CN115391228A - Accurate testing methods, devices, equipment and media - Google Patents

Abstract

The application provides a precise testing method, device, equipment and medium. In this method, the target function call graph is generated based on the code and stack data of the version to be tested through the precise test platform; then the affected function is determined according to the difference code and the target function call graph, and then the interface identifier of the affected function is sent to to the automation platform. The automation platform can obtain the test cases according to the interface identification, and then use the test cases to complete the test. This solution generates the target function call graph based on the code and stack data of the application to be tested, and then determines the test case according to the target function call graph, which makes the test case more perfect and effectively improves the test coverage.

Description

Accurate testing methods, devices, equipment and media

technical field

The present application relates to the field of software testing, in particular to a precise testing method, device, equipment and medium.

Background technique

With the escalation of enterprise business complexity and diversification of services, more and more module codes rely on many cases; at the same time, in the face of rapid iteration of project versions, rapid test support cannot be achieved; in this context, it is urgent to implement a reliable test The platform obtains the code changed by developers in this version iteration, automatically analyzes the impact of these codes, and helps to shift the test to the left and improve the test coverage.

In the prior art, for testing a new version of an application, the difference code between the new version and the old version is usually obtained, and then a test case for testing is determined according to the difference code. Then execute the test case, and determine whether the new version of the application can be used normally according to the comparison between the execution result and the expected result. Furthermore, the test coverage rate of the differential code can also be determined.

To sum up, the existing software testing methods only determine test cases through difference codes, resulting in incomplete test cases and low test coverage.

Contents of the invention

The embodiment of the present application provides a precise testing method, device, equipment and medium, which are used to solve the problem that the existing software testing method only determines the test cases through difference codes, resulting in insufficient test cases and low test coverage. .

In the first aspect, the embodiment of the present application provides a precision testing method, which is applied to a precision testing platform, and the method includes:

Obtain the code of the application version under test, the difference code between the application version under test and the previous version application, and the stack data of the application version under test;

Generate a target function call graph according to the code of the application to be tested and the stack data;

Determine the affected function according to the difference code and the target function call graph;

Send the interface identifier corresponding to the affected function to the automated testing platform.

In a specific implementation manner, the generation of the target function call graph according to the code of the application under test and the stack data includes:

Generate an initial function call graph according to the code of the application of the version to be tested;

Generating an actual function call graph according to the stack data;

Generate the target function call graph according to the initial function call graph and the actual function call graph.

In a specific implementation manner, the acquiring the code of the application of the version to be tested, the difference code between the application of the version to be tested and the application of the previous version, and the stack data of the application of the version to be tested include:

receiving an application release success message sent by the server, where the application release success message includes a version identifier of the application of the version to be tested;

Obtain the code of the application of the version under test and the difference code between the application of the version under test and the application of the previous version from the code warehouse according to the version identification;

Establish a socket socket connection with the server;

Receive the stack data sent by the server through the socket channel.

In a specific implementation manner, the determining the affected function according to the difference code and the target function call graph includes:

determining a difference function in the difference code according to the difference code;

For each difference function, in the target function call graph, the difference function, a function that indirectly calls the difference function, and a function that directly calls the difference function is determined as the affected function.

In the second aspect, the embodiment of the present application provides a precise testing method, which is applied to an automated testing platform, and the method includes:

Receive the interface identifier corresponding to the affected function sent by the precise test platform;

Determine the test case according to the interface identifier, the corresponding relationship between the interface identifier and the test case;

Use the test case to test the version application to be tested, and generate a test report.

In a specific implementation manner, the method further includes outputting codes not covered by tests in the difference codes.

In the third aspect, the embodiment of the present application provides a precision testing device, including:

An acquisition module, configured to acquire the code of the application of the version to be tested, the difference code between the application of the version to be tested and the application of the previous version, and the stack data of the application of the version to be tested;

Processing modules for:

Generate a target function call graph according to the code of the application to be tested and the stack data;

Determine the affected function according to the difference code and the target function call graph;

A communication module, configured to send the interface identifier corresponding to the affected function to the automated test platform.

