CN115376072B - Transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method - Google Patents

Transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method Download PDF

Info

Publication number
CN115376072B
CN115376072B CN202211291069.5A CN202211291069A CN115376072B CN 115376072 B CN115376072 B CN 115376072B CN 202211291069 A CN202211291069 A CN 202211291069A CN 115376072 B CN115376072 B CN 115376072B
Authority
CN
China
Prior art keywords
safety
area
altitude operation
transformer substation
scaffold
Prior art date
Legal status (The legal status is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the status listed.)
Active
Application number
CN202211291069.5A
Other languages
Chinese (zh)
Other versions
CN115376072A (en
Inventor
赵学会
訾泉
赵琛
贺威
徐峰
王严
倪慧明
罗伟来
陈兆
邵长征
苗晶晶
王源卿
徐琦睿
Current Assignee (The listed assignees may be inaccurate. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation or warranty as to the accuracy of the list.)
Anhui Bonus Information Technology Co ltd
Suzhou Power Supply Co of State Grid Anhui Electric Power Co Ltd
Original Assignee
Anhui Bonus Information Technology Co ltd
Suzhou Power Supply Co of State Grid Anhui Electric Power Co Ltd
Priority date (The priority date is an assumption and is not a legal conclusion. Google has not performed a legal analysis and makes no representation as to the accuracy of the date listed.)
Filing date
Publication date
Application filed by Anhui Bonus Information Technology Co ltd, Suzhou Power Supply Co of State Grid Anhui Electric Power Co Ltd filed Critical Anhui Bonus Information Technology Co ltd
Priority to CN202211291069.5A priority Critical patent/CN115376072B/en
Publication of CN115376072A publication Critical patent/CN115376072A/en
Application granted granted Critical
Publication of CN115376072B publication Critical patent/CN115376072B/en
Active legal-status Critical Current
Anticipated expiration legal-status Critical

Links

Images

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V20/00Scenes; Scene-specific elements
    • G06V20/50Context or environment of the image
    • G06V20/52Surveillance or monitoring of activities, e.g. for recognising suspicious objects
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/06Energy or water supply
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06QINFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY [ICT] SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL OR SUPERVISORY PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Information and communication technology [ICT] specially adapted for implementation of business processes of specific business sectors, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • G06Q50/26Government or public services
    • G06Q50/265Personal security, identity or safety
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/0002Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/60Analysis of geometric attributes
    • G06T7/62Analysis of geometric attributes of area, perimeter, diameter or volume
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06TIMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
    • G06T7/00Image analysis
    • G06T7/60Analysis of geometric attributes
    • G06T7/64Analysis of geometric attributes of convexity or concavity
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING OR COUNTING
    • G06VIMAGE OR VIDEO RECOGNITION OR UNDERSTANDING
    • G06V40/00Recognition of biometric, human-related or animal-related patterns in image or video data
    • G06V40/10Human or animal bodies, e.g. vehicle occupants or pedestrians; Body parts, e.g. hands

Landscapes

  • Engineering & Computer Science (AREA)
  • Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Theoretical Computer Science (AREA)
  • Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • General Physics & Mathematics (AREA)
  • Tourism & Hospitality (AREA)
  • Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Economics (AREA)
  • Computer Vision & Pattern Recognition (AREA)
  • General Health & Medical Sciences (AREA)
  • Multimedia (AREA)
  • Primary Health Care (AREA)
  • Marketing (AREA)
  • General Business, Economics & Management (AREA)
  • Human Resources & Organizations (AREA)
  • Geometry (AREA)
  • Strategic Management (AREA)
  • Human Computer Interaction (AREA)
  • Water Supply & Treatment (AREA)
  • Public Health (AREA)
  • Computer Security & Cryptography (AREA)
  • Development Economics (AREA)
  • Educational Administration (AREA)
  • Quality & Reliability (AREA)
  • Management, Administration, Business Operations System, And Electronic Commerce (AREA)

Abstract

The invention relates to the technical field of transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring analysis, and particularly discloses a transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method.

