CN115456325A - Analysis method for disaster fortification capability of non-coal mine - Google Patents

Abstract

The invention provides an analysis method for disaster fortification capacity of non-coal mines, which comprises the following steps: s1: acquiring disaster fortification related information of a non-coal mine; s2: based on disaster types, dividing and integrating the disaster fortification related information in time sequence to obtain disaster fortification time sequence information corresponding to the disaster types; s3: analyzing the disaster fortification capability of the non-coal mine based on the disaster fortification time sequence information to obtain a disaster fortification capability evaluation value and a fortification capability defect analysis result corresponding to the disaster type; the disaster fortification capacity evaluation method is used for integrating disaster fortification capacity related information acquired according to a plurality of indexes according to the belonged defense stages to acquire disaster fortification time sequence information, and comprehensively and accurately evaluating the disaster fortification capacity from the plurality of indexes on the basis of the disaster fortification time sequence information, so that the comprehensive result of the disaster fortification capacity can be visually seen, and the analysis result of disaster fortification defect can also be visually seen.

Description

An analysis method for disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines

technical field

The invention relates to the technical field of disaster fortification, in particular to an analysis method for disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines.

Background technique

At present, the disaster prevention capability reflects the ability of the emergency management system to use engineering, economic and social resources to carry out disaster prevention and mitigation activities, minimize the losses caused by disasters, especially catastrophes, reduce vulnerability, and improve resilience, including pre-disaster reduction Risks or preparations in advance to reduce the possible losses caused by disasters; rapid response and scientific disposal when disasters occur to minimize the losses caused by disasters; rapid reconstruction after disasters and the restoration of pre-disaster stability and prosperity as soon as possible. The purpose of the disaster fortification capability analysis of non-coal mines is to grasp the implementation of relevant measures adopted by non-coal mines to avoid natural disasters.

However, the analysis of disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines is mainly based on the following categories of indicators: non-coal mine site basic information, site fortification information, and emergency management information; however, due to the different sources of these information and the analysis time The evaluation criteria and analysis methods are also different, so it is difficult to use a unified system or coherent analysis method to accurately analyze the disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines from the above multiple indicators, and automatically integrate the results based on the analysis of multiple indicators , to obtain not only the comprehensive results of disaster fortification capabilities but also the analysis results of disaster fortification defects.

Therefore, the present invention proposes an analysis method for the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines.

Contents of the invention

The present invention provides an analysis method for the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines, which is used to integrate the relevant information of the disaster fortification capability obtained according to multiple indicators according to the defense stage that plays a defensive role when the disaster occurs, and obtain the disaster Based on the timing information of disaster fortification, comprehensive and accurate evaluation of the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines can be carried out from multiple indicators, so that the obtained analysis results of disaster fortification capability can not only intuitively see the comprehensive result of disaster fortification capability, but also The analysis results of disaster fortification defects can be seen intuitively.

The present invention provides an analysis method for the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines, including:

S1: Obtain relevant information on disaster fortification of non-coal mines;

S2: Based on the type of disaster, divide and integrate the related information of disaster fortification, and obtain the time series information of disaster fortification corresponding to the type of disaster;

S3: Analyze the disaster fortification capability of the non-coal mine based on the disaster fortification sequence information, and obtain the disaster fortification capability evaluation value and the fortification capability defect analysis result corresponding to the disaster type.

Preferably, the analysis method for the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines, S1: obtaining information related to disaster fortification of non-coal mines, including:

S101: Obtain the basic information and on-site fortification information of the non-coal mine site;

S102: Retrieving the emergency resource management information of the non-coal mine from the emergency resource management database;

S103: Summarize the basic information, the on-site fortification information, and the emergency resource management information to obtain disaster fortification-related information of the non-coal mine.

Preferably, the above-mentioned method for analyzing the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines, S2: based on the type of disaster, divide and integrate the related information of disaster fortification to obtain the time series information of disaster fortification corresponding to the type of disaster, include:

S201: Based on the basic information in the disaster fortification-related information and the disaster type, divide the disaster fortification-related information into sub-disaster fortification-related information corresponding to the disaster type;

S202: Perform time-series integration of the sub-disaster fortification-related information to obtain disaster fortification time-series information corresponding to the disaster type.

Preferably, the method for analyzing the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines, S201: based on the basic information in the disaster fortification related information and the disaster type, classify in the disaster fortification related information Fortification-related information of sub-disasters corresponding to disaster types, including:

Based on the basic information in the disaster fortification-related information, a three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine is built;

Based on the type of disaster, the required fortification location and required fortification plan information corresponding to the type of disaster are determined in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine;

Based on the required fortification position and the required fortification plan information, divide the sub-site fortification information corresponding to the disaster type from the on-site fortification information in the disaster fortification-related information;

Based on the fortification plan information, divide the sub-emergency resource management information corresponding to the disaster type from the emergency resource management information in the disaster fortification related information;

The sub-site fortification information and the sub-emergency resource management information are regarded as sub-disaster fortification-related information corresponding to the type of disaster.

Preferably, the analysis method for the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines, based on the type of disaster, determines the required fortification position and the required fortification corresponding to the type of disaster in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine. Required defense plan information, including:

Determine the type of on-site evaluation data based on the type of disaster, and identify the evaluation location of the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine based on the evaluation location list of the type of on-site evaluation data, and determine a plurality of on-site evaluation locations;

Based on the evaluation rules for each evaluation location, conduct an initial evaluation of the corresponding on-site evaluation location's defense capabilities against the corresponding disaster types, and obtain an initial evaluation score;

Mark the on-site evaluation position in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine, determine the evaluation mark model, and determine the evaluation influence relationship between all on-site evaluation positions in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine based on the evaluation position influence relationship list ;

Based on the distribution position of the on-site assessment position in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine and all assessment influence relationships, a three-dimensional network of assessment position influence relationships is constructed;

Determine the separation distance between every two on-site evaluation positions based on the distribution positions, and determine the comprehensive influence degree of each on-site evaluation position based on the separation distance and the corresponding evaluation influence relationship;

Taking the on-site assessment position corresponding to the maximum comprehensive impact degree as the central assessment position, starting from the central assessment position, and taking the on-site assessment position adjacent to the central assessment position as the end point, constructing the impact direction of the central assessment position vector;

When the central evaluation position has only one influence pointing vector, then based on the central evaluation position and the influence pointing vector, unify the three-dimensional network of the influence relationship of the evaluation position in a preset coordinate system, and obtain a standard coordinate unification result;

When the central evaluation position has more than one influence pointing vector, then based on the evaluation position influence relationship list, determine the on-site evaluation position corresponding to the end point of each pointing vector and the first mutual influence degree of the central evaluation position, based on The center evaluation position, the influence direction vector and the first degree of mutual influence are unified in the three-dimensional network of the evaluation position-influence relationship in a preset coordinate system to obtain a unified result of standard coordinates;

Based on the unified results of the standard coordinates and all initial evaluation values, a three-dimensional evaluation value matrix is constructed, and based on the evaluation position impact relationship list, the relationship between each remaining on-site evaluation position and the evaluation position other than the central evaluation position is determined. The second degree of mutual influence between the center evaluation positions, based on the unified result of the standard coordinates and all the second degree of mutual influence, a three-dimensional influence evolution matrix is constructed;

Determine the number of iterations n, multiply the evaluation value matrix and the influence evolution matrix n times, and then raise the nth power to obtain the final evaluation evolution matrix, and calculate the positions below the evaluation threshold in the three-dimensional final evaluation evolution matrix As the required fortification position corresponding to the disaster type, based on the value of the required fortification position in the corresponding final evaluation evolution matrix and the difference between the evaluation threshold and the type of the required fortification position, the required Fortification plan information.

