CN115687103A - Full-process system testing method and device - Google Patents
Full-process system testing method and device Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN115687103A CN115687103A CN202211302884.7A CN202211302884A CN115687103A CN 115687103 A CN115687103 A CN 115687103A CN 202211302884 A CN202211302884 A CN 202211302884A CN 115687103 A CN115687103 A CN 115687103A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- test
- source type
- flow
- type parameter
- service source
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
Images
Landscapes
- Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
Abstract
The application provides a full-flow system testing method and device. Specifically, first, a first service origin type parameter may be obtained. The first service source type parameter is used for indicating a test service type corresponding to a first test flow in a test process. Then, a first simulation operation flow in the first test flow can be determined according to the first service source parameter. The first simulation operation flow is used for executing simulation operation on the tested system. The first simulation operation flow is used for simulating the behavior of a technician and carrying out corresponding operation on the tested system. In this way, after the first simulation operation flow is determined, the system under test may be tested based on the first simulation operation flow, and test data of the system under test in the test process may be obtained. Therefore, the simulation test flow of the tested system is determined based on the first service source type parameter, and the operation of a technician can be simulated to test the tested system.
Description
Technical Field
The present application relates to the field of computer technologies, and in particular, to a full-process system testing method and apparatus.
Background
In order to improve the reliability of the system, the system can be tested, so that faults which may occur when the system is in actual application can be determined, and the system can be adjusted and modified in time. At present, an important method for testing a system is to simulate possible operations in an actual operation process, input the possible operations into the tested system, and monitor feedback of the tested system under the possible operations so as to determine whether the tested system has a fault or a bug.
However, for a large number of companies such as banks, the number of links of the system is often relatively large. For this reason, in the process of testing the system, a large number of operations are mostly required to be performed on the system. Currently, technicians mostly perform operations manually, and observe and record feedback conditions of a tested system in a testing process, so as to judge whether the tested system has a bug or a fault. Specifically, the current long transaction flow system and multi-channel collaboration system of the bank are tested by the method.
However, the manual test by technicians has the problem of high event and labor cost, which is not favorable for the quick update and iteration of the system.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of this, the present application provides a method and an apparatus for testing a full-flow system, and aims to automatically test a long-transaction flow system or a channel-transaction system.
In a first aspect, the present application provides a full-flow system testing method for testing a long-transaction flow system or a multi-channel transaction system, the method comprising:
acquiring a first service source type parameter, wherein the first service source type parameter is used for indicating a test service type corresponding to a first test flow in a test process;
determining a first simulation operation flow corresponding to the first test flow according to the first service source type parameter, wherein the first simulation operation flow is used for executing simulation operation on a tested system;
and testing the tested system based on the first simulation operation flow, and acquiring test data of the tested system in the test process.
In some possible implementations, the method further includes:
acquiring a second service source type parameter, wherein the second service source type parameter is used for indicating a test service type corresponding to a second test flow in a test process;
determining a second simulation operation flow corresponding to the second test flow according to the second service source type parameter, wherein the first simulation operation flow is used for executing simulation operation on the tested system;
and testing the tested system based on the second simulation operation flow, and acquiring test data of the tested system in the test process.
In some possible implementations, the obtaining the first service source type parameter includes:
acquiring a service source type parameter sequence, wherein the service source type parameter sequence comprises the first service source type parameter and the second service source type parameter;
the sequence of the first service source type parameter and the sequence of the second service source type parameter in the service source type parameter sequence is matched with the sequence of the first test flow and the second test flow in the test process.
In some possible implementations, the obtaining test data of the system under test in the test process includes:
acquiring image information of the tested system in the testing process;
and performing character recognition on the image information, and acquiring related service parameters of the tested system in the testing process to obtain the testing data.
In some possible implementations, the method further includes:
acquiring a target processing result;
judging whether the actual processing result corresponding to the test data is matched with the target data processing result;
and responding to the matching of the actual processing result corresponding to the test data and the target data processing result, and completing the test of the tested system.
In a second aspect, the present application provides a full-flow system testing apparatus, the apparatus is used for testing a long-transaction flow system or a multi-channel transaction system, the apparatus includes:
the system comprises an acquisition module, a test module and a processing module, wherein the acquisition module is used for acquiring a first service source type parameter which is used for indicating a test service type corresponding to a first test flow in a test process;
the determining module is used for determining a first simulation operation flow corresponding to the first test flow according to the first service source type parameter, wherein the first simulation operation flow is used for executing simulation operation on a tested system;
and the test module is used for testing the tested system based on the first simulation operation flow and acquiring test data of the tested system in the test process.