Description

Transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method
Technical Field
The invention belongs to the technical field of operation safety monitoring and analysis of a transformer substation construction site, and relates to a transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method.
Background
The transformer substation is an important component in a power network and plays an important role in converting voltage, collecting current and distributing electric energy, and the field high-altitude operation is a relatively complex process involving a lot of dangerous operations, so that the importance of safety monitoring on the high-altitude operation of the transformer substation construction field is highlighted.
At present, the safety monitoring of the high-altitude operation of the transformer substation construction site mainly comprises the operation monitoring of construction equipment, and has certain disadvantages, and obviously, the following problems still exist in the safety monitoring of the high-altitude operation of the transformer substation construction site at present: 1. the safety monitoring of the current high-altitude operation only monitors high-altitude operation facilities, the operation state of a high-altitude operation worker cannot be known, the behavior of the worker is one of main uncertain factors of the high-altitude operation, the monitoring necessity is self-evident, the state corresponding to the worker is not monitored currently, the timeliness of safety early warning of the high-altitude operation worker cannot be improved, the falling operation safety and the falling operation stability of the high-altitude operation worker are low, and further accidents such as treading on the ground, treading on the ground and the like are caused. 2. The scaffold is used as one of main supporting components of high-altitude operation, the stability of the structure and the safety of the appearance directly determine the operation safety of high-altitude operation personnel, detailed analysis is not carried out at present, powerful operation support cannot be provided for the high-altitude operation personnel, and meanwhile powerful guarantee cannot be provided for the operation safety of the high-altitude operation personnel, so that the operation early warning efficiency and the early warning effect of the prior art cannot meet the early warning requirement of the high-altitude operation. 3. At present, the safety monitoring mode for the high-altitude operation belongs to a manual monitoring mode, the monitoring efficiency is low, the monitoring content has great limitation, meanwhile, the manual monitoring mode has great subjectivity and a visual field blind area, the monitoring effect of the safety monitoring for the high-altitude operation and the early warning efficiency of the high-altitude operation cannot be guaranteed, and the subsequent production work and the safe and stable operation of a power grid are influenced.
Disclosure of Invention
In view of this, in order to solve the problems in the background art, a method for monitoring the operation safety of a substation construction site is provided.
The purpose of the invention can be realized by the following technical scheme: the invention provides a transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method, which comprises the following steps: firstly, safety monitoring of protective articles: the use information of each high-altitude protective article in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation is monitored through the arranged high-definition cameras.
Step two, safety analysis of protective articles: and respectively calculating the safety evaluation coefficients of all gloves, all safety helmet evaluation coefficients and all safety belt evaluation coefficients in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation according to the use information of all high-altitude protection articles in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation, and respectively processing all high-altitude protection articles in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation.
Step three, scaffold safety monitoring: the method comprises the steps that pressure information of all scaffolds in an aerial working area in a target substation is monitored through distributed pressure sensors, and meanwhile surface information of all scaffolds in the aerial working area in the target substation is monitored through distributed high-definition cameras, wherein the pressure information comprises the number of aerial working personnel corresponding to all scaffolds and the weight corresponding to all the personnel.
Step four, scaffold safety analysis: and respectively analyzing the pressure information and the surface information of each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation to obtain the structural safety factor and the surface safety factor corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation, and further comprehensively calculating to obtain the stability safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation.
Monitoring the overhead workers: the method comprises the steps that the distributed high-definition cameras are used for collecting images of feet of all high-altitude operation personnel in the high-altitude operation area in a target transformer substation, meanwhile, the current scaffold level where all the high-altitude operation personnel are located is collected, the method is also used for collecting wearing images of the high-altitude operation protection belts corresponding to all the high-altitude operation personnel, and then behavior safety assessment coefficients corresponding to all the high-altitude operation personnel in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation are obtained through analysis.
Sixthly, safety analysis of the transformer substation construction site: and comprehensively calculating to obtain a construction safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to the target transformer substation according to the safety evaluation coefficient of each high-altitude protective article in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation, the stability safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each scaffold and the behavior safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each high-altitude operation worker.
In a possible implementation manner, the usage information of each high-altitude protective article in the step one includes each glove information, each safety helmet information and each safety belt information, wherein each glove information includes the number of sanded bristles, the corresponding sanded area at each sanded position, the number of broken holes and the corresponding broken hole area at each broken hole, each safety helmet information includes the number of dents, the corresponding dent volume at each dent, the number of ruptures and the corresponding rupture length at each rupture, and each safety belt information includes the number of brittle rupture strands.
In a possible implementation mode, the safety evaluation coefficients of all gloves, the safety helmet evaluation coefficients and the safety belts in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation are calculated in the second step, and the specific calculation process is as follows: a1, mutually comparing and screening the sanding area corresponding to each sanding part of each glove in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation and the broken hole area corresponding to each broken hole, screening to obtain the maximum sanding area and the maximum broken hole area of each glove, and respectively marking the maximum sanding area and the maximum broken hole area as the maximum sanding area and the maximum broken hole area of each glove
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE001
Wherein i represents a number corresponding to each glove,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE002
a2, comparing and screening the corresponding concave volume of each concave part and the corresponding rupture length of each rupture part of each safety helmet in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation, further screening to obtain the maximum concave volume and the maximum rupture length of each safety helmet, and recording the maximum concave volume and the maximum rupture length as the maximum rupture length of each safety helmet
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE003
Wherein j is the number corresponding to each safety helmet,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE004
a3, according to the sanding number, the maximum sanding area, the broken hole number and the maximum broken hole area of each glove, utilizing a calculation formula
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE005
Calculating to obtain the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each glove
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE006
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE007
respectively representing the reference sanding number and the reference broken hole number of the set glove,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE008
respectively representing the number of sanded and broken holes corresponding to the ith glove,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE009
respectively representing the reference sanding area and the reference broken hole area of the glove, and respectively representing the influence factors corresponding to the set sanding number, sanding area, broken hole number and broken hole area by b1, b2, b3 and b 4.
A4, utilizing a calculation formula according to the number of the dents, the maximum dent volume, the number of the cracks and the maximum crack length of each safety helmet
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE010
Calculating to obtain the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each safety helmet
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE011
Wherein, in the process,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE012
respectively expressed as a set reference number of recesses of the helmet and a reference number of cracks,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE013
respectively expressed as the number of dents and the number of cracks corresponding to the jth safety helmet,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE014
respectively expressed as the reference sunken volume and the reference burst of the set safety helmetThe crack lengths a1, a2, a3 and a4 are respectively expressed as the corresponding influence factors of the set pit number, pit volume, crack number and crack length.
A5, utilizing a calculation formula according to the brittle fracture strand number of each safety belt
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE015
