CN115391938B - A failure mode identification method for full-length bonded bolts under shear action - Google Patents

A failure mode identification method for full-length bonded bolts under shear action Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN115391938B
CN115391938B CN202210985335.8A CN202210985335A CN115391938B CN 115391938 B CN115391938 B CN 115391938B CN 202210985335 A CN202210985335 A CN 202210985335A CN 115391938 B CN115391938 B CN 115391938B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
anchor rod
failure mode
anchor
failure
shearing
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN202210985335.8A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN115391938A (en
Inventor
朱林锋
王亮清
郑罗斌
吴善百
王琛璐
邓姗
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
China University of Geosciences
Original Assignee
China University of Geosciences
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by China University of Geosciences filed Critical China University of Geosciences
Priority to CN202210985335.8A priority Critical patent/CN115391938B/en
Publication of CN115391938A publication Critical patent/CN115391938A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN115391938B publication Critical patent/CN115391938B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/10Geometric CAD
    • G06F30/17Mechanical parametric or variational design
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F30/00Computer-aided design [CAD]
    • G06F30/20Design optimisation, verification or simulation
    • G06F30/27Design optimisation, verification or simulation using machine learning, e.g. artificial intelligence, neural networks, support vector machines [SVM] or training a model
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTING ARRANGEMENTS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N20/00Machine learning
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRIC DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F2111/00Details relating to CAD techniques
    • G06F2111/10Numerical modelling

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Evolutionary Computation (AREA)
  • General Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Software Systems (AREA)
  • Medical Informatics (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • Artificial Intelligence (AREA)
  • Computer Hardware Design (AREA)
  • Computing Systems (AREA)
  • Data Mining & Analysis (AREA)
  • Mathematical Physics (AREA)
  • Computational Mathematics (AREA)
  • Mathematical Analysis (AREA)
  • Mathematical Optimization (AREA)
  • Pure & Applied Mathematics (AREA)
  • Investigation Of Foundation Soil And Reinforcement Of Foundation Soil By Compacting Or Drainage (AREA)

Abstract

本申请提出了一种剪切作用下全长黏结锚杆破坏模式判识方法,针对在不同因素的影响下,锚杆受剪时发生何种破坏模式的界定不清晰的问题,基于材料力学组合变形理论和强度理论,将锚杆发生纯剪破坏、拉剪破坏和拉弯破坏的判定流程嵌入UDEC计算主程序并获得训练数据集,通过随机森林分类算法和粒子群寻优算法建立剪切作用下锚杆破坏模式与各特征参数之间的映射关系,从而对锚杆受剪时发生的破坏模式进行有效判识。本申请提出的方法能够根据提供的岩体、结构面和锚杆参数,准确判别全长黏结锚杆的破坏模式,为锚杆抗剪性能的评估提供参考,对岩质边坡和深部岩体锚固支护参数优化具有重要意义。

Figure 202210985335

This application proposes a method for identifying the failure mode of a full-length bonded anchor under shearing. Aiming at the problem that the failure mode of the anchor is not clearly defined when the anchor is sheared under the influence of different factors, based on the combination of material mechanics Deformation theory and strength theory, embed the judgment process of pure shear failure, tensile shear failure and tensile bending failure of anchor rods into the main program of UDEC calculation and obtain training data sets, and establish shearing effect through random forest classification algorithm and particle swarm optimization algorithm The mapping relationship between the failure mode of the lower bolt and each characteristic parameter can be used to effectively identify the failure mode of the bolt when it is sheared. The method proposed in this application can accurately determine the failure mode of the full-length bonded anchor according to the provided rock mass, structural surface and anchor parameters, and provide a reference for the evaluation of the shear performance of the anchor. The optimization of anchor support parameters is of great significance.

Figure 202210985335

Description

一种剪切作用下全长黏结锚杆破坏模式判识方法A failure mode identification method for full-length bonded bolts under shear action

技术领域technical field

本申请属于边坡、巷道支护技术领域,具体涉及一种剪切作用下全长黏结锚杆破坏模式判识方法。The application belongs to the technical field of slope and roadway support, and in particular relates to a failure mode identification method of a full-length bonded anchor rod under shearing action.

背景技术Background technique

全长黏结锚杆由于其结构简单、施工方便、经济的优点,在边坡、地下硐室中得到了广泛应用。由于天然岩体中大量节理、裂隙等结构面的存在,在人为扰动或地应力作用下,局部岩体会沿着结构面发生剪切大变形,这就导致了全长黏结锚杆发生的破坏通常不是传统意义上的纯拉伸破坏或砂浆脱黏破坏,而是在剪力、弯矩、轴力共同作用下的组合破坏。The full-length bonded anchor has been widely used in slopes and underground chambers due to its simple structure, convenient construction, and economical advantages. Due to the existence of a large number of structural surfaces such as joints and fissures in the natural rock mass, under the action of artificial disturbance or in-situ stress, the local rock mass undergoes large shear deformation along the structural surfaces, which leads to the failure of the full-length bonded anchor. It is usually not pure tensile failure or mortar debonding failure in the traditional sense, but a combined failure under the combined action of shear force, bending moment and axial force.

锚杆发生何种破坏模式与岩石、结构面和锚固参数直接相关,但当前关于在不同的特征参数取值下锚杆发生何种破坏模式的界定并不清晰。由于不同的破坏模式对锚杆屈服或破坏时的抗力有显著影响,因此,建立锚杆破坏模式与各特征参数之间的映射关系,有效预测锚杆破坏模式,对评估锚杆的抗剪性能、进而指导岩体锚固工程实践具有重要的现实意义。The failure mode of the bolt is directly related to the rock, structural surface and anchoring parameters, but the current definition of the failure mode of the bolt under different characteristic parameter values is not clear. Since different failure modes have a significant impact on the resistance of the anchor when it yields or fails, establishing the mapping relationship between the failure mode of the anchor and each characteristic parameter can effectively predict the failure mode of the anchor, which is very important for evaluating the shear performance of the anchor. , And then guide the rock mass anchoring engineering practice has important practical significance.