In the fourth aspect, the embodiment of the present application provides a precision testing device, including:

The communication module is used to receive the interface identifier corresponding to the affected function sent by the precise test platform;

Processing modules for:

Determine the test case according to the interface identifier, the corresponding relationship between the interface identifier and the test case;

Use the test case to test the version application to be tested, and generate a test report.

In a fifth aspect, the embodiment of the present application provides an electronic device, including:

Processor, memory, communication interface;

The memory is used to store executable instructions of the processor;

Wherein, the processor is configured to execute the precise testing method described in any one of the first aspect by executing the executable instructions.

In a sixth aspect, the embodiment of the present application provides an electronic device, including:

Processor, memory, communication interface;

The memory is used to store executable instructions of the processor;

Wherein, the processor is configured to execute the precision testing method described in any one of the second aspect of the claim by executing the executable instructions.

In a seventh aspect, the embodiments of the present application provide a readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the precise testing method described in any one of the first aspect to the second aspect is implemented.

In an eighth aspect, an embodiment of the present application provides a computer program product, including a computer program, which is used to implement the precise testing method described in any one of the first aspect to the second aspect when the computer program is executed by a processor.

The precise testing method, device, equipment, and medium provided by the embodiments of the present application use the precise testing platform to generate the target function call graph according to the code and stack data of the version to be tested; and then determine the affected function, and then send the interface identifier of the affected function to the automation platform. The automation platform can obtain the test cases according to the interface identification, and then use the test cases to complete the test. This solution generates the target function call graph based on the code and stack data of the application to be tested, and then determines the test case according to the target function call graph, which makes the test case more perfect and effectively improves the test coverage.

Description of drawings

In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application or the prior art, the following will briefly introduce the drawings that need to be used in the description of the embodiments or the prior art. Obviously, the accompanying drawings in the following description These are some embodiments of the present application. Those skilled in the art can also obtain other drawings based on these drawings without any creative effort.

Fig. 1 is a schematic flow chart of the first embodiment of the precise testing method provided by the present application;

Figure 2 is a schematic flow diagram of the second embodiment of the precise testing method provided by the present application;

Figure 3a is a schematic flow diagram of Embodiment 3 of the precise testing method provided by the present application;

Figure 3b is the initial function call diagram provided by the embodiment of the present application;

Figure 3c is the actual function call diagram provided by the embodiment of the present application;

Figure 3d is a target function call diagram provided by the embodiment of the present application;

Figure 4 is a schematic flow diagram of Embodiment 4 of the precise testing method provided by the present application;

Figure 5 is a schematic structural view of Embodiment 1 of the precision testing device provided by the present application;

Fig. 6 is a schematic structural diagram of Embodiment 2 of the precision testing device provided by the present application;

FIG. 7 is a first structural schematic diagram of an electronic device provided by the present application;

FIG. 8 is a second structural schematic diagram of an electronic device provided by the present application.

Detailed ways

In order to make the purposes, technical solutions and advantages of the embodiments of the present application clearer, the technical solutions in the embodiments of the present application will be clearly and completely described below in conjunction with the drawings in the embodiments of the present application. Obviously, the described embodiments It is a part of the embodiments of this application, not all of them. Based on the embodiments in this application, all other embodiments made by persons of ordinary skill in the art under the inspiration of this embodiment fall within the protection scope of this application.

The terms "first", "second", "third", "fourth", etc. (if any) in the description and claims of this application and the above drawings are used to distinguish similar objects and not necessarily Describe a particular order or sequence. It is to be understood that the data so used are interchangeable under appropriate circumstances such that the embodiments of the application described herein can be practiced in sequences other than those illustrated or described herein. Furthermore, the terms "comprising" and "having", as well as any variations thereof, are intended to cover a non-exclusive inclusion, for example, a process, method, system, product or device comprising a sequence of steps or elements is not necessarily limited to the expressly listed instead, may include other steps or elements not explicitly listed or inherent to the process, method, product or apparatus.

With the rapid development of science and technology, the iterative upgrade speed of the application program is getting faster and faster, and the upgraded functions are also increasing. In order to ensure that the updated version of the application can be used normally, it needs to be tested.

In the prior art, for testing a new version of an application, the difference code between the new version and the old version is usually obtained, and then a test case for testing is determined according to the difference code. Then execute the test case, and determine whether the new version of the application can be used normally according to the comparison between the execution result and the expected result. Furthermore, the test coverage rate of the differential code can also be determined. The solutions in the prior art determine the test cases only through difference codes, which leads to the problem that the determined test cases are not perfect and the test coverage rate is low.

Aiming at the problems existing in the existing technology, the inventor found in the process of researching the accurate testing method that the application code usually generates new code dynamically during the execution process, so in order to increase the test coverage, not only through the test The code of the version application generates the initial function call graph, and also generates the actual function call graph based on the stack data generated by the running actual data of the version application to be tested, and then generates the target function call graph based on the initial function call graph and the actual function call graph. Therefore, according to the difference code and the target function call graph, more accurate affected functions can be determined, and the test cases determined according to the interface identifiers corresponding to the affected functions are also more accurate. Using this test case for testing, the test coverage rate is also higher. high. Based on the above inventive concepts, the precise testing scheme in this application is designed.

Exemplarily, the following describes the application scenarios of the precise testing method provided by this application.

In this application scenario, after the staff releases the application of the version to be tested, the server will send an application release success message to the precise test platform, and the application release success message includes the version identification of the application of the version to be tested.

After the precise test platform receives the message that the application is released successfully, it can test the application of the version to be tested. According to the version identification, the code of the application of the version to be tested and the difference code of the application of the version to be tested and the application of the previous version can be obtained from the code warehouse. And then interact with the server to obtain the stack data generated by the actual running data of the application of the version to be tested. In this way, the target function call graph is generated according to the code and stack data of the version to be tested, the affected function is determined according to the difference code and the target function call graph, and the interface identifier corresponding to the affected function is sent to the automated test platform.

After receiving the interface identifier, the automated test platform finds the corresponding test case according to the interface identifier, and then uses the test case to test the application of the version to be tested, obtains a test report, and completes the test.

It should be noted that the above scenario is only an illustration of an application scenario provided by the embodiment of the application, and the embodiment of the application does not limit the actual form of various devices included in the scenario, nor does it define the interaction mode between devices. Limitation, in the specific application of the scheme, can be set according to actual needs.

Below, the technical solution of the present application will be described in detail through specific embodiments. It should be noted that the following specific embodiments may be combined with each other, and the same or similar concepts or processes may not be repeated in some embodiments.

Figure 1 is a schematic flow diagram of Embodiment 1 of the precise testing method provided by the present application. In this embodiment of the present application, the precise testing platform is applied according to the code of the version to be tested, the difference code between the application of the version to be tested and the application of the previous version, and the application of the version to be tested. The stack data of the affected function is determined to determine the interface identifier corresponding to the affected function; the automated test platform determines the test case and performs the test according to the interface identifier corresponding to the affected function. The method in this embodiment may be implemented by software, hardware, or a combination of software and hardware. As shown in Figure 1, the precise testing method specifically includes the following steps:

S101: The precise testing platform obtains the code of the application of the version to be tested, the code difference between the application of the version to be tested and the application of the previous version, and the stack data of the application of the version to be tested.

In this step, after the version of the application to be tested is successfully released, it needs to be tested, and the accurate test platform also needs to obtain the code of the application of the version to be tested and the difference between the application of the version to be tested and the previous version of the application from the code warehouse Code; and then interact with the server to obtain the stack data of the application under test generated by running the actual data of the application under test.

S102: The precise test platform generates a target function call graph according to the code and stack data of the application to be tested.

In this step, after the Accurate Test Platform obtains the code of the application under test, the difference code between the application under test and the previous version, and the stack data of the application under test, since there are function calls in the code of the application under test The relationship exists, and the function call data is also stored in the stack data, so a function call graph can be generated respectively according to the application code and stack data of the version to be tested, and then the target function call graph can be obtained by combining the two function call graphs.

