that the instructions stored in the computer-readable memory produce an article of manufacture including instruction means which implement the function specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
These computer program instructions may also be loaded onto a computer or other programmable data processing apparatus to cause a series of operational steps to be performed on the computer or other programmable apparatus to produce a computer implemented process such that the instructions which execute on the computer or other programmable apparatus provide steps for implementing the functions specified in the flowchart flow or flows and/or block diagram block or blocks.
In one typical configuration, a computing device includes one or more processors (CPUs), input/output interfaces, network interfaces, and memory.
The memory may include volatile memory in a computer-readable medium, random Access Memory (RAM) and/or nonvolatile memory, etc., such as Read Only Memory (ROM) or flash RAM. Memory is an example of a computer-readable medium.
Computer readable media, including both non-transitory and non-transitory, removable and non-removable media, may implement information storage by any method or technology. The information may be computer readable instructions, data structures, modules of a program, or other data. Examples of storage media for a computer include, but are not limited to, phase change memory (PRAM), static Random Access Memory (SRAM), dynamic Random Access Memory (DRAM), other types of Random Access Memory (RAM), read Only Memory (ROM), electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EEPROM), flash memory or other memory technology, compact disc read only memory (CD-ROM), digital Versatile Discs (DVD) or other optical storage, magnetic cassettes, magnetic tape magnetic disk storage or other magnetic storage devices, or any other non-transmission medium, which can be used to store information that can be accessed by a computing device. Computer-readable media, as defined herein, does not include transitory computer-readable media (transmission media), such as modulated data signals and carrier waves.
It should also be noted that the terms "comprises," "comprising," or any other variation thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, such that a process, method, article, or apparatus that comprises a list of elements does not include only those elements but may include other elements not expressly listed or inherent to such process, method, article, or apparatus. Without further limitation, an element defined by the phrase "comprising one … …" does not exclude the presence of other like elements in a process, method, article or apparatus that comprises an element.
It will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that embodiments of the present application may be provided as a method, system, or computer program product. Accordingly, the present application may take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment combining software and hardware aspects. Furthermore, the present application may take the form of a computer program product embodied on one or more computer-usable storage media (including, but not limited to, disk storage, CD-ROM, optical storage, and the like) having computer-usable program code embodied therein.
The foregoing is merely exemplary of the present application and is not intended to limit the present application. Various modifications and changes may be made to the present application by those skilled in the art. Any modifications, equivalent substitutions, improvements, etc. which are within the spirit and principles of the present application are intended to be included within the scope of the claims of the present application.
Claims (7)
1. A method of verifying an automatically triggered barrier derailment guard range, the method comprising:
configuring a designated open interface of a train automatic monitoring system in a test environment;
importing a specified line and an automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list corresponding to the specified line into the test environment by using the specified open interface, wherein the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list comprises protection test examples corresponding to all numbered sections in the specified line, and the protection test examples comprise target numbered sections corresponding to the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range;
simulating and adding trains in each numbered section in the designated line and activating obstacle derailment positions so as to perform an automatic obstacle derailment protection test;
outputting a verification result corresponding to the obstacle derailment protection range based on a test result corresponding to the obstacle automatic derailment protection test;
before configuring the designated open interface of the automatic train monitoring system in the test environment, the method further comprises:
configuring the list of the derailment protection ranges of the automatic triggering barrier according to the plane layout diagram of the specified line and the preset safety distance corresponding to the specified line;
According to the plan view of the specified line and the preset safety distance corresponding to the specified line, configuring the list of automatically triggered barrier derailment protection ranges comprises the following steps:
acquiring initial origin-destination kilometer marks corresponding to the numbered sections in the designated line;
acquiring a preset safety distance corresponding to the designated line, wherein the preset safety distance is used for representing the front and rear safety distances of the train when emergency braking occurs under a preset running condition corresponding to the designated line;
performing secure location mapping on the initial origin-destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section based on the preset secure distance to obtain a target origin-destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section;
determining the derailment protection range of the obstacle corresponding to each numbered section according to the position relation between the target origin-destination kilometer label corresponding to each numbered section and the initial origin-destination kilometer labels corresponding to other numbered sections, wherein the position relation specifically refers to the position crossing relation between the target origin-destination kilometer label corresponding to each numbered section and the initial origin-destination kilometer label corresponding to other numbered sections;
and constructing a protection test instance corresponding to each numbered section by utilizing each numbered section and an obstacle derailment protection range corresponding to each numbered section, and configuring the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list based on each protection test instance.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the preset safety distance comprises a front end preset safety distance and a back end preset safety distance; performing secure location mapping on the initial origin-destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section based on the preset secure distance to obtain a target origin-destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section, including:
acquiring the line type and the running direction of the appointed line;
when the line type is an uplink line and the running direction is an uplink direction, performing position mapping on the initial origin kilometer post of each numbered section based on the front end preset safety distance, and performing position mapping on the initial starting origin kilometer post based on the rear end preset safety distance, so as to obtain a target origin kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section;
when the line type is an uplink line and the running direction is a downlink direction, performing position mapping on the initial starting point kilometer post of each numbered section based on the front end preset safety distance, and performing position mapping on the initial destination kilometer post based on the rear end preset safety distance to obtain a target destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section;
When the line type is a downlink line and the running direction is a downlink direction, performing position mapping on the initial starting point kilometer post of each numbered section based on the front end preset safety distance, and performing position mapping on the initial destination kilometer post based on the rear end preset safety distance, so as to obtain a target destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section;
when the line type is a downlink line and the running direction is an uplink direction, performing position mapping on the initial origin kilometer post of each numbered section based on the front end preset safety distance, and performing position mapping on the initial starting origin kilometer post based on the rear end preset safety distance, so as to obtain a target origin kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section.
3. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the obstacle derailment protection range for each numbered section based on the positional relationship of the target origin-destination kilometer label for each numbered section and the initial origin-destination kilometer labels for other numbered sections comprises:
determining a virtual mapping range corresponding to each target origin-destination kilometer sign based on the target origin-destination kilometer sign corresponding to each numbered section;
And taking the numbered sections with the position crossing relation with each virtual mapping range as target numbered sections, and taking the continuous target numbered sections as obstacle derailment protection ranges corresponding to each numbered section.
4. The method of claim 1, wherein outputting a verification result corresponding to verifying the obstacle derailment protection range based on a test result corresponding to the obstacle automatic derailment protection test, comprises:
marking each protection test instance in the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list based on a test result corresponding to the obstacle automatic derailment protection test;
and taking the marked list of the automatically triggered barrier derailment protection ranges as a verification result corresponding to the barrier derailment protection ranges, and outputting the verification result corresponding to the barrier derailment protection ranges.
5. An apparatus for verifying an automatically triggered barrier derailment guard range, said apparatus comprising:
the first configuration unit is used for configuring a designated open interface of the automatic train monitoring system in the test environment;
the input unit is used for inputting a specified line and an automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list corresponding to the specified line into the test environment by utilizing the specified open interface obtained by the first configuration unit, wherein the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list comprises protection test cases corresponding to all numbered sections in the specified line, and the protection test cases comprise target numbered sections corresponding to the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range;
A test unit for simulating addition of a train and activation of an obstacle derailment position in each of the numbered sections within the specified line obtained by the import unit, to perform an obstacle automatic derailment protection test;
the output unit is used for outputting a verification result corresponding to the obstacle derailment protection range based on the test result corresponding to the obstacle automatic derailment protection test obtained by the test unit;
the apparatus further comprises:
the second configuration unit is used for configuring the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list according to the floor plan of the specified line and the preset safety distance corresponding to the specified line before the first configuration unit;
the second configuration unit includes:
the first acquisition module is used for acquiring initial origin-destination kilometer marks corresponding to the numbered sections in the designated line;
the second acquisition module is used for acquiring a preset safety distance corresponding to the appointed line, wherein the preset safety distance is used for representing the front and rear safety distances of the train when emergency braking occurs under a preset running condition corresponding to the appointed line;
the mapping module is used for performing security position mapping on the initial origin-destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section obtained by the first obtaining module based on the preset security distance obtained by the second obtaining module so as to obtain a target origin-destination kilometer post corresponding to each numbered section;
The determining module is configured to determine an obstacle derailment protection range corresponding to each numbered section according to a position relationship between the target origin-destination kilometer label corresponding to each numbered section and the initial origin-destination kilometer labels corresponding to other numbered sections, where the position relationship specifically refers to a position intersection relationship between the target origin-destination kilometer label corresponding to each numbered section and the initial origin-destination kilometer label corresponding to other numbered sections;
the configuration module is used for constructing a protection test instance corresponding to each numbered section by utilizing each numbered section and the obstacle derailment protection range corresponding to each numbered section obtained by the determination module, and configuring the automatic triggering obstacle derailment protection range list based on each protection test instance.
6. A storage medium comprising a stored program, wherein the program, when run, controls a device in which the storage medium is located to perform the method of verifying an auto-triggering barrier derailment guard range according to any one of claims 1 to 4.
7. A processor for running a program, wherein the program is run to perform the method of verifying an auto-triggering barrier derailment guard range of any one of claims 1 to 4.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310045989.7A CN115782993B (en) | 2023-01-30 | 2023-01-30 | Method and device for verifying derailment protection range of automatic triggering obstacle |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310045989.7A CN115782993B (en) | 2023-01-30 | 2023-01-30 | Method and device for verifying derailment protection range of automatic triggering obstacle |
Publications (2)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN115782993A CN115782993A (en) | 2023-03-14 |
| CN115782993B true CN115782993B (en) | 2023-05-30 |
Family
ID=85429237
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202310045989.7A Active CN115782993B (en) | 2023-01-30 | 2023-01-30 | Method and device for verifying derailment protection range of automatic triggering obstacle |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN115782993B (en) |
Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2006045327A1 (en) * | 2004-10-23 | 2006-05-04 | Valeo Schalter Und Sensoren Gmbh | Device and method for determining the position or contour of a defining section of an obstacle |
| JP2007068383A (en) * | 2005-09-02 | 2007-03-15 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Automatic train stop device |
| CN103158739A (en) * | 2013-03-18 | 2013-06-19 | 彭岚 | Method and device for dynamically handling railway track bad shunting |
| CN110901711A (en) * | 2019-12-04 | 2020-03-24 | 卡斯柯信号(北京)有限公司 | Verification method and device for automatically triggering access triggering track |
| CN112606880A (en) * | 2020-12-23 | 2021-04-06 | 卡斯柯信号有限公司 | Railway signal control method based on introduction of vehicle information in Boolean logic operation |
| CN115056830A (en) * | 2022-07-19 | 2022-09-16 | 炫彩互动网络科技有限公司 | Design simulation operation system |
-
2023
- 2023-01-30 CN CN202310045989.7A patent/CN115782993B/en active Active
Patent Citations (6)
| Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WO2006045327A1 (en) * | 2004-10-23 | 2006-05-04 | Valeo Schalter Und Sensoren Gmbh | Device and method for determining the position or contour of a defining section of an obstacle |
| JP2007068383A (en) * | 2005-09-02 | 2007-03-15 | Mitsubishi Electric Corp | Automatic train stop device |
| CN103158739A (en) * | 2013-03-18 | 2013-06-19 | 彭岚 | Method and device for dynamically handling railway track bad shunting |
| CN110901711A (en) * | 2019-12-04 | 2020-03-24 | 卡斯柯信号(北京)有限公司 | Verification method and device for automatically triggering access triggering track |
| CN112606880A (en) * | 2020-12-23 | 2021-04-06 | 卡斯柯信号有限公司 | Railway signal control method based on introduction of vehicle information in Boolean logic operation |
| CN115056830A (en) * | 2022-07-19 | 2022-09-16 | 炫彩互动网络科技有限公司 | Design simulation operation system |
Also Published As
| Publication number | Publication date |
|---|---|
| CN115782993A (en) | 2023-03-14 |
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| US10908051B2 (en) | Testing method and apparatus applicable to driverless vehicle | |
| CN111123735B (en) | Automatic driving simulation operation method and device | |
| CN107944091B (en) | Virtual-real combined vehicle networking application scene testing system and method | |
| US11354462B2 (en) | Method and apparatus for determining coping capability boundary information of an unmanned vehicle and electronic device | |
| US20220048533A1 (en) | Method and system for validating autonomous control software for a self-driving vehicle | |
| CN110796007B (en) | Scene recognition method and computing device | |
| CN102975748B (en) | Train positioning and speed measuring method and system | |
| CN112249022B (en) | Performance analysis method and device of advanced vehicle driving assistance system | |
| CN110310499A (en) | A kind of method and device of ring road speed limit identification | |
| GB2541710A (en) | Locating train events on a railway network | |
| CN103760774A (en) | Simulation assessment system for reasonability of traffic sign design and set position | |
| CN112671487B (en) | Vehicle testing method, server and testing vehicle | |
| CN111765904B (en) | Test method and device for automatic driving vehicle, electronic equipment and medium | |
| CN115782993B (en) | Method and device for verifying derailment protection range of automatic triggering obstacle | |
| CN113928383A (en) | Rail transit operation diagram conflict detection method and device | |
| CN116167255B (en) | Vehicle-road collaborative closed-loop simulation test method and system based on VTD | |
| CN107451342A (en) | A kind of rule verification method and device of rail traffic signal system basic data | |
| US11427232B2 (en) | Systems and methods for auditing assets | |
| CN114435433B (en) | Method and device for verifying automatic trigger route conflict | |
| KR102579590B1 (en) | Autonomous Vehicle ability evaluation scenario generation system based on the Road Traffic Act | |
| CN112329277A (en) | Indoor roadster test sequence compiling method and device based on CTCS-2 | |
| CN109974731A (en) | A kind of method and apparatus of Unmanned Systems' path planning target selection | |
| CN115956190A (en) | Method and apparatus for providing high resolution digital map | |
| CN115923884B (en) | Method and device for verifying route names in urban rail projects | |
| CN116142253B (en) | Code bit table generation method and device |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant | ||
| GR01 | Patent grant |