Preferably, in the method for analyzing disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines, S202: time-series integration of the sub-disaster fortification-related information to obtain disaster fortification time-series information corresponding to disaster types, including:

Based on the fortification position and corresponding disaster type of each fortification information in the sub-site fortification information in the sub-disaster fortification related information, determine the first defense stage corresponding to each fortification information;

Based on the required fortification plan information, determine the second defense stage of each resource management information in the sub-emergency resource management information in the sub-disaster fortification-related information;

Based on the first defense stage and the second defense stage, each fortification information and each resource management information in the sub-disaster fortification-related information is time-sequentially integrated to obtain disaster fortification time-series information corresponding to a disaster type.

Preferably, the method for analyzing the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines, S3: analyzing the disaster fortification capabilities of the non-coal mines based on the disaster fortification timing information, and obtaining the disaster fortification capability evaluation corresponding to the type of disaster Results of the value and fortification capability gap analysis, including:

Analyzing the disaster fortification capability of the non-coal mine based on the disaster fortification timing information, generating a disaster fortification capability analysis record thread corresponding to the type of disaster;

Based on the disaster fortification capability analysis record thread, determine the disaster fortification capability evaluation value and the fortification capability defect record thread corresponding to the disaster type;

Integrating and summarizing the fortification capability defect record thread to obtain the analysis result of the fortification capability defect corresponding to the type of disaster.

Preferably, the method for analyzing disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines is to analyze the disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines based on the disaster fortification timing information, and generate disaster fortification capability analysis record threads corresponding to disaster types ,include:

Based on the classification rules corresponding to the disaster types, determine the maximum disaster occurrence data for each disaster level of the disaster type, and determine the disaster evolution rules for each disaster level of the disaster type;

Based on the maximum disaster occurrence data corresponding to the disaster level of the disaster type and the disaster evolution rule, perform disaster evolution simulation in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine, and record and obtain the disaster evolution simulation thread corresponding to the disaster level of the disaster type;

Based on the disaster evolution simulation thread, generate the disaster evolution dynamic data corresponding to the disaster level of the disaster type;

Aligning the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine with the disaster fortification timing information corresponding to the disaster type and the fortification evolution thread to obtain the first alignment thread corresponding to the disaster level of the disaster type;

Determine the corresponding fortification defect position based on the first alignment thread, mark the fortification defect position on the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine, obtain a non-coal mine defect marking model, analyze the non-coal mine defect marking model, and determine Out of fortification defect coefficient;

Based on the fortification defect coefficient, determine the risk coefficient of each evolution time point in the first alignment thread, divide the first alignment thread based on the risk coefficient and the preset risk coefficient gradient, and obtain the sub-alignment evolution thread sequence;

Based on the partial fortification evolution threads in the first sub-alignment evolution thread sequence in the sub-alignment evolution thread sequence and the maximum disaster occurrence data, determine the first defense evaluation value evolution curve of the first sub-alignment evolution thread, At the same time, based on the partial disaster evolution dynamic data in the first sub-alignment evolution thread, a corresponding first disaster attack value evolution curve is generated, and the first defense evaluation value evolution curve is aligned with the first attack value evolution curve , obtaining a first alignment evolution curve, analyzing a sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record thread based on the first alignment evolution curve, and determining a fortification evolution damage coefficient based on the sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record thread;

Based on the partial defense evolution threads in the second sub-alignment evolution thread sequence in the sub-alignment evolution thread sequence and the defense evolution damage coefficient, determine the second defense evaluation value evolution curve of the second sub-alignment evolution thread, based on the The second defense evaluation value evolution curve and the corresponding second attack value evolution curve are obtained to obtain a second alignment evolution curve, and a new sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record thread is analyzed based on the second alignment evolution curve until the sub-disaster fortification capability is traversed. After aligning the evolution thread sequence, all sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record threads are connected to generate disaster fortification capability analysis record threads corresponding to disaster types.

Preferably, the method for analyzing the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines, S3: analyzing the disaster fortification capabilities of the non-coal mines based on the disaster fortification timing information, and obtaining the disaster fortification capability evaluation corresponding to the type of disaster After the value and fortification capability gap analysis results, also include:

Obtain real-time on-site information of the non-coal mine, and predict possible target disaster types and disaster-related information based on the real-time on-site information;

Based on the disaster-related information and the disaster fortification capability evaluation value of the target disaster type, it is judged whether real-time remediation is required, and if so, a corresponding real-time remedial plan is generated based on the analysis result of the fortification capability defect corresponding to the disaster type, otherwise, The corresponding judgment result is retained.

Preferably, the method for analyzing the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines, based on the disaster-related information and the evaluation value of the disaster fortification capability of the target disaster type, determines whether real-time remediation is required, including:

Determine the highest defensible level corresponding to the disaster fortification capability evaluation value of the target disaster type based on the highest defensible level list of the target disaster type;

The predicted disaster level is determined based on the disaster-related information, and it is judged whether the highest defensible level is not lower than the predicted disaster level, and if so, it is determined that real-time remedial action is not required; otherwise, it is determined that remedial action is required.

Additional features and advantages of the invention will be set forth in the description which follows, and in part will be apparent from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention. The objectives and other advantages of the invention may be realized and attained by the structure particularly pointed out in the written description and claims hereof as well as the appended drawings.

The technical solutions of the present invention will be described in further detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings and embodiments.

Description of drawings

The accompanying drawings are used to provide a further understanding of the present invention, and constitute a part of the description, and are used together with the embodiments of the present invention to explain the present invention, and do not constitute a limitation to the present invention. In the attached picture:

Fig. 1 is a flow chart of an analysis method for the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines in an embodiment of the present invention;

Fig. 2 is another kind of analysis method flow chart that is used for the disaster fortification ability of non-coal mine in the embodiment of the present invention;

Fig. 3 is a flow chart of another analysis method for disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines in the embodiment of the present invention.

detailed description

The preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings. It should be understood that the preferred embodiments described here are only used to illustrate and explain the present invention, and are not intended to limit the present invention.

Example 1:

The present invention provides a kind of analysis method that is used for the disaster fortification ability of non-coal mine, with reference to Fig. 1, comprises:

S1: Obtain relevant information on disaster fortification of non-coal mines;

S2: Based on the type of disaster, divide and integrate the related information of disaster fortification, and obtain the time series information of disaster fortification corresponding to the type of disaster;

S3: Analyze the disaster fortification capability of the non-coal mine based on the disaster fortification sequence information, and obtain the disaster fortification capability evaluation value and the fortification capability defect analysis result corresponding to the disaster type.

In this embodiment, the information related to disaster fortification includes: basic information of non-coal mines, on-site fortification information, and emergency resource management information.

In this embodiment, the types of disasters are, for example, earthquakes, floods, and the like.

