CN115456580A

CN115456580A - Resource auditing method and system

Info

Publication number: CN115456580A
Application number: CN202211125798.3A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 段岳姣; 田飞文; 徐婧
Original assignee: Shanghai Bilibili Technology Co Ltd
Current assignee: Shanghai Bilibili Technology Co Ltd
Priority date: 2022-09-15
Filing date: 2022-09-15
Publication date: 2022-12-09

Abstract

The embodiment of the application provides a resource auditing method and system, wherein the method comprises the following steps: acquiring resources to be audited; creating a double-blind task aiming at the resource to be audited; the double-blind task comprises an original task and a mirror image task corresponding to the original task; allocating different processing accounts to the original task and the mirror image task for processing respectively, and receiving auditing results submitted by the different processing accounts; and executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited according to the audit result. Therefore, key content resources can be defined, multiple cross audits are carried out on the audits of some key/high-risk resources in advance by adopting a transparent non-perception cross double-blind auditing method, problems are found in time, the high-risk content is prevented from being missed, the auditing efficiency is high, and the problem of hysteresis existing in a quality inspection mode after auditing is effectively solved.

Description

Resource auditing method and system

Technical Field

The embodiment of the application relates to the technical field of data processing, in particular to a resource auditing method, a resource auditing system, computer equipment and a computer-readable storage medium.

Background

For content resources generated in some services, in order to ensure the safety of the contents, each piece of content needs to be checked and confirmed manually, the accuracy of the checking is very important, and for important/high-risk contents, secondary checking of the checking result is also necessary. However, based on consideration of factors such as the auditing labor cost, auditing efficiency, user experience and the like, secondary auditing is often performed by adopting a quality inspection mode after auditing, and the method has certain hysteresis, so that the influence is difficult to eliminate. Therefore, a preventive function capable of performing secondary verification on key/high-risk content is needed, so that cross-checking and confirmation of multiple persons on the key/high-risk content are ensured, and the risk of missing the key/high-risk content is reduced.

Disclosure of Invention

An embodiment of the present application provides a resource auditing method, system, computer device, and computer-readable storage medium, which are used for solving the following problems: the key content is checked for the second time in a quality inspection mode after being checked, so that certain hysteresis is provided, and the influence is difficult to eliminate.

One aspect of the embodiments of the present application provides a resource auditing method, including:

acquiring resources to be audited;

establishing a double-blind task aiming at the resource to be audited; the double-blind task comprises an original task and a mirror image task corresponding to the original task;

allocating different processing accounts to the original task and the mirror image task for processing respectively, and receiving auditing results submitted by the different processing accounts;

and executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited according to the audit result.

Optionally, the creating a double-blind task for the resource to be audited includes:

acquiring double-blind task configuration information;

and under the condition that the resources to be audited meet the double-blind task establishment condition according to the double-blind task configuration information, establishing the double-blind task aiming at the resources to be audited.

Optionally, the double-blind task configuration information includes a double-blind turn-on switch and a precondition for generating a double-blind task;

after the step of obtaining the double-blind task configuration information, the method further comprises:

and if the double-blind starting switch is in an open state and the resource to be audited meets the precondition for generating the double-blind task, determining that the resource to be audited meets the establishment condition of the double-blind task.

Optionally, the double-blind task configuration information further includes a double-blind task creation ratio; the determining that the resource to be audited meets the double-blind task creation condition includes:

generating a random number;

and if the random number is smaller than or equal to the double-blind task creation proportion, determining that the resource to be audited meets the double-blind task creation condition.

Optionally, the executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited according to the audit result includes:

acquiring double-blind task configuration information;

and executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited according to the audit result and the double-blind task configuration information.

Optionally, the double-blind task configuration information includes double-blind result validation opportunity and upgrade channel information; wherein, the double-blind result validation opportunity comprises any one of the following: the first submitted double-blind task result takes effect, the second submitted double-blind task result takes effect, and the upgrade agent submission result takes effect.

Optionally, the executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited according to the audit result and the double-blind task configuration information includes:

and under the condition that the audit result only contains the result corresponding to the original task or the result corresponding to the mirror image task, if the double-blind result takes effect when the double-blind result takes effect as the first submitted double-blind task result, executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited.

and if the double-blind result takes effect when the double-blind result takes effect for the second submitted double-blind task result, executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited.

when the audit result comprises a result corresponding to the original task and a result corresponding to the mirror image task and the result corresponding to the original task is different from the result corresponding to the mirror image task, an upgrade task is created for the resource to be audited according to the upgrade channel information, and the result corresponding to the upgrade task is received;

and if the double-blind result takes effect when the upgrade agent submission result takes effect, executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited according to the result corresponding to the upgrade task.