S103: The precise testing platform determines the affected function according to the difference code and the target function call graph.

In this step, after the accurate test platform generates the target function call graph, in order to more accurately obtain the influence range of the application to be tested compared with the previous version, the target function call graph can be drawn according to the functions in the difference code, The function, the function that indirectly calls this function, and the function that directly calls this function are determined as the affected functions.

S104: The accurate test platform sends the interface identifier corresponding to the affected function to the automated test platform.

In this step, after the precise test platform determines the affected function, it can find the interface identifier corresponding to the affected function. In order to determine the test case later, the interface identifier needs to be sent to the automated test platform.

S105: After the automated test platform receives the interface identifier corresponding to the affected function sent by the precision test platform, it determines the test case according to the interface identifier and the corresponding relationship between the interface identifier and the test case.

In this step, after the precise testing platform sends the interface corresponding to the affected function to the automated testing platform, the automated testing platform can receive the interface identifier. Since the automated test platform stores the corresponding relationship between the interface identifier and the test case, the automated test platform can determine the test case according to the interface identifier and the corresponding relationship between the interface identifier and the test case.

S106: The automated testing platform uses the test case to test the application of the version to be tested, and generates a test report.

In this step, after the automated test platform determines the test case, it can use the test case to test the version application under test, that is, use the test version application to run the test case, the test coverage can be obtained during the test, and the test is generated at the end of the test. testing report.

After the test report is generated by the automated test platform, the test report can be sent to the tester so that the tester can view the test report.

It should be noted that, after the automated test platform completes the test, it can also send the fault (BUG) generated during the test to the BUG management platform, so that the corresponding staff can modify the application of the version to be tested according to the BUG.

It should be noted that the content in the test report may include test coverage, test cases, test case running results, and the like. The embodiment of the present application does not limit the content of the test report, which can be determined according to the actual situation.

The precise testing method provided in this embodiment generates the target function call graph through the code of the application to be tested and the stack data generated by the actual data of the application to be tested; determines the affected function according to the difference code and the target function call graph; and then After determining the test case according to the interface identifier corresponding to the affected function, use the test case for testing. Compared with the existing technology that only uses difference codes to determine test cases, this solution determines test cases based on difference codes, the code of the application to be tested and the stack data generated by the actual data of the application to be tested, making the test cases more complete , effectively improving the test coverage.

Figure 2 is a schematic flow diagram of Embodiment 2 of the precise testing method provided by the present application. On the basis of the above-mentioned embodiments, the embodiment of the present application obtains the code of the application of the version to be tested from the code warehouse, the application of the version to be tested and The difference code of the previous version of the application; the interaction with the server to obtain the stack data of the test version of the application generated by the actual data of the test version of the application will be explained. As shown in Figure 2, step S101 in the first embodiment can be realized through the following steps:

S201: The server sends an application publishing success message to the precise testing platform.

In this step, after the staff publishes the application of the version to be tested to the server, in order to test the application of the version to be tested more quickly, the server will send an application release success message to the precise test platform. The application release success message includes the application of the version to be tested The version ID of .

S202: After receiving the application release success message sent by the server, the accurate test platform obtains the code of the application of the version to be tested and the difference code of the application of the version to be tested and the application of the previous version from the code warehouse according to the version identification.

In this step, after the server sends the application release success message to the precision test platform, the precision test platform receives the application release success message. Since the application release success message includes the version identification of the version to be tested, it can be based on the version identification , acquire the code of the application of the version under test, and the difference code of the application of the version under test and the previous version of the application of the version under test from the code warehouse.

S203: The precision test platform establishes a socket (socket) connection with the server.

S204: The server sends the stack data to the precision test platform through the socket channel.

In the above steps, in order to realize the real-time communication between the precision test platform and the server, it is necessary to establish a socket connection between the precision test platform and the server.

Since the application under test will have reflections and other situations during the running process, functions that do not appear in the code of the application under test will be generated. Therefore, in order to further improve the test coverage, it is necessary to introduce actual data into the under test through data drainage. The version application, that is, the actual running data of the version application to be tested, will generate stack data during the running process. After the precise test platform establishes a socket connection with the server, the server is triggered to send the stack data to the precise test platform through the socket channel.

S205: The precise test platform receives the stack data sent by the server through the socket channel.

In this step, after the server sends the stack data to the precision test platform, the precision test platform can receive the stack data sent by the server through the socket channel.

It should be noted that the execution order of step S202 and step S203 to step S205 may be to execute step S202 first, and then execute step S203 to step S205; it may also be to execute step S203 to step S205 first, and then execute step S202; it may also be Step S202 is executed simultaneously with steps S203 to S205. The embodiment of the present application does not limit the execution sequence of step S202 and step S203 to step S205, which can be set according to actual conditions.

In the precise testing method provided in this embodiment, the precise testing platform obtains the code of the application of the version to be tested and the difference code between the application of the version to be tested and the application of the previous version through the code warehouse. The precision test platform interacts with the server through the socket channel to obtain the stack data generated by the actual running data of the application version to be tested. Effectively improve the communication efficiency between the precise test platform and the server. In addition, the affected function is determined using the code, difference code, and stack data of the application to be tested, which effectively improves the accuracy of determining the affected function.

Figure 3a is a schematic flow diagram of the third embodiment of the precision testing method provided by the present application. On the basis of the above-mentioned embodiments, the embodiment of the present application generates a function call graph for the precision testing platform according to the code and stack data of the version to be tested, and in the The description will be given based on the generation of the target function call graph from these two function call graphs. As shown in Figure 3a, step S102 in the first embodiment above can be implemented through the following steps:

S301: Generate an initial function call graph according to the application code of the version to be tested.

In this step, after the Accurate Test Platform obtains the application code of the version to be tested, because there is a function call relationship in the code, it can generate a Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG for short) about the function call, that is, Initial function call graph.

Exemplarily, Fig. 3b is the initial function call diagram provided by the embodiment of the present application. As shown in Fig. 3b, function A calls function B and function C; function B calls function D; function C calls function E; function D also calls function E; function E calls function F and function G.

S302: Generate an actual function call graph according to the stack data.

In this step, after the precision test platform obtains the stack data, since the stack data includes the data of the function call, it can generate a DAG about the function call, that is, the actual function call graph.

Exemplarily, Fig. 3c is the actual function call diagram provided by the embodiment of the present application, as shown in Fig. 3c, function C calls function E; function E calls function G; function G calls function H; function H calls function I and function J .

It should be noted that the execution order of step S301 and step S302 may be that step S301 is executed first, and then step S302 is executed; The embodiment of the present application does not limit the execution sequence of step S301 and step S302, which may be set according to actual conditions.

S303: Generate a target function call graph according to the initial function call graph and the actual function call graph.

In this step, after the precision test platform obtains the initial function call graph and the actual function call graph, the target function call graph can be obtained by combining the initial function call graph with the actual function call graph.

Exemplarily, Fig. 3d is the target function call diagram provided by the embodiment of the present application. On the basis of Fig. 3b, the calling relationship between function A to function G can be obtained, and on the basis of Fig. 3c, function C can be obtained , function E, function G to function J, so according to Fig. 3b and Fig. 3c, Fig. 3d can be obtained. As shown in Figure 3d, Figure 3d is the union of the function reference relationship in Figure 3b and Figure 3c, based on the function reference relationship in Figure 3d, function G calls function H; function H calls function I and function J .

Optionally, when the amount of actual data is relatively large, and all functions of the application version under test can be realized by running the application version under test using these actual data, the actual function call graph may be determined as the target function call graph.

The precise testing method provided by this embodiment generates an initial function call graph according to the code of the version to be tested; then generates an actual function call graph according to the stack data; and then combines the initial function call graph and the actual function call graph to obtain the target function call picture. The affected function is determined by using the target function call graph, which effectively improves the determination accuracy of the affected function.