In this embodiment, dividing the disaster fortification-related information is to divide the disaster fortification-related information according to disaster types to obtain sub-disaster fortification-related information corresponding to each disaster type.

In this embodiment, the time-series information of disaster fortification is the information about the time-series change of disaster fortification corresponding to the type of disaster obtained by dividing and time-sequentially integrating the related information of disaster fortification.

In this embodiment, the disaster fortification capability evaluation value is the evaluation value obtained after analyzing the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines based on the disaster fortification time series information for evaluating the non-coal mines' fortification capabilities for corresponding disaster types.

In this embodiment, the defect analysis result of the fortification capability is the defect analysis result obtained after analyzing the disaster fortification capability of the non-coal mine based on the disaster fortification timing information for evaluating the fortification capability of the non-coal mine for the corresponding disaster type.

The beneficial effect of the above technology is: by integrating the disaster fortification capability-related information obtained according to multiple indicators according to the defense stage that plays a defensive role when the disaster occurs, the timing information of the disaster fortification is obtained, and based on the disaster fortification timing information. This index comprehensively and accurately evaluates the disaster fortification ability of non-coal mines, so that the obtained disaster fortification ability analysis results can not only intuitively see the comprehensive results of disaster fortification capabilities, but also intuitively see the analysis results of disaster fortification defects.

Example 2:

On the basis of Embodiment 1, the described method for analyzing disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines, S1: Obtain relevant information about disaster fortifications of non-coal mines, referring to Figure 2, including:

S101: Obtain the basic information and on-site fortification information of the non-coal mine site;

S102: Retrieving the emergency resource management information of the non-coal mine from the emergency resource management database;

S103: Summarize the basic information, the on-site fortification information, and the emergency resource management information to obtain disaster fortification-related information of the non-coal mine.

In this embodiment, the basic information is the location information and three-dimensional structure information of the non-coal mine.

In this embodiment, the on-site fortification information is the fortification information on a non-coal mine site, for example, an anti-seismic reinforcement device somewhere in a non-coal mine.

In this embodiment, the emergency resource management database is an information database for storing emergency resource management information of non-coal mines.

In this embodiment, the emergency resource management information is the relevant information of the emergency resource that can be dispatched when a disaster occurs in a non-coal mine, retrieved from the emergency resource management library.

The beneficial effects of the above technologies are: by obtaining the basic information of non-coal mines, on-site fortification information, and emergency resource management information, the information related to the disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines can be obtained and analyzed from multiple dimensions, and for the subsequent realization from multiple The indicators provide a basis for comprehensive and accurate evaluation of the disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines.

Example 3:

On the basis of Example 2, the method for analyzing disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines, S2: Based on the type of disaster, divide and integrate the information related to disaster fortification to obtain the corresponding disaster type Disaster fortification timing information, refer to Figure 3, including:

S201: Based on the basic information in the disaster fortification-related information and the disaster type, divide the disaster fortification-related information into sub-disaster fortification-related information corresponding to the disaster type;

S202: Perform time-series integration of the sub-disaster fortification-related information to obtain disaster fortification time-series information corresponding to the disaster type.

In this embodiment, the sub-disaster fortification-related information is part of the disaster fortification-related information corresponding to the type of disaster divided in the disaster fortification-related information based on the basic information and disaster type in the disaster fortification-related information.

The beneficial effects of the above technologies are: based on the types of disasters, the disaster fortification-related information is divided and then integrated in time series, which provides a basis for the subsequent analysis of the disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines for different types of disasters.

Example 4:

On the basis of Embodiment 3, in the analysis method for the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines, S201: based on the basic information in the disaster fortification related information and the disaster type, in the disaster fortification In the relevant information, the sub-disaster fortification-related information corresponding to the disaster type is divided, including:

Based on the basic information in the disaster fortification-related information, a three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine is built;

Based on the type of disaster, the required fortification location and required fortification plan information corresponding to the type of disaster are determined in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine;

Based on the required fortification position and the required fortification plan information, divide the sub-site fortification information corresponding to the disaster type from the on-site fortification information in the disaster fortification-related information;

Based on the fortification plan information, divide the sub-emergency resource management information corresponding to the disaster type from the emergency resource management information in the disaster fortification related information;

The sub-site fortification information and the sub-emergency resource management information are regarded as sub-disaster fortification-related information corresponding to the type of disaster.

In this embodiment, the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine is the three-dimensional structure model of the non-coal mine built based on the basic information in the disaster fortification related information.

In this embodiment, the required fortification position is the position determined based on the type of disaster that needs to be fortified in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine.

In this embodiment, the required fortification plan information is the relevant information of the specific plan that needs to be fortified at the required fortification location, such as the rules of the required reinforcement device or the specification of the rainwater drainage channel, or the emergency resources that can be dispatched.

In this embodiment, the sub-field fortification information is part of the on-site fortification information corresponding to the type of disaster divided from the on-site fortification information in the disaster fortification-related information based on the required fortification location and the required fortification plan information.

In this embodiment, the sub-emergency resource management information is part of the emergency resource management information corresponding to the type of disaster divided from the emergency resource management information in the disaster fortification related information based on the fortification plan information.

The beneficial effects of the above technologies are: based on the basic information in disaster fortification-related information, a three-dimensional structure of non-coal mines is built, which provides a basis for the subsequent accurate determination of the required fortification location and required fortification plan information corresponding to the type of disaster. The mountain 3D results can accurately determine the required fortification location and required fortification plan information corresponding to the type of disaster. Accurately divide the sub-disaster fortification-related information corresponding to the disaster type.

Example 5:

On the basis of Embodiment 4, the analysis method for the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines, based on the type of disaster, determines the corresponding disaster type in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine Required location and required arming plan information, including:

Determine the type of on-site evaluation data based on the type of disaster, and identify the evaluation location of the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine based on the evaluation location list of the type of on-site evaluation data, and determine a plurality of on-site evaluation locations;

Based on the evaluation rules for each evaluation location, conduct an initial evaluation of the corresponding on-site evaluation location's defense capabilities against the corresponding disaster types, and obtain an initial evaluation score;

Mark the on-site evaluation position in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine, determine the evaluation mark model, and determine the evaluation influence relationship between all on-site evaluation positions in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine based on the evaluation position influence relationship list ;

Based on the distribution position of the on-site assessment position in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine and all assessment influence relationships, a three-dimensional network of assessment position influence relationships is constructed;

Determine the separation distance between every two on-site evaluation positions based on the distribution positions, and determine the comprehensive influence degree of each on-site evaluation position based on the separation distance and the corresponding evaluation influence relationship;

Taking the on-site assessment position corresponding to the maximum comprehensive impact degree as the central assessment position, starting from the central assessment position, and taking the on-site assessment position adjacent to the central assessment position as the end point, constructing the impact direction of the central assessment position vector;

When the central evaluation position has only one influence pointing vector, then based on the central evaluation position and the influence pointing vector, unify the three-dimensional network of the influence relationship of the evaluation position in a preset coordinate system, and obtain a standard coordinate unification result;

When the central evaluation position has more than one influence pointing vector, then based on the evaluation position influence relationship list, determine the on-site evaluation position corresponding to the end point of each pointing vector and the first mutual influence degree of the central evaluation position, based on The center evaluation position, the influence direction vector and the first degree of mutual influence are unified in the three-dimensional network of the evaluation position-influence relationship in a preset coordinate system to obtain a unified result of standard coordinates;

Based on the unified results of the standard coordinates and all initial evaluation values, a three-dimensional evaluation value matrix is constructed, and based on the evaluation position impact relationship list, the relationship between each remaining on-site evaluation position and the evaluation position other than the central evaluation position is determined. The second degree of mutual influence between the center evaluation positions, based on the unified result of the standard coordinates and all the second degree of mutual influence, a three-dimensional influence evolution matrix is constructed;

Determining the number of iterations n, multiplying the evaluation value matrix and the influence evolution matrix n times and then raising the nth power to obtain the final evaluation evolution matrix, and calculating the positions below the evaluation threshold in the three-dimensional final evaluation evolution matrix As the required fortification position corresponding to the disaster type, based on the value of the required fortification position in the corresponding final evaluation evolution matrix and the difference between the evaluation threshold and the type of the required fortification position, the required Fortification plan information.