Optionally, each processing account has a corresponding non-claimable task set, and the allocating the original task and the mirroring task to different processing accounts for processing respectively includes:

determining a first account number to be allocated and an original task, if an unclassified task set corresponding to the first account number does not contain the original task, allocating the original task to the first account number for processing, and adding a mirror image task corresponding to the original task to the unclassified task set; or the like, or a combination thereof,

determining a second account and a mirror image task to be allocated currently, if an unclassified task set corresponding to the second account does not contain the mirror image task, allocating the mirror image task to the second account for processing, and adding an original task corresponding to the mirror image task to the unclassified task set.

Optionally, the method further comprises:

deleting the original task or the mirror task from the unclassified task set under the condition that the original task or the mirror task is distributed in the unclassified task set.

Optionally, the method further comprises:

under the condition that the resources to be audited do not meet the double-blind task establishing conditions according to the double-blind task configuration information, establishing common tasks aiming at the resources to be audited;

distributing the common tasks to processing accounts for processing, and receiving results corresponding to the common tasks submitted by the processing accounts;

and executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited according to the result corresponding to the common task.

One aspect of the embodiments of the present application further provides a resource auditing system, including:

the resource acquisition module is used for acquiring resources to be audited;

a double-blind task creating module, configured to create a double-blind task for the resource to be audited; the double-blind task comprises an original task and a mirror image task corresponding to the original task;

the double-blind task allocation module is used for allocating different processing accounts to the original task and the mirror image task for processing respectively and receiving the auditing results submitted by the different processing accounts;

and the resource state changing module is used for executing a resource state changing process on the resource to be audited according to the auditing result.

An aspect of the embodiments of the present application further provides a computer device, which includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the computer program to implement the steps of the resource auditing method as described above.

An aspect of the embodiments of the present application further provides a computer-readable storage medium, in which a computer program is stored, where the computer program is executable by at least one processor, so that when the computer program is executed by the at least one processor, the steps of the resource auditing method are implemented.

The resource auditing method, the system, the equipment and the computer readable storage medium provided by the embodiment of the application acquire the resource to be audited; creating a double-blind task aiming at the resource to be audited; the double-blind task comprises an original task and a mirror image task corresponding to the original task; allocating different processing accounts to the original task and the mirror image task for processing respectively, and receiving auditing results submitted by the different processing accounts; and executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited according to the audit result. Therefore, key content resources can be defined, multiple cross audits are carried out on the audits of some key/high-risk resources in advance by adopting a transparent non-perception cross double-blind auditing method, problems are found in time, the high-risk content is prevented from being missed, the auditing efficiency is high, and the problem of hysteresis existing in a quality inspection mode after auditing is effectively solved.

Drawings

FIG. 1 is a diagram schematically illustrating an application environment of a resource auditing method according to an embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a resource auditing method according to a first embodiment of the present application;

FIG. 3 is a schematic diagram of a framework of an audit platform according to a first embodiment of the application;

FIG. 4 is a schematic diagram illustrating a flow of data processing by the double-blind task creation module of the review platform of FIG. 3;

FIG. 5 is a schematic diagram illustrating a flow of processing data by a task distribution module of the auditing platform in FIG. 3;

FIG. 6 is a schematic flow chart of data processing by the review module of the review platform of FIG. 3;

FIG. 7 is a block diagram that schematically illustrates a resource auditing system, according to a second embodiment of the present application; and

fig. 8 schematically shows a hardware architecture diagram of a computer device suitable for implementing the resource auditing method according to a third embodiment of the present application.

Detailed Description

In order to make the objects, technical solutions and advantages of the present application more apparent, the present application is described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments. It should be understood that the specific embodiments described herein are merely illustrative of the present application and are not intended to limit the present application. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present application.

It should be noted that the descriptions relating to "first", "second", etc. in the embodiments of the present application are only for descriptive purposes and are not to be construed as indicating or implying relative importance or implicitly indicating the number of technical features indicated. Thus, a feature defined as "first" or "second" may explicitly or implicitly include at least one such feature. In addition, technical solutions between various embodiments may be combined with each other, but must be realized by a person skilled in the art, and when the technical solutions are contradictory or cannot be realized, such a combination should not be considered to exist, and is not within the protection scope of the present application.

In the prior art, secondary verification is performed on the important content in a quality inspection mode after verification, so that certain hysteresis is provided, and the influence is difficult to eliminate.

In view of this, the present application aims to provide a resource auditing method based on a double-blind mechanism, by acquiring a resource to be audited; creating a double-blind task aiming at the resource to be audited; the double-blind task comprises an original task and a mirror image task corresponding to the original task; allocating different processing accounts to the original task and the mirror image task for processing respectively, and receiving auditing results submitted by the different processing accounts; and executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited according to the audit result. Therefore, key content resources can be defined from the viewpoint of balancing audit manpower cost and content safety, multiple cross audits are carried out on some key/high-risk resources in advance by adopting a transparent non-perception cross double-blind audit method, problems are found in time, high-risk content is prevented from being leaked, audit efficiency is high, and the problem of hysteresis existing in a quality inspection mode after audit is effectively solved. In addition, the auditing quality and the specialty of the processing account can be evaluated through the consistency of double-blind multi-auditing results.

The present application provides various embodiments to further introduce a resource auditing scheme, which are specifically referred to below.

