CN115544322A - Detection method and device for verification report detection items - Google Patents
Detection method and device for verification report detection items Download PDFInfo
- Publication number
- CN115544322A CN115544322A CN202211513049.8A CN202211513049A CN115544322A CN 115544322 A CN115544322 A CN 115544322A CN 202211513049 A CN202211513049 A CN 202211513049A CN 115544322 A CN115544322 A CN 115544322A
- Authority
- CN
- China
- Prior art keywords
- verification
- detection
- detection item
- report
- conclusion
- Prior art date
- Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
- Pending
Links
- 238000001514 detection method Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 527
- 238000012795 verification Methods 0.000 title claims abstract description 416
- 238000006243 chemical reaction Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 32
- 238000000034 method Methods 0.000 claims abstract description 29
- 230000007547 defect Effects 0.000 claims description 155
- 238000010200 validation analysis Methods 0.000 claims description 37
- 238000013070 change management Methods 0.000 claims description 32
- 238000012360 testing method Methods 0.000 claims description 22
- 230000003044 adaptive effect Effects 0.000 claims description 12
- 238000004891 communication Methods 0.000 claims description 3
- 238000010586 diagram Methods 0.000 description 6
- 230000009286 beneficial effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 230000007613 environmental effect Effects 0.000 description 3
- 238000007726 management method Methods 0.000 description 2
- 238000012356 Product development Methods 0.000 description 1
- 230000000694 effects Effects 0.000 description 1
- 238000001303 quality assessment method Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000013441 quality evaluation Methods 0.000 description 1
- 238000006467 substitution reaction Methods 0.000 description 1
Images
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/901—Indexing; Data structures therefor; Storage structures
- G06F16/9017—Indexing; Data structures therefor; Storage structures using directory or table look-up
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F16/00—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F16/90—Details of database functions independent of the retrieved data types
- G06F16/906—Clustering; Classification
Landscapes
- Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- Databases & Information Systems (AREA)
- Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
- Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
- Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
- General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
- Software Systems (AREA)
- Debugging And Monitoring (AREA)
Abstract
The application provides a detection method and a detection device for a verification report detection item, and relates to the technical field of railway signal system equipment verification. The detection method for the verification report detection item comprises the following steps: the method comprises the steps of obtaining a verification report for detecting the vehicle-mounted equipment, classifying detection items in the verification report according to the type of a verification conclusion, determining the type of the detection item with a verification rule, and detecting the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item by using the verification rule. When the technical scheme of the application detects the detection items of the verification report, condition conversion for determining more verification conclusions of the verification report is not needed, and the conversion of the verification rules is only needed according to the type of the detection items, so that the conversion times of the verification rules are less, the detection time is shorter, and the detection efficiency of the detection items of the verification report is improved.
Description
Technical Field
The invention relates to the technical field of railway signal system equipment verification, in particular to a method and a device for detecting verification report detection items.
Background
The method comprises the steps that product development is carried out on vehicle-mounted equipment of a Chinese train operation control system, a plurality of verification reports are generated, a plurality of contents such as environmental parameters, use cases, requirements and detection results related to each test detected by the vehicle-mounted equipment are recorded in the verification reports, the plurality of contents in the verification reports are stored in a form of a table, the content in each column in the table is one of the parameters such as requirements, use cases, environmental parameters and detection results related to one test carried out on the vehicle-mounted equipment, and each row in the table is the parameters such as requirements, use cases, environmental parameters and detection results corresponding to one test. In order to ensure the correctness of the verification report, the detection result of the detection item in the verification report needs to be verified.
In the prior art, when detecting a detection item of a verification report, detection results of each row need to be sequentially detected, and when detecting verification results other than a correct verification result in the detection results of each row, it needs to be determined that the verification result is one of empty, unsuitable and incorrect, and it may be determined to be successful once or successfully twice or three times, that is, it needs to perform condition conversion once, twice or three times for determining the verification result of each row. Since the number of rows of a large number of verification reports is large, the determination of the verification conclusion corresponding to all rows of the verification reports needs to be performed multiple times of condition conversion, so that the determination of the verification conclusion of all rows in the verification reports is time-consuming, the detection of the detection item in the verification reports is time-consuming, and the detection efficiency is low.
Disclosure of Invention
The embodiment of the application aims to provide a method and a device for detecting detection items of a verification report, and solves the problem that the efficiency of detecting the detection items in the verification report is low.
In order to solve the above technical problem, an embodiment of the present application provides the following technical solutions:
a first aspect of the present application provides a method for detecting a verification report detection item, the method including:
acquiring a verification report for vehicle-mounted equipment detection, wherein the verification report records verification conclusions corresponding to all detection items of the vehicle-mounted equipment through a form;
classifying the detection items in the verification report according to the type of the verification conclusion;
determining a category of the detection item having a validation rule for detecting validity of the validation conclusion;
and detecting the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item by using the verification rule.
A second aspect of the present application provides a detection apparatus for verifying a report detection item, the apparatus comprising:
the system comprises an acquisition module, a verification module and a verification module, wherein the acquisition module is used for acquiring a verification report detected by the vehicle-mounted equipment, and the verification report records verification conclusions corresponding to all detection items of the vehicle-mounted equipment through a table;
the classification module is used for classifying the detection items in the verification report according to the type of the verification conclusion;
a first determining module, configured to determine a category of the detection item having a validation rule, where the validation rule is used to detect validity of the validation conclusion;
and the first detection module is used for detecting the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item by using the verification rule.
A third aspect of the present application provides an electronic device, comprising: at least one processor; and at least one memory, bus connected with the processor; the processor and the memory complete mutual communication through a bus; the processor is configured to call program instructions in the memory to perform the method for detecting a verification report detection item according to the first aspect or any one of the alternative embodiments of the first aspect.
A fourth aspect of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, where the storage medium includes a stored program, where when the program runs, a device on which the storage medium is located is controlled to execute the method for detecting the verification report detection item in the first aspect or any optional embodiment of the first aspect.
Compared with the prior art, the detection method for the verification report detection item provided by the first aspect of the application detects the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item by using the verification rule through determining the type of the detection item with the verification rule; therefore, the validity detection can be performed on the verification conclusion in the detection item according to the verification rule corresponding to the type of the detection item, the validity detection can be performed on the verification conclusion in the detection item according to different corresponding verification rules of the type of different detection items, the detection relates to the conversion of the verification rule, the conversion times of the verification rule according to the type of the detection item are fewer, the detection time is shorter, and the detection efficiency of the detection item of the verification report is improved; compared with the prior art that the determination of more verification conclusions needs to be carried out for a plurality of times of condition conversion, so that the detection of detection items in the verification report is time-consuming, when the detection of the detection items of the verification report is carried out, the determination of more verification conclusions of the verification report does not need to be carried out for a plurality of times of condition conversion, and the conversion of the verification rules only needs to be carried out according to the types of the detection items, so that the conversion times of the verification rules are less, the detection time is shorter, and the detection efficiency of the detection items of the verification report is improved.