发明内容Contents of the invention

本申请要解决的技术问题在于,针对现有研究对全长黏结锚杆在剪切作用下发生何种破坏模式的界定不清晰的问题,提供一种剪切作用下全长黏结锚杆破坏模式判识方法。The technical problem to be solved in this application is to provide a full-length bonded anchor failure mode under shearing in view of the unclear definition of the failure mode of the full-length bonded anchor under shear in the existing research identification method.

本申请解决其技术问题所采用的技术方案是:提出一种剪切作用下全长黏结锚杆破坏模式判识方法,具体包括以下步骤:The technical solution adopted by this application to solve the technical problem is to propose a method for identifying the failure mode of a full-length bonded anchor under shear, which specifically includes the following steps:

Q1、基于UDEC软件建立岩石结构面剪切数值模型,并在数值模型中央植入一根全长黏结锚杆;Q1. Based on the UDEC software, the shear numerical model of the rock structural plane is established, and a full-length bonded anchor is implanted in the center of the numerical model;

Q2、通过UDEC软件自带的FISH编程语言,将锚杆发生纯剪破坏、拉剪破坏和拉弯破坏的判定流程嵌入数值计算主程序;Q2. Through the FISH programming language that comes with the UDEC software, the judgment process of pure shear failure, tensile shear failure and tensile bending failure of the anchor is embedded in the main program of numerical calculation;

Q3、选取剪切作用下影响锚杆破坏模式的特征参数,所述特征参数包括:锚杆直径D、锚杆轴向屈服强度fy、极限抗拉强度fu、锚杆倾角α、岩石单轴抗压强度和砂浆单轴抗压强度中的较小值σc和结构面剪胀角θ;Q3. Select the characteristic parameters that affect the failure mode of the bolt under shear action. The characteristic parameters include: bolt diameter D, bolt axial yield strength f y , ultimate tensile strength f u , bolt inclination angle α, rock unit The smaller value of the axial compressive strength and the uniaxial compressive strength of mortar σ c and the dilatancy angle θ of the structural plane;

Q4、选取三组典型的加锚结构面剪切试验,将其有关的特征参数代入数值模型中,根据剪切力-剪切位移曲线,对锚杆单元中的法向耦合弹簧和切向耦合弹簧参数进行标定,并确保数值试验中锚杆的破坏模式与实验中锚杆的破坏模式一致;Q4. Select three groups of typical anchored structural surface shear tests, and substitute their relevant characteristic parameters into the numerical model. According to the shear force-shear displacement curve, the normal coupling spring and tangential coupling spring in the anchor unit Calibrate the spring parameters and ensure that the failure mode of the anchor in the numerical test is consistent with the failure mode of the anchor in the experiment;

Q5、根据工程中常见的地质环境及常用的锚杆规格,对第i个特征参数选取合适的范围和li(li为正整数,且每个参数的li可以不同)个水平;所述特征参数具体为:

Figure BDA0003800111470000021
/>
Figure BDA0003800111470000022
Figure BDA0003800111470000023
Q5. According to the common geological environment in engineering and the commonly used anchor bolt specifications, select the appropriate range and l i (li is a positive integer, and the l i of each parameter can be different) levels for the i-th characteristic parameter; The characteristic parameters are specifically:
Figure BDA0003800111470000021
/>
Figure BDA0003800111470000022
and
Figure BDA0003800111470000023

Q6、根据步骤Q5中划分的各特征参数的范围及水平,通过正交试验设计出n组数值试验,n一般应大于20;Q6. According to the scope and level of each characteristic parameter divided in step Q5, design n groups of numerical experiments through orthogonal experiments, and n should generally be greater than 20;

Q7、在步骤Q3、Q4的基础上,对步骤Q6中设计的n组数值试验一一进行求解,记录每一组数值试验下的锚杆破坏模式,建立包含n个样例的数据集E,数据集中的每个样例的形式为Ei=(xi,FMi),其中xi=(Di,fyi,fuiicii);i=1,2,3...,n,FMi代表了锚杆发生的破坏模式,其中纯剪破坏记作“PS”(pure-shear),拉剪破坏记作“TS”(tensile-shear),拉弯破坏记作“TB”(tensile-bend);Q7. On the basis of steps Q3 and Q4, solve the n sets of numerical tests designed in step Q6 one by one, record the bolt failure mode under each set of numerical tests, and set up a data set E containing n samples, The form of each sample in the data set is E i =(xi , FM i ), where xi = (D i ,f yi ,f uiicii ); i=1,2 ,3...,n, FM i represents the failure mode of the bolt, where the pure shear failure is denoted as "PS" (pure-shear), the tension-shear failure is denoted as "TS" (tensile-shear), and the tension-bend Destruction is recorded as "TB"(tensile-bend);

Q8、采用随机森林分类算法对该数据集进行学习,将步骤Q7中数据集E中每个样例的xi作为输入变量,FMi作为输出变量,建立随机森林分类模型;Q8. Use the random forest classification algorithm to study the data set, use the x i of each sample in the data set E in step Q7 as an input variable, and FM i as an output variable to establish a random forest classification model;

Q9、采用粒子群算法对步骤Q8中建立的随机森林分类模型中的超参数进行智能寻优,包括决策树的数量G,随机森林的最大深度d以及采用随机属性原则时在单个树中尝试的最大特征数k,建立优化后的锚杆破坏模式判识模型;Q9. Use the particle swarm optimization algorithm to intelligently optimize the hyperparameters in the random forest classification model established in step Q8, including the number G of decision trees, the maximum depth d of the random forest, and the number of attempts in a single tree when using the random attribute principle The maximum characteristic number k is used to establish an optimized rock bolt failure mode identification model;

Q10、对于一根特定地质环境中的全长黏结锚杆,当结构面两侧岩体发生相对滑动或有相对滑动的趋势时,锚杆受到强烈的剪切作用,此时确定特征参数[D,fy,fu,α,σc,θ],将其带入步骤Q9中建立的锚杆破坏模式判识模型,得到的破坏模式即为算法判识的剪切作用下锚杆发生的破坏模式。Q10. For a full-length bonded bolt in a specific geological environment, when the rock masses on both sides of the structural surface slide or have a tendency to slide relative to each other, the bolt is subjected to strong shearing. At this time, determine the characteristic parameters [D ,f y ,f u ,α,σ c ,θ], and bring it into the bolt failure mode identification model established in step Q9, the obtained failure mode is the shearing action of the bolt identified by the algorithm destruction mode.