In this embodiment, the type of on-site evaluation data is the type of data that needs to be evaluated on the non-coal mine site determined based on the type of disaster. For example, when the type of disaster is a flood, the corresponding type of on-site evaluation data can be a sunken channel on the surface of a non-coal mine Related data and data related to ground depression channels.

In this embodiment, the list of assessment locations is a list of multiple assessment locations corresponding to the types of on-site assessment data. The assessment locations are, for example, sunken channels on the surface of non-coal mines or ground sunken channels.

In this embodiment, the on-site evaluation location is based on the evaluation location list of the on-site evaluation data type, and after the evaluation location is identified on the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine, a plurality of locations in the non-coal mine that need to be evaluated for fortification capability are determined.

In this embodiment, the evaluation rule is the evaluation rule corresponding to the evaluation position, for example: whether the slope of the sunken channel on the surface of the non-coal mine is greater than the slope threshold and whether the depth is greater than the depth threshold.

In this embodiment, the initial evaluation score is the score obtained after initial evaluation of the corresponding on-site evaluation location's defense capability against the corresponding disaster type based on the evaluation rules of each evaluation location.

In this embodiment, the assessment marking model is a new three-dimensional model obtained by marking the on-site assessment position in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine.

In this embodiment, the evaluation location influence relationship list is a list including evaluation influence relationships between different evaluation locations.

In this embodiment, the evaluation influence relationship is the relationship between different on-site evaluation positions in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine that has an impact on the evaluation result of the fortification capability, for example, the relationship between the sunken channel on the surface of the non-coal mine and the defense evaluation result of the ground sunken channel Evaluate impact relationships.

In this embodiment, the three-dimensional network of evaluation position influence relationship is a three-dimensional network structure representing the mutual influence relationship between evaluation positions constructed based on the distribution position of the on-site evaluation position in the non-coal mine three-dimensional model and all evaluation influence relationships.

In this embodiment, based on the separation distance and the corresponding assessment influence relationship, the comprehensive influence degree of each on-site assessment position is determined, including:

In the formula, δ is the comprehensive influence degree of the currently calculated on-site assessment position, j is the jth on-site assessment position that has an assessment influence relationship with the currently calculated on-site assessment position, and m is the evaluation influence relationship with the currently calculated on-site assessment position The total number of on-site evaluation positions in , x _j is the distance between the jth on-site evaluation position that has an evaluation influence relationship with the currently calculated on-site evaluation position and the currently calculated on-site evaluation position, δ _j is the distance from the current calculated on-site evaluation position The degree of evaluation influence corresponding to the evaluation influence relationship between the jth on-site evaluation position that has an evaluation influence relationship with the currently calculated on-site evaluation position;

For example, m is 3, x ₁ is 1, x ₂ is 2, x ₃ is 3, δ ₁ is 0.1, δ ₂ is 0.2, δ ₃ is 0.3, then δ is 0.13.

In this embodiment, the central evaluation location is the on-site evaluation location corresponding to the maximum comprehensive impact degree.

In this embodiment, the influence direction vector is a vector constructed with the central evaluation location as the starting point and the on-site evaluation location adjacent to the central evaluation location as the end point.

In this embodiment, when the central assessment position has only one influence directional vector, based on the central assessment position and the influence directional vector, the three-dimensional network of the assessment position-influence relationship is unified in a preset coordinate system to obtain The unified result of standard coordinates is:

The center evaluation position is coincident with the origin of the preset coordinate system, and the direction corresponding to the only influence pointing vector is coincident with the positive direction of the abscissa axis, so as to obtain the unified result of standard coordinates.

In this embodiment, the first degree of mutual influence is the degree of mutual influence between the on-site evaluation position and the central evaluation position corresponding to the end point of each pointing vector determined based on the evaluation position influence relationship list.

In this embodiment, based on the central evaluation position, the influence direction vector and the first degree of mutual influence, the three-dimensional network of the evaluation position-influence relationship is unified in a preset coordinate system to obtain a standard coordinate unified result, namely for:

The center evaluation position is coincident with the origin of the preset coordinate system, and the direction corresponding to the influence direction vector corresponding to the maximum first degree of mutual influence coincides with the positive direction of the abscissa axis to obtain the unified result of the standard coordinates.

In this embodiment, the standard coordinate unification result is the result obtained after unifying the three-dimensional network of the evaluation position-influence relationship in the preset coordinate system based on the center evaluation position, the influence direction vector and the first mutual influence degree.

In this embodiment, based on the unified results of the standard coordinates and all initial evaluation values, a three-dimensional evaluation value matrix is constructed, including:

Look at the unified results of the standard coordinates in the x-axis dimension, obtain the evaluation position plan, determine the evaluation value matrix capacity of the corresponding dimension based on all horizontal evaluation position capacities and all vertical evaluation position capacities in the evaluation position plan view, and construct an empty matrix based on the evaluation value matrix capacity (that is, the values in the matrix are all 0, and the number of rows and columns of the matrix is equal to the capacity of the evaluation value matrix), and the initial evaluation value of the corresponding evaluation position in the evaluation position plan is used as the value of the corresponding position in the empty matrix to obtain the corresponding dimension evaluation matrix.

In this embodiment, the second degree of mutual influence is the degree of mutual influence between each on-site evaluation position other than the central evaluation position determined in the evaluation position influence relationship list and the central evaluation position

In this embodiment, based on the unified results of the standard coordinates and all second mutual influence degrees, a three-dimensional influence evolution matrix is constructed, including:

Look at the unified results of the standard coordinates in the x-axis dimension, obtain the evaluation position plan, determine the evaluation value matrix capacity of the corresponding dimension based on all horizontal evaluation position capacities and all vertical evaluation position capacities in the evaluation position plan view, and construct an empty matrix based on the evaluation value matrix capacity (that is, the values in the matrix are all 0, and the number of rows and columns of the matrix is equal to the capacity of the evaluation value matrix), and the second correlation influence degree corresponding to the evaluation position in the evaluation position plan is taken as the value of the corresponding position in the empty matrix, and obtained The influence evolution matrix of the corresponding dimension.

In this embodiment, the number of determination iterations n is determined according to preset settings and is related to the preset disaster evolution time.