In some possible implementation manners, the obtaining module is further configured to obtain a second service source type parameter, where the second service source type parameter is used to indicate a test service type corresponding to a second test procedure in a test process;
the determining module is further configured to determine a second simulation operation flow corresponding to the second test flow according to the second service source type parameter, where the first simulation operation flow is used to perform simulation operation on a system under test;
the test module is further configured to test the system under test based on the second simulation operation flow, and obtain test data of the system under test in a test process.
In some possible implementation manners, the obtaining module is specifically configured to obtain a service source type parameter sequence, where the service source type parameter sequence includes the first service source type parameter and the second service source type parameter;
the sequence of the first service source type parameter and the sequence of the second service source type parameter in the service source type parameter sequence is matched with the sequence of the first test flow and the second test flow in the test process.
In some possible implementations, the test module is specifically configured to obtain image information of the system under test in the test process; and performing character recognition on the image information, and acquiring related service parameters of the tested system in the testing process to obtain the testing data.
In some possible implementation manners, the obtaining module is further configured to obtain a target processing result;
the test module is further used for judging whether an actual processing result corresponding to the test data is matched with the target data processing result; and responding to the matching of the actual processing result corresponding to the test data and the target data processing result, and completing the test of the tested system.
In a third aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides an apparatus, which includes a memory and a processor, where the memory is configured to store instructions or codes, and the processor is configured to execute the instructions or codes, so as to cause the apparatus to perform the full-flow system testing method described in any one of the foregoing first aspects.
In a fourth aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a computer storage medium, where a code is stored in the computer storage medium, and when the code is executed, a device that runs the code implements the full-flow system testing method described in any one of the foregoing first aspects.
The application provides a full-flow system testing method and device. The method can be used for carrying out full-flow test on a more complex system. Specifically, when the full-flow system testing method provided by the present application is executed, first, a first service source type parameter may be obtained. The first service source type parameter is used for indicating a test service type corresponding to a first test flow in a test process. Then, a first simulation operation flow in the first test flow can be determined according to the first service source parameter. The first simulation operation flow is used for executing simulation operation on the tested system. That is to say. The first simulation operation flow is used for simulating the behavior of a technician and carrying out corresponding operation on the tested system. In this way, after the first simulation operation flow is determined, the system under test can be tested based on the first simulation operation flow, and test data of the system under test in the test process can be acquired. Therefore, the simulation test flow of the tested system is determined based on the first service source type parameter, so that the operation of a technician can be simulated to test the tested system. Therefore, by setting different first service source type parameters, the method can cover service data of various initiating channels and initiating modes, provides a full-process testing method, forms a full-process automatic testing method from service initiation and reception to service processing and result confirmation of the system, non-invasively performs cross-platform integration, reduces joint debugging testing workload and communication cost, and reduces repeated operation.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments or the prior art, the drawings used in the embodiments or the prior art descriptions will be briefly described below, and obviously, the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present application, and other drawings can be obtained by those skilled in the art without creative efforts.
FIG. 1 is a flowchart of a method for testing a full-flow system according to an embodiment of the present disclosure;
fig. 2 is a schematic structural diagram of a full-flow system testing apparatus according to an embodiment of the present disclosure.
Detailed Description
Due to the characteristics of the system, the system test of long transaction flow and multi-channel cooperation mostly depends on manual test, and the problems of slow progress of regression test and joint debugging test and high communication cost exist because the execution steps are multiple, the test result needs to be confirmed manually, and the time and labor cost are high.
In order to solve the above problem, an embodiment of the present application provides a full-flow system testing method and apparatus. The full-flow system testing method can be applied to a testing system. The test system can be a server or a server cluster formed by the servers. The following describes a full-flow system testing method provided in the embodiments of the present application from the perspective of a testing system. It should be apparent that the described embodiments are only some of the embodiments of the present application, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present application.
Referring to fig. 1, fig. 1 is a flowchart of a method of a full-flow system testing method provided in an embodiment of the present application, including:
s101: a first service source type parameter is obtained.
To test a system under test, the test system may first obtain first traffic source parameters. The first traffic source parameter may be preset by a technician. For example, in some possible implementations, one or more optional traffic source type parameters may be preset. The technician may select the first traffic source parameter based on the actual demand situation.
In an actual application scenario, the multiple optional service source type parameters may include a foreground initiation type, an interface initiation type, an initiation type of an interface of a call correlation system, and a generation type of a database of a modification correlation system. Each will be described in detail below.