进一步地,步骤Q1中采用Rockbolt单元来模拟全长黏结锚杆,相比于其他结构单元模拟的锚杆,Rockbolt单元同时具备抗拉、抗剪、抗弯的能力,适用于锚杆受剪的情况。Furthermore, in step Q1, the Rockbolt unit is used to simulate the full-length bonded anchor. Compared with the anchors simulated by other structural units, the Rockbolt unit has the ability to resist tension, shear, and bending at the same time, and is suitable for shearing of the anchor. Condition.

进一步地,步骤Q2中将纯剪破坏、拉剪破坏和拉弯破坏三种破坏模式嵌入计算主程序,其主要流程如下:Further, in step Q2, the three failure modes of pure shear failure, tension shear failure and tension bending failure are embedded in the main calculation program, and the main flow is as follows:

a)进行主程序运算,运行至stepi(第i步)时,通过FISH内置函数找到Rockbolt单元第一个节点的地址,提取节点中储存的轴力、剪力和弯矩;a) Carry out the main program operation, when running to stepi (step i), find the address of the first node of the Rockbolt unit through the FISH built-in function, and extract the axial force, shear force and bending moment stored in the node;

b)用下式(1)判断锚杆是否进入屈服状态:b) Use the following formula (1) to judge whether the anchor rod enters the yield state:

Figure BDA0003800111470000031
Figure BDA0003800111470000031

式中:σe为锚杆屈服强度,M0和N0为锚杆的弯矩和轴力,W为弯曲截面系数,

Figure BDA0003800111470000032
A为锚杆截面积;In the formula: σ e is the yield strength of the anchor, M 0 and N 0 are the bending moment and axial force of the anchor, W is the bending section coefficient,
Figure BDA0003800111470000032
A is the cross-sectional area of the bolt;

c)若屈服状态判定式(1)不满足,则认为锚杆没有屈服,继续用Tresca破坏准则(2)来判定锚杆是否发生纯剪破坏:c) If the yield state judgment formula (1) is not satisfied, it is considered that the anchor has not yielded, and continue to use the Tresca failure criterion (2) to determine whether the pure shear failure of the anchor occurs:

Figure BDA0003800111470000041
Figure BDA0003800111470000041

式中:Q0为锚杆一点的剪力,Nu为锚杆的轴向极限强度对应的轴向极限力。In the formula: Q 0 is the shear force at one point of the anchor rod, and Nu is the axial ultimate force corresponding to the axial ultimate strength of the anchor rod.

如果上式(2)满足,则认为锚杆发生纯剪破坏,输出第一字符串“PS”,将锚杆的屈服值(yield-tension)和屈服应变(tension-failure-strain)设置为一个缺省值(1×10-10),程序会判定锚杆发生破坏,计算程序终止;若上式(2)不满足,则认为锚杆仍处于弹性状态,对下一个节点地址重复迭代,直到整根锚杆的节点遍历完成,令i=i+1,进行下一步主程序运算;If the above formula (2) is satisfied, it is considered that the pure shear failure of the anchor occurs, and the first string "PS" is output, and the yield value (yield-tension) and yield strain (tension-failure-strain) of the anchor are set as one The default value (1×10 -10 ), the program will determine that the anchor is damaged, and the calculation program will be terminated; if the above formula (2) is not satisfied, the anchor is still considered to be in an elastic state, and the next node address will be iterated repeatedly until The node traversal of the whole anchor rod is completed, let i=i+1, and proceed to the next main program operation;

这里的纯剪破坏不是严格意义上的只有剪应力的纯剪破坏,而是由于此时轴力很小,剪力占主导,所以近似认为是纯剪破坏;The pure shear failure here is not strictly a pure shear failure with only shear stress, but because the axial force is small at this time and the shear force dominates, it is approximately considered to be a pure shear failure;

d)若屈服状态判定式(1)满足,则认为锚杆在该点发生屈服,锚杆进入塑性状态;在主程序中将此时的弯矩M0赋值给锚杆的塑性矩(plastic-moment),塑性铰形成,弯矩到达塑性矩后不再增加,而轴力随着结构面剪切位移的增加会进一步增长,此时需要对锚杆进入塑性状态后的破坏模式进行判定;d) If the yield state judgment formula (1) is satisfied, it is considered that the anchor rod yields at this point, and the anchor rod enters a plastic state; in the main program, the bending moment M 0 at this time is assigned to the plastic moment of the anchor rod (plastic- moment), the plastic hinge is formed, the bending moment will not increase after reaching the plastic moment, and the axial force will further increase with the increase of the shear displacement of the structural surface. At this time, it is necessary to judge the failure mode of the anchor rod after it enters the plastic state;

e)锚杆进入塑性状态后,若一点的轴力和剪力满足Mises破坏准则(3),认为在该点发生拉剪破坏:e) After the anchor rod enters the plastic state, if the axial force and shear force of a point meet the Mises failure criterion (3), it is considered that tensile shear failure occurs at this point:

Figure BDA0003800111470000042
Figure BDA0003800111470000042

若上式(3)满足,则输出第二字符串“TS”,同样将锚杆的屈服值和屈服应变设置为缺省值(1×10-10),计算程序终止;If the above formula (3) is satisfied, then output the second character string "TS", and also set the yield value and yield strain of the anchor as the default value (1×10 -10 ), and the calculation program terminates;

f)若上式(3)不满足,则继续进行判定:若一点的轴力和弯矩满足以下关系式(4),则认为发生拉弯破坏,输出第三字符串“TB”,同样将锚杆的屈服值和屈服应变设置为缺省值(1×10-10),计算程序终止:f) If the above formula (3) is not satisfied, continue to judge: if the axial force and bending moment of a point satisfy the following relational formula (4), it is considered that tension bending failure occurs, and the third string "TB" is output, and the The yield value and yield strain of the anchor are set to the default value (1×10 -10 ), and the calculation program is terminated:

Figure BDA0003800111470000051
Figure BDA0003800111470000051

g)若以上拉剪破坏和拉弯破坏的判定式(3)、(4)均不满足,说明锚杆虽然进入了塑性状态,但仍然没有到到破坏极限,此时需要继续进行节点遍历,若遍历后仍不满足,则令i=i+1,进行下一步主程序运算,直到任意一种破坏模式判定成功,主程序终止运算。g) If the judgment formulas (3) and (4) above for tensile-shear failure and tensile-bending failure are not satisfied, it means that although the anchor rod has entered a plastic state, it still has not reached the failure limit. At this time, it is necessary to continue node traversal. If it is still unsatisfied after traversal, set i=i+1, and proceed to the next step of the main program operation until any one of the damage modes is successfully judged, and the main program terminates the operation.

进一步地,步骤Q8中采用的随机森林分类算法以C4.5决策树为基学习器,根据C4.5决策树基本理论,当前样本集合R中第k类样本占比例为pk(k=1,2,...,|y|)时,采用信息熵Ent(R)来度量样本集合的纯度,信息熵的定义公式为:Further, the random forest classification algorithm adopted in step Q8 is based on the C4.5 decision tree, and according to the basic theory of the C4.5 decision tree, the proportion of samples of the kth class in the current sample set R is pk (k=1, 2,...,|y|), the information entropy Ent(R) is used to measure the purity of the sample set, and the definition formula of information entropy is:

Figure BDA0003800111470000052
Figure BDA0003800111470000052

假设离散属性a有V个可能的取值,用最大的信息增益率来进行决策树的划分属性选择,信息增益率的定义公式为:Assuming that the discrete attribute a has V possible values, the maximum information gain rate is used to select the partition attribute of the decision tree. The definition formula of the information gain rate is:

Figure BDA0003800111470000053
Figure BDA0003800111470000053

其中:in:

Figure BDA0003800111470000054
Figure BDA0003800111470000054

Figure BDA0003800111470000055
Figure BDA0003800111470000055

式中:Rv为第v个分支节点包含的R中所有在属性a上取值为av的样本。In the formula: R v is all samples in R contained in the vth branch node that take the value of a v on attribute a.

由于本发明的输入属性均为连续值,采用二分法,对于某一个连续属性a,将相邻的属性取值[ai,ai+1)的中位点

Figure BDA0003800111470000061
作为候选划分点,然后像离散值一样来考察划分点,并选取最优划分点进行样本集合的划分,其中i为正整数。Since the input attributes of the present invention are all continuous values, the dichotomy method is adopted. For a certain continuous attribute a, the median point of the adjacent attribute value [a i , a i+1 )
Figure BDA0003800111470000061
As a candidate division point, then examine the division point like a discrete value, and select the optimal division point to divide the sample set, where i is a positive integer.

进一步地,步骤Q8中采用随机森林分类算法对数据集E进行学习包括:根据随机森林分类理论,基于bagging法对包含n个训练样本的数据集E随机采样,得到G个含有m个训练样本的采样集(G、n、m均为正整数),分别用于每棵决策树的训练。Further, in step Q8, learning the data set E by using the random forest classification algorithm includes: according to the random forest classification theory, randomly sampling the data set E containing n training samples based on the bagging method, and obtaining G training samples containing m training samples The sampling set (G, n, and m are all positive integers) is used for the training of each decision tree respectively.

进一步地,步骤Q8中随机森林分类算法采用投票法对每一个决策树的分类结果投票,预测结果为得票最多的破坏模式,用公式表示为:Further, in step Q8, the random forest classification algorithm uses the voting method to vote for the classification result of each decision tree, and the prediction result is the damage mode with the most votes, which is expressed as:

Figure BDA0003800111470000062
Figure BDA0003800111470000062

式中:X为样本,

Figure BDA0003800111470000063
表示在第i个基学习器上在类别标记j(破坏模式)上的输出,G为决策树的数量,H(x)为最终输出。In the formula: X is the sample,
Figure BDA0003800111470000063
Denotes the output on the category label j (destruction mode) on the i-th base learner, G is the number of decision trees, and H(x) is the final output.

进一步地,步骤Q9中需要对决策树的数量G,随机森林的最大深度d以及采用随机属性原则时在单个树中尝试的最大特征数k进行选定,本发明采用粒子群优化算法对这三个参数进行全局智能寻优,得到最优组合(G,d,k),最大化地提高模型性能,具体包括以下步骤:Further, in step Q9, it is necessary to select the number G of decision trees, the maximum depth d of the random forest, and the maximum number of features k tried in a single tree when the principle of random attributes is adopted. The present invention uses particle swarm optimization algorithm to select the The global intelligent optimization of parameters is carried out to obtain the optimal combination (G, d, k) to maximize the performance of the model, which specifically includes the following steps:

a)初始化粒子、种群速度,设定最大迭代次数Imax=300、粒子种群数量为25,定义最小错误率为Wmina) Initialize the particle and population speed, set the maximum number of iterations I max =300, the number of particle populations is 25, and define the minimum error rate W min ;

b)根据粒子数与种群速度,确定相应的参数组合(G,d,k),并代入模型得到预测结果;b) Determine the corresponding parameter combination (G, d, k) according to the particle number and population velocity, and substitute it into the model to obtain the prediction result;

c)采用10折交叉验证方法,每一折交叉验证过程中采用错误率W来构建适应度函数,计算个体的适应度值:c) Using the 10-fold cross-validation method, the error rate W is used to construct the fitness function in each cross-validation process, and the fitness value of the individual is calculated:

Figure BDA0003800111470000071
Figure BDA0003800111470000071

式中:K为样例集,f代表了学习器,f(xi)为随机森林分类模型预测结果,yi为实际结果;In the formula: K is the sample set, f represents the learner, f(xi ) is the prediction result of the random forest classification model, and y i is the actual result;

d)更新粒子速度和粒子位置,进行下一次迭代,重复步骤b和步骤c;d) Update particle velocity and particle position, perform next iteration, repeat step b and step c;

e)当达到设置的最大迭代次数时,结束迭代,输出最小错误率Wmin对应的参数组合(Gi,di,ki),代入模型当中,生成优化后的判识模型。e) When the set maximum number of iterations is reached, the iteration ends, and the parameter combination (G i , d i , ki ) corresponding to the minimum error rate W min is output and substituted into the model to generate an optimized discrimination model.