The detection apparatus for detecting the verification report detection item provided by the second aspect of the present application has the same beneficial effects as the detection method for detecting the verification report detection item provided by the first aspect of the present application.
Drawings
The above and other objects, features and advantages of exemplary embodiments of the present application will become readily apparent from the following detailed description read in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. Several embodiments of the present application are illustrated by way of example and not by way of limitation in the figures of the accompanying drawings and in which like reference numerals refer to similar or corresponding parts and in which:
FIG. 1 schematically illustrates a first flow chart of a method of verifying detection of a report detection item;
FIG. 2 schematically illustrates a block diagram one of a test device verifying a reported test item;
FIG. 3 schematically illustrates a second block diagram of a test device verifying a reported test item;
fig. 4 schematically shows a block diagram of an electronic device.
Detailed Description
Exemplary embodiments of the present application will be described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. While exemplary embodiments of the present application are shown in the drawings, it should be understood that the present application may be embodied in various forms and should not be limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the disclosure to those skilled in the art.
It should be noted that: unless otherwise defined, technical or scientific terms used herein shall have the ordinary meaning as understood by those of skill in the art to which this application belongs.
For the detection of the verification report detection item, in the prior art, the detection result of each row needs to be detected in sequence, and when the verification conclusion in the detection result of each row is detected, the verification conclusion needs to be determined to be one of null, inadaptable and incorrect. Because the prior art needs to perform one, two or three times of condition conversion for successfully determining each row of verification conclusions, and because the number of rows of a large number of verification reports is large, the determination of the verification conclusions corresponding to all the rows of the verification reports needs to perform a large number of times of condition conversion, so that the determination of the verification conclusions of all the rows in the verification reports is time-consuming, and the detection of detection items in the verification reports is time-consuming. Therefore, the invention considers that when a large number of verification report detection items are detected, the determination of a large number of verification conclusions needs to be performed with a large number of condition conversions, so that the detection of the detection items in the verification report is time-consuming, a detection mode with a small number of conversion times of the detection items of the verification report is needed, and the detection mode with the large number of condition conversions in the prior art is replaced. Therefore, the detection method with less conversion times is selected to detect the detection items of the verification report, so that the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item is detected according to the verification rule corresponding to each category for each category of the detection items with the verification rule, the conversion of the verification rule can be carried out according to the category of the detection item, the detection item corresponding to the verification rule is detected according to the verification rule after the conversion, the conversion times of the verification rule according to the category of the detection item are less when the detection of the detection item is carried out, the detection time is short, and the detection efficiency of the detection item of the verification report is improved. The specific implementation mode is that a verification report for vehicle-mounted equipment detection is obtained, the verification report records verification conclusions corresponding to all detection items of the vehicle-mounted equipment through a table, the detection items in the verification report are classified according to the types of the verification conclusions, the types of the detection items with verification rules are determined, the verification rules are used for detecting the effectiveness of the verification conclusions, and the effectiveness of the verification conclusions in the corresponding detection items is detected by the verification rules.
The method in the examples of the present invention will be described in detail below.
Fig. 1 schematically shows a first flowchart of a detection method for a verification report detection item in an embodiment of the present invention, and referring to fig. 1, the method may include:
s101, obtaining a verification report for vehicle-mounted equipment detection.
And the verification conclusion corresponding to each detection item of the vehicle-mounted equipment is recorded in the verification report through the table.
The vehicle-mounted equipment can be vehicle-mounted equipment in a novel train control system and can also be vehicle-mounted equipment in the train control system. The verification report of the invention can be a requirement verification report or a use case verification report. The vehicle-mounted equipment detection verification report is more, and can be 56.
The acquisition of the verification report can identify the target file under the corresponding path according to the report number, and the target file comprises the verification report. For example, the verification report number is 02, the verification report number 02 is stored in the paths "this computer/document/file 1", "this computer/document/file 2", and "this computer/document/file 2", the path "this computer/document/file 1", "this computer/document/file 2", and "this computer/document/file 2" corresponding to the verification report number 02 can be identified, and 3 reports of the verification number 02 are acquired from these 3 paths.
When a verification report detected by the vehicle-mounted equipment is acquired, whether a corresponding target file exists in the specified path or not (the target file contains the verification report) can be judged, if not, the absence of the target file in the specified path is prompted and an operator is prompted to confirm whether input information (namely, a verification report number and a path) is correct or not, if yes, whether the format of the verification report of the target file in the specified path is correct or not is judged, if not, the operator is prompted to confirm whether the input information (namely, the verification report number and the path) is correct or not, the execution of the module is ended, and if the format is correct, the target file is acquired. The correct verification report format of the target file is that the attachment under the path is in an Excel format.
Each row in the table corresponds to a detection item, and the detection item contains a verification conclusion.
After acquiring the verification report detected by the vehicle-mounted device, the verification report can be identified and the target file can be downloaded. Specifically, whether a target file is obtained or not is judged, if the target file is not obtained, an operator is prompted to confirm whether input information (namely the target file) is correct or not, if the target file is obtained, whether a verification report is identified from the target file or not is determined, if the verification report is not identified, the operator is prompted to confirm whether the input information (namely the target file) is correct or not, if the verification report is identified, the target file is downloaded, and the target file comprises the verification report.
After identifying the verification report and downloading the target file, the extracted verification report can be processed, mainly the verification conclusion in the verification report is processed, specifically, whether the verification conclusion exists or not is identified, if the verification conclusion does not exist, an operator is prompted to confirm the correctness of the verification conclusion list in the verification report, if the verification conclusion list exists, each verification conclusion in the verification report is traversed, whether the verification conclusion list is empty or not can be judged, if the verification conclusion list is empty, the detection item corresponding to the empty verification conclusion list is output to a summary table 1 and a summary table 3, if the verification conclusion list is not empty, whether the verification conclusion list is incorrect (namely represented by NOK) is judged, if the verification conclusion list is NOK, the detection item corresponding to the NOK is output to the summary table 1 and a summary table 2, if the verification conclusion list is not NOK, whether the verification conclusion list is incorrect (namely represented by NA), if the verification conclusion list is not NA, the detection item corresponding to the NA is correct (namely represented by OK) and the operation is ended. The above operation may screen out the verification items corresponding to the verification conclusion of null, NOK, and NA and record them in the summary table 1, and the subsequent step may process the detection items according to the summary table 1 (i.e., the verification report of the verification conclusion of null, NOK, and NA), that is, the subsequent operation is to process the detection items according to the verification conclusion except the OK verification report.