The foreground initiation (FrtInt) type is to log in a tested system through a browser aiming at the service with the service source as the system, to input service data, to submit service application, and to complete the initiation of a service through the subsequent links of auditing, accounting and the like of the system. The service type source does not depend on a correlation system, only needs to be initiated from the system, and has less cross-system debugging work.
The interface initiation (SysInf) core is that the system is used as a service side, a service request comes from interface calling of the system, and after data is transmitted through a message, the test system completes service acceptance and flow propulsion to complete subsequent services. During manual testing, an interface test tool is usually used to simulate a message to initiate a request to the system interface, and test data is generated.
Calling a correlation system interface initiation (RelInf) type to be suitable for a service source as a correlation system, generating service data by calling a specific interface of the correlation system, and accessing the correlation system at regular time by the system to retrieve the service data for processing. In a conventional manual test, an associated system tester is usually required to call an interface thereof to initiate a service, and a relatively high communication cost is required during joint debugging test.
And modifying the data of the associated system database generation service (Moddab) type from the associated system, storing the associated system test data in a database table, modifying the table data by executing SQL during manual test to generate service data, and accessing the associated system at regular time by the system to retrieve the service data for processing. The method can generate the service data only by updating less table data of the correlation system, but has high operation repeatability, and the joint debugging test also needs to be communicated with the correlation system.
In practice, the technician may select a plurality of service source type parameters on the test system. The plurality of service source type parameters includes a first service source type parameter. Each service source type parameter corresponds to a test flow. Correspondingly, when the tested system is tested, a plurality of test flows can be determined according to the service source type parameters, so that the tested system is tested according to the test flows.
Alternatively, the technician may select the service source type parameter sequentially. The plurality of service source type parameters may constitute a sequence of service source type parameters. The sequence of the service source type parameter in the service source type parameter sequence represents the execution sequence of the corresponding test flow.
For example, assume that the sequence of service source type parameters includes a first service source type parameter and a second service source type parameter. Wherein the first traffic source type parameter is earlier in the sequence of traffic source type parameters than the second traffic source type parameter. Then, during the test, the tested system may be tested by using the first test flow corresponding to the first service source type parameter, and then the tested system may be tested by using the second test flow corresponding to the second service source type parameter.
S102: and determining a first simulation operation process corresponding to the first test process according to the first service source type parameter.
After the first service source type parameter is obtained, a first simulation operation flow corresponding to the first test flow may be determined. The first simulation operation flow is an operation flow performed by a technician when a first test flow is performed on the tested system manually. Optionally, the first simulation operation flow is obtained by a Robotic Process Automation (RPA) technology.
As can be seen from the above description, the optional service source type parameter may include four types, namely, a foreground initiation type, an interface initiation type, an initiation type for calling an associated system interface, and a generation type for modifying an associated system database. The following describes the corresponding first simulation operation flow respectively by taking the four service source type parameters as examples.
Optionally, if the first service source type parameter is a foreground initiating type, the corresponding first simulation operation flow may include: adding a target system test environment, carrying out automatic recording, simulating the operation of launching a service from a foreground, and executing the operations of auditing, accounting and the like by the system until the service is finally completed.
Optionally, if the first service source type parameter is an interface initiation type, the corresponding first simulation operation flow may include: and executing a Python script mode to send a request and generating a service. Selecting an execution template, selecting execution history records or re-uploading scripts, specifying an output path for requesting response, setting cycle times n, clicking for execution, and automatically generating n types of services corresponding to the types.
Optionally, if the first service source type parameter is a type for calling an associated system interface to initiate, the corresponding first simulation operation flow may include selecting an execution template, selecting execution history, or re-uploading a script, specifying an output path for requesting a response, setting a cycle number n, and clicking to execute, so as to automatically generate n services of corresponding types.
Optionally, if the first service source type parameter is a modification associated system database generation type, the corresponding first simulation operation flow may include selecting an execution template, filling in database information and SQL to be executed, and automatically executing the SQL to complete data update of the associated system. If the latter is selected, the Python script is used to connect the database, and the database table is updated after SQL is automatically executed.
If the technician selects a plurality of service source type parameters, the test system can determine the test processes corresponding to the service source type parameters respectively. For example, the sequence of service source type parameters includes a first service source type parameter and a second service source type parameter. The test system may determine a first test procedure corresponding to the first service source type parameter and a second test procedure corresponding to the second service source type parameter, respectively.