本申请的一种剪切作用下全长黏结锚杆破坏模式判识方法,基于材料力学组合变形和强度理论,将全长黏结锚杆在剪切作用下的三种破坏模式嵌入UDEC数值计算主程序,通过数值计算建立在不同参数下锚杆发生不同破坏模式的数据集,采用随机森林分类-粒子群优化结合的算法,构建锚杆破坏模式与岩石、结构面和锚杆参数之间的映射关系,建立剪切作用下全长黏结锚杆破坏模式判识模型。A method for identifying the failure mode of a full-length bonded anchor under shear in this application is based on the combined deformation and strength theory of material mechanics, and embeds the three failure modes of the full-length bonded anchor under shear into the UDEC numerical calculation The program establishes data sets of different failure modes of bolts under different parameters through numerical calculation, and uses the algorithm combining random forest classification and particle swarm optimization to construct the mapping between the failure modes of bolts and rocks, structural surfaces and bolt parameters Based on the relationship, a model for identifying the failure mode of the full-length bonded anchor under shear action was established.

实施本申请的一种剪切作用下全长黏结锚杆破坏模式判识方法,具有以下有益效果:构建了锚杆破坏模式与岩石、结构面和锚杆参数之间的映射关系,能够准确地判识在特定地质环境中、不同的锚固参数下锚杆受剪切作用下的破坏形式,对锚杆剪切抗力的准确评估、进而指导岩体锚固工程实践具有重要的现实意义。The implementation of a method for identifying the failure mode of a full-length bonded anchor under shear in the present application has the following beneficial effects: the mapping relationship between the failure mode of the anchor and the parameters of the rock, structural plane, and anchor is constructed, and the It is of great practical significance to identify the failure mode of the anchor under shear under different anchoring parameters in a specific geological environment, to accurately evaluate the shear resistance of the anchor, and to guide the engineering practice of rock mass anchorage.

附图说明Description of drawings

下面将结合附图及实施例对本申请作进一步说明,附图中:The application will be further described below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and embodiments, in the accompanying drawings:

图1是锚杆破坏模式判识的总流程图;Fig. 1 is the general flowchart of bolt failure mode identification;

图2是UDEC数值软件中锚杆破坏模式判定的流程图;Fig. 2 is a flow chart of bolt failure mode determination in UDEC numerical software;

图3是采用随机森林分类算法和粒子群寻优算法建立锚杆破坏模式判识模型的流程图;Fig. 3 is the flow chart of establishing the rock bolt failure mode identification model by adopting random forest classification algorithm and particle swarm optimization algorithm;

图4是锚杆受剪的示意图。Figure 4 is a schematic diagram of the anchor rod being sheared.

其中,图4中,1、锚杆,2、上岩块,3、下岩块,4、结构面,5、固定面,A、锚杆受剪区域,B、运动方向。Among them, in Fig. 4, 1, anchor rod, 2, upper rock block, 3, lower rock block, 4, structural surface, 5, fixed surface, A, anchor rod shear area, B, movement direction.

具体实施方式Detailed ways

下面将结合附图,以具体案例详细说明本发明的实施方式。The implementation of the present invention will be described in detail with specific cases below in conjunction with the accompanying drawings.

实施例1Example 1

请参考附图1-附图3,这里对本申请实施例提出的方法进行具体描述;本申请实施例提出的一种剪切作用下全长黏结锚杆破坏模式判识方法,具体包括以下步骤:Please refer to the accompanying drawings 1-3, here is a specific description of the method proposed in the embodiment of the application; a method for identifying the failure mode of a full-length bonded anchor under shear action proposed in the embodiment of the application, specifically includes the following steps:

P1、在UDEC软件中建立加锚结构面剪切数值模型,采用Rockbolt单元模拟剪切作用下的锚杆;P1. Establish the shear numerical model of the anchored structural surface in UDEC software, and use the Rockbolt unit to simulate the anchor rod under the shear action;

P2、将附图2中的锚杆破坏模式判定流程用FISH语言表达,并嵌入数值模拟计算主程序中;P2. Express the bolt failure mode judgment process in accompanying drawing 2 with FISH language, and embed it in the main program of numerical simulation calculation;

P3、选取三组典型的加锚结构面剪切试验数据,分别将参数[D,fy,fu,α,σc,θ]代入P2建立的数值模型中,根据剪切力-剪切位移曲线,对Rockbolt单元中的法向耦合弹簧和切向耦合弹簧参数进行标定,并确保破坏模式一致;P3. Select three sets of typical shear test data of anchored structural planes, and respectively substitute the parameters [D, f y , f u , α, σ c , θ] into the numerical model established in P2. According to the shear force-shear Displacement curves, which calibrate the parameters of the normal coupling spring and tangential coupling spring in the Rockbolt unit, and ensure that the failure mode is consistent;

P4、根据工程中常见的地质环境及常用的锚杆规格经验,对每一个参数选取合适的范围与水平,如表1所示:P4. According to the common geological environment in engineering and the experience of commonly used bolt specifications, select the appropriate range and level for each parameter, as shown in Table 1:

表1参数取值范围与水平Table 1 Parameter value range and level

Figure BDA0003800111470000091
Figure BDA0003800111470000091

P5、通过L25正交表设计出了共25组试验,如表2所示,将25组试验参数代入P2建立的数值模型进行计算,得到相应的锚杆破坏模式;P5. A total of 25 sets of tests were designed through the L25 orthogonal table, as shown in Table 2, the 25 sets of test parameters were substituted into the numerical model established by P2 for calculation, and the corresponding bolt failure mode was obtained;

