CN115375269A

CN115375269A - Tax process intelligent approval method, apparatus, device and medium

Info

Publication number: CN115375269A
Application number: CN202211001438.2A
Authority: CN
Inventors: 章梁; 程应峰; 顾正
Original assignee: Shenzhen Huayun Zhongsheng Technology Co ltd
Current assignee: Shenzhen Huayun Zhongsheng Technology Co ltd
Priority date: 2022-08-19
Filing date: 2022-08-19
Publication date: 2022-11-22

Abstract

The embodiment of the invention discloses a method, a device, equipment and a medium for intelligently approving tax processes, wherein the method comprises the following steps: setting a tax approval processing flow; receiving a task request of tax approval of a case handling system; executing a corresponding approval task according to the task request; and writing the examination and approval task data back to the tax system. According to the invention, through setting the tax approval processing flow, when the corresponding approval task is executed, the task can be automatically processed according to the set path of the tax approval processing flow, all steps of required work can be completed by one-time operation of the case handling system, and the working efficiency is improved. In addition, corresponding examination and approval task data can be automatically rewritten to the tax system, so that manual entry into the tax system is avoided, and errors of repetitive work and manual operation are reduced.

Description

Tax process intelligent approval method, apparatus, device and medium

Technical Field

The invention relates to the technical field of tax data processing, in particular to an intelligent approval method, device, equipment and medium for tax processes.

Background

The tax administration basic unit has the problems that the system stands, the data islanded and the manual examination and approval need to switch the multi-system check data at present, most of businesses are examined and approved manually by experience, and the repetitive operation causes heavy work tasks of workers and has error risks; although a small part of application workflow automation tools reduce the burden of workers, the traditional workflow automation tools use an interface (API) or a special scripting language provided by an application or a system to write a series of regular operations, calculations, arrangement and the like to realize the automatic execution of the final flow, but after the same data is processed by one system, the same processing needs to be carried out by another system, the intercommunication and the copying of the data processing cannot be realized, and repeated operations are needed for many times, so that the problem of work repeatability is caused, and the work efficiency is seriously influenced.

Disclosure of Invention

The invention aims to overcome the defects of the prior art and provides an intelligent approval method, device, equipment and medium for tax processes so as to avoid the problem that the same task needs to be processed by different systems for multiple times of repeated operation.

In order to achieve the purpose, the invention adopts the following technical scheme:

in a first aspect, the intelligent approval method for the tax process comprises the following steps:

setting a tax approval processing flow;

receiving a task request of tax approval of a case handling system;

executing a corresponding approval task according to the task request;

and writing the examination and approval task data back to the tax system.

The further technical scheme is as follows: before receiving the task request of the tax approval of the case handling system, the method further comprises the following steps:

establishing communication connection between a case handling system and a tax system;

logging in the same account in both the case handling system and the tax system;

judging whether a tax system login account is abnormal or not;

and if the tax system login account is not abnormal, executing the task request for receiving the tax approval of the transaction system.

The further technical scheme is as follows: and if the tax system login account is abnormal, refreshing a login interface of the tax system.

The further technical scheme is as follows: the method for judging whether the tax system login account is abnormal includes:

sending heartbeat data packets to a tax system at fixed time according to set interval time;

if the tax system cannot normally receive the heartbeat data packet, judging that a login account of the tax system is abnormal;

and if the tax system can normally receive the heartbeat data packet, judging that the login account number of the tax system is normal.

The further technical scheme is as follows: the rewriting of the approval task data into the tax system comprises the following steps:

extracting examination and approval task data, and grouping by using user names;

caching the grouped approval task data;

inquiring whether a task list corresponding to the approval task data exists in the tax system;

and if the task list corresponding to the examination and approval task data exists, writing the cached examination and approval task data into the corresponding task list of the tax system.

The further technical scheme is as follows: after the task list corresponding to the approval task data exists in the tax inquiry system, the method further comprises the following steps:

if the task list corresponding to the approval task data does not exist, judging that the write-back fails and recording an error log;

dividing error grades according to the recorded error logs;

and making different processing modes according to different error grades.