S103: and testing the tested system based on the first simulation operation flow, and acquiring test data of the tested system in the test process.
After the first simulation operation flow is determined, the test system can test the tested system through the first simulation operation flow and acquire test data of the tested system in the test process. Specifically, the test system may execute the first simulation operation flow through the script, thereby testing the system under test. It can be understood that, if the test system further obtains the second service source type parameter, the test system may further determine a second simulation operation flow corresponding to the second service source type parameter, so as to test the system under test based on the second simulation operation flow.
In some possible implementations, the test system may obtain image information of the system under test during the test process, for example, the image information may be obtained by screen capture or the like. Then, the test system can perform character recognition on the acquired image information, so as to acquire relevant service parameters of the tested system in the test process and obtain test data.
In some possible implementations, the test system may also automatically determine the test result. Specifically, the test system may obtain a target processing result. The target processing result is the result which the tested system without fault or exception should obtain in the testing process. Then, the test system may determine whether the actual processing result corresponding to the test data matches the target data processing result. And if the matching is achieved, the test system determines that the test on the tested system is completed. If the test system does not have the fake license plate, the test system can send a prompt to a technician so that the technician can adjust and optimize the tested system conveniently.
The application provides a full-flow system testing method. The method can be used for carrying out full-flow test on a more complex system. Specifically, when the full-flow system testing method provided by the present application is executed, first, a first service source type parameter may be obtained. The first service source type parameter is used for indicating a test service type corresponding to a first test flow in a test process. Then, a first simulation operation flow in the first test flow can be determined according to the first service source parameter. The first simulation operation flow is used for executing simulation operation on the tested system. That is to say. The first simulation operation flow is used for simulating the behavior of a technician and carrying out corresponding operation on the tested system. In this way, after the first simulation operation flow is determined, the system under test can be tested based on the first simulation operation flow, and test data of the system under test in the test process can be acquired. Therefore, the simulation test flow of the tested system is determined based on the first service source type parameter, so that the operation of a technician can be simulated to test the tested system. Therefore, by setting different first service source type parameters, the method can cover service data of various initiating channels and initiating modes, provides a full-flow testing method, forms a full-flow automatic testing method from service initiation and reception to service processing and result confirmation of the system, non-invasively performs cross-platform integration, reduces joint debugging testing workload and communication cost, and reduces repetitive operation.
The above embodiments provide some specific implementation manners of the full-process system testing method for the embodiments of the present application, and based on this, the present application also provides a corresponding full-process system testing apparatus. The full-flow system testing device provided by the embodiment of the present application will be described in terms of functional modularization.
Referring to the schematic structural diagram of the full-flow system testing apparatus 200 shown in fig. 2, the apparatus 200 includes an obtaining module 210, a determining module 220 and a testing module 230.
The obtaining module 210 is configured to obtain a first service source type parameter, where the first service source type parameter is used to indicate a test service type corresponding to a first test procedure in a test process.
A determining module 220, configured to determine, according to the first service source type parameter, a first simulation operation flow corresponding to the first test flow, where the first simulation operation flow is used to perform a simulation operation on a system under test.
The testing module 230 is configured to test the system under test based on the first simulation operation flow, and obtain test data of the system under test in a testing process.
The application provides a full-flow system testing device. The device can be used for carrying out full-flow test on a complex system. Specifically, first, a first service source type parameter may be obtained. The first service source type parameter is used for indicating a test service type corresponding to a first test flow in a test process. Then, a first simulation operation flow in the first test flow can be determined according to the first service source parameter. The first simulation operation flow is used for executing simulation operation on the tested system. That is to say. The first simulation operation flow is used for simulating the behavior of a technician and carrying out corresponding operation on the tested system. In this way, after the first simulation operation flow is determined, the system under test can be tested based on the first simulation operation flow, and test data of the system under test in the test process can be acquired. Therefore, the simulation test flow of the tested system is determined based on the first service source type parameter, so that the operation of a technician can be simulated to test the tested system. Therefore, by setting different first service source type parameters, the method can cover service data of various initiating channels and initiating modes, provides a full-flow testing method, forms a full-flow automatic testing method from service initiation and reception to service processing and result confirmation of the system, non-invasively performs cross-platform integration, reduces joint debugging testing workload and communication cost, and reduces repetitive operation
Optionally, in some possible implementation manners, the obtaining module 210 is further configured to obtain a second service source type parameter, where the second service source type parameter is used to indicate a test service type corresponding to a second test flow in a test process. The determining module 220 is further configured to determine, according to the second service source type parameter, a second simulation operation flow corresponding to the second test flow, where the first simulation operation flow is used to perform a simulation operation on the system under test. The testing module 230 is further configured to test the system under test based on the second simulation operation flow, and obtain test data of the system under test in the testing process.