Calculating to obtain the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each safety belt
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE016
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE017
expressed as a set seat belt reference frangible strand number,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE018
the number of brittle fracture strands corresponding to the p-th safety belt is expressed, p is the number corresponding to each safety belt,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE019
in a possible implementation manner, in the second step, each high-altitude protective article in the high-altitude operation area of the target substation is respectively processed, and the specific processing process is as follows: and comparing the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each glove with the standard glove safety evaluation coefficient stored in the database, if the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to a certain glove is smaller than the standard glove safety evaluation coefficient, discarding the glove, and if the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to a certain glove is larger than or equal to the standard glove safety evaluation coefficient, continuously using the glove in the high-altitude operation.
And treating each safety cap and each safety belt according to the corresponding treatment mode of each glove.
In a possible implementation mode, the structural safety factors corresponding to all scaffolds in the high-altitude operation area in the target substation are obtained through analysis in the fourth step, and the specific analysis process is as follows: extracting pressure information of each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substationThe number of the high-altitude operation personnel corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation and the weight corresponding to each personnel are taken out, and a calculation formula is utilized
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE020
And calculating the structural safety factor corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE021
U represents the number corresponding to each scaffold,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE022
and s is a number corresponding to each person,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE023
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE024
expressed as the weight corresponding to the s-th person of the u-th scaffold,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE025
expressed as the set scaffold reference maximum load value.
In a possible implementation mode, the stable safety evaluation coefficients corresponding to all scaffolds in the high-altitude operation area of the target substation are obtained through comprehensive calculation in the fourth step, and the specific analysis process is as follows: and B1, extracting the bending degree, the crack length, the crack number, the rusting area and the rusting position number corresponding to the surface of each scaffold according to the surface information corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area in the target substation.
B2, utilizing a calculation formula
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE026
And calculating the appearance safety coefficient corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE027
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE028
respectively expressed as the bending degree, crack length, crack number, rusting area and rusting position number corresponding to the u scaffold, W' is expressed as the set target scaffold allowable bending degree,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE029
expressed as a set reference bending angle difference,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE030
the allowable crack length, the allowable number of cracks, the allowable rusted area and the allowable number of rusted sites of the u-th scaffold are respectively expressed, and c1, c2, c3, c4 and c5 are respectively expressed by the external safety influence weight corresponding to the set bending degree, crack length, crack number, rusted area and rusted number.
B3, utilizing a calculation formula
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE031
And calculating to obtain the stability safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE032
Wherein d1 and d2 are respectively expressed as weighting factors corresponding to the set structural stability and appearance safety.
In a possible implementation mode, the behavioral safety assessment coefficients corresponding to all the aloft work personnel in the aloft work area of the target substation are obtained through analysis in the fifth step, and the specific analysis process is as follows: c1, extracting pedal areas from foot images corresponding to all the aerial workers, matching and comparing the pedal areas with reference safety pedal areas corresponding to the aerial workers stored in a database, if the pedal areas of feet corresponding to certain aerial workers are successfully matched with the reference safety pedal areas corresponding to the aerial workers, judging that the aerial workers are safety pedal personnel, and if the pedal areas corresponding to certain aerial workers and the reference safety pedal areas corresponding to the aerial workers are successfully matched, judging that the aerial workers are safety pedal personnelWhen the pedal area matching fails, the high-altitude operation personnel are judged to be dangerous pedal personnel, the number of the dangerous pedal personnel is counted, the dangerous pedal personnel are numbered according to a preset sequence, and the dangerous pedal personnel are marked in sequence
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE033
And extracting the pedal area corresponding to each dangerous pedal operator.
C2, based on the current scaffold level of each high-altitude operation worker, matching and comparing the scaffold level corresponding to each dangerous pedal worker with the set level interval corresponding to each level, screening to obtain the level corresponding to each dangerous pedal worker, and further positioning the danger weight of each dangerous pedal worker corresponding to the level from the database and recording the danger weight as the danger weight
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE034
Using a calculation formula
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE035
And calculating to obtain the pedal safety evaluation coefficient of the high-altitude operation personnel
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE036
Wherein r is a number corresponding to each dangerous pedal person,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE037
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE038
expressed as the pedal area corresponding to the r-th dangerous pedal personnel,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE039
expressed as a standard foot-pedal area corresponding to the set dangerous foot-pedal person,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE040
expressed as an aerial worker safety correction factor.
C3, extracting wearing information from each wearing image corresponding to each aerial worker, wherein the wearing information comprises the shoulder distance of the aerial worker protective belt, the length of the tail belt and the fastening buckle attaching area.
C4, using a calculation formula
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE041
And calculating to obtain the wearing safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each high-altitude operation personnel
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE042
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE043
respectively expressed as the standard shoulder distance of the protective belt for aloft work, the length of the standard tail belt and the joint area of the standard fastening button,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE044
respectively expressed as the shoulder distance, tail belt length and fastening buckle joint area of the protective belt corresponding to the h-th aloft worker, f1, f2 and f3 respectively expressed as the weighting factors corresponding to the shoulder distance, tail belt length and fastening buckle joint area, h expressed as the number corresponding to each aloft worker,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE045
c5, utilizing a calculation formula
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE046
And calculating to obtain a behavior safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each high-altitude operation personnel in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE047
Wherein k1 and k2 are respectively expressed as the corresponding influence factors of the set pedal safety and the set wearing safety.
In a possible implementation manner, the construction safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to the target substation is obtained through comprehensive calculation in the sixth step, and the specific analysis process is as follows: using a formula of calculation
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE048
Calculating to obtain a construction safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to the target transformer substation
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE049
Wherein, in the process,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE050
respectively expressed as weight factors corresponding to the set glove safety, safety helmet safety, safety belt safety, scaffold safety and high-altitude operation personnel safety.
As described above, the method for monitoring the operation safety of the substation construction site provided by the invention has at least the following beneficial effects: according to the transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method, the high-altitude protection articles, the scaffold, the foot images of the personnel and the wearing images of the personnel are monitored and analyzed to obtain the glove safety evaluation coefficients, the safety helmet safety evaluation coefficients, the safety belt safety evaluation coefficients, the scaffold safety evaluation coefficients and the high-altitude operation personnel evaluation coefficients, and the construction safety evaluation coefficients corresponding to the target transformer substation are obtained through comprehensive calculation.
According to the invention, the pedal area of the high-altitude operation personnel is collected and analyzed through the arranged cameras, so that the pedal safety evaluation coefficient of the high-altitude operation personnel is obtained, the timeliness of safety early warning of the high-altitude operation personnel is improved, the operation safety and stability of the high-altitude operation personnel are ensured, and accidents such as stepping on the ground and falling are reduced to a certain extent.