表2正交试验表Table 2 Orthogonal test table

Figure BDA0003800111470000092
Figure BDA0003800111470000092

P6、通过P5中的25组数值试验,得到了含有25组训练数据的数据集E,数据集E中的每个样例的形式为Ei=(xi,FMi),其中xi=(Di,fyi,fuiicii);i=1,2,3...,25;P6. Through the 25 sets of numerical experiments in P5, a data set E containing 25 sets of training data is obtained. The form of each sample in the data set E is E i =( xi , FM i ), where xi = (D i ,f yi ,f uiicii ); i=1,2,3...,25;

P7、采用随机森林分类算法,将步骤P6中xi=(Di,fyi,fuiicii)作为输入变量,FMi作为输出变量,建立锚杆破坏模式判别模型;P7. Using the random forest classification algorithm, set x i = (D i , f yi , f ui , α i , σ ci , θ i ) in step P6 as input variables, and FM i as output variables to establish bolt failure mode discrimination Model;

P8、用附图3中的粒子群寻优算法对步骤P7建立的随机森林分类模型中的决策树的数量G,随机森林的最大深度d以及采用随机属性原则时在单个树中尝试的最大特征数k进行全局寻优,建立优化后的锚杆破坏模式判识模型。最终,当树的数量为90,最大深度为4,最大特征数为3时,适应度最高(错误率最低),模型达到最优;P8, use the particle swarm optimization algorithm in accompanying drawing 3 to the quantity G of the decision tree in the random forest classification model that step P7 establishes, the maximum depth d of random forest and the maximum characteristic that try in a single tree when adopting random attribute principle The number k is used for global optimization, and the optimized bolt failure mode identification model is established. Finally, when the number of trees is 90, the maximum depth is 4, and the maximum number of features is 3, the fitness is the highest (the error rate is the lowest), and the model reaches the optimum;

P9、针对一个具体锚杆受剪的案例,在确定输入参数[D,fy,fu,α,σc,θ]后,将其代入P8中建立的判识模型,即可以得到相应的锚杆破坏模式。P9. For a specific case where the bolt is sheared, after determining the input parameters [D, f y , fu , α, σ c , θ], substitute them into the discrimination model established in P8, and the corresponding Anchor failure mode.

实施例2Example 2

为了更好地进行示例说明,以一个锚固结构面剪切试验为例进行详细说明。请参考附图4,图4中,锚杆1插入由上岩块2和下岩块3构成的结构体系中,上岩块2和下岩块3之间形成结构面4,锚杆1与结构面4之间的倾角α=90°,该试验中采用的锚杆1的直径D=4mm,锚杆1的屈服强度fy=475MPa,极限强度fu=580MPa,σc=51.44MPa,结构面剪胀角θ=13.67°,图4中的圆形区域A代表锚杆1的受剪区域,箭头指示方向B代表下岩块的运动方向。在试验结束后取出锚杆1进行观察,发现锚杆1有明显的拉剪破坏特征。In order to illustrate better, an anchored structural surface shear test is taken as an example to describe in detail. Please refer to accompanying drawing 4, among Fig. 4, anchor rod 1 is inserted in the structural system that is made of upper rock block 2 and lower rock block 3, forms structure surface 4 between upper rock block 2 and lower rock block 3, and anchor rod 1 and The inclination angle between the structural planes 4 is α=90°, the diameter of the anchor rod 1 used in this test is D=4mm, the yield strength of the anchor rod 1 is f y =475MPa, the ultimate strength f u =580MPa, σ c =51.44MPa, The dilation angle of the structural plane is θ=13.67°, the circular area A in Fig. 4 represents the shear area of the bolt 1, and the direction B indicated by the arrow represents the movement direction of the lower rock block. After the test, the anchor rod 1 was taken out for observation, and it was found that the anchor rod 1 had obvious tensile and shear failure characteristics.

实施例2的所有参数均在实施例1中数据集特征参数的取值范围内,因此可以使用实施例1中建立的模型进行判识,通过使用实施例1的模型对本申请实施例2中的剪切试验进行判识,最后输出的锚杆破坏模式为“TS”,与实验观察结果一致。实施例2进一步验证了本申请实施例提出的方法具有良好的判识准确度。All the parameters of embodiment 2 are within the value range of the data set feature parameters in embodiment 1, so the model established in embodiment 1 can be used for identification, and the model in embodiment 2 of the application can be identified by using the model of embodiment 1 The shear test is carried out to judge, and the final output bolt failure mode is "TS", which is consistent with the experimental observation results. Embodiment 2 further verifies that the method proposed in the embodiment of the present application has good recognition accuracy.

上面结合附图对本发明的实施例进行了描述,但是本发明并不局限于上述的具体实施方式,上述的具体实施方式仅仅是示意性的,而不是限制性的,本领域的普通技术人员在本发明的启示下,在不脱离本发明宗旨和权利要求所保护的范围情况下,还可做出很多形式,这些均属于本发明的保护之内。Embodiments of the present invention have been described above in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, but the present invention is not limited to the above-mentioned specific implementations, and the above-mentioned specific implementations are only illustrative, rather than restrictive, and those of ordinary skill in the art will Under the enlightenment of the present invention, many forms can also be made without departing from the gist of the present invention and the protection scope of the claims, and these all belong to the protection of the present invention.

Claims (7)

1. The method for judging the damage mode of the full-length adhesive anchor rod under the shearing action is characterized by comprising the following steps:
q1, establishing a rock structural surface shearing numerical model based on UDEC software, and implanting a full-length adhesive anchor rod in the center of the numerical model;
q2, embedding a judging process of pure shearing damage, tensile shearing damage and stretch bending damage of the anchor rod into a numerical calculation main program through a self-contained FISH programming language of UDEC software;
q3, selecting characteristic parameters influencing the anchor rod damage mode under the shearing action, wherein the characteristic parameters comprise: diameter D of anchor rod and axial yield strength f of anchor rod y Ultimate tensile strength f u The anchor rod inclination angle alpha, the rock uniaxial compressive strength and the smaller value sigma of the mortar uniaxial compressive strength c And a structural face shear angle θ;
q4, selecting three groups of typical anchor-added structural surface shear tests, substituting the relevant characteristic parameters into a numerical model, calibrating normal coupling springs and tangential coupling spring parameters in the anchor rod unit according to a shear force-shear displacement curve, and ensuring that the failure mode of the anchor rod in the numerical test is consistent with the failure mode of the anchor rod in the test;
q5, selecting a proper range and l according to the common geological environment in engineering and the common anchor rod specification i A level; the characteristic parameters are specifically as follows:
Figure FDA0004130586200000011
Figure FDA0004130586200000012
Figure FDA0004130586200000013
and->
Figure FDA0004130586200000014
Q6, designing n groups of numerical tests through orthogonal tests according to the range and the level of each characteristic parameter divided in the step Q5;
q7, on the basis of the steps Q3 and Q4, solving n groups of numerical tests designed in the step Q6 one by one, recording anchor rod damage modes under each group of numerical tests, and establishing a data set E containing n samples, wherein each sample in the data set E is in the form of E i =(x i ,FM i ) Wherein x is i =(D i ,f yi ,f uiicii ) The method comprises the steps of carrying out a first treatment on the surface of the i=1, 2,3., n, FM represents the failure mode of the bolt;
q8, learning the data set E by adopting a random forest classification algorithm, and obtaining x of each sample in the data set E in the step Q7 i FM as an input variable i As output variable, establishing a random forest classification model;
q9, intelligently optimizing the super parameters in the random forest classification model established in the step Q8 by adopting a particle swarm algorithm, wherein the super parameters comprise the number G of decision trees, the maximum depth d of the random forest and the maximum feature number k tried in a single tree by adopting a random attribute principle, and establishing an optimized anchor rod damage mode judgment model;
q10, for a full-length adhesive anchor rod in a specific geological environment, when rock masses at two sides of a structural surface slide relatively or have a tendency of sliding relatively, the anchor rod is subjected to strong shearing action, and at the moment, characteristic parameters [ D, f are determined y ,f u ,α,σ c ,θ]And (3) introducing the failure mode of the anchor rod into the failure mode judging model of the anchor rod established in the step (Q9), wherein the obtained failure mode is the failure mode of the anchor rod under the shearing action judged by an algorithm.
2. The method of claim 1, wherein the step Q1 uses a Rockbolt unit to simulate a full length cohesive bolt.
3. The method for judging the failure mode of a full-length adhesive anchor rod under a shearing action according to claim 2, wherein the process of embedding the judging process of pure shearing failure, stretch shearing failure and stretch bending failure into the numerical calculation main program in the step Q2 is as follows:
a) When the main program operation is carried out and the operation is carried out to the stepi, the address of the first node of the Rockbolt unit is found through a FISH built-in function, and the axial force, the shearing force and the bending moment stored in the node are extracted;
b) Judging whether the anchor rod enters a yield state or not by using the following formula (1):
Figure FDA0004130586200000031
wherein: sigma (sigma) e For the yield strength of the anchor rod, M 0 And N 0 Is the bending moment and the axial force of the anchor rod, W is the bending section coefficient,
Figure FDA0004130586200000032
a is the sectional area of the anchor rod;
c) If the yield state judging formula (1) is not satisfied, the anchor rod is considered to be unyielding, and the Tresca breaking criterion (2) is continuously used for judging whether the anchor rod is broken by pure shearing or not:
Figure FDA0004130586200000033
wherein: q (Q) 0 Is the shearing force of one point of the anchor rod, N u The axial limit force is corresponding to the axial limit strength of the anchor rod;
if the formula (2) is met, the anchor rod is considered to be damaged by pure shearing, a first character string is output, the yield value and the yield strain of the anchor rod are set as default values, the program can judge that the anchor rod is damaged, and the calculation program is terminated; if the formula (2) is not satisfied, considering that the anchor rod is still in an elastic state, repeating iteration on the next node address until node traversal of the whole anchor rod is completed, and performing next main program operation by making i=i+1;
d) If the yield state judging formula (1) is satisfied, the anchor rod is considered to yield at the point, and the anchor rod enters a plastic state; bending moment M at this time in the main routine 0 The plastic moment assigned to the anchor rod is formed by plastic hinge, the bending moment is not increased after reaching the plastic moment, the axial force is further increased along with the increase of the shearing displacement of the structural surface, and the failure mode of the anchor rod after entering the plastic state is judged at the moment;
e) If the axial force and shear force of a point meet Mises failure criterion (3), it is considered that a pull shear failure occurs at that point:
Figure FDA0004130586200000034
if the formula (3) is satisfied, outputting a second character string, setting the yield value and the yield strain of the anchor rod as default values, and terminating the calculation program;
f) If the above formula (3) is not satisfied, continuing the determination: if the axial force and the bending moment at one point meet the following relational expression (4), the stretch bending damage is considered to occur, a third character string is output, the yield value and the yield strain of the anchor rod are set as default values, and the calculation program is terminated:
Figure FDA0004130586200000041
g) If the judgment formulas (3) and (4) of the pull-up shear damage and the stretch bending damage are not satisfied, the anchor rod is in a plastic state, but the damage limit is not reached, node traversal is needed to be continued at the moment, if the judgment formulas are still not satisfied after the node traversal, i=i+1 is needed to carry out next main program operation until any damage mode judgment is successful, and the main program terminates operation.
4. The method for judging failure mode of full-length adhesive anchor rod under shearing action as claimed in claim 1, wherein the random forest classification algorithm adopted in the step Q8 uses C4.5 decision tree as a base learner, and the proportion of the kth sample in the current sample set R is p according to the basic theory of C4.5 decision tree k (k=1, 2, |y|) the information entropy is used to measure the purity of the sample set:
Figure FDA0004130586200000042
assuming that the discrete attribute a has V possible values, the maximum information gain rate is used for selecting the partition attribute of the decision tree:
Figure FDA0004130586200000043
wherein:
Figure FDA0004130586200000044
Figure FDA0004130586200000051
wherein: r is R v All of the R's included for the v-th branch node have a value of a on attribute a v Is a sample of (a).
5. The method for judging the failure mode of the full-length adhesive anchor rod under the shearing action according to claim 1, wherein the step Q8 is characterized in that a random forest classification algorithm is adopted to learn the data set E, and the method comprises the steps of randomly sampling the data set E containing n training samples based on a bagging method according to a random forest classification theory to obtain G sampling sets containing m training samples, wherein the G sampling sets are respectively used for training each decision tree.
6. The method for judging the failure mode of a full-length adhesive anchor rod under the shearing action according to claim 1, wherein the random forest classification algorithm in the step Q8 adopts a voting method to vote on the classification result of each decision tree, and the predicted result is the failure mode with the most votes, and is expressed as follows by a formula:
Figure FDA0004130586200000052
wherein:
Figure FDA0004130586200000053
is shown in the firstOutput on class label j on i base learners.
7. The method for judging the failure mode of a full-length adhesive anchor rod under the shearing action according to claim 1, wherein the intelligent optimization of the super parameters in the random forest classification model established in the step Q8 by adopting a particle swarm algorithm in the step Q9 comprises the following steps:
a) Initializing particle and population speed, and setting maximum iteration number I max =300, particle population number 25, defining minimum error rate W min
b) Determining corresponding parameter combinations (G, d, k) according to the particle numbers and the population speeds, and substituting the parameter combinations into the random forest classification model to obtain a prediction result;
c) Adopting a 10-fold cross verification method, constructing an fitness function by adopting an error rate W in each fold cross verification process, and calculating the fitness value of an individual:
Figure FDA0004130586200000061
wherein: k is the sample set, f represents the learner, f (x i ) Predicting the result, y, for the random forest classification model i Is the actual result;
d) Updating the particle speed and the particle position, performing the next iteration, and repeating the step b and the step c;
e) Ending the iteration when the set maximum iteration number is reached, and outputting the minimum error rate W min Corresponding parameter combinations (G i ,d i ,k i ) Substituting the model into the random forest classification model to generate an optimized judgment model.
CN202210985335.8A 2022-08-16 2022-08-16 A failure mode identification method for full-length bonded bolts under shear action Active CN115391938B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210985335.8A CN115391938B (en) 2022-08-16 2022-08-16 A failure mode identification method for full-length bonded bolts under shear action