The further technical scheme is as follows: the making of different processing modes according to different error grades comprises the following steps:

when the error grade is a first-grade error, feeding an error log back to a case handling system;

when the error grade is a second-level error, sending an error troubleshooting prompt and displaying;

and restarting the sending task of the current approval task data when the error grade is a three-level error.

In a second aspect, a tax process intelligent approval device comprises:

the setting unit is used for setting a tax approval processing flow;

the receiving unit is used for receiving a task request of tax approval of the case handling system;

the execution unit is used for executing the corresponding examination and approval tasks according to the task request;

and the rewriting unit is used for rewriting the approval task data into the tax system.

In a third aspect, a computer device comprises a memory, a processor and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor executes the computer program to implement the steps of the tax flow intelligent approval method as described above.

In a fourth aspect, a computer-readable storage medium stores a computer program comprising program instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the steps of the tax workflow intelligent approval method as described above.

Compared with the prior art, the invention has the beneficial effects that: according to the invention, through setting the tax approval processing flow, when the corresponding approval task is executed, the task can be automatically processed according to the set path of the tax approval processing flow, all steps of required work can be completed by one-time operation of the case handling system, and the working efficiency is improved. In addition, corresponding examination and approval task data can be automatically rewritten to the tax system, so that manual entry into the tax system is avoided, and errors of repetitive work and manual operation are reduced.

The foregoing description is only an overview of the technical solutions of the present invention, and in order to make the technical means of the present invention more clearly understood, the present invention may be implemented according to the content of the description, and in order to make the above and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention more apparent, the following detailed description will be given of preferred embodiments.

Drawings

In order to more clearly illustrate the technical solutions of the embodiments of the present invention, the drawings needed to be used in the description of the embodiments are briefly introduced below, and it is obvious that the drawings in the following description are some embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious for those skilled in the art to obtain other drawings based on these drawings without creative efforts.

Fig. 1 is a scene schematic diagram of an intelligent approval method for tax process according to an embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 2 is a functional structure diagram of an intelligent taxation process approval method according to an embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 3 is a flowchart of an intelligent approval method for tax process according to an embodiment of the present invention;

FIG. 4 is a schematic block diagram of an intelligent approval apparatus for tax administration according to an embodiment of the present invention;

fig. 5 is a schematic block diagram of a computer device according to an embodiment of the present invention.

Detailed Description

The technical solutions in the embodiments of the present invention will be clearly and completely described below with reference to the drawings in the embodiments of the present invention, and it is obvious that the described embodiments are some, not all, embodiments of the present invention. All other embodiments, which can be obtained by a person skilled in the art without making any creative effort based on the embodiments in the present invention, belong to the protection scope of the present invention.

It will be understood that the terms "comprises" and/or "comprising," when used in this specification and the appended claims, specify the presence of stated features, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.

It is also to be understood that the terminology used in the description of the invention herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only and is not intended to be limiting of the invention. As used in the specification of the present invention and the appended claims, the singular forms "a," "an," and "the" are intended to include the plural forms as well, unless the context clearly indicates otherwise.

It should be further understood that the term "and/or" as used in this specification and the appended claims refers to and includes any and all possible combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.

Referring to fig. 1 and fig. 3, fig. 1 is a schematic view of an application scenario of an intelligent approval method for tax process according to an embodiment of the present invention; fig. 3 is a schematic flow chart of an intelligent tax process approval method according to an embodiment of the present invention, where the intelligent tax process approval method is applied to a server, the method is executed by application software installed in the server, and the server performs data interaction with a case handling system and a tax system.

As shown in fig. 3, the tax process intelligent approval method includes the following steps: S10-S40.

And S10, setting a tax approval processing flow.

The tax approval processing flow is preset according to actual conditions and requirements, and when the approval task is executed, the tax approval processing flow can be executed according to a set flow path. As shown in fig. 2, a flow sample is illustrated in fig. 2, an approval flow initiated by a subject is pushed to a chief manager for approval, the chief manager for approval is sent to a branch leader for approval after approval, and the branch leader for approval is sent to a local leader in the city, wherein the subject, the chief manager for the subject, the branch leader for the subject, and the local leader in the city are equivalent to nodes in the flow, and the next node is entered after the previous node is completed.