Drawings
In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings used in the description of the embodiments will be briefly introduced below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are only some embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious for those skilled in the art that other drawings can be obtained according to the drawings without creative efforts.
FIG. 1 is a flow chart illustrating the steps of the method of the present invention.
Detailed Description
The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are only a part of the embodiments of the present invention, and not all of the embodiments. All other embodiments, which can be derived by a person skilled in the art from the embodiments given herein without making any creative effort, shall fall within the protection scope of the present invention.
Referring to fig. 1, the method for monitoring the operation safety of the transformer substation construction site provided by the invention comprises the following steps: firstly, safety monitoring of protective articles: the use information of each high-altitude protective article in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation is monitored through the distributed high-definition cameras.
As a preferable scheme, in the step one, the usage information of each high-altitude protective article includes information of each glove, information of each safety helmet and information of each safety belt, wherein the information of each glove includes the number of sanded bristles, the sanded area corresponding to each sanded bristle, the number of broken holes and the broken hole area corresponding to each broken hole, the information of each safety helmet includes the number of recesses, the volume of recesses corresponding to each recess, the number of fractures and the length of fractures corresponding to each fracture, and the information of each safety belt includes the number of brittle fracture strands.
Step two, safety analysis of protective articles: and respectively calculating the safety evaluation coefficients of all gloves, all safety helmet evaluation coefficients and all safety belt evaluation coefficients in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation according to the use information of all high-altitude protection articles in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation, and respectively processing all high-altitude protection articles in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation.
As a preferred scheme, the safety evaluation coefficients of all gloves, the safety helmet evaluation coefficients and the safety belts in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation are calculated in the second step, and the specific calculation process is as follows: a1, mutually comparing and screening the sanding area corresponding to each sanding part of each glove and the area of each hole corresponding to each hole in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation, and further screening to obtain the maximum sanding area and the maximum hole area of each glove and marking the maximum sanding area and the maximum hole area as the maximum hole area of each glove
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE051
Wherein i represents a number corresponding to each glove,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE052
a2, comparing and screening the depression volume corresponding to each depression of each safety helmet in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation and the fracture length corresponding to each fracture, screening to obtain the maximum depression volume and the maximum fracture length of each safety helmet, and recording the maximum depression volume and the maximum fracture length as the maximum fracture length
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE053
Wherein j is the number corresponding to each safety helmet,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE054
a3, according to the sanding number, the maximum sanding area, the number of holes and the maximum hole area of each glove, utilizing a calculation formula
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE055
Calculating to obtain the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each glove
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE056
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE057
respectively representing the reference sanding number and the reference broken hole number of the set glove,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE058
respectively representing the number of sanded and broken holes corresponding to the ith glove,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE059
respectively representing the reference sanding area and the reference broken hole area of the glove, and respectively representing the influence factors corresponding to the set sanding number, sanding area, broken hole number and broken hole area by b1, b2, b3 and b 4.
A4, utilizing a calculation formula according to the number of the dents, the maximum dent volume, the number of the cracks and the maximum crack length of each safety helmet
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE060
Calculating to obtain the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each safety helmet
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE061
Wherein, in the process,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE062
respectively expressed as the reference number of the set safety helmet concave and the reference rupture number,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE063
respectively expressed as the number of dents and the number of cracks corresponding to the jth safety helmet,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE064
respectively expressed as the set reference volume of the recess and the reference rupture length of the safety helmet, and a1, a2, a3 and a4 respectively expressed as the set number of the recesses and the number of the recessesThe volume of the trap, the number of fractures and the length of the fracture.
A5, utilizing a calculation formula according to the brittle fracture strand number of each safety belt
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE065
And calculating to obtain the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each safety belt
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE066
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE067
expressed as a set seat belt reference frangible strand number,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE068
the number of brittle fracture strands corresponding to the p-th safety belt is expressed, p is the number corresponding to each safety belt,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE069
as a preferred scheme, in the second step, each high-altitude protective article in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation is processed respectively, and the specific processing process is as follows: and comparing the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each glove with the standard glove safety evaluation coefficient stored in the database, if the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to a certain glove is smaller than the standard glove safety evaluation coefficient, discarding the glove, and if the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to a certain glove is larger than or equal to the standard glove safety evaluation coefficient, continuously using the glove in the aerial work.
And treating each safety cap and each safety belt according to the corresponding treatment mode of each glove.
In one particular embodiment, the process for each headgear is as follows: and comparing the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each safety helmet with the standard safety helmet safety evaluation coefficient stored in the database, if the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to a certain safety helmet is smaller than the standard safety helmet safety evaluation coefficient, discarding the safety helmet, and if the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to a certain safety helmet is larger than or equal to the standard safety helmet safety evaluation coefficient, continuously using the safety helmet in high-altitude operation.
In a specific embodiment, the process for each seat belt is as follows: and comparing the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each safety belt with the standard safety belt safety evaluation coefficient stored in the database, if the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to a certain safety belt is smaller than the standard safety belt safety evaluation coefficient, discarding the safety belt, and if the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to a certain safety belt is larger than or equal to the standard safety belt safety evaluation coefficient, continuously using the safety belt in the high-altitude operation.
Step three, scaffold safety monitoring: the method comprises the steps that pressure information of all scaffolds in an aerial working area in a target substation is monitored through distributed pressure sensors, and meanwhile surface information of all scaffolds in the aerial working area in the target substation is monitored through distributed high-definition cameras, wherein the pressure information comprises the number of aerial working personnel corresponding to all scaffolds and the weight corresponding to all the personnel.
In a specific embodiment, the intelligent electronic scale is required to weigh the weight of each aerial worker before each scaffold is put on, and then the weight of each aerial worker is transmitted to the background through the intelligent electronic scale to be collected and called.
Step four, scaffold safety analysis: and respectively analyzing the pressure information and the surface information of each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation to obtain the structural safety factor and the surface safety factor corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation, and further comprehensively calculating to obtain the stability safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation.
As a preferred scheme, the structural safety factors corresponding to all scaffolds in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation are obtained through analysis in the fourth step, and the specific analysis process is as follows: extracting the number of aerial work personnel corresponding to each scaffold in the aerial work area in the target transformer substation and the weight corresponding to each person according to the pressure information of each scaffold in the aerial work area in the target transformer substationUsing a calculation formula
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE070