Of course, the detection item whose verification conclusion is correct may be screened out, and the detection item whose verification conclusion is correct may be deleted from the verification report, and only the detection item corresponding to the incorrect verification conclusion (i.e. at least the verification conclusion of null, NOK, and NA) is left.
And S102, classifying the detection items in the verification report according to the type of the verification conclusion.
Specifically, the detection items in the verification report acquired in step S101 are classified according to the type of the verification conclusion.
The verification conclusion of the invention is the verification conclusion except the correct conclusion, and can eliminate the detection items corresponding to the correct verification conclusion in the verification report and only classify the incorrect verification conclusion. The verification conclusion has several corresponding categories, so that the detection items in the verification report are divided into several categories. For example, if the types of verification results are A, B and C, the detection items in the verification report can be divided into 3 categories according to the a type, the B type and the C type.
Specifically, the type of the verification result may include a null type, an NOK type, and an NA type, where the type of the verification result may be various, and the type of the verification result is not limited.
The detection items corresponding to the empty classes in the verification report can be classified according to the empty classes to obtain the empty detection item classes. The detection items corresponding to the NOK types in the verification report can be classified according to the NOK types to obtain the NOK detection item types. Detection items corresponding to the NA types in the verification report can be classified according to the NA types to obtain the NA detection item types.
S103, determining the category of the detection item with the verification rule.
Wherein the validation rule is used for detecting the validity of the validation conclusion.
Specifically, the determining of the category of the detection item having the validation rule may be to establish an association relationship between the validation rule and the detection item category, and the category of the detection item having the validation rule may be determined by the association relationship, and if there is a correspondence relationship between the detection item categories, it may be determined that the detection item category is the category having the validation rule, and if there is no correspondence relationship between the detection item categories, it may be determined that the detection item category is the category not having the validation rule.
Illustratively, the detection item categories are A, B and C, the association relationship between the detection item category a and the verification rule a is Aa, the association relationship between the detection item category C and the verification rule C is Cc, and no other association relationship exists, then it is determined that the association relationship Aa exists in the detection category a, the association relationship Cc exists in the detection category C, and the association relationship does not exist in the detection category B, then it can be determined that the categories of the detection items with the verification rule are a and C.
Specifically, the preset null detection item type has no verification rule, the NOK detection item type and the NA detection item type have an association relationship, the verification rules corresponding to the NOK detection item type and the NA detection item type can be respectively determined through the association relationship, and the verification rules corresponding to the NOK detection item type and the NA detection item type are different.
And S104, detecting the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item by using the verification rule.
Specifically, the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item in the category of the detection item with the verification rule determined in step S103 is detected by using the verification rule.
The verification rules corresponding to the categories of the detection items with the verification rules are different, and the verification rules corresponding to the same categories of the detection items with the verification rules are the same. Taking the example of step S103 as a support, the validity of the verification conclusion in the detection item corresponding to the detection item category a may be detected by the verification rule a, and the validity of the verification conclusion in the detection item corresponding to the detection item category C may be detected by the verification rule C, without detecting the validity of the verification conclusion in the detection item corresponding to the detection category B.
The validity of the verification conclusion of the detection item in the corresponding NOK detection item category can be detected according to the verification rule corresponding to the NOK detection item category. The validity of the verification conclusion of the detection item in the corresponding NA detection item category can be detected according to the verification rule corresponding to the NA detection item category.
The detection method for the verification report detection item provided by the embodiment of the invention determines the type of the detection item with the verification rule, and detects the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item by using the verification rule; therefore, the validity of the verification conclusion in the detection item can be detected according to the verification rule corresponding to the type of the detection item, the validity of the verification conclusion in the detection item can be detected according to different verification rules corresponding to different types of the detection item, the detection relates to the conversion of the verification rule, the conversion times of the verification rule according to the type of the detection item are fewer, the detection time is shorter, and the detection efficiency of the verification report detection item is improved; compared with the prior art that the determination of a plurality of verification conclusions needs to be carried out for a plurality of times of condition conversion, so that the detection of detection items in the verification report is time-consuming, when the detection items of the verification report are detected, the determination of the plurality of verification conclusions of the verification report does not need to be carried out for a plurality of times of condition conversion, and the conversion of the verification rules only needs to be carried out according to the types of the detection items, so that the conversion times of the verification rules are less, the detection time is shorter, and the detection efficiency of the detection items of the verification report is improved.
Further, as a refinement and an extension of the step S104, the detection items of the first category may be detected, and then the detection items of the second category may be detected by converting the validation rule, so that the validation rule conversion and detection may be performed on the detection items according to the classified categories, and the detection items do not need to be converted and detected line by line according to the detection items, so that frequent conversion is not needed, the number of conversion times is reduced, time consumption of multiple conversion may be avoided, the conversion efficiency during detection is improved, and further the detection efficiency is improved.
Specifically, the step S104 may include:
step A1: and detecting the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item according to the first verification rule.
And the first verification rule is a verification rule corresponding to the detection item type which is not suitable for the detection item type.
The category of the detection item with the validation rule at least includes a non-adaptive detection item category and an incorrect detection item category, and there may be a plurality of categories of the detection item with the validation rule, which are not limited herein. The non-adaptive detection item type is a set of detection items of which the verification conclusion is not adaptive, and the incorrect detection item type is a set of detection items of which the verification conclusion is incorrect.
The detection item type which is not suitable can be divided into corresponding detection item types which are not suitable according to the verification conclusion, and the character NA can be used for representing the detection item types which are not suitable according to the verification conclusion. The incorrect detection item category can be that the detection items are divided into corresponding incorrect detection item categories according to the correctness of the verification conclusion, and the characters NOK can be used for representing the incorrect detection item category according to the correctness of the verification conclusion.
The category of the detection item having no verification rule may include a set of detection items that are null for the null detection item category, and that are null for the verification conclusion. The null detection item category may be that the detection item is divided into corresponding null detection item categories according to that the verification conclusion is null, and that is, the verification conclusion is null, that is, no character is represented.
Each detection item category corresponds to a verification rule, the verification rule corresponding to the detection item category can be determined firstly, and the validity of the verification conclusion of the detection item in the corresponding detection item category is detected according to the verification rule. The verification rule corresponding to the detection item type which is not suitable for is the first verification rule, and the validity of the verification conclusion corresponding to the detection item in the detection item type which is not suitable for can be detected according to the first verification rule.
Specifically, one specific implementation manner of the step A1 may include:
step A11: whether reason content which does not adapt to the detection item category exists is detected.
Since each verification report includes an integrity table and a tracking row table. For example, as shown in table 1, the integrity table is a table including at least a parent requirement tag (which may be represented by SyAD-0001), a parent requirement text, a child requirement tag, a child requirement text, requirement assignment, a reason description, a defect type, a verification conclusion, and defect information (for recording a defect number). Table 1 shows only a part of the test item data of the verification report, and since the test item data is more, only a part of the test item data is given, and the parts that are not given are all valid test items for testing. In all tables below, the defect and change management tool library is simply referred to as a defect library.
TABLE 1
For the trace row table in the verification report, for example, as described in table 2, the trace row table at least includes a child requirement tag (which may be represented by SyITC-0001), child requirement content, parent requirement tag, parent requirement content, reason description, verification conclusion, and defect information (for recording defect number). Table 2 shows only a part of the test item data of the verification report, and since the test item data is more, only a part of the test item data is given, and the parts that are not given are all valid test items for testing.
TABLE 2
The integrity table and the trace row table have the same verification rule for detecting the unadapted detection item type, and are used for detecting whether the reason content of the NA detection item type exists or not. And detecting whether the verification conclusion corresponding to the NA detection item type is NA, namely detecting whether the verification conclusion is the reason content of the NA detection item type corresponding to the NA. Step a12 is executed when it is detected according to step a11 that the content of the cause not adapted to the category of the detection item exists, and step a13 is executed when it is detected according to step a11 that the content of the cause not adapted to the category of the detection item does not exist.
Step A12: the detection item corresponding to the detection item type which is not suitable is effective.
When the content of the reason for the detection item type which is not suitable is detected to exist according to the step a11, the detection item corresponding to the detection item type which is not suitable is valid, and valid results can be accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 3. That is, when the content of the cause of the NA detection item category is detected, the detection item corresponding to the NA detection item category is valid, and valid results can be accumulated to the summary table 3.
Step A13: the detection item corresponding to the detection item category which is not suitable is invalid.
When it is detected according to step a11 that the content of the cause of the unsuitable detection item category does not exist, the detection item corresponding to the unsuitable detection item category is invalid, and the invalid results may be accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 1. That is, when it is detected that the content of the cause of the NA test item category does not exist, the test item corresponding to the NA test item category is invalid, and the invalid results may be accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 3.
Step A2: when the detection item which is not suitable for the detection item category is detected, whether the undetected category exists is determined.
In order to ensure that all the detection items in the verification table are detected, it is necessary to determine whether an undetected category exists when a detection item that does not adapt to the category of the detection item is detected.
And when the detection item which is not suitable for the detection item type is detected, determining that the undetected type exists according to the step A2, executing the step A3, and determining that the undetected type does not exist according to the step A2, executing the step A4.
Step A3: and converting the first verification rule into a second verification rule, and detecting the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item according to the second verification rule.
And the second verification rule is a verification rule corresponding to the incorrect detection item category.
And B, determining that the undetected category exists according to the step A2, if the undetected category is the incorrect detection item category, converting the first verification rule into a second verification rule corresponding to the incorrect detection item category, and detecting the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item according to the second verification rule.
Specifically, one specific implementation manner of the step A3 may include:
step A31a: when the verification report is an integrity report, the validity of the incorrect detection item category is detected based on the first cause content, the defect type, and the first defect number.
Each verification report comprises an integrity report and a traceability report, the integrity report is a report at least comprising a first reason content, a defect type, a first verification conclusion and a first defect number, and the first reason content, the defect type, the first verification conclusion and the first defect number can be referred to as a detection result of the integrity report. The traceability report is a report including at least the second reason content, the second verification result and the second defect number, and the second reason content, the second verification result and the second defect number may be referred to as a detection result of the traceability report.
Since the integrity report and the traceability report detect the incorrect detection item type according to different verification rules, the integrity report and the traceability report are separated to detect the incorrect detection item type. Since the integrity report detection result includes the content of the first reason, the defect type, the first verification conclusion and the first defect number, the incorrect detection item category needs to be detected according to the content of the first reason, the defect type, the first verification conclusion and the first defect number.
Specifically, one specific implementation manner of the step a31a may include:
step a311a: it is determined whether the incorrect detection item category satisfies a first condition, a second condition, and a third condition at the same time.
The first condition is that the first reason content of the incorrect detection item type exists, the second condition is that the defect type of the incorrect detection item type is a preset defect type, and the third condition is that the first defect number of the incorrect detection item type exists in a defect and a management tool library is changed.
Specifically, for validity detection of an incorrect detection item category, it is necessary to determine whether the incorrect detection item category satisfies both of: the first reason content exists, the defect type is a preset defect type, and the first defect number exists in a defect and change management tool library.
The default defect types are defect type 01, defect type 02 and defect type 03, the defect type 01 is indicated as null, the defect type 02 is indicated as null or defect type error, and the defect type 03 is indicated as null or defect number not existing in the defect and change management tool library.
Since the foregoing step S103 has determined the category of the detection item having the verification rule, the subsequent detection of the detection item is to detect the detection item having the verification rule, that is, the subsequent detection of the detection item corresponding to the definite verification conclusion is performed. In determining whether the incorrect detection item category satisfies the first condition, the second condition, and the third condition at the same time, one way is: whether the content of the first reason exists or not can be judged, if not, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid, the invalid result is accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 1, the judgment is finished, if yes, whether the defect type is a preset defect type (one of a defect type 01, a defect type 02 and a defect type 03) or not is determined, if not, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid, the invalid result is accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 3, the judgment is finished, if the defect type is preset, the defect and change management tool library is connected, whether the first defect number exists in the defect and change management tool library or not is judged, if not, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid, the corresponding first defect number is counted, the first defect number can be counted in the summary table 3, the invalid result is accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 3, if the defect and change management tool library exists, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is accumulated and the valid detection result can be counted in the summary table 3. When determining whether the category of the incorrect detection item simultaneously meets the first condition, the second condition and the third condition, the sequence of firstly judging that the first reason content exists, the defect type is the preset defect type and the first defect number exists in the defect and change management tool library is not limited.