In this embodiment, the tax approval process flow is set in the case handling system.

The handling system (i.e., the handling center workstation of fig. 2) refers to a system in which a worker performs work processing, which is independent from the tax system (i.e., the tax system of fig. 2).

And S20, receiving a tax approval task request of the case handling system.

In this embodiment, an RPA (resilient Process Automation) technology is used, which is a set of technologies for executing a business Process by using software, and the same Process is executed according to an execution rule and an operation Process of a human. The RPA technology can reduce the labor input in the work and avoid artificial operation errors. And meanwhile, the user is allowed to automatically deploy the business process on the original business system, and the original system is not required to be modified, so that the method is a non-invasive technology.

The RPA simulates manual data carrying, makes data barriers through, solves the problem of software interconnection and intercommunication, and simultaneously, the RPA can be competent for both simple business processes and complex business processes by simulating a user to execute tasks in a Graphical User Interface (GUI) of an application program.

The RPA consists of a flow designer, an actuator and a console. The designer is a development tool for a developer to create an RPA robot configuration for setting a series of operations and decision logic to be run by the RPA robot. The executor is the running environment of the RPA and can execute the configured operation. The console monitors and controls the running state of the robot, starts and stops the RPA robot, or sets timing trigger or trigger conditions.

When the RPA receives a task request of tax approval of the case handling system, the request is analyzed and decomposed, so that the execution of subsequent approval tasks is facilitated.

And S30, executing a corresponding approval task according to the task request.

The approval task is as shown in fig. 2, the approval process initiated by the administrator is pushed to the chief deputy for approval, the chief deputy sends the approval to the branch leader for approval, and the branch leader sends the approval to the local leader of the city for approval.

Of course, there are other approval tasks, which are not listed in this embodiment.

And S40, rewriting the approval task data into the tax system.

In an embodiment, step S40 specifically includes the following steps: S401-S407.

S401, extracting the approval task data and grouping the approval task data by using user names.

In this embodiment, when the clerk initiates a document flow and pushes the document flow to the chief practioner for approval, data such as a document data set, information of a current link process person, basic information of a case and the like of the clerk are extracted and integrated, and the document data set, the information of the current link process person, the basic information of the case and the like are grouped by using user names.

S402, caching the approval task data which are grouped.

After the data are grouped according to the user name, the examination and approval task data are cached

And S403, inquiring whether a task list corresponding to the approval task data exists in the tax system, if so, executing the step S404, and if not, executing the step S405.

And S404, writing the cached approval task data into a corresponding task list of the tax system.

If a task list corresponding to the approval task data exists in the tax inquiry system, the cached approval task data is written into the corresponding task list of the tax system, so that data processed in the case handling system and the data written into the tax system form one-to-one correspondence.

S405, judging that the write-back fails and recording an error log.

Of course, data rewriting fails due to problems such as abnormal data and network abnormality, and therefore, when a task list corresponding to the approval task data does not exist in the tax system, rewriting failure is judged and an error log is recorded.

S406, dividing the error grade according to the recorded error log.

Since the cases of causing errors are different, the recorded error logs can be classified into error grades so as to facilitate subsequent targeted processing.

And S407, making different processing modes according to different error levels.

In one embodiment, step S407 specifically includes the following steps S4071-S4073.

S4071, when the error grade is first-grade error, feeding back an error log to the case handling system.

S4072, when the error grade is a second-level error, sending an error troubleshooting prompt and displaying.

S4073, when the error grade is three-level error, restarting the task of sending the current approval task data.

For S4071-S4073, in this embodiment, the errors are classified according to different degrees, where the first-level error is an error in the data written back by the transaction center, and includes that the data format does not conform to the standard for writing back by the tax system, the necessary data is missing, the provided data has an error, and the corresponding information cannot be found in the tax system. The second-level error is an internal system error, and comprises an error when a message queue transfer message is empty or abnormal data, a rule engine interface is abnormal, and data after successful rewriting is called back to the case handling system. The third-level errors are errors in rewriting of the tax system, and include unexpected errors such as page abnormal access caused by network abnormality, maintenance of the tax system, change of page elements of the tax system, overtime request and the like. Different levels of errors correspond to different processing schemes, the first level of errors can selectively feed back a case handling central system, and the second level of errors can warn developers to carry out error troubleshooting. And the three-stage error RPA can automatically restart the current task three times, if the three times fail, the data information is stored, and the data information is rewritten at random.

In an embodiment, before step S20, the method further includes the following steps: S11-S15.

S11, establishing communication connection between the case handling system and the tax system.

The establishment of the communication connection between the case handling system and the tax system is the basis for completing data rewriting, and if the communication connection is not performed, the timely data rewriting work cannot be completed.

And S12, logging in the same account in both the case handling system and the tax system.

In order to achieve consistency of the processing flow of the case handling system and the tax system, the same account needs to be logged in the case handling system and the tax system.

And S13, judging whether the tax system login account is abnormal or not, if so, executing the step S14, and if not, executing the step S20.

In an embodiment, step S13 specifically includes the following steps:

and S131, sending heartbeat data packets to the tax system at regular time according to the set interval time.

S132, if the tax system cannot normally receive the heartbeat data packet, judging that the login account of the tax system is abnormal.

And S133, if the tax system can normally receive the heartbeat data packet, judging that the login account of the tax system is normal.

For S131 to S133, in this embodiment, an RPA task is sent every 10 minutes through a timed heartbeat mechanism to refresh the browser where the user is located, and whether the current browser state is normal is determined. If abnormal conditions exist, such as the RPA service is restarted, the current user browser loses money or the screen is blank, and the heartbeat management service detects that the login is abnormal, a message is sent to a front-end page, so that the user can pass through the tax system again.

And S14, if the tax system login account is abnormal, refreshing a login interface of the tax system.

According to the invention, through setting the tax approval processing flow, when the corresponding approval task is executed, the task can be automatically processed according to the set path of the tax approval processing flow, all steps of required work can be completed by one-time operation of the case handling system, and the working efficiency is improved. In addition, corresponding examination and approval task data can be automatically rewritten to the tax system, so that manual entry into the tax system is avoided, and errors of repetitive work and manual operation are reduced.

Fig. 4 is a schematic block diagram of an intelligent approval apparatus 100 for tax administration according to an embodiment of the present invention. Corresponding to the foregoing tax process intelligent approval method, the specific embodiment of the present invention further provides an intelligent approval apparatus 100 for tax process. The intelligent tax process approval apparatus 100 includes a unit for executing the above intelligent tax process approval method, and the apparatus may be configured in a server.

As shown in fig. 4, the tax flow intelligent approval apparatus 100 includes:

the setting unit 110 is configured to set a tax approval process flow.

The receiving unit 120 is configured to receive a task request for tax approval of the case handling system.

And the execution unit 130 is configured to execute the corresponding approval task according to the task request.

And the rewriting unit 140 is used for rewriting the approval task data into the tax system.

In an embodiment, the tax process intelligent approval apparatus 100 further includes:

and the establishing module is used for establishing the communication connection between the case handling system and the tax system.

And the login module is used for logging in the same account in both the case handling system and the tax system.

And the judging module is used for judging whether the tax system login account is abnormal or not, and if the tax system login account is not abnormal, executing the task request for receiving the tax approval of the transaction system.

and the refreshing module is used for refreshing the login interface of the tax system.

In one embodiment, the determining module includes:

and the sending submodule is used for sending the heartbeat data packet to the tax system at regular time according to the set interval time.

And the first judging submodule is used for judging that the login account of the tax system is abnormal if the tax system cannot normally receive the heartbeat data packet.

And the second judging submodule is used for judging that the login account of the tax system is normal if the tax system can normally receive the heartbeat data packet.

In one embodiment, the write-back unit 140 includes:

and the extraction module is used for extracting the approval task data and grouping the approval task data by using the user names.

And the cache module is used for caching the approval task data which completes grouping.

And the query module is used for querying whether a task list corresponding to the approval task data exists in the tax system.

And the writing module is used for writing the cached approval task data into a corresponding task list of the tax system if the task list corresponding to the approval task data exists.

In one embodiment, the write-back unit 140 further includes:

and the judging module is used for judging the write-back failure and recording an error log if the task list corresponding to the approval task data does not exist.

And the dividing module is used for dividing the error grade according to the recorded error log.

And the formulating module is used for formulating different processing modes according to different error grades.

In one embodiment, the formulating module comprises:

and the feedback submodule is used for feeding back an error log to the case handling system when the error grade is a first-level error.

And the reminding submodule is used for sending out an error troubleshooting reminding and displaying when the error grade is a second-level error.

And the restarting submodule is used for restarting the sending task of the current approval task data when the error grade is three-level error.

The above-mentioned tax process intelligent approval apparatus 100 may be implemented in the form of a computer program, which may be run on a computer device as shown in fig. 5.

Referring to fig. 5, fig. 5 is a schematic block diagram of a computer device according to an embodiment of the present application. The computer device 500 may be a server, wherein the server may be an independent server or a server cluster composed of a plurality of servers.

As shown in fig. 5, the computer device includes a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored in the memory and executable on the processor, and when the processor executes the computer program, the steps of the tax workflow intelligent approval method are implemented.

The computer device 700 may be a terminal or a server. The computer device 700 includes a processor 720, memory, and a network interface 750, which are connected by a system bus 710, where the memory may include non-volatile storage media 730 and internal memory 740.

The non-volatile storage medium 730 may store an operating system 731 and computer programs 732. The computer program 732, when executed, causes the processor 720 to perform any one of the tax process intelligent approval methods.

The processor 720 is used to provide computing and control capabilities, supporting the operation of the overall computer device 700.

The internal memory 740 provides an environment for the operation of the computer program 732 in the non-volatile storage medium 730, and when the computer program 732 is executed by the processor 720, the processor 720 can execute any one of the methods for the intelligent approval of tax processes.

The network interface 750 is used for network communication such as sending assigned tasks and the like. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the configuration shown in fig. 5 is a block diagram of only a portion of the configuration relevant to the present teachings and is not intended to limit the computing device 700 to which the present teachings may be applied, and that a particular computing device 700 may include more or less components than those shown, or may combine certain components, or have a different arrangement of components. Wherein the processor 720 is configured to execute the program code stored in the memory to perform the following steps:

the intelligent approval method for the tax process comprises the following steps:

setting a tax approval processing flow;

receiving a task request of tax approval of a case handling system;

executing a corresponding approval task according to the task request;

and writing the examination and approval task data back to the tax system.

In one embodiment: before receiving the task request of tax approval of the case handling system, the method further comprises the following steps:

judging whether a tax system login account is abnormal or not;

In one embodiment: and if the tax system login account is abnormal, refreshing a login interface of the tax system.

In one embodiment: the method for judging whether the tax system login account is abnormal includes:

sending heartbeat data packets to a tax system at regular time according to set interval time;

and if the tax system can normally receive the heartbeat data packet, judging that the login account of the tax system is normal.

In one embodiment: the rewriting of the approval task data into the tax system comprises the following steps:

caching the grouped approval task data;

and if the task list corresponding to the approval task data exists, writing the cached approval task data into the corresponding task list of the tax system.

In one embodiment: after the task list corresponding to the approval task data exists in the tax inquiry system, the method further comprises the following steps:

dividing error grades according to the recorded error logs;

and formulating different processing modes according to different error grades.

In one embodiment: the making of different processing modes according to different error grades comprises:

when the error grade is a second-level error, sending an error troubleshooting prompt and displaying the error troubleshooting prompt;

and restarting the sending task of the current approval task data when the error grade is three-level error.

It should be understood that, in the embodiment of the present Application, the Processor 720 may be a Central Processing Unit (CPU), and the Processor 720 may also be other general-purpose processors, digital Signal Processors (DSPs), application Specific Integrated Circuits (ASICs), field Programmable Gate Arrays (FPGAs) or other Programmable logic devices, discrete Gate or transistor logic devices, discrete hardware components, and the like. Wherein a general purpose processor may be a microprocessor or the processor may be any conventional processor or the like.

Those skilled in the art will appreciate that the configuration of computer device 700 depicted in FIG. 5 is not intended to be limiting of computer device 700 and may include more or fewer components than those shown, or some components may be combined, or a different arrangement of components.

In another embodiment of the present invention, a computer-readable storage medium is provided. The computer readable storage medium may be a non-volatile computer readable storage medium. The computer readable storage medium stores a computer program, wherein the computer program, when executed by the processor, implements the intelligent tax process approval method disclosed by the embodiments of the present invention.

It is clear to those skilled in the art that, for convenience and brevity of description, the specific working processes of the above-described apparatuses, devices and units may refer to the corresponding processes in the foregoing method embodiments, and are not described herein again. Those of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that the various illustrative components and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both, and that the components and steps of the various examples have been described above generally in terms of their functionality in order to clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the implementation. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention.

In the embodiments provided by the present invention, it should be understood that the disclosed apparatus, device and method can be implemented in other ways. For example, the above-described apparatus embodiments are merely illustrative, and for example, the division of the units is only a logical division, and there may be other divisions in actual implementation, or units with the same function may be grouped into one unit, for example, multiple units or components may be combined or integrated into another system, or some features may be omitted, or not executed. In addition, the shown or discussed mutual coupling or direct coupling or communication connection may be an indirect coupling or communication connection through some interfaces, devices or units, and may also be an electric, mechanical or other form of connection.

The units described as separate parts may or may not be physically separate, and parts displayed as units may or may not be physical units, may be located in one position, or may be distributed on multiple network units. Some or all of the units can be selected according to actual needs to achieve the purpose of the solution of the embodiment of the present invention.

In addition, functional units in the embodiments of the present invention may be integrated into one processing unit, or each unit may exist alone physically, or two or more units are integrated into one unit. The integrated unit can be realized in a form of hardware, and can also be realized in a form of a software functional unit.

The integrated unit, if implemented in the form of a software functional unit and sold or used as a stand-alone product, may be stored in a storage medium. Based on such understanding, the technical solution of the present invention essentially or partially contributes to the prior art, or all or part of the technical solution can be embodied in the form of a software product stored in a storage medium and including instructions for causing a computer device (which may be a personal computer, a server, or a network device) to execute all or part of the steps of the method according to the embodiments of the present invention. And the aforementioned storage medium includes: various media capable of storing program codes, such as a usb disk, a removable hard disk, a Read-Only Memory (ROM), a magnetic disk, or an optical disk.

While the invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments, the invention is not limited thereto, and various equivalent modifications and substitutions can be easily made by those skilled in the art within the technical scope of the invention. Therefore, the protection scope of the present invention shall be subject to the protection scope of the claims.

Claims

1. The intelligent approval method for the tax process is characterized by comprising the following steps:

setting a tax approval processing flow;

receiving a task request of tax approval of a case handling system;

executing a corresponding approval task according to the task request;

and writing the examination and approval task data back to the tax system.

2. The tax process intelligent approval method of claim 1, wherein before receiving the task request for tax approval from the transaction system, further comprising:

judging whether a tax system login account is abnormal or not;

3. The tax process intelligent approval method of claim 2, wherein if the tax system login account is abnormal, the tax system login interface is refreshed.

4. The tax process intelligent approval method of claim 2, wherein the determining whether the tax system login account is abnormal comprises:

5. The tax process intelligent approval method of claim 1, wherein the rewriting of approval task data into a tax system comprises:

caching the grouped approval task data;

6. The tax process intelligent approval method according to claim 5, wherein after inquiring whether the task list corresponding to the approval task data exists in the tax system, the method further comprises:

dividing error grades according to the recorded error logs;

and making different processing modes according to different error grades.

7. The tax process intelligent approval method of claim 6, wherein the formulating of different processing modes according to different error levels comprises:

8. Tax flow intelligence approval device, its characterized in that includes:

the setting unit is used for setting a tax approval processing flow;

9. A computer device comprising a memory, a processor, and a computer program stored on the memory and executable on the processor, wherein the processor when executing the computer program implements the steps of the tax workflow intelligent approval method according to any one of claims 1 to 7.

10. A computer-readable storage medium, wherein the storage medium stores a computer program comprising program instructions that, when executed by a processor, cause the processor to perform the tax process intelligent approval method steps of any one of claims 1 to 7.