And calculating to obtain the structural safety factors corresponding to all scaffolds in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE071
U represents the number corresponding to each scaffold,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE072
and s is a number corresponding to each person,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE073
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE074
expressed as the weight corresponding to the s-th person of the u-th scaffold,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE075
expressed as the set scaffold reference maximum load value.
As a preferred scheme, the stable safety evaluation coefficients corresponding to all scaffolds in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation are obtained through comprehensive calculation in the fourth step, and the specific analysis process is as follows: and B1, extracting the bending degree, the crack length, the crack number, the rusting area and the rusting position number corresponding to the surface of each scaffold according to the surface information corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area in the target substation.
B2, using a calculation formula
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE076
And calculating the appearance safety coefficient corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE077
Wherein, in the process,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE078
individual watchShown as the degree of bending, crack length, number of cracks, rusty area, number of rusty spots corresponding to the u-th scaffold, W' is shown as the set target scaffold permitted degree of bending,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE079
expressed as a set reference bending angle difference,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE080
the allowable crack length, the allowable number of cracks, the allowable rusting area and the allowable number of rusted parts corresponding to the u-th scaffold are respectively expressed, and the c1, c2, c3, c4 and c5 are respectively expressed as the appearance safety influence weights corresponding to the set bending degree, crack length, crack number, rusting area and rusting number.
B3, utilizing a calculation formula
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE081
And calculating to obtain a stable safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE082
Wherein d1 and d2 are respectively expressed as weighting factors corresponding to the set structural stability and appearance safety.
Monitoring the overhead workers: the method comprises the steps that the high-definition cameras are arranged to collect images of feet of all high-altitude operation personnel in a high-altitude operation area in a target transformer substation, meanwhile, the levels of scaffolds where the high-altitude operation personnel are located are collected, the high-altitude operation protection belt wearing images corresponding to the high-altitude operation personnel are collected, and then behavior safety evaluation coefficients corresponding to the high-altitude operation personnel in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation are obtained through analysis.
As a preferred scheme, the behavior safety evaluation coefficients corresponding to all the aloft work personnel in the aloft work area of the target transformer substation are analyzed and obtained in the fifth step, and the specific analysis process is as follows: c1, extracting pedal areas from the foot images corresponding to the high-altitude operators, and storing the pedal areas and the high-altitude images in a databaseMatching and comparing reference safe pedal areas corresponding to operating personnel, judging that a certain high-altitude operating personnel is a safe pedal personnel if the foot pedal area corresponding to the certain high-altitude operating personnel is successfully matched with the reference safe pedal area corresponding to the high-altitude operating personnel, judging that the high-altitude operating personnel is a dangerous pedal personnel if the foot pedal area corresponding to the certain high-altitude operating personnel is failed to be matched with the reference safe foot pedal area corresponding to the high-altitude operating personnel, counting the number of the dangerous pedal personnel, numbering the dangerous pedal personnel according to a preset sequence, and sequentially marking the dangerous pedal areas as dangerous pedal personnel
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE083
And extracting the pedal area corresponding to each dangerous pedal personnel.
C2, based on the current scaffold level of each high-altitude operation worker, matching and comparing the scaffold level corresponding to each dangerous pedal worker with the set level interval corresponding to each level, screening to obtain the level corresponding to each dangerous pedal worker, positioning the danger weight of the corresponding level of each dangerous pedal worker from the database, and recording the danger weight as the danger weight
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE084
Using a calculation formula
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE085
And calculating to obtain the pedal safety evaluation coefficient of the high-altitude operation personnel
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE086
Wherein r is a number corresponding to each dangerous pedalling person,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE087
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE088
expressed as the pedal area corresponding to the r-th dangerous pedal personnel,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE089
expressed as a standard foothold area corresponding to the set dangerous foothold,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE090
expressed as an aerial worker safety correction factor.
And C3, extracting wearing information from each wearing image corresponding to each aerial worker, wherein the wearing information comprises the shoulder distance of the aerial worker protective belt, the length of the tail belt and the fastening buckle attaching area.
C4, using a calculation formula
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE091
And calculating to obtain the corresponding wearing safety evaluation coefficient of each high-altitude operation worker
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE092
Wherein, in the process,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE093
respectively expressed as the standard shoulder distance of the protective belt for aloft work, the length of the standard tail belt and the joint area of the standard fastening button,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE094
respectively representing the shoulder distance, tail belt length and fastening buckle attaching area of the protective belt for the high-altitude operation corresponding to the h-th high-altitude operation personnel, respectively representing the weight factors corresponding to the shoulder distance, the tail belt length and the fastening buckle attaching area by f1, f2 and f3, respectively representing the number corresponding to each high-altitude operation personnel by h,
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE095
c5, utilizing a calculation formula
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE096
And calculating to obtain a behavior safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each high-altitude operation worker in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE097
Wherein k1 and k2 are respectively expressed as the corresponding influence factors of the set pedal safety and the set wearing safety.
In a specific embodiment, the specific process of extracting wearing information from each wearing image corresponding to each aerial worker is as follows: the arranged cameras are focused on the aerial work protective belts of all aerial work personnel, and the shoulder distances, the tail belt lengths and the fastening buckle attaching areas of the aerial work protective belts are extracted from the aerial work protective belts.
According to the embodiment of the invention, the pedal area of the high-altitude operation personnel is acquired and analyzed through the arranged cameras, so that the pedal safety evaluation coefficient of the high-altitude operation personnel is obtained, the timeliness of safety early warning of the high-altitude operation personnel is improved, the operation safety and stability of the high-altitude operation personnel are ensured, and accidents such as treading on the ground, falling and the like are reduced to a certain extent.
Sixthly, safety analysis of the transformer substation construction site: and comprehensively calculating to obtain a construction safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to the target transformer substation according to the safety evaluation coefficient of each high-altitude protective article in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation, the stability safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each scaffold and the behavior safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each high-altitude operation worker.
As a preferred scheme, the construction safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to the target substation is obtained through comprehensive calculation in the sixth step, and the specific analysis process is as follows: using a formula of calculation
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE098
Calculating to obtain a construction safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to the target transformer substation
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE099
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure DEST_PATH_IMAGE100
respectively expressed as weight factors corresponding to the set glove safety, safety helmet safety, safety belt safety, scaffold safety and high-altitude operation personnel safety.
According to the transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method, the glove safety evaluation coefficients, the safety helmet safety evaluation coefficients, the safety belt safety evaluation coefficients, the scaffold safety evaluation coefficients and the high-altitude operation personnel evaluation coefficients are obtained by monitoring and analyzing the high-altitude protection articles, the scaffold and personnel foot images and the personnel wearing images, and the construction safety evaluation coefficients corresponding to the target transformer substation are obtained through comprehensive calculation.
The foregoing is merely exemplary and illustrative of the principles of the present invention and various modifications, additions and substitutions of the specific embodiments described herein may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the principles of the present invention or exceeding the scope of the claims set forth herein.