In this embodiment, the final evaluation evolution matrix is a matrix obtained by multiplying the evaluation value matrix and the influence evolution matrix n times and then raising the nth power.

In this embodiment, the required fortification position is the position lower than the evaluation threshold in the final evaluation evolution matrix of the three dimensions.

In this embodiment, the evaluation threshold is the maximum value of the corresponding position in the final evaluation evolution matrix when it is determined that the corresponding evaluation position is the required fortification position.

In this embodiment, based on the value of the required fortification position in the corresponding final evaluation evolution matrix and the difference between the evaluation threshold and the type of the required fortification position, the required fortification plan information is determined, which is:

Based on the difference list corresponding to the type of required fortification position, the corresponding fortification plan remedial information is determined, and the fortification plan remedial information is used as the corresponding required fortification plan information.

The beneficial effects of the above technologies are as follows: multiple on-site evaluation locations are determined in the 3D model of non-coal mines based on the type of disaster, which provides a preliminary screening basis for the subsequent determination of the required fortification location and required fortification plan information. On-site evaluation location and evaluation location impact relationship list, construct a three-dimensional network of evaluation location impact relationship, determine the comprehensive influence degree of each on-site evaluation location based on the on-site evaluation location and evaluation location influence relationship list, and determine the central evaluation location based on the comprehensive impact degree , and based on the influence direction vector of the central evaluation position, the three-dimensional network of the evaluation position impact relationship can be unified in the preset coordinate system, and the evolution dimension can be established for the subsequent fortification evolution process to ensure the accuracy of the subsequent determined required fortification position. Based on The unified result of the standard coordinates and the initial assessment value determined based on the corresponding assessment rules, as well as the second degree of interaction between each site assessment position and the central assessment position, determine the local defense of non-coal mines to disasters in the initial state The assessment value matrix of the capability and the impact evolution matrix representing the mutual influence relationship of the fortification capabilities of different assessment locations in the process of disaster evolution, and then through iterations, obtained the result of the evolution of the defense capabilities of the assessment locations, and then realized the consideration of When a disaster occurs, the influence of the mutual influence relationship between different positions on the disaster defense ability makes the final determined required fortification position more accurate.

Embodiment 6:

On the basis of Embodiment 4, in the analysis method for disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines, S202: time-series integration of the sub-disaster fortification-related information, to obtain disaster fortification time-series information corresponding to the type of disaster, include:

Based on the fortification position and corresponding disaster type of each fortification information in the sub-site fortification information in the sub-disaster fortification related information, determine the first defense stage corresponding to each fortification information;

Based on the required fortification plan information, determine the second defense stage of each resource management information in the sub-emergency resource management information in the sub-disaster fortification-related information;

Based on the first defense stage and the second defense stage, each fortification information and each resource management information in the sub-disaster fortification-related information is time-sequentially integrated to obtain disaster fortification time-series information corresponding to a disaster type.

In this embodiment, the fortification information is unit fortification information contained in the sub-site fortification information.

In this embodiment, the fortified position is the fortified position in the corresponding fortified information.

In this embodiment, the first defense stage is based on the fortification position of the corresponding fortification information and the corresponding disaster type, when the determined non-coal mine occurs the corresponding disaster type, the fortification device in the fortification information corresponds to the disaster defense stage.

In this embodiment, the second defense stage is based on the corresponding resource management information and the corresponding disaster type, and the emergency resources in the resource management information correspond to the disaster defense stage when the corresponding disaster type occurs in non-coal mines determined.

In this embodiment, the resource management information is unit emergency resource management information included in the sub-emergency resource management information.

The beneficial effect of the above technology is: through the determined first defense stage of each fortification information in the sub-site fortification information and the second defense stage of each resource management information, all the fortification information and all resources in the sub-disaster fortification related information After the time-series integration of management information, not only the stage of the defense function of the fortification information and resource management information is determined, but also the time-series integration of disaster fortification-related information is realized, which provides a basis for the follow-up on the disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines for different types of disasters. Analysis provides the basis.

Embodiment 7:

On the basis of Embodiment 1, the analysis method for disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines, S3: analyze the disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines based on the disaster fortification timing information, and obtain the corresponding disaster types The disaster fortification capability evaluation value and fortification capability defect analysis results, including:

Analyzing the disaster fortification capability of the non-coal mine based on the disaster fortification timing information, generating a disaster fortification capability analysis record thread corresponding to the type of disaster;

Based on the disaster fortification capability analysis record thread, determine the disaster fortification capability evaluation value and the fortification capability defect record thread corresponding to the disaster type;

Integrating and summarizing the fortification capability defect record thread to obtain the analysis result of the fortification capability defect corresponding to the type of disaster.

In this embodiment, the disaster fortification capability analysis recording thread is a thread for recording the evolution process of disaster fortification capability analysis results generated after analyzing the disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines based on the disaster fortification time series information and corresponding to the disaster type.

In this embodiment, the fortification capability defect record thread is the record thread of the fortification capability defect corresponding to the disaster type determined based on the disaster fortification capability analysis and record thread.

The beneficial effect of the above technology is: analyze the disaster fortification capability of the non-coal mine based on the disaster fortification timing information to generate the disaster fortification capability analysis record thread corresponding to the disaster type, and then determine the disaster fortification corresponding to the disaster type based on the disaster fortification capability analysis record thread The ability evaluation value and fortification capability defect analysis results realize the evaluation of the disaster fortification capability corresponding to the disaster type based on the disaster fortification timing information, and determine the fortification defects in the existing fortification, which provides reference information for the subsequent improvement of disaster fortification.

Embodiment 8:

On the basis of Embodiment 4, the analysis method for the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines is to analyze the disaster fortification capabilities of the non-coal mines based on the disaster fortification timing information, and generate disasters corresponding to the types of disasters Fortification capability analysis logging threads, including:

Based on the classification rules corresponding to the disaster types, determine the maximum disaster occurrence data for each disaster level of the disaster type, and determine the disaster evolution rules for each disaster level of the disaster type;

Based on the maximum disaster occurrence data corresponding to the disaster level of the disaster type and the disaster evolution rule, perform disaster evolution simulation in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine, and record and obtain the disaster evolution simulation thread corresponding to the disaster level of the disaster type;

Based on the disaster evolution simulation thread, generate the disaster evolution dynamic data corresponding to the disaster level of the disaster type;

Aligning the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine with the disaster fortification timing information corresponding to the disaster type and the fortification evolution thread to obtain the first alignment thread corresponding to the disaster level of the disaster type;

Determine the corresponding fortification defect position based on the first alignment thread, mark the fortification defect position on the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine, obtain a non-coal mine defect marking model, analyze the non-coal mine defect marking model, and determine Out of fortification defect coefficient;

Based on the fortification defect coefficient, determine the risk coefficient of each evolution time point in the first alignment thread, divide the first alignment thread based on the risk coefficient and the preset risk coefficient gradient, and obtain the sub-alignment evolution thread sequence;

Based on the partial fortification evolution threads in the first sub-alignment evolution thread sequence in the sub-alignment evolution thread sequence and the maximum disaster occurrence data, determine the first defense evaluation value evolution curve of the first sub-alignment evolution thread, At the same time, based on the partial disaster evolution dynamic data in the first sub-alignment evolution thread, a corresponding first disaster attack value evolution curve is generated, and the first defense evaluation value evolution curve is aligned with the first attack value evolution curve , obtaining a first alignment evolution curve, analyzing a sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record thread based on the first alignment evolution curve, and determining a fortification evolution damage coefficient based on the sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record thread;

Based on the partial defense evolution threads in the second sub-alignment evolution thread sequence in the sub-alignment evolution thread sequence and the defense evolution damage coefficient, determine the second defense evaluation value evolution curve of the second sub-alignment evolution thread, based on the The second defense evaluation value evolution curve and the corresponding second attack value evolution curve are obtained to obtain a second alignment evolution curve, and a new sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record thread is analyzed based on the second alignment evolution curve until the sub-disaster fortification capability is traversed. After aligning the evolution thread sequence, all sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record threads are connected to generate disaster fortification capability analysis record threads corresponding to disaster types.