Fig. 4 is a schematic flowchart of Embodiment 4 of the precise testing method provided by the present application. On the basis of the above-mentioned embodiments, the embodiment of the present application explains the situation of determining the affected function according to the difference code and the target function call graph. As shown in Figure 4, step S103 in the first embodiment above can be implemented through the following steps:

S401: Determine a difference function in the difference code according to the difference code.

In this step, after the precision test platform determines the target function call graph and the difference code, in order to determine the affected function, it needs to first determine the function in the difference code as the difference function according to the difference code.

S402: For each difference function, determine the difference function, the function that indirectly calls the difference function, and the function that directly calls the difference function in the target function call graph as affected functions.

In this step, after the precision test platform determines the difference function, it determines the difference function, the function that indirectly calls the difference function, and the function that directly calls the difference function in the target function call graph as the affected functions.

Exemplarily, on the basis of FIG. 3d, if the determined difference function is function D, then the affected functions are function D, function B and function A. If the determined difference function is function G, the affected functions are function G, function D, function D, function C, function B and function A.

The precise testing method provided in this embodiment determines the affected function through the difference function and the call graph of the target function, which effectively improves the accuracy of the determined affected function.

The following describes the case where the automated test platform also outputs the code not covered by the test in the difference code after the test report is generated.

After the test report is generated by the automated test platform, in order to improve the test case library, the automated test platform will also output the code that is not covered by the test in the difference code, that is, send it to the staff who write the test case, so that the staff can test the uncovered code based on this test. Code design test cases, so that the test case library can be improved, and the test coverage can also be improved in subsequent tests.

The precise testing method provided in this embodiment can improve the test coverage rate of subsequent tests by outputting the codes not covered by the test in the difference codes so as to improve the test case library.

The following are device embodiments of the present application, which can be used to implement the method embodiments of the present application. For details not disclosed in the device embodiments of the present application, please refer to the method embodiments of the present application.

FIG. 5 is a schematic structural diagram of Embodiment 1 of the precision testing device provided by the present application. As shown in Figure 5, the precision testing device 50 includes:

An acquisition module 51, configured to acquire the code of the application of the version to be tested, the difference code between the application of the version to be tested and the application of the previous version, and the stack data of the application of the version to be tested;

Processing module 52, for:

Generate a target function call graph according to the code of the application to be tested and the stack data;

Determine the affected function according to the difference code and the target function call graph;

The communication module 53 is configured to send the interface identifier corresponding to the affected function to the automated test platform.

Further, the processing module 52 is specifically used for:

Generate an initial function call graph according to the code of the application of the version to be tested;

Generating an actual function call graph according to the stack data;

Generate the target function call graph according to the initial function call graph and the actual function call graph.

Further, the communication module 53 is also used for:

receiving an application release success message sent by the server, where the application release success message includes a version identifier of the application of the version to be tested;

Further, the acquiring module 51 is specifically used for:

Obtain the code of the application of the version under test and the difference code between the application of the version under test and the application of the previous version from the code warehouse according to the version identification;

Further, the communication module 53 is also used for:

Establish a socket socket connection with the server;

Receive the stack data sent by the server through the socket channel.

Further, the processing module 52 is also specifically used for:

determining a difference function in the difference code according to the difference code;

For each difference function, in the target function call graph, the difference function, a function that indirectly calls the difference function, and a function that directly calls the difference function is determined as the affected function.

The precision testing device provided in this embodiment is used to execute the technical solution of the precision testing platform in any of the foregoing method embodiments, and its implementation principle and technical effect are similar, and will not be repeated here.

Fig. 6 is a schematic structural diagram of the second embodiment of the precision testing device provided by the present application; as shown in Fig. 6, the precision testing device 60 also includes:

The communication module 61 is configured to receive the interface identifier corresponding to the affected function sent by the precise test platform;

processing module 62 for:

Determine the test case according to the interface identifier, the corresponding relationship between the interface identifier and the test case;

Use the test case to test the version application to be tested, and generate a test report.

Further, the communication module 61 is also used for:

Output the code not covered by tests in the diff code.

The precise testing device provided in this embodiment is used to implement the technical solution of the automated testing platform in any of the foregoing method embodiments, and its implementation principle and technical effect are similar, and will not be repeated here.

FIG. 7 is a first structural schematic diagram of an electronic device provided in the present application. As shown in Figure 7, the electronic device 70 includes:

Processor 71, memory 72, and communication interface 73;

The memory 72 is used to store executable instructions of the processor 71;

Wherein, the processor 71 is configured to execute the technical solution of the precise test platform in any of the foregoing method embodiments by executing the executable instructions.

Optionally, the memory 72 can be independent or integrated with the processor 71 .

Optionally, when the memory 72 is a device independent of the processor 71, the electronic device 70 may further include:

The bus 74, the memory 72 and the communication interface 73 are connected to the processor 71 through the bus 74 to complete mutual communication, and the communication interface 73 is used for communicating with other devices.

Optionally, the communication interface 73 may specifically be implemented by a transceiver. The communication interface is used to realize the communication between the database access device and other devices (such as client, read-write library and read-only library). The memory may include a random access memory (random access memory, RAM), and may also include a non-volatile memory (non-volatile memory), such as at least one disk memory.

The bus 74 may be a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) bus or an extended industry standard architecture (EISA) bus or the like. The bus can be divided into address bus, data bus, control bus and so on. For ease of representation, only one thick line is used in the figure, but it does not mean that there is only one bus or one type of bus.

Above-mentioned processor can be general-purpose processor, comprises central processing unit CPU, network processor (networkprocessor, NP) etc.; It can also be digital signal processor DSP, application-specific integrated circuit ASIC, field programmable gate array FPGA or other programmable Logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components.

The electronic device is used to implement the technical solution of the precision test platform in any of the foregoing method embodiments, and its implementation principle and technical effect are similar, and will not be repeated here.

FIG. 8 is a second structural schematic diagram of an electronic device provided by the present application. As shown in Figure 8, the electronic device 80 includes:

Processor 81, memory 82, and communication interface 83;

The memory 82 is used to store executable instructions of the processor 81;

Wherein, the processor 81 is configured to execute the technical solution of the automated testing platform in any of the foregoing method embodiments by executing the executable instructions.

Optionally, the memory 82 can be independent or integrated with the processor 81 .

Optionally, when the memory 82 is a device independent of the processor 81, the electronic device 80 may further include:

The bus 84, the memory 82 and the communication interface 83 are connected to the processor 81 through the bus 84 to complete mutual communication, and the communication interface 83 is used for communicating with other devices.

Optionally, the communication interface 83 may specifically be implemented by a transceiver. The communication interface is used to realize the communication between the database access device and other devices (such as client, read-write library and read-only library). The memory may include a random access memory (random access memory, RAM), and may also include a non-volatile memory (non-volatile memory), such as at least one disk memory.

The bus 84 may be a peripheral component interconnect (PCI) bus or an extended industry standard architecture (EISA) bus or the like. The bus can be divided into address bus, data bus, control bus and so on. For ease of representation, only one thick line is used in the figure, but it does not mean that there is only one bus or one type of bus.

Above-mentioned processor can be general-purpose processor, comprises central processing unit CPU, network processor (networkprocessor, NP) etc.; It can also be digital signal processor DSP, application-specific integrated circuit ASIC, field programmable gate array FPGA or other programmable Logic devices, discrete gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components.

The electronic device is used to implement the technical solution of the automated test platform in any of the foregoing method embodiments, and its implementation principle and technical effect are similar, and will not be repeated here.

The embodiment of the present application also provides a readable storage medium on which a computer program is stored, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, the technical solution provided by any one of the foregoing method embodiments is implemented.

An embodiment of the present application further provides a computer program product, including a computer program, and when the computer program is executed by a processor, it is used to implement the technical solution provided by any one of the foregoing method embodiments.

Those of ordinary skill in the art can understand that all or part of the steps for implementing the above method embodiments can be completed by program instructions and related hardware. The aforementioned program can be stored in a computer-readable storage medium. When the program is executed, it executes the steps of the above-mentioned method embodiments; and the aforementioned storage medium includes: ROM, RAM, magnetic disk or optical disk and other various media that can store program codes.

Finally, it should be noted that: the above embodiments are only used to illustrate the technical solutions of the present application, and are not intended to limit it; although the application has been described in detail with reference to the foregoing embodiments, those of ordinary skill in the art should understand that: It is still possible to modify the technical solutions described in the foregoing embodiments, or perform equivalent replacements for some or all of the technical features; and these modifications or replacements do not make the essence of the corresponding technical solutions deviate from the technical solutions of the various embodiments of the present application. scope.

Claims (12)

1. an accurate testing method, is characterized in that, is applied to accurate testing platform, and described method comprises: Obtain the code of the application version under test, the difference code between the application version under test and the previous version application, and the stack data of the application version under test; Generate a target function call graph according to the code of the application to be tested and the stack data; Determine the affected function according to the difference code and the target function call graph; Send the interface identifier corresponding to the affected function to the automated testing platform. 2. The method according to claim 1, wherein said generating a target function call graph according to the code of said version-to-be-tested application and said stack data comprises: Generate an initial function call graph according to the code of the application of the version to be tested; Generating an actual function call graph according to the stack data; Generate the target function call graph according to the initial function call graph and the actual function call graph. 3. The method according to claim 1 or 2, wherein said obtaining the code of the application of the version to be tested, the difference code between the application of the version to be tested and the previous version of the application, and the stack of the application of the version to be tested data, including: receiving an application release success message sent by the server, where the application release success message includes a version identifier of the application of the version to be tested; Obtain the code of the application of the version under test and the difference code between the application of the version under test and the application of the previous version from the code warehouse according to the version identification; Establish a socket socket connection with the server; Receive the stack data sent by the server through the socket channel. 4. The method according to claim 3, wherein the determining the affected function according to the difference code and the target function call graph comprises: determining a difference function in the difference code according to the difference code; For each difference function, in the target function call graph, the difference function, a function that indirectly calls the difference function, and a function that directly calls the difference function is determined as the affected function. 5. A precise testing method is characterized in that being applied to an automated testing platform, the method comprises: Receive the interface identifier corresponding to the affected function sent by the precise test platform; Determine the test case according to the interface identifier, the corresponding relationship between the interface identifier and the test case; Use the test case to test the version application to be tested, and generate a test report. 6. The method according to claim 5, further comprising outputting codes not covered by tests in the difference codes. 7. A precise testing device, characterized in that it comprises: An acquisition module, configured to acquire the code of the application of the version to be tested, the difference code between the application of the version to be tested and the application of the previous version, and the stack data of the application of the version to be tested; Processing modules for: Generate a target function call graph according to the code of the application to be tested and the stack data; Determine the affected function according to the difference code and the target function call graph; A communication module, configured to send the interface identifier corresponding to the affected function to the automated test platform. 8. A precision testing device, characterized in that it comprises: The communication module is used to receive the interface identifier corresponding to the affected function sent by the precise test platform; Processing modules for: Determine the test case according to the interface identifier, the corresponding relationship between the interface identifier and the test case; Use the test case to test the version application to be tested, and generate a test report. 9. An electronic device, characterized in that it comprises: Processor, memory, communication interface; The memory is used to store executable instructions of the processor; Wherein, the processor is configured to execute the precise testing method according to any one of claims 1 to 4 by executing the executable instructions. 10. An electronic device, characterized in that it comprises: Processor, memory, communication interface; The memory is used to store executable instructions of the processor; Wherein, the processor is configured to execute the precise testing method according to claim 5 or 6 by executing the executable instructions. 11. A readable storage medium, on which a computer program is stored, characterized in that, when the computer program is executed by a processor, the precise testing method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 is realized. 12. A computer program product, characterized by comprising a computer program, which is used to implement the precision testing method according to any one of claims 1 to 6 when the computer program is executed by a processor.

Images