Optionally, in some possible implementation manners, the obtaining module 210 is specifically configured to obtain a service source type parameter sequence, where the service source type parameter sequence includes the first service source type parameter and the second service source type parameter. The sequence of the first service source type parameter and the sequence of the second service source type parameter in the service source type parameter sequence is matched with the sequence of the first test flow and the second test flow in the test process.
Optionally, in some possible implementations, the testing module 230 is specifically configured to obtain image information of the system under test in the testing process; and performing character recognition on the image information, and acquiring related service parameters of the tested system in the testing process to obtain the testing data.
Optionally, in some possible implementations, the obtaining module 210 is further configured to obtain a target processing result. The test module 230 is further configured to determine whether an actual processing result corresponding to the test data matches the target data processing result; and responding to the matching of the actual processing result corresponding to the test data and the target data processing result, and completing the test of the tested system.
The embodiment of the application also provides corresponding equipment and a computer storage medium, which are used for realizing the scheme provided by the embodiment of the application.
The device comprises a memory and a processor, wherein the memory is used for storing instructions or codes, and the processor is used for executing the instructions or codes so as to enable the device to execute the full-flow system testing method in any embodiment of the application.
The computer storage medium has code stored therein, and when the code is executed, the apparatus for executing the code implements the full-flow system testing method according to any embodiment of the present application.
In the embodiments of the present application, the names "first" and "second" (if present) in the names "first" and "second" are used for name identification, and do not represent the first and second in sequence.
As can be seen from the above description of the embodiments, those skilled in the art can clearly understand that all or part of the steps in the above embodiment methods can be implemented by software plus a general hardware platform. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present application may be embodied in the form of a software product, which may be stored in a storage medium, such as a read-only memory (ROM)/RAM, a magnetic disk, an optical disk, or the like, and includes several instructions for enabling a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network communication device such as a router) to execute the method according to the embodiments or some parts of the embodiments of the present application.
The embodiments in the present specification are described in a progressive manner, and the same and similar parts among the embodiments are referred to each other, and each embodiment focuses on the differences from the other embodiments. In particular, for the apparatus embodiment, since it is substantially similar to the method embodiment, it is relatively simple to describe, and reference may be made to some descriptions of the method embodiment for relevant points. Some or all of the modules may be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the present embodiment. One of ordinary skill in the art can understand and implement it without inventive effort.
The above description is only an exemplary embodiment of the present application, and is not intended to limit the scope of the present application.
Claims (10)
1. A full-flow system testing method is used for testing a long transaction flow system or a multi-channel transaction system, and comprises the following steps:
acquiring a first service source type parameter, wherein the first service source type parameter is used for indicating a test service type corresponding to a first test flow in a test process;
determining a first simulation operation flow corresponding to the first test flow according to the first service source type parameter, wherein the first simulation operation flow is used for executing simulation operation on a tested system;
and testing the tested system based on the first simulation operation flow, and acquiring test data of the tested system in the test process.
2. The method of claim 1, further comprising:
acquiring a second service source type parameter, wherein the second service source type parameter is used for indicating a test service type corresponding to a second test flow in the test process;
determining a second simulation operation flow corresponding to the second test flow according to the second service source type parameter, wherein the first simulation operation flow is used for executing simulation operation on the tested system;
and testing the tested system based on the second simulation operation flow, and acquiring test data of the tested system in the test process.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein obtaining the first traffic source type parameter comprises:
acquiring a service source type parameter sequence, wherein the service source type parameter sequence comprises the first service source type parameter and the second service source type parameter;
the sequence of the first service source type parameter and the sequence of the second service source type parameter in the service source type parameter sequence is matched with the sequence of the first test flow and the second test flow in the test process.
4. The method according to any one of claims 1-3, wherein the obtaining test data of the system under test during the test comprises:
acquiring image information of the tested system in the testing process;
and performing character recognition on the image information, acquiring relevant service parameters of the tested system in the testing process, and obtaining the testing data.
5. The method of claim 4, further comprising:
acquiring a target processing result;
judging whether the actual processing result corresponding to the test data is matched with the target data processing result;
and responding to the matching of the actual processing result corresponding to the test data and the target data processing result, and completing the test of the tested system.
6. A full flow system testing apparatus, wherein the apparatus is used for testing a long transaction flow system or a multi-channel transaction system, the apparatus comprising:
the system comprises an acquisition module, a test module and a processing module, wherein the acquisition module is used for acquiring a first service source type parameter which is used for indicating a test service type corresponding to a first test flow in a test process;
the determining module is used for determining a first simulation operation flow corresponding to the first test flow according to the first service source type parameter, wherein the first simulation operation flow is used for executing simulation operation on a tested system;
and the test module is used for testing the tested system based on the first simulation operation flow and acquiring test data of the tested system in the test process.
7. The apparatus of claim 6,
the obtaining module is further configured to obtain a second service source type parameter, where the second service source type parameter is used to indicate a test service type corresponding to a second test procedure in a test process;
the determining module is further configured to determine a second simulation operation flow corresponding to the second test flow according to the second service source type parameter, where the first simulation operation flow is used to perform simulation operation on a system under test;
the test module is further configured to test the system under test based on the second simulation operation flow and obtain test data of the system under test in a test process.
8. The apparatus of claim 7,
the acquiring module is specifically configured to acquire a service source type parameter sequence, where the service source type parameter sequence includes the first service source type parameter and the second service source type parameter;
the sequence of the first service source type parameter and the second service source type parameter in the service source type parameter sequence is matched with the sequence of the first test flow and the second test flow in the test process.
9. The apparatus according to any one of claims 6 to 8,
the test module is specifically used for acquiring image information of the tested system in the test process; and performing character recognition on the image information, acquiring relevant service parameters of the tested system in the testing process, and obtaining the testing data.
10. The apparatus of claim 9,
the acquisition module is also used for acquiring a target processing result;
the test module is further used for judging whether an actual processing result corresponding to the test data is matched with the target data processing result; and responding to the matching of the actual processing result corresponding to the test data and the target data processing result, and completing the test of the tested system.
Priority Applications (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211302884.7A CN115687103A (en) | 2022-10-24 | 2022-10-24 | Full-process system testing method and device |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
| Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211302884.7A CN115687103A (en) | 2022-10-24 | 2022-10-24 | Full-process system testing method and device |
Publications (1)
| Publication Number | Publication Date |
|---|---|
| CN115687103A true CN115687103A (en) | 2023-02-03 |
Family
ID=85099800
Family Applications (1)
| Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
|---|---|---|---|
| CN202211302884.7A Pending CN115687103A (en) | 2022-10-24 | 2022-10-24 | Full-process system testing method and device |
Country Status (1)
| Country | Link |
|---|---|
| CN (1) | CN115687103A (en) |
-
2022
- 2022-10-24 CN CN202211302884.7A patent/CN115687103A/en active Pending
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| CN110262964A (en) | Test method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN108509344B (en) | Daily cutting batch test method, equipment and readable storage medium | |
| CN109977012B (en) | Joint debugging test method, device, equipment and computer readable storage medium of system | |
| CN112380255A (en) | Service processing method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN110990289B (en) | Method and device for automatically submitting bug, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| US20050203717A1 (en) | Automated testing system, method and program product using testing map | |
| CN111221727A (en) | Test method, test device, electronic equipment and computer readable medium | |
| CN115794639B (en) | Visual test based on flow and visual simulation test system and method | |
| CN117290255A (en) | Batch interface performance test method based on Python and Locut frameworks | |
| CN110209565A (en) | A kind of metadata schema adjustment method and its device | |
| CN116431522A (en) | Automatic test method and system for low-code object storage gateway | |
| CN115687103A (en) | Full-process system testing method and device | |
| CN111427582A (en) | Management method, device and equipment of RT L code and computer readable storage medium | |
| CN108804307B (en) | Flow automation test method and device | |
| CN115934559A (en) | Testing method of intelligent form testing system | |
| CN113986263A (en) | Code automation test method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
| CN113934619A (en) | Sound source testing method, system and storage medium based on Robot Framework testing Framework | |
| CN112199229A (en) | Data processing method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN115878448A (en) | Database test method, distributed database and storage medium | |
| CN111813665A (en) | Big data platform interface data testing method and system based on python | |
| CN113094281B (en) | Test method and device for hybrid App | |
| CN113806222B (en) | Interface test script generation method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
| CN113608996B (en) | Mirror image compiling test method, system, device and readable storage medium | |
| CN115421824B (en) | Micro-service execution engine, running method and application method | |
| CN116633815A (en) | Debugging method, device, electronic equipment and storage medium |
Legal Events
| Date | Code | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|---|
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| PB01 | Publication | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
| SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination |