CN115544322A - A detection method and device for a verification report detection item - Google Patents

Abstract

The application provides a detection method and a detection device for a verification report detection item, and relates to the technical field of railway signal system equipment verification. The detection method for the verification report detection item comprises the following steps: the method comprises the steps of obtaining a verification report for detecting the vehicle-mounted equipment, classifying detection items in the verification report according to the type of a verification conclusion, determining the type of the detection item with a verification rule, and detecting the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item by using the verification rule. When the technical scheme of the application detects the detection items of the verification report, condition conversion for determining more verification conclusions of the verification report is not needed, and the conversion of the verification rules is only needed according to the type of the detection items, so that the conversion times of the verification rules are less, the detection time is shorter, and the detection efficiency of the detection items of the verification report is improved.

Description

A detection method and device for a verification report detection item

technical field

The invention relates to the technical field of railway signal system equipment verification, in particular to a method and device for detecting items detected in a verification report.

Background technique

The product development of the on-board equipment of China's train operation control system will generate many verification reports, which record the environmental parameters, use cases, requirements and test results involved in each test of the on-board equipment detection. A number of contents in the report are stored in the form of tables, and the content of each column in the table is one of the parameters involved in a test of vehicle equipment, such as requirements, use cases, environmental parameters, and test results. Each row of is the corresponding requirements, use cases, environment parameters, test results and other parameters of a certain test. In order to ensure the correctness of the verification report, it is necessary to verify the detection results of the detection items in the verification report.

In the prior art, when testing the test items in the verification report, it is necessary to test the test results of each line in turn, and when testing the verification conclusions in the test results of each line except for the correct verification conclusion, it is necessary to determine that the verification conclusion is empty One of the three, inappropriate and incorrect, may be determined once, or it may be determined twice or three times, that is to say, the determination of the verification conclusion of each row needs to be determined once, twice or three times. convert. Since a larger number of verification reports has a larger number of rows, the determination of the verification conclusions corresponding to all the rows of the verification report requires more conditional transformations, so that the determination of the verification conclusions of all the rows in the verification report will be relatively slow. It is time-consuming, and it is also time-consuming to detect the detection items in the verification report, resulting in low detection efficiency.

Contents of the invention

The purpose of the embodiment of the present application is to provide a method and device for detecting the detection items in the verification report, so as to solve the problem of low efficiency in detecting the detection items in the verification report.

In order to solve the above technical problems, the embodiments of the present application provide the following technical solutions:

The first aspect of the present application provides a detection method for a verification report detection item, the method comprising:

Obtaining a verification report for the detection of the vehicle-mounted equipment, wherein the verification report records the verification conclusions corresponding to each detection item of the vehicle-mounted device through a table;

Classify the detection items in the verification report according to the type of the verification conclusion;

determining the category of the detection item having a verification rule, the verification rule being used to detect the validity of the verification conclusion;

The validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item is detected by using the verification rule.

The second aspect of the present application provides a detection device for verification report detection items, the device includes:

An acquisition module, configured to acquire a verification report for vehicle-mounted equipment detection, wherein the verification report records the verification conclusions corresponding to each detection item of the vehicle-mounted equipment through a table;

A classification module, configured to classify the detection items in the verification report according to the type of the verification conclusion;

A first determining module, configured to determine the category of the detected item having a verification rule, the verification rule being used to detect the validity of the verification conclusion;

The first detection module is configured to use the verification rule to detect the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item.

The third aspect of the present application provides an electronic device, and the electronic device includes: at least one processor; and at least one memory and bus connected to the processor; wherein, the processor and the memory communicate with each other through the bus; the processor is used to call The program instructions in the memory are used to execute the detection method of the verification report detection item in the first aspect or any optional embodiment of the first aspect.

The fourth aspect of the present application provides a computer-readable storage medium, the storage medium includes a stored program, wherein when the program is running, the device where the storage medium is located is controlled to execute the first aspect or any optional embodiment of the first aspect Validate the detection method for the reported detection.

Compared with the prior art, the method for detecting the detection items of the verification report provided in the first aspect of the present application determines the type of the detection items with verification rules, and uses the verification rules to detect the validity of the verification conclusions in the corresponding detection items; thus, The validity of the verification conclusion in the detection item can be checked according to the verification rules corresponding to the type of the detection item. Different types of detection items need to be validated according to the corresponding verification rules. Detection involves the conversion of verification rules, and the number of conversions of verification rules according to the category of detection items is less, so that the time-consuming detection is shorter and the detection efficiency of the detection items in the verification report is improved; The determination of more lines of verification conclusions requires more condition conversions, which makes it time-consuming to detect the detection items in the verification report. Compared with the detection of the detection items in the verification report, the present invention does not require more The determination of the multi-line verification conclusion requires more condition conversions, and only needs to convert the verification rules according to the category of the detection items, so that the number of conversions of the verification rules is less, which in turn makes the detection time-consuming shorter and improves the verification report. The detection efficiency of the detection item.

The device for detecting the detection items of the verification report provided in the second aspect of the present application has the same beneficial effects as the method for detecting the detection items of the verification report provided in the first aspect of the present application.

Description of drawings

The above and other objects, features and advantages of the exemplary embodiments of the present application will become readily understood by reading the following detailed description with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the accompanying drawings, several embodiments of the present application are shown in an exemplary rather than restrictive manner, and the same or corresponding reference numerals represent the same or corresponding parts, wherein:

Fig. 1 schematically shows a flowchart one of a detection method for a detection item in a verification report;

Fig. 2 schematically shows a structural diagram 1 of a detection device for a detection item in a verification report;

Fig. 3 schematically shows the second structural diagram of the detection device for the detection items in the verification report;

Fig. 4 schematically shows a structural diagram of an electronic device.

detailed description

Exemplary embodiments of the present application will be described in more detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings. Although exemplary embodiments of the present application are shown in the drawings, it should be understood that the present application may be embodied in various forms and should not be limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided for thorough understanding of the application and to fully convey the scope of the application to those skilled in the art.

It should be noted that unless otherwise specified, the technical terms or scientific terms used in this application shall have the usual meanings understood by those skilled in the art to which this application belongs.

For the detection of the detection items in the verification report, the existing technology needs to detect each row of the detection results in turn. When the verification conclusion is detected in the detection results of each row, it is necessary to determine that the verification conclusion is empty, unsuitable and incorrect. one of them. Because the existing technology needs to carry out one, two or three condition conversions for each row of verification conclusions, and because the number of rows in a large number of verification reports is large, it is necessary to determine the verification conclusions corresponding to all rows of the verification report. A large number of conditional conversions are performed, which makes it time-consuming to determine the verification conclusions of all rows in the verification report, and it is also time-consuming to detect the detection items in the verification report. Therefore, the present invention considers that when detecting a large number of verification report detection items, the determination of more lines of verification conclusions requires more condition conversions, so that it will be more time-consuming to detect the detection items in the verification report. There is a need for a detection method with fewer conversion times for detection of detection items in the verification report, to replace the detection method with more conditional conversions in the prior art. For this reason, the present invention selects the detection method with fewer conversions to detect the detection items of the verification report, so that for each category of detection items with verification rules, the verification conclusions in the corresponding detection items are detected according to the verification rules corresponding to each category In this way, the verification rules can be converted according to the category of the detection items, and the detection items corresponding to the verification rules can be detected according to the converted verification rules. The number of rule conversions is less, so that the detection time is shorter, and the detection efficiency of the detection items in the verification report is improved. The specific implementation method is to obtain the verification report of the detection of the vehicle-mounted equipment. The verification report records the verification conclusions corresponding to each detection item of the vehicle-mounted equipment through a table, and classifies the detection items in the verification report according to the type of verification conclusions to determine whether there is a verification result. The category of the detection item of the rule, the verification rule is used to detect the validity of the verification conclusion, and the verification rule is used to detect the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item.

The method in the embodiment of the present invention will be described in detail below.

Fig. 1 schematically shows the first flow chart of the detection method of the verification report detection item in the embodiment of the present invention. Referring to Fig. 1, the method may include:

S101. Obtain a verification report on vehicle equipment detection.

Wherein, the verification report records the verification conclusion corresponding to each detection item of the vehicle-mounted equipment through a table.

The vehicle-mounted equipment of the present invention may be the vehicle-mounted equipment in the new train control system, or the vehicle-mounted equipment in the train control system. The verification report of the present invention may be a requirement verification report or a use case verification report. The present invention has many verification reports for vehicle-mounted equipment detection, up to 56 copies.

The acquisition of the verification report of the present invention can identify the target file under the corresponding path according to the report number, and the target file contains the verification report. For example, the verification report number is 02, and the verification report numbered 02 is stored in the paths "this computer/document/file 1", "this computer/document/file 2" and "this computer/document/file 2", which can identify Paths "this computer/document/file 1", "this computer/document/file 2" and "this computer/document/file 2" corresponding to the verification report number 02, and the verification number 02 is obtained from these 3 paths 3 reports.

When obtaining the verification report of vehicle equipment detection, it can judge whether there is a corresponding target file in the specified path (the target file contains the verification report), if not, it will prompt that there is no target file in the specified path and prompt the operator to confirm the input information (that is, the verification report number and path) is correct, if it exists, judge whether the format of the verification report of the target file under the specified path is correct, if the format is incorrect, prompt the operator to confirm the input information (that is, the verification report number and path) Whether it is correct, and end the module execution, if the format is correct, then get the target file. The format of the verification report of the correct target file is in Excel format as the attachment under the path.

Each row in the table corresponds to a test item, and the test item contains the verification conclusion.

After obtaining the verification report of the vehicle equipment detection, the verification report can be identified and the target file can be downloaded. Specifically, it is to judge whether the target file is obtained. If the target file is not obtained, the operator is prompted to confirm whether the input information (that is, the target file) is correct. If the target file is obtained, it is determined whether the verification report is recognized from the target file. If the verification report is not recognized Then the operator is prompted to confirm whether the input information (that is, the target file) is correct, and if the verification report is identified, the target file is downloaded, and the target file contains the verification report.

After identifying the verification report and downloading the target file, the extracted verification report can be processed, mainly for the verification conclusion in the verification report, specifically to identify whether the verification conclusion exists, if not, prompt the operator to confirm the verification The correctness of the verification conclusion column in the report. If it exists, traverse each verification conclusion in the verification report to determine whether the verification conclusion column is empty. If it is empty, it will output the corresponding detection item to summary table 1 and In summary table 3, if it is not empty, judge whether the result of the verification conclusion column is incorrect (that is, expressed as NOK), if it is NOK, output the detection item corresponding to NOK to summary table 1 and summary table 2, if not NOK judges whether the verification conclusion column is unsuitable (that is, represented by NA), and if it is NA, the detection item corresponding to NA is output to summary table 1, and if it is not NA, the verification conclusion is correct (that is, represented by OK) and ends above operation. The above operations can filter out the verification items corresponding to the verification conclusions being empty, NOK and NA and record them in summary table 1. The subsequent steps can be checked according to summary table 1 (that is, the verification report that the verification conclusion is empty, NOK and NA) The item is processed, that is to say, the subsequent operation is to process the detection item according to the verification conclusion except the OK verification report.

Of course, it is also possible to filter out the detection items whose verification conclusions are correct, and delete the detection items whose verification conclusions are correct from the verification report, leaving only the incorrect verification conclusions (that is, at least empty, NOK and NA verification conclusions) corresponding to detection items.

S102. Classify the detection items in the verification report according to the types of verification conclusions.

Specifically, the detection items in the verification report acquired according to step S101 are classified according to the type of verification conclusion.

The verification conclusion of the present invention is a verification conclusion other than the correct conclusion, and the detection items corresponding to the correct verification conclusion in the verification report may be eliminated, and only the incorrect verification conclusions are classified. If there are several types of verification conclusions, the detection items in the verification report are divided into several categories. For example, if the types of verification conclusions are A, B, and C, then according to type A, type B, and type C, the detection items in the verification report can be divided into three categories.

Specifically, the types of verification conclusions may include empty types, NOK types, and NA types. Here, there may be multiple types of verification conclusions, and the types of verification conclusions are not limited.

The detection items corresponding to the empty type in the verification report can be divided according to the empty type to obtain the empty detection item category. The detection items corresponding to the NOK types in the verification report can be divided according to the NOK types to obtain the NOK detection item categories. The detection items corresponding to the NA types in the verification report can be divided according to the NA types to obtain the NA detection item categories.

S103. Determine the category of the detection item with the verification rule.

Among them, the verification rule is used to detect the validity of the verification conclusion.

Specifically, determining the category of the detection item with the verification rule may be to establish an association relationship between the verification rule and the detection item category, and the category of the detection item with the verification rule may be determined through the association relationship. If there is a corresponding relationship between the detection item category, it may be It is determined that the detection item category is a category with verification rules, and if there is no corresponding relationship between the detection item categories, it may be determined that the detection item category is a category without verification rules.

Exemplarily, the detection item categories are A, B, and C, the association relationship between detection item category A and verification rule a is Aa, the association relationship between detection category C and verification rule c is Cc, and there is no other association relationship, then, It is determined that the detection category A has an association relationship Aa, the detection category C has an association relationship Cc, and the detection category B does not have an association relationship, then it can be determined that the categories of detection items with verification rules are A and C.

Specifically, there is no verification rule for the preset empty detection item category, and there is an association relationship between the NOK detection item category and the NA detection item category. Through the association relationship, the verification rules corresponding to the NOK detection item category and the NA detection item category can be determined respectively. The validation rules corresponding to the item category and the NA detection item category are different.

S104. Use the verification rule to detect the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item.

Specifically, the verification rules are used to detect the validity of the verification conclusions in the corresponding detection items in the category of detection items with verification rules determined according to step S103.

The verification rules corresponding to each category of detection items with verification rules are different, and the verification rules corresponding to the same category of detection items with verification rules are the same. Following the example of the above step S103, the verification rule a can be used to detect the validity of the verification conclusions in the detection items corresponding to the detection item category A, and the verification rule c can be used to detect the validity of the verification conclusions in the detection items corresponding to the detection item category C , instead of checking the validity of the verification conclusion in the detection items of detection category B.

The validity of the verification conclusion of the detection item corresponding to the NOK detection item category can be detected according to the verification rule corresponding to the NOK detection item category. The validity of the verification conclusion of the detection item corresponding to the NA detection item category can be detected according to the verification rule corresponding to the NA detection item category.

The detection method of the detection item of the verification report provided by the embodiment of the present invention determines the category of the detection item with the verification rule, and uses the verification rule to detect the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item; Verification rules, to check the validity of the verification conclusions in the detection items. Different types of detection items need to check the validity of the verification conclusions in the detection items according to their corresponding different verification rules. The detection involves verification rules. Conversion, according to the category of detection items, the number of conversions of verification rules is less, so that the detection time is shorter, and the detection efficiency of the detection items in the verification report is improved; and the determination of more lines of verification conclusions in the prior art needs to be carried out More times of conditional conversion makes it more time-consuming to detect the detection items in the verification report. Compared with the detection of the detection items in the verification report, the present invention does not need to determine the verification conclusions of more rows in the verification report. Conditional conversion times, only need to convert the verification rules according to the category of the detection items, so that the number of conversions of the verification rules is less, which in turn makes the detection time-consuming shorter and improves the detection efficiency of the detection items in the verification report.

Further, as a refinement and extension of the above step S104, after the detection of the detection items of the first category is completed, the detection items of the second category can be detected by converting the verification rules, so that the detection items are classified according to the categories The conversion and detection of verification rules does not need to be converted and detected line by line, and frequent conversion is not required. The number of conversions is reduced, which can avoid time-consuming multiple conversions, improve the efficiency of conversion during detection, and improve the detection efficiency. efficiency.

Specifically, the above step S104 may include:

Step A1: Detect the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item according to the first verification rule.

Wherein, the first verification rule is a verification rule corresponding to an inappropriate detection item category.

The categories of detection items with verification rules include at least the category of unsuitable detection items and the category of incorrect detection items. There may be multiple types of detection items with verification rules, which are not limited here. The unsuitable detection item category is a collection of detection items whose verification conclusion is inappropriate, and the incorrect detection item category is a collection of detection items whose verification conclusion is incorrect.

For the unsuitable detection item category, the detection item can be divided into corresponding unsuitable detection item categories according to the verification conclusion that it is unsuitable, and the verification conclusion that it is unsuitable can be represented by the character NA. For the category of incorrect detection items, the detection items can be divided into corresponding categories of incorrect detection items according to the verification conclusion that it is correct, and the verification conclusion that it is incorrect can be represented by the character NOK.

The category of detection items without verification rules may include the category of empty detection items, which is a collection of detection items whose verification conclusion is empty. For the category of empty detection items, the detection items may be divided into corresponding categories of empty detection items according to the fact that the verification conclusion is empty.

Each detection item category corresponds to a verification rule, and the verification rule corresponding to the detection item category can be determined first, and the validity of the verification conclusion of the detection item in the corresponding detection item category is checked according to the verification rule. The verification rule corresponding to the unsuitable detection item category is the first verification rule, and the validity of the verification conclusion corresponding to the detection item in the unsuitable detection item category can be checked according to the first verification rule.

Specifically, one of the specific implementations of the above step A1 may include:

Step A11: Detect whether the content of the reason not suitable for the detected item category exists.

Since each validation report includes a completeness form and a traceability form. For example, as shown in Table 1, the completeness table includes at least the parent requirement label (which can be represented by SyAD-0001), the parent requirement text, the child requirement label, the child requirement text, the requirement assignment, the reason description, the defect type, the verification conclusion and Defect information (used to record the defect number). Table 1 is only part of the test item data in the verification report. Since there are many test item data, only a part is given, and the parts not given are all test items that are effective for testing. In all the following tables, the defect and change management tool library is referred to as the defect library for short.

Table 1

For the tracking line table in the verification report, for example, as described in Table 2, the tracking line table is to include at least the child requirement label (which can be represented by SyITC-0001), child requirement content, parent requirement label, parent requirement content, reason description, Verification conclusion and defect information (for recording defect number). Table 2 is only a part of the test item data in the verification report. Since there are many test item data, only a part is given, and the parts not given are all effective test items.

Table 2

The integrity table and the tracking row table have the same verification rules for detecting unsuitable detection item categories, and they both detect whether the cause content of the NA detection item category exists. Detect that the verification conclusion corresponding to the NA detection item category is NA, that is, detect whether the cause content of the NA detection item category corresponding to the verification conclusion is NA exists. When it is detected according to step A11 that there is a reason content not suitable for the category of the detected item, step A12 is executed; when it is detected according to step A11 that the content of reason not suitable for the category of the detected item exists, step A13 is executed.

Step A12: The detection items corresponding to the unsuitable detection item categories are valid.

When it is detected in step A11 that there is a reason for the unsuitable detection item category, the detection item corresponding to the unsuitable detection item category is valid, and the valid results can be accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 3 . That is, when it is detected that the cause content of the NA detection item category exists, the detection item corresponding to the NA detection item category is valid, and the valid results can be accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 3 .

Step A13: The detection item corresponding to the unsuitable detection item category is invalid.

When it is detected according to step A11 that there is no reason content for the unsuitable detection item category, the detection item corresponding to the unsuitable detection item category is invalid, and the invalid results can be accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 1 . That is, when it is detected that the reason content of the NA detection item category does not exist, the detection item corresponding to the NA detection item category is invalid, and the invalid results can be accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 3 .

Step A2: When the detection items that do not fit the detection item category have been detected, determine whether there is an undetected category.

In order to ensure that all the detection items in the verification table are detected, it is necessary to determine whether there is an undetected category when the detection items that do not fit the detection item category are detected.

When the detection items that are not suitable for the detection item category are detected, it is determined according to step A2 that there is an undetected category, then step A3 is performed, and according to step A2, it is determined that there is no undetected category, then step A4 is performed.

Step A3: Convert the first verification rule to the second verification rule, and check the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item according to the second verification rule.

Wherein, the second verification rule is a verification rule corresponding to an incorrect detection item category.

According to step A2, it is determined that there is an undetected category, and the undetected category is an incorrect detection item category, then the first verification rule is converted to the second verification rule corresponding to the incorrect detection item category, and then the corresponding detection is detected according to the second verification rule Validity of verification conclusions in items.

Specifically, one of the specific implementations of the above step A3 may include:

Step A31a: When the verification report is an integrity report, check the validity of the incorrect detection item category according to the content of the first cause, the defect type and the first defect number.

Wherein, each verification report includes an integrity report and a traceability report, and the integrity report is a report including at least the content of the first cause, the type of defect, the first verification conclusion and the number of the first defect, and the content of the first cause, the type of defect , the first verification conclusion and the first defect number are called the detection results of the integrity report. The traceability report is a report including at least the second cause content, the second verification conclusion and the second defect number, and the second cause content, the second verification conclusion and the second defect number may be referred to as detection results of the traceability report.

Since the integrity report and the traceability report are based on different verification rules for detecting incorrect detection item categories, the integrity report and traceability report should be separated to detect incorrect detection item categories. Since the integrity report detection results include the first cause content, defect type, first verification conclusion and first defect number, it is necessary to correct the incorrect detection items according to the first cause content, defect type, first verification conclusion and first defect number category to detect.

Specifically, one of the specific implementations of the above step A31a may include:

Step A311a: Determine whether the category of the incorrectly detected item satisfies the first condition, the second condition and the third condition at the same time.

Among them, the first condition is the condition that the first cause content of the incorrect detection item category exists, the second condition is the condition that the defect type of the incorrect detection item category is a preset defect type, and the third condition is the incorrect detection item category. The first defect number exists as a condition in the Defect and Change Management Toolbase.

Specifically, for the validity detection of the incorrect detection item category, it is necessary to determine whether the incorrect detection item category satisfies at the same time: the content of the first cause exists, the defect type is a preset defect type, and the first defect number exists in the defect and change management tool library.

The default defect types are defect type 01, defect type 02 and defect type 03. The defect type 01 means that the description is empty, the defect type 02 means that the defect type is empty or the defect type is wrong, and the defect type 03 means that the defect number is empty or the defect number is not Exists in the Defect and Change Management Toolkit.

Since the aforementioned step S103 has determined the category of the detection items with verification rules, the subsequent detection of detection items is to detect the detection items with verification rules, that is, the subsequent detection is to detect the corresponding detection items with clear verification conclusions . When determining whether the incorrect detection item category satisfies the first condition, the second condition, and the third condition at the same time, one way is: first determine whether the content of the first cause exists, and if it does not exist, then NOK the detection item corresponding to the detection item If the result is invalid, accumulate the invalid results and accumulate them in the summary table 1, and end the judgment. If it exists, then determine whether the defect type is a preset defect type (one of defect type 01, defect type 02 and defect type 03) ), if it is not a preset defect type, the test result corresponding to the NOK test item is invalid, and the invalid results are accumulated and accumulated in summary table 3, and the judgment is completed. In the case of a preset defect type, connect again Defect and change management tool library, and judge whether the first defect number exists in the defect and change management tool library. If it does not exist in the defect and change management tool library, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid, and the corresponding first Defect number can be counted, which can be counted in summary table 3, and invalid results can be accumulated and accumulated in summary table 3. If it exists in the defect and change management tool library, the test result corresponding to the NOK test item is valid and can be The effective results are accumulated and accumulated in summary table 3. When determining whether the category of incorrect detection items satisfies the first condition, the second condition and the third condition at the same time, for first judging that the first cause content exists, the defect type is the default defect type and the first defect number exists in the defect and change management The sequence of tool libraries is not limited.

When determining whether the category of the incorrect detection item satisfies the first condition, the second condition and the third condition at the same time, another way is: first determine whether the content of the first cause exists, if not, then NOK the corresponding detection item The detection result is invalid, and the invalid results are accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 1, and the judgment is completed. If it exists, it is judged whether the defect type is empty. If the defect type is empty, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid. Accumulate invalid results and accumulate them in the summary table 3, and end the judgment. If the defect type is not empty, determine whether the defect type is a preset defect type (one of defect type 01, defect type 02 and defect type 03), If it is not a preset defect type, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid, and the invalid results are accumulated and accumulated in summary table 3, and the judgment ends. In the case of a preset defect type, the first Whether the defect number is empty, if the first defect number is empty, it can be counted in the summary table 3, and the invalid results will be accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 3, if the first defect number is not empty, the defect and change will be connected Manage the tool library, and judge whether the first defect number exists in the defect and change management tool library. If it does not exist in the defect and change management tool library, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid, and the corresponding defect number is counted. It can be counted in summary table 3, and the invalid results can be accumulated and accumulated in summary table 3. If it exists in the defect and change management tool library, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is valid, and the valid result can be carried out Accumulated, accumulated in summary table 3. When determining whether the incorrect detection item category satisfies the first condition, the second condition and the third condition at the same time, for first judging that the first cause content exists, the defect type is empty, the defect type is the preset defect type, and the first defect number is The order in which empty and first defect numbers exist in the defect and change management tool repository is not limited.

According to step A311a, it is determined that the category of the incorrect detection item satisfies the first condition, the second condition and the third condition at the same time, then step A312a is performed, and it is determined according to the step A311a that the category of the incorrect detection item does not simultaneously satisfy the first condition, the second condition and the third condition condition, execute step A313a.

Step A312a: The detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is valid.

When it is determined according to step A311a that the category of the incorrect detection item satisfies the first condition, the second condition and the third condition at the same time, the detection item corresponding to the category of the incorrect detection item is valid. The effective results can be accumulated and accumulated into summary table 3. That is, when it is detected that the NOK detection item category satisfies the first condition, the second condition, and the third condition at the same time, the detection item corresponding to the NOK detection item category is valid, and the valid results can be accumulated and accumulated in summary table 3.

Step A313a: The detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is invalid.

According to step A311a, when it is determined that the category of incorrectly detected items does not satisfy the first condition, the second condition and the third condition at the same time, that is, only the first condition is met, or only the second condition is met, or only the third condition is met, or the first condition is met at the same time. When the first condition and the second condition, or the first condition and the third condition are satisfied at the same time, or the second condition and the third condition are satisfied at the same time, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is invalid. Invalid results can be accumulated and accumulated in summary table 3. That is, when it is detected that the first condition, the second condition, and the third condition are met at the same time when the NOK detection item category is different, the detection item corresponding to the NOK detection item category is invalid, and the invalid results can be accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 3.

For the detection items in Table 1, the aforementioned steps can be followed, that is, according to step A1 (step A1 includes steps A11 to A13), step A2, and step A31a in step A3 (step A31a includes steps A311a to A313a) to carry out validity detection, it can be obtained There are 7 invalid (that is, wrong) verification conclusions in the integrity table corresponding to Table 1, and the detection items corresponding to the 7 invalid (that is, wrong) verification conclusions can be extracted and recorded in the following Table 3. Table 3 is Invalid checks for record integrity tables. The last column is the error description, NA verification conclusion has 1 error item, NOK verification conclusion has 5 error items, and the verification conclusion is empty error item is 1 item.

table 3

Step A31b: When the verification report is a traceability report, check the validity of the incorrectly detected item category according to the content of the second cause and the second defect number.

Since the detection result of the traceability report includes the second reason content, the second verification conclusion and the second defect number, it is necessary to detect the incorrect detection item category according to the second cause content, the second verification conclusion and the second defect number.

Specifically, one of the specific implementations of the above-mentioned step A31b may include:

Step A311b: Determine whether the category of the incorrectly detected item satisfies both the fourth condition and the fifth condition.

Among them, the fourth condition is the condition that the second reason content of the incorrect detection item category exists, and the fifth condition is the condition that the second defect number of the incorrect detection item category exists in the defect and change management tool library.

Specifically, for the validity detection of the incorrect detection item category, it is necessary to determine whether the incorrect detection item category satisfies at the same time: the second cause content exists and the second defect number exists in the defect and change management tool library.

When determining whether the category of the NOK detection item meets the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, one way is: first determine whether the second cause content exists, if not, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid and will be invalid The results are accumulated and accumulated in summary table 1, and the judgment is completed. If it exists, then judge whether the defect number is empty. If the defect number is empty, it can be counted in summary table 3, and the invalid results are accumulated. Accumulated to the summary table 3, if the defect number is not empty, connect to the defect and change management tool library, and judge whether the second defect number exists in the defect and change management tool library, if it does not exist in the defect and change management tool library, then The test results corresponding to the NOK test items are invalid, and the corresponding defect numbers are counted, which can be counted in summary table 3, and the invalid results are accumulated and accumulated in summary table 3. If they exist in the defect and change management tool library , the test results corresponding to the NOK test items are valid, and the valid results can be accumulated and accumulated in summary table 3. When determining whether the category of incorrectly detected items satisfies the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, there is no limit to the sequence of first determining the existence of the second cause content and the existence of the second defect number in the defect and change management tool library.

When determining whether the category of the NOK detection item meets the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, one way is: first determine whether the second cause content exists, if not, the detection result corresponding to the NOK detection item is invalid and will be invalid The results are accumulated and accumulated in the summary table 3, and the judgment is completed. If it exists, then connect to the defect and change management tool library, and judge whether the second defect number exists in the defect and change management tool library. If it does not exist in the defect and the change management tool library, the test results corresponding to the NOK test items are invalid, and the corresponding defect numbers are counted, which can be counted in summary table 3, and the invalid results are accumulated and accumulated in summary table 3, if any In the defect and change management tool library, the test results corresponding to the NOK test items are valid, and the valid results can be accumulated and accumulated in summary table 3. When determining whether the category of incorrectly detected items satisfies the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, there is no limit to the sequence of first determining the existence of the second cause content and the existence of the second defect number in the defect and change management tool library.

When determining whether the category of the NOK detection item satisfies the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, another way is: first determine whether the second cause content exists, if not, the corresponding detection result of the NOK detection item is invalid, and the Invalid results are accumulated and accumulated in summary table 3, and the judgment is completed. If there is a defect number, it is judged whether it is empty. If the defect number is empty, it can be counted in summary table 3, and the invalid results are accumulated. , accumulated in the summary table 3, if the defect number is not empty, connect to the defect and change management tool library, and judge whether the second defect number exists in the defect and change management tool library, if it does not exist in the defect and change management tool library, Then the test results corresponding to the NOK test items are invalid, and the corresponding defect numbers are counted, which can be counted in summary table 3, and the invalid results are accumulated and accumulated in summary table 3. If they exist in the defect and change management tool database, the test results corresponding to the NOK test items are valid, and the valid results can be accumulated and accumulated in summary table 3. When determining whether the category of incorrect detection items satisfies the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, first determine the existence of the second cause content, the second defect number is empty, and the second defect number exists in the defect and change management tool library. Not limited.

According to step A311b, it is determined that the type of incorrect detection item satisfies the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, then execute step A312b; according to step A311b, it is determined that the type of incorrect detection item does not satisfy the fourth condition and the fifth condition, then execute step A313b.

Step A312b: The detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is valid.

When it is determined according to step A311b that the category of the incorrect detection item satisfies both the fourth condition and the fifth condition, the detection item corresponding to the category of the incorrect detection item is valid. The effective results can be accumulated and accumulated into summary table 3. That is, when it is detected that the NOK detection item category satisfies the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, the detection item corresponding to the NOK detection item category is valid, and the valid results can be accumulated and accumulated in summary table 3.

Step A313b: The detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is invalid.

When it is determined according to step A311b that the category of the incorrect detection item does not meet the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, that is, only the fourth condition is met, or only the fifth condition is met, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is invalid. Invalid results can be accumulated and accumulated in summary table 3. That is, when it is detected that the NOK detection item category does not meet the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, the detection item corresponding to the NOK detection item category is invalid, and the invalid results can be accumulated and accumulated in summary table 3.

For the detection items in Table 2, the aforementioned steps can be followed, that is, according to step A1 (step A1 includes steps A11 to A13), step A2, and step A31b in step A3 (step A31b includes steps A311b to A313b) to perform validity detection, and it can be obtained There are 5 invalid (that is, wrong) verification conclusions in the traceability table corresponding to Table 2, and the detection items corresponding to the five invalid (that is, wrong) verification conclusions can be extracted and recorded in the following Table 4. Table 4 is Records of invalid detections in the traceability table. The last column is the error description, 1 error item for the NA verification conclusion, 3 error items for the NOK verification conclusion, and 1 error item for the null verification conclusion.

Table 4

Step A4: End the detection of the validity of the verification conclusion in the detection item.

According to step A2, it is determined that there are no undetected categories, that is to say, the verification conclusions in the detection items corresponding to the existing detection item categories have been detected, and no further detection is required, and the verification conclusion in the detection items is ended. effectiveness testing.

After completing the detection of the validity of the verification conclusions in the detection items, the validity detection data of all verification reports can be summarized, the integrity report and the traceability report can be summarized separately, and all non-OK reports can be output in the integrity report and traceability report respectively. (that is, empty, NOK, and NA) total number of conclusions, the total number of NA verification conclusion items with invalid verification conclusions (that is, errors), the total number of NOK verification conclusion items with invalid verification conclusions (that is, errors), the verification conclusion is empty, that is, the verification conclusion is wrong The total number of verification conclusion items is empty. According to the sum of the total number of NA verification conclusion items with invalid verification conclusions (that is, errors), the total number of NOK verification conclusion items with invalid verification conclusions (that is, errors), and the total number of empty verification conclusion items with wrong verification conclusions, and the total number of all non-OK conclusions The ratio is used to calculate the percentage of valid (that is, correct) verification conclusions. Alternatively, the cumulative total of invalid results and the cumulative total of valid results can be obtained from Summary Table 3, and the valid (that is, correct) verification conclusion can be calculated by dividing the cumulative total of valid results by the sum of the cumulative total of valid results and the cumulative total of invalid results. percentage. The percentage of valid (ie correct) verification conclusions can be called quality evaluation results. It is also possible to output the total number of defect numbers and defect numbers corresponding to invalid detection items. According to the total number of all non-OK (that is, empty, NOK and NA) conclusions, the total number of NA verification conclusion items with invalid verification conclusions (that is, errors), the total number of NOK verification conclusion items with invalid verification conclusions (that is, errors), and the verification conclusion is empty. If the verification conclusion is wrong, the total number of verification conclusion items, the total number of defect numbers corresponding to invalid detection items, and the defect number and quality evaluation results can generate a draft version report. The draft version report can visually reflect the effectiveness of the overall verification activity results (that is, correctness ) draft version report can be presented in tabular form, as shown in Table 5. The total number of NA verification conclusion items with wrong verification conclusions, the total number of NOK verification conclusion items with wrong verification conclusions, the total number of verification conclusion items with empty verification conclusions, the total number of defect numbers corresponding to invalid detection items, and the defect numbers can be directly obtained from the above Table 3 and Table 4 obtained directly from the . Before testing the test items in the verification report, each verification report will have the original pass and fail conclusions. For example, there are 4 verification reports, and the original conclusion of the verification report is that verification reports 1 and 4 are passed, and verification report 2 is passed. and 3 fail, in order to ensure the correctness of the detection items in the verification report, all four verification reports need to be tested, and the detection items with wrong verification conclusions can be determined. When the detection items with wrong verification conclusions are detected, the The report where it is located is recorded as failed. If the wrong detection item exists in the verification report 1, 2 and 3, the verification report 1, 2 and 3 will fail, and the verification report 4 will pass. This is the final conclusion of the verification report. Whether the report record where the wrong detection item is located is passed or not can facilitate subsequent confirmation of the original and final failed reports to ensure the accuracy of the verification report.

table 5

Based on the same inventive concept, as an implementation of the detection method for the detection items in the verification report, an embodiment of the present invention also provides a detection device for the detection items in the verification report. Fig. 2 is a structural diagram 1 of the device in the embodiment of the present invention, as shown in Fig. 2, the device may include:

The acquisition module 201 is configured to acquire a verification report for the vehicle-mounted equipment detection, and the verification report records the verification conclusion corresponding to each detection item of the vehicle-mounted equipment through a table;

A classification module 202, configured to classify the detection items in the verification report obtained by the acquisition module 201 according to the type of the verification conclusion;

The first determining module 203 is configured to determine the category of the detected item classified by the classification module 202 having a verification rule, the verification rule being used to detect the validity of the verification conclusion;

The first detection module 204 is configured to use the verification rule to detect the validity of the verification conclusion corresponding to the detection item determined by the first determination module 203 .

On the basis of Fig. 2, the present invention also provides another embodiment of the device, as shown in Fig. 3, Fig. 3 is the second structural diagram of the device in the embodiment of the present invention, the device may include:

The first detection module 204 includes:

The second detection module 2041 is configured to detect the validity of the verification conclusion corresponding to the detection item determined by the first determination module 203 according to the first verification rule, and the first verification rule is a verification rule corresponding to the unsuitable detection item category ;

The second determination module 2042 is used to determine whether there is an undetected category when the detection items detected by the second detection module 2041 that are not suitable for the detection item category have been detected;

The conversion module 2043 is configured to convert the first verification rule to a second verification rule if the second determination module 2042 determines that there is an undetected category, and detect the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item according to the second verification rule. Validity, the second verification rule is a verification rule corresponding to the category of the incorrect detection item;

The end detection module 2044 is configured to end the detection of the validity of the verification conclusion in the detection item if the second determination module 2042 determines that there is no undetected category.

Further, the verification report also includes reason content, and the second detection module 2041 is specifically used to detect whether the reason content of the unsuitable detection item category exists; if it exists, then the corresponding The detection item is valid; if it does not exist, the detection item corresponding to the unsuitable detection item category is invalid.

Further, each verification report includes an integrity report and a traceability report, the integrity report is a report including at least the content of the first cause, the type of defect, the first verification conclusion and the first defect number, and the traceability report is A report including at least the content of the second reason, the second verification conclusion and the second defect number; the conversion module 2043 is specifically configured to, when the verification report is the integrity report, according to the content of the first reason, the defect number Type and the validity of the incorrect detection item category determined by the second determination module 2042 for detection of the first defect number; when the verification report is the traceability report, according to the content of the second reason and the The second defect number checks the validity of the incorrect detection item category determined by the second determination module 2042 .

Further, the conversion module 2043 is specifically used to determine whether the category of the incorrect detection item determined by the second determination module 2042 satisfies the first condition, the second condition and the third condition at the same time, the first condition being the incorrect The condition for the existence of the first cause content of the detected item category, the second condition is the condition that the defect type of the incorrect detected item category is a preset defect type, and the third condition is the incorrect The first defect number of the detected item category exists in the condition of the defect and change management tool library; if satisfied, the detected item corresponding to the incorrect detected item category is valid; if not satisfied, the described incorrect The detection corresponding to the detection category is invalid.

Further, the conversion module 2043 is specifically configured to determine whether the category of the incorrect detection item determined by the second determination module 2042 satisfies the fourth condition and the fifth condition at the same time, the fourth condition being the category of the incorrect detection item The condition for the existence of the second reason content, the fifth condition is the condition that the second defect number of the incorrect detection item category exists in the defect and change management tool library; if satisfied, the incorrect detection The detection item corresponding to the item category is valid; if not satisfied, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is invalid.

Based on the same inventive concept, an embodiment of the present invention also provides an electronic device. FIG. 4 is a structural diagram of an electronic device in an embodiment of the present invention. Referring to FIG. 4, the electronic device 40 may include: at least one processor 401; and at least one memory 402 and a bus 403 connected to the processor 401; wherein The processor 401 and the memory 402 communicate with each other through the bus 403; the processor 401 is used to call the program instructions in the memory 402, so as to execute the detection method of the verification report detection item in the above-mentioned one or more embodiments.

It should be pointed out here that: the above description of the detection device embodiment of the verification report detection item is similar to the description of the above method embodiment, and has similar beneficial effects as the method embodiment. For the technical details not disclosed in the embodiment of the detection device for the detection item of the verification report in the embodiment of the present invention, please refer to the description of the method embodiment of the present invention for understanding.

Based on the same inventive concept, an embodiment of the present invention also provides a computer-readable storage medium, the above-mentioned computer-readable storage medium includes a stored program, wherein, when the program is running, the device where the storage medium is located is controlled to execute one or more of the above-mentioned embodiments method in .

It should be pointed out here that: the above description of the computer-readable storage medium embodiment is similar to the description of the above method embodiment, and has similar beneficial effects as the method embodiment. For technical details not disclosed in the embodiments of the computer-readable storage medium in the embodiments of the present invention, please refer to the description of the method embodiments of the present invention for understanding.

The above is only the specific implementation of the application, but the scope of protection of the application is not limited thereto. Anyone familiar with the technical field can easily think of changes or substitutions within the technical scope disclosed in the application, and should cover Within the protection scope of this application. Therefore, the protection scope of the present application should be based on the protection scope of the claims.

Claims (10)

1. A detection method of verification report detection item, is characterized in that, described method comprises: Obtaining a verification report for the detection of the vehicle-mounted equipment, wherein the verification report records the verification conclusions corresponding to each detection item of the vehicle-mounted device through a table; Classify the detection items in the verification report according to the type of the verification conclusion; determining the category of the detection item having a verification rule, the verification rule being used to detect the validity of the verification conclusion; The validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item is detected by using the verification rule. 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein the categories of the detected items with the verification rules at least include an unsuitable detected item category and an incorrect detected item category, and the unsuitable detected item category is all The verification conclusion is a collection of inappropriate detection items, and the incorrect detection item category is a collection of incorrect detection items for the verification conclusion; the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection items detected by the verification rule is sex, including: Detecting the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item according to the first verification rule, the first verification rule is a verification rule corresponding to the category of the unsuitable detection item; When the detection items that are not suitable for the detection item category are detected, determine whether there is an undetected category; If it exists, convert the first verification rule to a second verification rule, detect the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item according to the second verification rule, and the second verification rule is the incorrect detection item The validation rules corresponding to the categories; If it does not exist, the detection of the validity of the verification conclusion in the detection item is ended. 3. The method according to claim 2, wherein the verification report also includes reason content, and the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item detected according to the first verification rule includes: Detecting whether the content of the reason for the inappropriate detection item category exists; If it exists, the detection item corresponding to the unsuitable detection item category is valid; If not, the detection item corresponding to the unsuitable detection item category is invalid. 4. The method according to claim 2, wherein each verification report includes a completeness report and a traceability report, and the completeness report includes at least the first reason content, the defect type, the first verification conclusion and the second verification report. A defect number report, the traceability report is a report including at least the second cause content, the second verification conclusion and the second defect number; the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item is detected according to the second verification rule, Also includes: When the verification report is the integrity report, detecting the validity of the incorrect detection item category according to the first cause content, the defect type and the first defect number; When the verification report is the traceability report, the validity of the incorrect detection item category is detected according to the second cause content and the second defect number. 5. The method according to claim 4, wherein the detecting the validity of the category of incorrectly detected items according to the content of the first cause, the defect type and the first defect number comprises: Determining whether the category of incorrect detection items satisfies a first condition, a second condition, and a third condition at the same time, the first condition is a condition that the content of the first cause of the category of incorrect detection items exists, and the second condition The second condition is that the defect type of the incorrect detection item category is a default defect type, and the third condition is that the first defect number of the incorrect detection item category exists in the defect and change management tool conditions of the library; If satisfied, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is valid; If not, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is invalid. 6. The method according to claim 4, wherein the detecting the validity of the incorrect detection item category according to the second cause content and the second defect number comprises: determining whether the category of incorrect detection items satisfies a fourth condition and a fifth condition at the same time, the fourth condition is the condition that the content of the second cause of the category of incorrect detection items exists, and the fifth condition is that the category of incorrect detection items exists the condition that the second defect number of the incorrect detected item category exists in the defect and change management tool library; If satisfied, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is valid; If not, the detection item corresponding to the incorrect detection item category is invalid. 7. A detection device for a verification report detection item, characterized in that the device comprises: An acquisition module, configured to acquire a verification report for vehicle-mounted equipment detection, wherein the verification report records the verification conclusions corresponding to each detection item of the vehicle-mounted equipment through a table; A classification module, configured to classify the detection items in the verification report according to the type of the verification conclusion; A first determining module, configured to determine the category of the detected item having a verification rule, the verification rule being used to detect the validity of the verification conclusion; The first detection module is configured to use the verification rule to detect the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item. 8. The device according to claim 7, wherein the categories of the detected items with verification rules at least include an unsuitable detected item category and an incorrect detected item category, and the unsuitable detected item category is all The verification conclusion is a collection of inappropriate detection items, and the incorrect detection item category is a collection of incorrect detection items for the verification conclusion; the first detection module includes: The second detection module is used to detect the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item according to the first verification rule, and the first verification rule is a verification rule corresponding to the unsuitable detection item category; The second determination module is used to determine whether there is an undetected category when the detection items that are not suitable for the detection item category have been detected; A conversion module, configured to convert the first verification rule to a second verification rule if there is an undetected category, detect the validity of the verification conclusion in the corresponding detection item according to the second verification rule, and the second verification rule The verification rule is a verification rule corresponding to the category of the incorrect detection item; The end detection module is used to end the detection of the validity of the verification conclusion in the detection item if there is no undetected category. 9. An electronic device, characterized in that the electronic device comprises: at least one processor; and at least one memory and bus connected to the processor; Wherein, the processor and the memory complete mutual communication through the bus; the processor is used to call the program instructions in the memory to execute the verification report detection according to any one of claims 1 to 6 Item detection method. 10. A computer-readable storage medium, characterized in that the storage medium includes a stored program, wherein when the program is running, the device where the storage medium is located is controlled to execute the program described in any one of claims 1 to 6. The detection method of the detection items in the verification report described above.

Images