In this embodiment, the classification rules are the rules for classifying disasters.

In this embodiment, the maximum disaster occurrence data is the maximum disaster data that can occur corresponding to the disaster level, for example: for example, when the flood discharge is less than 100,000 cubic meters, it is a third-level flood, and then the maximum disaster data corresponding to the third-level flood is 100,000 cubic meter.

In this embodiment, the disaster evolution rule is the evolution rule corresponding to the type of disaster. For example, when the rainfall is 50 mm, the evolution speed of the flood will increase by one step per hour.

In this embodiment, the disaster evolution simulation thread is the largest disaster occurrence data and disaster evolution rules based on the disaster type corresponding to the disaster level, and the disaster evolution simulation is performed in the non-coal mine 3D model, and the thread records obtained after the corresponding simulation process are recorded.

In this embodiment, the disaster evolution dynamic data is the dynamic data of the disaster evolution process in non-coal mines corresponding to the disaster level extracted in the disaster evolution simulation thread.

In this embodiment, the first alignment thread is an alignment thread obtained after aligning the 3D model of the non-coal mine with the disaster fortification timing information of the corresponding disaster type.

In this embodiment, the second alignment thread is an alignment thread obtained by aligning the disaster evolution dynamic data with the defense evolution thread.

In this embodiment, the location of the fortification defect is the location where the fortification defect exists in the non-coal mine determined based on the second alignment thread.

In this embodiment, the non-coal mine defect marking model is a model obtained by marking the fortification defect positions on the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine.

In this embodiment, the fortification defect coefficient is the coefficient representing the degree of fortification defect analyzed based on the non-coal mine defect marking model.

In this embodiment, the non-coal mine defect marking model is analyzed to determine the fortification defect coefficient, including:

The defect coefficients of the fortified defect positions are determined based on the first alignment thread, and the average value of all defect coefficients is used as the fortified defect coefficient.

In this embodiment, based on the fortification defect coefficient, the risk coefficient of each evolution time point in the first alignment thread is determined, which is:

The corresponding disaster evolution curve is fitted based on the dynamic data of disaster evolution, and the slope of each evolution time point in the disaster evolution curve is used as the corresponding evolution coefficient, and the product of the evolution coefficient and the fortification defect coefficient is used as the risk coefficient of the corresponding evolution time point.

In this embodiment, the evolution time point is the time point in the first alignment thread.

In this embodiment, the preset risk factor gradient is the preset risk factor division gradient.

In this embodiment, the sub-alignment evolution thread sequence is a sequence composed of sub-alignment evolution threads obtained by dividing the first alignment thread based on the risk coefficient and the preset risk coefficient gradient.

In this embodiment, the sub-alignment evolution thread is a partial alignment evolution thread in the sub-alignment evolution thread sequence,

In this embodiment, the first defense of the first sub-alignment evolution thread is determined based on the partial defense evolution threads in the first sub-alignment evolution thread sequence in the sub-alignment evolution thread sequence and the maximum disaster occurrence data. The evaluation value evolution curve is:

Based on the part of the fortification evolution thread in the first sub-alignment evolution thread, the real-time maximum disaster occurrence data that can be resisted is determined, and the ratio of the maximum disaster occurrence data and the maximum disaster occurrence data that can resist the maximum disaster occurrence data is used as the first defense evaluation value, based on each time point The first defense evaluation value of the first defense evaluation value is fitted to the evolution curve of the first defense evaluation value.

In this embodiment, the first defense evaluation value evolution curve is the first sub-alignment evolution thread determined based on the partial defense evolution threads and the maximum disaster occurrence data in the first sub-alignment evolution thread sequence in the sub-alignment evolution thread sequence The evolution curve of the evaluation value of the first defense.

In this embodiment, the corresponding first disaster attack value evolution curve is generated based on the partial disaster evolution dynamic data in the first sub-alignment evolution thread, which is:

Based on the partial disaster evolution dynamic data in the first sub-alignment evolution thread and the preset conversion coefficient (that is, the conversion coefficient between the characterizing disaster data and the disaster attack value), the first disaster attack value evolution curve is determined.

In this embodiment, the first disaster attack value evolution curve is the evolution curve representing the disaster attack value generated based on part of the disaster evolution dynamic data in the first sub-alignment evolution thread.

In this embodiment, the first aligned evolution curve is a curve obtained by aligning the first defense evaluation value evolution curve and the first attack value evolution curve.

In this embodiment, the sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record thread is analyzed based on the first alignment evolution curve, including:

When the first defense evaluation value at the corresponding time point in the first alignment evolution curve is not lower than the first attack value, it means that the fortification capability is qualified; Fitting into a record thread to obtain the analysis record thread of sub-disaster fortification capability.

In this embodiment, the fortification evolution damage coefficient is determined based on the sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record thread, which is:

Determine the unqualified first time point of each fortification capability in the sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record thread and the end point time point of the sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record thread, form a corresponding first time point sequence based on all first time points, and determine Calculate the sorting ordinal number of each first time point in the first time point sequence, and calculate the fortification evolution damage coefficient based on the first time point and the corresponding sorting ordinal number and the end time point:

In the formula, h is the damage coefficient of fortification evolution, n is the total number of the first time points with unqualified fortification capabilities included in the sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record thread, and i is the current calculated value contained in the sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record thread The first time point when the fortification capability is unqualified, T _1i is the first time point when the i-th fortification capability contained in the sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record thread is unqualified, and T _end is the end time point;

For example, n is 3, T _end is 5, T ₁₁ is 1, T ₁₃ is 3, T ₁₃ is 5, then h is 0.49.

Based on the above formula, the coefficient representing the damage degree of the fortification evolution of the corresponding sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record thread can be accurately calculated.

In this embodiment, the evolution curve of the second defense evaluation value is based on the part of the defense evolution thread and the defense evolution damage coefficient in the second sub-alignment evolution thread sequence in the sub-alignment evolution thread sequence, the second sub-alignment evolution thread determined Evolution curve of defense evaluation value.

In this embodiment, the second aligned evolution curve is an aligned evolution curve obtained by aligning the second defense evaluation value evolution curve with the corresponding second attack value evolution curve.

In this embodiment, the evolution curve of the second defense evaluation value is the evolution curve of the corresponding disaster attack value generated based on the partial disaster evolution dynamic data in the second sub-alignment evolution thread.