In determining whether the incorrect detection item category satisfies the first condition, the second condition, and the third condition at the same time, another way is: whether the content of the first cause exists or not can be judged, if not, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid, the invalid result is accumulated and accumulated into the summary table 1, the judgment is finished, if the content of the first cause exists, whether the defect type is empty or not is judged, if the defect type is empty, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid, the invalid result is accumulated and accumulated into the summary table 3, the judgment is finished, if the defect type is not empty, whether the defect type is a preset defect type (one of the defect type 01, the defect type 02 and the defect type 03) or not is determined, if the defect type is not the preset defect type, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid, the invalid result is accumulated and accumulated into the summary table 3, the judgment is finished, if the defect type is the preset defect type, and then judging whether the first defect number is empty, if the first defect number is empty, counting the first defect number into a summary table 3, accumulating invalid results into the summary table 3, if the first defect number is not empty, connecting a defect and change management tool library, judging whether the first defect number exists in the defect and change management tool library, if the first defect number does not exist in the defect and change management tool library, invalidating a detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item, counting the corresponding defect number into the summary table 3, accumulating the invalid results into the summary table 3, and if the first defect number exists in the defect and change management tool library, enabling the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item to be valid, accumulating the valid results and accumulating the valid results into the summary table 3. When determining whether the category of the incorrect detection item simultaneously meets the first condition, the second condition and the third condition, the sequence of firstly judging the existence of the first reason content, the defect type is empty, the defect type is a preset defect type, the first defect number is empty and the first defect number exists in the defect and changing the management tool library is not limited.
If it is determined in step a311a that the incorrect detection item category does not satisfy the first condition, the second condition, and the third condition at the same time, step a312a is performed, and if it is determined in step a311a that the incorrect detection item category does not satisfy the first condition, the second condition, and the third condition at the same time, step a313a is performed.
Step A312a: the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is valid.
When it is determined according to step a311 that the incorrect detection item category simultaneously satisfies the first condition, the second condition, and the third condition, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is valid. The valid results can be accumulated into summary table 3. That is, when it is detected that the NOK detection item category simultaneously satisfies the first condition, the second condition, and the third condition, the detection item corresponding to the NOK detection item category is valid, and valid results can be accumulated to the summary table 3.
Step A313a: the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is invalid.
When it is determined according to step a311 that the incorrect detection item category does not satisfy the first condition, the second condition, and the third condition at the same time, that is, only the first condition is satisfied, only the second condition is satisfied, only the third condition is satisfied, or both the first condition and the second condition are satisfied, or both the first condition and the third condition are satisfied, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is invalid. Invalid results may be accumulated into summary table 3. That is, when it is detected that the NOK detection item categories do not satisfy the first condition, the second condition, and the third condition at the same time, the detection item corresponding to the NOK detection item category is invalid, and invalid results may be accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 3.
For the detection items in table 1, validity detection may be performed according to the foregoing steps, that is, according to step A1 (step A1 includes steps a11 to a 13), step A2, and step a31a (step a31a includes steps a311a to a313 a) in step A3, a verification conclusion that 7 items are invalid (i.e., errors) may be present in the integrity table corresponding to table 1, and the detection items corresponding to the verification conclusion that 7 items are invalid (i.e., errors) may be extracted and recorded in the following table 3, where table 3 is to record the invalid detection items of the integrity table. The last column is error description, the error item of the NA verification conclusion is 1 item, the error item of the NOK verification conclusion is 5 items, and the error item of the verification conclusion which is empty is 1 item.
TABLE 3
Step a31b: when the verification report is a traceability report, validity of the incorrect detection item category is detected based on the second cause content and the second defect number.
Since the traceability report detection result includes the second reason content, the second verification result and the second defect number, the incorrect detection item category needs to be detected according to the second reason content, the second verification result and the second defect number.
Specifically, one specific implementation manner of the step a31b may include:
step a311b: it is determined whether the incorrect detection item category satisfies the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time.
The fourth condition is that the second cause content of the incorrect detection item type exists, and the fifth condition is that the second defect number of the incorrect detection item type exists in the defect and change management tool library.
Specifically, for validity detection of an incorrect detection item category, it is necessary to determine whether the incorrect detection item category satisfies both: the second reason content exists and the second defect number exists in the defect and change management tool library.
In determining whether the NOK detection item category satisfies the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, one way is: whether the content of the second reason exists or not can be judged, if not, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid, the invalid result is accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 1, the judgment is finished, if the content of the second reason exists, whether the defect number is empty or not is judged, if the defect number is empty, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item can be counted and accumulated in the summary table 3, if the defect number is not empty, the defect and change management tool library is connected, whether the second defect number exists in the defect and change management tool library is judged, if the defect and change management tool library does not exist, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid, the corresponding defect number is counted and can be counted in the summary table 3, the invalid result is accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 3, and if the defect and change management tool library exists, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is valid, the valid result can be accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 3. When determining whether the category of the incorrect detection item satisfies the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, the sequence of first judging the existence of the second reason content and the existence of the second defect number in the defect and change management tool library is not limited.
In determining whether the NOK detection item category satisfies the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, one way is: whether the content of the second reason exists or not can be judged, if not, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid, the invalid result is accumulated and accumulated into the summary table 3, the judgment is finished, if the content exists, the defect and change management tool library is connected, whether the second defect number exists in the defect and change management tool library or not is judged, if the content does not exist in the defect and change management tool library, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid, the corresponding defect number is counted, the corresponding defect number can be counted into the summary table 3, the invalid result is accumulated and accumulated into the summary table 3, and if the content exists in the defect and change management tool library, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is valid, and the valid result can be accumulated and accumulated into the summary table 3. When determining whether the category of the incorrect detection item satisfies the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, the sequence of first judging the existence of the second reason content and the existence of the second defect number in the defect and change management tool library is not limited.
When determining whether the NOK detection item category satisfies the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, the other way is: whether the content of the second reason exists or not can be judged firstly, if not, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid, the invalid result is accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 3, the judgment is finished, if the content of the second reason exists, whether the defect number is empty or not is judged, if the defect number is empty, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item can be counted in the summary table 3, if the defect number is not empty, the defect and change management tool library is connected, whether the second defect number exists in the defect and change management tool library or not is judged, if the defect and change management tool library does not exist, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid, the corresponding defect number is counted and can be counted in the summary table 3, the invalid result is accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 3, and if the defect and change management tool library exists, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is valid, and the valid result can be accumulated in the summary table 3. When determining whether the category of the incorrect detection item satisfies the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, the sequence of first judging that the second reason content exists, the second defect number is empty and the second defect number exists in the defect and change management tool library is not limited.
If it is determined from step a311b that the incorrect detection item category does not satisfy the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, step a312b is performed, and if it is determined from step a311b that the incorrect detection item category does not satisfy the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, step a313b is performed.
Step A312b: the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is valid.
And when the incorrect detection item type is determined to simultaneously meet the fourth condition and the fifth condition according to the step A311b, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item type is valid. The valid results can be accumulated into summary table 3. That is, when the NOK detection item category is detected to satisfy the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, the detection item corresponding to the NOK detection item category is valid, and valid results can be accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 3.
Step a313b: the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is invalid.
When it is determined according to step a311b that the incorrect detection item category does not satisfy the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, that is, only the fourth condition is satisfied, or only the fifth condition is satisfied, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is invalid. Invalid results may be accumulated into summary table 3. That is, when it is detected that the NOK detection item categories do not satisfy the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, the detection item corresponding to the NOK detection item category is invalid, and invalid results may be accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 3.
For the detection items in table 2, validity detection may be performed according to the foregoing steps, that is, according to step A1 (step A1 includes steps a11 to a 13), step A2, and step a31b (step a31b includes steps a311b to a313 b) in step A3, a verification conclusion that 5 items are invalid (i.e., errors) may be found in the traceability table corresponding to table 2, and the detection items corresponding to the verification conclusion that 5 items are invalid (i.e., errors) may be extracted and recorded in the following table 4, where table 4 records the invalid detection items of the traceability table. The last column is error description, the error item of the NA verification conclusion is 1 item, the error item of the NOK verification conclusion is 3 items, and the error item of the verification conclusion which is empty is 1 item.
TABLE 4
Step A4: and ending the detection of the validity of the verification conclusion in the detection item.
And determining that no undetected category exists according to the step A2, namely, if the verification conclusion in the detection item corresponding to the existing detection item category is detected completely, the detection is not needed, and the detection of the validity of the verification conclusion in the detection item is finished.
After finishing the detection of the validity of the verification conclusion in the detection items, validity detection data of all verification reports may be collected, the integrity report and the traceability report are separately collected, and the total number of all non-OK (i.e., null, NOK, and NA) conclusions of the integrity report and the traceability report, the total number of NA verification conclusion items for which the verification conclusion is invalid (i.e., error), the total number of NOK verification conclusion items for which the verification conclusion is invalid (i.e., error), and the total number of null verification conclusion items for which the verification conclusion is null (i.e., verification conclusion error) are output, respectively. The percentage of the verification conclusion valid (i.e., correct) can be calculated from the ratio of the total number of NA verification conclusion items for which the verification conclusion is invalid (i.e., erroneous), the sum of the total number of NOK verification conclusion items for which the verification conclusion is invalid (i.e., erroneous), and the total number of verification conclusion items for which the verification conclusion is erroneous, to the total number of all non-OK conclusion items. Alternatively, the invalid result total number and the valid result total number may be obtained from the summary table 3, and the percentage of validity (i.e., correctness) of the verification result may be calculated by dividing the valid result total number by the sum of the valid result total number and the invalid result total number. The percentage of the validation conclusion that is valid (i.e., correct) may be referred to as the quality assessment result. The total number of defect numbers and the defect numbers corresponding to the invalid detection items can also be output. A draft version report can be generated according to the total number of all non-OK (i.e., null, NOK, and NA) conclusions, the total number of NA verification conclusion items for which the verification conclusion is invalid (i.e., wrong), the total number of NOK verification conclusion items for which the verification conclusion is null (i.e., that the verification conclusion is wrong), the total number of defect numbers corresponding to invalid detection items, and the defect number and quality evaluation results, and the draft version report can visually represent the validity (i.e., correctness) of the overall verification activity result in a table form, as shown in table 5. The total number of NA verification conclusion items with an incorrect verification conclusion, the total number of NOK verification conclusion items with an incorrect verification conclusion, the total number of verification conclusion items with an empty verification conclusion, the total number of defect numbers corresponding to invalid detection items, and the defect numbers may be directly obtained from the above tables 3 and 4. Before detecting the detection items of the verification reports, each verification report has original passing and failing conclusions, for example, 4 verification reports are provided, the original conclusion of the verification report is that the verification reports 1 and 4 pass, the verification reports 2 and 3 do not pass, 4 verification reports need to be detected in order to ensure the correctness of the detection items of the verification reports, the detection item with the wrong verification conclusion is determined, when the detection item with the wrong verification conclusion is detected, the report with the wrong verification conclusion can be recorded as failing, if the wrong detection item exists in the verification reports 1, 2 and 3, the verification reports 1, 2 and 3 do not pass, the verification report 4 passes, which is the final conclusion of the verification report, so that the report with the wrong detection item passes or fails, the subsequent non-passing and final-failing reports can be confirmed again, and the accuracy of the verification reports can be ensured.
TABLE 5
Based on the same inventive concept, as the implementation of the detection method for the verification report detection item, the embodiment of the invention also provides a detection device for the verification report detection item. Fig. 2 is a first structural diagram of an apparatus according to an embodiment of the present invention, and referring to fig. 2, the apparatus may include:
an obtaining module 201, configured to obtain a verification report for vehicle-mounted device detection, where a verification conclusion corresponding to each detection item of the vehicle-mounted device is recorded in the verification report through a table;
a classification module 202, configured to classify the detection items in the verification report obtained by the obtaining module 201 according to the type of the verification conclusion;
a first determining module 203, configured to determine a category of the detection item classified by the classifying module 202 having a validation rule, where the validation rule is used to detect validity of the validation conclusion;
the first detecting module 204 is configured to detect validity of the verification conclusion in the detection item determined by the corresponding first determining module 203 by using the verification rule.
On the basis of fig. 2, the present invention further provides another embodiment of an apparatus, as shown in fig. 3, fig. 3 is a second structural diagram of the apparatus in the embodiment of the present invention, and the apparatus may include:
a first detection module 204, comprising:
the second detecting module 2041 is configured to detect validity of a verification conclusion in the detection item determined by the corresponding first determining module 203 according to a first verification rule, where the first verification rule is a verification rule corresponding to the type of the unsuitable detection item;
a second determining module 2042, configured to determine whether there is an undetected category when the detection item that is not in the adaptable detection item category and is detected by the second detecting module 2041 is detected;
a converting module 2043, configured to, if the second determining module 2042 determines that an undetected category exists, convert the first validation rule to a second validation rule, and detect validity of a validation conclusion in a corresponding detection item according to the second validation rule, where the second validation rule is a validation rule corresponding to the incorrect detection item category;
the end detecting module 2044 is configured to end the detection of the validity of the verification conclusion in the detection item if the second determining module 2042 determines that there is no undetected category.