In the description of the present application, it should be understood that the numerical references before the steps do not identify the sequence of executing the steps, but merely serve to facilitate the description of the present application and to distinguish each step, and thus should not be construed as limiting the present application.

The following are the term explanations of the present application:

an auditing platform: and the background system is used for processing the account to audit the content resources.

The general tasks are as follows: and the user submits a draft, reviews, sends a barrage and the like, the produced content resources are sent to an auditing platform, and a corresponding task is created and is distributed to a processing account for auditing, and the task is a common task.

Double blind tasks: the content resources produced by the user are sent to an auditing platform, a task needing double-blind auditing is needed, and two tasks with the same content are created; one of the tasks is an original task, the other task is a mirror image task (with an attribute pointing to the original task), and the two tasks are called double-blind tasks.

And (3) upgrading tasks: and the new task is created under the condition that the processing results of the double-blind tasks are inconsistent and needs to be reviewed.

A channel: the method comprises the steps of processing a task collection for auditing content resources by an account;

a common channel: a user submits a common task or a double-blind task set created by content resources;

upgrading the channel: a set of upgrade tasks that need to be reviewed.

Fig. 1 schematically shows an environment application diagram according to an embodiment of the application. As shown in fig. 1:

the computer device 10000 can be connected to the client 30000 through the network 20000.

The computer device 10000 can provide services, such as network debugging, or return resource audit result data to the client 30000.

Computer device 10000 can be located in a data center, such as a single site, or distributed across different geographic locations (e.g., at multiple sites). Computer device 10000 can provide services via one or more networks 20000. The network 20000 includes various network devices such as routers, switches, multiplexers, hubs, modems, bridges, repeaters, firewalls, proxy devices, and/or the like. The network 20000 may include physical links such as coaxial cable links, twisted pair cable links, fiber optic links, combinations thereof, and the like. The network 20000 may include wireless links such as cellular links, satellite links, wi-Fi links, etc.

Computer device 10000 can be implemented by one or more computing nodes. One or more compute nodes may include virtualized compute instances. The virtualized compute instance may include an emulation of a virtual machine, such as a computer system, operating system, server, and the like. The computing node may load a virtual machine by the computing node based on the virtual image and/or other data defining the particular software (e.g., operating system, dedicated application, server) used for emulation. As the demand for different types of processing services changes, different virtual machines may be loaded and/or terminated on one or more compute nodes. A hypervisor may be implemented to manage the use of different virtual machines on the same compute node.

Client 30000 may be configured to access content and services of computer device 10000. Client 30000 can include any type of electronic device, such as a mobile device, a tablet device, a laptop computer, a workstation, a virtual reality device, a gaming device, a set-top box, a digital streaming media device, a vehicle terminal, a smart television, a set-top box, and so forth.

The client 30000 can output (e.g., display, render, present) resource audit result data and the like to a user.

The network commissioning scheme will be described below by way of various embodiments. The scheme may be implemented by the computer device 10000.

Example one

Fig. 2 schematically shows a flowchart of a resource auditing method according to a first embodiment of the present application. Comprising steps S200-S206, wherein,

step S200, acquiring resources to be audited;

specifically, according to different services, the resources to be audited may be various content resources submitted by the user, for example, after the APP or WEB end is used to perform a posting (such as a short video or a picture), a comment, a bullet screen, and the like, the content resources may be sent to the auditing platform.

Step S202, a double-blind task is created aiming at the resource to be audited; the double-blind task comprises an original task and a mirror image task corresponding to the original task;

in this embodiment, a double-blind task may be created for a resource to be audited that needs to be audited with emphasis, where the double-blind task includes an original task and a mirror task corresponding to the original task, so that the resource to be audited may be audited twice by the double-blind task.

Step S204, distributing different processing accounts to the original task and the mirror image task for processing, and receiving the auditing results submitted by the different processing accounts;

in this embodiment, the original task and the mirror task in the double-blind task cannot be processed by the same processing account, and multiple cross-auditing of resources to be audited can be achieved by allocating different processing accounts to the original task and the mirror task for processing.

And step S206, executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited according to the audit result.

Specifically, for the resource to be audited that passes the audit, the state of the resource to be audited can be set to be a public state, so that other users can load and view the resource to be audited; for the resource to be audited, which does not pass the audit, the state of the resource to be audited can be set to be the unpublished state, so that other users can be prevented from seeing the resource to be audited.

Several optional embodiments are provided below to optimize the resource review method, specifically as follows:

in a preferred embodiment of the present application, the step S202 may include the steps of: acquiring double-blind task configuration information; and under the condition that the resources to be audited meet the double-blind task establishment condition according to the double-blind task configuration information, establishing the double-blind task aiming at the resources to be audited.