The beneficial effect of the above technology is: based on the disaster type and disaster level and the corresponding disaster evolution rules, the disaster evolution simulation is carried out in the non-coal mine 3D model, and the disaster evolution dynamic data corresponding to the disaster type is obtained, and the non-coal mine 3D model and the The alignment of disaster fortification sequence information and fortification evolution thread corresponding to disaster types realizes the alignment of fortification sequence information and disaster evolution process, which provides a basis for subsequent determination of the risk coefficient at each evolution time point, and also provides a basis for the division of the second alignment thread The division standard is provided, which makes the stage division of the disaster fortification capability in the evolution process more accurate, and further ensures that the disaster fortification capability analysis record thread accurately shows the disaster fortification capability analysis process. Based on the sub-alignment evolution thread sequence obtained after the division, Based on the fortification evolution damage coefficient determined by the previous sub-alignment evolution thread, the fortification capability of the current sub-alignment evolution thread is analyzed, fully considering the evolution impact of the disaster on the fortification capability of the fortification device during the disaster evolution process, and by generating each The defense evaluation value evolution curve and attack value evolution curve corresponding to the sub-alignment evolution thread can accurately obtain the judgment result of whether the fortification is qualified or not.

Embodiment 9:

On the basis of Embodiment 1, the analysis method for disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines, S3: analyze the disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines based on the disaster fortification timing information, and obtain the corresponding disaster types After the disaster fortification capability evaluation value and the fortification capability defect analysis results, it also includes:

Obtain real-time on-site information of the non-coal mine, and predict possible target disaster types and disaster-related information based on the real-time on-site information;

Based on the disaster-related information and the disaster fortification capability evaluation value of the target disaster type, it is judged whether real-time remediation is required, and if so, a corresponding real-time remedial plan is generated based on the analysis result of the fortification capability defect corresponding to the disaster type, otherwise, The corresponding judgment result is retained.

In this embodiment, the real-time on-site information is the disaster-related on-site information of non-coal mines acquired in real time, such as rainfall, earthquake level, and the like.

In this embodiment, the target disaster category is the predicted possible disaster category based on real-time on-site information.

In this embodiment, the disaster-related information is the information related to the type of disaster that may occur that is predicted based on the real-time on-site information.

In this embodiment, the real-time remedial plan is the fortification remedial plan generated based on the analysis result of the fortification capability defect corresponding to the disaster type when it is determined that real-time remediation is required based on the disaster-related information and the evaluation value of the disaster fortification capability of the target disaster type.

In this embodiment, the judgment result is the result of judging whether real-time remediation is required based on the disaster-related information and the evaluation value of the disaster defense capability of the target disaster type.

The beneficial effects of the above technologies are: it realizes the prediction of possible target disaster types and disaster-related information based on the real-time on-site information of non-coal mines, and judges whether real-time remediation is needed, and realizes the on-site monitoring of non-coal mines based on real-time on-site information. Fortifications can be judged in real time, reducing possible losses due to disasters.

Example 10:

On the basis of Embodiment 9, the analysis method for the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines, based on the disaster-related information and the evaluation value of the disaster fortification capability of the target disaster type, judges whether it is necessary to carry out Real-time remediation, including:

Determine the highest defensible level corresponding to the disaster fortification capability evaluation value of the target disaster type based on the highest defensible level list of the target disaster type;

The predicted disaster level is determined based on the disaster-related information, and it is judged whether the highest defensible level is not lower than the predicted disaster level, and if so, it is determined that real-time remedial action is not required; otherwise, it is determined that remedial action is required.

In this embodiment, the highest defensible level list is a list including the range of disaster fortification capability evaluation values corresponding to different defense levels of the target disaster type.

In this embodiment, the highest defensible level is the highest defensible disaster level corresponding to the disaster fortification capability evaluation value of the target disaster type determined based on the highest defensible level list of the target disaster type.

In this embodiment, the predicted disaster level is the possible disaster level predicted based on disaster-related information.

The beneficial effects of the above technologies are: based on comparing the highest defensible level corresponding to the disaster fortification capability evaluation value with the predicted disaster level determined based on disaster-related information, it can be judged whether the fortification plan of non-coal mines needs real-time remediation, and further Reduced losses that may occur due to disasters.

Obviously, those skilled in the art can make various changes and modifications to the present invention without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Thus, if these modifications and variations of the present invention fall within the scope of the claims of the present invention and equivalent technologies thereof, the present invention also intends to include these modifications and variations.

Claims (10)