Claims (7)

1. A transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method is characterized in that: the method comprises the following steps:
firstly, safety monitoring of protective articles: monitoring the use information of each high-altitude protective article in a high-altitude operation area in a target transformer substation through the distributed high-definition cameras;
step two, safety analysis of protective articles: respectively calculating safety evaluation coefficients of gloves, safety helmet evaluation coefficients and safety belt evaluation coefficients in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation according to the use information of all high-altitude protection articles in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation, and respectively processing all high-altitude protection articles in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation;
step three, scaffold safety monitoring: monitoring pressure information of each scaffold in an aerial working area in the target substation through the arranged pressure sensors, and monitoring surface information of each scaffold in the aerial working area in the target substation through the arranged high-definition cameras, wherein the pressure information comprises the number of aerial working personnel corresponding to each scaffold and the weight corresponding to each personnel;
step four, scaffold safety analysis: respectively analyzing pressure information and surface information of each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation to obtain a structure safety coefficient and an appearance safety coefficient corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation, and further comprehensively calculating to obtain a stable safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation;
monitoring the overhead workers: the method comprises the steps that the distributed high-definition cameras are used for collecting images of feet of all high-altitude operation personnel in a high-altitude operation area in a target transformer substation, collecting the current scaffold level where the high-altitude operation personnel are located, collecting wearing images of high-altitude operation protection belts corresponding to the high-altitude operation personnel, and analyzing to obtain behavior safety evaluation coefficients corresponding to the high-altitude operation personnel in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation;
sixthly, safety analysis of the transformer substation construction site: comprehensively calculating to obtain a construction safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to the target transformer substation according to each glove safety evaluation coefficient, each safety helmet evaluation coefficient and each safety belt evaluation coefficient in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation, a stable safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each scaffold and a behavior safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each high-altitude operation worker;
and analyzing to obtain behavior safety evaluation coefficients corresponding to all the high-altitude operation personnel in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation, wherein the specific analysis process is as follows:
c1, extracting pedal areas from foot images corresponding to all the high-altitude operation personnel, matching and comparing the pedal areas with reference safety pedal areas corresponding to the high-altitude operation personnel stored in a database, if the pedal areas of feet corresponding to certain high-altitude operation personnel are successfully matched with the reference safety pedal areas corresponding to the high-altitude operation personnel, judging that the high-altitude operation personnel are safe pedal personnel, if the pedal areas corresponding to certain high-altitude operation personnel are failed to be matched with the reference safety pedal areas corresponding to the high-altitude operation personnel, judging that the high-altitude operation personnel are dangerous pedal personnel, counting the number of the dangerous pedal personnel, numbering all the dangerous pedal personnel according to a preset sequence, and sequentially marking the dangerous pedal personnel as dangerous pedal personnel
Figure 202212011640452771
Extracting the pedal area corresponding to each dangerous pedal operator;
c2, based on the current scaffold level of each high-altitude operation worker, matching and comparing the scaffold level corresponding to each dangerous pedal worker with the set level interval corresponding to each level, screening to obtain the level corresponding to each dangerous pedal worker, positioning the danger weight of the corresponding level of each dangerous pedal worker from the database, and recording the danger weight as the danger weight
Figure 202212011640453035
Using a calculation formula
Figure 202212011640453299
And calculating to obtain the pedal safety evaluation coefficient of the high-altitude operation personnel
Figure 202212011640453611
Wherein r is a number corresponding to each dangerous pedal person,
Figure 202212011640453846
Figure 202212011640454207
expressed as the pedal area corresponding to the r-th dangerous pedal personnel,
Figure 202212011640454558
expressed as a standard foot-pedal area corresponding to the set dangerous foot-pedal person,
Figure 202212011640454783
expressed as a high-altitude operator safety correction factor;
c3, extracting wearing information from each wearing image corresponding to each aerial worker, wherein the wearing information comprises the distance between shoulders of the aerial worker protective belt, the length of the tail belt and the attaching area of the fastening buckle;
c4, using a calculation formula
Figure 202212011640455047
And calculating to obtain the wearing safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each high-altitude operation personnel
Figure 202212011640455320
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure 202212011640455594
respectively expressed as the standard shoulder distance of the protective belt for aloft work, the length of the standard tail belt and the joint area of the standard fastening button,
Figure 202212011640455857
respectively representing the shoulder distance, tail belt length and fastening buckle attaching area of the protective belt for the high-altitude operation corresponding to the h-th high-altitude operation personnel, respectively representing the weight factors corresponding to the shoulder distance, the tail belt length and the fastening buckle attaching area by f1, f2 and f3, respectively representing the number corresponding to each high-altitude operation personnel by h,
Figure 202212011640456219
c5, using a calculation formula
Figure 202212011640456609
And calculating to obtain a behavior safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each high-altitude operation personnel in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation
Figure 202212011640457039
Wherein k1 and k2 are respectively expressed as the corresponding influence factors of the set pedal safety and the set wearing safety.
2. The transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method according to claim 1, characterized in that: the use information of each high-altitude protective article in the step one comprises each glove information, each safety helmet information and each safety belt information, wherein each glove information comprises the sanding number, the sanding area corresponding to each sanding position, the broken hole number and the broken hole area corresponding to each broken hole position, each safety helmet information comprises the depression number, the depression volume corresponding to each depression position, the breakage number and the breakage length corresponding to each breakage position, and each safety belt information comprises the brittle fracture strand number.
3. The transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method according to claim 2, characterized in that: and step two, calculating to obtain glove safety evaluation coefficients, safety helmet evaluation coefficients and safety belt evaluation coefficients in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation, wherein the specific calculation process is as follows:
a1, mutually comparing and screening the sanding area corresponding to each sanding part of each glove in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation and the broken hole area corresponding to each broken hole, screening to obtain the maximum sanding area and the maximum broken hole area of each glove, and respectively marking the maximum sanding area and the maximum broken hole area as the maximum sanding area and the maximum broken hole area of each glove
Figure 202212011640457303
Wherein i represents a number corresponding to each glove,
Figure 202212011640457605
a2, comparing and screening the corresponding concave volume of each concave part and the corresponding rupture length of each rupture part of each safety helmet in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation, further screening to obtain the maximum concave volume and the maximum rupture length of each safety helmet, and recording the maximum concave volume and the maximum rupture length as the maximum rupture length of each safety helmet
Figure 202212011640458045
Wherein j is the number corresponding to each safety helmet,
Figure 202212011640458348
a3, according to the sanding number, the maximum sanding area, the broken hole number and the maximum broken hole area of each glove, utilizing a calculation formula
Figure 202212011640458670
Calculating to obtain the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each glove
Figure 202212011640458924
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure 202212011640459207
respectively representing the reference sanding number and the reference broken hole number of the set glove,
Figure 202212011640459490
respectively representing the number of sanded hairs and the number of broken holes corresponding to the ith glove,
Figure 202212011640460076
respectively representing the reference sanding area and the reference broken hole area of the glove, and respectively representing the b1, the b2, the b3 and the b4 as the influence factors corresponding to the set sanding number, sanding area, broken hole number and broken hole area;
a4, utilizing a calculation formula according to the number of the dents, the maximum dent volume, the number of the cracks and the maximum crack length of each safety helmet
Figure 202212011640460408
Calculating to obtain the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each safety helmet
Figure 202212011640460828
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure 202212011640461121
respectively expressed as a set reference number of recesses of the helmet and a reference number of cracks,
Figure 202212011640461394
respectively expressed as the number of dents and the number of cracks corresponding to the jth safety helmet,
Figure 202212011640461648
respectively representing the reference recess volume and the reference rupture length of the safety helmet, and respectively representing the influence factors corresponding to the set recess number, recess volume, rupture number and rupture length by a1, a2, a3 and a 4;
a5, utilizing a calculation formula according to the brittle fracture strand number of each safety belt
Figure 202212011640461932
Calculating to obtain the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each safety belt
Figure 202212011640462205
Wherein, in the process,
Figure 202212011640462654
expressed as a set seat belt reference brittle fracture strand number,
Figure 202212011640462967
the number of brittle fracture strands corresponding to the p-th safety belt is expressed, p is the number corresponding to each safety belt,
Figure 202212011640463455
4. the transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method according to claim 3, characterized in that: and in the second step, the high-altitude protective articles in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation are respectively treated, and the specific treatment process is as follows:
comparing the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each glove with the standard glove safety evaluation coefficient stored in the database, if the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to a certain glove is smaller than the standard glove safety evaluation coefficient, discarding the glove, and if the safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to a certain glove is larger than or equal to the standard glove safety evaluation coefficient, continuously using the glove in the aerial work;
and processing each safety cap and each safety belt according to the corresponding processing mode of each glove.
5. The transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method according to claim 3, characterized in that: and analyzing in the fourth step to obtain the structural safety factors corresponding to all scaffolds in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation, wherein the specific analysis process is as follows:
extracting the number of aerial workers and the weight of each worker corresponding to each scaffold in the aerial work area in the target transformer substation according to the pressure information of each scaffold in the aerial work area in the target transformer substation, and utilizing a calculation formula
Figure 202212011640463748
And calculating to obtain the structural safety factors corresponding to all scaffolds in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation
Figure 202212011640464012
U represents the number corresponding to each scaffold,
Figure 202212011640464295
and s is a number corresponding to each person,
Figure 202212011640464568
Figure 202212011640464812
expressed as the weight corresponding to the sth person of the u scaffold,
Figure 202212011640465047
expressed as a set scaffold reference maximum load value.
6. The transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method according to claim 5, characterized in that: and comprehensively calculating to obtain the stability safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation in the fourth step, wherein the specific analysis process is as follows:
b1, extracting the bending degree, the crack length, the crack number, the rusting area and the rusting position number corresponding to the surface of each scaffold according to the surface information corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation;
b2, using a calculation formula
Figure 202212011640465437
And calculating the appearance safety coefficient corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area in the target transformer substation
Figure 202212011640465721
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure 202212011640466072
respectively representing the bending degree, the crack length, the number of cracks, the rusting area and the number of rusted parts corresponding to the u-th scaffold, W' representing the set allowable bending degree of the target scaffold,
Figure 202212011640466336
expressed as a set reference bending angle difference,
Figure 202212011640466609
respectively representing the allowable crack length, the allowable crack number, the allowable rusting area and the allowable number of rusted positions corresponding to the u-th scaffold, and respectively representing the c1, c2, c3, c4 and c5 as the appearance safety influence weights corresponding to the set bending degree, crack length, crack number, rusting area and rusting number;
b3, utilizing a calculation formula
Figure 202212011640466922
And calculating to obtain the stability safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to each scaffold in the high-altitude operation area of the target transformer substation
Figure 202212011640467273
Wherein d1 and d2 are respectively expressed as weighting factors corresponding to the set structural stability and appearance safety.
7. The transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method according to claim 6, characterized in that: and step six, comprehensively calculating to obtain a construction safety evaluation coefficient corresponding to the target transformer substation, wherein the specific analysis process is as follows:
using a formula of calculation
Figure 202212011640467537
Calculating to obtain a construction safety assessment coefficient corresponding to the target transformer substation
Figure 202212011640467771
Wherein, in the step (A),
Figure 202212011640447098
respectively representing weight factors corresponding to the set glove safety, safety helmet safety, safety belt safety, scaffold safety and high-altitude operation personnel safety.
CN202211291069.5A 2022-10-21 2022-10-21 Transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method Active CN115376072B (en)

Priority Applications (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202211291069.5A CN115376072B (en) 2022-10-21 2022-10-21 Transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method

Applications Claiming Priority (1)

Application Number Priority Date Filing Date Title
CN202211291069.5A CN115376072B (en) 2022-10-21 2022-10-21 Transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method

Publications (2)

Publication Number Publication Date
CN115376072A CN115376072A (en) 2022-11-22
CN115376072B true CN115376072B (en) 2023-01-06

Family

ID=84072974

Family Applications (1)

Application Number Title Priority Date Filing Date
CN202211291069.5A Active CN115376072B (en) 2022-10-21 2022-10-21 Transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method

Country Status (1)

Country Link
CN (1) CN115376072B (en)

Families Citing this family (5)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
CN116340394B (en) * 2023-05-23 2023-08-01 中交二公局东萌工程有限公司 Digital processing system based on enterprise security management
CN116844113B (en) * 2023-07-19 2024-04-12 淮北矿业股份有限公司许疃煤矿 Mine monorail crane safe operation image detection and analysis method
CN116663940B (en) * 2023-08-01 2023-10-20 安徽博诺思信息科技有限公司 Substation safety tool management system and management method
CN116824823B (en) * 2023-08-31 2023-11-17 湖北华中电力科技开发有限责任公司 Intelligent double-hook equipment monitoring system for preventing falling during high-altitude operation
CN117392876B (en) * 2023-10-13 2024-04-12 辽宁艾特斯智能交通技术有限公司 Intelligent wearable equipment monitoring management system for road safety construction

Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3293853A4 (en) * 2015-05-06 2018-03-14 Yang, Qibei Smart multi-dimensional big data analyzing expert system for high-voltage circuit breaker in power grid
CN108399508A (en) * 2018-03-22 2018-08-14 东北大学 Smelter operating personnel is with safety cap validity integrated evaluating method
CN112236788A (en) * 2018-06-04 2021-01-15 3M创新有限公司 Personal protection device and safety management system with active worker sensing and evaluation
CN114862289A (en) * 2022-07-06 2022-08-05 保利长大工程有限公司 Construction parameter-based safety state confirmation method and device

Patent Citations (4)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Publication number Priority date Publication date Assignee Title
EP3293853A4 (en) * 2015-05-06 2018-03-14 Yang, Qibei Smart multi-dimensional big data analyzing expert system for high-voltage circuit breaker in power grid
CN108399508A (en) * 2018-03-22 2018-08-14 东北大学 Smelter operating personnel is with safety cap validity integrated evaluating method
CN112236788A (en) * 2018-06-04 2021-01-15 3M创新有限公司 Personal protection device and safety management system with active worker sensing and evaluation
CN114862289A (en) * 2022-07-06 2022-08-05 保利长大工程有限公司 Construction parameter-based safety state confirmation method and device

Non-Patent Citations (2)

* Cited by examiner, † Cited by third party
Title
Risk Assessment of Adverse Effects on Employees, Based on the Distribution of Electric Field Strength on a 500 kV Substation;I.S. Okrainskaya等;《2020 IEEE International Conference on Electro Information Technology (EIT)》;20200929;184-189 *
基于改进贝叶斯网络的高处作业施工风险评价方法;翟越等;《安全与环境学报》;20220430;第22卷(第2期);541-549 *

Also Published As

Publication number Publication date
CN115376072A (en) 2022-11-22

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
CN115376072B (en) Transformer substation construction site operation safety monitoring method
Kokangül et al. A new approximation for risk assessment using the AHP and Fine Kinney methodologies
Suruda et al. Fatal work-related falls from roofs
Lefort Jr et al. Characteristics of injuries in the logging industry of Louisiana, USA: 1986 to 1998
CN115222242A (en) High-altitude operation safety online monitoring, analyzing and early warning system based on wireless sensor
US20130256349A1 (en) Tool tethers
Louhevaara et al. Development and evaluation of a test drill for assessing physical work capacity of fire-fighters
CN113697670A (en) Intelligent management and control method and system for crane equipment
CN107929972B (en) Rescue method for power transmission line overhead working personnel after pole tower falls down
Chang et al. Development of an observational checklist for falling risk assessment of high-voltage transmission tower construction workers
Lindberg et al. Self-rated physical loads of work tasks among firefighters
CN115618973B (en) Transformer substation operation monitoring anti-error analysis processing system based on centralized control station
Supattananon et al. Productivity improvement through a work study with ergonomic risk assessment: A case study of a high-voltage line distribution operation.
CN105701333B (en) A kind of space prestressed cable-strut system overall security evaluation method
Rini et al. Factors related to work fatigue among traffic police
CN104299080B (en) performance evaluation system based on mathematical statistics
Zhu et al. High-rise building group regional fire risk assessment model based on AHP
KR102088457B1 (en) Safety Helmet Wearing checking System and check method of Using Three-Axis Accelerometer Sensor
CN114359831A (en) Risk omen reasoning-oriented intelligent identification system and method for worker side-falling
CN103903191B (en) A kind of transformer station's real-time risk assessment method based on state
CN107545145B (en) Power grid forest fire disaster danger degree super-efficiency envelope analysis method and system
Setiani et al. The Influence of Safety Practices on Construction Labour Productivity
CN206961408U (en) A kind of one-stop building safety experience training platform
Turner The energy cost of some industrial operations
KR102376720B1 (en) Safty hook fastening system and safty hook fastening control method

Legal Events

Date Code Title Description
PB01 Publication
PB01 Publication
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
SE01 Entry into force of request for substantive examination
GR01 Patent grant
GR01 Patent grant
EE01 Entry into force of recordation of patent licensing contract

Application publication date: 20221122

Assignee: Anhui Bochuang Information Technology Co.,Ltd.

Assignor: ANHUI BONUS INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY CO.,LTD.

Contract record no.: X2024980002711

Denomination of invention: A safety monitoring method for construction site operations in substations

Granted publication date: 20230106

License type: Common License

Record date: 20240318

EE01 Entry into force of recordation of patent licensing contract