In this embodiment, a developer of the auditing platform may perform double-blind configuration in advance, perform judgment according to the double-blind configuration, and create a double-blind task for a resource to be audited under the condition that it is determined that the resource to be audited satisfies a double-blind task creation condition according to the double-blind task configuration information. Specifically, the double-blind task configuration information may include a double-blind opening switch, a double-blind task creation proportion, a precondition for generating a double-blind task, and the double-blind task configuration information includes a double-blind result validation opportunity and upgrade channel information; wherein, the double-blind result validation opportunity comprises any one of the following: the first submitted double-blind task result takes effect, the second submitted double-blind task result takes effect, and the upgrade agent submission result takes effect.

It should be noted that, a developer can adjust the double-blind task configuration information at any time according to the current manpower of the auditor, the change of high-risk content and other conditions, after the double-blind task configuration information is changed, the double-blind task configuration information is updated to the local cache in time through the asynchronous thread, and subsequent user resource submission creates tasks according to new configuration information, so that hot deployment is realized, and the tasks become effective immediately.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, the double-blind task configuration information includes a double-blind turn-on switch and a precondition for generating a double-blind task. The following steps may be further included after the step S200: and if the double-blind starting switch is in an open state and the resource to be audited meets the precondition for generating the double-blind task, determining that the resource to be audited meets the double-blind task creation condition.

In this embodiment, when an audit task needs to be created, it is first determined whether a double-blind start switch is in an open state according to double-blind task configuration information, if the double-blind start switch is in the open state, it is further determined whether a resource to be audited meets a precondition for generating a double-blind task, and if the resource to be audited meets the precondition for generating the double-blind task, it is determined that the resource to be audited meets a double-blind task creation condition. In one example, the precondition for generating a double-blind task may be an emphasis resource or a high-risk resource.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, the double-blind task configuration information further includes a double-blind task creation ratio; the determining that the resource to be audited meets the double-blind task creation condition may include the following steps: generating a random number; and if the random number is smaller than or equal to the double-blind task creation proportion, determining that the resource to be audited meets the double-blind task creation condition.

In some service scenes, more resources to be audited may meet the precondition for generating the double-blind task, and due to the limited auditors (each auditor corresponds to a different processing account), the double-blind task cannot be created for all the resources to be audited that generate the precondition for the double-blind task, so the amount of creating the double-blind task can be controlled by the double-blind task creation proportion. Specifically, under the condition that the resource to be audited meets the precondition for generating the double-blind task, a random number of 0-100 is further generated, and by comparing the random number with the double-blind task creation proportion, if the random number is smaller than or equal to the double-blind task creation proportion, the resource to be audited is determined to meet the double-blind task creation condition.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, the step S206 may include the steps of: acquiring double-blind task configuration information; and executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited according to the audit result and the double-blind task configuration information.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, the double-blind task configuration information includes double-blind result validation timing and upgrade channel information; wherein, the double-blind result validation opportunity comprises any one of the following: the first submitted double-blind task result takes effect, the second submitted double-blind task result takes effect, and the upgrade agent submission result takes effect.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, the executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited according to the audit result and the double-blind task configuration information may include the following steps: and under the condition that the audit result only contains the result corresponding to the original task or the result corresponding to the mirror image task, if the double-blind result takes effect when the double-blind result takes effect as the first submitted double-blind task result, executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited.

In this embodiment, by determining whether both an original task and a mirror image in a double-blind task have corresponding results, if yes, the auditing result only includes a result corresponding to the original task or only includes a result corresponding to the mirror image task, it is further determined whether the double-blind result validation time is that of the first submitted double-blind task, and if the double-blind result validation time is that of the first submitted double-blind task, the resource state change process is executed on the resource to be audited; and if the double-blind result is not effective for the first submitted double-blind task result, ending the process without executing the resource state change process on the resource to be audited.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, the executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited according to the audit result and the double-blind task configuration information may include the following steps: and if the validation time of the double-blind result is the validation of the double-blind task result submitted by the second time, executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited under the condition that the audit result comprises the result corresponding to the original task and the result corresponding to the mirror image task, and the result corresponding to the original task is the same as the result corresponding to the mirror image task.

In this embodiment, if both the original task and the mirror image in the double-blind task have corresponding results, that is, the audit result includes a result corresponding to the original task and a result corresponding to the mirror image task, it is further determined whether the result corresponding to the original task is the same as the result corresponding to the mirror image task, and if the result corresponding to the original task is the same as the result corresponding to the mirror image task, it is further determined whether the double-blind result validation timing is that of the second submitted double-blind task is valid, and if the double-blind result validation timing is that of the second submitted double-blind task is valid, a resource state change process is executed on the resource to be audited; if the effective time of the double-blind result is not the effective time of the second submitted double-blind task result, the process is ended, and the resource state change process is not required to be executed on the resource to be audited.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, the executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited according to the audit result and the double-blind task configuration information may include the following steps:

under the condition that the audit result comprises a result corresponding to the original task and a result corresponding to the mirror image task, and the result corresponding to the original task is different from the result corresponding to the mirror image task, an upgrade task is created for the resource to be audited according to the upgrade channel information, and the result corresponding to the upgrade task is received; and if the double-blind result takes effect when the upgrade agent submission result takes effect, executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited according to the result corresponding to the upgrade task.

In this embodiment, when the result corresponding to the original task is different from the result corresponding to the mirror image task, an upgrade task needs to be created for the resource to be audited according to the upgrade channel information to perform a review on the resource to be audited, and then, after the result corresponding to the upgrade task is received, if the double-blind result validation time is that the upgrade agent submission result is valid, the resource state change process is executed on the resource to be audited according to the result corresponding to the upgrade task; if the double-blind result validation opportunity is not the upgrade agent submission result validation opportunity, the process is ended, and the resource state change process is not required to be executed on the resource to be audited.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, each processing account has a corresponding non-claimable task set, and the step S204 may include the following steps:

determining a first account number to be allocated and an original task, if an unclassified task set corresponding to the first account number does not contain the original task, allocating the original task to the first account number for processing, and adding a mirror image task corresponding to the original task to the unclassified task set; or the like, or, alternatively,

In this embodiment, when distributing a double-blind task to an online processing account, it needs to ensure that: the same processing account cannot audit both the original task in the double-blind task and the mirror task corresponding to the same double-blind task, but only one of the tasks; this restriction does not exist for normal tasks.

Specifically, the implementation manner of judging whether a double-blind task is claimable is mainly to provide a single unclassified task set for each processing account, so as to store the unclassified double-blind task. The conditions for the double blind task to be added to the set are: the task has processed one of the double-blind tasks (e.g., the mirror task) and the other task (the original task) is unprocessed, and the other task (the original task) is added to the set.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, the step S204 may further include the steps of:

and deleting the original task or the mirror task from the unclassified task set under the condition that the original task or the mirror task is distributed in the unclassified task set.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, the method may further comprise the steps of: under the condition that the resources to be audited do not meet the double-blind task establishing conditions according to the double-blind task configuration information, establishing common tasks aiming at the resources to be audited; distributing the common tasks to processing accounts for processing, and receiving results corresponding to the common tasks submitted by the processing accounts; and executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited according to the result corresponding to the common task.

In this embodiment, under the condition that it is determined that the resource to be audited does not satisfy the double-blind task creation condition according to the double-blind task configuration information, a common task is created for the resource to be audited; and allocating the common tasks to the processing accounts for processing, receiving results corresponding to the common tasks submitted by the processing accounts, and executing a resource state change process on the resources to be audited according to the results corresponding to the common tasks. For the resource to be audited that is approved, the state of the resource to be audited can be set to be the public state; for the resource to be audited, which does not pass the audit, the state of the resource to be audited can be set to be the unpublished state.

To further describe the resource auditing method of this embodiment, fig. 3 shows a schematic diagram of a framework of an auditing platform, where the auditing platform includes a double-blind configuration module, a task creation module, a task distribution module, and an auditing module, and a process for processing data among the modules is as follows:

(1) After the user uses the APP or WEB side to perform acts such as posting, commenting and bullet screen sending, the content resources (manuscripts, comments, bullet screens and the like) are sent to the auditing platform.

(2) And the task creation module of the auditing platform judges whether to create the double-blind task according to the configuration in the double-blind configuration module, creates a corresponding common task or double-blind task to a certain common channel, and persists the common task or double-blind task to the DB and the Redis. The common tasks and the double-blind tasks are placed in the common channel to be distributed, so that the double-blind tasks are transparent and non-sensible to the processing account numbers in the common channel, and the condition that operation results are mutually influenced is avoided.

(3) And then the task distribution module distributes a common task or a double-blind task to the online processing account of the corresponding channel according to a specific task scheduling strategy.

(4) And the auditor corresponding to the processing account operates according to the specific content of the resource, and submits the result to the auditing platform. The auditing module determines whether the task is a double-blind task according to the task attribute: if the task is a common task, the auditing module directly changes the content resource state of the operation result and submits the operation result to the service party; if the task is a double-blind task, the auditing module judges whether the operation is in effect or not and whether the operation needs to enter the upgrading channel or not according to the operation result, if the result is in effect, the content resource state is changed, and if the operation needs to enter the upgrading channel, the content resource state is changed after the auditing is continued by a qualified auditing personnel.

In this embodiment, the double-blind task creating module is mainly used to create a common task or a double-blind task for auditing by an auditor, and a specific flow is shown in fig. 4 and includes: and receiving the content resource uploaded by the user, inquiring double-blind configuration, judging whether the double-blind is started, if not, executing a common task, storing the common task into a ZSTAT (ordered list), and ending the process. If so, further judging whether the resources meet the double-row creation condition, if not, executing the creation of a common task, storing the common task into a ZSTAT, and ending the process; if so, further generating a random number within 100, judging whether the random number is smaller than or equal to the double-blind creating proportion, if not, executing a common task, storing the common task into the ZSTAT, and ending the process. If not, executing the original task, storing the original task in the ZSET, simultaneously creating the mirror image task, storing the mirror image task in the ZSET, and ending the flow.

The task distribution module is mainly used for distributing tasks to online processing accounts, but needs to ensure that: the same processing account cannot audit both the original task in the double-blind task and the mirror task corresponding to the same double-blind task, but only one of the tasks; the general task is not limited, and a specific distribution flow is shown in fig. 5, and includes: and when the processing account number auditing task is on line, adding the uid set of the channel where the processing account number is located, and when the processing account number finishes off-line of the auditing task, deleting the uid set of the channel where the processing account number is located. And meanwhile, sorting the tasks of the channels from large to small according to the weight (the characteristic of ZSET), inquiring the uid set of the channel where the processing account is located, allocating the tasks to the online processing account according to the priority, judging whether the tasks are double-blind tasks or not, if not, allocating the tasks to the processing account, and returning to the step of allocating the tasks to the online processing account according to the priority after the auditing is finished. If the processing account is a double-blind task, further judging whether the processing account can be claimed, if the processing account is distributed to the processing account, returning to the step of distributing tasks to the online processing account according to the priority after the auditing is finished; if not, the task is skipped.

In a specific implementation, an implementation manner of judging whether a double-blind task is claimable is mainly to provide a separate set for storing a double-blind task set which cannot be claimed for each processing account. The conditions for the double blind task to be added to the set are: the task processes a certain task (such as a mirror task) in the double-blind task, and the other task (original task) is not processed, so that the other task (original task) is added into the set; the conditions for the double-blind task to be deleted from the set are: this task has been handled by other reviewers.

The auditing module is configured to perform corresponding processing according to the double-blind configuration and the auditing result, and a specific operation flow chart shown in fig. 6 includes: and submitting results after double-blind tasks are checked, judging whether the original task and the mirror image task in the double-blind tasks have operation results, if not, further judging whether double-blind configuration is effective as a first operation result, if so, changing the resource state, and otherwise, ending the process. If the original task and the mirror image task in the double-blind task have operation results, further judging whether the operation results are the same, if not, establishing an upgrading task for the task in an upgrading channel, if so, judging whether the double-blind configuration is effective for the second operation result, otherwise, ending the process, and if so, changing the resource state.

In this embodiment, after accepting a task, the processing account does not sense whether the task is a common task or a double-blind task, and they only need to perform auditing normally.

Example two

FIG. 7 is a block diagram that schematically illustrates a resource auditing system, which may be partitioned into one or more program modules, that are stored in a storage medium and executed by one or more processors to implement an embodiment of the present application, in accordance with a second embodiment of the present application. The program modules referred to in the embodiments of the present application refer to a series of computer program instruction segments that can perform specific functions, and the following description will specifically describe the functions of the program modules in the embodiments of the present application.

As shown in FIG. 7, the resource auditing system 700 may include the following modules:

a resource obtaining module 710, configured to obtain a resource to be audited;

a double-blind task creating module 720, configured to create a double-blind task for the resource to be audited; the double-blind task comprises an original task and a mirror image task corresponding to the original task;

the double-blind task allocation module 730 is configured to allocate different processing accounts to the original task and the mirror task for processing, and receive an audit result submitted by the different processing accounts;

and the resource state changing module 740 is configured to execute a resource state changing process on the resource to be audited according to the audit result.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, the double blind task creating module 720 includes:

the double-blind configuration acquisition sub-module is used for acquiring double-blind task configuration information;

and the double-blind task creating submodule is used for creating a double-blind task aiming at the resource to be audited under the condition that the resource to be audited meets the double-blind task creating condition according to the double-blind task configuration information.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, the double-blind task configuration information includes a double-blind turn-on switch and a precondition for generating a double-blind task; the double blind task creation module 720 further comprises:

and the task creation condition judgment submodule is used for determining that the resource to be audited meets the double-blind task creation condition if the double-blind starting switch is in an open state and the resource to be audited meets the precondition for generating the double-blind task.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, the double-blind task configuration information further includes a double-blind task creation ratio; the task creation condition judgment submodule includes:

a random number generating unit for generating a random number;

and the task creation condition judgment unit is used for determining that the resource to be audited meets the double-blind task creation condition if the random number is less than or equal to the double-blind task creation proportion.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, the resource status changing module 740 includes:

the double-blind configuration acquisition submodule is used for acquiring double-blind task configuration information;

and the resource state changing submodule is used for executing a resource state changing process on the resource to be audited according to the auditing result and the double-blind task configuration information.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, the double-blind task configuration information includes a double-blind result validation opportunity and upgrade channel information; wherein, the double-blind result validation opportunity comprises any one of the following: the first submitted double-blind task result takes effect, the second submitted double-blind task result takes effect, and the upgrade agent submission result takes effect.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, the resource status modification sub-module includes:

and the first resource state changing unit is used for executing a resource state changing process on the resource to be audited if the double-blind result takes effect when the double-blind result takes effect as the first submitted double-blind task result under the condition that the audit result only comprises the result corresponding to the original task or the result corresponding to the mirror image task.

and a second resource state changing unit, configured to, when the audit result includes a result corresponding to the original task and a result corresponding to the mirror task, and the result corresponding to the original task and the result corresponding to the mirror task are the same, execute a resource state changing process on the resource to be audited if the double-blind result takes effect when the double-blind result takes effect as a second submitted double-blind task result.

an upgrade task creating unit, configured to create an upgrade task for the resource to be audited according to the upgrade channel information, and receive a result corresponding to the upgrade task, where the audit result includes a result corresponding to the original task and a result corresponding to the mirror image task, and the result corresponding to the original task and the result corresponding to the mirror image task are different;

and the third resource state changing unit is used for executing a resource state changing process on the resource to be audited according to the result corresponding to the upgrading task if the double-blind result takes effect when the upgrading agent submission result takes effect.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, each processing account has a corresponding non-claimable task set, and the double-blind task allocation module 730 includes:

the first task allocation sub-module is used for determining a first account and an original task to be allocated currently, if an unclassified task set corresponding to the first account does not contain the original task, allocating the original task to the first account for processing, and adding a mirror image task corresponding to the original task to the unclassified task set; or the like, or, alternatively,

and the second task allocation submodule is used for determining a second account and a mirror image task to be allocated currently, if the non-claimable task set corresponding to the second account does not contain the mirror image task, allocating the mirror image task to the second account for processing, and adding an original task corresponding to the mirror image task to the non-claimable task set.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, the double-blind task allocation module 730 further includes:

and the task set deleting submodule is used for deleting the original task or the mirror image task from the unclassified task set under the condition that the original task or the mirror image task is distributed in the unclassified task set.

In a preferred embodiment of the present application, further comprising:

the common task creating module is used for creating a common task aiming at the resource to be audited under the condition that the resource to be audited does not meet the double-blind task creating condition according to the double-blind task configuration information;

the common task allocation module is used for allocating the common tasks to processing accounts for processing and receiving results corresponding to the common tasks submitted by the processing accounts;

and the second resource state changing module is used for executing a resource state changing process on the resource to be audited according to the result corresponding to the common task.

EXAMPLE III

Fig. 8 schematically shows a hardware architecture diagram of a computer device 10000 suitable for implementing a resource auditing method according to a third embodiment of the present application. In this embodiment, the computer device 10000 is a device capable of automatically performing numerical calculation and/or information processing according to a preset or stored instruction. For example, the server may be a smart phone, a tablet computer, a notebook computer, a desktop computer, a rack server, a blade server, a tower server, or a rack server (including an FEN independent server, or a server cluster composed of a plurality of servers), and the like. As shown in fig. 8, computer device 10000 includes at least but is not limited to: the memory 10010, processor 10020, and network interface 10030 may be communicatively linked to each other via a system bus. Wherein:

the memory 10010 includes at least one type of computer-readable storage medium including a flash memory, a hard disk, a multimedia card, a card-type memory (e.g., SD or DX memory, etc.), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a Static Random Access Memory (SRAM), a read-only memory (ROM), an electrically erasable programmable read-only memory (EEPROM), a programmable read-only memory (PROM), a magnetic memory, a magnetic disk, an optical disk, and the like. In some embodiments, the storage 10010 may be an internal storage module of the computer device 10000, such as a hard disk or a memory of the computer device 10000. In other embodiments, the memory 10010 may also be an external storage device of the computer device 10000, such as a plug-in hard disk, a Smart Media Card (SMC), a Secure Digital (SD) Card, a Flash memory Card (Flash Card), or the like, provided on the computer device 10000. Of course, the memory 10010 may also include both internal and external memory modules of the computer device 10000. In this embodiment, the memory 10010 is generally configured to store an operating system and various application software installed on the computer device 10000, such as program codes of a resource auditing method. In addition, the memory 10010 can also be used to temporarily store various types of data that have been output or are to be output.

Processor 10020, in some embodiments, can be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), controller, microcontroller, microprocessor, or other data Processing chip. The processor 10020 is generally configured to control overall operations of the computer device 10000, such as performing control and processing related to data interaction or communication with the computer device 10000. In this embodiment, the processor 10020 is configured to execute program codes stored in the memory 10010 or process data.

Network interface 10030 may comprise a wireless network interface or a wired network interface, and network interface 10030 is generally used to establish a communication link between computer device 10000 and other computer devices. For example, the network interface 10030 is used to connect the computer device 10000 to an external terminal through a network, establish a data transmission channel and a communication link between the computer device 10000 and the external terminal, and the like. The network may be an Intranet (Internet), the Internet (Internet), a Global System of Mobile communication (GSM), wideband Code Division Multiple Access (WCDMA), a 4G network, a 5G network, bluetooth (Bluetooth), wi-Fi, or other wireless or wired network.

It should be noted that fig. 8 only shows a computer device having components 10010-10030, but it should be understood that not all of the shown components are required to be implemented, and that more or fewer components may be implemented instead.

In this embodiment, the resource auditing method stored in the memory 10010 can be further divided into one or more program modules, and executed by one or more processors (in this embodiment, the processor 10020) to implement the embodiment of the present application.

Example four

Embodiments of the present application further provide a computer-readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, where the computer program, when executed by a processor, implements the steps of the resource auditing method in the embodiments.

In this embodiment, the computer-readable storage medium includes a flash memory, a hard disk, a multimedia card, a card type memory (e.g., SD or DX memory, etc.), a Random Access Memory (RAM), a Static Random Access Memory (SRAM), a Read Only Memory (ROM), an Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory (EEPROM), a Programmable Read Only Memory (PROM), a magnetic memory, a magnetic disk, an optical disk, and the like. In some embodiments, the computer readable storage medium may be an internal storage unit of the computer device, such as a hard disk or a memory of the computer device. In other embodiments, the computer readable storage medium may be an external storage device of the computer device, such as a plug-in hard disk, a Smart Media Card (SMC), a Secure Digital (SD) Card, a Flash memory Card (Flash Card), and the like provided on the computer device. Of course, the computer-readable storage medium may also include both internal and external storage devices of the computer device. In this embodiment, the computer-readable storage medium is generally used to store an operating system and various types of application software installed in the computer device, for example, the program code of the resource auditing method in this embodiment, and the like. Further, the computer-readable storage medium may also be used to temporarily store various types of data that have been output or are to be output.

It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that the modules or steps of the embodiments of the present application described above may be implemented by a general purpose computing device, they may be centralized on a single computing device or distributed across a network of multiple computing devices, and alternatively, they may be implemented by program code executable by a computing device, such that they may be stored in a storage device and executed by a computing device, and in some cases, the steps shown or described may be performed in an order different from that described herein, or they may be separately fabricated into individual integrated circuit modules, or multiple ones of them may be fabricated into a single integrated circuit module. Thus, embodiments of the present application are not limited to any specific combination of hardware and software.

The above description is only a preferred embodiment of the present application, and not intended to limit the scope of the present application, and all modifications of equivalent structures and equivalent processes, which are made by the contents of the specification and the drawings of the present application, or which are directly or indirectly applied to other related technical fields, are included in the scope of the present application.

Claims

1. A resource auditing method is characterized by comprising the following steps:

acquiring resources to be audited;

creating a double-blind task aiming at the resource to be audited; the double-blind task comprises an original task and a mirror image task corresponding to the original task;

2. The resource auditing method of claim 1, where creating a double blind task for the resource to be audited includes:

acquiring double-blind task configuration information;

3. The resource auditing method of claim 2, where the double-blind task configuration information contains a double-blind turn-on switch and preconditions for generating a double-blind task;

4. The method for auditing resources according to claim 3, wherein the double-blind task configuration information further comprises a double-blind task creation ratio; the determining that the resource to be audited meets the double-blind task creation condition includes:

generating a random number;

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein the performing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited according to the audit result includes:

acquiring double-blind task configuration information;

6. The resource auditing method of claim 5 where the double-blind task configuration information includes double-blind result validation opportunity and upgrade channel information; wherein, the double-blind result validation opportunity comprises any one of the following: the first submitted double-blind task result takes effect, the second submitted double-blind task result takes effect, and the upgrade agent submission result takes effect.

7. The method for auditing resources according to claim 6, wherein the performing a resource state change procedure on the resource to be audited according to the audit result and the double-blind task configuration information comprises:

8. The resource auditing method of claim 6, wherein the performing a resource state change procedure on the resource to be audited according to the auditing result and the double-blind task configuration information comprises:

and if the validation time of the double-blind result is the validation of the double-blind task result submitted by the second time, executing a resource state change process on the resource to be audited under the condition that the audit result comprises the result corresponding to the original task and the result corresponding to the mirror image task, and the result corresponding to the original task is the same as the result corresponding to the mirror image task.

9. The resource auditing method of claim 6, wherein the performing a resource state change procedure on the resource to be audited according to the auditing result and the double-blind task configuration information comprises:

under the condition that the audit result comprises a result corresponding to the original task and a result corresponding to the mirror image task, and the result corresponding to the original task is different from the result corresponding to the mirror image task, an upgrade task is created for the resource to be audited according to the upgrade channel information, and the result corresponding to the upgrade task is received;

10. The resource auditing method of claim 1, wherein each processing account has a corresponding set of non-claimable tasks, and the allocating the original task and the mirror task to different processing accounts for processing respectively comprises:

determining a second account number to be distributed and a mirror image task, if an unrecognized task set corresponding to the second account number does not contain the mirror image task, distributing the mirror image task to the second account number for processing, and adding an original task corresponding to the mirror image task to the unrecognized task set.

11. A resource auditing method according to claim 10, further comprising:

12. The resource auditing method of claim 2, further comprising:

13. A resource auditing system, comprising:

the resource acquisition module is used for acquiring resources to be audited;

14. A computer arrangement comprising a memory, a processor and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, characterized in that the processor is adapted to carry out the steps of the resource auditing method according to any one of claims 1 to 12 when executing the computer program.

15. A computer-readable storage medium, in which a computer program is stored which is executable by at least one processor to cause the at least one processor to perform the steps of the resource auditing method according to any one of claims 1 to 12.