Further, the verification report further includes reason content, and the second detecting module 2041 is specifically configured to detect whether the reason content of the non-adaptive detection item category exists; if the detection item exists, the detection item corresponding to the detection item type which is not suitable for is valid; and if not, the detection item corresponding to the detection item type which is not suitable for is invalid.
Further, each verification report comprises an integrity report and a traceability report, wherein the integrity report is a report at least comprising a first reason content, a defect type, a first verification conclusion and a first defect number, and the traceability report is a report at least comprising a second reason content, a second verification conclusion and a second defect number; a converting module 2043, specifically configured to detect, according to the first cause content, the defect type, and the first defect number, the validity of the incorrect detection item category determined by the second determining module 2042 when the verification report is the integrity report; when the verification report is the traceability report, the validity of the incorrect detection item category determined by the second determination module 2042 is checked according to the second cause content and the second defect number.
Further, the converting module 2043 is specifically configured to determine whether the incorrect detection item category determined by the second determining module 2042 simultaneously satisfies a first condition, a second condition and a third condition, where the first condition is a condition that the first cause content of the incorrect detection item category exists, the second condition is a condition that the defect type of the incorrect detection item category is a preset defect type, and the third condition is a condition that the first defect number of the incorrect detection item category exists in a defect and change management tool library; if so, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item type is valid; if not, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is invalid.
Further, the converting module 2043 is specifically configured to determine whether the incorrect detection item category determined by the second determining module 2042 meets a fourth condition and a fifth condition at the same time, where the fourth condition is a condition that the second reason content of the incorrect detection item category exists, and the fifth condition is a condition that the second defect number of the incorrect detection item category exists in a defect and change management tool library; if so, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item type is valid; and if not, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is invalid.
Based on the same inventive concept, the embodiment of the invention also provides electronic equipment. Fig. 4 is a structural diagram of an electronic device in an embodiment of the present invention, and referring to fig. 4, the electronic device 40 may include: at least one processor 401; and at least one memory 402, a bus 403 connected to the processor 401; the processor 401 and the memory 402 complete communication with each other through the bus 403; the processor 401 is configured to call program instructions in the memory 402 to execute the detection method of the verification report detection item in one or more embodiments described above.
Here, it should be noted that: the above description of the embodiment of the detection apparatus verifying the reported detection item is similar to the description of the embodiment of the method described above, and has similar beneficial effects to the embodiment of the method. For technical details not disclosed in the embodiments of the detection apparatus for verifying report detection items in the embodiments of the present invention, please refer to the description of the embodiments of the method of the present invention for understanding.
Based on the same inventive concept, the embodiment of the present invention further provides a computer-readable storage medium, where the computer-readable storage medium includes a stored program, and when the program runs, the apparatus on which the storage medium is located is controlled to execute the method in one or more embodiments described above.
Here, it should be noted that: the above description of the computer-readable storage medium embodiments is similar to the description of the method embodiments described above, with similar beneficial effects as the method embodiments. For technical details not disclosed in the embodiments of the computer-readable storage medium of the embodiments of the present invention, reference is made to the description of the method embodiments of the present invention for understanding.
The above description is only for the specific embodiments of the present application, but the scope of the present application is not limited thereto, and any person skilled in the art can easily conceive of the changes or substitutions within the technical scope of the present application, and shall be covered by the scope of the present application. Therefore, the protection scope of the present application shall be subject to the protection scope of the claims.
Claims (10)
1. A method for validating a report detection item, the method comprising:
acquiring a verification report for vehicle-mounted equipment detection, wherein the verification report records verification conclusions corresponding to all detection items of the vehicle-mounted equipment through a form;
classifying the detection items in the verification report according to the type of the verification conclusion;
determining a category of the detection item having a validation rule for detecting validity of the validation conclusion;
and detecting the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item by using the verification rule.
2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the classes of the detection items having the verification rule at least include a non-adaptive detection item class and an incorrect detection item class, the non-adaptive detection item class being a set of detection items for which the verification conclusion is non-adaptive, and the incorrect detection item class being a set of detection items for which the verification conclusion is incorrect; the detecting the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item by using the verification rule includes:
detecting the validity of a verification conclusion in a corresponding detection item according to a first verification rule, wherein the first verification rule is a verification rule corresponding to the type of the non-adaptive detection item;
when the detection items which are not suitable for the detection item categories are detected, determining whether undetected categories exist;
if the detection item exists, the first verification rule is converted into a second verification rule, the validity of a verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item is detected according to the second verification rule, and the second verification rule is a verification rule corresponding to the incorrect detection item;
if not, ending the detection of the validity of the verification conclusion in the detection item.
3. The method of claim 2, wherein the verification report further comprises reason content, and wherein the detecting the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item according to the first verification rule comprises:
detecting whether the reason content of the unadapted detection item category exists;
if the detection item exists, the detection item corresponding to the detection item type which is not suitable for is valid;
and if not, the detection item corresponding to the detection item type which is not suitable for is invalid.
4. The method of claim 2, wherein each verification report comprises an integrity report and a traceability report, the integrity report being a report including at least a first cause content, a defect type, a first verification conclusion, and a first defect number, the traceability report being a report including at least a second cause content, a second verification conclusion, and a second defect number; the detecting the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item according to the second verification rule further includes:
when the verification report is the integrity report, detecting validity of the incorrect detection item category according to the first reason content, the defect type and the first defect number;
detecting validity of the incorrect detection item category based on the second cause content and the second defect number when the verification report is the traceability report.
5. The method according to claim 4, wherein said detecting validity of said incorrect detection item category based on said first cause content, said defect type, and said first defect number comprises:
determining whether the incorrect detection item category simultaneously satisfies a first condition, a second condition and a third condition, wherein the first condition is that the first reason content of the incorrect detection item category exists, the second condition is that the defect type of the incorrect detection item category is a preset defect type, and the third condition is that the first defect number of the incorrect detection item category exists in a defect and change management tool library;
if so, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item type is valid;
and if not, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is invalid.
6. The method according to claim 4, wherein said detecting validity of said incorrect detection item category based on said second cause content and said second defect number comprises:
determining whether the incorrect detection item category satisfies a fourth condition and a fifth condition at the same time, wherein the fourth condition is a condition that the second reason content of the incorrect detection item category exists, and the fifth condition is a condition that the second defect number of the incorrect detection item category exists in a defect and change management tool library;
if so, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item type is valid;
and if not, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is invalid.
7. A test device for verifying a reported test item, the device comprising:
the acquisition module is used for acquiring a verification report for vehicle-mounted equipment detection, and the verification report records verification conclusions corresponding to all detection items of the vehicle-mounted equipment through a form;
the classification module is used for classifying the detection items in the verification report according to the type of the verification conclusion;
a first determining module, configured to determine a category of the detection item having a validation rule, where the validation rule is used to detect validity of the validation conclusion;
and the first detection module is used for detecting the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item by using the verification rule.
8. The apparatus according to claim 7, wherein the classes of the detection items having the verification rule at least include a non-adaptive detection item class and an incorrect detection item class, the non-adaptive detection item class being a set of detection items for which the verification conclusion is non-adaptive, and the incorrect detection item class being a set of detection items for which the verification conclusion is incorrect; the first detection module includes:
the second detection module is used for detecting the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item according to a first verification rule, wherein the first verification rule is a verification rule corresponding to the type of the non-adaptive detection item;
a second determining module, configured to determine whether there is an undetected category when the detection item that does not adapt to the detection item category is detected;
a conversion module, configured to convert the first validation rule into a second validation rule if an undetected category exists, and detect validity of a validation conclusion in a corresponding detection item according to the second validation rule, where the second validation rule is a validation rule corresponding to the incorrect detection item category;
and the ending detection module is used for ending the detection of the validity of the verification conclusion in the detection item if the undetected category does not exist.
9. An electronic device, characterized in that the electronic device comprises:
at least one processor;
and at least one memory, bus connected with the processor;
the processor and the memory complete mutual communication through the bus; the processor is configured to call program instructions in the memory to perform a method of verifying the detection of a report detection item as claimed in any one of claims 1 to 6.
10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that the storage medium includes a stored program, wherein when the program runs, the apparatus on which the storage medium is located is controlled to execute the method for detecting a verification report detection item according to any one of claims 1 to 6.
Priority Applications (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202211513049.8A CN115544322A (en) | 2022-11-30 | 2022-11-30 | Detection method and device for verification report detection items |
Applications Claiming Priority (1)
Application Number | Priority Date | Filing Date | Title |
---|---|---|---|
CN202211513049.8A CN115544322A (en) | 2022-11-30 | 2022-11-30 | Detection method and device for verification report detection items |
Publications (1)
Publication Number | Publication Date |
---|---|
CN115544322A true CN115544322A (en) | 2022-12-30 |
Family
ID=84722679
Family Applications (1)
Application Number | Title | Priority Date | Filing Date |
---|---|---|---|
CN202211513049.8A Pending CN115544322A (en) | 2022-11-30 | 2022-11-30 | Detection method and device for verification report detection items |
Country Status (1)
Country | Link |
---|---|
CN (1) | CN115544322A (en) |
Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110931097A (en) * | 2019-11-04 | 2020-03-27 | 武汉市纽艾云健康科技有限公司 | Processing and analyzing system for inspection report |
US20210374438A1 (en) * | 2020-06-02 | 2021-12-02 | Blue White Robotics Ltd | Validating object detection hardware and algorithms |
CN114782060A (en) * | 2022-05-05 | 2022-07-22 | 浙江露熙科技有限公司 | Interactive product detection method and system |
-
2022
- 2022-11-30 CN CN202211513049.8A patent/CN115544322A/en active Pending
Patent Citations (3)
Publication number | Priority date | Publication date | Assignee | Title |
---|---|---|---|---|
CN110931097A (en) * | 2019-11-04 | 2020-03-27 | 武汉市纽艾云健康科技有限公司 | Processing and analyzing system for inspection report |
US20210374438A1 (en) * | 2020-06-02 | 2021-12-02 | Blue White Robotics Ltd | Validating object detection hardware and algorithms |
CN114782060A (en) * | 2022-05-05 | 2022-07-22 | 浙江露熙科技有限公司 | Interactive product detection method and system |
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
CN109474488B (en) | Interface testing method and device and computer equipment | |
Martin-Lopez et al. | Test coverage criteria for RESTful web APIs | |
US8397104B2 (en) | Creation of test plans | |
CN104317713A (en) | Automatic testing tool and method on basis of templates | |
CN114116496A (en) | Automatic testing method, device, equipment and medium | |
CN110020550B (en) | Assessment method, device and equipment for verification platform | |
US7434132B2 (en) | Method and system of configuring a software program | |
CN115544322A (en) | Detection method and device for verification report detection items | |
CN115759049A (en) | Text detection method, apparatus, device, medium, and program product | |
CN116016270A (en) | Switch test management method and device, electronic equipment and storage medium | |
CN112612882B (en) | Review report generation method, device, equipment and storage medium | |
CN112631852B (en) | Macro checking method, macro checking device, electronic equipment and computer readable storage medium | |
CN113868137A (en) | Method, device and system for processing buried point data and server | |
CN113886373A (en) | Data processing method and device and electronic equipment | |
CN113704122B (en) | UI (user interface) automatic test system and method based on standard interface | |
JP2007199800A (en) | Degradation prevention support program and degradation prevention support method | |
Thapliyal et al. | A Newly Proposed Ambidextrous Software Testing Model Based on Conventional Black Box Testing Strategy Using the Applications of Gaussian Distribution | |
CN114791886B (en) | Software problem tracking method and system | |
CN116383834B (en) | Detection method for source code vulnerability detection tool abnormality and related equipment | |
CN117668506A (en) | Assessment method, model and computer storage medium for large language model | |
CN112486823B (en) | Error code verification method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium | |
CN111914543A (en) | Report validity detection method and device, electronic equipment and readable storage medium | |
CN118821685A (en) | Register processing method and device with self-checking function | |
CN114880225A (en) | Command testing method, computing device and storage medium | |
JP7029054B2 (en) | Identification program, identification device and identification method |
Legal Events
Date | Code | Title | Description |
---|---|---|---|
PB01 | Publication | ||
PB01 | Publication | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
SE01 | Entry into force of request for substantive examination | ||
RJ01 | Rejection of invention patent application after publication |
Application publication date: 20221230 |