1. An analytical method for the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines, characterized in that it comprises: S1: Obtain relevant information on disaster fortification of non-coal mines; S2: Based on the type of disaster, divide and integrate the related information of disaster fortification, and obtain the time series information of disaster fortification corresponding to the type of disaster; S3: Analyze the disaster fortification capability of the non-coal mine based on the disaster fortification sequence information, and obtain the disaster fortification capability evaluation value and the fortification capability defect analysis result corresponding to the disaster type. 2. A method for analyzing disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines according to claim 1, characterized in that, S1: Obtain relevant information on disaster fortification of non-coal mines, including: S101: Obtain the basic information and on-site fortification information of the non-coal mine site; S102: Retrieving the emergency resource management information of the non-coal mine from the emergency resource management database; S103: Summarize the basic information, the on-site fortification information, and the emergency resource management information to obtain disaster fortification-related information of the non-coal mine. 3. A method for analyzing the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines according to claim 2, characterized in that, S2: Based on the type of disaster, the disaster fortification-related information is divided and time-sequentially integrated to obtain the corresponding disaster Types of disaster fortification timing information, including: S201: Based on the basic information in the disaster fortification-related information and the disaster type, divide the disaster fortification-related information into sub-disaster fortification-related information corresponding to the disaster type; S202: Perform time-series integration of the sub-disaster fortification-related information to obtain disaster fortification time-series information corresponding to the disaster type. 4. A method for analyzing the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines according to claim 3, characterized in that, S201: based on the basic information in the disaster fortification related information and the disaster category, in the Disaster fortification-related information is divided into sub-disaster fortification-related information corresponding to disaster types, including: Based on the basic information in the disaster fortification-related information, a three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine is built; Based on the type of disaster, the required fortification location and required fortification plan information corresponding to the type of disaster are determined in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine; Based on the required fortification position and the required fortification plan information, divide the sub-site fortification information corresponding to the disaster type from the on-site fortification information in the disaster fortification-related information; Based on the fortification plan information, divide the sub-emergency resource management information corresponding to the disaster type from the emergency resource management information in the disaster fortification related information; The sub-site fortification information and the sub-emergency resource management information are regarded as sub-disaster fortification-related information corresponding to the type of disaster. 5. A method for analyzing the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines according to claim 4, characterized in that, based on the disaster category, it is determined in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine that the disaster category corresponds to information on required arming locations and required arming plans, including: Determine the type of on-site evaluation data based on the type of disaster, and identify the evaluation location of the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine based on the evaluation location list of the type of on-site evaluation data, and determine a plurality of on-site evaluation locations; Based on the evaluation rules for each evaluation location, conduct an initial evaluation of the corresponding on-site evaluation location's defense capabilities against the corresponding disaster types, and obtain an initial evaluation score; Mark the on-site evaluation position in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine, determine the evaluation mark model, and determine the evaluation influence relationship between all on-site evaluation positions in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine based on the evaluation position influence relationship list ; Based on the distribution position of the on-site assessment position in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine and all assessment influence relationships, a three-dimensional network of assessment position influence relationships is constructed; Determine the separation distance between every two on-site evaluation positions based on the distribution positions, and determine the comprehensive influence degree of each on-site evaluation position based on the separation distance and the corresponding evaluation influence relationship; Taking the on-site assessment position corresponding to the maximum comprehensive impact degree as the central assessment position, starting from the central assessment position, and taking the on-site assessment position adjacent to the central assessment position as the end point, constructing the impact direction of the central assessment position vector; When the central evaluation position has only one influence pointing vector, then based on the central evaluation position and the influence pointing vector, unify the three-dimensional network of the influence relationship of the evaluation position in a preset coordinate system, and obtain a standard coordinate unification result; When the central evaluation position has more than one influence pointing vector, then based on the evaluation position influence relationship list, determine the on-site evaluation position corresponding to the end point of each pointing vector and the first mutual influence degree of the central evaluation position, based on The center evaluation position, the influence direction vector and the first degree of mutual influence are unified in the three-dimensional network of the evaluation position-influence relationship in a preset coordinate system to obtain a unified result of standard coordinates; Based on the unified results of the standard coordinates and all initial evaluation values, a three-dimensional evaluation value matrix is constructed, and based on the evaluation position impact relationship list, the relationship between each remaining on-site evaluation position and the evaluation position other than the central evaluation position is determined. The second degree of mutual influence between the center evaluation positions, based on the unified result of the standard coordinates and all the second degree of mutual influence, a three-dimensional influence evolution matrix is constructed; Determine the number of iterations n, multiply the evaluation value matrix and the influence evolution matrix n times, and then raise the nth power to obtain the final evaluation evolution matrix, and calculate the positions below the evaluation threshold in the three-dimensional final evaluation evolution matrix As the required fortification position corresponding to the disaster type, based on the value of the required fortification position in the corresponding final evaluation evolution matrix and the difference between the evaluation threshold and the type of the required fortification position, the required Fortification plan information. 6. The method for analyzing the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines according to claim 4, characterized in that, S202: time-series integration of the sub-disaster fortification-related information to obtain the disaster fortification time sequence corresponding to the disaster type information, including: Based on the fortification position and corresponding disaster type of each fortification information in the sub-site fortification information in the sub-disaster fortification related information, determine the first defense stage corresponding to each fortification information; Based on the required fortification plan information, determine the second defense stage of each resource management information in the sub-emergency resource management information in the sub-disaster fortification-related information; Based on the first defense stage and the second defense stage, each fortification information and each resource management information in the sub-disaster fortification-related information is time-sequentially integrated to obtain disaster fortification time-series information corresponding to a disaster type. 7. A method for analyzing disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines according to claim 1, characterized in that, S3: analyzing the disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines based on the disaster fortification timing information to obtain corresponding Disaster fortification capability evaluation value and fortification capability defect analysis results of disaster types, including: Analyzing the disaster fortification capability of the non-coal mine based on the disaster fortification timing information, generating a disaster fortification capability analysis record thread corresponding to the type of disaster; Based on the disaster fortification capability analysis record thread, determine the disaster fortification capability evaluation value and the fortification capability defect record thread corresponding to the disaster type; Integrating and summarizing the fortification capability defect record thread to obtain the fortification capability defect analysis result corresponding to the type of disaster. 8. A method for analyzing the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines according to claim 4, characterized in that, analyzing the disaster fortification capabilities of the non-coal mines based on the disaster fortification timing information to generate corresponding disaster types The Disaster Fortification Capability Analysis records thread, including: Based on the classification rules corresponding to the disaster types, determine the maximum disaster occurrence data for each disaster level of the disaster type, and determine the disaster evolution rules for each disaster level of the disaster type; Based on the maximum disaster occurrence data corresponding to the disaster level of the disaster type and the disaster evolution rule, perform disaster evolution simulation in the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine, and record and obtain the disaster evolution simulation thread corresponding to the disaster level of the disaster type; Based on the disaster evolution simulation thread, generate the disaster evolution dynamic data corresponding to the disaster level of the disaster type; Aligning the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine with the disaster fortification timing information corresponding to the disaster type and the fortification evolution thread to obtain the first alignment thread corresponding to the disaster level of the disaster type; Determine the corresponding fortification defect position based on the first alignment thread, mark the fortification defect position on the three-dimensional model of the non-coal mine, obtain a non-coal mine defect marking model, analyze the non-coal mine defect marking model, and determine Out of fortification defect coefficient; Based on the fortification defect coefficient, determine the risk coefficient of each evolution time point in the first alignment thread, divide the first alignment thread based on the risk coefficient and the preset risk coefficient gradient, and obtain the sub-alignment evolution thread sequence; Based on the partial fortification evolution threads in the first sub-alignment evolution thread sequence in the sub-alignment evolution thread sequence and the maximum disaster occurrence data, determine the first defense evaluation value evolution curve of the first sub-alignment evolution thread, At the same time, based on the partial disaster evolution dynamic data in the first sub-alignment evolution thread, a corresponding first disaster attack value evolution curve is generated, and the first defense evaluation value evolution curve is aligned with the first attack value evolution curve , obtaining a first alignment evolution curve, analyzing a sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record thread based on the first alignment evolution curve, and determining a fortification evolution damage coefficient based on the sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record thread; Based on the partial defense evolution threads in the second sub-alignment evolution thread sequence in the sub-alignment evolution thread sequence and the defense evolution damage coefficient, determine the second defense evaluation value evolution curve of the second sub-alignment evolution thread, based on the The second defense evaluation value evolution curve and the corresponding second attack value evolution curve are obtained to obtain a second alignment evolution curve, and a new sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record thread is analyzed based on the second alignment evolution curve until the sub-disaster fortification capability is traversed. After aligning the evolution thread sequence, all sub-disaster fortification capability analysis record threads are connected to generate disaster fortification capability analysis record threads corresponding to disaster types. 9. A method for analyzing disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines according to claim 1, characterized in that S3: analyzing the disaster fortification capabilities of non-coal mines based on the disaster fortification timing information to obtain corresponding After the disaster fortification capability evaluation value and fortification capability defect analysis results of disaster types, it also includes: Obtain real-time on-site information of the non-coal mine, and predict possible target disaster types and disaster-related information based on the real-time on-site information; Based on the disaster-related information and the disaster fortification capability evaluation value of the target disaster type, it is judged whether real-time remediation is required, and if so, a corresponding real-time remedial plan is generated based on the analysis result of the fortification capability defect corresponding to the disaster type, otherwise, The corresponding judgment result is retained. 10. A kind of analysis method for the disaster fortification capability of non-coal mines according to claim 9, characterized in that, based on the disaster fortification capability evaluation value of the disaster-related information and the target disaster type, it is judged whether Real-time remediation is required, including: Determine the highest defensible level corresponding to the disaster fortification capability evaluation value of the target disaster type based on the highest defensible level list of the target disaster type; The predicted disaster level is determined based on the disaster-related information, and it is judged whether the highest defensible level is not lower than the predicted disaster level, and if so, it is determined that real-time remedial action is not required; otherwise, it is determined that remedial action is required.

Images