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202210985335.8A CN115391938B (en) 2022-08-16 2022-08-16 A failure mode identification method for full-length bonded bolts under shear action

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN115391938A CN115391938A (en) 2022-11-25
CN115391938B true CN115391938B (en) 2023-05-26

Family

ID=84121369

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202210985335.8A Active CN115391938B (en) 2022-08-16 2022-08-16 A failure mode identification method for full-length bonded bolts under shear action

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN115391938B (en)

Families Citing this family (1)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN118364533B (en) * 2024-03-05 2024-11-15 华蓝设计(集团)有限公司 A method for predicting shear resistance of pressure anchors and an anchoring force optimization system

Family Cites Families (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CA2835006C (en) * 2013-11-29 2016-05-17 9170-9980 Quebec Inc. Concrete masonry anchor and method of fastening
CN107237646B (en) * 2017-06-28 2019-04-26 山东科技大学 Large deformation constant resistance support grouting bolt, anchor cable and quantitative support method of roadway
CN111442997B (en) * 2020-03-31 2021-03-30 中国地质大学(武汉) Method for predicting shear load-shear displacement curve of full-length bonding type anchoring joint surface
CN114091158A (en) * 2021-11-24 2022-02-25 招商局重庆交通科研设计院有限公司 A shear strength calculation method for the lower structural surface anchored by shear bolts

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN115391938A (en) 2022-11-25

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN109635461B (en) Method and system for automatically identifying surrounding rock grade by using while-drilling parameters
US10546072B2 (en) Obtaining micro- and macro-rock properties with a calibrated rock deformation simulation
Gandomi et al. A new multi-gene genetic programming approach to non-linear system modeling. Part II: geotechnical and earthquake engineering problems
CN113820750B (en) Method for quantitatively predicting mudstone structural cracks based on elastoplastic mechanics
CN110006568B (en) Method and system for acquiring three-dimensional ground stress by using rock core
CN115470694B (en) Joint rock mass anchor rod shearing resistance prediction method considering anchor rod failure mode
CN109839493B (en) Underground engineering rock mass quality evaluation method, device, storage medium and electronic equipment
CN115391938B (en) A failure mode identification method for full-length bonded bolts under shear action
CN111222683A (en) PCA-KNN-based comprehensive grading prediction method for TBM construction surrounding rock
CN112765791B (en) A Risk Prediction Method of TBM Card Machine Based on Numerical Samples and Random Forest
CN113283173B (en) Comprehensive inverse analysis system and method for underground engineering energy and parameters
CN117313472B (en) Repeated fracturing parameter optimization design method for fracture-cavity carbonate reservoir
CN114154427A (en) Volume fracturing fracture expansion prediction method and system based on deep learning
CN112926267A (en) TBM tunnel rock burst grade prediction method and system based on tunneling parameter inversion
CN116663120A (en) Vibration speed and damage double-index control blasting method for tunnel construction
Yin et al. Practice of optimisation theory in geotechnical engineering
CN111305899B (en) Method for determining removal length of temporary support for construction of subway station arch cover method
Qiu et al. Evaluation and interpretation of blasting-induced tunnel overbreak: Using heuristic-based ensemble learning and gene expression programming techniques
CN108763164A (en) Evaluation method for coal and gas outburst inversion similarity
CN105164552A (en) Method of analyzing seismic data
CN106874627A (en) A kind of detection method for detecting mine anchor rod construction quality and working condition
KR20220089666A (en) Device for the rock mass classification in tunnel design using AI and the rock mass classification in excavation
CN111706322B (en) Rock drilling response prediction method and prediction system
CN112907698A (en) Logging curve generation method dynamically fusing time sequence and non-time sequence characteristics
CN112069644A (en) Method and system for constructing dry-hot rock mass heat storage parameter model

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant